Slashdot Mirror


'Daylight Savings' Is Grammatically Incorrect (qz.com)

A reader shares a report: We talk about time like it's money, and that may explain why we say "Daylight Savings Time," capitalizing the concept to emphasize its awesomeness. After all, who wouldn't want to be able to save hours like cash? The phrase "Daylight Savings Time," though commonly used in Australia, Canada, and the US, is technically incorrect. Time and Date, a website devoted to all things chronological, posits that the plural "savings" became popular because it's used in everyday contexts, like "savings account." The grammatically correct usage is "daylight saving time." The expression is singular and not capitalized, according to the US Government Publishing Office style guide. The GPO provides the guidance, "d.s.t., daylight saving (no 's') time."

312 comments

  1. Also... by Mats+Svensson · · Score: 5, Funny

    Whats the deal with "man-holes"?

    1. Re:Also... by j-beda · · Score: 1

      A bit of carma whoring by replying to an early post with unrelated info:

      Best Movie Trailers:

      Daylight Saving - Movie Trailer
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      And the sequel:
      Daylight Saving: Spring Forward - Movie Trailer
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    2. Re:Also... by j-beda · · Score: 1

      or "karma" if you prefer

    3. Re:Also... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since we are returning to "normal" time in the Fall, wouldn't that sequel actually be a prequel?

    4. Re:Also... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do we park in a driveway, but drive on a freeway?

      I think I'm about done with Slashdot. :-P

    5. Re:Also... by plopez · · Score: 1

      drop your pants, bend over, and I'll show you.

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    6. Re:Also... by anegg · · Score: 1

      Where I come from, we park on the driveway, and we drive on the parkway.

    7. Re:Also... by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 1

      It's an old Carlin riff, and it goes:
      Why Do We Park in the Driveway and Drive on the Parkway?
      And, there is an answer here:
      https://www.merriam-webster.com/words-at-play/drive-parkway-park-driveway-history
      As for "freeways", they are something that denoted the lack of a fee or toll to use...
      Oh, and I STILL want my flying car too!
      Then I'll fly past the (gridlocked) expressway and park on the roof...

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
    8. Re:Also... by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Cargo goes by ship. Shipments go by rail car!

      It's a conspiracy!

    9. Re:Also... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or Gallagher.

      Why do they put locks on 7-11's that are open 24 hours a day?

      Hot water heater? Who needs to heat hot water?

      And "Peacekeeper" missile?

    10. Re:Also... by uvajed_ekil · · Score: 1

      Whats the deal with "man-holes"?

      Why couldn't the ghost have kids?




      Because he had a hollow weenie.

      --
      This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
    11. Re:Also... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's the deal with airline food?
      What's the deal with marriage? I was the best man at a wedding. If I'm the best man, why is she marrying him?
      Why do they call it a ‘building?’ It looks like they’re finished. Why isn’t it a ‘built?'

    12. Re:Also... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know I'm really impressed with the TV show Dark Matter.

      I like tacos. And some trucks are big.

    13. Re:Also... by knorthern+knight · · Score: 1

      Why is it that a doctor who specializes in treating "gals" is called a "guy"-nicologist?

      --

      I'm not repeating myself
      I'm an X window user; I'm an ex-Windows user
    14. Re: Also... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She said carma. So therefor itâ(TM)s correct.

    15. Re: Also... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because there are many instances where the doors must be locked. After a robbery or other emergency for example. And try ordering unlockable doors for your building.

    16. Re: Also... by Gornkleschnitzer · · Score: 1

      And try ordering unlockable doors for your building.

      I would hope all the building's doors can be unlocked.

    17. Re: Also... by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 1

      ...And try ordering unlockable doors for your building.

      You should be able to get them wherever casinos get theirs...
      Not only are there no locks, the way they are normally kept closed at need is to chain them together.
      And yes, that does happen once in a great while.
      But it's rare.

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
  2. "News" that "Matters" by MightyYar · · Score: 1, Troll

    Wow, full retard.

    --
    W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    1. Re:"News" that "Matters" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      msmash is the full-retard editor so no surprises there.

    2. Re:"News" that "Matters" by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It looks like the Aspie pedants have finally taken over the asylum. Tune in next week when it is patiently explained to us how we don't "dial" a phone number any more.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    3. Re:"News" that "Matters" by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      Hey, if it could be made for yet *another* reason to get rid of DST....it might be good news!!

      ;)

      Good God I hate jumping back and forth...just pick one and lets all stick with it!!!

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    4. Re:"News" that "Matters" by kwbauer · · Score: 1

      or the prison if you really want to be risky in the current political climate.

    5. Re:"News" that "Matters" by msauve · · Score: 1

      Yea. Who cares if a term is grammatically incorrect when it is more importantly factually incorrect. There is no time saving(s) - the numbers just shift.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    6. Re:"News" that "Matters" by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      Technically, it is saving time, in the same way decreasing the rate of increase counts as "Cost Cutting".

      Do not give politicians bad ideas, for they will adopt them.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    7. Re:"News" that "Matters" by JoeDuncan · · Score: 1

      Wow, full retard.

      Good job down voting the most relevant comment, idiot.

    8. Re:"News" that "Matters" by anegg · · Score: 2

      At least we won't have to relive the "when does the millennium actually begin" drama.

    9. Re:"News" that "Matters" by slew · · Score: 1

      Technically, it is saving time, in the same way decreasing the rate of increase counts as "Cost Cutting".

      Do not give politicians bad ideas, for they will adopt them.

      Technically, it's saving *Daylight* not time...

      In summer months there is more daylight, so rather than "waste" daylight hours in the early morning, we save those daylight hours for the evening.

      Of course in practice, it's a cluster f*k as now some people need to awaken in the dark morning as the quantized 1-hour change overshoots the increase in the morning daylight for many latitudes, but we all get long summer evenings before it gets dark in exchange for this punishment. It mostly depends on if you are a morning person, or not if this is net bad for you...

    10. Re:"News" that "Matters" by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

      As someone who has never lived with DST, the whole thing seems stupid. In some places it makes no sense at all, like Alaska. During the summer the sun hardly sets at all, what's the point of changing the clock so that the sun is at the highest around 2pm in Anchorage or Fairbanks? Shouldn't that be closer to noon?

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    11. Re:"News" that "Matters" by slew · · Score: 1

      Do not give politicians bad ideas, for they will adopt them.

      As I recall, DST idea was a cruel joke *made* by a politician (Benjamin Franklin).

      Mr Franklin's meme "Early to bed and early to rise makes a man healthy, wealthy, and wise." seemed to be at odds with his observation of Parisian culture (who he observed generally slept in and stayed out late). So he made an elaborate joke at the at the expense of the Parisians about how much money they could collectively save by restricting access to candles at night and "forcing" them to wake up when the sun rose.

      Of course *other* politicians took the joke seriously and adopted this screwed up idea of a crazy scheme to force people to wake up when the sun rises...

    12. Re:"News" that "Matters" by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1
      "Early to rise and early to bed - makes a man healthy, wealthy and dead!"

      (James Therber claimed credit for it).

      It may not be true, but I am not taking any risks.

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    13. Re:"News" that "Matters" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the year 2000!!!

    14. Re:"News" that "Matters" by clovis · · Score: 1

      I wish we did get to choose between having sociopaths or having Aspies take over the asylum.
      They gave me a coin to flip for choosing, but both sides say "sociopath".

    15. Re: "News" that "Matters" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe we need a second daylight savings time in northern latitudes, with them being an hour behind the southern compatriots? So in summer you'd gave eastern, central, mountain, etc, on DST, in fall, plain eastern, etc in fall, and then for winter, southern eastern would remain the same, but northern eastern would change again. I'm sure it would be perfectly straightforward.

    16. Re:"News" that "Matters" by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      It''s about to become very dark, every early.

      I hate it.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    17. Re:"News" that "Matters" by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      It isn't even grammatically incorrect; it is just a different word form.

      A lot of people don't understand where English words come from; they come from being used.

      A lot of people get confused about dictionaries and mistake them for authorities; they are instead only a list of known words, known word spellings.

      If a spelling different than the one you prefer is repeatedly used by other people over a lengthy period of time, you may have started out with "mistakes" but in the end it is just two competing spellings. There is no Word Authority.

      In the French language, they had a big convention with all the top experts from around the world, and they agreed to standardize their language. And that consensus has held over time. So you can spell a French word "wrong."

      In English they tried the same thing; they gathered all the top experts from around the world, and most of them were attending with the idea that they were going to standardize the language; but after listening to each others ideas of what they would choose, they ended up agreeing not to standardize the language. And that consensus has also held. So it is only spelled wrong if you intended to spell it another way!

      The standard idiot who wants to be a pedant typically gets confused by all this; I even see people confusing etymology with meaning! LMFAO!!

    18. Re: "News" that "Matters" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And yet you can still be wrong in english. I'm OK with dialects and am on board with "well if everyone agrees, it's true" (hey I've stopped fighting wifi, cloud, and AI) - but you can simply speel wrods wonrg.

    19. Re:"News" that "Matters" by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      Hey, if it could be made for yet *another* reason to get rid of DST....it might be good news!!

      ;)

      Good God I hate jumping back and forth...just pick one and lets all stick with it!!!

      The correct one to pick is full DST, all the time. The second place option, which no one really likes, is the current DST / Standard switcheroo twice a year. The worst of all the options, a distant, distant third place, is switching to Standard Time year round.

      Those of us who don't like the idea of getting rid of the switchover don't like it because we're worried that the choice will just be all Standard Time, all the time. Fuck that, that's horrible. I'm willing to put up with a switchover twice a year to get a nice 8 months of DST.

  3. Grammar Nazi's Win! by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 5, Interesting

    We now have a grammar nazi post on the front page. Slashdot has really evolved, from the nascent grammar troll posts, through the mercurial grammar nazi years, to a full fledged front page grammar post.

