Google Wants Its New Pixelbook to Win the Laptop and Tablet Battle (fortune.com)

Google is once again trying to make a big splash with laptop computers, this time with its new Pixelbook. From a report: Google debuted its Pixelbook, a new laptop-tablet hybrid during its Pixel 2 event in San Francisco on Wednesday, a high-end version of its barebones Chromebook laptops that rely on Google's Chrome operating system (OS). Google hopes its new Pixelbook, which sells for $999 to $1,649, will give it a viable challenger to Apple's MacBooks and other premium laptops. With Google's low-end Chromebooks, the company supplies the OS while third-party companies like HP Inc. and Dell build the devices. But Chromebooks are bulky, short on processing power, have limited storage, and are incompatible with Google's new Pixelbook stylus pen for drawing digital images on touchscreens. Matt Vokoun, Google's director for Chromebooks, emphasized that his company is serious about the Pixelbook. Although Google previously sold both high-end laptops and tablets, they were mostly "demonstration-oriented," he said, meaning Google didn't produce many of them and that they were instead for showing to potential manufacturers to get them on board with the idea.

Comments

Not at those prices

[Rockoon]

If you want to win "the laptop and tablet battle" you are messing with the wrong end of the price spectrum.

Re:Not at those prices

[Anonymous Coward]

Yeah, there are already Win10 tablet/laptop hybrids in the sub-$200 price range, not to mention regular laptops like the HP Stream. They have the added benefit of running most software, though perhaps not at peak performance (at least SNES emulators should work on them).

Re:Not at those prices

[Anonymous Coward]

They presumably mean win in profits rather than sales numbers. i.e. win against Apple.

Re: Not at those prices

[Anonymous Coward]

Yeah I've seen some nice hp laptops with ssd for 200 range. Wonder if they can run linux

Re:Not at those prices

[ctilsie242]

This is a pretty expensive thin client. For a little bit more, I can buy a MacBook with 16 gigs of RAM, an i7, and 512 GB of SSD. It won't be a barnburner, but it definitely can do whatever tasks are needed when being remote. To boot, if I do not have Internet access, I'm still free to work offline without being tied to the cloud or running in a limited offline mode. I could buy a Surface laptop and at have similar functionality.

For me, Chromebooks have their spot... as Citrix clients and thin clients for the VDI. $1000 for what is basically a dumb terminal? I'll pass.

Re:Not at those prices

[u19925]

Hey, I am just copying Apple. Blame them for high price.

Re: Not at those prices

[lactose99]

Don't know about the HPs, but the low-end Acer and Lenovos can (I have one of each and they both run Linux just fine)

Re: Not at those prices

[Anonymous Coward]

Recommendations for exact model? I have a second hand HP Stream 11 I'd love to replace on the cheap.

Re:Not at those prices

[blind biker]

This is a pretty expensive thin client. For a little bit more, I can buy a MacBook with 16 gigs of RAM, an i7, and 512 GB of SSD.

Enjoy your soldered-in SSD and RAM. I'm not interested in the Chromebooks, either, but for that money I will rather buy an easily expandable laptop. And it won't be a barn-burner, either, but once that SSD craps out, I will be able to replace it or upgrade it.

Re:Not at those prices

[Anonymous Coward]

enjoy your large overweight luggable. Personally I will take the lightweight soldered in ram and SSD for a device I will be replacing before my warranty expires anyway.mobility and power are the key to the needs of many people like myself and we will happily trade some of the flexibility to have that power and mobility while roaming. Chromebooks though are just polished turds!

Re: Not at those prices

[loufoque]

Which end do you speak of? 1000 bucks is medium+.

It's the ideal price to target most people that still somewhat care about quality.

Re:Not at those prices

[ctilsie242]

It sucks, but everyone does that now, be it Apple, Dell, Lenovo, or Microsoft, when it comes to these types of laptops.

Of course, I could get a larger one... but I've done trips with various sizes of laptops, from 12" MacBooks to 17" laptops that I could barely fit in my backpack that had multiple fans, multiple SATA bays, and such.

