Slashdot Mirror


Will Millennials Be Forced Out of Tech Jobs When They Turn 40? (ieeeusa.org)

dcblogs shared an interesting article from IEEE-USA's "Insight" newsletter: Millennials, which date from the 1980s to mid-2000s, are the largest generation. But what will happen to this generation's tech workers as they settle into middle age? Will the median age of tech firms rise as the Millennial generation grows older...? The median age range at Google, Facebook, SpaceX, LinkedIn, Amazon, Salesforce, Apple and Adobe, is 29 to 31, according to a study last year by PayScale, which analyzes self-reported data... Karen Panetta, the dean of graduate engineering education at Tufts University and the vice president of communications and public relations at the IEEE-USA, believes the outcome for tech will be Logan's Run-like, where age sets a career limit... Tech firms want people with the current skills sets and those "without those skills will be pressured to leave or see minimal career progression," said Panetta...

The idea that the tech industry may have an age bias is not scaring the new college grads away. "They see retirement so far off, so they are more interested in how to move up or onto new startup ventures or even business school," said Panetta. "The reality sets in when they have families and companies downsize and it's not so easy to just pick up and go on to another company," she said. None of this may be a foregone conclusion. Millennials may see the experience of today's older workers as a cautionary tale, and usher in cultural changes...

David Kurtz, a labor relations partner at Constangy, Brooks, Smith & Prophete, suggests tech firms should be sharing age-related date about their workforce, adding "The more of a focus you place on an issue the more attention it gets and the more likely that change can happen. It's great to get the new hot shot who just graduated from college, but it's also important to have somebody with 40 years of experience who has seen all of the changes in the industry and can offer a different perspective."

29 of 247 comments (clear)

  1. Of course they will by orin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Every generation thinks it will be the exception. Gen-X techies were computer literate. We were around when the internet went mainstream. We were sure that Tech was going to grow up with us - but lots of Gen-X'ers found themselves on the wrong side of 40. Some got to hang around, but most moved on. The same will happen to the millennials, replaced with those born after 2000. Younger is cheaper.

    1. Re:Of course they will by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Somehow Silicon valley has tried to take over the word "tech"... but tech means technology, and I don't think this piece is talking about CPU design even, but rather quite specific internet companies. Why would you think that Google would continue to grow forever? It seems infinitely more likely to me that Google is going to be like IBM used to be... they have a period of some decades where they become giant, well established, and never go away, but other new things will happen, and none of us even know what that will be yet. In 50 years, I'm sure people will still think Google utilities (Maps, search, ...) are a good reference standard, but I doubt that anyone will think some internet advertising company is the cool place to work anymore. We all grow up in the end.

    2. Re:Of course they will by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 2

      I'm guessing that a lot will just leave on their own, and not be forced out of tech jobs. Ever since the end of the 80's, I've see more and more folks entering the IT business, not because they are tech geeks, but because they think that they can make easy money there. When they realize, after a few years, that they do not like their work . . . AND . . . they are not making that big IT money . . . they pick up their marbles and go into some other careers.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    3. Re:Of course they will by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Younger is cheaper.

      But not necessarily better value for money.

      The trap is managers who don't understand the difference.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    4. Re:Of course they will by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Maybe it's survivorship bias but I work with plenty of Gen-Xs and even some boomers. All are employed and productive. I'm an old millenial that has finally accrued a decade in industry I 'understand' what group of people this applies to.

      In college for engineering students usually fell into two groups. Those excited to learn, take on new concepts and learn more & those that were there to get the minimum for 'on the job training' and get out of there.

      The latter group has been sitting around in industry for a decade learning nothing. They treated a STEM degree like a vocational degree thinking that they'd learn their trade, get out, work on that until retirement.

      Look at 2015 vs 2005 and what has changed. If you're in any industry you're quickly becoming obsolete with 2005 level knowledge, especially if you're stubborn to pick up anything new. In mechanical engineering & controls (my field) that means adopting Simulink and autogenerated code. If you're a 2000 graduate and refuse to learn or even touch Simulink you're quickly finding your job options diminishing.

