Slashdot Mirror


Hewlett-Packard Historical Archive Destroyed In California Fires (pressdemocrat.com)

An anonymous reader quotes the Press Democrat: When deadly flames incinerated hundreds of homes in Santa Rosa's Fountaingrove neighborhood earlier this month, they also destroyed irreplaceable papers and correspondence held nearby and once belonging to the founders of Silicon Valley's first technology company, Hewlett-Packard. The Tubbs fire consumed the collected archives of William Hewlett and David Packard, the tech pioneers who in 1938 formed an electronics company in a Palo Alto garage with $538 in cash. More than 100 boxes of the two men's writings, correspondence, speeches and other items were contained in one of two modular buildings that burned to the ground at the Fountaingrove headquarters of Keysight Technologies. Keysight, the world's largest electronics measurement company, traces its roots to HP and acquired the archives in 2014 when its business was split from Agilent Technologies -- itself an HP spinoff.

The Hewlett and Packard collections had been appraised in 2005 at nearly $2 million and were part of a wider company archive valued at $3.3 million. However, those acquainted with the archives and the pioneering company's impact on the technology world said the losses can't be represented by a dollar figure... Karen Lewis, the former HP staff archivist who first assembled the collections, called it irresponsible to put them in a building without proper protection. Both Hewlett-Packard and Agilent earlier had housed the archives within special vaults inside permanent facilities, complete with foam fire retardant and other safeguards, she said. "This could easily have been prevented, and it's a huge loss," Lewis said.

Lewis has described the collection as "the history of Silicon Valley ... This is the history of the electronics industry." Keysight Technologies spokesman Jeff Weber said the company "is saddened by the loss of documents that remind us of our visionary founders, rich history and lineage to the original Silicon Valley startup."

23 Californians were killed in the fires, which also destroyed 6,800 homes, and Weber says Keysight had taken "appropriate and responsible" steps to protect the archive, but "the most destructive firestorm in state history prevented efforts to protect portions of the collection."

71 of 124 comments (clear)

  1. Real value: $0. by whoever57 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    While these were locked up so that only a very small number of people could see them, their value was effectively zero.

    Archives only have value when they can be studied. Lock them away and they are useless.

    --
    The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    1. Re:Real value: $0. by GrumpySteen · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Ah, but you're forgetting that they have whatever value they can convince the insurance company that they had. Admitting that the archives were useful only for seriously obsessed historians would lead to a payout of much less than $3.3 million.

    2. Re:Real value: $0. by del_diablo · · Score: 1, Insightful

      If they where of serious value, they would have to be stored properly.
      Not somewhere that would burn down to a wild wildfire.
      Or, at the least thats the case if this even resembles what happens to insurance of personal property.

    3. Re:Real value: $0. by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If they where of serious value, they would have to be stored properly.

      ...or already digitized.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    4. Re:Real value: $0. by drew_kime · · Score: 5, Funny

      If they where of serious value, they would have to be stored properly.

      ...or already digitized.

      Yes, that. Could no one at HP put their hands on a decent flatbed scanner?

      --
      Nope, no sig
    5. Re: Real value: $0. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      HP employees are probably not allowed to buy Epson or Cannon scanners.

    6. Re: Real value: $0. by datavirtue · · Score: 2

      ....or if you are really serious about scanning some docs perhaps a Brother or Fijitsu

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    7. Re: Real value: $0. by Dayze!Confused · · Score: 1

      My HP was flip a coin and maybe it'll print without having to reinstall the drivers. My Brother printer has gone 100 pages and counting, printing every couple days, and I only had to install drivers. My friend has the last generation one and has gone through 3 or 4 toner cartridges which would be somewhere around 6-10,000 pages, and has never had an issue.

      --
      "All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent." [Thomas Jefferson]
    8. Re:Real value: $0. by Hognoxious · · Score: 4, Funny

      Could no one at HP put their hands on a decent flatbed scanner?

      The problem was they they couldn't afford the ink.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    9. Re:Real value: $0. by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      You don't need ink for a flatbed scanner.

      It. Was. A. Joke.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    10. Re:Real value: $0. by barbariccow · · Score: 1

      Nah, they are appraised high to raise the net worth of the company such they could borrow against it. Equity!

