Slashdot Mirror


Hewlett-Packard Historical Archive Destroyed In California Fires (pressdemocrat.com)

An anonymous reader quotes the Press Democrat: When deadly flames incinerated hundreds of homes in Santa Rosa's Fountaingrove neighborhood earlier this month, they also destroyed irreplaceable papers and correspondence held nearby and once belonging to the founders of Silicon Valley's first technology company, Hewlett-Packard. The Tubbs fire consumed the collected archives of William Hewlett and David Packard, the tech pioneers who in 1938 formed an electronics company in a Palo Alto garage with $538 in cash. More than 100 boxes of the two men's writings, correspondence, speeches and other items were contained in one of two modular buildings that burned to the ground at the Fountaingrove headquarters of Keysight Technologies. Keysight, the world's largest electronics measurement company, traces its roots to HP and acquired the archives in 2014 when its business was split from Agilent Technologies -- itself an HP spinoff.

The Hewlett and Packard collections had been appraised in 2005 at nearly $2 million and were part of a wider company archive valued at $3.3 million. However, those acquainted with the archives and the pioneering company's impact on the technology world said the losses can't be represented by a dollar figure... Karen Lewis, the former HP staff archivist who first assembled the collections, called it irresponsible to put them in a building without proper protection. Both Hewlett-Packard and Agilent earlier had housed the archives within special vaults inside permanent facilities, complete with foam fire retardant and other safeguards, she said. "This could easily have been prevented, and it's a huge loss," Lewis said.

Lewis has described the collection as "the history of Silicon Valley ... This is the history of the electronics industry." Keysight Technologies spokesman Jeff Weber said the company "is saddened by the loss of documents that remind us of our visionary founders, rich history and lineage to the original Silicon Valley startup."

23 Californians were killed in the fires, which also destroyed 6,800 homes, and Weber says Keysight had taken "appropriate and responsible" steps to protect the archive, but "the most destructive firestorm in state history prevented efforts to protect portions of the collection."

124 comments

  1. Real value: $0. by whoever57 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    While these were locked up so that only a very small number of people could see them, their value was effectively zero.

    Archives only have value when they can be studied. Lock them away and they are useless.

    --
    The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    1. Re:Real value: $0. by GrumpySteen · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Ah, but you're forgetting that they have whatever value they can convince the insurance company that they had. Admitting that the archives were useful only for seriously obsessed historians would lead to a payout of much less than $3.3 million.

    2. Re:Real value: $0. by del_diablo · · Score: 1, Insightful

      If they where of serious value, they would have to be stored properly.
      Not somewhere that would burn down to a wild wildfire.
      Or, at the least thats the case if this even resembles what happens to insurance of personal property.

    3. Re:Real value: $0. by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If they where of serious value, they would have to be stored properly.

      ...or already digitized.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    4. Re:Real value: $0. by drew_kime · · Score: 5, Funny

      If they where of serious value, they would have to be stored properly.

      ...or already digitized.

      Yes, that. Could no one at HP put their hands on a decent flatbed scanner?

      --
      Nope, no sig
    5. Re: Real value: $0. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      HP employees are probably not allowed to buy Epson or Cannon scanners.

    6. Re: Real value: $0. by datavirtue · · Score: 2

      ....or if you are really serious about scanning some docs perhaps a Brother or Fijitsu

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    7. Re: Real value: $0. by Dayze!Confused · · Score: 1

      My HP was flip a coin and maybe it'll print without having to reinstall the drivers. My Brother printer has gone 100 pages and counting, printing every couple days, and I only had to install drivers. My friend has the last generation one and has gone through 3 or 4 toner cartridges which would be somewhere around 6-10,000 pages, and has never had an issue.

      --
      "All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent." [Thomas Jefferson]
    8. Re:Real value: $0. by Hognoxious · · Score: 4, Funny

      Could no one at HP put their hands on a decent flatbed scanner?

      The problem was they they couldn't afford the ink.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    9. Re:Real value: $0. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude... You don't need ink for a flatbed scanner. And you don't want to print the (now lost) documents, you want to store them in a digital archive, preferably secure at multiple physical locations for redundancy.

    10. Re:Real value: $0. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...or already digitized.

      That's all depended on what you value it for. If you value the content for historical knowledge, then yes, digitize would be the way to go. However, if you value its original form more (for future sale which seems to be what HP is aiming for), then it has to be kept in its original form. For example, original letters from General Lee during the civil war. Each letter now is very valuable (some are in thousands of dollars) for collectors. The content of the letter is no value in this case but the original form is. That could also be a reason for HP to keep theirs in original form.

