Slashdot Mirror


Apple Fires Engineer After His Daughter's iPhone X Video Goes Viral (engadget.com)

"In a brutal reminder of the secrecy tech companies enforce on employees, Apple recently fired an employee after his daughter posted a video of the iPhone X," writes long-time Slashdot reader HockeyPuck. Engadget reports: His daughter took down the video as soon as Apple requested it, but the takedown came too late to prevent the clip from going viral, leading to seemingly endless reposts and commentary... [I]t's important to stress that this wasn't a garden variety iPhone X. As an employee device, it had sensitive information like codenames for unreleased products and staff-specific QR codes. Combine that with Apple's general prohibition of recording video on campus (even at relatively open spaces like Caffe Macs) and this wasn't so much about maintaining the surprise as making sure that corporate secrets didn't get out. Apple certainly didn't want to send the message that recording pre-release devices was acceptable. All the same, it's hard not to sympathize -- the [radiofrequecy] engineer had poured his heart into the iPhone X, only to be let go the week before the handset reaches customers.
In a new follow-up video, the former Apple engineer's daughter says "I had no idea this was a violation," adding that her father "takes full reponsibility for letting me film his iPhone X." Here's some more quotes from her video.

  • "I made this little innocent video that was just supposed to be a fun memory of me and my family... It suddenly went viral, and I have no idea how my video got so much attention considering how many other iPhone X videos there are out there from other YouTubers..."
  • "At the end of the day when you work for Apple, it doesn't matter how good of a person you are, if you break a rule, they just have no tolerance. They had to do what they had to do. I'm not mad at Apple. I'm not going to stop buying Apple products. Rules are in place for the happiness and for the safety of workers, and my dad takes absolutely full responsibility for the one rule that he broke."
  • "It was an innocent thing, and to be honest I think Apple is going to do a much better job from here on out in addressing the rules and making sure that everybody is aware of the rules. And it was an innocent mistake, and he fully apologizes."
  • "We're not angry. We're not bitter. My dad had a really great run at Apple, and he appreciates that company for everything they did for his career. My dad's gonna be okay... And yeah, I don't think he deserves this, but we're okay. We're good."
  • [She breaks into tears when defending her father from critical commenters on YouTube.] "Apple really did like my dad. And they let him go. Because -- because he broke a rule. So my advice to people out there is to just not overlook rules when you're in the workplace or when you're in school or when you're at home."

326 comments

  1. X employee by turkeydance · · Score: 4, Funny

    iPhuckedup

    1. Re:X employee by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 2

      No more iPhones for the daughter, though. She'll get a Lumia for Christmas.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    2. Re:X employee by KiloByte · · Score: 1

      She'll get a Lumia for Christmas.

      As they're in US, that's illegal. 8th Amendment.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    3. Re:X employee by jarkus4 · · Score: 1

      8th amendment only applies to government so he is free to punish her this way.

    4. Re:X employee by Ramze · · Score: 5, Insightful

      She's a kid who explained she didn't know she broke a rule, and her father takes full responsibility for not informing her so that the rule wouldn't have been broken. It was his job, his workplace, and his decision to bring his daughter to work... and didn't tell her not to film the visit, nor did he stop her at any time while chaperoning her through sensitive areas to inform her to stop filming/delete the video / not post it online for others to see. This was all on the parent, not the child. He may as well have brought a film crew into the R&D area. What moron doesn't have a "what not to do while on this trip" conversation with their child before going into a sensitive area? Who in their right mind would think a kid of this day and age wouldn't have a phone on them and wouldn't be using it for social media unless you explicitly told them to put the thing away or took it from them? How hard is it to tell your own kid NOT to take any photo or video while at daddy's super secretive workplace? Or to at least smack the device out of their hands when you see them holding it up filming?!?!?

      Guy deserved to be fired and made an example of, but still sucks for everyone -- Apple loses an otherwise good employee and he loses a sweet job... and a family is impacted by it.

      also, you mean *sore and *college , though butts soaring through the air and expensive photo collages are interesting images to invoke.

    5. Re:X employee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      "a butt so soar she can't sit for a week."

      Go back to the 1920s and stay there.

    6. Re:X employee by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      Why? Sitting for a week isn't good for you anyway. You're supposed to have a walk every now and then.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    7. Re: X employee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Ladies and gentlemen! I present to you.... (drum roll)... The Problem With Today's Society!

      Ever wonder why children do stupid shit and behave like out of control monsters? There's a parenting strategy for that, and the guy above me is selling the handbook.

    8. Re:X employee by dwywit · · Score: 0

      I'm in awe. Someone who never made a mistake.

      It's...... beautiful.

      Except for the bit where you advocate corporal punishment. You should seek some help.

      Even if you were joking, you need help.

      P.S. if Daddy was working for Apple, he'll have a decent CV, which will get him a job elsewhere - you know these Silicon Valley types.

      So transparent.

      --
      They sentenced me to twenty years of boredom
    9. Re:X employee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      "butt so soar"

      So how high will her butt be soaring?

    10. Re:X employee by BlacKSacrificE · · Score: 2, Insightful

      you know these Silicon Valley types

      The guy allowed a breach of NDA. That's a fundamental rule in any shop that deals with products that ship more than 10 units per production round. He'll never work at that level again, as far as the big end of Silicon Valley is concerned, his name is mud.

      --
      [Sorry, this signature is unavailable in your country/region]
    11. Re: X employee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ****shit. I lived in SV for half a decade, there is no blacklisting for a mistake. Like everywhere else, its who you know. If he has friends at Google or Facebook he will have no problem landing another gig.

      Besides the smaller to mid-tier SV shops pay better anyway. I was making 200k at Roku just doing DevOps.

    12. Re:X employee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      She's a kid

      Not a kid.

      Just childish.

    13. Re: X employee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or...the entire saga was dreampt up and orhestrated by Apple.
      as they say 'there's no such thing as bad publicity.'

    14. Re:X employee by GrumpySteen · · Score: 3, Informative

      Going by her YouTube videos, she's an adult with her own house, her own husband (who already graduated from college) and a Pilates studio that she's selling (or sold) because she prefers to make movies.

      Her father isn't likely to be deciding anything about what phone she buys, she's probably done with education and hitting an adult (even your child) is assault, which is a punishable crime even if the victim doesn't want to cooperate in pressing charges.

    15. Re:X employee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Nah, he just wont work for an evil company again, this rules out Apple, Google, and a number of others. Facebook it's hit or miss but this wouldn't be a great start.

      Ignoring that as for RF engineering he will have no trouble finding work but maybe less hip products than the X.

    16. Re: X employee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah if only Hitlers parents would have treated him like it was 1920...

    17. Re: X employee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kid allowed to post videos online... seems like bad parenting

    18. Re: X employee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's BS... They are so god damn much behind everyone else ... that they have no god damn secrets that any competitor would want... Jeez

    19. Re:X employee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting


      The guy allowed a breach of NDA. That's a fundamental rule in any shop that deals with products that ship more than 10 units per production round.

      Your comments sound fascist and unduly harsh to me. That's extremely disturbing. The fact that people actually upvoted this comment is even worse.

      If this post is any indication, we're headed to a dreadful future where people defend undue punishment for "breaking the rules". That is the essence of a totalitarian society.

    20. Re: X employee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All you kids, get off my lawn...

    21. Re: X employee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personally, I love to give a punch to the jaw. And neckchaining them to
      a tree with a towing chain and a big
      heavy padlock.

    22. Re: X employee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Except that beatings don't work. You get the same bad behavior, just now it's done in secret with care taken that the parents don't find out about it.

      It's definitely not the way to raise children that grow into proper adults. There's a reason why there are so many restrictions on that stuff that didn't exist back in the '20s.

    23. Re:X employee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      TBH, this is just a case of Apple being assholes. The iPhone X is being released in a few days, the competition isn't going to be able to steal any of the technology and implement it faster because of the leak.

      This is just a case of Apple wanting to be control freaks about their marketing and general assholes.

      OTOH, when you work for the company of the douchebag hipsters, you should expect this kind of treatment.

    24. Re:X employee by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      Societies with corporal punishment of children produces adults who are keen to go abroad and conquer new territory.

      Beat your children for ze Fatherland!

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    25. Re: X employee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Beatings, no. Spanking, though, a resounding yes.

    26. Re: X employee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Spanking is beating, it has all the same problems associated with it. You're training the kid to equate getting caught with being punished, not necessarily the connection between doing something wrong and being punished.

      What's more, the parents that use violence as punishment are usually not terribly bright to begin with, which means there's an excellent chance that they couldn't explain why the rules were how they were.

      When all is said and done, punishment is rather pointless if you're not also doing the work of making sure that the kids understand what the desired outcome is and why. In most cases, you're better off rewarding good behavior than trying to punish bad behavior.

    27. Re:X employee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What she should be getting is a feature phone and a butt so soar she can't sit for a week.

      Are you suggesting her father should butt-fuck her really hard? That's sick.

    28. Re:X employee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      hitting an adult (even your child) is assault

      Complete horseshit. If you actually hit someone then it's battery not assault.

    29. Re:X employee by BasilBrush · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's more even that that. The dad appears in the video, and is at one stage demoing animated emojis to his daughters camera. He just didn't seem to be aware that this was a problem himself.

    30. Re: X employee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This from the Zero Tolerance Generation. Pretty Pathetic and one more reason for choosing freedom.

    31. Re: X employee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      How does disrespecting your kids teach them anything but insecurity?

    32. Re:X employee by 0123456 · · Score: 0

      "Your comments sound fascist and unduly harsh to me."

      1. Doesn't know what fascism is.
      2. Thinks sacking someone for breaking a contract is 'unduly harsh'.

      Let me guess: you're a Millenial Snowflake?

    33. Re: X employee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Way to ruin the joke, pedant.

    34. Re: X employee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sound like a fag.

    35. Re: X employee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      sadly hitler had involvement with the church and people that coddled him rather than disciplining him, perhaps he could have turned out different if he had had a few swift kicks up the jaxy when he was young.

    36. Re: X employee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      punishment doesn't teach getting caught results in punishment at least not for any smart child, it teaches a child that actions have consequences, something that is sadly lacking with many children that are babied in today's society where they have inherited a complete lack of understanding around consequences by bad parenting you are pushing. That punishment shouldn't be a beating, but a quick slap to the bum can do many a world of good.

    37. Re:X employee by mysidia · · Score: 1

      chaperoning her through sensitive areas to inform her to stop filming/delete the video / not post it online for others to see.

      Naw.... If the company is seriously concerned about people filming/taking pictures in certain areas, they would do what other companies do that are concerned about these things and have a strong security presence, bringing the guest in would have clear ground rules spelled out on that very day, and they would detect a kid coming in filming things in about 2 seconds, And some random kid wouldn't even get in the building without acknowledging security requirements verbally and signing for a visitor badge.

      If they're in places where the general public has access to (No security presence restricting access to employees), then they can't reasonably hold the parent responsible as an employee for their kid having access to that place and filming things there --- now filming the iPhone X is another matter, But "violation" for filming by the kid should require that some sensitive and not already publicly-available knowledge or information was exposed.

    38. Re:X employee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What she should be getting is a feature phone and a butt so soar she can't sit for a week.

      I think pederastic sodomy is a wee bit much of a punishment, don't you think?

    39. Re: X employee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple can make all the rules it wants, but through on outlet or another things will still be leaked. The event will simply find another path if casality and timing but still happen anyway due to human nature and the tendency of information to find a way through .and the fact that companies are made of people. In the end it's a net loss for apple because now they lost a great engineer all for the sake of illusion of power, while changing nothing for the pisitive

    40. Re: X employee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd say the snowflakes are the ones who can't deal with a world where people are responsible for themselves. That worship of legaliyy that demands one to be subservient to an external authority in exchange for the illusion of safety. And Foster demand that no one should dare live free of the artificial rulesets and social chains that have grown so familiar as to be come a unhealthy codepedency that will justify even the removal of another s freedom just to maintain that illusion of safety and familarity, demonizing those who would dare believe themselves worthy of self soveriegnity. It's might makes right choice vered with a sugar coated lie to make it appear more palatable

    41. Re: X employee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because instead of being taught to create their own steps and approach to life, and to create their own values, instead are taught they don't have a choice, you have to do this, you don't matter, do it anyway. It's not our creation, so we don't feel responsible for fallout due to it's demands being met or not. That mess was already here before I was born, it wasn't my idea to have society work the way it currently does, so why should I feel any personal loyalty to it?

    42. Re: X employee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the consequence is not percieved to be natural or in gaming terms, player vs, environment, then all it teaches is that is you can summon an emotion and justify it to yourself then it is not only advantagous but appropriate to hurt people until they do what you want. That's player vs player, which spawns rivalry, vengeance and ensures that contention and war is simply the way things work

    43. Re:X employee by torkus · · Score: 1

      Actually, having and enforcing rules instead of literally hiring babysitters for adults to 'remind' them not to do things they already know are wrong...is pretty stupid IMHO.

