Slashdot Mirror


Streaming Glitches Delay Massively Hyped Mayweather-McGregor Boxing Match (cnet.com)

"After initial indications the main event would commence at 11:15 p.m ET, it didn't get started until nearly one hour later," reports Variety. An anonymous reader quotes CNET: Saturday's much hyped fight between Floyd Mayweather Jr. and UFC champion Conor McGregor drew fans from all walks of life, even those who'd never typically watch a standard boxing match. But when some of those fans settled in to watch the spectacle, beverage and snacks in hand, they found themselves in a world of hurt. Watching the fight wasn't cheap (nearly $100 on pay-per-view), so naturally, those who had technical issues as fight time neared -- on whatever platform -- were fighting mad. At 6:28 p.m. PT, as the undercard matches preceding the event aired, the UFC admitted on Twitter it was having technical issues with its Fight Pass streaming service due to the overwhelming interest in the bout.
ESPN confirms that the much-hyped event was "delayed due to pay-per-view outages."

84 of 186 comments (clear)

  1. if you had dierctv same price for higher bit rate by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    if you had dierctv same price for higher bit rate and it can serve all customers at the same time.

  2. glitch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Who fucking cares.

    I wanna see two buffoons beat the shit out of each other all I have to do is look outside.

    And it's free.

    1. Re:glitch by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 4, Funny

      [If] I wanna see two buffoons beat the shit out of each other all I have to do is look outside.

      I can top that. I just look in a mirror.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    2. Re:glitch by Trogre · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah, I never did see the appeal in standing with a bunch of slack-jawed yokels watching to see who could inflict the most serious concussion on their opponent.

      Barbaric is what it is.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    3. Re: glitch by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      If enough people are willing to watch it then they will be a $100 pay per view for it.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    4. Re: glitch by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      He was the only one fighting for 8 out of those rounds.

      If by "fighting" do you mean "not doing shit other than getting himself tired" ... you are right.

      This is why Mayweather is the best boxer in history. Most of the time he is avoiding while his not-so-great opponent is being avoided.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    5. Re: glitch by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      So not doing squat for longer than most matches last is supposed to make him something great?

      That's messed up and why this match was put on in the first place.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    6. Re: glitch by apparently · · Score: 1

      It's called rope-a-dope, you fucking dope.

    7. Re:glitch by McWilde · · Score: 1

      He's Tyler Durden.

      --
      Maybe
  3. Clearly we have angered the Gods by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I demand a return to real bloodsport, where grievances are settled on the sands of the Arena, with the blessings of the Emperor and Almighty Iupiter, as our forefathers did.

    This will surely improve our lives, strengthening us so we no longer fear death, and demonstrating to our enemies how mighty we are.

    1. Re: Clearly we have angered the Gods by manofherb · · Score: 1

      mayweather went from a busted ass house as a kid to making 300 million + in a night

    2. Re:Clearly we have angered the Gods by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      I demand a return to real bloodsport, where grievances are settled on the sands of the Arena, with the blessings of the Emperor and Almighty Iupiter, as our forefathers did.

      That's more or less what we've got right now with terrorists. Except the swords are used on the asphalt of European cities. And the chariots have been replaced with white rental mini-vans.

      Although, the massive public interest in this Mayweather-McGregor spectacle has got me wondering. Obviously, it wasn't a "Boxing Match", since, when push comes to shove (haw, haw), McGregor isn't a boxer. But a "grievance" was hyped up, and a lot of folks appeared to be willing to pay lots of money to watch the "grievance" be violently resolved.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    3. Re: Clearly we have angered the Gods by Brockmire · · Score: 1

      Spartacus was awesome. Highly recommend.

  4. The fight I really want to see by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    is creimer against a cheeseburger.

  5. Re:$100? by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How the hell is that computer board worth 10 months of Netflix?

    How the hell is that spinny disk worth 10 months of Netflix?

    How the hell is that 3D printer worth 30 months of Netflix?

    People have different hobbies and interests. Do you have someone looking over your shoulder watching your spending habits?

