Slashdot Mirror


Did Amazon Really Lower Whole Foods' Prices? (bustle.com)

While Whole Foods "strategically marked down select items like avocados and almond milk, overall prices have dropped very slightly -- about 1 percent -- since Amazon ownership, according to an analysis by research firm Gordon Haskett." An anonymous reader quotes Bustle: This hardly seems like big savings, and Gordon Haskett noted that since the initial price cuts in August, the cost of some items have been slowly ticking back up. "The price of frozen foods, for example, was 7 percent higher on Sept. 26 than on Aug. 28, when Amazon officially took over," Abha Bhattarai reported for the Post, which is owned by Amazon. "Snack items had risen 5.3 percent in that period, while dairy and yogurt were up 2 percent. (Among categories where prices are lower: Beverages, down about 2.8 percent; bread and bakery, down 6.8 percent; and produce, down 0.5 percent...)"

For shoppers like me who buy mostly fresh fruits and vegetables, it did feel like I was saving money. However, one industry insider said there is a strategy behind how prices are cut. "The whole game is that you want the 100 most recognizable things -- milk, apples, bananas -- to be cheaper," Jan Rogers Kniffen, an industry consultant and former department store executive, told the Post. "If you can do that, you can build a perception that the whole store is competitively priced."

From July through September, Whole Foods brought in $1.3 billion in sales for Amazon.

122 comments

  1. Did Amazon Really Lower Whole Foods' Prices? by EvilSS · · Score: 4, Interesting

    " overall prices have dropped very slightly -- about 1 percent " so the yes. /article

    --
    I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    1. Re:Did Amazon Really Lower Whole Foods' Prices? by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      " overall prices have dropped very slightly -- about 1 percent "

      so the yes. /article

      Though the past tense is important as the prices are going back up. They did lower it... By a single percent point. For a month or so.

    2. Re:Did Amazon Really Lower Whole Foods' Prices? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No one at Whole Foods cares about prices anyway. What a stupid article.

    3. Re:Did Amazon Really Lower Whole Foods' Prices? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Whole Foods customers absolutely care about price. Ever heard of a Veblen good?

    4. Re:Did Amazon Really Lower Whole Foods' Prices? by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      I remember shopping there one time and then saying, "Oh, that's why they call it Whole Paycheck" and going other places ever since. Their customers might actually not really care.

      Check out how much higher their prices really are before you decide their customers care.

  2. yes. by turkeydance · · Score: 1

    1 %

  3. Not owner by Amazon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Abha Bhattarai reported for the Post, which is owned by Amazon"

    The Post is owned by Jeff Bezos, not Amazon.

  4. not going to happen by known_coward_69 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    in nyc whole foods is in the most expensive rent parts of the city. no way prices are dropping. at least not on the stuff lazy millennials will buy the most of, like frozen foods.

    for me, I go there for the fresh fruits and veggies

    1. Re:not going to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must feel very superior.

    2. Re:not going to happen by fermion · · Score: 2
      Pretty much Whole Foods has become a place to get drunk on wine while buying prepared food for dinner. 20 years ago they started realizing they could make a lot of money by selling 'natural' junk food. On the other hand, there things that Whole Foods has that are a good value or simply are hard to find.

      Amazon likely bought whole foods simply to expand the Amazon Fresh program and to have a local store from for pickup and returns. It probably does not need to increase sales, as it is looking for, I think the buzzword is, synergy. In this case there probably is profit to be made simply in the merger. Those who shop at whole foods will continue to . Amazon Prime Delivery already is delivering Whole Foods products.

      Those who want to be ripped at at Krogers unless they show their papers will continue to make that choice.

      Traders Joes provides a good choice for those who simply don't want to shop with the urban or rural males.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    3. Re:not going to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I go to Aldi - because fresh fruits and veggies are pretty much the same, and its way cheaper there.

    4. Re:not going to happen by SlaveToTheGrind · · Score: 1

      Those who want to be ripped at at Krogers unless they show their papers will continue to make that choice.

      If you're concerned about presenting a plastic card with an ID # that need not be tied to your name, I certainly hope you don't pay with a credit card.

    5. Re:not going to happen by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Those who want to be ripped at at Krogers unless they show their papers will continue to make that choice.

      Pick just about any store and you can probably use Jenny's number for the stalker discount. (your area code) 867-5309. If someone else hasn't already done it, you be the one.

    6. Re:not going to happen by fermion · · Score: 1
      If credit cards were as effective as tracking purchases and customers as 'loyalty cards', then stores would not incur the expense of running the programs.

      Also, if a store wants to give me something extra, that is great. A free piece of chocolate every month with purchase. Or a free pair of underwear every month. But don't jack up the prices and then pretend you are giving me a discount. Many retailers have been fined for such practices, and the one retailer who really started the practice back late in the last century was forced out of business.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    7. Re:not going to happen by SlaveToTheGrind · · Score: 1

      If credit cards were as effective as tracking purchases and customers as 'loyalty cards', then stores would not incur the expense of running the programs.

