Slashdot Mirror


Streaming Glitches Delay Massively Hyped Mayweather-McGregor Boxing Match (cnet.com)

"After initial indications the main event would commence at 11:15 p.m ET, it didn't get started until nearly one hour later," reports Variety. An anonymous reader quotes CNET: Saturday's much hyped fight between Floyd Mayweather Jr. and UFC champion Conor McGregor drew fans from all walks of life, even those who'd never typically watch a standard boxing match. But when some of those fans settled in to watch the spectacle, beverage and snacks in hand, they found themselves in a world of hurt. Watching the fight wasn't cheap (nearly $100 on pay-per-view), so naturally, those who had technical issues as fight time neared -- on whatever platform -- were fighting mad. At 6:28 p.m. PT, as the undercard matches preceding the event aired, the UFC admitted on Twitter it was having technical issues with its Fight Pass streaming service due to the overwhelming interest in the bout.
ESPN confirms that the much-hyped event was "delayed due to pay-per-view outages."

186 comments

  1. if you had dierctv same price for higher bit rate by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    if you had dierctv same price for higher bit rate and it can serve all customers at the same time.

  2. glitch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Who fucking cares.

    I wanna see two buffoons beat the shit out of each other all I have to do is look outside.

    And it's free.

    1. Re:glitch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Watching boxing probably appeals to the same people that watch NASCAR and "professional" wrestling.

      -~-~-

    2. Re: glitch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      boxing is a sport, look at MacGregor's lack of conditioning. I have never seen someone fail so hard unless they focked off in training camp. that said he would be good for the sport if only to see canelo, crawford, or ggg knock his ass out for real

    3. Re: glitch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How can you say that when McGregor went 10 rounds?

    4. Re: glitch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He didn't go 10 rounds. He survived 10 rounds but was spent by the 5th. From then on out it was only a matter of time.

    5. Re:glitch by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 4, Funny

      [If] I wanna see two buffoons beat the shit out of each other all I have to do is look outside.

      I can top that. I just look in a mirror.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    6. Re: glitch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      boxing is a sport

      Laser-tag Bowling is a sport.

      Bikini Beer Pong is a sport.

      Starcraft is a sport.

    7. Re:glitch by Trogre · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah, I never did see the appeal in standing with a bunch of slack-jawed yokels watching to see who could inflict the most serious concussion on their opponent.

      Barbaric is what it is.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    8. Re: glitch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He was the only one fighting for 8 out of those rounds.

    9. Re: glitch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Conner was spent after 5, he threw more punches in the early rounds but did no damage and while he technically would have been awarded a few of those rounds he well and truly lost them by spending all his energy for no damage, from the 5th onward he had nothing left in his punches and Mayweather just slowly tore him to pieces, by the end of the 7th it was over.

    10. Re: glitch by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      If enough people are willing to watch it then they will be a $100 pay per view for it.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    11. Re: glitch by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      He was the only one fighting for 8 out of those rounds.

      If by "fighting" do you mean "not doing shit other than getting himself tired" ... you are right.

      This is why Mayweather is the best boxer in history. Most of the time he is avoiding while his not-so-great opponent is being avoided.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    12. Re:glitch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not all of us have kids, you know.

    13. Re: glitch by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      So not doing squat for longer than most matches last is supposed to make him something great?

      That's messed up and why this match was put on in the first place.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    14. Re: glitch by apparently · · Score: 1

      It's called rope-a-dope, you fucking dope.

    15. Re: glitch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please don't ever compare what Ali did to anything Floyd has done. No it was not rope a dope.

    16. Re:glitch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you two buffoons?

    17. Re: glitch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It shows self control, knowledge of his opponent and great boxing skills. He drained the energy and danger from Mcgregor while taking no real damage himself. first class display of boxing on his part. Conner was the opposite, displayed a lack of discipline and let Mayweather dictate the fight while wasting energy early on making himself completely spent by the 5th. It was a display of some of the best and conversely what happens to an inexperienced boxer that doesn't have match fitness or good tactics..

    18. Re: glitch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This fight is like letting the champions of rugby and the champions of soccer play a soccer game to see who is the best. Or in the case of the mma fighter being exhausted half way the event, it is like a 100 meter sprint champion running the 1500 meter run against the 1500 meter champion. No matter how fast Bolt can or now could sprint, he was no match for those skinny 1500 meter runners on the 1500 meter.

    19. Re: glitch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's called rope-a-dope, you fucking dope.

      No it isn't. Rope a dope is when the boxer is trying to give the impression he is losing while absorbing the punishment and biding his time. Mayweather at no stage looked in any trouble what so ever, hell even at the end of the fight he barely looked like he had been in an easy sparring match. This was a comfortable easy fight for Mayweather, he let McGregor punch himself silly early on then just enjoyed a relaxing final 5 rounds.

    20. Re:glitch by McWilde · · Score: 1

      He's Tyler Durden.

      --
      Maybe
    21. Re:glitch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and it will more likely be a real fight instead of an act

  3. Probably Shouldn't Have Used Hooli Nucleus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And gone with Pied Piper.

    1. Re:Probably Shouldn't Have Used Hooli Nucleus by CustomSolvers2 · · Score: 1

      I heard something about a friend of the ex-wife of the guy in charge of hiring the streaming provider being a frat pal of Gavin Belson. At least, this is what someone bro-ed me because, you know, bros disclose. LOL.

      On a serious note: software-related (online) unreliability isn't precisely a surprise to me. The case of video streaming is particularly descriptive: there are quite a few sites with tons of problems, limited (browser or features) support and surprisingly slow. I have even seen these problems in the sites of major players in the broadcasting business like big television networks!

      --
      Custom Solvers 2.0 = Alvaro Carballo Garcia = varocarbas.
    2. Re:Probably Shouldn't Have Used Hooli Nucleus by CustomSolvers2 · · Score: 1
      (I seriously hate it, but seems unfortunately required)

      I heard something about a friend of the ex-wife of the guy in charge of hiring the streaming provider being a frat pal of Gavin Belson. At least, this is what someone bro-ed me because, you know, bros disclose.

      This whole paragraph is a reference to the sitcom Silicon Valley, exactly the same than the parent post.

      --
      Custom Solvers 2.0 = Alvaro Carballo Garcia = varocarbas.
    3. Re:Probably Shouldn't Have Used Hooli Nucleus by CustomSolvers2 · · Score: 1

      Clarification to the clarification: I am not interested in dealing with people actually needing these clarifications or similar (e.g., me adding "LOL" to denote that what I wrote shouldn't be taken seriously/literally). I am writing all these clarifications to minimise the chances of having to waste time on addressing nonsensical concerns (+ avoiding misunderstanding-based uncomfortable/negative-to-everyone situations).