      Most of the people reading this thread know that Apple is hugely secretive about unreleased products despite not (likely) ever having worked for Apple. Someone who DID work for them couldn't possibly have been unaware...and having babysitters is ridiculous. Sucks he got fired and all, but it's also not unexpected.

      --
      You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
    44. Re:X employee by ilsaloving · · Score: 1

      That is the essence of a totalitarian society.

      If it looks like a rose and smells like a rose...

      You do realize that business has worked this way for a while now, yes? *Especially* companies like Apple. Hell, we as people now *define* ourselves by our brand choices, to the point of hating people who prefer the "opposite" brand.

    45. Re:X employee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad the kid didn't post the video on Hillary's server. If it had gone to Hillary's, it would have merely been hacked by the Russians, the Chinese, The North Koreans, the Iranians, and possibly the Venezuelans (plus God knows whoever else) -- but neither Apple nor anyone else would have ever found out about it. And, if WikiLeaks had obtained and released it (from Russia? from a now-dead Clinton campaign worker?), Comey would have declined to press for prosecution of it. But, if the kid had posted on Hillary's server, I guess it would have eventually have wound up on Anthony Wiener's laptop -- and that's a terrible fate.

    46. Re:X employee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When the guy was hired, he signed an agreement saying that he wouldn't make a youtube video of all this super secret Apple work that he was doing. So he has his daughter come in, who is an aspiring youtube star, and make a video of all that super secret Apple work that he was doing. What do you want Apple to do, give him a bonus?

    47. Re:X employee by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      It's unfortunate that your command of English is so poor that your post was funny.
      Would her flying buttocks have been a part of her now unaffordable art project?

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    48. Re:X employee by KingBenny · · Score: 1

      bummer ..
      another reminder : save the planet, don't breed sapients

      --
      Free speech was meant to be free for all... how can anyone grow up in a nanny state ?
    49. Re:X employee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > He'll never work at that level again

      Oh, I doubt that. He allowed his daughter to breach the NDA so she could get popular, but it got out of hand and ended up with the images copied everywhere. Some future employers will reject him out of hand, but someone who actually needs his services is likely to say "did you learn your lesson?" and, if he acknowledges what he did wrong, they won't hold it against him. They WOULD hold it against him if he had leaked the info to a rumors site in order to enrich himself, or if he blamed Apple for acting unfairly by firing him (indicating that he still didn't understand what he did wrong.)

      The people here who think Apple is in the wrong for firing him just don't understand how dependent Apple is on marketing. The iPhone is massively overpriced and designed to break easily in normal use -- it makes wild profit margins only because people believe the story Apple feeds them. Anyone who messes up the story is a big, big, big problem, it doesn't matter who they are or why they do it. That's one prime reason for the NDA, the other being protection of intellectual property.

  2. He is lucky by pablo_max · · Score: 5, Informative

    He is lucks they only fired him. Apple is extremely aggressive when it comes to this type of thing. He is also lucky that he is out now. My current company, and many others would never hire someone from Apple who was there for more than 5 years and they are most like a person who was a heave coolaid drinker and thinks they are better than everyone else.
      I worked for an Apple "Partner" in the past. My God, the hoops they had us jump through were insane. We eventually told them, thanks, but no thanks.
    The experience of dealing with Apple is the reason while to this day, I refuse to buy Apple branded anything. Biggest bunch of self righteous smug motherfuckers I have ever met in my professional career.

    1. Re:He is lucky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      My God, the hoops they had us jump through were insane.

      You mean like requiring basic English literacy? I can see how that would be daunting for you.

    2. Re:He is lucky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...My current company, and many others would never hire someone from Apple who was there for more than 5 years and they are most like a person who was a heave coolaid drinker and thinks they are better than everyone else.

      So your company holds a Judge-A-Book-By-Its-Cover hiring policy? Can't imagine how that shit would go wrong. Good luck with those lawsuits.

      ...I refuse to buy Apple branded anything. Biggest bunch of self righteous smug motherfuckers I have ever met in my professional career.

      Surely you've left the United States by now, given the self righteous smug motherfucker who's running it.

    3. Re:He is lucky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the hoops they had us jump through were insane.

      What do you mean?

    4. Re:He is lucky by Calydor · · Score: 5, Funny

      Somehow I doubt that's a requirement from the company that starts their product names with a lowercase letter, then capitalizes the second.

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    5. Re:He is lucky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a non-native speaker (I'm not OP, by the way), I'm curious what's wrong with OP's sentence.
      I know that "jump through hoops" is a common expression, meaning - according to Google - "perform a difficult and grueling series of tests at someone else's request or command".
      Seems applicable and used properly?

    6. Re: He is lucky by lokedhs · · Score: 1

      I've read the sentence you quoted multiple times, and I still can't see anything wrong with it. Perhaps you are unaware of the expression "jumping through hoops"?

    7. Re:He is lucky by jcr · · Score: 1

      Cool story, bro.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    8. Re:He is lucky by bzipitidoo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Firing is still harsh. Plus, if he was an important employee, it will be costly to replace him. It's possible he was already on the edge, one more mistake from being fired, and this was the last straw. But it doesn't sound like that at all. His daughter could be totally mistaken, her parents could have spun a big illusion to keep her from worrying, but she claims Apple liked him.

      Apple could have docked him some pay. Have him not get the bonus, accept a pay cut, even demand he take an unpaid leave of absence. Summarily firing him sends all kinds of bad messages, like that they think great engineers grow on trees and everyone leaps at the opportunity to work for the great, mighty Apple, and that they don't care about morale and expect the rest their employees to drink deep of the company Koolaid that this firing was totally justified. Must be a stressful place to work, a worse sweatshop than most top tech companies, many of which have a bad reputation that way.

      There's also a small risk this could backfire on Apple. Apple's fans and customers could feel bad about what happened, and punish Apple for it. Apple is acting just like you say, smug and self-righteous, and that too could become part of this issue which comes back to haunt them. I doubt this though. Their customers probably will never notice, and that's a shame.

      --
      Intellectual Property is a monopolistic, selfish, and defective concept. It is "tyranny over the mind of man"
    9. Re:He is lucky by taylorius · · Score: 0

      A few typos: "lucks" vs lucky, "heave" vs heavy, and "like" vs likely.
      OP needs a comma after "and many others".
      Also OP should've ended the sentence after "more than 5 years" and continued with a new sentence (too many chained "ands" are no good)

      "jump through hoops" is fine though, as you thought.

      So there are certainly some issues, but in my view it hardly fails "basic English literacy".

    10. Re:He is lucky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just a couple of typos, "lucks" should be "lucky", a comma should go after, "and many others". The last sentence of the first paragraph is known as a 'run on sentence', "heave" should be "heavy". On /., there's no editing after you hit the 'submit' button.

    11. Re:He is lucky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My God, the hoops they had us jump through were insane.

      You mean like requiring basic English literacy? I can see how that would be daunting for you.

      There's nothing wrong with this sentence, are you a even a native english speaker? It is you who are the imbecile.

    12. Re:He is lucky by jcr · · Score: 4, Interesting

      she claims Apple liked him.

      Entirely possible, but showing the device to his daughter was already a firing offense. He might have skated on that if she hadn't gone on a public forum to blab about it, but once it was all over YouTube, Apple had to let him go.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    13. Re:He is lucky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's nothing wrong with it, the poster who thinks there is is an idiot who wishes to display this aspect of his personhood prominently on the internet.

    14. Re: He is lucky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean like the company who offshores their labor to cheap 3rd world slaves?

      Yeah... I'm sure they all speak flawless English.

      Congratulations on being the smug motherfucker he was talking about.

    15. Re:He is lucky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cool signature, bro. You think nobody can read your username?

      -Anonymous Coward

    16. Re:He is lucky by war4peace · · Score: 1

      So don't hit it until you're sure?

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    17. Re:He is lucky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My current company, and many others would never hire someone from Apple who was there for more than 5 years

      Why not ?
      Where I work, we prefer applicants who have shown commitment rather than just jumping from job to job every 12-18 months.
      We want somebody who wants a career with us, not just to be another entry in their LinkedIn profile.

      Biggest bunch of self righteous smug motherfuckers I have ever met in my professional career.

      LMAO, and your attitude in this post is any different ?

    18. Re:He is lucky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I used to post here there was almost always something I messed up and didn't realize until later. Shit happens.

    19. Re:He is lucky by Freischutz · · Score: 4, Interesting

      He is lucks they only fired him. Apple is extremely aggressive when it comes to this type of thing. He is also lucky that he is out now. My current company, and many others would never hire someone from Apple who was there for more than 5 years and they are most like a person who was a heave coolaid drinker and thinks they are better than everyone else.
      I worked for an Apple "Partner" in the past. My God, the hoops they had us jump through were insane. We eventually told them, thanks, but no thanks.
      The experience of dealing with Apple is the reason while to this day, I refuse to buy Apple branded anything. Biggest bunch of self righteous smug motherfuckers I have ever met in my professional career.

      Really? In a market where there's a shortage of qualified and experienced engineers and developers your company would not hire a an engineer who worked for one of the most successful device manufacturers on the planet for years because he is a 'Cool Aid drinking' .. 'self righteous smug motherfucker' ... 'who think he's better than everybody else'? If I was hiring engineers I would not turn my nose up at a dyed in the wool Android developer if he was qualified and an experienced coder even though I am no particular fan of the Android OS or Google. Same goes for Microsoft developers, I may not like Microsoft as a company but their engineers and developers are not radioactive space zombies who breathe in oxygen and exhale mustard gas. Apart from being a generalisation of ridiculous proportions, that whole post is mostly just a steaming pile of fanboy whining that make you sound like the love child of a drama queen and a snow flake, you really should get over yourself.

    20. Re:He is lucky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple could have docked him some pay. Have him not get the bonus, accept a pay cut, even demand he take an unpaid leave of absence....

      ... cut off a hand... public whipping... brand an apple logo into his forehead...

    21. Re:He is lucky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, at least you don't have to jump through hoops to be a pedantic asshole...

    22. Re:He is lucky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, he's just German.

    23. Re:He is lucky by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Firing is still harsh. Plus, if he was an important employee, it will be costly to replace him.

      Apple doesn't have important employees any more. If they did, maybe they would have some magic, but they don't. It's replaceable cogs all the way down.

      Apple is acting just like you say, smug and self-righteous, and that too could become part of this issue which comes back to haunt them. I doubt this though. Their customers probably will never notice, and that's a shame.

      Keeping the prototype out of the hands of others was part of his job, and he didn't do it. As it so happens, it was a part of his job that Apple takes seriously. This is not news or surprising to anyone. His willful disregard for his employer means that he should be fired.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    24. Re:He is lucky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, the replier was referring to OP's post in its entirety.
      I thought he was referring exclusively to the portion he quoted.

      Thanks for the explanation.

    25. Re:He is lucky by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      Really? In a market where there's a shortage of qualified and experienced engineers and developers

      What? Who told you that? There's a surplus of them. Tech people have literally gone into other lines of work because of the lack of jobs. Ongoing consolidation in the tech industry means that there are ever-less jobs, not more. Loads of those open positions are not designed to be filled; they are designed to justify outsourcing. Apple has probably got literally filing cabinets full of resumes and databases stuffed with application data, they will be able to replace this guy (assuming he wasn't redundant and they won't bother) tomorrow.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    26. Re: He is lucky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess you're kind of like the police. They won't hire really smart people for some jobs because they'd get bored and probably leave. You need people that would be satisfied with whatever it is you do so they don't rock the boat.

    27. Re:He is lucky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I imagine that the replier actually was referring referring to the quoted text, otherwise there would be no point in quoting that specific excerpt. I also see that as a ironic failure in the replier's own understanding of English, as nothing else in the original post (including the very minor typing errors pointed out by taylorius) are severe enough to indicate a problem with English literacy.

    28. Re:He is lucky by Junta · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'm not the parent poster, but at a company that has dealt with Apple.

      At least in a business relationship, they are quite abusive to their vendors. Of course, every company is as abusive to their vendors as they can afford to be, and Apple's position is such they can be really abusive.

      Beyond that, they would also put out crazy requirements that would cause expensive work to meet, and then select a vendor that didn't meet any of those requirements because ultimately the only metric that matters is cost. This wouldn't be so bad if they did not insist up front that these things were a hard requirement and not doing them would mean disqualification. The only time my business 'won', it meant bidding under cost, foolishly thinking that would kickstart the relationship, but no. We are also in the list of companies that go for the greener pastures in the market and happily ignore apple, as there is plenty of money to be made elsewhere.

      The thing is I wonder how their long term quality will be, if this is their attitude. As they ignore their requirements for cost savings, and more and more companies learn that bidding under cost isn't going to work, what happens to Apple?

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    29. Re:He is lucky by serviscope_minor · · Score: 3, Informative

      This is not news or surprising to anyone. His willful disregard for his employer means that he should be fired.

      Meh: it's just a phone. An expensive one, sure, but still just a phone.