    I'm going to continue to say Daylight Savings Time, because that is how nearly everyone says it, and alter the language irrevocably. In 50 years, hopefully we will have done away with daylight savings time completely and this topic will be dead, but if we have not, Daylight Savings Time will be the correct way to say it.

    1. Re:Grammar Nazi's Win! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Grammatically incorrect? Way to put the cart before the horse. Let's first address the fact that it's logically incorrect, since nothing is being saved.

    2. Re:Grammar Nazi's Win! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Slashdot has really evolved

      These days any shitty article is fine as long as it's from some hard left site.

    3. Re:Grammar Nazi's Win! by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      I think it's probably you that has the cognitive problems, seeing as you apparently can't hold a colloquial spelling used by pretty much everyone in English-speaking North America, grammatically correct or otherwise.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    4. Re:Grammar Nazi's Win! by halivar · · Score: 1

      You really took that personally.

    5. Re:Grammar Nazi's Win! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Way too many commas in your post.

    6. Re:Grammar Nazi's Win! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed, let's vote to change it to Daylight Shifting Time.

    7. Re:Grammar Nazi's Win! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the future, everyone will communicate only with emojis. No need for grammar and spelling.

    8. Re:Grammar Nazi's Win! by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 0

      In 50 years, hopefully we will have done away with daylight savings time completely and this topic will be dead, but if we have not, Daylight Savings Time will be the correct way to say it.

      Perhaps, at that same time, it will also be grammatically correct to insert superfluous apostrophes willy-nilly.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    9. Re: Grammar Nazi's Win! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do understand that Slashdot knows perfectly well that its audience is mostly chubby men's rights activists, right?

      And you guys don't generate ad revenue unless you stick around commenting on things unless you're angry about how oppressed you are.

    10. Re:Grammar Nazi's Win! by David_Hart · · Score: 1

      We now have a grammar nazi post on the front page. Slashdot has really evolved, from the nascent grammar troll posts, through the mercurial grammar nazi years, to a full fledged front page grammar post.

      I'm going to continue to say Daylight Savings Time, because that is how nearly everyone says it, and alter the language irrevocably. In 50 years, hopefully we will have done away with daylight savings time completely and this topic will be dead, but if we have not, Daylight Savings Time will be the correct way to say it.

      It's like my pet peeve, the term "offside" in sports has morphed to become "offsides"... Now even the veteran sports announcers are using it. Like it or not, its become part of the vernacular so we are stuck with it and may as well get used to it.

    11. Re:Grammar Nazi's Win! by kwbauer · · Score: 2

      Daylight Time Shifting Time as we are, technically, not shifting Daylight.

    12. Re:Grammar Nazi's Win! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But the Daylight doesn't shift. Let's call it Clock Adjusting Time instead.

    13. Re:Grammar Nazi's Win! by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      Remember when American Telecom and Telegraph renamed itself AT&T? Did you know DVD actually stands for DVD?

      I'm just going to call it DST.

    14. Re:Grammar Nazi's Win! by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's part of the 20th anniversary celebrations. We used to have some great holy wars over Imperial vs. Metric, the merits of DST and which endianess was best.

      By the way, I typed this post in EMACS, the greatest OS^H^H editor ever written. This kind of quality is impossible in Vi.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    15. Re:Grammar Nazi's Win! by JustOK · · Score: 1

      But it's not just clocks that need adjusting. Those lil bits o' magic need to be remathified to accommodate your movement in time, but not in space.

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    16. Re:Grammar Nazi's Win! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if the people of "English-speaking North America" are knuckle dragging idiots who have ensconced an outdated time-adjustment designed to support agrarian needs in some sort of money-making church of the dollar (you would not believe how much money goes into supporting the bullshite), then rest of the world can just suck it... right?

    17. Re:Grammar Nazi's Win! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Let's call it Clock Adjusting Time instead.

      I prefer Diurnal Operations Governance.

    18. Re:Grammar Nazi's Win! by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      In 50 years, hopefully we will have done away with daylight savings time completely and this topic will be dead, but if we have not, Daylight Savings Time will be the correct way to say it.

      Perhaps, at that same time, it will also be grammatically correct to insert superfluous apostrophes willy-nilly.

      Hopefully it'll also be correct to call commas apostrophes by then....

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    19. Re:Grammar Nazi's Win! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "English-speaking North America" is not the only place "daylight saving time" is used, so your entire argument is dead.

      When is Daylight Saving Time worldwide?

    20. Re:Grammar Nazi's Win! by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      Oh, haha... I was referring to the subject line rather than the post’s contents - but you’re right, there is also a superfluous comma in the post itself.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    21. Re:Grammar Nazi's Win! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They should have put up a trigger warning for the pedants in the summary. Look at this poor guy, his blood pressure has got to be through the roof.

    22. Re:Grammar Nazi's Win! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, you can take Canada right out you twit. They use the singular. That leaves maybe 350 Million Idiots, out of a population of the World of something like 22 times that.
      Five percent of the World's population gets to dictate the correct spelling of an incorrect assumption... an assumption that they didn't even invent?
      Aren't you Merkins _so_ special. In your honor, and in remembrance of your past history, why don't we just call it Daylight Slaving Time, and be done with it. You can even have little celebrations of your very favorite Traitors- "Spring Forward with Lee!"; "Fall Back with Davis!".

    23. Re:Grammar Nazi's Win! by c · · Score: 1

      We now have a grammar nazi post on the front page.

      Let's just file this one under "news for nerds" rather than "stuff that matters" and move on with out lives...

      --
      Log in or piss off.
    24. Re:Grammar Nazi's Win! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought it was Digital Versatile Disk.

    25. Re:Grammar Nazi's Win! by danbert8 · · Score: 1

      Commas are the spice of writing. Some people just like spicier text! I tend to be heavy handed with applications of commas as well, it's nothing to be ashamed of...

      --
      Yes it's an anecdote! Were you expecting original research in a Slashdot comment?
    26. Re:Grammar Nazi's Win! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The observatories refer to it as "daylight time" and "standard time". This is more correct because there isn't any saving involved.

    27. Re:Grammar Nazi's Win! by geekmux · · Score: 0

      I'm going to continue to say Daylight Savings Time, because that is how nearly everyone says it...

      Translation: I'm going to continue to say Daylight Savings Time, because Fuck You, that's why. Who the hell needs logic driven by grammar rules anyway.

      In 50 years, hopefully we will have done away with daylight savings time completely...

      50 years? Pffft. My clocks are all set to Zulu time, because Fuck You, that's why.

    28. Re:Grammar Nazi's Win! by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      We now have a grammar nazi post on the front page..

      The headline is also grammatically incorrect. It should read more like, "Daylight Savings" is a Grammatically Incorrect Term.

      But do terms need to be grammatically correct? They are what they are.,

    29. Re:Grammar Nazi's Win! by mjwx · · Score: 4, Interesting

      We now have a grammar nazi post on the front page. Slashdot has really evolved, from the nascent grammar troll posts, through the mercurial grammar nazi years, to a full fledged front page grammar post.

      I'm going to continue to say Daylight Savings Time, because that is how nearly everyone says it, and alter the language irrevocably. In 50 years, hopefully we will have done away with daylight savings time completely and this topic will be dead, but if we have not, Daylight Savings Time will be the correct way to say it.

      This, there is a lot of phrases and words in languages that are grammatically incorrect, however they're in the language because they're in popular use. Languages are not a science, they're also living things and change over time. Languages are based on what people use, not what is set out in a book of rules. Heaps of words are completely wrong like "ain't" which is a bastardisation of "isn't" and not a contraction of anything (isn't == is not) but its in popular use in some places much the same as "innit" in the UK (also a bastardisation of isn't).

      After that we have localisations, a word can mean different things in different places. Americans and Australians use the word "pants" to refer to any pair of clothing with separate legs, however in British English it refers exclusively to underwear (pants are trousers here). Neither definition is strictly incorrect, it just depends on where you are as to which one you use.

      And that mein Grammar Nazi's is just the tip of the mother fucking iceberg.

      English is an incredibly fault tolerant language. You can use completely the wrong sausage and everyone will still understand what you bacon. This is what makes the language so powerful and widely used. No other language in the world has the same robustness which is why it will remain the language of business for a long time.

      Finally, this is far from the worst issue with grammar these days. Priorities people, get some.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    30. Re:Grammar Nazi's Win! by Roger+Wilcox · · Score: 1

      Came here to comment about this... grammar nazis can suck my dick, and they certainly don't belong on the main page.

    31. Re:Grammar Nazi's Win! by anegg · · Score: 2

      That's American Telephone and Telegraph. I guess I'm autistically pedantic today.

    32. Re:Grammar Nazi's Win! by anegg · · Score: 1

      Looks like the American's didn't start it... http://www.webexhibits.org/daylightsaving/e.html/

    33. Re:Grammar Nazi's Win! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please note that the plural of "Nazi" is "Nazis", not "Nazi's".

      - a grammar Nazi

    34. Re:Grammar Nazi's Win! by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      Fair enough; although it's irrelevant history today, isn't it?

      It was just a setup for something ridiculous anyway.

    35. Re:Grammar Nazi's Win! by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

      This, there is a lot of phrases and words in languages that are grammatically incorrect...

      I hope the irony was deliberate.

    36. Re:Grammar Nazi's Win! by anegg · · Score: 2

      This whole thread is marvelously ridiculous.

    37. Re:Grammar Nazi's Win! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...there *are* a lot of phrases and words...

    38. Re:Grammar Nazi's Win! by clovis · · Score: 1

      And if the people of "English-speaking North America" are knuckle dragging idiots who have ensconced an outdated time-adjustment designed to support agrarian needs in some sort of money-making church of the dollar (you would not believe how much money goes into supporting the bullshite), then rest of the world can just suck it... right?

