Slashdot Mirror


'Bodega' CEO Apologizes, Insists They'll Create More Jobs (cnn.com)

Remember those two ex-Googlers who started a company to replace mom-and-pop corner stores with automated vending kiosks? An anonymous reader writes: The company's CEO has now "apologized in the face of mounting outrage," according to CNN. CEO Paul McDonald had shared a vision with Fast Company of a world where centralized shopping locations "won't be necessary" because there'll be a tiny automated one every 100 feet. Within hours McDonald was writing a new apologetic essay insisting he's not trying to replace corner stores, which carry more items and include a human staff who "offer an integral human connection to their patrons that our automated storefronts never will." In fact, he added that "Rather than take away jobs, we hope Bodega will help create them. We see a future where anyone can own and operate a Bodega -- delivering relevant items and a great retail experience to places no corner store would ever open." Promising to review criticism, he added his hope was to "bring a useful, new retail experience to places where commerce currently doesn't exist."
Bodega's CEO sees it as a way to beat Amazon by offering immediate access to popular products, and TechCrunch reports the company has already raised $2.5 million, while Fast Company notes "angel" investments from executives at Facebook, Twitter, Google, and Dropbox.

The company has already begun testing 30 Bodega boxes over the last ten months, and unveiled 50 more boxes last week, with hopes to have over 1,000 by the end of next year.

155 comments

  1. *Now* the business model is by ColdWetDog · · Score: 3, Funny

    A vending machine with a person inside it?

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    1. Re:*Now* the business model is by cdreimer · · Score: 1

      Except that the person inside would be an illegal alien to keep labor costs low.

      http://www.technovelgy.com/graphics/content07/postal-robot-mibII.jpg

    2. Re:*Now* the business model is by elrous0 · · Score: 2

      No, now the business model is exactly the same as it was before--except some bullshit about not putting small shops out of business...because small shops will be able to buy their own bodega vending machines...which will somehow employ more people somehow.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    3. Re:*Now* the business model is by OrangeTide · · Score: 2

      Make sure the illegal alien is an independent contractor so you don't have liability and don't need to pay for insurance, disability, workmans comp, etc. That's just smart business.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    4. Re:*Now* the business model is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, now the business model is a Little Free Library that isn't Free, is only open to smartphone users, and probably isn't full of books.

    5. Re:*Now* the business model is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's no person inside it. The idea is that anyone can walk up to the cabinet, open a glass door, take something out and record themselves with their smartphone camera. The item is deducted from an account. This would replace having to drive for three miles to get to the nearest 7-11.

    6. Re:*Now* the business model is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the previous article, it looked more like a honor bar or one of those sundries locker things that boutique hotels have by the front desk when they're not big enough to have a little store.

      So, not really a new idea and not likely to impact bodegas.

    7. Re: *Now* the business model is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better yet a franchisee!! N

    8. Re:*Now* the business model is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well we know they won't be able to fit *you* into a vending machine. A vending boat, maybe.

    9. Re:*Now* the business model is by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      bonus points if they are midgets

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    10. Re:*Now* the business model is by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      Productivity improvements are a good thing, and pointless make-work jobs are not "good for the economy". If this business model eliminates retail jobs, then the savings will go to the customers or owners who will spend it on OTHER STUFF. People will then be employed to create those other goods and services. So the end result is roughly the same number of jobs, but a higher standard of living since labor will go toward desirable goods and services instead of pointless busy work.

      If high productivity was bad for the economy then Ethiopia and Myanmar would be wealthy and prosperous, while America and Europe would be poor. For some weird reason, people accept that past productivity improvements were good, but think future improvements will obviously be bad.

    11. Re:*Now* the business model is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They can satisfy their diversity quotas.

    12. Re:*Now* the business model is by OrangeTide · · Score: 5, Insightful

      By independent contractor I mean what Uber does to shift the businesses costs onto their "employees". Many of which are really bad at estimating the total costs for their car loans, maintenance, etc. (I'm not a socialist, I just don't think it's very honorable to base a business off people making poor choices)

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    13. Re:*Now* the business model is by butchersong · · Score: 1, Interesting

      As a small business owner.. that is often about the only way you can afford to hire -other than the illegal alien part. I don't know where people think we can come up with 1300/mo for an employee for health care in addition to all the other costs when you're just trying to get off the ground.

    14. Re:*Now* the business model is by liquid_schwartz · · Score: 1

      Except that the person inside would be an illegal alien to keep labor costs low.

      Now every Home Depot will have at least one Bodega

    15. Re:*Now* the business model is by liquid_schwartz · · Score: 1

      (I'm not a socialist, I just don't think it's very honorable to base a business off people making poor choices)

      I'm not a fan of the lottery or Casinos either

    16. Re:*Now* the business model is by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      For some weird reason, people accept that past productivity improvements were good, but think future improvements will obviously be bad.

      It's not a weird reason, nor is it difficult to understand. Most people are concerned about their own immediate well-being, and productivity improvements threaten their jobs -- so it's perfectly understandable why they'd view them as being bad.

      That they may be good for the economy overall in the long term is cold comfort when you need to pay your bills right now.

    17. Re:*Now* the business model is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Honor is expensive. Investors and executives have no patience for it.

    18. Re:*Now* the business model is by twokay · · Score: 1

      If your business is not viable while treating employees humanely then it should not be a business. We might as well go back to slave labour.

      --
      Wannabe nerd.
    19. Re:*Now* the business model is by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Being a small business owner is no excuse to back slavery.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    20. Re:*Now* the business model is by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      Playing fair and not ripping off employees and customers might be a violation of SEC rules that protect against shareholder disenfranchisement, at least for publicly traded companies. It's hard for a corporation these days to spend too much on donating time, resources and money to improving communities as that usually isn't a tax write off except when directed to registered charities. The charities themselves are usually scams and inefficient, so a smart CEO might want to cut out the middle man to make the most effective use of a donation only to be kicked out by the corporate board.

      Profit is not a god to worship above all out. It's OK to make some profit if you can retain your humanity. But lawyers and greed have slowly outlawed any business operated by human beings.

      (disclaimer: I may have been listening to The Disposable Heroes Of Hiphoprisy when I posted)

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    21. Re:*Now* the business model is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gradual productivity improvements are good.

      Sudden shocks to the labor market are bad (e.g. self-driving trucks replace all trucking in the space of one year).

    22. Re:*Now* the business model is by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      Don't the health care requirements only kick in after 50 employees? Also, I know many (if not most if not all) startups don't have 401(k) plans either, etc..

    23. Re:*Now* the business model is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Warning, warning Will Robinson, illegal aliens have been spotted near where you live creimer:
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      Now you might be in trouble because the FBI suspects you to be the father and your mother to be the mother. They use this evidence as proof:
      https://school.discoveryeducat...

    24. Re: *Now* the business model is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry but, if your tech startup is creating more jobs than the industry it's trying to disrupt, you need to rethink your business idea.

  2. Anyone can own and operate a bodega? by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

    So where's the form to apply for one?