For what I need, if I am on the road and all I am doing is checking E-mail, logging into work via Citrix, or similar... a 12" laptop is a lot less of an issue after a long trip than a bigger one, even though the 12" model does have all its components soldered in. Even though it doesn't sound like much, after a day on the road, the difference in weight between a 12" laptop and a 15" can be noticeable.

Re:Not at those prices

[kelemvor4]

This is a pretty expensive thin client. For a little bit more, I can buy a MacBook with 16 gigs of RAM, an i7, and 512 GB of SSD.

Enjoy your soldered-in SSD and RAM. I'm not interested in the Chromebooks, either, but for that money I will rather buy an easily expandable laptop. And it won't be a barn-burner, either, but once that SSD craps out, I will be able to replace it or upgrade it.

Agreed. 1992 called and they want their chromebooks and macbooks back. It was a hard fought battle with manufacturers before we started seeing expandable portable devices on the market. It's very frustrating when you see people just accepting this reversion to inferior solutions that some of us worked very hard to eliminate.

Re:Not at those prices

[blind biker]

You probably won't see this but anyway.... I have a couple of 12" Thinkpad X220 laptops. They have user-replaceable/expandable components.

No thanks.

[Jason1729]

I don't want a tablet. I don't want a laptop that acts like a tablet. I don't want google spyware pre-installed. I don't want chromeOS.

I do want a powerful and open laptop.

So there is nothing to like about this product.

Re:No thanks.

[Dracolytch]

Maybe you shouldn't buy it then?
For some folks it has some attractive features.

Re:No thanks.

[sehlat]

I don't want google spyware pre-installed.

So you might go for Microsoft's instead? The Surface Pro 4 is in a similar price range.

Re:No thanks.

[Anonymous Coward]

Maybe you shouldn't buy it then?
For some folks it has some attractive features.

Yea, whatever, but the post claims that this is intended to as a MacBook competitor. It clearly isn't, for all the reasons the GP mention. A MacBook isn't a phone. It isn't a tablet. It's just a solid laptop.

Re:No thanks.

[avgjoe62]

I don't want google spyware pre-installed.

So you might go for Microsoft's instead? The Surface Pro 4 is in a similar price range.

:%s/google/$manufacturer/

Re:No thanks.

[Anonymous Coward]

I'm curious as to what those features would be? I have a chromebook, and I like it. It does what I'd expect from a $200 piece of hardware. But for $1000, the limitations of chromeOS are a non-starter. I mean, hell, it can't even reliably run all of the Android apps. A bunch of them crash as soon as you try to run them, but you'd better believe it lets you install them.

Re:No thanks.

[Anonymous Coward]

Exactly! Google has already lost on the laptop part! And if I could buy a tablet that would run an OS that didn't spy on me, and let ME decide what programs I want on it (and nothing else!) that would be a huge winner too!

Re:No thanks.

[rogoshen1]

if nothing else it represents competition to MS/Apple, and competition is always a good thing for consumers.

Re:No thanks.

[Anonymous Coward]

Not forgetting Amazon Wiretapping Services.

Re:No thanks.

[HiThere]

It's not just a table, it comes with an attached keyboard that (appears to be) full size. But it doesn't seem to have usb ports. So I'll probably give it a miss, just like I have the other chromebooks.

I'm rather strongly interested in a really portable computer...but this doesn't seem to be it. I'm just judging by their ad, of course.

Someone else called it a dumb terminal. I think that's a bit overly harsh, but it doesn't seem to be a real computer, either.

Re: No thanks.

[Anonymous Coward]

Do you say 'solid' because Apple is really being 'brave' now, and potting the whole inside of the laptop with epoxy?

Re:No thanks.

[Anonymous Coward]

Thank you. I'd like ChromeOS but only without any Google spyware on it.

Re:No thanks.

[Anonymous Coward]

> I do want a powerful and open laptop.

You get a powerful laptop with coreboot, so maybe you should buy it.