      Stating the obvious, with a loyalty card they can track purchases across payment methods, so for some people it could be more effective on the margins. But I'm not sure what that really has to do with my comment (or your "show your papers" language I was addressing). My point was that if you really consider presenting a quasi-anonymous ID # at the time of purchase to be "showing your papers," it's hard to see how you could feel good about providing a definitive ID # to them by paying with a credit card that's (if used lawfully) explicitly tied to you. It's virtually certain they're aggregating and tracking purchases made with the same (hashed, I'm sure) credit card number, so you're leaking the same quality of information without getting the benefits of the loyalty program.

      But don't jack up the prices and then pretend you are giving me a discount. Many retailers have been fined for such practices

      They're not pretending to give you a discount -- they actually are. Again stating the obvious, people who don't participate in the loyalty program don't get the discount. This isn't like the "GOLD CHAIN 95% OFF" schemes of yesteryear. Here, the regular prices are what they are, and every customer makes a conscious decision whether to trade information for discounts on select, rotating items. You may not like it, but there's nothing even vaguely illegal about that construct.

    8. Re:not going to happen by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

        Those who want to be ripped at at Krogers unless they show their papers will continue to make that choice.

      Ooooh, Krogers tracks my grocery purchasing habits. Therefor something something 1984 chemtrails something.

    9. Re:not going to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're not pretending to give you a discount -- they actually are. Again stating the obvious, people who don't participate in the loyalty program don't get the discount.

      Bullshit. I've watched more than one store start this scam and every time they've raise prices and added loyalty discounts.

  5. Re:Normal practice for Amazon by known_coward_69 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    everyone does the basket thing. wal mart pioneered it. you figure out what people tend to buy in groups. mark down one or two of the items and raise prices on the rest. it's a 20 year old strategy.

  6. Amazon serfs by DogDude · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Keep giving your paychecks to Amazon, you dumb fucks. Keep going.

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
    1. Re:Amazon serfs by PoopJuggler · · Score: 1

      Who do you give your paychecks to that is any better?

    2. Re:Amazon serfs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Buy gold coins

    3. Re:Amazon serfs by DogDude · · Score: 1

      I shop locally. With cash.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    4. Re:Amazon serfs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This, and this.

  7. Weak dollar by djinn6 · · Score: 1

    Meanwhile, crude oil went from $46 to $52, an 11% increase. Unlike what the article suggests, Whole Foods is actually cutting prices, just not relative to the dollar.

    1. Re:Weak dollar by lucm · · Score: 1

      Meanwhile, crude oil went from $46 to $52, an 11% increase.

      The increase percentage was even bigger (14%) for the people who use a non-broken calculator

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    2. Re:Weak dollar by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      It takes 3 months for prices of crude oil to reflect refineries and of course the price gougers errr I mean the buyers and sellers get the gasoline only to sell it again to gas stations. Notice when oil lost 75% that prices only went down 50%. The people buying and selling double dip before and after it is refined.

    3. Re:Weak dollar by bigfinger76 · · Score: 1

      An increase of $6 (52 - 46) from $46 represents a 13% increase.
      6 / 46 = 0.130434783, according to my calculator.

    4. Re: Weak dollar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have to be able to replace the gas you sell, and you can't bet the price is going to be down when you buy the next batch

    5. Re:Weak dollar by lucm · · Score: 1

      An increase of $6 (52 - 46) from $46 represents a 13% increase.

      6 / 46 = 0.130434783, according to my calculator.

      Oil prices always round UP, so it's 14%

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    6. Re:Weak dollar by bigfinger76 · · Score: 1

      Nice try. Oil prices may round up, but we are talking about percentage increases of oil prices. It's a subtle difference, I guess.

    7. Re: Weak dollar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have to be able to replace the gas you sell, and you can't bet the price is going to be down when you buy the next batch

      That, and the cost of crude oil is only part of the cost - refining and transports and other overheads are pretty much constants that stay even if the price of crude oil drops.through the floor.

    8. Re:Weak dollar by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      Oil prices always round UP, so it's 14%

      It's not that oil prices always round up, but that crude increases get reflected immediately in the price of refined products, while when crude drops, you have to wait for the price to "propagate through the magic one-way supply chain."

    9. Re:Weak dollar by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      This is one of those things that everyone knows for sure. There were so many complaints about it in the UK that the OFT investigated and found it to be total bollocks.

      Of course, that's the kind of thing you'd expect from commies without guns. Probably staffed by the same people who run the death panels.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  8. Re:No price changes for amber ale... by lucm · · Score: 1

    They let you buy amber ale on food stamps?

    --
    lucm, indeed.
  9. If you're this price-sensitive... by SeaFox · · Score: 1

    you shouldn't be shopping at Whole Foods to start with.

  10. Protip. by msauve · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Whole Foods is not where you go to save money.