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
    1. Re:Anyone can own and operate a bodega? by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      So where's the form to apply for one?

      Here you go.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    2. Re:Anyone can own and operate a bodega? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, just like anyone can own and operate a vending machine. These are literally just larger vending machines.

      My guess is once they finish testing to see if they work, they will gladly sell the machines to business and individuals and let them do the grunt work of keeping the things stocked while they take a % off the top for licensing fees, software updates, and official repairs.

    3. Re: Anyone can own and operate a bodega? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The whole idea is stupid. It's not even close to original.
      One of the major gas stations, Chevron or Exxon I don't remember, tried this. You could get gas too so it wasn't even just vending machines. They put a few in the burbs north of Houston, where there's millions of drivers and failed miserably.

      Every time someone drives past it, it just looks empty so nobody bothered going there.

  3. *create* jobs? by supernova87a · · Score: 1

    Not likely. Everything about this says taking the distributors and inefficient parts of the supply chain out of the picture.

    He may *say* "not taking away jobs", but that's just a saying -- not something he knows. Or at least, it's not going to be likely that the jobs created make up for the jobs lost.

    How long before hipsters (or Hispanic people) in the Mission start torching these?

    1. Re:*create* jobs? by elrous0 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The fact that they're "ex-Google employees" says it all to me. So they're 20-something tech-heads who think every problem can be solved by an app. It probably never even occurred to them that an app can actually CREATE problems. It's all about the VC funding and dropping tech buzzwords to angels. Who cares if it actually works or whether it puts real people out of work? It's an appy app, so give us our money that we haven't earned!

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    2. Re:*create* jobs? by WheezyJoe · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This. Nobody gets into this business to create jobs, they do it to sell stuff.
      THE RULE: Profit = Sales minus Jobs (and other irritating expenses)
      But TALK and LIES are free, so you can say you're creating jobs if it maybe creates/increases sales.
      "create jobs" my fanny. Let the record show he talks shit to the public to make his business plan look good.

      How long before hipsters (or Hispanic people) in the Mission start torching these?

      Please, no fires. Fires lead to riot tanks, rubber bullets, jack-booted free-market police. Be sensible, and clever. A little super-glue and spray-paint works wonders on keypads and other devices, hypothetically of course.

      --
      Take it easy, Charlie, I've got an Angle...
    3. Re:*create* jobs? by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1

      Not likely. Everything about this says taking the distributors and inefficient parts of the supply chain out of the picture.

      Somebody's going to have to keep it stocked and in good repair. Typically that's an independent owner grinding out a living who's going to pay close attention to each machine they own. That keeps all the incentives lined up. Paying an employee to do it is just asking for second rate service.

    4. Re:*create* jobs? by supernova87a · · Score: 1

      Yeah, someone has to keep it stocked. But the whole point of these is that one person can stock a whole bunch distributed across a wide area, probably the same person who previously would have minded just one shop. How can there not be job loss.

    5. Re:*create* jobs? by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1

      I was replying to the distributor comment. I don't know the answer to your question. This isn't going to replace a whole store, obviously, but if they cherry-pick the most profitable items it will hurt them. I'm skeptical, but if it somehow works then there's really nothing that can be done. Neighborhood bodegas rely on being able to charge more than the big stores in exchange for convenience. If that convenience can be found at a lower price then that's where people will shop. But I think they underestimate the problems.

    6. Re:*create* jobs? by alvinrod · · Score: 1

      I think it's a silly idea that anyone can create jobs, whether its a government or even a business. I suppose if you had a massive amount of capital you can slowly dispense it and have people do whatever you want them to, but that's clearly not sustainable. It's consumer demand that ultimately creates jobs, otherwise you could simply have people make and sell mud sculptures of Elvis for a living and there would be no unemployment.

      Fortunately for us all, humans have pretty much an endless supply of wants. Sure once you have a lot of many different goods, you might not want that much more of it, but there's always things that wear out and require repair or replacement. Even when a person has plenty of material goods, they typically also want social status, or to be able to spend more time with their family, or to have some new experience in their life.

      As you point out though, no one else really cares about anyone else's job. They just want goods and services at lower costs because it makes their own labor more valuable by comparison. There aren't too many cases where humans will go against this either, and most examples tend to be focused around small communities or tribal groups. The jobs will be lost sooner or later whether this company succeeds or its someone else with a similar idea and better execution. Small town general stores were largely supplanted by large wholesalers like Sears that would deliver, who were in turn replaced by malls and a new generation of retailers, who are now all dying because companies like Amazon are eating their lunch. The common thread is that its consumers who are dictating what jobs exist based on who can supply them with the cheapest access to the goods and services they desire. In the same way this might kill corner stores, but eventually something is going to kill these. Sure, existing jobs will be lost, but they give way to new ones in turn.

    7. Re:*create* jobs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Say two guys doing the stocking, Two guys doing the maintenance - although usually with vending machines it's just one guy that does both, but let's be generous here.

      In exchange for the area they cover (not everything needs fixing or complete re-stocking every day) say maybe twenty units, that's twenty corner stores that just lost their sales of probably the most critical stuff that attracts customers, all of which are going to have to cut down. Let's be generous again and say they only drop one shift by closing a bit earlier instead of being open every night.

      So already, we have 4 jobs replacing 20 jobs. And that's basically a best-case scenario. It's far more likely two jobs replacing 30 jobs and 5 business owners since some - but not all - of them will fold after a year or two of this. He gets to say he "created 4 jobs", and then just blames everything else - even laziness, we've seen that one bandied about quite often - for losing their business or employees, that has nothing to do with him.

    8. Re: *create* jobs? by Reverend+Green · · Score: 1

      Thank you for elegantly demonstrating why capitalism is a curse on our people.

    9. Re: *create* jobs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Limited amount of natural resources though.

    10. Re:*create* jobs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why should I care if the corner store charging exorbinant prices gets replaced by a machine charging slightly less exorbinant prices?

      To save your irl 7-11 job?

    11. Re: *create* jobs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cool down. It ist Just vending Machines hooked to Smartphones.

      No competition to serious Markers. Both in Terms of Service and economics.

    12. Re: *create* jobs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vending Machines cannot compete with real markets and Shops. Cool down.

    13. Re: *create* jobs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The weaving machine Had much bigger efficiency gains. The world did Not Break down, despite all the leftist Siren Songs.

    14. Re:*create* jobs? by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      These sound like a great way to move illicit products. Whether your switching items out yourself, or the distributor is putting a box of potatoes out that is packed with heroin...
      I wonder if that is the point.

    15. Re: *create* jobs? by WheezyJoe · · Score: 1

      Thank you for elegantly demonstrating why capitalism is a curse on our people.

      Respectfully, that's not what I said. Sometimes, a lot more times than we give credit actually, Profit=Sales-Jobs works out, when the interests of consumers, employees and business-owners align. In a functioning economy, where you can reliably call Domino's and actually get food in exchange for debit on your bank card, this alignment is happening a lot more often than you think.

