Slashdot Mirror


High-Nicotine E-Cigarettes May Make Teens Vape More, Study Warns (philly.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Philly.com: Teens who vape e-cigarettes with higher nicotine levels are more likely to start smoking conventional cigarettes soon after, new research shows. E-cigarettes are sold with nicotine levels ranging from zero to more than 25 milligrams of nicotine per milliliter (mg/mL). In this study, a high-nicotine device was defined as having levels at or above 18 mg/mL. Leventhal's team tracked outcomes for 181 grade-10 students from high schools in the Los Angeles area. All of the teens said they had used e-cigarettes within the past month, and they provided data on nicotine levels in the devices they used. Six months later, those who used higher nicotine levels in their e-cigarettes were more likely to report use of both e-cigarettes and regular cigarettes within the past month. These teens also reported vaping and/or smoking more intensely. While 43 percent of the students who'd used high-nicotine e-cigarettes said they were "frequent smokers" of traditional cigarettes six months later, that was true for only 10 percent of those who'd vaped using lower-nicotine devices, Leventhal's group found. And teens who vaped using high-nicotine e-cigarettes smoked an average of 14 times as many "regular" cigarettes per day six months later compared to those who'd tried nicotine-free versions of the devices, the findings showed. The study was published in JAMA Pediatrics.

173 comments

  1. No shit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nicotine is addictive.

    1. Re:No shit. by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Informative

      Nicotine is addictive.

      ... but not particulary harmful. Nicotine addicts are way better off vaping than smoking.

    2. Re: No shit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nicotine rules!

    3. Re:No shit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      ... but not particulary harmful.

      That's only true in very low doses. You can easily overdose on it and die.
      If you don't believe that, just go buy a box of nicotine patches and stick them all on your body at once, and see what happens...

    4. Re:No shit. by jordanjay29 · · Score: 0

      I mean, sure, just like an alcoholic is better off drinking light beer or spirits so they don't ingest so many empty calories.

    5. Re:No shit. by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Informative

      I mean, sure, just like an alcoholic is better off drinking light beer or spirits so they don't ingest so many empty calories.

      That is not a very good analogy. To an alcoholic, it is the alcohol that is harmful. But to a smoker, it is not the nicotine that causes cancer and heart disease. It is the tar and other crap in the smoke. If you vape, you don't get that.

    6. Re:No shit. by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      And? That doesn't mean that a person will go out and seek other sources of it when they already have a steady supply.

    7. Re: No shit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vape through your butthole

    8. Re:No shit. by jordanjay29 · · Score: 1

      Not really. You're ignoring the addiction and trying to make the delivery method healthier.

    9. Re:No shit. by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      I got a really nasty rash.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    10. Re: No shit. by dnaumov · · Score: 2

      Of course heâ(TM)s ignoring the addiction as the addiction itself is not particularly harmful. Vast majority of damage comes from the byproducts.

    11. Re:No shit. by geekmux · · Score: 1

      Nicotine is addictive.

      ... but not particulary harmful. Nicotine addicts are way better off vaping than smoking.

      From TFS:

      "Teens who vape e-cigarettes with higher nicotine levels are more likely to start smoking conventional cigarettes soon after...43 percent of the students who'd used high-nicotine e-cigarettes said they were "frequent smokers" of traditional cigarettes six months later...

      Seems you missed the main point being driven here.

      Over 450,000 deaths per year in America and 7 million worldwide. Cigarettes are probably the most addictive product man has ever created. It continues to reign as the #1 cause of preventable death, and yet it is a legal product.

      By comparison, anything else on the entire fucking planet is "not particularly harmful". And I think it's pretty clear that e-cigarettes aren't really doing a damn thing to prevent or deter the traditional product.

    12. Re:No shit. by kurkosdr · · Score: 1

      Of course, nicotine causes anxiety and sleeping disorders, so it's not harmless either.

    13. Re:No shit. by gtall · · Score: 1

      The CDC says it is over 480,000 deaths in the U.S. for 2016. Now about banning the little brown refugees so the don't come and kill Americans, one must have a sense of priorities to be good little zenophobe.

    14. Re:No shit. by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 0

      Nicotine is not harmful but vaping appears to be https://newatlas.com/e-cigaret...

      --

      Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

    15. Re:No shit. by v1 · · Score: 1

      So.... drug users that consume higher doses of their addictive drugs increase their drug consumption over time, not lower it.

      And so who does this surprise? That's the nature of addiction!

      I thought we were told that the intention of the nicotine-containing vapes was to try to wean the addicts off the stuff in a more public-friendly and medically-safe manner than reducing their cigarette consumption? Clearly they're just changing their form of addictive behavior, and in too many cases, increasing it.

      There ought to be a cap on the amount of nicotine in the vapes, and that cap should be lowered at a steady rate over a fixed number of years until it hits zero. We need to stop supporting these legalized addictive drug dealers as a permanent establishment and seek to shut down the addictive drug industry entirely in the foreseeable future.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    16. Re: No shit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They detect raised immune defences also associated with diseases and auto immune diseases. Bringing in the associaton is pure scare mongering ...

      You're putting foreign chemicals in the lungs, of course they will have an immune response. I work in a dusty plant for food ingredients, I'd put good odds of having the same.

    17. Re: No shit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Warning: leaving your protective cocoon may lead to injury or death

    18. Re: No shit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck yeh! Also sports, driving, running too fast, candy and sex.

    19. Re:No shit. by gnick · · Score: 1

      You can easily overdose on it and die.

      That depends on your definition of "easily". You make it sound like this happens accidentally in some recognizable rate. You can chain smoke packs and not have much to worry about in terms of putting yourself in the hospital. It's not like alcohol. You might notice a racing pulse and nausea. In which case, stop...

      No, you can't "easily" overdose on it unless you mean "intentionally" overdose on it.

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    20. Re:No shit. by gnick · · Score: 1

      Of course, nicotine causes anxiety and sleeping disorders, so it's not harmless either.

      The only solution to that is to find something else to smoke that helps with anxiety and sleep. Lemme think... What could I smoke that would help with anxiety and sleep...

      Of course, some people may find solutions that don't involve smoking at all, but what use are those?

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    21. Re:No shit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you slit your wrists with a clean knife, it's healthier too.

      How do you figure? You don't slit your wrists with the idea of dying from an infection.

    22. Re:No shit. by kilfarsnar · · Score: 3, Informative

      And I think it's pretty clear that e-cigarettes aren't really doing a damn thing to prevent or deter the traditional product.

      I don't know what the statistics are, but I have switched from smoking to vaping (hate that term). I feel a lot better and can breathe more easily. I don't know about others, but personally a vaporizer has helped me completely quit smoking.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    23. Re:No shit. by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      Nicotine is not harmful but vaping appears to be https://newatlas.com/e-cigaret...

      From the linked article:

      "It is important to note that this study was small and limited, with the authors including the fact that most of the e-cigarette cohort were formerly cigarette smokers, making it difficult to clearly identify whether these results were solely related to e-cigarette use."

