Slashdot Mirror


Shouting 'Pay Your Taxes', Activists Occupy Apple Stores in France (marketwatch.com)

An anonymous reader quotes MarketWatch: A group of global activists stormed and occupied several Apple Stores in France on Saturday in a move aimed at pressuring the company to pay up on a €13 billion ($15.5 billion) tax bill to the European Union. In a press release, the France unit of the Association for the Taxation of Financial Transactions and Citizen's Action organization (Attac), said 100 of its members occupied the Opera Apple Store in Paris, demanding the company pay its taxes... Attac said dozens of protests were organized at other Apple store locations throughout France on Saturday. In the Paris store, activists were seen via videos circulating on Twitter, pushing past security and hanging a banner that said "We will stop when Apple pays." Security in Paris reportedly evacuated Apple workers from the building as those protests began.
After three hours they left the store -- leaving behind protest messages on the iPads on display. The group claims that Apple has stashed $230 billion in tax havens around the world, but also hopes to raise awareness about other issues.

"Attac said the action was part of the #PhoneRevolt movement aimed at highlighting unfair practices by Apple, that are not just about taxes, but also pollution via extraction of metals for its phones, worker exploitation and driving a global consumption binge."

233 comments

  1. Taxes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are worse than Hitler.

  2. "Global" Activists? by sycodon · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    So, International assholes?

    Activist:
    1. someone who's always pissed about something they don't understand and of which they are largely ignorant.
    2. someone prone to believing inflammatory rhetoric without question.

    --
    When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    1. Re: "Global" Activists? by lucasnate1 · · Score: 2

      Yes, it is much better to always accept things as they are and never complain.

    2. Re:"Global" Activists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe they should find a job then they won't be so bored.

    3. Re: "Global" Activists? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes, it is much better to always accept things as they are and never complain.

      There is a middle ground: They could educate themselves, and then direct their outrage more constructively. For instance, if the French don't like their tax laws, perhaps they should complain to their politicians rather than to a company that is behaving legally.

    4. Re: "Global" Activists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better yet, to understand how things work, then change then work to change the laws for the parts they don't like. But I guess that involves too much work and thinking they weren't brought up or trained for.

    5. Re: "Global" Activists? by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Complaining to their politicians would never have made the front page of international newspapers to raise awareness about the issues surrounding the current tax laws.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    6. Re: "Global" Activists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, it is much better to always accept things as they are and never complain.

      There is a middle ground: They could educate themselves, and then direct their outrage more constructively. For instance, if the French don't like their tax laws, perhaps they should complain to their politicians rather than to a company that is behaving legally.

      You're assuming this is the only action they're taking or will take. Change of any kind usually requires multiple strategies.
      I suppose Rosa Parks could have done something more constructive than refuse to change seats.

    7. Re: "Global" Activists? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Informative

      Complaining to their politicians would never have made the front page of international newspapers to raise awareness about the issues surrounding the current tax laws.

      There is already plenty of awareness. I have seen dozens of front page articles about Apple's tax dispute with the EU.

      But awareness is not enough. It is important to take action, and to direct that action appropriately. A good example is the reaction on both the left and the right to America's financial bailout. The left reacted with "Occupy Wall Street", which focused on street protests against the companies that received the bailout. The right reacted with the "Tea Party" and focused on electoral politics, endorsing candidates that met their approval, and promoting challengers to those that did not.

      OWS never articulated any clear objectives, has now faded away, and is mostly forgotten.

      The Tea Party, meanwhile, has taken over the Republican Party and is now running the country.

      Lesson learned: Proper focus makes a difference.

    8. Re: "Global" Activists? by sjames · · Score: 1

      Apple's sweetheart tax deal with Ireland was found to be illegal.

    9. Re: "Global" Activists? by VeryFluffyBunny · · Score: 0

      The Tea Party were a tiny movement whose actual demands closely match those of the industrialists, e.g. the Koch family, who fund them, and the corporate media outlets, e.g. Fox News and News International, that also promote exactly the same line. The Tea Party doesn't protest, it rallies in support of the very policies that are bankrupting the USA and creating massive wealth and income inequality.

      --
      Debate is a form of harassment. Do not question my truth.
    10. Re: "Global" Activists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are entitled to your opinion about what you term a 'tiny movement' who presently have significant power and are using it to change government in major ways.

    11. Re: "Global" Activists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is professional protesters only complain and never put forth a viable solution to the problem they are complaining about. Instead protesters spend most of their energy on identifying who to blame for feeding their daily outrage inbox. Once blame is assigned, right or wrong, they move on to the next outrage on their list.

    12. Re:"Global" Activists? by sycodon · · Score: 0

      What are you going to do, throw a bike lock at me?

      You assholes gave up you guns a long time ago. The only people you have left that actually knows how a gun works, shoots them sideways and with one hand since the other hand is holding up their pants. Some Hipster in Skinny Jeans is going to fight a war? ROFLMAO!

      I predict that if any one of you actually shows up to the fight, managers to figure out how a gun works, and doesn't get head shot at 300 yards by a Good ol' boy with his deer rifle, will run away at the first shot.

      So you can take your Nazi, bullshit comment, shove it up you ass and then go die in a car fire, trapped behind the wheel, squealing like a pig.

      Maybe it will go viral on Facebook.

      --
      When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    13. Re:"Global" Activists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When the war comes, Trotsky-slut globalists will be smash-faced by republican citizens and crushed under yeomanry feet ... dead bodies to-the-dogs. Remember palsy we're always on-yo-bitchflank.

    14. Re:"Global" Activists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure. The activists are in the wrong here... not Apple management for unethically evading paying billions in taxes and exploiting poor working conditions in underdeveloped nations to pad their profits.

      Mind you Apple marketing department is pure genius. They practice the most reprehensible form of anything-goes capitalism while simultaneously trying to appear like liberals.

    15. Re: "Global" Activists? by Vinegar+Joe · · Score: 1

      I've never understood why the French just don't manufacture and use their own phones, computers and operating systems.

      --
      "The average reporter we talk to is 27 years old......They literally know nothing." - Ben Rhodes
    16. Re: "Global" Activists? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If only MLK and his followers would stop their boycotts and protests and informed themselves of the political process they'd get so much more.

      MLK's boycotts and protests always had clear and specific objectives. Integrate the buses in Montgomery. Raise the wages of garbagemen in Memphis. Etc. There was always a clear point where he could declare victory, and move on to the next objective.

      He was also very skilled at working with politicians, especially Lyndon Johnson.

      Contrast MLK with OWS or BLM, neither of which has any clear objectives or accomplishments.

    17. Re: "Global" Activists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OWS "faded away" because Obama wanted it gone. It was an embarassing reminder of the failure of US policies in the wake of the crisis and how the government surrendered to the banks. Had there be a Republican president, dissension and protest would have been welcomed and encouraged, but dissension and protest against Obama was racist and tantamount to treason. I was actually told this by more than one leftist "activist". The lesson here is clear: never protest when the "right" people are in charge.

    18. Re: "Global" Activists? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      France has a long history of this kind of protest taking place and getting results. From framers shutting down roads to campaigners against poverty openly robbing supermarkets, politicians take notice and stuff gets done. Of course, sometimes the protesters find themselves in the minority, but even then it tends to settle the issue for a while and stop them agitating.

      The French incorporated protest into their democracy, unlike many other countries where politicians are always looking for ways to marginalize and ignore such things. It's a good system because it results in fewer protests overall and a more participatory democracy.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    19. Re: "Global" Activists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They used to, but they were pushed out of the market by foreign competitors that don't pay their taxes.

    20. Re: "Global" Activists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a middle ground: They could educate themselves, and then direct their outrage more constructively. For instance, if the French don't like their tax laws, perhaps they should complain to their politicians rather than to a company that is behaving legally.

      Direct action and gaining publicity and lobbying politicians are not mutually exclusive. In fact lobbying tends to be more effective in conjunction with the correct direct action. Many campaigns have used such a combination effectively, some have used overly provocative actions and damaged their cases.

    21. Re: "Global" Activists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      rather than to a company that is behaving legally.

      What makes you think Apple is behaving legally?

