Slashdot Mirror


The US Military Admits It Spent $22 Million Investigating UFOs (boston.com)

Long-time Slashdot reader Joosy writes, "Until 2012 the Pentagon had a program, the 'Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program', that tracked unidentified flying objects." An anonymous reader writes: The Pentagon finally acknowledged the existence of the $22 million program today to the New York Times, while also claiming that they closed the program five years ago. "But its backers say that, while the Pentagon ended funding for the effort at that time, the program remains in existence. For the past five years, they say, officials with the program have continued to investigate episodes brought to them by service members, while also carrying out their other Defense Department duties."

Over the years the program "produced documents that describe sightings of aircraft that seemed to move at very high velocities with no visible signs of propulsion, or that hovered with no apparent means of lift. Officials with the program have also studied videos of encounters between unknown objects and U.S. military aircraft." But ultimately, a Pentagon spokesman said, "It was determined that there were other, higher priority issues that merited funding, and it was in the best interest of the DoD to make a change."

166 comments

  1. money well spent by gbjbaanb · · Score: 4, Funny

    but I wonder how much was spent... covering up what they found.... mouhahaahaaaa!

    1. Re: money well spent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, I'd like to see these videos. Sounds awesome.

    2. Re: money well spent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Oh, look, it's another Republican who complains about any government spending other than defense. And by defense, I mean the Republican crusade to exterminate Muslims. Investigating UFOs is actually worthwhile, unlike the Republican dream of exterminating all dark-skinned people from the planet. If the UFOs are experimental military aircraft, the government had plenty of reason to keep the information secret. And unlike the Republican wasting of money on the war against Islam, protecting military technology is actually useful for security.

    3. Re:money well spent by hairyfeet · · Score: 3, Insightful

      To be fair lets say, just for the sake of argument, that they found that there was alien spacecraft flying over our heads. Now what do you think the public would say when the PTBs announced "There are alien spacecraft that have visited us. they are superior to our technology in every way and if they decide to be hostile we have absolutely no chance...have a nice day."

      You would have the excrement hit the bladed cooling device at the speed of light, riots, religious whackos doing all kinds of crazy shit, the destruction would be epic. Remember the line from MiB? "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it."

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    4. Re: money well spent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This, ladies and gentlemen, is why I troll Slashdot. I thoroughly enjoy watching right wing nutjobs like the parent get triggered and make fools of themselves.

    5. Re: money well spent by c6gunner · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I know, that's pretty much what happened when the white man showed up in the Americas. Excrement hit the leaf-fan, natives running every which way, medicine men screaming about the end of the world. Total chaos.

    6. Re: money well spent by RightwingNutjob · · Score: 1

      It sounds awesome, but it looks like a camera artifact.

    7. Re:money well spent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In that scenario, here are some of the (likely) outcomes:
      - We now know there's intelligent life beyond earth.
      - That certain technologies are possible. This alone is a huge scientific advance. And from the available evidence etc, we might be able to discern how it worked (or even how it doesn't work, which is almost as useful).
      - The public at large would be a lot more interested in science/engineering and also be more accepting of the huge military budgets currently spent on overthrowing regimes not to our liking. See the scientific/engineering advances that occurs during the time of a total-war.
      - And while it won't be peace on earth, you know what what we won't be wasting our time/money/effort on...North Korea, Iran etc. It could even lead to an era of greater peace between the major world powers as they ally against a common threat.
      - Of course, this would result in a drop in living standards (eg war-time rationing and all), but I'd accept that if the alternative was to sit and do nothing.
      - If the aliens weren't hostile, I'd love to talk with them. And if they were hostile and going to eliminate us no-matter-what, I'd want to know what killed my planet in the 0.32 seconds before their star-killer is turned onto the earth.

    8. Re:money well spent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But man....it would be worth it.

    9. Re:money well spent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      22 million.

    10. Re: money well spent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Keep it up, trolling right wingers is working so well for you. Grats on 2016.

    11. Re: money well spent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No, it doesn't though. It's an F18's sensor, not a "camera" and it did in fact rotate.

    12. Re:money well spent by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1

      Riots and religious wackos are constant, if anything this may unify them (not necessarily helpfully, mind you) into a single direction.

      But let's face it, if an alien space ship is visiting earth, we are doomed if they decide to be hostile, whether the government chooses to tell us this or not. The question is whether you like a surprise or not.

    13. Re:money well spent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      In 2016, the government spent an estimated 3.9 trillion dollars. Divide that by 366 and you get about 10.7 billion dollars spent per day to operate. This is just a single rain drop in comparison. Any potential threat is worth investigating. No matter if it is domestic, foreign or alien in my opinion.

    14. Re: money well spent by RightwingNutjob · · Score: 0

      And it looks like any number of artifacts I've seen in all sorts of expensive "sensors." That fact that it stayed on in the center and rotated around the center makes me think it's a light leak or lens flare in the optics. Video on NYT didn't say what kind of sensor it's from, but my guess would be short-wave or midwave IR (~1-1.7um or 2-4um), so it could be a reflection of sunlight or a hotspot in the electronics immediately adjacent to the camera optics.

    15. Re:money well spent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Always happy to show SJWs for the racist creeps that they are.

      Really disappointing to see you position yourself firmly on the wrong side of history, seemingly out of nowhere.

    16. Re: money well spent by Beeftopia · · Score: 1

      Actually, you made a common charge, which the responder eloquently demolished. Sounds like an "own" rather than a "troll."

    17. Re:money well spent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would you like to know more?

    18. Re:money well spent by gbjbaanb · · Score: 0

      if only you had the ability to open your eyes to the fascist totalitarianism that is the SJW's position - you can think whatever you like, as long as its proscribed and approved to be acceptable by us.

    19. Re:money well spent by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      "There are alien spacecraft that have visited us. they are superior to our technology in every way and if they decide to be hostile we would be dead already... so they obviously aren't hostile."

      FTFY

      "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it."

