Slashdot Mirror


Some Smartphone Salesmen Aren't Sold on the iPhone X (cnet.com)

A CNET reporter visited four carrier stores to ask their salesmen if they'd recommend an iPhone X. But after visiting stores for Sprint, T-Mobile, AT&T, and Verizon, "I couldn't even find a salesperson to tell me it was the best iPhone I could buy." So he finally tried asking three salesmen at Apple Stores -- and still got equivocal answers. An anonymous reader quotes CNET's report: "Well, it depends on what you like," the salesman said, somewhat coyly. "The biggest problem I have with it is using Face ID for Apple Pay. You really have to put the phone at a certain angle or it doesn't work." He started with a problem. I was already suspicious. I was in something of a hurry, but I asked him: "So are you selling a lot more of these than other phones?"

He turned into a high-ranking member of a political party. "All our phones sell well," he said. Which sounded not entirely reassuring. Indeed, it sounded like a "no."

Chatting next with an Apple store "Genius" (who was testing his iPhone 6), CNET's reporter was told that "The X and the 8 are the same phone... Inside, I mean. With the X, you're just paying the extra money for the design." Unfortunately, that salesman's $999 iPhone X was wrapped in an ugly pink case, because after four weeks he'd already cracked it. And a third Apple salesman -- who touted the glories of an OLED screen -- also kept his iPhone X in a case at all times "It's glass," he explained. "You'll definitely need a case."

"But what about not being able to see the lovely phone?"

"Get a see-through case," he replied with a smile.

33 of 230 comments (clear)

  1. Obligatory Dilbert by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 5, Funny

    And a third Apple salesman -- who touted the glories of an OLED screen -- also kept his iPhone X in a case at all times "It's glass," he explained. "You'll definitely need a case."

    "But what about not being able to see the lovely phone?"

    "Get a see-through case," he replied with a smile.

    http://dilbert.com/strip/2017-...

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
    1. Re:Obligatory Dilbert by sad_ · · Score: 4, Insightful

      this is so true.
      have you ever seen anybody use an iphone without a protective case? never ever seen it.
      but, ooooh, the design is so pretty and it is so thin.

      yes, but you can't see any of that with your ridiculous, ugly, fat case (which you bought on the cheap?) around it

      --
      On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
  2. iPhones drove smartphones to the masses... then... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You can't really argue much that Apple pushed at the right time with the right product with the right app infrastructure, support etc. iPhones were king mainly because of the app store and how easy it was to use. Noone could even compare (no they couldn't) and Droids, or whatever they were called were lackluster in support, the apps were trash and the app stores were trash. Hell they couldn't even agree on the same os to support things. Apple succeeded because it had all that.

    Fast forward to today. Apple has lost that edge. They've also lost the vision people have when using their smartphones. They are moving back to their roots where "Apple knows best" except now... there are much better offerings. I'll be honest, I've been an Apple phone guy since iPhone 4 and bought a 5, 6 and 7. It ended with 8 and their "we know best" removal of ports, constant fighting with app developers and trying to control the playing field when it's not their field anymore.

    The X was the real shining moment that Apple was completely out of touch with what the majority of people want. Followed up by the bonehead move involving the batteries. Apple is struggling as people aren't playing ball with them anymore and instead of accepting what they are giving... now demand something better.

    I honestly have no idea what my next phone will be but I know for sure it won't be an iPhone. They aren't even close to the best phone anymore.

  3. I won't pay that sort of money for any phone by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'd like to think I'm past the "ooh, I want the new shiny" thing - more or less. Going forward, my "new phone" budget is going to be roughly $500, and it's going to be spent every 3-4 years.

    But, in any case, this reads like a hit piece. "Tech writer goes into a story with an agenda, manages to confirm it."

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:I won't pay that sort of money for any phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Two years? My 6s isn't even 2 years old, and it is 3 generations behind their "latest and greatest".

      Never again will I buy an Apple product.

  4. There can only be one by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Funny

    Chatting next with an Apple store "Genius"...

    As of this weekend, that word no longer means what you think it does.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
    1. Re:There can only be one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      stable: "a building in which domestic animals are sheltered and fed"
      genius: " a peculiar, distinctive, or identifying character or spirit"

      Clearly, he was calling himself horse shit

    2. Re:There can only be one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      You joke. He's obviously smarter, because he knows what "covfefe" means, and you don't.

