Slashdot Mirror


You Can Help Purism Build the Secure Open Source Linux-based Librem 5 Smartphone (betanews.com)

BrianFagioli writes: Thankfully, consumers are starting to wake up and become more aware of security and privacy, and some companies, such as Purism, are designing products to safeguard users. The company's laptops, for instance, run an open source Linux-based operating system, called "PureOS" with a focus on privacy. These machines even have hardware "kill switches" so you can physically disconnect a webcam or Wi-Fi card. Today, Purism announces that it is taking those same design philosophies and using them to build a new $599 smartphone called Librem 5. The planned phone will use the GNOME desktop environment and PureOS by default, but users can install different distros too. Sound good? Well you can help the company build it through crowdfunding. "Purism, the social purpose corporation which designs and produces popular privacy conscious hardware and software, has revealed its plans to build the world's first encrypted, open platform smartphone that will empower users to protect their digital identity in an increasingly unsafe mobile world. After 18 months of R&D to test hardware specifications and engage with one of the largest phone fabricators, Purism is opening a self-hosted crowdfunding campaign to gauge demand for the initial fabrication order and add the features most important to users," says Purism.

109 comments

  1. Needs removable battery. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I won't crowdfund it unless it has a removable battery. And it needs to work on Verizon. A plug-in keyboard would be nice, too.

    1. Re:Needs removable battery. by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Plus a kitchen sink with a working garbage disposal is a must have.

    2. Re: Needs removable battery. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is almost impossible for a small company to make a Verizon device because of ridiculous CDMA licensing fees. Nextbit tried to but they had to cancel it because it wasn't approved

    3. Re:Needs removable battery. by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      I'm not buying it until it has a pop-up roof, a fold-out bed and a built-in fridge and stove.

      Oh wait, that's for camping trailers.

      Carry on.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    4. Re: Needs removable battery. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This. CDMAIDS needs to die.

    5. Re: Needs removable battery. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who need ridiculous Verizon? When Vodafone or Orange is more than enough.

      And ridiculously stupid CDMA, only for idiots.

    6. Re:Needs removable battery. by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Don't bother. This has been tried before, and failed. Over and over. It's one thing to get linux running on it after a fashion, quite another to get the telecommunications parts working. And no, being able to connect only via usb is not a viable alternative.

      As the article points out, these are just artist's renderings. Also, they claim to have an arrangement with a manufacturer, but since they won't say who, my guess is it's just an informal "okay, if you can actually get it working, we'll talk." Certainly not a formal commitment to manufacture anything at this point, since it's only vaporware..

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    7. Re: Needs removable battery. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, Verizon and Sprint need to die.

      -jct

    8. Re:Needs removable battery. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've ordered one, and I want it to have a removable battery too.

    9. Re:Needs removable battery. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Android is Linux, just not a traditional unix userspace. The hardware support and drivers already exist, you just have to be OK with firmware blobs and forked, older kernels (which is a big problem for a secure, open OS).

    10. Re:Needs removable battery. by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      I also need a 1 25 pin Parallel interface port, 2 Serial Ports (9 Pin and 25 Pin), USB, VGA, DVI, HDMI, Read Write Blueray/DVD, Ethernet, RAID 5 array, a 17 inch screen.
      Where every part can be serviceable,

      Oh wait I want a desktop PC. not a phone. Perhaps I would be happy with a bulky laptop.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    11. Re: Needs removable battery. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Considering that building a smartphone involves negotiating over 100,000 patents, ain't gonna happen.

    12. Re:Needs removable battery. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Canonical couldn't make it work with millions of dollars and four or so years of effort. Mozilla couldn't make it work with millions of dollars and four or so years of effort, and half a dozen manufacturing partners.

      But I'm sure Purism will have something production-ready in two years. Definitely. </sarcasm>

    13. Re: Needs removable battery. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dunno. Virtually anyone is more capable than Mozilla.

    14. Re:Needs removable battery. by pakar · · Score: 1

      What both Canonical and Mozilla failed at was to get their respective OS'es attractive for consumers.. There where a number of devices launched, but they all failed to get any market-share so they where both canceled when they realized that.

      This device does have a niche market that may attract security-minded people.. Bringing a device like this to market in 2 years is fairly simple, depending on what SW you aim to run on it. In the video presentation they speak about running basically any linux-distro on it, so my guess is that it will just be a tiny portable PC with 3G/LTE capabilities.
      Question is what type of app's will be available on it, in addition to what you can install from the distribution repos..

