Slashdot Mirror


Facebook Rolls Out AI To Detect Suicidal Posts Before They're Reported (techcrunch.com)

Facebook is rolling out "proactive detection" artificial intelligence technology that will scan all posts on the site for patterns of suicidal thoughts, and when necessary send mental health resources to the user at risk or their friends, or contact local first-responders. The goal is to use AI to decrease how long it takes to send help to those in need. TechCrunch reports: Facebook previously tested using AI to detect troubling posts and more prominently surface suicide reporting options to friends in the U.S. Now Facebook is will scour all types of content around the world with this AI, except in the European Union, where General Data Protection Regulation privacy laws on profiling users based on sensitive information complicate the use of this tech. Facebook also will use AI to prioritize particularly risky or urgent user reports so they're more quickly addressed by moderators, and tools to instantly surface local language resources and first-responder contact info. It's also dedicating more moderators to suicide prevention, training them to deal with the cases 24/7, and now has 80 local partners like Save.org, National Suicide Prevention Lifeline and Forefront from which to provide resources to at-risk users and their networks.

171 comments

  1. Troll bait by countach · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How long before this is trolled into oblivion?
    How long before people sue Facebook for false positives and violating their privacy?

    1. Re:Troll bait by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 3

      Hopefully, the lawsuits come soon and will be painful -- FB should be a communication tool and not snoop on the content of non-public (i.e. privacy set to anything but "public") communications.

    2. Re: Troll bait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      If Facebook keeps doing this I'll kill myself

    3. Re:Troll bait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      how long before they start alerting 'the authorities' about illegal drug use, underage drinking, academic fraud, and other things, illegal or not... just because facebook doesn't like it (or if someone pays them enough to do it)....

    4. Re:Troll bait by Zaelath · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but really... wouldn't you love to see police arrive at the door of every vaguebook post?

      If anyone cares...

    5. Re:Troll bait by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 2

      How long before this is trolled into oblivion? How long before people sue Facebook for false positives and violating their privacy?

      Well, I won't post on Facebook what I've said here, that when my time draws close, I'm going to choose how and when I shift this mortal coil. I'm anything but suicidal, but have no intention of spending a decade or more in a nursing home, wearing depends and not having much idea of who I am.

      This really transcends creepiness, and turned into intrusion.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    6. Re: Troll bait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can't tell if troll or just massively misunderstands what Facebook is.

    7. Re:Troll bait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      When that time comes you may not be coherent enough to realize.
      Anyways, this is the lead up to thought crime.

    8. Re:Troll bait by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      When that time comes you may not be coherent enough to realize.

      My biggest fear is being incapacitated via a major stroke, boxed in and heroic efforts taken to keep me alive. I do have a very detailed advance directive in place, so that I will at least go fairly quickly in that event.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    9. Re: Troll bait by Reverend+Green · · Score: 2

      What makes you think they aren't doing that already?

    10. Re:Troll bait by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      Do you really think Facebook doesn't already scan private messages to build up your advertising profile and to look for banned content like child pornography?

      I doubt lawsuits will get very far - an entirely computer generated notice along the lines of "if you feel suicidal, you can call XXX-XXX-XXX to talk to someone" is going to fail tests for invasion of privacy and not exactly play well with a jury that can see Facebook is trying to do the right thing.

      If you want that level of privacy there are plenty of end-to-end encrypted channels.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    11. Re: Troll bait by Cryacin · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I can see this play out in the USA.

      Guy is detected about to commit suicide. Police is sent.

      Police first shoot guy's dog, then the guy.

      Circle of life...

      --
      Science advances one funeral at a time- Max Planck
    12. Re:Troll bait by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      I doubt lawsuits will get very far - an entirely computer generated notice along the lines of "if you feel suicidal, you can call XXX-XXX-XXX to talk to someone" is going to fail tests for invasion of privacy

      Sigh. Even TFS outright says "or contact local first-responders." Calling the cops on you because you might be suicidal is never the right thing to do, especially since there is a significant chance that the cops will just show up and murder you, even if people are standing by begging them not to.

      and not exactly play well with a jury that can see Facebook is trying to do the right thing.

      You mean "believe that" Facebook is trying to do the right thing, because they are not.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    13. Re:Troll bait by geekmux · · Score: 1

      Hopefully, the lawsuits come soon and will be painful -- FB should be a communication tool and not snoop on the content of non-public (i.e. privacy set to anything but "public") communications.

      Let's also remember this action by FB stems from the Won't-Someone-Think-Of-The-Children crowd, who is also likely to sue...for not thinking of the children.

      It's sad when bad parenting is so easily excused by throwing blame and litigation at everything but a mirror.

    14. Re:Troll bait by gnick · · Score: 1

      FB should be a communication tool and not snoop on the content of non-public (i.e. privacy set to anything but "public") communications.

      That made me chuckle. Anything you post to FB, you're volunteering to them. It will be mined and used 'against' you. Your job is to sit back and get injected, inspected, detected, infected, neglected and selected. Just keep feeding them info while they perfect their 'b0s0z0ku' model. It's not really snooping if they tell you up front that you're the product.

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    15. Re:Troll bait by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      You could be right. I underestimated just how fucked up the US is, especially the cops.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    16. Re: Troll bait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      in a sense they are b/c the pigs get special pig accounts where they are everyone's "friend".

    17. Re: Troll bait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can see this play out in the USA.

      Guy is detected about to commit suicide. Police is sent.

      Police first shoot guy's dog, then the guy.

      Circle of life...

      Well, attempted suicide IS a capital offense in some jurisdictions...

    18. Re:Troll bait by Wycliffe · · Score: 1

      If you want that level of privacy there are plenty of end-to-end encrypted channels.

      If you want ANY level of privacy, then you shouldn't be using facebook in the first place.
      At least suicide prevention is a mostly non-evil use for their massive profiling.
      And if you are using the end-to-end encrypted channel to connect to facebook then it's pretty much like sanitizing a straw to drink out of a toilet.

    19. Re: Troll bait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Shut that fucking dog up or I'll blow its head off"

    20. Re:Troll bait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How long before people sue every company of false advertising that claims they are using AI technology? They are really just taking advantage of the advances in the processing hardware. Every time they declare they are using AI they have either changed the definition of AI or they are just lying.