      It's when people get too greedy, and make-believe that marketing alone, particularly based on clever half-truths and lies, can make them rich without a decent or actual product, do things go sour. The modern trend or fashion of maximizing profits, at the expense of both employees and customers, is what sickens capitalism and leads to dumb ideas like electronic street bodegas, and ridiculous press-releases about "creating jobs" specifically intended to i) waive off government scrutiny and ii) attract more investors (fine print: return on investment not guaranteed).

      Capitalism isn't perfect - nothing is, and expecting it to be of course will leave you disappointed, bitter, anti-social, or ranting/raving on Slashdot. Chill. Go to a locally-owned coffee shop, pay the man for a freshly-baked muffin and a hot cup of joe, and realize that business usually works fine, except for a few asshats trying to get rich quick by cheating. If you become aware of the cheating, and consumers voice their opposition, workers choose not to work there, and investors withdraw their support, and maybe even an elected government sends inspectors to expose the bad meat, the cheater goes down in flames, and the delicate balance of interests that we call "capitalism" is working. Capitalism fails only where we tolerate lies, cheating, and dirty little secrets, the same things that fuck up everything everywhere.

      --
      Take it easy, Charlie, I've got an Angle...
    16. Re: *create* jobs? by Reverend+Green · · Score: 1

      ranting/raving on Slashdot. Chill.

      Thank you for amusing us all with your gratuitous bold-faced text and charmingly naive conception of economics. However I was replying to noted slumlord roman_mir, not you. Please consider taking your own advice as quoted above.

    17. Re: *create* jobs? by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1

      what makes you think my temperature is abnormally high? I'm just talking. This is not an exciting thing to me. And if anything you can see by my comment that I don't think this will be replacing bodegas.

    18. Re: *create* jobs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you were replying to roman_mir why did you reply directly to WhizzyJoe? Please note that your post is within his thread and not this other individual you mentioned.

    19. Re: *create* jobs? by WheezyJoe · · Score: 1

      At least he said I was charming, and amusing! Win!
      Time for coffee and a muffin!

      --
      Take it easy, Charlie, I've got an Angle...
    20. Re:*create* jobs? by liquid_schwartz · · Score: 1

      Please, no fires. Fires lead to riot tanks, rubber bullets, jack-booted free-market police.

      While I agree with no fires, it's way too late regarding the jack booted police state.

    21. Re:*create* jobs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speaking of jobs ... do you want fires with that?

    22. Re: *create* jobs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On mine it says he is replying to roman_mir. Your shit is busted ya cuck.

    23. Re: *create* jobs? by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      The modern trend or fashion of maximizing profits, at the expense of both employees and customers,

      "maximizing profits" is a company's job.

      is what sickens capitalism and leads to dumb ideas like electronic street bodegas,

      I think it's kind of a dumb idea too, but did you say the same thing about vending machines, or even automats (halfway between a vending machine and a restaurant), over full service restaurants/stores?

  4. Combine it with Uber by glitch! · · Score: 1

    Instead of planting fancy vending machines, why not double down on "because... Internet!" and combine it with Uber. The driver would have a mini store in the trunk and the Magical App would connect the customer with the nearest driver with matching inventory. They could call it something like "web van".

    --
    A dingo ate my sig...
    1. Re:Combine it with Uber by lucm · · Score: 2

      They could call it something like "web van".

      Webvan were right. They just came in 15 years and 15 billions too early. If they had launched a year or two ago during the startup gold rush they would have enjoyed unlimited funding. It would have failed eventually but they could have published their story on medium.com and they would have been heroes instead of losers.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    2. Re:Combine it with Uber by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should patent that idea and then get millions in VC money. Then piss it away on parties without creating an actual product. Winning!

  5. Um, every corner store I know by rsilvergun · · Score: 2

    is part of a major chain. The only one that's not completely awful is Qwik Trip, which at least pays it's people moderately well. What I remember was they all ran 24-7 and the folks on the night shift were going to get shot sooner or later. It was never a question of if it was when.

    I guess what I'm saying is, who still has a nice little mom & pop shop left that they can get mad at bodega? I watched all those get swallowed up by Circle K/7-11 in the late 80s. Even the immigrants don't run 'em any more.

    On the other hand it's hilarious having this guy talk about making jobs with a business model who's entire point is eliminating cashiers. And you can damn well bet the guys that stock these things will be on the 'sharing' economy payscale where they somehow manage to earn less than minimum wage and it's still legal. I'd like to think the backlash is more about that than about actual bodegas.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re: Um, every corner store I know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just remember, "um" rhymes with "dumb".

    2. Re:Um, every corner store I know by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      I live in a semi-rural area in the Puget Sound region. There are convenience stores here which are individually owned and managed. The closest one to my house is run by Vietnamese immigrants, actually.

      Some of the larger local farms also have their own seasonal stores - this area produces a lot of berries, something like 50% of the US' total rhubarb production, and the vast majority of its daffodil bulbs. These local farms are family owned.

      There are, of course, also some chains like 7/11 - but those tend to be in more semi-urban areas.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    3. Re:Um, every corner store I know by MangoCats · · Score: 1

      The real challenge will be breaking into the current stores' hegemony on business licenses, permits, zoning restricitons, etc.

    4. Re:Um, every corner store I know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A rhubarb is a vegetable, not a berry.

    5. Re:Um, every corner store I know by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      And daffodils are neither - that's why there are commas in that sentence.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    6. Re:Um, every corner store I know by Cinnamon+Beige · · Score: 1

      About the only jobs I see this actually displacing is that poor night shift cashier's--and that actually circulates among the staff, at many locations. I'm inclined to expect to see these turn up in the minimart, and possibly even just so you don't lose sales merely because somebody's gotten rid of your cashier...so the whole store's still gotta be open even at 3AM, the cashier just isn't needed for many of the transactions.

    7. Re: Um, every corner store I know by Reverend+Green · · Score: 1

      Googledouches sure do hate working people.

    8. Re:Um, every corner store I know by kamapuaa · · Score: 1

      I live in the Bay Area, and:

      1) Every retailer except bodegas is a chain. I mean, of course they have 7-11s, but the place on the corner or in a strip mall is locally owned by some family of immigrants.

      2) I had never heard of the term "bodega" until like a week ago. Liquor stores or corner stores.

      --
      Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
    9. Re: Um, every corner store I know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Googledouches sure do hate working people.

      Working people also hate rich, autistic geeks like you. You have much more in common with the Googledouches you apparently despise.

    10. Re: Um, every corner store I know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your little tidbit is as useless as this post.

    11. Re:Um, every corner store I know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reading comprehension much?

    12. Re:Um, every corner store I know by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      I guess what I'm saying is, who still has a nice little mom & pop shop left that they can get mad at bodega?

      This is very, very region-dependent. Some parts of the nation are chains as far as the eye can see (I call those areas "cultural wastelands). Other parts have many more genuine small businesses than chains.

    13. Re:Um, every corner store I know by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      AFAIK, "corner stores" (which 7-11 seems to be the most well known example) are different from bodegas. Bodegas seem to have a tiny bit more stuff like a 'regular' grocery store, PLUS all of the junk food and such... But they're still tiny. (They're all over NYC, at least according to TV shows set there!)