      So, you don't know any farmers. They pretty much all hate DST.
      DST has never been favored by any agrarian interests. It's a city thing and always has been.
      Think about it. Do plants and animals give adjust their schedule according to the sun or to the farmer's clock?
      The farmer's work cycle depends (to some extent) upon the animal's circadian rhythms. Animal behavior patterns depend on the sun, not our clocks.

    39. Re:Grammar Nazi's Win! by Whibla · · Score: 1

      I'm going to continue to say Daylight Savings Time, because that is how nearly everyone says it

      I 'saved' an hour of daylight yesterday, and again today. I'm going to 'save' an hour of daylight tomorrow too. All these hours 'saved' add up to real 'savings'.

      More to the point, is anyone seriously expecting me to give two fucks what the US Government Publishing Office has determined is the 'correct' phraseology.

      The day I take English lessons from a US government department is the day after our resistance to your invasion ends!

    40. Re:Grammar Nazi's Win! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well you Canuks would be right there with us on the Daylight Slaving Time

      http://www.thecanadianencyclop...

    41. Re:Grammar Nazi's Win! by Whibla · · Score: 1

      This, there is a lot of phrases and words in languages that are grammatically incorrect...

      I hope the irony was deliberate.

      In addition to that his other errors were "its in popular use", and the misidentification of "isn't" and "ain't" as having the same roots (is not is not the same as are not).

      None of these, however, detract from what were a number of good points. In particular, the apostrophising of certain plurals, the example given was doubly apt, just looks better, especially when pluralising acronyms.

      In short, errors aside, and I may be biased, but I completely agree with him.

    42. Re:Grammar Nazi's Win! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Daylight Time Shifting Time as we are, technically, not shifting Daylight.

      'clock offset time'? I can't see that anything's being shifted.

    43. Re:Grammar Nazi's Win! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are, not is.

    44. Re:Grammar Nazi's Win! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ain't ain't a contraction. If it were, it would be a shortened form of "ai not", and "ai" is not a word. It's a proper name for a species of three-toed sloth, and it's a vocal interjection, but it's not a word.

      Pluralizing acronyms with an apostrophe is actually correct. Acronyms are not a single unit. They're a series of individual letters that stand for the first letters in each word or name of something else. Just as you would apostrophize "there are three L's in parallel", you would say "I have a hundred DVD's in my collection" because DVD is an acronym and its letters stand alone as individual letters, not as parts of a word.

      Oh, and oxford commas forever! Everyone who says otherwise is wrong! (For proof, try leaving out a list delimiter in a programming language. Your efforts won't bear fruit until you put in proper delimiters between each element in a list. This is simply good, clean syntax. Urging people to violate clean syntax because of some "style" rule is asinine.)

      But I think the best point GP made was that English is fault-tolerant. I'd go a step further and say that it's actually a meta-proto-language (a language describing how to start a new language). Anyone from anywhere in the world can speak to anyone from anywhere else in the world as long as they both know English vocabulary. Not the language, not the syntax, not the nitpicky rules, but just the barebones words. You can get a native Chinese speaker and a native Swahili speaker together, and as long as they know a handful of basic English words on the topic they're concerned with, they can speak in their native language's structure but use English words, and be understood. And not just by them, but by others who also know those English words, and even native English speakers. That's because informal, spoken English allows nearly any sentence construction to be understood and accepted. The word "hungry" can become a sentence spoken by someone who is, a question spoken by someone wishing to invite you to eat, or a warning of a grizzly bear by someone running past you. No other words need be spoken, and the situational context provides all the meaning you need. The lack of structure makes it difficult to learn formally, but makes it incredibly useful as a real-world communication tool.

    45. Re: Grammar Nazi's Win! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for giving me a good laugh...!

      English is an incredibly fault tolerant language. You can use completely the wrong sausage and everyone will still understand what you bacon. This is what makes the language so powerful and widely used. No other language in the world has the same robustness which is why it will remain the language of business for a long time.

      That's like saying the business world is using windows because it's so robust and fault tolerant.

      Anyway, on a more serious note, no, not at all.
      As a European who speaks 4 western European languages fluently (5 if you count Swiss German as a separate language) and gets by fine without a dictionary in another two, I can only say, thanks for the laugh. Haha.

    46. Re:Grammar Nazi's Win! by Pfhorrest · · Score: 1

      "Ain't" is a phonetic spelling of a mispronunciation of a contraction of "am not". From "amn't", the m and n merge (somewhat like "damn it" -> "dammit"), yielding "an't". Mispronouncing the vowel as a long "a" yields something that sounds like "ain't", and writing that down phonetically yields "ain't" itself.

      --
      -Forrest Cameranesi, Geek of all Trades
      "I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
    47. Re:Grammar Nazi's Win! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny, because agrarian time schedules that vary through the year are given as rationale for adopting DST

      Industrialized societies generally follow a clock-based schedule for daily activities that do not change throughout the course of the year. The time of day that individuals begin and end work or school, and the coordination of mass transit, for example, usually remain constant year-round. In contrast, an agrarian society's daily routines for work and personal conduct are more likely governed by the length of daylight hours[9][10] and by solar time, which change seasonally because of the Earth's axial tilt. North and south of the tropics daylight lasts longer in summer and shorter in winter, with the effect becoming greater as one moves away from the tropics.

      However, the modern reasons that DST remains in place are that it gives people more time to go shopping after work in the winter, increases public safety etc...

      I find both to be bullshite, since the US Congress varies the start and end from year to year. This tells me that the real reason for DST is to generate money for consultants who install patches and set up (really) wanky systems to handle the transition. T-mobile still hasn't figured it out in my city and I have to set my time manually for a week each year when they try and figure it out.

    48. Re:Grammar Nazi's Win! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Americans struggle with the English language, the talk about Legos instead of Lego and say anyways instead of of anyway and can't pronounce Aluminium correctly at all.

    49. Re:Grammar Nazi's Win! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      English is an incredibly fault tolerant language.

      Thank you for the irony. "Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool." And by God there's lots of talent in America.

      I'd even say some want to hide their ignorance by purposefully destroying words. Nobody will understand "the principle capitol will affect change", but it's perfectly clear. I'm too busy watching teevee to explain it to you. And no, it's not because I'm too lazy to learn how to say what they meant.

      If ignorance is bliss, you cannot fail because you don't understand how you failed.
      Fox in the henhouse. Chicken love entertainment. Hunger will not strike.

    50. Re: Grammar Nazi's Win! by Tanman · · Score: 1

      *. . . there are a lot . . .

    51. Re:Grammar Nazi's Win! by bigdavex · · Score: 1

      The word "Ain't" is the contraction of am not. People often misused it as the all-purpose negative contraction, so it was hyper-corrected out of formal use entirely. You can tell when we miss it, because we fuck it all up.

      I'm a grammar nazi, aren't I?

      See, wtf? I *are* a grammar nazi? The word we need here is clearly "ain't".

      --
      -Dave
    52. Re:Grammar Nazi's Win! by bigdavex · · Score: 1

      Lot is singular.

      --
      -Dave
    53. Re:Grammar Nazi's Win! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You didn't understand what you read. In fact, you got it backwards.
      It is saying that agrarian society's don't work by the clock, they work by the sun. DST makes the usual time of getting up in the morning to be in darkness.
      Working outside in the dark is non-optimal.
      Farmers who deliver or take their products to markets get screwed because the markets open while it is still dark, but the farmers need to wait for the sunrise to pick, so they are late to the daily opening. It's a pain in the butt for them in many ways.
      In the WIKI article you linked to but obviously did not read, you'll see several mentions of farmer's objections to DST.

      Google for "farmer's object to DST" or something like that. You'll see these
      https://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2013/11/131101-when-does-daylight-savings-time-end-november-3-science/
      https://www.woot.com/blog/post/the-debunker-was-daylight-saving-time-instituted-for-farmers
      and numerous other links.

      I'll tell you why we have DST. The sport that our ruling class prefers to play is golf, and DST gives them more time to play in the evening.
      We will always have DST and we will be given a bunch of BS reasons why.

    54. Re:Grammar Nazi's Win! by war4peace · · Score: 1

      Summa' Time and Winta' Time.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    55. Re:Grammar Nazi's Win! by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

      Commas are the spice of writing. Some people just like spicier text! I tend to be heavy handed with applications of commas as well, it's nothing to be ashamed of...

      Comma splice! Please see me during my office hours for a review of your writing portfolio.

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
    56. Re:Grammar Nazi's Win! by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

      On this side of the Atlantic, this whole thread is marvellously ridiculous.

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
    57. Re:Grammar Nazi's Win! by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

      English is an incredibly fault tolerant language. You can use completely the wrong sausage and everyone will still understand what you bacon. This is what makes the language so powerful and widely used. No other language in the world has the same robustness which is why it will remain the language of business for a long time.

      Shullbit. All languages are fault tolerant to a similar degree, although the areas they are most tolerant in might vary. English has its limits -- for example, there is no way of resolving "I will do it yesterday" without directly asking for clarification (assuming you're not talking to Marty McFly, that is).

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
    58. Re:Grammar Nazi's Win! by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

      "Ain't" is a phonetic spelling of a mispronunciation of a contraction of "am not". From "amn't", the m and n merge (somewhat like "damn it" -> "dammit"), yielding "an't". Mispronouncing the vowel as a long "a" yields something that sounds like "ain't", and writing that down phonetically yields "ain't" itself.

      What is your evidence of this? There's a lot of incompatible theories about "ain't".

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
    59. Re:Grammar Nazi's Win! by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

      ...there *are* a lot of phrases and words...

      The move to the invariant "there's" is a legitimate and logical change in English. "There are..." originates in the Germanic verb-second rule that gives rise to archaic sentences such as "rarely do people write like this now" and "Old King Cole was a merry old soul and a merry old soul was he."

      It has been quite a few centuries since verb-second ceased to be a productive rule in English, and the few remaining fossilised exceptions have slowly dropped out of use since.

