Slashdot Mirror


Power Outage Strands Thousands at US Airport. 600 Flights Cancelled (cnn.com)

An anonymous reader quotes CNN: A power outage at the world's busiest airport left thousands of passengers stranded in dark terminals and in planes sitting on the tarmac, amid a nationwide ground stop. Incoming and outgoing flights at Atlanta's Hartsfield-Jackson International Airport were halted indefinitely as crews worked to restore power, leading to hundreds of flight delays and cancellations. Atlanta is the heart of the US air transport system, and what happens there has the potential to ripple through the country.

More than 600 flights to and from Atlanta have been canceled, including 350 departures, according to Flightradar24... Flights headed to Atlanta are being held on the ground at their departure airport. Inbound flights to Atlanta are being diverted, US Customs and Border Protection said. Departures from the airport are delayed because electronic equipment is not working in the terminals, the FAA said. The cause of the incident is under investigation.

Some people stranded in the dark terminals used their cellphones as flashlights, one passenger told CNN. "There were a few emergency lights on, but it was really dark -- felt totally apocalyptic."

189 comments

  1. Apocalyptic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    here were a few emergency lights on, but it was really dark -- felt totally apocalyptic

    Time for zombie/infected flash mobs to uplift the mood!

    1. Re:Apocalyptic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's in Atlanta. Just a bunch of redneck morons having to wait, no big deal.

  2. Atlanta is the heart of the US air transport syste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Really?
    All the times I've flown in the US, never have I been there.
    Miami international, Minneapolis, Detroit, Fort Worth, Denver. Never Atlanta.

  3. Oddly unprepared by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It seems odd than an airport is so unprepared for a power outage. I'd have thought they would have enough backup generators to run essential systems. As far as fuel goes, jet fuel would likely run in at least some diesel generators.

    Sure you have to divide up the circuits so you can run essential systems, or go around and turn a bunch of stuff off. You'd need emergency lighting 24/7 at minimum and at least all the computers and security equipment.

    Sure that level of redundancy is not cheap, but in a national emergency we need air travel to work. Whatever the issue is, it needs fixed.

    1. Re:Oddly unprepared by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 2

      Essential means the tower, ILS beacons, runway lights, and radios, so planes can take off and land without crashing. All else is optional.

    2. Re:Oddly unprepared by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "It seems odd than an airport is so unprepared for a power outage."

      Simple solution. The government will prohibit the word 'power-outage' and presto, no problemo.

    3. Re:Oddly unprepared by sjames · · Score: 4, Informative

      That's the absolutely essential. Ideally though, they could also keep enough systems running to continue moving people through. That would be computer terminals, adequate emergency lighting, baggage handling, etc. While highly arguable, I suppose TSA would claim their scanners are essential for as well.

    4. Re:Oddly unprepared by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There is quite some flexibility as to the term "essential". It often just means things which are safety critical, rather than things which are needed for business continuity.

      For example, I've worked at a number of hospitals where "essential" power means: OR, ICU, limited power to clinical areas, stairway lighting, laboratories, 1 piece of imaging equipment, telephone and servers running clinical systems, limited lighting in public areas, fire alarm systems, 1 elevator. Everything else - elevators, HVAC, catering, laundry, most office space, out-patient clinic rooms, most imaging, etc. don't get power. The point being that, anything which can be rescheduled/delayed isn't "essential".

      The point is that power outages may be rare, which necessarily makes the capital and maintenance costs for essential power expensive. I could imagine an airport only providing enough essential power for safety-critical things. Most other things could be safely delayed.

    5. Re:Oddly unprepared by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No.. you need it to be safe. This is what occurred though it inconvenienced a lot of passengers. Safe means grounding any departing flights and diverting any arriving flights to alternate destinations until the crisis is over.

      I'm betting they did have backup generators for critical systems (tower flight control, landing lights, ILS, ground-to-air radios, ground-based-phones and radar) to make sure the people both inbound and outbound could be kept safe.

      This doesn't include full lighting in the terminals, keeping the food court running perfectly or free in-terminal WIFI...

      Yes it is inconvenient and it sucks but in a *national emergency* (which this wasn't.. this is/was a temporary power outage at one of thousands of airports across the globe) nobody needs to be on a plane except the military and the sitting president.

      Peace out.

    6. Re:Oddly unprepared by pete6677 · · Score: 1

      US domestic airlines don't know the meaning of the phrase "contingency planning". All of their operations immediately go to shit at the slightest hiccup.

      Delta won't recover from this until early 2018, with the holiday travel rush coming just after they get this mess sorted out.

    7. Re:Oddly unprepared by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everything else - elevators, HVAC, catering, laundry, most office space, out-patient clinic rooms, most imaging, etc. don't get power.

      Do the elevators get power for a short time, to let out anyone who happens to be in the elevator when the power goes out?

    8. Re: Oddly unprepared by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope they had Bruce Willis on standby, just in case.

    9. Re: Oddly unprepared by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Time to watch the Christmas classics!

    10. Re:Oddly unprepared by Max_W · · Score: 1

      I would add check-in counters, ticketing, customs, immigration. People cannot just come in to a plane from the street.

    11. Re:Oddly unprepared by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      I know. We should go back to when the government called things like this a "man-involved disaster."

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    12. Re:Oddly unprepared by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Can't see the need for jet fuel. Airports must have plenty of diesel. There's huge numbers of airport vehicles that don't leave the airport. Most of them can't just drive down the highway to the nearest gas station.

    13. Re:Oddly unprepared by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And then there are the fuel pumps.
      Planes can't leave without fuel.

    14. Re:Oddly unprepared by stooo · · Score: 1

      >> -- felt totally apocalyptic.
      it's only the beginning.

      --
      aaaaaaa
    15. Re:Oddly unprepared by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 1

      I once worked at a company where "essential" meant "the computer that handles payroll". Seriously. When there was a major power outage, that was the first system for which UPS power got checked.

    16. Re:Oddly unprepared by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Were passengers prepared? I always carry a small power bank with suitable mixture of cables. And I can put my phone into a power-savings mode.

    17. Re:Oddly unprepared by danbert8 · · Score: 1

      Reading the news, many of the planes weren't able to be filled or emptied because the jetways require electrical power. A modern airport can't really accommodate the amount of passenger throughput without even simple technology...

      --
      Yes it's an anecdote! Were you expecting original research in a Slashdot comment?
    18. Re:Oddly unprepared by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I'd have thought they would have enough backup generators to run essential systems

      They do. Essential systems are the ones that keep the flying planes in the air, not ones that keep the airport fully functional.

