Slashdot Mirror


Startup Plans To Clean Up Cigarette Butts Using Crows (popularmechanics.com)

AmiMoJo writes: A startup in the Netherlands is developing the "Crowbar," a bird feeder that takes discarded cigarette butts as payment for dispensing food. A camera recognises cigarette filters and rejects any other objects placed in the Crowbar. The idea isn't entirely original, a gentleman in the US has already built a similar device and trained crows to deposit coins. The hope is that crows will be able to keep cities clean, sort through refuse and perform other tasks for our mutual benefit.
Popular Mechanics notes that crows "are some of the smartest animals in the world," suggesting this means "we could harness their abilities for the greater good of our planet."

205 comments

  1. Residue.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Let's hope the crows don't pick any bad habits themselves.. who knows, they may end up dying of beak cancer!

    1. Re: Residue.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I say we give them the right to vote, they're obviously smarter than republicans.

      lol

  2. Gateway drug by Templer421 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    To crows smoking marijuana.

    Next thing you know they will be robbing liquor stores and pirating music!

    1. Re:Gateway drug by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 4, Funny

      To crows smoking marijuana. Next thing you know they will be robbing liquor stores and pirating music!

      Stone the crows!

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    2. Re:Gateway drug by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 2

      To crows smoking marijuana.

      Next thing you know they will be robbing liquor stores and pirating music!

      Or start a band: Stoned Temple Pirate Counting Crows

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    3. Re:Gateway drug by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1
      --
      #DeleteFacebook
  3. While you're at it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can you train birds NOT to shit on my car? 'Kay, thanks...

    1. Re:While you're at it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not crows. That's bluebirds.

    2. Re:While you're at it... by KiloByte · · Score: 2

      Can you train birds NOT to shit on my car? 'Kay, thanks...

      The solution is similar: find an animal that can get rid of the problem.

      Some kittehs are afraid of anything bigger than a fly or spider. My current one has dragged in a couple of jackdaws hardly smaller than himself. No poop bombs from these two anymore!

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    3. Re:While you're at it... by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1
      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    4. Re:While you're at it... by ls671 · · Score: 1

      The solution is actually much simpler: make a "CrowBar" where the crows can go have a dump and get food in exchange.

      A friend of mine trained his parrot to shit in ashtrays so crows should be able to learn that, maybe other birds too.

      To refine the system, add bird facial recognition across stations and keep track of the intake versus the outtake and refuse to dispense food if the bird is not "clean".

      --
      Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
  4. human smokers will be trained by iggymanz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "it's okay for me to throw my butts into the street, because a crow will pick it up and get fed. I'm thinking of the crows"

    how about robots that pick up smoldering butts and use them to burn the faces of the smokers that throw them. I think this kind of negative reinforcement is a better solution and doesn't involve enslaving animals.

    1. Re:human smokers will be trained by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Hee hee, crows will swoop in on unsuspecting smokers and snatch their still-lit cigarettes from their hands. They will grab entire packs when they can. It will be hilarious.

    2. Re:human smokers will be trained by iggymanz · · Score: 4, Informative

      crows can actually be taught to do that, even to peck the smokers faces as it wrests the cigarettes away. the ad campaign can feature excerpts from Hitchcock's "The Birds"

    3. Re:human smokers will be trained by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I was in the military back in the 1990s. Each day, two guys would be assigned as the "barracks NCOs". (NCO: Non-Commisioned Officer, enlisted person of corporal or above) They were there to ensure nothing bad happened without it being written down in a log book. Ok, ok, sometimes they prevented bad stuff from happening to begin with.

      One day, I had the barracks NCO duty. It was on a Thursday, which was cleaning day for Friday's inspections. One duty was having a work detail clean the yard around the building, and the common areas in the 4-story building. Usually this was having 15-20 guys walk around the building picking up trash, which was mostly cigarette butts, and 8-10 guys cleaning the TV lounges, walk ways, and laundry rooms. So that would be 2 or 3 guys per floor.

      Anyway, on my day I asked the work detail a simple question: Who here smokes?

      No one raised their hand. I asked again, and again. Finally I said "OK. Nonsmokers, point to the smokers." Hands went up pointing out the 7 or 8 smokers. So only the smokers walked around the barracks that day, picking up all those cigarette butts, and the other guys were ecstatic because they didn't have to touch those nasty things, and they had a lot more help cleaning the common areas.

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    4. Re: human smokers will be trained by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about robots that fire steel bolts at people they see dropping cigarette butts on the ground?

    5. Re:human smokers will be trained by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      "it's okay for me to throw my butts into the street, because a crow will pick it up and get fed. I'm thinking of the crows"

      It's pretty obvious most smokers already think it's okay for them to throw their butts on the street - no justification necessary.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    6. Re:human smokers will be trained by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1, Funny

      how about robots that pick up smoldering butts and use them to burn the faces of the smokers that throw them. I think this kind of negative reinforcement is a better solution and doesn't involve enslaving animals.

      This sounds expensive to build and maintain. Let's just optimize it a little bit and just have robots that burn the faces of people that drop cigarette butts. No wait, that'll still be too expensive. Ok, so we can just have them burn the faces of people holding a cigarette butt. Hmm... still rather expensive. We could use a much slower processor if we just have robots that will burn people's faces. Now it's best if we optimize the mechanical aspect too so that we can really get the prices into range. We can do away with most moving and electronic components if we just have people line up to have their faces burned! It's perfect!

      I think everyone will agree that faceburning stations are an affordable future we can all live with. ;)

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    7. Re:human smokers will be trained by thegarbz · · Score: 0

      What do you mean "will be"? Human smokers are already trained to drop their butts where they stand.

    8. Re:human smokers will be trained by jellomizer · · Score: 2

      Done give away their actual motive. We can make robots to clean the streets. But we need animals to actually attack the cause. Plausible deniability.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    9. Re:human smokers will be trained by Shazatoga · · Score: 1

      While we're at it we can design the robots to take food away from fat people.

    10. Re:human smokers will be trained by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Littering is only bad because of its consequences. Mitigate the consequences, and littering is no longer a vice.

      Smoking, on the other hand, is still gross.

    11. Re:human smokers will be trained by Wrath0fb0b · · Score: 1

      Enslaving seems a bit harsh? They are going to offer them food in exchange for butts. If the crows don't like it they can literally fly off.

    12. Re:human smokers will be trained by bidule · · Score: 2

      Finally I said "OK. Nonsmokers, point to the smokers."

      This is so evil. I love you!

      --
      ID: the nose did not occur naturally, how would we wear glasses otherwise? (apologies to Voltaire)
    13. Re: human smokers will be trained by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      Good god! That would be a total waste of steel wouldn't it?

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    14. Re:human smokers will be trained by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      How about adapting the suicide booths from Futurama?

      Let's make "Smoking Booth" and make it mandatory to use them for smokers.

      The smoking booth functions as follows: when it detects smoke, it completely drench the inside via its fire suppression system. Every time. Blame it on malfunctions but still make their use mandatory for smokers.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    15. Re:human smokers will be trained by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly what I was thinking. Swiping lit cigarettes out of the hands and mouths of smoker would of course be a good thing.

      What? Train the birds that a full cigarette doesn't get you any food? The birds are smart enough to be able to break off the non-butt part and submit it.

    16. Re: human smokers will be trained by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Just use a magnet to recover the steel after cremation.

    17. Re:human smokers will be trained by Nethead · · Score: 1

      I had grounds duty in training in the Air Force back in '79 picking up butts. I also found quite a few roaches, often enough to make a decent joint out of them. Made for a relaxed weekend.

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    18. Re:human smokers will be trained by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course they do. Nicotine is a drug; when the user feels that itch nothing exists but the need and the nicotine. Once the itch has been satisfied the addict can see what a filthy process it is and refutes his connection to it by quickly hiding the fact from himself by pitching it. Anywhere.

      But I want to know about why some people think we must always "harness" the animals. Why is PM pushing this biblical mindset? Are PM's editors and writers too lazy to empty their own ashtrays? No wonder that magazine is dying. The crows will figure this out pretty quick. Soon they'll up the reward to four kibbles from one and they'll get it because the humans are so lazy and addled.