      Yeah, the movies are real life, that explains everything.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    20. Re: money well spent by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      That fact that it stayed on in the center and rotated around the center

      Is that not just because the camera is tracking the object?

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    21. Re:money well spent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >fascist totalitarianism that is the SJW's position

      and how would that work? do you know what fascism is? please explain.

    22. Re: money well spent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is what I thought first hand too, but there were many objects that appeared on the sensors of two f18s so it canâ(TM)t be a camera artifact.

    23. Re:money well spent by JaneTheIgnorantSlut · · Score: 1

      Hell, the Pentagon loses more than that in the couch every week.

    24. Re:money well spent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They spent $22 million investigating UFOs, not alien space ships or any other crackpot shit. UFOs are a common occurrence and are a good thing to keep on eye on because they could be spy craft, a nuclear missile, an asteroid or other danger.

    25. Re:money well spent by JohnStock · · Score: 1

      The people's right to know should always override any chaos that may ensue because of it.

    26. Re: money well spent by RightwingNutjob · · Score: 1

      Could be. But that would be awfully steady tracking on a blob that keeps changing shape. Can't say yes or no definitively without knowing more, but I've seen stuff that looks like this that was cured by better baffling of the optics.

    27. Re: money well spent by RightwingNutjob · · Score: 1

      If they were flying right next to each other and looking in the same direction, it could be the same lens flare. Need more information than what was in the NYT article.

    28. Re: money well spent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Notice that there was no bounce or jiggle to the object: even if they tracked it well, there should have been some small perturbations from the center as the jets is bounced by air currents. Almost certainly not a real object.

    29. Re: money well spent by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      There's no bounce or jiggle to the clouds in the background, either.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    30. Re:money well spent by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      There is nothing about aliens in the words "Unidentified Flying Object."

      Unidentified means you don't know what it is. If you knew it was aliens, it would be an identified object.

      Flying just means it is in sustained motion without touching the group. The most common flying objects I see are birds and insects.

      Object, just means it is a physical thing.

      A thing, in the air, and you don't know what it is. If you don't see them nearly every day, it just means you don't understand the words.

      I suspect the military is actually spending a much larger amount of money than that investigating all the objects that are flying that have yet to be identified!

    31. Re: money well spent by RightwingNutjob · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't expect bounce or jiggle in background objects, and I wouldn't expect bounce or jiggle in a fixed point being tracked on the ground open-loop, but I would expect bounce on something that's being tracked angles-only and is changing shape. The other thing that does it for me is its symmetry and that when it rotates, it rolls over where I assume the optical axis is. All of that just makes me think it's lens flare.

    32. Re: money well spent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or what they made.

    33. Re:money well spent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice try. You're only off my more than 3 trillion.

    34. Re: money well spent by bongey · · Score: 1

      Multiple sensors were picking up object(s), not just the target pod flir. This is how a real sensor pod works tracking an flying object,trust me I had to verify whether a simulation was working like the real sensor pod for an F-15. The target pods track just like in the video. Weirdest part is the pilot states that when the objects showed up that their radar started getting jammed. So that is 3, count them 3 different sensors suddenly going crazy, along with that happening on other aircraft.

    35. Re: money well spent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you just assume that all Muslims are dark skinned?

  2. Old news. by olsmeister · · Score: 1

    I saw a documentary on this many years ago.

    1. Re:Old news. by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      And if you don't have anyone looking into the UFO observations then you may miss something essential - like a foreign power aircraft or a drug smuggler.

      I don't really worry of the DoD has a few people looking into this area, it keeps them busy with pretty harmless stuff. And it can be great training for investigators too - if something leaks it's not revealing anything critical, it just look stupid. And that's something nobody want to be - look stupid.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    2. Re:Old news. by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Also, you won't know how successful individual details used to obscure the identity of experimental aircraft were. You won't know what people could really detect from the ground without some people who don't have access to the program looking up with serious intent and making observations. UFO sightings have those characteristics; they're an important resource for the military in numerous ways.

    3. Re:Old news. by SunTzuWarmaster · · Score: 1

      I always see news like this as an exercise in missing the point. The Department of DEFENSE was called to take a look at items flying at high speed, within national airspace, without permit, communications, or other markings. Yea. That's like, their job.

      If it were in orbit, you would call NASA.

  3. And they found that the Lizard People... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Have taken over the White House and the Republican Party.

    1. Re:And they found that the Lizard People... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they're certainly self-centred and egoistic, but I don't know if that are traits of lizards.

    2. Re:And they found that the Lizard People... by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      They went undetected for decades because we expected green skin instead of orange.

  4. UFO's... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Were the UFO's the Pentagon investigated also known as Unidentified Funding Opportunities? If so, the $22 million investment may well have been a sound decision.

    1. Re: UFO's... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When they canceled the program for "higher priority issues", they actually meant they canceled the program because they needed more money for the war against Muslims. You can thank the Republicans for wasting so much money on their dream of killing all Muslims and eventually all dark-skinned people.

  5. Not a bad way to spend money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Investigating UFOs advances national security (if they're experimental military aircraft) and science. We should be spending more on such efforts, but we can't afford it. Unfortunately, Republicans are too busy wastefully spending our money and putting our troops in harm's way because of the Republican crusade to exterminate Muslims. The war on Islam (what the Republicans falsely claim is a war on terror) is costing us dearly. We can thank Republicans that we're not safer and that science hasn't advanced.

    1. Re:Not a bad way to spend money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed. Fear is our greatest enemy.

    2. Re: Not a bad way to spend money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But the money wasn't spent investigating anything... from TFA:

      "initially it was largely funded at the request of Harry Reid, the Nevada Democrat who was the Senate majority leader at the time and who has long had an interest in space phenomena. Most of the money went to an aerospace research company run by a billionaire entrepreneur and longtime friend of Reidâ(TM)s, Robert Bigelow"

      If Pentagon staff can continue doing the video analysis in their spare time, most of that $22M was wasted on a friend of a politician.