    11. Re:Real value: $0. by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      You don't need ink for a flatbed scanner.

      It. Was. A. Joke.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    12. Re:Real value: $0. by barbariccow · · Score: 1

      Nah, they are appraised high to raise the net worth of the company such they could borrow against it. Equity!

    13. Re: Real value: $0. by ThurstonMoore · · Score: 1

      I've had really good luck with Brother. I just bought a new with a duplexer to replace the old one that is still going, but I did notice the new one does not print as well as the old one.

    14. Re:Real value: $0. by jenningsthecat · · Score: 1

      While these were locked up so that only a very small number of people could see them, their value was effectively zero.

      Archives only have value when they can be studied. Lock them away and they are useless.

      Not to mention that if they hadn't been locked away, there likely would have been some digital copies of the material. It's truly a shame that the actual artifacts were lost, but the real crime is that the information they contained was also lost - especially when it could have been stored on a device that fits comfortably in one hand.

      --
      'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
  2. Hmm... by EmeraldBot · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So important and valuable that nobody ever thought to scan them into Google Drive? And they weren't accessible either? These probably did contain interesting historical data, and it really sucks that they're gone, but what did we (the public) lose? We never had anything to begin with :/

    --
    "Set a man a fire, he'll be warm for the rest of the night. Set a man afire, he'll be warm for the rest of his life."
    1. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So important and valuable that nobody ever thought to scan them into Google Drive? And they weren't accessible either? These probably did contain interesting historical data, and it really sucks that they're gone, but what did we (the public) lose? We never had anything to begin with :/

      We need something like a distributed library of congress. Ideally anyone could start using it, but by doing so they implicitly agree to mirror part of it for the privilege of accessing it. Perhaps it would be bittorrent based, perhaps something else. You would sign up and then wait until you had saved and possibly served enough bytes to use it or to continue using it.

      It would need some kind of centralized control to control what is in the system, but not who gets what. (Without control it would just basically be a pirate bay clone.)

      The basic idea is the collected works of humanity would be saved, or at least the ones that can be freely copied. This kind of thing should survive war or natural disaster, as long as there is enough nodes left to keep it alive.

    2. Re:Hmm... by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You are addressing the wrong problem. Storing the data is not the problem. Scanning it is. Loading thousands or millions of pages into a scanner is a mostly manual process. Who is going to pay for that? Not me.

      If scanning a page takes a second, and you are paying $10/hr, then scanning a million pages would cost $2800.

      If each page is a megabyte, then a million pages would be a terabyte, which costs less than $20.

      Scanning is a hundred times as expensive as storing.

    3. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...

      Scanning is a hundred times as expensive as storing.

      Point taken, though I'd argue there is a lot of material that is already digital that is in danger of being lost...

    4. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If each page is a megabyte, then a million pages would be a terabyte

      Most of the black and white PDF-A documents I make are about 20kb per page at 600 dpi resolution and lossy JBIG. One million such documents would only be about 19GB. It would fit on a BD-R with room for ECC data.

      Point taken, though I'd argue there is a lot of material that is already digital that is in danger of being lost..

      Same problem: Verifying data integrity and upgrading media takes expensive manual labor and time.

    5. Re:Hmm... by Mashiki · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You are addressing the wrong problem. Storing the data is not the problem. Scanning it is. Loading thousands or millions of pages into a scanner is a mostly manual process. Who is going to pay for that? Not me.

      Scanning isn't a problem, not a problem at all. When I was out in AB a few years ago on vacation I got bored and digitized a towns historical records, council meetings, town liens, etc. There was around 80 years worth of the stuff, upwards of 140k pages worth of documents. With the in-office photocopier, I got all that done in around 2 weeks. Most of the pages were in a non-standard format as well usually 9x14" or 8.5x20" sheets. The only real problems were with odd-ball sized stuff like 2.5x11" stuff which had to be manually scanned otherwise it would jam the machine. Final payout was just under $7k for my time and effort. Even at that, everything could be stored on a single 60GB flash drive.

      There was a big push out in western canada to do this a few years ago after the wildfires that wiped out several towns and cities. It's absolutely doable and has been for years. They just didn't want to layout the money to do it and now they can enjoy the fruits of their inaction.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    6. Re: Hmm... by sound+vision · · Score: 2

      Supposedly, the collection was worth a few million. It's hard to imagine whoever owned the thing couldn't have put up a few thousand dollars to digitize them. Crowdfunding might even work on something like this.