      That's how i see it anyway..

    15. Re:Needs removable battery. by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      Ah, so neither my N900 nor my Sailfish 1 actually exist -- that's good, means I'll be carrying less in my pocket from now on.

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    16. Re:Needs removable battery. by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      What does that have to do with yet another vaporware announcement? Right now they have nothing.

      There is nothing to give anyone reason to believe that they can produce. Obviously the phone manufacturer doesn't have much confidence, or they would let themselves be named.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    17. Re:Needs removable battery. by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Android is not linux. The android runtime runs atop linux, same as all the linux desktop environments run atop linux, but are not themselves linux. Also, be ready to say goodbye to linux on android.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  2. How about a hardware keyboard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Anyone? Bueller?

    [crickets]

    1. Re:How about a hardware keyboard? by BlueStrat · · Score: 3, Interesting

      (How about a hardware keyboard?)

      Anyone? Bueller?

      [crickets]

      More important than features is the distinct possibility that any truly "secure" phone won't be allowed on US carrier's networks either through carrier restrictions or by US legal decision. Can't allow the plebs to talk among themselves without the ability to eavesdrop and install whatever spyware US TLAs roll out. For the children, of course.

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
    2. Re:How about a hardware keyboard? by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Most devices you can pair a blue tooth keyboard to it.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    3. Re:How about a hardware keyboard? by currently_awake · · Score: 1

      You should assume all phone base-band chips have government backdoors installed at the factory, unless proven otherwise.

    4. Re:How about a hardware keyboard? by jonwil · · Score: 1

      If you want a hardware keyboard on a phone that at least has the goal of being as open as possible, you want a Neo900
      http://neo900.org/
      It will be able to be used with NO closed blobs on the main ARM CPU for WiFi OR cellular modem. It will also be possible to use it with no closed blobs for the GPU if you dont need 3D acceleration.

      And there are hardware level security features built into the design. The cellular modem firmware has no access to the main ARM CPU, main RAM, the main filesystem, the microphone, the speakers, the Bluetooth chip or the WiFi chip so its not possible for backdoors (government or otherwise) in the cellular modem firmware to turn the Neo900 into a covert listening device or other covert device.

      There are physical hardware switches to let you turn off all the different wireless devices (cellular, WiFi, bluetooth, GPS) so its physically impossible for the firmware on those things to transmit if you turn them off.

      I have no association with the Neo900 project other than as someone who wishes he could afford one to replace his already-excellent Nokia N900 :)

      Just pointing out that there are other "make a phone as secure as possible" phones out there and there is a way to get one that has a hardware keyboard.

    5. Re:How about a hardware keyboard? by jonwil · · Score: 1

      Oh and for those who need US frequencies, there are 4 different modem variants currently listed as options for the Neo900, one of which supports CDMA2000 for those unlucky enough to live in an area where Verizon is your only option.

    6. Re:How about a hardware keyboard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      which is why the purism folks want a hardware switch to disable the base-band chip

  3. No, I can't.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It would have an inordinate amount of DickButts.

  4. No.... No they can not. Just more cons and BS. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Librem is as usual full of shit. How do you people fall for this down right BS. There will never be a secure opensource phone until all drivers for the gpu, modems, and baseband are open sourced. With that said, this is just another money grab by purism selling a scam to ignorant people.

    1. Re:No.... No they can not. Just more cons and BS. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what's YOUR alternative?

    2. Re:No.... No they can not. Just more cons and BS. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      shutting up, and using provided phones....
      the sun will rise
      you'll live

    3. Re:No.... No they can not. Just more cons and BS. by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      The only winning move is not to play.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    4. Re:No.... No they can not. Just more cons and BS. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Use a dumb phone to make calls/texts. On a seperate line, use a nexus/pixel as to create LTE/UTMS hotspot for your libre-laptop. That's the best you'll ever get to.

    5. Re:No.... No they can not. Just more cons and BS. by cloud.pt · · Score: 1

      They kinda just released a privacy-centered laptop and it appears to be somewhat decent, despite the price-tag, from early external statements. But then again, the mild price-hike is nothing compared to your privacy's worth - you know, if you don't want to be selling it to whatever other choice around which pretty much tracks you to hardware-level shenanigans. These guys go down to circuitry choice of components for making their gear secure on that level apparently.

