Slashdot Mirror


Amazon Bringing Echo and Alexa To 80 Additional Countries in Major Global Expansion (geekwire.com)

Amazon is launching three of its Echo devices with Alexa in 80 additional countries starting today -- a major international expansion for the company's smart speakers and voice-based assistant. From a report: New markets for the Echo, Echo Dot, and Echo Plus include Mexico, China, Russia and other countries in regions and continents including Europe, Africa, South America, the Middle East and Asia. Other Echo devices, such as the touch-screen Echo Show, are not included as part of the international expansion. Echo devices were previously only available in the US, UK, Germany, India, Japan, and Canada. Amazon earlier announced plans to bring Echo and Alexa to Australia and New Zealand next year. In addition, Amazon says its Music Unlimited subscription streaming service is available in 28 additional countries, including many of those where the Echo is now expanding, as well. Recommended reading: Don't buy anyone an Amazon Echo speaker.

38 comments

  1. Making the World safe for Chinese trinkets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Humankind's access to junky tchotchke took a major leap forward, thanks to Amazon bringing the Echo surveillance technology to more lemmings around the world.

    1. Re:Making the World safe for Chinese trinkets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Next up: bubonic plague, re-engineered and unplugged!

  2. But no more Youtube... by Kenja · · Score: 2

    I hate when mommy and daddy global monopoly fight...

    --

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
  3. resounding in our bodies minds spirits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    cease fire stand down.. thanks again..

  4. In other Alexa news... by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2

    Amazon Alexa supports Black Lives Matter.

    https://www.vibe.com/2017/12/a...

    Waiting for the alt-white boycott.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
    1. Re:In other Alexa news... by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      If they boycott every company that doesn't cater to their ideals. Perhaps they can starve themselves into a solution.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    2. Re:In other Alexa news... by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      Amazon Alexa supports Black Lives Matter.

      Believing that black lives matter is not the same thing as supporting Black Lives Matter.

    3. Re:In other Alexa news... by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2

      Believing that black lives matter is not the same thing as supporting Black Lives Matter.

      Yeah, it is.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    4. Re:In other Alexa news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, a new article on Slashdot. Lets figure out how we can make this about what color people are!
      Loser.

  5. How is the alt-white even on the internets? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They should be boycotting Apple, Google, Microsoft, Twitter, Facebook and basically every tech company.

  6. languages! by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

    All this means is you can order the English-speaking Alexa in those countries. (Or Japanese or German). So if you speak Chinese you'll have to look at the various Chinese-speaking devices available.

    --
    This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
  7. Fad bet? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    I give these gizmos a 50/50 on being a fad. On one hand those who purchased them overall give a roughly "C-" grade in practicality, and the potential for headline-making hacks is high.

    But, they will get gradually better over time and maybe hit a threshold utility quality level to stay. Based on past patterns of new gizmo categories, I expect there will be a crash in their use, but they'll then come back in roughly 5 years with improved technology and with some hard lessons applied from the first round.

    1. Re:Fad bet? by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      but why the need? We already have devices in our pockets that can speak and be spoken to, with graphics and touch interface also, hooked to a planet-spanning internet. I hear these devices even have task specific "apps" to do the things that echo does badly.

    2. Re:Fad bet? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      We already have devices in our pockets that can speak and be spoken to

      Because smart-phones are controlled by a limited set of companies, perhaps they figure they can make the voice-oriented gizmos more powerful than phone assistants so that you are compelled to buy two devices instead of one, increasing their revenues. Oligopolies, enjoy!

    3. Re:Fad bet? by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      At best I stepping stone technology. Where people get these cheap smart speakers, then load their homes up with expensive smart-automation tools for these things to actually be useful. Once these tools are in place, we find that it is easier to use our expensive smart phones which we already have to do the same thing. But these Speakers would be the first step.

      Kinda like the iPod and MP3 Players. Where they were popular for under a decade, and for the most part now had been replace with a smart phone.
      But it did bring the idea of these tiny devices with large storage, with is the form factor of our phones still.
      They got really small and cheap to stay relivlant for a while, but people just became OK using their phone.
       