      --
      Custom Solvers 2.0 = Alvaro Carballo Garcia = varocarbas.
  4. $100? by nateman1352 · · Score: 0, Troll

    I saw a couple ads for this actually. How the hell is this one hour of TV worth 10 months of Netflix? The fight is fake anyway... I just don't get it.

    1. Re:$100? by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      How the hell is that computer board worth 10 months of Netflix?

      How the hell is that spinny disk worth 10 months of Netflix?

      How the hell is that 3D printer worth 30 months of Netflix?

      People have different hobbies and interests. Do you have someone looking over your shoulder watching your spending habits?

    2. Re:$100? by dknj · · Score: 4, Informative

      did you watch the fight? it wasn't fake, it was blast from the past mayweather and mcgregor actually put up a good fight. this is what the pacquiao v mayweather fight should have looked like. fuck you "it's fake anyway". this ain't wrestling, son.

    3. Re:$100? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Netflix isn't live programming.

    4. Re: $100? by Thundercat007 · · Score: 0, Troll

      It was 100% fake. Like most MMA matches these days. Google about Rhonda Rousey and the wrestler Taz. He even predicted when she'd lose because of upcoming other commitments. They marketed it like a WWE match, McDick played his mouth piece roll, Mayweather kept his steak, everyone got paid except the suckers paying $100 for this crap.

    5. Re: $100? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      UFC in particular is more about hype than anything now. They market more attractive fighters harder. McGregor hasn't even really been tested enough to deserve all this hype. His title fight at a weight class he cuts 40 pounds for was against Aldo who had been undefeated for nearly 10 years and was bound to lose at any point. People just want to see the great white (Irish) hope that talks a bunch of shit to get everyone riled up. His grappling is nowhere near top competitive level. I don't doubt that a bunch of fights are fixed.

    6. Re: $100? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I had a look into it and it turns out that it's not fake.

    7. Re:$100? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A good fight? WTF, perhaps you saw a different fight to me. McGregor was completely schooled, he threw a few good hits in early rounds but by the 7th it was over, Mayweather did it smart and took him apart.

    8. Re:$100? by Trogre · · Score: 1

      Boxing is positively barbaric, but fake it is not.

      I suspect you're thinking of professional wrestling.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    9. Re: $100? by oobayly · · Score: 2

      I get the gist of what you're trying to say, but you choose some pretty bad examples. All of those last significantly longer than a month, not less.

    10. Re: $100? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      White.
      Irish.

      Pick one, dumbass.

    11. Re: $100? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      UFC in particular is more about hype than anything now. They market more attractive fighters harder. McGregor hasn't even really been tested enough to deserve all this hype. His title fight at a weight class he cuts 40 pounds for was against Aldo who had been undefeated for nearly 10 years and was bound to lose at any point. People just want to see the great white (Irish) hope that talks a bunch of shit to get everyone riled up. His grappling is nowhere near top competitive level. I don't doubt that a bunch of fights are fixed.

      Are you a retard, or do you just play one in real life?

    12. Re:$100? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How the hell is that computer board worth 10 months of Netflix?

      Worth more that a pile of steaming shit?

      How the hell is that 3D printer worth 30 months of Netflix?

      Worth more than an even bigger pile of steaming shit?

      People have different hobbies and interests.

      Quite true, but your examples tend to obscure your point.

    13. Re:$100? by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      "completely schooled" and 10 round TKO are an inherent contradiction.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    14. Re: $100? by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      It was 100% fake. Like most MMA matches these days.

      It doesn't matter. Both fighters have similar styles and the confidence of the man to step out of UFC into boxing has to be applauded. Because boxing isn't even half a fight compared to getting an elbow in the face or a shin hitting a quad muscle dead. Goodbye leg. Forget about taking someone to the ground and doing chokes or joint locks. Boxing is about as redundant in the 21st century as two gentleman walking ten paces and firing a pistol.

      Mayweather wouldn't last 20 seconds in the cage with MacGregor and everyone, especially Mayweather, knows it. MacGregor won as soon as Mayweather took the fight. This was about Boxing passing the flame to UFC because it's more exciting than boxing. You may say that MMA is fake, the difference is it can be more real than boxing ever could.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    15. Re: $100? by nasch · · Score: 1

      So a WWE wrestler claims, without evidence, that one particular UFC fight was faked, and from that you conclude that most UFC fights, as well as the Mayweather/McGregor fight, are faked?

    16. Re:$100? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "completely schooled" and 10 round TKO are an inherent contradiction.

      Not if exposing a poorly skilled boxer with insufficient endurance was the goal. Not if eliminating the "he just got in a lucky punch" defense was the goal. Not if you are so confident that you can engage in 10 rounds of fan service.

      Mayweather did indeed put on a clinic. He won on his terms, which he blatantly telegraphed.

    17. Re:$100? by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      I did not look into this, but at least one report said that most of the money was on McGregor even though the betting odds favored Mayweather. If that is true, it smells fishy to me. Generally, when the majority of the betting money is on one side, the odds for that side improve so as to encourage enough people to bet on the other side so as to cover the money the bookies need to pay out if the side with more money bet on it wins. Apparently, that did not happen here, suggesting that the bookies knew something no one else did.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    18. Re:$100? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A disproportionate amount of the betting was small wagers on McGregor. This is most likely attributable to Irish betters putting loseable amount on "their guy" as a show of cultural solidarity.

      In general this was a gimmick fight that blatantly played up ethnic rivalries, so it's no nec. "fishy" that the betting was irrational.

    19. Re:$100? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Do you have someone looking over your shoulder watching your spending habits?

      Well, yes.

      Hi by the way!

      -TLA

    20. Re:$100? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You might want to look up the first bout between Muhammad Ali and Floyd Patterson. Ali purposely kept the fight going for 12 rounds to maximize abuse (physical and verbal) on Patterson before knocking him out.

      Mayweather was playing to McGregor. If you've watched enough boxing, it was clear that McGregor never posed a threat to Mayweather and Mayweather knew it. Look at Mayweather's face after the bout was over. It looked as if he hadn't even fought one round yet.

