Slashdot Mirror


Tesla Switches on Giant Battery To Shore Up Australia's Grid (reuters.com)

Tesla switched on the world's biggest lithium ion battery on Friday in time to feed Australia's shaky power grid for the first day of summer, meeting a promise by Elon Musk to build it in 100 days or give it free. From a report: "South Australia is now leading the world in dispatchable renewable energy," state Premier Jay Weatherill said at the official launch at the Hornsdale wind farm, owned by private French firm Neoen. Tesla won a bid in July to build the 129-megawatt hour battery for South Australia, which expanded in wind power far quicker than the rest of the country, but has suffered a string of blackouts over the past 18 months. In a politically charged debate, opponents of the state's renewables push have argued that the battery is a "Hollywood solution" in a country that still relies on fossil fuels, mainly coal, for two-thirds of its electricity.

173 comments

  1. switches on? by nospam007 · · Score: 1, Funny

    Did they ship it fully loaded?

    1. Re:switches on? by barbariccow · · Score: 1, Funny

      Did they divert this battery from Puerto Rico to a richer area?

    2. Re: switches on? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They had already started this before Puerto Rico and had a pre-set deadline.

    3. Re:switches on? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      Bulk lithium batteries are usually shipped at about 30% charge.

      Lower charge is bad for the battery. High charge is not good for the battery either, and is also a fire danger.

    4. Re:switches on? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Flip that question on it's head: Would you divert a bought and paid for product from your customer to some other customer knowing full well the result would incur significant financial penalties while at the same time doing nothing of value as this is designed to resolve an intermittent stability problem rather than Puerto Rico's lack of electricity problem?

  2. Re:Elon Musk by OakDragon · · Score: 1

    Elon Musk did nothing wrong.

  3. 1910 called by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Today in 1910 it is time to make a robust investment in buggy whips and horse manure disposal because horses are responsible for two thirds of our road transportation"

    1. Re:1910 called by jellomizer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But it is equally a bad idea during 1910 to dump your investments in buggy whips and manure disposals because 2/3 of the road transportation is populated by horses. And we need these industries to stay strong while the transition takes place.
      While Renewable energy and battery storage gets perfected we still need to upgrade and manage the existing dirty power, to make sure services don't get cut off.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  4. Special Solution for a Special Problem by careysub · · Score: 3, Informative

    South Australia (and Australia generally) is a special case for renewable energy since it is a small continent, and sparsely inhabited.

    This is a fix for a remote corner in Australia, the edge of the 5th largest population center (Adelaide*) separated from it by 100 miles and isolated by hundreds of miles of emptiness from anywhere else. There is little redundant/backup infrastructure, or all that many people.

    More generally battery facilities shouldn't be needed in larger, more populous continents (North America, Eurasia).

    The solution to issues of variable power production is to connect the entire continent together with high voltage DC power lines (a nearly century old technology) which can ship power from one coast of North America to the other with losses of under 5%. You build enough excess solar and wind capacity that even under the worst conditions you still have enough for the entire continent (Canada and Mexico should be part of this grid also).

    This also allows using the sun out west to power the evening peak back east, and so forth, leveling out production/consumption mismatches.

    Pumped storage can service the entire grid since power can be transported long distances. The U.S. currently has enough pumped storage on-line to provide 2.2% of US grid capacity (and about twice this much more has been licensed), so it can be sited where ever geography makes it most convenient.

    We need some national-level vision to help bring this about (good luck with that at present), but mostly this can be done by private investment.

    *The greater metropolitan area of Adelaide has a population of 1,317,000 which is 77% of the entire population of South Australia (which is 50% larger than Texas). Things get really sparse really fast out past Adelaide's metro area.

    --
    Starships were meant to fly, Hands up and touch the sky - Nicky Minaj
    1. Re:Special Solution for a Special Problem by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      Why HVDC? DC is a bitch to convert between voltage and current, and it (generally) is more dangerous at any given voltage, though to be fair at transmission voltage levels it makes little difference if you're a DC or AC flavored charcoal lump.

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    2. Re:Special Solution for a Special Problem by Jzanu · · Score: 1

      More populated continents will have greater demands in a populated area, so will still require some sort of energy storage for excess production to be used at night or when there is no wind/heavy cloud cover, etc. Kinetic storage would actually be cheaper for small scale application, but it doesn't have the media appeal of batteries for some reason. What is more advanced than space-age technology creating nearly zero friction flywheels that weight tons?! Some dumb ass with a big mouth making a temperature sensitive solution in one of the hottest and driest areas of the world... One that won't even support the resource extraction industry that southern Australia depends on.

    3. Re:Special Solution for a Special Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      Lower transmission losses and connectivity between unsynchronized grids.

    4. Re:Special Solution for a Special Problem by apoc.famine · · Score: 1

      The GP noted

      which can ship power from one coast of North America to the other with losses of under 5%

      When you're sending power very long distances, where you're not tapping into it every few miles, the low losses of HVDC make a pretty big difference. Go take a look at a population density map of Australia, and it might make more sense. The GP is talking many hundreds or even thousands of miles of uninterrupted power transmission. At those extreme ranges, the losses are going to be the biggest issue.

      Sure, converting is an issue, but you're not doing that at more than a couple of places where you're dropping that continent-scale power grid into the local grid. The GP is talking about a continent scale power backbone.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    5. Re:Special Solution for a Special Problem by whoever57 · · Score: 2

      Most long-distance transmission is DC these days.

      AC requires the whole grid to be fully synchronous.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    6. Re:Special Solution for a Special Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're confusing voltage with AC/DC. At the same voltage DC is the same as or more efficient due to capacitive or reactive loss in the transmission line.

    7. Re:Special Solution for a Special Problem by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      That is wrong.
      Why don't you read something sbout it?
      Transmission losses are in the 5% - 7% range.
      The longer the distance the higher you make the voltage, and you stay in those limits.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    8. Re:Special Solution for a Special Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And, DC transmission would be horribly resource inefficient. Think meter thick lines to go several hundred KM. AC exists to reduce effective resistance without increasing wire gauges.

      And yet, we're already doing it.

      You're out of touch.

    9. Re:Special Solution for a Special Problem by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Actually most long range transports are AC.
      The biggest grid on the world spams from west Europ to Mongolia and East Russia.
      Probabl 15,000km ... and yes, it is synchronous.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    10. Re:Special Solution for a Special Problem by iggymanz · · Score: 2

      nope

      Ultra-high voltage DC lines are a real thing and the preferred and most efficient long distance solution, working commercial 1500 miles (2400 km) is state of the art and longer lines are planned

    11. Re:Special Solution for a Special Problem by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 3, Funny

      You build enough excess solar and wind capacity that even under the worst conditions you still have enough for the entire continent (Canada and Mexico should be part of this grid also).

