Slashdot Mirror


Elon Musk Posts First Photo of SpaceX's New Spacesuit (arstechnica.com)

Early Wednesday morning, SpaceX founder Elon Musk posted a photo of the spacesuit that will be used by astronauts flying aboard the company's Dragon spacecraft, perhaps as early as next year. Ars Technica reports: In his Instagram post, Musk added that this suit was not a mock-up but rather a fully functional unit. "Already tested to double vacuum pressure," he wrote. "Was incredibly hard to balance aesthetics and function. Easy to do either separately." (Double vacuum pressure simply means the suit was probably inflated to twice the pressure of sea level and then put into a vacuum chamber.) Musk gave no other technical information about the suit. Most strikingly, it is white, in contrast to the very blue spacesuits unveiled by Boeing in January. These are not, strictly speaking, "space suits." Rather, they are more properly flight suits designed to be worn during the ride to space and again on the ride back down to Earth. They have a limited time in which they can operate in a full vacuum and are not intended for spacewalks.

142 comments

  1. Call it what it is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    These are not, strictly speaking, "space suits." Rather, they are more properly flight suits designed to be worn during the ride to space and again on the ride back down to Earth. They have a limited time in which they can operate in a full vacuum and are not intended for spacewalks.

    So call the flight suit a flight suit. Different tools are for different jobs, and giving them a distinct name helps to avoid confusion.

    1. Re:Call it what it is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They have a limited time in which they can operate in a full vacuum ...

      Why? Do they start to leak or lose power after a few hours?

    2. Re: Call it what it is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They don't have the resources to keep a human breathing, non-irradiated and temperate over a long time period.

    3. Re:Call it what it is by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      you think that boosts public perception of spacex and musk as much?

      he doesn't care about mispresenting. it would be easy enough to argue that he deliberately makes misleading pr(more recently particularly about teslas financial affairs/state)

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    4. Re:Call it what it is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The term "flight suit" is probably used in space circles. Unfortunately in public circles that term likely viewed as an aircraft flight suit which is far more simple than a space rated flight suit (they're basically some coveralls with a hosed helmet to divert concentrated oxygen to the wearers face, and maybe some G-force compression pads). You could literally use these suits to EVA in a pinch (assuming a connection to a life support system), whereas in an aircraft flight suit you'd be dead pretty quick.

    5. Re:Call it what it is by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 1

      So call the flight suit a flight suit.

      Because flight suit is ambiguous just as space suit is also ambiguous. They are not strictly speaking "EVA" suits but they are IVA space suits. To quote Wikipedia

      Three types of spacesuits exist for different purposes: IVA (intravehicular activity), EVA (extravehicular activity), and IEVA (intra/extravehicular activity).

      Boeing uses the same nomenclature. http://www.boeing.com/features...

      They're designed to be used in a vacuum. Therefore space suit is a perfectly acceptable term. Just because a suit isn't an EVA suit doesn't mean it's not also a space suit.

    6. Re:Call it what it is by Guybrush_T · · Score: 1

      Because those suits are only here to address a risk that killed the Soyuz 11 crew : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

  2. I don't get it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Space suit" = "Flight Suit" != Space suit. Why? Why call it something that is not? Enough with the bullshit. There is way too much as it is.

  3. Re:flag? by michelcolman · · Score: 4, Funny

    That's just the currently selected layout for the built-in keyboard.

  4. better looking than boeing. by CaptnCrud · · Score: 1

    Not sure how it looks inflated but it certainly looks like a motorcycle outfit.

    I do like the fact it has an actual helmet, unlike the blue suit which looks like a completely "rollupable" uprated biohazard suit. Keep in mind these are just "pressure suits", not "space suits"

    1. Re:better looking than boeing. by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 1

      I do like the fact it has an actual helmet

      Boeing has a helmet as well. You just wear it inside the hazmat-bubble.

  5. Re:flag? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It doesn't, but the fact that Elon talks about the aesthetics shows that he is keen on the impression given by the suit. It's probably required to look sleek, futuristic and not very bulky. Everybody knows that a space suit should have a flag, but I wonder if it's not put in the wrong way, compared to NASA astronauts and aviators. Does anybody know?

    Furthermore I think it actually looks like a mock-up. It doesn't look very sturdy or robust at all, rather plastic or CG-like. It's pretty thin - where are all the hoses, joints and other life support systems? I think it looks like a white MC overall.

    Do they plan to send the Stig up? Surely he's want a British flag??

  6. Re:flag? by dehachel12 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    >Everybody knows that a space suit should have a flag I disagree strongly. we nearly rid ourselves of religion. we need to put this divisive nazi-onalistic bullshit behind us as well.