  6. Saw it for free on youtube by t0qer · · Score: 1

    If you can put up with the kid running OBS trying to get subscriptions tabbing out of the stream every so often to splash "SUBSCRIBE" across the screen and 15fps at 320x240 it wasn't 1/2 bad. Course he'll get shutdown by morning for copyright violation.

    1. Re: Saw it for free on youtube by manofherb · · Score: 1

      kodi was shit tonight, i just found a facebook livestream that wasn't promoting their mixtape and all was well

  7. Re:$100? by dknj · · Score: 4, Informative

    did you watch the fight? it wasn't fake, it was blast from the past mayweather and mcgregor actually put up a good fight. this is what the pacquiao v mayweather fight should have looked like. fuck you "it's fake anyway". this ain't wrestling, son.

  8. glitches from sheer greed. by nimbius · · Score: 5, Informative

    Pay per view for this fight in america was over $100. seats at the arena went for more than five thousand dollars, and ringside was nearly $250,000. this fight was hyped for more than six months. content providers had metrics, they had every chance in the world to bolster their networks and increase server count. They did not, because from the get go this fight has been a test to see exactly how magnificently a handful of promoters and media moguls can fleece the average customer. You'll likely never see a refund for your 'online ticket.' as of right now, the fightpass servers are barely online with much of the page content timing out or flat out not connecting at all.

    Now, from experience, when my fightpass connection glitched out after the second round I was angry enough to put my laptop through a fucking wall. But after some diligent searching I found pirate streams that were just as good, if not better quality, than the $100 show I paid to see. These streams remained consistently reliable throughout the entire fight, and im sure the torrents of the fight are going to be consistently high quality as well.

    the industry needs to learn from this. the 'customers as an endless cash cow' model of Hollywood media is exactly what drove cable, CD music, and the theater movie experience into the fucking ground. Screw these streams up badly enough, screw over paying customers frequently enough, and the internet will quit caring about your streaming content entirely.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
    1. Re: glitches from sheer greed. by manofherb · · Score: 1

      without the ppv $$$$ we would have never seen this fight

    2. Re:glitches from sheer greed. by xlsior · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Pay per view for this fight in america was over $100. seats at the arena went for more than five thousand dollars, and ringside was nearly $250,000. this fight was hyped for more than six months. content providers had metrics, they had every chance in the world to bolster their networks and increase server count.

      And for comparison: In the UK they charged GBP 19.95 (~$25), while in the Netherlands it was aired as regular programming on the Fox Sports cable channel.

      They pretty much just charged what the (local) markets would be willing to bear.

    3. Re: glitches from sheer greed. by Gussington · · Score: 2

      without the ppv $$$$ we would have never seen this fight

      Of course we would. Because people like Macgregor and Mayweather exist in amateur ranks. There's a whole world of cocky young upstarts that love frighting purely for bragging rights. We might not have seen the private jets or the the Roll Royce's, but had there been no ppv we could still see two guys punching each other's light out every day of the week.

    4. Re: glitches from sheer greed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      you could have found some dudes williing to fight for 1 /100 the price and had a great match.

      it was promotional trolling brilliance and betting companies made zillions.

    5. Re: glitches from sheer greed. by murdocj · · Score: 1

      What does watching a live stream have to do with 7 years of copyright? It was LIVE. And the grandparent is right, w/o the pay per view the fight doesn't happen.

    6. Re: glitches from sheer greed. by Brockmire · · Score: 1

      $99.99 is less than $100, not more. Why fucking lie in your first sentence and lose any credibility? Now everything you say may be exaggerated and not worth reading.

    7. Re: glitches from sheer greed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      $99.99 is less than $100, not more.

      $99.99 + tax > $100

  9. And in case you were wondering the result by cyn1c77 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Mayweather won, but it went 10 rounds and was by the referee calling it.