      If this were real, it wouldn't be a problem. This seems to be an instance of something being a secret not because of defense but to hide corruption.

    3. Re: Not a bad way to spend money by quantaman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But the money wasn't spent investigating anything... from TFA:

      "initially it was largely funded at the request of Harry Reid, the Nevada Democrat who was the Senate majority leader at the time and who has long had an interest in space phenomena. Most of the money went to an aerospace research company run by a billionaire entrepreneur and longtime friend of Reidâ(TM)s, Robert Bigelow"

      If Pentagon staff can continue doing the video analysis in their spare time, most of that $22M was wasted on a friend of a politician.

      If this were real, it wouldn't be a problem. This seems to be an instance of something being a secret not because of defense but to hide corruption.

      My interpretation is that everyone involved was sincere. What probably happened was something like Bigelow really believed in UFOs and wanted to study them so he went to Reid and asked for the money and mandate (so he could get military folks to talk to him) and Reid agreed. As for Bigelow's company doing the project I don't know how the bid would have been done, but I'm guessing the intersection of companies who could competently do the work and people who would take is seriously is not very large.

      I don't have a fundamental objection to a little government money going to studying UFOs, it's massive longshot but a huge payoff, and smart people doing weird stuff can generate unexpected spinoffs.

      Of course the risk is the whole thing becomes a BS factory where believers trying to justify the project start skewing the evidence and feeding the conspiracy theorists.

      --
      I stole this Sig
    4. Re: Not a bad way to spend money by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 0

      I'll support anything that makes Harry Reid look like an even bigger idiot.

    5. Re:Not a bad way to spend money by ixidor · · Score: 1

      “War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength.” George Orwell, 1984 thought we were at war with Eurasia

    6. Re:Not a bad way to spend money by tsa · · Score: 1

      Everyone can utter gibberish that sounds profound.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    7. Re: Not a bad way to spend money by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      I'll support anything that makes Harry Reid look like an even bigger idiot.

      Impossible. But I'll support anything that helps break down the media walls that were put up to keep people in his party from seeing that.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    8. Re:Not a bad way to spend money by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      And today that's not far from the actual truth. Pick pieces from 1984, "Brave New World", "The Running Man" and "Max Headroom" and you get what we have today. Especially now with Net Neutrality shot down in the sink.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    9. Re: Not a bad way to spend money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did Reid support this because Bigelow was his friend or because he submitted a grant proposal in response to RFP, like everyone else? Corruption pure and simple. On the other hand, if the contract had been given to the usual suspects, like say Boeing, it would have cost 22 Billion not million.

    10. Re: Not a bad way to spend money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It wasn't just Reid though. Ted "Internet Tubes" Stevens and another congressman were part of the committee that brought this project to life. But by all means, make sure to enforce it was a partisan cashgrab when you tell the story to everyone.

  6. $22 million is chump change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The cost of a buying, staffing, running and maintaining a single helicopter are probably way more than that.

    1. Re: $22 million is chump change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, if they identify some flying objects, they won't be unidentified any longer.

      It's past the start of winter, but some bug I haven't identified was flying around the lights in the ceiling tonight. I suppose I could try to identify it so it's not a UFO any longer. The cat seems interested in being involved.

    2. Re:$22 million is chump change by SunTzuWarmaster · · Score: 1

      Blackhawks (medium-lift, non-attack) helicopters run about $2200/flight hour of "all in" cost (including purchase price, training, spares, etc.). They seem to get ~8K flight hours across 10 years (https://fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ac/uh-60.htm), or about 800/year. So, about $1.76M/year. So this program cost about 12.5 helicopters. Given that this program lasted 5 years, we could have traded it for about a 2.5 helicopter fleet.

  7. cancel the "funding" -- NOW IT'S BLACK BUDGET by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, for the last five years it's been operating with zero oversight and effectively unlimited black budget.

  8. $22 million? Not even a rounding error. by rmdingler · · Score: 1

    The federal government is subsidizing cheese. The government spent $21.8 million purchasing surplus cheese and providing incentives for companies to enter the cheese industry."Government cheese really grates on taxpayers," the report states, showing the report's affinity for cheesy jokes.

    In 2014, Ghost Clinics received $35,000,000 in federal reimbursements. Millions of dollars were paid out to 118 “phantom” medical clinics. These were clinics, established by a network of criminal gangs, that never actually existed. They may have been fake clinics, but the government paid out real money and a lot of it.

    Alien abduction claims aside, it's virtually certain aliens who have the technological ability to travel to our galaxy also possess the advanced cloaking ability necessary to avoid detection. Yet, this may not even qualify as a top ten government spending boondoggle.

    --
    Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

    Ernest Hemingway

    1. Re:$22 million? Not even a rounding error. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yet, this may not even qualify as a top ten government spending boondoggle.

      You call it a boondoogle. I call it money well spent.

      Hint: UFO ("unidentified flying object") does not imply "alien," and the sightings could be unidentified spy aircraft from a hostile foreign nation, so you bet your ass the DOD investigated credible claims to see if they had any merit.

    2. Re:$22 million? Not even a rounding error. by fermion · · Score: 1
      For other US organizations that actually use their budget wisely, $22 million would be significant. It is even less significant as it appears to be money over a three year period, 2008-2011.

      Contrast this with the half trillion dollar F-35 program, which has resulted in 100 planes that can only, potentially, be used for training as they will be too expensive to upgrade, and not a single plane that is suitable for any practical warfare application.