    7. Re: Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure if you're being intentionally vague or what. It's pretty obvious he didn't mean that the world has no scanners or human beings to pull the documents off of the shelves. HP didn't want to incur the expense. The cost of LABOR involved in the scanning is the problem to which he was referring. You've done nothing but restate his point, and you were smug about it. For the record: The problem here is that you legitimately believe you had a counter-point to his argument.

    8. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You need to look at high volume document scanners. One familiar version is the fancy copiers at Kinkos. Granted, those scanners also print copies, but...
      The scanners that get used are not your typical desktop scanner solution. They can scan 60+ pages/minute. The trick would be then to ink-jet print say a fine yellow barcode on each document to help index the scanned images in the system. OCRing the documents may or may not be helpful. But if just archiving the images, then OCR isn't really needed, just initially store the images in a given batch with relevant metadata and OCR the imaged documents later. Still would scan hand-written documents, and have some sort of workflow that goes back and deals with those documents separately.

      Electronic documents have reduced the need for this kind of workflow, but not eliminated it. There is still a huge amount of paper documents that flow around the world and offices daily.

      source: I worked with (system admin) for a laboratory corporation's document handling system in San Diego in the mid-90's. Images, and OCR'd data, were stored on WORM drives. Even then, the COM library used for all the OCR bits (auto-rotating/auto-aligning, scan regions, etc were pretty solid). What I worked with then is not much different that what's done today. The scanners are faster and better, though.

    9. Re:Hmm... by mikael · · Score: 1

      They might have had information things on things which hadn't been patented. Ideas for future projects that were never implemented. Yes, they should have scanned in all those documents, and put the backup hard disk drives in a fire safe. But it wasn't justified on cost probably. Not the first time that an research institution has lost original work:

      https://www.theregister.co.uk/...

      https://www.theguardian.com/uk...

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    10. Re:Hmm... by mikael · · Score: 1

      I've seen BYTE magazines that were scanned into PDF's. One 400 page magazine was only 80 Megabytes.

      But it's the time to do the scanning that's the problem. There are flat-bed scanners that can automatically cycle through a stack of loose leaf pages. The cost in time is 10 seconds/page. But books and bound documents are far harder, they may not be able to be folded flat, so the scanner has to take the best picture it can and then use software to automatically compensate for curvature and misalignment of the two pages.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    11. Re: Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm in!

    12. Re:Hmm... by mysidia · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If scanning a page takes a second, and you are paying $10/hr, then scanning a million pages would cost $2800.

      I think you overestimate the cost of automated bulk scanning.
      Even so..... $2800 is miniscule compared to the cost to store and preserve a million physical pages indefinitely, which is approximately 10,000 pounds of paper. And ~30,000 cubic feet or 200 of those 10-ream boxes worth of paper to deal with, that has to be kept in a manner to safely preserve the content -- meaning moisture control, temperature control, and security.

      This would more than fill an average sized office, or take out a good sized chunk of a warehouse or dedicated large-scale storage area, So
          $2800 is probably a drop in the bucket compared to the rent for this much storage area.......

    13. Re:Hmm... by jabuzz · · Score: 3, Informative

      Perhaps someone has come up with a device that automates the whole process. Insert book into machine and it turns the pages and scans them all at the same time.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      Oh look they have. So scanning a book is no more time consuming that scanning a stack of loose leaf pages then.

    14. Re: Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interns?
      With college credit for payment?

    15. Re: Hmm... by sizzzzlerz · · Score: 1

      Was the published worth based on the content of the paper documents or on the physical documents themselves? I doubt digital copies of the documents have the same value as the originals. What they do have is the ability to be disseminated easily to those who do wish to study them and, presumably, with a longer lifetime. The originals, however, still have value as historical documents (at least to HP historians) and, thus, should have been better protected.

    16. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indexing is the problem. OCR only goes so far, and handwritten docs break it.

      Then, of course, someone has to understand the project sufficiently to guide the development of the index template. For these records, that spans design docs, manufacturing, discussions, contracts, philosophical notes, random stuff. You can end up with a few million pages organized into 65,000 topics.. Nope, actually, you have to have a minimal understanding of the material, at a high level, to guide the detailed indexing. This isn't a COM* project converting your old utility bills.

      *COM in the document imaging world means something very different than it does in software. The HP archives would never be a COM project.

    17. Re:Hmm... by lazarus · · Score: 1

      Behold! The HP Scanjet Enterprise 9000. 150 pages at a time and a duty cycle of 5000 pages a day. Pretty much fully automated.

      Hold on a second while I get out my HP-28S...

