Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Explains Why Edge Has So Few Extensions (betanews.com)

Mark Wilson writes: It's now a little more than a year since Microsoft first brought extensions to Edge. After so long you would expect the selection of addons to be overwhelming -- but that's far from being the case. In all, there are only 70-odd Edge extensions available, and Microsoft has been moved to explain why.

In a blog post, the company almost apologetically explains that it is "building a thoughtfully curated ecosystem," citing concern over quality and a fear of diminishing the user experience. What some might describe as "slow," Microsoft refers to as a "purposefully metered approach" to new extensions, and you probably shouldn't expect things to speed up a great deal any time soon.

Colleen Williams, senior program manager for Microsoft Edge, says "We want Microsoft Edge to be your favorite browser, with the fundamentals you expect -- speed, power efficiency, reliability, security." She also adds that "Astute observers of our release notes and active testers in the Insider program may have noticed that some preview builds break extensions temporarily."

152 comments

  1. Sigh. by ledow · · Score: 5, Funny

    Because they know that all it needs is one plugin, that replaces any web page you visit with a big "DOWNLOAD ANOTHER BROWSER" button that lets you grab Vivaldi, or Chrome/Chromium, or Firefox/IceWeasel, or whatever else.

    1. Re:Sigh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly, people simply don't use it. It seems the business world has ignored Edge too. I work for SAP and when we poll our customers and look at usage stats from our cloud services, we find Chrome is the most used. It also happens to be our recommended browser for internal use.

    2. Re:Sigh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People say Chrome's market share growth is because of Google pushing it everywhere they can. Well, Microsoft is pushing Edge hard - Cortana only uses Edge, and they've made Cortana harder to turn off now, etc etc - and yet Edge gets no love. Almost feel sorry for Microsoft, they must wonder what they're doing wrong.

    3. Re: Sigh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      What the fuck is cortana? Sounds like some sort of butthole disorder.

    4. Re: Sigh. by Insanity+Defense · · Score: 2, Funny

      What the fuck is cortana? Sounds like some sort of butthole disorder.

      Seems like an accurate description

    5. Re: Sigh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the fuck is cortana? Sounds like some sort of butthole disorder.

      That's about right.

    6. Re: Sigh. by Stephen+Battleware · · Score: 1

      LOL .. Cortana is a character from a software game which the people at Microsoft now use to anthropomorphize the creepy snitch spyware component of Windows 10's search utility. In Windows 10 Home you can turn it off with a registry edit, in Enterprise etc. through group policies (gpedit.msc). Once done, Windows Search will still function, but the Cortana malware component stays off.

    7. Re:Sigh. by geoskd · · Score: 2

      Almost feel sorry for Microsoft, they must wonder what they're doing wrong.

      It's not what they are doing wrong now, its what they've done wrong in the past.

      People who write browser extensions do it because they like the browser, but there is one little thing they think could be better. The problem Microsoft has is that most people who have a choice don't use edge because they don't trust microsoft, and people who use it because they have no choice are not the people who are going to write browser extensions.

      The only other path to browser extensions is profit, but theres no money in it because the market share is so low that it is essentially unmonetizable. Its the same basic problem that Microsoft had in mobile. The products are just fine, it's the company people don't trust. The only people who still like/trust Microsoft are those that are still ignorant of the real alternatives.

      --
      I wish I had a good sig, but all the good ones are copyrighted
    8. Re: Sigh. by Megol · · Score: 2

      Don't know if I should treat this as a bad troll or an insane idiot.

    9. Re: Sigh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting. A codename for a spyware.

    10. Re:Sigh. by paulatz · · Score: 1

      The fact that Cortana only uses Edge is in itself an excellent reason to not use Edge.

      --
      this post contain no useful information, no need to mod it down
    11. Re: Sigh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't understand why this was modded funny, I think it's a spot-on analysis.

    12. Re:Sigh. by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      And Cortana not being possible to turn off is a good reason to NOT use Edge.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    13. Re: Sigh. by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      What the fuck is cortana? Sounds like some sort of butthole disorder.

      It's a cream or ointment you can get for itching and hives. Usually comes in .5% and 1% strengths.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    14. Re: Sigh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anything that helps with itching is welcome, I guess.

    15. Re: Sigh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What specifically is incorrect? A feature that can't be (easily) turned off is a feature that gets criticism and conspiracy theories aimed at it.

    16. Re: Sigh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a sword.

      In the Marathon games, the AI Durandal was named after a sword. The game included quotes that alluded to the other two swords "of the same steel and temper", Cortana and Joyeuse.

      In the Halo games, the exact same story as Marathon was re-told with different names filled in like mad libs. The part that Durandal played in the Marathon series was named Cortana in the Halo series.

      Since Microsoft bought out Bungie (maker of Marathon and Halo) shortly before Halo was released and then made a fuckton of money from that franchise, they thought it would be "cute" to name their voice activated search software for Windows "Cortana", like it's a real AI or something.

      I'd rather have Durandal. At least he was a rampant, sadistic bastard with a plan. Cortana came across as mostly personality-free and more helpless and inept than anything else.

    17. Re:Sigh. by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      People say Chrome's market share growth is because of Google pushing it everywhere they can. Well, Microsoft is pushing Edge hard - Cortana only uses Edge, and they've made Cortana harder to turn off now, etc etc - and yet Edge gets no love. Almost feel sorry for Microsoft, they must wonder what they're doing wrong.

      The reason that Chrome is popular is that it isn't crappy. Even better when coupled with a chromebook. My Chromebook has had zero problems during a time when Windows has suffered many.

      And please Microsoft fans, spare that tired old meme about Google tracking you. Because Win10 is giving Microsoft the keys to your kingdom, you're information has already been compromised anyhow, and people are just waking up to th efact that the internet is to security like screendoors are to a submarine.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    18. Re:Sigh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People who write browser extensions do it because they like the browser, but there is one little thing they think could be better.

      No one can think of a way to improve Edge because it's already just that good!

    19. Re:Sigh. by Bill+Hayden · · Score: 2

      The only other path to browser extensions is profit, but theres no money in it because the market share is so low that it is essentially unmonetizable. Its the same basic problem that Microsoft had in mobile. The products are just fine, it's the company people don't trust. The only people who still like/trust Microsoft are those that are still ignorant of the real alternatives.