  7. This looks like it would inflate and stiffen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Those crinkles are not going to be fun when filled with atmospheric pressure. What makes space suits bulky is that they don't change volume when moving, keeping the vacuum from sucking the body into a particular configuration it cannot get out again.

    The photograph does not look anything like that. So what gives? Is the crinkly layer not actually getting atmospheric pressure? That would mean that there is another layer below that does. I just don't see the space for a constant-volume enclosure inside.

    1. Re:This looks like it would inflate and stiffen. by Rei · · Score: 1

      Wow, better warn SpaceX of their horrible oversight! I'm sure nobody at SpaceX thought of ensuring mobility during their design and testing phases, and I'm sure NASA does not have any mobility requirements - better warn them both, stat! Thank you, Anonymous Coward, for saving the space program!

      --
      Ever since, I've been suspicious of Jesus and very careful around chlorine.
    2. Re:This looks like it would inflate and stiffen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pathetic reply. Appeal to authority fallacy.

    3. Re:This looks like it would inflate and stiffen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The real world is not a high school debating club, where the goal is to merely win an argument rather than gain new knowledge.

      Deferring to people and organistations who have invested millions of man-hours into researching a subject in favour of someone who makes anonymous snide remarks from their armchair is a perfectly rational thing to do.

    4. Re:This looks like it would inflate and stiffen. by penandpaper · · Score: 1

      My armchair has a NASA sticker on it! My bed is also in the shape of a rocket ship.

      Whose the expert now? Check mate atheists.

    5. Re:This looks like it would inflate and stiffen. by lgw · · Score: 1

      That being said, this looks like a flight suit and doesn't look very realistic as a space suit. Where are the hose connections? How do you scratch your nose? Hydration? Visor for sunlight? I suspect the actual suit is much less "sleek" when ready for a spacewalk (also, if the shoulders really are that small, I'd love to know how he manages constant volume).

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    6. Re:This looks like it would inflate and stiffen. by Megol · · Score: 1

      He(?) is right you know. If you'd bothered to read any number of other replies to this topic this isn't a space suit, it can't work as a space suit and so the AC you replied to is right. There are a lot of problems with this design if it was intended to be a space suit (which it isn't) but it's still PR-ojected as being one. False news in other words.

      There are some ideas that maybe some day may make slimmer space suits possible but not today and probably not from SpaceX.

    7. Re:This looks like it would inflate and stiffen. by dddux · · Score: 1

      It made me wonder what your toilet looks like.

      --
      "It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society." - Jiddu Krishnamurti
    8. Re:This looks like it would inflate and stiffen. by penandpaper · · Score: 1

      Diaper. I am also an armchair astronaut.

  8. Re: flag? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I work there. That's the real deal.

  9. Something about spaceX or Tesla?? by N3wsByt3 · · Score: 1, Funny

    Then let the Elon Musk bashing begin!

    It's been the favourite pastime for trolls on Slashdot these last years, after all.

    --
    --- "To pee or not to pee, that is the question." ---
    1. Re:Something about spaceX or Tesla?? by dunkelfalke · · Score: 0

      Given the huge amount of wank given to Musk in Slashdot stories "these last years" it is not surprising that you can see a proportional amount of Musk bashing.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
  10. Re:flag? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He can remove the flag when he no longer needs money from taxpayers.

  11. Re:flag? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what money?

  12. Hey! I wanna be a spaceman! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cuz if I wuz a spaceman
    You'd sure care about me!
    Wha?
    Oh, yur breakin my heart!
    Yur tearin it apart!
    So,
    uh,
    FUCK YOU!

    Bang!
    Bang!

  13. Disturbing thought, balancing that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I mean, it's function is to keep you alive. There's no _balance_ in that, that's a zero fail mission. Balance implies trade offs. By definition this is one of those times you can't take away from B for A... at all. If there's _room_ for A, sure make some A... but leave B the fuck alone.

  14. Re:flag? by gl4ss · · Score: 5, Insightful

    it's a flight suit.

    not a space suit.

    as far as hoses, I suppose it's hidden somewhere. since it's not for space walks and is just for sitting down basically while in flight to protect you if pressure drops or something.

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  15. Can you poop in it?

    1. Re:But by dehachel12 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Sure. the question is : would it be hygienic if you did?

    2. Re:But by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Why shouldn't you be able to? I doubt that the way to keep the suit in place is that invasive that you can't squeeze one out.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re: But by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you wishing for a built-in butt plug?