      The question of alien life is legitimate. Reasonable research is valid. The money spent, in the wasteland that is the military budget, is also reasonable.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    3. Re:$22 million? Not even a rounding error. by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Um, no. Just no. This was a payoff to a buddy of Harry. If we really wanted to look for UFOs, there would have been a competitive competition for the contract. There wasn't. End of story.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
  9. One big thing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Area 51

    1. Re:One big thing. by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      Who's the Groom in the Lake?

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
  10. UFOs, real witnesses and Gov. Coverups. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Steven Greer's recent documentary is orders of magnitude more comprehensive and informative. And the witness names, positions, ranks, places, times and events are verifiable. As Carl Sagan used to say in his later years, "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence". Well, the extraordinary evidence is here, it is much more than would be required in a court of law, and it is verifiable. But please don't take my word for it. Watch it yourselves. Be prepared to discover your own experience of cognitive dissonance when this doesn't fit in with the model of the world you were conditioned to believe.

    There is a book as well. And there are others that make the case very well also in documentary and book form.

    1. Re:UFOs, real witnesses and Gov. Coverups. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you don't get even the slightest hint that Steven Greer is a money grubbing con man?
      Or complete nutter.
      Or both?

    2. Re: UFOs, real witnesses and Gov. Coverups. . . by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      Or it's not about Greer and you're a moron.

  11. Not investigating would be negligence by RhettLivingston · · Score: 5, Insightful

    An Unidentified Flying Object is nothing more than that. Any UFO could easily be an unidentified military (or even civilian these days) weapon. To choose to never investigate any report because of the association between the acronym UFO and "aliens" in the public mind would be foolishly negligent. A middle ground is essential. Hopefully, this just went full black.

    1. Re:Not investigating would be negligence by Pseudonym · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Most people don't know that the term "UFOB" (from which we get "UFO") was itself originally a USAF radar operator term. It referred to anything on a radar screen which wasn't obviously noise and hadn't yet been identified.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
    2. Re:Not investigating would be negligence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Project Blue Book redux

    3. Re:Not investigating would be negligence by hey! · · Score: 1

      Sure, there are vehicles that exist today that fifty years ago would have had to been written of as sheer fantasy -- stealth aircraft for example. And a plausible argument could be made that a country possessing a secret hypersonic vehicle might want to make overflights of US territory to determine whether the US is capable of responding to such a thing.

      But as easy as it is to gin up reasonable justification for a program like this, the details of this particular program carry a considerable whiff of crackpottery. And crony capitalism too.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  12. Buried the lead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "Initially it was largely funded at the request of Harry Reid, the Nevada Democrat who was the Senate majority leader at the time and who has long had an interest in space phenomena. Most of the money went to an aerospace research company run by a billionaire entrepreneur and longtime friend of Reid’s, Robert Bigelow". Just another handout.

    1. Re:Buried the lead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, you're assuming it was all spent on his associate's company when it wasn't close. You're a moron.

  13. As they should by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    $22M is just ten guys' salaries over 50 years.

    1. Re:As they should by PPH · · Score: 1

      That wouldn't even buy ten seasons of Scully and Mulder.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  14. white spots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I saw white spots in the sky in the daytime.

    Anybody else?
    You can post anonymous.Nobody knows who you are.

    1. Re:white spots by RightwingNutjob · · Score: 1

      I saw a big bright one. It keeps coming back every morning and hides every night. For about a week every month, it has a crescent-shaped partner.

    2. Re:white spots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No really I saw little white specs. Maybe a satellite I don't know. There were also airplanes in the sky so I could tell it wasn't an airplane.

      Don't you at least want to hear more?

      Go away you're ruining my thread.

    3. Re:white spots by RightwingNutjob · · Score: 1

      Was it the international space station? That's about the only thing you can see in daylight hours. At twilight you can see Mercury and Venus. At night you can see most large satellites in low orbit. They move about the width of your thumb in one second, give or take. It's easier to judge at night because you can reference to the stars.

    4. Re:white spots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think so.

      I always wondered why an alien ship would fly around at night with bright lights on. If they wanted to show themselves they could make themselves easier to see. I guess if they wanted to sneak around they could sneak around.

    5. Re:white spots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I saw white spots in the sky in the daytime. Anybody else?

      "Yes," said the old man, "that's just perfectly normal blue field entoptic phenomenon. Everyone in the Universe has that.”

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_field_entoptic_phenomenon

      Posting as AC since I already started moderating this discussion...

    6. Re:white spots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These where moving slowly. Like you where saying about a thumb width in a second. I showed another person and they saw it too. now i ask them and they deny they ever saw it. I guess I'm just the curious type always looking up and wondering what is up there.

    7. Re:white spots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's probably just something perfectly normal.There are billions and billions of light years full of vast space and countless galaxies and stars and even other worlds. Maybe this is the only planet that contains life. That would make each living thing on this planet super rare. Some people can believe that somehow there is no life anywhere else and yet value life on earth very little and insist we are not created deliberately. Maybe life is everywhere but space travel is harder than we imagine.I can't answer any of these question but I keep them in my mind. They can say they have the answers if they want I guess. I'm the type that needs more proof.

      There could be crustacean people like in the movie district 9. I guess I will not get any answers tonight . Thanks for listening old man.

      Trump sucks, Obama rules.

    8. Re:white spots by bigfoottoo · · Score: 1

      Yes, AC. Back in the early 2000's my wife was at work and I was in the parking lot waiting for her to get off. I looked to the north and saw two white objects dancing around each other. Hard to guess a distance, but I would think maybe 3 or 4 miles away. I had one of the old disposable cameras in the car and I took 13 photos of the objects. A co-worker of my wife saw the objects, and she also photographed them. I scanned my photos at 600 dpi, and I would be glad to attach them to an email if you can post an address.

    9. Re:white spots by bigfoottoo · · Score: 2

      Actually, the files are too big to attach. So, I put the photos in Google Drive. https://drive.google.com/drive... I hope this works.

    10. Re:white spots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The interesting thing about those dots is that in some of the photos they appear on the pillar to the right hand side of the photo. Whatever the phenomenon you experienced, it was unlikely to be flying.

    11. Re:white spots by bigfoottoo · · Score: 1

      Actually, if you heavily zoom in, the spots on the pillars are distinct and sharp edged. Likely film defects. These appear elsewhere in the images. The spots in the sky appear fuzzy. The white spots on the parking lot lamps are raven poop, and they are fuzzy. Real white objects are not distinct.