      You joke, but I for one am glad that the Pentagon gave him a very big nuclear button, to make sure he couldn't push it with his tiny hands.

  5. Upcoming earnings call by Camembert · · Score: 4, Insightful

    End of this month is Apple’s quarterly earnings call, which will include the commercial effect of iphone X. Then we will know whether they were succesful or not. I still see people queuing to pick up their X at the local Applestore, hence my bet is on it being a commercial success, despite cherry-picked negative articles on slashdot.

    1. Re: Upcoming earnings call by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You see nobody lining up because the launch was over two months ago.

      Anyway this is a CNET article, which is automatic garbage. The writer samples a few people, rejects any response that doesn't fit the agenda.

      I mean they could actually wait for financial figures instead of anecdotal sales rep opinions, but it's more fun to write a scandal sheet than something based on actual sales figures right?

    2. Re:Upcoming earnings call by Tough+Love · · Score: 3, Informative

      End of this month is Apple’s quarterly earnings call, which will include the commercial effect of iphone X. Then we will know whether they were succesful or not.

      Next quarter is the one. The smart money already called it: X sales 25% below expectation, relying on leading indicators such as Foxcon and supply chain already cut back.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
  6. Re:iPhones drove smartphones to the masses... then by Dracos · · Score: 3, Informative

    Apple has lost its edge mainly by succumbing to its own "function follows form" dogma. The main features of any iPhone are sleekness and thinness, which both compromise functionality.

    Cases are a necessity because these devices are designed to be fragile, gouging the customer again for the case itself and/or the inevitable repair/replacement of the device.

    It's a vicious scam, and unfortunately every handset OEM is convinced they must follow Apple's lead.

  7. Ah yes the 18yo who Is compâ(TM)d by hsmith · · Score: 2

    On moving some garbage LG phones is really going to push iPhones that he makes $0 on. More at 11.

  8. Hard to believe for me... by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 5, Interesting

    While I do have two issues with FaceID, and a couple others regarding the missing home button... it is impossible for me to believe this story. The screen is a huge selling point, and you get the same real-estate as a plus but in the smaller form factor. FaceID is great for trivial security and for securing the phone.

    So, my complaints: I am not comfortable with FaceID for securing banking passwords... but it is too secure for storing my /. password; I can't use FaceID while laying on my side in bed. For the home button, the inconsistencies between devices now is a pain.

    But hell.... it is the best phone I have owned.

    1. Re:Hard to believe for me... by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 2

      Heh.

      No, my complaints are specific to FaceID and some corner cases on UI. The phone as a whole is great-- awesome cameras, great speaker, good feel, great screen, solid battery, etc.

      Not everything is black and white you know....

    2. Re:Hard to believe for me... by windwalkr · · Score: 2

      But hell.... it is the best phone I have owned.

      I have to second this. It's not perfect. No phone is perfect. But it's very good.

      Whether ANY phone is worth that kind of money is a personal decision. But the X is undeniably an improvement over the previous iPhones in many ways, and realistically doesn't step backwards anywhere except for price. Maybe a step sideways in some areas (trading off one weakness for a new, different, weakness) but not backwards.

    3. Re:Hard to believe for me... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2, Informative

      Face ID and the missing home button are a poor compromise to avoid having to "copy" other phones that put the fingerprint sensor on the back.

      They reduced usability and performance just to avoid the obvious, tried and tested solution.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    4. Re:Hard to believe for me... by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 2

      Honestly, I disagree. I wouldn't want a back fingerprint reader; I would just like security levels for different apps/websites. Just being able to use a PIN for my bank and not bother me on my /. password would be enough.

  9. Re:iPhone X is a CF by Tough+Love · · Score: 2, Informative

    The lack of Bezel and presence of Face ID make it a non starter for many and the price hurts it too. I can scan my fingerprint very easily.

    The stereo minijack is missing.

    --
    When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
  10. Re: iPhones drove smartphones to the masses... the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The 7 lost the headphone port. That's when they lost me.

  11. The only phone I want is... by cheesyweasel · · Score: 2

    A phone that has a shatter proof screen, is waterproof, has user replaceable batteries and is not a portable spying device for every company and its government. What I want is a commercial failure.