    4. Re:But by amalcolm · · Score: 1

      I think there's a serious point here ... what does the casual space traveller do if caught short in space? Will there be air-locked loos where you can take of the suit safely to pee or crap? Sounds expensive

      --
      Time for bed, said Zebedee - boing
    5. Re:But by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't the answer to this stuff typically diapers? It may not be dignified, but it sure as hell is functional.

    6. Re:But by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do not know for certain in this case, but often astronauts wear adult diapers under their flight suits.

    7. Re: But by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 0

      It's not a wish, if the ticket costs your life savings it's an expectation (and with suction.)

    8. Re:But by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They basically don't. Crap that is. A diaper takes care of number one. One reason a big meal is traditional right before takeoff is that you don't eat much the day before so you don't have to crap until you get to the ISS, where they have loos.

  16. Since you wear a spacesuit... by LordHighExecutioner · · Score: 1

    ...to go into orbit, and not to a concert at the Royal Albert Hall, why should one care about aestethics ?

    1. Re:Since you wear a spacesuit... by bruce_the_loon · · Score: 1

      Because striding out in a aesthetically pleasing suit to the launch pad is a better photo op than waddling out in a balloon suit. Or do you disagree that the Mercury astronauts in their silver suits look better and cooler than the Shuttle astronauts in their orange blobs?

      --
      Trying to become famous by taking photos. Visit my homepage please.
    2. Re:Since you wear a spacesuit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Since SpaceX also wants to cash in on space-tourism: If you pay some million of USD for a trip, you also want to look good, right?

    3. Re:Since you wear a spacesuit... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Because people who have the cool millions laying around to enjoy a brief trip into space typically care about aesthetics.

    4. Re:Since you wear a spacesuit... by binarybum · · Score: 1

      eh, I'd mainly want to live. And to poop in it.

      --
      ôó
    5. Re:Since you wear a spacesuit... by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 2

      why should one care about aesthetics

      Because manned space flight is mostly about science PR. One man or woman walks out in a kickass space suit and 1,000 school kids run off to become engineers and software developers. It's the same reason the Blue Angels exist. Every time a Blue Angel flies over a city 100 kids enlist in the Navy.

      It's kind of also like how for every person who is a software developer a AAA game engine, there are a 1,000 programmers who are working on eCommerce shopping-cart code that were inspired to learn programming in order to "make games".

  17. "Was incredibly hard to balance aesthetics... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... and function."

    LOL. Right there you can tell they haven't got a clue. Aesthetics are completely irrelevant when it comes to mission critical components like spacesuits. And why didn't they use a solid spacesuit? A hundred times cheaper to manufacture, and much stronger.

    1. Re:"Was incredibly hard to balance aesthetics... by Rei · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually, when your goal is to make space travel mass market, making things aesthetically appealing is a key aspect. Musk's goal is not and never has been $25m trips to space for the select few; he wants to make space travel a common occurrence.

      As for "solid spacesuit", I assume you mean like the NASA AX series, which are built more like atmospheric diving suits than traditional space suits. And the answer is the same reason why NASA doesn't use them - while mobility in them is superb, they're significantly heavier. About the only place in the solar system where it makes sense to use them at present (in combination with insulation and either a heat-absorbing material (akin to Venera) or a heat pump with cooling channels, and a bellows balloon) is the surface of Venus. A more popular research topic is hybrid pressure / hard suits, where you have certain parts rigid (such as the torso) and others inflated.

      --
      Ever since, I've been suspicious of Jesus and very careful around chlorine.
    2. Re: "Was incredibly hard to balance aesthetics... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      The rocket I saw land in Florida sure looked real , tell me more internet keyboard flat earther!

    3. Re:"Was incredibly hard to balance aesthetics... by Junta · · Score: 1

      I'm skeptical that *any* space suit is a part of a mass market space travel future.. So long as there is a risk of decompression severe enough to warrant the precaution of wearing a spacesuit, I don't see it as being a 'common occurance'.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    4. Re:"Was incredibly hard to balance aesthetics... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the answer is the same reason why NASA doesn't use them - while mobility in them is superb, they're significantly heavier.

      This is the reason that people like the National Space Society want to establish manufacturing facilities on the moon and in orbit. Once you already have the item in space, the weight is much less meaningful.

      It is still expensive to do orbital plane changes, but now weight just becomes a trade for time. It will just take you longer to get where you want the heavier you are.

      Right now we have to deal with launch costs and planetary thinking. So lightweight suits it is.

    5. Re:"Was incredibly hard to balance aesthetics... by Eloking · · Score: 1

      Actually, when your goal is to make space travel mass market, making things aesthetically appealing is a key aspect. Musk's goal is not and never has been $25m trips to space for the select few; he wants to make space travel a common occurrence.

