Slashdot Mirror


CNN Plans To Offer Subscriptions for Digital News Next Year (wsj.com)

Benjamin Mullin, writing for WSJ: After investing in digital verticals focused on business and politics and acquiring an online-video startup, CNN is gearing up for another big step: It plans to launch tiered subscription offerings for its digital news business (Editor's note: the link could be paywalled; alternative source) as early as the second quarter of next year. A proposed premium offering will give subscribers access to special content on topic-specific verticals such as CNN Money and CNN Politics, built around network personalities. A second option will provide additional, though less specialized, content across all of CNN's sites. Pricing hasn't been finalized. The move is part of a broader five-year plan to develop new revenue streams and reach $1 billion in digital revenue by 2022. CNN's digital arm expects to pull in $370 million this year, according to a person familiar with its financials.

60 comments

  1. BBC News by jfdavis668 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This is why I get most of my news from the BBC, even though I live in the US. They don't try to dramatize it, they just report. I don't know why I would pay for the extra drama CNN tries to add to every story.

    1. Re: BBC News by Type44Q · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I wonder how much CNN would charge not to bring us their "news. "

    2. Re: BBC News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      >They don't try to dramatize it, they just report.

      Best laugh of the day, thanks.

    3. Re:BBC News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The BBC is the CNN of the UK. The truth is there never was an unbiased news service anywhere.

    4. Re: BBC News by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      Have to agree. BBC is a very biased "news" organization. I wouldn't trust them as far as I could throw them. They have a better brand than CNN, that's it.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    5. Re: BBC News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have to agree. BBC is a very biased "news" organization. I wouldn't trust them as far as I could throw them. They have a better brand than CNN, that's it.

      So the new motto at the BBC ought to be: "Trying harder to suck less." ????

  2. Have no opinion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Pay to have ours!! :P

    1. Re:Have no opinion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Found the Fox News fanboi.

    2. Re:Have no opinion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think Fox News falls in the same boat.

  3. Slow news day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not sure why this is on slashdot... must be a slow news days for liberals. Canâ(TM)t yaâ(TM)ll make up some more anti-Trump bs?

    1. Re:Slow news day by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Canâ(TM)t yaâ(TM)l

      Where are you copypasting all this stuff from?

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
  4. not CNN, WSJ by supernova87a · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Funny how this is being reported by the WSJ.

    If there is one news source that's worth paying for, it's the Wall Street Journal. Say what you will about their conservative / nonsensical editorial page writers and editors, but their actual journalism is top notch, and one of the few outlets actually worth subscribing to.

    CNN is basically an infographic production group, with an uninformed talking soundtrack.

    1. Re:not CNN, WSJ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny how this is being reported by the WSJ.

      As we talk about a paid service. And then there's a paywall on the link. Oh the irony.

  5. Why pay for fake news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    No point in supporting their fake news business scheme.

  6. Can't I? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Can't I already buy poop via subscription on Amazon or something like that?

    No thanks, I don't want leftist propaganda even for free.

  7. Another dumb company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey CNN your business is dying. Trying to get folks to pay for the crap service you offer is not going to save you. Al Jazeer, Sky News, BBC and a host of others are way better than the crap you folks put out. Who is going to pay real money for your made up news?

  8. Why would anyone pay for CNN? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They can read trumps Tweets for free on Twitter. Why would you pay a service to do that for you?

    I look forward to a future in which CNN does not exist.

  9. So now I have to pay for autoplay? by Kaeleku · · Score: 1

    No thank you.

  10. CNN faceplants alldaylong! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    talk about fraud by wire, radio, or television!

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=q_l1DKk1xng

  11. Auto-play videos by sremick · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Can I pay to not have videos auto-play ever time I want to READ an article?

    1. Re:Auto-play videos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      In Firefox -> about:config -> media.autoplay.enabled -> set to False. You must click on the small 'Play' button to the left of the seek bar to play the video. Sometimes twice on some sites. Small price to pay, though. Chrome surely has something similar...

    2. Re:Auto-play videos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not just auto-play: I'd like to get rid of auto-refresh also. Way too often have links to interesting-looking articles gone away before I could read down to them.

  12. All hail James Oâ(TM)Keefe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Imagine being this shallow: to think that the only two camps someone could possibly fall in are CNN Democrats and Fox Republicans. No, citizen, there are no views outside the diverse and intellectually-rigorous range that spans from Chuck Schumer all the way to John McCain. Those are the only views you are allowed to have!

    Now, for the rest of us who have put more than 5 minutes of independent thought into the matter, let us take this opportunity to thank James Oâ(TM)Keefe for exposing the gigantic propaganda mill that is the (formerly) mainstream media. I have every reason to believe that he is going to get Fox one day, too.

    1. Re:All hail James Oâ(TM)Keefe by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2

      All hail James Oâ(TM)Keefe

      Why did you feel the need to copy and paste James O'Keefe's name?