      100 Boxes is about 150,000 loose pages (assuming banker's boxes). At 5000 pages a day you've got 30 days or one month.

      So, at your rate of pay they could have had it all digitized for about $2400. Not including the cost of the scanner (since they made it themselves).

      Document storage (paper) is about $0.30/box/month. So assuming that we stored these boxes since 1950, storage costs would be: $24,120.

      You're right. They totally should have let you store those files on a USB key bouncing around in your car's glove box. Scanning is 10x cheaper than storing (paper) files.

      --
      I am not interested in articles about life extension advancements.
    18. Re:Hmm... by barbariccow · · Score: 1

      Really advanced tech from the 1940s? It wouldn't matter anyway. Prior art rules were revised a few years ago that now it's "first to file" not first to invent.

    19. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      god damn you are a fucking retard

    20. Re:Hmm... by 14erCleaner · · Score: 1

      Law firms do this kind of thing routinely - scanning and indexing documents in lawsuits is essential these days. A quick web search finds companies that will scan your docs for a few cents per page, so your estimate is an order of magnitude low, but it's still pretty cheap. Oh, well, HP let it go to Agilent and then to Keysight, so they obviously didn't value their history very highly.

      --
      Have you read my blog lately?
  3. Apparently they didn't have much real value at all by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Boxes of unsorted papers piled into a bin at a storage facility don't have much value at all (other than as fire starter, which function they apparently did indeed fulfill.)

    If they were real archives they would be kept somewhere that they could be indexed and studied. Papers would be scanned and put online for scholars to view.

    Boxes in a garage (or garage equivalent)? Meh.

    They suddenly become valuable to someone in hindsight. Sure it is. Just like the kids comic book collection that Mom threw out after telling him to clean up his room fifty times over the course of the previous week. If it's valuable, look after it. Otherwise, it ain't.

    --
    If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
  4. Does the missing $538 mean more a bad thing? by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 1

    That's all that grabbed my attention, and I saw as a loss.

    1. Re:Does the missing $538 mean more a bad thing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that cash wasn't in the fire, thats the money they used to found HP.

    2. Re:Does the missing $538 mean more a bad thing? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      While still not a fortune, $538 was worth more in 1938 than we might initially think - roughly half a year’s income.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
  5. People died by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The writings of two other dead men are pointless compared to those who died in that fire.

    Anyway, if you didn't bother to make this stuff public it probably wasn't of much use or importance to anyone. Just secrets locked up until they could be redacted most likely.

    1. Re: People died by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hang on there cowboy and make sure you have all the facts. Remember that these are papers which belonged to rich white men. Some of the people who perished in the fires may also have been rich white men, which would be a tragedy of course, but some could have been black, brown and/or female in which case I'm sure you'd realize the hilarity of your comment.

    2. Re: People died by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know you think you're funny, but I think you're going to want to sit down for what I'm about to tell you...

    3. Re: People died by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People die all the time. Everybody dies eventually. Men and women congregate to complete a process that pumps out more people all the time. This is more like the minor writings and working notes of Abraham Lincoln being destroyed in a fire. People dieing is a statistic. The destruction of significant historical records is a tragedy.

      This is still Slashdot, you stupid fucks. We still care about tragedys like this, no matter how many of you fucking pinks have infiltrated the sitet.

  6. More than 42 people died by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But fuck them, the history of the electronics industry was lost?

  7. HP Calculator Museum by pipingguy · · Score: 1

    So what? We have the HP Calculator Museum online now! Screw those physical artifacts!

    *obsessively fondles HP-11c* My Precious

  8. So many stupid posts here by Jzanu · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    The vast majority of information in the world isn't accessible by internet access or database on a computer. Most real information requires physical access for investigation, and that is the case here. The information was cataloged but idiots who don't pay for things fantasize about immediate access. Do you all have some medical condition or something that makes you retarded? There is no excuse for people at all involved in information technology to not understand both. Idiots who hate history don't make it value-less, they just show off the limits of their overly-sheltered lives and stupidity.

    1. Re:So many stupid posts here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Idiots who revere history don't make it worth millions, either.

      If we lost the knowledge of who created the first transistor and why, it would have absolutely no effect on society. It's just trivia. The same goes for everything that was in those archives. Any technological advance documented in them that's still in use is documented in the places where it's being used as well, so nothing of real value has been lost.

    2. Re:So many stupid posts here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The vast majority of information in the world isn't accessible by internet access or database on a computer. Most real information requires physical access for investigation, and that is the case here. The information was cataloged but idiots who don't pay for things fantasize about immediate access. Do you all have some medical condition or something that makes you retarded? There is no excuse for people at all involved in information technology to not understand both. Idiots who hate history don't make it value-less, they just show off the limits of their overly-sheltered lives and stupidity.

