Slashdot Mirror


Bill Gates Is First Guest Editor In Time Magazine's 94-Year History (geekwire.com)

Long-time Slashdot reader theodp writes: Time invited Bill Gates to be the first guest editor in the 94-year history of the magazine. Among the news Bill deemed fit to print in Time's first augmented-reality-enhanced issue were articles by wife Melinda and pal Bono, both of whom graced the cover of Time with Bill as the 2005 Persons of the Year... Another article reveals that "the four learning hacks Bill Gates swears by" include Khan Academy (a $10+ million Gates Foundation partner), tech-backed Code.org (to which Bill, the Gates Foundation, Microsoft, and Steve Ballmer have given somewhere north of $17M), the Big History Project (to which Bill had contributed a "modest $10 million" as of 2014), and The Teaching Company (which got Bill stoked about Big History).
The issue also includes Gates' "four favorite ways to give back" and "six innovations that could change the world." In fact, the theme of the whole issue is "optimism," with 62-year-old Gates writing that "On the whole, the world is getting better. This is not some naively optimistic view; it's backed by data. Look at the number of children who die before their fifth birthday. Since 1990, that figure has been cut in half. That means 122 million children have been saved in a quarter-century, and countless families have been spared the heartbreak of losing a child."

Another optimistic essay came from Daily Show host Trever Noah, who writes, "Mock millennials all you want. Here's why they give me hope."

36 of 64 comments (clear)

  1. By all means, give back by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Give back to the people who worked for the corporations you drove out of business with illegally anticompetitive business practices, Bill. Give back to the people who had to clean up after your deliberate attempts to sabotage Linux. Give life back to the people that your investments have killed. Give back the tax revenues you've avoided paying even though you're one of the biggest beneficiaries of the system. Let us have back control of education. Please, Bill. Give Back.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    1. Re:By all means, give back by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      Give back to the people who worked for the corporations you drove out of business

      Basic computing infrastructure software should not be controlled by "other corporations". It should be free. We got this right with the Internet, but we should have gotten it right with operating systems as well. If Linux or FreeBSD had been available in 1985 rather than 1991, then Windows would have never become dominant.

      Companies like Sun and DEC deserved to be crushed. They were as hostile to open source as Microsoft, pushing Solaris and VMS, along with proprietary GUIs, until it was too late to matter.

    2. Re:By all means, give back by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 2
      DECUS would have a lot different view about DEC and open source. DEC actively encouraged open source in the form it took in the PDP11 days. I don't know about later.

      I give you that Ken Olsen said "Unix is snake oil" but that was not because it was open source - it wasn't then. And he refused to port VMS to the 486 - which would not have been that difficult technically, but that has nothing to do with open source either.

      Sun, OTOH has behaved disgracefully, and all I can say in their defence is they were not as bad as Oracle - but then it is arguable whether Satan is as bad as Oracle.

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    3. Re:By all means, give back by ArtemaOne · · Score: 1, Interesting

      A lot, but never heard of a legitimate claim for Bill Gates.

    4. Re:By all means, give back by ebonum · · Score: 1

      He used the opportunity to shamelessly self promote. Free advertising for himself at Time's expense. Nice move.

    5. Re:By all means, give back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      He played the same game by the same rules that his completion played. And a big part of MS's success was innovators lining up to sell their technology to MS. Three of the most popular MS applications were not developed by MS. WordPerfect , Lotus1-2-3, and Dbase dominated the MS application space but the owners of these applications ultimately sold their technology to MS for big pay days and in some cases received big pay days while being given jobs at MS. And then MS Office came into being. And don't forget Netscape had a 90% browser market share in the internet browser space and pissed it away by making some of the stupidest mistakes possible. They screwed up their product so bad that even IE 3.0 looked better. MS did not come into the world as an industry leader. They started with nothing more than $50K loan. MS earned their dominance because nobody else stepped up and competed with them. Waiting until MS became the industry leader and then whining about not being able to compete is a weak excuse.

      In tax related matters he also played the same game with the same rules as everyone else. He has no obligation to give away any of his wealth. He didn't sabotage Linux. The Linux supporters and collaborators did that all by themselves.

    6. Re:By all means, give back by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Companies like Sun and DEC deserved to be crushed.

      I don't know how open OpenVMS actually was so I can't speak to that, but commercial UNIX(tm) was at least based on open standards, even when it was not based on open source. Several commercial Unixes including SunOS 4.x and NeXTStep were based on BSD even after that became open source, at least the -lite version, and System V was sufficiently well documented that knocking it off was eminently possible. And in fact, that's what happened; except for some very early examples, Linux has always been more SysVish and POSIXish than BSDish. So even though SunOS 5 was not open source, its general adherence to System V style meant that it helped open the door for Linux. I personally installed several Linux systems in a Sun shop at the time specifically on the basis of the similarity to SunOS 5 at a lower cost. They were able to run tools like magic and pspice directly for a fraction of the cost of running them on Sun workstations, and users were able to remotely run verilog tools as if they were local due to the common adherence to the same graphics standards. Having to manually bash out XF86Config files was a small price to pay compared to the large literal price of the Sun hardware.