      As a Canadian, I can already tell you that it will never work. Up north, we use metric electricity.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    12. Re:Special Solution for a Special Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you can transport 1000V DC power over 1000 miles with only 5% power loss then you should get a Nobel prize. Because no one has been able to do it to this date. Strangely, I can't find your name or even nomination in the Nobel prize list.

    13. Re:Special Solution for a Special Problem by apoc.famine · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the OP and I did read about it. That's why wrote what we wrote. Why don't you read about it, and come back with either some new knowledge or good link which explains why HVDC is a bad option for long-distance power transmission.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    14. Re:Special Solution for a Special Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Think meter thick lines to go several hundred KM.
      >AC exists to reduce effective resistance without increasing wire gauges.

      Why do people persist in believing this nonsense?
      AC won the war of the currents because back in the late 1800s it was more economical to convert AC power to high voltages for transmission, thus reducing I^2R losses.
      There are several high voltage DC lines in use, *TODAY*, that run thousands of kilometers, and they don't use meter thick wires. There have been HVDC lines in use for at least 50 years.
      A picture.
      AC does not "exist" to "reduces effective resistance." Physics and electrical generator design are why AC exists, but mostly physics.
      DC not inherently lossier than AC over transmission lines because of to its direct nature.
      You don't need to take it from me, do a search for high voltage direct current.

    15. Re:Special Solution for a Special Problem by tlhIngan · · Score: 4, Informative

      Why HVDC? DC is a bitch to convert between voltage and current, and it (generally) is more dangerous at any given voltage, though to be fair at transmission voltage levels it makes little difference if you're a DC or AC flavored charcoal lump.

      If your grid is disparate, then getting them into synchronicity can be a pain. With modern semiconductors, it is however possible to rectify and invert DC into AC quite painlessly.

      This is used for grids that have historically never been tied together, as well as new grids which never were synchronized. In Texas, there's a grid intertie that connects the three major US and Canadian grids together so power imbalances can be dealt with. But trying to synchronize the grids is a next to impossible problem, so the intertie uses HVDC internally so it's able to move power between the grids as necessary.

      I believe China has a HVDC distribution network for the same reason - too many little grids to synchronize up.

      HVDC systems do have lots of advantages over traditional AC systems.

    16. Re: Special Solution for a Special Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try 1000 kv DC, and done.

    17. Re:Special Solution for a Special Problem by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 5, Informative

      South Australia (and Australia generally) is a special case for renewable energy since it is a small continent, and sparsely inhabited.

      This is a fix for a remote corner in Australia, the edge of the 5th largest population center (Adelaide*) separated from it by 100 miles and isolated by hundreds of miles of emptiness from anywhere else. There is little redundant/backup infrastructure, or all that many people.

      More generally battery facilities shouldn't be needed in larger, more populous continents (North America, Eurasia).

      Many folks may not fully appreciate the primary function of these batteries. It is not to levelize renewables, but rather to provide fast response to prevent overloads and voltage/frequency support when there is a sudden event on the system. That is because, as you say, they rely on a small number of lines and therefore don't have the networked/redundancy to maintain reliability. Adding new transmission lines for these long distances is expensive.

      With the batteries, if there is a transient event on the grid the hope is they provide voltage and frequency support to ride it through without some overload on a major line. Now that it is operational, it will be interesting to see how well that works and how often that support is needed.

      One important factor to note, when batteries need to be available for this type of support they must retain a certain percentage of capacity. They can also use them for renewable levelization or peaking support, but they don't want to discharge them too much or they may not be able to supply adequate voltage/frequency support when called upon. Full discharge/recharge cycles will likely not happen often.

    18. Re:Special Solution for a Special Problem by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      HVDC is not a bad option for long distance power transmissions.
      No idea why you claim that ...

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    19. Re: Special Solution for a Special Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because it is more efficient.

    20. Re:Special Solution for a Special Problem by apoc.famine · · Score: 1

      Can you point to where I claimed that HVDC was a bad option for long distance power transmission? I was arguing the opposite in the first post of mine you responded to calling it wrong.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    21. Re: Special Solution for a Special Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have that exactly backwards. HVDC is popular because it is more efficient. DC power does not suffer from skin effect, therefore the current uses the entire cable cross section and not just the surface allowing for the use of smaller cables.

    22. Re:Special Solution for a Special Problem by Jzanu · · Score: 0

      Hmm, maybe. DC transmission at high voltages still requires conversion back to AC for heavy machinery, and the equipment required is more complex, heavy, and more expensive. It is just shifting the burden of costs for a DC decision in power supply out to the customer.

    23. Re:Special Solution for a Special Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most long-distance transmission is DC these days.

      AC requires the whole grid to be fully synchronous.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      And AC is dangerous! Just ask Topsy.

    24. Re:Special Solution for a Special Problem by 110010001000 · · Score: 2

      Two idiots arguing about agreeing with each other.

    25. Re:Special Solution for a Special Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. HV means high voltage, so current is no different than the same voltage AC. DC has the advantage that you wouldn't have to sync say the western Australian grid to the east coast grid (currently not connected) and you could drop a honking great solar thermal plant (or a dozen) in the intervening desert to supply both.

      tl;dr - AC for local distribution and regional grids, *high voltage* DC for interconnects and to let us access the great solar resources available in the interior deserts, plus batteries and pumped-hydro for storage as needed.

    26. Re:Special Solution for a Special Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Technology has moved on. These days inverters have reached the point where high-power AC/DC conversion is economical and efficient. Google HVDC grid interconnects.

      It's actually an interesting reversal of the days of Tesla and Edison where transformers and AC were the clear winners: now, well, "it depends".

    27. Re:Special Solution for a Special Problem by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      As a Canadian, I can already tell you that it will never work. Up north, we use metric electricity.

      Everyone uses metric electricity. Amps, Volts, and Watts are all metric units.

      In America, large electric motors are sometimes rated by horsepower instead of watts, but even that is increasingly uncommon.

    28. Re: Special Solution for a Special Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Skin effect does not exist at 60 hertz. You have to get into the microwave range to see the skin effect. "DUMB ASS".

    29. Re:Special Solution for a Special Problem by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      At those extreme ranges, the losses are going to be the biggest issue.

      Sure, converting is an issue,

      Probably I read that out of context :D

      My apologizes.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    30. Re:Special Solution for a Special Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your off by a magnitude or more on the voltage. Add three to six more zeros.

      AND

      E=IR
      It is called Ohms Law.

      Shit should come out of your ASS, not your mouth moron.

    31. Re:Special Solution for a Special Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you completely unfamiliar with DC transmission? DC transmission lines are actually thinner than AC lines for the same current because the skin effect doesn't apply.