    19. Re:Oddly unprepared by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      That would be computer terminals, adequate emergency lighting, baggage handling, etc.

      In your list that etc part is very long and includes many more systems. Airports require a phenomenal power draw during normal operation those computer terminals you list alone number in the thousands. It isn't as simple as keeping the lights on and shuffling people around using hand-written notes.

    20. Re:Oddly unprepared by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Simple solution. The government will prohibit the word 'power-outage' and presto, no problemo.

      Don't worry, you'll also discover that WAPO lied to you ... again.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    21. Re:Oddly unprepared by jbengt · · Score: 1

      Sometimes one elevator in a bank is designated to be connected to emergency power. Sometimes, hydraulic elevators will make a non-powered return to the first floor upon losing electricity. I'm assuming a cable elevator can do similar.

    22. Re:Oddly unprepared by jbengt · · Score: 1

      I'm involved in an emergency generator construction project for an airport that was previously the world's busiest. They will have an 18 MW capacity. The system was designed to run for 4 hours from the diesel fuel tanks located in the generator building ( a code requirement) and for 48 hours including the underground diesel fuel storage tanks located at the heating and refrigeration plant. (a request from the user and insurer) A lot of things are connected to the generators, but they have a load shedding program to drop power to less essential items if there is too much draw. Those with the highest priority are fire suppression systems, emergency lighting, and air traffic safety (which I believe, has its' own backup). Lowest priority are items that the tenants want in order to stay in operation.

    23. Re:Oddly unprepared by acoustix · · Score: 1

      Essential means the tower, ILS beacons, runway lights, and radios, so planes can take off and land without crashing. All else is optional.

      That's strange, because my company built a new HQ in the mid 2000's and we're required to light up the building like the Las Vegas Strip during a power outage. How is an airport not required to do at least the same? There were reports that people stranded in the terminals couldn't see because there were so few emergency lights.

      --
      "A plan fiendishly clever in its intricacies"- Homer Simpson
    24. Re:Oddly unprepared by jbengt · · Score: 1

      Yes, at another large airport I've done work at they have160,000 gallons of diesel fuel just for backup for the heating plant and emergency generators. That does not count the fuel stored for the trucks and buses, which the generators would not have access to, anyway.

    25. Re:Oddly unprepared by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 0

      "It seems odd than an airport is so unprepared for a power outage."

      Simple solution. The government will prohibit the word 'power-outage' and presto, no problemo.

      Or maybe they could buy some generators instead of hiring another airport diversity commissioner. But that wouldn't win as many +1 Snarky mods.

    26. Re:Oddly unprepared by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Scanners are not 'essential', your luggage can simply wait till normal power is restored and then they deal with the backlog.

    27. Re:Oddly unprepared by sjames · · Score: 1

      If the luggage doesn't move, people don't move either.

    28. Re:Oddly unprepared by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NYT reported a fire in a substation probably caused the outage, and ALSO knocked out an emergency backup system. Single failure knocks out both primary and backup.

    29. Re:Oddly unprepared by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

      I think it is one at time each one goes to landing and then 1 in the bank becomes the only working one when on backup power.

    30. Re:Oddly unprepared by wyHunter · · Score: 1

      Yeah it's like Obama calling the attack on fort hood "workplace violence."

    31. Re:Oddly unprepared by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most major airports have redundant power feeds from two different power generators. Whats weird in this instance is that both feeds fed into the same distribution point which is what caught on fire?

    32. Re:Oddly unprepared by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get over it republican shill. It was workplace violence, he worked there and it was no different than the guy that goes postal after he is fired.

  4. If only... by goombah99 · · Score: 1

    If only they had a large number of mobile power plants they could just fly in...

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
  5. Thanks Trump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One less way for deplorable immigrants to get into our great country. But, donâ(TM)t forget to build that wall!

  6. What happened to backup generators? by sinij · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What happened to backup generators? You would think that such crucial infrastructure system would have backup generators to run important systems.

    1. Re:What happened to backup generators? by WankerWeasel · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They certainly have backup power for critical systems like air traffic but remember that an airport is basically a city. 275,000 people a day pass through that airport. The eleven different four-car trains there carry 200,000 people each day. The terminal is 6.8 million square feet. Just to keep some lights on so people don't panic requires a ton of backup power. Providing power for all the baggage handling, runway lights, and all other systems is a HUGE ask. Powering it during normal times likely takes damn near its own power plant. Running it on backup power would an insane requirement.

    2. Re:What happened to backup generators? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given the way the US seems to work, I'd sarcastically (hopefully) respond to that saying they probably sold the useless backups to prop up the stock price last quarter. :p

    3. Re:What happened to backup generators? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      We did up until recently have a robust power generation capacity, but it lacked sufficient power to run the automated passenger immobilization & compression system required to load the next generation of aircraft (late 2019 and beyond). There are also no generating systems on the market which are capable of powering the new equipment, so it would serve no purpose beyond keeping the lights and computers running. If primary power shuts down, we lose the ability to load passenger-bearing aircraft and will have to shutdown anyway, so we might as well slightly reduce our operating expenses.

      Anyway, the vacated space where the backup generators were previously located will be re-purposed for additional luggage mis-routing capacity, as well as for disregarding the complaints of some of our more vocal customers.

    4. Re:What happened to backup generators? by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 5, Informative

      It can be done pretty easily, it just costs money. Airports like Honolulu have on-site backup generation, but not sure what percentage of the load it covers— my guess would be about 65%.

      For Atlanta the load should be around 35-40MW. 5-6 Turbines would cover it, but it would be about $20 million, and then you need to make sure your common points of failure with utility power are manageable, which would likely double the cost.

    5. Re:What happened to backup generators? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The cause of the power failure may also prevent the backup generators from being able so supply power. If there's a short somewhere, you can't just add more power and hope it'll work.

    6. Re: What happened to backup generators? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "the automated passenger immobilization & compression system..."

      The what????
      WTF is wrong with you?

    7. Re:What happened to backup generators? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Enough to keep the communications systems working to tell flights to divert to their alternate airports.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    8. Re:What happened to backup generators? by HotNeedleOfInquiry · · Score: 2

      They don't need backup generators for this kind of fault. Just a second main power feed from the grid. There's plenty of power in the city of Atlanta, just no way to get it to the airport.

