Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: How Do You Avoid 'Information Overload' (wikipedia.org)

As we approach a holiday weekend and a brand new year, do we need to start carving out more time away from the internet? "I'm convinced the Internet (as in Slashdot) is making many people more lonely (and duller), not better," writes long-time Slashdot reader shanen: I think the best description of the problem I've read is The Shallows: What the Internet is Doing To Our Brains by Nicholas Carr. Not exactly his formulation, but in brief I would say that too much information is overwhelming us...

Some approaches towards solutions appear in The Art of Thinking Clearly by Rolf Dobelli (based on the German Die Kunst des klaren Denkens : 52 Denkfehler, die Sie besser anderen uberlassen. Again, better references would be greatly appreciated, especially as regards the problem of disaster porn overwhelming journalism.

New Media professor Clay Shirky has argued that "it's not information overload, it's filter failure." And Carr's original question was actually "Is Google Making Us Stupid?" though he still warned of the possibility that "the crazy quilt of Internet media" is remapping the neural circuitry in our brains. (And that "as we come to rely on computers to mediate our understanding of the world, it is our own intelligence that flattens.") The original submitter asked the question another way -- "Is deep thought possible in the Internet Age?" But it'd be interesting to hear what strategies are being used by Slashdot readers.

Leave your best answers in the comments. How do you avoid information overload?

133 comments

  1. I get my information from only one source: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Fox News

    1. Re:I get my information from only one source: by Pseudonym · · Score: 0

      I was about to say, this is a perfectly feasible solution. Pick a partisan outlet (Fox News is one possibility, MSNBC is another), get all your information from there, and you will never have to think again.

      Another option is to read any Internet comment section (even Slashdot works for this). This will want you to go away and hide from all humans for a long time; no information overload there.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
  2. Summary is too long by james_gnz · · Score: 5, Funny

    I didn't have enough attention span to read the summary. Could someone please summarise it?

    1. Re:Summary is too long by PsychoSlashDot · · Score: 5, Funny

      I didn't have enough attention span to read the summary. Could someone please summarise it?

      "Here's a couple books we'd like you to buy."

      --
      "Oh no... he found the .sig setting."
    2. Re:Summary is too long by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative
    3. Re:Summary is too long by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just pretend nothing is real. http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/white-house-denies-report-on-trump-saying-haitians-all-have-aids-nigerians-live-in-huts/article/2644304 + https://www.nbcnews.com/news/north-korea/how-kim-jong-un-bested-donald-trump-slugfest-was-2017-n823651

      "I'm best at everything no matter what results" Be a pile of shit and living god at the same time, just don't give a fuck and let your most base and puerile instincts guide you to victory.

      Fuck the world, it can't matter compared to what I want. Say it, believe it : I am the only one that matters - verbatim. Make sure that's on the record. Winning.

    4. Re:Summary is too long by shanen · · Score: 2

      If you're referring to me, then no, but I would recommend seeing what your local library has to offer. I do read more than average, but I couldn't afford the habit if I didn't use the library so much.

      Actually, I can only think of one book I bought in the last two years and two more than have been given to me as gifts, and I haven't finished those three...

      --
      Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
    5. Re:Summary is too long by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think he's referring to whoever added the Amazon links instead of directing people to their local libraries.

      If you support the public libraries, I think that is wonderful. I do too. Sometimes I go to the library just for the peaceful atmosphere. Our libraries also have ebooks.

  3. You'll grow out of it. by nospam007 · · Score: 5, Funny

    "I'm convinced the Internet (as in Slashdot) is making many people more lonely (and duller)"

    That's because you still hope to find some news for nerds, stuff that matters,
    We old fucks gave that hope up years ago.

    1. Re:You'll grow out of it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nonsense, dupes have existed for decades. You'd think we'd have been able to filter that by now though.

    2. Re:You'll grow out of it. by shanen · · Score: 2

      Yes, but, but, but... In the original form [not that I would want to complain about the editing], I was asking for a Christmas present of enlightenment. I think I went wrong when I tried to make it into a joke along the lines of "Go ahead, punks, make my [Christmas] day" with help for deeper thinking.

      I think I would be violating the network protocol to say more. However, the revised version did remind me of The Filter Bubble , which is another closely related book. I read that one last year, though it was published in 2012... (I didn't want to bury the topic under the books I've already read. It always leads back to Godel, Escher, Bach .)

      --
      Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
    3. Re:You'll grow out of it. by basic.gongfu · · Score: 1

      And the only reason we come back is to have a chuckle at it in the company of other old fucks ;)

    4. Re:You'll grow out of it. by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 0

      I'm not good with giving up hope

    5. Re:You'll grow out of it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      We old fucks already lost money in a get-rich-quick scheme before, so we recognize bitcoin for the pyramid scam it is.

    6. Re:You'll grow out of it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      " Godel, Escher, Bach ."

      One of the most over-rated pieces of crap I've had the misfortune of buying.

    7. Re:You'll grow out of it. by nospam007 · · Score: 1

      "At least you old fucks have objective perspectives on Bitcoin."

      No, we might have a couple of hundred bitcoins we mined in the day, but we can't remember the password.

    8. Re:You'll grow out of it. by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Someone will be along shortly to say that's because you don't understand it. Normally it would have happened already; apologies for the delay.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  4. Drink a fuck ton of beer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Easy answer.

  5. Ignore the news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    Since Trump was elected I mostly ignore the news. Instead of CNN, I discovered all the Star Trek reruns on BBC America. No information overload and I'm happier.

    1. Re: Ignore the news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those are also severely edited to allow for more commercials. BBC America sucks.

    2. Re:Ignore the news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Then, simply put, you've allowed Trump and his band of corporate thugs win. You have turned the country over to the idiots and sticking your head in the sand and ignoring it does nothing but allow them to run roughshod over almost 250 years of hard earned rights. If you've given up, at least move to a red state and vote blue. That's the only way this shithole of a country is ever going to get back on the proper path towards becoming that shining city on the hill that Reagan envisioned for us.

    3. Re:Ignore the news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same here. TBH, I gave it up sometime in the 90's, but followed it closely after 9/11 until about 6 months ago. There was too large of a discrepancy between what I saw IRL and what almost seemed like, if I was paranoid, a concerted effort to push some sort of story, Meh,maybe I am paranoid, but as the great Andy Grove once stated...only the paranoid survive.