      In other words, an AC wire only uses the outside of the wire to transmit current, while a DC wire uses the whole cross section to transmit. At wire thicknesses applicable to long-distance transmission running AC may be 10% less efficient than running DC at the same voltage down the same wire.

      Of course there's quite some work involved in turning that high-voltage source into DC in the first place and then converting back to AC, but modern power electronics can do that efficiently.

      Plus, wind turbines and PV arrays can't be put on an AC grid with just regular switchgear because they need to be synchronized. That requires inverters to take the power and generate a grid-synchronized AC sine wave at the right voltage and phase. Using DC avoids the need for synchronizing with the rest of the grid.

      dom

    32. Re:Special Solution for a Special Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You lost me at the high voltage DC power lines.

      Thanks but no thanks.

    33. Re: Special Solution for a Special Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dumbass yourself. Skin depth in copper at 60Hz is about 8.5mm in copper. So if a solid wire has a diameter above 17mm it starts to play. A bit more for aluminium.

    34. Re:Special Solution for a Special Problem by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      This is one of the things that is often missed about the power outages in SA. One side is shouting OMG IT WAS TEH RENUABLS! while the other side is shouting OMG IT WAS THE TRANSMISSION TOWER THAT WAS KNOCKED OVER!

      The reality as always is in the middle. Yes a large transmission tower was knocked over, but the renewable kept generating and were happily powering a large portion of the state, or at least they would have if it weren't for a massive loss of synchronisation tripping offline wind farms, gas turbines, and the inter-connectors to Victoria.

      This battery won't power 30000 homes when the state goes dark. What it will do is prevent a small power outage escalating into a large one while capacity is still available.

    35. Re: Special Solution for a Special Problem by NoMaster · · Score: 1

      Skin effect does not exist at 60 hertz. You have to get into the microwave range to see the skin effect. "DUMB ASS".

      Skin depth @ 60Hz is ~8.4mm in Cu, or ~10.5mm in Al. It's why single conductor high-current AC distribution cables max out @ ~17-25mm thick (depending on material & frequency), and even higher-current cables are either wound bundles or larger diameter & hollow (which allows for oil cooling).

      Now, about your "dumb-arse" comment...

      --
      What part of "a well regulated militia" do you not understand?
    36. Re:Special Solution for a Special Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Australia has a special case of a long stringy AC grid. It goes from north of Adelaide, SE down to Mt Gambier, across the bottom of Victoria, up through the Snowy Mountains to NSW, and then through to Queensland, and finally up the east coast to just north of Cairns. Having all the synchronous generators in the grid react to each other makes stability studies VERY challenging [spent 3 years on that].

      It's about 5000km end to end, with very little meshing.

    37. Re:Special Solution for a Special Problem by gbjbaanb · · Score: 1

      what's more advanced?

      Well NASA-invented Vanadium redox flow batteries for example. Useless for powering your car as they have to be big and are slow to release power but the fact that they retain their capacity for a much longer time and can be recycled very easily makes them perfect fit for grid-scale storage.

      Have a link to one company that makes these things:
      http://www.redtenergy.com/how-...

    38. Re:Special Solution for a Special Problem by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      I get the linking disparate grids, but GGP was saying that it would be a single unified grid, so... that issue doesn't apply.

      However, as I did decide that I should likely read up on it, I did.

      Among the other benefits of HVDC: Inductive loss and charge coupling, particularly in undersea cables, but also just to the air (I presume damper is worse), so over genuinely long assed distances this adds up to a few percent less loss than HVAC. A few percent of a 25GW+ grid is a *ton* of power, therefore, the hassle of converting back to AC is worth it.

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    39. Re:Special Solution for a Special Problem by willy_me · · Score: 1

      AC requires the whole grid to be fully synchronous.

      Yes, and this is why your oven clock keeps accurate time for years. It is synchronized to the 60 (or 50) Hz input power. The grid then guarantees that they will generate, on average, exactly the specified 50/60 Hz frequency. The frequency changes slightly with load but it all averages out in the end.

      Not long ago there was a /. article talking about how the US has announced an end to the 60Hz promise - in ~20 years. The introduction of numerous solar panel installations has made it more difficult to maintain a specific output frequency. In addition - GPS, cell, and accurate crystals have made the benefits of accurate mains timing far less important.

      So the grid is already synchronous with but a few exceptions. The losses due to AC are minimal for shorter, lower voltage runs and will be less then losses resulting from converting from DC to AC. So for the most part, things run on AC. However, DC starts to look good when you are running at a very high voltage or if the surrounding environment is impacted by a changing magnetic field (think underwater). In such situations, DC is a good choice due to advancements in silicon switching technology.

    40. Re:Special Solution for a Special Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DC is more efficient to transmit - no AC impedance problems. Power electronic switches (FETs and the like) turn DC into AC using much smaller (cheaper) inductors than the transformers that you see siting at power substations. Most new power transmission systems are DC. Many have been for a long time.

    41. Re:Special Solution for a Special Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try https://www.furukawa.co.jp/en/release/2015/kenkai_150415.html

    42. Re:Special Solution for a Special Problem by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      Microgrids with HVDC interconnects address a number of issues, but wind is hard to make work without a fully dispatchable power source/sink. The best one available today is large hydro, but there are significant (environmental) issues with constructing more.

      The microgrids will always need a fossil fuel plus battery backup, as best I can see with the numbers available to me.

    43. Re:Special Solution for a Special Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure - you use metric for your inferior electrons. In the US, we have the best electrons in the whole world. The very best. Nobody's electrons are better than the US. And our electrons are going to be even better in the future - the vey best.

    44. Re:Special Solution for a Special Problem by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      There is a difference between running at the same frequency and running in phase.

      Secondly, the guarantee of instantaneous frequency isn't as accurate as you think. The reason that mains synchronous clocks keep good time is that there is a guarantee that there will be the correct number of cycles over a 24-hour period (or something like that). During the day, the frequency may slow slightly and increase at night.

      So, yes, grids are synchronous, but there are often multiple grids, which don't have a guarantee that they remain synchronous with each other.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    45. Re:Special Solution for a Special Problem by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      Reading again, I see you addressed the variation in frequency. But you miss that DC is often good for long-distance transmission because it is connecting two independent grids.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    46. Re:Special Solution for a Special Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the only thing that prevents them from the same problem they had is that they are spending a fortune now on 2 new fossil fuel powered generators (270MW) to prevent power outages. These things make no money, need to have upkeep and staff and a bunch of costs, and are intended just for emergencies.

      Honestly, smarter people need to get involved in how to build fail-safe networks. South Australia have to dumbest system. Too much politics.

    47. Re:Special Solution for a Special Problem by Circlotron · · Score: 1

      Well NASA-invented Vanadium redox flow batteries for example.