    --
    "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    1. Re:Protip. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Protip: Trader Joe's

    2. Re:Protip. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a reason it's known as "Whole Paycheck."

    3. Re:Protip. by Doug+Jensen · · Score: 1

      There's a reason it's known as "Whole Paycheck."

      Do you also refer to Neiman Marcus as Whole Paycheck? How about your local Mercedes Benz dealer?

      --
      Doug Jensen
  11. Re:Normal practice for Amazon by msauve · · Score: 4, Informative

    "it's a 20 year old strategy."

    So, you're a millennial? Cause, grocery has always been low margin with price leaders.

    And, Walmart.

    --
    "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
  12. Re:No price changes for amber ale... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why would fat porn lovers look at a middle-aged failure that barely registers as "alive", never mind sexually active?

    THIS is fat porn, you loser.

  13. Re:No price changes for amber ale... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here are some Creimer's posts from his account that was blocked and renamed by Slashdot management:

    "Nah... I just do it to piss off my trolls and make coffee money off of them."
    https://slashdot.org/comments....

    "Which doesn't violate the Slashdot TOS. If you got a problem with that, take it up with management."
    https://slashdot.org/comments....

    This year I've posted ~4,000 comments.
    https://slashdot.org/comments....

    We have different priorities. You want to climb the corporate ladder. I want to own the corporate ladder.
    https://slashdot.org/comments....

    My employers don't care about what my Slashdot trolls think. Now go off and lick your balls somewhere else.
    https://slashdot.org/comments....

  14. Re:Normal practice for Amazon by Brett+Buck · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Try even further back (1917):

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    As soon as you had fixed prices that people could choose themselves, this was standard practice.

  15. Re:No price changes for amber ale... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    CREIMIER SAID:

    All you need to do is find a website with a permissive TOS, say, Slashdot, create a Python script to scrape your own comments, sprinkle Amazon affiliate links in various posts, and then re-post past links whenever possible. Won't be long before you start making "coffee money" each month.

    https://slashdot.org/comments....

    Shitposting, Amazon affiliate spam, being fat, and being a general nuisance.

    CREIMER SAID:
    Only on Slashdot.

    https://slashdot.org/comments....

    So why hasn't managed to ban this intentionally disruptive user? According to him his "trolls" can't help themselves.. he is the one in control willingly and maliciously creating disruptions. Reasons that slashdot has stated they will ban accounts at their discretion.

    Why isn't creimer banned? He degrades the slashdot experience for everyone and attempts to monetize these efforts. This is effectively stealing from Dice.

    Just the other day creimer attempted to dox a user by posting her name and ip address. How many chances should he be given?

  16. Re:No price changes for amber ale... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Chris' case is getting worse, he spends all day replying to himself as AC on /.

    The tests we ran on Chris have shown that Chris has the intelligence of an ameba:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    So, technically, he is able to conceive some kind of agenda but it will be silly or impossible to follow on a human scale.

    For example, Chris had an agenda to post anything he felt like on Slashdot which did not work well because it was based on his false beliefs that he had an infinite number of karma points as he wrote here several times.

    Several people here explained to Chris that karma maxed out at some level like 50 or so but Chris kept on insisting that his python script had confirmed that he had millions of karma points!

    Oh well, as I wrote before: "It isn't Chris' fault if he is the way he is. We do the best we can do with him and he is partially integrated into society. We try to cure his abnormal need for attention but he is kind of stubborn and won't listen to anybody."

    For the valuable /. users that might already have read the following, please note that there is an important update.

    IMPORTANT UPDATE:
    Special Education for the Santa Clara County Office of Education has invested money to buy Chris a new chair:
    http://www.keynamics.com/image...

    Information about Christopher Dale Reimer and autistic people:

    Autistic people have obsessions about things normal people don't care. For example, one of our autistic patient went haywire when he realized that there was a penny missing in his pocket change.

    To calm him down, one of our educator pretended to have found it on the floor and gave a penny to him.

    The autistic patient condition went even worse because he realized it wasn't the same penny!

    Chris has an obsession with budgeting every penny. He doesn't understand that most people do not budget to the penny and have a flexible amount they allow for miscellaneous items.

    I am Nancy Guerrero and I am Director of Special Education for the Santa Clara County Office of Education. We use Chris' (a.k.a. creimer,cdreimer) picture in our document because he is the hardest case we have ever had to handle:
    http://www.sccoe.org/depts/stu...

    Our artists were inspired by the low carb diet that Christopher follows scrupulously for the small lunch box and by the picture linked below for the rest. I am sure that you will notice the similarities such as the bump on the side of his chest and more:
    https://ibb.co/gVad65

    Please be easy on Christopher although, I am aware that some of our staff handling Chris post joke comments here and obvoiusly, the Santa Clara County Office of Education disapprove that behavior vehemently:
    https://school.discoveryeducat...

    But it isn't Chris' fault if he is the way he is. We do the best we can do with him and he is partially integrated into society. We try to cure his abnormal need for attention but he is kind of stubborn and won't listen to anybody.