  15. Misleading headline. They were looking for rocks. by CFD339 · · Score: 1

    They were looking for rocks that could be a hazard to life on earth. Nothing to see here. Move along and quit being stupid.

    --
    The problem with quotes on the internet, is that nobody bothers to check their veracity. -- Abraham Lincoln
  16. So what? by Jeremi · · Score: 4, Informative

    The US military budget is $597 billion a year (that's billion, with a 'b').

    $22 million spent looking for UFOs means that over the program's lifetime they spent .003% of one year's budget on the program.

    Now you can argue that that was money wasted, and maybe its was, but if you're going to complain about the US military wasting money, this program is way down the list. And if it actually found something (and who is to say it hasn't? oooooh), then it would have been very well worth the investment for the military to know that aliens are among us -- knowing whether your country is being surveilled or infiltrated (and by whom) is considered very important to know in defense circles.

    --


    I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    1. Re: So what? by c6gunner · · Score: 2

      And if it actually found something (and who is to say it hasn't? oooooh), then it would have been very well worth the investment for the military to know that aliens are among us -- knowing whether your country is being surveilled or infiltrated (and by whom) is considered very important to know in defense circles.

      This is why I've always argued that the military should have a real program in place to try and locate Santa Claus. I mean, sure, the likelihood of every finding him is slim, but think of the benefits if we DID find him! Not only could we stop that goddamn commie from invading our houses every year, but we could put his slave elf labour pool to work building weapons and ammunition.

      For some reason I have been unable to convince my local government representative to put $20 million into this project, but I remain hopeful!

    2. Re:So what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since when did UFO mean aliens? And where in the article did they say they were *looking* for UFOs? They investigated reports from within their ranks of Unidentified Flying Objects. It would be negligent not to investigate especially after WWII and during the cold war, they could have been secret experimental aircraft from other countries which would need investigation and learning the capabilities of the aircraft. Perhaps the program has been suspended because monitoring technology, radar, satellite, etc is good enough to identify what these sightings really are?

      It was nothing like the X-Files where they investigated every hicks claim of being abducted.

    3. Re: So what? by ScentCone · · Score: 3, Interesting

      On behalf of everyone who's experienced something that doesn't have a conventional explanation... go fuck yourself.

      Have you ever noticed how hostile are the people who don't want anyone to point out they've imagined stuff? The closer a person gets to the threshold of admitting they've grasped onto a phony supernatural or extraterrestrial explanation for something, the angrier they get at everyone else who rolls their eyes because they've already figured out it was phony. Based on your anger, you're now very close to finally admitting that to yourself.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    4. Re:So what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $22 million spent looking for UFOs

      They actually didn't spend money looking for UFOs, they tried to investigate and identify those already found. From TFS: "episodes brought to them by service members".

    5. Re: So what? by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      Youre projecting; not being a millennial, I'm perfectly capable of stating what needs to be said without getting angry. ;)

    6. Re: So what? by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      On behalf of everyone who understands that "no conventional explanation" doesn't mean "I can make up whatever explanation I like", grow up.

    7. Re:So what? by swb · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Even without taking into consideration the notion of aliens, flying saucers or any similar phenomena, this program makes sense if it helps sort out problems in radar imaging, remote sensing or pilot training/target identification.

      Even if you think this $22 million was wasted "because UFOs don't exist", you have to admit that a military program to explain simultaneous failure of radar systems is money well spent if some natural or other phenomenon can be identified as tricking both sensing networks and pilots.

      Even without that kind of hard-headed practical purpose, why *not* have some kind of office to investigate weird aerial incidents, especially if they are backed by pilot testimony, radar data, FLIR imagery, etc. It's not like it would take a ton of money, especially measured in military scales.

    8. Re: So what? by ScentCone · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm perfectly capable of stating what needs to be said without getting angry

      I know, it's like smoking, right? You could quit any time but you just don't want to. That little outburst was just for fun, I guess.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
  17. $22M proves they didn't find anything. by FrankSchwab · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Imagine that the USAF investigated a UFO report, and found credible evidence that there was a real flying craft, and that it was of alien origin.

    I'd imagine their budget for following up on UFO sightings would suddenly have three zeros added to it. The supposition that this didn't happen proves they haven't found anything of interest.

    --
    And the worms ate into his brain.
    1. Re:$22M proves they didn't find anything. by careysub · · Score: 1

      Imagine that the USAF investigated a UFO report, and found credible evidence that there was a real flying craft, and that it was of alien origin.

      I'd imagine their budget for following up on UFO sightings would suddenly have three zeros added to it. The supposition that this didn't happen proves they haven't found anything of interest.

      Well, it could be buried in a black budget, if there were billions be spent on studying aliens. But I quite agree, if we had any real evidence that alien intelligence were present the result would be a project like the Manhattan Project (i.e. highly classified) and Project Apollo (which was much bigger) rolled into one. Just from a purely national security view the mere of presence of an intelligence/technology capable of travelling between the stars threatens massive disruption. All security programs, policies and expenditures could overthrown. No way this would not result in a massive mobilization of resources.

      --
      Starships were meant to fly, Hands up and touch the sky - Nicky Minaj
    2. Re: $22M proves they didn't find anything. by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      I like your simple reasoning; unfortunately, there are a few more variables on the equation.

  18. Well..... by MerlTurkin · · Score: 0

    they DO love wasting money of bullshit.

  19. They weren't looking for little green men by elrous0 · · Score: 2

    They were investigating:

    1) Possible Russian and Chinese spyplanes and experimental aircrafts.
    2) To find out what the public knew about OUR spyplanes and experimental aircrafts.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:They weren't looking for little green men by RightwingNutjob · · Score: 0

      In theory yes. In practice they funnelled $22m of taxpayer funds to one of Harry Reid's wealthy friends for a pet project of his and are trying to pass off a camera artifact or lens flare from an F-18 as justification for it.