      Furthermore, we now have "it's me", "it's you" and "it's us", where the verb does not encode number, and this is really no different to switching to "there's"/"there is" as a fixed singular expression.

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
    60. Re:Grammar Nazi's Win! by Doghouse13 · · Score: 1

      As the saying goes - "A little learning is a dangerous thing".

      What these people always miss, is what most grammars ARE - namely static models of a language. A model is NOT the thing itself, and anyone who forgets that fact has left the path of wisdom. A real language such as English is both more complex than the model and is continuously evolving. And, definitively, when normal, accepted language usage takes a form that doesn't match the grammar, the discrepancy is a shortcoming of the grammar - it is not the fault of the language for being "ungrammatical".

      In other words - you can choose to follow a grammar if you wish - and for some purposes that's a useful thing to do - but that is a CHOICE. And the correct response to being criticised for "bad grammar" is, "So what?"

    61. Re:Grammar Nazi's Win! by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      Rather than the marvelously ridiculous, I prefer a story about a magnificent bastard.

    62. Re:Grammar Nazi's Win! by Pfhorrest · · Score: 1

      That was just from memory, but the the WIkipedia article has a well-sourced description of it as well, though apparently that is only a portion of the whole story, and several different contractions (including that one) all independently converged to "ain't" over time.

      --
      -Forrest Cameranesi, Geek of all Trades
      "I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
    63. Re:Grammar Nazi's Win! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thre "are" a lot etc etc

    64. Re: Grammar Nazi's Win! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with you about grammar nazis being a pain in thw proverbial. But you are wrong when you claim that most people say "daylight savings". In fact until today I didn't know that ANYONE did.

    65. Re: Grammar Nazi's Win! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Nazis actually abolished Daylight Saving. They brought it back in post-war West Germany when they decided to... (wait for it)... Addenhauer.

    66. Re:Grammar Nazi's Win! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the saving is for one person or one entity, then the singular is correct.

      But the population is plural, as is my household. We are seven, and hence each of us gets a saving of daylight. Ergo the plural is ok too.

  4. What about saying this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck daylight saving time.

    1. Re:What about saying this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck daylight savings time

      There fixed that for you!

    2. Re:What about saying this by glenebob · · Score: 1

      No, fuck Daylight standard time.

    3. Re:What about saying this by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1

      Fuckwit Standard Time?

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
  5. Um... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Daylight Saving's time.

  6. Incredible by eepok · · Score: 1

    This might be the least relevant Slashdot post I've ever seen. And I'm proud to be a part of it.

    There's not even an argument for the abolition of the time change and the programming task ahead if such a decision is made!

    1. Re:Incredible by JustOK · · Score: 1

      At this point, the only reason we still have time changes at all is because of powerful lobbying by the likes of www.timeanddate.com and momentjs.com and so on.

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    2. Re:Incredible by rmdingler · · Score: 1

      This might be the least relevant Slashdot post I've ever seen. And I'm proud to be a part of it.

      The least relevant post ever on Slashdot? Combined with the annual DST thread?

      Wouldn't miss it... I'm hopping on here, too.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

  7. What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously. STFU.

    How the hell does a little piece of garbage nitpick like this make it to the front page of slashdot?

    Is the motto still "news for nerds. stuff that matters"?

  8. He's back!! by NotFamous · · Score: 1

    Hey, Cliff Clavin, glad to see you off the bar stool and out on the W's.

    --
    Some settling may occur during posting.
  9. People have been pointing this out for decades by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yawn.

    Really? Are you a millennial by any chance?

    This has appeared in newspapers (look that up) pretty much every year since I've been able to read.

    1. Re:People have been pointing this out for decades by Custard+Horse · · Score: 1

      This has appeared in newspapers (look that up) pretty much every year since I've been able to read.

      3 years?

  10. Exciting news day at Slashdot. by aliquis · · Score: 1

    no comment.

  11. Totally by Jfetjunky · · Score: 4, Funny

    Because that's TOTALLY why everyone hates it, the incorrect grammar.

  12. Get rid of it. by grub · · Score: 4, Funny

    I was always a proponent of Daylight Saving Time. Moving all the clocks ahead or back an hour was always a lot of fun.

    This, though, ruins it for me. I think we should ban DST altogether.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:Get rid of it. by acoustix · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think we should be on DST year round. I want my sunlight at the end of the work day instead of the beginning.

      --
      "A plan fiendishly clever in its intricacies"- Homer Simpson
    2. Re:Get rid of it. by plopez · · Score: 1

      In fact we could have it 6 or 10 times a year. Randomly. Just giving people 2 to 3 days notice. Also, change your batteries every time as well. The battery lobby would be all for that.

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    3. Re:Get rid of it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Your boss, on the other hand, would prefer you to be well rested at the start of the day instead of the end of the day.

    4. Re:Get rid of it. by Virtex · · Score: 5, Funny

      I want my sunlight at the beginning AND end of the work day. Can't we just fall back in the mornings and spring forward in the afternoon? The shorter work day would be nice too!

      --
      For every post, there is an equal and opposite re-post.
    5. Re:Get rid of it. by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      I think we should be on DST year round. I want my sunlight at the end of the work day instead of the beginning.

      Id give you all my mod points, if I had any.

      (Sorry about the missing apostrophe - a guy further up the page stole it)

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    6. Re:Get rid of it. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      DST is just a pain in the arse, with almost no benefits.

      Anything that used a clock gets screwed by it, e.g. computers that have to deal with the same hour happening twice or a one hour gap.

      Humans have to manually change their clocks twice a year, although personally I don't bother and just live with them being an hour out. I guess it was less of an issue when clocks were shit and needed to be corrected regularly anyway, but these days I adjust mine maybe twice a decade at most.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    7. Re:Get rid of it. by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      So, on a 32-hour work week, would you prefer 6h24m days starting work at 10:30am, or four 8-hour days and a three-day weekend every week?

    8. Re:Get rid of it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds great until it's dark at 8 AM in December. Maybe even later depending on where you live.

    9. Re:Get rid of it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think we should be on DST year round. I want my sunlight at the end of the work day instead of the beginning.

      Well fuck you.
        -Signed Everyone Who Has Trouble Getting Up In The Dark

    10. Re:Get rid of it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes! Virtex for president!

    11. Re:Get rid of it. by geekmux · · Score: 1

      I was always a proponent of Daylight Saving Time. Moving all the clocks ahead or back an hour was always a lot of fun. This, though, ruins it for me. I think we should ban DST altogether.

      Well, you gotta admit it would be rather funny if a grammar war was what ultimately ended it...

    12. Re:Get rid of it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This. What moron's idea was it to shift everyone's clock so that you get to drive to work while staring directly into the sunrise and drive home from work in the dark? I much prefer driving into work in the dark and having some daylight left when I get home so I can play sports with my kids or ride my bike.

    13. Re:Get rid of it. by sootman · · Score: 2

      Do you want your kids walking to school in the dark at 8am all winter long?

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    14. Re:Get rid of it. by vladimir.sakharuk · · Score: 2

      Let say, I will vote for any presidential candidate who promised to keep daylight time whole year...

    15. Re:Get rid of it. by acoustix · · Score: 1

      Sounds great until it's dark at 8 AM in December. Maybe even later depending on where you live.

      That's what would happen to me. And I'm fine with that. In Iowa, it's next to impossible to do any activity outdoors after 4:30/5:00PM in the winter. It's too dark.

      On the flip side, I don't mind that it's dark in the morning. I can't do anything prior to 8am outdoors anyway (if I'm being a good neighbor).

      --
      "A plan fiendishly clever in its intricacies"- Homer Simpson
    16. Re:Get rid of it. by acoustix · · Score: 1

      Do you want your kids walking to school in the dark at 8am all winter long?

      Is this one of those "won't somebody think of the children" posts? I don't fall for the "do _____ under the guise of the children".

      And yes, I do have elementary school age children.

      --
      "A plan fiendishly clever in its intricacies"- Homer Simpson
    17. Re:Get rid of it. by Tyler+Durden · · Score: 1

      Or we could just change our work hours accordingly. That way we don't need DST temporarily or otherwise and 12pm and 12am would still approximate noon and midnight.

      --
      Happy people make bad consumers.
    18. Re:Get rid of it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So arrive at work at 4 AM and leave at noon, rather than forcing everybody else to lie to themselves about what time it is.

    19. Re:Get rid of it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since you won't answer it, I will. No, I don't want kids on the road in the dark. And I no longer have elementary school age children.

      captcha: martyrs

    20. Re:Get rid of it. by clovis · · Score: 1

      I was always a proponent of Daylight Saving Time. Moving all the clocks ahead or back an hour was always a lot of fun.

      This, though, ruins it for me. I think we should ban DST altogether.

      They tell me I'm doing DST wrong.
      Back when they said "move your clocks ahead or back an hour", I put all my clocks in the car and drove into Alabama.
      All my clocks were then right, but then they told me I can't return to Georgia for half a year.

    21. Re:Get rid of it. by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      Do you want your kids walking to school in the dark at 8am all winter long?

      Yes. In the snow. Ten miles. Uphill, both ways. Just like I did. It builds character.

      Now get off my lawn, you molly-coddled youngster.

      How the hell is this "news", for nerds or otherwise? How does it matter to anyone?

    22. Re:Get rid of it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, 8am? My elementary school started at 7:30am and my high school at 6:30am; both were a 20 minute walk and it was always dark in the winters (~ 42N lat)

    23. Re:Get rid of it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about 9 straight amphetamine-fueled 16-hour days followed by three weeks off?

    24. Re:Get rid of it. by Huge_UID · · Score: 1

      So move to a city on the western edge of a time zone. Indianapolis, Boise, Honolulu, Kashgar (China)...

    25. Re:Get rid of it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let say, I will vote for any presidential candidate who promised to keep daylight time whole year...