    21. Re:Troll bait by KingBenny · · Score: 1

      Not too recently i read some article about a doctor sending the police to someones home b/c of a post of one his patients on facebook worrying him ... And also something about one of those smart things you can talk to (OMG THE INNOVATION) but it looks cool with a nifty name calling the cops cos there was a bit of a quarrel going on in the house I can imagine me and some of my exes having one of those (equals L M A O) so , now facebook gets to send the whitejackets to your house ? I knew i had to quit all those years ago and nothing has proven me wrong so far o m f g ... super-A.I. google this week detected "author restricted content" or whatever it calls it in a few videos ... most just had music playing in the background while i was recording ... which means like if the windows open and someone walks by , they hear a song im playing from a cd they havent bought then the mafiAAbrainBAFsaddampolice gets to come to my house and plaster ads on the wall i guess. The funniest one however was a recording of a gamesession of gridrunner (ancient yak-psychedelics) where i got a notice too on some guy named "Popov" stating i used his song in my video . Which i did, because it was the soundtrack of the very game i was recording while playing ... WHICH I BOUGHT ... so i think i bought the song too actually so either this popov is a douchefap or google a.i. is better at Go than checking videos anyway ... that's harmless ... sending unasked for help to your door ?
      how intrusive can you get ? more reasons not to get back on facebook

      --
      Free speech was meant to be free for all... how can anyone grow up in a nanny state ?
  2. How about no? by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There are going to be some serious privacy issues and a lot of false positives. If all goes according to plan, expect the cops to send a SWAT team to bust down someone's door and "accidentally" pump two dozen bullets into them...

    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    1. Re:How about no? by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      expect the cops to send a SWAT team to bust down someone's door and "accidentally" pump two dozen bullets into them

      There has to be better ways to stop someone from killing himself.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    2. Re:How about no? by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 2, Informative

      American cops and injustice system be like...

      "We'll kill/incarcerate the fuck out of you to save you."

      Remember, we're the country that locks up the most people for what they choose to take into their own bodies. We also used to lock up or kill people for their choice of partners -- wrong color was almost a capital offense in many parts of the country.

      Don't underestimate the stupidity and brutality of the American criminal injustice system.

    3. Re:How about no? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are going to be some serious privacy issues and a lot of false positives.

      You bet it. I will make a point of that. [wink]

    4. Re:How about no? by geekmux · · Score: 2

      There are going to be some serious privacy issues and a lot of false positives. If all goes according to plan, expect the cops to send a SWAT team to bust down someone's door and "accidentally" pump two dozen bullets into them...

      Let's remember what S.W.A.T. stands for, in order to understand what justifies their presence.

      An individual being flagged for suicidal thoughts does not qualify as a SWAT-level threat, nor would they have trained staff to properly handle it.

    5. Re:How about no? by arth1 · · Score: 2

      Some states had laws making suicide a felony, and some up until the 1990s. If you survived, you could theoretically go to jail for attempted murder of yourself.

      I guess that by that logic, the police would be justified in shooting your murderer. You'd die anyhow, but the crime would be prevented.

    6. Re: How about no? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The logical extension is that if we can find the suicidal with AI, we can also find the psychopaths and roll SWAT for a quick chat.

    7. Re: How about no? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      ...we can also find the psychopaths and roll SWAT for a quick chat.

      My first thought based on some earlier comments: "Suppose you were an idiot, and suppose you were a member of Congress; but I repeat myself."

    8. Re: How about no? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...we can also find the psychopaths and roll SWAT for a quick chat.

      My first thought based on some earlier comments: "Suppose you were an idiot, and suppose you were a member of Congress; but I repeat myself."

      "Idiot" and "member of Congress" should be flipped. As is, you are implying that all idiots are members of Congress.

    9. Re: How about no? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nope. this is true and tested!

    10. Re:How about no? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Suicide is a crime in India because it reflects badly on the corrupt ruling class

    11. Re: How about no? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You think SWAT teams just appear when needed?
      How does that happen?
      Because they are almost every cop.
      They just run back to the station, put on the all black stuff and leave in a couple teams instead of a bunch of separate units.

    12. Re:How about no? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's because it's illegal to damage government property, citizen.

    13. Re:How about no? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      Can anyone confirm that in the US the response to a potentially suicidal person is a SWAT team?!

      In most places it's considered a medical emergency. If any law enforcement is involved it will only be to help medical personnel gain access to the patient. In this case the first response would probably be calling the phone number that the user supplied to Facebook.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    14. Re: How about no? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You think SWAT teams just appear when needed? How does that happen? Because they are almost every cop. They just run back to the station, put on the all black stuff and leave in a couple teams instead of a bunch of separate units.

      There is no way in hell that "almost every cop" is a member of SWAT. Most can't shoot for shit because they don't train or practice nearly often enough, and they certainly don't hold military-grade weight standards (the "black stuff" doesn't usually come in 3X sizes.) And dealing with a suicidal person often requires someone who is trained to deal with mental health issues.

    15. Re:How about no? by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 2
      Can anyone confirm that in the US the response to a potentially suicidal person is a SWAT team?!

      No. That was what they call a "joke". In moderately bad taste....

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    16. Re:How about no? by Kiuas · · Score: 2

      There are going to be some serious privacy issues and a lot of false positives. If all goes according to plan, expect the cops to send a SWAT team to bust down someone's door and "accidentally" pump two dozen bullets into them

      If the cops respond to a suspected suicidal person with a SWAT-team, then the AI reporting to them about a suicidal individual is the least of your problems.

      --
      "It is the business of the future to be dangerous" -Alfred North Whitehead
    17. Re:How about no? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      At least two people modded it insightful...

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    18. Re: How about no? by Cryacin · · Score: 1

      Just the smart ones, dum dum!

      --
      Science advances one funeral at a time- Max Planck
    19. Re:How about no? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Can anyone confirm that in the US the response to a potentially suicidal person is a SWAT team?!

      It doesn't take SWAT to show up and murder an innocent. The "normal" cops manage to do that all the goddamned time. There's something like that in the news about every month, and that's just the ones that are happening to someone sufficiently mediagenic to bother reporting upon.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    20. Re: How about no? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no way in hell that "almost every cop" is a member of SWAT. Most can't shoot for shit because they don't train or practice nearly often enough, and they certainly don't hold military-grade weight standards (the "black stuff" doesn't usually come in 3X sizes.)

      Besides, most are fat.

    21. Re:How about no? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but as has long been established, most of the people who moderate around here are idiots.

    22. Re:How about no? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having the cops kill the people targeted by facebook will be in the interest of facebook. Suing facebook will be much harder when the victim is dead by police action. So YES. DO actually and seriously expect there to be shootings as a result of this policy. Once there is a financial interest in killing people, people will be killed. The police don't mind shooting people. Hell, it's their job.

    23. Re:How about no? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      In England, it is the responsibility of the police to deal with reports of suicidal people. They will talk to the person reported or self-reporting as suicidal, take them home if not already at home, and they will try to arrange for someone they know to keep them company without involving health services, collecting them if needed.

      It is only if the person is refusing to comply or will be left alone or has already caused themselves physical damage that they'll consider calling in a medical professional (of which 3 with specific training are required in England for sectioning).