      Now a phone is a very different piece of kit to develop than a laptop, which is mostly standardized and you can mostly tune off-the-shelf stuff to your needs (in this case, privacy without a huge usability compromise). Especially the OS. On a phone, not only you would need to go through some hardcore loops for hardware customization, but I can't start to grasp the task of making an OS and ecosystem that suits the mobile phone I (and probably most of you) need today - with navigation, versatile connectivity and, you know, supporting convenience apps for this and that that have pretty much merged themselves to our lives out of sheer convenience. And do that on a 600 price tag is a very nice dream unless it comes true. Running Linux is no guarantee of it having the community or even 3rd-party support it deserves.

    6. Re:No.... No they can not. Just more cons and BS. by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Sticking it in a metal box, like an old 3x5 index card holder, takes care of everything.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    7. Re: No.... No they can not. Just more cons and BS. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True. But on the plus side, _everything else_ is open source AND not far from what I use I'm my computer.

    8. Re:No.... No they can not. Just more cons and BS. by infolation · · Score: 1

      A home-made faraday bag would be more portable.

    9. Re:No.... No they can not. Just more cons and BS. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Their privacy-centered laptop launched without an open source BIOS. They got that, but they still haven't figured out how to defeat or disable the Intel Management Engine. So it's a mostly-private laptop, but not a fully private one.

      If you insist on fully private, you need to go for one of the FSF-approved Respects-Your-Freedom devices. But they're relative dinosaurs, since they way they get around Intel Management Engine is by being manufactured before it existed. :)

      I respect what Purism is trying to do, but I think their advertising is intentionally misleading. They're trying to get customer that know a bit about free software and freedom, but not enough to know Purism isn't the complete solution.

    10. Re:No.... No they can not. Just more cons and BS. by ilikenwf · · Score: 1

      ME has been defeated for some time now.

  5. WOW.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whose old GPS cases did they buy for that ugly design.

  6. Re:THE FOURTH REICH SUPPORTS YOUR FREEDOM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And what are you planning to do about the American top-secret industrial military complex?

  7. OpenMoko 2.0? by Narcocide · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I would have bought an OpenMoko phone too, if they'd you know, supported America. Another Euro-networks-only Linux phone isn't gonna help us at all over here though.

    1. Re:OpenMoko 2.0? by Useless · · Score: 1

      The OM GTA02 worked on US networks.

      --
      "Even Prophets don't know everything"
    2. Re:OpenMoko 2.0? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is this Euro only?

      The hardware will run almost any GNU+Linux based distribution, it will also work with 2G/3G/4G, GSM, UMTS, and LTE networks.

      https://puri.sm/shop/librem-5/

    3. Re:OpenMoko 2.0? by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      I would have bought an OpenMoko phone too, if they'd you know, supported America. Another Euro-networks-only Linux phone isn't gonna help us at all over here though.

      Who'd bother making a Linux phone for America? Americans are sheep who worship at the altar of apple.

      (True story -- my first N900 was bought by a friend in NY as it was cheaper in dollars than in Euros -- smart move, Nokia).

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    4. Re:OpenMoko 2.0? by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      I used my Nokia N900 on US EDGE networks -- worked quite well.

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
  8. You can help by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    By sucking on my DAMN balls!

  9. GNOME? No, thanks! I refuse to use GNOME. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The planned phone will use the GNOME desktop environment ...

    On the surface, this offering sounds compelling. But GNOME is a total deal breaker for me. I refuse to use any Linux distro that uses GNOME by default.

    The presence of GNOME is like a smoke test. If a Linux distro's maintainers voluntarily choose to use GNOME, then I can't trust the other decisions they'll have to make when creating a Linux distro, and so I refuse to use such a distro.

    There is no reason to use GNOME. No reason at all. There are many far better alternatives out there.

    1. Re:GNOME? No, thanks! I refuse to use GNOME. by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 3, Insightful

      >> On the surface, this offering sounds compelling. But X is a total deal breaker for me. I refuse to use any (thing I value) that uses X (as a default option).

      Your day job wouldn't happen to be "Republican Member of Congress", would it?

    2. Re:GNOME? No, thanks! I refuse to use GNOME. by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      Worse: He's a KDE user.

    3. Re:GNOME? No, thanks! I refuse to use GNOME. by unixisc · · Score: 2

      Precisely! They could have picked KDE's mobile version, or even Ubuntu's Unity - which was lousy for laptops, but would be fine for phones.