    22. Re: "Global" Activists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      You would be suprised to learn that France is one of the very few countries in the world with a truly independent computer platform development. Their national architecture split from the earliest generation of IBM360 in the 1960s and the BULL company developed it further independently. French electronic industry however is not cost-competitive in the post-Cold War world, so their architecture is only used in military and nuclear industrial applications nowadays.

      For example, the french Dassault Rafale fighter jet has the world's most advanced electronic warfare computer system called SPECTRE. It is able to receive and analyze enemy radar signals in REAL-TIME and uses a specialized mini-supercomputer Fourier core to generate "counter-phase" signals onboard, which are then fed to gallium-based power modules and emitted back towards the enemy radar, so the factual and faux radar returns cancel each other out completely and Evil Regime (TM) sees nothing. That's one huge tour-de-force in hightech, which neither Russia, Japan or USA can imitate currently.

      In essence the Rafale jet is both aerodynamic and stealthly at the same time, without the need to use cumbersome geometric stealth shapes in US fashion (remember how ungainly the F-117 looks) or the need for any exotic, high-maintenance and very poisonous paint materials on the fuselage surfaces to supress radar return. (In comparison the F-22 Raptor needs partial repainting every time it flies through rain or wet bulb clouds.) That enables frenchies to operate the Rafale on their aircraft carrier, while USA is currently unable to meet the heavy maintenance requirements of stealth planes onboard its CVNs.

      That's the power of (admittedly low-visibility) french computing technology.

    23. Re: "Global" Activists? by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      The Tea Party, meanwhile, has taken over the Republican Party and is now running the country.

      Lesson learned: Proper focus makes a difference.

      Yeah, and they even elected a president with a strong Anti Wall Street rhetoric. Who put more Wall Street men into his cabinet than any before. And will now deregulate the banks so they again screw over the world. All Hail Trump!

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    24. Re: "Global" Activists? by v1nce29 · · Score: 0

      Because 5500 Apple researchers are paid by public money. How will you compete against such a firm ?

    25. Re: "Global" Activists? by Seb+C. · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Your comment was tagged as insightfull, but i'd rather say it's naive, and actually not insightfull at all...

      It's not a problem of French tax law, it's not even a problem of EU tax law, it's a problem of Ireland playing the "tax paradise" card, offering low tax harbor for enterprise like Apple, which can then deliver freely in Europe (due to tax free market inside all European Union).
      Things are changing though and UE is starting to show its muscles to Ireland.
      Beside all that, these events are mainly targeted to shame firms that do unfair tax "optimization", which is (right now) not legally punished, but still morally dist

    26. Re: "Global" Activists? by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      I assume this was said in jest as I seem to recall that they did all those things.

    27. Re: "Global" Activists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For instance, if the French don't like their tax laws, perhaps they should complain to their politicians rather than to a company that is behaving legally.

      That would only work if France was the whole world, or if it had the power to bully other countries to respect France's laws instead of their own laws.

      The activists are not just complaining to politicians because they're not stupid, and they're not some smug asshole's (ie yours) strawman or patsy, but are searching for the most effective way to make their point known.

    28. Re: "Global" Activists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are not entitled to change the truth. The tea party is Wallstreet friendly, or at least useful idiots.

    29. Re: "Global" Activists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cry me a river, the left play a team sport, it's true, but the right is in a team war, they will even support a teen molester if that player is on their side.

    30. Re: "Global" Activists? by orlanz · · Score: 1

      Funny, I remember people saying the same thing about treason during the prior Republican presidency. At least with Obama, we didnâ(TM)t get into any NEW wars. Atleast we killed the guy who did 9/11.

      With another Republican President, we appear to be 2-3 tweets away from invading NK.

    31. Re:"Global" Activists? by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      LOL that's not really how it is playing out in the streets. DERP!

    32. Re: "Global" Activists? by sabri · · Score: 1

      Apple's sweetheart tax deal with Ireland was found to be illegal.

      Not by any Irish court.

      --
      I'm not a complete idiot... Some parts are missing.
    33. Re: "Global" Activists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Tea Party, meanwhile, has taken over the Republican Party and is now running the country.

      Not really. Check "voter registration" for ANY "state of x" elections, down to the county.

      Compare with "federal citizen" in black's law dictionary.

      Compare Dred Scott, Susan Anthony, etc.

      They are literally "representing themselves" nowadays -- only "federal citizens" can vote at all levels.

      I will add "commerce" and "civil law" are all "foreign" (american common law is the "law of the land") ... and there are no courts, they are all "federal" too.

      Thomas Jefferson would wonder why his face is on paper, Andrew Jackson would send the military to protect an actual treasury "specie is the only constitutional money in this country", www.dict.org, "specie"

      The phony "tea party" might be running things, but they are just corporate shills that have nothing in common with any actual "tea party."

      The whole thing is taxes were fine locally, i.e. with representation. They resented paying import/export taxes on tea they didn't want -- they were fine buying/selling elsewhere to avoid the fees.

      With literally everything being ran by "federal citizens" that should tell you how far gone things are.

      Likewise, "feds" are not a nation or people, they have no traditions, they are not a "state" (although they call themselves new state of columbia, still not a state) ...they literally cannot run actual common law courts anyways.

    34. Re: "Global" Activists? by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      It violated treaties that Ireland had voluntarily signed, and hence the Irish government actions were illegal.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    35. Re: "Global" Activists? by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      OWS was against some things, but never could come up with things to be specifically in favor of, and pissed away a lot of potential activism. BLM's objectives are long-term, and involve piling up minor wins until they become a trend. Unlike OWS, BLM can't use MLK's techniques.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    36. Re:"Global" Activists? by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      We're going to call the cops on you when you violate the law, like any civilized group. It's been a long time since civil order was maintained by private armaments, and good riddance to that. Your good ol' boy is going to spend a fair number of years in prison for that shot.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    37. Re: "Global" Activists? by sabri · · Score: 1

      It violated treaties that Ireland had voluntarily signed, and hence the Irish government actions were illegal.

      I see that you have no idea how the legal concept of treaties work. Even if the Irish government would have signed away their rights to determine their tax legislation rights, then the EU still has no business dealing with Apple. Apple did not sign that treaty and Apple has a separate agreement with the Irish government. It is the Irish government that determines their taxation and not the EUSSR.

      --
      I'm not a complete idiot... Some parts are missing.
  3. Why does Apple even bother by SuperKendall · · Score: 0, Troll

    Apple is the only phone company I know of to even both to produce something like environmental reports.

    This includes things like the mildly nauseating fact that Apple makes their own artificial sweat to test watches.

    And what do they get for it? Protestors flooding stores. Where are the protests at the local stores selling other phones, which engage in the same tax practices and far worse environmental hijinks? Crickets.

    I'm sure it's because they can get more attention if they flood an Apple store instead of the local T-Mobile phone hut. But even so, it's just sad to see such a brazen display of showmanship over real care for the environment or taxes. Maybe Apple should just stop paying attention to any of that stuff and make phones the way the rest of the market does without all of the expense of trying to do so in a responsible way.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Why does Apple even bother by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe it's because Apple doesn't pay any taxes in the EU, and instead pays a pitiful tax rate in Ireland?

    2. Re:Why does Apple even bother by mrwireless · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Why did they put that killer in jail, when he brushed his teeth every day?"

      Your first assumption is that you can weight these things against each other, and your second assumption is that this must be done. Why? The only place where boiling ethics down to a boolean is effective is in Hollywood movies.

    3. Re:Why does Apple even bother by Kohath · · Score: 0, Troll

      Maybe it's because Apple doesn't pay any taxes in the EU...

      Should they? In exchange for what government services? Seems like the government of the EU serves the people of the EU. The people of the EU should be paying for it.

    4. Re: Why does Apple even bother by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Government services like protection of the glass storefronts of their stores. And IP protection of their software and their designs. Just a few thing that immediately come to mind as to why they should pay their taxes.

      Otherwise, perhaps the EU should just set up their own iOS app stores and bypass Apple. They only need one copy of each app to open shop.

    5. Re:Why does Apple even bother by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshit, if apple care about taxes they would be paying them. Less and less people are believing the lies and excuses that pro apple fanatics are spewing.

    6. Re:Why does Apple even bother by r1348 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Oh, I wasn't under the impression that Apple uses their own private road network in the EU, but I am clearly mistaken.

