Slashdot Mirror


Russian Submarines are 'Prowling Around' Undersea Internet Cables (thehill.com)

An anonymous reader quotes The Hill: Russian submarine activity around undersea cables that provide internet and other communications connections to North America and Europe has raised concerns among NATO officials, according to The Washington Post. NATO officials say an unprecedented amount of Russian deep-sea activity, especially around undersea internet lines, constitutes a newfound "vulnerability" for NATO nations. "We are now seeing Russian underwater activity in the vicinity of undersea cables that I don't believe we have ever seen," said NATO submarine forces commander and U.S. Navy Rear Adm. Andrew Lennon. "Russia is clearly taking an interest in NATO and NATO nations' undersea infrastructure."
"The Russian Defense Ministry did not respond to a request for comment about the cables," reports the Washington Post, adding that "prowling around" the cables "could give the Kremlin the power to sever or tap into vital data lines, officials said."

They cite the commander of NATO's submarine forces, who says "We know that these auxiliary submarines are designed to work on the ocean floor, and they're transported by the mother ship, and we believe they may be equipped to manipulate objects on the ocean floor."

175 comments

  1. Why is Russia suddenly so much cooler than us? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Man, they've really been kicking sand in our faces lately. It's somewhat embarassing.

    1. Re: Why is Russia suddenly so much cooler than us? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We can fix this with war

    2. Re: Why is Russia suddenly so much cooler than us? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's very likely heading that way.

      Making sure you can cut ground comms is a big step in attaining that. Keep the people confused and break the interwebs. Half of the people today addicted to facebook aren't going to know what to do with themselves and will probably start crying.

      I could totally see something stupid, unhelpful and altogether wasteful kicking off between russia, china and the us.

    3. Re: Why is Russia suddenly so much cooler than us? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There's not much cool about being a repressive regime with a struggling economy and rampant corruption.

    4. Re: Why is Russia suddenly so much cooler than us? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can also see America being stupider than Russia in this. That's why Putin games Thumper with such ease. We'd do better if we didn't always lead with our ego.

    5. Re: Why is Russia suddenly so much cooler than us? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You're being silly, comrade. If they wanted to cut the cables they'd do that instantly. A depth charge could accomplish that without even needing a diver.

      The threat is if they can install splices and listening devices. Any idiot with an anchor can take out a fiber cable as happens periodically.

    6. Re: Why is Russia suddenly so much cooler than us? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We can fix this with war

      Hillary, is that you?

    7. Re:Why is Russia suddenly so much cooler than us? by gtall · · Score: 2

      Really? Look at their mortality rate. They aren't cool.

    8. Re: Why is Russia suddenly so much cooler than us? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Two points:

      1: Russia is fucking with everything now because the terrorist boogeyman was not enough to keep the idiots in line and preoccupied so they donâ(TM)t notice that both parties are conspiring with the banks to rob everyone blind

      2 The only thing standing between the American and Russian people is their governments

    9. Re:Why is Russia suddenly so much cooler than us? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Russia hunts terrorists and removes their bases and support structures. A very simple mission that everyone can support and understand.

      The USA is doing regime change, supporting color revolutions globally.
      So the USA has to create, support and supply "freedom fighters" all around the world.
      That gets difficult to spin as been good news.
      Faith based groups funded and supported by the USA trying to take over normal governments who do not want to fall to US backed faith based insurgents.

      Russia has one simple mission to help stop terror.
      The USA has to help remove governments globally supporting anyone who wants to become a freedom fighter.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    10. Re: Why is Russia suddenly so much cooler than us? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or is that anchor really a grappling hook?

    11. Re: Why is Russia suddenly so much cooler than us? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did he finally sign them?

      It's not about cutting them off. At least not right now, though remote ability to do so would be useful.

      It's about the intell.

      Thankful President Trump has assured us there is no cyber threat.

    12. Re: Why is Russia suddenly so much cooler than us? by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 2

      Umm. No.

      Russia can never become a 3rd-world country. They're 2nd-world and always will be, so long as they exist. That's literally the definition of 1st, 2nd, and 3rd world countries:

      1st world: The US, UK, and their allies.
      2nd world: Russia and its satellite states
      3rd world: Everyone else.

      The only way Russia can cease to be 2nd world and enter the 3rd world is for it to collapse entirely and cease to exist as Russia.

      --
      Imagine all the people...
    13. Re:Why is Russia suddenly so much cooler than us? by vtcodger · · Score: 1

      The concern is what? The Russians might interfere with NSA monitoring gear installed on the cables?

      Why the folks in Washington, London, Brussels, and Bonn are determined to make enemies out of Russia, Iran, and -- if possible -- China eludes me. (North Korea is perhaps a somewhat different case as Kim Jong-un may actually be crazier than Trump -- assuming that to be possible). As Rodney King once said, "Can't we all just get along?"

      Anyway, IMO the chances of worldwide digital communications remaining up for more than a few hours in the event of serious conflict between advanced countries are about zero. The undersea cables and satellite links will stay up just long enough to take down most of the internet connected critical infrastructure on both sides. I make it about six hours between the first "shot" and the last cat picture being received from the last functioning ISP.

      But that's only a guess.

      --
      You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
    14. Re: Why is Russia suddenly so much cooler than us? by BoFo · · Score: 1

      The US and UK have already tapped the underwater cables. That is the whole story behind Edward Snowden's revelations -- that was how the NSA and GCHQ got around encryption, by tapping the unencrypted lines between, for instance, Google servers. The US and UK also hacked into Proximus in Belgium in order to listen in on GSM conversations. https://www.theatlantic.com/in... As usual, this is more NATO agitation, designed to muddy the waters and develop excuses for further demonization of Russia. The sooner NATO is dissolved and the EU takes control of their own defense, the safer the world will be.

    15. Re: Why is Russia suddenly so much cooler than us? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Da, da, Ivan. Kakaya pogoda segodnya v Moskve?

    16. Re:Why is Russia suddenly so much cooler than us? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? Look at their mortality rate. They aren't cool.

      Really? Look at their median / average temperatures. They're quite chilly.