    4. Re:Ignore the news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No thanks, I think I'll just keep paying attention to the stuff that matters to me. I don't give a shit about Trump, America or you.

    5. Re:Ignore the news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then, simply put, you've allowed Trump and his band of corporate thugs win

      So what are you going to spend monies from your wage increase and tax cuts on? Merry Christmas!

      That's the only way this shithole of a country is ever going to get back on the proper path towards becoming that shining city on the hill that Reagan envisioned for us.

      Ho, ho, ho! Santa just emptied his sack, it'll taste as salty to you as your tears, enjoy the splurge.

    6. Re:Ignore the news by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      Since Trump was elected I mostly ignore the news.

      I have selectively ignored some news for decades. For instance, you can filter out all news about the Middle East for twenty years, and when you tune in again the situation will be exactly the same.

      Here is a quick cheat sheet:
      1. Always ignore news about "people".
      2. Selectively ignore news about "events".
      3. Read news about ideas and innovations - stuff that matters.

    7. Re:Ignore the news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That sounds about right.

    8. Re: Ignore the news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jokes on you, it has always been run by them. The founding fathers were the original band of thieves.

      Or did you think they literally owned people to work their farms because they just didn't realize they were people?

    9. Re:Ignore the news by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1
      “Men and women range themselves into three classes or orders of intelligence; you can tell the lowest class by their habit of always talking about persons; the next by the fact that their habit is always to converse about things; the highest by their preference for the discussion of ideas.”

      https://quoteinvestigator.com/...

    10. Re: Ignore the news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      They were also scientists and the philosophical thinkers of the Age of Enlightenment.

      ‘Real historical understanding is not achieved by the subordination of the past to the present, but rather by our making the past our present and attempting to see life with the eyes of another century than our own.’

      - Butterfield, 1931

    11. Re:Ignore the news by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      There used to be something along the lines of the first question people ask about a movie: the plebs ask who's in it, intellectuals ask what it's about, and hipster knobtroughs ask who directed it.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    12. Re:Ignore the news by shanen · · Score: 1

      “Men and women range themselves into three classes or orders of intelligence; you can tell the lowest class by their habit of always talking about persons; the next by the fact that their habit is always to converse about things; the highest by their preference for the discussion of ideas.”

      https://quoteinvestigator.com/...

      This particular comment has been praying upon my mind, even though I've read it before. Before the editing of my question, I actually asked for a rather larger Christmas present, a secret of deeper thinking, but maybe all I got was a deeper thought. If so, then I think this brief comment may have triggered it, though the chain of reasoning seems obscure as I think about it now. Even more obscure when I see that you [thinkwaitfast] were replying to an AC [Anonymous Cowad] post. My settings rarely show them...

      My xmas present in the form of a deep thought is not that I'm too judgemental and intolerant. I already knew that, but I'm now wondering how much my judgment focuses on material things that are not affected by what anyone thinks of them versus people who naturally hate being judged, especially the negative judgments. I would say I'm even too judgmental about ideas, though I think I do have a much higher tolerance for bad ideas. The better to blow them away? Should my highest priority be to become less judgmental?

      One related observation is that it probably explains why I have relatively few friends these years... Even worse that the old ones seem to be passing away faster than I acquire new ones. Worst of all that it doesn't bother me more?

      The deeper topic underlying the quote as a possible example of 'great minds thinking alike' is the ontology of people that I've been working on over the last few months. Was it really seeded by some earlier encounter with that quote? I've been thinking about people divided into materialists, humanists, and idealists.

      Many of the world's problems seem attributable to people who put material things (including money as a token for things) first. They love these material things above all else, leading to the state of corporate cancerism we live in today. They are avaricious and greedy beyond reason, to the point where they don't care if their greed injures or even kills other people. They may also worship such material things as drugs or alcohol or gambling (to acquire more material things), with all of their attendant problems. Last week's tax "reform" may be one of the materialists greatest triumphs in making super-rich people richer at the expense of relatively poor people who will suffer and die for their profits. As I've often said, under corporate cancerism, there is no gawd but profit.

      The humanists focus on other people first, though I don't think they should necessarily be regarded as the "lowest class" solely on that basis. I believe many of my best teachers were humanists. However, some of the humanists are kind of despicable. For example, I regard #PresidentTweety as primarily a humanist, though his twisted form of humanism is to put himself first. Malignant narcissists are like that, eh?

      Me? I'm obviously one of those idealists. Mostly harmless?

      --
      Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
  6. Turn off the phone, put it in a room you're not in by TigerPlish · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Seriously. Turn off the phone and put it in a room you're not in. Then, step away from the computer (PC, tablets, laptops, whatever you use.)

    Now, go do other things you've forgotten how to do.

    --
    The "Civilized World" jumped the shark ca. 1973.
  7. Compartmentalize... by ctilsie242 · · Score: 1

    I give everything a time, then swap to something else. Here in the US, it takes some digging to get an accurate report about something since sources are heavily biased, so one's best bet is other countries (which have a slant, but tend to be neutral in the case of the issue mentioned.)

    Sites like Reddit and Slashdot help, since eventually the truth relating to some allegation or some happening does work its way out, better than most mainstream media, and you will find insights (even if it is someone doing a troll attempt) that you won't find with the heavily filtered replies on "mainstream" news sites.

    1. Re:Compartmentalize... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      See you at the impeachment and grand jury.

    2. Re:Compartmentalize... by shanen · · Score: 2

      Actually the last advice in The Art of Thinking Clearly was to stop reading the news. While I do agree that the lion's share of the news is trivia, disaster porn, or worse, I think that it's going too far to ignore all of it.

      In terms of solutions, I've been thinking along two lines. One involves time management, as you mentioned, but the problem there is project planning. It's really hard to judge how much time a specific task or project will consume, but it's even harder to decide how much time that task or project is worth.

      The line that seems more tractable to me involves public reputation of the sources. This would involve collecting and displaying such public information as how people have reacted to public writings, but I think there's also enormous potential in sharing the profile information that is already being compiled (by such companies as the google) and sharing it back to the people it came from in the first place.

      --
      Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
  8. Slashdot by bugs2squash · · Score: 5, Funny

    I exclusively read slashdot on the internet. That keeps the actual information content down.