      --
      "Eve of Destruction", it's not just for old hippies anymore...
    9. Re:What happened to backup generators? by pete6677 · · Score: 1
    10. Re: What happened to backup generators? by bagofbeans · · Score: 1

      Whooosh? Humour alert... it's how the next generation of passengers will be transported.

    11. Re:What happened to backup generators? by jrmcferren · · Score: 2

      NO FUCKING EXCUSES! This is a major hub, the entire airport is a critical goddamn circuit, and don't give me the load of bullshit about the amount of power either when this same country has a CITY with a UPS! That's right, Fairbanks, Alaska has enough battery power to run the city until the emergency plant can come on if the line to Anchorage fails Atlanta airport is nothing.

      --
      sudo mod me up
    12. Re:What happened to backup generators? by Known+Nutter · · Score: 1

      They don't need backup generators for this kind of fault.

      Has the nature of this power failure been determined?

      --
      Beware of the Leopard.
    13. Re:What happened to backup generators? by WankerWeasel · · Score: 1

      Fairbanks has a population of 32,751. This airport sees more than 839% more people come through in a single day. The two aren't anywhere near comparable.

    14. Re:What happened to backup generators? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They can land planes just fine. There is just nowhere to offload passengers.

    15. Re:What happened to backup generators? by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 2

      It isn't as far off as you might imagine though. The Australian Tesla battery plant as an example could give the whole airport ~3 hours of ride-through. Break it up so you have backup at each substation and you are in pretty good shape.

    16. Re:What happened to backup generators? by WankerWeasel · · Score: 1

      The Tesla battery factory likely has the most battery power on the planet. That's like saying they'd be fine if they just had their own nuclear power station.

    17. Re: What happened to backup generators? by c6gunner · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Referring to 40 MW as "backup power" is a bit ridiculous. That's a whole new powerplant right there.

      Anyway, it looks like there was a fire which not only cut power but also damaged some of the backup systems.

    18. Re:What happened to backup generators? by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      There's plenty of power in the city of Atlanta, just no way to get it to the airport.

      Send it FedEx/UPS by air ... oh, wait.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    19. Re:What happened to backup generators? by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      The grid storage projection Australia. 129MWh.

    20. Re: What happened to backup generators? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I work for a company that manages a relatively average sized datacenter (A few thousand servers, which in my industry is not all that much), and we have over 1MW of on-site generation. If we can do it for a medium-sized entertainment website, ATL should have no excuses for having backup power for essential transportation infrastructure.

    21. Re:What happened to backup generators? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suspect that there was a fire something like in a room containing switchgear, circuit breakers, or control circuitry.

      ATL is a big airport, so it requires many MW of power. That means a substation will be distributing power to its various circuits, and the substation is going to be what switches between grid power and generator power. If there's a fire at the substation, though, you're fucked.

      dom

    22. Re:What happened to backup generators? by stooo · · Score: 1

      That's wrong.
      There is plenty of space on the ramp, and there are some mobile stairs too.
      Offloading is not a problem.

      --
      aaaaaaa
    23. Re:What happened to backup generators? by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      One single gas turbine derived from a large aircraft engine should be able to generate that much electrical power. GE LM9000 comes to mind.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    24. Re:What happened to backup generators? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doubt anyone will see this as I'm AC, but I work in this area, and I don't think "double the cost" would come close to handling on demand backup power of 35-40 MW. You're essentially talking about having an entire backup power plant if you want to do this right, and you're not doing that for anywhere near that number when you go through the entire process required to spec, bid, get past regulation, build, etc. Well designed, efficient backup of even 1 MW will run you a cool mil easily, unless you're cheaping out significantly and OK with a solution that won't work (yes, people do this, strangely enough!). It can be done without a full plant, but you have to look at any of this with long term maintenance costs, etc., for any type of government bid. It's just nowhere near as cheap as people think it is, especially because once you start getting into a certain level of wattage, we're not talking something you can just "wire in and go".

      It's also worth pointing out that Honolulu's airport isn't even 1/10th the size of Atlanta's airport. Many of these things just don't scale how people would expect.

    25. Re:What happened to backup generators? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      So you don't need a power plant you only need a power plant?

    26. Re:What happened to backup generators? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fairbanks has only 7 minutes of battery power and their local power site (Chena) has a maximum output of only 27.5 MW. It may be impressive that a city has such a capability, but it would not be sufficient for Atlanta's airport.

      dom

    27. Re:What happened to backup generators? by brix · · Score: 1

      Good call - Turns out (at least the Mayor is saying) that was exactly the case. The substation fire also damaged the switch to the backup system.

    28. Re:What happened to backup generators? by PrimaryConsult · · Score: 1

      According to one of the CNN interviews, a plane that landed at 1:15 didn't get access to a portable stairway until 7:30. Unless they authorize emergency slides, or were lucky enough to be regional jets with built-in stairs, there were still limiting factors.

    29. Re:What happened to backup generators? by jbengt · · Score: 1

      $20 million is an very low estimate,especially for construction at an airport with all the security requirements, the need to work around airport operations, the need to keep the place open 24 hrs a day / 365 days a year (366 on leap years), etc.

    30. Re: What happened to backup generators? by jbengt · · Score: 1

      ORD has (will have when construction is complete) 16 MW emergency generator capacity. That is backup. The way the place is wired, they just connected at the switchgears to everything, but with automatic switches to shed loads so as to not overlaod the generators.
      Still, if one of those switchgears were to catch fire, the way one apparently did at Hartsfield, a large area would be without main power and without backup power, but it would be likely confined to a single terminal.

    31. Re: What happened to backup generators? by jbengt · · Score: 1

      Correction: Six 3 MW generators for 18 MW capacity.

    32. Re:What happened to backup generators? by jbengt · · Score: 1

      They already had a second feed.

    33. Re: What happened to backup generators? by sheph · · Score: 1

      Ever been through security at a major airport? Not very mobile, and somewhat compressed. The future has arrived.

      --
      I don't believe in karma, I just call it like I see it.
    34. Re:What happened to backup generators? by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      You don't necessarily need efficiency (or an SCR) for a backup system. Diesels would be cheaper, and for six concourses would likely be an easier approach, but it just comes down to how the distribution is set up and what single points of failure you want to manage.

  7. Too cheap to buy/maintain a generator... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I am not surprised by this. Airlines and cities look at UPSes and generators as a cost center that don't bring in money, so let them wind up falling into disrepair, or not buying them in the first place. It isn't surprising this happens because there is little to no interest in disaster prep other than things terrorist based.