      As for "solid spacesuit", I assume you mean like the NASA AX series, which are built more like atmospheric diving suits than traditional space suits. And the answer is the same reason why NASA doesn't use them - while mobility in them is superb, they're significantly heavier. About the only place in the solar system where it makes sense to use them at present (in combination with insulation and either a heat-absorbing material (akin to Venera) or a heat pump with cooling channels, and a bellows balloon) is the surface of Venus. A more popular research topic is hybrid pressure / hard suits, where you have certain parts rigid (such as the torso) and others inflated.

      Well, here's the answer to the question I wanted to ask.

      Still, I'm surprised that so much energy was put on aesthetic. I mean, how could you make a freaking "space/flight suit" unaesthetic? Even the original NASA space suit is so cool that people bring it at hockey games.

      --
      Elok
    6. Re:"Was incredibly hard to balance aesthetics... by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      And yet, I rode a vehicle to work today that is so dangerous the law requires me to wear a helmet. I saw two other people on the road on my way in riding the same sort of vehicle.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    7. Re:"Was incredibly hard to balance aesthetics... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Right there you can tell they haven't got a clue. Aesthetics are completely irrelevant

      They are intending to bring space travel to the ultra rich. They understand their market far better than you do.

    8. Re:"Was incredibly hard to balance aesthetics... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I'm skeptical that *any* space suit is a part of a mass market space travel future..

      The market is already there, the only question is price. You can already pre-order a flight on Virgin Galactic, and from what I call a few rich people already have.

  18. Re:flag? by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 2

    Can you choose Klingon? tlho'!

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
  19. "double vacuum pressure" - WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Already tested to double vacuum pressure".

    What is "double vacuum pressure"? Surely a vacuum is a vacuum? How can you have a double vacuum?

    1. Re:"double vacuum pressure" - WTF? by Rei · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Outside is vacuum, inside is double pressure.

      --
      Ever since, I've been suspicious of Jesus and very careful around chlorine.
    2. Re:"double vacuum pressure" - WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That isn't double vacuum. I was going to post the same comment as the OP and had to go a long way down before anyone got onto this point, most preferring to scream about the current meme du jour of the divisive trump USA.

      It's not double vacuum pressure. It's double atmospheric pressure. It's tested against two atmospheres. Which IS a figure different from one atmosphere unlike twice zero being absolutely identical to zero.

      It's tested to two atmospheres and doesn't leak.

      Not twice vacuum pressure.

      Either Musk is a moron, talking to morons, had his speech written by a moron or isn't au fait with English and had a moron do a check on his wording.

    3. Re:"double vacuum pressure" - WTF? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Why would you bother to put it in a vac chamber? All pressures are relative. Pressurize the suit to 3X.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:"double vacuum pressure" - WTF? by Rei · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's not that simple. Materials can behave differently in a vacuum than they do at atmospheric pressure.

      --
      Ever since, I've been suspicious of Jesus and very careful around chlorine.
    5. Re:"double vacuum pressure" - WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would you bother to put it in a vac chamber?

      I'm no rocket scientist, but perhaps the effects of outgassing are significant.

    6. Re:"double vacuum pressure" - WTF? by Junta · · Score: 1

      On this particular point, I think I can be sympathetic. He's talking to the media and wanting this consumed by people who are likely to hear 'two atmospheres? that's crazy there's no atmosphere in space, is he an idiot?'.

      Meanwhile, the people who know that to be inappropriate phrasing quickly knew what he was trying to say.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    7. Re:"double vacuum pressure" - WTF? by nine-times · · Score: 1

      Well also, if you told someone that the suit was "tested to two atmospheres", I would expect some people might understand that to mean that the suit is able to maintain integrity when two atmospheres of pressure are on the outside of it. It makes sense to try to make a distinction and say that they tested it in a vacuum, but tested with greater pressure inside than would normally be necessary.

      I don't know if there's a more commonly accepted way of making that distinction, but it makes sense to me that someone would want to make that distinction.

  20. Typical of Musk by Pollux · · Score: 0

    He's like a car salesman that starts by showing you the cup holders.

    He promises us the Hyperloop, then shows us the inside of its cabin.

    He promises human flight to the ISS, then shows us the space, oh wait, I mean flight suit, that will be worn by travelers.

    When will he show us what he promised to show us?

    1. Re:Typical of Musk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You mean like rocket first stages landing safely at a specific location in a way conducive to being reused ? Or perhaps electric cars that you can buy right now? Maybe home power storage solutions?

      Sure, he might not have all his projects finished yet, but he's certainly delivering a hell of a lot more than most big-talkers.