    21. Re:$100? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nothing fishy here. What the bookies knew, is that the true odds were 100-to-1 or even 1000-to-1 in Mayweather's favor, but the accounting departments at the various sportsbooks wouldn't allow the exposure of those odds, since it would have been catastrophic if some bizarre fluke had caused Mayweather to lose. So the line was much more balanced than it should have been. The "squares" lost their shirts as expected, and the "sharps" who came in at the last minute as the line improved won big. Several sharp bets for a million dollars were placed on Mayweather as the sportbooks moved the line to try and cover more of their exposure in the closing days. Nothing fishy - just smart management of the line to avoid over-exposure to a fluke.

    22. Re:$100? by gravewax · · Score: 1

      No they aren't. Mayweather while completely dominating treated Conner as a risk, so he let Conner punch himself out in the early rounds and as he became less and less of a threat he dismantled him. The 10 rounds is a testament to Conner's ability to survive or perhaps Mayweather had instructions not to put him down too early, either way the fight was over 5 rounds earlier when Mayweather could see Conner had nothing left in the tank, Conner displayed a lack of discipline and endurance by punching himself out early.

    23. Re: $100? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshit. Mayweather was just taking his time. If that idiot McGregor fought a younger hard hitting boxer he would have lost in 2 rounds. Mayweather just toyed with him and was never even remotely in danger.

    24. Re: $100? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow you mean the bookies knew a hack mma dunce wouldn't waltz into the ring and beat one of if not the best boxer of all time?!!! This was a farce.

    25. Re: $100? by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      Mayweather just toyed with him and was never even remotely in danger.

      hahaha - 20 seconds in the octagon, any boxer.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    26. Re: $100? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No one is claiming he would do well in an octagon not even Mayweather, however a lot of retards and rednecks (and Conor himself) seem to think that octagon skills somehow mean they can dominate in other combat sports. Conor may be a professional in the Octagon but he is a rank amateur in the ring and the inverse would go for Mayweather.

    27. Re:$100? by gravewax · · Score: 1

      nothing strange here at all. All the large bets of the professional gamblers and the more impartial parties were on Mayweather, A lot of the smaller bets are McGregor/Irish/MMA fan base supporting McGregor who really did so regardless of how little chance he had.

    28. Re: $100? by bungo · · Score: 1

      And I've driven my Lotus Exige Cup 260 around and around in circles. Do you have any idea how expensive that is? I'm not even racing, as that is not allowed, as normally timing equipment isn't allowed. I drive at places like the F1 track at Spa. It's fun. It's not productive, and is a total waste of time. I'm at high risk or an accident or injury.

      I don't like boxing, but watching it on pay-per-view is cheaper than what I do. Don't judge other people on their choice of entertainment. It's their money. Let them enjoy it how they like.

      --
      "The best part? I became an ordained minister while not wearing pants." -- CleverNickName
    29. Re: $100? by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      Conor may be a professional in the Octagon but he is a rank amateur in the ring and the inverse would go for Mayweather.

      Well as a rank amateur in boxing he just went 10 rounds with one of boxing's best, that's a pretty professional effort. I think MacGregor has just shown that UFC fighters could hold their own in a boxing ring with a limited toolset, UFC fighters have to know how to punch even if they don't know the strategy of boxing.

      Boxers don't have a kick game, a ground game, a elbow game, a choke game, a lock game. UFC fighters have to be all rounders and it shows that the punch game for some fighters in UFC is pretty good, forgetting about all the other things that can be done with hands.

      All in all I think this is a good thing for both sports. The level of professionalism show by both fighters was very high and I have a new respect for Mayweather because he was classy and humble in victory.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    30. Re:$100? by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      I watched it for $40 in a theater. It wasn't one hour, it was four hours, and had three title fights leading up to the grand finale. If you're not into boxing, you probably wouldn't care. I mostly thought it was a scam as well, but watching it changed my mind, not that anyone's actually worth the absurd amounts these guys got.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    31. Re: $100? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well as a rank amateur in boxing he just went 10 rounds with one of boxing's best, that's a pretty professional effort. I think MacGregor has just shown that UFC fighters could hold their own in a boxing ring with a limited toolset, UFC fighters have to know how to punch even if they don't know the strategy of boxing.

      Bullshit. A conservative figher like Mayweather was bound to make McGregor and the UFC look credible, which was the goal. An agressive fighter like Tyson would have destroyed any UFC fighter in his weight class within seconds.

    32. Re: $100? by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      You clearly didn't watch. I did (for $40, not $100), and in my not so humble opinion, and as someone who's spent a few years sparring, it was not fake. Now, you can legitimately argue the value of their take home purse, but that's a different issue.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    33. Re:$100? by NotThisMind · · Score: 1

      This fight was better than Pacquiao's ?? HAHAHAHAHAH McGregor could not hit a single fucking punch, and he doesn't know how to throw one. Get the fuck out of here.

    34. Re: $100? by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      An agressive fighter like Tyson would have destroyed any UFC fighter in his weight class within seconds.

      Only in boxing and only in a boxing ring. If you put a fighter like Tyson up against a machine like Bas Rutten or Hickson Gracie anywhere else it would end up the same, with the boxer, on his back on the ground, unable to use his hands getting a face massage with an elbow or with a paniced look on his face as he gets choked out, not knowing what to do or how to do it. Sure, the take down maybe difficult to get however a semi-accomplished Muay Thai Boxer would patiently chop a boxer down, and never need to take the boxer to the ground, just with leg kicks.

      Bullshit. A conservative figher like Mayweather was bound to make McGregor and the UFC look credible, which was the goal.

      Hahahahahaha. You have to be shitposting, MacGregor landed more scoring hits on Mayweather than the last few boxers he fought.

      What you don't seem to understand is UFC is a testing ground for which fighting systems are credible and effective. Boxing was discredited as an effective fighting system with a bunch of other bullshit martial arts back in the 1990s, boxers have stepped into the UFC and they have been annihilated when that is the only skill the have.

      Whatever problems the UFC has you can pick any of your current professional boxers, at the top of their game and put them in the UFC and you will find it is the end of their career from the humiliating beat down they would receive from ONE UFC bout, before they go back to boxing. Kicks in the leg, take downs and none of the boxing fast hands make a difference. Whilst I tip my hat to the professionalism to boxing as a sport, that's what it is. The UFC showed us, long ago, that boxing isn't a credible fighting system.

      Even the weight classes are heavier in UFC, where a light heavyweight in UFC is a heavyweight in boxing and on the street boxing is useless against even a semi-credible martial artist who could snap your knee and keep any boxer at distance just by using kicks and denying the boxer any use of their primary weapons.