    4. Re:GNOME? No, thanks! I refuse to use GNOME. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You obviously didn't RTFA... even when you buy a computer pre-loaded with linux it will likely have some popular DE to make it accessible to newbies or those don't care. It's an open platform phone, you can put any distro you can port to it, but if you don't want gnome you will have to find a decent touch interface somewhere. On the desktop i'm a tiling wm kinda person... but even I understand that for a touchscreen gnome is probably the best there is for linux at the moment (i'd be genuinely interested if you know of others though.)

    5. Re:GNOME? No, thanks! I refuse to use GNOME. by Thad+Boyd · · Score: 1

      X? But I thought all the mobile distros were going with Wayland.

    6. Re:GNOME? No, thanks! I refuse to use GNOME. by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      GTK+ isn't the popular choice for touchscreens.

      Qt found a home with Meego, Sailfish, BB OS 10, Ubuntu Touch etc.

    7. Re:GNOME? No, thanks! I refuse to use GNOME. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clearly you forget about Maemo. Maemo is entirely based on GTK+, and is alive. See maemo.org. MeeGo was a replacement for Maemo proposed by Nokia. Because of political issues on GTK+ versus Qt, Nokia chose Qt over GTK+, and lost several years in the battle.

  10. SJW Phone ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No Thansks !

  11. Liking this, but good luck. by wjcofkc · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I like this idea enough I may well go ahead and support it. I have been saying for a long time that Gnome 3 would be great on a tablet\phone. The interface is just about perfect for it. Past that, Google has spent the last few years falling out of my good graces. An iPhone is not an option. That said, this would probably be such a niche device as to fail. But I'm still going to back the project.

    --
    Brought to you by Carl's Junior.
    1. Re:Liking this, but good luck. by amiga3D · · Score: 0

      I don't think it's got a chance in hell. Look at what it offers. Privacy. All the World's corporations and governments will hate it. It's doomed.

    2. Re:Liking this, but good luck. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More to the point, they'll never get a useful product out. No manufacturer anywhere has managed to make a smart phone with free (as in freedom) drivers for everything. Canonical couldn't do it with Ubuntu Touch. Mozilla is very focused on freedom, and they couldn't manage it either. The Replicant project has been trying to do it, but all of their supported devices have major features like wireless, or GPS, or cameras disabled for lack of free drivers.

      How is Purism going to do differently?

  12. Re:THE FOURTH REICH SUPPORTS YOUR FREEDOM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Embrace it you fuckwit.

    -jct

  13. What the ... by Misagon · · Score: 2

    The planned phone will use the GNOME desktop environment...

    LOL.
    Oh, the humanity. (and I don't mean the desktop theme)
    It is going to be a total disaster out of the box.

    --
    "We mustn't be caught by surprise by our own advancing technology" -- Aldous Huxley
  14. But how safe, secure & reliable can it be.... by Bearhouse · · Score: 0

    (a) If it's using a Debian-based repo and hence SystemD (unless they replace(d) it in PureOS? Don't think so...

    (b) If the phone firmware is not also "free / open / whatever RMS is calling it these days..."

    If you want a *NIX 'phone, get an iPhone...

  15. Re:THE FOURTH REICH SUPPORTS YOUR FREEDOM by unixisc · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Fourth Reich is today's German government of Angela Merkel. The one that's successfully forced the EU to take in any Muslims who want to come, and is now trying to force countries like Poland, Czech, Hungary & Slovakia to do the same. The government that's not only thrown their women to the mercies of Muslim rapefugees, but also issues flyers on how to rape vaginally, as opposed to anally or orally. It was hard to imagine a German chancellor who'd be worse than Hitler, but Frau Merkel managed it!

  16. Low memory by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

    Seems everyone keeps making Ubuntu/Android/Revolution Remix/ChromiumOS/FirefoxOS phones these days, and we've seen a dozen independent GNU/FLOSS/TOOTHPASTE phones in the past 3 or 4 years. Folks will fall for it again I guess?

    1. Re:Low memory by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      postMarketOS is getting closer to running KDE's plasma mobile on older generic Android phones you might have lying in a drawer somewhere.

      The guy running this phone effort says he's a debian guy and committed to FOSS. So even if the crowdfunded handset is DOA, perhaps the software stack of Matrix may be portable to devices that people actually own rather than plonking down $600.

  17. Verizon compatibility by unixisc · · Score: 2

    Except that in the US, Verizon has the widest coverage. Most of the current phones are 4G or 3G, but the question of CDMA comes in when one is in a place that does not have 3G/4G coverage, and the phone has to fall back to 2G. That's when to access the Verizon 2G network, a phone has to be CDMA compatible. For which, they need to have Qualcomm parts.