    1. Re: And in case you were wondering the result by manofherb · · Score: 2

      like any boxing match when the guy is getting pummeled and can't defend themselves

    2. Re:And in case you were wondering the result by gravewax · · Score: 2

      The referee calling it? technically yes, but Conner was completely destroyed. Boxing has strict rules about when a match has to be called, when a boxer is no longer capable of defending themselves and is basically out on their feet it is over. Mayweather even though retired made Conner look like a complete joke.

    3. Re:And in case you were wondering the result by Gussington · · Score: 1

      Pretty much played out as expected. Mayweather let him go for a few rounds to figure him out, then dismantled him piece by piece as he ran out ideas and energy.
      This should be a lesson for rednecks who think outsiders would do a better job than the experts. Experts are experts because they are the best at what they do. No amount of wishful thinking changes this fact...

    4. Re:And in case you were wondering the result by blind+biker · · Score: 1

      A damn shame. For the money he's pocketed, he should have been beaten good.

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    5. Re:And in case you were wondering the result by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Result:

      A 40 year old smaller man with arthritic hands and much shorter arms beat the world's cockiest 29 year old UFC money fighter. 29 year old managed to gas out starting about round 5 of a 12 round fight. 29 year old bigger man left with black eye, swollen ear, swollen and stuffed up nose after being pummeled by 40 year old small man. 40 year old small man left looking better than he did at weigh ins.

      The only thing really good to come of this? MMA fighters will end up under an extension of the Ali Act, and so mobsters like the UFC will be making the thin spread while the fighters get the big stakes of the purse, like boxing.

    6. Re: And in case you were wondering the result by tommeke100 · · Score: 2

      right, and McGregor had a really hard time trying not to hold back the head bashing every time they got clinched. I'm pretty sure the ref could have disqualified him after the n-th time he did that.

    7. Re:And in case you were wondering the result by jon3k · · Score: 1

      Going 10 rounds with one of the greatest boxers in history, and winning rounds, makes you a "complete joke" ?

    8. Re:And in case you were wondering the result by tommeke100 · · Score: 2

      If anything, we learned that McGregor can take a few punches in a boxing match. This is a welterweight class fight and McGregor is still a good fighter so he was likely not going to go down in 2 rounds. He tried using his range at first and Mayweather let him, waiting for him to get tired so he could get closer safely and start the actual boxing. McGregor was pretty much worthless at close range but since he could take the beating pretty well he managed to hang on for a few more rounds until he was just a wobbling punching bag (which he already was in the previous round and the ref could have called it quits there). So good call by the ref. The only thing McGregor could get in that fight was more brain damage.

    9. Re: And in case you were wondering the result by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      It almost looked like he was just trying to game the rules and encourage MacGreggor to disqualify himself.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    10. Re:And in case you were wondering the result by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      He played into Mayweather's hands and ended up looking like he was in over his head with inferior skill and inferior endurance.

      Mayweather is significantly older and and has been in retirement for 2 years. Yet, he was able to let Conor wind himself throwing weak punches and the finish the guy off according to the script he distributed before the fight.

      When a cat finishes off a mouse after toying with it, nobody is impressed that the mouse held off a superior opponent for an hour.

    11. Re:And in case you were wondering the result by gravewax · · Score: 1

      The fight was very one sided. Conner may have lasted 10 rounds but he did basically let Mayweather dictate the entire fight and it went exactly as Mayweather predicted. Conner did no real damage in the first few rounds and was exhausted because he threw way to many punches that didn't land or did no lasting damage, allowing Mayweather to pick him apart. It was an demonstration of how a professional boxer does it, no risks, careful execution of plan and total control. I would say he really only lasted 5 rounds, though even that is really quite impressive against a professional.

    12. Re: And in case you were wondering the result by Brockmire · · Score: 1

      To be fair, the corner stool with a towel on it could have won those first three rounds. They were giveaways, not earned.

    13. Re:And in case you were wondering the result by jon3k · · Score: 1

      Conor won more than one round, as many as 3-4 by some estimates. Conor was also never in danger until the 10th round when he got tired. Everyone knew going in that conditioning would be the big question and Mayweather did exactly what he needed to. This is a FAR cry from making him look like a joke. Mayweather could didn't land anything significant until probably the 7th round.