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    4. Re:Fad bet? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      We already have devices in our pockets that can speak and be spoken to

      My Echo is in the kitchen. I can ask it to do things when my hands are busy or dirty, or when I am across the room. The speaker is loud enough to hear over the blender or vent fan. Alexa can control the lights, warn me about motion on the porch, etc.

      A cell phone is not a substitute. When I am at home, my phone is on the charger in my office, not where I am, and it requires far more physical interaction. Why would I wash and dry my hands and then walk to my office and get my cell phone to turn off a light? It would be easier to just use the wall switch.

      I hear these devices even have task specific "apps" to do the things that echo does badly.

      The Echo also has 3rd party apps, but with a far better security model.

    5. Re:Fad bet? by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      I'm not going to stick an always-on mic in my home just to save 30 seconds in the kitchen.

    6. Re:Fad bet? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      I'm not going to stick an always-on mic in my home just to save 30 seconds in the kitchen.

      Do you own a cell phone? It is a far bigger threat to your privacy.

    7. Re:Fad bet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just make sure your next phone is waterproof/resistant and has a better battery. I just keep mine on me and wash the damned thing when it gets dirty (something everybody should do regularly, these things are infested by bacteria).

    8. Re:Fad bet? by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      ya know, you can set your phone up to be handsfree to respond to queries?

      the echo has no special "security model", hacks have been demonstrated just like most any other internet attached appliance running an OS.

  8. Headline's truncated, here's what's missing: by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 0, Troll

    Amazon Bringing Echo and Alexa To 80 Additional Countries in Major Expansion Of It's Surveillance Network

    1. Re:Headline's truncated, here's what's missing: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amazon Bringing Echo and Alexa To 80 Additional Countries in Major Expansion Of It's Surveillance Network

      Any time you complain about the privacy concerns of a device, first ask yourself "How is this worse than my cell phone, which goes with me everywhere, has a mic, camera and GPS, and has an opaque Internet connection which I cannot monitor?"

    2. Re:Headline's truncated, here's what's missing: by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 0

      I'm really getting tired of this shitty copypasta making me write the same copypasta in response. I'm seriously going to just save it as a text file to literally paste into replies:

      I do not currently have, nor do I ever plan to have a 'smartphone', they're about as secure and private as a collander.
      I have a $50 plastic LG clamshell phone.
      It's 'off' at least 90% of the time.
      When it's on I'm either at work or at home. The rest of the time it's 'off'; don't care if you know I'm at home or at work.
      It's GPS has been effectively disabled in hardware (took it apart, found the GPS antenna, shorted it to Ground; no GPS).
      The Internet settings have been scrambled so no Internet access is possible on it.
      I make or receive maybe a dozen calls at most in any given month.
      I make or receive maybe 20 or so texts in any given month.
      There is damned little data for anyone to scrape from my phone and it's too sparse to tell you anything you couldn't guess about me anyway.
      If wireless companies piss me off enough I'll just go back to a landline at home and never mind having a cellphone at all, I don't really need one.

    3. Re:Headline's truncated, here's what's missing: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Expansion of its Surveillance Network

      Since 80-90% of the population has a smartphone with features similar to Alexa (Siri/Ok Google listening to your phone microphone), what extra surveillance data does Amazon spyware give you, that you cannot already obtain from smartphone surveillance? I'm curious.

    4. Re:Headline's truncated, here's what's missing: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well I'm glad you're consistent. That still doesn't make Amazon's "Surveillance network" very impressive compared to, say, Apple's or LG's.

    5. Re:Headline's truncated, here's what's missing: by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

      it's[sic] GPS has been effectively disabled in hardware (took it apart, found the GPS antenna, shorted it to Ground; no GPS).

      They know where the phone is anyway if it's on; tower-based location has been with us for some time. Any time your GPS could have reported the phone live, the phone was in range of a tower anyway. So... they still know where that phone is. The only way to win that war is to not carry the phone, or take its battery out. If possible.

      BTW, "off" isn't always "off." If you really want "off", you need to take out the battery.