    Given the philosophy of Librem/Purism, where all the source code presumably has to be open, it's a non-starter for Qualcomm. Even if this phone uses Qualcomm chipsets, there's no way Qualcomm will agree to letting its IP be out there for everyone to copy. Otherwise, people in countries like China will copy them left & right, & Qualcomm will have no recourse.

    1. Re:Verizon compatibility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you just spout off nonsense all the time? Widest coverage? Do you just get your information from TV commercials?
      Where tf did Qualcom come from, the page has the CPU they're using, i.MX6/i.MX8 CPU.

    2. Re: Verizon compatibility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You think verizon doesn't have the widest coverage ?

      I camp, hike, kitesurf a lot. I lived in the back of my car a lot. I've been with other people and the people without reception are always non verizon people.

      This is all from RL experience. As soon as I find its not true I'll leave verizon but until then I don't think you know wtf you're talking about.

    3. Re:Verizon compatibility by unixisc · · Score: 1

      As the above poster mentioned, Verizon does have the widest coverage - as a Verizon user, I've noticed that as well. As far as chipsets/CPUs go, I did say 'Even if this phone uses Qualcomm...' You pointed out that it doesn't, making my case even stronger that it's impossible to support Verizon w/ this particular platform.

    4. Re: Verizon compatibility by darth+dickinson · · Score: 1

      You think verizon doesn't have the widest coverage ?

      I camp, hike, kitesurf a lot. I lived in the back of my car a lot. I've been with other people and the people without reception are always non verizon people.

      This is all from RL experience. As soon as I find its not true I'll leave verizon but until then I don't think you know wtf you're talking about.

      I can second this. I took the family on an RV trip and when we were winding around the back roads in south Alabama, my Verizon phone always had voice and data (at least 3G, if not LTE). My T-Mo devices were useless for a good chunk of the travel time.

  18. Open your Kimono first by spinitch · · Score: 1

    Who owns Pur.ism? Open your financials and crowd fund stock along with undeveloped products if really such a swell benevolent organization vs here is my money give me something of value maybe. Old thread below, maybe they have improved since a couple years ago. https://m.slashdot.org/story/2...

  19. Re:But how safe, secure & reliable can it be.. by unixisc · · Score: 1

    Oh, RMS would call any ROM in the phone a 'circuit', and give it a special waiver. Even while he trolls the likes of TiVo for putting their firmware in a locked flash memory device

  20. Re:THE FOURTH REICH SUPPORTS YOUR FREEDOM by diesalesmandie · · Score: 0

    Fourth Reich is today's German government of Angela Merkel. The one that's successfully forced the EU to take in any Muslims who want to come, and is now trying to force countries like Poland, Czech, Hungary & Slovakia to do the same. The government that's not only thrown their women to the mercies of Muslim rapefugees, but also issues flyers on how to rape vaginally, as opposed to anally or orally. It was hard to imagine a German chancellor who'd be worse than Hitler, but Frau Merkel managed it!

    At the time of this reply the quoted comment has a score of 2; I find that really, really sad. If you are gonna compare Merkel's germany to the Nazi regime and say that she is worse than Hitler, then are you be implying that it's OK to set up concentration camps (under hitler's command) and systemically exterminate (mostly innocent, if not ignorant, considering Islam didn't have a reformation like Christianity) Muslims? because that would just make the whole situation worse, giving radical Muslims an excuse to be more bold in their acts of terror against the west, aside from the fact that doing that to any human being is totally horrific.

    --
    This is my sig, there are many like it but this one is mine
  21. OpenBSD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I would rather see a port of OpenBSD on phones if was supposed to be geared towards security. I don't believe we will ever be entirely secure using Linux as our kernel for smart phones.

  22. Freedom theater by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They can't even get open firmware into their laptops yet they trumpet their great privacy far and wide.

  23. Solutionism... by VeryFluffyBunny · · Score: 1

    ...at it's finest. Privacy is a complex political issue. There isn't an app or techy hardware for that.

    The other thing is that, even if there was a tech solution, what Purism are essentially proposing is to take on the Samsung-Apple duopoly and take market share away from them. If the succeed to any degree, it'll only take one frivolous law suit from either of these behemoths to bankrupt Purism. Good luck with that.