  6. Non-apology apology by elrous0 · · Score: 1

    We're sorry. And we promise that we're going to immediately change our business model in no way. Did we mention that we're sorry?

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re: Non-apology apology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Flagged for 2 Youtube links in the same post. And really, the same link both times? Just how "um" do you think we are?

    2. Re:Non-apology apology by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      there is really nothing to apologize for. that is what I find most problematic about this. people need to stop apologizing just because others are offended or angry at things when there is no legitimate reason to be so. All this behavior does is signal to these consistent complainers is that their complaining is working. stop rewarding stupid behavior.

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    3. Re: Non-apology apology by elrous0 · · Score: 2
      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  7. I don't see the innovation by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 4, Informative

    Bodega's CEO sees it as a way to beat Amazon by offering immediate access to popular products

    We've had that for centuries - it's called a store. These guys' model just potentially moves the pickup point slightly closer to us.

    And, given the inherently higher maintenance costs of their business model (repeatedly stopping and restocking these small "every 100 feet" locations with tiny deliveries), even without on-site staff it's hard to see how this could be competitive with either a traditional store or with Amazon.

    TechCrunch reports the company has already raised $2.5 million

    Given the type of business they're trying to create, that's not actually very much at all.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:I don't see the innovation by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Given the type of business they're trying to create, that's not actually very much at all.

      Unless they've already tried it at a small scale in a few places, then $2.5 billion looks like they are scaling too quickly.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    2. Re:I don't see the innovation by MangoCats · · Score: 1

      If you move the pickup point close enough to suburban American bedrooms that they can (and do) walk to it instead of getting in the car, you've made a major cultural shift.

    3. Re:I don't see the innovation by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      It's 2.5 million, not billion.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    4. Re:I don't see the innovation by ark1 · · Score: 1

      Amazon drones and self driving cars will get it to your door.

    5. Re:I don't see the innovation by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Oh, I read it wrong, and you're right, that is nothing. It's enough to buy a few vending machines on ebay and experiment with them at a few locations.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    6. Re:I don't see the innovation by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      These guys' model just potentially moves the pickup point slightly closer to us.

      And "staffed" it 24/7/365.

    7. Re:I don't see the innovation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This.

      I did my MBA thesis on "last mile business models" and the sad truth is that they are almost universally non-viable in the US because of suburbs and low-density cities. The only city in all of America where the population density is sufficient to have any chance at all is: wait for... NYC! And they've already adapted a socio-economic business model called (the original) bodega!

      Last mile costs are exponential and they suffer from NP-completeness in terms of cost optimization. The best you can hope for is setting up hubs to reduce the size of N (which is what Amazon has done BTW) which merely makes the NP-complete routing "heuristically manageable".

      Add to this the tone-deafness of the Bodega business model which 1) pushed cost into employees, 2) drives profits out of the many into the few, 3) drives middle class into poverty/lower class, and 4) solves a "problem" that doesn't even exist.

      It would be so easy to address a socially creative/multiplicative/generative product/model for these but because these guys' only experience is at Google, so every "problem" looks like a nail, so the only solution is the typically destructive (new) Silicon Valley solution of throwing technology at it even when technology isn't the right primary solution. Typically the socially inept trying to apply their narrow understanding of the world upon the rest of society that doesn't really need them. Missing the forest for the trees. Cluelessness.

  8. Weak CEO's do what? by Presence+Eternal · · Score: 1

    "...the right questions of the right people." What a sad sack of crap CEO. Kids, never apologize to people who feel slighted on other people's behalf. The obeisance they demand is never-ending and will suck you dry. Especially never apologize to people who use terms like "cultural misappropriation" unironically. And especially especially never apologize to people who were never going to be your customers in the first damn place.

    Also never apologize to people who are angry over the loss of "character." They're the ones who bemoan the loss of public libraries they never visit.

    1. Re:Weak CEO's do what? by Jack9 · · Score: 0

      > Kids, never apologize to people who feel slighted on other people's behalf.

      Never apologize to people who feel slighted in any context. You cannot control for how other people feel and are not responsible for them or their experiences. Words are not violence. Words are the first alternative to violence. The moral perversions to the contrary, that have begun eroding western culture, are poisonous to reason.

      --

      Often wrong but never in doubt.
      I am Jack9.
      Everyone knows me.
  9. No, Standing Next To It by WheezyJoe · · Score: 1

    A vending machine with a person inside it?

    Standing next to it, to help people who can't work it, reset it when it breaks, print coupons when it eats money or mangles the goods, and call the cops when an angry consumer goes insane. Just like the guy standing at the "self-checkout" lanes at your grocery store.

    --
    Take it easy, Charlie, I've got an Angle...
    1. Re:No, Standing Next To It by Presence+Eternal · · Score: 1

      Man, I wish my local stores had someone to tend the self checkouts. All we get is a flashing light when there's a problem. Employees try to come help, but they're moving against the current, borne back ceaselessly into the past.

    2. Re:No, Standing Next To It by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      The business mode sounds ridiculous to me. Basically, it trusts your smartphone camera to do the checkout for you, and trusts the customer to video everything they take from the machine. In the real world, unless it's in a *very* secure location with someone watching, criminals will game the shit out of those things immediately. They'll open it up with a burner or stolen phone, steal everything, then toss the phone.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    3. Re:No, Standing Next To It by elrous0 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I've actually went back to a full-service grocery store again. It was bad enough when most stores started making us bag our own groceries. Now they want us to check ourselves out too. Pretty soon they'll be asking customers to stock the shelves and clean the bathrooms.

      Fuck that noise. I'll pay a few dollars extra to get real humans helping me, thanks.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    4. Re:No, Standing Next To It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I bag my groceries better than most supermarket employees.

      There is a reason that they work at a supermarket, and not a job that actually pays decently. Similarly, there is a reason why I have a mentally challenging job with lots of responsibility, many people who depend on me, and many complex problems to solve.

      And that reason is: I am good at Tetris.

      I can group cold stuff together. I can arrange items so the bananas don't get squished, the eggs don't get crushed, one bag isn't 100 pounds, and there aren't three bags each with one item in them. And I can do this on the fly, without planning, without frantically pulling items back out of a bag to put them in another. I can do this naturally.

      So, given the significant difference in quality of service here, I would rather do this myself.

    5. Re: No, Standing Next To It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This! Just had a young checker place my eggs in the bottom of the bag. She was very nice and apologetic about in putting then there, hoping they don't break. Didn't have the heart to tell her they should go on top of everything.

    6. Re: No, Standing Next To It by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 2

      Eggs should go on top of everything? I question your logic. Have you ever tried eggs on top of spaghetti? Yuck.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    7. Re: No, Standing Next To It by chipschap · · Score: 2

      Have you ever tried eggs on top of spaghetti? Yuck.

      Obviously you never tried carbonara.

    8. Re:No, Standing Next To It by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      When I lived I the US I found them bagging groceries for you just plain odd.