    2. Re:Typical of Musk by Rei · · Score: 2

      Hyperloop Transportation Technologies has nothing to do with Musk. More to the point, the only thing Musk initially stated about Hyperloop that he's now starting to go back on was that he wasn't going to get personally involved with it.

      --
      Ever since, I've been suspicious of Jesus and very careful around chlorine.
    3. Re:Typical of Musk by conquistadorst · · Score: 1

      He's like a car salesman that starts by showing you the cup holders.

      He promises us the Hyperloop, then shows us the inside of its cabin.

      He promises human flight to the ISS, then shows us the space, oh wait, I mean flight suit, that will be worn by travelers.

      When will he show us what he promised to show us?

      If every company showed nothing until everything was done we'd have quite a boring (and probably poor performing) market. This stuff, the sneak peaks, gets people excited about things now and makes them eager to see more. That's how it always works, I'm sure you weren't born yesterday? Instead of criticizing them for not delivering human space flight ahead of schedule, save your criticism for next year when they fail to meet their actual '18 Q2 delivery time. Then you'll actually have some ground to stand on!

    4. Re:Typical of Musk by EvilSS · · Score: 1

      Or the Dragon cargo capsule that the crew capsule is based on, making deliveries to the ISS?

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    5. Re:Typical of Musk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Think you forgot the solar shingles.

    6. Re:Typical of Musk by eepok · · Score: 1

      The promise wasn't simply self-landing first-stage rockets. It was a commitment to provide low cost orbital launch vehicles and responsive launch services, on a recurring basis, using a mature vehicle design and a commercially derived booster to meet mission/payload requirements. (2005) It's safe to say that that expectation hasn't been met (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Falcon_9_and_Falcon_Heavy_launches#Past_launches).

      The promise wasn't "electric cars that you can buy now", it was "electric cars that anyone can afford funded by electric sports cars for the rich". That didn't happen. The public funded the subsidization of the electric sports cars and the "affordable" EV is happening as the result of massive public and private investment. And the affordable vehicle won't even have the features promised.

      Home power storage solutions was never a promise because we have still yet to approach the point where people NEED to store their own power. It's a solution for a problem that doesn't exist and has come as a side-effect of Tesla needing to source their own batteries (and thus have a battery factory) and then sell the batteries they'll over-produce.

      Someone mentioned solar roof tiles. Those still aren't here yet and they won't ever be at the price of replacing a roof outright as promised. It will only be comparable in price when you factor in receiving all possible incentives (in the long run) and the irrational idea of financing a $7,500 roof with a 30-year loan (thus artificially increasing the cost of a regular roof). It's all here: https://www.tesla.com/solarroo... . And even then, it's not likely going to be the whole roof full of tiles.

      Here's the thing-- I don't think these projects will fail in the long run. I know that the private transportation of goods to space is a current reality and it will only improve with time. I know that EVs (or hydrogen fuel cell vehicles) are the future of private transportation. I know that we'll eventually have a majority of autonomous vehicles on the road. I know that when we move more towards ubiquitous solar (were sensible) and wind, we'll need better ways of storing energy to deal with grid spikes and valleys. But it won't be nearly as quick as Musk says and it won't be nearly as cheap. Someone has to pay and even if it's not out of pocket for you right now, you're likely paying for it in your taxes via subsidies. Musk isn't a financial or technological genius. He's not the scientist or researcher making these things happen. He's not Tony Stark. He's an ideas guy and a hype-man.

      ... because there's no way in Hell that Tony Stark would believe that boring holes under a metropolis or the hyperloop would EVER actually work. Those ideas are guaranteed vaporware.

    7. Re:Typical of Musk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah!!! I want to see those damn rockets he's supposed to launch and those first stages he's supposed to recover!! Lying Musk!!

      Fucking retard.

  21. Re:flag? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Military regulation requires that the flag's stars always be on the forward-facing side, as he has it in the picture. Usually a civilian organization would do it in the other direction.

  22. Interstellar by chlodnictwoaz · · Score: 1

    Look pretty awesome.

  23. Re:flag? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >Everybody knows that a space suit should have a flag
    I disagree strongly. we nearly rid ourselves of religion. we need to put this divisive nazi-onalistic bullshit behind us as well.

    Right.

    Because anybody who disagress with you is a divisive Nazi.

    Irony is completely lost on you, isn't it?

  24. Re:flag? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How does that work for flags without stars?

  25. It's not a spacesuite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's really the Stig's new suite.

    1. Re:It's not a spacesuite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      His "suite"? Like a room in a hotel? I don't get it. This article is about a suit. I guess you can wear a suit inside a suite.

    2. Re:It's not a spacesuite by Megol · · Score: 1

      Well a proper space suit is essentially a house for the body so suite maybe correct in a way...