    17. Re:Why is Russia suddenly so much cooler than us? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man, they've really been kicking sand in our faces lately. It's somewhat embarassing.

      Things like, oh, say, "red lines".

      Draw one, and then say, "Nah, I didn't really mean it" when it gets crossed.

      Imagine how a bully would respond if he took your lunch money, you told him "Do that again and I'll kick your ass!". The next day, the bully comes to take your lunch money and you not only give it him you give him an extra fiver and say, "Please don't do it again?"

      Yeah, that bully is laughing at your ass now.

  2. Simple solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Deploy surveillance equipment around the undersea cables. If Russian submarines are operating there, gather intelligence about their submarines and maybe carry out some espionage. Make it a risky proposition for the Russians to keep playing these games.

    1. Re:Simple solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good luck with that - a few thousand miles of murky dark to keep eyes on. That'll work.

    2. Re: Simple solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We already have the ability to detect the submarines, otherwise we wouldn't know they're going near the undersea cables. The combination of sonar and heat from the nuclear reactors makes them easy to track.

    3. Re:Simple solution by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      A few thousand miles of murky dark to keep eyes on. That'll work.

      Well, if it's going to work why wouldn't they do it?

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    4. Re: Simple solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The US has done this in the past with Soviet/Russian undersea cables. Read up on the USS Halibut and its missions.

      Can't imagine Dr Ballard was only doing above the board [sic] work with the Alvin.

      And the DSRV minisubs weren't only for sub rescues...

      Kinda hard to do inductive taps on fiber optic cables. Someone on both ends will notice if a fiber optic cable gets cut...
      So then the way to do this would be to infest one of the cable-laying companies. Cause a cable break, and have your krewe on the repair ship put in the fiber optic taps in as part of the "repair".

      Would be intriguing if both Russian & NSA krewes were on the same ship trying to compromise the same cable at the same time...awkwatd!

      No, NSA probably has their taps in at the demarc points, where the cable comes out of the seas onto land.

    5. Re: Simple solution by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      Read the wording of these stories. They don't know jack shit. They assume, because that's what they have been doing for a long time.

      Read up on Jimmy Carter.

    6. Re:Simple solution by vtcodger · · Score: 1

      I'll be very surprised if there is much about Russian military capability that is not known to the US. And vice versa. It's really hard to keep secrets these days.

      --
      You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
  3. US used to (still does?) tap Russian cables.. by TigerPlish · · Score: 5, Informative

    The US used to (still does, I bet) tap Russian cables. Turnabout is fair play?

    Read "Blind Man's Bluff" for stories of us playing all sorts of crazy sub games against the Russians.

    Kinda feels like we've got a new Cold War, don't it? Only now it's an Information / Data / Commerce thing, not a Nukes thing.

    --
    The "Civilized World" jumped the shark ca. 1973.
    1. Re:US used to (still does?) tap Russian cables.. by Kenja · · Score: 4, Funny

      Do unto others as you forbade them doing unto you!

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    2. Re:US used to (still does?) tap Russian cables.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Turnabout is fair play?

      There is no "fair." Grow up please.

    3. Re:US used to (still does?) tap Russian cables.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      The US used to (still does, I bet) tap Russian cables. Turnabout is fair play?

      Read "Blind Man's Bluff" for stories of us playing all sorts of crazy sub games against the Russians.

      Kinda feels like we've got a new Cold War, don't it? Only now it's an Information / Data / Commerce thing, not a Nukes thing.

      There are two problems. Russia is attacking and succeeding in destabilizing our country is one. The second is the number of people that are complicit in it, either because the don't want to accept the truth, or because being complicit actively put them in an advantageous position, or advanced positions they favored. In short a lot of people, whether they say it or not believe the ends justify the means. They don't. They never have.

      The same problems apply to other countries. No one should expect that Russia or other bad actors are suddenly going to become good. The fact that the US at times has not been innocent doesn't excuse it either. That is the world we are in.

      You can't really secure undersea cables, beyond detecting tampering to some extent. Encrypt both ends and hand carry updated keys daily if you have to. You can also simply use a true random number generator to fill a hard drive and clone it then hand carry that. Change keys periodically till you run out of keys. Hand carry with as much security as necessary.

      In short there is no good reason not to secure the endpoints. Sure it may take custom expensive hardware, but compared to the cost of a new undersea cable that is nothing. You probably can't prevent Russia from cutting a cable, but you can make any tap useless.

    4. Re:US used to (still does?) tap Russian cables.. by currently_awake · · Score: 2

      The Russians are probably trying to trace how/where the USA taps undersea cables. Following those taps would tell them where the American intelligence bases are located around the world, and help them develop countermeasures against anyone tapping their cables.

    5. Re:US used to (still does?) tap Russian cables.. by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      The US used to (still does, I bet) tap Russian cables.

      No, former US President Jimmy Carter is NOT tapping undersea cables . . . he is building new houses for poor folks.

      Well, he does plant a few bugs in the homes . . . might as well do that while the studs are still bare.

      Oh, and I guess Carter does a wee bit of cable tapping: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      But we're the good guys, so tapping is OK for us to do.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    6. Re:US used to (still does?) tap Russian cables.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah except this is specifically around NATO country cables, Einstein. The 5-Eye doesn't need to tap those. It controls both ends and the inline monitoring sensor net. Russia is trying to develop taps on NATO cables, OR this is a ruse to bring out the US top-secret robotic minisubs for observation/capture. If you recall China tried to steal one of the less-secret drones earlier last year.

    7. Re:US used to (still does?) tap Russian cables.. by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      Does the word 'escalation' mean anything to you?

    8. Re:US used to (still does?) tap Russian cables.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      My money is on the idea that Russia is doing whatever it can covertly to destabilize or destroy NATO, which would enable Putin to begin invasions (either covert or outright) with little to no resistance, due to no co-ordination in the EU. Divide and conquer. Remember NATO was formed to keep Russia in check. I'm pretty sure that's chafed Putin's backside his entire life.

    9. Re:US used to (still does?) tap Russian cables.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps our governing officials will start seeing the value of strong encryption that does not have backdoors?

    10. Re:US used to (still does?) tap Russian cables.. by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 2

      The US used to (still does, I bet) tap Russian cables. Turnabout is fair play?