    I live in a state that is often mocked for a flyover state. However, the state capital's airport has "n+1" generators, with both natural gas and diesel powered, so the airport can run indefinitely if the grid goes down for a while.

  8. Re:Moscow Donald is going to prison for TREASON by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'm far beyond being able to figure out whether these posts are made by genuinely crazy liberals or just people trying to make liberals look crazy.

  9. Re:Atlanta is the heart of the US air transport sy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    yup. atlanta. mainly due to the hub-and-spoke structure of commercial airline routes. this is delta's primary hub for the eastern half of the country.

    more passengers fly through atlanta than any other airport in the world.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    and also busiest when measured by number if aircraft.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

  10. Cut power line to an airport at Christmas?!? by elrous0 · · Score: 5, Funny

    And John McClain just tweeted that he's about to pick his wife up from the airport!

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:Cut power line to an airport at Christmas?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yippee ki yay

    2. Re:Cut power line to an airport at Christmas?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Nonsense, how could the same thing keep happening to the same guy?

    3. Re:Cut power line to an airport at Christmas?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "yippee ki yay"

      That's yippee ki yay, motherfucker!

    4. Re: Cut power line to an airport at Christmas?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where there is smoke there is fire

    5. Re:Cut power line to an airport at Christmas?!? by bagofbeans · · Score: 1

      Wonderful. Now I want to re-watch them all in one sitting. Of course, the first one triggers a sad loss :(

    6. Re: Cut power line to an airport at Christmas?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great exit though.

  11. Atlanta is the heart of the US air system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Atlanta is the heart of the US air transport system"

    ORD, DIA, DFW, JFK, LAX would like a word...

    Also, IAD, MIA, even SFO are probably closer to the heart then ATL

    1. Re:Atlanta is the heart of the US air system by sjames · · Score: 2

      ATL is busier than all of those every day *Yes, including JFK). MIA is much smaller.

    2. Re:Atlanta is the heart of the US air system by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      Atlanta is a hub.

    3. Re:Atlanta is the heart of the US air system by Pauldow · · Score: 1

      Old Joke:

      When I die, I don't know whether I'll be going to heaven or hell, but one thing's certain; I'll have to change in Atlanta.

    4. Re:Atlanta is the heart of the US air system by bagofbeans · · Score: 2

      Exactly! If it had been implemented as a router, it would have been much more effective!

    5. Re:Atlanta is the heart of the US air system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not according to Wikipedia.

    6. Re:Atlanta is the heart of the US air system by danbert8 · · Score: 1

      I would think LUV would be the heart of the air transport system...

      --
      Yes it's an anecdote! Were you expecting original research in a Slashdot comment?
    7. Re:Atlanta is the heart of the US air system by sjames · · Score: 1

      That's just the international traffic. Try this link instead.

    8. Re:Atlanta is the heart of the US air system by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      United has, or used to have, an advertising campaign where they talk about how great their service is. Here's an example. It shows all flights to one destination, and then one, solitary flight to "friendly". I think they intended to have a smiley face effect, but all I thought when I saw it was that if I wanted "friendly" it was at another airport.

    9. Re:Atlanta is the heart of the US air system by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      Okay....good one.

  12. Re: Moscow Donald is going to prison for TREASON by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Donâ(TM)t worry about the Russians. Sarah Palin is keeping her eye on them from the safety of her home in Alaska.

  13. Elsewhere in the airport, John McClane is... by BenJeremy · · Score: 1

    ...stopping a heist of gold bars being shipped through the airport. All he was doing was catching a flight home for the holidays.

    1. Re:Elsewhere in the airport, John McClane is... by mrbester · · Score: 1

      M Night Shyalaman twist: this time it's John McClane seriously fucking with an airport.

      --
      "Wait. Something's happening. It's opening up! My God, it's full of apricots!"
    2. Re:Elsewhere in the airport, John McClane is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That movie is so implausible, it'd make much more sense if they were shipping the infinitesimally valuable BitCoins.

  14. Re: Moscow Donald is going to prison for TREASON by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While we're on the topic of timely and relevant jokes, do the one about Iraqi WMDs or Michael Dukakis' spelling.

  15. $5 a passenger fee can fix that! by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    $5 a passenger fee can fix that!

  16. Atlanta is not âoethe heart of the US air tra by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

    âoeAtlanta is the heart of the US air transport systemâ

    Absolutely not.

    I fly quite a lot for work, which is on the US east cost, and canâ(TM)t recall the last time I had to go through Atlanta.

    Yes it sucks that this airport was down, especially for Delta, but itâ(TM)s hardly a crippling event for the US.

    Let me know when JFK or Oâ(TM)Hare/Midway is out...

  17. Re: Atlanta is not âoethe heart of the US air by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, you could google the worlds busiest airports to understand

    or I could shit all over you by pointing out that you are apparently not a legit business traveler. Every legit business traveler knows Delta is the way to go and that means ATL, DTW or MSP in the US. Of the three ATL is by far the best, MSP is a distant second and DTW is to be avoided at all costs.

    What Iâ(TM)m saying is, sorry you have to fly some non-delta bullshit airline and lol I was in ATL after a redeye yesterday and my wife took off from ATL around 11 this morning

    that place is fucked right now holy shit

  18. Re:Ban bump stocks & msmash agenda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What are you even talking about, man? Are you drunk?
     
      The key to it all and the redeeming thing about the 600 flights being cancelled is that we will now have that much less fossil fuel burned. We are talking about thousands of Olympic swimming pools full of Jet Fuel not burned. And in 10 years, who's going to remember this holiday season anyway?

  19. Depending on the failure, Generators won't help! by dfenstrate · · Score: 1

    They certainly have backup power for critical systems like air traffic but remember that an airport is basically a city. 275,000 people a day pass through that airport. The eleven different four-car trains there carry 200,000 people each day. The terminal is 6.8 million square feet. Just to keep some lights on so people don't panic requires a ton of backup power. Providing power for all the baggage handling, runway lights, and all other systems is a HUGE ask. Powering it during normal times likely takes damn near its own power plant. Running it on backup power would an insane requirement.

    And to pile on, if you took out the central switchgear, you're screwed regardless of having generators. Offhand it appears they didn't think too much about redundancy or diversity when designing the airport's electrical system..... 'half the power is gone' would be a much less sensational headline!