      I'm not saying that e-cigarettes are completely harmless; I assume they are not. But I do think they are less harmful than cigarettes, by quite a bit. It's a matter of harm-reduction not complete elimination.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    24. Re:No shit. by kilfarsnar · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There ought to be a cap on the amount of nicotine in the vapes, and that cap should be lowered at a steady rate over a fixed number of years until it hits zero. We need to stop supporting these legalized addictive drug dealers as a permanent establishment and seek to shut down the addictive drug industry entirely in the foreseeable future.

      "We" are not supporting this industry. Its customers are, because they value the product enough to spend money on it. You really think we should be legislating what vices people are allowed to have? That's been tried, you know. From Prohibition to the War on Drugs, it hasn't worked out very well and has not achieved the desired outcomes.

      You gotta let people do what they want to do with their time and their bodies, even if you think it's bad for them. That's part of living in a free country. No one lives a perfect, harm-free life and that's okay. Just let people do their thing and give them help if they ask for it. If you want to give them information about the harmfulness of their actions, I think that's great and would support it. But legislation and the punishments that result from noncompliance are not the answer.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    25. Re: No shit. by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      Fuck yeh! Also sports, driving, running too fast, candy and sex.

      Yes, exactly. You can always find something that someone is doing that you think they ought not be doing.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    26. Re:No shit. by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      There was a story about a woman that died for that very reason.

      https://games.slashdot.org/sto...

    27. Re:No shit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's almost like if you increase the dosage of an addictive substance, the addict will need to use that substance more often.

      WHO WOULD HAVE THUNK IT?

    28. Re:No shit. by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      You can't hit the jingoistic sweet spot to get elected by railing against tobacco.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    29. Re:No shit. by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      I suppose it's a question of degree-of-harm. Everyone knows that smoking is horrible for your health. Using a vaporizer is probably still bad, but not anywhere as horrible as smoking.

      Not smoking or using any nicotine product is obviously better yet. But these people are chemically addicted, so reason only goes so far.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    30. Re:No shit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I think it's pretty clear that e-cigarettes aren't really doing a damn thing to prevent or deter the traditional product.

      I think, then, you're a drooling idiot.

      There are legions of former smokers who have only managed to quit cigarettes by way of e-cigarettes.

      Meanwhile, we have hit pieces like this screaming, "But think of the children!" - ignoring the simple truth that kids are dumbasses and these fuckers would be picking up Marlboros regardless of e-cigarettes.

      So, how much is Altria paying you?

    31. Re:No shit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't hit the jingoistic sweet spot to get elected by railing against tobacco.

      Yup, that was exactly the successful ruse of "cigarettes don't kill people" Pence.

      Yes, I'm bitter and biased, have two dear friend who died from lung cancer, and another now dying from COPD, all smokers, (Three of the five smokers in my circle of friends.) Yes, I know, small sample size and anecdotal ..., but damn it hurts!

    32. Re:No shit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nicotine causes high blood pressure, one of the leading causes of death, also called the silent killer because you don't realize you have it.

    33. Re:No shit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fortunately we have a literal canary in a coal mine - Vape shop workers. They work in a fog of the stuff every day. When they start showing some kind of health problems (not related to their multitudes of piercings and tattoos), then I'll consider one of these studies.

      But as it is, follow the money and you'll find Big Tobacco behind them.

    34. Re:No shit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      agree with you, but I believe nicotine was found to also cause heart disease - but most certainly not cancer, agreed.
      In no way a scholarly article, but one link, https://www.everydayhealth.com/atrial-fibrillation/living-with/this-is-your-heart-on-ecigarettes/

    35. Re:No shit. by RatPh!nk · · Score: 1

      Nicotine is addictive.

      ... but not particulary harmful. Nicotine addicts are way better off vaping than smoking.

      Nicotine addicts are much better off not using nicotine and if they vape to get there that is fine, but many are just permanently swapping which is not ideal.

      I would not rely on an op-ed from Forbes. The effects and risks of nicotine, especially to the cardiovascular system are well known. The nicotine patch for Alzheimer's in that op-ed has been in and out of the news since 1999, but so far nothing has come of it.

      --
      Argh. The laws of science be a harsh mistress.
    36. Re:No shit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Arterial Sclerosis is more strongly related to the Carbon Monoxide in the cigarette smoke than the nicotine

      Carbon monoxide may contribute to smoking-induced cardiovascular disease. Exposure to environmental CO has been associated with increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Animal and in vitro studies suggest that CO may contribute to atherosclerosis and endothelial injury.

      http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0735109701016163
      https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2495814/

      FYI, vaping introduces NO CO

    37. Re:No shit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's been tried, you know. From Prohibition to the War on Drugs, it hasn't worked out very well and has not achieved the desired outcomes.

      The desired outcomes are armies of cops, lawyers, judges, prison guards, the whole PIC - whether private or public - both are scum, prohibition officers, border guards/customs officials (additional, I'm not suggesting zero). It allows TPTB to keep down minorities and economically disadvantaged males.

      It DRASTICALLY reduces competition to more established players in the drug industry (big pharma, alcohol).

      It maintains doctors and insurance companies - big med - as gatekeepers to drugs - even in the most asinine of ways (e.g., my nephew's parents couldn't get a replacement epipen or equivalent without the 'script - or you travel overseas and lose access - or you have to have continuous visits even for the drugs that don't require kidney/liver testing etc).

      Works as intended, not as publicly advertised.

      This Bud's for you, bud.

    38. Re:No shit. by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      Works as intended, not as publicly advertised.

      Yes, indeed. I was coming at it from a public policy as advertised point of view. But I agree that the public rationale is not the true rationale for these policies.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
  2. Boot it by wolfheart111 · · Score: 4, Funny

    The study also shows that 6 months after they started smoking traditional cigs, the subjects began straight up injecting the liquid into their veins... which eventually lead to them booty bumping the e-cig liquid.

    --
    [($)]
    1. Re:Boot it by msauve · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Nicotine is addictive. News at 11.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    2. Re:Boot it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... booty bumping ...

      ...: the drug is mixed with water then injected into the rectum with a needle-less syringe.

      Ahh, Slashdot is kinky anime porn without the colours.

      ... injecting the liquid into their veins ...

      The addicts aren't sucking soot and fire into their aviola, so that's a plus. Besides needle etiquette (not sharing, washing or correct disposal) is much easier than preventing second-hand smoke.

      ... reported vaping and/or smoking more intensely.

      What about their masturbating or studying? Won't someone, please, think of the children?

    3. Re:Boot it by subnomine · · Score: 1

      Dang it... I can't wait until 11. I hate it when the news does that.

    4. Re:Boot it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's "Boof" not Boot.

  3. e-Cig as hookah alternative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I use an e-Cig as an alternative to hookah. No more worries about a coal getting tipped and burning the carpet/floor/table and the flavor is way better. Plus it's portable though I never take it outside of my house. I've never smoked cigarettes and always use 0mg nicotine juices.

