Slashdot Mirror


Audacity 2.2.0 Released

Popular open-source audio editing software, Audacity, has received a significant update. The new version, dubbed Audacity 2.2.0, adds a range of features and options such as additional user interface themes, and the ability to customize themes for advanced users. It is also getting playback support for MIDI files, and better organised menus, the team wrote. You can find the complete changelog here.

13 of 103 comments (clear)

  1. A very neat relyable piece of FOSS Software. by Qbertino · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The audacity crew as been working away at their audio tool for more than a decade now and it's a cornerstone of all things audio I do. A very nice and neat piece of software. Works as advertised, does what it should and is offered up in a neat set of cross-plattform packages. Love it.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
    1. Re:A very neat relyable piece of FOSS Software. by markdavis · · Score: 3, Insightful

      +100

      It is a great piece of software. They don't ruin it with stupid UI changes, either. It is straight-forward, reliable, fast, and yet very powerful.

    2. Re:A very neat relyable piece of FOSS Software. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I agree, it really is a great bit of software.

      One thing I'd like to see is a more accurate, reconstructed waveform view. The current display is a simple "join the dots" affair with symmetrical RMS band overlaid.

      Due to the way that digital sampling works this waveform is not a real representation of the analogue reconstruction. To get that you basically resample at a much higher rate and then low pass filter at the original Nyquist frequency. Audacity actually does that when you change the sampling rate.

      I recently created something similar at work, with reconstruction and some shading to better highlight the true amount of energy in the vertical bands. It was a bit fiddly to get the shading to look good with every waveform.

      I wish I had the time to re-implement it in Audacity.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    3. Re:A very neat relyable piece of FOSS Software. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      It does what it does, for free. However, it still falls short of Goldwav and at just $45 bucks it's worth 10 times that much if you have to do anything even semi-professional with audio on a regular basis.

  2. This is how software should be by lucaiaco · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I agree: no flat design, no minimalist interface, no fancy icons or flashy features. It does exactly what it has to do, and nothing more. Its UI is so clear that I don't think I ever had to check the documentation on how to use it (and I am no expert in the field). One of the best free source software out there.

  3. Re:First used in 2005 by Travelsonic · · Score: 2

    Indeed - not bloated to hell, has a good amount of features, easy to use, though unlike MS Paint, you can actually customize it with plugins, if I recall (been a while)

    --
    If you believe in privacy, and believe you have "nothing to hide" at the same time, you're a goddammed idiot
  4. Re:Realtime effects stacks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    You want to do real-time audio effect stacks on your PC for free?

    Read this:

    https://sound.stackexchange.com/questions/26436/real-time-audio-effects-in-windows

    and this:

    https://music.tutsplus.com/articles/15-totally-free-reverb-plug-ins-that-rock--audio-35

  5. Re:Oh the Audacity! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Audacious is a player, audacity is an editor, so they are two different things.

  6. Re: Only took a year to support Sierra by F.Ultra · · Score: 2

    That it now has 'full' support does not mean that previous versions had no support. The problems lied in gatekeeper (that all had work arounds btw) so the fix for Sierra is also a fix for High Sierra.

  7. Looking forward to trying it out... by QuietLagoon · · Score: 2

    I currently have a license for Sound Forge (originally from Sonic Factory, then Sony now some marketing company), and I'm less than impressed with the current owner of the software. They seem to be more interested in DRM than the software itself. So I'm looking to Audacity to get me out of the DRM headlock that Sound Forge places on me.

  8. Re: Yeah never mind that... by BronsCon · · Score: 2

    Audio editing software: For editing already-recorded audio.
    DAW: For recording, arrangement, mastering, and live performance of audio.

    You may do some editing from within your DAW but, if you look closer, you'll discover that your DAW's editor is a plugin, most likely VST. I could use your DAW's editor in my DAW and vise-versa, even if you use Pro Tools and I use FL Studio, just as an example, because they're just plugins, not part of the DAW itself.

    If you don't like your DAW's bundled editing plugin, you can replace it because it's a plugin; many of us decide to replace it with Audacity which, in all honesty, could probably be made into a plugin as well with minimal work. Then you could use your DAW of choice and Audacity, without ever having to leave your DAW. Since you seem to think that any professional workflow exists entirely within the DAW, this thought should make you happy. If that's the case, you should get right on implementing the VST3 API in Audacity.

    Or, you know, realize that what comes out of a DAW is going to see some editing in a tool like Audacity in any professional studio. Sometimes it's to re-normalize the audio, or tweak the dynamic range compression that was applied by the DAW; head and tail silence is added or cut outside of the DAW that put it there (or left it out), effects that simply aren't practical in realtime -- think ring modulation and pre-echo. How, exactly, do you pre-echo my vocals before I sing them? You can do it if you add additional delay, equal to or greater than the length of the pre-echo, but that's not practical in a recording environment where the band might appreciate realtime feedback of how they sound. In fact, the DAWs that I've seen support either of those effects... well, I've only seen support through editor plugins. Probably because, despite being a relatively processor-light effect, it isn't practical in realtime, for the reasons I mentioned.

    --
    APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
  9. Interface themes... really? by DulcetTone · · Score: 2

    This app handles space characters typed into the "save file" dialog box as hot keys to commence playback of the audio in the underlying window. The entire app is full of similar errors, but interface themes leapt to the top of the list?

    --
    tone
  10. Re:And still no binary with ASIO by fisted · · Score: 2

    Thank you grammar nazi. What would we do without you.

    That was actually a spelling nazi, please don't mistake those for true grammar nazis.

    That said, you forgot a fucking comma. How hard can it be?