    19. Re:human smokers will be trained by techno-vampire · · Score: 1

      I was in the military back in the 1990s.

      I don't know what branch you were in, but I'd bet money you weren't in the Army. Why? Well, I've noticed many times that Army vets talk about being in the Army, but vets from any other branch talk about being in the military. I've no idea why, but that's how it seems to work. And that's the way I say it, and I was in Uncle Sam's Navy back in 'Nam.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    20. Re:human smokers will be trained by h33t+l4x0r · · Score: 1

      I hope they swoop the guy who comes to refill the feeders. I can't think of a less dignified way to earn lunch.

    21. Re:human smokers will be trained by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Anyway, on my day I asked the work detail a simple question: Who here smokes?

      No one raised their hand. I asked again, and again. Finally I said "OK. Nonsmokers, point to the smokers." Hands went up pointing out the 7 or 8 smokers.

      I don't believe you. No soldier would ever rat out their fellow soldiers.
      Soldiers would stand there all night if need be, without saying a word, unless the smokers themselves stepped forward.
      Someone ratting out others would find themselves ostracised at best, and likely the reaction would be more severe, but the real reason they would not betray their fellow soldiers is that the first thing soldiers learn is that they have to be able to trust each other completely, because their lives depend on it.
      Not betraying trust is a big thing.

    22. Re:human smokers will be trained by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Think of the children! How can someone be so evil to train crows to prey on our young smokers like that?

    23. Re:human smokers will be trained by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea, I had that experience in the Marine Corps. As a private I did the dirty duty. As a corporal I used the same solution. In the field I asked the Lieutenant to only have smokers go clean up. He was delighted as he didn't smoke either. Most were sergeants as they could afford to smoke.
      It should not be that hard to put the butt in your pocket after knocking off the ash; then put in a garbage can. A trained behavior, not unlike training crows to pick up you waste.

    24. Re:human smokers will be trained by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What kind of trust do you have for a person who do not clean after themselves in an intentional manner? I'm perfectly happy with smokers who are sensible enough to put out their butts and put them out to trash. Any smoker who does not act to that level of decency is not worthy of respect as a human being and definitely not a soldier.

    25. Re:human smokers will be trained by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

      Sorry to burst your bubble, but when someone has to pick up cigarette butts from a barracks full of smokers who are such pigs that they throw the butts on the ground, the social convention of not ratting out your fellow men eventually disappears. Especially since only about one fourth to one third were smokers, so most of the ones picking up the butts were non-smokers.

      We aren't talking about having each others' backs in combat. We are talking about having to pick up others' biological waste. Those who put is there should pick it up.

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    26. Re:human smokers will be trained by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 2

      Good deduction. I was in the Marine Corps, stationed at the Marine Corps Air Station in Kaneohe, Hawaii. Nice place to be stationed.

      I usually use the generic term "the military" because too many people, veterans and non-veterans alike, have pre-conceived notions of each branch. I simply didn't want it to detract from the story. It's also shorter to type. :^)

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    27. Re:human smokers will be trained by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since when do animals care about dignity?

      And anyway fuck you. Cleaning trash is a real economic need and doing it is honorable work that benefits people and pays.

      The rest of us are tired of seeing up your nostrils.

    28. Re: human smokers will be trained by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Currently deployed to camp cupcake. Some vague hope in leadership was revived when I realized that O country has a bigger fraction of buts going into the can.

    29. Re:human smokers will be trained by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how about robots that pick up smoldering butts and use them to burn the faces of the smokers that throw them

      Such a quick descent into violence simply because you disagree with their decisions... You must be a modern-day liberal - Welcome to the party.

      Be sure to grab your "Not MY President" button next to the pitchforks and torches, by the door before we leave. And oh yeah, don't forget your "It's MY world they're littering with their disgusting cigarette butts" rhetoric for when you respond to my ignorant post. Have a nice day.

    30. Re:human smokers will be trained by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm also not buying it. You mean to tell me these hardened killing machines who value country and brotherhood are scared to pick up something that might have been pressed against a fellow soldier's lips for a few minutes? For the love of God, let's hope North Korea doesn't get word of the pussies we have in our armed forces.

    31. Re:human smokers will be trained by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Do you think it's more dignified for the human who currently has the job?

    32. Re:human smokers will be trained by pjt33 · · Score: 1

      I've no idea why, but that's how it seems to work.

      Because Navy and Air Force recruits are capable of using words of more than two syllables?

    33. Re:human smokers will be trained by pjt33 · · Score: 1

      It would be simpler to just randomly insert a small amount of some mild (but moderately stable) explosive in 1% of cigarettes.

    34. Re:human smokers will be trained by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Who said they were scared?

      Apart from you, that is.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    35. Re:human smokers will be trained by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      You'd feel better if a pack of cigarettes were stuffed down your throat. So would everyone else. I recommend you try it!

    36. Re:human smokers will be trained by ITRambo · · Score: 1

      I love your idea. The slobs that flick their butts onto my business' property, because they're too stupid to realize that putting it out first and then into a trash can is best, really really annoy me.

    37. Re: human smokers will be trained by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      Reminds of the terrifying scene in RoboCop where he overreacts by shooting up a smoker who violated no smoking ordinance.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    38. Re:human smokers will be trained by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Best of luck making a robot smarter and more capable of this job than a crow! (No, seriously, I'd be mad impressed and would love to see it.)

    39. Re: human smokers will be trained by Brockmire · · Score: 1

      If that was the opening scene in a movie set 50 years in the future, I'd be glued to my seat. When people would say douchey things, a robot could come over and slap them in the face. Imagine if robots dealt micro punishments to all the people doing the little annoying things in life...

    40. Re:human smokers will be trained by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
      Why do soldiers go around in threes?

      One can read polysyllabic words. On can write polysyllabic words. And one is there to keep an eye on those two suspicious intellectuals.

      (I know - it's version 378 of a very widespread joke.)

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    41. Re: human smokers will be trained by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      we've had that for decades, the penguins at catholic schools with their rulers....

  5. Fight Milk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Neat idea, hope it works.

  6. Equip crows with GoPros by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 0

    They get seed when they deposit overhead cleavage shots in the wifi bin.

    --
    If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    1. Re:Equip crows with GoPros by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      If you want to get your creep on, it's easier to just buy a drone.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    2. Re:Equip crows with GoPros by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      It's even easier to type something in a search engine.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
  7. They are smart... by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 5, Funny

    Crows are smart, but I'm not sure about being smartest. I found an injured crow when I was a kid and took it home to nurse it back to health. It eventually got better, but didn't seem to have any interest in being returned to the wild. Whenever I would take it outside it would flop around like it still had a broken wing. It got to the point that it would start flopping around in the house anytime my mom would start bitching about it. She eventually threw it out the third story window, and it tried to fly back in. As soon as I opened the door to the house, it flew back in. It learned to ring the doorbell to get someone to open the door after a couple of days. I think my mom was happy when we moved, in part, to get rid of my pet crow.

    I wonder what the unintended consiquences of rewarding a bunch of crows could be? They may start raiding public trash and ashtrays for food.

    1. Re:They are smart... by KiloByte · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Sounds pretty smart to me. Being in the wild means no food other than what you catch yourself, cold and so on. Faking an injury means having food delivered right under your beak, and a warm house. I guess you didn't do anything stressful like keeping the bird confined in a tiny cage, so the new environment wasn't bad.

      The crow wasn't a professional at mind-controlling humans like the Master Species so no meows at frequencies that simulate a human baby, no mind-altering parasites, and it doesn't look cute either, thus you managed to get rid of that crow... but the principle is the same.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    2. Re:They are smart... by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Honestly that description makes the crow sound really smart.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    3. Re: They are smart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Smarter than the humans in the story for sure.

    4. Re:They are smart... by avandesande · · Score: 1

      The pet human doesn't know his place ;-)

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    5. Re: They are smart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I pity the people who moved in after you left.