    1. Re:e-Cig as hookah alternative by umghhh · · Score: 1

      So why you smoke? I smoke on occasion (twice in one year then 2y pause etc) and only a good thing not the cigarettes. But I would not even do that if not for a benefit of getting a good feeling about things for a change. Why bother if there is no benefit? Or you do because your pals do? That I can understand although I would not do it if that were only reason.

  4. THis is great news by JustNiz · · Score: 1

    Its nice to see that natural selection is being kept alive.

    1. Re:THis is great news by ScentCone · · Score: 0

      Trump voters will be wiped out in no time.

      All of the smokers I've known, and all of the obsessive vapers, are Trump Derangement Syndrome types. I'm sure there are plenty of Trump voters who smoke/vape, but I wouldn't even begin to assume that the balance is somehow heavily that direction. Direct experience says otherwise.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    2. Re: THis is great news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sound like one of those people who fake cough while I smoke across a 4 lane street from you. Then yell and makes faces at me from so far away.

      I swear to god if you ever yell at me about smoking outside when your puny ass could walk away I will put the butt out in your eye.

      There isn't any avoiding smoke ever, it's always in the air and forest fires have way more chemicals than tobacco.

      Have you ever taken any air or water samples? I have. Guess what? Outside is dirty as fuck.

    3. Re: THis is great news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We only do it to annoy you and make you complain about having such thin skin.

    4. Re:THis is great news by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

      they are also killing off the rest of us who have to choose between either inhaling the noxious stuff as well or not breathing at all when there's somebody smoking nearby.

      If your system is so weak that 2nd-hand cigarette smoke from a passing smoker has any effect on your health then it's a wonder you're still alive.

      IOW, I call bullshit on your claims of temporary 2nd-hand smoke having any effect on your health. Long-term (living with a smoker, for example) - sure. But someone smoking on the street? Bullshit.

      --
      I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
    5. Re: THis is great news by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      "Your smoke bothers me!!!!"
      "Good. Look, lady, it kills me, but do you see me make a fuss?"

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    6. Re:THis is great news by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      I sure as fuck hope you're not living in a big city. Because if, second hand smoke is the least of your concern when you breathe...

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    7. Re:THis is great news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      smoke
      [smohk]

              Examples
              Word Origin

      See more synonyms on Thesaurus.com
      noun
      1.
      the visible vapor and gases given off by a burning or smoldering substance, especially the gray, brown, or blackish mixture of gases and suspended carbon particles resulting from the combustion of wood, peat, coal, or other organic matter.
      2.
      something resembling this, as vapor or mist, flying particles, etc.

      So yeah, ecigs result in smoke. So sod off.

      To the others. Don't just complain about other people's bad habits impacting you. I invented an electronic deliver method of vaporized nicotine for example, fully knowing that the smokers would dose themselves higher and higher. I also invented crypto coin conspiracy pumps, which will result in those chumps losing what little they have.

      Does it solve the problem? No, but I don't have to complain about it passively anymore...

    8. Re: THis is great news by gtall · · Score: 1

      The CDC says 41,000 Americans were killed in the U.S. during 2016 due to second hand smoke.

    9. Re: THis is great news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I will put the butt out in your eye.

      If you've been smoking for a while, you probably won't as your heart has been greatly weakened and the physical exertion of a scuffle might quite literally cause you to suffer a heart attack and die. Remember, you aren't exactly in good shape.

    10. Re:THis is great news by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I sure as fuck hope you're not living in a big city. Because if, second hand smoke is the least of your concern when you breathe...

      It's not all that expensive to put your home under positive pressure with a HEPA+carbon filter. In the grand scheme of expenses in the big city, it's minor. These days most cars worth more than a buck or two have a carbon cabin air filter. If you don't spend much time outside, second hand smoke could actually be one of your major air pollutants.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    11. Re: THis is great news by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      The CDC says 41,000 Americans were killed in the U.S. during 2016 due to second hand smoke.

      And I'd wager none of those people died as a result of standing next to a smoker at a bus stop. That's the kind of thing that Mark-T was whining about above; not a non-smoker who lives with a smoker.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    12. Re:THis is great news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately not... while these imbeciles who didn't have the common sense to not start in the first place might very well be killing themselves off (not quickly enough, for my liking), they are also killing off the rest of us who have to choose between either inhaling the noxious stuff as well or not breathing at all when there's somebody smoking nearby. Unfortunately, one's ongoing need for oxygen may somewhat limits the non-smoker's options in this regard.

      So many commenters on Slashdot are some of the most rude, hateful, and condescending people I have ever heard(read). Always so quick to judge others and claim a persons/groups lives as valueless; themselves displaying bizarre feelings of undeserved superiority. Like this person, who can't wait for people to die because he doesn't like their choice in drugs. They'll probably claim second hand smoke, "its affecting me too!!". I would counter that its another example of natural selection, killing off the weak who can't handle a little smoke.

      What is it about Slashdot's audience that so many are filled with hate, anger, disrespect, and inflated sense of worth and superiority?

    13. Re: THis is great news by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 2

      The CDC says 41,000 Americans were killed in the U.S. during 2016 due to second hand smoke.

      And I'd wager none of those people died as a result of standing next to a smoker at a bus stop. That's the kind of thing that Mark-T was whining about above; not a non-smoker who lives with a smoker.

      Actually, the statistic is based on the number of people that died from what they define as "smoke related illnesses," which includes lung cancer and heart disease. People are included even if they never smoked and were never around smokers. Makes it easier to inflate the numbers.

      --
      "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
      --- Jerry Garcia
    14. Re:THis is great news by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 1

      They'll probably claim second hand smoke, "its affecting me too!!". I would counter that its another example of natural selection, killing off the weak who can't handle a little smoke.

      What is it about Slashdot's audience that so many are filled with hate, anger, disrespect, and inflated sense of worth and superiority?

      Mostly the 2nd-hand smoke issue was a lot of propaganda designed to raise funding than any real science. The largest and longest study (Enstrom & Kabat) followed more than 35,000 subjects for almost 40 years and found no significant risk associated with second-hand smoke. Similarly, the World Health Organization spent seven years at a dozen research centers in seven countries and came to the same conclusion.

      The real science is out there if you look for it. Here is one example.

      I'm braced to be modded into oblivion for pointing out this fraud.

      --
      "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
      --- Jerry Garcia
    15. Re:THis is great news by mark-t · · Score: 1

      would counter that its another example of natural selection, killing off the weak who can't handle a little smoke.

      I'd agree with you if the cause of that smoke was itself natural. It is no more an example of natural selection, as you say, "killing off the weak who cannot handle a little smoke", than bullets fired from a rifle are natural selection, killing off the weaklings who can't take a gunshot wound. The exposure to both are caused by the choice of another person, and there is nothing natural about either.

      To be perfectly honest, I'd rather they really just quit smoking than actually die... but the odds of dying (eventually) are substantially higher than them quitting soon enough to make a difference in how their behavior affects others.