    14. Re: And in case you were wondering the result by jon3k · · Score: 1

      Mayweather was just executing his game plan which was not to expend any energy and he did it perfectly. Conor performed surprisingly well. Certainly a far cry from looking like "a joke". That's absurd. He went 10 rounds with Floyd Mayweather. Suggesting otherwise is ludicrous.

    15. Re:And in case you were wondering the result by gravewax · · Score: 1

      you need to learn something about boxing. Conor was in serious trouble by the 5th round as he had expended huge amounts of energy for no return. By the end of the 5th round this fight was over bar the shouting.

    16. Re:And in case you were wondering the result by jon3k · · Score: 1

      The reality is he went 10 rounds with one of the greatest living boxers. No legitimate voice in the professional boxing community is calling him a joke. In fact, it's just the opposite. Every real boxing fan is surprised by how well McGregor was able to do against a real boxer like Mayweather.

    17. Re:And in case you were wondering the result by gravewax · · Score: 1

      picking a generic sports reporter as your proof of what the boxing world thought really??? Here is what the boxing world really thought, an excellent article basically a good effort but he was completely outclassed in every department.

      http://www.boxing.com/mayweath...
      "In any case, “Notorious” was gassed, red-faced and full of exhaustion long before the end came in round ten. His jab was null and void. He was visibly breathing through his mouth. The maximum one can fight in a UFC contest is twenty-five minutes and to many, Conor was giving his lungs a supreme workout long before the eighth round. Floyd didn’t exactly pull a “rope-a-dope” strategy and let his opponent tire out from throwing too many punches. Did anyone get a look at the contrast between faces after the bout was brought to a close?"

    18. Re:And in case you were wondering the result by jon3k · · Score: 1

      before the end came in round TEN .

      Many had the bout much closer than a near shutout, especially in the earlier rounds.

      https://www.si.com/boxing/2017...

      For the first few rounds, Conor McGregor, the UFC fighter, looked like a boxer. A competent boxer. Dare we say, even a good boxer. He looked like he might even do what he had been telling us heâ(TM)d do for the last three months: beat Mayweather at his own sport, outbox one of the best boxers of all time. In the first round Mayweather threw five total punches. McGregor charged forward, looking like he wanted to make good on his promise that heâ(TM)d drop Mayweather in the first round. He put his arms behind his back, taunting Mayweather. He threw jabs and landed them. He countered a Mayweather attack with an uppercut, something that very few professional boxers have ever done. The vastly pro-McGregor crowd broke out in an olé chant, thinking their hero was going to do the impossible, again, just like he told them he would.

      https://www.nytimes.com/2017/0... https://www.nytimes.com/2017/0... https://www.forbes.com/sites/b...

      None of the shots McGregor landed seemed to hurt Mayweather, but the success the Irishman experienced was more than many boxing pundits thought he could enjoy. Mayweather stayed composed throughout the fight and gradually turned up the heat beginning in the fourth round Until you can find a professional analyst who claims McGregor "looked like a joke" we'll just have to agree to disagree.

    19. Re:And in case you were wondering the result by gravewax · · Score: 1

      Until you can find a professional analyst who claims McGregor "looked like a joke" we'll just have to agree to disagree

      challenge accepted
      https://www.boxinginsider.com/columns/mayweather-vs-mcgregor-party-finally/
      "McGregor was terrible, and although we knew he couldn’t box, I was amazed at how bad he really was."

  10. Happened to me once by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I was overseas and wanted to watch the Superbowl. Hurray for drinking beer at 7:30am Monday morning! Tried and tried to use the legitimate NFL.com streaming to watch the game. It just would not work. I clicked submit and then it either timed out or went to a website error.

    I went to myp2p.eu and got the stream from there. Steady, reliable, and it even got the commercials which the NFL.com stream would have lacked. Superbowl is the one time a year I actually want to watch the commercials. Once again, the pirates provided a better service than the corporations.