      NASA did an earlier version. VR batteries were invented by Maria Skyllas-Kazacos of the University of NSW, Australia. http://www.vanadiumcorp.com/20...

    48. Re:Special Solution for a Special Problem by Barsteward · · Score: 1

      They could put solar on every roof (where its possible) and attach a battery to it, they can then all be linked locally into a microgrid and when all microgrids are linked together across the country into the grid itself, they can then become the "grid" storage with every single battery (no matter how its charged) and EV battery connected to it as the storage solution.

      --
      "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
    49. Re:Special Solution for a Special Problem by Barsteward · · Score: 1

      "but rather to provide fast response to prevent overloads and voltage/frequency support when there is a sudden event on the system" - this might become a problem of the past if power storage is distributed when more and more properties have battery storage (and EV) and are connected to a local microgrid

      --
      "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
    50. Re:Special Solution for a Special Problem by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      "but rather to provide fast response to prevent overloads and voltage/frequency support when there is a sudden event on the system" - this might become a problem of the past if power storage is distributed when more and more properties have battery storage (and EV) and are connected to a local microgrid

      Its not a common problem now, most grid networks have enough paths and redundancy. There is no plan, as far as I know, for any country to divide up into micro grids, but different people apply different meaning to that word.

    51. Re: Special Solution for a Special Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong. South Australia is not part of Eastlink which is the grid the covers the eastern coast.

    52. Re: Special Solution for a Special Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Australia is similar in land size to the continental United States. We are just sparsely populated, due to inhospitable climate.

    53. Re:Special Solution for a Special Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And over long distances power lines turn into transmission lines. 50Hz requires a 3,000km half-wave dipole antenna. A 3,000km power line radiates power out into the universe pretty well unless you've got 75 ohm loads on each end!

    54. Re:Special Solution for a Special Problem by Agripa · · Score: 1

      Why HVDC? DC is a bitch to convert between voltage and current, and it (generally) is more dangerous at any given voltage, though to be fair at transmission voltage levels it makes little difference if you're a DC or AC flavored charcoal lump.

      For a given power, conduction losses are proportional to the resistance and square of the current so there is a premium on using the highest voltage possible. Corona and other AC losses are higher at crest factors greater than 1. These factors make DC more efficient and cost effective for long distance transmission even with conversion losses.

      Further, there are difficulties in synchronizing widely separated and large AC grids so there will be a conversion to DC and back to AC anyway. If this is done, then the transmission line might as well be DC.

    55. Re:Special Solution for a Special Problem by Agripa · · Score: 1

      And over long distances power lines turn into transmission lines. 50Hz requires a 3,000km half-wave dipole antenna. A 3,000km power line radiates power out into the universe pretty well unless you've got 75 ohm loads on each end!

      There are near field losses do to the dielectric which includes things like dirt, water, cows, people, whatever, but the structure is literally a transmission line so radiation is not a problem whether the load is matched or not.

    56. Re:Special Solution for a Special Problem by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

      You build enough excess solar and wind capacity that even under the worst conditions you still have enough for the entire continent (Canada and Mexico should be part of this grid also).

      As a Canadian, I can already tell you that it will never work. Up north, we use metric electricity.

      Are the electrons square or oval? They told me that electrons are in the shape of very small (microscope sized) ice-cubs

      --
      Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
  5. In other words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

    Australia was so quick to go green with renewables, they didn't realize that it's called intermittent generation for a reason. Once they retired their reliable fossil generation, they had blackouts because the wind is only consistent on average, and now they need an even more expensive solution to shore up the wind energy output.

    1. Re: In other words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. The blackouts were not caused by renewables. That is propaganda from a federal government receiving donations from the coal industry. In one case an unprecedented storm blew down multiple high voltage transmission lines. Nothing to do with renewables.

    2. Re: In other words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another blackout was the result of the federal energy controlling agency shedding power to that state in order to shore up the power supply to New South Wales, a state relying more on coal powered generation than South Australia.

    3. Re: In other words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From the article: Supporters, however, say it will help stabilize the grid in a state that now gets more than 40 percent of its electricity from wind energy, but needs help when the wind dies down.
       
      Anyway...
       
      How does downed transmission lines get solved by a large centralized battery? It may help in the case that the battery and the power generators are physically separated by some distance but it doesn't look like that's the case from the slideshow presentation in the article.
       
      I'm not saying that they're moving in the wrong direction but without more clarification of the matter it does look like they're heading to a fairly reasonable solution on a cattywampus path. I don't believe that I have more knowledge than the people who put this together but the way they've presented it here it does give cause for raised eyebrows.

    4. Re: In other words by aussie_a · · Score: 0

      It doesn't help deal with the problem that occurred. It helps deal with the propaganda put out by the Federal government.

    5. Re: In other words by TheReaperD · · Score: 1

      I believe it is to make their grid more independent so they do not have to rely on the transmission lines so much. Without storage, their grid is susceptible to power dips when the wind is lower and spikes when it is higher that lead to wasted energy without the transmission lines. This way, there is a buffer that would handle most normal use cases without relying on the long-distance transmission for either dips or spikes.

      --
      "Be particularly skeptical when presented with evidence confirming what you already believe." -
    6. Re: In other words by Rei · · Score: 3, Informative

      Indeed. Look at the stats on the battery: 100MW, yet only 129MWh. This isn't storing power for long periods of time; it's providing a power-plant level of power until power plant outputs can be ramped up elsewhere. Hence it physically cannot be used as a "storage for when the wind doesn't blow" solution (unless the wind is only stopped for an hour or so). Tesla does make longer-term storage solutions too (it's done that for solar in a number of places), but that's not what this battery is.

      --
      Pinkypants -- my favorite!
    7. Re:In other words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Australia was so quick to go green with renewables, they didn't realize that it's called intermittent generation for a reason.

      I know! In my solar-powered house I have to use kerosene lamps at night!

    8. Re: In other words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YES the blackouts were caused indirectly from renewables. SA moved to a far less stable power generation system that relied upon interstate connectors instead of a stable baseload.

    9. Re: In other words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshit, one blackout due to loss of transmision towers, nothing to do with renewables.

  6. There is no other way than coal! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Coal today, coal tomorrow, coal forever!

    I am sure that the fact that Australia is a coal exporter has absolutely nothing to do with the politician's coal-protecting attitude. Or that Australia has decided its economic future lies in being an exporter of raw materials to advanced countries like China.

  7. Fossil fools. The battery will help you TOO. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What people don't realize is that the electric grid is on demand; there has never before been a battery system. The power requirements of society must be monitored continuously, and generators must not only be put online as demand increases, but must also be taken offline as demand decreases.

    This has been one of the problems with the growth of solar panels in Hawaii. Those panels would dump more electricity into the grid than was needed, causing outages as safety mechanisms kicked in. Until batteries have become workable, the only thing to do with that extra power has been to squander it.