    --
    Debate is a form of harassment. Do not question my truth.
  24. Nice in theory by JohnFen · · Score: 1

    It's nice in theory. Very nice. But the obstacles to actually making it real are very, very high. So high, that I'm very skeptical that it can be done until there is a sea change in the phone manufacturing industry.

    I wish them well and a lot of success! I don't like the hardware they've settled on and so won't buy it whether or not the OS works properly, but if they're successful then perhaps the OS could be put on a phone that I actually would buy.

  25. Product Differentiation - Use a M.2 NVMe PCIe SSD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Suggestions:

    * Product differentiation is important. Instead of on-board flash, even though it'll make the product a little bit thicker, use an off-the-shelf M.2 NVMe PCIe SSD, like the Samsung 960 EVO M.2 250GB NVMe PCI-Express 3.0 x4 Internal SSD. They cost $119.99 now, which would be justifiable for a $599 smart-phone with 3GB RAM.

    * Make above M.2 SSD slot-installable.

    * Removable battery - maybe slot-load.

    * Dual or triple SIMs, even if only one is active.

    * Include one or more tiny cheap GeekPorts on the back, bottom, and top.
        The connector can simply be an in-line pin-socket.
        Possible Pin-Out:
        1 - Gnd
        2 - -Unused-
        3 - +3.3V
        4 - USB Data+
        5 - USB Data-
        6- Bi-Directional 5V Tolerant Digital
        7 - Bi-Directional Analog
        8 - Charge-In

  26. Small and thick and robust ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I will buy any phone that is small and thick and robust ( like they all used to be ) rather than big and thin and fragile ( like they all are now ).

    Make it so !

    1. Re:Small and thick and robust ! by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      Not all of the thin phones are fragile. Mine has been dropped in a toilet, run through a washing machine, dropped on hard surfaces a number of times, and run over with a car once.

      It's still going strong. Not even a cracked screen. And I don't even put it in a case.

    2. Re:Small and thick and robust ! by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      The last phone I broke was the old Candy Bar phone I got in 1997. I never had problems with the thin phones, As they normally fit well in your pocket, compared to the bulky phones of old which were hanging off your belt, ready to get side swiped, or crushed against a wall.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    3. Re:Small and thick and robust ! by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      I will buy any phone that is small and thick and robust ( like they all used to be ) rather than big and thin and fragile ( like they all are now ).

      Make it so !

      Wanna buy a N900? I ave a couple of spares.

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
  27. Dev kit available by wjcofkc · · Score: 1

    I see the dev kit is available and only $299. That's a good price for something new to play with. The question is, what kind of form factor appropriate applications to develop on a full fledged computer OS? Yes, this will be fun.

    --
    Brought to you by Carl's Junior.
  28. They a joking ?! by real+httpd · · Score: 1

    They a joking ?! Who is their consumer
    - Most pro users don't use gnome. Gnome lost their souls long time ago
    - Other users have Android or iPhone
    Max 12000 gnome hipsters maybe can purchase this phone.

    1. Re:They a joking ?! by Thad+Boyd · · Score: 1

      I'm not a big GNOME fan either, but it's silly to say it's not a widely-used DE (as Linux DEs go); it's the default in many of the biggest distributions. It's also about to be the default in Ubuntu, which is why it's going to be the default in downstream PureOS.

      The argument that Apple and Google have already cornered the market is a much better one. That companies with the resources of Microsoft and Canonical have failed to break in shows just how hard a market this is.

  29. an imx6..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thinking of using an imx6 for a product in 2019, hahahahaha

    1. Re:an imx6..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll take a phone using a silicon chip over steam power any day. Think of all of the challenges with steam...chopping down the wood, refilling the water, not to mention when you lock-down the over-pressure relief, over-fuel it, and the boiler explodes. Do you really WANT that happening in your pants pocket? Do you??

  30. Absolutely! by blind+biker · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I won't crowdfund it unless it has a removable battery. And it needs to work on Verizon. A plug-in keyboard would be nice, too.

    Yes, one million times this - please make the hardware repairable, with components easily replaceable, especially the battery!!!

    --
    "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
  31. Re:THE FOURTH REICH SUPPORTS YOUR FREEDOM by mukinrestak · · Score: 0

    Hmmm, you missed the part where Muslims would be unable to commit terror attacks in the west after they all get deported and some Trumpian walls get built.

  32. It is neither really open source, nor libre. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    None of the Purism hardware has been.

    It's all a bunch of cheap gimmicks that don't live up to the hype.