      The government generally has a much more pragmatic attitude: they have been doing it longer and the secrets are more important (life or death in some cases). What they have found the hard way by bitter experience is if you massively crack down on rule breakers then you give people a really satrong incentive to cover up when they fuck up.

      That actually tends to compound things and make bad mistakes really really bad.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    30. Re: He is lucky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the irony is lost on this kind...

    31. Re:He is lucky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Were you asleep during the last 15 years? Do you not recall Apple obliterating Think Secret? If anything, Apple's reaction to what anyone conscious during the last 15 years would have known was a dumb thing to do, was mild, merely termination, no charges. I don't agree with Apple's methods, but I recognize them, and I am aware of their MO, and this awareness makes your post obtuse.

    32. Re: He is lucky by sound+vision · · Score: 1, Troll

      My guess as to why Apple was so horrified over this particular leak is that it showed the new iPhone being played with as a child's toy. Apple has reason to be particularly sensitive about this model - they see the hype train is losing steam, as well as the sales figures. I know that whenever I hear "iPad", the images that come to my head are of kids smearing their fingers all over one trying to punch the monkey, or my last workplace literally bolting one to the wall as an example of corporate waste (although that was certainly not their intention). Spotting an iProduct in these places doesn't promote the image Apple wants for their brand.

    33. Re: He is lucky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If he had âoecovered it upâ, then there most likely wouldnâ(TM)t have been a problem. Putting a video on YouTube is kind of the opposite of hiding your infraction.

    34. Re:He is lucky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is not news or surprising to anyone. His willful disregard for his employer means that he should be fired.

      Meh: it's just a phone. An expensive one, sure, but still just a phone.

      Such statements are not compatible with being an Apple employee either.

    35. Re:He is lucky by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      It's possible he was already on the edge, one more mistake from being fired, and this was the last straw. But it doesn't sound like that at all.

      There are zero tolerance rules for even the best out there. The better companies enforce them equally on all employees.

      Apple could have docked him some pay. Have him not get the bonus, accept a pay cut, even demand he take an unpaid leave of absence. Summarily firing him sends all kinds of bad messages

      That depends on the circumstances. If there was clear policy that was broken and the punishment was end of employment then firing him sends all kinds of GOOD messages, like the ones that say "we stand by the rules we set". I'm not sure about this case specifically but Apple is quite well known for this kind of thing.

      drink deep of the company Koolaid that this firing was totally justified. Must be a stressful place to work

      You're making a lot of completely unjustified assumptions.

      Apple's fans and customers could feel bad about what happened, and punish Apple for it.

      Apple fans and customers happily let the company shit on them, tell them they are holding things wrong, let their devices bend in their pockets, and do things *directly* to them, and they don't punish Apple. No one will care about one guy getting fired. Most people won't even know. Of those who do know, most won't remember this happened tomorrow.

    36. Re: He is lucky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The daughter was a full grown adult, which is probably why he got fired. If she'd been some teenager or pre-teen posting on YouTube he probably would have got his wrist slapped, but she was a full grown, married adult who he should probably not even have given access to the Apple campus who he allowed to record video while there.

    37. Re:He is lucky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well its a mac.com email address so arrogance is expected.

    38. Re:He is lucky by v1 · · Score: 2

      I think it's not just about repercussions, but also about sending a message. Every now and then someone takes a step WAY over the line and Apple has to give them a public flogging to remind the rest of the employees that they need to take that NDA they signed very seriously.

      People complaining about Apple being nasty..... no, not really. If Apple had filed a lawsuit against this guy, then OK that's taking it too far. But they ARE within their right to do so. So anyone that says they "took it too far" isn't looking at how far they can go. He's in breech of contact, and has caused harm to Apple that they can probably prove some value of in court. I think this guy got exactly what he deserved, no more, and no less.

      I wonder has everyone forgotten the last time this happened? The guy that left a prototype iPhone at a bar? It's not like Apple hasn't been periodically reminding people how seriously they take their trade secrets. This engineer was well-aware of it and was still careless.

      I bet the next engineer to take a prototype home will have this in mind when his kid begs him to show off his prototype. And that's precisely why Apple had to do it.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    39. Re:He is lucky by quantaman · · Score: 2

      Firing is still harsh. Plus, if he was an important employee, it will be costly to replace him. It's possible he was already on the edge, one more mistake from being fired, and this was the last straw. But it doesn't sound like that at all. His daughter could be totally mistaken, her parents could have spun a big illusion to keep her from worrying, but she claims Apple liked him.

      As the saying goes, the graveyard is full of indispensable people. I'm sure he was a good employee, but he will be replaced.

      Apple could have docked him some pay. Have him not get the bonus, accept a pay cut, even demand he take an unpaid leave of absence. Summarily firing him sends all kinds of bad messages

      Firing him sent exactly the message they wanted, leak company secrets and you get fired.

      Apple more than any other IT company is a marketing company, the secrecy that surrounds their new products is part of their marketing campaign. That means you need to be extremely harsh on someone who leaks anything because a single screenshot can spill the beans on a major new product announcement.

      --
      I stole this Sig
    40. Re:He is lucky by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      Meh: it's just a phone. An expensive one, sure, but still just a phone.

      No, that's the point. Apple's selling hype, not just phones. And he gave the hype away for free. All that leaves is a phone, and lots of companies are able to sell those.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    41. Re: He is lucky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd be hesitant to take grammar advice from a guy who makes six comma splices and other comma errors in a 3 sentence response.

    42. Re:He is lucky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is pretty dumb. There are two different tech worlds. Silicon Valley, and the world of highly visible consumer facing market leading product technologies is not the same as whatever you're describing. People aren't leaving because there are less jobs. They aren't outsourcing these jobs. They can't hire the people they desire in the numbers they want. There's not consolidation going on between Google, Apple, Facebook, Microsoft, etc.. These companies and plenty of other smaller successful companies, are growing and actively hiring anyone they can that they think is good.

      One engineer who can't follow his NDA isn't a significant loss to them. But make no mistake, they have tons of positions they want to fill, can't fill, and aren't outsourcing. Anyone on linked in with any reasonably well known Silicon Valley Tech Company on their resume is getting several recruiter mails a week who are desperate to hire them.

    43. Re:He is lucky by alexo · · Score: 1

      brand an apple logo into his forehead...

      So you're saying Harry Potter worked for Opel?

    44. Re:He is lucky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stocks, right by the employee entrance. Bins of cafeteria waste at hand for employees to throw. 24 hours.

      No guard provided for bunghole, it's the bay area...he hopes nobody puts him on Grindr.

      Apple leaves the stocks up as warning.

    45. Re:He is lucky by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      His daughter generated unscheduled hype. Messing with Apple's carefully laid plans.

      Depending on just how viral the video went, she might have earned a few years worth of bay area engineer's salary. She would have had to have the parts in place with youtube etc.

      I doubt it was very lucrative, just not enough fanbois.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    46. Re:He is lucky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > it meant bidding under cost

      This must be doubly insulting, giving that Apple products are sold at a hefty premium. These aren't low-margin Dell laptops or Android phones here; Apple makes at least a 50% markup on its phones and similar with its laptops (you can buy a Windows gaming laptop for less than the price of a MacBook; and the ones I've seen are quad-core).

      Heck, for years, the Apple TV was their only fairly priced product, but they went and increased that as well.

    47. Re: He is lucky by sound+vision · · Score: 1

      Wow... That just makes the whole story even sadder.

    48. Re:He is lucky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's true. when I worked at microsoft, in our windows support/test/dev space we co-shared the building with mac support/test/dev and oh boy were those apple folks truly self-righteous. it's okay. they like good looks but sure as hell could not figure out how to get a matrox video card install in their mac so i helped them out and showed them, see. don't need a computer engineering degree to figure this out.. i''m a farm boy from kansas and its just as easy as plug and play. doh!

      we had a guy at microsoft that did some pretty bad stuff, and though HR management fired him per corporate policy, the same leadership and management he worked for turned right around and rehired him and doubled his pay and had a frank discussion and meeting with HR and said, fine, your rules.. our company... now.. let's revise your HR benefits for your HR team and your lack of ... you know the drill. fine.. you win the battle, we win the war... time to outsource HR, yet keep legal internal.. and close.

      what a bad day for Apple. the apple folks I worked with were pretty good once they knew i knew what they knew... pro, priest, zealot.. me pro, they priest, and yes we had some linux zealots. ;-) one big happy family.

    49. Re:He is lucky by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      I suspect your dislike of Apple isn't shared by your company at all. It'd be a pretty dumb move for a technology company not to hire Apple developers if they were available and affordable.

    50. Re:He is lucky by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1

      I have a different view. Ever notice how every single time Apple releases a big new product there's a controversy? Remember when some Apple employee forgot their prototype iPhone in a bar?

      I think he was going to leave, anyway, and the PR folks put together a cool scenario where he got fired because of his daughter's video. And now people on Slashdot are talking about Apple and iPhone X. Or, go fully cynical with me - she's not his daughter, he never worked at Apple and they're both simply paid actors.

      I don't believe the story, frankly. Had they canned him they would almost certainly have demanded some sort of "gag order" in the final terms. I just think it's a publicity stunt that worked wonderfully.

    51. Re:He is lucky by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Funny, as a native speaker with a high standardized English comprehension level I was also curious what was wrong, mostly just so I could laugh at the false-pedant. Unfortunately, it was just typos and not even entertaining.

    52. Re: He is lucky by Brockmire · · Score: 1

      Very similar dealing with Indian companies like Tata. Some of the requirements were nonsensical, yet the competition wrote something down on the RFP so we had to play the game. They don't give a shit that they bankrupt their partners, not realizing they are fucking useless and need the hand holding support.

    53. Re: He is lucky by Brockmire · · Score: 0

      If you're still with Microsoft, explains a lot. How much of a cunt do you have to be to avoid using caps in your post? You write like a fucking kid in a basement.

    54. Re:He is lucky by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Apple doesn't have important employees any more.

      Presumably a radio frequency engineer is doing QA on their implementation of the radio chip's reference design, so easily replaced. Secrecy is most of the job, the only reason to even do it in-house when production happens somewhere else.

    55. Re:He is lucky by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      The government generally has a much more pragmatic attitude

      Yeah, secure points of entry.

      It is the engineer's fault because they don't have site security; but in a perfect world somebody else would have prevented the situation and he wouldn't have to be good at it.

    56. Re:He is lucky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      showing the device to his daughter was already a firing offense.

      Have you got evidence for that or did you just make it up?

    57. Re:He is lucky by gravewax · · Score: 1

      Showing friends and family would be a sacking offense, this went well beyond that. I would say they had absolutely zero choice here as they could not risk setting a legal precedent that you can get away with such a massive breach of your employment contract.

    58. Re:He is lucky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's also a small risk this could backfire on Apple. Apple's fans and customers could feel bad about what happened, and punish Apple for it.

      lol...thanks. I needed that :)

    59. Re:He is lucky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I lost you at Microsoft.

      At least Apple is full of successful assholes making successful products.

      Softies are just irredeemable soulless assholes.

    60. Re:He is lucky by jcr · · Score: 1

      I read the NDAs I signed, sparky.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    61. Re:He is lucky by fyzikapan · · Score: 1

      Firing is not harsh. It's the standard at big tech companies. I guarantee I'd have been escorted off campus had I handed over piles of SEMs and TEMs to non-employees.

    62. Re: He is lucky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. His first violation of the NDA for that project was letting an undisclosed person handle the device. The video was another violation of the NDA, and a violation of facility rules. This is now a pattern. Who else did he show the phone to? He *agreed* to be fired when he signed his general NDA, and the project specific NDA. I have no sympathy for him.

    63. Re:He is lucky by Gussington · · Score: 2

      At least in a business relationship, they are quite abusive to their vendors. Of course, every company is as abusive to their vendors as they can afford to be,

      I think this is more at the big end of town, where even a typo can cost millions of dollars. This is why I moved out of big business into medium sized. You still have enough money to do cool stuff, but you don't have as many over-ambitious fuckwits trying to shit on you at every opportunity. Now my vendors are more like partners. We work together and most people behave like adults.

    64. Re:He is lucky by Gussington · · Score: 1

      Summarily firing him sends all kinds of bad messages.

      It sends the most important message Apple cares about, confidentiality is more important than your job.
      Given how much Apple despises leaks, this was the only course action they could take and maintain their position. Therefore it's the right one.

    65. Re:He is lucky by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      Really? In a market where there's a shortage of qualified and experienced engineers and developers

      I definitely experience this issue regularly in business.

      There's a surplus of them. Tech people have literally gone into other lines of work because of the lack of jobs.

      Someone who has a PHD in computer science but applies to work in for example a datacenter systems architect role but has no knowledge or qualifications in the work, not even as a passing interest or hobby is of no use. They get informed they don't have the experience or knowledge for this particular work and what they need for it. Someone with just a computer science PHD can't get a science R&D job because the requirements for one involves having degrees in the other sciences and mathematics, so they end up going into some other non-IT fields all together.