      Read "Blind Man's Bluff" for stories of us playing all sorts of crazy sub games against the Russians.

      Kinda feels like we've got a new Cold War, don't it? Only now it's an Information / Data / Commerce thing, not a Nukes thing.

      Besides, this activity has been vetted and approved by the Republican party. It's part of th eparty platfoem now.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    11. Re:US used to (still does?) tap Russian cables.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They know where the bases are, lol.

    12. Re:US used to (still does?) tap Russian cables.. by AHuxley · · Score: 4, Informative

      The West likes to think nobody can recall Ivy Bells.
      That was within territorial waters and off limits to foreign vessels.
      Operation Ivy Bells https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    13. Re:US used to (still does?) tap Russian cables.. by mikeiver1 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Was going to bring up just this same thing... We tapped the undersea cable in the sea of Okhotsk in the early 70s, operation Ivy bells was the name of it. So they are sniffing around the cables? Big whoopy. The fact is that they can monitor/ interrupt data just fine by compromising the network infrastructure that the internet runs on. I suspect that they are looking at the easiest locations to sever the cables in a time of war. Remember that the Chinese are also out there in the cyber war arena as well. Throw in the North Koreans and the Iranians and the environment is pretty grim. The fact is that they are all facing the American industrial and military as targets of their cyber efforts to even the technological fields and to be ready for possible disruption. We are good but they are many. That and we train them in our schools and then send them home...

    14. Re:US used to (still does?) tap Russian cables.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The phrase "turnabout is fair play" is quite common among adults.

      Perhaps it is you that needs to grow up.

    15. Re: US used to (still does?) tap Russian cables.. by Cochonou · · Score: 1

      Indeed, the Jimmy Carter submarine is believed to be specialized in that task. Of course, all of that outrage is fake - it is just part of the international game. For both parties, it just makes encryption even more worthwhile.

    16. Re:US used to (still does?) tap Russian cables.. by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      The US used to (still does, I bet) tap Russian cables. Turnabout is fair play?

      Nope, this is geopolitics, not a game.

      Kinda feels like we've got a new Cold War, don't it

      Yup, and just like any war, I want my side to win. (Also, not commit war crimes. But short of that, all is supposed to be fair.)

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    17. Re:US used to (still does?) tap Russian cables.. by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      I'll take that bet. How much money are you willing to gift me on the bet of "Russian invasions of NATO"?

    18. Re:US used to (still does?) tap Russian cables.. by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      Geopolitics by definition is a game.

      Just because stakes are high doesn't make it any less of one.

    19. Re:US used to (still does?) tap Russian cables.. by Freischutz · · Score: 1

      The US used to (still does, I bet) tap Russian cables. Turnabout is fair play?

      Read "Blind Man's Bluff" for stories of us playing all sorts of crazy sub games against the Russians.

      Kinda feels like we've got a new Cold War, don't it? Only now it's an Information / Data / Commerce thing, not a Nukes thing.

      And the Russians spied on the US, got a hold of US naval cipher machines, decoded US naval signals traffic into the 1980s, stole all kids of other military information and industrial trade secrets, compromised and blackmailed politicians, the list goes on. It's not as if the Russians were somehow unfairly victimised and that we should let them tap our signals traffic wholesale to make up for our past unfair transgressions against poor mother Russia because there weren't any. I say chase these subs off, if they refuse to leave sink them. If they claim their subs are't there the won't be missed when they are torpedoed. That's what the Russians would do if NATO subs refused to stop skulking around their undersea cables and no mistake about it. One thing is for sure, the NATO countries had better start checking these cables every couple of months or so for bugging devices. Either way, you'd better start encrypting all of your signals traffic, if the Russians aren't listening it's the NSA, the Brits, the French, the Germans, the Chinese .....

    20. Re: US used to (still does?) tap Russian cables.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Also, not commit war crimes. But short of that, all is supposed to be fair."

      So everything not covered in the numerous treaties, conventions, and U.N. rules that govern war?

      Obviously stupid statement is obviously stupid.

    21. Re:US used to (still does?) tap Russian cables.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >not a Nukes thing.

      One word: Crimea.

    22. Re:US used to (still does?) tap Russian cables.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't see the point of tapping undersea cables today. 1950's Cold War undersea cable tapping I can understand, maybe.

      What is it Russian's want to tune into on undersea cable now that we on dry land can't get? Is there anymore "online" than being online? What secret is so fn secret that it needs to go across an undersea cable, because no other form of communication is secure enough?

    23. Re:US used to (still does?) tap Russian cables.. by Megol · · Score: 1

      And still NATO behave like children apparently.

      Now THAT'S scary!

    24. Re:US used to (still does?) tap Russian cables.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Russians are probably trying to trace how/where the USA taps undersea cables.

      Go look at a map of undersea cables.
      There is no reason whatsoever for the US to tap the cables under the sea. It is much easier to tap them when they reach land and are within US borders.
      There aren't many undersea cables that doesn't go to the US.

      South America to the rest of the world goes through US.
      The rest of the world is mainly land cables.

    25. Re:US used to (still does?) tap Russian cables.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Newsflash: it's right for the police to carry weapons, conduct surveillance (within court orders) and so on, it's not right for mafia to do the same thing. And Putin's Russia is increasingly behaving like a mafia thug and not a civilised member of the world community.

    26. Re:US used to (still does?) tap Russian cables.. by ElizabethGreene · · Score: 1

      Thanks to Mr. Snowden, the US programs that do this are Tempora, Oakstar, Stormbrew, Blarney, and Fairview.

      "Thou hypocrite, first cast out the beam out of thine own eye; and then shalt thou see clearly to cast out the mote out of thy brother's eye." Matthew 7:5

    27. Re:US used to (still does?) tap Russian cables.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the American Way... sigh.

    28. Re: US used to (still does?) tap Russian cables.. by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      Umm... short of new tech hat needs to be addressed, yes? I'm not sure what not-covered thing you think is unjust...