    7. Re:Why does Apple even bother by Kohath · · Score: 1

      Oh, I wasn't under the impression that Apple uses their own private road network in the EU, but I am clearly mistaken.

      Does Apple use roads at all? Their contractors and customers and employees probably do, but then those people pay taxes for fuel and VAT and income and whatever else. So the road users pay for the roads they use. Any other reason Apple should pay?

    8. Re: Why does Apple even bother by Kohath · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Government services like protection of the glass storefronts of their stores.

      Presumably they pay property taxes (or rent that ultimately goes to pay for property taxes) to cover the cost of law enforcement protection of their property.

      And IP protection of their software and their designs.

      I haven’t read the treaty, but I think Europe protects foreign IP in exchange for the US and other countries protecting European IP. If Europe wants out of that treaty, there's probably a way to end it. I doubt the treaty allows for holding IP protection hostage for a tax grab.

    9. Re:Why does Apple even bother by Jzanu · · Score: 1

      Centralized commerce requires concentrated customers. Concentrated customers only exist in cities, and cities also decrease costs for businesses with agglomeration economies, but cost money for maintenance. Cities are supported by their nation. Taxes for all are mandatory. Disagree and you can go try making and selling shit in Somalia. In which case, good luck - a pirate will shoot your clerks, steal your products, and take you hostage to be killed unless paid promptly.

    10. Re:Why does Apple even bother by r1348 · · Score: 1

      Oh yes, I'm sure the taxes that an Apple store shop assistant pays totally cover the road maintenance needed by trucks full of iPhones.
      Not to mention the cost on the judicial system imposed by endless IP litigation.
      Or the police investigation needed to track down that crate full of Macs that mysteriously disappeared from logistics.
      Or...
      Or... ...

      Are you seriously so gullible to believe that a corporation doesn't represent a cost on public infrastructure higher that the sum of its singular employees?

    11. Re:Why does Apple even bother by Kohath · · Score: 1

      Cities didn't get created to help Apple. Cities were built by the people, for the benefit of the people. The people should pay their own way, for their own benefit — not try to get someone else to pay their way for them.

    12. Re: Why does Apple even bother by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why we can't have too much AI. We need real people working to pay the taxes for the companies... right?

      Pfff. What an argument. Can't get sillier than this.

    13. Re: Why does Apple even bother by Jzanu · · Score: 1

      Apple directly benefits from all of those location factors and more in terms of services or they would not have stores anywhere, and would teleport products after being telepathically sold. Or go bankrupt

    14. Re:Why does Apple even bother by Kohath · · Score: 1

      Oh yes, I'm sure the taxes that an Apple store shop assistant pays totally cover the road maintenance needed by trucks full of iPhones.

      You thing Apple owns trucks? More likely they contract with a shipping company. The shipping company pays fuel and VAT and other taxes to cover their share of road maintenance.

    15. Re:Why does Apple even bother by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      In exchange for what government services?

      Police who will come to your store and arrest trespassers and thieves comes to mind.

      If Apple doesn't want to pay taxes, then there shouldn't be any penalties for people who steal from Apple's stores.

    16. Re: Why does Apple even bother by easyTree · · Score: 1

      Government services like healthcare to keep an army of n00bs healthy enough to keep buying iPhones?

    17. Re:Why does Apple even bother by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yes, I'm sure the taxes that an Apple store shop assistant pays totally cover the road maintenance needed by trucks full of iPhones.

      You thing Apple owns trucks? More likely they contract with a shipping company. The shipping company pays fuel and VAT and other taxes to cover their share of road maintenance.

      You're wasting your time on an Apple apologist.

    18. Re:Why does Apple even bother by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In exchange for what government services?

      Police who will come to your store and arrest trespassers and thieves comes to mind.

      So then... How many of these protestors were arrested? It doesn't sound like Apple got the protection you say they should pay for.

    19. Re: Why does Apple even bother by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or they could go back to the old days and sell stuff in third party stores. I remember the old days when stores like CompUSA had four or five aisles of PC software and a short half aisle in the back with Mac software. There was also a little Mac hardware display back there.

    20. Re:Why does Apple even bother by PPH · · Score: 1

      Police who will come to your store and arrest trespassers and thieves comes to mind.

      That would be the Irish police in Ireland. The EU doesn't have a police force.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    21. Re:Why does Apple even bother by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      This is slashdot, if he "learned" something from the movies other than how to repeat Monty Python lines, that passes as expert knowledge.

    22. Re:Why does Apple even bother by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Doesn't sound like any did, so I guess Apple got exactly what they paid for: nothing. They should have grabbed some loot while they were at it.

    23. Re:Why does Apple even bother by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

      Cities didn't get created to help Apple. Cities were built by the people, for the benefit of the people. The people should pay their own way, for their own benefit — not try to get someone else to pay their way for them.

      Anyone who wants to be part of the collective has to pay the tax that the collective demands. Apple included.

      --
      I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
    24. Re: Why does Apple even bother by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, we are a big EU company. We are going to set stores across all main US cities , sell our products to US citizen, and take the money overseas back to EU.
      Why should we even bother paying taxes to US ?

    25. Re:Why does Apple even bother by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      Someone should rip your face off and stuff it in a toilet. You are that stupid.

      Unless France is as stupid as it leads the world to believe, Apple pays property and business taxes for its stores. The tax haven stuff is for profits on actual sales.

    26. Re:Why does Apple even bother by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Apple has subsidiaries in Europe. They do a huge amount of business in Europe. They employ Europeans, who have their education and healthcare partially or fully funded by taxation. They use European infrastructure. They own property in Europe, like the Apple store being protested at. They advertise in Europe, they pay European sales tax. They have to abide by European data protection and consumer laws.

      Apple should pay its fair share of taxes, or get out of Europe. They won't do the latter because it is a huge, profitable market for them. They want the profit, they just don't want to pay for the privilege of operating here.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    27. Re:Why does Apple even bother by Gryle · · Score: 1

      On the philosophical side, your argument is only valid if there is somewhere left to go that is not part of the collective. (Yes, I know Apple wants to be part of the collective, but the whole idea of social contracts bug me.)

      --
      Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not entirely sure about the universe - Einstein
    28. Re:Why does Apple even bother by crimson+tsunami · · Score: 1

      No, cities didn't get created to help Apple, so why should they get to use them for free when everyone else has to pay?

    29. Re:Why does Apple even bother by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      In exchange for what government services?

      A pool of educated people to select employees from. Even a retail store benefits from people who can read and write and have a certain understanding of the world so as to represent Apple in a quasi-professional manner. These people in turn have a system for having a place where they can shower and practice good hygiene. Transportation systems to get the employees to work in a timely manner. Apple benefits directly from all of this. Really the list is endless and it is almost comical that you would think Apple exists in a bubble somehow.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    30. Re: Why does Apple even bother by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look, the massive influx of violent Muslim immigrants along with their rapes and terrorist attacks is costing us a ton of money here in the EU, so we feel justified in raping whatever foreign business we can to help foot the bill. We sure can't afford it with 3-1/2 day workweeks and socialized-everything.

    31. Re:Why does Apple even bother by Kohath · · Score: 1

      Seems like Apple gets indirect benefits from government services that they should pay for indirectly, like by paying an educated employee a salary, and having that employee pay taxes on that salary to finance that education. They should probably also pay a little tax directly for the direct government services they get.

      But I'd say the protestors are more interested in plundering Apple for loot than getting the government services Apple uses reimbursed.

    32. Re: Why does Apple even bother by r1348 · · Score: 1

      That's just delegating retail sales, the fact that Apple would still benefit from public infrastructure remains, even if it's not used by them directly.

    33. Re:Why does Apple even bother by r1348 · · Score: 1

      Somalia is pretty much that. So libertarian, it doesn't even impose which side of the road you should drive. Enjoy your Freedom Car Crash.

    34. Re:Why does Apple even bother by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      No, they are directly benefiting from having educated employees.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  4. Taxes? by dicobalt · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Giant corporations don't pay taxes, they evade them. Then they hoard more money by using $2/hr Chinese labor which is illegal anywhere else but okay since it is across a line on a map and in China. Then they buy out their competition and use frivolous IP lawsuits to limit new competition. There, now you know everything you need to know in order to become a member of the Corporatist movement and control your elected official using money.