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    6. Re:Headline's truncated, here's what's missing: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Its"

    7. Re:Headline's truncated, here's what's missing: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, so since it's "not very impressive compared to, say, Apple's or LG's" we should just call everything A-OK? This is a completely idiotic response.

      Moreover, the *quality* of surveillance from these listening devices *far* outweighs what is possible on a smartphone. But really, this is a totally stupid point to be arguing over one way or another.

    8. Re:Headline's truncated, here's what's missing: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just fuck off, I don't have a goddamned smartphone.

    9. Re:Headline's truncated, here's what's missing: by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      It's this: https://www.att.com/cellphones... OFF is OFF and YES the battery comes out. Do you really think I'm that dumb?

    10. Re:Headline's truncated, here's what's missing: by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

      I think if you turn the phone on, they know where you are. If you don't turn the phone on, why do you own one?

      You can't have "they can't track me" and "I use the phone" both, that's all.

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    11. Re:Headline's truncated, here's what's missing: by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      IDGAF if they know what cell tower it's connected to. That's only an accuracy of, what, a mile? So what. As to the other: Why the actual fuck do you care if I have my goddamned phone on or not? If someone can't be bothered to leave a voicemail then I guess it wasn't important to call me in the first place. Why do you think you have to have a phone on 100% of the time? Do you really think you're such and important person that you need your phone on 100% of the time so you don't miss a call or text? I'd sooner believe that someone *convinced* you that your phone needs to be on all the time, played on your fears, or somesuch. Do you even remember when there were no cellphones, and you'd have to wait until you got home to hear your messages on your answering machine? I sure do, and life went about it's business just fine, the world didn't collapse because people weren't available instantly. Maybe you need to think about that?

    12. Re:Headline's truncated, here's what's missing: by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      Oh and by the way, you totally took me off onto a tangent that wasn't even relevant, here, let me fix that: I will NOT have a listening device in my home, EVER, and I think you're all a bunch of FOOLS if you have one of these -- and don't sit there and try to claim it's not a listening device, because it clearly is, has been demonstrated as such. Enjoy having ZERO PRIVACY even at home, because you want 'convenience'. I think you're stupid if you do and you get what you deserve for that.

  9. Need to Improve it by crow · · Score: 1

    It's nice that they've gotten the language support to roll out in additional countries, but I wish they would put a bit more work into improving the device.

    The use of skills is very clunky. It feels like I'm coding when I'm talking to it. Skills should be able to register questions that they can answer, so if Alexa gets a question she doesn't handle natively, the first active skill that does can be triggered. So instead of "Alexa, ask ," it would just be "Alexa, ."

    The inability to stream music from a local server is really annoying. I have a huge library, and as it is now, I can either pay to upload it to the cloud (they let you do a small portion free), or I can pay for their streaming service. Google Home is no better, again because they want to sell you their own music service. Sure, you can use it as a bluetooth speaker, but you don't have voice control over your library, which is rather the point. I'm hoping that Apple will release their product, as it should talk to a local iTunes server, which just might push the others into adding local support.

    What I really want is to be able to write a local skill that would interact with my own home computer. For example, it would be very convenient to ask her how much time is left on the current TV show, and have it query the MythTV and get the answer (knowing how much time is left on the kid's show when cooking is very helpful). I'm sure if I had this ability, I would find all sorts of things that would be nice to have.

    1. Re:Need to Improve it by Fnkmaster · · Score: 1

      Some top-level surfacing of skills has already launched publicly. Can't say anything more than that, other than that this was addressed in the Alexa keynote at AWS re:Invent last week. If you are interested, I encourage you to watch:

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

  10. Factually incorrect on which countries have it by mark-t · · Score: 1

    As this matter is one that I directly dealt with only a few months ago, I can positively assert that Alexa has most definitely *NOT* ever been available in Canada.... and although I've heard workarounds exist, they are not officially supported. As of the time that I'm writing this, it is still not available here, and I've heard of no indication of when it will be, if ever.

  11. A better headline by reboot246 · · Score: 0

    Amazon spreads its spy network worldwide.

  12. Telescreens for all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And they're making you buy them! I've never heard of anything so ridiculous since Mexico paying for a lunatic's cockamamie wall