    6. Re:They are smart... by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1
      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    7. Re:They are smart... by antdude · · Score: 1

      I wonder if that pet crow survived the humans moved.

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    8. Re:They are smart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Sounds pretty smart to me."

      Given you didn't observe the obvious intended humor of the tale, your estimation doesn't seem to be a high standard.

  8. Can’t wait to see this happening by Sla$hPot · · Score: 0

    I love crows, they are smart and intelligent creatures.
    They are very systematic and meticulous in their way of foraging.
    So it wouldn’t surprise me if they would take on the challenge.
    But we have to be careful not spawning a new crow race of evolution,
    turning our crow buddies into our flying overlords.

  9. Steal other crows food? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What if several crows wait at large to steal food from the ones that bring the butts.

  10. Rude by cerberusss · · Score: 0

    I've never understood this, perhaps smokers can answer this.

    I think almost everybody is raised by their parents to throw garbage in the bin, instead of on the street. So why do smokers discard their cigarettes on the ground?

    --
    8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
    1. Re:Rude by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Simple answer: because they can get away with it.

      The only way you could actually enforce the laws prohibiting it (and there are actual laws against it in every city I've ever lived in), is if you had cameras *EVERYWHERE*... and advanced image recognition software to instantly recognize when a person was breaking the law, and be able to make them accountable.

    2. Re:Rude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A smoker here.

      "..why do smokers discard their cigarettes on the ground?"

      For the same reason car drivers run around our main streets emitting all kind of toxic waste into the air without a care.

      Yes, our parents raised us kids, fifty years ago, to be socially aware and not make a mess around the place.

      Since then smoking as a habit has declined a lot in the western world.

      But still, people will complain like hell if you are blowing smoke in the street. However their driving around in some toxic emission belching SUV is quite OK. So who is "rude" ?

      What have you done, cerberusss, to clean up your impact on the environment we all live in?

      I think a few cigarette butts around the place is the least of our worries today.

    3. Re:Rude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We probably wouldn't smoke if we had good parents that taught us that shit!

    4. Re: Rude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll let my dog shit on your lawn for the same reason. We have bigger shit to worry about, like my broken toilet.

      P.S. I don't really have a dog. Sorry. Still cool though by your logic.

    5. Re: Rude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you think he'll notice a few more dog poops on his lawn? Between the broken appliances and non-functional cars already on his lawn you'll be lucky to find a spot to slip one in.

    6. Re:Rude by arth1 · · Score: 1

      I think almost everybody is raised by their parents to throw garbage in the bin, instead of on the street. So why do smokers discard their cigarettes on the ground?

      Do you want them to toss it on the ground, or toss it in a bin where there's paper and other flammables? Think about it.

      If there's an ashtray around (and not one of those pole-with-a-hole designed by non-smokers with no clue how stubbing out a cigarette works), smokers will generally use it. But the anti-smokers don't want ashtrays.

      (And yes, I'm a non-smoker.)

    7. Re:Rude by MiniMike · · Score: 1

      Do you want them to toss it on the ground, or toss it in a bin where there's paper and other flammables? Think about it.

      Part of the problem is the viewpoint that those are the only two options. It's your (or their) trash, dispose of it properly. Why is there an expectation that ashtrays should be provided at any random spot that someone might finish smoking? Like any other trash, hold onto it until there is a proper place to dispose of it. Throwing your trash on the ground should never be viewed as an acceptable option.

    8. Re:Rude by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Why is there an expectation that ashtrays should be provided at any random spot that someone might finish smoking? Like any other trash, hold onto it until there is a proper place to dispose of it.

      Unless there's a chance to stub it out, a typical cigarette will continue burning and melt the filter, and create a stench that's far worse than the tobacco smell, or burn the person's fingers. Or did you want them to stub it out on the nearest wall? Some do, and I think that's a far worse solution than dropping it and stepping on it.

      Best would be if smokers didn't smoke, but they do, and I personally prefer to (a) provide usable ashtrays, and when ashtrays aren't available, (b) for the smoker to dispose of the fire hazard on a patch of fire-proof ground, not a container of flammables, and (c) any other solution.

    9. Re:Rude by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Nah, random reinforcement actually works better. You catch one chucking a butt, you fine them. Yes, you miss 99% of the times. But you make the one time hurt enough, and they stop doing it.

      When I was a kid people tossed all kinds of litter. You'd be driving along and see McDonalds cups go flying out car windows pretty routinely. Now? Very rarely.

    10. Re:Rude by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      There are lots of other options. Carry your own ashtray with a lid. I've even seen nice leather cases that do that duty. They're stylish and everything.

      Smokers are and have always been irresponsible and entitled regarding their habit. Many of them still deny the problems with second hand smoke and think it's terribly unfair that they can't just smoke anywhere they want.

      I very occasionally enjoy a cigar. I definitely do not chuck it on the ground when I'm done. I dispose of it responsibly, like an adult, not like a smoker.

    11. Re:Rude by pjt33 · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure when I last saw a bin that didn't include an ashtray in its design. Do people violently oppose installing them where you live?

    12. Re:Rude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a smoker. When driving, part of the problem is that they designed ashtrays out of the newer cars. In rare occasions that I smoke in one like that, I bring a soda can half-filled with water as a makeshift ashtray (disgusting, yes).

      For people who just throw them outside whereever, I have no idea. I guess they think they just vanish when it rains or something. When I'm done with one, if there's no trash can around, I empty the remaining tobacco, and put the butt in my back pocket until I find the next trashcan. It's not hard, it can make your pants stink though.

    13. Re:Rude by mark-t · · Score: 1
      They can (and sometimes will) do that already... it doesn't work worth shit, because it's so rare that they actually will catch someone doing it. The percentage of enforcement is so tiny that nobody else ever bats an eye.

      How often do you see people smoking in areas near buildings where there are clearly labelled no-smoking signs. I see it all the time where I live. I have known countless people that smoke, but only know of one person I've met in my entire life that ever actually got a fine for doing this. They do it because the enforcement is so random and infrequent that nobody takes it seriously until it happens to them... (and if it does, they feel unjustly persecuted, because so many others are getting away with it).

    14. Re:Rude by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Yes, there's a certain threshold, but it doesn't have to be particularly frequent, so long as the fine hurts enough. If you have a 0.001% chance of getting caught and the fine is $50, who cares? If you have a 0.01% chance of getting caught and the fine is $5000... somebody you know is going to have gotten stomped. And that's going to make you think twice.

      There was a news story about a guy tossing a lit cigarette out of his car in an area that's had a lot of bad forest fires. A cop saw him and threw the book: a multi-thousand dollar fine. Then the guy got roasted in the national media after complaining. Want to bet he doesn't chuck butts out his window anymore?

      I agree with ramping up enforcement, and fines. Make the fines pay for the extra enforcement. When the problem goes away, you can reduce things again.

    15. Re:Rude by arth1 · · Score: 1

      There are lots of other options. Carry your own ashtray with a lid. I've even seen nice leather cases that do that duty. They're stylish and everything.

      Yeah, and you can trade them in for a Mogwai.

      But they require both hands, and from what I can tell, smokers a much as anyone else often carry stuff. Any solution expected to work has to be convenient. Perhaps the greatest convenience is to ban smoking altogether and subsidize personal mist devices for ex-smokers.

      A problem I see as bigger is bottlecaps. They harm nature more than cigarette butts which dissolve within months.

    16. Re:Rude by arth1 · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure when I last saw a bin that didn't include an ashtray in its design. Do people violently oppose installing them where you live?

      No, but they're either designed by someone who has never been around smokers and lack a way to extinguish or de-ember cigarettes, they are waterlogged due to bad placement or lack of awning, or if by a miracle they are actual usable ashtrays, they're full of paper waste that others have tossed there, being too lazy to even aim for the hole a few inches lower, making it hazardous to use them as an ashtray.

      Egotism and laziness isn't something that smokers have a monopoly on. I remember my old place of work, where the smoking room had a sign saying "If you don't put teabags in my ashtray, I won't put cigarette butts in your tea".