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    29. Re:US used to (still does?) tap Russian cables.. by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      Just because it has multiple competing actors doesn't make it a game. There is no universal set of rules (with the exception of the war crimes mentioned earlier) that govern how nation-states act, and certainly no referee to appeal to. It's a competition, but not agame because a game is better organized, has clear win conditions, etc.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    30. Re:US used to (still does?) tap Russian cables.. by hey! · · Score: 1

      The Soviets screwed up by assuming that cables at the bottom of the ocean couldn't be tapped. It's now public knowledge that they can be tapped. So tapping data lines does them no good unless they can break encryption that is routinely used these days.

      So looking at exploit scenarios, there's two that stand out. The first is that Russia discovers (or plants) a weakness in some commonly used crypto software, and then quietly uses that with their taps. The second is that they simply disrupt communications at some point where it will do maximal damage.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    31. Re:US used to (still does?) tap Russian cables.. by McFortner · · Score: 1

      They have. As soon as somebody figured out you could use submarines to do this to underwater cables and not get noticed doing it, both sides started from the early telegraph lines, to phone lines, to internet. Everybody who can spies on everybody else, even their friends. Remember the old Russian saying, "Trust, but verify."

      --
      Beware of Sales Reps bearing gifts.
    32. Re:US used to (still does?) tap Russian cables.. by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      So any game that doesn't have clear win conditions, or isn't well organised isn't actually a game?

      When you have to redefine meanings of words to suit your narrative, you concede.

    33. Re:US used to (still does?) tap Russian cables.. by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      I'm not redefining words. Please give me your definition of game.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    34. Re:US used to (still does?) tap Russian cables.. by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      Common definition.

  4. silent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    They're probably laying time bombs or remote activation bombs for when they attack Estonia.

    1. Re:silent by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      And preparing ICBMs to attack US, since MAD is in effect.

  5. In before Putlerbots pretend all news is fake news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I'm so tired of the Mainstream Military telling us Russia's aggressive, coordinated program to probe our vulnerabilities is a potential threat! Why don't they investigate Hillary's submarine crimes?"

  6. How is this news? by argStyopa · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I'm astonished: either the news-makers are amazingly stupid (the US has more or less openly discussed their task-specific subs capable of tapping such cables for twenty years...which means they've been able to do it for at least thirty), or this is another mendacious effort to paint the Russians as some sort of special bogeyman (they're still our primary strategic competitor, as they have been more or less for decades even after the cold war...an idea the previous president openly mocked, I'll remind everyone).

    Either way this isn't news: it's either ignorant or manipulative. In neither case is it worth listening to.

    --
    -Styopa
    1. Re:How is this news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      Yes, comrade, Russia probing the US undersea cables with greater frequency has no meaning or value, we should all just drink Vodka and forget our treasonous POTUS and remove the sanctions. The Rubles are in the mailski, Manafort sends his handjobs.

    2. Re:How is this news? by gtall · · Score: 0

      Wow!!! You must be getting all the memos. Could you please publish your sources so we can all believe the same thing?

    3. Re:How is this news? by AHuxley · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Everyday slashdot has to get its "Russia" story pushed out.
      Today its about submarines.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    4. Re:How is this news? by sound+vision · · Score: 2

      It's worth listening to if you're concerned with how Cold War II is playing out, which is among the most important geo-political developments of the 7 to 10 years. What would be ignorant is if you choose to ignore what's going on in the world.

    5. Re: How is this news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The article is full of weasel words. Seems rather specious. And so what if they are? If you aren't using encryption, I assume you want someone else to read your data. Of course, you should only encrypt if you have something to hide, right?

    6. Re:How is this news? by fafalone · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It's because it's righteous and just when we do something, but evil when Russia does the same thing. Come on, everyone knows that.

      I don't believe for one minute that the NSA doesn't have every major undersea cable tapped.

    7. Re:How is this news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's righteous and just when we do something, but evil when Russia does the same thing

      Would you feel better if "we" did everything that Russia does?

    8. Re: How is this news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't knock it, it keeps you lot in work.

  7. Re: Why is Russia suddenly so much cooler than us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    That was the point he was making. Russia does seem much cooler.

  8. Re: Why is Russia suddenly so much cooler than us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're really concerned with how "cool" a past-prime superpower looks? Gee, what an important consideration you fucking Trump buffoon.

  9. Quantum Chinese. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now we know why the Chinese are building a quantum network so it doesn't matter if one has the capability or not. Any taps will be detected.

  10. merkins are only upset by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    because it makes it harder for them to do so to EVERYONE including their 'allies'.

  11. Just another chapter or banter in this game by no-body · · Score: 3, Interesting

    towards well, your guess as good as mine..

    Fact is that nervousness is increasing with all the little acts some "not so smart" people are undertaking.

    How did wars start? Some event, be it a shot or some other rocket started, when the exciting level is pushed up and the spark ignites.
    Are people learning from the past, looking at the current actors, definitely no. All feeding their own insanity and the millions either seduced by emotional excitement or staying remote in disgust are suffering from those the games those jerks play.

    Truly amazing that this nonsense still happens.

    System failure, reset & reboot, but on what hardware???

    1. Re:Just another chapter or banter in this game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We do all understand that all of the trans-atlantic and trans-pacific cables are heavily insulated.. and fiber-optic right? No submarine.. alone just trolling through the water could actually intercept information without direct penetration of the cable infrastructure itself.

      Having said that.. it seems they are plotting the location of cables which if they wanted to, they could just sever at their will with whatever weapon they choose and cut the information flow between NATO nations.

  12. More concerning by Okian+Warrior · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The US used to (still does, I bet) tap Russian cables. Turnabout is fair play?

    Read "Blind Man's Bluff" for stories of us playing all sorts of crazy sub games against the Russians.

    Kinda feels like we've got a new Cold War, don't it? Only now it's an Information / Data / Commerce thing, not a Nukes thing.

    A more concerning question is: Have they installed cable severing devices that can be remotely triggered? I suppose a remotely-triggered bomb would be easy enough, but it might be something more sophisticated, such as a method to turn off a repeater and then turn it back on again later.

    If we ever get into a war with a country that has submarines (or Disney, for that matter), expect intercontinental internet and phone service to be gone for the duration.