    2. Re:They weren't looking for little green men by RightwingNutjob · · Score: 0

      Also the plural of 'aircraft' is 'aircraft.' Troll better next time.

    3. Re: They weren't looking for little green men by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      All this hot air out of your ass is a dead giveaway that you didn't even read the article.

    4. Re: They weren't looking for little green men by RightwingNutjob · · Score: 1

      I did read it. I learned from it that the radar on that warship was registering a large number of false alarms that the radar on the F-18 was not, possibly caused by the operator on the ship not knowing what he was doing and the pilots knowing what they were doing, and nowhere did the Navy pilot actually say he saw the thing with his eyes. All we're presented with is a video that for the life of me looks like lens flare, but could be any one of a half-dozen other things that aren't possible to rule in or out without knowing the exact time of day, location, and orientation of the camera field of view and knowing what sort of image processing/dithering/gain frame/dark frame was or was not being applied to generate the data that was being presented in the video.

    5. Re: They weren't looking for little green men by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Had this been Newt Gingrich and one of his wealthy friends, I'm sure the parent post would have Type44Q in the "by" line.

  20. UFOs do not automatically mean aliens! by morethanapapercert · · Score: 4, Informative
    You see something in the sky, you report to the Air Force or FBI. They have a duty to investigate it if it seems at all like a credible sighting. They are responsible for the safety of the public after all, and need to at the very least, confirm that the sighting is no threat. Further, the Air Force and the Armed Forces in general, have to know that they don't always have complete intelligence about the actions and capabilities of hostile and potentially hostile countries and groups. For most "lights in the sky" that are spotted, the VAST majority are terrestrial aircraft or terrestrial phenomenon. The term UFO properly means just that the witness couldn't recognize it.

    I remember a video that was going around the UFO community that had them all in a flap. It was a hourglass shaped object, seen hovering and darting around in a vertical posture in dusk conditions around Buenos Aires or something like that. The UFO nuts were saying that there was no such aircraft and it moved too fast to be of human manufacturer. I recognized it though. It was a CL-227 Sentinel UAV. The UFO nuts didn't notice the co-axial rotors around it's waist and misjudged how far away it was, leading them to over-estimate how fast it was moving. As far as I was concerned, the only interesting bit was that I didn't know that any South American nations even had any of them. My training identified them as being Canadian and only in use by NATO members. This is exactly the sort of thing I'd expect the US Air Force to investigate. People see funny lights or objects in the sky, the Air Force needs to find out if it's a mistaken report, a legitimate but unrecognised aircraft, or just possibly another group sending drones into US airspace for intelligence gathering.

    --
    I need a wheelchair van for my son. Help me get the word out. https://www.gofundme.com/wheelchair-van-for-jj
    1. Re:UFOs do not automatically mean aliens! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clear bright sky, about 12 noon, watching something trailing an aircraft. The aircraft had contrails, the thing trailing didn't.
      As it passed overhead, the trailing thing did a sudden 45 degree and both continued on.
      I stood there repeating, no way, nope, they don't exist.

    2. Re:UFOs do not automatically mean aliens! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (morethanapapercert, can't be bothered to log in)
      I never said that the sightings were never UFOs, just that the vast majority have mundane explanations. In your account it is possible that the lack of contrails was because it wasn't actually at the same altitude as the aircraft. A military aircraft, especially a fighter, could complete a manoeuvre that looks like an abrupt 45 degree turn from the ground. I think meteors can also pull that effect off when they start to break up. Human vision utterly sucks at depth perception beyond a few meters. You don't say whether the unknown object was large enough to allow you to see it's actual shape and orientation. Given that the aircraft being followed was showing contrails, I have to assume that the unknown object would have been little more than a speck from your perspective.

      Like a significant number of UFO sightings, your account just doesn't contain enough evidence to definitely state what the object could have been.

      FWIW, I have also seen objects in the sky that I couldn't identify, despite the fact that I took astronomy courses in a gifted student enrichment program and had formal aircraft recognition training in the Canadian Armed Forces. However, I've never seen one that made me think that alien technology was the only valid explanation.

    3. Re:UFOs do not automatically mean aliens! by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      "You see something in the sky, you report to the Air Force or FBI. They have a duty to investigate it if it seems at all like a credible sighting"

      Really? Which office of the USAF is responsible and assigned to do so? Answer: None. Oh, and as for the FBI, it's not in their swim lane either: https://www.fbi.gov/about/miss...

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
  21. The Military is how we Americans do socialism by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    No joke. After WWII Eisenhower couldn't figure out how to keep our economy from falling back into the inevitable recession that resulted from the massive wealth inequality of the 20s and 30s. His solution was the Military Industrial Complex. The theory being that the rich would pay for it (and therefore some money would make it out of their hands and into the general populace) to protect themselves. He talked about feeling guilty about it in his memoirs.

    Jokes on him. The Uber rich are global now. They're not tied down by companies anymore. So they no longer fear another nation coming and taking all their stuff. So more and more of that government military money is going to the war profiteers and less to the troops. This is why we had soldiers die from electrocution in badly made buildings in Iraq.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:The Military is how we Americans do socialism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's planned economics, not 'socialism' per se. But you're right. The tail wags the dog.

    2. Re: The Military is how we Americans do socialism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Actually Eisenhower warned against the M.I.C.
      In that same speech he warned about the rise of a 'scientific-technological elite.'

      Some would argue that was at least as valid a warning.

    3. Re: The Military is how we Americans do socialism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank God we're gonna limit the poor's access to information! #MAGA

    4. Re: The Military is how we Americans do socialism by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      Thank God we're gonna limit the poor's access to information!

      What, by taking away all of their favorite lefty news anchors because they're sexual predators, or by making them stay in union-run public schools that don't care at all about their education?