      I don't see cigarette butts as more of a problem than leaves or dead insects. Since the 60s, filters are made to dissolve, and the tobacco, well that's leaves. Chewing gum and bottle caps is a much bigger menace in my opinion.

    17. Re:Rude by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      What's a Mogwai? The first few pages of Google say it's a Scottish rock band.

      That's an option. Short of banning it entirely, have a license to buy cigarettes. If you get caught littering you lose your license, but you can apply again in six months. Applications require submission of 100 cigarette butts.

      I see very few bottle caps around. None at all on city streets, and very rarely in parks. People in the park who have caps take them along, or throw them away. Yet the very same people think nothing of tossing a cigarette butt on the ground.

    18. Re: Rude by Brockmire · · Score: 1

      Driving cars from one place to another has a number of uses and benefits. Littering butts is considered the same? Where is ANY benefit? You keep telling yourself that, but you're still a piece of shit.

    19. Re:Rude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. I want them to eat it.

  11. Crows more trainable than smokers? by MiniMike · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's too bad some humans can't be trained not to litter in the first place.

    1. Re:Crows more trainable than smokers? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      From TFS: "Crows are some of the smartest animals in the world".

      And remember we are comparing them to evolved monkeys who work 8+ hour days for most of their lives, in exchange for money, which they spend on small sticks made of a cocktail of nasty toxic substances, all so they can inhale those substances all the while knowing fully well that in the end their only achievement was to exchange their earned money for an even shorter life expectancy.

  12. I for one welcome... by Rujiel · · Score: 3, Informative

    There was a college experiment several years ago where people put on masks, some of which then messing with the crows. It became clear that they remember faces. https://www.popsci.com/science...

    1. Re:I for one welcome... by danomac · · Score: 1

      Crows can definitely identify people... and cats. My brother's cat made enemies of the crows near his house, so whenever the cat went outside all the crows around his house would dive at his cat.

    2. Re: I for one welcome... by Brockmire · · Score: 1

      That proved nothing. If there were 4 cats and only one was getting attacked, you'd have a point.

    3. Re:I for one welcome... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was a college experiment several years ago where people put on masks, some of which then messing with the crows. It became clear that they remember faces. https://www.popsci.com/science...

      That wasn't the salient point of the experiment. The salient point was that the people with the masks only messed with the parents, making very sure never to be seen by the offspring, and yet the offspring reacted to the masks a whole lot more than average crows.

  13. Yeah, sure by 50000BTU_barbecue · · Score: 1

    Until the crows get beak cancer and PETA finds out.

    You know, maybe, just maybe, we could convince municipalities that it's THEIR job to keep a city clean, by, you know, HIRING people to sweep streets?

    Not everything needs to be a magical unicorn tech-incubator 3D printed private space asteroid-mined facebook-enabled startup.

    Just saying.

    --
    Mostly random stuff.
    1. Re:Yeah, sure by ffkom · · Score: 1

      You know, maybe, just maybe, we could convince municipalities that it's THEIR job to keep a city clean, by, you know, HIRING people to sweep streets?

      Since it would actually be the smokers duty to not litter the city, municipalities should rather hire people to fine those who throw their butts everywhere.

    2. Re:Yeah, sure by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      It would be better to hire people to shoot smokers in the head. Or train the crows to do it.

  14. I'm intrigued by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So how do they get the FIRST crow to use the system? I'm pretty sure from there on others will learn from them, but the first one may be a challenge. Maybe get a tame one and give it a butt to deposit then fly off (repeat until established)?

  15. Well... by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

    At least it's not another Kickstarter.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think there should be a kickstarter. Literally. Just pay people to kick smokers when they litter. Write a city ordinance that states "it's not assault if you drop your cigarette butt and somebody kicks you for it", so no prosecution either.

      Kicking the crap out of douchebags and dipshits should be socially acceptable.

    2. Re:Well... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      I've considered running for office on the policy of "Dog owners will either clean it up or eat it".

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  16. Re: Great idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Could crows replace the people who read Google News?

  17. They will take them while you are smoking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    These things are cheeky fuckers and a bit feral and fearless in the cities. They rummage bins in populated car parks right in front of people making a massive mess, because they know there is food there. They don't care about humans/cars/etc there.

    Once they learn that cigarette = reward, I reckon they will start trying to steal them right out of smokers mouths/hands etc.

    1. Re:They will take them while you are smoking by MyFirstNameIsPaul · · Score: 1

      Ever try to take a cigarette from a smoker? Yeah, that won't last long.

      --

      I once took an excursion to Reddit, and later HN. Unlimited up/down voting sucks when dealing with a hive-mind.

    2. Re:They will take them while you are smoking by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Where I live if you harm a bird in public people will take videos and call the cops, and you'll be arrested for either "Molesting Wildlife" or "Animal Cruelty."

      One time I caught a fish in the city park and a heron swooped down and ate it. I turned my back for 2 seconds to get my fish whacker to kill the fish, and it saw me turn my head and swooped right in. All you can do is keep fishing, the bird wins that one. They'll have to learn to just run away from crows! LOL

    3. Re:They will take them while you are smoking by ceoyoyo · · Score: 0

      Sounds good to me. Win all around. Butt doesn't get thrown in the first place, entertainment for all the non-smokers, and the smokers get their risk of death reduced a bit.

  18. If you don't even care what dirt enters your lung by ffkom · · Score: 2

    ... why should you bother to keep anything less vital to you clean?

  19. Tickets by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 2

    If cigarette butts are that big of a problem why not just hire some bylaw enforcement officers to patrol the areas and give out tickets for littering for anyone throwing the butts on the sidewalk/street. After people get a large fine, or two, for littering they will change their ways.

    We are a part of nature. It doesn't exist for use to use as raw materials. Until we change this attitude that everything is here for us to exploit then we will continue to seeing nature "fight back".

    1. Re: Tickets by Corbets · · Score: 1

      We have that here. The problem is that the smokers are too numerous to make a dent in the problem this way.

    2. Re:Tickets by nospam007 · · Score: 1

      f cigarette butts are that big of a problem why not just hire some bylaw enforcement officers to patrol the areas and give out tickets for littering for anyone throwing the butts on the sidewalk/street. After people get a large fine, or two, for littering they will change their ways.“

      People don‘t work for peanuts, crows do.

    3. Re: Tickets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seems like it should be self-sustaining/limiting, if there is a fine attached? Just keep hiring more enforcement officers until the fine revenue per officer drops off.

    4. Re:Tickets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > We are a part of nature. It doesn't exist for [us] to use as raw materials.

      Um, no. That's why Nature is here.

      Take a good, hard look at what _actually_ happens in the natural environment. _Everything_ uses everything else as raw materials.

      Not only are humans the best on the planet at this, we have the self-awareness required to understand the importance of conservation efforts. _Every_ other part of nature uses up resources until its population cannot be sustained on the level of resources left, then its population has _massive_ die-offs.

      The human way of doing things is _far_, _far_ better than anything else Nature has come up with to date.

    5. Re:Tickets by onkelonkel · · Score: 1

      Why not put a deposit on them just like cans and bottles. Say 50 cents per cigarette. Refundable at any place that sell cigarettes. People would pick them up just as soon as they hit the ground.

      --
      None of them can see the clouds; The polished wings don't care.
    6. Re:Tickets by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      People are sneaky, it is too hard. You'd have to use cameras. And then there is a whole different [blah blah blah].

    7. Re:Tickets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While that's a good idea, that's also how you get a bootleg cigarette industry.

    8. Re:Tickets by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      After people get a large fine, or two, for littering they will change their ways.

      Sure. We only need to catch 1 billion people a couple of times and the problem will be solved. Except for those who don't see fines as a deterrent. And those who do the math and realise that the police can't catch everyone and the odds of getting a fine are minuscule. Oh I think the police have better things to do.

      Speaking of littering, on the front page is an article that says NASA got fined $400 for dropping a space station on some town. Incidentally the cost of a packet of cigarettes from a service station in Perth is $25. So the fine for littering isn't really much compared to the habit itself.