      Try and understand the difference between data and information.

      Information has value. Data is worthless shit.

      This loss was a pile of "priceless" data that no one bothered to protect properly or find valuable enough to share with anyone.

      And the world is full of data. Don't be retarded and assume it's all information.

    3. Re:So many stupid posts here by Jzanu · · Score: 2

      Language and communication for knowledge transfer is what that truly differentiates humans from animals; especially with writing and reading developed to save knowledge for future use. You should be fine with getting a lobotomy if you don't understand that, and otherwise you're a damn troll. Understanding how a major successful company forms and survives provides information that informs business research and management practice. That is the narrow application. Larger contexts apply for the now unknowable insights it contained. Loss of knowledge is a loss for humanity.

    4. Re:So many stupid posts here by Jzanu · · Score: 1

      Are you fucking autistic or something? Historical communications between the founders of a major company are important for the information they contain. That is lost now.

    5. Re:So many stupid posts here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is lost now.

      "That" was never found in the first place.

    6. Re:So many stupid posts here by Jzanu · · Score: 1

      No, "that" meaning this you fucking moron. I imagine you're up for an election somewhere stupid soon, but for now you should fuck off!

    7. Re:So many stupid posts here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you fucking autistic or something? Historical communications between the founders of a major company are important for the information they contain. That is lost now.

      The data was not even valued enough to protect properly. Some history is interesting. This was apparently so interesting they never bothered to do jack shit with it other than warehouse it.

    8. Re:So many stupid posts here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      idiots

      Do you all have some medical condition or something that makes you retarded?

      Idiots

      they just show off the limits of their overly-sheltered lives and stupidity.

      You should be fine with getting a lobotomy

      Are you fucking autistic or something?

      you fucking moron. I imagine you're up for an election somewhere stupid soon, but for now you should fuck off!

      you're a damn troll

      Careful with that projection buddy. Maybe seeing how you treat others will be enlightening.

    9. Re:So many stupid posts here by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      Your hostility is extremely off-putting. You have some issues to work through, but in the meantime, you should probably refrain from posting to Slashdot.

    10. Re:So many stupid posts here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fuck off

    11. Re:So many stupid posts here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bull. Crap. If it was important, it should have been released to public domain, scanned and preserved. Obviously, the people holding the information didn't think it had any value other than a big fat write off. No one is going to give a rat's ass about this in the future. Would it be nice to have? Sure, if it was public domain information. Is it a loss? Go home and cry it off. No one else, other than the insurance company, is going to do the same.

    12. Re:So many stupid posts here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      stupid faggot

  9. Priceless Irony. by geekmux · · Score: 5, Interesting

    So, it's 2017.

    Previously valued at $2 million, but were apparently priceless artifacts related to a company known for making some of the best printers in the world.

    Did anybody bother to fucking scan them?

    If not, I assume it was a flood of irony that helped put out flames of raging stupidity.

    1. Re:Priceless Irony. by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      they had value because they were not scanned and distributed freely. if someone wanted to make a book of the two fellows for example, this could have had much more value as it was...

      however, since they weren't put in a fireproof housing, I kinda doubt the insurer is willing to pay 2 mil for them - that and the company really didn't give a rats ass about them apparently.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    2. Re:Priceless Irony. by inking · · Score: 1

      I do historical research and you wouldn’t believe how many archival materials are not scanned at all or stored on microfilm in a single location. It’s absolutely absurd.

    3. Re:Priceless Irony. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed. "Modular building" sounds like a fancy name for an outbuilding or garage..

    4. Re:Priceless Irony. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Scanning them often damages them and reduces their historical value. Scans do a shit-poor job of capturing the nuances that are important, like the light pencil notes on the margin, etc. Let's face it, morons ripping the spine off of volumes and shoveling the pages into a sheet feeder seems all modern and stuff, but two hundred years from now historians will be seeking out the stuff that didn't get ripped through by todays morons... er.. historians... who got their advanced degree and have since scrambled to get the funding to pay for the servicing of their vintage BMW.

  10. I blame Carly Fiorina by Gojira+Shipi-Taro · · Score: 4, Funny

    She wasn't satisfied ruining everything great about the company's past, she wanted to wipe all record of it too.