    --
    Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms should be the name of a store, not a government agency.
  20. in case you didn't know... by irving47 · · Score: 1

    DELTA hub...
    "Duh, Everything Leaves Through Atlanta"

    --
    I had a sucky sig.
  21. Positive effect: by no-body · · Score: 0

    Sure stops air pollution - those airplanes do pump out a lot of garbage into the air.
    Check out how many tons of fuel a Trans- Atlantic takes with a passenger plane.

    1. Re:Positive effect: by BlueStrat · · Score: 1

      Sure stops air pollution - those airplanes do pump out a lot of garbage into the air.
      Check out how many tons of fuel a Trans- Atlantic takes with a passenger plane.

      Also on a rather bizarre note, during the power outage TSA agents were allegedly spotted wandering around aimlessly and acting very confused. One agent reportedly attempted to detain a trash receptacle for interrogation, and another was said to have been spotted giving a 'pat down' to a support column and becoming agitated that the column would not 'spread wider please' and proceeded to attempt to have the column arrested. No details were available regarding the specific charges the column faces.

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
  22. Possibly intentional? by OFnow · · Score: 2

    Some folks with no love for the US have been experimenting lately. A recent incident involved corrupting some systems intended to prevent wide-scale power interruptions. One wonders if this was simply a proof-of-concept operation. One hopes this is thoroughly investigated. Not just written off as embarrassing.

    1. Re:Possibly intentional? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bomb iran

    2. Re: Possibly intentional? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Just finished Lights Out the other day and heard about this when I landed(not in ATL). I wouldn't be surprised if it turns out to be intentional. I hope if enough of these smaller events happen, maybe it will help us prepare for a large scale event.

  23. backup.generators by n329619 · · Score: 1

    What happened to backup generators?

    Airport Guy: Backup generators? You mean a backup and generators? We had both, but we never tested the backup and the generators are dead.

  24. Re: Moscow Donald is going to prison for TREASON by haruchai · · Score: 1

    " Michael Dukakis' spelling"
    That was Dan Quayle

    --
    Pain is merely failure leaving the body
  25. Re: Moscow Donald is going to prison for TREASON by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a payed troll tactic that I think is being automated somehow. It gives search engine bots an automatic excuse to burry "fake news" or "hate speech" when it detects key words. Three letter agencies and large corporations only need a few guys to start an outrageous rant like above, and it's faster than emailing Google to take it down. Slashdot WILL have to use a third partly like Disqus in a year or two.

  26. Re: Depending on the failure, Generators won't hel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Backup generators require maintenance as well. Especially if they are rarely used.

    When I was in middle school we had a quick brownout. It was less than a second but it triggered the generators. They weren't needed and one got fried and caught fire.

  27. Atlanta can't be the busiest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Busier than JFK or LAX? Doubt it.

    1. Re:Atlanta can't be the busiest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Facts don't bother you much do they?
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_the_busiest_airports_in_the_United_States

  28. Re:Atlanta is the heart of the US air transport sy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It shouldn't be this way.
    too centralized and too much of the "all your eggs in 1 basket" issue.
    For security of our whole air travel infrastructure they need to break it up into 4 smaller airports spread out more

  29. It may be an accident... by DavidMZ · · Score: 1

    Yet, I cannot help thinking about the wired article about power outages in Ukraine.

  30. Re: Moscow Donald is going to prison for TREASON by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hate to tell you this, but Sarah Palin never said she could see Russia from her house - that was Tina Fey, acting as Sarah Palin, on Saturday Night Live.

  31. Re: Atlanta is the heart of the US air transport s by Type44Q · · Score: 2

    It shouldn't be this way.

    Someone should tell all the travelers that they need to arrive in the U.S. from some other direction.

  32. Re: Moscow Donald is going to prison for TREASON by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nope

  33. Re:Moscow Donald is going to prison for TREASON by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

    Slashdot is mainly white guys entering fox news age: it's getting noticeably more conservative over the years as new blood fails to come in.

    Anyway, these near-copy-pastas are never serious. See Dr. Bob chiropractic for example.

  34. Any confirmation? by Blinkin1200 · · Score: 1

    Any confirmation Bruce Willis was seen in the area?

    Or maybe this is a sign of things to come with the new Air Neutrality agreement...

    Can we shutdown the interstates next?

  35. Re: Atlanta is the heart of the US air transport s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they already do. JFK is the busiest airport in the u.s. for international passenger traffic. and the only one in the u.s. among the top 25 busiest (at number 19) worldwide by that metric.

  36. Re:Atlanta is the heart of the US air transport sy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's largely because the USA's network is rather insular, and the majority of Delta's flights are to/from ATL. (There's essentially two check-in areas - "Delta" and "Other".)

    it's not 'gateway to the USA', the way SFO, LAX, JFK, DFW, HNL or IAD are. Rather it's USA-to-USA interconnection, but most visitors to the USA arrive via a gateway airport and then go to where they're heading as those airports have enough connections inwards. ATL is mostly Delta and Delta is rather US centric, so chances are you didn't fly to the USA on Delta, which means you probably didn't go via ATL.

    TL;DR: Delta focuses on Americans. ATL is Delta hub.

  37. Re:Depending on the failure, Generators won't help by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 2

    A backup system limits the common points of failure with the primary system. While there are plenty of airports with co-generation plants that can backfeed the primary utility circuits supporting the airport, this is generally not considered a backup system. (LAX has about 20MW of generation in their central plant, but IIRC it doesn't have black-start capability, as an example.)

    Airports have the benefit of being big; generally, a properly designed system will maintain reduced operations under failure conditions. It won't eliminate an incident, but it can drastically reduce the impact of a major problem. You can sacrifice a concourse, but you limit the impact on other concourses so you can keep moving in the degraded state.

  38. Decrepit Infrastructure by techdolphin · · Score: 1

    Maybe if we rebuilt our decrepit infrastructure we wouldn't have these problems.

  39. How is it that these major airports lack by ToddInSF · · Score: 1

    the proper infrastructure to even operate ?

  40. Have they never heard of backup generators? by Chas · · Score: 1

    Seriously?

    They never thought about a backup power scenario?

    EVER? In 90 years?

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  41. felt totally apocalyptic by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

    As opposed to partially apocalyptic.

    a poc a lyp tic - adjective:
    - describing or prophesying the complete destruction of the world.

    That said, I was in the Atlanta airport at 4am once, many years ago, for a red-eye layover from LA to Norfolk and it was pretty quite and creepy.