    1. Re:Taxes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Evade is not the word.
      Tax authorities can't actually 'prove' dodgy arrangements like price transfer and arms length transactions. Made harder when IP is a monopoly. Unless there is a leak or worse. But when less that 15% of income tax is paid - they should cry foul. The solution is a 25% withholding tax, refunded to another tax authority.

  5. Good job by lucasnate1 · · Score: 0

    Using force is the only language that corporates understand. After all, by definition, greed is their only purpose.

  6. Community organizing by Kohath · · Score: 0, Troll

    Protestors produced nothing of any value to anyone, instead demanding productive people — people who create value for customers, employees, shareholders, and their communities — pay more.

    Why should producers listen to demanders when demanders offer nothing of any value to anyone? Are remorseless demands fair? How is demanding things while offering nothing good for a society?

    1. Re:Community organizing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple is receiving a lot but they have to play by the rules. They are not. What good are they doing if they don't pay their taxes as everybody else? Are they even more than parasites? What are they offering for the greater good?

    2. Re:Community organizing by Kohath · · Score: 1

      Apple is receiving a lot

      Such as ...?

      What are they offering for the greater good?

      Phones. Software. Maps. Email. Cloud storage. Communications. Payment services. Publishing services. Apple makes products. Apple customers judge those products good.

    3. Re:Community organizing by jcr · · Score: 2

      they have to play by the rules. They are not.

      That's a goddamned lie. If anything, they're paying too damned much. They should be far more proactive in minimizing their tax payments, the way that GE does.

      Apple has a duty to their shareholders (like me) to keep as much of our money out of government's greedy hands as possible.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    4. Re: Community organizing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not enough. They need to do more... Like paying taxes for instance.

    5. Re: Community organizing by Kohath · · Score: 1

      Why?

    6. Re:Community organizing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right, so it's parasites (activists), protesting another parasite "evil corporation", for preying on parasites "government". Hmm, seems like the host "productive working people" is the only one being consumed.
      Sounds like something needs a good deworming.

    7. Re: Community organizing by easyTree · · Score: 1

      What are they offering for the greater good?

      Phones. Software. Maps. Email. Cloud storage. Communications. Payment services. Publishing services.

      ...A peculiar emotion within the minds of customers who realize that not only have they paid over the odds for behind-the-curve locked-down phones but the workers who built their phones were paid almost nothing and may have been one of the few to escape onerous working conditions by jumping to their deaths.

    8. Re:Community organizing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only for their own end. apple pretty much offer nothing to anyone unless you buy their products. Lock in at its worse. They contribute next to nothing.

    9. Re: Community organizing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      anyone using services and not paying their share is a leech

    10. Re: Community organizing by Kohath · · Score: 1

      Name-calling is neither reasoned nor persuasive.

    11. Re:Community organizing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL no one is more greedy and corrupt than apple. Hope these protests start all over the EU. apple is a tech parasite.

    12. Re:Community organizing by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 2

      I mean, protesters got the 40 hour work week, ended segregation in the US and South Africa, and a lot of other benefits. That's not nothing.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    13. Re: Community organizing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Noone reasonable consider emotions an offering ... except emotocentric gaffots and Trotsky dik-dykes.

    14. Re:Community organizing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just about me eh pad're ? And actively just citizenry jealous for low-hanging booty have the responsibility to scrape clear your money-grubbing azwhole till it shines like Anye Rands forehead.

    15. Re: Community organizing by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      You are a bigoted piece of shit. You should be raped up the ass with a Samsung S5 and then killed.

    16. Re: Community organizing by easyTree · · Score: 1

      Enjoy your next movie.

    17. Re:Community organizing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But only as long as they keep within the bounds of law. Right now, they have an unfair advantage compared to companies that don't break the law.

    18. Re:Community organizing by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Phones. Software. Maps. Email. Cloud storage. Communications. Payment services. Publishing services.

      Yeah, those don't really help us as much as you think they do.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    19. Re:Community organizing by Kohath · · Score: 1

      It's nothing this century. And these protestors weren't protesting injustice. Actually the opposite; they want to take money other people earned so they can spend it on themselves.

    20. Re:Community organizing by Kohath · · Score: 1

      Yeah, those don't really help us as much as you think they do.

      People highly value them. I don't know who you think "us" is, but your definition of "help" seems to be contrary to Apple customers' definition.

  7. The activists then... by guruevi · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... went to the nearby Starbucks to Twitter about their "action", and posting their selfies on Instagram and Facebook using their iPhones.

    --
    Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    1. Re:The activists then... by CODiNE · · Score: 1

      Ahem...
      That's "Le Starbucks"

      --
      Cwm, fjord-bank glyphs vext quiz
    2. Re:The activists then... by guruevi · · Score: 1

      That's La Starbucks when you talk about Starbucks as it is a chain and corporation, both of those in French are feminine.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    3. Re:The activists then... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm French Canadian ...and I don't give a fuck about Le or La...

  8. Well technically... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The employees there do pay their taxes... So shouting at them to pay their taxes ain't gonna work.
    You can't make the "entity" that is Apple to pay their taxes, when the ones who call the shots aren't even there.

    1. Re: Well technically... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe the employees get ashamed of working in a leech of a company and decide to work elsewhere. Eventually Apple would need to pay taxes if they wanted people working for them at all.

    2. Re: Well technically... by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      Or maybe reality will set it and France will cease to exist, as no one will be working at all.

  9. Good for France by Neuronwelder · · Score: 1, Informative

    Seems like they are awake. Taxes are what holds up and maintains infrastructure, health, food and shelter for the poor.

    1. Re:Good for France by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And plenty in taxes are paid. So this is nothing but statist slaver bullshit.

    2. Re:Good for France by Kohath · · Score: 1

      Taxes are what holds up and maintains infrastructure, health, food and shelter for the poor.

      Why shouldn’t French people pay for government services to help French people?

    3. Re:Good for France by jcr · · Score: 1

      Bullshit. Taxes are what makes it possible for governments to murder people en masse.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    4. Re:Good for France by phayes · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Note that I'm French.

      If your sentiment that the reason for the protests were that french people desire companies to pay their taxes were true, they would have been protesting in Total gas stations. The problem is that Total, (who owes more money in taxes to the French Government) Is French so it wouldn't be popular. Muuch better to target that foreign Apple company...

      --
      Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
    5. Re:Good for France by humptheElephant · · Score: 1

      Welll, they just got a big tax break from the folks with sponsors. Their taxes in this country will go down as will greedy billionairs taxes while most of us will have increased taxes. The USA really can't afford these bastards anymore. They are huge leaches sucking the life out of us.

    6. Re:Good for France by psycho12345 · · Score: 0

      Ahh found the resident ancap. Curious, guns make it possible for people to murder en masse, should we restrict those?

      Corporations make it possible for people to poison and murder en masse, should we restrict those?

    7. Re: Good for France by easyTree · · Score: 1

      Seems like they are awake. Taxes are what holds up and maintains infrastructure, health, food and shelter for the poor.

      Some of these concepts are missing from the American psyche so they underestimate the implied tax burden.

    8. Re:Good for France by Neuronwelder · · Score: 1

      Gas stations? Gas stations are local. They are not overseas companies. The taxes go for infrastructure to France, don't they? Do you like pot holes in roads?

    9. Re:Good for France by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck the poor. They are entitled to NOTHING. If you cant produce enough for food, shelter, and health care for yourself and the 7 bastard children you produced, AND a bit more to support the governing infrastructure, each and every day, then society doesn't have a place for you. The poor are leeches sucking the life out of the working class. No one has a RIGHT to anything other than an opportunity to choose to be self sufficient, or to choose to starve to death in the elements. The working TAXPAYERS owe the poor nothing.
      The corporations owe the poor NOTHING. They offer jobs, and that should be appreciated. If you dont like the jobs offered, get off your ass and start your own business. If you choose to not partake, then save us the expense and throw yourself off a cliff.

    10. Re: Good for France by easyTree · · Score: 1

      They are huge leaches sucking the life out of us.

      No doubt there is an as-yet unappreciated societal benefit to this, analogous to that provided by the use of leeches in early medicine.