      It's actually a money-losing proposition. You have to pay Microsoft to be an official developer and publish your free Edge browser extension, not unlike Apple and Safari. To me, that's offensive -- so I only publish my browser extensions for Firefox and Chrome, even though they would run fine on Safari and Edge.

      --
      Protect your browser with the Force Safe Search add-on
    20. Re:Sigh. by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

      Edge isn't crappy. (The first release kind of was, but it has received many updates since then.) It just isn't quite as good as Chrome or Firefox. There is no compelling reason to switch to it, so people don't. To get people to switch Microsoft will have to make it BETTER than Chrome and Firefox, which is a challenge because those people have been working on their browsers for many years, and because we're getting to the Good Enough point where further improvements don't matter much.

      Internet Explorer is crappy. Anybody who is still running it should switch to something else, unless forced to stay with IE because of requirements of some crappy corporate site. If you're using Windows 10 and you'd prefer to stick with a Microsoft product, switch to Edge; you'll be happy.

    21. Re:Sigh. by BrinkeGuthrie · · Score: 1

      ""We want Microsoft Edge to be your favorite browser, with the fundamentals you expect -- speed, power efficiency, reliability, security" Ho Ho Ho. I had to spend five minutes retrieving my password just to comment on that quote. Now who on Earth thinks Edge is their favorite browser. Raise your hands. We'll all wait. Meanwhile, I'll check out the new Chrome Beta.

  2. Better explanation: by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The API is a massive security hole and can tank the entire browser with ease so they will only allow large companies that they can fight in court to make extensions.

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    1. Re:Better explanation: by freeze128 · · Score: 1

      It couldn't possibly be any worse than ActiveX.

    2. Re:Better explanation: by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      You underestimate the ability for new bugs in new generations of developers.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
  3. Doesn't explain Windows Store, though... by Aryeh+Goretsky · · Score: 1

    Hello,

    It is interesting how concerned Microsoft is about "building a thoughtfully curated ecosystem" with browser extensions that are "high-quality and trustworthy" for Microsoft Edge, while at the same time, its Windows Store offers many poor-quality mobile apps bordering on the scammy (fake browsers meant to look like Google Chrome, pirated copies of books, etc.) for years.

    Of course, Microsoft collects a percentage of sales from Store apps, so maybe it was more to their incentive to have it filled with these in order to inflate the number of apps back when the "app gap" was a concern before they abandoned Windows Phone/Windows 10 Mobile.

    I have to wonder, though, if Chrome and Firefox versus Edge is the new version of iOS and Android versus Windows Phone.

    Regards,

    Aryeh Goretsky

    --
    Dexter is a good dog.
    1. Re: Doesn't explain Windows Store, though... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      fake browsers meant to look like Google Chrome

      I'm pretty sure that Firefox is intended to be a real browser, even if it does a bad job at it.

    2. Re: Doesn't explain Windows Store, though... by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      It seems that MS is still stuck behind other companies when it comes to app stores. Whatever excuse they come up with, the real reason is that there are few users therefore few customers. Thus few developers who want to make apps or extensions. And history shows that eventually MS will abandon these systems leaving the developers and users without options. For example the Zune App Store then Windows Phone store, etc. Meanwhile Google and Apple app stores have billions of downloads daily.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    3. Re: Doesn't explain Windows Store, though... by Stephen+Battleware · · Score: 1

      I suppose people think Chrome is a browser and not Google right on your system spying.

    4. Re: Doesn't explain Windows Store, though... by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      I suppose people think Chrome is a browser and not Google right on your system spying.

      I suppose that no other software spies on you. If you are using W10, the idea that Chrome is a privacy issue is kinda funny.

      There is no, has been no, and never will be privacy on the internet anyhow., and if you haven't been compromised already, it is just luck. Don't go for the tor meme either, which use just makes you extremely interesting to some folks.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    5. Re: Doesn't explain Windows Store, though... by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

      "You have zero privacy anyway, get over it." Scott McNealy (then CEO of Sun Microsystems), 1998.

    6. Re: Doesn't explain Windows Store, though... by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      "You have zero privacy anyway, get over it." Scott McNealy (then CEO of Sun Microsystems), 1998.

      Pretty much hasn't changed either. If you are on the interwebs, it can be determined who you are. It all depends on how badly someone wants to find you, because it can take an effort. But they even found the Silk Road dude. They make a big deal out of the gumshoe part where they swooped in on him live to snatch his laptop, but they already knew who he was, where he was, and just needed the physical evidence.

      tl;dr version, if you want to do crime, don't do it on the internet.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  4. Edge is fine without a ton of extensions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Considering how extensions seem to be the target of hackers these days. I am fine with Microsoft being picky about what get's approved. I don't use extensions much and have really begun to like Edge as a browser. I also think its good to have Firefox making a comeback with Firefox 57 and so far I am impressed with the beta. Nice to see other browser stepping up to Chrome. I really don't want a dominant browser like we used to have with IE.

    1. Re:Edge is fine without a ton of extensions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice try at making that sound like a balanced but pro-Edge view, Mr Nadella, but how 'bought you leave the astrotufing to the pros.

    2. Re:Edge is fine without a ton of extensions by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      I love the whole Peewee Herman "I meant to do that" apologetic being pedaled by Redmond and its shills. Anything but admit that the majority of Windows 10 users view Edge as nothing more than the Chrome download app.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    3. Re:Edge is fine without a ton of extensions by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      I purposefully use the Chrome browser as little as possible. Because I don't want to contribute to the creation of the next big web monopoly. We've learned from Microsoft's past not to use the biggest thing every time.

    4. Re:Edge is fine without a ton of extensions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Firefox 57 is very disappointing. I kept hearing about how it's so much faster and lighter than Chrome, so I decided to try out the latest Firefox 57 beta for myself.

      My test was simple, realistic and practical: I started the browser, I loaded the Slashdot front page, I watched how long it took to load the page, and I checked the memory usage afterward.

      This is what the memory usage was like. Firefox used 829.9 MB of memory, while Chrome used only 683.4 MB. So Firefox used almost 23% more memory than Chrome did for the same usage pattern!