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  42. Re: Moscow Donald is going to prison for TREASON by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Funny how people upgrade to being conservative as they get older and wiser.

  43. Re:Moscow Donald is going to prison for TREASON by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He is even though no evidence has been released showing that. We all know it's true considering how much the media is talking about it.

  44. Re: Moscow Donald is going to prison for TREASON by greenwow · · Score: 0

    Wrong. That is fake news. We know she said it since the media has attributed it to her so many times.

  45. Not a supply issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The power outage wasn't because of a brownout.

    Baseline, as in base load, power is also a myth. Coal plants, as with most others, can be made to either throttle slowly or react quickly. There are self-starting power plants, and there are power plants that require grid power to start. All of this has been planned out.

    The reason coal plants are dying is because of the stupid international commodity markets. The people that control the money are really enamored with how inexpensive natural gas is over the long run in comparison to coal and coal dust. This isn't SimCity.

    1. Re:Not a supply issue by stooo · · Score: 1

      >> The reason coal plants are dying...
      The reason coal plants are being phased out is their lack of competitiveness.

      --
      aaaaaaa
  46. 2nd major delay in as many weeks... by Drakonblayde · · Score: 4, Informative

    I was stuck at Hartsfield for 11 hours last week thanks to the snowstorm that hit Atlanta.

    The snow wasn't all that bad. The problem was that the planes had to be deiced before they could take off. Hartsfield only has 4 de-icing pads. It takes about 15 to 20 minutes to de-ice a regional jet, about an hour to de-ice one of the heavies. I was listening to ground control pretty much the entire time (thank you LiveATC app), and it was a mess. Pilots weren't responding to directions properly, creating an even bigger traffic jam. There was no clear order in which the planes were going to be de-iced, it was decided by the airlines based on priority of flight and the order wasnt always communicated to the ground control tower, so the ground controllers couldn't even line them up in the order they were going to be de-iced. This combined with the lack of speed to de-ice the planes led to a number of flights having to return to the gate in order to avoid tripping over the 3 hour rule. This also resulted in other flights not pushing back from the gates, since once they close that cabin door, the 3 hour countdown begins. Incoming flights were delayed or cancelled because there weren't gates open for their passengers, and since inbound flights were getting cancelled, outbound flights were as well since the planes that would be servicing those outbound flights were no longer inbound.

    It became apparent to me that this wasn't a weather problem. It was a major inefficiency in airline operations. Yeah, I know, it's Georgia (I lived in the Atlanta metro area for over 2 decades) and it doesn't snow that often, but you'd think the busiest airport in the US would be better equipped to handle something like de-icing planes, especially given the ripple effect that disruptions at Hartsfield has on not just US transport, but globally as well. The international disruption isn't that bad, those flights can be diverted pretty easily, but domestic flight? There aren't any nearby airports that are even close to capable of handling the load that Hartsfield does.

    And then today there's a major power outage that disrupts one of the busiest travel weekends of the year.

    Maybe now they'll pay attention and revamp Hartsfield's operations so that it doesn't fuck everyone plans up.

    1. Re:2nd major delay in as many weeks... by edtice1559 · · Score: 1

      How many de-icing stations is one expected to keep in a area of the country chosen because it rarely drops below freezing.

    2. Re:2nd major delay in as many weeks... by Mal-2 · · Score: 1

      Either none if keeping the airport operating below freezing is not important, or as many as airports further north that freeze frequently. Doing things by halves was as good as useless, and costs far more than doing nothing. Go big or stay home.

      --
      How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
    3. Re:2nd major delay in as many weeks... by jbengt · · Score: 1

      An hour to de-ice? Sounds ridiculously long.

    4. Re:2nd major delay in as many weeks... by Drakonblayde · · Score: 1

      That would be a valid question if it wasn't for the fact that problems at Hartsfield have a bigger effect than just the area of the country that rarely drops below freezing.

      Busiest airport in the US. The only way you get to that state is by landing and departing a very large number of flights. There aren't enough flights in the southeast to garner that distinction, so when Hartsfield is fucked up, its more than just the southeast that's fucked up. Gotta stop thinking of Atlanta as just a georgia airport, its a hell of alot more important in domestic travel than that.

    5. Re:2nd major delay in as many weeks... by Drakonblayde · · Score: 1

      That's what the ground controller was telling the pilots, and I believe it. I've had to sit through a deicing process while boarded on a CRJ900 before, and it was about 20 minutes. The heavies are way bigger, and since they have to inspect the body after deicing to make sure they got it all, thats alot more plane to cover, so I can believe it takes longer.

      The thing that surprised me is that the airport apparently doesnt have any deicing trunks. If you pull up a map of the airport, the area marked Ramp 20 are the deicing pads. Seems like it'd be a hell of alot more efficient to roll some decing trucks and hit the plane while it's at the gate.

    6. Re:2nd major delay in as many weeks... by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      Seems like it'd be a hell of alot more efficient to roll some decing trucks and hit the plane while it's at the gate.

      Collecting the deicing fluid before it hits the aquifer or other environmentally sensitive area is the problem.

    7. Re:2nd major delay in as many weeks... by edtice1559 · · Score: 1

      Well it has to be more than below freezing. Even in northern airports (I used to fly out of Pittsburgh all the time), there are often delays associated with de-icing. You don't need to do it every day or even all day.

    8. Re:2nd major delay in as many weeks... by edtice1559 · · Score: 1

      Which is why they have de-icers at all!

    9. Re:2nd major delay in as many weeks... by Mal-2 · · Score: 1

      I'm not arguing that. I'm saying that if an airport is going to have de-icing machines with the intent of keeping operations going in freezing weather, then it damn well should have enough of them to continue operations. Of course there will be delays, but in this case the delays were so long that the airport was non-functional and would have been better off just ceasing operations as soon as the problem became evident. Either have enough de-icing stations to do the job and keep things sort of moving, or don't have any. In between measures just delayed the inevitable, and cost money.

      --
      How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
    10. Re:2nd major delay in as many weeks... by edtice1559 · · Score: 1

      More machines would have helped. But it also sounds like there was terrible operational planning. If you can only deice a certain number of planes (you have a throughput of X/hour), you should really decide which ones are gong to get de-iced *before* loading passengers on them. Otherwise all you do is burn fuel and waste time before you have to turn back to the gate. I don't think any airport has as much de-icing capacity as runway capacity.