      This is why we have such a large amount of people who counted to be in the tech industry and why they are undesirable to most companies that require tech workers.

      Loads of those open positions are not designed to be filled; they are designed to justify outsourcing.

      As someone who does a lot of consultancy and contractor work, the biggest reason I find companies outsource is not necessarily cost, but the immediate need to get something done, particularly when you don't have the right culture, business knowledge or the right people to perform the work.

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
    66. Re:He is lucky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your username is in the post. You don't need to do "-jcr" -- slashdot clearly shows your username for everyone.

      Just an FYI.

    67. Re:He is lucky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nothing to really add to the main discussion, but I have also worked for an Apple "partner" company and know exactly what you mean. They get a bug up their butt about something, expect you to turn your entire business upside down to accommodate their wishes, and once you reach about the 51% mark, suddenly they don't care about that anymore, it's this new thing that is suddenly the most important thing in the world to them.

      Plus, sooner or later Apple will drop you either in favor of a home grown solution (ask Imagination Technologies) or some other company. The best way to handle Apple is to just tell them you're willing to accept less business from them if it means not having to jump through a never ending series of hoops. It's also important not to let Apple be the primary source of your company's revenues, because it just means you're going to go out of business when Apple goes with someone else.

      "Biggest bunch of self righteous smug motherfuckers" is a bit kind of you really.

    68. Re:He is lucky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's in breech of contact, and has caused harm to Apple that they can probably prove some value of in court.

      Yes, he is in breach of contract, which is why he was fired. But what actual harm was done to Apple by this?

      There is certainly potential for harm, but I seriously doubt any was done in this case.

    69. Re:He is lucky by eam3 · · Score: 1

      There's also a small risk this could backfire on Apple. Apple's fans and customers could feel bad about what happened, and punish Apple for it. Apple is acting just like you say, smug and self-righteous, and that too could become part of this issue which comes back to haunt them. I doubt this though. Their customers probably will never notice, and that's a shame.

      I doubt it as well. In the ultimate case of irony, Apple fans are no different than the people under Big Brother's rule in the 1984 Macintosh commercial. They will buy and worship anything Apple regardless of what they do. They will be lining up like sheep to buy the latest iPhone, price be damned, because Apple had the courage to include an innovative new feature that Samsung introduced on their phones a year of two before. And a lot of the Apple users I know look down their noses at anything that doesn't have their precious logo on it. I have nothing against Apple products, still have a G5 somewhere in my house and owned an iPad and iPhone for a couple of years. It's the brainwashed users that get on my nerves.

    70. Re:He is lucky by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      Of course if anything you said was actually true, you'd be in a lot of trouble now.

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    71. Re:He is lucky by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      Summarily firing him sends all kinds of bad messages, like that they think great engineers grow on trees and everyone leaps at the opportunity to work for the great, mighty Apple, and that they don't care about morale and expect the rest their employees to drink deep of the company Koolaid that this firing was totally justified. Must be a stressful place to work, a worse sweatshop than most top tech companies, many of which have a bad reputation that way.

      It wasn't like his daughter secretly filmed it. He knew and allowed his daughter to film at Apple which was already against rules. He also let her film his iPhone X which was a prototype. Then she posted it on YouTube.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    72. Re:He is lucky by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      Yes, he is in breach of contract, which is why he was fired. But what actual harm was done to Apple by this?

      So it's okay to breach rules as long as no one is harmed? What kind of message does that send to other employees? You can break the rules all you want if no one gets hurt?

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    73. Re: He is lucky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jumping through hoops, can also mean doing pointless and counterproductive steps in the name of productivity in order to to artificial y sustain an a perspective of rationality, while in reality these hoops are to supplement and validate the emotions I that stem from clinging to obsolete or ineffective processes

    74. Re: He is lucky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea. Rules are just tools, a strategy by which to try and achieve a given outcome, if the rules themselves become inflexible and more important then the desired outcome they were created to attempt to achieve, then the your missing the forest for the trees. Rules require flexibility to stay useful

    75. Re: He is lucky by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      And if you ignore someone breaking multiple rules then don't rules become meaningless? Also the phrase that is ignored is "this time". This time, no immediate harm was a result.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    76. Re:He is lucky by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      On /., there's no editing after you hit the 'submit' button.

      Except that hitting the "submit" button is the only way to see mistakes in what you've written. That's my experience, anyway.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    77. Re:He is lucky by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Hey, at least you don't have to jump through hoops to be a pedantic asshole...

      You don't know very much about us, do you? The hoops we have to jump through. Knowing the difference between similar words, knowing what "affect" means as a noun and "effect" as a verb, that's just the start.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    78. Re:He is lucky by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Do we know that no harm was done? TFS says the video revealed sensitive information.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    79. Re:He is lucky by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Meh: it's just a phone. An expensive one, sure, but still just a phone.

      With, according to TFS, sensitive information on it. If it hadn't been for that, all the video would have done is screwed up a carefully planned marketing campaign.

      The government generally has a much more pragmatic attitude

      If you're referring to inadvertent mishandling of classified information, the government doesn't prosecute for the reason you give. Firing someone or revoking a clearance is considered a reasonable punishment, although it doesn't always happen. (This is from what I was able to find out.)

      Also, this would not be considered inadvertent mishandling, since the video was intentionally made and put on Youtube. Do this with classified information and you will find yourself in prison.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    80. Re: He is lucky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I knew of a guy with a TS who worked in a SCIF. One day his coworkers found out he had posted a profile on a dating site so they looked him up and saw that he had posted a selfie of himself inside the SCIF. They were keyed off that the photo was from inside the SCIF because of a map on the wall. There werenâ(TM)t any major intel leaks but the result was he lost his clearance over it and then his job which required the clearance. Long story short: posting pictures from inside secure areas whether they belong to a corporation or the US Government can result in loss of employment or worse.

    81. Re:He is lucky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I read the NDAs I signed, sparky.

      -jcr

      Perhaps you misunderstood the question: I'm not interested in what you signed, I'm interested in what you know about what he signed since you're the one making the assertions here. I read the NDAs I sign as well but I don't pretend anybody else is bound by those same ones.

  3. It's business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If that leak gave opponents a 1 month head start, that month represents 1 month of lost lead.

    And while she might pretend to be sorry, she's really trying to get attention with the 'sorry video' too. A private sorry to her dad is needed, and he needs to do a sorry to his boss at Apple if this is intended to soften Apple's view. A public video is not the appropriate forum for apologies, and it sounds like its intended to shame Apple for its hard line more than a genuine apology.

    On the plus side, you didn't leak top secrets to the Russians and then block Congregational and Senate backed sanctions against Russia (the deadline for implementing the sanctions has long passed and Trump has not implemented the Russian sanctions). But that just shows how Republicans put party above country.

    1. Re: It's business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the downside, there isn't three new investigations starting this week looking into her criminal collusion with the Russians like Hillary and the DNC. They didn't just put party above country... They actively undermined and committed treason against it.

    2. Re: It's business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With a 1 month lead... ... You'll have to look at what was going on with Android 2 years 11 months ago.

      Massive disadvantage.

  4. Can see both sides by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is one of those situations were you feel sorry for the guy, but at the same time he brought it on himself. It's like the guy who was fired by Nintendo for doing an unauthorised interview. At least the Apple guy has skills, and probably a lot of money, while the Nintendo guy worked in localisation and had an English degree. He likes now sells Nintendo Switches in BestBuy.

  5. An unfortunate incident by Mostly+a+lurker · · Score: 1

    This is an example of bad things happening to good people. It was an accident. It seems neither father nor daughter blame Apple. Indeed, I get the impression that Apple acted because they felt the credibility of their rules needed to be protected, not because they thought there was any malice involved in posting the video.

    I feel sorry for them. They seem like a fine family.

    1. Re:An unfortunate incident by Cyberpunk+Reality · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Not to target you personally, but "the credibility of their rules needed to be protected" is a stupid and lame reason to fire someone. In the long run, *rule* is completely irrelevant. What's important is the goal the rule is trying to achieve - not leaking any product info early.

      Now, maybe pour encourager les autres firings will actually achieve that. But I doubt it. From what I read, they're firing him for making a mistake. Everyone makes mistakes, even big ones. The key is to keep employees who learn from their mistakes, so that you don't end up paying the cost of a different employee maing the same mistake again. Now, maybe this was one of several incidents (and they don't need to all be leaks), but I didn't see any evidence of that.

      What it really send a message about is a draconian corporate culture. It tells other employees to live in fear. And random fear at that. Robert Powell, the engineer who lost a prototype iPhone at a bar years ago, still appears to be employed there according to LinkedIn. So now it looks more like a campaign of terror than "rule enforcement".

      --
      Rule 35 of the internet: "If it can be hacked, it will be". - Charles Stross
    2. Re:An unfortunate incident by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      It was an accident.

      This was no accident. She was filming the whole ordeal with a fat DSLR on the Apple Campus with her father and lots of other Apple people around. The video is also heavily edited, underlined with music and all that other typical Youtube vlogger stuff. This was not a case of "woops, two seconds of iPhone X footage slipped into a snapchat", this was a vlogger very deliberately showing of the shiny new phone and everybody being aware of her doing it. I am surprised that Apple even let her carry that DSLR around there in the first place.

      Accidentally breaking an NDA can happen, but this is as far away from an accident as you can get.

    3. Re:An unfortunate incident by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      This is an example of bad things happening to good people.

      Apple are shit, the engineer is a lame for ignoring the wishes of his employer (which hey, is his job) and his daughter is a spoiled brat for putting her never-going-to-go-anywhere social media reputation over her father's employment. Point at the good people.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re: An unfortunate incident by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't the employee who signed the NDA filming the video and posting it on the internet be as far away from acvidentally violating the NDA as one could get...?

    5. Re:An unfortunate incident by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Not to target you personally, but "the credibility of their rules needed to be protected" is a stupid and lame reason to fire someone.

      In a vacuum, that might be true. However...

      In the long run, *rule* is completely irrelevant. What's important is the goal the rule is trying to achieve - not leaking any product info early.

      ...but he did. He totally did that thing. And even if it's not serious, it interferes with Apple's most important product — the veneer of capability and competence. When holes are punched in that, Apple suffers, because it's all they've got. They don't have technical superiority, they don't have unique features... all they have is their name, and the value of that is based on things like sphincter control.

      From what I read, they're firing him for making a mistake. Everyone makes mistakes, even big ones. The key is to keep employees who learn from their mistakes, so that you don't end up paying the cost of a different employee maing the same mistake again.

      Apple does not have any critical employees. Literally anyone at Apple could get hit by a bus tomorrow without impeding the operation of the company. The days when Apple depended on would-be superstars to do anything but give presentations are long over and Apple is now just banging out new iterations by formula, and there are people lined up ten deep to step into every role Apple's got, desperate for a paycheck. Keeping a prototype secret is clearly and obviously very important for Apple; Apple has a long history of taking this issue very seriously. Nobody who has trouble remembering this should need Apple to "do a much better job from here on out in addressing the rules and making sure that everybody is aware of the rules" because anyone with two brain cells to rub together ought to be fully aware of the rules by now.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:An unfortunate incident by leonbev · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but I really blame "Daddy" for getting himself fired here. He should have known that the second he handed that iPhone X employee prototype over to his kid (Who was filming it ON Apple property nonetheless!), he just made a huge NDA violation that could get him fired. A simple "Yo, dummy, stop filming this!" would have probably been enough to stop him from getting in serious trouble, or even a "Don't be an idiot and post this on YouTube".

      We all know how paranoid Apple is when it comes to secrecy, and he really should have known better. He should be happy that he works for Apple and not one of the three letter government agencies. Something tells me that you would get prison time if you got caught handing one of their phones over for someone to look at.

    7. Re:An unfortunate incident by serviscope_minor · · Score: 3, Informative

      Apple does not have any critical employees.

      In fairness, no large organization can. Any institution over 70 years old has almost certainly had every "important" employee beyond a certain point die whether from accident, illness or simple old age. Likewise even important employees have other things in their life which even if not death will pull them away from the company at little notice.

      This is why large organisations appear inefficient. They have to have redundancy otherwise they'd be in bad trouble. Apple has 116,000 employees (according to google who are never wrong). That means that a one in a million event per employee per day happens once every two weeks or less.

      Small organisations don't have this, but they can collapse if a key person leaves. The inefficiency is hidden from view however.

      Not defending apple here, just commenting on the general nature of bigger organsiations.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    8. Re:An unfortunate incident by thegarbz · · Score: 4, Interesting

      and everybody being aware of her doing it.

      Being aware and giving a shit are two different things. It's amazing to see how far you can get with quite obviously breaking rules without someone stopping to speak up to you.

      It's amazing how much you get away with if you show the confidence of someone who is supposed to do what they have. I remember at once chemical plant I worked at I occasionally have to take pictures. If I'm using my phone I get stopped every 5 minutes by someone asking to see my photography permit. When I brought in my DSLR and a tripod, not a single person questioned me.