    I mean for fuck's sake, they used an Intel chip with ME in their Purism laptop.

    AND it took them what, two or three years to get Coreboot on it to replace the AMI Bios it came with stock because, as it turned out after pitching otherwise, it couldn't run libreboot on it because Intel ME, as had been known for a few years by that time, wasn't libre, and any device requiring it would never be supported by Libreboot, short of Intel providing a signing key for 3rd parties to develop their own Intel ME firmware images.

    The fact that slashdot still posts these slashvertisements for Purism products is personally offensive to me, especially without documenting these facts in the editorial.

    1. Re:It is neither really open source, nor libre. by pakar · · Score: 1

      And you seem to be fairly out of date..
      https://www.phoronix.com/scan....

      Sure, i would like a chip without any ME at all, but being able to disable it is atleast a step in the right direction.

  33. Re:But how safe, secure & reliable can it be.. by amiga3D · · Score: 1

    The CPU is separated from the Cellular Baseband. That alone makes it a great idea. A user controlled device. Nothing else fits that description, nothing in the world.

  34. Re: THE FOURTH REICH SUPPORTS YOUR FREEDOM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Black Lives Matter, Rapefugees Welcome, ANTiFA, ISIS, PC SJWs no any differences

  35. Re:But how safe, secure & reliable can it be.. by blind+biker · · Score: 2

    If you want a *NIX 'phone, get an iPhone...

    Either you're sarcastic, or you're trolling hard. iPhones are the exact opposite of open SW or HW.
    At least with most Android phones, you can unlock them, sideload apps, or even install a different OS.

    --
    "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
  36. Why would I want to do that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can also punch myself in the nuts repeatedly, but I don't see a logical reason to do that, either.

  37. One word .... Jolla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    n/t

  38. KDE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was once a flamewar, KDE vs. GNOME, like Vim vs. Emacs, Ronaldo vs. Messi, Senna vs. Prost (lol).
    I used Gnome for a while and it used to be OK (prefered KDE but sure Gnome was OK).

    But these days, i genuinely find laughable to consider Gnome and not KDE. On every single aspect, i find KDE superior and modern, and Gnome just .. awkward and limited.

    Ubuntu drops its own for Gnome, and this - i mean WTF.
    Can anyone explain to me this obsession with Gnome? Someone actually likes it!?

    And no one knows about Plasma Mobile?
    https://plasma-mobile.org/

  39. Re:THE FOURTH REICH SUPPORTS YOUR FREEDOM by unixisc · · Score: 0

    At the time of this reply the quoted comment has a score of 2; I find that really, really sad. If you are gonna compare Merkel's germany to the Nazi regime and say that she is worse than Hitler, then are you be implying that it's OK to set up concentration camps (under hitler's command) and systemically exterminate (mostly innocent, if not ignorant, considering Islam didn't have a reformation like Christianity) Muslims? because that would just make the whole situation worse, giving radical Muslims an excuse to be more bold in their acts of terror against the west, aside from the fact that doing that to any human being is totally horrific.

    How is setting up concentration camps worse than letting in rapists loose on the local population? In both cases, you're making the lives of citizens a living hell. Except for slashdotters whose attitude towards rape seems to be to simply lay down & enjoy it!

  40. Go for it by omfglearntoplay · · Score: 1

    I applaud the idea around this phone. Spying on bad guys is fine... spying on normal people is evil.

  41. CDMA2000 by tepples · · Score: 2

    You didn't list CDMA2000. In many rural parts of the United States, only Verizon's CDMA2000 signal is usable, if unixisc's comment is to be believed.

  42. "Pureism" has been a fraud from day 1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They make huge claims they can't possibly full fill while others actually spend time and money on fixing low level problems. I'm not a huge fan of Mini Free, but at least they're not selling total bullshit. I'm not going to even argue Mini Free's laptops are 100% free- but they are a heck of a lot better and more worthy of the claim 'libre'. There are costs involved and I wouldn't even object to a phone from this company if they didn't make claims they can't possibly fill.

    You will NEVER have a 100% libre phone (the fact I have to say 100% just goes to demonstrate the phone IS NOT libre, libre is freedom, it's the opposite of open source, it's meaning is 100% freedom, whereas open source may or may not be, ie ATI graphics drivers/firmwares are "open source", not libre, as they can't be used without the non-free pieces). However this doesn't mean a more privacy friendly phone can't be developed. It's just expensive. Canonical failed with significant amounts of cash- but still not enough. Now what Purism is going to do is take a stock reference design that CAN'T be adapted to be privacy friendly. That's the reality of it.