    --
    Nullius in verba
  9. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  10. be unemployed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Being unemployed is the very best way to avoid information overload. You don't have a boss telling you what to do. Your friends won't talk to you because you don't have any money. Without income you don't have to worry about paying taxes. Without a schedule you can sleep when you're tired and eat when you're hungry. Without distractions you can choose to read whatever information you want whenever you want. Of course without money you will starve and die and no one will miss you. Merry Christmas!

    1. Re:be unemployed by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      I've been unemployed for years and I can't think if any friends who aren't talking to me.>/p> Maybe you need better friends.

    2. Re: be unemployed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When you have no money you can eat when you're hungry.

      Are you sure about that?

  11. Re:Turn off the phone, put it in a room you're not by chispito · · Score: 2

    Seriously. Turn off the phone and put it in a room you're not in. Then, step away from the computer (PC, tablets, laptops, whatever you use.)

    Now, go do other things you've forgotten how to do.

    This is exactly my strategy. You know what's the very last thing most people need? A smart watch, or anything else that tethers them even more to the online world. I think people are forgetting how to experience life first hand.

    --
    The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
  12. Discipline, pacing and limits... by jpellino · · Score: 1

    Phone is a phone and GPS and health tracker. No browser, no news, no mail.

    No smartwatch.

    Main personal device is a tablet. Browser, newsreader and social media app. eMail. eBooks.

    "Computer" for work and last resort for personal stuff.

    Notepad, reminders, calendar sync across all.

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
  13. Re:All Pr0n All Dya by shanen · · Score: 2

    I'd probably give you the "Funny" mod if I ever saw a mod point, but the deeper truth underlying your joke is that the Internet was largely paid for by porn. I had that not from the horse's mouth, but straight from the owner of an early ISP.

    However I'm not sure whether to classify the joke itself as the shallowest form of not thinking or as deep fantasies. I'm embarrassed that I can't recall the name of the anonymizing network... The thing with the little onion?

    --
    Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
  14. I don't... by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 0

    Instead of worrying about identifying and remedying problems in my life, I just let Systemd manage my life. If i get to caught up and don't respond to it in time, it kills me and then spawns a new copy! Speaking of which, OH GOD, I FORGOT THE BUTTON! AAAARRRRGGGHHHhhhh!
    ...
    ...

    New computer, who dis?

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    1. Re:I don't... by hackwrench · · Score: 0

      Roba Kawabata, Abjuraian. Have you heard of our Lady and Savior Tsunami Jurai?

  15. Re:Turn off the phone, put it in a room you're not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yep, if I'm working and the phone is incessantly bothering me I turn it off. A cell phone is essential for emergencies but time wasters get the idea fast enough, I cannot be disturbed when I'm working. I don't even watch mainstream news, I use YouTube and do an hour an evening. The rest is playtime and I do as I please. Mostly, as an INTJ, I seek information but it's absolutely pre-filtered, usually technical and I am in control of the information I'm absorbing.

    There is no information overload, just poor filtering.

  16. The Kingdom of God by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    is within you.

  17. The internet is not making people dumber... by blahplusplus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... it is exposing how shallow and stupid humanity always was. The reality is we live in a dystopian idiocracy. The reason the world is so corrupt is because the vast majority of the public falls for the lies of the rich and powerful and their corporations and vote against their own interests. That's reality.

    1. Re:The internet is not making people dumber... by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      Edwards: Why the big secret? People are smart. They can handle it.

      Kay: A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it. Fifteen hundred years ago everybody knew the Earth was the center of the universe. Five hundred years ago, everybody knew the Earth was flat, and fifteen minutes ago, you knew that humans were alone on this planet.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    2. Re:The internet is not making people dumber... by shanen · · Score: 2

      I have to disagree with your premise, though you managed to land some good punches from the side. I would say that our current reality is we live in an economy of corporate cancerism. Capitalism and communism are long dead. The only gawd is profit, and <your favorite (or least favorite) profitable corporation here> is gawd's prophet.

      While I agree that there is a whole lot of stupidity going on, I think much of it has been cultivated. There was method in their madness when they divided and conquered public education in America. Now there is a tiny division of good schools that the truly concerned parents can slimly hope their children can get into, while the lion's share of students are in obedience schools you wouldn't send your dog to. Or worse. We created our own crop of mindless mushrooms for a certain Russian kleptocrat to harvest...

      The funny part happens when you consider the motivations. I used to think it was mostly stupid parents who were motivated to make sure their children were as stupid as they were, but now I realize they were just useful idiots. Follow the money. In this case, property taxes. Killing public schools reduces the need for property taxes that used to fund the public schools. Certain rich real estate speculators have always hated property taxes, and suddenly the circle is unbroken.

      However, all of this is getting rather far away from the original question...

      --
      Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
    3. Re:The internet is not making people dumber... by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Matches my observation. The average person is astonishingly stupid. And then there are all those that are below average or not so much above. In the end, there are not many people around that are independent thinkers and can actually verify an argument or a statement of fact. Most just estimate the "reputation" of the one making a statement using a process that is not in any way suitable for that and then believe according to that score. That leads to the most hilariously stupid beliefs.

      My personal estimation is that the independent thinkers are around 10%, not more. Even in a class of, say, CS students that should be smarter then the average, you only have something like 10-15% of them and that is an observation I share with several friends who also teach academically. These few people that have actual insight then just get swamped by the unthinking morons and that is it.

      And that is also why democracy does not work. If 90% of the population can be easily manipulated because they understand nothing, democracy just becomes a game of who manipulates public opinion better.

      The fascinating thing is that the morons often do not actually lack in intelligence, they lack in the will and skill to apply it. For example, they may be able to solve a complicated engineering problem, but are complete unable to think rationally about a moral question or a trend in society. That is not lack of intelligence, that is lack of wisdom. People can be highly intelligent and completely unable to think independently at the same time. And yet, some people of decidedly lower intelligence can do it. They may take longer, they need to read up and consult experts, but in the end, they actually can find a reliable, verified answer.