Re:No thanks.

[thegarbz]

I don't want a tablet and a laptop. I want one device that does both. I want it to be useful out of the box. I don't want a full desktop OS.

There's a lot to like about this product.

Well, no

[drinkypoo]

Google hopes its new Pixelbook, which sells for $999 to $1,649, will give it a viable challenger to Apple's MacBooks and other premium laptops.

Apple's MacBooks and other premium laptops are OS-agnostic, OSX aside. You can run Windows or Linux on them without having to worry about hitting the wrong key at boot time and wiping out your installation. Google's value proposition is based on collecting data about you and advertising to you; are they going to let you escape their clutches, and install another operating system on the device without extreme hazard at every boot time?

Re:Well, no

[Anonymous Coward]

You cannot get Linux to run all the hardware on recent MacBooks.

Re:Well, no

[Luthair]

Take it from someone who has run Windows on Macbooks from work since 2010 - don't do it. Apple intentionally cripples battery life and provides half-assed drivers.

Re:Well, no

[unrtst]

You cannot get Linux to run all the hardware on recent MacBooks.

While that's true, it's a driver issue, rather than a purposeful lock out. Stuff that is/isn't working on the 2016/2017 MBP's: https://github.com/Dunedan/mbp...

The Chromebooks all have to be put into developer mode to boot another OS, and a bad button press can wipe out the system. So, while you can still put Linux on them, it's certainly not ideal.

Re: Well, no

[Anonymous Coward]

Microsoft provides the drivers for bootcamp.

Re: Well, no

[Anonymous Coward]

no it doesn't, Microsoft certifies or signs them after they are submitted to them, the manufacturer has to supply their own drivers. AKA Apple

Re:Well, no

[Anonymous Coward]

Apple and Microsoft don't care if you install Linux on their offerings. They made their dosh from the hardware and don't care what you do from that point on. Google, on the other hand, is a company built on slinging ads and slurping data. They want that revenue stream, even with the high zoot models, so hitting the wrong key at boot gets you a nice, clean, power-washed thin client... which is what they want for continuous monitoring.

A Chromebook for a sub-200 price? Great. It is perfect for a secure desktop to communicate to a VDI. A Chromebook for $1000? Not worth it. If I need a stylus and such, I can buy an iPad. If I want a laptop, a MacBook or Surface.

Re:Well, no

[swillden]

Google hopes its new Pixelbook, which sells for $999 to $1,649, will give it a viable challenger to Apple's MacBooks and other premium laptops.

Apple's MacBooks and other premium laptops are OS-agnostic, OSX aside. You can run Windows or Linux on them without having to worry about hitting the wrong key at boot time and wiping out your installation. Google's value proposition is based on collecting data about you and advertising to you; are they going to let you escape their clutches, and install another operating system on the device without extreme hazard at every boot time?

Chromebooks have always had a "dev screw", a switch (originally a screw) that allows you to switch the device into "dev mode". In that mode, all verification of the bootloader and OS is disabled and you're free to install anything you want on it.

Google engineering actually has a pretty strong cultural belief that it's important that users be able to fully "own" their devices. Google can't force that view on Android device makers, but actually has managed to force it on Chromebook makers. So you can be certain that Google's own device has such a switch.

Re: Well, no

[Anonymous Coward]

Look everybody, swillden is back to shill for his bosses again. Tell me more swillden, I'm all ears. Your pragmatic objectivity is what I come here for.

Re:Well, no

[thegarbz]

Google's value proposition is based on collecting data about you and advertising to you

No, Google core business is that. The value proposition here is a device with a very premium price. They aren't selling a lossleader.

And yes people have installed various flavours of Linux and even Windows on Chromebooks. You just enable the development mode via the official method provided by Google and you're free to do whatever you want.