      Not sure that's a good idea. Presumably we only have storage space for a certain amount of daylight, after that it's going to get more and more expensive if we never use it up.

    26. Re:Get rid of it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since you won't answer it, I will. No, I don't want kids on the road in the dark. And I no longer have elementary school age children.

      captcha: martyrs

      We have sidewalks with lighted intersections. No need to walk on the road.

      I too wish people would stop using children as an excuse to do the logical thing.

    27. Re:Get rid of it. by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Somebody's position on DST depends partly on their longitude and latitude.

      The farther north you are, the more your sunrise and sunset vary.

      Each time zone has a central meridian, such that the time is based on that meridian's mean sun time. If you're east of that meridian, you get light earlier. If you're west, you get light later.

      Since I'm in Minneapolis, my sunrise and sunset times vary more than for most of the US, and I'm located significantly west of 90W, so sunrise and sunset are delayed about 13 minutes from 90W. Therefore, it stays darker in the morning in winter than it does in most of the rest of the US.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    28. Re:Get rid of it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you want your kids walking to school in the dark at 8am all winter long?

      Modern children don't "walk". That would be abuse and neglect!

    29. Re:Get rid of it. by antdude · · Score: 1

      Ditto. Frak standard. Daylight saving forever please.

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    30. Re:Get rid of it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In that case you should move to Spain or Argentina. They're both in timezones that are out of step with actual daylight by at least an hour, such that solar noon always occurs at 1pm or later throughout the year. A side effect of this is both countries have a cultural tendancy for late dinners.

    31. Re:Get rid of it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I want to go back to the sundial clock.

      Split the time between sun-up and sun-down into twelve parts called "hours", eight of which form a work day.

      Then, in spring, let's jump forward to the ol' atomic clock hours, and in fall we revert to the sundial hours.

      Problem solved.

    32. Re:Get rid of it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YES YES YES' a thousand times yes, Sunlight for end of day. Kids could play after school in daylight.

  13. Why now? by drew_kime · · Score: 1

    I won't beat the "How is this news?" drum, because that's already been hit multiple times. What I want to know is, why now? We're nowhere close to the change from or to DST, so what brought this up to begin with?

    --
    Nope, no sig
    1. Re:Why now? by aaron44126 · · Score: 1

      Err, the time change is this weekend (in the U.S.), seems timely enough to me...

    2. Re:Why now? by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

      I We're nowhere close to the change from or to DST, so what brought this up to begin with?

      dst is this coming weekend....

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    3. Re:Why now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the _end_ of dst that's coming this weekend

    4. Re:Why now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What I want to know is, why now? We're nowhere close to the change from or to DST, so what brought this up to begin with?

      This Sunday, around 2am, most of North America will change their clocks.

      So, yeah, it's kinda relevant and timely.

      Of course, the inability of most people to use grammar is kind of pointless to highlight here. How many people would say "attorney generals" as the plural instead of the correct "attorneys general"??? Very few, in fact.

      Now, how many people give a shit? Very few, in fact.

    5. Re:Why now? by SScorpio · · Score: 1

      If only that were true. It'll be back in March, same as always

    6. Re:Why now? by drew_kime · · Score: 1

      Err, the time change is this weekend (in the U.S.), seems timely enough to me...

      Doh!

      --
      Nope, no sig
    7. Re:Why now? by Calydor · · Score: 1

      And Europe changed back this weekend.

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
  14. Really by rossdee · · Score: 1

    This is Slashdot

    Who Tango Foxtrot cares about grammer or spelling

    I would be more concerned about the actual fact that we don't actually 'save' any daylight

    1. Re:Really by freeze128 · · Score: 1

      Perhaps it should be called "Daylight Shifting Time". That does away with the "s" problem, and fixes your issue as well.

    2. Re:Really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, the problem is the messing with the fucking clocks twice a year!

    3. Re:Really by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      no, the problem is the messing with the fucking clocks twice a year!

      DFT?

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  15. I bet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I bet your fun at partys.

    1. Re:I bet... by cayenne8 · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'll bet you're fun at parties.

      There, fixed that for you.

      ;)

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    2. Re:I bet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      THAT'S THE JOKE.

  16. Try to keep up, please by fibonacci8 · · Score: 2

    What's the grammatically correct emoji to express daylight saving time?

    --
    Inheritance is the sincerest form of nepotism.
    1. Re:Try to keep up, please by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      Do NOT give them any ideas!

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    2. Re:Try to keep up, please by JoeRandomHacker · · Score: 1

      The poo one?

    3. Re:Try to keep up, please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A clock with both hands giving you the finger.

  17. /. Is done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    So sad that this is the crap thats getting posted on slashdot now. One of the first great tech news site, now just blithering idiots trying to push social ideals on people. Take a look at what happened to other media outlets that abandoned their purpose for this crap.

  18. Still understandable by HideyoshiJP · · Score: 1

    This bothers me less than people confusing abbreviations for standard and daylight saving time per time zone. I will propose times for meetings in EDT and get back responses with EST. I suppose that also can still be understood, but is more inaccurate than a grammatical error.

    1. Re:Still understandable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This bothers me less than people confusing abbreviations for standard and daylight saving time per time zone. I will propose times for meetings in EDT and get back responses with EST. I suppose that also can still be understood, but is more inaccurate than a grammatical error.

      This is why I always use ET (or CT or PT). Everyone understands it even the most pedantic.

  19. Yawn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pedantic nerds are so annoying. You know what's the best way to deal with pedantic nerds? You beat them up. Hard. You twist their arms so hard they will not be able to jerk off for months. You shit on their faces. And then you shove them heads-down into a wastebasket.

    1. Re:Yawn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look out, we got an internet badass over here.

  20. Capitalization by ffejie · · Score: 1

    One of the issues with saying d.s.t should be lowercase is that time zones are regularly capitalized. Eastern Standard Time becomes Eastern Daylight Time. Now people have in their heads that "Daylight" is a proper noun. I'm on board with dropping the "s" but I'll likely continue capitalizing. Until people start regularly following US GPO standard on capitalization of timezones, I think this is probably a fight lost.

    --
    Disagreeing with me does not mean you get to mod me troll.
  21. Pedantic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pedantic, pedantic, Pedantic!!!!

  22. Heck, everyone knows that (video) by bfwebster · · Score: 1

    Best video on the subject ever: https://youtu.be/k4EUTMPuvHo

    OK, only video on the subject, likely, but still the best ever. ..bruce..

    --
    Bruce F. Webster (brucefwebster.com)
  23. Saving What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Daylight saving time. Not a single second of daylight is saved by this ploy.

    - Crazy English

  24. It rolls better off the tongue by Arzaboa · · Score: 1

    Daylight Savings has a bit of twang to it, as in, "Wez iz savings sum daylight"

    --
    "Time Out!" - Mom

  25. GFY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm a professional linguist, and here's my message to the author: go fuck yourself

    1. Re:GFY by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      I'm a professional linguist, and here's my message to the author: go fuck yourself

      Some achievement being a professional linguist at the age of twelve!

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    2. Re:GFY by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      He's obviously a well-versed legal professional as well, having issued a response in the nature of Arkell vs Pressdram.

    3. Re:GFY by anegg · · Score: 1

      He may be quite cunning.

  26. Year-round DST by acoustix · · Score: 1

    Let's just keep it all year and stop changing the time.

    --
    "A plan fiendishly clever in its intricacies"- Homer Simpson
  27. Zieg Heil! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Mein Obergrammerfuhrer.

  28. Colossal stupidity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And 'daylight saving time' was idiocy six ways from Gomorrah in the first place. AC

  29. No DST here by Malc · · Score: 2

    We don't have DST here you insensitive clods. It's just "summer time" or "GMT". I've always wondered why you provincial folks refer to it as DST. I'd be very happy for it to be summer time all year around!

    1. Re:No DST here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GMT is Greenwich Mean Time, or basically UTC, a universal time standard. Nothing to do with moving the clocks around for stupid reasons.

    2. Re: No DST here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GMT is the current time zone for the U.K. Their daylight saving time zone is called British Summer Time. The 'G' in 'GMT' refers to 'Greenwich', in east London. British ships had a clock set to GMT so they could calculate their longitudinal position, and given they ruled the waves and a quarter of the land in the 19th century, their home time zone became the reference point to everybody.

    3. Re:No DST here by mccalli · · Score: 1

      No - OP is right. The different times are referred to as either GMT or BST (British Summer Time) in the UK. You'd expect that - that's where Greenwich actually is...

    4. Re: No DST here by anegg · · Score: 1

      And they took their time quite seriously https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Harrison/

    5. Re:No DST here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We don't have it either. We have Hawaiian Standard Time.

      Oh, and "Island Time" (15-30 minutes late).

      Both times happen all the time.

    6. Re:No DST here by Godwin+O'Hitler · · Score: 1

      Notice they never changed the name from BST to EST. What foresight. Think of all the extra millions Brexit would cost if they had to change it back again.

      --
      No, your children are not the special ones. Nor are your pets.
    7. Re:No DST here by mccalli · · Score: 1

      Good spot. Although we could also have made the best of it and taken our chance to dump the damned thing forever. I'm really not a daylight savings fan...

  30. Still incorrect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And why wouldn't it be Daylight-Saving(s) Time? Expanding on the comparison in the summary, you could say a savings account, moneymarket account, or moneymarket savings account (no need for hyphenation). To the contrary, you wouldn't say Saving Time or Daylight Time, and saving has little reference to time and more reference to daylight, so I would posit Daylight-Saving(s) should be hyphenated.

  31. Of all the things wrong with .... by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Of all the things that are wrong with daylight saving time, the grammar mistake is the least important one.

    There is no reason to continue this anachronism any more.

    Steven Pinker last book The better angels of our nature talks about how much the cost of artificial light has fallen in the last three hundred years.