      And yes, the only thing the Internet does here is making it abundantly clear how pathetically stupid most people actually are and that for most people actual independent application of intelligence is not something they can do. It is like this humanity is a mix of two different species: A small minority of independent thinkers and a large majority of basically herd animals.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    4. Re:The internet is not making people dumber... by gweihir · · Score: 1

      I disagree. Being able to think independently seems to be something people do not learn, it seems to be nature. The only thing education may be able to do is bring it out a bit earlier, if that. You can have the most highly educated and intelligent morons that cannot think independently about anything, except maybe some narrow field of specialization and even there they are not really original. No, the problem is with the people. "Corporate cancerism" (like the term, BTW!) is just large corporations having found out after a very long learning process (they are not smart either), that they can too use propaganda techniques and statistical mass-evaluations that traditionally were only available to nation-states. There is a reason the texts by Goebbels are used directly or indirectly today in marketing education. The results are usually not so visible, because products live in many different spaces and people have a lot of "true" beliefs, so each one gets a smaller part. But look at some extremes, like the Church of Apple or the Cult of Rust and you find the same mindlessly cheering crowds that screamed their lungs out for the Fuehrer and with about as much understanding of what is going on.

      Unfortunately, I do not see any solution that can be established. Sure, a meritocracy, where a strong capability for independent thought would be an absolute requirement and a strong and reasoned adherence to principles of human rights would be an absolute requirement to wield power of any kind would probably work. It would also probably have to draft people into position of power, as those with these qualities usually do not want power or only very little. But I do not see any way to establish that. Greed, fear, arrogance, racism and its variants, etc. are motivating lots of the wrong people to seek power. And the results are predictably pathetic: Wars, poverty, hunger, sickness, lack of education, etc. are the reality for most human beings and it does not look like this is going to change.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    5. Re:The internet is not making people dumber... by shanen · · Score: 1

      Hmm... The topic seems to have mostly expired, but I would say that I have read that authoritarian tendencies tend to be innately favored in about 30% of the population (and it must be a coincidence that #PresidentTweety's hardcore base is estimated around 30%), but I think bad schooling can make things worse. The current trend of teaching to the test under the guise of accountability for those damn tenured left-wing teachers is a kind of obedience training that will stifle any development of independent thinking.

      ALL of the answers are already known and the students MUST memorize them.

      Question authority? Perish the thought and fail the test, too, if you dare to do so.

      --
      Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
    6. Re:The internet is not making people dumber... by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Well, there is actually research on the topic, and one main contributor put it into a form that is pretty well readable. Some may object to the (clearly marked) personal comments and hence disregard the solid scientific core though (a specific effect of stupidity, namely creating a filter bubble). Anyways, here is the reference. I found it pretty enlightening as it put together quite a few observations I had already made: https://theauthoritarians.org/

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    7. Re:The internet is not making people dumber... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably the best-delivered line in that film.

    8. Re:The internet is not making people dumber... by epine · · Score: 1

      The reality is we live in a dystopian idiocracy. The reason the world is so corrupt is because the vast majority of the public falls for the lies of the rich and powerful and their corporations and vote against their own interests.

      100 million ad and brand impressions eventually add up to real stupidity (7,000 ad impressions/day * 40 years).

      This is not even counting the full IQ point per minute that decays into radioactive sludge by attending—be it ever so slightly—to trite pleasantries exchanged between the anchor desk and the weather personality.

      Ever since I filtered most of that crap out of my life, I haven't felt overloaded in the least.

    9. Re:The internet is not making people dumber... by shanen · · Score: 1

      I'd heard of the book earlier, probably from John Dean, who later wrote a related book. My database says that I didn't finish reading it, however. I have a hard time actually getting through any ebook. Only managed that feat a couple of times, whereas I can usually apply myself to finishing any dead-tree book, even if tedious.

      --
      Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
  18. I blame the activist mindset by DeplorableCodeMonkey · · Score: 1

    I've felt for a while that there has been a steady drumbeat in the culture to be "engaged" and "informed" and now "woke." There's no respect for someone who says "I work 50 hours a week plus commute, I don't give a shit about $HEADLINE_X. I am going to grab some beer and enjoy $ALCOHOL_COMPATIBLE_ACTIVITY instead of worrying about shit that I can't fix."

    But that person is actually speaking a pretty hardcore truth 99% of the time, and the effects of denigrating it are toxic. Here's a good example...

    How well do you know the local police force's reputation? There are plenty of people who shriek "da police, da police, fuck da police" like there aren't something like over 3k departments with very different cultures. Yet how many people, not knowing much of anything about the reputation of their local police looks at some shit that went down several states away and resents their local police? A lot. You know what that is? It's not woke, it's fucking braindead.

    1. Re:I blame the activist mindset by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In contrast, it may spark something in people to investigate the public records of their local police to see how much shit goes on. The boys in blue love a good cover-up, especially of one of their own. But sooner or later, you'll find that police are no different from other positions of power, and it (ironically) follows the same model they pursue: crime. Crime is possible with motive, means, and opportunity. When you have political or judicial power, what more do you need? That's means *and* opportunity in one.

      The truth is there is more serious and more damaging crime emanating from positions of "legitimate" power than anything the mafia or gangs could do. Even serial killers can't match the wholesale manipulation and impoverishing of thousands of people at a time. Granting power to one person over another is the root cause of our troubles as an entire species. We create our own problems.

  19. Well, not sign up for Facebook. by toonces33 · · Score: 1

    or any of the other app-du-jour. That's a start. A lot of the "information" is so low-grade that it isn't worth bothering with. It reminds me of an old joke. Someone commented that the rate at which the library shelf space required to hold scientific journals may soon exceed the speed of light. But it wouldn't violate the theory of relativity because no information was being exchanged.

  20. It's easy by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 4, Funny

    1. No Facebook
    2. No Twitter
    3. No LinkedIn
    4. No Instagram
    5. No Flickr
    6. No Slashd.... d'oh!

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
    1. Re:It's easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd just summarize as, no alerts. Even email requires me to pull it and check if I have any, which I will only do if I care about it at the moment, which happens like twice a day. The only alert I honor is the phone ringing, which happens when my mechanic calls. Otherwise, nada. Life is bliss. I keep reading about people "checking their phones" all the time and I honestly have no idea what they are talking about. I only "check my pohone" to pause the music when someone comes to my desk. ROFL.

    2. Re:It's easy by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      It's not about "no alerts or not", it's about not wasting time on platforms which give you basically nothing.

      I also forgot, first one should have been "No YouTube". It's so easy watching one video, then another, then another... you start viewing cat videos and end up looking at 1980's hardware hacks for some reason.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    3. Re:It's easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah. No alerts except for the phone. Email & forums strictly wait for me. No boring "social media" garbage - so no information overload.