Re: Well, no

[drinkypoo]

Most drivers are written by whoever created a thing, especially for Windows, not by the PC manufacturer. Intel makes their chipset drivers, for example. The Wifi chip manufacturer makes the Wifi driver. If Apple has chosen components for which there is no satisfying Windows driver, that is a real problem for potential Windows users, and I'm not aware of it because I don't buy things from Apple anyway and wouldn't bother to put in the research to find out how good the experience is, or isn't. But since I typically have had to find better drivers than what the OEM has provided to me either with a laptop or even on their website in order to get hardware to work correctly, I take such claims with a grain of salt. "Apple doesn't give me good enough drivers" is not a complete explanation. "The manufacturer doesn't either" would finish it off.

Re:Well, no

[drinkypoo]

And yes people have installed various flavours of Linux and even Windows on Chromebooks. You just enable the development mode via the official method provided by Google and you're free to do whatever you want.

Except keep your installation if you accidentally hit the wrong key at boot time.

Apparently Libreboot works on some Chromebooks, so there is a solution to the problem, but it's too complicated for an average user.

Re: Well, no

[Anonymous Coward]

Shilling is if you're not open about whose side you're on.
Likely swilden is telling honestly how he experiences his colleagues ' attitude.
To me, that's informative.

Your post however, is quite useless.

Re: Well, no

[Anonymous Coward]

So when the M$ guy next rolls into a thread and dares say anything remotely neutral to positive about ANYTHING, I'm quite sure your attitude will change. Shill the wrong word? Fine, he's a lap dog and based on your reply I'm guessing you both work there.

Who is this product for?

[Anonymous Coward]

Not people who need performance, not people looking for economy?

Call me cynical but isn't this exactly how Netbooks flopped?

Re:Who is this product for?

[Anonymous Coward]

When a Google manages to sell someone a crappy device with huge profits it serves a marker. The customer is a proven idiot with loose cash, who will likely buy anything similar, so Google can sell his identity and serve ads for bigger price.

good investment

[Anonymous Coward]

I love ChromeOS. No viruses, no ransomware, and boots very quickly and mine has about 8 hour battery life(8 hours of continuous use) and can be dropped without trouble. Now that it's 2 1/2 years old, the $149 I spent for it was a good investment! Not sure a $1,000 one would be a good investment. They mention their old high cost ones were for demonstrations to manufacturers, but no manufacturers came out with ones that high priced.

Re: good investment

[SuperKendall]

You just made a great argument for an iPad, which all models of would be cheaper than this Chromebook and more capable.

Re: good investment

[Cyberpunk Reality]

As others have pointed out, it does come loaded with Google's own ransomware and spyware. It's just that the costs you pay for having the system loaded with Google's own malware seem worth it to you. For now.

Re: good investment

[Anonymous Coward]

Did you notice his price point of $149? I think you can get three or four dongle accessories for that atbthe Apple Store. Definitely not an Ipad.

advertising company

[anthony_greer]

I would rather not get my hardware and OS from a company that generates over 90% of its income from advertisements.

Apple and Windows/amd64 OEMa have their issues but they do at least, for the most part, treat teh person buying the device as the customer, not the person buying the spy data.

Re:advertising company

[emacsomancer]

At least with Windows 10, I don't think one can make that claim for Microsoft. Perhaps for Apple. So far.

Re:advertising company

[jareth-0205]

I would rather not get my hardware and OS from a company that generates over 90% of its income from advertisements.

Apple and Windows/amd64 OEMa have their issues but they do at least, for the most part, treat teh person buying the device as the customer, not the person buying the spy data.

*sigh*, this trope is getting pretty dull. Why are you willing to trust *any* company? Do we actually have any evidence of Google acting badly with people's data? Should be some by now. I get that modern tech trends are worrying - but I can't bring myself to be any more scared of Google than Microsoft or Apple, especially since MS have turned into a data company now too.

Re: advertising company

[dnaumov]

Because Apple is betting the farm on their reputation as protectors of users privacy and SO FAR there has been no indication they have been lying.

Re: advertising company

[JohnFen]

I have to admit, with the direction that Microsoft and Google are going, that Apple is getting more and more attractive every day.

I don't like Apple's user interfaces and have avoided them because of that, but there comes a point at which the UI isn't the most important thing anymore.