      Firefox also felt far slower, too. Firefox took longer to open. Firefox took longer to load pages. Even using the Firefox UI feels slow and laggy, while Chrome zips along really quickly.

      Firefox isn't making a comeback. It's dying.

      If Microsoft ported Edge to Linux and macOS, we'd finally have the real Chrome competitor we've wanted for so long. If Edge ran on LInux and macOS then we would have no need for Firefox.

    5. Re:Edge is fine without a ton of extensions by Stephen+Battleware · · Score: 1

      I don't care about minor speed differences. FF is certainly quick enough. Moreover, FF is really getting better. The latest is better organized. And the thing is so customizable. I don't do too much with it, but I made it look nicer, added the dictionary I wanted, and employ a well known tab addon that makes tabs work the way I want. It's cross-platform. Chrome spyware is pushed like a drug with every visit to a Google site, the ugly Edge spyware is built into the OS of most desktops/laptops, the FireFox software is a choice, like Vivaldi and others.

    6. Re:Edge is fine without a ton of extensions by MightyMartian · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Give it a rest already. They're all spying on us.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    7. Re:Edge is fine without a ton of extensions by johanw · · Score: 1

      Who cares if browser X is 2 ms faster that browser Y. They killed the adaptability in FF 57, that's why it is going to fail completely now. But what can you expect from a bunch of "the user should want it the way we do it" SJW's who fire people for their political views?

    8. Re:Edge is fine without a ton of extensions by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      The problem with the new Firefox is all plugins no longer working.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
  5. Edge is wanting by tobiasly · · Score: 1

    "We want Microsoft Edge to be your favorite browser"

    I'm reminded of a saying about wanting in one hand, and shitting in the other...

  6. If you want people to use Edge,... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You might want to fix some if it's issues. Such as randomly crashing when opening another browsing tab while on YouTube. Or maybe give users the ability to integrate other search engines and remove Bing. But, fuck, what do I know. I'm just a user and have no say in how my computer works anymore.

  7. I assumed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...it was because no bugger uses it.

  8. Windows 10 only by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft Edge is a good browser....if you're only using Windows 10 PC and Windows Phone

  9. How about they explain why... by MatthiasF · · Score: 3, Insightful

    IT HAS SO FEW FEATURES!

    I try using it, just to give it a chance but there's no way to organize bookmarks easily, it has constant problems on popular sites like Flickr and it's hard as hell it find the settings you want to tweak it to something comfortable for your use.

    It's like Microsoft made a browser for speed but then forgot that people need to be able to USE it too!

    1. Re:How about they explain why... by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      Does Edge support drag & drop already? It didn't when last I cared to check about a year ago.
      All other browsers support it... including older versions of Internet Explorer!

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    2. Re:How about they explain why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why use BOOKMARKS? Why don't you just search for everything like a good little consumer? Hit start, start typing what you're looking for and we'll give you what you're looking for with only a very small $0.99 transaction fee attached....

    3. Re:How about they explain why... by iampiti · · Score: 1

      Haven't you gotten the memo? Programs nowadays must be made with as few features as possible as they confuse users.

    4. Re:How about they explain why... by MatthiasF · · Score: 1

      You can drag links in but you can't drag links out. So, if I want to make a URL file, I need to copy/paste into Firefox and drag the address out.

      I'm not asking for much. We're talking 2-3 common, expected features.

    5. Re:How about they explain why... by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      Actually, Microsoft will pay *you* to search with bing via their Rewards program.

  10. Or maybe by thegarbz · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There are no users so extension writers don't give a damn? It explains why a lot of Firefox extensions are rotting away too.

    1. Re:Or maybe by Stephen+Battleware · · Score: 1

      The writer for the FF extension I use just updated his. FF is getting quite good now. I use it every day on both macOS and Windows and it does a good job for me. And unlike Chrome and Edge/Cortana, it's not spyware.

    2. Re:Or maybe by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      The writer for the FF extension I use just updated his.

      Congratulations. I'm blowing one of those party whistles for you. Edge also has an extension. What's your point?

    3. Re:Or maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's that, but if microsoft keeps breaking extensions with their updates, it would make some writers decide to hold off on writing fixes for a "high maintenance platform" so to speak. Either they'll wait until the majority use the platform as their default (lol.) or until it's been built enough to not expect to have to rewrite their plugins every update.

    4. Re:Or maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One Firefox extension writer has totally demolished your argument that "extension writers don't give a damn". That was the point.

  11. Edge? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh! That's the browser that opens from time to time on my desktop. Yeah, I've seen it. Damned if I've figured out how to do anything with it - other than close the window. Edge is the browser for those who are neither literate nor of even average IQ. Talk about giving your customers a really bad experience....

  12. Don't need plugins by Thraxy · · Score: 1

    Who needs plugins when you've got telemetry?

  13. microsoft by strstr · · Score: 1

    they have a long history of having addon capability. no one produces such addons. the most addons that ever appear for Microsoft products include adware, spyware, Trojans, viruses, etc. I've seen this happen to generations of Microsoft products: IE, WMP, etc.

    something about the community of developers, they suck, and go for other solutions instead such as foobar2000, Winamp, Firefox, etc.

    I'm surprised to see 70+ addons for a Microsoft product. O_O

    https://www.trumpsweapon.com/

  14. Why the fuck was this bumped? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Funny how the comments pre-date the article.

    Fuck you slashdot.

  15. Edge is horrible Microsoft SHIT by brxndxn · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Microsoft, you are assholes. You are assholes to the users and you are assholes to web developers. For years, when Internet Explorer was the dominant browser, you had numerous little gimmicks in your 'interpretation' of web standards that made pages appear broken unless developers went out of their way to support Internet Explorer specifically. Now that Internet Explorer is only a relic for corporate IT to continue using outdated software (and thus not doing their job), you create an entirely new browser that fucks the user even harder.

    That browser is called Edge. It is the most worthless browser ever created. It looks like it renders about 50% of web pages in some kind of usable form - but even the intended 'usable' form is a nightmare in UI. Because a few people use Windows 10 as a tablet, you make it work like that for 100% of people. The reason there are no Edge plugins is because there are no Edge users. The only Edge users left are the dumb ones that don't even know they can search 'Chrome', 'Firefox', or 'Opera' and instantly start having a better computing experience. Edge is a half-finished smoldering pile of garbage that makes the user feel like he or she is being controlled.