  21. Prioritize by reboot246 · · Score: 1

    I put incoming information into three categories - stuff I need to know, stuff I want to know, and stuff I don't care about at all.

    I need to know things like the weather, traffic conditions, family plans, etc.. If a local, national, or international news event will affect me directly, I pay attention and try to find out what exactly is going on. If it's not going to affect me, I ignore it (category #3).

    I want to know things like some sports scores, how something works, how to repair something, how to cook with a new recipe - you get the drift. In this category are things I want to know now and some things I can learn about during slack times.

    Everything else goes into the "I don't care about it" category. Not surprisingly about 99% of the news goes into this category.

    Getting away from the phone can be done with a little willpower. Make it a point to at least put it in airplane mode when you're around friends and family. It's extremely rude to look at your phone when you're talking to somebody - JUST DON'T DO IT. Leave it in the car or in the house when you're going shopping, going to a sporting event, working in the yard, going to the doctor, going to the theater, etc.. What's the worst that could happen? Answer - not much.

    1. Re:Prioritize by gweihir · · Score: 1

      I put incoming information into three categories - stuff I need to know, stuff I want to know, and stuff I don't care about at all.

      Same here. Plus I have "stuff I don't want to know now, but maybe later" and occasionally I pull up something of that later. And I do aggressive filtering. Quite a bit of "legitimate" email goes into my SPAM folder, because it is newsletters and such. I have stopped unsubscribing, I just add a custom rule and never see their great messages again.

      The other thing I found valuable, is to read aggregated news with a specific scope. For example, Slashdot is still useful to follow the most important things in IT vulnerabilities, if you do not mind getting the information a few days late. No need to follow this anywhere else.

      But in the end, it boils down to daring to be uninformed on many topics (you can always change that if the need arises for a specific topic) and just getting comfortable with the idea of ignoring a lot of the "information" that is presented to you. Most is of very transient value anyways, you just need to get over the feeling of "missing out". And with that, "information overload" becomes a non-issue.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  22. What information overload? by RhettLivingston · · Score: 1

    If the information wasn't surrounded by so much misinformation and non-information, I might be worried about information overload. As it is, the problem is the time it takes to find enough drops to satiate the thirst.

    1. Re:What information overload? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I for one welcome our new information overload.

      --sf

  23. Stock up on "Underload' by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

    How Do You Avoid 'Information Overload'

    Watch Fox News or CSPAN - no information there.

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  24. Information overload? No, entertainment overload by Kjella · · Score: 3, Interesting

    As we approach a holiday weekend and a brand new year, do we need to start carving out more time away from the internet?

    I don't have any problem with the Internet being full of information, I find it's great. Even if parts of it are full of crackpots you can find tons of useful posts if you're willing to go outside the echo chambers. No, what's killing "everything else" is that there's so much entertainment, even if Sturgeon's law that says 90% of everything is crap I have the feeling the total is growing and growing. Here's a good TV series, there's a good movie, this was a cool game and I feel like I have a "backlog" of things that would be fun but that didn't make the cut. Heck, I have a bunch of things that I'd kinda like to watch a second time which gets constantly pre-empted by something new.

    I don't think it's that I've gotten less picky. Maybe it's that I had more time, but that still doesn't explain everything. I feel like things were different before like before WoW etc. where you couldn't get so addicted to a game you'd basically disappear into the computer. Not that I actually played WoW, I knew I had the tendencies from other games and that would be like shooting heroin. But damn, they're good at making things addictive. And this new trend of releasing a whole season at once hasn't helped me, it's like an invitation to binge watching. If I had a week's cool down maybe I'd stop and think it wasn't that great instead of getting caught up in what happens next. And the smartphone killed the remaining zone-out time.

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  25. Information in excess!!!. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Our brain is not ready to recognize too information.

    When an exceeded information is a source code, our brain is not trained to do too calculation of their algorithms.

    The worse case could be horribly blink from the human memory.

  26. We're not overload with information; by hey! · · Score: 4, Insightful

    we're overloaded with data.

    There isn't a precise semantic distinction between these two terms, and they're often used interchangeably. That leads to confusing terms like "information overload".

    But if you think about information as that aspect of data or its context that makes us informed, and we instead call the phenomenon we're talking about "data overload", then things become a lot clearer. What we're talking about is a form of incapacitation, but this is exactly the opposite of becoming informed, which is a kind of empowerment. The experience of becoming informed is one of surprise; it makes you sit up and feel alert.

    So the answer is to be both more selective about information and more broad-minded about it at the same time. Absorbing data which simply reinforces what you already know is mind-numbing. Seek data which puts the data you already have in context, or shows it in a new light. That's what I mean by being more selective (stop mindlessly consuming the same old stuff) and more open-minded (seek out data that challenges your preconceptions and takes you out of your rut).

    Also, beware data that is packaged to be easy to consume mindlessly. It's junk food data. You need more intellectual roughage, something that takes time and effort to chew.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    1. Re:We're not overload with information; by tquasar · · Score: 1

      Junk food data. Nailed it.

  27. Its not information overload by Icyfire0573 · · Score: 2

    You brought up the shallows in the summary. But the issue isn't that you have information overload, the issue is that you keep surfacing new ideas all the time. Stop what you're doing. Turn off reddit and pick 2 or 3 places for information and check them on a schedule. Not when you're bored, not when you have free time. The problem is that a person gets attuned to the constant 'ding' new thing alert, its the same thing as someone playing slots in vegas. Just choose when it is time to look at things, stick to the schedule and problem solved.

  28. People have different tolerances by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The best indicator is probably their career choice. A tech journalist probably has a higher tolerance for constant information overload than a web developer, and web developer probably has a higher tolerance than a kernel or hardware engineer.

    1. Re:People have different tolerances by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That may be, but it will still be the tech journalist who suffer information overload. The kernel dev have the option of shutting the world out for a week or two - and will do so with impunity to debug a something. The tech journalist can't shut the world out - he risk missing stuff important to his job.

  29. Reading Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Reading Slashdot helps.

    1. Re:Reading Slashdot by PPH · · Score: 1

      Not reading it is even better. Just blindly hit 'Post'.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  30. Leave it for tomorrow by H-S.he29 · · Score: 1

    I'm not exactly sure what classifies as "information overload".

    I currently have 20,930 unread Slashdot stories stored in my RSS reader (since April 2010). Is this information overload? It is definitely an amount of information that is beyond my processing ability. Yet I don't really feel overloaded.