    It is high time we get rid of it.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:Of all the things wrong with .... by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      LED lighting is one of the greatest things ever invented. There's basically no downside.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    2. Re:Of all the things wrong with .... by Kjella · · Score: 1

      Steven Pinker last book The better angels of our nature talks about how much the cost of artificial light has fallen in the last three hundred years.

      The absolute cost is one thing, that would make the absolute gain less. But it also matters than a few hundred years ago most people were farmers in the field and when it got dark you went to bed. Today the premise that shifting it matters is highly dubious, like here in Norway it's now pitch dark out and it's 6 PM. Does it matter? No, the lights are on and they'll stay on until I head to bed. As long as the daylight hours fall sometime between getting up and going to bed it doesn't matter when, because I'll fill the rest of the time anyway. The silly thing is that I'm wasting the precious daylight hours in the office. To flip the situation on its head, how many people would need more than ordinary interior lighting to work in the middle of the night? Looking at employment by major industry sector I'm guessing:

      Mining 0.4%
      Construction 4.3%
      Utilities 0.4%
      Transportation and warehousing 3.2%
      Agriculture, forestry, fishing, and hunting 1.5%

      That's almost 10%, maybe there's a few in other categories too but I think I'm generous if I say 15% of jobs are outdoors and the rest in offices, factories, stores, hospitals or such where you don't get any more benefit than at home. If society was smart we'd just start waaay earlier and have our daylight after work when we can actually do something more useful with it like be outside, while the oddballs would be those working then instead of those doing the night shift.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    3. Re:Of all the things wrong with .... by Bryansix · · Score: 1

      DST is not for the farmers. Can we stop that myth already?
      Source

    4. Re:Of all the things wrong with .... by Bryansix · · Score: 1

      ackshually there are a host of negative effects of light pollution.

    5. Re:Of all the things wrong with .... by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      LED lighting is one of the greatest things ever invented. There's basically no downside.

      Except when cheap companies make cheap switching power supplies to run them and flood the spectrum with RF noise. And cheap contractors use lower quality lights intended for office (I forget which class of unintentional emitter that is) and shop use in a place where the better class device is required -- another example of RF pollution.

    6. Re:Of all the things wrong with .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Myth 1: Paywalls are a good idea. Any chance of a non-paywalled source?

    7. Re:Of all the things wrong with .... by udachny · · Score: 0

      It is high time we get rid of it.

      - Aaah! But is it high daylight saving time we get rid of it?

    8. Re:Of all the things wrong with .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Open the page in incognito/private mode might work.

    9. Re:Of all the things wrong with .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LED lighting is one of the greatest things ever invented. There's basically no downside.

      The downside to LED lighting is not immediately obvious. LED has become very efficient with lumens, but the quality of the light itself is much worse than incandescent. LED has too much blue. The Sun itself is an incandescent light source. As LED development becomes more advanced, with phosphors that help reduce the amount of UV and blue light produced to render more accurate browns and reds, the LED becomes less efficient. I doubt there will be any efficiency intersection between LED and incandescent lighting, but there are indeed some valid downsides to using LED light.

      It is difficult to argue this to convince anyone that hasn't studied color and light, but you can try this yourself if you have both LED and incandescent light sources of similar lumen output. Set your alarm clock to wake you in the dark hours of morning, and sleep. When you wake in the dark, test the different light sources against the sensitivity of your eyes, and if you are from Earth, you will find the LED far more irritating than the incandescent light.

      Another downside to LED is color rendition. Incandescent lights, even he sickly yellow dim 2000K color temperatured incandescents, render color perfectly. LED can't do this perfectly, and it has taken many years for LED dev to even begin to approach accurate color rendition with their usually very blue 7000K+ color temperature (though it isn't color temp that is the problem, it is instead the color spectrum produced by the LED and its phosophors.)

      The end of the line for LED efficiency is rapidly approaching, will hit its theoretical maximum efficiency ceiling I believe by the year 2020. I don't know if the continuing development of incandescent lighting will ever approach today's LED effieciency, but you better believe it is still being developed, and for good reason.

      Granted, not all LED are equal. Most incandescent sources do seem to be about equal, regarding color spectrum and color rendition.

      My point is that it is not as simple as it seems. LED is not clearly superior in all aspects to incandescent sources, and far from it, and clear aspects where incandescent will likely always blow LED away is in the quality of the light itself, regarding spectrum and color rendition.

    10. Re:Of all the things wrong with .... by Gussington · · Score: 1

      Steven Pinker last book The better angels of our nature talks about how much the cost of artificial light has fallen in the last three hundred years.

      It is high time we get rid of it.

      Because artificial light feels just like sunshine...

    11. Re:Of all the things wrong with .... by Godwin+O'Hitler · · Score: 1

      Apart from truly lousy lighting comfort, nope, no downsides.

      --
      No, your children are not the special ones. Nor are your pets.
    12. Re:Of all the things wrong with .... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Wow, someone is buying cheap shit and then reflecting on the entire industry.

    13. Re:Of all the things wrong with .... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Because artificial light feels just like sunshine...

      I live in England you insensitive clod.

    14. Re:Of all the things wrong with .... by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      I am suspicious of anyone who says that incandescent light bulbs provide good quality light. Some do, but not the ones you typically find in a house.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  32. Serves you ex-Colonials right by tehcyder · · Score: 1
    You should stick to the correct phrase "British Summer Time".

    (Insert your own joke about there being two days of actual summer in the UK here).

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    1. Re:Serves you ex-Colonials right by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 2

      (Insert your own joke about there being two days of actual summer in the UK here).

      Oh, you guys have gained a day! Is that because of global warming?

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    2. Re:Serves you ex-Colonials right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Insert your own joke about there...

      What the fuck did you just say about my penis?!

      ...about there being two days of actual summer in the UK here.

      Oh, uh... my mistake. Never mind. Forget I said anything...

    3. Re:Serves you ex-Colonials right by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      Oh, you guys have gained a day! Is that because of global warming?

      Not so, dear sir. Global warming is going to make Britain colder, don't you know? It's supposed to shift the gulf stream south away from the British coast, and all the heat that flows from the equator to England will go to the other EU countries.

      I've heard it's a retaliation by Belgium and France for Brexit, but that could just be a rumor.

    4. Re:Serves you ex-Colonials right by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      This subthread reminds me of our local Puget Sound area summer:

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      On a side note - those of us who garden in this corner of the US often look to England for guidance, given the similarities in climate.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
  33. What's even more useful... by argStyopa · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...are the people who take the time to point this out.

    They believe that they're just being helpful, pointing out a common grammatical mistake of usage.

    What they're really doing is showing the rest of us that they're annoying as fuck so we can avoid them generally.

    Grammar Nazis are like the intellectual equivalent of skunk smell, warning us all away from something we REALLY don't want to experience any more closely.

    It's socially a very useful thing. Thank you, Grammar Nazis.

    --
    -Styopa
    1. Re:What's even more useful... by Moof123 · · Score: 1

      Cart meet horse.

      I'm of the opinion that the "right" English is what is in common usage, rather than what some pedantic sot digs out of a book written by some other pedantic sot ages ago. I'd rather have an evolving growing language than a locked down regulated one with gatekeepers and enforcers shouting down every new variation and mis-usage.

      It is not like the English language, with all its esoteric rules fell from the sky fairy on golden plates. Rather usage got documented and became a festering field upon itself.

  34. USGPO Guidelines by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 1

    It's going to be a real drag if I have to write daylight saving (no 's') time every single time I want to mention it. That's sort of like "News for Nerds (no 'z'), Stuff that Matters."

    --
    Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
  35. Daylight SHIFTING Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because it doesn't save anything.

  36. Also logically wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It's also logically wrong, because you don't actually save any daylight by closing the curtains to be able to see the TV or computer, the sun still shines (believe it or not, I've been outside to check), so it should actually be daylight wasting time.

    The daylight we are wasting in the evening is then replaced by electrical light in the morning.

    1. Re:Also logically wrong by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      It's also logically wrong, because you don't actually save any daylight by closing the curtains to be able to see the TV or computer,

      You've gone well beyond any personal experience held by most /. readers. There are no windows and thus no curtains in their parent's basement. They never get sun glare on the computer.

  37. DST is also logically incorrect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get rid of that shit.

  38. I'd like to withdraw my savings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wont use either term until someone explains how any daylight is saved at all. Until then, it is daylight time and standard time for me.

  39. Who gives a F$%^& by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously people. Don't you have better things to think about!

    Yes, I did spend 20 seconds on this post. What's it to ya?

  40. "though commonly used in Australia" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "though commonly used in Australia"

    Fuck off.
    By who? The same idiots who say "safeways"?

    I've always known it as Daylight Saving Time. The first time I ever heard anyone say otherwise was the lyrics to The Bad Touch.

    1. Re:"though commonly used in Australia" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the dumb Trump-voting yanks trying to tar everyone with the same brush. They've hit peak stupidity.

  41. Glad you cleared that up! by JoeDuncan · · Score: 1

    ... because we were all just SO *confused* about it!

    I can sleep easy now, am totally plussed.

  42. I'm a grammar nazi by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

    and this seems pretty nitpicky to me.

  43. Why do we even bother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shifting the clocks is a colossally stupid thing anyway. Why do we even bother? Just shift all the time zones permanently to DST and get back to life.

    Besides, I assure you that, whatever you do with your time pieces, there will be exactly the same amount of daylight. Nothing you do to your clocks does anything with daylight. It doesn't save it.

  44. Hu focking kairs! by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Grammer Knotsees kan eet et!

  45. Australia and Canada don't give a shit what the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This might be news to the author - Australia and Canada don't give a shit what the US Government Publishing Office style guide says.

  46. Don't analyse it too hard by jeremyp · · Score: 1

    Never mind the grammar, ghowever you spell and capitalise it the term is complete nonsense.

    Firstly, DST is generally applied in the summer when daylight hours are actually in surplus. If there's any point in the year where we need to save daylight, it is the winter.