    --
    "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
    1. Re:I blame Carly Fiorina by MattskEE · · Score: 1

      The Agilent spinoff was slightly before Ms. Fiorina was CEO of HP. And in any case that was years ago (1999). Agilent, and now Keysight, has had plenty of time to come up with a secure storage location if they wanted to.

    2. Re:I blame Carly Fiorina by Anubis350 · · Score: 1

      According to the summary, let alone TFA, Agilent *did* have adequate storage, it's the second spinoff, Keysight, that screwed up here

      --
      "goodbye and hello, as always" ~Prince Corwin, from Zelazny's Amber series
    3. Re:I blame Carly Fiorina by Presence+Eternal · · Score: 1

      That was actually the first thing I thought. But I checked, and she wouldn't have been the one responsible. This is one thing she didn't do.

  11. Another Sad Tale by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I once worked for a huge international corporation that existed for nearly a hundred years ago. It, too, had an archive, and I'm sure it was lost. This was not because of a fire, but because of multiple mergers and sales of buildings. I'm sure that at the end, there was no one employed there who was considered to be responsible for the archive's preservation. In short, "it's not my job."

    1. Re:Another Sad Tale by harvey+the+nerd · · Score: 1

      ok you got my curiosity, maybe others too. Here's your chance to perhaps use the power of networking - opensource to start something.

      Which one ? Standard or a steel? Now is the time, tomorrow might be too late.

  12. Posting from a Packard-Bell. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    still better uptime than your HP rig

  13. Re:Apparently they didn't have much real value at by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Value is variable. That comic book collection might not have had value to the person who threw them out, or maybe not to the kid at the time. 50 years later, they could be valuable to many people.

  14. So sad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The folks at archive.org are probably facepalming right now, they would have loved to digitize all of that I'm sure.

  15. And with it, all evidence. by HalAtWork · · Score: 1

    How convenient!

  16. Not scanned, not backed up? by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1
    Tech company papers, lost because the company that sells millions of scanners did not scan its own historical documents ...

    With incompetence this bad, does it really need a Carly to finish it off? Any run of the mill CEO could have run it to ground, you don't need the extra stupid.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:Not scanned, not backed up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder if there were copyright issues, that you could not scan them. Oh well. Nothing of value lost.

  17. the HP Way went up in smoke long ago by swschrad · · Score: 2

    and now it's history has, too.

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
  18. Let me guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Keysight was planning to have the papers scanned, that project was given the green light and would've started right after Thanksgiving.

    1. Re:Let me guess by harvey+the+nerd · · Score: 1

      The proverbial "day late and a dollar short"

  19. Forget DECENT... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    HP had an entire Printer test division. I assume at least some of that involved flatbed scanner checks as well (once they started doing the combo printers which should have been the early '00s.)

    Meaning they could have been doing this before all the spinoffs as a fucking *SCANNER TEST PROJECT* in between calibration scan pages.

    But instead we lost what might or might not have been an important part of Silicon Valley history because people couldn't be arsed to scan it in while it was still corporeal!

    While we're on the subject, go check out bitsavers.org and maybe send an email thanking them for all their service. They've been grabbing every copy of every tech manual they can salvage, scrounge, get donated, etc to make pdfs of almost every facet of (mostly american) computer technology from the univac up to the mid 90s. In 50 years this might be one of a half dozen electronic collections that actually preserved the majority of the tech side of things, and god only knows what will be left of the business/personal side.

    1. Re:Forget DECENT... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I sat for my CDIA back in the 00s Fujitsu scanners were already the clear choice for high volume scan and index applications. HP was not mentioned in serious discussions, and Kodak scanners were the choice of the IBM sycophants.

      Not that I didn't recommend HP scanners for regular business use, they were fine, and for color often very good, and Epson scanners were underrated. But HP just didn't measure up for the most demanding uses, and that's not a slam, it's just missing the top 10% of the market, whatever.

      Printing technology has nothing to do with it. All-in-one printers are so ubiquitous that I know co workers who think these are what printers are. Feh.

    2. Re:Forget DECENT... by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      Unless Bitsavers finish their work, there is a change in digital formats in 5 years, and this archive isn't rediscovered until 10 years later when there is no machinery available to read the hard disk or usb thumb drive it is encoded on.

      Unfortunately, digital storage is the most ephemeral means of storing information man has ever created. If they wanted the manuals to be available for a reasonably long time, they'd copy it to papyrus.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    3. Re:Forget DECENT... by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Skywriting is a tad more ephemeral than digital storage, unless you're considering unrefreshed DRAM.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  20. After the company has been flipped several times by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only thing regarded as sacred in the halls of what's left of "Hewlett Packard" are three numbers:

    - earnings per share
    - EBITDA
    - stock price

  21. Valuable historical records always disappear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like NASA and their fake moon missions.