    If I feel like reading news, I open the RSS reader and mash Delete for half a minute on some recent unread articles. After getting rid of the uninteresting clutter, I end up with a list of about 10 stories I'm interested in. Some of them I read right away and some of them I will leave "for tomorrow", usually when the comment section looks too time consuming.

    The thing is: I don't panic when the "tomorrow" group does not get any attention for another week or month. It's not going anywhere. I will either get to it eventually, or I'll die first. Either way, problem solved. :)

    So for me, the solution is simply "not to care". Just deal with the most important stuff first and leave the rest for tomorrow (or press Delete). I've been fighting procrastination for years but now I kind of realize it can also be a great tool for filtering out all the unnecessary stress.

  31. Re: Turn off the phone, put it in a room you're no by llZENll · · Score: 2

    How to stop drinking? Stop drinking. How to stop drugs? Stop taking them. Information overload? Stop consuming it.

  32. millenial problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this is a problem for kids that don't know a life without/before computers/cellphones. sucks to be them. really.

  33. Just read more that bites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Zero problem here, just read more than bite-sized media.
    For free www.longform.org aggregates hundreds of good long form articles/journalism from around the world.

  34. Ideas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    An actually realistic strategy....

    Turn off sound notifications for email. Turn off notifications for Facebook. Turn off notifications for anything notifying you off stupid sh*t. Don't look at your phone all the time.

  35. I find this helps by slickwillie · · Score: 1

    More Cowbell!

  36. If you are lonely, internet will not make it worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Too much information? Well, yes. But having too many to learn is better than having too little, in my opinion.

  37. 101 of mental health by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Learn to stop the thinking part of the brain. Constant thinking is like you have a hand that can't stop fiddling around: it's a mental disease. Thoughts keep building a virtual view of the world, and people get to believe they _are_ this thinking process and disconnect from reality, never having the occasion to just experience how they feel, here and now. Words everywhere (radio, ads, TV, on clothes... and now internet) make it more difficult to stop thinking.
    You don't need to think that much: just a bit of planning ahead, or for activities like coding. Most other thoughts are just pieces of ideologies running around in your head, trying to grab control of your life.
    So practice and get rid of that. "Information overload" is just one of many non-problems solved. Welcome to life!
    Oh yeah, almost forgot: Welcome to the planet of the apes!

  38. I don't. I don't need it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I could process more information if I had an avenue with enough bandwidth.

  39. Information overload is not the problem by slashdotiscorrupt · · Score: 2

    The complete and total compromise of our society is the problem.

    Natural selection is finding a way to operate through the interface of our mechanized microcosm.
    The weak are being sucked into the singularity. Their humanity; their reason, their spirituality, their vision, have long since left them and now the devil is coming to collect their debt. There are going to be hordes of brainless media drones no matter what we do now.
    Most people reading this are already far down that path, their amygdala programmed by hyperstimulation, overriding all other conscious mental function, spurring them to classically conditioned behavior triggered by artificial symbols.

    The question is not what we do to help the fallen. They are already gone.
    The question is how do we stop the current leaders of the world from using them to rip civilization to shreds and destroy the freedom of humanity forever.
    Aside from that, they are physically destroying the world with poisons and climate change.

    If some crisis doesn't happen to wake up the middle class and spur them to take action against the power structure, the fate of the world, the fate of life itself, looks very doubtful.

    --
    My karma was manually wiped by site staff https://slashdot.org/~slshdtisctrldbysjws 18 mod up, 10 mod down = bad karma
    1. Re:Information overload is not the problem by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Very poetic. Unfortunately not fictional.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    2. Re:Information overload is not the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A country is three missed meals away from revolution. Things will change when enough of the middle class becomes poor and can't feed their family and have little left to lose. Why take a chance in losing your job because you were arrested at a protest and missed work?

  40. Shades of Slashdot past by shanen · · Score: 1

    All I got for Christmas was a relatively nice discussion on Slashdot. Judging by what I've seen recently, it makes me wonder if the professional trolls started their vacations early...

    My main reaction is that the editing of the submission to direct it towards information overload has kind of limited the scope of the discussion. Probably a good thing, even though I think the underlying topic is mostly deeper and broader than the important aspect tagged "information overload".

    --
    Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
  41. Duckduckgo, w3m, and mpv by TheOuterLinux · · Score: 1

    The Linux way: I use Duckduckgo in a text web browser (w3m) or something quick like Dillo. DDG doesn't show me a bunch of useless, click-bait info like Google does. Then, if I want to watch YouTube videos (use https://tonvid.com/ as frontend) or any other website with youtube-dl supported embeds (https://rg3.github.io/youtube-dl/supportedsites.html), I can set w3m's external browser setting to "mpv -ytdl --vo=opengl,drm,caca --ao=pulse,alsa. Using the commas sets a priority order just in case one is not supported. Then, I set w3m's user-agent to mobile Safari. This forces most video and radio sites to switch to mobile friendly, Adobe-free, format like MP4, m3u, etc. If you do open a page and get a JS error, ignore it and press Shift+M to launch mpv anyway; youtube-dl will parse the URL for you. Using mpv as my player, I can stream videos to my computer in both GUI and TTY as long as I'm runlevel 3 or 5 and have keyboard controls, which vlc-nox does not in TTY. It's basically an easier to use fork of mplayer. Made a tutorial here: https://www.bitchute.com/video.... No ads, no JS tracking, and lightning speed. And yes, that also means getting your p0rñ fix without lea in the command-line. ;)

  42. As we became better and better farmers ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As we became better and better farmers ... our hunting skills declined. Is farming making us stupid?

  43. Inf ovrld?? by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

    TL DR;

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  44. The load is totally under your control! by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    I find the very concept of "information overload" kind of silly since we are all in complete control of the amount and type of information we consume.

    The underlying problem is really just that you consume too much information that triggers your anger response. As Bob Newhart would say "Stop It".

    Just stop reading so much. Or maybe read more about things that bring you joy. Too many people are feeling alienated because they consume a mental diet tailor-made by crack teams to make you feel afraid and angry and alone.

    Stop It.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  45. In general: Categorized recording... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: Breaking things into discrete categories (general @ 1st & then subcategories are more specialized) in bookmarks (or a database of any kind that's searchable) - because you have to face 1 fact - there is NO WAY you can retain (or sadly, even GAIN) "all information possible" in this life as we're limited in how long we can retain things (things get 'rusty'/'hazy') but IF YOU KNOW WHERE TO LOOK & have it ORGANIZED? It usually works (or @ least helps).