    3. Re:It's not a spacesuite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Maybe" may be correct, in a way.

  26. Re:flag? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've always heard the backwards flag meant war time. If you look at pictures of troops before Afghanistan, there was no flag on the uniforms. There was during desert storm, too, but not before.

  27. Look of the suit by Morgoth314 · · Score: 1

    I'm curious about the part "hard to balance aesthetics and function". How will it look like? Space Marine Power Armor? Exo-skeleton? Really curious to see.

    1. Re:Look of the suit by EvilSS · · Score: 2

      I'm curious about the part "hard to balance aesthetics and function". How will it look like? Space Marine Power Armor? Exo-skeleton? Really curious to see.

      So maybe click the link in the summary to go see pictures of it??

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
  28. Re:flag? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The flag is backward because George Washington was a satanic Freemason and this is part of their dark occult symbolism.

  29. Re:flag? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ? SYNTAX ERROR

  30. Re: flag? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    .. and that's because if you were running forward with a flag on a pole, the flag would be appear "backwards" from this side - as the pole would of course be at the front and the stars are nearest the pole.

  31. Re: flag? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I should elaborate that in the case of SpaceX, putting the stars first is appropriate symbolism. I think it's a clever double entendre.

  32. Re:flag? by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 1

    Do they plan to send the Stig up? Surely he's want a British flag??

    And a tinted visor. Also could they send Jeremy Clarkson up and leave him there for the sake of humanity!

    --

    Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

  33. Re: flag? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, you work in space? Can see stars out the window while wearing a flight suit?

    Does the neck turn or is it fixed?

  34. Looks like an Evel Knievel costume by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nt

  35. Photograph ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Right ...

  36. Re:flag? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no, nationalism is divisive, just like religion is.

  37. Re: flag? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Traditional to display the national flag of the suits user, globalism is a dream fella always will be

  38. Missed opportunity by johannesg · · Score: 1

    If cabin pressure drops, the suit balloons up and makes it hard to move. An excellent way to counter this is by simply leaving less air in the suit, i.e. make it skintight. It's a shame they didn't do this; I was rather looking forward to our glorious future society where everyone walks around in skintight suits...

    1. Re:Missed opportunity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      everyone walks around in skintight suits...

      Egads! Be careful what you wish for! Be VERY careful....

    2. Re:Missed opportunity by cmdr_klarg · · Score: 1

      If cabin pressure drops, the suit balloons up and makes it hard to move. An excellent way to counter this is by simply leaving less air in the suit, i.e. make it skintight. It's a shame they didn't do this; I was rather looking forward to our glorious future society where everyone walks around in skintight suits...

      Be careful what you wish for. Have you seen most Americans? You wouldn't want to see me in one, that's for sure...

      --
      THE SOFTWARE, IT NO WORKY!!!
    3. Re:Missed opportunity by Baron_Yam · · Score: 1

      Skin tight suits have issues with creasing pinching the wearer's skin. Now, for a suit you're only wearing in case of a cockpit pressure failure, you may be willing to risk that in return for a more comfortable suit.

      Another option is the constant volume suit - and we've been making those since the 60s. They have their advantages, but they probably are better for situations where you're not mostly depending on your spacecraft for pressure anyway.

    4. Re:Missed opportunity by johannesg · · Score: 1

      If cabin pressure drops, the suit balloons up and makes it hard to move. An excellent way to counter this is by simply leaving less air in the suit, i.e. make it skintight. It's a shame they didn't do this; I was rather looking forward to our glorious future society where everyone walks around in skintight suits...

      Be careful what you wish for. Have you seen most Americans? You wouldn't want to see me in one, that's for sure...

      I'm currently on a business trip to the US, so I see lots of them all around me. And while many would not be improved much by skintight clothing, there have been a few that I certainly wouldn't mind observing in such manner ;-)

  39. Can we 3D print one? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I mean, it's the future right? We have 3D printed houses and 3D printed cars now?

  40. Re: flag? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We know it is a nightmare to those who like power.

  41. Where's the beef? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The interesting picture would be one with it inflated.

    This one is just cool marketing.

    This is interesting because X usually brings the beef.

  42. Boeing's are cooler by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The SpaceX suit is queer.

  43. Re:flag? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nazi = National Socialist, you fucking idiot.

  44. Space 1999 by skullandbones99 · · Score: 2

    I think this flight suit was tested in Space 1999...

    1. Re:Space 1999 by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      On a related note, I hear Musk has an awesome plan to deal with nuclear waste by storing it on the moon.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  45. Re:flag? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 2

    it's a flight suit.

    not a space suit.

    as far as hoses, I suppose it's hidden somewhere. since it's not for space walks and is just for sitting down basically while in flight to protect you if pressure drops or something.