      Every time MacGregor got Mayweathers back, that was where the fight ended anywhere else that wasn't a boxing ring. You clearly have no idea what you are talking about or are shitposting because the scenario you spell out can only happen in boxing. Here is what happens when boxer meets a purple belt in Jui Jitsu, even when you give the boxer a few more weapons Or you can listen to what boxers have to say about stepping into UFC.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  5. Re:if you had dierctv same price for higher bit ra by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Also if you had bothered to Pirate if from the source, there was no delay whatsoever.

  6. Clearly we have angered the Gods by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I demand a return to real bloodsport, where grievances are settled on the sands of the Arena, with the blessings of the Emperor and Almighty Iupiter, as our forefathers did.

    This will surely improve our lives, strengthening us so we no longer fear death, and demonstrating to our enemies how mighty we are.

    1. Re:Clearly we have angered the Gods by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shaddap faggot. Go enlist and die if you want.

    2. Re: Clearly we have angered the Gods by manofherb · · Score: 1

      mayweather went from a busted ass house as a kid to making 300 million + in a night

    3. Re:Clearly we have angered the Gods by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      I demand a return to real bloodsport, where grievances are settled on the sands of the Arena, with the blessings of the Emperor and Almighty Iupiter, as our forefathers did.

      That's more or less what we've got right now with terrorists. Except the swords are used on the asphalt of European cities. And the chariots have been replaced with white rental mini-vans.

      Although, the massive public interest in this Mayweather-McGregor spectacle has got me wondering. Obviously, it wasn't a "Boxing Match", since, when push comes to shove (haw, haw), McGregor isn't a boxer. But a "grievance" was hyped up, and a lot of folks appeared to be willing to pay lots of money to watch the "grievance" be violently resolved.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    4. Re: Clearly we have angered the Gods by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whooooosh.

    5. Re: Clearly we have angered the Gods by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      His father and uncle were both pro fighters. Floyd came from nothing broken except maybe a broken family. He was never poor.

    6. Re: Clearly we have angered the Gods by Brockmire · · Score: 1

      Spartacus was awesome. Highly recommend.

  7. The fight I really want to see by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    is creimer against a cheeseburger.

    1. Re: The fight I really want to see by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cremier always wins that fight.

    2. Re: The fight I really want to see by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is bloody though.

  8. Re:if you had dierctv same price for higher bit ra by EzInKy · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Perhaps, but DirecTV requires you pay for a shitload of channels that you probably don't won't, so they are a no go for anybody with an ounce of brains.

    --
    Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
  9. Saw it for free on youtube by t0qer · · Score: 1

    If you can put up with the kid running OBS trying to get subscriptions tabbing out of the stream every so often to splash "SUBSCRIBE" across the screen and 15fps at 320x240 it wasn't 1/2 bad. Course he'll get shutdown by morning for copyright violation.

    1. Re: Saw it for free on youtube by manofherb · · Score: 1

      kodi was shit tonight, i just found a facebook livestream that wasn't promoting their mixtape and all was well

    2. Re: Saw it for free on youtube by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny how the 'pay' part has to really work before the 'view' part does. I think that the consumers (aka suckers) should have the ability to view first, then pay up after their consumption of what they're expected to pay for. Broken business model.

  10. glitches from sheer greed. by nimbius · · Score: 5, Informative

    Pay per view for this fight in america was over $100. seats at the arena went for more than five thousand dollars, and ringside was nearly $250,000. this fight was hyped for more than six months. content providers had metrics, they had every chance in the world to bolster their networks and increase server count. They did not, because from the get go this fight has been a test to see exactly how magnificently a handful of promoters and media moguls can fleece the average customer. You'll likely never see a refund for your 'online ticket.' as of right now, the fightpass servers are barely online with much of the page content timing out or flat out not connecting at all.

    Now, from experience, when my fightpass connection glitched out after the second round I was angry enough to put my laptop through a fucking wall. But after some diligent searching I found pirate streams that were just as good, if not better quality, than the $100 show I paid to see. These streams remained consistently reliable throughout the entire fight, and im sure the torrents of the fight are going to be consistently high quality as well.

    the industry needs to learn from this. the 'customers as an endless cash cow' model of Hollywood media is exactly what drove cable, CD music, and the theater movie experience into the fucking ground. Screw these streams up badly enough, screw over paying customers frequently enough, and the internet will quit caring about your streaming content entirely.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
    1. Re: glitches from sheer greed. by manofherb · · Score: 1

      without the ppv $$$$ we would have never seen this fight

    2. Re: glitches from sheer greed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the world would be a better place for it. Fuck copy"right". It's immoral abuse by an elite over the rest of us. It's a fraud. 7 years has been extended indefinitely for all practical purposes and nobody can own an idea or thought morally. You are using violence (government power/thugs) on peaceful people who disagree and that can NEVER be justified.

    3. Re: glitches from sheer greed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the fight was a joke, a retired old boxer completely destroying an inexperienced amateur is not a fight.

    4. Re:glitches from sheer greed. by xlsior · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Pay per view for this fight in america was over $100. seats at the arena went for more than five thousand dollars, and ringside was nearly $250,000. this fight was hyped for more than six months. content providers had metrics, they had every chance in the world to bolster their networks and increase server count.

      And for comparison: In the UK they charged GBP 19.95 (~$25), while in the Netherlands it was aired as regular programming on the Fox Sports cable channel.

      They pretty much just charged what the (local) markets would be willing to bear.

    5. Re: glitches from sheer greed. by Gussington · · Score: 2

      without the ppv $$$$ we would have never seen this fight

      Of course we would. Because people like Macgregor and Mayweather exist in amateur ranks. There's a whole world of cocky young upstarts that love frighting purely for bragging rights. We might not have seen the private jets or the the Roll Royce's, but had there been no ppv we could still see two guys punching each other's light out every day of the week.

    6. Re: glitches from sheer greed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      you could have found some dudes williing to fight for 1 /100 the price and had a great match.

      it was promotional trolling brilliance and betting companies made zillions.

    7. Re: glitches from sheer greed. by murdocj · · Score: 1

      What does watching a live stream have to do with 7 years of copyright? It was LIVE. And the grandparent is right, w/o the pay per view the fight doesn't happen.

    8. Re: glitches from sheer greed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would say BS the fight wouldn't have happened without PPV. According to the costs of the tickets to see this live, they made a killing even if this fight could have only been seen in person at the venue. Apparently something around 5k for "normal" tickets and a quarter million a pop for ring side seats?!?!?! Seriously who pays for this shit? If I want to see a fight ill just got out to the local bar district and watch drunks slug it out at 3am in the street. At least that is a real fight and probably funny to boot, not some over hyped choreographed shit show.