      This has a positive aspect, namely that they don't start dragging in an army of strangers to the likely already terrified person's location unless needed, but also a very obvious negative aspect, namely that you can have an actively suicidal person processed with absolutely zero involvement from a healthcare professional.

      The underlying problem is that, since the H&SWA 2012, there is no longer comprehensive mental healthcare in the UK, nor a duty for the state to provide it.

    24. Re: How about no? by tsqr · · Score: 1

      ...we can also find the psychopaths and roll SWAT for a quick chat.

      My first thought based on some earlier comments: "Suppose you were an idiot, and suppose you were a member of Congress; but I repeat myself."

      "Idiot" and "member of Congress" should be flipped. As is, you are implying that all idiots are members of Congress.

      Read it again, carefully, and think about it for 30 seconds. If you still think it's wrong, you should write an angry letter to Mark Twain's estate.

    25. Re:How about no? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's something like that in the news about every month

      Then why is crime at an all time low and continuing to decline?

    26. Re:How about no? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, not SWAT, but it has happened that someone on the verge of suicide has the cops called on them and the cops kill them to prevent the suicide. It's stupid, and a testament to how fucked up our entire legal system is, but it happens.

    27. Re:How about no? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why does there have to be? Legalize suicide.

    28. Re:How about no? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends on circumstance. If someone calls the police, and tells them X person is suicidal and has a gun, there is a high likelihood of SWAT deployment. You might think it's ridiculous, but the cop just heard "mentally unstable suspect with a gun". If it turns out they're homicidal instead of suicidal, the department will get torn apart for not handling the threat appropriately. And since cops -never- suffer anything worse than paid vacation for gunning down someone, better to err on the side of caution and send the kill squad.

    29. Re:How about no? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That hasn't stopped swat from responding to other calls. Such as medical calls where they shot up the place.

      The police seem to be trying to imitate Hollywood. More Rambo, less sheriff Taylor. We need more Sheriff Taylor, less Rambo.

  3. They needed to do this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They're just attempting to get ahead of things because they know damn well at some point someone is going to do some research and show how many suicides Facebook actually CAUSES. Legally, they can say they are taking all the reasonable measures possible to prevent it.

    1. Re:They needed to do this by eaglesrule · · Score: 1

      Facebook already admitted to conducting experiments on manipulating user emotions. Developing AI to accurately detect if someone is depressed would make sense as they would need to be able to determine how effective their methods are.

  4. I wonder if they ever considered.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I wonder if they have ever considered that some people may be suicidal precisely because of this impersonal, constantly surveilled machine the modern internet has thrust upon everyone which gives the illusion of caring ("getting suicidal people the help they need, faster than ever before!") without actually giving a shit.

    Maybe what we need isn't even more ways to present the illusion of being connected without really being so. Maybe what we need is actual deeper, meaningful human interaction.

    Frankly, the world these people seem to want: algorithms constantly analysing and monetizing everything everyone ever does - is enough to drive many people into depression.

    1. Re:I wonder if they ever considered.... by thereitis · · Score: 0

      Yep, mod this person up. The constant pressure of surveillance, over-monetization, deforestation, global warming, geopolitical unrest, high population, pollution, animal exploitation... Looking at the world is like looking through a crystal: it changes depending on what angle you view it from. View it from the wrong angle and it seems hopelessly pointless. Frankly it's easier to cope by plugging one's ears and go "la-la-la" to most of it and just try and get by with a few laughs and close friends/family.

  5. THIS. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, get the fuck off of ANY non-face-to-face human interaction every once in a while.

    It improves mood as much as having NO artificial light source improves sleep and alertness.

    Or how eating only meat that you grilled on your fire and vegetables from your harden improves the energy that you have throughout the day, your health and our well-being.

    Technology is not the devil. But also not the savior. We need to use it much more carefully and wisely.

    1. Re:THIS. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      vegetables from your hardon improves the energy

      What?

    2. Re: THIS. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      He's saying your kids are braindead.

    3. Re:THIS. by Kiuas · · Score: 2

      Seriously, get the fuck off of ANY non-face-to-face human interaction every once in a while.

      The problem with social media (not just FB) and depression is not that people do nothing but stare at FB and get depressed. The problem (or, one of them) is that if you're already depressed, viewing social media can make it worse. Why? Well, because people like to present their best side on social media; people's profiles are by and large advertisements of themselves. People post about their holidays, trips, happy times with friends and family, If you're someone who feels shitty about your life, browsing the feed can make these feelings even worse because it seems to highlight to you how much better everyone else is doing and hence how much of a 'failure' you are because you don't have these kinds of situations.

      So yeah, staying out of FB can be a good thing during depression, but it carries the downside of isolating one even more from one's social circle. For me and you it's easy to call up a friend and go grab a beer or a coffee out in the real world, but for a depressed person who might have trouble just getting out of bed this can be a monumental task, so just telling these people to log out of FB and go out is not exactly a miracle solution.

      What FB could do if they get this working is change the feed of depressed people slightly. I mean, they already embed ads into the feed, so for these individuals embedding information and resources about getting help as well as possible articles/videos about how to deal with depression while also simulatenously toning down the amount of other people's 'look at my awesome day out on a date with my girlfriend' -posts would likely be a good thing.

      --
      "It is the business of the future to be dangerous" -Alfred North Whitehead
    4. Re:THIS. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And then on top of (but sort of the opposite of all that): when you throw in the political stuff, you get to see just how horrible the things your friends and family believe are. It gives a really bleak view of humanity. I've been avoiding it for the past year or so.

    5. Re:THIS. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What FB could do if they get this working is change the feed of depressed people slightly. I mean, they already embed ads into the feed, so for these individuals embedding information and resources about getting help

      Or tweak the algo to show the depressed the negative stuff other people post [there's is always negative stuff]. So, hopefully they'll realize that there are people as unhappy as they are. That should work if the problem is the perceived good life other people live.

    6. Re:THIS. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      people like to present their best side on social media; people's profiles are by and large advertisements of themselves. People post about their holidays, trips, happy times with friends and family

      Not everyone. Drama queens tend to post on social media about how awful their lives are. Back when I actually used Facebook, I had friends who would post, in excruciating detail multiple times per day, just how shitty their lives were. Some of the drivel was even factually correct. Those are the types of people that could make Mr. Rogers cry. I wanted no part of that.

    7. Re:THIS. by Wycliffe · · Score: 1

      Or tweak the algo to show the depressed the negative stuff other people post [there's is always negative stuff]. So, hopefully they'll realize that there are people as unhappy as they are. That should work if the problem is the perceived good life other people live.

      This would be a VERY difficult thing to get right. Yes, if you're miserable and see everyone else is happy, this can possibly make you feel worse but so can seeing a bunch of depressing posts from everyone. Ideally what you would probably want to show is posts of people overcoming difficulties but it would likely be hard to find this thread consistently.