    This would be a crippling economic tactic, so long as the US would suffer more than the country at war. For most countries it would be a net win for them.

    I can't think of any realistic way to protect this asset, either.

    Maybe satellite internet (per previous Slashdot article) isn't such a bad idea?

    1. Re:More concerning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't say that intercontinental communication would be totally severed in such a war, but the cheap intercontinental communication that we enjoy today would probably become pricey using sat links as backups.

      Russia has to be careful because they stand just as much chance fucking up their ability to globally communicate.

    2. Re:More concerning by mysidia · · Score: 2

      A more concerning question is: Have they installed cable severing devices that can be remotely triggered? I suppose a remotely-triggered bomb would be easy enough, but it might be something more sophisticated,

      Well..... we should help our carriers inspect our cables, and if anyone's installed such a device, then that in itself is an act of war and must be met with sanctions against the country responsible.

      In fact.... we really should NOT tolerate foreign nations poking about with ANY craft on the ocean floors between other countries without permission from the countries adjoined by that section of ocean --- they're only allowed to transit their vessels through that space; the ocean floor itself and any cables is clearly the right of way and property of the countries that cables across that floor would intersect, And no other country has any legitimate business or right messing with, affecting that property, or "mapping out" cables in the first place...

    3. Re: More concerning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... how would this be crippling exactly?

      Aside from the already on going war ?

    4. Re:More concerning by Freischutz · · Score: 1

      Maybe satellite internet (per previous Slashdot article) isn't such a bad idea?

      It is, right up until they start shooting down each others satellites. On the bright side though, whoever finds an economic way to clean up massive amounts of orbital debris stands to make a killing once the shooting stops.

    5. Re:More concerning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hilariously sad.....so in the middle of the Atlantic, which two countries have exclusive right to have cables in the ocean floor? How are you drawing "the line" between two counties? straight, shortest distance, least amount of terrain changes (mountians, canyons, etc), soft or hard floor? And of course after drawing a straight line between each country on one side of an ocean to each country on the other side of the ocean and also to the same side of the ocean none of those lines cross each other -- what type of geometry are you using?

    6. Re:More concerning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Declare attack on internet and comms as using a weapon of mass destruction.
      Our policy is to retaliate to WMDs with WMDs, ans we don;t discriminate between types of WMDs.

      So, declare cutting a cable as using a WMD and then Nukes are allowable by policy.

  13. In international waters ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To cut the undersea cables is a declaration of war, right?

  14. Re: Why is Russia suddenly so much cooler than us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course they're tapping more cables. As if any country with the resources isnt or doesnt! Its 'cyber' cold war now and for the forseable future. Everyones part of it too, not just russia and the usa.

  15. Re: Why is Russia suddenly so much cooler than us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did you mean Bush Sr/Jr?

  16. Instant Internet kill switch... by willy_me · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You can bet that there will be explosives placed in various locations under the main internet communication links. Should it be required, a remote detonation signal could be sent and then say goodby to the internet. I suppose if they were going to go that far then they would also disable / destroy any satellites. Europe and the US would have almost all communications cut - good luck responding to a Russian threat in a timely manner.

    This is all theoretical but if I were Russia, I would do it. Much easier then tapping into cables and there would be no way to find said explosives.

    1. Re:Instant Internet kill switch... by guruevi · · Score: 1

      Not sure if you knew but the Internet is designed to route around damage. There are plenty of lines running between the US and Russian-controlled waters, what would blowing one up accomplish?

      Even if they managed to take out everything in the Atlantic, there would still be capacity via satellite, radio and Pacific links. The only "use" of this exercise would be to tap traffic, but then what idiot throws about valuable data unencrypted on the Internet. Additionally, if they managed to tap a line, then they would have to install their own line to be able to actually listen to it which would be very noticeable.

      In the end this is just warmongering and spreading FUD, there are better ways of destroying the Internet or valuable infrastructure, they have access to the source code of Microsoft Windows, they could probably power down the entire Navy fleet and the majority of government offices remotely since they're still running XP.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    2. Re:Instant Internet kill switch... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You probably wouldn't need to take out that many links actually for the other links to be saturated, which would cause packet loss for everyone. It'd be similar to when one of the backbone providers (level3 etc) experience a major outage. Anything using TCP would probably still work but be far slower and experience connection timeouts and anything using UDP (VoIP etc) would suffer even more.

    3. Re:Instant Internet kill switch... by willy_me · · Score: 2

      All Internet connection would not have to be severed - all it would take is the majority of underwater cables being severed at the same time. Such an event would cause sufficient gridlock to make the Internet useless. The "self healing" nature of the Internet can barely correct for accidents - let alone deliberate sabotage. That is why I described a scenario involving explosives triggered by a remote signal. Sending underwater transmissions is difficult. There are severe bandwidth limitations with huge antennas are required. But such signals will travel around the globe and it does not take much bandwidth to send an activation signal.

      It is difficult to imagine a more efficient way of disabling global Internet communications. Admittedly, satellite communication would also need to be severed in order to be effective. But this would be one important step if Russia ever performs an aggressive move in Europe. Even if the military can use their dedicated radios, it prevents the vast majority of people from communicating.

      The point would not be to kill the Internet so much as limit communications thereby blinding the enemy. It is a discussion involving tactics and theoretical scenarios. Only when it is reported that military subs are crawling the underwater cables does it become concerning. As you stated, all important information is encrypted. What other reason could Russia have for doing this?

    4. Re:Instant Internet kill switch... by mysidia · · Score: 1

      Such an event would cause sufficient gridlock to make the Internet useless.

      No.... the internet would continue to function in the US, but it could create many network partitions, and communications between the US and other countries would be harder and slower.

    5. Re:Instant Internet kill switch... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 3, Funny

      How would they troll Facebook if they cut the cables?

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    6. Re:Instant Internet kill switch... by mikeiver1 · · Score: 1

      I suspect that we know just where they are working around the cables... Ever hear of hydrophone strings? Locating the devices would not be to hard. We are all racing towards quantum entangled communications, the Chinese especially. This will render brute force attacks on the physical links between Europe and the US of minimal value at best. I give it 10-20 years before they are them. None of the countries want any major war, it is easier to hose the people with banks, insurance companies, and shitty business practices. Dead people have no need for such things and that is bad for business.