    --
    --- We need more Ron Paul!
    1. Re: Edge is horrible Microsoft SHIT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That browser is called Edge. It is the most worthless browser ever created.

      Try Mozilla Servo. Within 30 seconds you'll be wishing that you were using Edge instead.

    2. Re:Edge is horrible Microsoft SHIT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh FFS. No, Edge is a lot better than that.

      The real issue is Chrome trades battery efficiency for performance and frequent updates. THAT matters - so what the Edge team need to do is:
      1. Uncouple Edge from the Windows Update. Update it far more frequently (at LEAST once a month)
      2. Focus on PERFORMANCE. This thing needs to FLY.

      Anyway, I think the Edge plugin API is the same WebExtensions being used by all the browsers, isn't it?

    3. Re:Edge is horrible Microsoft SHIT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well said you retard.

  16. Why the fuck was this bumped? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use headlines to tell where I'm read down to.

    I know I saw "Microsoft Explains Why Edge Has So Few Extensions" yesterday, so when I see it today, I MUST have read everything below it already, and I can stop reading there.

    Funny how the comments pre-date the article, it's almost like you posted it yesterday, then bumped it up to the top.

    FUCK YOU "EditorDavid".

  17. Very Un-Microsoftlike by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Usually Microsoft is championing how they're "Making it Simple(TM)" to develop and deploy millions of plugins with little regard to privacy, security, upgradability, or robustness. Just get the latest Visual Studio which will give you a wizard that will spew out reams of boilerplate code, and you insert your application in the white spaces.

    1. Re:Very Un-Microsoftlike by Insanity+Defense · · Score: 1

      Usually Microsoft is championing how they're "Making it Simple(TM)" to develop and deploy millions of plugins with little regard to privacy, security, upgradability, or robustness. Just get the latest Visual Studio which will give you a wizard that will spew out reams of boilerplate code, and you insert your application in the white spaces.

      Not always. At one time their promotion of add ons for IE amounted to "It is harder to make add ons so you will have less competition.

    2. Re:Very Un-Microsoftlike by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      I would have to check, but I could imagine that this is actually the case. But you know what they say, you can lead a donkey to the well but you can't make him drink, and you can make it easy to develop plugins but you can't force people to make one for a browser nobody uses.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  18. Chrome and Firefox won't run on Windows 10 S by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 2

    and that is MS hope to make edge get users. Just wait for the EU smack down on that.

    1. Re:Chrome and Firefox won't run on Windows 10 S by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google and Mozilla are perfectly free to make UWP versions of their browsers and post them on the Windows Store. Until they try and are rejected for being "too competitive", the EU is going to just have to punt.

    2. Re:Chrome and Firefox won't run on Windows 10 S by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

      they must use the edge browser engine per app store rules.

  19. Edge is a Utility by Stephen+Battleware · · Score: 1

    Edge most optimistically, with almost a forced smile, is at most a utility for the enterprise environment. Maybe .. it could be used for in-house browsing where the company can be sure everyone is on the same page. It would enable companies to leave Internet Explorer yet still make use of a built in browser. Elsewise, Edge is so b*tt-ugly, who would use it? It looks like an poor rejected mediocre iPhone app that grew by stuffing its face and forced it's way onto the desktop. IE is much better looking. With IE you can even assign icons of your choice to the folders in Favorites. But Edge is ugly. It looks unpolished. It looks like a low quality "app". The arrows don't even look like graphics, they look like they were borrowed from the font bin. Ugly. Moreover, it's colourless and drab. Depressing to look at. A sad sad piece of software regardless of load times and javascript speed. And it's not intuitive - go to erase your history - they hide half the list. And if you expand it, it's rehidden when you go back the next time. Did I mention it's colourless? Colourless, drab and although I am an "up" person, I would imagine other people could get depressed by its drab colourless appearance. Drab, colourless, Edge.

  20. Microsoft, please port Edge to Linux and macOS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Microsoft, please port Edge to Linux and macOS!

    With Firefox having essentially destroyed itself, and with Firefox 57 breaking nearly all of my extensions, I'm in the market for a new browser. I prefer to use the same browser on all the systems I use, so it has to support Linux and macOS.

    I refuse to use Pale Moon after how its development team treated Pale Moon's users so awfully during the AdNauseam extension blocking disaster. Pale Moon doesn't even exist now, as far as I'm concerned.

    I also don't want to use any Chromium-derived browser, including Chrome, Vivaldi, Opera or Brave. I do like Safari, but it doesn't work on Linux, obviously.

    If Edge were ported to Linux and macOS, it could finally become the cross-platform Chrome competitor we've all wanted for so long, or at least since Firefox went shitty.

    I would gladly use Edge if it supported the OSes that I use.

    1. Re:Microsoft, please port Edge to Linux and macOS! by Stephen+Battleware · · Score: 1

      Ha ha - that made me laugh - port it - lol - please - he says. Funny. Good one.

    2. Re:Microsoft, please port Edge to Linux and macOS! by Entropius · · Score: 1

      What's wrong with Opera? I'm using Opera on Linux with no trouble.

    3. Re:Microsoft, please port Edge to Linux and macOS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      You're probably too young to remember this, or maybe they didn't have computers in Canada back then, but Internet Explorer used to run on classic Mac OS and Mac OS X. And Internet Explorer used to run on Solaris and HP-UX, too. So Microsoft porting its web browsers to Mac and UNIX platforms isn't without precedent.

      Maybe you're also ill-informed about how Microsoft has released .NET Core and has ported it to Linux and macOS. And maybe you're also ill-informed about how Microsoft's Visual Studio Core product runs on Linux and macOS. And although you probably don't know what SQL Server is, the reality is that Microsoft has been porting it to Linux, too.

      I know it will fuck up your really shallow and pathetic world view, but Microsoft has a long history of porting their software to other platforms. It's quite reasonable to think that Edge could be ported to Linux and macOS at some point. If that did happen, it probably would mean the end of Firefox.