    * This imo IS why writing was created (what I call our 'racial memory' building on the shoulders of giants before us), & it is our GREATEST invention (& what separate us from other species who have instinct + senses superior to ours letting us dominate this planet vs. them).

    * That's as well as I can put this concept out - & it probably is very elementary to most here...

    APK

    P.S.=> No, you don't have to KNOW 'everything' - you only need to know WHERE TO LOOK (& have it organized + broken down for faster searches for answers)... apk

  46. Simple! by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    I just stopped worrying about compl

  47. One way by DaMattster · · Score: 1

    I felt significantly better after ditching Facebook and Twitter. It took me a little while to stop craving the need to use social media but it feels good to be without it. As a sort of funny side effect, my smartphone has better battery life without those apps installed.

  48. Beer does the trick. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Beer. Lot's of beer.

    Beer soon erases all that all that annoying information overload.

    In bad cases a stronger solvent might be required.

    Cheers.

    Merry Christmas and an information free New Year everyone!

  49. Stop the news, TV, and recycles by I75BJC · · Score: 1

    I don't read newspapers or watch network news. A radio newstalk host said once that there are only 3 (political) news stories. I stopped listening to the media for six months and found, after a quick review, that there really are only 3 stories when I listened again. I stopped listening for 99% of the stories. That saves a lot of time when one doesn't have to listen to all the individual stories. I don't watch USA network television. Streaming lets me watch what I want to watch and without commercials. In IT, the ideas are constantly repackaged. Same ideas just new wrappers -- it's either centralized or distributed: mainframes or workstations, client/server, cloud computing. This happens with other IT services and other industries. Lots and lots of back and forth between a limited number of options. The biggest help is growing older. Young people like drama and management uses drama to corral their younger work forces.

  50. I avoid info overload by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bye delibuhlitly remaneeng ignint, mayng. Yuo nebba heer ub african americuns subbering frum inflowmayshun oberloab, does yuo?

  51. Nature is the best cure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Walking in a forest preserve, park, state park. Taking time to watch the sunrise/sunset. Kayaking in the river, lakes and ocean. Gardening. Camping. Hiking. Looking up at the stars. In short, taking time to smell the roses of what life has to offer (literally and figuratively). The beauty is that the answer is simple, is everywhere and surrounds you every day. You don't need a book. You just need to make the effort to treat yourself. 10 minutes, 10 hours or 10 weeks. Whatever it takes to just do it. You would be surprised.

  52. Drastic remedies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Homeopathy is a sure cure for "information overload".

  53. Re: Turn off the phone, put it in a room you're no by grep+-v+'.*'+* · · Score: 1

    Information overload? Stop consuming it.

    WOW -- I find your ideas intriguing and would like to subscribe to your email newsletter.

    It'll fit right in with the rest of the stuff I never quite get around to actually read.

    --
    If the universe is someone's simulation -- does that mean the stars are just stuck pixels?
  54. Re: Information overload? No, entertainment overlo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I literally watch the same few shows over and over again*, because all of the new shows are garbage. I've been disappointed by a lot of movies as of late, though the odd one shines through.

    I dont even /watch/ most of it. It let it play in the background while i'm working. One of the downsides of working from home is it feels lonely, so the noise helps calm my nerves when i'm burried in code.

    * for the sake of completeness:
    - Futurama
    - That 70s Show
    - Eureka
    - Warehouse 13

  55. Stare Into The Lights My Pretties by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just finished watching a documentary about this very subject: the how and why the screen leads to short attention spans, information overload and so forth... It's a creepy situation. The screens also make us addicted!

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q5qJjNM2Kx0

  56. Avoiding Information Overload is simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go to the bar and get drunk, pass out, wake up, don't remember anything. Databanks purged!

  57. Deload by MoogMan · · Score: 2

    How do you avoid information overload?

    Make space in your life.

    1. Stop reading the news. It's amazing how (1) information isn't really all that important, nor informative and (2) you tend to get to know important information by IRL socialising.
    2. Deactivate your Facebook. Or at least, remove the bloody app from your phone and stop checking it every damn day.
    3. Socialise with real people, in real life. Have meaningful conversations.

  58. How do I avoid information overload? I don't :-[ by sonamchauhan · · Score: 2

    But if I did, it'd take the form of a 'distributed intelligence agency' of devices and people that observed me, observed my interactions with the world, engaged me in conversation (and other devices and humans on my behalf), and then acted based on its perception of my need. Such actions would include filtering or augmenting my information flows (preferably, doing both). But of course, such a system would need to be controlled, and answerable, to me the user.

    This is such a natural role for operating system vendors, its a wonder that Apple, Microsoft, Google, Fitbit, Amazon, Redhat, Omron, Arduino, KDE, etc, haven't cottoned onto it yet. Perhaps because building a 'society of intelligent agents' that acts in the best interests of the customer requires cooperating with 'the other'. And that is hard - both financially, and technically.

    When that day comes around, my medical records, Fitbit history, readings from my home blood pressure monitor, locations from my mobile, credit card history -- all these would be brought together and 'digested'. I'd then be 'counselled' to eat healthy takeaway from WholeFoods, bypassing the PizzaHut I was walking towards. (Or not, as the case may be - I've had a stellar exercise week).

    Unfortunately, commercial OS vendors and data providers are busy building or tending the walled gardens of their rent-seeking dreams. So the API hooks this 'Society of the Mind' intelligence agency requires aren't available. Until that comes to pass, we're stuck entering data into our own life.

  59. No Social Networks, selective reading ... by Qbertino · · Score: 2

    social networks:

    No social networks. I have one spoof account on FB for my social dancing contacts which I use as needed. Can go for weeks without looking at it. My other social network account has my real portrait and name and is basically there to lead people to my professional Homepage (I do websoftware development).

    Email:

    I get roughly 5 meaningful emails a week (that includes work), the rest is mostly newsletter spam which I filter or unsubscribe. I seriously cannot fathom what these poor sobs getting 200 emails a day handle it.