      Kind of reminds me about my last red-light fine. That was 100EUR. Given I spend 280EUR per month in petrol I didn't even even take notice of it. It sure as hell wasn't a deterrent (not that I intended to run a red light).

    9. Re:Tickets by PoopJuggler · · Score: 1

      After people get a large fine, or two, for littering they will change their ways.

      Just like how there's no speeders on the road because the first few speeders got a large fine.

    10. Re:Tickets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately, we already have large fines for littering in the UK. You know what that gets you? Nothing. The "enforcement officers" don't want to have to deal with anyone who looks a bit rough, so the slobs who think it's fine to chuck stuff everywhere do so with impunity. They have fined a few people who just happen to drop stuff by accident, but generally speaking they'd have had a much larger effect on public cleanliness by spending their time picking up litter rather than trying to enforce an unenforcable law.

    11. Re:Tickets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eh, we have massive taxes on them now, and bootlegging isn't a massive issue. Also: if you pay people for them, even if the original owner doesn't want that 50 cents, some homeless dude will collect them up for sure.

    12. Re: Tickets by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Fine the ones you catch enough to clean up all the butts. Repeat as necessary

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    13. Re:Tickets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "why not just hire some bylaw enforcement officers to patrol the areas and give out tickets for littering for anyone throwing the butts on the sidewalk/street."

      I live at a busy traffic-lighted intersection in what was a rural community that's now surburban and just north of a main throughfare to a small city. You can stand here for 15 minutes 0645am to 1115pm and catch any weekday as well as Saturday and Sunday afternoons and have your pick of multiple obvious and glaring offenders--noise, exhaust, littering, speeding. I'm not talking ticky tack stuff, I'm talking obvious public nuisances borderline health issues re lungs and hearing. We have blaring jakers, bassers, harleys, spiking sportbikes, tuners racing, pickups rolling coal, etc.

      To pull some relevance to the /. story, my front yard has so many cigarette buts lining the width that when it rains, it washes into the driveway, where I sweep them and about 5 cig pack wraps up in clumps.

      Where are the cops? They patrol 1 mile north and south of here, the areas of a main residential and the shopping mall district (where everyone passes by my area to and from to shop). All they pick up are speeders, if that, for show. Every driver in the area knows where they'll target and they don't patrol sufficiently here so anything goes.

      Even when the do patrol here, you'd be amazed at what they let pass. Like a police car waiting at the intersection with open window first to go, and watching the crossing traffic, or the basser that pulls up next to them and the idiot decides to flaunt it with window rattling.

      This is a county that decided to centralize all police calls, so when you call the local police number, it goes to a county dispatch, who are dog slow, head up their ass incompetent. We had a triple murder in a suburban area in the dead of night, down the road form the station, and it took the officer 15 minutes to arrive, and we have a police force of near 60 in a 3,000 home municipality.

      Why don't they pull people over? (1) Most of the obvious commercial offenders, like the jakers, are major employers in the area. (2) A number of the major other offenders are cops themselves or related to cops (I won't go into the very simple and legal way to ascertain this with some minor legwork).

      Anyways, the point is, cops are people too. They have their own way of doing things and interests. There is little incentive for them to go after low grade offenders even if they are a good police officer looking out for the general public's interests. Cops really don't like spending time in municipal court pushing their cases, often assigning bunches to the new bloods to handle.

      Early on, we used to call in on the flagrant violations (like the pizza delivery kid that left every 40minutes doing burnouts off the light). They'll take the call, show up 2-3 hours later, spend 30 minutes taking a report while badgering you what you were doing at the time, etc. So now we don't bother.

      What we do now is keep a record of blatant violations that are ignored when an officer is present (and there are strangely a number, despite low actual policing, they do have to pass through here). This has proven surprisingly, say, useful in other situations.

    14. Re:Tickets by djinn6 · · Score: 1

      Just double the fine every time they're caught littering. It'll start hurting very quickly even for a billionaire.

      If you need help enforcing it, give the fine based on video recordings instead of requiring police eye-witness. If the video comes from a layperson, then give them 10% of the fine. Pretty soon you'll have lookouts on every street and alleyway.

    15. Re:Tickets by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Smokers hate that idea, and are numerous enough to be a fairly large voting and lobbying bloc.

    16. Re:Tickets by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      That's a good example. The vast majority of people (here at least) drive at the highest speed that the cops will ignore. A small number drive faster, and get fined. Seems like the fines work for the majority.

    17. Re:Tickets by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Then you're missing the point that odds of enforcement are low. Police have better things to do, and the studies that show the scale of punishment doesn't make it a deterrent. All you're doing is eventually feeding the prison industrial complex with people who make poor financial choices and littering rather than with criminals. The often insane disconnect between crime and punishment is precisely how the USA got to where it is.

      If the video comes from a layperson, then give them 10% of the fine.

      This is a dumb idea:
      a) you waste police time with analysing video authenticity
      b) you waste time with proof of identity
      c) coveillance leads to a crumbling of society where rather than rely on your neighbour and your friend you treat them with incredible suspicion at all times.
      d) the inclusion of a profit motive really just shows you didn't think this through. I mean if it wasn't a bad idea before it would definitely be now.

      Pretty soon you'll have lookouts on every street and alleyway.

      Yep great outcome. But that's a lot of people dedicating their time to the love of cleanliness. We would need a department to oversee this. We could even give it a catchy name like Ministry of Love. While you're at it you can give the entire program a catchy name like the "War on Butts". I'm sure it will work just as well as the war on drugs.

      You can't change culture and history by enforcement of laws that people will consider unfair. Also remember you're applying a solution that seems logical in your mind to people who are literally trading money for reduced lifespans with zero benefit. Good luck with that.

    18. Re: Tickets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      are you fucking dense? its exacy the opposite, asshole.

    19. Re:Tickets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not just have the litter police pick up the garbage... they got nothing better to do.

    20. Re:Tickets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A small number drive faster, and have a very small chance of driving by a cop that notices and decides to give a fine, but most of the time they get away with it.

  20. tobacco is poisonous to birds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since tobacco is poisonous to birds like chocolate is to dogs, this idea is a non starter.

  21. Smokers are the worst by sycodon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't know what it is, but even nice respectable people who smoke don't seem to have any issue pitching their butts out the window when finished, often not even making sure they are out. Not just a few wildfires have been started by this behavior.

    Bizarre.

    --
    When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    1. Re:Smokers are the worst by BLToday · · Score: 1

      Every year, at least one brush fire is started that way in California.

    2. Re:Smokers are the worst by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They don't care about their own body. Why would they care about the city? Generally speaking you can take it to the bank that smokers are either dumb or weak-willed. At the very least it shows poor decision making skills.

    3. Re:Smokers are the worst by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the smoke maybe?

    4. Re:Smokers are the worst by saloomy · · Score: 1

      Citation Needed

    5. Re: Smokers are the worst by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every time a citation is needed, it is needed.

      (Citation needed)

    6. Re:Smokers are the worst by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      There are rarely fines for tossing cigarette butts on the ground, so smokers do it. People used to toss all kinds of garbage, but many cities instituted fines, and jacked them up until it stopped.

      Some idiot chucking a butt out a car window in an area just devastated by a forest fire recently got a $2500 fine. He complained in national media. He didn't get a lot of sympathy.

    7. Re:Smokers are the worst by Evtim · · Score: 2

      And the non smokers are just as bad. Really.

      The Dutch are a wonderful nation but one of the few black spots on their image is throwing stuff on the ground. It is truly depressing widespread behavior. A bunch of people walk through a park on the way to a venue and after that it is like the Huns have passed. The non-smokers will trow other trash - they are not at all less likely to do it.

      I know from my bird watching friends that every filter can cost a bird's, life because often they swallow them and suffocate. So I made an absolute commitment many years ago never to throw a cigaret butt on the ground and I followed through. However, I have seen (hours of commuting every day for more than a decade) people from all colors and social strata (truly, this is no PC!) throwing it on the ground NEXT to the designated ashtray!!! (on a train station for example). I have no explanation.