    Now, those batteries can be charged at off-peek hours by even those fossil fuel plants, and the batteries can then be used to supplement/smooth power requirements during peak hours. This will put fossil fuel plants under less stress, in terms of mechanics and personnel. It will make fossil fuel usage more efficient.

    1. Re:Fossil fools. The battery will help you TOO. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There have ALWAYS been battery systems.

    2. Re:Fossil fools. The battery will help you TOO. by Ichijo · · Score: 0

      The power requirements of society must be monitored continuously, and generators must not only be put online as demand increases, but must also be taken offline as demand decreases.

      Or instead of managing supply, manage demand, in the same way eBay prevents too many people from winning the same auction. So instead of putting a generator online as demand increases (or the wind stops blowing), reduce demand until that generator isn't needed.

      --
      Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
    3. Re:Fossil fools. The battery will help you TOO. by ledow · · Score: 1

      What you say also works on the assumption that batteries will also be able to accept that charge (i.e. not already fully charged) in order to act as a sink for that spare energy.

      Once you charge the batteries up, you only get a trickle of losses being consumed and all that spare electric just sits on the grid still.

      There's a reason that things like water pumps are used to pump water uphill above reservoirs in times of surplus - because it's a constant sink whether or not you bother to re-capture that water later on.

    4. Re:Fossil fools. The battery will help you TOO. by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      Solar is very predictable; easy enough to plan for and work around. The problem with "too much" solar is when it exceeds about 75% of base load requirements. The problem with dumb grids is that protection for reverse power flows and disparate flow on individual circuits... along with overloading transformers.

      Wind is much harder though. It cycles on a multi-day basis, which makes it harder to rely on except as a low-cost source when other dispatchable sources can easily be curtailed.

  8. Hollywood Solutions by citylivin · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Star Trek's PADD device was a hollywood solution too. Until it wasn't.

    --
    As a potential lottery winner, I totally support tax cuts for the wealthy
    1. Re:Hollywood Solutions by jedidiah · · Score: 0

      It's still a Hollywood solution to anything but media consumption.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    2. Re:Hollywood Solutions by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      my PADD makes phone calls, does business email & scheduling, is part of a multi-factor auth system, orders stuff and pays bills.

      maybe yours is broken if it only does "consumption media"

    3. Re:Hollywood Solutions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Touchscreen input works for business applications as well as your shift key worked in your comment.

    4. Re:Hollywood Solutions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The opponents should also look around what is being done in the real world in similar situations. "Alaska solution" could then fit in their vocabulary as well, if talking about backup battery systems in inhospitable areas.

    5. Re:Hollywood Solutions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most checkouts - particularly at new stores, use tablets rather than cash registers now.

  9. In real-world units by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For those wondering how much 129 MWh is in real life, it's the energy equivalent of about 3300 gallons of Diesel fuel.

    In other words, the battery is basically storing the same energy as the fuel tank to a large backup generator. For comparison, a semi-tanker has a capacity of about 9000 gallons (which after considering conversion losses is probably what it would take to put the same energy onto the grid).

    The benefit of a LiIon battery is that it can discharge the energy much more quickly than a mechanical generator.

    dom

    1. Re:In real-world units by Mike+Van+Pelt · · Score: 1

      And the LiIon battery can turn excess electricity back into "Diesel fuel" to re-fill the tank when demand for electricity is lower.

      As a means of dealing with short-term transient loads, this seems like a pretty good idea.

    2. Re:In real-world units by Rei · · Score: 1

      This is correct. This battery system is not designed as a replacement for power plants. It's being used as an "instant on" system to keep people powered until standby power can be ramped up (which takes time). Aka, a high ratio of power to capacity. You can also get battery systems with a high ratio of capacity to power, but this is not one of them.

      --
      Pinkypants -- my favorite!
  10. Re:Elon Musk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    please explain

  11. Not at this scale, or at the scale envisioned. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why do you think there have been problems already, as in Hawaii? The battery systems aren't meaningful enough.

    1. Re:Not at this scale, or at the scale envisioned. by TheReaperD · · Score: 1

      You have to build them first before they can become meaningful. We had done little to no energy storage solutions in this country. Instead, we always focused on keeping the power generation balanced according to demand on a constant basis as parent said.

      --
      "Be particularly skeptical when presented with evidence confirming what you already believe." -
    2. Re:Not at this scale, or at the scale envisioned. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It might be to do with all the crypto currency mining.

    3. Re:Not at this scale, or at the scale envisioned. by Rei · · Score: 1

      More to point: the grid has always had to deal with intermittancy: demand intermittency. Different side of the same coin.

      --
      Pinkypants -- my favorite!
    4. Re:Not at this scale, or at the scale envisioned. by anegg · · Score: 1

      Leading to power companies paying bonuses to people to install devices in their homes that permit the power utility to turn off/on certain appliances (air conditioning, water heaters, and the line) to mediate demand under peak loading conditions.

  12. Giant Battery by djupedal · · Score: 1

    Every home is an energy battery. This example isn't that big, but good on tesla for staying in the news cycle.

  13. Re:Elon Musk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you own a lot of oil stocks or something?

  14. Elon Musk ... by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 5, Interesting
    An engineer who delivered one fourth of what Elon Musk has delivered will be assured of a place in Engineering Hall of Fame. But what he has delivered is still a fraction of what he promised to deliver and he will be judged by how much he fell short...

    He might end up a pauper dying alone in a hotel room like his inspiration, Nicholi. Or he might actually deliver enough of what he promised to be ranked along with Whitney, Colt, Edison, Westinghouse, Ford as the leading light of American Industry....

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:Elon Musk ... by mykepredko · · Score: 1

      It's actually spelled "Nikola" - assuming you're talking about the Tesla the company is named for.

    2. Re:Elon Musk ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Musk has far more in common with Edison than Tesla. He's a "doer" that relies on the engineering expertise of others, he didn't invent anything and wasn't even the first. He made the technologies practical and economical (much like Edison). Nothing against him or Edison; I don't understand the hate Edison gets online due to some webcomics. Tesla had a lot of help with his motors and generators in Edison labs, and afterwards had interesting ideas but ultimately nothing practical - and imo wasn't a genius ahead of his time but rather someone out of touch with reality focused on his ego and appearance.

    3. Re:Elon Musk ... by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      He might end up a pauper dying alone in a hotel room like his inspiration, Nicholi.

      No haha. He has enough money that all he has to do is not lose it.......that is, get investments from elsewhere instead of personally investing his own money. And he's very good at raising money from elsewhere.

      So even if all his current ventures fail (which they won't), he's still doing really well.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    4. Re:Elon Musk ... by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 2
      Fundamentally, Edison was a tinkerer, without fully understanding electricity or magnetism. He did manage to invent lots of useful things but without any real understanding of how/why they worked. On top of it he was a racist and cruel too. Electrocuted circus elephants purely for FUD.