      Actually I learned that the purpose of soft fruits is padding so when you put the eggs on the bottom, you put a layer of raspberries above so the eggs don't break when you pile the potatoes on top.

      But seriously most baggers suck at bagging. Also what astonished me is how long people were prepared to wait to have a bagger turn up. The staff always seemed surprised that I'd deign to bag my own groceries rather than stand there like a Muppet waiting 10 minutes doing nothing while someone came off break.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    9. Re:No, Standing Next To It by pnutjam · · Score: 2

      Why would they do that when they can swap out some bisquick for an identical box stuffed with heroin. Sounds like a great dead drop.
      Swap a box stuffed with heroin for a box stuffed with cash.

    10. Re:No, Standing Next To It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like to bag my own groceries the way I prefer.
      I also like to be able to feed lots of random small change into the machine and get something tidy out (and yes, I only do this when there's no queue).
      I don't want to have an awkward conversation with someone who's obviously been told by their manager to 'interact with the customer' but who's heart obviously isn't in it.

    11. Re: No, Standing Next To It by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      Eggs on pasta sustained me when I needed to save money.

      Quite delicious.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    12. Re:No, Standing Next To It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'll pay a few dollars extra to get real humans helping me, thanks.

      That's the thing about market forces. Those "full-service" grocery stores still exist because there is a large enough market for them in some places. The same reason No Frills exist, because there is a market for people who don't mind bringing reusable bags and packing their own goods and pay less because of it. The chains the middle may be leaning towards the No Frills side simply because that model works and they have to compete.

    13. Re: No, Standing Next To It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eggs on top of everything!!?? Eggs go under bread and light shit or by themselves if there's no light shit.

    14. Re: No, Standing Next To It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True story. My youngest is working part time at the local supermarket, sweeping up. Mom sees him and says to her elementary school kid, "See, that's why you need an education: so you don't wind up like that boy there". Without a word, my son pulls out his college ID and holds it up to her. Woman backpedals away gripping her kid's hand and apologizing for insulting my son.

      And yeah, a lot of baggers don't know how to do it correctly, but then being undertrained and undereducated is almost a badge of honor in America nowadays. At least for the people running things, who think that's somehoe the road to greater profits instead of business failure. My oldest is working behind the deli counter in the same store on weekends, and makes a special effort to try filling in the gaps in the training of new workers. To say they don't get much in the way of meaningful preparation is an understatement. Of course it's only a part time gig for him as well. During the week he's struggling with the vagaries of C# programming and simulation design in his college CS lab.

    15. Re: No, Standing Next To It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and putting leftover pasta in scrambled eggs the next morning. Fantastic!

    16. Re:No, Standing Next To It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It depends on the store you go to. Most inexpensive stores have you bagging your own groceries.

    17. Re:No, Standing Next To It by sexconker · · Score: 2

      I bag my groceries better than most supermarket employees.

      There is a reason that they work at a supermarket, and not a job that actually pays decently. Similarly, there is a reason why I have a mentally challenging job

      You're mentally challenged?

    18. Re:No, Standing Next To It by geekoid · · Score: 1

      So you walking up to a checkout. A human will do it for 10 bucks, or do it yourself. Which do you choose?

      Anyway, this is the ultimate goal:

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    19. Re:No, Standing Next To It by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Security and private club. A lot fewer shoplifters at costco.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    20. Re: No, Standing Next To It by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      Fried spaghetti! That's what I'd do mostly.

      Make a huge pot, and after day one use the slightly dry pasta in eggs like that.

      Could eat not too terribly for very little money.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
  10. This whole thing is nothing but one ... by Qbertino · · Score: 2

    ... big bullshitty PR drumroll. A completely staged pseudo-controversy. Nothing else.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
  11. Sorry by Kohath · · Score: 2

    Sorry a bunch of internet drama people freaked out about nothing. Sorry a news report created a false narrative and a mob of angry jerks believed it. Sorry you were trolled. Sorry that simple, entirely voluntary commerce is so upsetting to some people with a loose grip on rationality.

    Let me make it up to you by telling you a completely different nonsense story full of soothing pretense. That's what shallow drama people understand.

    1. Re:Sorry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean something like the outrage factories called Fox News or InforWars?

      Are they gearing up to fight that "War on Christmas" again?
      How about that Obama-didn't-wear-a-flag-pin drama? Is there another candidate that they can get into a tizzy over?

      Is the Pizzaria-is-a-Clinton-front-for-pedophiles? Is that still a big story on Fox News? Or was that just InfoWars?

      Or maybe the latest claim that Jennifer Lawrence said that Trump was to blame for the hurricanes? Nevermind that she didn't say that.

    2. Re:Sorry by Kohath · · Score: 1

      You mean something like the outrage factories called Fox News or InforWars?

      Yeah, that stuff sucks. People shouldn't watch any TV news and they should be deeply skeptical of any other news reports. Especially if the stories are interesting or seem to confirm a specific belief or bias they hold.

      "There are fools on the other side too" isn't really saying much, is it? Let's all stop being fools and tell our people to stop believing this garbage and letting themselves be manipulated for an agenda or for ad clicks.

      Or maybe the latest claim that Jennifer Lawrence said that Trump was to blame for the hurricanes? Nevermind that she didn't say that.

      I looked it up. She tied hurricanes to "voting" through climate change. Celebrities say stupid stuff like this all the time. When there's a disaster with an very obvious human toll, making political statements about it is extremely bad form. Hopefully she learned not to do that.

      It's sad that Fox is taking statements out of context and trolling their viewers the same way CNN does.

  12. Trumpian job promises. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they were, as they're promising, hiring people enough to replace mom and pop stores then it would be happening already. What an idiotic claim, don't they think investors deserve realism? This is the age of horseshit.

    1. Re:Trumpian job promises. by lucm · · Score: 3, Insightful

      hiring people enough to replace mom and pop stores

      Yeah, they're "gig-economying" jobs that were already low-paid and uncertain. True pioneers.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    2. Re:Trumpian job promises. by wyHunter · · Score: 1

      They're true lefties, actually. Make people poor and desperate.

    3. Re:Trumpian job promises. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ho ho! The ol' Switcheroo! Very popular in the 4th grade, if I remember correctly. That whole I'm rubber, you're glue thing.

  13. This is just the start by boudie2 · · Score: 1

    If this succeeds their next project is a robot prostitute, the Ho-dega.

    1. Re:This is just the start by stabiesoft · · Score: 1

      I thought Woody Allen invented that decades ago. It was called the orgasmatron.

    2. Re:This is just the start by boudie2 · · Score: 1

      It still makes me laugh when thinking of the look on his face as he "engaged" with the Orgasmatron.

    3. Re:This is just the start by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Barbarella's orgasmatron predated Woody's by 5 years. He didn't invent it. Likely didn't remember where/that he had seen it, thought it was original.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  14. Bring On The Vending Machines! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hate dealing with staff in a shop so I I always go to the self-service checkout at the supermarket. Between going to a corner shop or a vending machine, I'd take the vending machine.