    4. Re:Microsoft, please port Edge to Linux and macOS! by Stephen+Battleware · · Score: 1

      Don't hold your breath.

    5. Re:Microsoft, please port Edge to Linux and macOS! by Teckla · · Score: 2

      Opera is owned by a dodgy Chinese company now.

      Use it at your own risk.

    6. Re:Microsoft, please port Edge to Linux and macOS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem with opera at this point is that it's basically just chromium with some minor UI changes.

    7. Re:Microsoft, please port Edge to Linux and macOS! by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Oh, give it up already and use Emacs.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    8. Re:Microsoft, please port Edge to Linux and macOS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i use opera 12.18,fast and lite, no RAM eat

    9. Re:Microsoft, please port Edge to Linux and macOS! by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      Lynx is always an option.

      Or you can use something based on curl or wget.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    10. Re:Microsoft, please port Edge to Linux and macOS! by tepples · · Score: 1

      Have you tried using Edge in Windows 10 in VirtualBox in GNU/Linux or macOS?

    11. Re:Microsoft, please port Edge to Linux and macOS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is EDGE not ported to Win7?

    12. Re:Microsoft, please port Edge to Linux and macOS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How they treated users?

      Pretty well, IMO. They discovered an add-on was making fraudulent "advertising clicks", something that may or may not be illegal (depending on how much the advertisers own your politicians), and blocked it by default, while still allowing those who know what they are doing to use the add-on.

      That compromise was probably the best possible outcome for both sides.

      They could have been tough on malware and blocked it completely (to anyone who didn't know the details, the add-on in question was indeed malware), or they could have done nothing and become known as the browser that doesn't care about malware.

      Instead they found a way to both protect users and allowing users freedom at the same time.

    13. Re:Microsoft, please port Edge to Linux and macOS! by denis-The-menace · · Score: 1

      It way more likely that MS will create their own Linux Distro first.

      --
      Obama's legacy: (N)othing (S)ecure (A)nywhere and (T)error (S)imulation (A)dministration
    14. Re:Microsoft, please port Edge to Linux and macOS! by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      I've been testing the Firefox beta and I have to say -- once NoScript is available for it (and assuming that it didn't have to lose any important functionality for the port), then I'll stay with Firefox.

      However, after testing a bunch of alternatives, I think I've settled on the one that works best for me, should I need it: Waterfox.

    15. Re:Microsoft, please port Edge to Linux and macOS! by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      What's wrong with Opera?

      It's essentially Chrome. If Chrome is a browser that sits well with you, then nothing's wrong with Opera, although I'd wonder why not just use Chrome.

    16. Re:Microsoft, please port Edge to Linux and macOS! by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

      Because Microsoft is trying to use Edge as a tool to get people to upgrade to Windows 10. Their initial hope was that EVERYBODY would upgrade, which would decrease their support burden substantially.

      I have upgraded all but one of my Windows 7 systems to Windows 10. The holdout is the Media Center system, because Microsoft has chosen not to make that available for Windows 10. I'm not sure what I'll do with that system after 2020; there is not yet a replacement for Media Center's DVR capabilities that I am happy with.

    17. Re:Microsoft, please port Edge to Linux and macOS! by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

      That requires an expensive Windows license to do legally. The Windows license that came with the machine won't suffice; it only covers running Windows on the machine's bare metal, not in a VM. For that you have to buy a FULL RETAIL license, not an OEM (also known as System Builder for a while) copy.

    18. Re:Microsoft, please port Edge to Linux and macOS! by tepples · · Score: 1

      If Anonymous Coward #55287393 is unwilling to pay $120 for Edge, then he or she really doesn't want Edge that badly.

    19. Re:Microsoft, please port Edge to Linux and macOS! by Entropius · · Score: 1

      It doesn't have the memory leaks that Chromium did last time. I'll try Chromium again and see if it's more stable.

  21. More like nobody cares by gweihir · · Score: 2

    Seriously, who cares about Edge? If you write a Chrome plugin, it runs on Chrome and a lot of other browsers using the same engine (Vivaldi, for example). And you are not tied to one platform (Windows) either. Even learning how to write an Edge plugin is a waste of time, the market is far too small.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    1. Re:More like nobody cares by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You have to excuse them, they're not used to not being the biggest market where people would jump through even the most ridiculous hoops to develop for them.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:More like nobody cares by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Very true.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  22. No, edge will never be a favorite browser. by HermMunster · · Score: 1

    It is from a far too untrustworthy company.

    --
    You can lead a man with reason but you can't make him think.
  23. Re: Microsoft, please port Edge to Linux and macOS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Opera Software was acquired by some Chinese partnership, last I'd heard. That makes a lot of people uncomfortable about using Opera's products.

  24. Microsoft Store by Dwedit · · Score: 1

    The reason why I didn't even try to use edge is that every extension must from the Microsoft Store. No thanks. Not touching that thing with a 20 foot pole.

  25. They have Tampermonkey by BenJeremy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    That opens the door for a lot of userscripts.

  26. Let Microsoft explain ... by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

    ... why hardly anyone uses Edge.

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  27. Have you ever looked at Firefox's privacy policy?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anybody who claims that Firefox protects their privacy probably hasn't actually looked at Firefox's privacy policy.

    Below are some excerpts from the Firefox privacy policy that is dated July 31, 2017.

    Be sure to notice the type of information being collected and possibly even transmitted to third parties (including Google, some "Leanplum" company, a "mobile analytics vendor", and "certain developers"). We see terms like:

    • - "IP address"
    • - "browser version"
    • - "operating system"
    • - "locale"
    • - "language preference"
    • - "list of add-ons you have installed"
    • - "phone number"
    • - "email address"
    • - "URLs associated with the downloaded file"
    • - "hardware configuration"
    • - "commonly visited domains"
    • - "location"
    • - "the active URL"
    • - "Google advertising ID"
    • - "personal information"
    • - "key word searches"
    • - "Wi-Fi networks"
    • - "cell phone towers"

    Here are the excerpts:

    Once per day, Firefox sends the following info to Mozilla when it checks for browser updates: your Firefox version information, language preference, operating system, and version.

    Firefox contacts Mozilla once per day to check for add-on information to check for malicious add-ons. This includes, for example: browser version, OS and version, locale, total number of requests, time of last request, time of day, IP address, and the list of add-ons you have installed.