    11. Re: Real value: $0. by ThurstonMoore · · Score: 1

      I've had really good luck with Brother. I just bought a new with a duplexer to replace the old one that is still going, but I did notice the new one does not print as well as the old one.

    12. Re:Real value: $0. by jenningsthecat · · Score: 1

      While these were locked up so that only a very small number of people could see them, their value was effectively zero.

      Archives only have value when they can be studied. Lock them away and they are useless.

      Not to mention that if they hadn't been locked away, there likely would have been some digital copies of the material. It's truly a shame that the actual artifacts were lost, but the real crime is that the information they contained was also lost - especially when it could have been stored on a device that fits comfortably in one hand.

      --
      'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
  2. Hmm... by EmeraldBot · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So important and valuable that nobody ever thought to scan them into Google Drive? And they weren't accessible either? These probably did contain interesting historical data, and it really sucks that they're gone, but what did we (the public) lose? We never had anything to begin with :/

    --
    "Set a man a fire, he'll be warm for the rest of the night. Set a man afire, he'll be warm for the rest of his life."
    1. Re:Hmm... by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You are addressing the wrong problem. Storing the data is not the problem. Scanning it is. Loading thousands or millions of pages into a scanner is a mostly manual process. Who is going to pay for that? Not me.

      If scanning a page takes a second, and you are paying $10/hr, then scanning a million pages would cost $2800.

      If each page is a megabyte, then a million pages would be a terabyte, which costs less than $20.

      Scanning is a hundred times as expensive as storing.

    2. Re:Hmm... by Mashiki · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You are addressing the wrong problem. Storing the data is not the problem. Scanning it is. Loading thousands or millions of pages into a scanner is a mostly manual process. Who is going to pay for that? Not me.

      Scanning isn't a problem, not a problem at all. When I was out in AB a few years ago on vacation I got bored and digitized a towns historical records, council meetings, town liens, etc. There was around 80 years worth of the stuff, upwards of 140k pages worth of documents. With the in-office photocopier, I got all that done in around 2 weeks. Most of the pages were in a non-standard format as well usually 9x14" or 8.5x20" sheets. The only real problems were with odd-ball sized stuff like 2.5x11" stuff which had to be manually scanned otherwise it would jam the machine. Final payout was just under $7k for my time and effort. Even at that, everything could be stored on a single 60GB flash drive.

      There was a big push out in western canada to do this a few years ago after the wildfires that wiped out several towns and cities. It's absolutely doable and has been for years. They just didn't want to layout the money to do it and now they can enjoy the fruits of their inaction.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    3. Re: Hmm... by sound+vision · · Score: 2

      Supposedly, the collection was worth a few million. It's hard to imagine whoever owned the thing couldn't have put up a few thousand dollars to digitize them. Crowdfunding might even work on something like this.

    4. Re:Hmm... by mikael · · Score: 1

      They might have had information things on things which hadn't been patented. Ideas for future projects that were never implemented. Yes, they should have scanned in all those documents, and put the backup hard disk drives in a fire safe. But it wasn't justified on cost probably. Not the first time that an research institution has lost original work:

      https://www.theregister.co.uk/...

      https://www.theguardian.com/uk...

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    5. Re:Hmm... by mikael · · Score: 1

      I've seen BYTE magazines that were scanned into PDF's. One 400 page magazine was only 80 Megabytes.

      But it's the time to do the scanning that's the problem. There are flat-bed scanners that can automatically cycle through a stack of loose leaf pages. The cost in time is 10 seconds/page. But books and bound documents are far harder, they may not be able to be folded flat, so the scanner has to take the best picture it can and then use software to automatically compensate for curvature and misalignment of the two pages.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    6. Re:Hmm... by mysidia · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If scanning a page takes a second, and you are paying $10/hr, then scanning a million pages would cost $2800.

      I think you overestimate the cost of automated bulk scanning.
      Even so..... $2800 is miniscule compared to the cost to store and preserve a million physical pages indefinitely, which is approximately 10,000 pounds of paper. And ~30,000 cubic feet or 200 of those 10-ream boxes worth of paper to deal with, that has to be kept in a manner to safely preserve the content -- meaning moisture control, temperature control, and security.

      This would more than fill an average sized office, or take out a good sized chunk of a warehouse or dedicated large-scale storage area, So
          $2800 is probably a drop in the bucket compared to the rent for this much storage area.......