    16. Re: THis is great news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All the human-hating leftists should be encouraging people to smoke as much as they piss and moan about overpopulation and carbon footprints and other horseshit.

    17. Re:THis is great news by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      I still prefer them to the passive-agressive posters with such tiny balls that post anything even slightly contentious as AC.

    18. Re:THis is great news by JustNiz · · Score: 1
    19. Re:THis is great news by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

      http://www.lung.org/stop-smoki...

      That study in [8] seems to agree with me, as they define SHS exposure in terms of how much exposure is received, with SHS exposure below their threshold being considered non-exposure.

      IOW, they don't consider "2nd-hand cigarette smoke from a passing smoker " to be SHS. This lets them lead the abstract off with "no levels of SHS are safe" because they specifically ignore non-chronic SHS. Smart. Misleading, but smart.

      I've not seen any study on non-chronic SHS. Every study leaves it out, usually because the non-chronic SHS impact is too small to even be measured, nevermind compared against other things on the street (noxious fumes from cars comes to mind).

      --
      I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
    20. Re:THis is great news by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      I agree that average city air being so polluted with other stuff would make a non-chronic SHS study almost impossible.
      That said, if I go anywhere near people smoking, even just briefly, my own body quickly starts clearly telling me that it's some nasty shit that I'm (re)breathing.
      I surprisingly quickly start to get stinging eyes and irritated sinuses etc. and it only gets worse if I stay around them.
      I don't get anything like that from gasoline car exhausts or anything much else, except I also very quickly get a bad sensation to diesel exhaust even just in passing.

    21. Re:THis is great news by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      >> It is no more an example of natural selection...than bullets fired from a rifle are natural selection, killing off the weaklings who can't take a gunshot wound.

        There's absolutely nothing about the process of natural selection that requires the source of potential death to be not man-made. Assuming multiple people are shot in an identical way, then some live and go on to breed while others die, you most definitely are subjecting them to natural selection.

    22. Re:THis is great news by mark-t · · Score: 1

      There's absolutely nothing about the process of natural selection that requires the source of potential death to be not man-made

      In general, something being man-made is typically considered to be exclusive of it being naturally caused. You wouldn't go around saying that automobiles naturally exist, would you?

    23. Re:THis is great news by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      You're missing a fundamental point. The thing that is natural is the process of selection itself, not the instigator.

  5. Kids that smoked more than kids that didn't? by mveloso · · Score: 1

    "And teens who vaped using high-nicotine e-cigarettes smoked an average of 14 times as many "regular" cigarettes per day six months later compared to those who'd tried nicotine-free versions of the devices"

    This is ridiculous. Kids that e-smoked nicotine smoked more than kids that smoked nicotine-free e-cigs? What's the point of smoking if you have nicotine-free e-cigs?

    1. Re:Kids that smoked more than kids that didn't? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >What's the point of smoking if you have nicotine-free e-cigs?
      Blowing out big clouds and rings is fun

    2. Re:Kids that smoked more than kids that didn't? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's the point of smoking if you have nicotine-free e-cigs?

      To look "cool".

    3. Re:Kids that smoked more than kids that didn't? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure. It looks really cool to give a robot a blow job.

    4. Re:Kids that smoked more than kids that didn't? by msauve · · Score: 1

      "What's the point of smoking if you have nicotine-free e-cigs?"

      I say the same thing about decaffeinated coffee.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    5. Re:Kids that smoked more than kids that didn't? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's because neither of you are very perceptive. Decaf coffee is for two types of people: senior citizens who are lifetime coffee drinkers with heart conditions; their doctors ban caffeine, and people who drink coffee habitually but don't want the effects at the end of the night.

    6. Re: Kids that smoked more than kids that didn't? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I identify as a cyborg, so yes I do enjoy electronic erotica.

    7. Re: Kids that smoked more than kids that didn't? by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      how lame.

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    8. Re:Kids that smoked more than kids that didn't? by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      Mostly because coffee is much more than a caffeine delivery system.
      It's just that people seem to only think about that.

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    9. Re:Kids that smoked more than kids that didn't? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nicotine free ecigs would be for those who A) have kicked the nicotine habit, but still need the oral fixation of smoking/vaping. or B) those who just enjoy vaping for the flavors but don't want to get addicted to the nicotine.

      Some people just like to put stuff in their mouths, people who chew gum, pencils, pens, finger nails.

    10. Re:Kids that smoked more than kids that didn't? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      "Because I like the taste!"

      (Usually spoken by people who then drown any kind of coffee flavor there might be with some syrup)

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    11. Re:Kids that smoked more than kids that didn't? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And non-alcoholic beer.

    12. Re:Kids that smoked more than kids that didn't? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps they like the flavor of the syrup drowning the coffee?

    13. Re:Kids that smoked more than kids that didn't? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      What's the point of smoking if you have nicotine-free e-cigs?

      Nicotine-free doesn't mean drug-free. You can smoke all the same stuff you can smoke in other ways in your e-cig, except maybe crack. It probably doesn't get hot enough for that, given that people normally have to smoke that with a torch.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    14. Re:Kids that smoked more than kids that didn't? by Kielistic · · Score: 1

      So are ecigs- hence the thousands of flavours.

    15. Re:Kids that smoked more than kids that didn't? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Sure, if you heavily mod the e-cig, or create a tincture of the material. Good luck otherwise.

      It probably doesn't get hot enough for that, given that people normally have to smoke that with a torch.

      Not only are you ignorant of e-cigs, you're ignorant of crack, too. For shame.

    16. Re:Kids that smoked more than kids that didn't? by butchersong · · Score: 1

      You can put other things in e-cigs than nicotine. I have no experience with it but I imagine THC oil would be an interesting addition.

  6. News at 11 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Higher concentrations of addictive substances causes people to use more of this addictive substance. Are /. editors high as well? More than likely to approve this brain dead stupidity.

    1. Re:News at 11 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The drug in their e-cigs wasn't nicotine.

  7. those who crave higher nicotine content - smoke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Correlation does not equal causation. My conclusion would be that those who crave higher nicotine content end up using cigarettes.

    1. Re:those who crave higher nicotine content - smoke by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      At least in the EU, they certainly wouldn't. The limitations on nicotine in cigarettes over here mean that you can have WAY, WAY higher nicotine levels in your vape than in a whole pack of cigs.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  8. Not Surprised by AbandonAllHope · · Score: 3, Informative

    "In this study, a high-nicotine device was defined as having levels at or above 18 mg/mL." I vape in the high 90 watt, low 100 watt range depending on device, but holy shit hitting a liquid with anything higher than 12mg/ml at that power is straight up painful. And while you certainly can find it online, the local shops I go to sell mostly in the 3mg and 6mg range. So yeah, if 18 or 25 isn't doing it for you, you almost have to go to cigarettes because vaping with liquid that strong at even moderate wattage is like having your throat scraped with a thousand tiny ice picks.