      And the work that the 'younger is cheaper' does is typically non-exploratory roles when you need to throw bodies at a problem. I, and my group, have plenty of work to do but 'older' workers are too expensive and over qualified for what we need. Right now it's the company's MO to throw that work to India. I'd rather hire 2-dozen 'boot camp' python coders and have them knock out the modules that we need. Someone with a full CS degree isn't what we need, let alone someone with 10 years experience.

      But those that are driving the changes, all of those guys are still employed. Some are nearing retirement and we're not sure what we're going to do without them. Some of them wrote the literal book on some of the technologies we use today. How is Linus' employability? Did Dennis Ritchie need to beg for jobs near retirement?

      Given Slashdot's track record of guessing what technology is going to take off I take most comments with a grain of salt. It's pretty easy to look back at stories breaking everything from the iPod, Bittorrent, Bitcoin to self driving tech and see the comments.

    5. Re:Of course they will by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      For some reason it seems to be an issue unique to STEM.

      MDs have required training (CME) needed to keep their licenes. The voc-tech trades have training centers to keep plumbers, electricians, steam fitters, and the other union trades up to date on the latest.

      But for some reason STEM thinks that when they graduate everything they've learned in school is all there is to ever learn. So a large number of people sit and coast on it for as long as they can. Then complain it's someone elses fault when they're caught with no useful skills. (And 'learning' is a useful skill).

      There are embedded C guys at work that are picking up "flavor of the week" languages for fun. They earn their bread and butter on C and assembly. But they try out new things.

      Some of the polygots at work know C, C++, Perl, Python, Java, .NET, C#, VBA, Matlab. They may not know some as well as others but when something comes across their desk in any language they jump in and figure it out, fix it and move on. They don't sit and pout that it's not in C.

      For that reason they're pretty recession proof. The youngest Gen-Xers are on 2 recessions. (2001 / 2007) and the oldest may have graduated into one (1982) and had 10 years in industry around the the one in 90.

    6. Re: Of course they will by ranton · · Score: 2

      There isn't much difference between STEM and the medical field, except STEM workers need to take personal responsibility to grow professionally instead of being forced to by a governing body. But the result is generally the same, since in both industries you won't last long without continuing education.

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    7. Re:Of course they will by jdunn14 · · Score: 2

      Amen to this. I went to college in the late 90s and was blown away by the people who saw a CS degree as a good way to make money without having any actual interest in the field. They spent four years bitching about not getting trained on the flavor of the week technology because they couldn't extrapolate how things they learned in language A could be applied to language B with minimal work. Those of us who actually wanted to know *how* things worked and what was underlying whatever keyword / checkbox was "critical" on a resume have done pretty well but I would be shocked if half of the people who went into it for a quick paycheck were still in the industry.

      The giant tech bubble bursting about the time I graduated played a roll in sending me to grad school but it was a hell of a filter on the somewhat capable, get rich quick students.

      When it comes to hiring, I don't care how old you are. In fact, I'd rather have the less frazzled older guy working 40 hours a week than the guy fresh out of school working 60 but producing 30 because he's going back and fighting his own design decisions every other day. Keep updating your skills. If that new language or framework really looks promising, great, do some side or personal project in it. Be prepared to explain why the new is or isn't better than the old. Don't blindly embrace the new and don't blindly hold onto the old just because you know it. Show me you can use your brain since that's kind of a requirement for these sorts of jobs. Too many people couldn't debug their way out of a paper bag. Try not to limit yourself based on your prejudices. I'll never love working in javascript, but I know I need to be competent. Don't try and bluff your way through talking about something you know literally nothing about. I'd rather hear "I know the name but I've never worked with it" than watch you make an ass of yourself explaining something I understand and you googled in the waiting area. If you're enthusiastic, bright, clearly know what you're doing with at least tangential skills, and demonstrate that you can pick up new things then I can overlook some mismatch of training. I mean, come on, if you're *really* good at almost any procedural language you'll have 90% of what's required in most of the rest. These are not all special and unique snowflakes. Show me you can *think*.