    About once per day, Firefox connects to Mozilla and provides you with new snippets, if available. Mozilla may collect how often snippets are clicked, snippet name, browser locale, and which version of Firefox you're using.

    Firefox sends Mozilla a monthly request to look up your location at a country level using your IP address.

    Some Mozilla sponsored snippets are interactive and allow you to optionally share your phone number or email address.

    This data includes, for example: device hardware, operating system, Firefox version, add-ons (count and type), timing of browser events, rendering, session restores, length of session, interaction with search access points and use of Firefox search partner codes, how old a profile is, basic information about errors and crashes, and count of pages.

    Firefox sends to this third-party information identifying the site's certificate.

    About twice per hour, Firefox downloads Google's SafeBrowsing lists to help block access to sites and downloads that are malicious or forged (Google's privacy policy is at https://www.google.com/policies/privacy/).

    Firefox may send metadata, including URLs associated with the downloaded file, to the SafeBrowsing service.

    Usage statistics or "Telemetry" is a feature in Firefox that sends Mozilla usage, performance, and responsiveness statistics about user interface features, memory, and hardware configuration. Your IP address is also collected as a part of a standard web log.

    Firefox sends to Mozilla data relating to the tiles such as number of clicks, impressions, your IP address, locale information, and tile specific data (e.g., position and size of grid).

    In Firefox Beta, certain short-term Telemetry experiments (see above) for Tiles may collect information about commonly visited domains.

    Firefox sends Mozilla a request once to look up your location at a country level using your IP address.

    Firefox may send the terms you type in the Awesome Bar or Search Bar to your

  28. Developers, Developers, Developers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm currently writing "Developers, Developers, Developers!", a fat, sweaty plugin for Edge which is going to KILL all other plugins!

    (seriously, NOT: I won't touch Microsoft, not with a ten foot pole).

  29. Enough Extensions for Me by dave562 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I recently switched to Edge from Chrome because I am doing everything I can to step away from Google.

    The only Chrome extension that I use that was not available in Edge is Privacy Badger. I went with Ghostery instead.

    Other than that, they had everything else I use. LastPass. Adblock Plus. etc.

    1. Re:Enough Extensions for Me by MightyMartian · · Score: 0

      This message is so totally not brought to you by Redmond. Nope, no shilling here...

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    2. Re:Enough Extensions for Me by Barabul · · Score: 1

      Google is bad, you want to step way from it. I can understand that. But to Microsoft?

    3. Re:Enough Extensions for Me by dave562 · · Score: 1

      Hate to break it to you, but I'm not a shill. I have a feeling that we've had this discussion before.

      I guess not going along with group think is enough to be labeled a shill these days.

    4. Re:Enough Extensions for Me by dave562 · · Score: 1

      One browser is the same as any other these days. As other commenters have pointed out, they all have their security flaws. At this point all I care about is making it harder for Google to maintain the profile that they have built on me.

      As for Win10 and being tracked, it doesn't matter anymore. Have any of you guys been paying attention? The NSA has pwnt the entire internet. All of our metadatas are belongs to them. They already know who we are talking to and when we are talking to them. Whether it is via SMS, email, Facebook or face to face. The GPS in the phone is geotagged and cross referenced to everything else.

      If you are up to anti-government activities or associated with those who are, you are already on the list and are being actively monitored. And the list of "anti-government" activities is growing every day. The Feds even want records on who "liked" the Facebook page about the J20 inauguration day protest. (As if they don't already know. They are just building the case to prosecute anyone even tangentially involved, or at least threaten them with prosecution.)

      It doesn't matter if you're running Linux, Windows or your own home brew OS that you wrote in pure assembly. It doesn't matter if you are running Chrome, Firefox, Edge, Ice Weasel or Lynx. As soon as those packets leave your NIC, it's game over.

    5. Re:Enough Extensions for Me by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      When someone insists they're moving from Google's spyware to Microsoft's spyware because somehow they think they're sticking it to the man, if they're not a shill, then they're just naive, or possibly just an idiot.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    6. Re:Enough Extensions for Me by dave562 · · Score: 1

      I guess I'm just an idiot then. An idiot who found all of the extensions that I needed for Edge.

    7. Re:Enough Extensions for Me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What, Adblock Plus works in Edge now? Because it has never worked properly in IE, it would hang up or crash literally all the time, I completely gave up trying. So why does it now work in Edge?

    8. Re:Enough Extensions for Me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and now that this has been pointed out, you don't have the "I'm a dope" excuse, so tell me your reasoning now?

    9. Re:Enough Extensions for Me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Smart move. You don't want a more and more evil company to have all your data, so you decided to give it to a company that is known for it's ethics. Smart move indeed.

    10. Re:Enough Extensions for Me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I once tried to change to Edge but couldn't find downloads for my Linux desktop, Android phone or ChromeOS laptop.

    11. Re:Enough Extensions for Me by sad_ · · Score: 1

      And firefox isn't an option because... ?

      --
      On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
    12. Re:Enough Extensions for Me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One: You totally sound like a fanboy/shill.

      Two: There are alternate options; like Opera, Vivaldi, Firefox and Chromium

      Three: What's the fucking point mate? All did you did was swap one corporate overlord for another.

    13. Re:Enough Extensions for Me by dave562 · · Score: 1

      I know that you are being sarcastic / trolling here. But Brad Smith at Microsoft has pushed back on government overreach very publicly over the last few years. No company is perfect. Having said that, I /know/ that Google is selling my data to advertisers and profiting off of my browsing behavior. I don't /know/ that Microsoft is doing that (unless I use Bing, which I don't).

      I don't think it matters, but I'm also using Win10 Enterprise from a work ISO. Not the free upgrade version that they pushed out to everyone and their mom.

    14. Re:Enough Extensions for Me by dave562 · · Score: 1

      Edge is getting the job done. Firefox is an option. I was an avid Firefox user before I used Chrome. Maybe I am naïve, but I think Microsoft has a stronger security team than Mozilla does.

  30. Re: Microsoft, please port Edge to Linux and macOS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's the reason I dropped it.

  31. You want for Edge to be or favorite browser? by OneHundredAndTen · · Score: 1

    Sure. How do I install it in my Linux box?

