Slashdot Mirror


Disney Is Pulling Star Wars and Marvel Films From Netflix (arstechnica.com)

Disney CEO Bob Iger announced on Thursday that his company will pull the full catalog of films from the Star Wars franchise and Marvel universe from Netflix after 2019. Last month, Disney announced it would be pulling a number of Disney titles from the Netflix catalog, but left the door open to keeping the Star Wars franchise and Marvel films. That door has since been slammed shut, "choosing instead to use movies like Iron Man, Captain America, and the forthcoming Star Wars: Episode IX as a draw to a new Disney-owned streaming service," reports Ars Technica. From the report: It's not clear exactly which films are affected by Iger's announcement. A Netflix spokesperson told The Verge last month that "we continue to do business with the Walt Disney Company on many fronts, including our ongoing deal with Marvel TV." That refers to a collaboration between Disney and Netflix to produce several live-action television series based on lesser-known Marvel characters Daredevil, Jessica Jones, Iron Fist, and Luke Cage. Some of those series are still being actively developed. It's a high-risk gamble for Disney. It makes sense for Disney to bring its best-known franchises back under its own roof to give the Disney streaming service the best possible chance of success. But Disney is leaving a lot of money on the table by not doing a deal with Netflix or one of its competitors. It could be an expensive mistake if the Disney streaming service doesn't get traction.

7 of 195 comments (clear)

  1. Just say no by gravewax · · Score: 5, Interesting

    As per previous discussions on this. FUCK YOU DISNEY! I will not support service proliferation in this manner no matter what movies you have that I may want to watch. You are basically trying to create the exact same licensing, package lockin and distribution restrictions we fled to these streaming services to escape.

  2. I can't wait to pay $20/m for a disney streaming by hsmith · · Score: 5, Insightful

    service. said no one ever. The rates they'll charge itll be cheaper to buy the titles you like, or simply pirate them. My price elasticity has already tapped out for these services.

  3. Re:I can't wait to pay $20/m for a disney streamin by Mike+Van+Pelt · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This. Every dang studio and every dang TV network is planning to have their very own subscription service for $$/month, just to see the one program of interest that they have, and I'm not doing it. I would probably have watched the new Star Trek series, but I'm not paying CBS $$/month subscription for their package of crap I'll never watch just for that one program.

    I hadn't been tempted to go pirate before, but this is making me waver...

  4. Re:Score one for Cable by solios · · Score: 5, Interesting

    People have been demanding "a la carte" cable for decades.

    Well, we finally got it - you can buy all the individual channels you want. Thing is, each one is now its own individual streaming service, with its own account and billing and app interface and media catalog.

    Give it another five to ten years and there'll be services that bundle these services for you, and then we can start complaining about how Cable 2.0 is charging us too much for packages we don't use when all we want is Hulu and Netflix.

  5. Congratulations Netflix! by argStyopa · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Considering Disney makes literally the worst POSSIBLE choices every time as far as distribution of their product, I'd say Netflix should see this as validation.

    VHS? Disney ran SCREAMING away from it, insisting it was going to destroy filmmakers, finally grudgingly dragging itself back to VHS...about the time DVDs came out.

    DVD? Hahaha, Disney (insisting such tech would destroy filmmakers and the entire industry) backed the original Divx, which was a rental scheme by which you could buy the disk for about triple the price of a movie rental, and you could then play it (once it validated itself and your purchase in what was essentially an early IoT-locked dvd player) for 48 hours. If you wanted to play it past that 48 hours, you could pay again. (http://www.dvdjournal.com/extra/divx.html)

    So...pretty much any tech that Disney's terrified of will soon become the defacto standard.

    --
    -Styopa
  6. Re:I can't wait to pay $20/m for a disney streamin by markdavis · · Score: 5, Insightful

    >"If you're in the US, not sure that's an issue. Isn't CBS still free over the air??"

    CBS has explicitly said they are NOT going to air the new Star Trek and have it ONLY on their streaming service. There are absolutely ZERO other shows most of us want from CBS, so this is likely to go over like a lead balloon. So they will have very little streaming revenue and zero ad revenue. I suspect they will give up and air it anyway after they discover people will not tolerate it and it ends up very popular on illegal file sharing.

  7. Re:So long... by stealth_finger · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No big loss. Then NExt it will be all the universal movies...no big loss.... then all the WB movies... then soon after Netflix and other generic streaming services are all dead and you are back to having to buy individual packages from overpriced services where you get no choice or flexibility. I agree there is no big loss for Disney content, but the precedent and trend it sets is awful, especially if it is successful.

    Pretty soon every studio or production house will have their own streaming service, all wanting a tenner a month and everyone will flock back to thepiratebay.

    --
    Wanna buy a shirt?
    https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u