    When human staff increase cost and reduce the quality of service, they represent a detrimental factor to the business. Vending machines are clearly a good business model and I'll use them as long as they match the price at the supermarket.

    1. Re:Bring On The Vending Machines! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why I order as much food as is available from Amazon and Walmart. Still have to buy bananas and eggs at the store, but that's about it. Sick of waiting in line at the checkout for some mouthbreather to scan everything, and then wait for some overtanned wrinkled-at-30 soccer mom to fiddle around with her purse to find a credit card to pay for a $40 bill; the whole time some guy coughing and sniffling behind me holding a bunch of cold medicine. Fuck human operated stores.

    2. Re: Bring On The Vending Machines! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And with less people around I am free to snipe you from across the street and just waltz on over to pick up your wallet... I don't even have to go through a door.

  15. "Welfare" fraud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    When you hear conservatives moaning about "food stamp" (or EBT or SNAP) fraud, a lot of the real examples behind their complaints come from what goes down at bodegas. Scams like buying a $5 item, having the register ring up $95 in sales and the bodega owner splitting the $90 with the welfare recipient.

    There are still plenty of real bodegas out there, but they are primarily in lower income areas so if you didn't think they still existed then you are probably doing fairly well. This is also why most of their profits come from sale of age-controlled items such as cigarettes, alcohol and lottery tickets.

      And if financial news reporters were better than cheerleaders in business suits, they would be ripping this business startup as doomed to failure because it's founders:
    1) fail to understand the business they claim to want to disrupt
    2) fail to offer a means of conducting the highest-profit transactions that business has

    Only if they had even talked a smidge about having ideas for handling age-restricted sales could I see their venture as anything other than a vehicle to fleece venture capitalists. Shit, they could have just hand waved about "leveraging Face ID to reduce friction in high value sales" to demonstrate a minimal comprehension of their self-described target market...

  16. Oblig Bad Car Analogy by PPH · · Score: 1

    We're sorry we named our new product line 'Buggy Whip'. We will immediately re-brand it as 'automobile'.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  17. Not the first or last of these. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My default stance is, if we have a way to do things that requires less jobs, that should actually be the goal. Other than ensuring that people have an income and are able to live, why would you want to CREATE work? Technology is about reducing the amount of work, and progress has always BEEN about reducing work. Domestication and agriculture changed society so that instead of everyone having to work for their food (and being mostly unable to do anything else) we could have some people handle the food and let other people do other things with their time. Whether by this kiosk system or the next, if you are a cashier start training for something else, because it's not going to be a career option in 20 years.

    At the same time, I feel bad that we will lose it, as I do like interacting with people when I go shopping. We should consider what the goal of this efficiency is. What do we enable by getting rid of that obsolete worker? If, because of the way our society is currently structured, replacing a job with a robot hurts someone, and doesn't actually provide that person with a new opportunity, and is merely giving the rich more money and more ways to exploit the poor, then we should rail against those plans with everything we've got. While efficiency is a worthy goal, I think personal experiences and livelihood are more important than progress, unless we doom the race by ignoring that progress.

    I don't think that replacing the corner store with a kiosk is going to be one of the advances that save us from the apocalypse.

  18. Sure... by xlsior · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Bodega's CEO sees it as a way to beat Amazon by offering immediate access to popular products

    Best Buy offers you immediate access to popular products too, but that just makes them Amazon's de-facto showroom instead.

    Given the *extremely limited* storage space constraints of a typical vending machine, that will be guaranteed to mean "Current inventory: two types of luke-warm soda of a flavor you can't stand, a cellphone charger that's not compatible with your phone, and a special deal on sombrero's. Oh, and don't mind the homeless people using the side of our unattended machine as a public bathroom".

    Other thoughts:
    It seems very unlikely that the particular machine that you're close to will carry what you're looking for, even when limiting themselves to 'popular products'. After all, it is an incredibly inefficient way to manage your inventory. Example: you want a cellphone charger. in a typical store, they'd have half a dozen sitting on a shelf. Depending on the size of the store, that serves customers anywhere from within the next few blocks, to half a city. With these vending machines, they'd needs hundreds of them to cover a similar size chunk of town that the current single store does. And even then, the odds that the machine you are standing next to won't have it are huge because at best they carried one or two, and it's not like they'll be restocking these multiple times a day... (And if they ARE continuously driving in circles restocking these all day, everyday, then expect that the price for any item is going to be a multitude of normal, it's WAY more expensive to drive around all day than to just pay a minimum wage worker in a traditional store to unpack a few pallets worth of products)

    Meanwhile, they want to compete with Amazon, who carries 480 million different products on their website, and which on top of that already offers 1 hour delivery service in limited markets -- Good luck with that, not holding my breath...

    1. Re:Sure... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      They also have the minor problem of existing vending machines. I wouldn't be surprised if they actually believe that the tendency of current vending machines to mostly stock a tiny selection of soda, snacks, and candy is just because it's an ossified legacy industry that does not understand the glory of 'apps'; nor would I imagine that finding some VCs who share this belief will be tricky; but I would strongly suspect that they will either learn the hard way that current vending machine selection sucks because that's what keeps the cost of keeping the things stocked to acceptable levels; or (if they do have some amazing logistical plan), will find that existing vending machine operators will be much happier to adopt the new plan than they be to go out of business.

    2. Re:Sure... by MangoCats · · Score: 1

      It _could_ work well, if it stocked things that you normally drive to the market often for like milk, juice, eggs, etc.

      It could also work well as a sort of community mailbox for commonly purchased items - if you wanted a particular brand of bacon or yogurt, you could order it on an app in your phone and go to the refrigerated mailbox to pick it up. If you're a good faithful customer they'll keep stocking your stuff, if you never show to pick it up you might become lower priority compared to their more reliable customers.

    3. Re:Sure... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      They also have the minor problem of existing vending machines. I wouldn't be surprised if they actually believe that the tendency of current vending machines to mostly stock a tiny selection of soda, snacks, and candy is just because it's an ossified legacy industry that does not understand the glory of 'apps';

      You can buy pretty much anything from a vending machine, including a car. (You have to make the purchase online because of laws around sale requirements which they can't fulfill with a simple vendomatic, but you go pick up the car without ever even speaking with a human.) In hotels you can buy bluetooth headphones and phone chargers from vending machines. There's no reason why you can't converge apps and vending machines (you ask the app which machine has the item you want, and then it holds it for you so that it's actually there when you get there — though this machine doesn't seem to have that capability) and in fact this has been done already. Sodastream, anyone?

      Since these machines are intended to be installed inside of other businesses, they can vend more expensive items than usual since they won't be so easy to compromise simply due to location. I think they're probably perfectly viable in a lot of situations.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  19. creating jobs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because wage slaves are better than independent business owners?
    I got some jobs for this tool!

  20. The stocking isn't a problem by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    if you can get desperate people to do your stocking for you because they can't find full time work.Amazon's doing that right now with their delivery system. One of my brother's coworkers delivers packages after work for them because he doesn't make enough money at his full time job to make ends meet.