    Thank You dear users,
    ---
    Nancy Guerrero
    Dircetor
    Special Education
    Santa Clara County Office of Education

  17. Re:No price changes for amber ale... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thanks Nancy,

    Your posts are always enlightening and right on topic! Keep up the good work over there at Special Education!

    Also, I have noted that Chris uses child psychology to convince his so called trolls to give up by pretending they just give him free publicity. That's adoring! ;-)

    ---
    Silvia Bunge
    Psychology Department
    University of California, Berkeley

  18. why by AndyKron · · Score: 2

    Why would anybody shop there in the first place? Sounds scammy to me

    1. Re:why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure what you mean by "sounds scammy." If it is the Amazon promise to drop prices, well that was a typical corporate statement not unique to Amazon and can be assessed in light of all the statements made by other corporations with the same basic message.

      Whole foods actually has the best prices on some particular items. I shop there regularly as I can do a short circular route and visit Whole Foods, Fresh Thyme, Trader Joe's and two regular grocery stores. I can also travel a bit more and visit Lucky's. Each shop may have a better deal on certain items but Trader Joe's stands out as almost NEVER having anything lower priced. Whole Foods always has at least one item that is cheaper. So those located where easy price shopping is possible there is a reason to shop there. Others may not be as price sensitive and those people can find items of a particular nature in one place so there is another reason.

    2. Re:why by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      Why would anybody shop there in the first place? Sounds scammy to me

      It's the grocery store in the nice neighborhood, and therefore on the way home from work. No matter what, it's going to be more expensive than other places, but still have to show perceived added value over other places so people don't get angry enough to go someplace else. I've seen the same thing at QFCs. As the neighborhood becomes more affluent, the deli and cheese bar gets bigger, the alcohol selection get larger on the top end, and the cheap brands disappear for more expensive brands. Meanwhile, Red Apples with their cheap no name brands move farther out into the suburbs.

  19. Re:No price changes for amber ale... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I went into Whole Foods a few weeks ago to get some cheese, tofu and amber ale. I didn't notice any price changes.

    Well, I think we can conclude from creimer's exhaustive analysis of the price point of 3 items that he buys "every few weeks," that the price hasn't changed at all.

    Or, we could believe the analyst who is actually paid to answer these questions, who concludes that overall, prices are down 1%. Pro tip for all the millennials who want their organic fair trade artisanal artichoke hearts for a penny a pound: If you buy something yesterday for $100, and today, the same item costs $99, you are saving fucking money. Your feelings do not entitle you to a larger discount just because you feel like you deserve it.

    Hey, Fat Porn Lovers! New Creimer pic!

    Looks pretty much exactly like the old one: same fat guy, with massive man tits and rolls of fat on his upper arms, shoulders, and back, a double chin large enough to land a fucking Dreamliner on, and a too-tight t-shirt which is barely holding together at the seams under the explosive back-pressure of all that fat.

    1/10, would not bang.

  20. Maybe not really cheaper but did get me back in by SuperKendall · · Score: 5, Informative

    I knew what the article summary says going in - they probably only cut the price on a handful of popular things, things I probably wouldn't buy there anyway...

    However it did get me back into the store just to look at it, so mission accomplished. They actually have several things there I like quite a lot that are unique to the store, so while I don't do much general shipping there I do go back about once a month to get a few things.

    I am a little surprised the convergence with Amazon has not meant more though. Not even a little discount for being Prime for example?? Seems like they have a huge potential to make small changes that would make people even a little more likely to come in.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  21. Slowly ticking back up by macraig · · Score: 1

    ... since the initial price cuts in August, the cost of some items have been slowly ticking back up.

    It didn't take a genius to see this coming, only someone who had previous dealings with Amazon's so-called Subscribe And Save program. It promised exactly the same lie. They are merely repeating the same tactic in brick and mortar.

  22. ... and this is a surprise, why? by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1

    ... since the initial price cuts in August, the cost of some items have been slowly ticking back up ...

    Amazon buys Whole Foods and lowers the prices on some items. Amazon gets all manner of free press about the lower prices. Once the initial attention wears off, Amazon slowly raises the prices back to prior levels. This doesn't surprise me. What surprises me is that others seem to be surprised at this chain of events.

  23. Re:No price changes for amber ale... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  24. Corporate B.S. on steroids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My sense is the prices aren't really lower.
    What's worse: my most frequent purchases were at the food bar, where the choices became less healthy after the Amazon take-over. WF already had a problem with sugar, sugar-laden juice and/or starch added to most prepared dishes. Recently, the tastiest healthy dishes were eliminated, replaced by plain side dishes like plain quinoa that are only edible if some unhealthy starchy sauce is applied. My last two visits, I've left empty handed. And after hearing the new corporate ethos explained by the manager, I don't know when I'll go back. Amazon doesn't have a clue about what's healthy.
    WF is now WTF?