    7. Re:Hmm... by jabuzz · · Score: 3, Informative

      Perhaps someone has come up with a device that automates the whole process. Insert book into machine and it turns the pages and scans them all at the same time.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      Oh look they have. So scanning a book is no more time consuming that scanning a stack of loose leaf pages then.

    8. Re: Hmm... by sizzzzlerz · · Score: 1

      Was the published worth based on the content of the paper documents or on the physical documents themselves? I doubt digital copies of the documents have the same value as the originals. What they do have is the ability to be disseminated easily to those who do wish to study them and, presumably, with a longer lifetime. The originals, however, still have value as historical documents (at least to HP historians) and, thus, should have been better protected.

    9. Re:Hmm... by lazarus · · Score: 1

      Behold! The HP Scanjet Enterprise 9000. 150 pages at a time and a duty cycle of 5000 pages a day. Pretty much fully automated.

      Hold on a second while I get out my HP-28S...

      100 Boxes is about 150,000 loose pages (assuming banker's boxes). At 5000 pages a day you've got 30 days or one month.

      So, at your rate of pay they could have had it all digitized for about $2400. Not including the cost of the scanner (since they made it themselves).

      Document storage (paper) is about $0.30/box/month. So assuming that we stored these boxes since 1950, storage costs would be: $24,120.

      You're right. They totally should have let you store those files on a USB key bouncing around in your car's glove box. Scanning is 10x cheaper than storing (paper) files.

      --
      I am not interested in articles about life extension advancements.
    10. Re:Hmm... by barbariccow · · Score: 1

      Really advanced tech from the 1940s? It wouldn't matter anyway. Prior art rules were revised a few years ago that now it's "first to file" not first to invent.

    11. Re:Hmm... by 14erCleaner · · Score: 1

      Law firms do this kind of thing routinely - scanning and indexing documents in lawsuits is essential these days. A quick web search finds companies that will scan your docs for a few cents per page, so your estimate is an order of magnitude low, but it's still pretty cheap. Oh, well, HP let it go to Agilent and then to Keysight, so they obviously didn't value their history very highly.

      --
      Have you read my blog lately?
  3. Apparently they didn't have much real value at all by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Boxes of unsorted papers piled into a bin at a storage facility don't have much value at all (other than as fire starter, which function they apparently did indeed fulfill.)

    If they were real archives they would be kept somewhere that they could be indexed and studied. Papers would be scanned and put online for scholars to view.

    Boxes in a garage (or garage equivalent)? Meh.

    They suddenly become valuable to someone in hindsight. Sure it is. Just like the kids comic book collection that Mom threw out after telling him to clean up his room fifty times over the course of the previous week. If it's valuable, look after it. Otherwise, it ain't.

    --
    If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
  4. Does the missing $538 mean more a bad thing? by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 1

    That's all that grabbed my attention, and I saw as a loss.

    1. Re:Does the missing $538 mean more a bad thing? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      While still not a fortune, $538 was worth more in 1938 than we might initially think - roughly half a year’s income.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
  5. HP Calculator Museum by pipingguy · · Score: 1

    So what? We have the HP Calculator Museum online now! Screw those physical artifacts!

    *obsessively fondles HP-11c* My Precious

  6. Priceless Irony. by geekmux · · Score: 5, Interesting

    So, it's 2017.

    Previously valued at $2 million, but were apparently priceless artifacts related to a company known for making some of the best printers in the world.

    Did anybody bother to fucking scan them?

    If not, I assume it was a flood of irony that helped put out flames of raging stupidity.

    1. Re:Priceless Irony. by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      they had value because they were not scanned and distributed freely. if someone wanted to make a book of the two fellows for example, this could have had much more value as it was...

      however, since they weren't put in a fireproof housing, I kinda doubt the insurer is willing to pay 2 mil for them - that and the company really didn't give a rats ass about them apparently.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    2. Re:Priceless Irony. by inking · · Score: 1

      I do historical research and you wouldn’t believe how many archival materials are not scanned at all or stored on microfilm in a single location. It’s absolutely absurd.

  7. I blame Carly Fiorina by Gojira+Shipi-Taro · · Score: 4, Funny

    She wasn't satisfied ruining everything great about the company's past, she wanted to wipe all record of it too.