    7. Re:Instant Internet kill switch... by argStyopa · · Score: 1

      If you were Russia, the reason your subs are 'sniffing around' is just to make sure all those charges are still good after their 10th or 20th year maintenance check.

      --
      -Styopa
    8. Re:Instant Internet kill switch... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder how you remote detonate explosives underwater. There some special radio for that? Does it work from more then 1 mile away?

      Can it be triggered accidentally? Would a lightning strike on the water above the bomb cause any trouble?

      Are they wired into the internet so you can detonate them from anywhere on the net? What if some hacker figures out how to trigger them?

      How long do the explosives last while sitting in saltwater? Will they still go boom after 1 year of immersion?

      Lots of issues with the old "put a bomb on it and wait decades for war" plan.

    9. Re:Instant Internet kill switch... by guruevi · · Score: 1

      No, communication would be slower and it would be "useless" only to consumers that want instant load times but we used to have network links that were much, much slower, more fragile and had more packet loss.

      I can communicate with Japan at gigabit rates these days, anyone remember Sourceforge Japan, that site had an effective bandwidth of a 56k modem here in the US, it still worked though for the rare occasion you needed something from it.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    10. Re:Instant Internet kill switch... by currently_awake · · Score: 1

      Or they sever all connections that don't route through Russian controlled nodes, where traffic can be "Changed" or deleted as required. Our internet still works, but we can't see the pictures of Russian tanks invading Germany.

    11. Re:Instant Internet kill switch... by mysidia · · Score: 1

      Our internet still works, but we can't see the pictures of Russian tanks invading Germany.

      If Russian tanks invade germany, then there are channels of communication such as HF Radio stations and Satellite which do not rely on the internet.

    12. Re:Instant Internet kill switch... by chihowa · · Score: 1

      I wonder how you remote detonate explosives underwater. There some special radio for that? Does it work from more then 1 mile away?

      Extremely low frequency radio

      Can it be triggered accidentally? Would a lightning strike on the water above the bomb cause any trouble?

      Coded control messages. The probability of an accidental trigger drops significantly.

      Are they wired into the internet so you can detonate them from anywhere on the net? What if some hacker figures out how to trigger them?

      No. Why would you do that?

      How long do the explosives last while sitting in saltwater? Will they still go boom after 1 year of immersion?

      A solved problem: Parts of some World War II naval minefields still exist because they are too extensive and expensive to clear. It is possible for some of these 1940s-era mines to remain dangerous for many years to come. Even circa 1870's mines lasted "several years" submerged.

      Lots of issues with the old "put a bomb on it and wait decades for war" plan.

      Solvable issues that were tackled centuries to decades ago.

      --
      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
    13. Re:Instant Internet kill switch... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Do the links from Germany to France & Britain go through Russia? Sounds pretty unlikely to me.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  17. Imagine a future Bitcoin Economy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Imagine the disruption to a future Bitcoin Economy if international communication links could not be maintained. Ha!

    1. Re:Imagine a future Bitcoin Economy by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 0

      That's why you should invest in Dogecoin instead of Bitcoin.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    2. Re:Imagine a future Bitcoin Economy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm mining poo coins right now.

    3. Re:Imagine a future Bitcoin Economy by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 0

      Imagine the disruption to the current economy if international communication links could not be maintained.

      FTFY

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    4. Re:Imagine a future Bitcoin Economy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We need something with real value, rather than fiat currency. We can't go back to gold-backed currency. Instead try electronic currency backed by your ass. Each "butt-coin" could be convertable to one session of anal sex.

  18. drop some depth charges on them by FudRucker · · Score: 1

    isnt that what your supposed to do to submarines that dont mind their own business?

    --
    Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
  19. Most likely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I imagine that Russian has done this, as have other unfriendly submarine nations.

  20. Testing the waters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This story isn't really about Russian submarines. It's about US warmongers figuratively testing the waters to see if they have the necessary domestic and international support for an armed conflict with Russia. "Look, Russia is threatening critical infrastructure! Can we please kick their ass already? Papa wants a new $10 Trillion war."

    1. Re: Testing the waters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bingo. Propaganda. Why release to general public now? Russianâ(TM)s having fun teasing their strategic competitor. 5,6,7,8 open up those pearly gates.

  21. Slashdot needs a Russia filter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Can we have a method to filter out all the Russia stories?

    1. Re:Slashdot needs a Russia filter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Sure, just plug your fingers in your ears and say "laa laa laa, it's not happening! fake news!" Plenty of people here have figured that one out... jeez, get with the program.

    2. Re:Slashdot needs a Russia filter by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Can we have a method to filter out all the Russia stories?

      Sure, you just need to Putin the right pluggin.

    3. Re:Slashdot needs a Russia filter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with this. I too am American and am sick of Russia stories. Russia is peaceful nation, attacks by SJW liberals get me bored of not news on _slashdot.org_.

  22. Re: Why is Russia suddenly so much cooler than u by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tapping? I call BS. You so much as cut that cable, it would be fucked from all the seawater intrusion already at crushing depths.

  23. Re: Why is Russia suddenly so much cooler than by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah because the rubber coating is protecting the fiber from pressure ... oh wait

  24. Re: Why is Russia suddenly so much cooler than by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

    Well, aren't condoms designed to protect our dicks from the crushing pressure of vaginas?

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  25. Encryption? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not much you can do to prevent physical destruction, but that would be a fairly obvious event.

    More likely in my mind is tapping the cables.
    Why would all the data sent across these not be encrypted by default?
    Hardware encryption /decryption should be fast enough, and only the company that runs the endpoints need know the keys.

    Is this a case of engineers just being naive? Same as airplane /traffic control security?

    1. Re:Encryption? by JcMorin · · Score: 1

      I agree with you, I don't think you can connect the wire and get all the data in clear text...

  26. Re: Why is Russia suddenly so much cooler than us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He means Toddler-boy Trump, who already has the Commandant of the Marine Corps salivating over the thought of some exciting general-ling from the comfort of his cushioned arm-chair in the air-conditioned war-room.