      Ugh, sorry, had some flashbacks to days interviewing new hires.

    8. Re:Of course they will by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 2

      One of the challenges is knowing what to be current in, re: needed to keep their license. A doctor doesn't have to fully understand a dozen new diseases every year. I used to be an embedded asm/c++ guy who picked up a "flavor of the week" language or technology (think OpenGL) for fun, bu that is a lot of work, usually with no payoff, so now I just kinda keep track of what is out there

    9. Re:Of course they will by chipschap · · Score: 2

      I think it's HR departments as much as managers.

      HR departments typically understand nothing. We can hire a 23 year old for half the wages? Great! All the buzzwords are on the resume so it's all good, right?

      As I've said elsewhere, a successful IT project is not magic. It requires skill, dedication, experience, and good leadership. The 23 year olds have how many of those attributes to what degree? Skill, probably. Dedication, possibly.

      Nothing against 23 year olds. But at that point in my career I was grateful for those experienced mentors who were able to channel my skills and enthusiasm. They were paid twice as much for sure, maybe more, but they provided commensurate value.

  2. Yeah, if you work for Google or Reddit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Then its OK.

    Just don't discriminate based on sexual orientation or gender. That's off-limits.

  3. I'm almost 50...and I got hired recently... by MindPrison · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Surprise surprise, I didn't expect that to happen, but a large company just recruited me.

    And I'm not even the oldest one they recruited, the oldest one was over 60. In fact, in our group of 20 people just newly recruited, every age group imaginable was represented, everyone from 19 to 60+ and inbetween.

    I'm still kinda surprised by that, pleasantly surprised - but quite surprised. Guess there's a lot of common misconceptions about age discriminations.

    --
    What this world is coming to - is for you and me to decide.
    1. Re: I'm almost 50...and I got hired recently... by Entrope · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The big tech companies want young (especially childless) workers because those workers will work insane hours in an effort to generate marginally more output than the person at the next open-plan table. Lots of other companies are more reasonable about expectations and environment.

    2. Re:I'm almost 50...and I got hired recently... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      I'm coming up to 40 and I've found that there are plenty of well paid jobs than ever for someone with my experience and skills. Then again this is the EU... Maybe the US has more age discrimination.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    3. Re:I'm almost 50...and I got hired recently... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Your experience is an outlier though. It's not a misperception. The facts don't lie the average age in tech is not much above 30. The median is even less. And this is not just age discrimination too - a lot of people move on into business development, executive management, or just decide to leave tech altogether for other pursuits. Few want to stick it out for 40 years doing the same job.

    4. Re:I'm almost 50...and I got hired recently... by El+Cubano · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I'm coming up to 40 and I've found that there are plenty of well paid jobs than ever for someone with my experience and skills. Then again this is the EU... Maybe the US has more age discrimination.

      I too am approaching 40, but I am in the US (in the Midwest, specifically). My experience and observation is that while companies here certainly hire young talent (I teach an upper university class and most of my students with whom I stay connected end up with jobs in tech), the companies around here tend to value experience a great deal. It is reflected in the salaries for mid-level and senior-level developer jobs that are advertised. In fact, the salary I am able to command here (based on my experience) is no where close to what I would likely be able to get in SV (accounting for the significant cost of living different as well). The lifestyle I am able to enjoy is far and away from the lifestyle I would be able to enjoy in SV, even if I could find a job with a salary comparable to what I earn now that accounted for the differences in cost of living.

      It still absolutely amazes me that people, especially in middle age, want that SV culture. I feel like I would have to give up everything that I value that I have now in return for nothing that I value. Plus as a middle aged worker I don't feel like I would be valued by a SV company.