    Wouldn't want anybody to figure out space is fake. Earth is flat.

    1. Re:Valuable historical records always disappear by OneHundredAndTen · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't want anybody to figure out space is fake. Earth is flat.

      And run by lizards. Or the stupid Illuminati. Or Illuminati lizards.

    2. Re:Valuable historical records always disappear by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't want anybody to figure out space is fake. Earth is flat.

      Actually, the Earth is near-spherical, it's space that only has two dimensions.

  22. Negligence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    More than 100 boxes of the two men's writings, correspondence, speeches and other items were contained in one of two modular buildings that burned to the ground at the Fountaingrove headquarters of Keysight Technologies.

    What moron stores historical documents unprotected in what is essentially a mobile home? No fire suppression system, no insulated safe, just sitting there in the open in boxes. For Christ's sake they could have went to Target and bought some fire safes at least.

  23. No digital copy by manu0601 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It is worth 2 million USD and nobody thought about making a digital copy? Or perhaps the 2 million figure is just for insurance company?

  24. How can you trust HP with your data? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When, they cannot even protect their own?

  25. Another Priceless Treasure by kenwd0elq · · Score: 2

    Also destroyed was the home and museum of "Peanuts" cartoonist Charles Schultz.

    1. Re:Another Priceless Treasure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Schulz museum was not destroyed, it simply suffered smoke damage.

    2. Re: Another Priceless Treasure by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      Our porn history suffered a great loss this month, but I'm sure if you google it, you'll find something like that anyway.

    3. Re:Another Priceless Treasure by kenwd0elq · · Score: 1

      Good to hear. That's what I get for relying on newspaper reports.

  26. Real value: still $0. by n329619 · · Score: 1

    Backup is overrated.

  27. To add to that by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    There wouldn't even had been a loss if they had all at least been scanned, the first step to sharing...

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  28. too bad it was not scanned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it would have been cool to have the items scanned and digitally stored somewhere. i hope someone finds the digital scans if they exist at all.

  29. Back up by Vinegar+Joe · · Score: 1

    Or fuck up.

    --
    "The average reporter we talk to is 27 years old......They literally know nothing." - Ben Rhodes
  30. No backups, why would there be? by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Suppose there actually WHERE copies or backups or whatever and Keysight Technologies simply want everyone to think the stuff is gone? And why would they do that?

    Well, it depends on what kind of agreement they have with Agilent Technologies or HP about who gets paid what and owns what if Keysight finds anything interesting in those files.

    And now who's to say now where Keysight got their ideas that fall into the areas of interest in Mr. Hewlett and Mr. Packard's personal notes and assorted ephemera, when there's no way to check the stuff that burned up with no backups?

    Yes, of course no one made backups of material that was valuble enough to be negotiated for because of some perceived value of the content when Keysigh split off from Agilent... Of course not.

    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
  31. Wow by Nexion · · Score: 1

    Honestly I cannot adequately convey how much I completely loathe HP as a company, but this is truly a tragedy to lose a huge part of human history to fire. As someone who had the first half of their life erased by fire I can sympathize greatly, but while my history mattered to no one, I have to wonder, why this was not better protected. I somewhat feel certain records should be retained indefinitely, and while the "personal papers" of these two individuals might drive me to vomit; the loss to the future cannot be measured in dollars when in time this media would have truly become priceless.

    This is a shame.

       

    1. Re: Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed, it is a shame.

      And it's a shame you never had the opportunity to meet Bill and Dave.

      I guarantee that you would not be moved to nausea, in fact, if you could work at Bill and Dave's HP, you would have found it to be quite enlightened.

      The great values that made HP what it was began to decline as management began to transition to MBA values, away from human and technical values.

      The fundamental problem with virtually all large, successful companies in the last three decades is that they think their purpose is to "maximize shareholder value". Great companies (both to work for and to do business with) know their purpose is to create excellent products addressing real customer needs. If you build great products and sell them at a fair price, your customers do well and you do well--and the shareholders do well as a consequence. Your employees see the results of their creative efforts and are enthusiastic and fulfilled.

      But if you turn it around and think your purpose is to make money for shareholders, you rush and scrimp on your products, and do not improve your customer's lives, and your employees figure out that they are simply regarded as crank-turning commodities.

      When the HP Way was dissipated at HP, much more than the collected papers of these two enlightened individuals was lost.

  32. Post-script for human history 2001-2054 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This could easily have been prevented, and it's a huge loss.