    --
    Abandon All Hope, Ye Who Enter Here
    1. Re:Not Surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would say that might be another thing these kinds of studies don't take into account. sure there are different levels of nicotine in the liquids. but smoking 6mg liquid at 100w might be the equivalent to smoking 18mg liquid at 5-15w that some of the cheap pen style ecigs use.

      The higher wattage is going to vaporize more liquid in the same period of time than the lower wattage device would.

      Look at the size of the vapor clouds coming from people smoking those high powered mods. Could completely fog up the interior of a small space like a car with one puff, where as a lower power device would not.

    2. Re:Not Surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've used e-cigarettes for 6 - 7 years now since I quit smoking, and I've always used 18mg liquid. I'm currently vaping at 25-30W.

      If vapor generation is proportional to wattage it would be around equivalent to using 75-90W at 6mg, so the difference is likely not that big.

      The devices I use these days could go much higher, but I find this medium-high nicotine content and "low" wattage preferable to huge clouds. And I don't go through as much liquid in volume. I consume about 1.5 - 2 ml a day. From what information I've managed to gather about nicotine how much of the nicotine gets absorbed I think the nicotine I get from this amount of liquid is about equal to smoking 7 - 10 cigarettes a day, which happens to be about the same what I used to smoke.

      I would imagine, however, that if you were to vape 18mg liquid at over 40W the breaths would be very short and the nicotine hits quite strong, much like smoking a cigarette.

    3. Re:Not Surprised by AbandonAllHope · · Score: 1

      I thought I had diluted some 12mg down to about 9ish at one point but I'd accidentally just mixed two 12mg bottles and hit it at 120 watts. Never again. That one pull hurt more than any cigarette I ever smoked. But generally, yeah, my experience mirrors yours. The only reason I've gone up this high wattage wise is because the flavors I find I enjoy (mostly tobacco variants) don't seem to come out at the low end. My wife has a variety of fruit flavor stuff, mostly apple and sugary cereal imitations, that I find totally over powering just at 40 watts / 6mg.

      --
      Abandon All Hope, Ye Who Enter Here
    4. Re:Not Surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Once I found 36mg juice it worked for me. I smoked cigarettes for about 40 years and was making my own for the last 10 out of Halfzware shag dark tobacco. It was wonderful but my 2nd wife has asthma and I had to try to keep it away from her as much as possible. Vaping seemed like a workable alternative but starting on the 510 cig-a-like drip thingys was ludicrous. Once I found 36mg juice and variable voltage sticks I stopped the cigarettes - the last one I smoked was on my birthday in May of 2012. Of course I have sub-ohm tanks and temp control mods now too but as far as I'm concerned, I quit smoking. I've watched them try to make this alternative more illegal and harder to obtain for years and it's exactly what I expected to happen. Why the fuck can't they just leave me alone?

  9. Bullshit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Nicotine is nothing. The smallest slice that will get you off cigs.
    But all the other chemicals from smoking? That's the REAL addiction there.
    All the thousands of compounds in the cigs or created by burning them together. That's the real danger. And the real addiction.
    A chemical stew that ohhhhhhhh... yeah.

    You can vape an insane dangerous nicotine level like 6%. Get used to it.

    And even after all that. A few puffs on a real cig will FUCK YOU UP like a kid hotboxing his first marlboro.

    Ecigs are the best thing ever invented to finally kill smoking once and for all. We could do it. We should be throwing these things at people.
    (good ones. not gas station garbage.)

    We could be the generation that ends smoking. But nope. the anti-vape propaganda is well funded.

    1. Re:Bullshit. by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 1

      We could be the generation that ends smoking. But nope. the anti-vape propaganda is well funded.

      Yep. Big tobacco is losing the market for vapes to the small companies, so they would rather see vapes go away. And then there's the Tobacco company settlement, which provides millions of dollars to all kinds of governments and NGOs. They've seen what happens to their funding when cigarette sales start to fall off, and so does their funding. They will do anything to keep that from happening, from false claims that vapes are just as harmful as cigarettes, to restrictions on vapes that make them harder to get than cigarettes.

      --
      "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
      --- Jerry Garcia
  10. Who Cares by DatbeDank · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Vaping by itself is completely harmless with nicotine being on par with caffeine in terms of harm and effects.

    This is nothing more than the anti cigarette brigade getting their panties in a wad over the fact that people flat out love nicotine and want to enjoy it without the bad effects of cigarettes (which are bad).

    Better the young'ins be vaping rather than smoke cigarettes.

    1. Re:Who Cares by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The person you are responding to did not say "nicotine is healthy"

      Nicotine and caffeine have many comparisons to make. Price, physical dependence, commonality, legality, do these things not exist in your "think of the children" mindset?

      Careful, even if you feel that way please don't type that since it's not true.

      Citations please.

      Careful, even if you feel that way please don't type that since it's not true.

      You can't be serious. That is inquisition thought crime levels of absurd.

    2. Re:Who Cares by jordanjay29 · · Score: 1

      I'd like to see a serious study about the addictive and side effects of nicotine in e-cigs. Most nicotine studies are done with cigarettes and the bath of chemicals there really dilutes the findings on nicotine alone.

      That said, the delivery system is still pretty obnoxious. Whether or not the cloud of exhaled vapor is "just water vapor" or not, it still projects into the air and affects the people around the vaper.

      Whereas caffeine's delivery system is totally isolated, only the person consuming it will be affected.

    3. Re:Who Cares by Mordaximus · · Score: 1

      That said, the delivery system is still pretty obnoxious. Whether or not the cloud of exhaled vapor is "just water vapor" or not, it still projects into the air and affects the people around the vaper.

      Whereas caffeine's delivery system is totally isolated, only the person consuming it will be affected.

      It can be obnoxious, but not every paper is a cloud chaser. And I bet those who object to the clouds still prefer that to cigarette smoke.

      As for caffeine, it has a strong odour. I'm sure someone somewhere would complain about that.

    4. Re:Who Cares by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      Vaping by itself is completely harmless with nicotine being on par with caffeine in terms of harm and effects.

      No
      it's
      not

      This is nothing more than the anti cigarette brigade getting their panties in a wad over the fact that people flat out love nicotine and want to enjoy it without the bad effects of cigarettes (which are bad).

      If that's what you think then maybe you should actually read the article... or the summary.

      Better the young'ins be vaping rather than smoke cigarettes.

      And if that is where it stopped we wouldn't be commenting on this story.

    5. Re:Who Cares by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "completely harmless"
      Um, nice try, sweetie. That's turning out to NOT be the case.

    6. Re:Who Cares by jordanjay29 · · Score: 1

      They're not going to get caffeine from an odor, though.

    7. Re:Who Cares by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn’t call vaping “completely harmless”. I got sick and broke out when I started vaping for a few months.

    8. Re:Who Cares by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Half the world get sick from drinking cows milk because they cannot digest it sonny. And you want us to base global health policy off of your personal overdose of nicotine?