  32. how do i uninstall edge ? by cats-paw · · Score: 2

    The single most awful thing about win 10 is all the crap I have to leave installed because microsoft.

    I don't want edge because it's probably a security threat even if you don't use it. How long before there's an exploit that invokes it even when it's not your default web browser.

    and yet - it appears to be very difficult to remove.

    --
    Absolute statements are never true
    1. Re:how do i uninstall edge ? by iampiti · · Score: 1

      Are you kidding me? You surely must have seen the ads inside the freaking OS that promote Edge if you happen to use another browser. If they do that why would they allow you to remove it? Toghether with the other made-for-touch basic included apps Microsoft actively tries to get you to use them.
      It's like Microsoft wants Windows to become Android but they're actually worse since, AFAIK, not even Android promotes its maker's apps with ads originating from the very OS.

    2. Re:how do i uninstall edge ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get https://www.ntlite.com/download/

      And make a custom install with edge removed.

      You can't remove it AFTER install. You can just make it look like it's not there. (but it still is)

  33. Re:Addendum: Addons = security exploits also by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dude ... YOU are the number one reason why more people don't use your software or hosts in general. But you're like most people, egotistical, so you'd rather deny that there is a problem than take steps to remedy it.

  34. Re:Have you ever looked at Firefox's privacy polic by Stephen+Battleware · · Score: 1

    AFAICT with the latest versions, e.g. 55, 56, most of the reporting is default OFF and has to be manually turned ON. Moreover, you can select whatever search engine you want with FF. Almost all of that you'd expect e.g. if you click the links in the Tile page - duh - they're built in. But I have even the Tile page OFF. And they check my IP once a month at the country level!? Most websites figure out my IP to the city block, every visit. FF is not the big spy machine you think it is. They ask permission, so it's not even spying. And yes, to check a certificate , it has to go to a certificate authority - third party. Then again though, there's an open easy way to turn off certificate checking. The list is very mild, basic, and really applies to things one rather deliberately opts into, rather than going on secretly, or was some click through at install time. I don't "sync" with FF for instance, so all the stuff regarding syncing would be NIL. Now, give of the list of stuff sent using Edge/Cortana on Windows 10 using the default settings. Give us the list of all websites with the Google snitch widgets embedded, all Chrome enhanced I would venture.

  35. Edge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    of my seat

  36. Translation? by hduff · · Score: 1

    We have a difficult time getting developers to create them.

    --
    "I believe in Karma. That means I can do bad things to people all day long and I assume they deserve it." : Dogbert
  37. IE is better than Edge. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Microsoft Edge is missing basic functionality that has been found in every other browser for the past 10 years (the ability to view a certificate). The Senior Program Manager saying things like "We want Microsoft Edge to be your favorite browser, with the fundamentals you expect". Is the equivalent to somebody telling you they are trying to lose weight while eating an entire gallon of ice cream.

    If you search "Edge view certificate" the answer given by a moderator on technet is basically Open Internet Explorer and check the certificate there.

    This is just the tip of the ice berg. Almost every time I try to use edge I run into a quirk and it is unable to do what I need it to do... Currently it is garbage.

  38. If he's running Win10 anyways.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does it really matter if he's running Edge or another browser?

    He's pwn3d either way. Only difference is if it is by hackers or state actors. Because we all know that is what Microsoft's gameplan has been dating back to the mid 90s. Sell out to the military-industrial-big brother surveillance complex and call it a day.

    Get mandated as a/the state approved OS so they know they can spy on everyone, and you're golden. It works for Red Star Linux in North Korea, it can work for Windows/Android/MacOS/iOS in the rest of the increasingly less civilized world.

  39. Addons = inefficient & inferior vs. hosts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hosts protect vs. what addons can't (or as well):

    1.) bad sites (past ads)
    2.) protection vs. botnet C&C servers
    3.) DNS down
    4.) poisoned dns
    5.) trackers (dnsrequestlogs/ads/transparent ISP proxy)
    6.) spam/phish payload
    7.) dns blocks
    8.) slowdown 2 ways: adblocks & hardcodes

    ADDONS = EXPLOITABLE (bigtime) https://news.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=11166303&cid=55266729/

    Hosts = Ez data edit + better efficiency (cpu/ram/I-O) - see p.s. below for proof.

    * BEST HOSTS FILE = APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-7 32/64-bit https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=%22APK+Hosts+File+Engine%22+and+%22start64%22&btnG=Google+Search&gbv=1/

    APK

    P.S.=> AB+ 151mb https://www.google.com/search?...

    UBlock 64MB https://www.google.com/search?...

    (Hosts = ~ 16mb)

    Addons = ClarityRay defeatable

    Addons don't work http://www.businessinsider.com/google-microsoft-amazon-taboola-pay-adblock-plus-to-stop-blocking-their-ads-2015-2/

  40. Yeah, I want a winning lottery ticket too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Colleen Williams, senior program manager for Microsoft Edge, says "We want Microsoft Edge to be your favorite browser, with the fundamentals you expect -- speed, power efficiency, reliability, security."

    She also adds that "We want a pony."

  41. Addons = inefficient & inferior vs. hosts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hosts protect vs. what addons can't (or as well):

    1.) bad sites (past ads)
    2.) protect vs. botnet C&C servers
    3.) DNS down
    4.) poisoned dns
    5.) trackers (dnsrequestlogs/ads/transparent ISP proxy)
    6.) spam/phish payload
    7.) dns blocks
    8.) slowdown 2 ways: adblocks & hardcodes

    ADDONS = EXPLOITABLE https://news.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=11166303&cid=55266729/

    * No single addon does as much as hosts (if stacked addons slowup more)

    Hosts = Ez data edit + better efficiency (cpu/ram/I-O):

    AB+ 151mb https://www.google.com/search?...

    UBlock 64MB https://www.google.com/search?...