    A quick victorious war, and then he'll be Presidential Turd for life.

  27. Re: Why is Russia suddenly so much cooler than by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hell if I know, I post on slashdot

  28. Re: Why is Russia suddenly so much cooler than us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But... uh... WINNING!

    Wait, is it the sitcom douche or the reality-TV douche that said that?

  29. Re: Why is Russia suddenly so much cooler than u by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Specially design submarines have underwater diving bell type airlock compartments that can be positioned above a cable, the cable hauled up and the splicing work is performed with the airlock.

  30. Hello? by easyTree · · Score: 1

    Russia have already been 'the enemy' within living memory. You're supposed to choose a new one to keep people guessing. Doh!

    1. Re:Hello? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We have always been at peace with Eastasia.

  31. Re: Why is Russia suddenly so much cooler than u by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Undersea cables have more taps than they do cable!

  32. Re: Why is Russia suddenly so much cooler than us by Type44Q · · Score: 1

    The California National Guard alone can project more global military power than Russia.

    Had to quit reading when I got to the above.

  33. Re: Why is Russia suddenly so much cooler than us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't gloat. This was all according to plan. The very last thing the post-WWII West wanted was an efficient, robust Soviet economy. This was made easier to avoid by the poor Soviets wasting five generations of their people's potential under the worst economic theory ever concocted. I believe the Russian people have suffered enough but the swingin' cocks in both our capitols won't let it rest. If their children had to be bayoneted in the mud it might be different but we all know that ain't gonna happen...

  34. Re: Why is Russia suddenly so much cooler than us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I love how the liberals all think Trump is Putin's stooge. Putin is the enemy, but he really doesn't give a fuck about Donald Trump. Putin's real game is to divide the USA between left and right, white and black. He is doing it very effectively. If the liberals really wanted to give a finger to Putin they would support Donald Trump and join forces with the conservatives and unite behind the flag of the United States.

    The conservatives should do the same thing and unite with the liberals. Support black lives matter along with the stars and stripes, and realize that there is no reason to be divided internally when Russia, China, and Mexico are all united together against the USA.

  35. Re: Why is Russia suddenly so much cooler than us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With Hillary we would have had some lame posturing to look strong and an emphasis on quick reaction times to overcompensate for idiotic Benghazi criticism.

    Other than that, we would just have to put up with qualified people running government agencies. And Republicans in Congress continuing to "investigate" things instead of working with Democrats to pass compromise legislation, so we'd be cycling hard through all that government shut down stock volatility that Republican insiders make shit-tons of money on.

  36. Re: Why is Russia suddenly so much cooler than u by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's the big deal -- we ARE using TLS, IPsec, SSH, etc. right? What data are they tapping into besides your kitty videos?

  37. Re: Why is Russia suddenly so much cooler than u by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I love all the random anons piping in and high fiving each other about "evil Russians." Ever since globalist front BIZX, LLC purchased Slashdot a year or so ago, this odd propaganda has been pushed in every story.
     
    There is no tech news anymore.
     
    If you don't make some "anti Russia" comment, you are modded down.
     
    Looks as though there is an army of ghost accounts maturing like pupa as those accounts ferment to the point of having modpoints.
     

  38. PREPARE TO BE MODDED DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are a BIGOT and a RACIST and break against everything that the purchase of Slashdot by BIZX, LLC stands for.
     
    Prepare to be banned!

  39. Navy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To me it just sounds like someone wants more budget for their navy and Russia is the current bogeyman.

    Are they up to something? Yeah, probably. Are we up to something? Yeah, probably. Is scaring a bunch of people a way to get money voted to your department? Very definitely.

  40. Re: Why is Russia suddenly so much cooler than us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You should have continued reading because the statement is pretty much true.

    People routinely under estimate US military power and over estimate everyone else. If the US politicians would let the military fight a war without one hand tied behind their backs there wouldn't be any never ending festering conflicts that in the world. In WW2 the US military pounded the shit out of their opponents until any opposition was killed. Collateral damage and civilian casualties did not hinder any military operations.

  41. Great observation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The globalist crap has been laid on extra thick lately, and certain lying editors have been burying anything that does not toe the globalist line EVEN IF it is a tech-relevant story.

    You are on the losing side of history, globalists.

  42. The state is the enemy of all free people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The U.S. government is not your friend.
    The Russian government is not your friend.
    The EU is not your friend.

    Governments subsist by dividing people from other people and convincing us that we need them. Nationalism and globalism alike are cancer.

    Say no to war, regulation, taxation and police statism.

    Say yes to liberty, capitalism, free trade, and open communication.

  43. Re: Why is Russia suddenly so much cooler than us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Put you on the front line then. See how you like be up close and personal to your enlightened fix!

  44. Warning came against a background of proposed cut by qaz123 · · Score: 2

    "Russia could cut off internet to nato countries british military chief warns" 2017 DEC 14
    https://www.theguardian.com/wo...
    Peach’s warning came against a background of proposed cutbacks to the UK’s armed forces, including a reduction in the number of marines from 7,000 to 6,000 and the scrapping of two amphibious landing ships as part of a Cabinet Office security review scheduled to be announced early next year.

  45. Its not cutting cables by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's adding or sutracting information from information already sent.

  46. Re: Why is Russia suddenly so much cooler than us by vtcodger · · Score: 1

    Hmmm. Our memory doesn't go back to Vietnam much less the American Revolution does it? The message of history is pretty clear. Occupying forces from a dominant military control the ground they stand on completely. ... And if they are so motivated, the guys in black pajamas or homespun clothes control everything else.

    --
    You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
  47. Re: Why is Russia suddenly so much cooler than us by vtcodger · · Score: 1

    Mexico? Surely not. After all, Mexicans share a common language and culture with 40% of the population of California and Texas. There are wide swaths of the LA basin where you'll be hard put to find a sign in English.

    --
    You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
  48. So where are the pictures and proof? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You have nothing, only accusations, and nothing to back it up with. What HAS been proven definitely is that NSA and/or CIA have been involved in tapping and sabotaging other countries undersea cables, after their own classified material and reports leaked.