  47. 99.999% uptime by raymorris · · Score: 1

    That was my first thought. Then it occurred to me I don't recall hearing this ever happen before at an airport. Perhaps they have sufficient backup systems to handle any expected power outage, but those backup systems failed for whatever reason, or transitioning to them failed. I'm sure they've needed to switch to backup power before; we probably didn't hear about it because it switched over just fine in the past.

    I've seen incidents where a web server had two independent backups that both failed. Good, redundant design can give you 99.999% uptime, but Murphys law is always awaits.

  48. Re:Atlanta is the heart of the US air transport sy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That makes sense then.

  49. Rich folk be rich by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Puerto Rico has been without power for months.

    Atlanta is so special that their rich people on a plane are more important than daily life for Puerto Ricans?

    Utter first world problem.

    If you think this story is more important than the Puerto Rico story, you might need some perspective and some time at church to get your caring and love back.

  50. Re: Depending on the failure, Generators won't hel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Use the backup systems every Sunday morning 3am - 4 am.

  51. Re: Atlanta is not âoethe heart of the US air by Cederic · · Score: 1

    Every legit business traveler knows Delta is the way to go

    So to test this I just randomly checked flights between two arbitrary US cities. Then another pair.

    One pair, lots of direct flights, Delta nowhere near the cheapest. The other pair, all needed a change, Delta nowhere near the cheapest - and Delta's change wasn't in Atlanta.

    I made sure one of the pair was on the East Coast each time.

    So as a legitimate business traveller that prioritises direct flights and cost effective travel, why the fuck would I fly Delta?

    Maybe you meant to say, "As a legitimate collector of Delta airmiles, irrespective of the cost to my employer"?

  52. Preparedness is just hard work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Read the timeline and the trending of the comments here.
    It appears that the Hartford airport's life safety emergency systems required by the building codes worked. See NFPA 110 life safety code if you want details. However the life safety code only handles keeping the facility "safe" it does not keep it functioning.

    While shutting down the airport complex is expensive, that needs to be compared with the investment needed for massive redundancy and / or emergency operations planning. Now that the event has occurred and the impact is on record, I anticipate Hartford airport will spend efforts to have an emergancy plan ready if a site power outage occurs again.

    1. Re:Preparedness is just hard work by wyHunter · · Score: 1

      It also requires smart people in management, something the USA lacks. "Like, wow, man, I'm gonna get how much in stock options?"

  53. "Redundant" systems damaged by electrical fire? by OneAhead · · Score: 3, Insightful
    CNN Reports:

    The electrical fire's intensity damaged two substations serving the airport, including the airport's "redundant system" that should have provided backup power, Reed said.

    Am I the only one who finds it strange that two supposedly redundant systems are housed under the same roof, or at least so close together that both of them can be damaged by the same fire? At my last employer, we duplicated stuff that is far less critical over 2 buildings located at a good distance from each other...

    1. Re:"Redundant" systems damaged by electrical fire? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It does seem like GaPwr is a bit lacking in location diversity.

      It would be interesting to see what they said when they got the power feed plan approved.

    2. Re:"Redundant" systems damaged by electrical fire? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably like the same mistake New Zealand made
      Electrical trunk reached 100% of its rating, Pointy hairs said hey it works at 140%, and we can do 200% without spending. It broke down for weeks. Once overloaded it takes only a water leak or a rat to set the place on fire, if repeated cycling does not find teh weakest link. .

    3. Re:"Redundant" systems damaged by electrical fire? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      What? Your last employer spent money?

    4. Re:"Redundant" systems damaged by electrical fire? by Shimbo · · Score: 1

      Am I the only one who finds it strange that two supposedly redundant systems are housed under the same roof, or at least so close together that both of them can be damaged by the same fire?

      Possibly. At some point you need to join your A and B feeds together; unless you are going to put dual power supplies into just about everything, which would be wildly impractical for something as large as an airport.

    5. Re:"Redundant" systems damaged by electrical fire? by wyHunter · · Score: 1

      It's as odd as the backup generators for Fukushima were in a basement in an area prone to tsunamis, unlike the ones at fukushimi daiini, which were in the containment building.

    6. Re:"Redundant" systems damaged by electrical fire? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Possibly. At some point you need to join your A and B feeds together; unless you are going to put dual power supplies into just about everything, which would be wildly impractical for something as large as an airport.

      Not really no. I believe most airports are divided into enough distinct sections that half could run from one power path and the other half could have a completely separate power path. That way even if you combined things where the generators link up, you would still have half the airport operating regardless.

  54. Why no generator? by sjbe · · Score: 1

    A power outage at the world's busiest airport left thousands of passengers stranded in dark terminals and in planes sitting on the tarmac, amid a nationwide ground stop. Incoming and outgoing flights at Atlanta's Hartsfield-Jackson International Airport were halted indefinitely as crews worked to restore power, leading to hundreds of flight delays and cancellations. Atlanta is the heart of the US air transport system, and what happens there has the potential to ripple through the country.

    Have airports ever heard of something called a standby generator? Yes it would have to be a big one for an airport but it only really has to power operationally critical systems. If the starbucks is without power for a few hours, who cares? I have a hard time believing they cannot cost justify some sort of power redundancy to keep flight operations going for several hours at minimum.

    Yes I read the bit about a substation being damaged. If a fire to a single substation screws up the backup power then it wasn't actually a backup. The entire point of a backup is to eliminate single points of failure. Backup power has to come from a physically independent source for anything larger than a UPS on a PC and the only common transmission should be the final few feet to the point of use in most cases.

    1. Re:Why no generator? by jbengt · · Score: 1
      >blockquote>The entire point of a backup is to eliminate single points of failure.

      You're still going to have a single point of failure at the switchover point, no matter what you do. Not that that should allow a single fire to take down two separate substations, but you never know if the reporter understands what they're being told let alone translates properly so the reader understands.

  55. Hold my beer... by CRB9000 · · Score: 1

    Bet it started when some drunk said, "Hold my beer, watch this."

  56. Optimism by sjbe · · Score: 1

    Maybe now they'll pay attention and revamp Hartsfield's operations so that it doesn't fuck everyone plans up.

    That's mighty optimistic of you. I'm reasonably confident they will do a good approximation of absolutely nothing and have the exact same problem again in the future. I really try to avoid that particular airport as much as I can. I've flown through Atlanta Hartsfield quite a few times and the number of times I've gotten through that airport without some flight operations fiasco occurring might be 20-30% of the time. There always seems to be at least a minor delay and I've been stranded there overnight more than once. Maybe just my bad luck but it seems to happen way to consistently to just be me.