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    1. Re:Happened to me once by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      --Seriously, this is 2017 and streaming to huge crowds isn't a Solved Problem yet? Aren't they supposed to be able to add more cloud servers dynamically for anticipated loads, or something?? Good God youse guys, get your sh*t together... $100 is Serious Money for a lot of people, especially to see a single event--!

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
  11. I hate that! by dohzer · · Score: 1

    I really hate it when my fight didnâ(TM)t get streamed on time.

  12. Re: $100? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I had a look into it and it turns out that it's not fake.

  13. Re:Probably Shouldn't Have Used Hooli Nucleus by CustomSolvers2 · · Score: 1

    I heard something about a friend of the ex-wife of the guy in charge of hiring the streaming provider being a frat pal of Gavin Belson. At least, this is what someone bro-ed me because, you know, bros disclose. LOL.

    On a serious note: software-related (online) unreliability isn't precisely a surprise to me. The case of video streaming is particularly descriptive: there are quite a few sites with tons of problems, limited (browser or features) support and surprisingly slow. I have even seen these problems in the sites of major players in the broadcasting business like big television networks!

    --
    Custom Solvers 2.0 = Alvaro Carballo Garcia = varocarbas.
  14. Will someone please explain to me by Alain+Williams · · Score: 1, Troll

    what the attraction is of watching one man hit another ? People wail when terrorists drive lorries into crowds but then cheer when someone smashes his fist into another man's face. I don't understand ?

    1. Re:Will someone please explain to me by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 1

      It's a primate thing. Not much we can do about it.

      The real mystery to me is why we don't care.

      There's some consolation to me that they're "sportsmen". If Mayweather crippled McGregor, people would be sad about it. No parallel with random hate and violence.

    2. Re:Will someone please explain to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The ability to test one's strength and endurance. Do I have the capability to take or avoid a hit and return the favor? There's a hell of a lot of work that a person has to put in to be able to defend themselves and fight back and that's what it's all about. The mutual agreement of saying, "Let's fight out who the stronger and more skillful person is."

      Stop looking at it so simply, you high-and-mighty jackass.

    3. Re:Will someone please explain to me by Solandri · · Score: 1

      I don't watch boxing, but I can understand its attraction. It's the same reason sports are popular (and in particular why judged sports like figure skating are often criticized). Theories, talk, arguments about which team or boxer is better don't count for anything. You're conclusively resolving the debate with a pure head-to-head confrontation. Any theory about whose strategy will be more successful is immediately and with finality validated, or is shot down.

      It differs from terrorism and criminal violence in that the participants are willing. Same difference between sex and rape, between trade and theft.

    4. Re:Will someone please explain to me by Yosho · · Score: 1

      what the attraction is of watching one man hit another ?

      Do you enjoy watching any competitive sports? Why is that?

      People wail when terrorists drive lorries into crowds but then cheer when someone smashes his fist into another man's face.

      One of those things is consensual, the other is not.

      --
      Karma: Terrifying (mostly affected by atrocities you've committed)
  15. Re:$100? by Trogre · · Score: 1

    Boxing is positively barbaric, but fake it is not.

    I suspect you're thinking of professional wrestling.

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  16. Sports stream glitch when the excitement climaxes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Slightly off topic, I didn't watch this stream in particular. Why do sports streams always start glitching and lagging just as the action culminates? Like, just before there's a goal in football (soccer), and even when the time is running out in chess! Surely, not a lot of people are tuning in just then. If it's a variable bitrate stream, requiring more bandwidth for the fast action, that still doesn't explain it -- surely their streaming platform should be able to manage the overall bandwidth. Is it just a cognitive bias that it seems that way, or can anyone explain this for me?

  17. panem et circenses by thesupraman · · Score: 1

    Ah, I had also managed to completely ignore it.

    Let me check..
    Mayweather wins.. I guess that means something to someone (and if you didnt want to know, I dont give a shit)

    And my wallet is not $100 lighter, which is the best outcome.