    But it does not have huge padded shoulders and epaulets! Cryst, a million sci-fi moves and television shows tell us that it has to have huge padded shoulders and epaulets!

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  46. Re:flag? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because it's for NASA? NASA is an American government agency? Are you really that fucking dense, snowflake? Did the flag trigger you?

  47. Re:flag? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please mod this up.

    -Adolf Hitler

  48. Dude, space is huge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just open the hatch and piss into the vacuum. Problem solved.

  49. Re:flag? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Pressure drops" are a common misconception. Pressure actually increases the deeper you go in space.

  50. Re:flag? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    because the world is such a warm and cuddly place and if only we did away with national boundaries we would have utopia.

    name one human endeavor that isn't divisive. pro tip, you can't.

  51. Re:flag? by diesalesmandie · · Score: 1

    >Everybody knows that a space suit should have a flag I disagree strongly. we nearly rid ourselves of religion. we need to put this divisive nazi-onalistic bullshit behind us as well.

    Bullshit? Then what would we be defined (i used the word defined loosely) by then? private enterprise? GDP? National debt? An arbitrary symbol? (what the Nazis in fact used)

    --
    This is my sig, there are many like it but this one is mine
  52. Re:flag? by Rhipf · · Score: 1

    This isn't a "space suit" it is a "flight suit". These will only be used during transport to and from orbit. They are not intended to be used for extended space walks. For space walks you would need the bulkier suits.

  53. Re:flag? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When flying from a pole, the starfield is always to be next to the pole, but when displayed as a graphic on a movable object, be it plane, boat, car, or person, the flag is displayed as it would be when blown by the relative wind when the object is moving forward. In this case, were the astronaut moving forward, the flag is blown back, placing the starfield on the right.

  54. Re:flag? by diesalesmandie · · Score: 0

    no, nationalism is divisive, just like religion is.

    Not necessarily, it can be used also to distinguish a nation from an occupying foreign power, as was the case with Ireland's struggle against the British (to name a popular yet completely valid example). Personally I don't like this whole "one world, no nation" idea; people may be fundamentally the same across countries; there is only a finite number of observable personally types (if looked at from a robust and not an idiosyncratic perspective), but cultural differences do exist, and should be respected and preserved. Why should a person from a melting pot like, New York for example be expected to click with someone from a rural and homogeneous town in Japan for example.

    --
    This is my sig, there are many like it but this one is mine
  55. Awesome tech in the tradition of Steve Zissou by johnstrass1 · · Score: 1

    "But we made ours with a special rabbit ear on the top so we could pipe in some music." -- The Life Aquatic with Steve Zissou is a 2004 film starring Bill Murray as eccentric oceanographer Steve Zissou

  56. Dressing for Altitude:U.S. Aviation Pressure Suits by Tenebrousedge · · Score: 1

    NASA produced a book some few years ago on the history of flight suits called Dressing for Altitude. It's not the world's most riveting read, but it is freely available online and it may (somewhat ironically) have the best design and typography of any book I've read.

    Also in a similarly space-related bent, if anyone here has not read John Clark's Ignition! then they should certainly do so. The subtitle of the book should probably be "The secret history of rocket fuel", but the author went for "An informal history of liquid rocket propellants" instead.

    --
    Those who advocate genocide deserve every protection afforded by law, and none afforded by common human decency.
  57. Re:Dressing for Altitude:U.S. Aviation Pressure Su by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I actually had the dead-tree version of that book and it is gorgeous. I found it in a little free library in my neighborhood, and returned it when finished.

    It's an excellent read and makes clear why Playtex won the contract for the Apollo suits, against all odds until you see the history. 3 cheers for NASA choosing the best.

  58. Who wore it better? by mccrew · · Score: 2
    --
    Hey, Windows users, there is no such thing as "forward" slash, there is only slash and backslash.
  59. We will get Star Destroyers! by allcoolnameswheretak · · Score: 1

    Looks like a prototype for Stormtrooper armor.

    Galactic Empire confirmed!

  60. Re:flag? by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    The American flag is put on with stars forwards. That way, it is 'not in retreat'. Of course, these days, not sure that is the case.
    However, the flag will be replaced with whatever nation the suit owner has. Canadian flag for Canadian owner. etc. etc. And right now, that suit is targeted to NASA.

    Also, the connections tend to be on the lower left-hand side.