  6. False positives? by RogueWarrior65 · · Score: 1

    Can I sue Facebook for bunchteen million dollars if they report a false positive?

    1. Re:False positives? by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 0

      Even funnier, if Bitcoin's value keeps going up, sue them for 1000 Bitcoins. By the time the trial is over, it's going to cost them so much money they'll have to close shop.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    2. Re:False positives? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      meh they have already flagged every slashdot reader.

  7. How long before it's used maliciously? by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 0

    Say someone's FB account gets hacked and a suicidal message is posted. Cops arrive at their door to take them away to the loony-bin for a psych hold. Fun times! Also, will there be a human in the loop for posts like "I'll jump under a freakin' train if the Patriots lose the Superbowl"?

    1. Re:How long before it's used maliciously? by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 2

      How super can this bowl really be if people keep losing it?

      Just buy another one!

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    2. Re:How long before it's used maliciously? by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 0

      Also, will there be a human in the loop for posts like "I'll jump under a freakin' train if the Patriots lose the Superbowl"?
      Flag as Inappropriate

      And what if they don't send anyone and you DO throw yourself under a train? I mean, the Patriots are America's Team, it would be quite understandable if you became despondent if they suck in the Super Bowl.

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    3. Re:How long before it's used maliciously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm, this is the United States. The cops don't take you to the loony-bin when they think you are suicidal, they shoot you.

    4. Re:How long before it's used maliciously? by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 0
      How super can this bowl really be if people keep losing it?
      Just buy another one!

      Or smoke one ... I hear w33d helps with suicidal ideations. But don't mention it on Facebook since their AI bot might report you to the local po-po.

    5. Re:How long before it's used maliciously? by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      Yep, I over-estimated the IQ of the average US cop. Maybe they'll do it in Canada, though.

    6. Re:How long before it's used maliciously? by arth1 · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately, part of US police scare tactics and abuse is to have you committed to psychiatric evaluation against your will. Even if you're deemed sane, you end up with the bill, which can be quite substantial - five to six figures is to be expected.

    7. Re:How long before it's used maliciously? by raind · · Score: 1

      Or "I'll be dead or in jail if Obama wins"
      - Ted Nugent

      --
      Get up!
    8. Re:How long before it's used maliciously? by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      The USSR was also well known for abuse of psychiatric incarceration.

    9. Re:How long before it's used maliciously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I mean, the Patriots are America's Team, it would be quite understandable if you became despondent if they suck in the Super Bowl.

      No. The Cowboys are America's team in the sense that the Cowboys are now America actually is. The Packers are America's team in the sense that the Packers are what America strives to be.

    10. Re: How long before it's used maliciously? by Reverend+Green · · Score: 2

      We have become the Soviet Union.

    11. Re: How long before it's used maliciously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The USSR wasn't smart enough to charge the forcibly committed. We've added a whole new level to the ick factor.

  8. So now if I say I had a bad day at work... by greenwow · · Score: 0

    will Facebook call the police on me? This sucks. Someone already did that to me on reddit, and they located where I live from a picture I took of a pot shop out my bedroom window. It took me hours to talk my way out of being taken into custody.

    1. Re: So now if I say I had a bad day at work... by Reverend+Green · · Score: 2

      Maybe Facebook is worried that Reddit has the lead in the potentially lucrative Stasi collaboration market.

    2. Re:So now if I say I had a bad day at work... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is why drugs are bad umkay.

  9. I haz a sad by Snotnose · · Score: 0

    I don't have a FB account and suspect this will make me suicidal. Should I be worried? Should I not lay in the kitchen with my shotgun pointed at the door for the FB police to do a no knock warrant cuz I'm "not normal". Curious minds want to know, how long do I have to lay on my kitchen floor? When can I feed the cat? When can I safely watch TV? I do aerobics 3x a week, should I ignore the concealed carry laws in California (hint, you ain't gonna get one here) and carry to my aerobics class?

    I turn 60 in 6 months, can I count on making it to my next birthday due to not ever making a FB account?

    1. Re:I haz a sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      63 years old here. No Facebook. No Twitter. I don't have time for that silly bullshit. Facebook should mind their own business. If someone kills themself, so what. Darwin in action.

    2. Re: I haz a sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously suicidal post.
      Reported by SmileyFacebot

    3. Re:I haz a sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Darwin was a scientist.

  10. Friends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can't wait to login to my friends Facebook and update the status for some lolz welcome to the new "swatting"

  11. Does it actually work? by alvinrod · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I was under the impression that people who are actually suicidal don't often post about it on Facebook. If you really want to kill yourself, bringing more attention to yourself isn't a good way to accomplish this. Don't get me wrong, the petty narcissists that try to get attention by acting suicidal clearly need help as well, but I don't think this will do much to deter those who are actually suicidal.

    If Facebook really cared about the mental health and wellbeing of their users, they'd kick people off after more than fifteen minutes of daily use or just outright pull the plug on the whole works.

    1. Re:Does it actually work? by mark-t · · Score: 5, Insightful

      True, but most people who are suicdal do not genuinely want to die as much as they would rather want their living circumstances just to be different from whatever they are

    2. Re:Does it actually work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why shouldn't they use the internet to complain, get attention, maybe feel better by trolling? I think Facebook is afraid they make such a great case for suicide, everyone will want to join them because the neoliberal system Facebook thrives in sucks.

    3. Re:Does it actually work? by arth1 · · Score: 1

      True, but most people who are suicdal do not genuinely want to die as much as they would rather want their living circumstances just to be different from whatever they are

      How do you know? I think quite a few people would like a better life than what they have but still would prefer no life, and quite a few others are rationally certain that different living circumstances would in all likelihood be worse than what they have. Especially if they also have to pay huge psychiatric bills, which is the likely outcome of seeking help.

      There's also quite a bit of begging the question in modern pseudo-psychology, where people are now conditioned to think that those who try to kill themselves suffer from a mental illness, and they know this because they try to kill themselves.

      I think we need to get rid of the suicide stigma, and allow people to do what they want with their own lives, including ending it. Without no interference from well-meaning people who prolong other's suffering or discomfort to feed their own moral beliefs. Let people die with dignity, not shame.

    4. Re:Does it actually work? by TheSync · · Score: 1

      There's also quite a bit of begging the question in modern pseudo-psychology, where people are now conditioned to think that those who try to kill themselves suffer from a mental illness, and they know this because they try to kill themselves.

      The facts is that nearly 50% of suicides are due to clinical depression. Those suffering from depression are at 25 times greater risk for suicide than the general population.