      I always try to hit them where it hurts (the Dutch love cheap and saving money) mentioning the high garbage collection tax - well you pay for someone to clean your mess. Don't complain or do not be messy!

    8. Re:Smokers are the worst by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      Every year, at least one brush fire is started that way in California.

      That is less of a problem, since smoking rates in California have gone way down. California is now under 15%, and only Utah does better. Kentucky is the worst, at 30%.

      Smoking rates by state.

      One reason for California's low rate is their anti-smoking ads. Many states squandered their tobacco settlement money on ads about how smoking is unhealthy, which was not effective. California focused their ads on making smoking look stupid and uncool. There was a billboard on my commute with a man asking an attractive woman "Do you mind if I smoke?" Her reply "Do you mind if I fart?"

    9. Re: Smokers are the worst by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was from an old Steve Martin bit.

    10. Re:Smokers are the worst by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      throwing it on the ground NEXT to the designated ashtray!!!

      I used to hate the smokers who worked for a company that I see out my window at work - every day they drop their cigarette puts into the water drainage grate in the middle of the parking lot rather than the butt stop near the door they go in and out of. I wondered what kind of uneducated assholes they had to be to do that, and then I looked at our own smoking area and realized our own employees (gov't, educated, good salaries) do the exact same thing - ignore the buttstop right next to where they are standing so they can drop it in a drainage grate instead.

  22. Minute of hate by DCFusor · · Score: 1, Informative

    Let's have our minute of hate for those who grew up when smoking was cool and haven't been able to quit, despite a lot of hassle and hate. Then get real. Glad I didn't grow up around the hateful people posting on this (or the week older hackaday thread...and it looks like about the same dumb, intolerant crowd here). I smoked 44 years, then quit. It was EXTREMELY HARD to do. But I managed - and years later, it still tugs on me just about every day. When you've pulled that off, you can talk hateful about people who didn't do as well as you, maybe...but only maybe.
    But you jerks grew up when it was already uncool and never got addicted. Proud of yourself for just going with the flow? You got lucky, you weren't smarter or more disciplined. Don't feel so superior just because you had situation luck...
    Why not try actually being superior first. It's hard, it's why everyone can't be above average - or won't. Which are you? Most seem like they could, but won't. Lazy.

    --
    Why guess when you can know? Measure!
    1. Re:Minute of hate by The+Good+Reverend · · Score: 1

      Did you have this copied somewhere, just waiting for a thread that mentions smoking? Almost every post here is disparaging people who litter, not for smoking in general. The big reason non-smokers hate smokers is because they have to breathe your smoke in. If smokers didn't regularly expose the rest of us to their smoke and disgusting trash, you wouldn't have to post stuff like that, because we generally wouldn't care.

    2. Re:Minute of hate by thrich81 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'll end up saying something similar to the Reverend, maybe less angry. We're (at least not me) aren't intolerant of smokers, especially now that little of it is done inside. I recognize it's a tough addiction to kick (I can't even kick my mild desire for sugary sodas). What I don't care for is cigarette butts all over the place. I don't throw my soda cans on the ground, they go into a recycle bin. If smokers would do something similar and get the other smokers to do the same, I'd have no problems with it.

    3. Re:Minute of hate by DCFusor · · Score: 1

      No, I made it up on the spot after being disgusted at the unreasoning hate displayed here and last week on the same thread at Hackaday. If you think "pecking the eyes out of smokers" is about littering in general, you need to go some work on reading comprehension. Smokers might be jerks, but most picked up the habit when it was cool - and then couldn't put it down, ask anyone familiar with addiction how hard it is. As a smoker, I didn't force it on others, I went away from them once the majority switched to non smoking, but I never hated over it, even though I was in pain and actually the one losing my own life, and ashamed I couldn't quit something many say is harder to quit than opiods...
      And I gave up mod points - which are like a bucket in a tsunami sometimes - to post that.
      Hatred isn't justified for most situations. That's a big thing wrong in our world today, from virtue signalling without owning the virtue, to divide and conquer working on jerks just waiting for something easy to understand to fall for so they don't have to think...that blame passing thing gets real old if you're seen 60+ years of it.

      --
      Why guess when you can know? Measure!
    4. Re:Minute of hate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is not about being addicted to smoking, this is about throwing shit on the floor once your done with it because your too fucking lazy and don't care about polluting. I don't care if you are a smoker or a kid dropping a mars bar wrapper, it's the same problem.

    5. Re:Minute of hate by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      You end up paying for them when they get cancer too. Either through your taxes, or through higher insurance premiums, depending how your country does it.

    6. Re:Minute of hate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's have our minute of hate for those who grew up when smoking was cool and haven't been able to quit, despite a lot of hassle and hate.

      Smoking was known to be bad in the early 90s (at least, growing up, that's when I became aware of it. Even before then, I hated the smell). The excuse that smoking was cool is pretty thin now. Most smokers that I have encountered would have been children or young adults back then.

      I smoked 44 years, then quit. It was EXTREMELY HARD to do. But I managed - and years later, it still tugs on me just about every day.

      Goon on you.

      But you jerks grew up when it was already uncool and never got addicted. Proud of yourself for just going with the flow? You got lucky, you weren't smarter or more disciplined. Don't feel so superior just because you had situation luck...

      I don't do things because they are "cool". Anyway, smoking has been known to be a health risk for most of my life, and I don't like breathing in smoke. There will always be people who want to try it out, and they get addicted. They ignore the known risks, and they don't care about exposing others to second-hand smoke and littering. Yeah, those people are not going to get much sympathy.

    7. Re:Minute of hate by avandesande · · Score: 1

      I am an ex-smoker too and I think the hatred is warranted.

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    8. Re:Minute of hate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um... "Goon" should be "Good".

    9. Re:Minute of hate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's have our minute of hate for those who grew up when smoking was cool

      No, it was always filthy and it was never *actually* cool. It's just that there was a whole bunch of people who wanted to cling to the idea it was cool to defend an obviously filthy habit.

      You got lucky, you weren't smarter or more disciplined.

      Oh jesus christ. Yes, a lot of people were. You're just trying to defend a bad behavior and pretend that you weren't somehow beneath people who didn't smoke.

      Stop projecting your hate. We don't hate people just for smoking. We hate people for smoking *and* somehow thinking that they didn't have a problem, or that they were just "lucky" that they didn't choose to take up smoking.

    10. Re:Minute of hate by thesandtiger · · Score: 1

      I don't hate people who smoke - I hate people who smoke and are assholes about it. Smoke yourself silly when I don't have to smell it, fine by me. Smoke when it affects me, or make a mess that I have to deal with - no, that's not acceptable.

      BTW, I also grew up when smoking was cool and smoked for decades and quit as well - climb off your fucking cross.

      --
      Since I can't tell them apart, I treat all ACs as the same person.
    11. Re:Minute of hate by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      Amen to that, but what does any of it have to do with the littering problem being discussed here? Whether someone is suffering from an unfortunate addiction or not has no impact on their ability to dispose of their trash.

    12. Re:Minute of hate by djinn6 · · Score: 1

      Have you tried having your own opinions on what is "cool" or not? Since this is Slashdot, I'll bet a lot of people here were nerds before it was cool and were ostracized for it. Guess what? It's cool now. And maybe in a few years it won't be. Who cares? The real nerds will keep doing what they love.

      Regarding your point about superiority: You still see the world like a teenager. Because it's hard for you to do, you think you deserve some sort of an award. Guess what? In the real world, people respect you for things that are hard for them to do, like playing a Chopin piece perfectly, because it's something they can't do without months of practice. Nobody respects a toddler for learning to walk, even if it's the worst struggle it had ever faced in its short life.

    13. Re:Minute of hate by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Quit whining about people trying to help you. More restrictions on smoking mean its easier for ex-smokers to stay that way, and for current smokers to quit. You picked up a deadly addiction from some evil corporations. A bunch of people fought really hard to make what those corps did to you as illegal as they could. That's why smoking "wasn't cool" for the generation after you. The "hate" is peer pressure, harnessed and used for good.