    What needs to be done is a modular-based phone design that utilizes something like EOMA68. That'll reduce the cost to design and manufacture bringing the demand up and number of users up to something that'll actually be practicable. Then you can separate concerns giving control of the modem to the core of the phone. The modem would not be able to defeat encryption at this point on the phone while also enabling intelligent algorithms to be developed to reduce the resolution of the tracking. That would make it more of a communication device or pager-like device, but none-the-less it should work. There is also the possibility of adding a radio chip so you could basically have a device that didn't track you so long as you weren't making a call. You'd be notified over radio like HAM of any incoming calls. Then your phone would turn the modem on and you could answer or return the call (upon your approval).

    1. Re:"Pureism" has been a fraud from day 1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RTFA

  43. Re:THE FOURTH REICH SUPPORTS YOUR FREEDOM by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

    How is setting up concentration camps worse than letting in rapists loose on the local population?

    How is something that really happened and killed millions worse than something that didn't happen?

    Hello Mr Trump.

    --
    Watch this Heartland Institute video
  44. Re:But how safe, secure & reliable can it be.. by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

    You are seriously confused. The only phone that uses a Debian based distro uses upstart, not systemd.

    The phone that uses systemd is RPM based, not deb/apt based.

    (Personally, I'd take systemd over upstart any day).

    --
    Watch this Heartland Institute video
  45. Re:But how safe, secure & reliable can it be.. by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

    There is only one Linux distro that allows you free choice of the init system -- Debian works with systemd, upstart, openrc, or sysvinit.

    --
    Watch this Heartland Institute video
  46. Chipset and safe/secure by DrYak · · Score: 1

    (b) If the phone firmware is not also "free / open / whatever RMS is calling it these days..."

    That's the whole idea for going after a Freescale i.MX 6 :
    according to them, the plain vanilla upstream linux kernel and upstream gallium3d's etna_viv can support this chip, no firmware blobs required.
    (they keep the eventuallity to switch to i.MX 8 if it ends up getting similar support).

    And regarding the other components (cell network, wifi, and camera) :
    the whole point of this phone is to have the functionality handled by separate chips that talk over a standard channels (camera as a USB UVC, Wifi as a network device, etc.) with *a physical switch to shut them off*.

    So yeah, the cell modem will probably runs some manufacturer/carrier provided binary (as required by licensing).
    But that modem will basically be seen as serial or USB-Network device and can be unplugged from its bus simply at a swtich flip.
    Unlike most other chipsets (e.g.: Qualcomm) where the modem basically serves as the chip's northbridge.

    in short :
    all the things that the user and OS will ever interact with, will be running pure opensource software.
    all the rest will be isolate and only come over a standard interface.

    government agencies can upload whatever over-the-air "upgrades" they want, they won't have access to anything relevant.

    In theory this looks like a nice idea.

    In practice that is going to require fucktons of work to design their own PCB that works.
    (Look at how long it took to OpenMoko back then to do GTA01/GTA02 - what was basically the same "open-source friendly" design,
    again look how long it took for Golden Delicious to make their custom GTA04/Pyra - which doesn't even have an open-source friendly GPU).

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  47. Precedent by DrYak · · Score: 1

    Actually back then, OpenMoko's GTA01/GTA02 design was exactly the same (trying to make it opensource friendly).

    The Golden Delicious' GTA04 upgrade board (same design then reused in other devices like Pyra) at least took the same "separate cell modem" design
    (though used the "binary-only" PowerVR GPU of the OMAP chipsets).

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  48. Re:THE FOURTH REICH SUPPORTS YOUR FREEDOM by unixisc · · Score: 1

    Oh, those rapes in Europe not only happened, but they continue to happen on a regular basis!

  49. Re:THE FOURTH REICH SUPPORTS YOUR FREEDOM by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

    Oh, yes, rapes happen in Europe.

    What the fuck that has to do with Angela Merkel I can't imagine you pathetic little nazi apologist.

    --
    Watch this Heartland Institute video
  50. Re:THE FOURTH REICH SUPPORTS YOUR FREEDOM by unixisc · · Score: 1

    Not to the scale it has since Europe became a free for all, you little Muzzie cock sucker! Where public signs have to be posted telling people not to grope or rape women, or where flyers are distributed on the 'right way' to have sex.