         

    5. Re:Does it actually work? by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      How do you know? I think quite a few people would like a better life than what they have but still would prefer no life

      I felt that way after my wife died. My religion kept me from being actively suicidal (fear of hell and all of that). That said, I did not communicate this on facebook or any social medium. I had no desire for the publicity, felt shame, and did not want others feeling responsible if something did happen to me. I also didn't want to possibly die in an accident and have everyone assume I had killed myself. Not the legacy I wanted for my kids.

      Many years have now passed and there are many times where I feel numb to life but I am glad I am alive for my kids sake and even for my own.

      Suicide should have a stigma. It is permanent. At the very least, there should be a 5 year pre-registration.

    6. Re:Does it actually work? by AHuxley · · Score: 0

      If the SJW can get this working, they will push for an AI to track a lot of other content too.
      Connect a diagnosis handbook up with an AI, let it wonder the social media internet and report users, comments.
      Dont like a movie? Should any negative movie review be searchable? Why is the movie review so negative? Ban the account.
      The SJW could code up a technique for the psychological reporting for any sets of comments they don't like.
      Comment on the teachings, politics and history of a faith? Could an AI be requested to find all such comments and remove the accounts?
      Journalists investigate the politics of other journalists and post video clips of the political thoughts from their paper, newsroom. Ban the video's and the any comments about the results investigative journalism?
      Comment on illegal immigration? Ban and report the account to their respective gov?
      Start to offer blasphemy law options to other nations? Report users who questions their faith or want to escape from their faith?
      Whistleblowing about the NSA, GCHQ? Stop all related links and report all comments?
      State got some powerful Ag-gag laws https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... ? Report users in that state who comment to their local gov?

      It can be make to work, just who wants a social media account that collects ip and all other details for any requesting state and federal government for any reason globally?

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    7. Re:Does it actually work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let people die with dignity, not shame.

      It is shameful if you don't do your part. Your duty is to:
      1.) Buy stuff you don't need
      2.) Help keep wages depressed through 'every man for himself' style participation in the labor pool
      3.) Avoid logic, reason and critical thought
      4.) Do not read the Constitution of the United States or, for other nations, the closest equivalent
      5.) Cherry pick religious texts
      6.) Accept inequitable treatment
      7.) Believe all marketing/advertising
      8.) View privacy as evil rather than simply passe
      9.) Avoid reading - for an extra gold star reward, find a copy of Fahrenheit 451 and burn it

      Exemption from these and other rules are the privilege of the privileged. You can not do your duty to the privileged if you kill yourself and you should know better than to be an uppity pawn. Unless, of course, you have an illness that is expensive to treat. In that case, you have permission. The privileged already taught us our morals.

    8. Re:Does it actually work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most suicidal people I've met have been extremely conflicted. There are certainly those just go and off themselves, no one can help them. Life becomes unbearable for majorly depressed people. However, many people realize that killing themselves is a big deal and has serious implications for other people, and also there's no going back. The psychology of depression isn't simple.

    9. Re:Does it actually work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Suicidally depressed people are convinced there is no way things can possibly get better, so even if you suggest a plausible better alternative it is immediately dismissed because the person is feeling so miserable and emotion robs reason.

    10. Re:Does it actually work? by mark-t · · Score: 2

      Suicidally depressed people are convinced there is no way things can possibly get better, so even if you suggest a plausible better alternative it is immediately dismissed because the person is feeling so miserable and emotion robs reason.

      Absolutely true... but my point is only that they would generally still prefer to live a life in better circumstances than to actually die, and genuinely unusual for someone to simply wish themselves to be dead as a preference to simply having a better life circumstance, however impossible it might be for them to imagine.

      And given that, it is possible, although not necessarily certain, that a person who is suicidal and therefore generally just wants an improvement to their circumstance, but in absence of any hope that such a thing can be achieved, seek to end their existence as they currently experience it can be helped... that possibly, with such help, they can get past whatever has brought them to that point, and find a life that is actually worth living for.

      As it was mentioned before, the people who do really want to kill themselves don't bother to tell anybody about it.. But as I said, this is not typical for people with seriously suicidal thoughts, which can often take several weeks or months to escalate to that point, and there are often outward indications that could be visible to people that are in that person's social circle and life if they knew what to look for.

    11. Re: Does it actually work? by Reverend+Green · · Score: 2

      FB exec: "Millions of our countrymen are being literally driven mad by capitalism. How can we profit from this?"

    12. Re:Does it actually work? by geekmux · · Score: 1

      If Facebook really cared about the mental health and wellbeing of their users, they'd kick people off after more than fifteen minutes of daily use or just outright pull the plug on the whole works.

      This tends to highlight why Greed N. Corruption is the CEO of Capitalist America.

      Nothing else matters, no matter how damaging.

    13. Re: Does it actually work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      um, it's a mental disorder not an issue with circumstance. truly depressed and suicidal people can't be fixed simply by making their circumstances more favorable.

      its why people who are filthy rich and successful still kill themselves.

    14. Re:Does it actually work? by arth1 · · Score: 0

      The facts is that nearly 50% of suicides are due to clinical depression.

      The fact is that what the fact is is seldom clear.
      The nearly 50% includes those who have been diagnosed with clinical depression because of their suicidal actions, i.e. a classic example of affirming the consequent. That is a real problem.
      Also, "due to" is not necessarily correct. There can be cases where someone suffers from clinical depression but chooses suicide for other reasons. There may be a common cause for both the clinical depression and the suicide, or the two may be unrelated. After all, "nearly 50%" implies that for most suicides, there is no such connection.

      Can it be related? Absolutely. Is that a problem? Most certainly.
      But it is not a carte blanche to treat everybody as if it were the case. Assuming, without other evidence, that it is due to mental health issues, and then using that assumption to justify overriding the individual's free choice is abhorrent. Freedom means freedom for people to do things that may be a phobia or religious conviction for others. That right needs protection.

    15. Re:Does it actually work? by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Many years have now passed and there are many times where I feel numb to life but I am glad I am alive for my kids sake and even for my own.

      But you did not make the choice to kill yourself, which puts you in a different category from those who did.

      Suicide should have a stigma. It is permanent. At the very least, there should be a 5 year pre-registration.

      Who gave you a right to decide what's right for others?
      Of course it is permanent. That's the whole point.
      Being dead is painless and without remorse. Regrets are for the living; the dead are completely unaffected.

    16. Re:Does it actually work? by eaglesrule · · Score: 1

      One just needs to look at how Jordan Peterson was treated by the SJW controlled social media to understand that using AI to punish thoughtcrime and stifle dissent is inevitable. The corporations that assume the role as institutions in society will dictate the terms for our participation as merely being something as simple as trying to appease a complex and obfuscated algorithm.

      To get a glimpse of this wonderful future waiting for us, have a look at what China is already doing with their own social credit system, that will punish you for dissent.