    5. Re: I'm almost 50...and I got hired recently... by AmazingRuss · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That open plan bullshit is wasting billions. Let's pay people to think, and force them into a noisy fluorescent lit hellscape for the entire workday.

      Advocates of open office need to wake up and smell the headphones.

    6. Re: I'm almost 50...and I got hired recently... by mpechner · · Score: 2

      The POS managers that want idiots willing to work crazy hours and are too young to call bullshit in deadlines in the name of agile get reputations. If you aren't off playing ping pong and getting your work done, 40-50 hours of solid work, and a good manager will notice. The 50+ hours weeks should only be for special events the last less than a month once maybe twice a year. If you are working 50+ on a regular basis, you better be one of the first 20 hires and have ownership in whole percentage points.

      Saiyeth the Old man who has followed this philosophy for 30+ years.

  4. Stop obsessing over Silicon Valley by hsmith · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Outside that shit hole of garbage where they want young people to shove in the meat grinder this maybe the case. Outside of SV, I've seen more senior people fought after because they don't make junior mistakes. SV loves young people because they'll work 90 hour weeks and not think twice. Older established folks want a normal work week but can put out a better product.

    1. Re:Stop obsessing over Silicon Valley by apoc.famine · · Score: 2

      God, that sounds awful. Why would you work anywhere near those places?
       
      One place I worked was a nice 8-5 sort of place, where the management encouraged the developers to take a walk or two every day down to the nearby park to stretch their legs and eyes. 2/3 were married with kids, all were well compensated, and the only thing preventing promotion was a flat company structure with only a head of the department and a CEO above them.
       
      If your "extensive personal experience" is all shit companies, I don't know what to say other than "move". There are so much better places out there.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    2. Re:Stop obsessing over Silicon Valley by twdorris · · Score: 2

      Older established folks want a normal work week but can put out a better product.

      I hadn't thought of it that way before but you're probably hitting the nail on the head. The companies that people feel aren't hiring older engineering types are probably the very same companies whose profit margins aren't necessarily defined by a "better product". Companies that have to compete with other companies (i.e., MOST) *want* to hire people they feel confident will improve the quality of their product not the number of webpages and ads they can fling around. In *that* area, age is irrelevant and it's all talent and/or experience.

  5. What are the numbers actually telling us? by MacTO · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Over half of those companies are very young, Apple and Adobe being the outliers. If they hired young, their workforce will still be young. The numbers themselves do not say that older people are being forced out.

    At least half of those companies also experienced phenomenal growth in recent years. There is a good chance that a subset of the early employees could afford to leave the company (stock options, rapidly being promoted, etc.). Those who were stuck in dead end positions had plenty of examples to encourage jumping ship for better opportunities. Again, age statistics alone cannot tell us much on that front.

    Of course, simply reporting the median age alone does not say much about the age distribution. It implies a normal distribution, which is where I suspect the 40 year old figure comes from, yet that may be misleading.

    1. Re:What are the numbers actually telling us? by swillden · · Score: 2

      I work for Google, and your comments are consistent with what I see. Plus I can add a couple of points you didn't consider.

      The company is young, and mostly hires new grads. They hire some older guys (I was hired at 42, now 48, and have worked with Google engineers as old as 70), and they're perfectly happy to do it, but still they find it easier to hire new grads. That skews the median young.

      The first point you didn't consider is that Google has an academia-like "up or out" system, with a sort of tenure level. New grads are hired at level 2 or 3 and expected to get promoted to level 5. Once you reach level 5, that's "tenure", where as long as you continue doing your job you can stay forever. There aren't any hard timelines for getting to 5, but if you stall at some level below that you'll eventually be asked to leave.

      L5s are basically team leads. To become an L5 you have to demonstrate that you can find a significant business problem, design the solution and build and lead a small team in building and deploying it your solution. So the only people who are allowed to stay are those with the technical and social skills to excel in a pool of pretty high-performing people. Google L5s would be rockstars at most companies... and most of them live in the tech startup capital of the world.