      Perhaps you were quitting smoking when it was still permissible to smoke in public places like bars. I have friends who did that. They say the hardest time to resist their addiction was when they were in a room filled with people smoking. You don't have to face that now.

    14. Re:Minute of hate by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      I did the research on that for an assignment in undergrad. At the time (and taxes haven't gone down since then), the average smoker in Canada paid quite a bit more in taxes than they took out in public health care for their lung cancer and emphysema. Smoking costs a truly unreasonable amount when you add up a lifetime of it, and smokers tend to die fairly quickly, young enough that they haven't cost much in health care or pensions as elderly people.

    15. Re:Minute of hate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I started smoking circa 1962, and quite in 1964 when I was 13. In 1960's into the 1980's, 9 out of 10 times if I asked a smoker, politely, to give me some space between me and the smoke, I knew I was risking getting punched in the nose. A low risk, but many times I got a response that could have easily escalated into someone throwing punches at me. Having smoke blown in my face with an attitude was about a 50-50 chance.
      I did get a polite response maybe 25-30% of the time, mostly from women.
      Fast forward to circa Halloween, circa 1990. I went to a Sisters of Mercy concert. I was surrounded by Goths, dressed in black. Pale green pancake makeup.
      I got to my seat and this Goth chick who is smoking (no longer allowed), and blowing her exhale up away from me, asked me if her smoking was bothering me.
      WTF?!?! What was the world coming to, when you can't count on a rebellious youth counterculture member to be an asshole, let alone polite?
      Side note: fish in the Santa Monica By have measurable levels of nicotine in them Cigarette butts and ash are suspected to be a major contributor. Many plants, native, invasive, and non-native-planted on purpose also have nicotine. But the butts are still considered a major source. Do the math, 10 million in LA County. If 1 million smoke, and they smoke an average of 10 cigarettes a day, and if 20% of the butts get thrown in the street, that is 2 million butts a day, or 730 million butts a year.,

    16. Re:Minute of hate by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Well, one less reason to object then! Might even help fix the pension problem.

    17. Re:Minute of hate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullcrap.
      I grew up with my mom and dad smoking. I hated it because the whole house smelled and it made it hard to breathe, so I declared my own bedroom the only smoke-free place in the house. And surely for my friends it was cool enough to smoke.
      It's disgusting and it always has been. My mom managed to quit at some point.

      I know it's hard to quit once you start smoking. Still makes it a very poor life decision to begin with.

    18. Re:Minute of hate by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Yes, aside from the humanitarian issues, if we could get all the smokers to do it in isolation, it would be a pretty big net gain for society. Most places are pretty well toward that goal now, except for the littering issue.

      The humanitarian issue is pretty big though.

    19. Re:Minute of hate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the average smoker in Canada paid quite a bit more in taxes than they took out in public health care for their lung cancer and emphysema.

      This doesn't sound right... did you account for all the other things their tax is supposed to pay for and then compare the proportion of their tax to the cost of their health care?

    20. Re:Minute of hate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hard? You have to go out of your way to buy cigarettes and smoke them.

      Try giving up gluten, dairy and sugar. Go ahead, try. I did it. My daughter has an extreme form of Celiac disease. "gluten free" isn't good enough. It has to be less than 5 PPM. Packaged food might test lower than that, but they cheat. They take 100 boxes of cereal and average the results. If my daughter gets the one bad box, she's bedridden for three or four days.

      She doesn't miss it at all. Her misery was that bad. Now she's better. I'm healthy but decided to match her diet in solidarity (she's only 13).

      Hardest thing I've ever done. It takes research and a steel will. Yeah, I miss desert. I miss fast food. I miss restaurants. Every meal home cooked, from scratch, every day is a pain in the ass chore. I do it for my daughter.

      Do that. Let me know if it was harder than quitting smoking. Think of someone you care about. Quit for them.

  23. Crows can be entertaining by boudie2 · · Score: 1

    There used to be a crow that turned up where I lived at the time who would take the bread thrown out for him and dunk it in a puddle before eating it. Kind of like dunking a doughnut in your coffee. Another time there were a bunch of crows flying around, they looked younger, and one of them did a barrel roll. It was very impressive.

    1. Re:Crows can be entertaining by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      One outside my grandmother's house when I was a kid learned to make a sound like a car alarm. It took me a while to figure out it was a crow. I'm pretty sure it did it purely for the enjoyment of watching the local BMW owner go running out to check his car.

  24. I have a better idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Train crows to peck the eyes out of anyone smoking. If they're already blind then a second set of crows will be trained to peck the eyes out of their dog. Canada geese will be trained for anyone who didn't get the first lesson to rip out their tongues or other vital organs.

  25. how to dispose of shitloads of fat crows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds nice, and I'm sure it will work if the cameras work, crows will have no problem doing this job.

    How do we deal with an overload of crows and/or fat-as-fuck crows?

  26. If you are going to train the crows ... by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...why train them to pick cigarette butts? Why can't you train them to poop on the smokers?

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:If you are going to train the crows ... by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      ...why train them to pick cigarette butts? Why can't you train them to poop on the smokers?

      That requires active training with video verification. Lots of work.

      This setup is more passive, and the verification can be automated and based on still frames of a known input receptacle.

      Maybe an AR headset for crows would be a good personal project for somebody? Probably not for everycrow, though.

  27. And a world of new possibilties... by arpad1 · · Score: 1

    ...opens up for organized labor.

    --
    Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum.
  28. As a young smoker... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A couple thoughts, as a young (mid-20s) man who has been smoking for almost ten years.

    I have to say I didn't realize the hate that some people have for smokers these days. I smoke, both at home in my apartment as well as out in public. A dirty, unhealthy habit? Absolutely, but I thoroughly enjoy it and I make an effort to be courteous, both in public and at home - I purchased a ducted fan for the explicit purpose of exhausting smoke as well as providing much needed air circulation.

    When I'm out in public, here's what I do to try and keep others from having to "suffer" from my horrible habit:

    a) If I'm around other people, say while waiting for public transit, I'll stand at least 5 metres away and downwind.
    b) When walking up the road, if I'm about to pass by someone, I cup the cigarette in my hand until I'm well past them.
    c) I dispose of my butts in a designated container where they are available. Otherwise yes, I butt them out on the ground, but make sure they are completely extinguished. I'd be more than happy to dispose of them in the trash, but tossing a potentially still smoldering stick into a regular trash can is a good way to start a fire. No, carrying around some bulky, fireproof container is not a viable solution.

    That said at times I've started to lose my urge to be 'courteous', now that having a cigarette out in public is almost a crime worthy of death according to some people. Where I reside, they've already outlawed smoking:

    a) Pretty much anywhere indoors except your own residence (fine, mostly, but I think that should be a decision left up to businesses especially bars)
    b) Within 4 metres of the entrances to any government/commercial building (still in the realm of reasonable)
    c) At any park or beach. This is where I think it's crossing into insanity. If I want to sit on the beach or in an open park and enjoy a cigarette, I should be able to do so, so long as I'm not doing it right in someone's personal space.

    Debates come up occasionally where there are who want to prohibit any smoking in public entirely, even if it's while standing next to rush-hour traffic belching out exhaust an order of magnitude more harmful than the toxins emitted from a couple grams of burning tobacco. My short and frank response to that is simply this: if you tell me I can't go for my morning walk up the road and through a near empty park surrounded by trees whilst drinking my coffee and having a puff, I'm likely to tell you to go pound sand.

    This level of nonsense is part of the reason I keep an e-cigarette always handy; you can use them just about anywhere which is a big upside on days when the weather is terrible.

    1. Re:As a young smoker... by ChoGGi · · Score: 1

      No, carrying around some bulky, fireproof container is not a viable solution.

      Back when I smoked I carried around a little latched tin container, it ain't hard.

      This level of nonsense is part of the reason I keep an e-cigarette always handy; you can use them just about anywhere which is a big upside on days when the weather is terrible.

      Oh you're one of them...

    2. Re:As a young smoker... by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Yup.

      "I'm so courteous I don't understand why non-smokers think I'm disgusting. Yes, I throw burning litter on the ground, but it would be mildly inconvenient for me to carry it with me and dispose if it properly."