    Finally, look again at that material. I think that it is type of pleather, perhaps the same stuff that is now in tesla seats. If so, it is VERY strong and very rip/cut safe. In fact, the 'pleather' in Tesla only comes in white and black at this time, so, I really think that is the case.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  61. Re:flag? by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    baloney.
    When all nations are no longer in a cold/hot war and all contribute equally, then it is fine.
    BUT, with China in a major cold war with the west ( and winning it on the economic front), it makes little sense to NOT take some pride.
    As it is, ALL NATIONS display their flags. It seems like AMerica tends to be the one hit over the head for doing what everybody else is doing.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  62. Re:flag? by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    fucking idiots like you do not read or understand history. NAZIs were socialist in name only. They were a FAR RIGHT group, even by Hitlers words.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  63. Re:flag? by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    huh. So, what nations have gotten rid of their nationalism?

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  64. If it wasn't designed by Chris Gilman... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    then it's crap.

  65. Not astronauts, but... by Captain+Ramage · · Score: 1

    Since these will be used for the short vanity flight of the very rich, can we not call them astronauts and, instead, call them Space Douches, or something else?

    1. Re:Not astronauts, but... by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 1

      Since these will be used for the short vanity flight of the very rich, can we not call them astronauts and, instead, call them Space Douches, or something else?

      No. These will be mostly used by Astronauts visiting the International Space Station.

  66. Re:flag? by Teancum · · Score: 1

    I'm pretty sure that the flag is necessary according to both the Geneva Convention (since it is technically a government uniform) and it is also needed according to the Outer Space Treaty in terms of what country is responsible for that astronaut's actions. It is legally required by international law and conventions of space travel.

    Furthermore I think it actually looks like a mock-up

    Nope, that is the final design, minus a few tweaks. SpaceX engineers have actually been wearing it for human factors design tests.

  67. Re:flag? by petermgreen · · Score: 1

    NASA funded development of the falcon 9 and dragon and are currently funding development of the dragon 2. They are also the largest single buyer of the falcon 9 and the only buyer so far for the dragon capsule.

    --
    note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  68. Re:flag? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    huh. So, what nations have gotten rid of their nationalism?

    Denmark. Flying the Danish flag outside your home as Americans are so wont to do would be seen as being in rather poor taste by the average Dane.

  69. Render therefore unto Caesar by N3wsByt3 · · Score: 1

    I would say: "Render therefore unto Caesar the things which are Caesar's" - though I want to avoid religious connotation hence I would be categorized as a Elon-wanker. ;-)

    But give to the man what he deserves, and he deserves at least some small praise. That some un-rightfully praise him into heavens is not his fault, and doesn't mean he deserves to be un-rightfully bashed neither. He's not at fault for wankers, nor for slashdot-stories, so I fail to see the logic why it would be justified to bash him without reason; it's as silly as blindly idolizing him without reason. Silliness and irrationality is not made less by adding silliness and irrationality. Both are sides immature in that case.

    The most mature thing, is to be rational about things and evaluate it properly. This means acknowledging he has his faults, but also that he has accomplished some good things.

    --
    --- "To pee or not to pee, that is the question." ---
  70. Re:flag? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think it looks like a white MC overall.

    Like Vanilla Ice??

  71. Re:flag? by MoaDweeb · · Score: 1

    Clarkson would not fit in this suit but send him up anyway. The windbag will provide an auxillary propulsion source.

    --
    New Zealanders are well balanced with a chip on each shoulder. One represents Australia, the other the rest of the world
  72. Re:flag? by blindseer · · Score: 1

    why does it need to show a flag?

    So they know where to mail the body once it's found floating in the ocean?

    So they have some idea on what language the wearer speaks if they land far off target?

    So they don't get shot/hanged as a spy if they land far off target? (Not that it'd save them universally but wearing a country identifier does conform to international laws on things like piracy, spies, and such.)

    Because decades of seeing pictures of government funded astronauts wearing flags on their spacesuits people expect flags on spacesuits? In other words, marketing.

    --
    I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
  73. Re:flag? by blindseer · · Score: 1

    Isn't it also supposed to have a health readout on a chest plate and/or armband? How else are people supposed to know that the air runs out in 24 minutes but there's 28 minutes before they land and it's safe to open the hatch?

    --
    I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
  74. Re:flag? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

    Isn't it also supposed to have a health readout on a chest plate and/or armband? How else are people supposed to know that the air runs out in 24 minutes but there's 28 minutes before they land and it's safe to open the hatch?

    Oh, they'll know. At least 4 minutes before landing. That's calle "just in time expiration".

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  75. Re:flag? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Nazis were a left wing group in competition with the Communists and the other German socialist parties, some of which they were political allies with before they seized power. Painting them as hard right has always been a propaganda ploy of the left.