      Similarly walking through one company's plant without hearing protection on, I got pulled up straight away (even though it was a quiet area). Same company different site which I wasn't familiar with I walked into the plant protected area after turning down the wrong street. I was in suit and tie, people everywhere. No one dared to question the "important looking" person.

      An obvious breach of the rule often look so deliberate that they may not be breaches of the rules.

    9. Re:An unfortunate incident by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      If only it was that good. You're forgetting the peter principle and its corollaries. Large, not young, organizations are _far_ less efficient than you explanation can account for.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    10. Re:An unfortunate incident by HornWumpus · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This is a skill everybody should get down while still young enough to be charged as a minor.

      'Walk like you own the joint!'

      Practice in intimidating places. Take trophies like the (police chief's/bishop's/judge's/principal's) desk nameplate. Sure, there are cameras everywhere now. Jr high school is the age to do your chutzpah practicals.

      You will learn the importance of costume.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    11. Re:An unfortunate incident by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even in a location with rules against cameras/filming, there are officials and visitors who are given permission to take pictures/videos. See it enough times, and especially out in the open like that, and people just assume they are allowed.

      Only an idiot would do this, without permission, right?

    12. Re:An unfortunate incident by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple does not have any critical employees. Literally anyone at Apple could get hit by a bus tomorrow without impeding the operation of the company.

      This is not true. This is how you get products that drop calls if you hold them the way people would naturally hold them.

    13. Re:An unfortunate incident by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Oh sure. I mean that that puts an upper limit on their efficiency. Even with magic pixie dust that fixed all the communication problems, Peter principle magnets and etc they'd still need considerable redundancy and appear inefficient.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    14. Re:An unfortunate incident by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      He probably assumed that since it had already been announced (I assume), and members of the press had already gotten to play with them in person, there was nothing still secret. The question I have is this: did the video actually contain any meaningful secrets? If not (and nothing in the articles implies that it did), then while Apple might technically be within their rights to do what they did, I seriously question the wisdom of doing so. After all, employees learn from mistakes, so he almost certainly wouldn't make a similar mistake in the future even without firing him. Thus:

      • The punishment seems grossly disproportionate to the crime.
      • The punishment appears to be purely about vengeance rather than preventing future harm or gaining justice.
      • To the extent that the firing "serves as an example to others", it also creates a hostile work environment that encourages nearby employees who can get work elsewhere to do so.
      • Their competition is likely to hire this guy immediately and without hesitation, so they've hurt themselves and helped their competitors.
      • Unless he was a high-level employee, he probably wasn't under any non-solicitation agreement, and I'd expect a lot of his former coworkers to jump ship. Thus, they've created the perfect conditions for brain drain.

      Just because you can fire someone for something, it does not follow that you should. And I think somewhere along the lines, perhaps Apple management forgot that. As Saint Thomas Aquinas put it, justice without mercy is cruelty. Food for thought.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    15. Re:An unfortunate incident by 0123456 · · Score: 1

      "To the extent that the firing "serves as an example to others", it also creates a hostile work environment that encourages nearby employees who can get work elsewhere to do so."

      Oh, what a load of crap. Sensible people know that letting their kids take videos of unreleased products and put them up on Youtube without permission is... not something you do. Ever.

      Every company I've worked for would have considered that a sacking offence.

    16. Re: An unfortunate incident by Brockmire · · Score: 1

      A guy with "punk" in his handle is going to preach about rules? GTFO.

    17. Re:An unfortunate incident by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      Sensible people know that letting their kids take videos of unreleased products and put them up on Youtube without permission is... not something you do. Ever.

      Why not? The product has been announced, which means that it is no longer secret. Journalists have used it, written about it, published videos of them using it, etc. Sensible people would assume that letting their kids do the same thing is okay, so long as the build of the OS on that device doesn't have any features that haven't been publicly announced yet. There's no plausible way that the company could be harmed by it, so a sane, rational employee would assume that it falls within reasonable behavior. Feel free to disagree, but you're going to need a better reason than "the product was unreleased".

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    18. Re:An unfortunate incident by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Come on.

      Even the crappy clone-makers will fire you for publishing information about their unreleased unoriginal products.

      It's Corporate employment 101.

    19. Re:An unfortunate incident by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      What it really send a message about is a draconian corporate culture. It tells other employees to live in fear. And random fear at that. Robert Powell, the engineer who lost a prototype iPhone at a bar years ago, still appears to be employed there according to LinkedIn. So now it looks more like a campaign of terror than "rule enforcement".

      Only if you equate all actions as equal. The other engineer lost a prototype phone. This engineer allowed his daughter to film at Apple (which is clearly against the rules) AND showed her a prototype (which is also clearly against the rules) AND allowed her to film said prototype phone. It wasn't something out his control or accidental. See the difference?

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    20. Re:An unfortunate incident by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was my response: Apple is extremely draconian, disallowing *cell phones* let alone cameras on-site, especially where it matters.

    21. Re:An unfortunate incident by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Old orgs have massive redundancy in incompetence.

      Why government is so irreparably broken, it doesn't naturally go broke and get replaced every century or so.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    22. Re:An unfortunate incident by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Old orgs have massive redundancy in incompetence.

      they have massive redundancy in everything.

      Why government is so irreparably broken,

      That's begging the question "is the government irreparably broken?" to which I would say no.

      it doesn't naturally go broke and get replaced every century or so.

      First, the government really is too big to fail. When governments fail, people tend to die in large numbers. Thing is there's no such thing as "no government". When one disappears and a power vacuum occurs it's almost instantly filled with some sort of de-facto government, and almost always one worse than the one it's replacing.

      Also, there are organisations much older than 100 years. In fact there are organisations much older than your country.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    23. Re:An unfortunate incident by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Apple does not have any critical employees. Literally anyone at Apple could get hit by a bus tomorrow without impeding the operation of the company.

      This is not true. This is how you get products that drop calls if you hold them the way people would naturally hold them.

      Has it escaped you that the fired employee was an RF engineer? That might literally have been his fault, depending on how long he's worked for Apple.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  6. Too bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    Yo, Apple .. the competition is not going to steal some idea off a YouTube video literally a week before the product is in people's hands. This was shown after the product was announced. Sorry but nobody was hurt by this. Second there was no willful disclosure of any trade secret because the iPhone X was already announced. Third, don't lie to me with the "no exceptions" BS that rules have to be followed regardless of circumstance. Apple should suck it up it really should. They suffered no loss, and even if they did they are a mega corporation they can absorb it quite easily. Someone broke into my Benz when I parked it on the street stupidly and had some cash easily visible in it. I didn't go crying to the cops, I just let it go because one it's too much hassle and second maybe some dude needed to feed his family. Why can't Apple be like that? As for you âoebut but the contract, the NDA, the rules!â idiots: I 100% guarantee if you were in a plane crash in the woods and needed a first aid kit to as save your friends you would break the law and break into a cabin to steal first aid supplies. And what about the guy in Las Vegas who stole a truck to drive victims of a shooter to the hospital? So do you honestly I think that driver should be charged with theft? Fact is saying something is against âoerulesâ shouldnâ(TM)t come up in any argument. Letâ(TM)s talk about ethics.

    1. Re:Too bad by jcr · · Score: 0

      the competition is not going to steal some idea off a YouTube video

      Not the point, but feel free to keep guessing.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    2. Re:Too bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So when someone puts rules in place you should only be disciplined if someone was negatively affected? How would you prove this?

      So if you are speeding in front of a school? Probably less than 1% of speeding cars will hit anyone so they should go free?
      If you sell alcohol to minors... That single instance of them drinking will probably not cause any harm so what's the problem?

      Just because that single instance of breaking the rule might not have cause any harm, but by enforcing the rule it will deter others from violating it.. Applying rules selectively may also introduce a perception of favoritism.

      There is a reason why we do have rules and laws. If someone break the rules or the law they will be punished in one way or another.. If you work for Apple, and know that it's against the rules to take video/photos, maybe you should have told your daughter not to take pictures or record a video..

      Apple probably did not suffer any damage from this single instance, but it they do not enforce the rules then employees will stop following the rules and that will cause Apple to suffer.
      A non-enforced rule may even stop being valid to use for termination. (May differ from place to place)

    3. Re: Too bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's a Benz?

      Oh you mean the swanky car? Hey look everyone we've got a Benz owner here!

    4. Re:Too bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cool comment, bro.

    5. Re:Too bad by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Yo, Apple .. the competition is not going to steal some idea off a YouTube video literally a week before the product is in people's hands.

      Irrelevant.

      Second there was no willful disclosure of any trade secret because the iPhone X was already announced.

      Announced, yes. Released? No.

      As for you "but but the contract, the NDA, the rules!" idiots: I 100% guarantee if you were in a plane crash in the woods and needed a first aid kit to as save your friends you would break the law and break into a cabin to steal first aid supplies. And what about the guy in Las Vegas who stole a truck to drive victims of a shooter to the hospital? So do you honestly I think that driver should be charged with theft? Fact is saying something is against "rules" shouldn't come up in any argument. Let's talk about ethics.

      What the fuck are you talking about? The girl wouldn't have been doing anything unethical if she hadn't made the video, and the ex-employee wouldn't have been doing anything if he hadn't allowed his daughter to have access to it. It certainly wasn't some kind of ethical obligation that anyone had here to break any rules here, so trying to compare this situation to one of your above to examples clearly indicates a lack of understanding about why the guy was actually fired

      The point is that he *DID* allow his family to have access to confidential information (specifically, he permitted them to have access to the actual device which had not yet been released without explicit authorization from Apple), and even if no harm was actually done by this particular incident, it has shown that he cannot be trusted to respect the confidentiality that his employer requires. Apple may had announced that the device was being released, but that is not the same thing as actually having released it already and for people to have physical access to it.

  7. Responsibility Accepted by jaa101 · · Score: 1

    her father "takes full reponsibility for letting me film his iPhone X."

    Responsibility Accepted Captain Needa. The level of response from Apple seems about right to me. You can be sure the people with pre-release hardware have the potential consequences of leaks explained to them very clearly. And not for no reason: this leak probably cost Apple way more money than they would have paid this employee even had he worked for them his whole life.

    1. Re:Responsibility Accepted by jaklode · · Score: 1

      Why should it _cost_ them money? It's free press, and creates a buzz for the product, leading to increased sales, leading to more profit.

    2. Re:Responsibility Accepted by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why should it _cost_ them money? It's free press, and creates a buzz for the product, leading to increased sales, leading to more profit.

      Apple spends orders of magnitude more than this guy's [former] salary on advertising, and a big portion of that is controlling the timing of the release of information. When this one engineer allowed his daughter to take pictures of this one device, it will have resulted in actual work (which costs actual money) for other employees. It may have affected media spend, where lots of zeroes on the ends of numbers are commonplace. When the left hand and the right hand don't cooperate, it becomes difficult to pull off a magic trick, and magic is Apple's differentiating factor. At the end of the day, the competitors' devices accomplish all the same tasks, so Apple isn't competing on the basis of competence. They're competing on the basis of image, and part of that is keeping wraps on their prototypes so that they can maintain secrecy, so that they can in turn control the message.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:Responsibility Accepted by mark-t · · Score: 1

      While I agree that Apple's response was entirely appropriate, I sincerely doubt that this leak actually cost them very much money except what they may have spent trying to get the video taken down.

    4. Re:Responsibility Accepted by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Apple is now competing on the basis of viciousness. I've never been a fan, but up until now I would at least consider buying their products, and wouldn't try to dissuade others from buying. No more.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    5. Re:Responsibility Accepted by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Apple is now competing on the basis of viciousness.

      Apple has long been a publicly-traded corporation that doesn't give one tenth of one shit about humans.

      I've never been a fan, but up until now I would at least consider buying their products, and wouldn't try to dissuade others from buying. No more.

      So just to be clear, walled gardens, holding it wrong, overcharging, and slave labor weren't enough for you, but they fire one fuckup engineer and that's the straw?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  8. Re:Who cares. It's just a phone by cowdung · · Score: 1

    SE is very good. The ginormous ones don't interest me..

  9. lose-lose situation by hagnat · · Score: 1

    its one of those sad moments where everybody lose for no good reason.
    The employee lost his job, sure, but Apple loses what seems to be a good employee, has to deal with any information leak in the video, has to deal with morale issues with close colleagues in the fired employee department.
    Should Apple had ignored this incident and let the employee go with just a warning, that would set an awful precedent for the company, which would make any future incidents like this more likely/damaging.

    welp, if there is anything positive coming from this is that the kid -- and probably a lot of other kids -- are now familiarised with non-disclosure agreements.

    --
    "life is a joke, and someone is laughing at me"
    1. Re:lose-lose situation by bzipitidoo · · Score: 1

      That's why I was suggesting docking his pay. Surely there is some middle ground between a warning and a firing? He doesn't get off scot-free, and Apple doesn't have to go through the large expense of replacing him.

      What's with management at so many companies acting like mindless, soulless bureaucrats? Rules is rules. no exceptions! Might as well replace them all with AIs, since they seem to lack discretion and a human touch.