    11. Re:Good for France by Neuronwelder · · Score: 1

      Hmm. I wonder how people get free healthcare? https://www.renestance.com/blo... I don't see too much bad in the cons.

    12. Re:Good for France by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Governments "solve" this by decreasing taxes and increasing military budgets.
      But the problem there is the US empire and its appeasers and enablers.

    13. Re:Good for France by phayes · · Score: 2

      I'd prefer it if they weren't hypocritically targeting foreign companies. The taxes that Total is avoiding paying are higher than those for Apple. Potholes don't care who paid the taxes to fix them.

      --
      Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
    14. Re: Good for France by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey mr. "Fuck the poor", newsflash! The situation is changing rapidly, people who want to work can't find a job because jobs are being automated. The sad thing is most people can't grok this until it happens to themselves, even having it happen to a family member is not good enough- that formerly hard working family member has obviously turned into a bum.

    15. Re:Good for France by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Worse, life makes death possible!

      And even worse, it makes it certain!!!

      Therefore, ban turtleneck sweaters and gravy boats! End the suffering!

    16. Re:Good for France by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      I'm not seeing that on the internet, maybe you could provide an English-language source?

      The internet says they lose money in France, and actually don't owe much taxes there.

      It does say their subsidiary Total Gabon owes lots of unpaid taxes to Gabon.

    17. Re: Good for France by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      The tax burden is what law says it is, not what some self-entitled shit-heads with funny accents think it should be.

    18. Re: Good for France by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The economy does not need those people anymore, it's as simple as that. The endgame should be clear: the One Percenters inherit the Earth, the rest dies off. It's not a bad outcome at all. It will lead to a sustainable human population with no more poverty and crime. Why should anyone be against this?

    19. Re:Good for France by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you like pot holes in roads?

      I'm trying to think, and I don't recall ever seeing a pothole in France.

    20. Re:Good for France by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      What, are governments going broke or something? Gimme a break! They're awash in cash, they spend it all, and then they borrow in order to spend even more money. Like that poor government just doesn't have enough money and we need to pay more. Jesus Christ.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    21. Re: Good for France by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      American taxes are what makes possible the global regime of destruction that America inflicts on the rest of the world without its consent. Clearly, the U.S. is the greatest threat to world peace. Somehow, it seems to have bestowed upon itself the right to be the world's policeman, lawmaker and judiciary. Facts don't lie, the U.S. has invaded, and bombed many countries around the world causing the death of millions of civilians and turning millions more into refugees. If justice prevails, many U.S. politicians and military leaders would be charged as war criminals. The U.S. defends its actions as protecting democracy and human rights. Really? Ask the people of Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Qatar, Brunei, Egypt, Turkey, the U.A.E. and many other dictatorial and human rights violating nations that are U.S. allies and spared U.S. criticism and military intervention. The U.S. is all about maintaining world domination and nothing else matters. Without those sweet, sweet tax dollars it all comes crashing down and the world would be a much more peaceful place.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    22. Re:Good for France by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have heard of protests in France against Total too. News is about the new, though, so sometimes campaigns hop onto the next target as it is more interesting.

    23. Re:Good for France by Neuronwelder · · Score: 1

      To THAT i'l agree on 100%! - Responsible spending of taxes is for all political parties. You don't put the money in your pockets, give it to "friends" as some incentive, or bribe someone with it, or think you are going to gain some sort of "power" if you keep it... It is to be spent on the people!

    24. Re:Good for France by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some extreme branch of christian zionist Calvinism merged with the asylum-grade übermensch sociopathy of Nietzche to create the above post?

    25. Re:Good for France by Neuronwelder · · Score: 1

      Two very well said comments! You are on top of what's really going on! I fear that we are going to be catapulted back in time to the age of "Lords" and "surfs". But don't forget that the way to win a war is not with violence. All wars were only won with peace movements from Gandhi to Reverend Martin Luther King.

    26. Re:Good for France by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      So the next time I go to a store and my bill comes to $200, I should just hand them $50 and tell them that's plenty? It will be plenty to me, so I guess that's all that matters right?

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    27. Re:Good for France by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 1

      Well then, perhaps they should pressure the world's governments to close the loopholes that make tax avoidance (This is NOT tax *evasion* we're talking about.) possible.

      That will never happen though, because those loopholes are there on purpose. And closing them would anger the companies that actually payed for them to be there. The only reason various people are in a snit about Apple, Google, Amazon, Facebook, and the like, is that these companies cleverly realized that, once on the books, those laws actually apply to everyone. So tech has been taking advantage of said laws without actually having lobbied and paid for them. And those pockets have to be lines, "gifts" given, and re-election coffers filled, after all.

      That, and I've no doubt that plain old xenophobia (Yes, Europe is headed in that direction too, with Brexit, how close Le Pen came to the French presidency, and increasing anti-immigrant sentiment as fine examples.) is in play too. News abounds about Europe, and France in particular, taking on US companies like the aforementioned Apple, Google, Amazon, and Facebook. But where are the stories about the EU or France taking the likes of EADS/Airbus, Total S. A., Dassault, or Royal Dutch Shell to task for their more than ample (And going far beyond mere tax avoidance.) shenanigans?

      In both cases, this is nothing but rank hypocrisy.

      --
      Imagine all the people...
    28. Re:Good for France by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And plenty in taxes are paid. So this is nothing but statist slaver bullshit.

      Apple must be modding you insightful because they clearly haven't paid their taxes... if anything they probably set a record for paying the least percentage corporation tax of all time while simultaneously being one of the most successful and valuable corporations of all time. So yeah... fuck you anonymous coward/ apple fan boi / apple troll

    29. Re:Good for France by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe France should follow the Citizen's United example - that way, as a taxable 'person', Apple would finally pay its fair share just like in the United States!

    30. Re:Good for France by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All wars were only won with peace movements

      Yes. Passive resistance brought down the the Third Reich.

    31. Re:Good for France by jcr · · Score: 1

      Guns make it possible to resist governments, as you well know. That's why you're afraid of them.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    32. Re:Good for France by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then again, in international news people will be like, "Total, is that the detergent company?"

    33. Re:Good for France by Neuronwelder · · Score: 1

      Excellent reply!!!

    34. Re:Good for France by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      One would assume that "plenty" would be the legally required amount, which Apple has been careful to evade.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    35. Re:Good for France by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      No, guns do not make it possible to resist governments. No civilian force is able to resist a much smaller modern military force.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    36. Re:Good for France by rhodium_mir · · Score: 2

      Serious question: How will the poor do that if they've already been processed into a useful industrial slurry?

      --
      You can't spell "oneiromancy" without "roman".
    37. Re:Good for France by psycho12345 · · Score: 1

      Historically, no, nearly no revolution has worked without the support of a modern military. Guns are no match for logistics. Guns don't do anything when your army is starving. See Valley Forge for an example.

  10. Hey Dumb Fucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Go after your poiticians. They're the ones who enable this shit.

    Apple has done nothing wrong. They are jsut taking advantage of existing law.

    1. Re: Hey Dumb Fucks by lucasnate1 · · Score: 0

      I am curious. In some arab countries rape is legal in some cases. Do you think that the only one that should be blamed for rape in that case is the politican who made it legal? Or also the person who commited it.

      If you answered the second, please explain how rape is different from tax evasion in this case?

    2. Re: Hey Dumb Fucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you think that the only one that should be blamed for rape in that case is the politican who made it legal? Or also the person who commited it.

      What I think, is that in a country where rape is illegal, yelling at a raper to stop raping is an exercise in futility. If you want them to stop, then change the goddamned law so that they can actually get prosecuted for it.

    3. Re: Hey Dumb Fucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If rape is legal, then the person committing it can't be blamed since it is legal. Are you a moron?

    4. Re: Hey Dumb Fucks by easyTree · · Score: 1

      Omg. Fail 101. Right here folks.

    5. Re: Hey Dumb Fucks by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      Rape is morally wrong. Not paying taxes you don't owe isn't.

      Now go get yourself raped, you illogical fuck.

    6. Re: Hey Dumb Fucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Corporations are buying government favors, because the government has favors to sell.