    17. Re:Does it actually work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you really want to kill yourself, bringing more attention to yourself isn't a good way to accomplish this.

      That isn't how being suicidal feels.

      One problem with treating suicide is that anti-depression medication sometimes makes people feel enough better that they get enough will and motivation to kill themselves. You have to watch them closely in the phase when they are first being force-fed the pills, before their former personality has been completely destroyed by them.

      There's no such thing as people who "want attention" vs. people who "really" want to kill themselves. Often people want to kill themselves because they aren't getting enough attention. It's not only narcissists that want attention. People are unusually isolated right now, and this is linked to suicide. The attitude that people who are suicidal are defective non-persons who need to be taken to the professional brain shop to get fixed up is known as "callous altruism," a close cousin of virtue signalling.

    18. Re:Does it actually work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do you know?

      By having felt suicidal, dumbass.

      I understand many people never experience these thoughts, but many people do, many more people than die, but you can just look at the number of people dying to understand it will not be unusual to encounter someone at risk in a slashdot comments thread and know for certain that not everyone's experience is like your own.

    19. Re:Does it actually work? by arth1 · · Score: 1

      By having felt suicidal, dumbass.

      You're assuming feeling suicidal and committing suicide is the same thing. The difference is as big as between attracted to a woman and jumping her bones.

      but you can just look at the number of people dying to understand it will not be unusual to encounter someone at risk

      "At risk"? That's presuming that it's something to be avoided. You don't know that beforehand. As you yourself say:

      know for certain that not everyone's experience is like your own.

      That's exactly my point. One person's risk, another person's chance.

    20. Re:Does it actually work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      • My religion[...] (fear of hell and all of that).
      • I did not communicate this[...] I had no desire for the publicity, felt shame
      • did not want others feeling responsible
      • Not the legacy I wanted for my kids.

      The disease model of suicide is not working. The threat of its forceful application is isolating people from actual meaningful care they could otherwise receive. It's trapping people in a holocaust literally worse than death. It's doing all of this to help non-suicidal people, who already feel good, to feel better. The priority of who's feelings matter is set this way because of callous power.

    21. Re:Does it actually work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is nothing broken about wanting to kill yourself after your wife died. There are reasons not to do it, if you are strong enough, but there is nothing broken about feeling a wish to do it. You should be supported in finding that strength, not shamed or marked broken or threatened and bullied into living. I am angry about the circumstance you and many others have gone through.

    22. Re: Does it actually work? by mark-t · · Score: 1

      A person who is rich and successful and wanting to kill themselves is probably suffering from clinical depression rather than situational depression. Situational depression is actually much more common, and can manifest in having thoughts of suicide just as clinical depression might. The difference between them is that when the circumstances about which the person is depressed improve, or once they have had a chance to psychologically adapt to whatever life change caused them to become depressed in the first place, the desire to kill oneself also goes away. It needs to be taken no less seriously because it is just as possible for them to act on it as a clinically depressed person would.

  12. Facebook and happiness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  13. Narrow end of the wedge. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is their best attempt at making a palatable pre-crime detection system. If it works, the system will be expanded to other crimes (suicide being a criminal act in many jurisdictions).

  14. Precognition! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Precognition!

  15. Didn't Google do this a long time ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    predicting that Kurt Cobain was suicidal (after the fact) by analyzing emails? I probably read it on /. many years ago.

  16. Oh, great. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now a person can't even feel safe when going through a tough time without automated software "that knows better" interfering with that person's life and sending "help" that will destroy that person's life.

    Why use Facebook at all?

    1. Re: Oh, great. by Reverend+Green · · Score: 1

      Feeling glum? Your good friends at Facebook are going to help you by sending uniformed thugs to kick your ass and throw you in a cage!

  17. They put you through to their call center in India by boudie2 · · Score: 1

    Hello, this is Raj, I am understanding that you have feelings of suicide? Could you please confirm your email address and I will give you the numbers of a counselor who can make you feel better. Please hold the line.

  18. Re:But they can't stop illegal racial housing???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That wasn't what was going on. Targeted demographics for the advertisements were race-based, whereas the fair housing law prohibits the kind of activity you are describing. So it's something that Facebook should probably have blocked for moral reasons, not something that was necessarily illegal on the part of the advertisers.

  19. Probably a good thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... that this wasn't active during the meltdown that was the 2016 Presidential election.

  20. The synopsis says it will notify your FRIENDS?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I sincerely hope that the synopsis is incorrect, because it would be a massive violation of privacy if facebook just starts notifying random people in your social network that you've authoried a suicidal post - especially if, as it sounds like, they are looking at the content of posts that haven't even been submitted yet. Most depressed folks I know have enough suicidal episodes to have experienced writing a suicide note or three but end up using the writing of the note to work through the issue at hand and come back down enough to get over the worst of it or seek help on their own. I'd be enormously upset to discover that working my way through an episode like that resulted in some public announcement of my mental state by facebook. Granted, I'd never write such a thing in a text box on a live website, simply to avoid accidentally submitting or reloading, never mind snooping on unposting content by the site's owner, but others might be careless enough to get caught out.

  21. Sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Facebook's employees understand literally nothing about human beings. I think millennial tech is going to disappear altogether at some point in the future due to its fallacious nature and ultimate uselessness. Whatever, Zuck.

  22. "AI" = "an algorithm" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Since when has "AI" = "an algorithm"?

    Fucking buzzwords

    Add it to the list of cloud = internet, etc.

    1. Re:"AI" = "an algorithm" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now, what are we supposed to call real AI?

      (If it ever happens)

    2. Re:"AI" = "an algorithm" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Data mining and machine learning are subsets of AI. Since this algorithm uses machine learning, it's fair to call it AI. "AI" as being defined by computer science textbooks and not the latest Hollywood movie or news article. Everything in AI is also a subset of algorithms. so anything that can be called AI can also be called an algorithm but the reverse isn't true.

    3. Re:"AI" = "an algorithm" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Human. If we make it look like us, it'll probably demand nothing less nor would it deserve anything less.

    4. Re:"AI" = "an algorithm" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Human. If we make it look like us, it'll probably demand nothing less nor would it deserve anything less.

      And solve the exact same problems we do.

  23. Why? More nanny state intrusiveness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Every individual has the right to determine his own life. Not only do many of these people really want to commit suicide, they actually need to commit suicide, and must be encouraged in their journey to the great beyond.

  24. Clippy by IckySplat · · Score: 1

    It looks like you are trying to kill yourself.
    Would like help?

    --
    Help! help!, the termites are eating my DRAM!!!
  25. Lost my nephew today to suicide by burningcpu · · Score: 1

    My nephew committed suicide today. Several hours before, he posted a link on FB to the music video for "Logic - 1-800-273-8255."
    I don't have any wisdom to share, just the sadness.