      Nikola Tesla too did not understand the inverse square law. If you radiate in a spherical front, 10 times the distance from the tower, 1% is the power density. No way you could transmit power in spherical front wirelessly. He was doomed too, but at least he got AC right.

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    5. Re:Elon Musk ... by quanminoan · · Score: 2

      I never saw anything that said Edison was racist and cruel. Read quite a bit about him, but could be wrong. Most first hand accounts portray Edison as a very likable guy (great book - "Uncommon Friends"). The elephant fiasco was partially Edison, but as always the big picture is more complicated. The elephant killed was going to be put to death anyway as it had killed people at the circus. The brainchild of electrocution by AC was Morgan, Edison's business partner. However, Edison has stated the whole AC DC feud was his biggest regret.

      You're correct Edison didn't know much, however he hired people who did and ran the world's first industrial R&D lab for profit. While he was the "front" guy, credit was applied to those who innovated. Personnel in his lab invented myriad new devices and received credit. Edison's contributions came through tinkering, but quite successfully. You can't denounce his contributions towards working economical bulbs and phonographs, for example.

      Believe it or not Tesla too was a tinkerer. He didn't believe in atoms, for one, and had his own (incorrect) ideas about how the universe worked. Most of what came from his lab has messing around with coils, not a mathematically rigorous method. And to your point on whether or not he was a "good person", he was a proponent of eugenics and had an odd hatred of obese people, especially obese women.

      Really, everyone has faults and today's trend of painting everyone historically by their worst actions gets a little tiresome. Edison by all accounts was a great person who made fantastic contributions to society either directly or indirectly through his funding and personnel at his laboratory. The 20th century was born in his laboratory. Tesla too was by all accounts overall a great person, but his contributions to society have, in my opinion, been horrendously exaggerated.

    6. Re:Elon Musk ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not so sure I agree with you, and I'm 100% a fanatical Musk fan (musketeer? muskrat?). That being said, he doesn't do this stuff on his own. He doesn't program the control system for the falcon reverse landing. He doesn't design the systems in a tesla. None of those technologies were invented, the landings being done to a much smaller extent with the DC-X in the 90s, electric car had the EV1.

      What he *did* do is start business that brought together brilliant people that perfected these technologies. Eventually he should get a spot in the Engineering Hall of Fame for his engineering entrepreneurship efforts. Would be even more impressive if these companies start to turn a profit, but he of course already demonstrated they work.

    7. Re:Elon Musk ... by avandesande · · Score: 1

      Anything is possible when you spend $500,000 an hour......

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    8. Re:Elon Musk ... by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Anything is possible when you spend $500,000 an hour......

      Our Swedish welfare system spends 26.3 million / hour.

      On 10 million citizens.

    9. Re:Elon Musk ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I however have heard that. And his cruelty was to his competitors and anyone who worked for him too. Isaac Newton was also a shithead. Being brilliant or being inventive doesn't mean you can't be a twat. Thinking so is purely hero worship and you can go blind from that.

    10. Re:Elon Musk ... by avandesande · · Score: 1

      USA borrows 60million an hour, top that! ; )

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
  15. Re:Elon Musk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Soviet Russia....

  16. Re:Elon Musk by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

    With a comment so evil, he must own dinosaurs stocks.

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  17. Musk wins again: Slashdot is butthurt by mschuyler · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is so funny. Here comes Musk--again--makes a big boast "Battery in 100 days or it is free!" Beats his own goal, turns on the battery, and some people here just can't stand it. Musk wins. You lose. Get over yourselves.

    --
    How about a moderation of -1 pedantic.
    1. Re:Musk wins again: Slashdot is butthurt by linuxguy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This is not the same Slashdot that many remember from the old days. It is now filled with grumpy old naysayers and griefers.

    2. Re:Musk wins again: Slashdot is butthurt by Miles_O'Toole · · Score: 1

      I wish I could say you were wrong. I wonder whether the influx of right wing political drones is a cause or a symptom.

      --
      Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.
    3. Re:Musk wins again: Slashdot is butthurt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been trolling here since the 90s, educating fags when they needed educatin'.

    4. Re:Musk wins again: Slashdot is butthurt by avandesande · · Score: 1

      A 50 million dollar sale for a company that burns 500K an hour doesn't really seem like a big deal.

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    5. Re:Musk wins again: Slashdot is butthurt by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Well, Steve Jobs is dead.
      The fanboi haters need a new target.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    6. Re:Musk wins again: Slashdot is butthurt by Miles_O'Toole · · Score: 1

      So you're the original Anonymous Coward?

      --
      Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.
    7. Re:Musk wins again: Slashdot is butthurt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're forgetting the under 40 crowd that don't know shit from apple butter.

    8. Re:Musk wins again: Slashdot is butthurt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is not the same Slashdot that many remember from the old days. It is now filled with grumpy old naysayers and griefers.

      grief builds character : (

    9. Re:Musk wins again: Slashdot is butthurt by MattskEE · · Score: 1

      That one sale is not the only part of the business that they have going. And Tesla is making massive capital investments for future sales of Model 3's and batteries for car/grid/home applications.

      I think they have bitten off a lot to demonstrate actual cost-effective and rapid mass production of Model 3's, and continue to scale up the Gigafactory. Is their burn rate really unusual given the business plan they are currently following? Also, are they actually spending at a rate of $4.4B/year?

    10. Re:Musk wins again: Slashdot is butthurt by avandesande · · Score: 1

      Also, are they actually spending at a rate of $4.4B/year?

      Yes, google it if you must. For all we know this battery installation cost them 100M and was done for publicity purposes. Still impressed?

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    11. Re:Musk wins again: Slashdot is butthurt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many young become grumpy and old, but some of these ideas, albeit a few, have merit. It's great to have a bunch of young people with energy not knowing from experience what is possible and what is not trying to do something that hasn't been done. Something might get done! Which is a lot better than a bunch of old grumps dictating a world where nothing gets done. Sadly, I do believe all us young-ins' will be old and grumpy sometime too, but let us have fun and perhaps accidentally change the world with our ignorance via trial and error...

    12. Re:Musk wins again: Slashdot is butthurt by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 1

      How many weeks did that last?

    13. Re:Musk wins again: Slashdot is butthurt by AbRASiON · · Score: 1

      I am not a finance guy, but I follow quite a few online.

      I am and have *consistently* seen breakdowns of the finances of $TSLA for about the past 6-12 months where people are entirely baffled how the stock remains at the current price.

      My understanding is, they are completely running the whole thing poorly, they're not profitable, things are hugely delayed, they are burning through cash like crazy.