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    2. Re:All hail James Oâ(TM)Keefe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      like you, he's a retard.

    3. Re:All hail James Oâ(TM)Keefe by ClickOnThis · · Score: 1

      I have every reason to believe that [James O'Keefe] is going to get Fox one day, too.

      I doubt it. For the same reason sharks don't bite lawyers: professional courtesy.

      --
      If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
    4. Re: All hail James Oâ(TM)Keefe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Name calling: the mark of a defeated man with no argument.

    5. Re: All hail James Oâ(TM)Keefe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So in your metaphor, Project Veritas is a shark because they release actual video proof of corrupt media figures admitting journalistic fraud?

    6. Re: All hail James Oâ(TM)Keefe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okeefe is the fraud. Doctored videos and hack editing and all.

    7. Re: All hail James Oâ(TM)Keefe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If that was the case then ACORN would still exist. Your disagreement with O'Keefe's position doesn't excuse prima facie evidence of illegal activity.

    8. Re: All hail James Oâ(TM)Keefe by reboot246 · · Score: 1

      Doctored videos? LOL! Not in your dreams. Try "edited" videos, just like everybody in the news business does. Oh, and he also releases the full, unedited videos just for doubters like you.

      What kind of evidence do you need?!?

    9. Re: All hail James Oâ(TM)Keefe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that Explains why okeefe is still running around after he was found guilty for trying to bug a senators phone. ...right?

    10. Re: All hail James Oâ(TM)Keefe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When your âoeeditingâ job depicts people saying the opppsite of what they intended itâ(TM)s called âoedoctoringâ

  13. So if I pay... by wjcofkc · · Score: 1

    Do I get access to real news?

    --
    Brought to you by Carl's Junior.
    1. Re:So if I pay... by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      Yes....but you have to pay for that.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
  14. CNN has fewer viewers than spongebob by ZippyTheChicken · · Score: 0

    CNN has fewer viewers than spongebob ... honestly so this is going to fail hard

  15. Cmon really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do I really want to pay for one of the three letter agencies human programing? They should just fuck them self off already.

  16. The gunshot you just heard by Shogun37 · · Score: 1

    ...Was CNN shooting themselves in the foot. Again. Either use a bigger gun, or aim higher. Put yourself out of our misery.

  17. They will have to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Watch themselves, who in the right mind would pay for their news?

  18. CNN IS FAKE NEWS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just get hbo or showtime. they're supposed to be fake.

  19. Cool by Tailhook · · Score: 2

    Another establishment group-think cesspool blocked by a paywall. Between that and the huge numbers dropping cable TV service CNN won't be seen outside airports.

    --
    Maw! Fire up the karma burner!
  20. digital verticals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    English please?

  21. Oh please by DaMattster · · Score: 1

    Oh please let me hurry up and subscribe. I am so excited that it just might end my constipation and I just might be able to take a lavish shit.

  22. Not all is lost! by blindax · · Score: 1

    You will still be able to get CNN fake news for free.

  23. Beyond Worthless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not a chance in hell I would pay a dime for their "news" now. Not even click-thru...

  24. BREAKING NEWS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    CNN is now charging for fake news!

  25. Polly Want a Cracker? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fake New!! Fake News!! SQWAAAAAK!! Fake News!!

    I took the liberty of paraphrasing.

  26. just saying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    when did CNN get into the news business?

    1. Re:just saying by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      Solid. Solid.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
  27. Sweet, sweet irony by SlaveToTheGrind · · Score: 1

    It plans to launch tiered subscription offerings for its digital news business (Editor's note: the link could be paywalled . . .

  28. What not going to wait just one day?? by laurencetux · · Score: 1

    Then it would make real sense since

    Remember Remember the Fifth of November...
    is already a thing ( a cross the pond thing but...)

  29. Meh, I'll take the NY Times over WSJ by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    I prefer a bit more muck racking, and WSJ is too thoroughly owned by corporate interests to do any of that.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  30. Financial over optimistic? by twotonfist · · Score: 1

    Wow maybe someone should invest in this venture looking at those returns.

  31. CNN = like cow feces, but more expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just buy some cows. They will produce lots of fresh milk so they practically pay for themselves, plus all the poop you could ever want. Any time you feel like watching CNN, you can just go outside and bask in a world of cow patties.

  32. CNN Digital Subscriptions? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So CNN is about to offer Digital News Subscriptions. Great! Another opportunity to JUST SAY NO to CNN.

  33. CNN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who even uses CNN for news, Why would you even consider paying for that crap.

  34. A Poor News Channel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    CNN was once the leader and powerhouse in the news industry, until Turner sold it off -- it's now a quagmire of poor programming and utterly bullsh*t reporting, with useless "entertainment" like Nancy Grace, etc. I wouldn't pay for it, no way.

  35. If it wasn't drama laiden garbage, maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's news for stupid people