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    5. Re: The Military is how we Americans do socialism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The original draft of the speech was 'Congressional-military industrial complex', but was reduced for brevity.

  22. Our plan has succeeded by PPH · · Score: 1

    We have lulled the earthlings into a sense of complacency. Signal the mother ship that it is time to commence phase 2.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
    1. Re:Our plan has succeeded by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      We have lulled the earthlings into a sense of complacency. Signal the mother ship that it is time to commence phase 2.

      What, drive them into fighting amongst themselves with politics and social media? Mission accomplished. Begin phase 3.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  23. It has to be said by boudie2 · · Score: 1

    I, for one, welcome our new insect overlords.

  24. This Is Something They Should Be Doing by careysub · · Score: 2

    I do not believe that there are any space aliens appearing on our skies. I am skeptical even that any genuinely unexplainable events are being regularly and reliably detected (the usual UFO scenario).

    But absolutely I believe the military should maintain an on-going program to record and investigate unusual detections and reports of strange observations by trained personnel. Like listening for extra-terrestrial life with radio telescopes, if you don't look you will never see anything, and in any case this is important even if LGMs (little green men) are not even in the picture.

    It could be secret programs of other countries (or even our own) or other sorts of organizations. Could be natural events not yet identified (sprites are good example of strange things that proved quite real). You need to look to see the rare black swan.

    --
    Starships were meant to fly, Hands up and touch the sky - Nicky Minaj
  25. 22 [M]illion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That will probably buy you a typical 5 story office building in an office park, just to show the scale of the money spent here.

    1. Re: 22 [M]illion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It won't even buy you one apartment overlooking central park. Or one Ferrari 250gto. Or one Bitcoin in 2019 (ok that last part was a joke)

  26. ufos in the military != ufos in pop-culture by Lobachevsky · · Score: 4, Interesting

    UFO in the military means something different than in pop-culture. In pop-culture, it means aliens and flying saucers, and ray-guns, and Martians. In the military, it means an unidentified flying object, including flights by non-cleared personnel like hobbyists or foreign surveillance drones. Every one of our "drones" in Afghanistan would be a UFO to the Afghan military if we didn't seek clearance from them first.

    My guess is the name "UFO" wreaked of bad smell over the years and the military just changed the name and defunded the old one. They likely *still* want to investigate any sightings or blips on the radar to record when and where China or Russia are running spy drones over American soil or international waters, and hence whatever personnel are conducting those investigations are still funded, just under a better name than UFOs.

    1. Re: ufos in the military != ufos in pop-culture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People who make money selling tabloid-grade publications about 'UFO space ships' will still want their nickels, though.

      I mean, sites like Alex Jones' website rack up good money selling that stuff.

  27. Stupendous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In related news, the U.S. Military has redisclosed that some enemy combatants were harmed during overseas U.S. military operations sometime in the last seventy years.

  28. Just a guess by slshdtisctrldbysjws · · Score: 1

    More likely they put $20 million into a slush fund and just said it was for investigating UFOs because it was funny and might serve a social conditioning purpose. Certainly everyone seems a bit distracted by this story.

    --
    My karma was manually wiped by site staff https://slashdot.org/~slshdtisctrldbysjws 18 mod up, 10 mod down = bad karma
  29. LOL Harry Reid pays off campaign contributer by Crashmarik · · Score: 1

    http://www.washingtonexaminer....

    Somehow this never gets mentioned in the story here.

  30. Admits? Msmash, you inbred Indo-chimp! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I love the bias, Miss Mash.
     
    I LOVE THE CLICKBAIT BIAS.

  31. Funnily enough by aepervius · · Score: 4, Interesting

    They would have been right, seeing how the few of them (which survived their epidemic and intercine wars), were wiped out by the subsequent arrival of the white men , and all the war , conquest, and pushing away their population, new disease etc...

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
    1. Re: Funnily enough by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      Whether or not they would have been right is debatable, given that most of their decline happened before The Arrival. We would have to weigh the negative aspects against the positive ones. But, even if I accept that proposition with no qualifications, it just makes the original argument look even more silly; the fact that they WEREN'T flipping out and panicking when they had good reason to do so makes it rather irrational to assume that our populations would flip out if an alien species showed up.

    2. Re:Funnily enough by LeftCoastThinker · · Score: 2

      The arrival of the white man was the end of the Native American way of life, but we are still here. All of us smart ones integrated, intermarried and are productive members of society. A few holdouts, mostly stubborn idiots, fought the white man and lost and the ones that are still stubborn idiots live on reservations. In each generation, the smart ones move out and integrate into society.

      When someone shows up and demonstrably proves that your way of life and beliefs are backwards and wrong, the wise man accepts reality and adapts. I am not saying that the arrival of Europeans was good for Native Americans of the time, but I am glad to not be living that life today. I greatly enjoy modern civilization.

      --
      If you disagree, please post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like
    3. Re: Funnily enough by c6gunner · · Score: 2

      I suspect that's very much what would happen if a more advanced alien species took an interest in us. Assuming their goal wasn't genocide, they'd likely assimilate us. And I for one would gladly put on their space pants, learn to speak Keplerian, and join them amongst the starts, even if it meant being treated as a second class citizen for generations to come.

      Maybe they would set aside Australia as a reservation for the humans who don't want to adapt.

  32. The strangest UFOs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The strangest UFOs I've seen are those "organic" looking objects recorded with border control / military equipment. The fact that many of such equipment uses thermal imaging, causing the object to look/act very strangely and the result is very different than when recording visible light.

  33. They never stopped by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ever since Roswell NM the US government has been quietly studying UFO's or rather they are not really unidentified but identified. But have been very vigilant about not disclosing any of it to the public. Probably because when you do not know how to deal with it, then you don't talk about it.

  34. CIA declassified 13 million documents as well by MrKaos · · Score: 1

    The article in post fails to mention the New York Times story which has DOD video from an F-18 sensor recording of a UAV they are tracking.