  25. Amazon is cheap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They treat their employees like crap and underpay while overcharging. In other words it is turning into another Walmart.

    It was once like another Costco or Sams club that used to see value in their employees. None of the Alexis team is still employed just as an example. I appled to work in their IT department in a local office and they wanted a System Administrator but only wanted to pay $35,000 a year. Worse, I would need to work in the warehouse during the busy season and expected to work long hours for no extra pay.

  26. Re:No price changes for amber ale... by datavirtue · · Score: 1

    Jesus...you need to get a real job.

    --
    I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
  27. If you have to ask a question like this by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    the answer is no.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  28. Re: Normal practice for Amazon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Loss leader is old, the innovation gp was talking about is applying that concept to smaller groupings of items.

  29. Re:No price changes for amber ale... by lucm · · Score: 1

    I make $4,250+ per month.

    protip: if you feel like you have to include hundreds and below when you bring up your monthly income, you're poor.

    --
    lucm, indeed.
  30. Re: No price changes for amber ale... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After or before taxes

  31. Re:No price changes for amber ale... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uh, did you see that little + after the number? Chris is making Trump-level money, especially considering he only works one hour a day and spends the rest of the day sleeping in, errr, cleaning the storage closet.

    I bet there's a pile of empty boxes and thousands of crumpled printer test pages with a sasquatch-sized indentation in there!

  32. Crashing and burning. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "If you can do that, you can build a perception that the whole store is competitively priced."

    If you market to morons then soon you will be hiring morons. Merge with failure and reap destruction.

  33. Low price stuff at entrance by peter303 · · Score: 1

    Comparable to Kroger prices, where I mainly shop. The other food looks expensive. (I use WF mainly for fast food. One of the few places you can quickly get a wide choice of cooked veggies.)

  34. Whole Foods definitely lowered all their prices by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

    They moved the tags closer to the floor.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  35. Here's why... by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 2

    Why would anybody shop there in the first place? Sounds scammy to me

    Because in many places, if you want organic this and that and GMO-free this and that, it's the only option because there are no food coops, farmer's markets, or Trader Joe's.

    So if you live "in the city" it all depends on if you want organic/GMO-free. If not, you can certainly find a store with healthy food at a cheaper price.

    HOWEVER: Where food coops and Trader Joe's DO do exist in close proximity, it's a "status symbol" thing.

    Plus, they have a hipster bar with a dozen or so micro brews where you can order hipster pizza by the slice and get a nice buzz while your significant other shops. Sometimes, I'll pay extra for that.

    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    1. Re:Here's why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if you want organic this and that and GMO-free this and that

      So as the OP said, to get scammed.

    2. Re:Here's why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GMO itself isn't the problem, its what its being used for. Which is typically either making your food resistant to poisonous things used on the field so more if it can be used, that then don't hurt your food, but you'll consume together with your food, or simply have the plants produce the poisonous stuff themselves, with the same result.

      If they're just engineering for bigger potatoes or more tasty apples, that's harmless. But that's only part of the engineering.

    3. Re:Here's why... by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      If they're just engineering for bigger potatoes or more tasty apples, that's harmless...

      But when GMO is used for these purposes, the hippie lunkheads will still avoid it because "not natural."

    4. Re:Here's why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it's avoided because it's not healthy. Think about what a more tasty apple means. It means a higher sugar ratio. They're turning healthy food into candy and designing it to grow in nutrient poor environments. When you grow something like that, it also ends up lacking in nutrients. Do you really want a world where there's no healthy food left and everyone is dying from inflammatory diseases?

      Even when we've proven how bad the western diet is, it's still marching around the world making everyone sicker because eating American is seen as a status symbol and is constantly pushed in ads.

      The food is being engineered to increase profits, not for any human benefits. The one group doing that, golden rice, failed.

  36. stalker alert by lucm · · Score: 0

    Chris

    You're on first name basis with creimer?

    ( -.-)

    --
    lucm, indeed.
    1. Re:stalker alert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chris and Lilly have been on a first name basis for a few days now.

    2. Re:stalker alert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chris and Lilly have been on a first name basis for a few days now.

      After Chris got off the boat at Tokyo, he was disappointed to learn that Lilly looked nothing like this and wasn't a ladyboy as she claimed to be. He was heartbroken and took a boat back to San Francisco.

  37. Re:Normal practice for Amazon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    merchants have been doing this a lot longer than walmart has even existed. walmart just perfected it.

  38. Merger should have never been allowed by mike2006 · · Score: 2

    This blind trust and worship of monopolies these days is unprecedented. While people debate fake bogey men political issues, we are losing competition and ultimately our freedoms to a handle full of monopolies.

  39. I work in Seattle, and I noticed Bezos lied... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    about reducing prices. I was beaten for that and then raped anally with a piece of a 19" server rack for saying that. I almost bled to death for calling Bezos on his lies. His thugs rape engineers anally to death too damn often for telling the truth against his lies. I almost died. After over $24k worth of medical bills, I'm almost back to normal after the Bezos fans anal raped me. That is how those Amazon.com people be. It's how they be.