Re:advertising company

[Anonymous Coward]

If I apply to jobs in one particular area of computer tech (visualization, academic research, industrial research positions), then no sooner that I have sent out an Email, that I'm plagued with recruiters trying to fill positions for mobile and embedded. It becomes so predictable, it's becoming annoying and irritating.

Re: advertising company

[Anonymous Coward]

Apple's whole approach is their image and marketing hype. Be well assured that if and when security goes south with them, their customers will be the last to know

Re: advertising company

[93 Escort Wagon]

I have to admit, with the direction that Microsoft and Google are going, that Apple is getting more and more attractive every day.

Funny thing is (and I say this as a Mac user since 2003) - as Apple takes a privacy stance which appeals to the technologically literate, they simultaneously seem to be designing their laptops to be less useful to that same group.

10-15 years ago, there seemed to be a big movement to Apple laptops by Unix sysadmin / programmer types. I believe that was part of the reason interest in Apple laptops started to take off among the young college crowd.

Maybe they think laptops are dying as a business... but they sure seem to be squandering the technical fan base they once held.

Re: advertising company

[thegarbz]

Because Apple is betting the farm on their reputation as protectors of users privacy and SO FAR there has been no indication they have been lying.

So has Google, which is why they are an advertising company rather than selling your data to any third party.

In terms of who's privacy is best covered, so far Google is one of the few companies who haven't let personal information get out.

Yahoo, breached. MS, breached. Most of the ISPs openly sell data rather than advertising access. Samsung, sell data. Apple, breached (and in quite a personal way too thanks to their shitty iCloud security).

Finally enough

[DarkRookie]

i5 and 8GBs of RAM. Should finally be able to run Chrome fully then.

What can you do when offline?

[presidenteloco]

Just curious.

Could one do software development and testing while offline, with one of these puppies? e.g. Can I have linux in a VM or use docker containers etc in chromeos?

Re:What can you do when offline?

[Anonymous Coward]

Just curious.

Could one do software development and testing while offline, with one of these puppies? e.g. Can I have linux in a VM or use docker containers etc in chromeos?

No.

Re:What can you do when offline?

[110010001000]

Google can't spy on you if you are offline. Why do you think they created ChromeOS?

Re:What can you do when offline?

[Anonymous Coward]

Docker only runs in Linux (the Mac port is pretty hokey, in essence bringing up a thin virtualization layer to make the Mac machine look like linux.

Re:What can you do when offline?

[jareth-0205]

Just curious.

Could one do software development and testing while offline, with one of these puppies? e.g. Can I have linux in a VM or use docker containers etc in chromeos?

It's pretty straightforward. I haven't tried VMs though

https://www.lifewire.com/insta...

Re:What can you do when offline?

[swillden]

Just curious.

Could one do software development and testing while offline, with one of these puppies? e.g. Can I have linux in a VM or use docker containers etc in chromeos?

No.

Yes. That one is a chroot system running under ChromeOS' Linux OS, but there are other approaches. Crouton is great as a dev environment.

Also note that ChromeOS works just fine offline as long as the Chrome apps you're using support it. Most do.

In addition, there's always the option of flipping the device to dev mode and replacing ChromeOS with whatever you like (and can get to run; many Linux and *BSD distros work fine on Chromebooks. I'm not sure you could get Windows to run and I would be amazed if you could make OS X work).

An internet browser at that price? Uhhh...

[Anonymous Coward]

This laptop would make a lot more sense if it was bundled with the pen, and sold for $400. It's really only competing with the Galaxy Tab A 10.1 w/S-pen.

It doesn't even run linux software, unless you chroot it and pray you never hit the wrong button when turning it on.

Google will be....

[brennz]

Spying on everything you can possibly do with this chromebook, because Google is in the business of marketing your personal information to advertisers. This will probably better enable them to link your credit card to your devices to your viewing preferences, to your buys, to your everything.

Considering that Google is an anti-science SJW organization, I wouldn't be surprised if they disabled these devices for libertarians and right wingers.