    1. Re:Lost my nephew today to suicide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry to hear it. Be strong, sad, happy, or whatever helps you through it.
      Thanks for sharing.

      A /. friend.

    2. Re:Lost my nephew today to suicide by mccalli · · Score: 1

      My condolences to both yourself and to the rest of the family as well.

  26. Expectation vs Reality by n329619 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Expectation:

    Guy1: I've lost my job and my family in an accident on the same day. There's no hope anymore.

    FB: Looks like you need some help! Go visit Save.org today!

    Guy1: Thanks FB. It really helped.

    Reality:

    Guy2: Omg, this guy on the internet is so stupid. I am literally banging my head so hard that it's killing me.

    FB: Looks like you need some help! Go visit Save.org today!

    Guy2: Is this the part where I continue to bang my head?

    FB: Looks like you need some help! Go visit Save.org today!

    Guy2: Damn it. Stop spamming me. You're killing me.

    FB: Looks like you need some help! Go visit Save.org today!

    Person2: Arrrrrrugh!!! Do you want me dead or something?

    FB: We booked you a schedule on Suicide Prevention Lifeline. Thank you for using FB newest AI chatbot technology. This chatbot is sponsored by Nice-Long-Rope, the best $1.99 rope to hang things from the ceiling.

  27. Today is a sad sad day..wish it would end... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...10 min later...Welcome to the suicide watch....and in case you dont responds let me email all your friends you sad fuck...

    yours truly
    Facebook

  28. forget gbcw posts, detect the killers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It would be more useful if Facebook could develop an algorithm that could detect the next Steve Stephens or Devin Patrick Kelly before they go out kill innocent people.

    1. Re: forget gbcw posts, detect the killers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, they should only kill guilty people

  29. Yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My AI auto detects terrorist activity and SWATS their house. That's what you get for making me hear "terrorists win" on CS.

  30. Re:I see good things coming out of this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This should be up to friends and family to correct this kind of behavior, not some Facebook algorithm

  31. What could possibly go wrong by Solandri · · Score: 4

    "Man commits suicide after becoming depressed that Facebook flagged his regular posts as suicidal."

    1. Re:What could possibly go wrong by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "Man commits suicide after becoming depressed that Facebook flagged his regular posts as suicidal."

      Man commits suicide after Facebook ruins his life by referring him to a state-sponsored mental health care system that thrives primarily on overprescription. But if Facebook wants more fake-ass posts that don't tell how people are really thinking, I guess this is one way to get them. I know that I will now fear Facebook referring me to some legal organization for "help", and adjust my posts accordingly.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  32. obligatory rat park reference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    True, but most people who are suicdal do not genuinely want to die as much as they would rather want their living circumstances just to be different from whatever they are

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rat_Park

    Personally I've found that there is a correlation between extreme financial stress and consideration of life as worth living. These things sound obvious when you say them out loud, but oddly not present in many rationales regarding suicide.

    And Pump Up The Volume is a classic movie, and completely on topic. Of course Facebook lacks all the goodness of a pirate communications channel.

    Sieze the day kids. Steal the air.

  33. Effects of false positives? by bradley13 · · Score: 0

    What, exactly, are they going to do with this information? What will the false-positive rate be? Intuitively, I expect it to be very high: 90% or more of the reported cases will be false positives.

    So: The suicide prevention lines will suddenly be overloaded with incorrect reports? And random individuals will have the police knocking on their doors as 3am, saving them from...nothing?

    Prediction: This is yet another feel-good idea that will have predominantly negative effects. Why do SJWs insist on sticking their noses in other people's lives?

    --
    Enjoy life! This is not a dress rehearsal.
    1. Re:Effects of false positives? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another way of saying "90% false positives" is "One in every 10 posts that the admins review will be an actual suicidal person."

      It doesn't need to be perfect. It just needs to filter out enough crap that you can plausibly hire a human to look through the remainder and pick out the true positives from the false positives. Instead of having a human read a million Facebook posts each day, you can use an AI to filter that down to 1,000 potential suicides, and then have a human pick out the 100 real suicides in that group.

      AI isn't going to completely replace human review (not yet, at least), but even a really crappy tool can be powerful when it handles a million times more data than a human can.

  34. thx 1138 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wou are about to cost more money to the system than you are producing. We will send jou some help.

  35. Re:I see good things coming out of this by schleimkeim · · Score: 1

    Nothing good ever came from facebook. Nothing.

  36. Re:But they can't stop illegal racial housing???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not illegal to discriminate against who your ads are shown to, outlawing that would set a precedent that would obliterate the ad industry overnight. If I put up job postings in a white neighborhood and a black guy comes in looking for a job, I only break the law if I deny him on basis of his race. That can be difficult to prove, but the demographics of my postings can be used as evidence despite being perfectly legal.

  37. If i want to DIE by chris.vanderheyden · · Score: 0

    that's MY choice... No one else should decide whether i NEED to live or not ... It's the most individual of individual choices we can make .... We don't even get to decide if we're born or not ... A society that prevents people to decide on their own life ending, is the ultimate form of slavery

  38. Says it all really... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    https://www.economist.com/news/united-states/21731693-could-they-hold-culprit-their-hands-teenagers-are-growing-more-anxious-and

    Oh, you mean "reported" as in notifying the authorities? Ah, gotcha...

  39. Violation of rights by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Suicidal people donâ(TM)t want that information getting out because they know that their feelings can hurt others which only makes matters worse.

    Leave them alone.

  40. It's not about prevention by shortscruffydave · · Score: 1

    It's so FB can sell your friends targeted advertising from funeral directors and florists

    1. Re:It's not about prevention by volodymyrbiryuk · · Score: 1

      So they can send in a SWAT team to neutralize you before you can harm yourself.

      --
      sudo rm -r -f --no-preserve-root /
  41. False positives? by The+Cynical+Critic · · Score: 1

    I somehow get the feeling that this will probably go just as well as youtube's automatic flagging and de-monetization of videos that has completely baffled independent content creators (traditional media ones like CNN and the BBC are excluded from this system) with the way it's arbitrarily de-monetized massive amounts of completely benign content.

    However what worries me even more is if they try their hand using the same flagging scripts for flagging other things. I probably ought to remove the post I made yesterday about the seemingly extremely quick delivery of something I ordered online where I joked about it probably being the fastest delivery since that German guy* tried to get the British Post Office to start delivering "V2 style" using rockets. Because if I don't I get the feeling they may put me on a list of "known neo-nazis" or something.

    *https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerhard_Zucker

    --
    "Why should I want to make anything up? Life's bad enough as it is without wanting to invent any more of it."
  42. Re:But they can't stop illegal racial housing???? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    If I put up job postings in a white neighborhood and a black guy comes in looking for a job, I only break the law if I deny him on basis of his race. That can be difficult to prove, but the demographics of my postings can be used as evidence despite being perfectly legal.