    Yes, got to keep the rabble entertained somehow, apparently.

    1. Re:panem et circenses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Let me check.. Mayweather wins.. I guess that means something to someone (and if you didnt want to know, I dont give a shit)

      Thanks for that super aggressive parenthetical comment. I guess you're trying to demonstrate that you're some kind of badass even though you didn't watch the fight like most of the other alphas did?

      And my wallet is not $100 lighter, which is the best outcome.

      That's fantastic, especially since your wallet likely didn't have $100 in it to start with. Leave the expensive entertainment to the guys who have the cash to afford it. Also, nobody, but nobody, drops $100 to watch this. You have a watch party and invite over 5-10 buddies.

      Yes, got to keep the rabble entertained somehow, apparently.

      Yes, people need entertainment to be happy. Apparently your entertainment is looking down your nose at what other people choose. Sad!

    2. Re:panem et circenses by murdocj · · Score: 1

      Well, at least you can feel superior, that's something. Same way I feel when guys on slashdot start ranting about which which GUI they use.

    3. Re:panem et circenses by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Boxing isn't about hurting people as much as trying to wear them down. Pain is a factor in taking the endurance out of someone. Their is strategy and skill behind it. Unlike a death match where anything can happen. That is why they are rules and a referee to stop the fight before someone gets too hurt.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    4. Re:panem et circenses by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      If you don't enjoy MMA or Boxing, why the fuck are you even commenting. My double-MBA wife (the rabble) bought $40 tickets for our date night, We watched on the big screen from huge recliners, and in of my low expectations or Connor, he put up a decent fight for the first few rounds until he got gassed, which was part of Mayweather's plan.

      Connor's longer reach, and his ability with the jab, and counterpunching won him the first few rounds, but he wasn't able to hurt Floyd with the few good punches he got in. Floyd didn't really do much of anything until round 4, and from then on, he was just picking Connor apart. For those who commented on Connor's stamina, if you've never stepped into a ring, you should just STFU. I sparred in TKD for several years (training about 15 hrs/week), and for even folks who are in good condition, going three rounds would wipe you out.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
  18. Re: $100? by oobayly · · Score: 2

    I get the gist of what you're trying to say, but you choose some pretty bad examples. All of those last significantly longer than a month, not less.

  19. Fuck You. Fuck Your Latin by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 1

    It is fascinating how this story has triggered all the classist buffoons and brought them out on parade.

  20. Re:if you had dierctv same price for higher bit ra by jedidiah · · Score: 1

    Except it's $8 versus $100.

    Plus DirectTV craps out in bad weather.

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  21. Re:$100? by jedidiah · · Score: 1

    "completely schooled" and 10 round TKO are an inherent contradiction.

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  22. Re: $100? by MrKaos · · Score: 1

    It was 100% fake. Like most MMA matches these days.

    It doesn't matter. Both fighters have similar styles and the confidence of the man to step out of UFC into boxing has to be applauded. Because boxing isn't even half a fight compared to getting an elbow in the face or a shin hitting a quad muscle dead. Goodbye leg. Forget about taking someone to the ground and doing chokes or joint locks. Boxing is about as redundant in the 21st century as two gentleman walking ten paces and firing a pistol.

    Mayweather wouldn't last 20 seconds in the cage with MacGregor and everyone, especially Mayweather, knows it. MacGregor won as soon as Mayweather took the fight. This was about Boxing passing the flame to UFC because it's more exciting than boxing. You may say that MMA is fake, the difference is it can be more real than boxing ever could.

    --
    My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  23. Re: $100? by nasch · · Score: 1

    So a WWE wrestler claims, without evidence, that one particular UFC fight was faked, and from that you conclude that most UFC fights, as well as the Mayweather/McGregor fight, are faked?

  24. Re:$100? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "completely schooled" and 10 round TKO are an inherent contradiction.

    Not if exposing a poorly skilled boxer with insufficient endurance was the goal. Not if eliminating the "he just got in a lucky punch" defense was the goal. Not if you are so confident that you can engage in 10 rounds of fan service.