However, this isn't just a left or right thing. If there is an upcoming election, you can count on this piece of ..... to be pushing Hillary Clinton ads, and suppressing Bernie content, yet again.

Google is an amoral company. Don't buy their products, or use their services. Block all their crooked websites, their performance-sapping ad campaigns, and their duplicitous products.

http://www.newsweek.com/assang...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
http://www.washingtontimes.com...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
https://www.salon.com/2014/02/...

Re:Google will be....

[Captain Splendid]

Wow, this post is like a shitcrazy hamburger. The buns on either side are stale as fuck and the meat is this weird chimera of conspiracy and lack of awareness.

3/10 would not eat again.

Re:Google will be....

[Anonymous Coward]

People, people, such needless concern...Take it from Google Asshole Shawn Willden, spying on everything you can possibly do is a Really Good Thing!!

Re:Google will be....

[brennz]

Hello Google Apologist. Apparently you drank the Koolaid

Please, if you are going to defend Googal at every turn, by all means, come out and admit you are a shareholder, a fanboi, or employed there. No doubt their tools are useful, but they are corrupting some signficant processes e.g. Democratic nominations and open conversations on policy.

Re:Google will be....

[Captain Splendid]

Well, using your own particular logic that makes you a Bing fanboi, right? Oh wow, I see now why you view the world in such a manichean fashion, it feels so good!

Re:Google will be....

[Anonymous Coward]

yeah! you may want to talk to your shrink soon. the symptoms are showing again.

Re:Google will be....

[lactose99]

Delusion much?

Re: Google will be....

[Anonymous Coward]

I agree 100%. google is the real devil today!!!

Only the first to market with

[Anonymous Coward]

a laptop/tablet that can play modern 3d games at modern resolutions, all the while lasting all day, will be the victor in this battle.

At the very least, get it to last a couple days with what we have now.

captcha: combats

Re:Only the first to market with

[tepples]

a laptop/tablet that can play modern 3d games at modern resolutions

Nintendo Switch is a "tablet that can play modern 3d games at modern resolutions".

"Serious"

[110010001000]

Google is definitely serious about this. At least for another 8 months, after which they will get bored of it and cancel the whole idea.

Re:"Serious"

[Anonymous Coward]

Because after 8 months of lackluster sales, they will shift focus back to their phone, wondering why it hasn't caused a dent in the IOSphere. Hint: Put a 3.5mm "courage" jack on the phone, call it audio if you wish, FFS

Will it run Matlab and R?

[Anonymous Coward]

Will it run Matlab and R? Will it run simulation tools? If so, yes, it would be nice to have an alternative to crappy PCs and solid but connector limited and overpriced Mac Books.

Re:Will it run Matlab and R?

[fygment]

"... crappy PC's..." ? Why would you run R/Matlab/simulation tools on anything but a PC. For any price point I have yet to see a laptop match the performance of PC. Drop $1k on a PC and you can have 6-8 cores, 16 GB RAM, 500 GB HD and a +22" screen. Spend $7k on a laptop and a PC at the same price will outperform it by 2 orders of magnitude.
 

Company x wants their product to win.

[kelemvor4]

No shit, sherlock. Thanks for figuring that out for us. Pretty much every company that has made a product has such goals. In other news, water is still wet.

So, as a Mac user

[93 Escort Wagon]

I have a 2015 MacBook Pro that I like quite a bit. I've always liked Mac keyboards (well... until post 2015), I like having a variety of ports, it runs Unix, it's nice and light and has superb battery life (> 10 hours for me).

But that laptop is in the shop right now, and I'm using a late 2016 MacBook Pro... which I really don't like at all. The low-travel keyboard is sub-optimal, the touch bar is just stupid (having a virtual ESC key is asinine!), the lack of an SD card slot is an annoyance, etc.