      --
      Intellectual Property is a monopolistic, selfish, and defective concept. It is "tyranny over the mind of man"
    2. Re:lose-lose situation by drinkypoo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      its one of those sad moments where everybody lose for no good reason.

      You don't seem to understand that Apple sells hype. This engineer interfered with Apple's cloak of mystery, which is one of the biggest ways they enhance their perception of value. Without smoke and mirrors, Apple is just another manufacturer of trinkets from whom the magic escaped long, long ago. Apple literally does not give one tenth of one shit whether they have the best RF engineer. Remember "holding it wrong"? That guy is an interchangeable robot to Apple. Secrecy, on the other hand, is valuable. You can't put the smoke back into the capacitor.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re: lose-lose situation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I assure you, a good RF engineer, once having mastered the art of black magic, can put smoke back into a capacitor.

  10. There's a reason for those NDAs. by jcr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Back when I first joined the company in '02, one of my colleagues explained to me what product secrecy was worth to us in dollar terms. We had just gotten the iMac G4 on the cover of Time magazine, because it was news. It was news, because it was a secret. You can't buy the front cover of Time as an ad placement, but if you could, it would be worth tens of millions of dollars.

    Apple has always gotten vast amounts of press attention, worth hundreds of millions, maybe even billions of dollars, because of the secrecy. If some guy drops the ball on maintaining that secrecy and keeps his job, then more people are going to get sloppy about it, and that pisses away a massive benefit to the shareholders.

    Sucks for him that he didn't take the NDAs seriously, but Apple did the right thing in showing him the door.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    1. Re:There's a reason for those NDAs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cool story, bro.

    2. Re:There's a reason for those NDAs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are talking about product secrecy, iPhone x is not a secret, apparently it was some other secret on the phone, although it's not very clear what exactly. If the news eats up how Apple fired an employee for essentially showing their daughter their phone who youtubed it. That could be worth negative hundreds of millions of dollars. Many of use know Apple is a jerk, but their faithful following has ignored that minority "view", that could easily change.

    3. Re:There's a reason for those NDAs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You don't think assholes can be insightful?

      Prince.

    4. Re:There's a reason for those NDAs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's absolutely a firing offence, but Apple must be nuts to go through with it. Most people are just going to read the headline and assume it's a little kid and Apple massively overreacted. There had to have been a better way of handling this than getting these headlines.

    5. Re:There's a reason for those NDAs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We don't get to decide how damaging the video was to Apple. Apple alone decides that. They are motherfuckers, and everyone knows they are motherfuckers, so if someone looks at Apple cross-eyed and gets shown the door, they should have known it would happen. The girl did something stupid and her father let her do it. The father is indeed lucky he didn't face a lawsuit, but only termination.

      Does anyone still believe social media benefits it's users? How many social media horror stories do we need before as a society we recognize that broadcasting our personal lived can never help, but only hurt us. There is an old saying: "keep your name out of the papers." By avoiding social media entirely, one is more secure than those that shit their lives out for anyone online to see. It may be security by obscurity, but it is better than no security. Keep your head down, folks, it is a Brave New World.

    6. Re:There's a reason for those NDAs. by OzPeter · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      You don't think assholes can be insightful?

      Prince.

      Sheesh .. it's amazing what goes for critical thinking around here.

      1. The OP made a statement about Apple enforcing its NDAs. Like them or hate them, if they are legal and you don't comply with them, well sucks to be you.

      2. The 1st AC called the OP a fucking asshole. That was not an insightful comment, that was an Ad Hom pure and simple because there was no argument as to why the AC disliked/disagreed with the actual contents of the OPs spot.

      3. The 2nd AC points out this same line of reasoning.

      3. Thus in your reply to the 2nd AC, without any substance from the 1st AC, your contention that "Assholes can be insightful" is purely a red herring. It has nothing to do with the OPs post or the 2nd AC's post. It appears to only exist for the sake of you justifying calling someone an asshole because I dunno .. Free Speech??? (and heads up .. that last part was sarcasm)

      So does this make me an asshole too?

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    7. Re:There's a reason for those NDAs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go easier on yourself.

    8. Re:There's a reason for those NDAs. by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      I refuse to even sign NDAs, and even I would have fired the guy.

    9. Re:There's a reason for those NDAs. by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      Sucks for him that he didn't take the NDAs seriously, but Apple did the right thing in showing him the door.

      Apple are the richest bunch of fuckers in history. They don't need to earn millions. They should be giving away the iPhone for free. The fact that they aren't is a damning indictment of capitalism.

    10. Re:There's a reason for those NDAs. by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Do you think Apple is paying them to say "It's our fault, Apple is great." or threatening them?

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    11. Re:There's a reason for those NDAs. by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      An "ad hominen (abusive)" is an argument of the form "You're evil, therefor your conclusion is wrong." Calling the OP a fucking asshole is just an insult, and doesn't even rise to the level of an ad hominem.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    12. Re:There's a reason for those NDAs. by jcr · · Score: 1

      Yeah, lemme know how Kim Fat Ass's Juche Phone is coming along, dipshit.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  11. Why is his daughter still posting? by kronix1986 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Watched the video expecting it to be a 12-year-old, but no, it's a grown woman. How on earth could she not have known that she'd get into trouble for posting this before release? Did she think she was entitled to a world exclusive hands-on preview of the device because her dad is an Apple engineer?

    Simply put, it's the father's fault for letting his daughter handle an employee device. Letting family use a top-secret company prototype is reasons enough for dismissal, but the family member then posting videos to YouTube of this *unreleased* product really takes the biscuit.

    Apple have done some terrible things (e.g. getting the police to raid Gizmodo after they legally acquired a pre-release iPhone) but I see no issue with this firing. The fact that the daughter posted a follow-up video really says it all. Let me guess, she wants to be a social media star?

    1. Re:Why is his daughter still posting? by dwywit · · Score: 1, Troll

      It almost makes me wonder if the whole fuss was manufactured for publicity....

      Nahhh, Apple wouldn't do that.

      Never.

      --
      They sentenced me to twenty years of boredom
    2. Re:Why is his daughter still posting? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How on earth could she not have known that she'd get into trouble for posting this before release?

      Because she is a woman. From the movie As Good as It Gets:

      Receptionist: How do you write women so well?
      Melvin Udall: I think of a man, and I take away reason and accountability.

    3. Re:Why is his daughter still posting? by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, that video also looks like an elaborated ad for the iPhone X.

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    4. Re:Why is his daughter still posting? by stephanruby · · Score: 2

      Let me guess, she wants to be a social media star?

      Well, now she has to become a social media star. There is no going back.

      Her dad's unemployment is certainly not going to cover the rent in Silicon Valley.

      It will cover food and a few expenses, but that's about it.

    5. Re: Why is his daughter still posting? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sadly, the daughter strikes me as a priviliged spoiled brat. One detail I picked up on in the video is she says she lives is SoCal while her parents live in NorCal. So she is a grown woman, the âoedaughterâ angle is really pushing it and is manufactured spin IMHO. For the record, I donâ(TM)t blame the daughter, despite my previous comment, she seems likeable enough. I blame the father for being a poor parent and all around idiot. For a supposed brilliant engineer you would think youâ(TM)d know the companyâ(TM)s security rules.

      FWIW, where I work, use of an unauthorized personal camera on campus is a fire-able offense. And WTF was she doing eating in the company canteen anyway? If a company allows non-business related visitors why would they be trotting around unreleased tech for all to see?

    6. Re:Why is his daughter still posting? by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      How on earth could she not have known that she'd get into trouble for posting this before release? Did she think she was entitled to a world exclusive hands-on preview of the device because her dad is an Apple engineer?

      Did she read, sign the NDA, go through training, know in detailed the device was secret and not to be published?

      You're criticising someone who doesn't know something when they also can't know something. Unless her dad specifically told her anything where was she supposed to get this information from? "Oooh dad gave me his phone to play with, I better second guess him and go ask Apple's legal department!"

      The buck stops with the last person required to be in the know. The family member is fully vindicated by the fact that she was (almost certainly) not covered by the NDA.

    7. Re:Why is his daughter still posting? by willy_me · · Score: 2

      Apple have done some terrible things (e.g. getting the police to raid Gizmodo after they legally acquired a pre-release iPhone)

      Acquiring stolen property is never legal - unless, by chance, you are the original owner. Just because Gizmodo paid for it does not make it legal.

    8. Re:Why is his daughter still posting? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      The fact that the daughter posted a follow-up video really says it all. Let me guess, she wants to be a social media star?

      You needed a follow-up video to get to that conclusion?

    9. Re:Why is his daughter still posting? by supernova87a · · Score: 1

      Not only that, but after having gotten her dad fired, she feels the need to post yet another video about it. This is some kind of internet addiction / alternate internet-fueled reality / inability to just shut up and be quiet for a while when you've gotten slapped to the ground. How many lessons does it take?

    10. Re:Why is his daughter still posting? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's an attempt at white privilege, affluenza, monetization, etc.

    11. Re:Why is his daughter still posting? by edx93 · · Score: 1

      Watched the video expecting it to be a 12-year-old, but no, it's a grown woman. How on earth could she not have known that she'd get into trouble for posting this before release? Did she think she was entitled to a world exclusive hands-on preview of the device because her dad is an Apple engineer?

      She never signed the NDA, and 99.999% likely she never even read it. He, on the other hand, did. It was his lack of judgment that caused these issues, not her entitlement (which, from my brief glimpse of the video, doesn't appear to be any different than most millenials).

    12. Re:Why is his daughter still posting? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're actually wondering that, you're as clueless as the daughter and her dad were.

    13. Re:Why is his daughter still posting? by Swave+An+deBwoner · · Score: 1

      Even better, the apology clearly tells viewers that the moral of the story is to obey rules.

      Think Affluent

    14. Re:Why is his daughter still posting? by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      How many lessons does it take?

      Seventy times seven. And they still don't learn.

    15. Re:Why is his daughter still posting? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, Apple would intentionally damage their weapon of secrecy which nets them hundreds of millions worth of free advertising simply for a publicity stunt. I hate Apple and they make stupid decisions all the time but I seriously doubt even they would be that stupid.

    16. Re:Why is his daughter still posting? by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      (e.g. getting the police to raid Gizmodo after they legally acquired a pre-release iPhone)

      Nope; at that point the phone was stolen property.

      Assuming the person taking the phone didn't, say, assist the engineer in losing the phone, the person had three legal choices of who to give the phone to: the owner, the place where it was lost, and the police. Selling the thing to Gizmodo for $5K was certainly illegal and probably a felony. Buying it may have been a felony, and was certainly illegal.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  12. Aww by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it's hard not to sympathize

    Those hurt corporate feelings. So touching. And adorable. They should have the right to burn down the family house as a compensation for their obvious suffering.

  13. What a difference 20 years makes by vittal · · Score: 1

    Apple 1997: "Think different"

    Apple 2017: "just not overlook rules when you're in the workplace or when you're in school or when you're at home"

  14. Takes full responsibility? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1, Insightful

    In a new follow-up video, the former Apple engineer's daughter says "I had no idea this was a violation," adding that her father "takes full reponsibility for letting me film his iPhone X."

    In that case, why are we even seeing this non-story at all? If he takes full responsibility, then clearly he expected to be fired for being careless with Apple's prototype, and there is literally nothing to report here. We are only hearing about it because he is irresponsible!

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  15. News for nerds by nospam007 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Guy is stupid
    Guy gets fired.

    Just because somehow a new gadget is involved, doesn't make in news, only for the yellow press perhaps.

    1. Re:News for nerds by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Slashdot can't even afford yellow pixels!

      In Soviet Slashdot, press yellows you!

  16. wrong by matushorvath · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "Apple really did like my dad."

    Apple is a company. A company cannot like or dislike something. Any emotions you ascribe to a company are actually the emotions of whoever is in charge. You change the leader and the emotions of the company can reverse in a minute.

    People often make this mistake of "trusting a company" or "believing in a company". You can trust the current leaders, but you can't trust a company. A company is not a person, it's a legal construct. Personifying companies too much only results in disappointment.

    1. Re:wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh in America you are quite wrong. Corporations are people here, with all the morals and political views of a human.

    2. Re:wrong by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      I always fire people I like, too.

    3. Re:wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have fired multiple people I have liked over the years (and many I didn't). my job is to represent the interests of the company I am working for, not my personal feelings.

  17. The "look at me" generation by JoeyRox · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Sorry to go all old-man-yells-at-cloud up in here but today's generation is all about looking for ways to be noticed any way they can. Her apology video demonstrates that - she's beaming with pride about how her video was trending before it was taken down. People used to only earn recognition by either achieving something through hard work. YouTube and social media has provided them shortcuts to that status.

    1. Re: The "look at me" generation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I watched the original video. The first few minutes are of her shopping at boutiques in downtown San Jose. Now I know young women like shopping but do people actually enjoy watching others shop? Or is that simply self-important attention seeking behavior? I blame the Kardashians and social media for destroying this current generation of young adults. Maybe my grey hairs are showing.