    (Hosts = ~ 16mb)

    Addons = ClarityRay defeatable

    Addons don't work http://www.businessinsider.com/google-microsoft-amazon-taboola-pay-adblock-plus-to-stop-blocking-their-ads-2015-2/

    APK

    P.S.=> BEST HOSTS FILE = APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-7 32/64-bit https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=%22APK+Hosts+File+Engine%22+and+%22start64%22&btnG=Google+Search&gbv=1/

  42. Re:Addons = inefficient & inferior vs. hosts by IWantMoreSpamPlease · · Score: 1

    Correction:

    Adblock Plus doesn't work against taboola, there are plenty of other extensions that do. So be accurate there.

    --
    So rise up, all ye lost ones, as one, we'll claw the clouds.
  43. one day, someone will tell me... by holophrastic · · Score: 1

    one day, someone will tell me why my browser needs an add-on in the first place. It's been 30 years, and as long as my browser shows the web page, I don't see what else it needs to do. One plug in to open a PDF, but not any other type of file? What good is that?

    Maybe edge needs an add-on to be able to print a selection. That'd be swell. PrintScreen & Paint will do just fine though.

    1. Re:one day, someone will tell me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > one day, someone will tell me why my browser needs an add-on in the first place.

      Ad companies have thrown enormous tantrums every time someone tries to integrate a good blocker.

    2. Re:one day, someone will tell me... by holophrastic · · Score: 1

      blocker? hosts file have 10'000 entries of domain names to block. That kills 99% of all ads -- image and video. blocking third-party cookies blocks most of the rest.

      ask me how many times I go to Slashdot.org, and expect to receive content from superads.com? About as many times as I walk into best buy, and expect to receive products from bed bath and beyond. If the sales guy in best buy told you to first go next door and look at bed bath and beyond's mattress sale before shopping for your sd card, would you do it? It's ridiculous.

      I can block any content that isn't coming from the domain name that you typed into the address bar. And, I come very close to doing exactly that. Quite frankly, typing this, maybe a quick pac-file would be a very easy answer. Does windows still support pac files? I just remembered building a pac file to log stuff fifteen years ago. It may actually have run for ten years -- long after I'd forgotten about it. I should delete that log file!

    3. Re:one day, someone will tell me... by thejynxed · · Score: 1

      Some of us absolutely can't stand the awful defaults of an ugly gray or blue browser with gray or white scrollbars a blindingly bright white background upon which black text is displayed and ads all over the damned place.

      To remedy those situations, we need extensions.

      --
      @Mindless Drivel: 100% of Twitter posts ever Tweeted.
    4. Re:one day, someone will tell me... by holophrastic · · Score: 1

      No you don't. You can block ads at the network level, and you can change default backgrounds with a user-defined stylesheet.

      Maybe you need extensions because you don't know what your browser already has?

    5. Re:one day, someone will tell me... by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      It's been 30 years, and as long as my browser shows the web page, I don't see what else it needs to do.

      Using the web without a full complement of tools like Javascript blocking, popup blocking, XSS & clickjack protection, etc. is pretty hellish. It makes huge portions of the web straight-up unusable.

    6. Re:one day, someone will tell me... by holophrastic · · Score: 1

      The huge portions that I haven't needed in thirty years, and don't expect to need in the next thirty? I seem to be doing pretty well with Slashdot, techreport, duckduckgo, Wikipedia, amazon, ebay, all of my clients, all of my suppliers, and garfield. I block facebook, twitter, and google at the network level, I block ads at the network level, and I don't click on stupid things. I think you're making "scary" sound more complicated than "don't go there". It's not.

    7. Re:one day, someone will tell me... by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      Sure, I'm with you in that I'm very selective about what sites I go to. But you and I aren't representative of the usual web user at all. For those who are less discriminating, extensions are very important in terms of making the web usable, at least until browsers start incorporating these sorts of defenses natively (which will never happen).

  44. 70 unique extensions ? by v1nce29 · · Score: 0

    that's 2 extensions per user, no ?

  45. Re:Addons = inefficient & inferior vs. hosts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh, Alexander, don't ever change! \(^o^)/

  46. Re:Addons = inefficient & inferior vs. hosts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No single addon by itself does as much as hosts do for speed, security, reliability & anonymity online NOR are they as efficient in resources use on many levels. Taboola isn't the only one that has adblock paid off not to work either. So be accurate there yourself.

  47. Re:Have you ever looked at Firefox's privacy polic by schleimkeim · · Score: 1

    still better than anything google.

  48. There are no extension by schleimkeim · · Score: 1

    ... because no one uses Edge. Even where I work people rather use an old ass IE instead of Edge. Most have chrome or FF for web stuff installed anyway.

  49. Re: Microsoft, please port Edge to Linux and macOS by allston · · Score: 0

    Look up Windows 10 Media Center on the MDL fourms, there is a hacked version WMC that works in Windows 10. Been using for almost a year and it's great.

  50. Re: Microsoft, please port Edge to Linux and macOS by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

    That makes a lot of people uncomfortable about using Opera's products.

    It makes a lot of people more confident about using Opera's product.

    Opera Software was acquired by some Chinese partnership, last I'd heard.

    No NSA backdoors. I hope. I'll just make sure to use Firefox for my planning to overthrow the Chinese state and Opera for planing to overthrow the USA by campaigning for Trump2020.

    --
    Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  51. Yep, that's some gooooood horse shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Translation: It's all about removing user-choice and letting us control / steal your data and usage. We are user-hostile in disguise. Telemetry? We're honest!

    Microsoft is untrust-worthy scum plain and simple.

  52. Who uses your non-existent ware? Nobody by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject & "I'm going to continue using the Host File Engine. Your software is well written, functional. The Host File Engine performs exactly as promised" by mmell

    his hosts program is actually pretty good by xenotransplant

    his hosts tool is actually useful for those cases in which one does indeed want to locally block stuff outright while consuming minimum system resources by alexgieg

    (APK's) work, I've flat out said it's good by BronsCon

    I've tried his hosts file generating software. It works by bmo

    APK your posts on this & the hosts file posts, and more, have never been in error &/or bad advice by BlueStrat

    Your premise that hostfiles are a good way to deal with advertising & malvertising is quite valid by JazzLad

    I like your host file system by Karmashock

    (NEED MORE? Ask!)

    * It's hosted by Malwarebytes' hpHosts!

    APK

    P.S.=> China imitated me http://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/04/26/boffins_supercharge_the_hosts_file_to_save_users_plagued_by_dns_outages/ ... apk