    --
    "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
    1. Re:I blame Carly Fiorina by MattskEE · · Score: 1

      The Agilent spinoff was slightly before Ms. Fiorina was CEO of HP. And in any case that was years ago (1999). Agilent, and now Keysight, has had plenty of time to come up with a secure storage location if they wanted to.

    2. Re:I blame Carly Fiorina by Anubis350 · · Score: 1

      According to the summary, let alone TFA, Agilent *did* have adequate storage, it's the second spinoff, Keysight, that screwed up here

      --
      "goodbye and hello, as always" ~Prince Corwin, from Zelazny's Amber series
    3. Re:I blame Carly Fiorina by Presence+Eternal · · Score: 1

      That was actually the first thing I thought. But I checked, and she wouldn't have been the one responsible. This is one thing she didn't do.

  8. Re:Apparently they didn't have much real value at by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Value is variable. That comic book collection might not have had value to the person who threw them out, or maybe not to the kid at the time. 50 years later, they could be valuable to many people.

  9. Re:So many stupid posts here by Jzanu · · Score: 2

    Language and communication for knowledge transfer is what that truly differentiates humans from animals; especially with writing and reading developed to save knowledge for future use. You should be fine with getting a lobotomy if you don't understand that, and otherwise you're a damn troll. Understanding how a major successful company forms and survives provides information that informs business research and management practice. That is the narrow application. Larger contexts apply for the now unknowable insights it contained. Loss of knowledge is a loss for humanity.

  10. Re:So many stupid posts here by Jzanu · · Score: 1

    Are you fucking autistic or something? Historical communications between the founders of a major company are important for the information they contain. That is lost now.

  11. Re:So many stupid posts here by Jzanu · · Score: 1

    No, "that" meaning this you fucking moron. I imagine you're up for an election somewhere stupid soon, but for now you should fuck off!

  12. And with it, all evidence. by HalAtWork · · Score: 1

    How convenient!

  13. Not scanned, not backed up? by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1
    Tech company papers, lost because the company that sells millions of scanners did not scan its own historical documents ...

    With incompetence this bad, does it really need a Carly to finish it off? Any run of the mill CEO could have run it to ground, you don't need the extra stupid.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  14. the HP Way went up in smoke long ago by swschrad · · Score: 2

    and now it's history has, too.

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
  15. Forget DECENT... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    HP had an entire Printer test division. I assume at least some of that involved flatbed scanner checks as well (once they started doing the combo printers which should have been the early '00s.)

    Meaning they could have been doing this before all the spinoffs as a fucking *SCANNER TEST PROJECT* in between calibration scan pages.

    But instead we lost what might or might not have been an important part of Silicon Valley history because people couldn't be arsed to scan it in while it was still corporeal!

    While we're on the subject, go check out bitsavers.org and maybe send an email thanking them for all their service. They've been grabbing every copy of every tech manual they can salvage, scrounge, get donated, etc to make pdfs of almost every facet of (mostly american) computer technology from the univac up to the mid 90s. In 50 years this might be one of a half dozen electronic collections that actually preserved the majority of the tech side of things, and god only knows what will be left of the business/personal side.

    1. Re:Forget DECENT... by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      Unless Bitsavers finish their work, there is a change in digital formats in 5 years, and this archive isn't rediscovered until 10 years later when there is no machinery available to read the hard disk or usb thumb drive it is encoded on.

      Unfortunately, digital storage is the most ephemeral means of storing information man has ever created. If they wanted the manuals to be available for a reasonably long time, they'd copy it to papyrus.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    2. Re:Forget DECENT... by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Skywriting is a tad more ephemeral than digital storage, unless you're considering unrefreshed DRAM.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  16. No digital copy by manu0601 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It is worth 2 million USD and nobody thought about making a digital copy? Or perhaps the 2 million figure is just for insurance company?

  17. Another Priceless Treasure by kenwd0elq · · Score: 2

    Also destroyed was the home and museum of "Peanuts" cartoonist Charles Schultz.

    1. Re: Another Priceless Treasure by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      Our porn history suffered a great loss this month, but I'm sure if you google it, you'll find something like that anyway.

    2. Re:Another Priceless Treasure by kenwd0elq · · Score: 1

      Good to hear. That's what I get for relying on newspaper reports.

  18. Real value: still $0. by n329619 · · Score: 1

    Backup is overrated.

  19. To add to that by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    There wouldn't even had been a loss if they had all at least been scanned, the first step to sharing...