  11. Stinks like a Greenpeace PR stunt. by Darkness+Of+Course · · Score: 1

    Greenpeace has done many poorly thought out (IMO) attacks on apple. When pressed they admit that apple does better than quite a few global players but pulling the stunts on them don't get any press coverage. So they attack apple.

    Same old, same old. Different players, using taxes as their pivot then mumble waving about the environment.

    It's all about press.

    1. Re:Stinks like a Greenpeace PR stunt. by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      When pressed they admit that apple does better than quite a few global players but pulling the stunts on them don't get any press coverage. So they attack apple.

      Um, yes...?

      The point of protesting is to raise awareness. If the laws clamp down on Apple, they will also clamp down on other, lett well known companies who use the same tax dodges.

      So if they raise awareness, via attacking a company who does bad stuff even if there are companies who do worse, and get the laws fixed then that seems like a net win to me.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    2. Re:Stinks like a Greenpeace PR stunt. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If apple is doing better than those other companies, and the publicity stunt causes people to stop buying apple's stuff and instead buy those other companies' stuff, then their awareness campaign is complete counterproductive.

  12. GET A BETTER ACCOUNTANT! by Templer421 · · Score: 1

    A better shout.

  13. Re:Apple should not pay the taxes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then EU should seize Apple assets, and they are completely justified to do that.

  14. Should try that at the whitehouse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pop over and say the same to Trump

  15. Re:U.S. First by thegarbz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Since Apple's corporate headquarters is in the U.S., we get the money first.

    Why would you get the money? Apple isn't the subject of a US court battle about the US not collecting taxes from Apple properly. Apple pays as much taxes in the USA as is required by law, unlike in the EU where it was found their tax agreement with Ireland was illegal.

  16. Re:Apple should not pay the taxes by magarity · · Score: 1, Interesting

    EU countries impose massive tax burdens relative to the rest of the world

    No kidding; For example, DSLRs can only make 29 minute, 59 second video clips because a camera that can take >= 30 minute clips is a "movie camera" under EU laws and triggers a much higher tax. So our Canons and Nikons in the US and the rest of the world have that limit too.

  17. Re:Apple should not pay the taxes by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    DSLRs can only make 29 minute, 59 second video clips because a camera that can take >= 30 minute clips is a "movie camera" under EU laws and triggers a much higher tax. So our Canons and Nikons in the US and the rest of the world have that limit too.

    It's trivial to issue different firmwares for different regions, companies do this all the time. I imagine, though, that there are unofficial patches to remove that limit from at least some cameras.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  18. Re: Apple should not pay the taxes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah. Because hex editing that firmware byte code to #FFFF:F0FF and updating is so hard.

  19. Re: The US gives France jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If your argument is equally applicable to legitimizing slavery as it is tax evasion, you might want to rethink your position.

  20. Ireland is in the E.U. [Re:Why does Apple even...] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe it's because Apple doesn't pay any taxes in the EU, and instead pays a pitiful tax rate in Ireland?

    Ireland is in the E.U.

  21. Re:Apple should not pay the taxes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Completely arbitrary.

    This is what post-net-neutrality world is going to look like - arbitrary cost structures on top of existing TCP sessions. Once the government figures that out they apply arbitrary tax structures on top of the arbitrary cost structures. Now you'll need to fill out a page on your taxes detailing all the URLs you followed for the fiscal year.

    This is coming soon. Count on it.

  22. Re: Apple should not pay the taxes by easyTree · · Score: 1

    They should seize all iPhones and install Android :D

  23. Re: Apple should not pay the taxes by easyTree · · Score: 2

    Well, the US is about to ruin the internet for everyone and then there's the whole continuous wars thing. Maybe EU taxes aren't so bad by comparison.

  24. Re: Apple should not pay the taxes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why should the user suffer the agony of being forced to used a completely insecure OS ?

  25. Re:U.S. First by GuB-42 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Apple's headquarters are in the US but it also has branches in the EU, and these branches depend on the laws of the country they are in.

    So when Apple Ireland makes a sale in the EU, it has to pay taxes to Ireland, like any Irish company. And Apple France has to pay taxes in France. That the headquarters are in the US doesn't matter. And it's a good thing, otherwise, the headquarters would have been quickly relocated to a tax heaven.

  26. Re:U.S. First by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    isn't Apple hoarding in offshore accounts?

  27. c'est la vie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why are the french so impossibly stupid.

  28. USEFUL IDIOTS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These are useful idiots which propagate and support the very system which is anally raping them. Hypocrites!

  29. Re:The US gives France jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They dont want jobs. They are socialists, they want handouts. Jobs are considered "slavery". See comment below.

  30. Re:U.S. First by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

    Do they still funnel dough through Ireland? It's up to the French government and the EU to close any loopholes.

    It seems not unreasonable to me for Apple's retail arm in France to be registered as a French business. If they rent buildings in Paris and other cities, employ local workers and collect French sales tax then they should pay the same proportion of tax as Gerard's Boutique d'Ordinateurs (pardon mon franÃais!) on the corner.

    Is this not happening? A relative here in Australia was surprised when an Apple product purchased locally in a shop put Singapore on the bill.

  31. 'Planet America' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... stashed $230 billion in tax havens ...

    While the USA enforces global taxation on natural and non-natural citizens, the non-natural citizens have found a loophole: Keeping their money out of US territory and in territories (Cayman Islands, Keeling Islands) that have no corporation taxes. The USA can enforce global conformity on international banking (even Switzerland complies) but not on its own own taxation laws. The "Kansas experiment" could easily cancel corporate taxation but not corporate loopholes: Meaning corporations in the state were, in effect, 'paid' to not pay taxes.

    Watch the show 'Planet America' (made in Australia) to see how fucked-up US tax laws are.

  32. Apple pays a lot of taxes in the EU, provides more by SuperKendall · · Score: 1, Insightful

    "Appleâ(TM)s Irish tax arrangements have allowed it to pay tax at a rate of 3.8 percent on $200 billion of overseas profits"

    From this article.

    So that is 7.6 *billion* dollars in taxes that Apple has paid to the EU in taxes.

    Not to mention, that for every expensive Apple device sells, the EU is of course collecting a tax of taxes (VAT) atop that as well. All just because Apple has physically located a store there. The taxes collected alone on sales must be many more billions.

    Again, just for Apple having a store located in that country or city.

    Do you seriously think the tiny impact of Apple having a store in those countries is not more than offset by the taxes already paid? Apple has paid for roads, security, and far more out of the very large amount of money Apple has collected and paid in taxes.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  33. Re: Apple should not pay the taxes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    because they're EU. duh.

  34. Re: The US gives France jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So all technology and information comes from the USA. I didn't know that. Thanks for the information.

  35. Re: Apple should not pay the taxes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You do realize that your lord and savior Obama was very happy without net neutrality, that regulation has never been applied, and that nothing has changed, right?

  36. Re: The US gives France jobs by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    Parts of the EU did not get far beyond Minitel https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... .
    The modern Internet then offered technology and information to many parts of the EU.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  37. Corporation tax falls on consumers, not companies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I may be wrong, but as I understand it, in economics, businesses do not pay tax. When they are taxed, what happens is that the price of their services and good rises. It is the *consumer* of the services or goods who pays the tax. That is usually you and me.

    Really, we pay income tax, and we pay corporation. We also of course pay sales tax.

    Roughly speaking, I think in the West, about 75% of the wealth we produce each month is taken from us in the form of tax.

  38. Re: The US gives France jobs by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    AC, A company has to pay some tax in most normal nations.
    If a country has set a low tax rate to attract jobs and investment then that is the tax rate that has to be paid.
    The private sector has to pay a tax rate set a gov.

    The private sector still has the freedom just move its jobs to areas better suited to support capitalism.
    Why not put some effort into creating good private sector jobs?
    Allowing more people to study for jobs that pay well?
    When the private sector invests, show some support that company and then attract more private sector investors to the area?

    Instead of all that effort focused on one company why not try and attract 10 other companies to the area?

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  39. Re:Apple should not pay the taxes by doctorvo · · Score: 3, Informative

    EU countries impose massive tax burdens relative to the rest of the world.

    Actually, EU corporate taxes are generally lower than US corporate taxes. That's why US corporations keep their money overseas.