    Mayweather did indeed put on a clinic. He won on his terms, which he blatantly telegraphed.

  25. Re:$100? by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

    I did not look into this, but at least one report said that most of the money was on McGregor even though the betting odds favored Mayweather. If that is true, it smells fishy to me. Generally, when the majority of the betting money is on one side, the odds for that side improve so as to encourage enough people to bet on the other side so as to cover the money the bookies need to pay out if the side with more money bet on it wins. Apparently, that did not happen here, suggesting that the bookies knew something no one else did.

    --
    The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
  26. Multicast to the home? by grumling · · Score: 1

    At what point will ISPs open up multicasting to the home? I'm sure the organizers used MC to get to distribution servers but everything from there to the end users is still unicast. I was working during the fight and our multicast to the edge modulator in the headend did just fine. I'm sure they'll point out that events like the Super Bowl will tax their edge routers but what about an event like this? I'm sure it was popular, but still a small fraction of users.

    --
    "Well, good luck finding a judge that doesn't run a bestiality site."
  27. Re:$100? by gravewax · · Score: 1

    No they aren't. Mayweather while completely dominating treated Conner as a risk, so he let Conner punch himself out in the early rounds and as he became less and less of a threat he dismantled him. The 10 rounds is a testament to Conner's ability to survive or perhaps Mayweather had instructions not to put him down too early, either way the fight was over 5 rounds earlier when Mayweather could see Conner had nothing left in the tank, Conner displayed a lack of discipline and endurance by punching himself out early.

  28. Re: It's money and greed everywhere you look by Brockmire · · Score: 1

    It's the start of a new sports Entertainment industry. The next one will be Michael Jordan against Wayne Gretzky in a tennis match.

  29. Re: $100? by MrKaos · · Score: 1

    Mayweather just toyed with him and was never even remotely in danger.

    hahaha - 20 seconds in the octagon, any boxer.

    --
    My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  30. Re:$100? by gravewax · · Score: 1

    nothing strange here at all. All the large bets of the professional gamblers and the more impartial parties were on Mayweather, A lot of the smaller bets are McGregor/Irish/MMA fan base supporting McGregor who really did so regardless of how little chance he had.

  31. Re:Probably Shouldn't Have Used Hooli Nucleus by CustomSolvers2 · · Score: 1
    (I seriously hate it, but seems unfortunately required)

    I heard something about a friend of the ex-wife of the guy in charge of hiring the streaming provider being a frat pal of Gavin Belson. At least, this is what someone bro-ed me because, you know, bros disclose.

    This whole paragraph is a reference to the sitcom Silicon Valley, exactly the same than the parent post.

    --
    Custom Solvers 2.0 = Alvaro Carballo Garcia = varocarbas.
  32. Re: $100? by bungo · · Score: 1

    And I've driven my Lotus Exige Cup 260 around and around in circles. Do you have any idea how expensive that is? I'm not even racing, as that is not allowed, as normally timing equipment isn't allowed. I drive at places like the F1 track at Spa. It's fun. It's not productive, and is a total waste of time. I'm at high risk or an accident or injury.

    I don't like boxing, but watching it on pay-per-view is cheaper than what I do. Don't judge other people on their choice of entertainment. It's their money. Let them enjoy it how they like.

    --
    "The best part? I became an ordained minister while not wearing pants." -- CleverNickName
  33. Re:Probably Shouldn't Have Used Hooli Nucleus by CustomSolvers2 · · Score: 1

    Clarification to the clarification: I am not interested in dealing with people actually needing these clarifications or similar (e.g., me adding "LOL" to denote that what I wrote shouldn't be taken seriously/literally). I am writing all these clarifications to minimise the chances of having to waste time on addressing nonsensical concerns (+ avoiding misunderstanding-based uncomfortable/negative-to-everyone situations).