    1. Re: I work in Seattle, and I noticed Bezos lied... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My roommate died from anal bleeding after pointing out Amazon lies. People here in Seattle get so violent when you call our Amazon for their lies.

    2. Re: I work in Seattle, and I noticed Bezos lied... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anal rape to death is just too common in Seattle. Lost two friends due to anal bleeding after they complained about Microsoft.

  40. Grocery price surge is amazing by iamacat · · Score: 1

    Even being in middle class, it's distressing to get an $200 bill for a week worth of supplies from Safeway. Upon close inspection, prices are Ok for obvious stuff like milk but pretty outrageous for anything slightly unusual like shampoo. It's also not down to making the margins, as Costco and asian grocery stories obviously manage to survive without such tricks. I can afford to swallow the increase, but I feel really sorry for common people who can't afford to drive to a further away store or just are not educated enough to figure out the nuances, If you have nothing but 7/11 in your neighborhood, you are fucked.

    1. Re:Grocery price surge is amazing by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      You must be shopping in California. Most parts of the free world have lower prices.

    2. Re:Grocery price surge is amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK Troll. First of all people who understand that GMO isn't a matter of "not natural" but rather a matter of inadequate assessment and control of gene transfer to wild plant and animal populations are not "hippies" nor I suspect whatever you mean by "lunkhead."

      Since the poster mentioned shampoo, 200/week outside of California is not at all uncommon for food and other household items these days. There has been a significant increase in prices in the last few years for grocery items. The Gov just adjusts its market basket to reduce the impact of price rises on the official inflation rate. Greenspan wrote academically to promote this market basket adjustment and it has been practiced for some time.

      Do you have anything of substance to offer or just "mind turned off", sophomoric snarks?

  41. Re:No price changes for amber ale... by Kaenneth · · Score: 0

    You people seriously need to get a life, and stop spamming.

  42. That depends by thegarbz · · Score: 4, Funny

    Given that they dropped their price on avocados and that some millionaires and politicians keep attributing the poor millennial's inability to afford to buy houses to their consumption of avocado on toast I would say Amazon's price drop is attempting to single-handedly solve* the housing affordability crisis facing our next generation.

    * For those of you who don't get the obvious sarcasm, this was obviously sarcastic.

    1. Re:That depends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No sarcasm necessary. When I was young, single and working an entry level job I didn't blow $22 on lunch everyday or shop at overpriced stores. There's a reason graduate students live on ramen noodles and take the bus. You have to decide where you want to go in life and what is important to you. If you want a house maybe you need to get the feature phone and prepaid phone plan and bag your lunch.
      Every millennial wants to live n the parent's lifestyle without having spent the time working for the equity.
      Now get off my lawn.

    2. Re:That depends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every millennial's parents lived their parents' lifestyle easily while they were working for that equity.

  43. Not bad by nospam007 · · Score: 1

    "overall prices have dropped very slightly -- about 1 percent "

    Most groceries/supermarkets/discounters have less than 1% profit margin, at least in Europe.

    1. Re: Not bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshit

      Nobody works out of the goodness of their heart for 1 percent gain.

      The 1 percent number is Hollywood accounting

      My uncle runs a grocery chain.

    2. Re: Not bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Supermarkets are a high-volume, low margin operation with fierce competition almost by definition. They have a lot of personnel (even budget chains like Aldi and Lidl), they need to carrya a very broad range of products to remain competititive and a significant part of what they sell needs to move quickly and unfortunately, a lot is thrown away because it isn't sold before its sell-by date. They do not choose to have low margins -- they simply have no other option. Someone else will undercut them if they raise their prices too much.

  44. Trustworthy Sources of Slashdot by Thruen · · Score: 1

    reported for the Post, which is owned by Amazon.

    Why are we linking to shitty sources that lie, and including their lies in the summary? That Bustle article that's quoted has a clear grudge, they try to paint Amazon as big evil even after explaining the practice is commonplace among grocers. The stltoday article is a straight-up reprint of the original WaPo article that just doesn't link back to the original or the original sources. Bustle links back to the same WaPo article no less than five times, suggesting it's really just a repackaging of the same article, and it is, they just write it with more of an obvious grudge against Amazon. Hey David, maybe take the "editor" bit out of your name, you don't edit anything you fool. You can't even filter out bullshit repackaged month-old stories.

  45. Still Overpriced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Went into the local Whole Foods about a week after their first price cut. Their rotisserie chicken, a small dried out thing, priced dropped from $10 to $9.99. Sorry but their other store items are about twice the price of any competitor.

  46. huh. marketing is a thing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shocking!

  47. Actually, normal practice for Retail Food by gordguide · · Score: 1

    I am not at all surprised by the findings. It succinctly summarizes the retail Food Industry in first-world nations.