  33. publicly ding CEOs by harvey+the+nerd · · Score: 1

    Humanity and HP's founders are victims of the clueless megacorporate cultures. Not just Keysight but every HP successor CEO since Bill Hewitt died in 2001 should dinged in their biographies for failure to preserve and protect the founders' legacy. I'm thinking Wikipedia's hagiographies as an important endpoint .

  34. What good has language done YOU? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are the same shit-throwing monkey, doing it "over the Internet" hasn't made you stink any less.

  35. Incompetence getting worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sometimes you wonder, are we getting smarter or dumber. You have archives worth millions but spend zero dollars protecting it. Besides the fact nothing appears to have been done to save any of it. Just incredible the stupidity that takes place with records these days. From the Equifax mess to poorly protecting history of HP. Have we handed the keys to the asylum to the patients?

  36. How did the HP archive end up there? by hackertourist · · Score: 1

    I get that subsidiaries can be split off and end up with some of the assets of the parent company. But it seems odd the personal archives of the 2 founders would be among those assets. The parent company is the one with the history.

    1. Re:How did the HP archive end up there? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I get that subsidiaries can be split off and end up with some of the assets of the parent company. But it seems odd the personal archives of the 2 founders would be among those assets. The parent company is the one with the history.

      HP originally started out as a test equipment manufacturer, so maybe the documents just largely consist of information relating to such. You could consider Keysight being the original HP.

  37. So fsociety started the Califirnia fire? by rjejr · · Score: 1

    I'd ask Elliot, but he probably doesn't recall.

  38. Why weren't they digitized? by wardrich86 · · Score: 1

    I don't understand... clearly if they were of any importance they would have been digitized by now... and probably stored in a fireproof vault.

  39. Very allegoric by OneHundredAndTen · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Pretty much in line with HP's protracted death.

  40. inexcusable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Having read some of Dave Packard's notes at his ranch home, I realize how significant these papers were. It's a massively tragic loss of records that would correct the currently published history of the company and much more besides.

    Almost no one is aware of the true significance of these records.

    I was promised a look at the entire collection. Now I'll never have the chance. The negligent handling and storage of these documents is inexcusable. Had the Federalist Papers been handled like this, the Constitution would have been a complete mystery now.

  41. CALIFORNIA by Ted+Stoner · · Score: 1

    I LAC OF RAIN

    Sad to hear. $1000 in h/w and one dedicated soul could have digitized it all. A reasonable insurance price for a $2M asset.

  42. If only... by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 1

    They could have gotten in touch with a company that makes scanners or something where they could have digitized all this... too bad.

    --
    Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
  43. I don't get your joke. Ink for a scanner?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who the fuck modded this funny?

  44. Aren't you forgetting something? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are addressing the wrong problem. Storing the data is not the problem. Scanning it is. Loading thousands or millions of pages into a scanner is a mostly manual process. Who is going to pay for that? Not me.

    If scanning a page takes a second, and you are paying $10/hr, then scanning a million pages would cost $2800.

    If each page is a megabyte, then a million pages would be a terabyte, which costs less than $20.

    Scanning is a hundred times as expensive as storing.

    Shouldn't you also be considering the value of the data in there somewhere?

  45. Re:I don't get your joke. Ink for a scanner?!? by drew_kime · · Score: 2

    Who the fuck modded this funny?

    Someone who got the joke.

    --
    Nope, no sig
  46. HP cursed by AndyKron · · Score: 1

    HP has been cursed by the Electron Gods ever since they spun off their heart and called it Aglient.

  47. Hardly! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And a locked archive can be... unlocked! See how that works?

    Archives are easy to neglect. For all those saying that scanning was an obvious choice... well it is. Except it's one of those tasks that takes quite a bit of time and it needs someone to make it a priority. It's going to cost some money too.

    As long as the archive is there, locked away, it looks pretty safe. Not to an archivist or a documentation preservation specialist, just to the managers at Agilent/Keysight who undoubtedly had operational control of the archive. "Why should I spend a half million to scan the archive, when we can just provide access to the archive? Whenever we need to? It's not like those boxes are going anywhere... And when was the last time we had an access request? It was 20 years ago!"

    That is the thinking you are dealing with, I'll bet.

  48. that shouldnt be a problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if you cant find their drivers in their site and that hasnt been a problem in decades this shouldnt be either

  49. HP archives destroyed by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

    Carly Fiorina wanted for questioning.

    --
    Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  50. Data without backups by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

    Without backups all data is stored in /tmp

    --
    Watch this Heartland Institute video