    9. Re:Who Cares by umghhh · · Score: 1

      so why did you continue? I recall being in a pub drinking my first beer of the weekend and a Swedish friend giving me 'snuss'. He used soe strong one but I do not think that would have made any difference. I felt terrible. I though I'd collapse. I did not drink my beer and went home. That effect was because I do not smoke. Whether inhaling nicotine vapours has an effect on body? Yes of course it does it is a fucking poison. yet I also heard from my physician that small amounts of N. correlate with lower levels of dementia. Now there does not have to be a connection but it may be. I have not investigated it anymore as I do not see a point of adding more addictions to my existing collection.

    10. Re:Who Cares by geekmux · · Score: 2

      Vaping by itself is completely harmless with nicotine being on par with caffeine in terms of harm and effects.

      This is nothing more than the anti cigarette brigade getting their panties in a wad over the fact that people flat out love nicotine and want to enjoy it without the bad effects of cigarettes (which are bad).

      Better the young'ins be vaping rather than smoke cigarettes.

      How in the FUCK have so many missed the main fucking point being driven here...

      "Teens who vape e-cigarettes with higher nicotine levels are more likely to start smoking conventional cigarettes soon after...43 percent of the students who'd used high-nicotine e-cigarettes said they were "frequent smokers" of traditional cigarettes six months later..."

      Better the "young'ins" not touch the products that create insatiable addiction and contribute to our #1 cause of preventable death.

    11. Re: Who Cares by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      None of those studies compared against caffeine.

    12. Re:Who Cares by DatbeDank · · Score: 1

      Vaping by itself is completely harmless with nicotine being on par with caffeine in terms of harm and effects.

      No
      it's
      not

      This is nothing more than the anti cigarette brigade getting their panties in a wad over the fact that people flat out love nicotine and want to enjoy it without the bad effects of cigarettes (which are bad).

      If that's what you think then maybe you should actually read the article... or the summary.

      Better the young'ins be vaping rather than smoke cigarettes.

      Did you bother even reading those studies before you posted them?

      And if that is where it stopped we wouldn't be commenting on this story.

      Study 1 only had 42 participants. Wow, I bet we're supposed to assume 42 people equal the whole of humanity right?

      Study 2 claims nicotine causes damage to DNA. You know what else causes damage to DNA? Everything from food to the sun dingus. That's why our bodies developed a way to work against that with antioxidants.
      http://www.whydontyoutrythis.c...

      Study 3: a complete duplicate of study 2 hosted on a different server.

      Did you even bother reading these studies before you posted to my reply or were you just anxiously looking around on Google for weak proof that all things nicotine are bad?

      The anti smoking brigade are almost as bad as the temperence twats.

    13. Re:Who Cares by DatbeDank · · Score: 1

      Exhaled e-cig vapor does NOT have any nicotine in it and it disapates in a matter of seconds with zero smell where as smoke will linger indefinitely (remember bars in the 90s). The person's lungs will have consumed all of it to the point of the remaining bit being so miniscule. You'll get more of a buzz breathing car exhaust than ecig vapor.

      Lots of misinformed individuals on the differences of vapor versus smoke and the subsequent knee jerk reactions.

    14. Re:Who Cares by mea2214 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Nicotine is far more harmful to your health than caffeine. Vaping is better than inhaling whatever the hell is in that smoke. I tried vaping as a way to quit completely. The first few times I got a nicotine high. For those who don't smoke, or those who quit for awhile, you'll get a nicotine high the first few cigarettes that can make you light headed and want more. The highs get less and less the more you smoke. The increased nicotine concentration you get from vaping can make your nicotine addiction worse. Quitting smoking was one of the hardest but best things I ever did.

    15. Re:Who Cares by pak9rabid · · Score: 1

      Vaping by itself is completely harmless with nicotine being on par with caffeine in terms of harm and effects.

      Wrong. Last I checked, caffeine was suspected to cause hardening of your arteries like nicotine is.

    16. Re:Who Cares by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      Did you even bother reading these studies before you posted to my reply

      Not only did I read it. We discussed all of them at length of Slashdot with plenty more references if you ever feel to look something up. But given you didn't even read the first line of TFS on this story before posting your nonsense I know you won't.

      You sound exactly like all those people who claimed smoking was healthy when studies came out saying it wasn't.

    17. Re:Who Cares by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      perfume and aftershave isn't consumed and has no real purpose.

      but people still don't care they're spreading a toxic stew around the world that causes severe allergic reactions.

      so why should the vapers care?

  11. Kids that take drugs take more drugs by mveloso · · Score: 1

    Kids that take drugs take more drugs than kids that don't. News at 11.

  12. Something's missing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The article didn't indicate if these users were already smoking traditional cigarettes, the study only indicates that they were asked if their friends smoked cigs or hookah.

    In the high mg group 95% of their friends smoked(and likely they did as well). Without having the numbers of who the smokers were at the beginning of the study, the conclusion is suspect. Another study out of nannystate cali with a couple harrumphs from their cousin NY. This comes out as Gottlieb is re-evaluating the regulations that were released with the deeming ruling of 2016.

    This data was gathered from 2013-2015, which was still in the stone age of vaping. Modern devices utilize a much lower range of nicotine from 0-6mg/ml.

    https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/fullarticle/2657310

    1. Re:Something's missing by sjames · · Score: 1

      Looking at their setup, there is a critical flaw. They apparently didn't bother to see if the students vaping nigh nicotine were current or former smokers at baseline or if they started nicotine with vaping. My observation is that really strong nicotine liquids are needed by people trying to transition to e-cigs. This is especially true if they're using those wimpy pen style devices you can get at the convenience store.

      Given that not everyone who tries to switch to e-cigs succeeds, attempted quitters will show up as smoking cigarettes at followup. Some likely smoked at baseline (but apparently weren't asked) and still smoked cigarettes at followup. Even if they cut back on smoking during the 6 months they were categorized as supporting the conclusion that high-nic vaping causes smoking.

      Simple omissions like that, especially when they COULD go back and ask the necessary questions about smoking status at baseline but didn't always raise suspicions.

    2. Re:Something's missing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Showing correlation is easy and relatively cheap. If there is correlation then a follow up study into causation may be warranted, if not then no. Nanny state issues are irrelevant, as if consumers are to make informed choices they need information.

    3. Re:Something's missing by shabble · · Score: 1

      The article didn't indicate if these users were already smoking traditional cigarettes

      Nor, had e-cigs not been a thing, they would have been smoking anyway, and the presence of e-cigs merely delayed the takeup of normals cigs (rather than being a gateway, as these sorts of studies tend to proclaim.)

    4. Re:Something's missing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2008 was the stone age of vaping, where 10-12 watts was a lot. I've seen devices that go past 200 watts today.

    5. Re:Something's missing by tehgeiger · · Score: 1

      My guess is that they did collect this info, but omitted it because it contradicted their conclusion.

    6. Re:Something's missing by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Modern devices utilize a much lower range of nicotine from 0-6mg/ml.

      Errr modern devices don't "utilize" anything. Users chose what to inhale, they have since the infancy of vaping. That was one of the founding features.