    During "one of those conversations" ... note that this is purely anecdotical ... a casual acquaintance piped in about a discussion on the day's grocery purchases and people's general food buying preferences. I liked Safeway, due to the quality of fresh meat and produce offered there, and someone said that they shopped at The Great Canadian Superstore, another food reseller in western Canada, owned by the Weston family, a massive conglomerate of food industry companies that dominate the Canadian market. They claimed Safeway food prices were "too high".

    I replied that careful shopping (using a list being the most prominent) meant I didn't pay any more and that Superstore meat was of marginal cut quality (the grades were fine; but if you bought, say, a tray of Pork Chops, underneath the nice looking cuts were others that "looked like they were cut with a chainsaw").

    Then the acquaintance piped up. He said he and his family had participated in a study by the Canadian Federal Government consumer agency whereby they created a standard shopping list, buying whatever they normally did but sticking strictly to the list they created themselves, and shopping at four major food resellers, alternating by month.

    "The overall grocery bill was the same. There was almost no difference. You might save here, but they nail you there. The specific items changed from store to store, with one item lower in price while it may be higher elsewhere, but in the end, taken as a basket of goods, there was no difference. None"

    I fully expect(ed) that Whole Foods, which is not "the same as everybody else" price-wise, would have the essentially the same outcome, in that, taken as a basket of goods, the overall price would be unchanged from before the Amazon buyout.

    1. Re:Actually, normal practice for Retail Food by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's just based on a false premise. Why would anyone not buy at multiple stores to get the best price on each individual item? That's what I do. That and buy in bulk items which don't spoil when the price is lowest?
      As for Whole Foods, just as an example 90/10 ground beef is over $10 a pound. Walmart sells it for $3.28. I can often find a local grocer who has a sale on it for $1.83. If I go and buy only ground beef and not the 100 other items that have been marked up to support the sale I come out ahead.

    2. Re:Actually, normal practice for Retail Food by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good thing gas for driving between those stores is free.

      And that you don't have anything better to do with your time.

    3. Re:Actually, normal practice for Retail Food by gordguide · · Score: 1

      That's just based on a false premise. Why would anyone not buy at multiple stores to get the best price on each individual item? That's what I do. That and buy in bulk items which don't spoil when the price is lowest?
      As for Whole Foods, just as an example 90/10 ground beef is over $10 a pound. Walmart sells it for $3.28. I can often find a local grocer who has a sale on it for $1.83. If I go and buy only ground beef and not the 100 other items that have been marked up to support the sale I come out ahead.

      Absolutely. But it takes time, and careful record keeping, it might mean putting up with mounds of flyers in the mailbox (you can't just indicate "grocery stores only"; I have a "No Flyers" label on my mailbox, and that takes care of almost all junk mail except that where the originator pays the much higher rate to the Post Office, whom guarantee delivery to every address in the zip code / postal code paid for). Still the newsprint variety is essentially non-existant in my home.

      So that means checking online. Not difficult to do, just difficult to endure over time.

      If you don't want to do either, that means physically visiting a group of stores, and keeping records on your smartphone (probably). That is, as a matter of fact, what I do. But the list of "price check" items is relatively short ... certainly not my entire basket of goods, so the rest comes from memory and familiarization, which again I don't find difficult, just tedious.

      But here's the thing ... I only really began doing these things in earnest when illness forced me to live with a much reduced income. At my working salary, I cared a little less, which is not to say not at all, but still, it meant in at least some cases I just put stuff in the cart and left, done for the month (supplanted by weekly trips for smaller quantities of fresh fruit, dairy, and meat). Not any more, but I am not the average consumer anymore either.

      Most consumers want to "get in and get out" ... it may be the only category of retail where most women won't shop around; they see it as drudgery to buy for the family, week in and week out. Males ... most simply don't care beyond minimizing the amount of time spent shopping for groceries.

      You can game the system just as the system can game you. But guess which one happens more often?

  48. Game Changers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Aldi and Lidl grocery stores are upsetting the game a bit, as their market space only partly overlaps the major grocery chains.
    Many items are offered as one brand - private label, which does lower upstream costs. Many items offered at the major grocery chains are not offered at all.
    Store layout seems to violate the usual practice of trying to keep customers in the store longer to increase the amount of "temptation" purchases. My time in store to get the planned on items seems to be less.
    How the other stores react to this remains to be seen.

    1. Re:Game Changers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aldi and Lidl have moved a bit upmarket in the last fifteen years or so. In the past, they only offered private label products and everything was purposefully engineered to look cheap. They now offer quite a lot of organic products and things that would have been to expensive to offer when they were specialised in bare-bones budget products. They also seem to be making less of an effort to make the shops look as cheap as possible.

  49. Re:No price changes for amber ale... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...but not the guy with two websites dedicated to his mediocrity, his twelve cashew accounts here, and his various delusions about his relevance?

  50. If you are shopping based on cheap prices by nedlohs · · Score: 2

    You aren't shopping at whole foods in the first place. So who cares?