    2. Re:The "look at me" generation by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      It's not recognition, it's attention. I have been shocked at just how much some people crave attention, and how satisfying it is for them to get it. People will hit themselves in the nuts with a hammer and set themselves on fire to get attention. I always knew that there were attention whores out there, but I had no idea just how bad it was. Please not I'm not saying all people, and I certainly enjoy getting likes whenever I post to social media. But damn, they really take it not just to the next level, but to several levels above that. We're in a new era and we're far from figuring out how humans are going to handle this instant positive attention for negative behavior.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    3. Re:The "look at me" generation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And which generation is responsible for teaching them that attitude?

    4. Re:The "look at me" generation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      C'mon, she's just a kid who posted a video that did get attention, I'd be a proud 12 year old too. I'm also in the camp of "it's just another version of a phone". For a guy to lose his job over it is wrong. Apple is in no danger of going under because of it. So some shareholders lose a couple of bucks, oh the horror! We've made so much progress as a species, this reaction in 2017 worries me.

    5. Re:The "look at me" generation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And ironically this is the type of people apple targets to sell their crap too.

    6. Re:The "look at me" generation by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      People used to only earn recognition by either achieving something through hard work

      Not sure if you don't understand history or you don't understand people, but since the dawn of the human race people have earned fame, recognition and importance through blind luck, critical social connections, or inheritance / ancestry. People who achieved this through hard work are incredibly rare.

      but today's generation is all about looking for ways to be noticed any way they can. ... People used to only earn recognition by either achieving something through hard work.

      I know you didn't intentionally contradict yourself but you managed to congratulate her for her efforts. She's putting work and effort into a follow up video to promote the windfall she got. Maybe be less angry at the next generation and realise they aren't that different.

    7. Re:The "look at me" generation by JoeyRox · · Score: 1

      The difference being that "blind luck, critical social connections, or inheritance/ancestry" are passive states of being whereas my comparison was for volitional actions, ie a lifetime of work vs spending an hour recording a video of a prohibited product disclosure.

    8. Re:The "look at me" generation by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      She's apparently a 20 something 12 year old. That was the GPs point, there are lots of them. They are the best reason to avoid facebook but love it at the same time. Just like AOL of old, it serves a good purpose.

      It remains no excuse for her dad. Unless she filmed it with a pen camera.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    9. Re:The "look at me" generation by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      ie a lifetime of work

      I'm downgrading my original comment. People achieving something through hard work is incredibly rare. People achieving something through a lifetime of effort are non-existent.
      Even among the people who achieved something through "hard work" their achievements boil down to a handful of specific moments that suddenly elevate them to a point where they can capitalise on other achievements, and making that moment in an hour recording a video is far more effort than most successes actually get.

      You're trivialising a single moment of her efforts ignoring her other many videos she uploaded in her quest for fame along with god knows what else she's doing other than playing with Youtube (people craving attention rarely limit themselves to one platform).

    10. Re:The "look at me" generation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looked at the video after commenting, heard she was 12, kind of looks it too. Still, as celebrities say, all p.r. is good p.r. Apple gets more social media buzz no matter what. Slick video too, almost could make someone thing that this whole thing was orchestrated...

    11. Re: The "look at me" generation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is cheaper to watch....

    12. Re:The "look at me" generation by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Darn clouds! Stop beaming like that and rain or something.

    13. Re:The "look at me" generation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What part of the video or the letters DSLR make you think it was a pen camera?
      Other responded is much more sensible, this reeks of fake story to create buzz. But then Apple would never do something like that would it.

    14. Re:The "look at me" generation by Gussington · · Score: 1

      I have no mod points that that is post of the day.

    15. Re:The "look at me" generation by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      People achieving things through hard work are the rule, not the exception.

      I'm comfortably retired after a career of hard (mental) work. I made some nice things. I know many other people who can make the same claim, all middle class. All that is "achieving something."

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    16. Re:The "look at me" generation by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Oh okay, if you calculate making it through to the end of the rat race an achievement then sure let's go with that. Send me your email address so I can send you an auto-generated participation award.

  18. How old is she? by rjejr · · Score: 2

    I know it shouldn't matter, but reading this it does. If she's 8, 9 or 10 I feel more sympathetic than if she's 19 or 25. All the article says is "daughter", a daughter can be any age, and a little kid may not understand, a teen looking to cause trouble or an adult looking to make a name for themselves. It changes the dynamic of the story reading this depending on how old I imagine the daughter to be. If they didn't want to give her age, then grade school, high school, college could have been used, just to frame it.

    1. Re:How old is she? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      It changes the dynamic of the story reading this depending on how old I imagine the daughter to be.

      She's a grown up if you watch the video, but really the more important question is: why? How does the dynamic of the story change? The age, gender, or relationships have no bearing on the case in question which is generalised to: Person who signed NDA gives thing under NDA to person who has not signed NDA in breach of the NDA, and person who has not signed NDA posted it on the internet likely due to not being told about the NDA.

    2. Re:How old is she? by rjejr · · Score: 1

      To me, the dynamic changes, b/c a kid may not know any better, a teenager may be trying to get her father fired b/c he made her break up with her boyfriend or something, a grown woman may be trying to promote her Youtube site. Also, how involved the father is with the situation. Was he even aware of the posted vid? I read the article summary and the article, no where did it mention her age and I do think it's relevant. Maybe not her specific age, but little kid, teenager, or adult matters.

    3. Re:How old is she? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I still don't see it at all relevant. Breaking an NDA doesn't make it better because it's a kid vs an adult trying to get Youtube hits (in this case the latter).

      Focusing on this is missing the issue. Missing the issue is what causes people to direct anger in the wrong place and Slashdot is full these posts right now: damn kids, damn people promoting their site, damn Apple instead of the only single issue that matters: damn idiot who has just been punished for breaching an NDA.

    4. Re:How old is she? by gravewax · · Score: 1

      It doesn't matter as regardless of the age the father should not have
      a) allowed his daughter to access a employee prototype
      b)allowed his daughter to film on campus with said prototype
      c) after filming not telling his daughter if you post this online we are fucked.

      She is an adult, but even if she was a kid it is still his responsibility to ensure she is doing the right thing. So little kid, teenager, adult, old woman is completely irrelevant.

    5. Re:How old is she? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It matters. A small child is not a rational person capable of even signing NDAs. She is a kind of non-person. It would be akin to sharing the iPhone with your dog or cat.

      I'm surprised some people don't see this.... autism?

    6. Re:How old is she? by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 1

      It doesn't matter as regardless of the age the father should not have
      a) allowed his daughter to access a employee prototype
      b)allowed his daughter to film on campus with said prototype
      c) after filming not telling his daughter if you post this online we are fucked.

        She is an adult, but even if she was a kid it is still his responsibility to ensure she is doing the right thing. So little kid, teenager, adult, old woman is completely irrelevant.

      Checking the video it's obvious she's filming. On one scene the phone is on the front facing camera and you can see the SLR. It's not like she was discretely running a cameraphone without her father's knowledge. In another scene she's talking to the camera in front of her father "This is the new iPhone ten".

      My company isn't a "tech company" nor as leading edge as Apple, but when I have visitors I don't let them film anything in the workplace, and people have been fired for posting pictures / videos to social media.

    7. Re:How old is she? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends on how small the child, but even a 5-year-old can comprehend, "you have to promise not to tell anyone about this phone!"

  19. This is a stunt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So you're telling me that in all the decades that Apple has been around, someone finally filmed some stuff and posted it on the Internet to only have the father be fired for? Let's "face" it, the X is creepy as hell and they don't want the risk of their own whistleblowers.

  20. Apple is the best company E-V-E-R!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple is the best company E-V-E-R!!!

    This isn't like spilling coke on a keyboard. She probably cost the family $150K+/yr over this stupidity. Guess she will go to the community college instead of Stanford now.

    If they just posted all their code to github and developed in the open, none of this would have happened.

    Apple, you are THE BESTEST!

  21. Re: Who cares. It's just a phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    6s plus is very good. I got used to the size, feels normal now and my old iPhones seem tiny. Bigger screen helps my eyes too. I don't care for the newer ones. I love my headphone jack and Touch ID.

  22. Not sure who saw the video... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but there is a point where she shows the camera shes recording with. There is now way Apple didn't know this was happening. You cant hid that camera to well.

  23. Of course there will be consequences... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They broke the NDA.
    Should consider themselves lucky Apple didn't decide to also sue them for that.

  24. iPhones are like hot dogs by boudie2 · · Score: 1

    You don't want to know how they're made. A few years back, made the mistake of going to work for an outfit doing Apple tech support. Thought I would be doing something with computers. And I would have been, pushing extended warranties mostly. They fired me after about ten days, but I have to admit to having a problem with being so dishonest for so little remuneration. Some people are cut out to be Apple types and some aren't.

    1. Re:iPhones are like hot dogs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well I can say I was actually considering upgrading my older MacBook Pro to a newer iMac to continue running all my VM's in Fusion since I do a lot of Linux and Windows development.

      After their actions on this? I believe they had other options they could have explored and chose to scorch-earth it.

      Guess what Apple? It doesn't mean much but I have decided to not re-join the Apple ecosystem. I think I will be getting another manufacturers desktop and laptop and run my machines virtually in someone else's hardware. And since I was in the market for a phone as well, I'll be picking up an Samsung S8 or similar and eschewing your company's tech altogether. It's been a pleasure, but you heavy-handed bastards are just too much for me to support.

      Like I said it doesn't mean a lot to you (or much of anything) but you have indeed lost a customer over it.

  25. Re: Who cares. It's just a phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SE is good because it's a 5S with new guts. Still has a headphone jack. Sometimes "newer" is not "better". This is true on the software side as well. Fuck, I'd still be running iOS 8 if I could.

  26. Just watched the video by magusxxx · · Score: 0

    Damn, she's hot! It's great that she grew out of her adolescent blueberry phase.

    --
    Care killed the cat, but satisfaction brought it back.
    1. Re:Just watched the video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn, she's hot! It's great that she grew out of her adolescent blueberry phase.

      The "daughter" is a LEA decoy.

  27. Is she reading from a script? by SlaveToTheGrind · · Score: 1

    They had to do what they had to do. I'm not mad at Apple. I'm not going to stop buying Apple products. Rules are in place for the happiness and for the safety of workers

    That's just a little creepy.

    1. Re:Is she reading from a script? by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      They had to do what they had to do. I'm not mad at Apple. I'm not going to stop buying Apple products. Rules are in place for the happiness and for the safety of workers

      That's just a little creepy.

      And she's wrong. Most rules, and especially these rules, are in place for the profitability and security of the company. I'm not saying that's a bad thing, but she needs to learn this lesson sooner rather than later.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    2. Re:Is she reading from a script? by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      If she hasn't learned it now, maybe just make a note that not everybody can learn things.

  28. Live by your word. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you agree to not disclose what youâ(TM)re working on donâ(TM)t let your kids play with it. Doctors and lawyers donâ(TM)t show kids their client files and documents. Engineers shouldnâ(TM)t show their kids their confidential work. Duah.

  29. Calling Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    [I]t's important to stress that this wasn't a garden variety iPhone X. As an employee device, it had sensitive information like codenames for unreleased products and staff-specific QR codes.

    And we are supposed to believe that all of that was hidden in the meta data of the video that she took? Why else should that matter, unless that information was somehow available to the millions who saw the original video? Sorry, calling bullshit on that.

  30. north korean version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would love to see NK Kim, get a stolen IPX from china, and make a video of it :)

    1. Re:north korean version by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      China is bootlegging obsolete network protocols?

      We should sabotage them, send N Korea a Netbeui.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  31. Her father? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He takes resoonsibility? Of course. Heaven forbid she own her mistake herself. That generation is a flipping disaster. And good job, dad. There is no way he didn't know this was a no-no - why did his daughter, whom again, HE is the parent of, have her phone in a restricted area in the first place? They are both pathetic.

  32. The cult of Apple is pure evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look at the knuckle-dragging scum justifying Apple's actions in this comment section. They use the same 'logic' as the millions of cultists who are apologists for male and female genital mutilation- and indeed I bet all these male Apple apologists were mutilated by their parents shortly after birth.

    Tribal psychology is always the same- and sadly it works on the least valuable members of any society. And the psychology is exploited by the most ruthless alphas, who in their personal lives would never ever follow the 'corporate' philosophy. Slavery is for the drones.

    PS the same dribblers supporting Apple and saying Apple had to do this are the same dribblers supporting the demonisation of Russia daily on this site. A coincidence? I think not!

  33. Here is the full video by lhaeh · · Score: 1

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    "Shopping solves all my problems"

  34. In the iCafeteria by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The video was shot in the Apple cafeteria, with her dad.
    Dad was well aware of the video being made and was a participant.

  35. Cringe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That bideo was painful to watch

  36. Forget about the rules by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Rules are for people who think with their a$$

  37. P R Scat by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

    Being fired is never a âoeoh well next timeâ event. The rent is due on the first. I would hope dad gets a job soon.