    Secondly, DST doesn't actually save any time. It may look like you have got a bit of extra daylight in the evening, but it turns out that is because it was robbed from the morning. The whole thing is some kind of scam.

    --
    All I want is a secure system where it's easy to do anything I want. Is that too much to ask ~~ Randall Munroe
  47. Just for the sake of argument by Solandri · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Totally agreed grammar nazi posts don't deserve to be on the front page.

    But isn't it called a "savings account" (plural) because you deposit money you've saved on multiple occasions into it? Likewise, shouldn't it be "daylight savings" because you save daylight on multiple days? i.e. If we only changed the clocks for one day, then it would be "daylight saving time." But since we change the clocks for multiple days, doesn't that make "daylight savings time" correct?

  48. Was this REALLY NECESSARY!? by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

    Are we to the point where we're making pedantry into an actual story!? Is there nothing better to post on the goddamned front page!?

  49. Not a grammatical error by bipbop · · Score: 3, Informative

    The plural attributive construction is well established as standard, and has been on the rise for the past 70 to 80 odd years. It's standard everywhere, but is somewhat more common in British English than American English. If the OP were interested, they could read about this topic in A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language (Quirk et al 1985), where it is covered starting on page 1333, although somehow I doubt they're interested.

    1. Re:Not a grammatical error by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language (Quirk et al 1985)

      I'll admit that I looked up this title to see if the lead author's last name really is Quirk... and it is. That's such a perfect name for someone working on a tome covering English grammar.

  50. Daylight Wasting Time by crow · · Score: 2

    I'm just trying to get everyone to call the winter shifted time "daylight wasting time." I don't care about the capitalization, though considering that other periods of time, like months or days, are capitalized, it might be logical to capitalize it. Perhaps I should trademark it and capitalize on the merchandising. :)

  51. Old saying by cwsumner · · Score: 4, Insightful

    To use an old Sioux saying:

    "Daylight saving time is like cutting a foot off of your blanket and sewing it on to the other end, and thinking you have made it longer!"

    1. Re:Old saying by anegg · · Score: 1

      Even the Sioux argued about Daylight Saving Time?

    2. Re:Old saying by cwsumner · · Score: 1

      Even the Sioux argued about Daylight Saving Time?

      The Sioux are right there to this day...
      But that was about 15 years ago.

  52. Summer time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...which is why 'daylight savings time' is really called summer time.

  53. Start work earlier in the day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And do it, not do it and make the clock lie about you doing it.

    1. Re:Start work earlier in the day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some people are required to be at their place of employment at fixed hours.

      Sorry Dale, we can't run the assembly line because Bob doesn't believe in DST and won't be into work for another hour.

  54. +1 for "Daylight Shifting Time" by bigpat · · Score: 1

    Agreed, let's vote to change it to Daylight Shifting Time.

    If we can't eliminate daylight "savings time" might as well give it a name that isn't misleading.

    +1 for "Daylight Shifting Time"

  55. Shift them to LST not DST. Then leave it there. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why should you get up at 9am, four hours before midday at 1pm rather than at 8 am, the same time of the day, but this time without making the clock lie about your lie-in?

  56. Ugh. This isn't a grammar issue by LostOne · · Score: 1

    It isn't a grammar issue for whether to use "saving" or "savings". It's what the official name of the thing is that matters. If the relevant authorities say it is "saving", it is "saving". If they agree that "savings" is okay, then "savings" is okay. It's about naming things correctly, not grammar. Whether the name makes grammatic sense of not *does not matter*. Names need not make any sense whatsoever. They just *are* and behave like any other noun grammatically no matter how they were formed.

    What is clear is that there is a natural tendency to use "savings" in this context in English for whatever reason (whether it's due to the reason suggested in the summary or some more fundamental thing about English syntax/grammar) and that tendancy goes back a *long* time. That should suggest to the relevant authorities and pedants alike that insisting on "saving" is a lost cause.

    (And don't get me started on things that various pedant types have insisted are incorrect but which have no basis in the history of English. Like not splitting infinities or not ending sentences with prepositions, both things that English has done since forever. But that's off topic here.)

    --

    If it works in theory, try something else in practice.
  57. While we're at it by boudie2 · · Score: 1

    Is it Keith Richard or Keith Richards?

    1. Re:While we're at it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it Keith Richard or Keith Richards?

      Keiths Richard just like "kinghts errant"

  58. You mean Mediterranians... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    pic related,
    https://i.imgur.com/04pOwzq_d.jpg?maxwidth=640&shape=thumb&fidelity=medium

  59. The real story is that DST is pointless and crap by wardrich86 · · Score: 1

    DST is a sham and should be killed off already. The bonus is that it will fix the grammatical issue because nobody will need to use the term anymore.

  60. well, duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that's been the joke about dst forever.

    i think i first heard it (daylight savings time doesn't 'save' daylight) in preschool or kindergarten, 50 years ago.

  61. The British are always right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the UK we call it British Summer Time (B.S.T.) because if we didn't how would we know it was summer.

  62. subject to taxes and fees... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Measuring the savings of "daylight saving time", as promoted by Congress, and the promise of an extra hour of daylight, I find no actual savings, nor is there an extra hour of daylight. But this may be measured after taxes and fees were deducted. Congress is hellbent on taxing everything and I really have no way to tell for sure that there was no hidden daylight saving tax stealing away that promised extra hour.

  63. what's in a name? by swell · · Score: 1

    Call it what you will. Pass laws if you like. The reality is that the sun does not care and no daylight will be saved. Farmers and fisherpeople will continue to live by the sun and the seasons.

    However millions of people who have to go to school or jobs will be horribly inconvenienced by those who manipulate our clocks.

    --
    ...omphaloskepsis often...
  64. Daylight Saving's is factually incorrect by peterofoz · · Score: 1

    As attributed to a wise Native American, "You can't make a blanket longer by cutting a foot off the top and sewing it to the bottom."

    1. Re:Daylight Saving's is factually incorrect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends on who's foot you cut off. If it is Hairy Bigfoot, then there may be method in the madness.

  65. Well, there is an "s" in "destroy",,, by Tom+Veil · · Score: 1

    ... as in "destroy them"!

    ...

    Destroy them!

    --

    There's nothing you have that they can't take away: Absolute zero, Gentle Jack, bottom line.

  66. Does anyone care? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In another ten to fifteen years the ability to type legibly will be as over as the ability to speak when face to face is for teenagers that just want to keep tap-fapping on their cell phones. So who the hell cares about grammatical nonsense? Or time, for that matter. It's all illusory.

  67. Nobody likes being called childish, however... by RJFerret · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When I was a child, I was taught there were right and wrong ways of saying things, so I could communicate with others. That was decades ago.

    Then I learned that language evolves, and what is spoken and permissible nowadays are totally different words and formats than from when I was a child--I've adapted so I can communicate with others.

    That's what grown adults do, relate to those around them and their community, not try to enforce specific aberrations of speech or stay stuck in the past. If you can shift your clock forward in the Spring, you can stop calling it Daylight Saving Time and refer to it as everyone else does, Daylight Savings Time, which matches nicely with other "savings"; and fits with the plural aspect of it, as there are lots of different Daylight Savings times in various places with different starts and endings.

    1. Re:Nobody likes being called childish, however... by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      You're expect to conform the the conventions of you peers. That's how languages evolve. It's a fairly gradual process and not without controversy.

      If you're at all into grammar, then it matters that some words are countable or others are uncountable. And in some contexts you'll be judged as uneducated if you use improper grammar.

      Ultimately words have meaning, and there is a serious problem if you prefer to repeat words without understanding the meaning.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    2. Re:Nobody likes being called childish, however... by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      expected*

      PS - like my sig says. I don't practice what I preach.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  68. Re:The real story is that DST is pointless and cra by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    When I was a farmer, all the farmers blamed the city boys and golfers for DST. Farmers hated it and thought it was stupid because all it accomplished is messing up animals set on a schedule twice a year.

    When I lived in the city, all the city boys blamed the farmers for DST. City boys hated it because they thought it just randomly moved the goalposts on travel time to and from work to maximize the amount of time you spend with the sun DIRECTLY in your eyes during your commute.

    So if everybody hates it and blames someone else for it, WHY THE FUCK DOES IT STILL EXIST? Gah.

  69. How about calling it... by Jerrry · · Score: 1

    Let's just call it "Just get up an hour earlier, you lazy bastard, if you want more daylight" time.

  70. WHAT? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    God damn it, i was saving for my retirement!

  71. Re:The real story is that DST is pointless and cra by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    DST is a sham and should be killed off already.

    Or, the more likely explanation ... you're a moron, and in places DST makes a huge difference in the timing of usable daylight throughout the year.

    Where I live, in the summer it's the difference between a day which runs from 4am-8am in terms of daylight, or with DST one which runs from 5am-9pm in terms of daylight. DST pushes that to times which more people will be able to enjoy.

    Where you live may be at a different latitude, but if you think it's a sham you're a fucking moron.

  72. Language shifts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try to keep up, would you?

  73. Re:And while we're at it... by anegg · · Score: 1

    You forgot to mention mute points.

  74. We lost the "healthy"/"healthful" battle by Wrath0fb0b · · Score: 1

    And we literally completely lost "literally" as well.

    Maybe it's time for some new leadership in the Grammar Nazi camp?

    1. Re:We lost the "healthy"/"healthful" battle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just literally died inside reading this post.

  75. The too short blanket... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Daylight savings is a retarded idea. Anyone with more than a room temperature IQ knows that when your blanket is too short, cutting a piece off at the bottom and sewing it on at the top won't help.

  76. Standard Time always by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think we should be on DST year round. I want my sunlight at the end of the work day instead of the beginning.

    As someone who lives in Toronto, DST-in-winter would mean sunrise at around 9 AM, with a corresponding sunset at 6 PM. Given that most office workers get off at 5 PM, and many commutes take 30-60 minutes, it's not like you're gaining much.