    9. Re: glitches from sheer greed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This 10000000x.

    10. Re: glitches from sheer greed. by Brockmire · · Score: 1

      $99.99 is less than $100, not more. Why fucking lie in your first sentence and lose any credibility? Now everything you say may be exaggerated and not worth reading.

    11. Re: glitches from sheer greed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      $99.99 is less than $100, not more.

      $99.99 + tax > $100

  11. And in case you were wondering the result by cyn1c77 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Mayweather won, but it went 10 rounds and was by the referee calling it.

    1. Re: And in case you were wondering the result by manofherb · · Score: 2

      like any boxing match when the guy is getting pummeled and can't defend themselves

    2. Re:And in case you were wondering the result by gravewax · · Score: 2

      The referee calling it? technically yes, but Conner was completely destroyed. Boxing has strict rules about when a match has to be called, when a boxer is no longer capable of defending themselves and is basically out on their feet it is over. Mayweather even though retired made Conner look like a complete joke.

    3. Re:And in case you were wondering the result by Gussington · · Score: 1

      Pretty much played out as expected. Mayweather let him go for a few rounds to figure him out, then dismantled him piece by piece as he ran out ideas and energy.
      This should be a lesson for rednecks who think outsiders would do a better job than the experts. Experts are experts because they are the best at what they do. No amount of wishful thinking changes this fact...

    4. Re:And in case you were wondering the result by blind+biker · · Score: 1

      A damn shame. For the money he's pocketed, he should have been beaten good.

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    5. Re: And in case you were wondering the result by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agree. What would happen if Floyd stepped into the octagon?

    6. Re: And in case you were wondering the result by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Answer that everyone already knows: He would tap out in the first round against almost any halfway decent MMA fighter, because they'd go for his legs. Good luck punching someone when they've got you on the ground in a headlock, and you're about to pass out in 3...2...

    7. Re:And in case you were wondering the result by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Result:

      A 40 year old smaller man with arthritic hands and much shorter arms beat the world's cockiest 29 year old UFC money fighter. 29 year old managed to gas out starting about round 5 of a 12 round fight. 29 year old bigger man left with black eye, swollen ear, swollen and stuffed up nose after being pummeled by 40 year old small man. 40 year old small man left looking better than he did at weigh ins.

      The only thing really good to come of this? MMA fighters will end up under an extension of the Ali Act, and so mobsters like the UFC will be making the thin spread while the fighters get the big stakes of the purse, like boxing.

    8. Re: And in case you were wondering the result by tommeke100 · · Score: 2

      right, and McGregor had a really hard time trying not to hold back the head bashing every time they got clinched. I'm pretty sure the ref could have disqualified him after the n-th time he did that.

    9. Re:And in case you were wondering the result by jon3k · · Score: 1

      Going 10 rounds with one of the greatest boxers in history, and winning rounds, makes you a "complete joke" ?

    10. Re:And in case you were wondering the result by tommeke100 · · Score: 2

      If anything, we learned that McGregor can take a few punches in a boxing match. This is a welterweight class fight and McGregor is still a good fighter so he was likely not going to go down in 2 rounds. He tried using his range at first and Mayweather let him, waiting for him to get tired so he could get closer safely and start the actual boxing. McGregor was pretty much worthless at close range but since he could take the beating pretty well he managed to hang on for a few more rounds until he was just a wobbling punching bag (which he already was in the previous round and the ref could have called it quits there). So good call by the ref. The only thing McGregor could get in that fight was more brain damage.

    11. Re: And in case you were wondering the result by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The ref should have disqualified Floyd for not keeping his head up and continuously turning his back to McGregor.

    12. Re: And in case you were wondering the result by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      It almost looked like he was just trying to game the rules and encourage MacGreggor to disqualify himself.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    13. Re:And in case you were wondering the result by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      He played into Mayweather's hands and ended up looking like he was in over his head with inferior skill and inferior endurance.

      Mayweather is significantly older and and has been in retirement for 2 years. Yet, he was able to let Conor wind himself throwing weak punches and the finish the guy off according to the script he distributed before the fight.

      When a cat finishes off a mouse after toying with it, nobody is impressed that the mouse held off a superior opponent for an hour.

    14. Re:And in case you were wondering the result by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At no stage was he any competition, He did EXACTLY as Mayweather wanted, Mayweather let him punch himself out in the first 3-5 rounds and then took him apart. It was a textbook lesson in how to defeat an amateur. Hats off to McGregor for surviving so long, but it was over by the 5th and McGregor really was not any sort of serious threat before that, beyond the risk of landing a lucky KO (which is a risk for any fighter).

    15. Re:And in case you were wondering the result by gravewax · · Score: 1

      The fight was very one sided. Conner may have lasted 10 rounds but he did basically let Mayweather dictate the entire fight and it went exactly as Mayweather predicted. Conner did no real damage in the first few rounds and was exhausted because he threw way to many punches that didn't land or did no lasting damage, allowing Mayweather to pick him apart. It was an demonstration of how a professional boxer does it, no risks, careful execution of plan and total control. I would say he really only lasted 5 rounds, though even that is really quite impressive against a professional.

    16. Re: And in case you were wondering the result by Brockmire · · Score: 1

      To be fair, the corner stool with a towel on it could have won those first three rounds. They were giveaways, not earned.

    17. Re: And in case you were wondering the result by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      since when has keeping your head up been a rule in boxing? the only rule I am aware of their is you must keep your head above the waistline of your opponent.

    18. Re:And in case you were wondering the result by jon3k · · Score: 1

      Conor won more than one round, as many as 3-4 by some estimates. Conor was also never in danger until the 10th round when he got tired. Everyone knew going in that conditioning would be the big question and Mayweather did exactly what he needed to. This is a FAR cry from making him look like a joke. Mayweather could didn't land anything significant until probably the 7th round.

    19. Re: And in case you were wondering the result by jon3k · · Score: 1

      Mayweather was just executing his game plan which was not to expend any energy and he did it perfectly. Conor performed surprisingly well. Certainly a far cry from looking like "a joke". That's absurd. He went 10 rounds with Floyd Mayweather. Suggesting otherwise is ludicrous.