      They were as hostile to open source as Microsoft, pushing Solaris and VMS, along with proprietary GUIs, until it was too late to matter.

      The proprietary GUI included with SunOS 4 was a bit wonky, I'll give you that. But the GUI bundled with SunOS 5 was based on Motif, which was open source long before that was hip. That is why the first Linux desktops were motif-based. You could cheaply buy a source license for Motif (which was always open source), and ISTR there being at least two independent commercial ports for Linux. One way to get a Motif license indirectly was to get Caldera Network Desktop, which came with a Motif-based desktop similar to SCO Open Desktop (with icons on a desktop.) I don't remember if there is any relation between the two products, though you would certainly expect there to be. AIX's and HP bundled the same GUI that SunOS did (CDE) which was actually based on HP-VUE. CDE was superseded even in these commercial Unixes by GNOME, which has been the de facto standard for the Unix desktop ever since.

      Motif was released as free open source software in 2012 (a few months after CDE.) It's especially interesting in the context of this conversation because Microsoft was on the Motif WG. That's why Windows [NT] 3.x and Motif operate essentially identically, with a menu in the upper-left of the window, buttons in the upper right, and distinct resize handles at every corner and every side of every non-palette-style window. This behavior persists in Windows to this day, although the visual style has changed substantially, with the grab handles disappearing entirely and being only implied by the pointer changing during mouseover. This also continues to be the dominant window handling paradigm on the Unix desktop.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re:By all means, give back by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      WordPerfect , Lotus1-2-3, and Dbase dominated the MS application space but the owners of these applications ultimately sold their technology to MS for big pay days and in some cases received big pay days while being given jobs at MS.

      Those companies lost their positions in the market because, under the direction of Bill Gates, Microsoft abused its dominant position in the marketplace in a way that the USDoJ found to be illegal and unethical (see GP comment for link.)

      And don't forget Netscape had a 90% browser market share in the internet browser space and pissed it away by making some of the stupidest mistakes possible. They screwed up their product so bad that even IE 3.0 looked better.

      To whom?

      MS earned their dominance because nobody else stepped up and competed with them.

      Microsoft engaged in a number of business deals in bad faith which had the effect of stifling competition.

      In tax related matters he also played the same game with the same rules as everyone else.

      Many wealthy people are the same kind of asshole as Bill Gates, but this conversation is about Bill Gates. Try to stay on topic.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    8. Re:By all means, give back by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      I don't know how open OpenVMS actually was so

      It wasn't. The "Open" in "OpenVMS" was marketing BS.

      commercial UNIX(tm) was at least based on open standards

      DEC was openly hostile to Unix ... at a time when 90% of Unix ran on DEC hardware. This sounds stupid ... and it was.

      Sun used Unix, but was openly hostile to open source on their systems. They fought against X-Windows, and pushed their own crappy proprietary GUI. You mention Motif (which was closed source until 2012), but Sun was actually opposed to Motif for years. They switched from BSD Unix to SysV (Solaris) in the face of strong objections from developers, and viewed the Sun Users Group as a hostile organization. They even removed the C compiler from the system to keep people from downloading and compiling stuff from the Internet.

    9. Re:By all means, give back by nyet · · Score: 1

      Yep. Not a dime from Bill Gates to the FSF or the EFF.

      He really is a piece of work.

    10. Re:By all means, give back by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      They even removed the C compiler from the system to keep people from downloading and compiling stuff from the Internet.

      Yes, the Sun shop I worked for had a license for the sunspro compiler, and I'd compile stuff on whatever the big machine was and then distribute it out to the other machines. We made liberal use of nis and nfs so it was all easy enough. But binaries of GNU software were a thing for Sun machines way back, including gcc.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    11. Re:By all means, give back by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Is that idea even relevant any more. Perhaps you are still trapped in the lie that US main stream media has any value beyond advertising. They are straight up propaganda, all the big hoop de doop about a first ever guest what ever, so the guest did it themselves instead of paying an editor already on the payroll to do it for them. Who is advertising whom in this piece. Is Time desperate for attention, ohhhh look we have Wee Willie Gates the turd as editor, is Wee Willie, desperate for attention, ohh look I am an editor on yesteryears Time (they are just no longer relevant having dived too deep in the corporate propaganda pool), is it just collusion of the attention whores, mmm, boo hoo no one is listening to us any more, Gates and or Time.