  29. why can't we get the crows to teach other crows? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The wild crows should catch on fairly quick after watching their brothers profit so easily.

  30. I do this with dogs. by pubwvj · · Score: 4, Interesting

    We have a large pack of livestock working dogs on our farm. I taught one to pickup trash for treats. Others observed this and picked up the behavior. One of them figured out how to increase the price by breaking trash up into pieces and getting treats for each piece. Doganomics.

    http://sugarmtnfarm.com/2011/0...

    It's quite successful.

    1. Re:I do this with dogs. by Kaenneth · · Score: 1

      > breaking trash up into pieces and getting treats for each piece.

      Wow, many humans don't understand that until age 3-4.

    2. Re:I do this with dogs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How does a dog sign to communicate back with you?

    3. Re:I do this with dogs. by pubwvj · · Score: 1

      We have used ASL for 30 years in our family - it's useful with pre-verbal children as they can sign before they can speak and it is useful in noisy environments like on the farm. Initially with the dogs we used signs in additions to whistles and spoken words - this is common with working dogs.

      One dog keyed in on signs and adapted them so that she was able to use them back to us in her own version much like baby-sign is a take off of ASL signing. There are some things a baby can't do for signs (crossing the midline is hard) and there are some things dogs can't do (finger motions) but many things they can do.

      Virtually simultaneous with that Yes and No started being used by the dogs to communicate back to us. This made it so we could ask questions and they could answer at the very least in Yes or No form. The understanding of language is greater than their ability to express in our pidgin so sometimes even now we fall back on that.

      Once these two things happened it was like the breaking of a dam such that in the past ten years communications expanded dramatically both to and from them with us. They even use some of this with each other. They also use some of our English words although they have very thick accents. Once you cut through the accent and learn the signs even someone from outside our family farm is able to understand them. All told they use about 300 words.

      They have a larger language than that of their own which we understand a little - I estimate their language to be at around 1,000 words in true dog as opposed to the pidgin combination of English, sign, whistles and dog that we use together. Compare that with humans who use 10,000 to 100,000 words. Pigs use about 30 words max. Chickens about ten. Ducks about six to eight words, I think. I know these species since we raise all of them on our farm out on pasture.

      I suspect that things are quite different in a confinement situation or in a singleton situation like most dogs have. Our dogs have the benefit of six generations of pack to pass on culture and language. Most dogs get 'adopted' by a human family and isolated from their own culture and most humans don't spend all that much time working with their dogs in contrast to a farm working dog pack so this situation may be ideal, not something we'll see in most dog situations. Interestingly, some of the dog language that I have picked up is used by other dogs that have no contact with our pack suggesting some universality and thus genetic and instinct similarly to how some words in human languages are similar across many languages and cultures.

      Note, the dogs, as far as I can tell, don't discuss deep philosophy or existentialism, etc. Communication is more about things that need doing, wants, predators, livestock, etc. They're farm dogs.

  31. Would it be possible by nehumanuscrede · · Score: 1

    to simply make the cigarettes out of biodegradable materials ? Dissolves / decays when exposed to sunlight or water for X amount of time.

    I'm not a smoker so dunno how plausible it would be, but beats having animals picking up our trash.

    1. Re:Would it be possible by sfcat · · Score: 1

      to simply make the cigarettes out of biodegradable materials ? Dissolves / decays when exposed to sunlight or water for X amount of time.

      I'm not a smoker so dunno how plausible it would be, but beats having animals picking up our trash.

      Well done on that sarcasm. But lately there have been ads running claiming that butts last for some long amount of time which is clearly not true (otherwise this would be a real problem instead of some hatefest clickbait). So many people are seriously under the impression that they are not biodegradable for some weird reason.

      --
      "Those that start by burning books, will end by burning men."
  32. "No wait, I got space for more..." by sonamchauhan · · Score: 1

    I was on vacation once, and there was this crow-like bird outside my vacation cabin. I'd thrown him bits of banana, and he'd gobbled them down.

    At some point, he must have gotten full, but he knows there's more banana available. All of a sudden, he regurgitates other food he'd eaten earlier (you could tell it was a different color), and carries on with the banana pieces.

  33. Double reward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would double the reward for any unfinished cigarette. It might even become a new problem.

    "The freaking bird stole my cigarette!"

  34. Don't sell cigarettes with filters... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There was a time when cigarette filters were considered female/lame.. They found that by adding them, a smoker could smoke a LOT MORE, cause it wouldn't cause nearly as much irritation... As part of the anti-smoking campaign, it should be illegal to sell cigarettes WITH filters, let people know and feel more of what they are putting into their lungs..

    Most of the litter on my property is from smokers passing by(people stopping by to give estimate for work, packages, etc ).

  35. Or take them from bins by UpnAtom · · Score: 1

    ... and would we ever know?

  36. Good grief by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ethics and animal cruelty aside, what a stupid idea. It's right up there with, 'Let's use homeless citizens as wi-fi hotspots!'. Utterly and completely demeaning, narcissistic, and retarded. Young tech is a sad and frequently disgusting thing to behold, and it just gets worse.

  37. teach them... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe teach the crows to attack the smoker until they pick it up.

  38. Nicotine is poison by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Last I heard nicotine is poisonous at certain levels. I wonder how long before the crows die from it. They're relatively small. So, I say a few days. Who/What will be trained to pick up dead crows?

  39. Mental image by Ebsolas · · Score: 1

    The mental image this paints feels more like something Salvador Dali would paint.

  40. they're taking our jobs! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shouldn't we be building drones with AI that do the job? Shouldn't AI that's going to take all human jobs soon, at least be able to take the job of crows?

  41. Filthy lazy smokers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The best solution would be a deposit-refund scheme. Legislation worked with aluminum cans.

  42. Feed Gulls with a Ghetto Blaster going by PennyHassett · · Score: 1

    Not my idea, and I can't find the original, but I like the suggestion of feeding gulls from a car with a ghetto blaster going at full volume.

  43. Amazing Crows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How many decades or centuries will it take for "Silicon Valley AI" to do this?

  44. Even simpler solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ban plastic in filters. Making them from pure cellulose should be possible and healthier for the smoker.

  45. Next in the chain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who or what are you going to train to clean up the crow crap?

  46. Crow Cancer in 3...2...1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I never understand why cigarrette smokers just throw butts on the ground everywhere, ruining an area's look - it's essentially shitting in your own bed.
    Of course if you're smoking, you're probably not the brightest to begin with (I would never hire a smoker, it's a mark of stupidity).

  47. Forget about cigarette butts, what about pigeons? by eric_harris_76 · · Score: 1

    Too bad that won't work for pigeons. I used to take light rail from a station near downtown -- and a grain elevator.

    There were pigeons all over, and a lot of pigeon crap -- despite those spiky anti-roosting strips all over the bridge and platform.

    Even if only a tiny fraction of 1% of the grain hauled to the grain elevator falls off, that's still enough to keep hundreds of pigeons fed.

    I'm surprised some hawks don't take advantage of the easy pickings.

    --
    There's no time like the present. Well, the past used to be.
  48. This devalues work by eneville · · Score: 1

    Currently there are people paid to do the work of tidying the streets. For every crow "employed" through payment in form of feed, a community service worker will miss out on a role. Community service could become more akin to helping the aged, but there are qualified people doing these roles. So there is a knock on effect. It's great to train the crows to do something that appears worthwhile, but why not have them do something that humans can't currently do?

  49. Re:Great idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, you can change your Google News edition to something like Czech Republic or Russia.

  50. who going to pick up...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    after the Crows shitting everywhere and on everything including people? WTF

  51. Easier solution... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ban smoking. There is zero excuse to permit smoking to continue. This includes so-called "medical" marijuana. If there is any health benefit than put it in a drug or non-exhaled vaporizer.

  52. Crow clan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What happens when crowd start snatching butts from the hands of people while they were smoking

  53. My idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I brought this up on slashdot several years ago. I also said crows can be used to steal pot from growers. Lazygenes is my username.
    ,