    20. Re:And in case you were wondering the result by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Conor won more than one round, as many as 3-4 by some estimates. Conor was also never in danger until the 10th round when he got tired. Everyone knew going in that conditioning would be the big question and Mayweather did exactly what he needed to. This is a FAR cry from making him look like a joke. Mayweather could didn't land anything significant until probably the 7th round.

      Mayweather did exactly what he said he would do before the fight. Conor had zero impact on Mayweather's strategy and couldn't overcome his own predicted weakenesses. That is what makes him look like a joke.

      Imagine a cocky baseball player sending a press release before a game saying "At my first at-bat, I am going to let the pitcher throw two strikes right over the center of the plate without swinging, and then I am going to hit the third pitch for a home run." And then he does exactly that. You don't congratulate the pitcher for sneaking two strikes in and getting to within one pitch of an out.

      The problem with McGregor apologists is that they seem to have no understanding of boxing and believe that every fighter goes in looking for a knock-out in the first round. This isn't how Mayweather fights. He was always going to be conservative and let McGregor punch himself out, then pick him apart in the later rounds.

    21. Re: And in case you were wondering the result by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      since when has keeping your head up been a rule in boxing?

      Since Mayweather won handily under all the real rules.

    22. Re:And in case you were wondering the result by gravewax · · Score: 1

      you need to learn something about boxing. Conor was in serious trouble by the 5th round as he had expended huge amounts of energy for no return. By the end of the 5th round this fight was over bar the shouting.

    23. Re: And in case you were wondering the result by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He didn't go 10 rounds. he went a couple of rounds, remembering Mayweather had no intention of doing much for the first 4-5 rounds, boxing is rarely a one round event and Conor showed serious inexperience with his strategy and lack of endurance. Conor may have won some of those early rounds on points but he lost EVERY round because of poor strategy, to get a couple of point round victories early in the match he threw away any hope of winning. After the 5th round Mayweather could see Conor had nothing left so he just slowly ramped up the pressure, the fight could also have easily been called the prior round.

    24. Re:And in case you were wondering the result by jon3k · · Score: 1

      The reality is he went 10 rounds with one of the greatest living boxers. No legitimate voice in the professional boxing community is calling him a joke. In fact, it's just the opposite. Every real boxing fan is surprised by how well McGregor was able to do against a real boxer like Mayweather.

    25. Re:And in case you were wondering the result by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sorry but that is complete bullshit. The majority of the boxing world is surprised he lasted as long as he did, but they do NOT think he boxed well, he was completely dominated strategy wise from start to finish letting Mayweather have everything exactly as he wanted, to make it worse he did not have the endurance to even stay toe to toe beyond the 5th. This was one of Mayweathers easiest fights.

    26. Re:And in case you were wondering the result by gravewax · · Score: 1

      picking a generic sports reporter as your proof of what the boxing world thought really??? Here is what the boxing world really thought, an excellent article basically a good effort but he was completely outclassed in every department.

      http://www.boxing.com/mayweath...
      "In any case, “Notorious” was gassed, red-faced and full of exhaustion long before the end came in round ten. His jab was null and void. He was visibly breathing through his mouth. The maximum one can fight in a UFC contest is twenty-five minutes and to many, Conor was giving his lungs a supreme workout long before the eighth round. Floyd didn’t exactly pull a “rope-a-dope” strategy and let his opponent tire out from throwing too many punches. Did anyone get a look at the contrast between faces after the bout was brought to a close?"

    27. Re:And in case you were wondering the result by jon3k · · Score: 1

      before the end came in round TEN .

      Many had the bout much closer than a near shutout, especially in the earlier rounds.

      https://www.si.com/boxing/2017...

      For the first few rounds, Conor McGregor, the UFC fighter, looked like a boxer. A competent boxer. Dare we say, even a good boxer. He looked like he might even do what he had been telling us heâ(TM)d do for the last three months: beat Mayweather at his own sport, outbox one of the best boxers of all time. In the first round Mayweather threw five total punches. McGregor charged forward, looking like he wanted to make good on his promise that heâ(TM)d drop Mayweather in the first round. He put his arms behind his back, taunting Mayweather. He threw jabs and landed them. He countered a Mayweather attack with an uppercut, something that very few professional boxers have ever done. The vastly pro-McGregor crowd broke out in an olé chant, thinking their hero was going to do the impossible, again, just like he told them he would.

      https://www.nytimes.com/2017/0... https://www.nytimes.com/2017/0... https://www.forbes.com/sites/b...

      None of the shots McGregor landed seemed to hurt Mayweather, but the success the Irishman experienced was more than many boxing pundits thought he could enjoy. Mayweather stayed composed throughout the fight and gradually turned up the heat beginning in the fourth round Until you can find a professional analyst who claims McGregor "looked like a joke" we'll just have to agree to disagree.

    28. Re:And in case you were wondering the result by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As per the OP, you are just linking generic sports reporters, most know about as much about boxing as you seem too. what is so hard to understand here. Conor did great to stand up for as long as he did, especially as he was really defeated 5 rounds earlier. he boxed ok for an amateur in the first 4 rounds but had no impact especially as it could be argued he was only able to do anything in the first 4 rounds as Mayweather had no intention of doing anything himself. Really 100's of other boxers could have done as well if not better, I suspect their are quite a few in the MMA ranks that could do better too. Important to remember as well this was not a boxer in his prime, he was out of retirement to fight and could not even spar in the weeks leading up to the match because of the damage his hands have taken through his career.

    29. Re:And in case you were wondering the result by gravewax · · Score: 1

      Until you can find a professional analyst who claims McGregor "looked like a joke" we'll just have to agree to disagree

      challenge accepted
      https://www.boxinginsider.com/columns/mayweather-vs-mcgregor-party-finally/
      "McGregor was terrible, and although we knew he couldn’t box, I was amazed at how bad he really was."

  12. Happened to me once by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I was overseas and wanted to watch the Superbowl. Hurray for drinking beer at 7:30am Monday morning! Tried and tried to use the legitimate NFL.com streaming to watch the game. It just would not work. I clicked submit and then it either timed out or went to a website error.

    I went to myp2p.eu and got the stream from there. Steady, reliable, and it even got the commercials which the NFL.com stream would have lacked. Superbowl is the one time a year I actually want to watch the commercials. Once again, the pirates provided a better service than the corporations.

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    1. Re: Happened to me once by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cool story bro

    2. Re:Happened to me once by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The URL is not "2p", it is "2".

      Specifically:
      http://myp2.eu
      http://xn--myp2-esa.eu

    3. Re:Happened to me once by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's an international character "", which slashdot isn't showing. Any ways, google for myp2p.eu, and you'll find it.
       