    America is sabotaging your networks and communication means, while making you angry at Russia about it. Wake the F up and realize that Russia is not the problem, they are only the scapegoat and distraction.

  49. Re: Why is Russia suddenly so much cooler than us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's see how well your californian guard tackles terrorism before taking your bullshit seriously.

  50. Re: Why is Russia suddenly so much cooler than u by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Terrorist "refugees" have been invading america for the last 50 years, more so under terrorist-in-chief obama.

    It came to a point where America now is indistinguishable from terrorism, it in fact embodies terrorism, supplying it's ISIS branches with weaponry, with CIA intelligence etc.
    Of course when shit hit the fan, terrorist headquarters in Pentagon had to temporarily distance themselves, and double down on propaganda.

  51. Re: Why is Russia suddenly so much cooler than us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With the amount of homeless, undereducated, and unhealthy in America, I'd argue about its 1st world status. Increasing numbers of 3rd world "refugees" also damages its reputation.

  52. But but but Trump said we'ld be friends! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Theres no way he could have LIED?!?

  53. Re: Why is Russia suddenly so much cooler than u by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

    No sane person thinks Putin likes Trump, but Trump thinks he does. Putin is trying to keep the US divided and knows as long as he keeps praising Trump, Trump's ego will keep him from doing anything while Putin does whatever he wants. Trump is very much a stooge, and like most stooged unwittingly so.

    --
    The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
  54. is someone grovelling for more money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like some organization is sniffing around looking for money to strengthen undersea cable connections.
    This threat has always existed.

  55. Re: Why is Russia suddenly so much cooler than us by dougdonovan · · Score: 1

    you do realize that trump and putin do talk IT. why would the US waste time ( time is $ ) when putin can do the work then hook up with trump.

  56. Re: Why is Russia suddenly so much cooler than by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't kitty porn against the law?

  57. military vs civilian infrastructure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The West likes to think nobody can recall Ivy Bells.

    That was within territorial waters and off limits to foreign vessels.

    Operation Ivy Bells https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    Ivy Bells was targeting military communications. The undersea cables we're talking about in this story is civilian use.

    If the Russians were / are going after US/NATO military comms there'd be less of a stink IMHO. It's the difference between bombing a air force base and bombing a hospital. (At least on purpose, shit does happen.)

    Of course Russia isn't above purposefully targeting civilians since the ends justify the means it seems:

    * http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-02-14/aleppo-civilians-targeted-final-attack-report-finds/8267924

  58. Re: Why is Russia suddenly so much cooler than us by dk20 · · Score: 1

    thought the exact same thing, and stopped reading at the same point. Not sure what "projecting military power" means but i dont think a few coast guard cuters trying to rescue stranded fishermen does that?

  59. Re: Why is Russia suddenly so much cooler than us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Care to list any "war" the US participated in without an ally and won?

    Korean war?
    Vietnam war?
    Golf war (1 and 2)?

    The US really "pounded the shit out of those" people.

  60. Re: Why is Russia suddenly so much cooler than us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not sure how cutting those cables would stop me from getting to facebook. It would on the other hand ruin Russia's internet.

  61. Re: Why is Russia suddenly so much cooler than us by Plus1Entropy · · Score: 3, Funny

    Golf war

    Trump is out there fighting it every day.

    --
    Only crack the nuts that crack. You don't put the ones that don't crack in the sack.
  62. The Left Has Gone Insane by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, you lost. Get over it.

    People hate the Democrats' arrogance and pretentiousness. You want proof? It's easy. Who controls the following: Congress, the White House, the Supreme Court, most state legislatures, most state governorships, the federal court system?

    Republicans do. Why? Because they aren't a bunch of stuck-up, whiny-ass, spoiled, arrogant brats.

    Oh, wait, that's right. It was the Russians. The Democrats are impotent because Vladimir Putin is a meanie pants.

    No wonder no one is voting Democrat.

  63. Re: Why is Russia suddenly so much cooler than us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Grenada

  64. Re:Propaganda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes! I am also American and is obvious that USA is much worser than the Russia. With president oBama noone in world was safe, especially of the undersea cables. Maybe strong and handsome president Trump can fix problem and have world work together again for peaces and prosperity of all!

  65. Pot, meet the Kettle... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The USA is rightfully concerned about this behaviour as it's exactly what they have been doing for years

  66. So funny by McFortner · · Score: 1

    This has been done since Submarines were reliable enough to do so. Hell, surface ships were pulling up submerged cables to put taps on them around a century ago.

    You Millennials are so cute thinking you are the first to think of an idea and act on it.

    --
    Beware of Sales Reps bearing gifts.
  67. Re: Why is Russia suddenly so much cooler than u by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe it's got something to do with how Putin is playing the US president like a violin. He knows that stroking Trump's insatiable ego will let him get away with anything he wants to do.

  68. The Royal Navy and GCHQ must be furious. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The way I heard it, Washington had granted them exclusive tapping rights.

  69. pow by BrandonGinn · · Score: 1

    NUKE EM

  70. Re: Propaganda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I too living in America and born here with star an stripes !

    I says we need not worry about Russia as is great and peaceful country under wise leader Putin. Forget the worries with Russia. Nothing to be seeing here old chum so best be moving along !

    Phew i'm so glad we have rid of devil obama !!! President Trump will make glorious benefit for all America, wait and see !

  71. Old is New Again... by MercTech · · Score: 1

    I hate to disappoint "The Hill" but this kind of thing was stock and trade for cold war era antics.
    And the way the article was written; you would think it was edited by a 2nd grader that can't find the term DSRV anywhere or look up the evolution of deep diving vessels that manipulate things on the ocean floor.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep-submergence_rescue_vehicle

    Gad, you can rent one for repairing underwater oil pipelines from offshore rigs.
    https://i.pinimg.com/originals/5b/7c/15/5b7c158be3ce5919e596f468b6a1ac4f.jpg

    --
    NRRPT/RCT
  72. The US has been doing the same for years by maxcelcat · · Score: 1

    The US has been poking around underwater cables off the coast of Russia, and previously the USSR, for years. Here's a fun example from the late 70's early 80's: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... Also lets not forget that the USS Jimmy Carter is probably up to this stuff right now: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...