AND that new MBP seems slower than mine, much of the time! (That could be High Sierra)

So I'm curious - who makes nice Linux/BSD-friendly laptops which are at least marginally like my 2015 MacBook Pro? And by that I mean reasonably light, good keyboard, 13"-ish form factor with lots of ports, a nice screen, good battery life, and functional wifi? My current Mac should be good for several more years; but when it dies, it sure seems like I won't want to get whatever crippled Mac has sprung from the Mind of Ive.

Re:So, as a Mac user

[Anonymous Coward]

There was the Dell XPS 13 Developer Edition, but as far as I can find, it has not been updated to the new XPS 13 hardware.

Re:So, as a Mac user

[Anonymous Coward]

Same coward, with better searching skills.
It has been updated. Disregard the previous statement.

Re:So, as a Mac user

[Anonymous Coward]

So I'm curious - who makes nice Linux/BSD-friendly laptops which are at least marginally like my 2015 MacBook Pro?

I'm using a Dell XPS 15 9550 running Sierra.

Decent keyboard, great battery life, amazing (touch) screen, and it dual boots OS X and Windows. It's technically a 15" laptop, but because the screen has such small bezels it's more like a 14" form factor.

You might also look into System76 laptops, which are specifically designed for Linux.

Re:So, as a Mac user

[Anonymous Coward]

System76 makes nice laptops with Linux installed for hundreds less than Mac tax, at least at the medium-high end.

Re:So, as a Mac user

[jemmyw]

It's not high sierra, I have the same issue with Sierra. And I don't know why its slower, because on a per task basis it is faster... it's just laggy when switching apps / windows / spaces.

I really liked the new keyboard to begin with, but now I hate it. I like it for the extra clickyness, the old ones feel spongy by comparison. But it goes awry very often, the keys lose sensitivity, or change travel distance. I think its just too low profile.

Touch bar - fun for a few minutes, then completely pointless. I never use it now.

I cannot wait to move on from this laptop. I'm not sure what to get next, I've been using macs for many years.

This is a great deal....

[u19925]

I am getting Google privacy at Apple price point.

Uphill battle

[DaMattster]

Google is facing a real uphill battle to get into a saturated market. I see no real benefit to buying Google hardware because you get tied to their platform. I could see a purchasing a dirt cheap, sub 200.00 laptop but not at those prices.

Re:Uphill battle

[sd4f]

This will be google's 'windows phone' moment.

How Serious?

[bill_mcgonigle]

How long can warranties be extended?
How long will particular models be available?
How long is Google commiting to make parts available?
How long will Google provide Tier-1 software updates?

aside: Do the power connectors all break off like the Chromebooks?

I don't get it.

[Anonymous Coward]

I have an android phone and an android tablet that I use quite a lot. I often take the tablet plus a bluetooth keyboard traveling if I don't need to do anything too demanding workwise, because the tablet is light and small and cheap enough that I can afford to lose it ... but at this price, how is a Chromebook better than an equivalent Windows or Apple laptop?

Carry two flash drives with your Chromebook

[tepples]

The Chromebooks all have to be put into developer mode to boot another OS, and a bad button press can wipe out the system.

As BarbaraHudson wrote in a reply to me, wiping the drive if you are dumb enough to follow the prompts is a feature. It helps ensure that the majority of people, who are unfamiliar with Chrome OS, will not access private data that you have stored on the device's internal storage. Just make sure to carry two USB flash drives with your developer mode Chromebook: one with reinstallation media for the operating system and applications, and the other to back up data that you expect to persist for more than five minutes.

Or if your hardware warranty has already expired, install replacement firmware without the warning.

Re:Carry two flash drives with your Chromebook

[unrtst]

HAHHAHAHA, BarbaraHudson can be an idiot. That doesn't prevent anyone from doing anything. Bios passwords and encrypted root partitions prevent others from being able to boot into my laptop OS of choice. I'll pass on the magic key that can erase all of my stuff, since I can easily buy a more capable machine for less money that doesn't have this "feature".