    As long as we're giving companies a pass on minimum wage law because it's 'on an app' you'll see more of this. There's a whole universe of shitty business models that spring to life when the working class stops taking care of its own...

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  21. Wouldn't these things have more inventory? by rsilvergun · · Score: 2

    For the same reason robot warehouses have more stuff in them: They don't need aisles for those troublesome fleshies.. Plus no AC or heat. And they're not trying to compete with Amazon, they're competing with 7-11. I don't buy coffee and stale donuts online.

    You're right about the bums peeing, or more likely punks tagging the thing. Japan's had tons of vending machines selling damn near everything for ages. It works because they have very little vandalism. My guess is there'll be cameras everywhere and they'll track and prosecute people who tag the machines. Maybe get some laws passed for much, much harsher sentences for vandalism (in America that wouldn't be hard). After a few guys do 1-3 years hard time for spray painting a dick on these things word'll get around. Either that or they're gonna coat them in something that makes it really easy to clean spray paint off. But either way they've got to solve the vandalism problem somehow.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Wouldn't these things have more inventory? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No AC? You mean no refigeration? So you do want warm soda.

      Unless it is a tardis, a corner store still has more room. If this is just a cover for further developing their tardis tech, that's great, just let me know when I can apply it to my house or the trunk of my car.

  22. Good marketing by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    I think if CEO's are smart, we'll see more outrage targeting like this. It's so easy to manufacture a single statement that will generate a huge backlash - to which the right response can easily defuse things and in the meantime you have just gained a lot of recognition...

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  23. Look... this is stupid on multiple levels! by King_TJ · · Score: 1

    The thing I haven't really seen talked about here is that traditional bodegas will *never* be replaced by this type of business model. (Perhaps that's why some are offended they borrowed the name.) Bodegas as they exist in places like New York City, cater to lower income urban citizens who don't necessarily have the money to purchase what they need right away. Bodega owners often extend credit to these people, relying on knowing them personally and their past history. Their customers are likely NOT to have forms of credit like a credit debit cards that can be swiped or read at a vending kiosk.

    But even putting that aside? These automatic vending systems tend to suffer from mechanical breakdowns or loss of network connectivity (needed to verify the cards being processed). That's likely one reason they haven't become more popular a long time ago. This idea really isn't anything new at all. Pretty much any company who ever built a vending machine probably thought about it. It just doesn't make a whole lot of financial sense when you have to deal with people who may need to do returns or exchanges on whatever they buy, and who need basic necessities ASAP, so can't just "come back later" if the system can't vend them the loaf of bread or gallon of milk they're after for that night's dinner.

    As I recall, large scale vending like this was actually experimented with in some big cities. I recall being told about such a system on a street corner somewhere in Memphis, for example? I think it was done as a drive-up thing? Anyway, it was removed after a year or two. Apparently not so profitable or well liked.

  24. Another Revolutionary Concept by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a fucking vending machine. My only complaint is that there is no opportunity here for me to part fools with their money.

  25. The war on automation! by slasher999 · · Score: 1

    We're entering the age of the war on automation. We now have ways to automatically do many things that have typically done by cheap unskilled labor (i.e. shelf stocking, cashier, not small business owner) and the people who hold these jobs are going to revolt. No one wants to be seen as redundant or unnecessary, but that is what is happening. For years we've been seeing a shift from service oriented jobs to high tech jobs because in a capitalist economy we understand the later is more profitable and less risky in the long run. I don't hate the change, nor do I blame Bodega for what they envision (although that is a terrible name) but I do understand the perspective of those being displaced.

  26. See: Twice the Ice by MangoCats · · Score: 1

    Specialty vending machines, like Twice the Ice, and most gas stations these days, are awesome. Small drive-thru convenience stores like Farm Stores are becoming more automated, and could potentially go "operator free" for most of the 24 hour cycle.

    Personally, I'd rather have one of these automated stores within 1km throughout the residential neighborhoods, instead of the junk-marts that currently accompany basically every gas station in the US. If you got the auto-mart density up to 0.3km, people could walk to the store for a liter of milk or juice instead of having to get in the car.

    1. Re:See: Twice the Ice by CrybabiesArePeople · · Score: 0

      You seem to place the threshold at 300m, I would rather say: 0 to 1km: walk (at most, 30 mins of walking which is good for you), 1km to 4km: bike, further than 4km: car. This changes the density necessary for the system to be useful and efficient. BTW thanks for no using yards or miles :)

  27. I say again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is douchebaggery an official qualification requirement to work at Google? They are *surprised* there was outrage? I see this going the way of Soylent or that stupid juicer. Put *down* the LSD, kids.

  28. Sooo.. 21st century peice work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Given housing prices in many major cities, I guess well all be renting a sitting spot in a flop soon, thanks I always wondered what the 19th century was like

  29. Come to Mexico by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Literally every 100 ft or there abouts, someone has a tienda (store because bodega means closet).

    For some reason we don't do this in the USA anymore.
    We don't stress entrepreneurship and this is costing us a generation or more of future business innovators.

    Having lived in Mexico for 5 years now, I can tell you that Latin America is learning the lessons we in the USA discarded in order to sit in an office 60 hrs a week. But as these tiendas grow and as more people take their destiny into their own hands, they are coming to realize that they do not need corporate or banking masters and are beginning to throw off the chains of the USA style of social welfare and instead rely on their own ability to manage their own affairs.

    It is absolutely amazing to drive through these neighborhoods many with homes costing the equivalent of 30 years salary or more and realize these people bought and built everything they have.

    If you want a real eye opener I invite you to come on down here and take a look.

    Signed one very happy expat.

  30. Vending machines are not a new concept by magzteel · · Score: 1

    Like every other vending machine owner they will need to strike deals to place their machines and deal with restocking and broken machines.

  31. Everyone has a choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We all spend our money somewhere. We all have the right to choose where we spend it and what businesses we choose and do not choose to support. If you want to preserve the shops and character of your neighborhoods, choose with your wallet. Personally, I only look online as a last resort, I eat local, do my best to support local business and the culture they bring to my neighborhood. I get to know all the staff at the places I am a regular.

    Obviously attitudes like that are rare and big business has made nearly every city a homogeneous place with set in a different location with different weather. Sure some cities still have something unique, but business and technology are quickly obscuring and erasing those things leaving them to stories of "back in my day."

    Technology and big business are making it so Mom and Pop local businesses cannot compete because of volume and the better price points while simultaneously making the quality of our goods and services suffer. I have a few fans's from the early 1900's that still work today. If I go to Walmart and buy some cheap fan, I am lucky if it lasts 3 or 4 years of 247 operation, ending up in a landfill because its cheaper to buy a new one than fix the old one. I have a lot of shop equipment from the 40's and 50's I inherited from my father and work great to this day without ever needing a repair, beyond a little oil or grease every few years. I drive a 47 year old car, still with original paint and interior, and has only had handful of parts replaced. Runs like a champ and looks far better than modern cars. Oh and thanks to technology, I can play my music, use some map app, and use my cellphone via its FM radio.