      Ahh, the opinions of the elites, what are the worth any more, they only have one true opinion "I want more, More, MORE OF EVERYTHING", this regardless of how much they already have, all they are is greed. Rather sad and something to be pushed into the past, rather than being celebrated in the media from the previous millenniums.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    12. Re:By all means, give back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Right. Have Bill give back to those poor, poor well educated, well paid people working for Microsoft's competitors, as opposed to the dirt-poor people the Gates Foundation is currently focusing on. Makes sense to me.

      Keep your nerd-rage to yourself, 1%-er.

    13. Re:By all means, give back by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      A lot, but never heard of a legitimate claim for Bill Gates.

      When the "Dark Cloud over Good Works of Gates Foundation" article originally came out, the Gates Foundation published a press release on their site saying that they would be reviewing their investments' ethical ramifications. The next day, they took that down, and put up another one saying that they wouldn't be reviewing the ethicality of their investments, because that was hard.

      They know what they are doing.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    14. Re:By all means, give back by ArtemaOne · · Score: 1

      I hadn't read that before. That's a real shame. Pollution, real pollution, is definitely not any better than using a bullet. I'll concede this one!

  2. WIndows 8! by Templer421 · · Score: 1

    And other bad ideas.

  3. Newsflash! by Nova+Express · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Man last relevant in 2001 edits magazine last relevant in 1996! Details at 10!"

    --
    Lawrence Person (lawrencepersonh@gmailh.com (remove all "h"s to mail)

    http://www.lawrenceperson.com/

  4. Giving back? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If Bill really wants to give back, then give me back some of my money your corporation made from its illegal business practices.

    But that feeling may stem from the fact that I'm still pissed that the torturing war criminal George Bush torpedoed the court decision to break Microsoft up into multiple companies for Microsoft's multiple violations of our anti-trust laws.

    > On the whole, the world is getting better.

    Starving polar bears and the clear and present danger of global warming loudly say otherwise. :(

    1. Re:Giving back? by greenwow · · Score: 1

      I'd wish they'd fix their software even more than getting money back. My entire weekend is going to be wasted trying to install KB4056890. Looks like it's going to take through the weekend to update 21 servers since Microsoft's update keeps failing, and I have to keep hitting retry. Security updates shouldn't be so unreliable.

  5. I don't understand the worship of Gates by Jarwulf · · Score: 1

    Sure, he gives to a bunch of good causes...that benefit his image, in between giving to causes that will benefit him politically and materially. But so what? A rich man with more money than he knows what to do with doles it out instead of taking it with him to the afterlife? A clever psychopath would do the exact same thing. Its like praising a bankrobber for using his fortune to set up a charity. He's not even giving away the money wholesale like he demands other people do with his lobbying for taxes and centralization of government. Rather its doled out in a carefully controlled and targeted fashion at all steps to precisely where he wants under the aegis of his foundation. People instantly forgot what he did to get this money the second he started throwing it in their faces. Maybe if he was really generous he should give that money back to the people he crushed it from so they can become beloved philanthropists.

  6. Slashdotters knees jerking... by rcharbon · · Score: 1

    ...in 3-2-1...

  7. In utterly unrelated news by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 2

    Time has given Windows 10 a 5 star review. "The perfect software," the news weekly says.

  8. Jumping to conclusions by arth1 · · Score: 1

    Look at the number of children who die before their fifth birthday. Since 1990, that figure has been cut in half. That means 122 million children have been saved in a quarter-century, and countless families have been spared the heartbreak of losing a child."

    Giving them prophylactics and education so they won't make children that die would also spare heartbreaks and help curb population growth. We're not an endangered species; we don't need as many child births as possible.

    And, cynically, a small but significant number of children dying is helpful from an evolutionary point of view. Unless there is competition and culling, the gene pool will become less healthy over time. Make sterilization mandatory when saving a child's life, whether it's a rich child or a poor child.

  9. He Should Donate To The MS Veterans Foundation by dryriver · · Score: 1

    No, not veteran coders at Microsoft. People who have wrestled with various MS products starting back with MS-DOS and are now... erm... "slightly damaged" by that experience. Config.sys and autoexec.bat come to mind. 640 Kb memory limit as well. Blue screens of death. Constant rebooting and restarting and reformatting of PCs. Flaky Windows installers. Viruses and malware in their tens of thousands. Plug and play that just did not work properly for years. Printers that wouldn't print. Soundblaster cards that couldn't be configured properly. Modems and other devices that Windows had to be beaten into seeing by turning them on and off and pluging them in and out 20 times over. Office files that aren't backwards compatible. The clusterfuck that is the Excel GUI. A lot of Windows 8 veterans for example have mental issues now. They walk the empty hallways of eerie mental institutions muttering "someone took my Start Button... someone took my Start Button..." or "Windows 8 hates me, Windows 8 hates me". A lot of people took bad shrapnel wounds from using Internet Exploder as well. Then there was MS Visual Studio with its ultra-funky GUI design, where you spend more time trying to understand what in God's name VS is showing you in its GUI than actually writing working code. Give generously, Billy G. We veterans need it.

