Slashdot Mirror


Kansas Swatting Perpetrator 'SWauTistic' Interviewed on Twitter (krebsonsecurity.com)

"That kids house that I swatted is on the news," tweeted "SWauTistic" -- before he realized he'd gotten somebody killed. Security researcher Brian Krebs reveals what happened next. When it became apparent that a man had been killed as a result of the swatting, Swautistic tweeted that he didn't get anyone killed because he didn't pull the trigger. Swautistic soon changed his Twitter handle to @GoredTutor36, but KrebsOnSecurity managed to obtain several weeks' worth of tweets from Swautistic before his account was renamed. Those tweets indicate that Swautistic is a serial swatter -- meaning he has claimed responsibility for a number of other recent false reports to the police. Among the recent hoaxes he's taken credit for include a false report of a bomb threat at the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) that disrupted a high-profile public meeting on the net neutrality debate. Swautistic also has claimed responsibility for a hoax bomb threat that forced the evacuation of the Dallas Convention Center, and another bomb threat at a high school in Panama City, Fla, among others.

After tweeting about the incident extensively Friday afternoon, KrebsOnSecurity was contacted by someone in control of the @GoredTutor36 Twitter account. GoredTutor36 said he's been the victim of swatting attempts himself, and that this was the reason he decided to start swatting others. He said the thrill of it "comes from having to hide from police via net connections." Asked about the FCC incident, @GoredTutor36 acknowledged it was his bomb threat. "Yep. Raped em," he wrote. "Bomb threats are more fun and cooler than swats in my opinion and I should have just stuck to that," he wrote. "But I began making $ doing some swat requests."

Krebs' article also links to a police briefing with playback from the 911 call. "There is no question that police officers and first responders across the country need a great deal more training to bring the number of police shootings way down..." Krebs argues. "Also, all police officers and dispatchers need to be trained on what swatting is, how to spot the signs of a hoax, and how to minimize the risk of anyone getting harmed when responding to reports about hostage situations or bomb threats."

But he also argues that filing a false police report should be reclassified as a felony in all states.

18 of 434 comments (clear)

  1. Earlier police failures... by mi · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Those tweets indicate that Swautistic is a serial swatter

    Well, score another one for police — why was not the fake caller prosecuted after his very first crime?

    false report of a bomb threat at the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) that disrupted a high-profile public meeting on the net neutrality debate

    Ah, well, that changes everything. If a crime is committed for a noble cause, the criminal becomes a hero...

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    1. Re:Earlier police failures... by sg_oneill · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Probably didn't work out who it was.

      This kids fucked. But he's *very* damn lucky Swatting isn't a felony, because Felony + Someone dies is enough to trigger a capital murder case in some states. And even if thats not the case wherever he is, theres a good chance all the cops would need is three felonies and the kid goes away for the best part of his life.

      Oh, he'll be doing big time though, count on that much.

      --
      Excuse the Unicode crap in my posts. That's an apostrophe, and slashdot is busted.
    2. Re: Earlier police failures... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      How is calling people who are there to protect other people a crime?

      That'd be legally acknowledging that you are safer by not engaging with LEOs at all.

    3. Re:Earlier police failures... by dryeo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      People don't want to pay taxes so the cops have to concentrate on crimes such as pot smoking where they can invoke civil forfeiture to make sure of getting a pay check. This also leads to the cops not wanting to spend time on money losing endeavors such as taking their time at a hostage situation when they can just shoot the perp and save time and money including court costs and of course chasing after someone on the internet has no return on the investment.
      Related is the for profit prison industry, needed so taxes can be lowered, where they don't want violent criminals in their workshops, rather non-violent offenders who make better slave labourers.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    4. Re: Earlier police failures... by Demena · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Funny how in some Scandinavian countries the penalties are even less and yet there is almost no crime. Your statement appears counterfactual.

  2. What an asshole by Baron_Yam · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "I didn't kill anyone because I didn't pull the trigger"

    Wow. No, you just fooled a bunch of heavily armed people into thinking they were going to be confronting an armed and dangerous person who had already killed one person. No way could you have POSSIBLY predicted that situation could potentially lead to a death.

    This idiot should be locked away for a very, very long time to think about what he did.

    On a separate note - the cops need to be royally reamed. They know swatting is a thing, they know getting the address wrong is a thing... yet they roll up and without any confirmation of what's going on they shoot the guy who answers the door. FFS, no hostage-taking murderer with a gun is going to open up the front door to the police without a hostage in front of them anyway.