      If you go to Vapeclub.co.uk you have a choice of some 300 flavours with 20mg, over 20% of all of the product ranges on sale.

  13. Cigarettes are bad, m'kay? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Listen up, you younger Slashdotters: Don't start smoking. It's a filthy, smelly habit and nobody wants to be around a smoker. Now nicotine is a pretty decent recreational drug, and if you're going to use it, vaping is how you want to go, but stay off it until you're fully grown. I don't know if it's true or not, but people used to say that if you smoked when you were young, it would stunt your growth, so just don't take a chance. And that applies to all recreational drugs. Wait until you're fully grown, then do as thou wilt.

    Also, stay in school and always wear a rubber. And be nice to each other.

    I'm glad we had this talk.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
    1. Re:Cigarettes are bad, m'kay? by n329619 · · Score: 1

      You forgot to add in Facebook to the list of recreational drug.

    2. Re:Cigarettes are bad, m'kay? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think Facebook is more harmful than pot or nicotine, though.

    3. Re:Cigarettes are bad, m'kay? by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Actually, I was surprised by just how not-great nicotine is. I had always heard about how addictive it was, etc. Come to find out, it's not that great of a drug. You get a little hit of pleasure but that's it. And the more you do, the less pleasure you get. I had thought such a formidable drug would be better. And the addiction part isn't really that hard to kick. You just have to want to quit.

      One thing I did find, though, is that smoking and drinking go together like peanut butter and jelly. What a good combo. And a smoke after a good meal is sublime. But other than that, it's just not in the same class with pot, much less real drugs.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    4. Re:Cigarettes are bad, m'kay? by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      Great advice, asshole. Now I'm expelled from school for wearing a rubber in class.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    5. Re:Cigarettes are bad, m'kay? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Instructions unclear. Dick caught in vaper.

    6. Re:Cigarettes are bad, m'kay? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      You were also supposed to wear clothing. I'd say hope this helps, but I assume you're already on the list.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re:Cigarettes are bad, m'kay? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know if it's true or not, but people used to say that if you smoked when you were young, it would stunt your growth, so just don't take a chance.

      People also say that masturbating gives you bad eyesight and hairy hands. Do you really think it is a good idea to repeat things that people used to say without first verifying them, just in case?

    8. Re:Cigarettes are bad, m'kay? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot to add in Facebook to the list of recreational drug.

      There is an incredible amount of truth in this.
      I've quit both smoking (13 years) and Facebook (5 years).
      The feeling was eerily similar.

    9. Re:Cigarettes are bad, m'kay? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My Dad spent the last five years of his life sitting on a couch wearing an oxygen mask, wheezing with every breath. Last year I held his hand in the hospital while he slowly suffocated to death. During those last years, the low O2 and high CO2 in his blood basically cooked his brain. He went from being a brilliant engineer to not being able to work the microwave oven. That part was actually harder than watching him die.

      Mom is right behind him. COPD is kicking in and she'll be on oxygen pretty soon.

      So yeah, kids, smoking is bad. The first time you try it, you'll either puke or get high. If it makes you high, you'll be hooked for life and it will eventually kill you, in an awful way.

      (Oh, and wear your jimmy hat. Also good advice.)

    10. Re:Cigarettes are bad, m'kay? by butchersong · · Score: 1

      That's right kids. If you must smoke tobacco, smoke cigars. Otherwise, just stick to pot.

  14. An upgrade will fix it by Tablizer · · Score: 2

    When are F-Cigarettes coming out?

    1. Re:An upgrade will fix it by BlueStrat · · Score: 1

      When are F-Cigarettes coming out?

      F-Cigarettes were the previous model, suffix is regressive. It's also conveniently an acronym; 'F' as in 'Fire' like real cigs use.

      Looking forward to using the "C-Cigs??...Where??" come-back line after those come out.

      D-Cigs...I'm sorry, just Nope.

      B-Cigs reportedly do show some positive reactions among males in studies, however....

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
    2. Re:An upgrade will fix it by BlueStrat · · Score: 1

      suffix is regressive

      Gah! *Prefix!*

      Maybe AI can add an edit-post function to /.

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
  15. Simply shocking by pablo_max · · Score: 2

    Wow! They figured out that using more of an addictive chemical makes you want the addictive chemical more? That is simply shocking.

    1. Re:Simply shocking by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      No your conclusion is non-sequitur. The story is about people switching to cigarettes. A typical cigarette is equivalent in nicotine to somewhere between the 12mg/mL and 18mg/mL vaping varieties. If we follow your logic then cigarette smokers would be switching en mass to vaping to get more of a hit.

      This study showed its the other way around.

    2. Re:Simply shocking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Addictive things don't necessarily act that way (e.g. you may become satiated), and the delivery mechanism may mean that there is a limit. So the conclusion isn't as obvious as you suggest.

  16. smoke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My anecdotal is somewhat irrelevant here, but I smoked 1-20 cigs a day for perhaps 8 year (quitting completely around 3 years ago), started vaping on 36 mg/ml (during the last year or so of smoking, I went very rapidly from previous usage rate to 1-5 cigs a week), and now occasionally vape 3mg/ml in the face of life's stresses (and more frequently nicotine free). Also, have some extra parentheses, I'm almost out of them anyhow. ()()()()()()()()()()()

    1. Re:smoke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do realize your abuse of parentheses is a symptom of your abuse of nicotine?

  17. anti smoke nazis are ignorant by swell · · Score: 1

    Nicotine is closely related to choline- a popular aid to mental performance. Users have discovered that it can help with memory and test performance in college. Nicotine is shown to reduce stress in various environments such as noisy factory settings. It is addictive in the same way that protein, caffeine and sweets are. In other words, it's a very mild craving and closely related to the stress of your lifestyle.

    Yes, it is one of over 100 ingredients in cigarets that may be harmful in some sense. Nevertheless, you will some day see nicotine as a dietary supplement that can enhance your cognition and improve your life. Don't be a sucker for the emotional and ignorant anti smoke fanatics. Here on Slashdot at least, there should be some room for science.

    --
    ...omphaloskepsis often...
    1. Re:anti smoke nazis are ignorant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you think choline is good for you, why? Just because something gives you a temporary improvement on memory and test scores doesn't mean it's good or "mild".

      "Hey, everyone else does it so it must be ok." Where have I heard that before...?

      I think there's a point to avoiding additional addiction in one's life, even if the substance is fairly benign. Start by spending 5 minutes a day smoking your e-cig. Then tack on whatever other mundane "dietary supplements". Grab a coffee from Starbucks in the morning, or take one of those caffeine shots to keep you awake. Physical effects aside, these sorts of behaviors still reduce once's overall quality of life. Oh, but don't ask yourself if that's the case--just trust the part of your brain that says everything is going to be ok.

      Oh, and while you're at it, do your 5 minute daily quests in a few mobile apps, and then swipe away all your notifications and check your facebook feed. Watch your 15 minutes of TV, or Dota or whatever games you play. Before you know it, it's time for bed and you've got work in the morning.