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  20. Back up by Vinegar+Joe · · Score: 1

    Or fuck up.

    --
    "The average reporter we talk to is 27 years old......They literally know nothing." - Ben Rhodes
  21. No backups, why would there be? by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Suppose there actually WHERE copies or backups or whatever and Keysight Technologies simply want everyone to think the stuff is gone? And why would they do that?

    Well, it depends on what kind of agreement they have with Agilent Technologies or HP about who gets paid what and owns what if Keysight finds anything interesting in those files.

    And now who's to say now where Keysight got their ideas that fall into the areas of interest in Mr. Hewlett and Mr. Packard's personal notes and assorted ephemera, when there's no way to check the stuff that burned up with no backups?

    Yes, of course no one made backups of material that was valuble enough to be negotiated for because of some perceived value of the content when Keysigh split off from Agilent... Of course not.

    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
  22. Wow by Nexion · · Score: 1

    Honestly I cannot adequately convey how much I completely loathe HP as a company, but this is truly a tragedy to lose a huge part of human history to fire. As someone who had the first half of their life erased by fire I can sympathize greatly, but while my history mattered to no one, I have to wonder, why this was not better protected. I somewhat feel certain records should be retained indefinitely, and while the "personal papers" of these two individuals might drive me to vomit; the loss to the future cannot be measured in dollars when in time this media would have truly become priceless.

    This is a shame.

       

  23. publicly ding CEOs by harvey+the+nerd · · Score: 1

    Humanity and HP's founders are victims of the clueless megacorporate cultures. Not just Keysight but every HP successor CEO since Bill Hewitt died in 2001 should dinged in their biographies for failure to preserve and protect the founders' legacy. I'm thinking Wikipedia's hagiographies as an important endpoint .

  24. Re:Another Sad Tale by harvey+the+nerd · · Score: 1

    ok you got my curiosity, maybe others too. Here's your chance to perhaps use the power of networking - opensource to start something.

    Which one ? Standard or a steel? Now is the time, tomorrow might be too late.

  25. Re:Let me guess by harvey+the+nerd · · Score: 1

    The proverbial "day late and a dollar short"

  26. How did the HP archive end up there? by hackertourist · · Score: 1

    I get that subsidiaries can be split off and end up with some of the assets of the parent company. But it seems odd the personal archives of the 2 founders would be among those assets. The parent company is the one with the history.

  27. So fsociety started the Califirnia fire? by rjejr · · Score: 1

    I'd ask Elliot, but he probably doesn't recall.

  28. Why weren't they digitized? by wardrich86 · · Score: 1

    I don't understand... clearly if they were of any importance they would have been digitized by now... and probably stored in a fireproof vault.

  29. Very allegoric by OneHundredAndTen · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Pretty much in line with HP's protracted death.

  30. Re:Valuable historical records always disappear by OneHundredAndTen · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't want anybody to figure out space is fake. Earth is flat.

    And run by lizards. Or the stupid Illuminati. Or Illuminati lizards.

  31. CALIFORNIA by Ted+Stoner · · Score: 1

    I LAC OF RAIN

    Sad to hear. $1000 in h/w and one dedicated soul could have digitized it all. A reasonable insurance price for a $2M asset.

  32. If only... by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 1

    They could have gotten in touch with a company that makes scanners or something where they could have digitized all this... too bad.

    --
    Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
  33. Re:I don't get your joke. Ink for a scanner?!? by drew_kime · · Score: 2

    Who the fuck modded this funny?

    Someone who got the joke.

    --
    Nope, no sig
  34. HP cursed by AndyKron · · Score: 1

    HP has been cursed by the Electron Gods ever since they spun off their heart and called it Aglient.

  35. Re:So many stupid posts here by Rakarra · · Score: 1

    Your hostility is extremely off-putting. You have some issues to work through, but in the meantime, you should probably refrain from posting to Slashdot.

  36. Re:Valuable historical records always disappear by Rakarra · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't want anybody to figure out space is fake. Earth is flat.

    Actually, the Earth is near-spherical, it's space that only has two dimensions.

  37. HP archives destroyed by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

    Carly Fiorina wanted for questioning.

    --
    Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  38. Data without backups by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

    Without backups all data is stored in /tmp

    --
    Watch this Heartland Institute video