  38. Pressured to make follow up video, typical Apple. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wording and sentences in this and previous videos seems differ greatly. My guess would be, that they had agreement to avoid litigation and one of the demands is to show how fair and great Apple is sacking the engineer cause of RULES.

  39. Really people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this is apple we are talking about. The kings of manipulation. Its publicity stunt to get people talking abut a newly released iToy. Im sure the sacrificial engineer will be compensated for his loyalty to the cult.

  40. FIRINGS are propoganda too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use to work for APPLE, and my promotion to another department in another company was staged as being fired. I was intentionally carrying secret bogus information to defectively plant into a competing company, where I was accepted with open arms like Mr. T in a fried chicken restaraunt-brothel.

    I bet that 'daughter' is on Apple payroll, while the dad gets the job he wanted and Apple farts bad tech in their leaked NDA's. You can't get fired by Apple, really, everyone moves on to something 10x better.

  41. test your might! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    test your might!

  42. Whoosh by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Really? In a market where there's a shortage of qualified and experienced engineers and developers

    This is true.

    Tech people have literally gone into other lines of work because of the lack of jobs.

    This is also true.

    Can you truly see why these two things can not be true at the same time? Read carefully the original line, then think about the people who cannot find work...

    Ongoing consolidation in the tech industry means that there are ever-less jobs

    Ongoing consolidation, while at the same time Amazon alone does things like hire hundreds to work on Alexa. While at the same time companies continue to be born at a fevered pace.

    As the original poster said, there's a shortage of *qualified* and experienced developers...

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Whoosh by hey! · · Score: 1

      Well, you're supposing people are always rational in their hiring decisions. There's a lot of emotion and "gut" thinking involved in most hires, so much so that I think of rationality as a kind of competitive advantage.

      And by the way irrationality is a two way street when it comes to employment. Take ageism. If you believed that employees and employers were entirely rational it wouldn't be a problem. An older employee would take a lower paid engineering job rather than an even lower paying non-engineering job. And faced with the reality of ageism a smart employer would go bargain hunting for experienced older employees.

      So you do have engineers leaving the field while there is a shortage of people with their skills, usually ones over 40. If hiring decisions (and job acceptance decisions) were made by expert systems which found the cheapest (best paying available) fit of skills to requirements, ageism wouldn't exist.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  43. Yeah, fuck Appple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I worked as a contractor for Apple for a year or two. It sucked balls. Their software sucks, their API's suck, their management sucks. It was "suck" all the way down. In the end I wasn't able to make happen what they wanted to happen due to their fucked up API's. I literally said "I can't do anything else with this shit" and told them to get lost. I lost a little money but in the end I gained money by having future contracts not supplied by egotistic assholes with no skill. Fuck that! I never worked long-term for them again except for 2 or 3 instances where they paid 3 times the going rate to fix something "right now" that their in-house idiots couldn't understand. The whole place is full of underskilled children.

    1. Re:Yeah, fuck Appple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I literally said "I can't do anything else with this shit" and told them to get lost.

      Heh. And you call THEM the "underskilled children"...

  44. Re:Chicken shit move by DaMattster · · Score: 0

    Oh and whomever modded me a troll is an Apple fanboi!

  45. Wrong camera filter! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I watched the video and she used a camera filter to squeeze the height of the video, making the iPhone X look short and thick like an iPhone I.

  46. Re:Chicken shit move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Use 'who/whoever' where you would use he/she.
    Use 'whom/whomever' where you would use him/her.

    "Him modded me a troll" is ungrammatical.

  47. A drone gets her wings. by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

    And they let him go. Because -- because he broke a rule. So my advice to people out there is to just not overlook rules when you're in the workplace or when you're in school or when you're at home."

    And another complacent worker bee is born.

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  48. Buzzkill by mhlo · · Score: 1

    It did contribute to building excitement for the iPhone X. Tim Cook's Apple seems to have forgotten about how to create a buzz around a new product launch.

  49. No Preview on mobile by tepples · · Score: 1

    Last I checked, there was no Preview button in Slashdot's mobile view.

    1. Re:No Preview on mobile by war4peace · · Score: 1

      Maybe, but the Preview button only helps with proper tag closing. Spelling should be even easier on mobile, because the keyboard features take care of that (through autocorrect - not perfect but it's a prop).

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    2. Re: No Preview on mobile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This auto stuff on iPhones sucks, watch what it does.

      I just want a guy who can be my own guy for a while he has a great time and he is always there for you and your family is always t to be the best thing to say about it and it's not very good at all the time to change it all over the world and the people that are you mentioned that you can do that to your own point of the context.

      Yeah next word prediction is great when I haven't typed anything yet.

    3. Re: No Preview on mobile by war4peace · · Score: 1

      I'm talking about autocorrecting misspelled words and you're talking about next word prediction.
      Different things.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
  50. Gut feeling is rationality at work by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Well, you're supposing people are always rational in their hiring decisions.

    They pretty much are; just not how you think.

    There's a lot of emotion and "gut" thinking involved in most hires

    That is the ultimate in rationality, because your subconscious is much better at judging the quality of a human being quickly than you are, especially in terms of working with them over a long period of time. It's the same brain performing intellectual thought as it is issuing snap assessment of character.

    Almost never have my initial impressions of a co-worker, been mistaken in the long run. You subconscious knows when someone is diligent, or trustworthy, or any number of other qualities much better than does your "rational" brain which has only a page or two listing experience and perhaps a half hour or hour chat, only marginally technical in nature.

    Take ageism

    Sorry but ageism (like so many things) isn't really an issue outside of Silicon Valley (if even there). After having worked with countless older developers I have come to the conclusion that like so many claims of victimhood, cries of ageism are generally made by workers who over years, did not stay current, did not stay sharp, did not stay productive or are not pleasant to work with...

    So you do have engineers leaving the fieldM

    But again, you don't have QUALIFIED engineers leaving the field, at least not because they cannot find work... if anything because of the pull of other interests.

    So again, what you have is a very real shortage of qualified (not mediocre) developers and engineers, which are badly needed everywhere I look.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Gut feeling is rationality at work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Almost never have my initial impressions of a co-worker, been mistaken in the long run.

      Look out- someone who thinks that they're never wrong. Ever consider this is a poor position to claim? It makes you sound dumb. Maybe you want to sound dumb.

  51. White + straight + guy = FIRED! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obviously if he wasn't at least one of those (s)he'd be ok.

  52. Still cruel and unusual. Also EVIL. by shanen · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Too bad the EVIL is NOT unusual. That's just how corporations work in their mindless and soulless pursuit of infinite profit.

    Spent a while searching through this promising topic in search of funny or insightful comments. Remarkably disappointing. There was a recent article with a little wayback machine for old Slashdot articles, and each time I tested it I seemed to find much more humor and insight in the ancient history of Slashdot.

    Actually I regard this topic of being fired for theoretically threatening profits as a religious issue:

    There is no gawd but profit, and Apple is profit's prophet.

    That's as in #1 profit according to Forbes for 2016. Lesser prophets include Gilead, the google, Exxon, and some gamblers.

    The priority is money, not principles or people. Rather like #PresidentTweety, eh? I think that prioritization tends to produce evil, but your mileage may differ. I think good programmers naturally tend to put principles first, insofar as programs are just instantiated abstractions.

    --
    Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
    1. Re:Still cruel and unusual. Also EVIL. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was a recent article with a little wayback machine for old Slashdot articles, and each time I tested it I seemed to find much more humor and insight in the ancient history of Slashdot.

      Sadly, it's not just Slashdot. The Eternal September is truly upon us.

    2. Re:Still cruel and unusual. Also EVIL. by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      In other words, no matter how strict and important the secrecy is, don't do anything to the guy that leaked big-time?

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    3. Re:Still cruel and unusual. Also EVIL. by shanen · · Score: 1

      In other words, you think the child who made a mistake deserves to suffer so the soulless corporation can increase the hoopla and fake buzz around a slightly improved smartphone. Did you ever do anything that caused some sort of problem for your parents? Of course not.

      Me? Mostly I think children make mistakes and should learn from them. Ditto parents. The massive penalty for her childish enthusiasm may well traumatize her for life. Also, I think our hardware is running away from us and the software continues to reek like the big dogs' m0es. I also think you're probably some sort of troll, but I don't really care about the details of your disordered priorities.

      --
      Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
    4. Re:Still cruel and unusual. Also EVIL. by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      You're letting your prejudices run wild here. Apple has a right to operate as it sees fit, regardless of your personal feelings about Apple and hardware and software, and Apple spends a lot of money on carefully orchestrated PR. Apple establishes rules for its employees, like any other company, and needs to enforce these rules.

      The daughter isn't getting the blame, the father is. The daughter is not getting fired. As a parent, you need to either supervise your child or keep your child out of certain situations. If you give your child the opportunity to take videos the child should not be taking and then post them to Youtube, you've failed as a parent. If you don't react fast when the child climbs on the arm of a dinette chair with castors and swivels to reach the sharp knives, well....

      Not to mention that the "child" is apparently over 20 and married, and, in general, old enough to know better, and that the parent apparently cooperated in this. For flagrantly disregarding basic security rules, the parent's firing is completely reasonable.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    5. Re:Still cruel and unusual. Also EVIL. by shanen · · Score: 1

      Your comment is quite insane. Apple has absolutely NO "right to operate as it sees fit". At least not until after they bribe the politicians sufficiently to eliminate all laws and regulations. Perhaps they can eliminate my moral considerations at the same time?

      Troll identified. Further comments from 598059 go straight to the Z file.

      --
      Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
  53. The problem with today's society by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "This new generation has no respect for their elders" -- 4th century Greek text

  54. She cost her dad his career... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He can't say it to her.

    As a teen, she can't even imagine taking responsibility for her actions. Likely as an adult she won't either.

    There were two failures, and the larger one rests on her dad. They teach "we will sue you to the fullest extent of the law" in orientation there. Jobs was famous for his militancy about IP. He knew his career was on the line.

    There are clearly communicated rules about cameras and filming. She couldn't get on campus without knowing that. She knew too. She broke a rule that she knew about, she filmed, and she put it on youtube.

    It is devastating. It is too terrible to face. About a million dads (and moms) split into Intel, Honeywell, IBM, google, hp, samsung, facebook ... all don't break this rule. They know the cost and they keep from crossing that line.

  55. The sad thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is in his daughter's video the iPhone x didn't break. They did a better job advertising the phone than Apple's official keynote.

  56. Re:Chicken shit move by gravewax · · Score: 1

    If I had mod points I would have modded you troll too. You are responsible for people you bring into an environment, you are responsible for company secrets entrusted too you. Said Child is also an Adult (not a little kid), regardless the father is responsible for ensuring she doesn't have access to corporate secrets while he escorts her on campus and ensuring she isn't filming etc. I dislike apple as much if not more than anyone and don't have a single apple product, but in this case they are 100% in the right.

  57. The Doctrine of Corporate Personality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A company is not a person, it's a legal construct.

    I don't disagree with the general tenor of your post, but this was slightly unfortunate. A company is not a human being ...

    Not to be pedantic, but just for the next time you express your (very valid) point: It was "unfortunate" because the very "legal construct" in question is the legal construct 'person.'

    Being a person is the defining attribute of a corporation (as against other species of company, which could be a natural person trading as XYZ Co, partnerships, etc where the responsible persons are humans), [The other usual feature of a corporation is limited liability (hence 'Ltd.').] A (legal) person is that which can, inter alia, enter into a contract in its own name (and thus sue and be sued). Most adult humans are persons as well: natural persons as opposed to corporate persons.

    But I agree with your sentiment .... A corporation is not the kind of person you want to put your trust in.

  58. Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does anyone actually believe her bs? She said she noticed it trending and still didn't delete it until Apple contacted her? You got taken for a ride.

  59. I got lost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple's marketing gimmicks get weirder each year.

  60. I Hope less people buy APPLE after this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i mean all the sweat shops in China and now just going out of control firing people for showing a product that is already being sold ,, thats BS

  61. "...what happens to Apple?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See what happened to GM and what is happening to GE.

  62. Re:Chicken shit move by DaMattster · · Score: 1

    Fuck you! You're an insensitive prick!

  63. Its not mine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "If it's not yours, don't touch it. Ask for permission."

  64. Viral Videos = $$$ by sampson7 · · Score: 1

    So how much do you think she made by having a viral video on YouTube? How much more will she make now that they are giving a "second life" to the video by re-linking to it?

    That said, I am actually getting increasingly turned off by Apple as a company. The arrogance and the bad customer service is starting to grate on me (and we have eight different Apple devices in my house hold). I think my next purchase will probably be a Samsung. Not saying they will necessarily be any better, but at some point, Apple has run out of second chances.

  65. And? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They did him a favor in firing him. His career was over at Apple, anyway. No one would have ever trusted him again.

  66. What Is Wrong With You People? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That any of you would condone this bullshit by apple? WTF has happened to this world? And that girls stupid fucking pitiful post, wtf was that? My dad apologizes? Fuck her as well.