    Web:

    I read and write a little Slashdot every day, and skim German newspapers and newsmags. Although I've reduced that lately - to much cheaply produced read & enrage bait even in respectable outlets (they are *all* struggling to compete). I watch John Oliver, Jim Sterling, and the occasional TED talk. Tim Ferriss (tim.blog) roughly once a month.

    Professional:

    Techcrunch roughly once a week, Chromedev channel on YouTube roughly once a month.

    My biggest struggle is trying not to get caught up in to many web technology fads, which I don't always manage. With full stack webdev you never stop learning so there is more than enough information for me to take in anyways.

    Books: roughly 1 every two months right now. To little. I read American scientific stuff (poor economics, why Nations fail, etc.) and some sci-fi and cyberpunk fiction.

    Recently I've picked up the habit of breaking off reading if I find I have more important/rewarding things to do, like yoga, dancing or planning my next trip.

    My 2 cents.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
  60. Limit exposure by HalAtWork · · Score: 2

    I limit my exposure, and force time restrictions on my own browsing. I will only allow myself to browse certain set times and when I feel I need to look some information up, I take note and either wait for that time or consider alternatives.

  61. take a tip from Mr. Paul Anka.. by gosand · · Score: 1
    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  62. ROTFLMAO by Shogun37 · · Score: 1

    That's cute...You think people use the space between their ears for something other than keeping their heads three dimensional. If you killed every intelligent being on this planet, the population MIGHT drop by...twelve?

  63. The real problem is Entertainment Overload by jwkauffman1951 · · Score: 2

    This may not be true of Slashdot readers, but I think the majority of Americans spend a huge percentage of their non-working, non-sleeping time tapped into some kind of entertainment. TV shows, Netflix, sports, music-as-background, smartphone and console games; the list goes on and on. All of these interfere with critical thinking. In the U.S., doing critical thinking brands you as an "intellectual", and we've always been anti-intellectual in this country. What other country in their history has had a political party called the "Know Nothings"? I think for the most part we've inoculated ourselves against Information Overload just by not paying attention.

  64. Pick your information ... by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

    ... and avoid the rest.

    Information not related to your interests is not only uninteresting, it's a waste of time.

    You can be even more informed about your core passions by tamping down on the noise.

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  65. I don't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With anxiety/depression and no job at the moment, I literally seek out information overload to avoid ruminating on past negative stuff.

  66. Disconnect. by SCHecklerX · · Score: 1

    Seriously. Hike. Bike. Paddle a Kayak. Snowboard. Camp. Get on an elliptic trainer and stare at the girls in yoga pants at the gym. It's hard maybe to start doing it, but once you find something that you like, it will be hard to stay away from that thing. My biggest addiction is whitewater kayaking. Playboats. Class IV-V creeking. Waterfalls, whatever! You can't really be distracted by facespace drama and world politics when you're in the gnar!

    The thing that really rocks about individual sports like snowboards, mountainbikes, and kayaks is that there is always a progression and you look forward to working hard to get to that next level.

  67. This is how by JThundley · · Score: 1

    I do it by skipping fluff stories such as this thing. Unless of course, I have something snarky and not constructive to add.

  68. Re:Information overload? No, entertainment overloa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The problem is not that the Internet is full of information. It is a great place to look up stuff - more up to date than a lexicon.

    Just make sure you strictly use it in a "pull" fashion. Don't let anyone "push" information to you. Only get information when you want to get some - not ever because someone else thought they had something to say. Way too many thinks they have an 'important' message. Avoid all those (no kind of service that 'alerts' you or wants you to 'follow' something.) People wo respond to 'alerts' and 'follow', are the ones who suffer information overload.

  69. The time just slides by. An alarm timer helps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A cooking or children's timer helps limit the time you spend on news sites. For example this timer at a nationwide chain of school supply stores... Count Up & Count Down Digital Timer $12.99 "Dual-function timer has simple controls and an extra-large display that clearly shows minutes and seconds, so it’s easy to track elapsed time or count down to zero." item# PP183 https://www.lakeshorelearning....

  70. Define the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As with any project, first define the problem accurately.

    What is 'information?' What is 'overload?'

    The distinction between drug users and drug addicts is how much it affects your life.

    I don't do facebook at all. Vacation photos and baby talk from relatives. I don't do that in real life either.

    Lots of other people do tho, and it's not an overload for them. It's useful information or entertainment.

    Decide what sort of life you want to lead and don't let random tweets from other people drive your attention.

    What do _you_ want to attend to? That's the question that should drive how you use the wonderfully exciting and possibly destructive crap on the worldwide web.

    And technology shouldn't change your answer.

  71. Re:Turn off the phone, put it in a room you're not by epine · · Score: 1

    Seriously. Turn off the phone and put it in a room you're not in. Then, step away from the computer (PC, tablets, laptops, whatever you use.)

    Now, go do other things you've forgotten how to do.

    Huh, this highly recycled hummingbird feather got moderated as insightful.

    My mission here will be complete and I can die happy if only I can now figure out how to moderate a moderation point as +1 QED.

  72. Viewing or using the Internet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For my point of view, the main problem is believing that all is on the Internet, then we need do nothing...
    Another side of the problem is to find the way to organise (an filter) the portion of information that we need. This issue is not easy at all, and we cannot rely on Google cookies to do so. Google is now a limitation, i.e., I am sure that if you search something, the results that you got are different from mines.
    Which kind of searching tool we really need (as intelligent creatures)?

    1. Re:Viewing or using the Internet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How you think that this new searching tool should be?

  73. filter failure reminds me of autism/aspergers by Wycliffe · · Score: 1

    The whole idea of filter failure reminds me of what is happening in people with autism/aspergers and also supposedly wild animals. The human brain has been designed to filter out the unimportant and focus on the important. It's the reason that most non-autistic people after a short amount of time will stop noticing a ticking clock in the background. I think the problem with technology today is just like we have figured out how to synthesize stuff like sugar and drugs that directly bypass the brain's controls, we are doing the same with media. We are basically overloading our brains with tons of stimulus that our primitive brains can't filter properly into important and not important. In a small community, knowing that there is a murderer out killing people is likely very important knowledge. Knowing that some crazy killed someone halfway around the world is probably not important to your overall health but your brain doesn't know that. Even though your higher level conscience can usually differentiate between what is real and what is not real, it's not 100%. Your heartrate still increases while watching a horror movie because at some level your brain still thinks its real. Add to that that companies actually go out of their way to make their products more addicting and you have a disaster on your hand.