      I am unsure if this is all true, but I can say, I'm seeing it posted online a LOT. I'd like to see Musk 'win' I'd like his products to work, I'd like the world to be a better place, I like the idea of America getting some manufacturing going on (and I'm not even American, just less stuff being built in China please!)

      That being said, if it's running as poorly as I continue to read, it ain't good at all. Only a matter of time for $TSLA to go south.

    14. Re:Musk wins again: Slashdot is butthurt by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

      I doubt it. I think Rob (Cmdr Taco) beat all of them into real users.

  18. First day of summer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't the seasons generally change around the 21st of the month?

    1. Re:First day of summer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you have never set foot in Australia, the answer is no. Individual Australian states even choose their own dates to celebrate the Queen's birthday. Rebellious lot.

  19. Tyrant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You either serve other people, or you control them with an iron fist.

    Capitalism demands that you serve other people; socialism implies that you must control them.

    1. Re:Tyrant by Jzanu · · Score: 2

      No, capitalism requires that you chase capital without mercy. Socialism implies that you generate what people need.

      Read this article from 1988; specifically "It is this obsession with capital accumulation that distinguishes capitalism from the simple system for satisfying human needs it is portrayed as in mainstream economic theory. And a system driven by capital accumulation is one that never stands still, one that is forever changing, adopting new and discarding old methods of production and distribution, opening up new territories, subjecting to its purposes societies too weak to protect themselves. Caught up in this process of restless innovation and expansion, the system rides roughshod over even its own beneficiaries if they get in its way or fall by the roadside. As far as the natural environment is concerned, capitalism perceives it not as something to be cherished and enjoyed but as a means to the paramount ends of profit-making and still more capital accumulation."

    2. Re:Tyrant by Mike+Van+Pelt · · Score: 0

      Socialism implies that you generate what people need.

      Not exactly... In Socialism, you generate what some bureaucratic committee decides they want the people to have. This can be OK if the bureaucratic committee is basing this on what people actually want, not so good if they decide on some arbitrary definition of "need", and "You don't need that, so tough", bad to worse if the committee bases their decisions on other considerations.

      "The difference between theory and practice is that in theory there is no difference, but in practice, there is."

    3. Re:Tyrant by Jzanu · · Score: 2

      No, that is a command economy, designed for wartime efficiency in the face of scarcity despite increased needs for defence. Every country uses it for industrial warfare now. Socialism in the sense of the article is about removing the impetus for capital accumulation beyond what is used to meet the needs of people. Gluttony is the core of raw capitalism. This is why modern countries use social democracy with markets to correct that excess.

    4. Re:Tyrant by Ichijo · · Score: 1

      I see, eBay controls people with an iron fist.

      --
      Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
  20. Re:Elon Musk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's nothing 'evil' about being a moron, it's just conservatism in action today. Refuse the new facts!

  21. Re:Elon Musk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Imagine a Beowulf cluster of these

  22. Re:Elon Musk by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

    Imagine a Beowulf cluster of these

    This old trope needs to be updated. How about, "Imagine a Bitcoin mining cluster of these?"

  23. Provides ONE HOUR to 30,000 homes... USELESS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Another fine PR move and all the supporters gobble it up.

  24. The environment is someone's capital. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The problem with environmental disasters is due to a lack of property rights; those problems are caused by government.

  25. Disposal by sheph · · Score: 1

    And what shall we do with said battery when it has outlived its usefulness?

    --
    I don't believe in karma, I just call it like I see it.
    1. Re:Disposal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Recycle it to make smaller batteries? Li-ion batteries are fairly easily recyclable, the biggest difficulty is normally separating them from the small consumer electronics they live in. As the world's biggest deployment of large battery modules, this will be retired into the world's largest deposit of easily reprocessable lithium.

    2. Re:Disposal by Miles_O'Toole · · Score: 1

      Only willfully ignorant people don't already know the answer to that question.

      --
      Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.
    3. Re:Disposal by Miles_O'Toole · · Score: 1

      Are you sure it would be powerful enough? I heard she had a plug in model scaled to her weight, but when she used it, there were rolling blackouts across half the city.

      --
      Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.
    4. Re:Disposal by Local+ID10T · · Score: 1

      And what shall we do with said battery when it has outlived its usefulness?

      There is this new concept.. Recycling.

      It's where we take old things and make new things out of them. You should read up on it.

      --
      "You want to know how to help your kids? Leave them the fuck alone." -George Carlin
  26. Utter Rubbish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The State of South Australia went on a privatisation binge and sold off state owned assets such as the electricity grid and generating stations. The new owner underinvested and did tot keep up capacity to meed demand. When a series of freak weather events occurred (big winds) that happens to topple just the wrong transmission line towers everything went black.

  27. How do you know what people need? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Capitalism is the philosophy that no one knows what people want or need, and that the answer to this question must be found through voluntary trade in a market.

    Socialism is the philosophy that The Dear Leader has all the answers, and you should just do what you're told, comrade.

    1. Re:How do you know what people need? by Jzanu · · Score: 1

      No, markets existed before capitalism and will exist long after it is dead and part of history. Capitalism in the applied sense, which is all that matters, is abuse of markets for personal gluttony. I am a capitalist if it that word is substituted for the real term "trader", but not for its realy meaning as one in favor of gluttony and abuse at all costs.

  28. Re:Elon Musk by Rei · · Score: 5, Informative

    Sure he did - he made a bunch of Slashdotters (and "experts") look silly ;)

    The proposed system would contain 129,000 kilowatt-hours of capacity, meaning the project's cost would start at around $42 million. The head of Tesla's battery division has quoted a cost of about $65 million in the past. Other experts say a system of that size is likely to cost somewhere between $60 and $120 million.

    (It cost $50M. And judging from Semi battery prices, if they were to do it again late next year, it'd be a small fraction of that much)

    Hope they have a site ready for him, leveling and concreting a section of land can take years. Yeah, yeah, I know Aussie is flat, but not that flat.

    Link

    Getting them there is only a small part of the problem. The real issue is that Australia can throw lots of roadblocks in Elon's way, from customs to building permits. And there is a hell of a difference between delivering enough batteries in the stated time and building up a power system to use them. I think Musk's ego go the better of him here and he shot off his mouth too fast. Betting that you can do something in 100 days or it is free against the very people who can block you at every move isn't the smartest thing to do.

    That's the rub. He hasn't even clearly defined what problem he will solve. The recent articles describe the symptoms of a more complex problem. Musk is proposing to alleviate the local symptoms possibly, not necessarily the core systemic problem which is continuously evolving. And of course he needs to tell them how much it will cost to 'solve' the problem.

    Australia clearly won't fall for his rhetoric.