    --
    Custom Solvers 2.0 = Alvaro Carballo Garcia = varocarbas.
  34. Re: $100? by MrKaos · · Score: 1

    Conor may be a professional in the Octagon but he is a rank amateur in the ring and the inverse would go for Mayweather.

    Well as a rank amateur in boxing he just went 10 rounds with one of boxing's best, that's a pretty professional effort. I think MacGregor has just shown that UFC fighters could hold their own in a boxing ring with a limited toolset, UFC fighters have to know how to punch even if they don't know the strategy of boxing.

    Boxers don't have a kick game, a ground game, a elbow game, a choke game, a lock game. UFC fighters have to be all rounders and it shows that the punch game for some fighters in UFC is pretty good, forgetting about all the other things that can be done with hands.

    All in all I think this is a good thing for both sports. The level of professionalism show by both fighters was very high and I have a new respect for Mayweather because he was classy and humble in victory.

    --
    My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  35. Re:$100? by dcw3 · · Score: 1

    I watched it for $40 in a theater. It wasn't one hour, it was four hours, and had three title fights leading up to the grand finale. If you're not into boxing, you probably wouldn't care. I mostly thought it was a scam as well, but watching it changed my mind, not that anyone's actually worth the absurd amounts these guys got.

    --
    Just another day in Paradise
  36. Re: $100? by dcw3 · · Score: 1

    You clearly didn't watch. I did (for $40, not $100), and in my not so humble opinion, and as someone who's spent a few years sparring, it was not fake. Now, you can legitimately argue the value of their take home purse, but that's a different issue.

    --
    Just another day in Paradise
  37. Re:$100? by NotThisMind · · Score: 1

    This fight was better than Pacquiao's ?? HAHAHAHAHAH McGregor could not hit a single fucking punch, and he doesn't know how to throw one. Get the fuck out of here.

  38. Re: $100? by MrKaos · · Score: 1

    An agressive fighter like Tyson would have destroyed any UFC fighter in his weight class within seconds.

    Only in boxing and only in a boxing ring. If you put a fighter like Tyson up against a machine like Bas Rutten or Hickson Gracie anywhere else it would end up the same, with the boxer, on his back on the ground, unable to use his hands getting a face massage with an elbow or with a paniced look on his face as he gets choked out, not knowing what to do or how to do it. Sure, the take down maybe difficult to get however a semi-accomplished Muay Thai Boxer would patiently chop a boxer down, and never need to take the boxer to the ground, just with leg kicks.

    Bullshit. A conservative figher like Mayweather was bound to make McGregor and the UFC look credible, which was the goal.

    Hahahahahaha. You have to be shitposting, MacGregor landed more scoring hits on Mayweather than the last few boxers he fought.

    What you don't seem to understand is UFC is a testing ground for which fighting systems are credible and effective. Boxing was discredited as an effective fighting system with a bunch of other bullshit martial arts back in the 1990s, boxers have stepped into the UFC and they have been annihilated when that is the only skill the have.

    Whatever problems the UFC has you can pick any of your current professional boxers, at the top of their game and put them in the UFC and you will find it is the end of their career from the humiliating beat down they would receive from ONE UFC bout, before they go back to boxing. Kicks in the leg, take downs and none of the boxing fast hands make a difference. Whilst I tip my hat to the professionalism to boxing as a sport, that's what it is. The UFC showed us, long ago, that boxing isn't a credible fighting system.

    Even the weight classes are heavier in UFC, where a light heavyweight in UFC is a heavyweight in boxing and on the street boxing is useless against even a semi-credible martial artist who could snap your knee and keep any boxer at distance just by using kicks and denying the boxer any use of their primary weapons.

    Every time MacGregor got Mayweathers back, that was where the fight ended anywhere else that wasn't a boxing ring. You clearly have no idea what you are talking about or are shitposting because the scenario you spell out can only happen in boxing. Here is what happens when boxer meets a purple belt in Jui Jitsu, even when you give the boxer a few more weapons Or you can listen to what boxers have to say about stepping into UFC.

    --
    My ism, it's full of beliefs.