      That leads obviously to the second point: Google has moderately high turnover among its more senior engineers, because they leave to join -- or found -- startups. They go off and take a pay cut for a few years in exchange for a pretty solid possibility of becoming independently wealthy. If they've been at all careful with their money, they can afford to take such risks, and with Google on their resume they can pretty easily find another job if it doesn't work out. Or go back to Google... that's easy to do, and common.

      So... young company, young hires, many of the early hires were able to cash out and retire young, many others were forced out because they didn't show the requisite growth, and a fair rate of more senior (and hence older) people leaving for startups. There's really no need to wonder why the median is young. It's rising, though, because some percentage of people (like me) don't want to do the startup thing.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  6. I Left Tech Voluntarily at 40 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    When the CEO of my company said in an all-hands meeting that the company would focus on hiring younger engineers, I decided to leave voluntarily, seeing that I would quickly become a target.

    Sure enough, in the months since then, they've started forcing out the "old" guard though hostile working practices and punitive performance reviews.

    I studied engineering because I loved the art, but our culture has destroyed the art of technology. I don't miss working in tech at all, but I do enjoy teaching high school math and science (my new career), and doing whatever I can to discourage students from pursuing a career in it.

    1. Re:I Left Tech Voluntarily at 40 by blind+biker · · Score: 2

      What are you encouraging your students to do, then?
      I myself started in tech, but am now a researcher in academia, and I would never go back. Science is so much fun, I'd do this for fucking nothing. It's awesome. It really is. I don't have a single regret for switching to academic research.

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
  7. The smart ones will leave before they are forced by mark_reh · · Score: 4, Insightful

    out.

    Engineers in their 40s are pushed toward marketing or management, but there are 10 engineers for every one of those jobs. And that insight and perspective that an older engineer can provide can be provided by one engineer. You don't need 20 of them on the payroll.

    Engineering is fine work while you're younger, but you should be working toward your second career by the time you're 30.

    I left engineering (or shall I say, engineering and I parted ways?) when I was in my mid 40s. I went back to school for 6 years and became a dentist. That's a field where most patients prefer to see an older person...

  8. Re: No, as long as they aren't clueless by ranton · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It will be the same for Millenials as it is now for Gen X. Those with genuine ability will enter the highest paid portion of their career, and those who never grew professionally will be pushed out of the industry. Nothing new to see here.

    Those who don't continue in IT have plenty of other options if their soft skills are developed. Those without soft skills or IT skills are the ones who come to Slashdot to complain about ageism.

    --
    -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
  9. Doesn't matter by maxrate · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm not sure age has much to do with it if you are 'good'. I'm 38 years old, been running my own tech company since 2000/2001. (We are small - 7 employees). We hired a really talented guy in his early 20's a couple months ago. More than satisfied with his work to say the least, and he was pretty good with the customers. I was more than satisfied with his tech capabilities, but didn't always work things out logically I found, missing the target - but he'll learn over time. Sadly, had to let him go this week, he could never arrive on time - and you could never, not once, get a hold of him on his mobile/email/etc during or after hours. I'm not talking 5 minutes late to work, I'm talking hours late to work, 4 out of 5 days a week - every week. WORK ETHIC COUNTS. I have shown up to work on zero hours sleep, hung over, etc - on-time and still effective. Same goes with the rest of the staff. People who know their stuff and are willing to learn will last forever. I have no age biases. I have a guy nearing retirement working for us for the past 8 years, and for the past 3 years I have a 21 year old (started 19 - still in school). Be a productive employee and keep learning & adapting - you'll last forever........ IF your workplace is not comprised of short sighted douche bags (or the environment is 'too' corporate).

  10. Re:The smart ones will leave before they are force by Ryanrule · · Score: 2

    "Engineering is fine work while you're younger, but you should be working toward your second career by the time you're 30." Good luck with that if you graduated in 09