    And it's not like Toronto is that high up either (43N). Certainly most Canadian cities would have a worse DST-in-winter (Vancouver, Calgary, etc.), but even NYC and Chicago are in a similar situation.

    Personally I'd rather have Standard-Time-always: in the summer, sunrise in the morning at 4:30 and sunset at 8:00 PM (versus 5:30 and 9) isn't so bad IMHO.

  77. Re:And while we're at it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, now that the parent post has been modded to -1 and effectively invisible, your comment is now itself a moot point.

  78. Say what? by leadfoot · · Score: 1

    I'm from Arizona you insensitive clod!!

    --
    "We're gonna need a bigger boat"
  79. Also... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Daylight Saving Time is incorrect.

  80. Irregardless: Grammar is what we say it is. by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

    If enough people use it that way, it's proper grammar. Same thing for the definition of words.

    Don't loose your cool when someone says Daylight Savings Time.

    Just play it fast and lose.

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  81. It's literally incorrect as well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Daylight hours are shorter in the winter, yet "Daylight Saving Time" occurs during the summer months. So why are we "saving daylight" during the time of the year when we have the most daylight?

    (The whole thing's stupid anyway, nobody can even remember why we started doing it...for the war effort, for the children who have to walk to school, for the electricity savings, for the farmers...the list of non-reasons goes on forever)

  82. Not just grammatically incorrect by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

    Not just grammatically incorrect, but monumentally stupid.

    --
    When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
  83. Admit it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    English is a shite language. There are worse languages, but it's still shite.

  84. Subject of a Teen Titans Go episode by mpercy · · Score: 1

    Hey, it's what's on my TV when I wake up after I fall asleep during Adult Swim.

  85. And that's how we get "Buttfuckers" by mpercy · · Score: 1

    In the Idiocracy future.

  86. Re:And while we're at it... by mpercy · · Score: 1

    And of course..."I gonna axe Bob to..." No you'll "ask" him.

  87. 15 U.S.C. 6(IX)(260-7) by mpercy · · Score: 1

    "daylight saving time" is specified in the US law

    United States Law - 15 U.S.C. 6(IX)(260-7)
    Time zones and daylight saving time
    United States Code
    Title 15 - Commerce and Trade
    Chapter 6 - Weights and Measures and Standard Time
    Subchapter IX - Standard Time

    1. Re: 15 U.S.C. 6(IX)(260-7) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "daylight saving time" is specified in the US law

      United States Law - 15 U.S.C. 6(IX)(260-7)

      United States federal law also classifies marijuana as a dangerous drug with high abuse potential and no recognized medical use, so you can fuck right off if you think something being put into law in the U S of A makes it right.

  88. The morons forgot to capitalize DST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Abbreviations are supposed to be capitalized. NASA, EDT, CDT, MDT, PDT, etc.

    Maybe they wanted to have capitals savings writing.

  89. what about an apostrophe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Daylight Saving's Time.
    Because its the time that belongs to Daylight Saving.

    Or maybe people just didn't want it to sound like there were on some really weird Greenpeace protest to SAVE THE DAYLIGHT

  90. Then stop being a moron! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously? Calling somebody a Nazi because you're too fucking stupid and lazy, to write something that is readable without having to decipher the crap that you shat out of your head? And without guessing what you meant with half a dozen ambiguities?

    No, we could not just not read it! Because we wouldn’t know that it is not worth reading, without having (at least started to) read it (and stumbled over your crap) in the first place!

    Stop being such a lazy fuck, you moron! You're not at the home for disabled people!

    1. Re:Then stop being a moron! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Found a real Nazi. Did you enjoy your white lives matter rally this past weekend?

  91. Another example: Olympiad! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Olympiad is the time between two Olympic games!

  92. Circular definition much? by blibbo · · Score: 1

    Your bank savings account is exactly as grammatically incorrect as daylight savings time.

    Or grammatically correct... From a certain viewpoint. You save multiple dollars multiple times. Multiple people save multiple minutes.

    How about grass cuttings when you mow the lawn? Is it grammatically correct? I suspect the people that care about this stuff will come to their own conclusions long ago. The rest of us, at best, noted the difference between scientific and government publications compared with round-the-family-home usage and got on with our lives. Slow news day.

    1. Re: Circular definition much? by blibbo · · Score: 1

      **will have come to their own conclusions.

      Slashdot, please add preview to mobile. How many times do we need to say it?!

      Also your anti-caps lameness filter is preventing me from adequately expressing my frustration with your i n c o m p e t e n c e.

    2. Re:Circular definition much? by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      Your bank savings account is exactly as grammatically incorrect as daylight savings time. Or grammatically correct... From a certain viewpoint. You save multiple dollars multiple times. Multiple people save multiple minutes.

      A "savings account" is the account where you keep your savings. Or, a "saving account" is the account you use for saving money. I guess the different viewpoints are between active usage vs. passive storage. (In my native Finnish, "säästötili" can be interpreted both ways.)

      Anyway, this whole topic beg's the question, have the grammer nazi's won?

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    3. Re: Circular definition much? by blibbo · · Score: 1

      Exactly, and daylight savings is when you get some time savings. Beside which, aren't time and money both supposed to be non-count nouns? Just saying, it's funny how we say checking account but we don't always say saving account. But you could.

  93. Glad we got that cleared up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is all.

  94. Duh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Those of us with functioning brain cells already knew this. Granted, no one wants to know the correct way to say that, kinda like X Window, not X Windows. It's amazing the number of folks claiming to be competent tech types that don't seem to know these things.

    The whole problem with daylight saving time could be eliminated if we just eliminate DST. It never made much sense to begin with and expanding the period in which we have to suffer with it only makes it worse. Something else the Republicans screwed up, but we're used to that. It's just a shame they have to muck stuff up for everybody. If they won't get rid of it, at the very least, we need to reduce the period where DST applies to where it actually might make some sense.

  95. Just kill it! PLEASE! by p51d007 · · Score: 1

    It is outdated, and not needed. When this nation was more rural, with farming being a mainstay, it MIGHT have made sense to "extend" the day, to allow farmers with kids in school, to get a little extra work after school, but, in today's world, it's a PAIN IN THE ASS to deal with. Clocks that have to be moved forward and backward (that don't automatically change), having small children that have to be up an hour early in the spring to meet the bus/get to school and on and on and on. The best reaction to daylight savings time, has to be attributed to an old Indian who said...only a white man could think you could cut the bottom off of a blanket, sew it onto the top and make the blanket longer. Leave the %#(^)@@! clocks alone. Either set them for DST, or leave them for regular time.

  96. How about... by XSportSeeker · · Score: 1

    ... Fucking Your Biological Clock Time (FYBCT)?

  97. Interesting, though I find the rationale debatable by Picodon · · Score: 1

    First, I’ll disagree with the mob: I thought that this article was interesting!
    On the other hand, I was surprised by the original article disregarding any connection of DST with the concept of money savings:

    “Remember the name by thinking that you are saving light (...) You’re unlikely to conflate the concept with money or bank accounts that way, probably because no one says “light is money.””

    I’d never thought of DST as meaning that we are saving daylight, because we’re obviously not putting daylight in a safe deposit box, nor are we conserving daylight (producing or using less): we’re merely rescheduling it. On the other hand, one of the reasons for adopting DST (particularly, after the oil crisis of the 1970s) was to use less energy. Thus, it was hoped that DST would provide tangible savings (supplies and money). For that reason, “daylight-savings time” made sense to me: clocks were adjusted to achieve savings by way of the time-shifted daylight.

    Nonetheless, I stand corrected!

  98. We May Not Have Enough Minerals To Even Meet Elect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Reckon you could add a couple more 'even's in there. We Even May Not Even Have Enough Minerals To Even Meet...

  99. Whooooooosh..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not to brite, are yoo?

  100. No DST by kattisch · · Score: 1

    How about if we abolish the whole Daylight Savings Time change all together which actually saves nothing and obnoxiously disrupts our routines. That would be so much better. It is such a stupid, stupid idea!

  101. So you're mentally retarded ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But you project your self-hatred onto others, who tell you that maybe, you should not act mentally retarded, unless you are?

    Yeah, real grown-up there, retard.

  102. Mirroring? Is that all you got? Thanks, I guess... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Around here, very young children have this thing, where when somebody criticizes them in any way, they go "mirrored" and "mirrored back" (in our language of course). Maybe "reflected" is a better term, I don't know.
    Like kids going "a million!" ... "a trillion" ... "infinite!" ... "infinite plus one!" ... "infinite times infinite" ... "always one more than you!".

    So is that what you are attempting here?
    REALLY?? How old is your mind? Four?
    Because if you'd have to actually stand in front of me in real life, and say that, with everybody around watching... you couldn't have found a worse person to say this to. XD

    You didn't even attempt to bring any arguments against my arguments. So there isn't even anything to refute. You just said ... *nothing*.
    So if you like empty statements and personal attacks so much, you will enjoy this comment! XD

    Yes, I'm older than you, and use "XD". Which, in your emotionless psychopath culture, is very much frowned upon. So ... eat your shriveled black heart out, you emotionally dead psychopath. ^^

  103. Day light saving? FFS, it is irrelevant. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Day light saving time is something trivial that governments can screw around with without actually impacting much of anything. Thus they do.
    Sure, people die due to the clock changes -- but until the ultra rich suffer it doesn't matter. We've too many peons and rich folk don't care apparently.

    The world would be fine using UTC universally once people adjusted to the new times. Who cares if you wake up at 23:00. Really, it's just a number. Sunrise hasn't changed, the cows won't stop milking, the curtains don't fade. Iceland uses British time even though they are two hours shifted -- it doesn't matter.

  104. Re:Day light saving? FFS, it is irrelevant. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One more whiny post with nothing to add? Talk about irrelevant, and redundant and repetitive, ad nauseam, too many times.