    Excessive taxation, especially for how EU countries spend the money, is unjust.

    European tax systems tend to me more fair: the European middle class, which receives most of the benefits from taxation, pays considerably higher taxes than the US middle class; that is, they pay what they use and balance their budgets.

    The US middle class still deludes itself into believing that they can continue to get free stuff by taxing the wealthy and running up a massive debt.

  40. Re:Apple should not pay the taxes by doctorvo · · Score: 0

    This is what post-net-neutrality world is going to look like

    If by "post net neutrality world" you mean a world post introduction of "net neutrality", then you're right: after all, the FCC taking control of the Internet is the first step towards imposing more arbitrary rules and taxes.

  41. Re:U.S. First by Aighearach · · Score: 1

    The EU already said there is no loophole, Ireland simply made false promises to Apple.

    Loopholes don't spring into existence just because your lawyer waved his hands and said words; if it was a dubious theory that was never tested in court, you had no reason to believe it was actually a loophole!

  42. Re:Apple pays a lot of taxes in the EU, provides m by Aighearach · · Score: 2

    VAT is not a "tax of taxes." That is just silliness.

    And anyways, who cares? "Your honor, I did steal that money, but last week I gave a smaller amount of money to a charity. That makes it OK." "*Bang!*Bang* Maximum sentence!"

  43. Re:Apple pays a lot of taxes in the EU, provides m by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stop spreading lies.
    https://www.cnbc.com/2016/08/30/how-apples-irish-subsidiaries-paid-a-0005-percent-tax-rate-in-2014.html

    The only reason i can see for you to be spreading such blatant lies is you are paid by apple to do so. Its not working.

  44. Re: Apple should not pay the taxes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah. Because asymmetric crypto and checksums aren't a thing, and all devices always blindly accept whatever firmware you flash to them.

  45. The epitome of silliness by SpaghettiPattern · · Score: 1

    I appreciate the efforts taken. But protesting against a company that behaves immorally is the epitome of silliness.

    Companies aren't obliged to have a moral; They merely need to obey the law. They must explore every way of making money and optimizing costs. Their competitors will do likewise.

    Go after politicians that created opportunities for companies to optimize their taxes to an absurd level. Hell you can even use your actual influence and vote to try and accomplish your goal and make tax laws more fair.

    --

    I hadn't the slightest objection to his spending his time planning massacres for the bourgeoisie... (P.G. Wodehouse)
    1. Re:The epitome of silliness by lucasnate1 · · Score: 2

      If companies are not obliged to have a moral, why do protesters do? Why can a company do whatever it wants while individuals are always judged morally. I think that the reason why these protesters are acting the way they are is because they are fighting fire with fire. Maybe their mistake is that their fire is not hot enough.

  46. Re:U.S. First by K.Bu · · Score: 1

    Well, I believe this concept to be outdated. A bit like the "intellectual Property transfer rights". Nowadays, the paptent holder for IP rights dwelves in tiny european countries. The countries made a business model out of stealing fiscal product of their neighbor. Nobody complains, because everybody uses them. Hell the president of the european commission was the "tax evader in chief" as head stateman of Luxembourg for the better part of his career. Honestly, It would be much simpler to tax the benefits of the company based on their profit, country by country. After all, what is the meaning of the location of the headquarter of a multinational in our connected world ? Nowadays, Apple transfered its headquarter in a tiny british Island known for its very low corporate tax (zero). https://www.nytimes.com/2017/1... Oudated context.

    --

    ---
    By the way I apologies my dear US friend, I'm French...
  47. Wrong by aepervius · · Score: 1

    Undoing mod.... I am french too , and the reason people do not protest that much about total, is that apple is far more in the news, and news about total tax far less you have to dig and keep yourself informed (*). Otherwise those hippie activist (yes I know some of them, and they are the 2017 hippies)= would protest a dirty , co2 making , petrol station than apple. But they are as a group (at least those I speak to) utterly uninformed (*). It isn't about foreign company AT ALL. If you knew anything about those activist you would know that. As for the mod, at best this parent would be "interesting" as an opinion or "informative" if you stretch it but nowhere near insightful.

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
  48. Re: The US gives France jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obviously it is not, as anyone with a minimum of rational thinking would see, but of course we cannot allow reason to stand in the way of your knee-jerk childish arguments.

  49. Re: The US gives France jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If it all came from the EU, we would not be having any discussion. Obviously the Europeans like to talk big about the superiority of their "culture" and "civilization" but then they do not deliver. You know, like that obnoxious pedantic know-it-all kid in class who liked to correct everybody - including teachers - like he was the next Einstein or so, and then you find him pumping gas or selling TV sets at Walmart.

  50. Soros minions cannibalizing SJW Cook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Poor Tim Cook.

    He thought he was being clever using his CEO bully pulpit to fundraiser for the SPLC and other Marxist groups. Now he is being cannibalized by European commies.

    Hey, Tim: time to become a libertarian. The left is not your friend.

  51. Re:Apple pays a lot of taxes in the EU, provides m by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

    So that is 7.6 *billion* dollars in taxes that Apple has paid to the EU in taxes.

    So your argument is that Apple should pay a lower tax rate because the make a lot of money?

    Out of interest, which political wing do you identify with?

    --
    SJW n. One who posts facts.
  52. They have tried by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually several french companies have tried over the years, but have all confronted the same major obstacle: they are obliged to pay taxes in France.

  53. Re:Apple should not pay the taxes by Computershack · · Score: 4, Informative

    EU countries impose massive tax burdens relative to the rest of the world. Excessive taxation, especially for how EU countries spend the money, is unjust. Refusing to pay unfair and excessive taxes is a moral position. Apple should continue to not pay the taxes, and they are completely justified in that position.

    We get a good universal healthcare system, good welfare state, good education system and decent infrastructure for our money. You may think we're taxed to death but the tax burden per capita in the UK for the NHS is the same as the tax burden per capita of Medicare/Medicaid is for the US yet we get a healthcare system where it is free to use for all. We also get things provided for free that are an additional cost in the USA. We don't pay a separate charge through our local taxes for the fire department for example.

    I'd rather keep paying the taxes and have what we have than not do and end up living in a first world country where highway bridges are collapsing and people go bankrupt because they get ill.

    --
    I only please one person per day. Today is not your day. Tomorrow isn't looking good either. - Scott Adams
  54. Re:Apple pays a lot of taxes in the EU, provides m by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

    "AppleÃ(TM)s Irish tax arrangements have allowed it to pay tax at a rate of 3.8 percent on $200 billion of overseas profits"

    From this article.

    So that is 7.6 *billion* dollars in taxes that Apple has paid to the EU in taxes.

    Or to put it another way, it's at least 50 *billion* that Apple dodged paying to the EU in taxes.

    The corporation tax rate in France is 33%. It varies around Europe but 25-30% is typical.

    Again, just for Apple having a store located in that country or city.

    No. It includes everything they sell on iTunes to French citizens. It includes all the paid services they offer to French customers like repairs, battery replacements and cloud storage. It includes all the business services they offer in France like Siri integration. This stuff is so significant that Apple set up a French subsidiary to manage it all, and also to dodge paying tax on it.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  55. Re:U.S. First by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That isn't how taxes work.

  56. Re:Apple pays a lot of taxes in the EU, provides m by bungo · · Score: 1

    Hang on, what are you saying?

    Why should the overall tax rate for my company be 10 times higher than it it for Apple?

    Are you saying this is fair?

    And thanks for mentioning VAT - that's tax that the consumer pays, not the business. So, no only to I pay a higher tax rate, I also get to pay extra tax as a consumer that Apple doesn't pay.

    Well, at least I'm paying to have a civilized country.

    --
    "The best part? I became an ordained minister while not wearing pants." -- CleverNickName
  57. Re:Apple pays a lot of taxes in the EU, provides m by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So that is 7.6 *billion* dollars in taxes that Apple has paid to the EU in taxes.

    To Ireland, not to the EU. The EU doesn't levy any taxes. More importantly, the 7.6 billion dollars is only a small part of what they really had to pay and what every other company would have paid under the same circumstances.

    Not to mention, that for every expensive Apple device sells, the EU is of course collecting a tax of taxes (VAT) atop that as well. All just because Apple has physically located a store there. The taxes collected alone on sales must be many more billions.