    A container ship can cross the pacific in 2-4 weeks so that's not a big deal. Lead time would be a serious problem though for his 100 day boast. Presume it takes 20 days to transport the batteries and maybe another 30-40 to build them all (probably optimistic), they would be left with maybe a month to design, install and test the whole thing. Not saying it would be impossible but it would be a tight squeeze most likely unless he has already built the batteries and designed the system. He could probably get it up and running quickly but perhaps not at full capacity.

    Reminder: it was not only done 99 days from the bet, but only 55 days from the contract signing ;)

    It's not just the batteries that are the issue, unless Elon is only saying that the batteries will be there within 100 days. Utility scale electrical equipment is generally bespoke and/or custom manufactured and has long lead times. On top of the batteries you need to have utility scale inverters. You need switchgear to direct the produced power, you need large transformers to boost it up to utility voltages. In the organization I work with, we just finished a major electrical upgrade where we purchased 12 pad-mount transformers. While they were out of the catalogue, the lead time before shipping was still 8 weeks, and that was from a major manufacturer. Really big transformers, those capable of working with megawatts of power, take months to manufacture.

    When Vancouver lost one of the two large transformers that supply the downtown part of the city, it was found that it would take 18 months to get a replacement manufactured.

    I'm quite sure getting all the permits takes longer than 100 days.
    Where can I sign the contract for a free 100MW battery storage system.

    Given that it took 1.125 days per MWh for Los Angeles, I wo

    --
    Pinkypants -- my favorite!
  29. Leading the World? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Leading the world in dispatchable renewable energy? That's a load of hogwash, even for Australia, which has hydropower in other states.

    The state of Tasmania pretty much runs on hydro power, while the Snowy Mountains Hydroelectric Scheme that is shared by the states of New South Wales and Victoria has gigawatts of dispatchable renewable energy and a small pumped storage component.

  30. You're describing Authoritarianism. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I mean, if you define "capitalism" as accumulation of resources at all costs, then you'd have to admit that the Soviet Union was capitalist, or that absolute monarchs were capitalist, etc.

    Clearly, that makes no sense.

    Capitalism depends on individual ownership of resources; exchange of resources must be voluntary, otherwise it is by definition not capitalism—if you use your material might to take what you want from people against their will, then obviously that is a lack of respect for individual property rights; it cannot be capitalism; it must be something else.

    Guess what?

    Eminent domain, taxation, regulation by decree, prohibition, etc., are all examples of anti-capitalism. Your real problem is not with capitalism, but with the authoritarianism inherent in government.

    That is what existed before capitalism: Authoritarianism. That is what you want chucked into the dustbin of history.

    Get your terms straight, man.

  31. In other news... by ishmaelflood · · Score: 1

    Weatherill (the South Australian Premier who is trying to enjoy his last few days in the sun, before he gets voted out of power) has also bought 276 MW of diesel fuelled generators "the state Labor government will purchase nine new GE TM2500 aero derivative turbines through APR Energy, providing up to 276 MW of generation to the grid when required." . These of course will be very useful for providing baseload power when the wind doesn't blow.

    1. Re:In other news... by Falconhell · · Score: 1

      Last days in the sun, lol, the Liberal National coalltion is so incredibly hopeless in SA, they will never win government.
      Note for US readers, the Liberal party here is the right wing party.

    2. Re:In other news... by Falconhell · · Score: 1

      Recently, the 30% of homes with solar in SA were supplying 60% of the states energy needs.
      Another 30 and we wont need anything other than storage.
      I generate more than I use from a 2Kw high end solar rig that cost only 4k aud.
      When Inget my own battery, i will not use the grid at all.

    3. Re: In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The sun never sets on the empire ? And there are no prolonged periods of substantial cloud cover ?

    4. Re: In other news... by Falconhell · · Score: 1

      In Adelade, nah mate, worked right thru winter just fine.

  32. Lithium? What about Vanadium Redox? by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I was under the impression that Australia already had substantial industrial-scale power grid energy storage using vanadium redox flow batteries.

    Seems to me that's a better match to the problem - unless Tesla has made drastic improvements in cost and cycle-life as a fallout of their work to improve them for cars and house-scale renewable storage.

    Lithium Ion batteries are, IMHO, more about portability of energy storage than price-efficiency.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  33. Re:Elon Musk by thegarbz · · Score: 4, Funny

    Personally I only ever hire armchair engineers. Real engineers are useless for a comedy show.

  34. Galaxy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope he didn't use the design from the original Galaxy Note 7 for his battery.

  35. Re:Elon Musk by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1

    Hitler installed giant batteries better than Musk??

  36. Re: Elon Musk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am so glad you posted these. Fucking know-all nutbags. Shame there's no names pretty sure some of these weren't AC

  37. Re:Elon Musk by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 0

    You have to admit that it's a big surprise that the people who work for the Australian government went along with it. In my experience they just enjoy wielding power and will block things just to feel good.

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  38. Re:Elon Musk by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

    You have to admit that it's a big surprise that the people who work for the Australian government went along with it. In my experience they just enjoy wielding power and will block things just to feel good. Also to give a big fuck you to the Americans, which everyone likes to do. I mean, look at the result, America wins. This is terrible.

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  39. So are they making 5Bn/year? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hollywood spends similar figures in a year. Never heard you complaining about the waste of cash....

    1. Re:So are they making 5Bn/year? by avandesande · · Score: 1

      I am not impressed with Hollywood either. Tesla is supposed to be a business, not a show.

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
  40. Power Grid Inertia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is a general misconception about what this battery system is doing. Traditional generation stores energy for short time response (faster then the governor can open or close the throttle) as rotating inertia. So large grids having many generators tend to have plenty of rotating inertia, with the demand for short term storage coming entirely from users.

    In the new model with substantial wind and solar, wind and solar has a demand for short term stabilization without bringing along a corresponding amount of rotational inertia storage. What is most likely happening here is that the battery will be dispatched per the grid frequency control signal, rather than the energy dispatch signal.

    IE Questions: What Is Inertia? And What’s Its Role In Grid Reliability?

    AEMO publishes final report into the South Australian state-wide power outage

    1. Re:Power Grid Inertia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kinetic storage is still better, with literally infinite discharge cycles and infinite capacity (up to maximum) for actual immediate discharge, and temperature insensitivity.

  41. Misleading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Australia doesnâ(TM)t have a âoeshaky power gridâ. The majority of Australia has no power grid issues, only a single state, South Australia, has a joke of a power grid (shaky is an understatement). Why is that one state so bad you might ask, well the answer is in the state mandated unachievable renewable/green power target. They had no issues until the true-huggers and criminally naive forced them to close coal powered power stations.

  42. Re: Elon Musk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not the Federal Australian Government (who are anti-renewables, and anti-climate change), but the South Australian staye government, who are a bit more level headed, and believe in renewables etc.