  51. Re:No price changes for amber ale... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    200$ PER MONTH!? Chris, you're so full of shit even the shit flies are repulsed.

    http://www.sandiegocounty.gov/...

    http://www.sandiegocounty.gov/...

    It's TWO THOUSAND dollars per month! Your tiny reptilian brain simply saw the number 200, completely ignored the % sign, and just made up a bullshit story on the spot.

  52. Re:No price changes for amber ale... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How exactly does spam-bombing his comments on Slashdot change any of that?

    The websites are not going away. The fat cashew accounts have been quiet for a week, probably because the AC running them got bored after a month. Every entrepreneur has delusions about relevance.

  53. Re:No price changes for amber ale... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Chris, bitching about it in the comments changes nothing. Don't like it? Complain to the management.
    PS: Chris, the word "entrepreneur" is French, it relates to being enterprising, doing things. What have you done?

  54. Re:No price changes for amber ale... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're probably the same guy started the support group. Must be lonely talking to yourself and lashing out at Chris all the time from hurting your covfefe.

  55. Re:No price changes for amber ale... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "You wouldn't know that since you got the dollar sign on the wrong side and you're not a US citizen. Don't let that inconvenient fact get in the way of your stupidity."

    You enumerated TWO "facts", yet you refer to "that" fact, Chris. I know your crammar, I can smell your bullshit through my screen. You're not even original enough to come up with new "catchphrases". Don't let THOSE inconvenient facts get in the way of your deceptive bullshittyness.

    You said "you can only make $200 or less per month. I make $4,250+ per month.". That is the present tense.

    Then you said as AC "" The $200 figure that creimer quoted was from 2011 when he worked 20 hours per month at $16/hr for six months""

    So which is it? Is that 200$ figure for NOW or six years ago, you fat failure? This is your typical argument style, Chris, just randomly changing your story around as your fat ADHD brain rattles along from one moment to the next.

    "he income limit for a single person is $1307. Creimer makes THREE TIMES"

    It's a federal limit, so whether you're sleeping in a garbage bin in Santa Clara or San Diego is irrelevant.

    Chris, talking about yourself in the third person is extremely unhealthy, even David Miscavige isn't that narcissistic. That 200$ figure is meaningless since the limit is a federally mandated number connected to the poverty level, not your income.

    Chris, take a breather. You're making an even bigger fool of yourself. Hard to believe when you weigh 375 pounds, but there you go.

  56. Note to industry consultant... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... we shop at three or four different places just for groceries, and it's really clear what is cheaper where, and what to buy where. You can top 100 yourself all you want, it's not going to lull me into thinking the other 3 stores aren't cheaper on many different items. Yawn.

  57. Re:No price changes for amber ale... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "You're probably the same guy [MISSING A WORD HERE, CHRIS] started the support group"

    Yes, Chris, I am. Your crammar alone deserves its own group!

    " Must be lonely talking to yourself "

    It's just you, your twelve personalities, and your "team". The amount of effort you are putting into this is incredible. The entertainment I get in return for typing a few paragraphs in a Tokyo cyber-café is worth it!

    " lashing out at Chris all the time from hurting your covfefe."

    Not even sure what you're trying to convey here, Chris.

  58. Their reputation prevents me by dasgoober · · Score: 1

    from shopping at WF, because I know they'll be more expensive.
    The only time that I shop there is as a last resort, when some fruit/veg are going out of season, in the chance that they might have a better selection.

  59. IF YOU LIKE CREIMER YOU'LL LIKE THESE GUYS!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can't get enough CREIMER???
    If you love C.D.Reimer's writing sure to rate these other POSITIVE KARMA creimer pen-names!!!

            Anonymous Cashews:
      https://slashdot.org/~Anonymous+Cashews

            I Tape Fat Cashews:
      https://slashdot.org/~ITapeFatCashews

  60. POSITIVE KARMA CREIMER SOCKS ENCLOSED!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can't get enough CREIMER?????
    If you love C.D.Reimer's writing sure to rate these other POSITIVE KARMA creimer pen-names!!!

            Anonymous Cashews:
    https://slashdot.org/~Anonymous+Cashews

            I Tape Fat Cashews:
    https://slashdot.org/~ITapeFatCashews

  61. Re:No price changes for amber ale... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This support group?

    I tried to join it but the guy running it hasn't approved my membership BUT!!!

    I can tell you hate it so:
    https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/creimer_support/info
    https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/creimer_support/info
    https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/creimer_support/info
    https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/creimer_support/info
    https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/creimer_support/info

  62. Amazon Doesn't Own WaPo by ImprovOmega · · Score: 1

    This is one of those lies that I first heard from Trump and he keeps repeating even though it's false. Amazon does NOT own the Washington Post, Jeff Bezos owns the Washington Post and happens to also be the CEO of Amazon. This does not place WaPo under Amazon's control.

  63. Amazon Does Not Own Washington Post by bird · · Score: 1

    Amazon does not own the Washington Post. Jeff Bezos != Amazon.