    The EU doesn't collect VAT. VAT is a national tax.

    Again, just for Apple having a store located in that country or city.

    No, it's for selling products. VAT is levied on sales.

    Do you seriously think the tiny impact of Apple having a store in those countries is not more than offset by the taxes already paid? Apple has paid for roads, security, and far more out of the very large amount of money Apple has collected and paid in taxes.

    The issue is not whether what Apple pays is or is not sufficient to cover for the costs of having Apple's business. The problem is that Apple is not paying it's fair share because they are breaking the law, thus putting competitors who don't break the law at a disadvantage.

  58. Re:U.S. First by v1nce29 · · Score: 1

    NO. All the money in EU is evaded to Ireland where Apple pays (almost) no taxes at all because of some illegal agreement between Apple and Ireland. Protesters don't ask Apple to pay their taxes in France they ask Aple to pay the real deal to Ireland

  59. Re: U.S. First by Type44Q · · Score: 0

    ...is evaded

    Correct sequence:

    A) Learn the language.

    B) Post in said language.

    Hint: you've got the sequence backwards...

  60. Lemme get this straight. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple employs EU people. They pay for EU goods. They even pay for EU services. And you want to bleed them even more?

  61. Simple Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is a simple solution to the problem. Demonetize the assets of those corporations who evade taxes. India gave us a poor example, but we have the means to track cash by serial number. Why not apply it to this problem.

  62. Payback by h8sg8s · · Score: 1

    Literally payback. Apple has cherrypicked tax localities and laws to the point of absurdity.

    --
    Organization? You must be joking..
  63. Why do protesters do, you ask? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Easy: virtue signaling.

  64. we're screwed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    we're really screwed if the youth is so brainwashed they think paying taxes is a good thing.

  65. Re:Apple pays a lot of taxes in the EU, provides m by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 1

    Apple is not breaking the law though. Tax avoidance (as opposed to tax evasion) is perfectly legal. And tax avoidance (structuring your finances so that the tax you're legitimately obligated to pay), is something that everyone, everywhere, does. Apple has merely done it better than you or I could each April.

    The only example where it's actually been established that laws have been broken, with regard to taxation, has been the case recently where the EU ruled that Ireland set it's tax rate too low, giving Apple a larger incentive to locate there than what they were allowed under EU rules; for which the EU is trying to punish Apple, instead of Ireland. That is, of course, being appealed. And all that proves tho is that the US has no monopoly on xenophobia and jingoism.

    --
    Imagine all the people...
  66. Re:Apple pays a lot of taxes in the EU, provides m by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    To Ireland, not to the EU.

    Is Ireland in the EU? Why yes, yes it is.

    The EU doesn't collect VAT. VAT is a national tax.

    The EU provides no services to Apple stores. Nations do. So why does the EU need the taxes again?

    Also do you seriously not think that part of the VAT collected flows back to the EU from every nation. If not, where does EU funding come from?

    VAT is levied on sales. .. from physical stores.

    The issue is not whether what Apple pays

    Actually that is EXACTLY what I was responding to, an assertion that Apple pays "no taxes" in the EU which is a blatant lie. Some think they pay too little, but that is a wholly different discussion.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  67. Not saying what you think I am by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Why should the overall tax rate for my company be 10 times higher than it it for Apple?

    I totally agree. You should be paying the same rate as Apple. And you could be if you used the same technique.

    Apple may be paying a low rate but even at that low rate they pay a HUGE sum of money in taxes. Just because you are taxed WAY too much does not mean Apple is in the wrong, the EU benefits greatly from the taxes collected on sales of Apple products.

    And thanks for mentioning VAT - that's tax that the consumer pays, not the business.

    But it's money that would not be collected if Apple was not selling products there. If Apple stopped selling products across the EU tomorrow would there be a vast shortfall in VAT revenue or not?

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  68. That was not the point by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    So your argument is that Apple should pay a lower tax rate

    Nope.

    The original post I responded to said Apple paid "No Taxes" in the EU. Is 7.6 billion dollars greater than, or equal to zero?

    Out of interest, which political wing do you identify with?

    I belong to the "Correcting Blatant Lies With Facts" party. I know we are greatly in disfavor in these days Where the "Angry Factless Slander" party is greatly on the uptick, but you really should consider joining us instead as it's much better for your health. Especially your mental health. Our motto is "We Drink and We Know Things".

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  69. Re:U.S. First by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why would you get the money?

    We have the most guns and are the only reason why Russia isn't taking back eastern Europe. Tough titties.

  70. Re:Apple pays a lot of taxes in the EU, provides m by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only example where it's actually been established that laws have been broken, with regard to taxation, has been the case recently where the EU ruled that Ireland set it's tax rate too low, giving Apple a larger incentive to locate there than what they were allowed under EU rules; for which the EU is trying to punish Apple, instead of Ireland. That is, of course, being appealed.

    Not really. The EC ruled that Ireland gave Apple a special treatment, which is not allowed. They are not punishing anyone for that; they are merely insisting that Ireland make Apple pay the taxes it should have paid in the first place.

  71. Re: U.S. First by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple Ireland is owned by Apple some.other-tax-haven-in-Europe. Manx, I think.

  72. Re:Apple pays a lot of taxes in the EU, provides m by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is Ireland in the EU? Why yes, yes it is.

    It's in the UN too. Does that mean that Apple pays VAT to the UN?

    The EU provides no services to Apple stores. Nations do. So why does the EU need the taxes again?

    It doesn't. You are the one claiming that it did.

    Also do you seriously not think that part of the VAT collected flows back to the EU from every nation. If not, where does EU funding come from?

    From the general budget of the member states. It is not connected to any specific tax.

    VAT is levied on sales. .. from physical stores.

    ... and online shops. It's not in any way connected to physical buildings. Only to sales.

    Actually that is EXACTLY what I was responding to, an assertion that Apple pays "no taxes" in the EU which is a blatant lie.

    That may very well be, but that is not the issue here of course. The issue is that Apple is cheating by breaking the law.

  73. Re:Illegal? Huh? by GuB-42 · · Score: 1

    A government can make the laws in their own country, of course.
    However, if a country enters a trade agreement, and the EU is for most part a trade agreement, it should play by the rules it if it wants to continue trading.

  74. The issue is that the EU CLAIMS by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    It's in the UN too. Does that mean that Apple pays VAT to the UN?

    Apple doesn't "pay" VAT to anyone, they collect it on behalf of a local government.

    It doesn't. You are the one claiming that it did.

    Claiming what? That the EU provides services? I made no such claim.

    From the general budget of the member states. It is not DISCONNETED FROM any specific tax.

    Corrected that for you. Unless you seriously want to assert no VAT money goes to fund the EU, ever. Come on, I know you can do it! I dare you. ... and online shops. It's not in any way DISCONNECTED FROM physical buildings. Only to sales.

    You seem to have a real problem with writing these things correctly.

    I never said it didn't apply to online sales also. But that was merely one aspect of my point where I was tying things back to all the people that claimed Apple used physical resources of countries and that's why they need to pay more tax. The more sales are online, the fewer resources of the nation Apple is in fact using and the less it makes sense for them to pay. If we are all trying to actually be fair and not just loser Apple Haters out for a joyride.

    So thanks for bringing that up, because Apple's high online sales rate more than validates why they should be paying less in taxes than other companies in the EU, which is still a number much greater than zero by may billions of dollars.

    That may very well be, but that is not the issue here of course.

    In fact the ONLY ISSUE I was writing about was Apple paying any taxes at all, not zero - all other material was just bonus to refute points and arguments based around that. You chose to re-direct it badly, but utterly fucked up your arguments which fall apart like a house made of 20 year old plastic wicker baskets you let sit out in the sun.

    I'll let you have the last response now that you have been TAKEN TO THE WOODSHED OF ULTIMATE TRUTH and REALITY.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  75. Too many thieving bastards these days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ah yes, more turds bitching they can't steal the fruits of someone elses labor. Color me surprised.

  76. Jokes on them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    because taxation is theft...

  77. Re: U.S. First by v1nce29 · · Score: 1

    Mastering A & B is easy. Difficulty starts with C) Learn a foreign language I guess you didn't try.