    --
    Why did the chicken cross the road? Because Elon Musk put an AI chip in its head.
  10. Why all the hate against Bill? by FeelGood314 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Seriously, it seems like a bunch of virtue signalling to me. Bill post Microsoft, has been probably the greatest and smartest philanthropist of our time. So I'm guessing the hate has to be directed at Microsoft and his time there. Now if Microsoft is anywhere close to the top of your list of evil organizations then you have a serious lack of world knoledge. If you look at the details of Microsoft's abuses most of them are just being very competitive and a couple I would attribute to luck more than planning (e.g. Novell printer support).

    The world likes standards. If you make software for home users you ideally only want to make it for one platform and you want it to be so simple your grandmother can use it without making a support call. Microsoft gave the world that and they also made it easy for developers. Ask anyone who ever created anything for a Mac in the early 90s how easy it was just to make a window appear. Microsoft also did everything possible to make your old programs run on new versions of their OS. So that accounting software that ran on DOS 5.1 still works under Windows 10. Microsoft gained their OS dominance through being smart and working hard.
    Did they abuse their dominant position in the OS to gain an advantage else where? Yeah
    Did they overreact and crush netscape when they felt threatened? Yeah
    Did they give us an OS that most of us still use everyday at work, does it work pretty darn well and get stuff done for us? Yes
    Of the platforms - Linux, iOS, Windows and the Android on you AT&T phone, windows doesn't even seem that locked down.

    So competitive and occasionally evil but in the greater scheme of things Microsoft at it's worst was a better behaved company than 90% of the worlds large companies.

    1. Re:Why all the hate against Bill? by basic.gongfu · · Score: 2

      I can see two possible explanations for this level of ignorance, either you weren't around back when Microsoft was king of the hill and free to display all it's psychopathic traits in public without consequences; or you're somehow vested in Billy boy's reputation. He's an elitist asshole; always was, always will be; that he's now more into vaccinating children to death in lesser countries and indoctrinating the next generation to not think for themselves, while patting himself on the shoulder in public; doesn't change that, quite the opposite.

    2. Re:Why all the hate against Bill? by Jarwulf · · Score: 2

      Its not so much hating him I just don't understand the pervasive worship of him among the media and gen Y. He was and is a ruthless industrialist. He's buying love rather than companies now. He earned his money ruthlessly but legally, more or less, and is now acting coldly and logically in his selfinterest. Thats alright...for the most part, but he's no saint for doing this.

    3. Re: Why all the hate against Bill? by Jesus+H+Rolle · · Score: 1

      Now if Microsoft is anywhere close to the top of your list of evil organizations then you have a serious lack of world knoledge.

      It sounds like you're trying to say that Microsoft isn't as bad as ISIS.

    4. Re:Why all the hate against Bill? by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      You can't spend your life as an evil robber baron and then make it up with charity. It doesn't work that way. Bill Gates held computers back for a decade with his illegal monopoly. People here had to deal with it on a daily basis. He did tremendous harm, all so he could not get rich, but get richer.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  11. Good news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It's nice to hear that Sonny Bono is being productive these days.

    1. Re:Good news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      He's dead, you insensitive clod!

    2. Re:Good news. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      He's dead, you insensitive clod!

      How quickly you forget what he was doing just before that tree got him. (If only ski season had come early that year...)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  12. It's quite amazing, really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    How the erstwhile richest man on earth manages to buy himself this access to Time to, well, [i]signal his virtue[/i]... ... and yet remain utterly irrelevant as anything but the man who got rich holding us all back.

    I no longer hate him or his company because neither has much of any relevance left: They can safely be ignored. What we do need to do is learn from the damage, and work around it where we can't repair it. There always was a lot to be done. Thanks to him, now that much more. But that's really all the impact he ever had, and ever will have.

    He cannot even buy relevance, and he knows it; this shows it.

  13. Graced? by nospam007 · · Score: 2

    "graced the cover of Time with Bill as the 2005 Persons of the Year."

    Like Stalin and Hitler who also 'graced' the cover in their day?
    It's not an honor.

    1. Re:Graced? by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      it's in the mind of the beholder, I'm sure PRAVDA said "graced"

  14. How Bill Gates single handly destroyed computing by najajomo · · Score: 2

    That would be an interesting Time Article .. ref