    There is good and bad to all this progress. Imho, most of its been bad for humanity in recent decades and I have been responsible for some very significant aspects of it and that negative impact on society/ Years ago, like many older tech folks, I wised up and now choose my projects with more thought and wisdom on its impact to humanity and human nature.

    All those landfills with old tech. The marketing driven and builtin need to upgrade every few years. Think about the global impact of all the hurricane victims in the US. Millions of new TV's sold, cars bought, phones, shoes, clothes, dishes, toys, all those people will be buying new things that will end up in our environment in a few years because of the next hurricane or they break in a few years or whatever.

    Disaster Economics and Planned Obsolescence at its finest.

    The victim is humanity and quality of our goods. The earth will get along fine without us, while we keep supporting businesses and ways of living that will kill us all. Technology is not all bad, but the lack of ethics and morals and long term thinking about our future for stock growth and sales is what is creating these problems.

    If you are going to buy something, buy it with the intent that you will own it and use it your entire life. Do you just want it or need it. In a world with exponential population growth, things people want create a lot more waste than things people actually need.

    If you want to buy machine made food served in a box filled with germs, preservatives, and processed shit that causes health problems that's your choice. I'll go to my local farmers markets, stick with my fresh organic stuff that I know how it was grown and taken care of before coming home with me. Its the only way I can avoid the gluten, dairy, and yeast, that create disease in me and put me in the hospital if I consume to much of it. I used to think those issues were just getting old problems, until I figured it out and cut all of that out of my diet and ate in a manner more akin to folks 100 years ago when these common health and mental issues were not common as they are today.

    Similarly blaming someone and suing a company for something you purchased like cigarettes or fast food making you fat. That was your stupid and you deserve all the health issues and problems that come into your life because of it, just spread your shit on my lawn and in my body in the process.

    1. Re:Everyone has a choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +100. You sir are the enemy of liars. I am a friend to the the enemy of my enemy. ;-)

    2. Re:Everyone has a choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Technology and big business are making it so Mom and Pop local businesses cannot compete because of volume and the better price points while simultaneously making the quality of our goods and services suffer. I have a few fans's from the early 1900's that still work today. If I go to Walmart and buy some cheap fan, I am lucky if it lasts 3 or 4 years of 247 operation, ending up in a landfill because its cheaper to buy a new one than fix the old one. I have a lot of shop equipment from the 40's and 50's I inherited from my father and work great to this day without ever needing a repair, beyond a little oil or grease every few years. I drive a 47 year old car, still with original paint and interior, and has only had handful of parts replaced. Runs like a champ and looks far better than modern cars. Oh and thanks to technology, I can play my music, use some map app, and use my cellphone via its FM radio.

      Here is an easy example. Many people believe old things represent a higher level of craftsmanship than do new things. It’s sort of a “they don’t make them like they used to” kind of assumption. You’ve owned cars that only lasted a few years before you had to start replacing them piece by piece, and, would you look at that, there goes another Volkswagen Beetle buzzing along like it just rolled off an assembly line. It’s survivorship bias at work. The Beetle or the Mustang or the El Camino or the VW Minibus are among a handful of models that survived in large enough numbers to become iconic classics. The hundreds of shitty car designs and millions of automobile corpses in junkyards around the world far outnumber the popular, well-maintained, successful, beloved survivors. According to Josh Clark at HowStuffWorks, most experts say that cars from the last two decades are far more reliable and safer than the cars of the 1950s and ‘60s, but plenty of people believe otherwise because of a few high-profile survivors. The examples that would disprove such assumptions are rusting out of sight. Do you see how it’s the same as Wald’s bombers? The Beetle survived, like the bombers that made it home, and it becomes a representative of 1960s cars because it remains visible. All the other cars that weren’t made in the millions and weren’t easy to maintain or were poorly designed are left out of the analysis because they are now removed from view, like the bombers that didn’t return.

      Similarly, photographer Mike Johnston explains on his blog that the artwork that leaps from memory when someone mentions a decade like the 1920s or a movement like Baroque is usually made up of things that do not suck. Your sense of a past era tends to be informed by paintings and literature and drama that are not crap, even though at any given moment pop culture is filled with more crap than masterpieces. Why? It isn’t because people were better artists back in the day. It is because the good stuff survives, and the bad stuff is forgotten. So over time, you end up with skewed ideas of past eras. You think the artists of antiquity were amazing in the same way you associate the music of past decades with the songs that survived long enough to get into your ears. The movies about Vietnam never seem to include songs in their soundtracks that sucked.

      From: Survivorship Bias by David McRaney, May 23, 2013.

  32. japan can also sell beer at them Can't do that in by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    japan can also sell beer at them Can't do that in usa also what happens in japan when it jams and some beats the shit out of to un jam it??

  33. But this one's a STARTUP! by SeattleLawGuy · · Score: 1

    Like every other vending machine owner they will need to strike deals to place their machines and deal with restocking and broken machines.

    Ssssh, we're calling this one a "Startup."

    And to be fair, there is room for innovation in the vending machine space.

    --
    Real lawyers write in C++
    1. Re:But this one's a STARTUP! by wyHunter · · Score: 1

      They're just calling it a startup so they can get millions in VC, burn through it by going to Europe doing trade shows, then go out of business.

  34. Meanwhile in Finland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here in Finland they have started to open Modulshops where you can get few 100's off goods from wending machines. I have not visited yet, but one is just opening near by later this fall. One can open the door with credit card, pic the stuff from machines and go home. There are few of the, already, they serve 24/7. They say small normal shop can not produce enough for employing two persons, in 1 person shop the problem is that shopkeeper should visit retailer etc. from time to time. Night time extras and weekend salaries make also 24/7 opening difficult for normal shops unless you are some very big supermarket. With this system the owner can concentrate to maintaing storage etc. As it is cashless, there are also no problems with someone trying to rob you in some suburb in the middle of night.

    Company behind it: http://rivender.com/fi/etusivu/

    Some pictures in google: https://www.google.fi/search?q=modulshop&client=firefox-b&dcr=0&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjg79mNna7WAhVsJ5oKHfDNA5MQsAQIMw&biw=1332&bih=699

    Their promotional video. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ia8znILv6ZU

  35. Re:japan can also sell beer at them Can't do that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I asked about the beer and sake ones when I lived in Japan. The answer was they're all sitting out in the open, so any adult that sees a child buying alcohol would step in and stop them.

    I never had a vending machine properly jam over there, but I did have one try to deliver a drink and fail. It tried to drop the can out 3 times before giving up, putting that item as out of stock and spitting my money back out.

  36. Dumbass still doesn't GET IT by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

    We already have vending machines. You are not 'inventing' anything. We don't want just vending machines. We WANT convenience stores. GET A CLUE!

  37. People will be outraged! by geekoid · · Score: 1

    You know, until it can save them a nickel.

    Wal-Mart has never destroyed a small town, people who shop at wal-mart did.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect