Slashdot Mirror


Asgardia Becomes the First Nation Deployed in Space (cnet.com)

An anonymous reader quotes CNET: An Orbital ATK Antares rocket carrying a cubesat named Asgardia-1 launched from NASA's Wallops Flight Facility in Virginia early Sunday. The milk carton-sized satellite makes up the entirety of territory of the self-proclaimed "Space Kingdom" of Asgardia... Over 300,000 people signed up online to become "citizens" of the nation over the last year. The main privilege of citizenship so far involves the right to upload data to Asgardia-1 for safekeeping in orbit, seemingly far away from the pesky governments and laws of Earth-bound countries...

As of now, Asgardia's statehood isn't acknowledged by any other actual countries or the United Nations, and it doesn't really even fit the definition of a nation since it's not possible for a human to physically live in Asgardia. Not yet, at least. The long-term vision for Asgardia includes human settlements in space, on the moon and perhaps even more distant colonies.

On Tuesday Orbital ATK's spacecraft will dock with the International Space Station for a one-month re-supply mission -- then blast higher into orbit to deploy the space kingdom's satellite. "Asgardia space kingdom has now established its sovereign territory in space," read an online statement.

Next the space kingdom plans to hold elections for 150 Members of Parliament.

10 of 176 comments (clear)

  1. Sovereign-territory-in-space my ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    HIGHLIGHTS from the Terms of service at https://asgardia.space/en/page/terms-of-service

    "All disputes regarding these Terms of Service, with the exception of copyright claims, will be settled by arbitration in Austria, under its laws."

    1. Re:Sovereign-territory-in-space my ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      AUSTRIA!!!

      G'day MATE!!

    2. Re:Sovereign-territory-in-space my ass by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Got the feeling that the person who posted this comment is unfamiliar with a concept known as a woosh.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
  2. Pirate Bay Haven by mentil · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The Pirate Bay had little luck trying to base their data out of Sealand, maybe they'll try again... IN SPAAAAACE!
    I'd like to see the MAFIAA try to get their cronies to raid a satellite.
    I expect that the nationality of the owner would determine the jurisdiction for crimes done involving storing data on the satellite, with a similar situation to Pitcairn Island.

    --
    Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
  3. A celestial tax haven is next? by deviated_prevert · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Soon the rich will be able to form holding companies and tax haven banks in space if this imaginary nation state is recognized. Could be the answer to the offshore tax havens needing to increase tax rates to pay for hurricane damage. Some are increasing their rates because of the increased costs of services in remote places and the simple fact that they also have to employ large numbers of expensive armed guards and costly security specialists to secure the gold vaults. The only thing that secretive offshore tax havens are really good at is hiding away physical assets like gold, not today's digital capital which any bank registered in these places can do. Yes they really are the new Pirates of the Caribbean.

    How could they also achieve space tax heavens? Simply assign a value of a certain weight of land held gold to the space craft then like bit coin issues trade it in units that can be exchanged without government oversight essentially a unit based barter system for the very rich members who buy into the schemes. Essentially a new gold standard of exchange overstepping the US Fed and becoming a viable and stable means of exchange exclusively for the very rich.

    --
    This message was not sent from an iPhone because Peter Sellers really was a deviated prevert without a dime for the call
    1. Re:A celestial tax haven is next? by No+Longer+an+AC · · Score: 3, Funny

      Soon the rich will be able to form holding companies and tax haven banks in space

      Yeah, screw offshore accounts.

      A new life awaits you in the off-world colonies. The chance to begin again in a golden land of opportunity and adventure.

      (and tax havens).

      I don't suppose the FDIC covers off-world banks.

  4. Yeah, it sounds goofy. However... by wjcofkc · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I think the timing is about spot of for this to be forward thinking to be not too forward thinking. The new space race is on. This time it's not just governments. Commercial interests are bent on getting people off of the planet. Between low earth orbit trips and colonizing Mars, capitalism and new enabling technologies may just be what our species needs to make up for the last 50 years of not doing much and even race past where we should already be. Human space flight has always been about politics first. I am not sure that we would have yet put people in space at all, let alone on the moon if there had not been political interests. The size of a milk carton be damned. That people can come together announce this crazy idea while also be able to launch a satellite at all is remarkable. Look at how we are taking it for granted. That in itself makes it all the incredible. So when you combine the new and newly realized commercial interests in put people in space and keeping them there combined with the new political interests prompting the governments of the world to race to the moon and stake a claim while they can, we may just be seeing the beginning of humanities future in space that should have already been realized. We just might yet survive ourselves after all

    I just woke up and this could have been written better. But you get the idea.

    --
    Brought to you by Carl's Junior.
  5. Re:Still playing their game by bradley13 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You are overly cynical; governments do solve a problem. Or, at least, they are supposed to solve a problem. The primary purpose of a government is to promulgate and enforce rules on personal interactions; these are the laws. The secondary purpose is to provide the citizens a means of acting collectively, for example, to hire police to enforce those laws.

    In a free-wheeling anarchy (which is the libertarian utopia), there is no state, there is only private power. The dream is that the good folk will outnumber the bad folk, and be able to dominate the society. Nice dream, but human nature will ensure that this does not happen. Power will tend to accumulate in the hands of violent sociopaths. They may initially sell themselves as the hired protectors, but it won't be long before they demand protection money. Eventually, they will abuse the libertarian utopia to establish themselves as tyrants. By all reports, many people living under effective Mafia rule in Sicily are quite happy - as long as you are in the inner circle, it's great. It's less great for everyone else, especially those people who want to opt out of the protection racket, and get their kneecaps broken.

    Government is an attempt by the "good guys" to solve these problems. We haven't got it quite right yet - our governments take on lives of their own, and get out of control. The current batch is going to have to be replaced at some point (and the politicians losing power are not going to like this). But first, we need better ideas, and we don't have them:

    - The progressives yearning for communism, socialist or fascism (which is just socialism under another name) want to go backwards to stuff that worked even worse than what we have now.

    - The conservatives basically want to "conserve" what we have now, which has mutated into crony-capitalism.

    - The few libertarian idealists effectively want anarchy, which is the short road to tyranny.

    What we need is an incremental improvement on democracy and capitalism, because those systems are - so far - the best we have managed. Some iteration that limits the accumulation of money and power into the hands of the 1%, while at the same time avoiding "bread and circuses" for the populist masses. The development of this incremental improvement is left as an exercise for the reader :-)

    --
    Enjoy life! This is not a dress rehearsal.
  6. Re:Perhaps a different name would’ve been be by mjwx · · Score: 4, Informative

    Asgard is not a place, it's a people.

    Actually it is a place in Norse Mythology. Its the world where the Norse gods lived, hence Stargate used it for the Asgardians (note they were mostly named after gods in Norse mythology). Midgard was the term for Earth if you were interested.

    --
    Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  7. Re:I nominate.... by Rakarra · · Score: 3, Funny

    It takes a snowflake to to know one, eh?

    We had to listen you you Nazis and your KKK brethren for eight years; we're just returning the favor. Paybacks are a bitch eh?

    Can't wait for the midterms. If your side loses are you going to be the gracious losers you seem to think we should be? No? I thought not.

    fuckin' crybaby winners are the worst.

    The wonderful thing about this post is it's vague enough that I can't tell which side he's on.