    4. Re:Happened to me once by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      --Seriously, this is 2017 and streaming to huge crowds isn't a Solved Problem yet? Aren't they supposed to be able to add more cloud servers dynamically for anticipated loads, or something?? Good God youse guys, get your sh*t together... $100 is Serious Money for a lot of people, especially to see a single event--!

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
    5. Re: Happened to me once by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having significantly more demand to throw money at you is a problem we'd all love to have.

  13. I hate that! by dohzer · · Score: 1

    I really hate it when my fight didnâ(TM)t get streamed on time.

  14. Azteca aired it for free. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No need to pirate or have some provider. You people are morons. All of you.

    1. Re:Azteca aired it for free. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Azteca aired it region locked for free after the fight ended...so that didn't help people not in Mexico that wanted to watch it live.

  15. Re:One Hundred Dollars? by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 0

    Complaining about Shows You Don't Watch

    "Because guess what? You might not know everything about a genre you refuse to listen to."

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  16. Re: Mayweather had to present his ass... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've found that as long as you present ass, white people will allow you to get away with anything.

  17. Re: Mayweather had to present his ass... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    White people always require us to present our asses.

  18. Re:Mayweather had to present his ass... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    white people be trippin

  19. Rule #1: Always Bet On The Black Guy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Rule #2: ?

    Rule #3: Profit!

  20. Re: Mayweather had to present his ass... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Trump owns Vegas and required that ass presental.

  21. Re:Mayweather had to present his ass... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Vegas is racist, and they required him to submit his ass like that before they dishonestly ended the fight and gave it to him. McGregor was beating him, but a couple of good punches was all of the excuse the racists needed to give the fight to the negroid that submitted to them. Obviously that negroid lost\ and lost hard.

  22. Re: Mayweather had to present his ass... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bit that negroid seemed to enjoy it. I guess I would to given how much he was paid.

  23. Re:Mayweather had to present his ass... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good point. McGregor was just owning that black guy, but the first time that black guy got a couple of good hits, Vegas ordered the fight stopped. The bias is obvious. McGregor didn't even go down but was declared the loser to protect profits.

  24. Re: Mayweather had to present his ass... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That Irishman never even went down, but Vegas betters decided he lost.

  25. Re: Mayweather had to present his ass... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Except on this case when they gave the fight to the loser. McGregor was beating the hell out of that other guy.

  26. Re:Mayweather had to present his ass... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The ref ended the fight before it was over in order to protect Los Vegas profits. Mayweather lost this one, but the refs stopped it before it was too obvious.

  27. Re: Mayweather had to present his ass... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mayweather obviously lost but the ref stopped it before he went down.

  28. Re: Mayweather had to present his ass... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He lost but the ref gave it to him.

  29. Re: Mayweather had to present his ass... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think he did that more times than that so those whites will be very happy that they gave the fight to him.

  30. Re:Mayweather had to present his ass... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Giving away the win to the black guy was good. I just wish they didn't decide to make it so obvious. He didn't even knock down the white guy.

  31. Re: Mayweather had to present his ass... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Notice how after he presented his ass enough times that he was given the win.

  32. Re: Mayweather had to present his ass... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He had to in order to be given the win.

  33. We ended up pirating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A bunch of us tried to legitimately pay, UFC app, PSN, Sky, the works, we tried every avenue possible for several hours to give our money to someone and no platform would let us, so we ended up having to pirate the stream.

    The kicker was the stream froze during the last round and we missed the knockout, when we came back we had a frozen screen and had to check reddit to see who had won!

    All in all, pretty shitty.

    1. Re: We ended up pirating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yours is one of the most on-topic comments :). The story is about technical glitches, yet most people are talking about the fight itself. So where did it go wrong? Who did the streaming? Was it Neulion as I've read some places, or a bunch of companies? Were all services broken, or just in some countries like the US?

  34. Will someone please explain to me by Alain+Williams · · Score: 1, Troll

    what the attraction is of watching one man hit another ? People wail when terrorists drive lorries into crowds but then cheer when someone smashes his fist into another man's face. I don't understand ?

    1. Re:Will someone please explain to me by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 1

      It's a primate thing. Not much we can do about it.

      The real mystery to me is why we don't care.

      There's some consolation to me that they're "sportsmen". If Mayweather crippled McGregor, people would be sad about it. No parallel with random hate and violence.

    2. Re:Will someone please explain to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The ability to test one's strength and endurance. Do I have the capability to take or avoid a hit and return the favor? There's a hell of a lot of work that a person has to put in to be able to defend themselves and fight back and that's what it's all about. The mutual agreement of saying, "Let's fight out who the stronger and more skillful person is."

      Stop looking at it so simply, you high-and-mighty jackass.

    3. Re:Will someone please explain to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It can't be explained any more than the attraction of watching some talent-less mannequin prancing around on a stage while lip-synching to loud noise.

    4. Re:Will someone please explain to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Consider a government is nothing more than a "big man" that can beat up some other big man (government). This is the only thing that keeps you safe and with your lifestyle.

      Physical dominance and safety is above any law and in fact the only thing that truly matters in life (including procreation). Without it you might be dead or not even exist in the first place.

    5. Re:Will someone please explain to me by Solandri · · Score: 1

      I don't watch boxing, but I can understand its attraction. It's the same reason sports are popular (and in particular why judged sports like figure skating are often criticized). Theories, talk, arguments about which team or boxer is better don't count for anything. You're conclusively resolving the debate with a pure head-to-head confrontation. Any theory about whose strategy will be more successful is immediately and with finality validated, or is shot down.

      It differs from terrorism and criminal violence in that the participants are willing. Same difference between sex and rape, between trade and theft.

    6. Re:Will someone please explain to me by Yosho · · Score: 1

      what the attraction is of watching one man hit another ?

      Do you enjoy watching any competitive sports? Why is that?

      People wail when terrorists drive lorries into crowds but then cheer when someone smashes his fist into another man's face.

      One of those things is consensual, the other is not.

      --
      Karma: Terrifying (mostly affected by atrocities you've committed)
    7. Re:Will someone please explain to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's even worse these days now with EDM DJs being all the rage you can pay to watch someone stand there, hit play on their serato dj playlist, while they twist and fiddle with knobs, buttons and sliders on their mixer which probably isn't even plugged in. LOL

    8. Re:Will someone please explain to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought things couldn't get any worse than boy bands and pop stars like Britney spears. Now anyone and their mother can become a EDM DJ. slap together a playlist, create yourself some crazy logo, don't forget the "sacred geometry"' and spam yourself on social media.