I honestly don't have a problem with the way the Chromebooks are setup by default, even the way the developer mode works. However, I do believe that aspect should be configurable in the bios. It'd take almost no work for that feature to be added... certainly less than work than it took to add the feature, and less work than they're spending supporting and defending that feature, and I'd buy one if that was possible.

SWEET

[Anonymous Coward]

Not made by Apple, therefore its ALREADY better!

Re:SWEET

[Anonymous Coward]

Only in your limited brain

Really impressive bit of kit

[Shemmie]

So it's 16GB RAM, running an i5 or an i7 - and it can run Chrome, or a variation thereof.

It can also run Android apps.

All that for only $1000 - $1649?

Nothing but a glorified net appliance

[Anonymous Coward]

This is actually LESS than a netbook but at the price of a professional laptop. Why spend so much money on something that can't do even 20% of what you can do with a regular cheap laptop?

Seriously overprice for what it can do. It is nothing but a glorified net appliance that can't even match the functionality of crappy netbooks.

summary

[Reverend Green]

Deep-pocketed mega-corporation, with close ties to the security services and a dysfunctional company culture, hasn't created a compelling new product since 2004 but hopes boring and overpriced laptop series will be the next big hit.

Then install Linux on it

[KayakFun]

It is quite easy to put Linux on a Chromebook. But I would not buy a 1000 US$ laptop for that, but rather the Acer Chromebook 14. It is an all-Aluminium case, with decent 14" full-HD screen. You can find it for around 330 US$.

Took lead from MS SurfaceBook?

[fygment]

Likely laptop development has reached it's limit, they all look alike.
But this does look like a SurfaceBook but without the very cool, carry friendly hinge that the latter has.

to answer your question... I don't!

[gosand]

Well, privacy is a fallacy, but I really do try to limit - as much as I am able - the amount of information that gets shared.

But it's not easy. I don't log into my google account in my browser, so they don't know all of my searches. If I log into my Amazon account, I make sure to sign out when I am done. On my phone - they've pretty much got me.. but I limit what I do on there. And I turn off my location unless I need it, then I turn it off. I don't run Windows at home, but mainly because I prefer Linux. I don't use FB or IG (anymore), although I do use whatsapp, which unfortunately is owned by FB now. I only use that because I have friends across the country that I stay in close contact with.

We have a new health insurance plan at work... and you can save money on your premiums if you participate in their program - where you share info about yourself, and track your activity. They promote linking your account to a fitbit to easily update your steps every day. No Thanks! I signed up (after reading all three of their separate disclosure statements, and I know they are sharing my information) because with a family I can use the break on the premiums.

But I will not use any tracking device. It is ridiculous to me how quickly and easily people are willing to just give up their information.
I swear, some days I half expect Marlin Perkins to pop out and wrestle me down and put a tag in my ear.

Since when did Chromebooks become bulky?

[drew_kime]

My daughters both have Chromebooks they use for school. They're roughly the same size as the MacBook Pro I carry for work, and about half the weight. Since when did that become "bulky"?

There is one big advantage to this Cloud thing ...

[Qbertino]

How long can warranties be extended?
How long will particular models be available?
How long is Google commiting to make parts available?
How long will Google provide Tier-1 software updates?

There is one big advantage to this cloud thing (or so I suspect):
All those questions you posted don't really matter. Device discontinued? Lost? Stolen?

Your stuff is in the cloud. Get the next cheapo box/laptop you can lay your hands on, log in and continue to work where you left off.
I'm trying this sort of workflow right now, and it is compelling - I'll give Google that much. I'm typing this on a new dirt cheap 130 Euro Chromebook and have all my sh*t synced with my Smartphone just about instantly. Couldn't say that for any other system. Unless, of course, Apple. But I simply don't have the money for them right now. The current gen portables by Apple are way to expensive and where much cheaper in comparsion 10 years ago. The 13" iBook G4 - my first Apple - was 700$ cheaper than the next cheapest subnotebook. Not anymore with Apple. They've moved beyond what I'm currently willing to spend on hardware - that's the cold hard truth.

So cloud it is then for me, now. For the time being.

My 2 eurocents.