  57. Don't feed the trolls by sjbe · · Score: 1

    Atlanta is so special that their rich people on a plane are more important than daily life for Puerto Ricans?

    Of course they aren't but let's be honest. Atlanta is one of the busiest airports in the world and interrupted flight operations there have literally global effects on our transportation network. Puerto Rico is a tragedy but of a completely different sort. Just because Puerto Rico is a sad situation doesn't mean we should overlook current news until that issue is fixed. This isn't an either/or scenario.

    Utter first world problem.

    Puerto Rico is literally a territory of the United States and so by definition is part of the First World. You are being quite condescending towards the people of Puerto Rico to pretend otherwise.

    If you think this story is more important than the Puerto Rico story, you might need some perspective and some time at church to get your caring and love back.

    Nobody was arguing it is more important. Methinks you are trolling.

    1. Re:Don't feed the trolls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, Puerto Rico is a third world country. Median family income $18K. Rest of US: ~60K. Uneducated people. Corruption in every corner. Incompetence in every corner. Just like most other Spanish-speaking countries. Yes, technically it is part of the US, due to craziness in 1898. So what?

      And, yes, Atlanta airport is more important than all of Puerto Rico and its people. Sorry, must face reality.

  58. Easy justification by sjbe · · Score: 1

    Fairbanks has a population of 32,751. This airport sees more than 839% more people come through in a single day. The two aren't anywhere near comparable.

    Then with that much commerce going on it should be trivial to justify the cost of a properly designed backup power system. Especially when you consider the full costs of a shutdown at such a major airport.

  59. So build a backup power plant by sjbe · · Score: 2

    Referring to 40 MW as "backup power" is a bit ridiculous. That's a whole new powerplant right there.

    What's your point? A major transportation hub like Atlanta easily does enough commerce to justify a standby power plant. Heck, power companies maintain these already for times of need. Wouldn't be hard to work out a deal to share the cost.

    Anyway, it looks like there was a fire which not only cut power but also damaged some of the backup systems.

    If one fire can damage the backup systems then they weren't really backup systems now were they?

    1. Re: So build a backup power plant by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      So true. They should really have a 40 MW backup powerplant for their 40 MW backup powerplant. That's just poor planning right there.

    2. Re:So build a backup power plant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have clearly never don pe work in reliability. Single point of failure can be minimized but only rarely can they be removed.

  60. Re: Atlanta is the heart of the US air transport by orlanz · · Score: 1

    I would hope the US ranks pretty low in global international travel. We only have 2 big countries bordering us and neither has a lot of air travel. Outside them, everyone is 5+ hours away by flight.

    While Hong Kong, London, Shanghai, etc are centers of commerce with multiple countries within 2 hours of flight. In many parts of the world, you would cross multiple countries flying from one side of Texas to the other.

  61. Re:Atlanta is the heart of the US air transport sy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've always read that Chicago's O'Hare is the busiest airport in the world. When did it change?

  62. Re:Atlanta is the heart of the US air transport sy by jbengt · · Score: 1

    It changed back and forth a couple of years ago if you go by number of flights, but O'Hare lost its' No. 1 status way earlier than that if you go by number of passengers

  63. At US airport? by OneHundredAndTen · · Score: 1

    Atlanta-Hatfield is not just a US airport. If things go bad there, that's likely to have a knock-on effect on the whole of the US, and on many intercontinental flights.

  64. Re:Atlanta is the heart of the US air transport sy by jbengt · · Score: 1

    It's not really all eggs in one basket. There are several other airports in the US with similar numbers of flights, and even Delta has other hubs, .like Salt Lake City, Minneapolis, Detroit, & NY, though its' headquarters and largest hub is Atlanta.

  65. NTSB incident by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will they have to file an official report and trigger an investigation?

    Title 49 830.2

    Incident means an occurrence other than an accident, associated with the operation of an aircraft, which affects or could affect the safety of operations.

    They might squeak by without having to tell the story?

  66. TRITON Malware? by brix · · Score: 1

    My first question would be whether the Georgia Power substation was using Triconex Safety Instrumented System (SIS) controllers.

    See this post last week by FireEye, where an attack was made in a similar scenario.

    From the post, "We have not attributed the incident to a threat actor, though we believe the activity is consistent with a nation state preparing for an attack."

  67. Re: Depending on the failure, Generators won't hel by jbengt · · Score: 1

    I worked on a project where the backup generators passed weekly tests with flying colors, then failed under load during an actual power outage because they weekly tests didn't include a load bank.

  68. Let me guess... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tomorrow's headline: "(insert state sponsor here) Hackers To Blame For Airport Power Outage"

    lol...

  69. Re: Atlanta is the heart of the US air transport by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From http://www.iata.org/pressroom/pr/Pages/2012-12-06-01.aspx, we find this tidbit that gives you a sense of how crazy big the US airline market is, even given the lack of nearby international destinations...

    By 2016, the top five countries for international travel measured by number of passengers will be the United States (at 223.1 million, an increase of 42.1 million), the United Kingdom (at 200.8 million, 32.8 million new passengers), Germany (at 172.9 million, +28.2 million), Spain (134.6 million, +21.6 million), and France (123.1 million, +23.4 million).

  70. Re: Moscow Donald is going to prison for TREASON by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This ^ Of course some just don't have the cerebral capacity to move on from adolescence.

  71. A whacko loon's impersonating me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: To whom it may concern - the freak I'm replying to has some dumb scheme in impersonating me folks - ignore him.

    * He's just a butthurt fool that tried to "take me on" in tech stuff & lost badly to his public dismay is all - I've seen it before & it makes me LMAO!

    (His "kind" brings it on themselves & this is their WEAK effete 'retaliation')

    APK

    P.S.=> You're a whackjob freak - no questions asked - this has to be the 10th time you've impersonated me this week alone...apk

  72. Re: Moscow Donald is going to prison for TREASON by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

    Yeah, just like how they "upgrade" to baldness, obesity, impotence, higher blood pressure, Alzheimers, cancer, liver spots, incontinence, sagging skin, old man stink, nearsightedness, forgetfulness...

  73. Re: Atlanta is the heart of the US air transport by orlanz · · Score: 1

    But those countries populations do not even add up to the US. Just their growth in international travel is 1/3 to 1/4 their population. But the comparison is not really proper. International airtime there is equivalent to domestic interstate travel here. Berlin to London is shorter than Atlanta to Dallas.