    9. Re:Will someone please explain to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a primate thing. Not much we can do about it.

      The real mystery to me is why we don't care.

      There's some consolation to me that they're "sportsmen". If Mayweather crippled McGregor, people would be sad about it. No parallel with random hate and violence.

      I have no interest in it. I don't really care if it's barbaric or not, I just don't watch sports really.
      If one of them was crippled, I also wouldn't care. I don't even know these people.

  35. Re:if you had dierctv same price for higher bit ra by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Netflix gives me a whole bunch of crap I don't want too...so I guess it's an even match!

  36. Middleout by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If only they'd used middle out compression...

  37. Re: Mayweather had to present his ass... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This. Never going down is a great but doesn't matter if the ref was told to give it to the other guy.

  38. It's money and greed everywhere you look by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I couldn't care less about this over-hyped fight. As far as I can tell, the two fighters don't even play the same sport. Then somehow it was agreed that one of the guys would cross over and take on the other guy, at that other guy's game. The whole thing doesn't even make any sense - unless and until you add money to the equation, of course.

    1. Re: It's money and greed everywhere you look by Brockmire · · Score: 1

      It's the start of a new sports Entertainment industry. The next one will be Michael Jordan against Wayne Gretzky in a tennis match.

  39. Re: Mayweather had to present his ass... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This. The ref was crooked and gave the fight away.

  40. Sports stream glitch when the excitement climaxes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Slightly off topic, I didn't watch this stream in particular. Why do sports streams always start glitching and lagging just as the action culminates? Like, just before there's a goal in football (soccer), and even when the time is running out in chess! Surely, not a lot of people are tuning in just then. If it's a variable bitrate stream, requiring more bandwidth for the fast action, that still doesn't explain it -- surely their streaming platform should be able to manage the overall bandwidth. Is it just a cognitive bias that it seems that way, or can anyone explain this for me?

  41. panem et circenses by thesupraman · · Score: 1

    Ah, I had also managed to completely ignore it.

    Let me check..
    Mayweather wins.. I guess that means something to someone (and if you didnt want to know, I dont give a shit)

    And my wallet is not $100 lighter, which is the best outcome.

    Yes, got to keep the rabble entertained somehow, apparently.

    1. Re:panem et circenses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Let me check.. Mayweather wins.. I guess that means something to someone (and if you didnt want to know, I dont give a shit)

      Thanks for that super aggressive parenthetical comment. I guess you're trying to demonstrate that you're some kind of badass even though you didn't watch the fight like most of the other alphas did?

      And my wallet is not $100 lighter, which is the best outcome.

      That's fantastic, especially since your wallet likely didn't have $100 in it to start with. Leave the expensive entertainment to the guys who have the cash to afford it. Also, nobody, but nobody, drops $100 to watch this. You have a watch party and invite over 5-10 buddies.

      Yes, got to keep the rabble entertained somehow, apparently.

      Yes, people need entertainment to be happy. Apparently your entertainment is looking down your nose at what other people choose. Sad!

    2. Re:panem et circenses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      People who feel enjoyment from watching other people get injured deserve to be looked down on.
      Fucking deal with it.

    3. Re:panem et circenses by murdocj · · Score: 1

      Well, at least you can feel superior, that's something. Same way I feel when guys on slashdot start ranting about which which GUI they use.

    4. Re:panem et circenses by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Boxing isn't about hurting people as much as trying to wear them down. Pain is a factor in taking the endurance out of someone. Their is strategy and skill behind it. Unlike a death match where anything can happen. That is why they are rules and a referee to stop the fight before someone gets too hurt.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    5. Re: panem et circenses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GUI? You poser.

    6. Re:panem et circenses by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      If you don't enjoy MMA or Boxing, why the fuck are you even commenting. My double-MBA wife (the rabble) bought $40 tickets for our date night, We watched on the big screen from huge recliners, and in of my low expectations or Connor, he put up a decent fight for the first few rounds until he got gassed, which was part of Mayweather's plan.

      Connor's longer reach, and his ability with the jab, and counterpunching won him the first few rounds, but he wasn't able to hurt Floyd with the few good punches he got in. Floyd didn't really do much of anything until round 4, and from then on, he was just picking Connor apart. For those who commented on Connor's stamina, if you've never stepped into a ring, you should just STFU. I sparred in TKD for several years (training about 15 hrs/week), and for even folks who are in good condition, going three rounds would wipe you out.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
  42. Fuck You. Fuck Your Latin by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 1

    It is fascinating how this story has triggered all the classist buffoons and brought them out on parade.

  43. Re:if you had dierctv same price for higher bit ra by jedidiah · · Score: 1

    Except it's $8 versus $100.

    Plus DirectTV craps out in bad weather.

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  44. Well they paid for it in the end by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The cost of delaying the event is pissing off advertisers and it's also pissing off people who scheduled time for it, with fees for the delay and and cancellations from customers

  45. The greater attraction is doing the hitting. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is nothing better than the feeling of inflicting insult, pain and injury on another with one's own body. No need for a rock, stick, sword, gun, explosive. Just mastery of the human body. I was most at peace when breaking the jaw of someone who mouthed off to me, or watching a mugger writhe in pain after administering well placed blows to the kidney area.

    1. Re: The greater attraction is doing the hitting. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      White American cop?

  46. Re:Sports stream glitch when the excitement climax by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it just a cognitive bias

    Yup.
    Try to think about the times the stream glitches when you don't give a shit about what's going on.
    You can't really, and that's because of the bias.
    I just makes you mad when the quality drops or the stream freezes when you're actually paying attention.

  47. Multicast to the home? by grumling · · Score: 1

    At what point will ISPs open up multicasting to the home? I'm sure the organizers used MC to get to distribution servers but everything from there to the end users is still unicast. I was working during the fight and our multicast to the edge modulator in the headend did just fine. I'm sure they'll point out that events like the Super Bowl will tax their edge routers but what about an event like this? I'm sure it was popular, but still a small fraction of users.

    --
    "Well, good luck finding a judge that doesn't run a bestiality site."
  48. Wahy was it hyped? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everybody knows McGregor cant box. It would have been interesting if it had been MMA.

  49. Hundred bucks? by p51d007 · · Score: 0

    What a joke...oh well, suckers born every day I guess. SPORTS...waste of time & money, but, at least it ain't my money.