    10:1 the shooter had bad trigger discipline. Odds are even better that what blame the cops can't avoid will be so thinly distributed that pretty much no punishment results despite the fact they killed one of the people they're charged with protecting.

    1. Re: What an asshole by makerfixer · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That was a disgusting shooting, the guy basically was shot 10 rounds into a game of Simon Says. Swat teams need to consider that they are meant for shock and awe but trained and give instructions expecting calm and careful reasoning of subjects in front of them.

  3. It's easy to second guess police... by klindsay · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The killing today in Colorado of a sheriff's deputy responding to a domestic violence call highlights the challenge faced by law enforcement officers.

    1. Re:It's easy to second guess police... by arth1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The killing today in Colorado of a sheriff's deputy responding to a domestic violence call highlights the challenge faced by law enforcement officers.

      A thousand cops being killed does not justify a single innocent person being killed by cops.

      If they cannot do their jobs without being killed or killing innocents, it's time to replace the police. Close it down and create a new police force based on police in countries where crime is at a similar level but the death toll in police confrontations is much lower.

    2. Re:It's easy to second guess police... by rossz · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Uh, no. Police work is not all that dangerous of a job. Cops who die on the job mostly die from car accidents because they drive like idiots, or from heart attacks from all those donuts.

      --
      -- Will program for bandwidth
    3. Re:It's easy to second guess police... by Solandri · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A thousand cops being killed does not justify a single innocent person being killed by cops.

      That makes no sense at all.We're all people- even cops. If we're innocent (police or civilian), each of our lives is worth the same. It only makes sense if you assume all cops aren't innocent.

      And real-life is messy and full of errors. If you set the standard as perfection (no innocents killed), that's an unattainable standard and will result in massive costs elsewhere in the system. You can set it as a goal, but to set it as a requirement is simply unrealistic. If you tell police they face automatic incarceration even if they accidentally kill an innocent, you will have no more police force. They will all quit and nobody will want to replace them.

    4. Re:It's easy to second guess police... by rahvin112 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yes cops are people too, the problem is they aren't punished like people when they make mistakes, particularly mistakes that result in people dying. When you make the cops above the law and allow them to make these mistakes without punishment you create situations where the police shoot first and explain it later.

      As in all police shootings the police reported the killed innocent reached for his waist band. Of course no weapon was found and he didn't actually reach for his waist band. Because of this a bad cop will remain on the force, a cop that shot first and killed an innocent father.

      Cops need to be held responsible for their actions in the same way a doctor is held responsible when they make mistakes that result in someones death. In fact cops are about the only profession in the country where they can kill people through negligence and aren't punished for it. That's wrong and you should admit it.

  4. Cops and Swatter by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The cop who shot and the swatter should share a general populaiton cell for 20+ years for complicity in the murder.

    Swatter obviously created a dangerous situation, but this danger was exacerbated by the typical behavior of American cops.

    Cops were supposed to be professionals. Instead, they were trigger-happy to save their sorry hides and murdered an innocent man. The cop who shot has blood on his hands and should never be forgiven or seen as anything but a murderer.

    The emergency dispatcher who didn't ask the right questions to determine if it was a prank is also somewhat negligent. The call was to the city hall, not 9-1-1, and described a different home than where the murder took place.

  5. Throw the book at him . . . by cold+fjord · · Score: 5, Insightful

    He begs to be made an example of, and it should be done pour encourager les autres.

    We cannot have that in civil society.

    --
    much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
  6. Fatal rookie mistake by the officer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I've read of how some of the responding officers are so adrenaline filled and under trained for the high alert event that they suddenly get involved with that they get..., "over-zealous". That officer never should have had his finger on the trigger, but instead on the trigger guard. Fatal results ensue, unfortunately. Prosecute the swatter, re-train all the officers.

  7. Huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The fact that this guy can openly admit to this so carelessly and not be afraid of repercussions already shows a complete breakdown of American due process and the justice system.

  8. This is just a sad state of affairs by SigIO · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Examples are going to be made of everyone. The kid who did the Swatting. The kid who paid for the swatters services. And the unfortunate cop who pulled the trigger. 4 lives minimum, ruined.

    1. Re:This is just a sad state of affairs by mea2214 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And the unfortunate cop who pulled the trigger. 4 lives minimum, ruined.

      The cop won't be punished. He'll be treated as a victim in this. The swatters will get good lawyers who will find some loophole in the law. The guy who answered the door is the only life that will have been ruined.