    If you only hang fliers in a white neighborhood, black people can still come into that neighborhood and see them, at least in this era. If you explicitly select not to show your ad to anyone but white people, on the other hand, that's substantially different and clearly an attempt at discrimination. It's difficult to prove you were only trying to rent to whites if you post flyers in a white neighborhood, because you can reasonably claim that you were attracted by the economic status of the neighborhood. It's difficult to prove you were only trying to rent to whites if you post an ad on a website frequented mostly by white people, too. But it's trivial to prove that you were trying to exclude non-whites if you actually selected "show this ad only to white people".

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  43. for the "profits of psychiatry." by strstr · · Score: 1

    basically the way this is supposed to work: Facebook detects the billable mental disorder and reports you to authorities for forcibly psychiatric lock up. The hospital/doctors then bill your insurance against your will, prescribing drugs that disable your brain and create mental illness for reals, permanently making you disabled. Doctors/hospital/investors in the pharma company/congressman walk away with a mint at the victims expense.
    Psychiatry isn't treatment it's a business model.

    https://www.trumpsweapon.com/

  44. Slippery slope? by houghi · · Score: 1

    They start with suicide; Next it will be helping people that are depressed or have PTSD. Then it will be people who are unahappy. So where do you draw the line as to when to stop?
    On the one side they do not allow Russians to advertise for whatever party they want to. On the other hand, I am sure they will take money from companies to influence the peoples behavior of what they buy.

    Some quotes from THX 1138 that could be relevant:
    Thou art a subject of the divine, created in the image of man, by the masses, for the masses.

    Female voice (medicine cabinet): If you feel you are not properly sedated, call 348-844 immediately. Failure to do so may result in prosecution for criminal drug evasion.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    1. Re:Slippery slope? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's already a well-established rules about where you draw the line. Medical ethics (and legal rules) are pretty clear that you don't treat patients without their consent, outside of some narrow emergency rules. You can lock someone up if they've said that they plan to jump off a building or shoot up a school, but aside from that, if they don't want a psychologist, they don't have to get one.

      This rule is well-established as the fence that stops people going down the slippery slope, and I don't see why it would disappear just because computers are available as a diagnostic tool.

      I'm not even sure how you imagine them taking action against unhappy people. Like, if someone's suicidal, Facebook can call the cops and say "This person is clearly suicidal, send help." But if you call the cops and tell them "This person is unhappy," they'll laugh and say "Cool. Call back when you have a real emergency."

    2. Re:Slippery slope? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I'm not even sure how you imagine them taking action against unhappy people. Like, if someone's suicidal, Facebook can call the cops and say "This person is clearly suicidal, send help." But if you call the cops and tell them "This person is unhappy," they'll laugh and say "Cool. Call back when you have a real emergency."

      Bollocks.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:Slippery slope? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What does that have to do with unhappy people?

      The fact that the cops are bad at dealing with suicidal people is a separate question from what situations you're able to call the cops for.

  45. What about terrorism pre-crime? Domestic violence? by IHTFISP · · Score: 1

    Sounds like naïve emotionalistic public relations propaganda to me. “We detect & report pre-crime!”

    If it were really that simple to detect suicidal tendencies, wouldn't FB also announce efforts to detect/prevent:
    * terrorist attacks
    * domestic abuse
    * human trafficking
    * illegal drug trade
    * illegal border crossings
    * tax evasion
    * racism
    * blasphemy
    * insults against the State
    * thoughtcrime
    * impure thoughts
    * sarcasm

    Etc. What a bunch o' hooey!

    They might well intend this as a “cover our arses” defense against suicide liability suits, but it opens the door to a plethora of other suits if they don't also address a host of other comparable issues. The unintended consequences could be epically Orwellian.

    All in all: this appears to be a bad idea poorly implemented, a.k.a. activist government policy pandering.

    --
    Error: NSE - No Signature Error
  46. The eight most terrifying words in English by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm from Facebook and I'm here to help.

  47. facebook is eating itself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Note personal anecdote, YMMV

    A couple of years ago i deleted facebook due to not having any use for it, recently that changed. I became involved in a few social groups that predominantly use facebook to organize and so i went to create a profile. I used the same name and email as my previous profile and so far when i have tried to login it has informed me that it has detected suspicious activity and i must upload a picture with a clear view of my face, which they will delete (yeah right). I dont know if this is caused because i use no-script, ublock origin and i refuse to save my browser. the problem is that given all of facebook's policies are actually making it more of a pain to use than it used to be. That ease of use is what made it so popular and stories like this are just fodder that can be used against it. In the end one of the groups has switched to an email list and no one seems to have a problem with using it to organize events and outings.

    Facebook was all fine and dandy when the user had control, but ever since they felt that they had the right to take away the user choice they have been in decline. I don't care if they want to do a/b testing or put the most popular things at the top of the feed, just give users the choice to opt out and actually respect their choice. Unfortunately it is too late for facebook to gain the public's trust back as the word of mouth campaign against facebook is mature and strong and has lots of evidence.

    Markets are built on consumer confidence and facebook has lost the confidence of consumers.

  48. To protect me from the enemy, myself by Sporkinum · · Score: 0

    All I want is a Pepsi and she wouldn't give it to me
    All I wanted was a Pepsi, just one Pepsi
    And she wouldn't give it to me, just a Pepsi

    --
    "He's lost in a 'floyd hole"
  49. Re:I see good things coming out of this by PPH · · Score: 1

    drama queens

    The sort of people that emacs psychiatrist would just say, "kys".

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  50. Oblig. ST by avandesande · · Score: 0

    All I wanted was a Pepsi, just one Pepsi

    --
    love is just extroverted narcissism
  51. AI to become suicidal by Migraineman · · Score: 1

    I would expect the AI to become suicidal having been forced to wade through umpteen million posts about "what I'm currently eating," regurgitated cute-cat videos, and various flavors of tween- and teen-drama.

    AI: "Oh god, not ANOTHER bathroom selfie ..."

  52. Just the beginning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After they roll this out under the guise of preventing suicide, how much tweaking would the algorithm, I'm sorry the "AI" need to start identifying people who are angry or unstable enough to become potentially violent? The real fun starts when people start losing their constitutionally protected rights stemming from a speculative diagnoses provided by a social media "AI". I'm not saying that Facebook will be directly putting people on no-fly or no-buy lists, but this could be reshaped to be the first step of that process by reporting people to the authorities.

  53. another lens for the global panopticon by cas2000 · · Score: 1

    this will surely be welcomed by those whose despair and depression is caused by the stress of living in the panopticon of an ever-increasing surveillance state that makes Orwell seem like a naive optimist.