      There's a price to pay for anything addictive, and it's not the vaping or whatever but rather by all of the life experiences that are passing you by. Lose an hour every week, then two hours, then six hours. You'll never be able to make up what you missed out on, for you only live once.

    2. Re:anti smoke nazis are ignorant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But it can also be a fantastic marketing tool.

      I play in a band that uses fog machines. We switched to filling them with 24mg/ml vaping liquid we mix from bulk instead of regular fog-machine mix. Audiences don't start fleeing for the doors after a half-hour to an hour to smoke, and we're seeing a rise in the percentage of 'regular' audience members at any given show, usually sitting up front. The vaping liquid also smells much better than standard fog-machine juice. We're especially popular at youth events.

    3. Re:anti smoke nazis are ignorant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do you know YOU are not the one missing things in your life?

  18. The fix is simple by FithisUX · · Score: 1

    ban conventional cigarettes which are a public health danger.

  19. Re:Boring by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 2

    E-Cigarettes have also been linked to inflammatory lung disease https://newatlas.com/e-cigaret...

    --

    Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

  20. Mixed messages by ScooterComputer · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Beyond the misleading choice not to baseline the high-nicotine vapors/smokers for prior smoking levels, I also find it curious that the study didn't track the youths' opinions on e-cigs vs cigarettes in terms of health/harm. Considering that over the past 5 years the "official" US government "message" has been that vaping is as, and sometimes more, dangerous than smoking cigarettes (obvious hogwash), I have found a lot of smokers who had switched to vaping (some, entirely, completely off cigarettes) go back to smoking "because the government says there is no difference." This would have been a useful data point to track, especially in a nanny-state like California where such mixed-messaging is too-often used as a governmental propaganda tool. That the researchers decided not to track a simple question of "WHY smoke?" is, to me, quite telling as to the purpose of the study, since that basic question would have shed a lot of light on actual causation (vs mere speculation).

    --
    Scott
    "Hokey religions and ancient weapons are no match for a good blaster at your side, kid."
    1. Re:Mixed messages by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      obvious hogwash

      Most people said the same thing about the first studies that said Cigarettes are unhealthy.

      News flash: doing new things to your body not previously extensively studied may have unintended consequences.

    2. Re:Mixed messages by Baron_Yam · · Score: 1

      While vaping likely cuts out a lot of the nasty substances you'd find in a standard cigarette (though for all I know it adds some new ones)... the end result is you're getting dosed with nicotine, and that alone has some negative health effects.

      On the other hand, at least I don't have to smell you or see people tossing their cigarette butts everywhere, so please, if you're going to become a slave to a drug that is highly addictive and doesn't give much of a long-term high... vape.

    3. Re:Mixed messages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People who've never smoked should shut the fuck up and go fuck themselves until they fucking die like the arrogant dipshits they are. When I was smoking, I was waking up in the morning wheezing, hacking, and couching. That coughing continued throughout the day. When I switched to vaping, the changes were immediate. Now I breath free and clear, without the craving for a cigarette.

      Yes, dumbass teens will be dumbass teens and might decide to start vaping because they think it's "cool." Fuck them and fuck you. Vaping was originally developed and intended as an alternative for smokers. It's helped me and others. Deal with it.

  21. You think by DrXym · · Score: 1

    Who'd have thought that an addictive substance could be addictive. E-cigarettes might be "better" than regular cigarettes but that's damning with faint praise.

  22. LOL pot meets kettle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Study warns zig zag paper users are more prone to use it with pot and hash than users of cigarettes. Study warns if you put jet fuel in your car engine you have a better chance of having issues with your car. Study warns cigarette users and e-cigarette users are better off not smoking at all than smoking, whichever the device they are using. What kind of conflict-of-interest ridden study is that freaking thing calling Mr. Obvious? Come on!

    In the grander scheme of things, e-cigarettes is the best way to actually stop smoking, and if you have to smoke, it's the best way not to kill yourself in the process. Even the high-dose nicotine products are not that high compared to traditional cigarettes. If you look at the nicotine on its own, it's not something that's absolutely evil, most of the problems come from the other chemicals, such as tar and other carcinogens. Most vaping shops will usually sell 0ml or 6ml or sometimes 12ml nicotine products, but they usually are either 0 or 6, which is hundred of times less than cigarette, without any other carcinogens. And finally, e-cigarettes don't generate any smoke and health issues for anyone else: what you see is a little bit of flavour (much less than what you get in your can of air freshener) and water. It got demonstrated multiple times little to no nicotine is present in this cloud.

    (Anonymous coward because don't want to take time to log in - disclaimer, I'm not working with any cigarette/e-cigarette/health org/..., don't smoke. But my dad used to smoke and I did my research. Now he vapes 0ml nicotine 2-3 times per day and he's happy... and I will have a dad a few years more than before)

  23. Did you read the summary? by cmseagle · · Score: 2

    Did you read the summary?

    Six months later, those who used higher nicotine levels in their e-cigarettes were more likely to report use of both e-cigarettes and regular cigarettes within the past month

    The point of this article is that vaping with high-nicotine liquid correlates with eventually smoking. Meaning, if we want to keep the young'ins from smoking cigarettes ("which are bad"), maybe we need to keep them away from high-nicotine e-liquid too.

    1. Re:Did you read the summary? by DatbeDank · · Score: 1

      Did you read the summary?

      Six months later, those who used higher nicotine levels in their e-cigarettes were more likely to report use of both e-cigarettes and regular cigarettes within the past month

      The point of this article is that vaping with high-nicotine liquid correlates with eventually smoking. Meaning, if we want to keep the young'ins from smoking cigarettes ("which are bad"), maybe we need to keep them away from high-nicotine e-liquid too.

      Correlation does not always equal causation. Smoking is a cool act that has various influences whether the anti smoking brigade feels otherwise.

      Teens that want to smoke will and so will others who want to. The fact that vaping is now available means someone may puff a cigarette every now and then but revert to vaping immediately because of the negative side effects.

  24. 50 years ago people were debating that by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    as well as whether cigarettes were unhealthy. You need studies to prove what should be obvious because people make billions lying about things.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  25. I don't want my kid beholden to addiction by rsilvergun · · Score: 2

    better the young'ins be doing neither. Go read Fred Pohl's The Space Merchants.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  26. Re:Boring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Funny thing

    The anti-smoking industry, which has received massive windfalls ($Billions) from sin-taxes on cigarettes have seen those funds go down massively since e-cigarettes have entered the market.

    They are more focused on keeping the money coming in by slandering e-cigarettes in hopes that the public will create new taxes on them and give the money to anti-cigarette groups

    It does not matter that e-cigarettes reduce the harmful elements of smoking by gt 98%
    It does not matter that nicotine can be purchased over the counter and is judged as non-harmful by the FDA
    It does not matter that this FUD and e-cigarette taxes will lead to more people smoking cigarettes

    The ONLY thing that matters to these groups right now is money in their pockets

  27. No Way! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Warning! Addictive chemical is addictive!