    The BBC article posts a link to the CIA declassifying 13 million documents under the CIA's CREST archive.

    Enjoy!!

    --
    My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  35. Liberal media bias again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Funny how any negative story remotely related to a republican makes sure to call out their name and party. Meanwhile Democrat Harry Reid who requested this research gets a free ride.

  36. Three words (well, three words and a hyperlink): by TVmisGuided · · Score: 1
    --
    All the world's an analog stage, and digital circuits play only bit parts.
  37. the truest thing I've ever heard by epine · · Score: 1

    The truest thing I've ever heard is that the one big secret of Area 51 is how they spend their money.

    Toys for boys.

    Nothing beats a blank cheque like a black CC.

  38. The Universe is Massive and Diverse by LeftCoastThinker · · Score: 1

    Only a fool thinks they know everything about the universe. Given it's size and diversity, it is highly likely that aliens exist. If they are capable of interstellar travel, it is highly likely that they are vastly superior technologically to us.

    So one of two things is going on. The US is/was spending resources investigating possible UFOs which is just rational and prudent. They either have not found anything concrete, or there is a full on MIB situation, in which case, they sure as hell won't tell the world as there would be a massive shitstorm of craziness as people freaked out.

    --
    If you disagree, please post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like
    1. Re:The Universe is Massive and Diverse by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      That was a lot of words to use to say nothing of any consequence.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    2. Re:The Universe is Massive and Diverse by eaglesrule · · Score: 1

      They either have not found anything concrete, or there is a full on MIB situation, in which case, they sure as hell won't tell the world as there would be a massive shitstorm of craziness as people freaked out.

      Why would we want to adjust our notion of being at the center of the universe with it revolving around us, when there is still yet holy land left to squable over? After all, such a realization would necessitate at least some changes, and there are plenty that seem awfully interested in maintaining the status quo.

      That said, I'd like to hope we're at least of greater interest than just for an alien betting pool on when and how we blow ourselves up.

    3. Re:The Universe is Massive and Diverse by LeftCoastThinker · · Score: 1

      "That said, I'd like to hope we're at least of greater interest than just for an alien betting pool on when and how we blow ourselves up."

      Never underestimate the alien value of a medieval vacation destination. They are probably already here. I suspect "Florida man"...

      --
      If you disagree, please post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like
    4. Re:The Universe is Massive and Diverse by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      "Given it's size and diversity, it is highly likely that aliens exist."

      Given that there's been a grand total of zero evidence to back this up, the odds are much slimmer. And you don't need to "know everything about the universe" to project that. Feel free to toss out the Drake equation...it's truly meaningless since much of it is only based upon conjecture, speculation and unmeasured parameters.

      https://www.realclearscience.c...

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    5. Re:The Universe is Massive and Diverse by LeftCoastThinker · · Score: 1

      "Given it's size and diversity, it is highly likely that aliens exist."

      Given that there's been a grand total of zero evidence to back this up, the odds are much slimmer. And you don't need to "know everything about the universe" to project that. Feel free to toss out the Drake equation...it's truly meaningless since much of it is only based upon conjecture, speculation and unmeasured parameters.

      https://www.realclearscience.c...

      That is like a bacterium saying that it is unlikely that birds exist because it has never seen one in the 1cc of dirt 3 feet down where it has spent it's entire existence. Lack of knowledge about the universe does not preclude the existence of something, and is in fact only evidence of our own lack of experience in the universe.

      --
      If you disagree, please post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like
  39. Re: Escaping from AlienCon 2016 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Based on cremer's past statements, he's still using Slashdot to drive web traffic to his website. Interestingly, he recently changed his homepage link to his YouTube page. External traffic is one way to feed the YouTube algorithm.

  40. Spend more by RubberDogBone · · Score: 1

    The amount spent is a rounding error in comparison to other Pentagon spending, while the questions is asks are valid and important and deserve an impartial and fair investigation where the results lead the conclusions rather than looking for answers that fit predetermined desires.

    Why is this shit important?

    One one hand, we may have unknown machines operating in our airspaces and potentially posing a threat to civilian travel as well as our military and various no-fly-zone targets of interest all over the ground. This makes the investigation a matter of utmost national security.

    On the other hand, we have highly trained and vetted members of the military, operating our best technology and entrusted with things like securing, carrying and deploying nuclear weapons. These are the men and women we trust the most. And if they think they are seeing these phenomena, then investigating THAT is also a matter of utmost national security.

    There is no way this is not important.
       

    --
    Sig for hire.
  41. Re: Escaping from AlienCon 2016 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Interestingly, he recently changed his homepage link to his YouTube page.

    Why is that interesting?

  42. Re: Escaping from AlienCon 2016 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's interesting is Chris' personality disorders.

  43. Re: Mammoth said: There goes the neighborhood. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The arrival of the "Native Americans" was the end of the Native American Mammal way of life.

  44. Re: Escaping from AlienCon 2016 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Creimer is driving traffic from a website he controls to a website he doesn't control. You can't make money off of YouTube. Unless you're using YouTube to build an audience to drive traffic to the websites that you control. YouTube is much bigger than Slashdot.

  45. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  46. They should keep the investigation going.. by HiloJoe · · Score: 1

    until the 11the season of the X-Files is over..

  47. Re: Escaping from AlienCon 2016 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So when a few people see your shaky handheld footage of a nerd convention, they're going to be inspired to buy your Amazon books?

  48. Nothing to See Here by dcw3 · · Score: 1

    So, Harry Reid funds a pork barrel project for a buddy, and it gets headlines indicating that the DoD wants to look for UFOs? No, no it doesn't. It was simply doing what Congress required it to do. Congress creates the budget, not the Pentagon. Most likely, the only reason it was classified was to keep it from leaking out and embarrassing everyone.

    --
    Just another day in Paradise
  49. Re:Three words (well, three words and a hyperlink) by dcw3 · · Score: 1

    Three more words

    Waste of money

    --
    Just another day in Paradise