  12. Alternate Take by SuperKendall · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I bought the iPhone X and think it's one of the better phone upgrades in some time. Because of FaceID it is the first phone in a while that feels like a real jump from a previous model instead of incremental improvement. For me I prefer generally how FaceID works generally over TouchID, which includes ApplePay... FaceID works without conscious thought, so it feels like you are using a phone with no passcode.

    I will agree that the X is slippery, but I still use it without a case in day to day life. However traveling with it I still plan to use a case.

    There is no way going forward I would buy a phone that did not have FaceID. I was planning to upgrade an iPad but I'm going to wait until that supports FaceID as well... If they do that they will need to support more than one person though.

    I've seen people claiming the sales were lower than expected but I'm pretty sure that will not be the case since the pre-order wait times were really long compared to other phones.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  13. Re:iPhones drove smartphones to the masses... then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This silly idea of Apple ever having an edge on phones comes from the fact that American carriers had long cockblocked Nokia. The original iPhone was a sleek-looking featurephone that could not hold a candle to the true flagship smartphone of that year, the N95.

  14. Re:iPhone X is a CF by jandrese · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm trying to imagine the person who goes "This screen doesn't have a bezel? But that's the best part of the phone! No sale!!"

    --

    I read the internet for the articles.
  15. Not constant by SuperKendall · · Score: 5, Interesting

    He said it was corner cases.

    For me FaceID works more often than TouchID does (and I know for sure because for testing reasons I often still use my iPhone 7).

    In fact the X is great precisely because it REMOVES a lot of small annoyances you didn't even know were present in phones. Like I said in another post using an X feels like using an unlocked phone, in a way TouchID never did (even though TouchID did make it much easier to unlock a phone).

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  16. The thing is - no home button is simply better by SuperKendall · · Score: 3, Informative

    Face ID and the missing home button are a poor compromise

    The thing is, it's not a compromise at all. The way the iPhone X works is the way phones should work, period. It is WAY BETTER than a home button or virtual home buttons were. Going back to using a home button based device like an iPad or older iPhone just feels archaic now, the gesture based controls are easier for everyone to work with and the way you activate control center actually works 100% of the time now (before pulling up from bottom edge would sometimes not bring up control center if the keyboard was also up, really annoying).

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:The thing is - no home button is simply better by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Informative

      The home button is vastly inferior to the Android set of three. One for home, one to switch apps, one to go back. Makes operating the phone so much faster.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    2. Re:The thing is - no home button is simply better by SuperKendall · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Maybe so, but the X way is vastly superior to both. No icons, jus three gestures that work quicker than trying to press the right button.

      The back button on Android I think was a mistake, that has never worked well and just confuses people.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  17. Re: iPhones drove smartphones to the masses... the by Dynedain · · Score: 2

    Bullshit. I've been using Sleep Cycle on the iPhone for 5 years and it suffers from exactly zero if the problems you described.

    --
    I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
  18. Re:What happened with the OLED screen? by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 2

    I own two Samsung Galaxy S phones, the S3 and the S5, which both have OLED screens, and neither of them have any burn-in. A recent report noted iPhone X burn-in within 16 hours.

    That's contrary to what this report says.

  19. Re:iPhones drove smartphones to the masses... then by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 2

    iPhones sold because of the app store? There were NO third-party apps at launch. That was something Apple hastily retrofitted in later, because people were demanding it.

    The iPhone was successful because it had a well-designed full touchscreen, and it didn't look like it was designed by and for geeks.

    --
    Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
  20. Re:Why would you have to take off a helmet?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I see you've never worn a motorcycle helmet (or apparently seen one). You see, the full face helmet (the only ones a lot of riders will use because turns out wind blinds you, sunglasses do next to nothing to block it and the other types of helmets don't block wind at all, along with they're objectively the safest type) cover everything except your eyes. Your mouth, your nose, your forehead, your cheeks, none of that is visible. Basically, if you ski, the area that's covered by ski goggles, that's the only portion that isn't covered by something opaque with a full face motorcycle helmet.

    As for raising your helmet, well you see, at speed, air travels faster over the top than the bottom, similar to an airplane wing. This causes suction that literally tries to pull your helmet off your head. To combat this, there's typically a strap on the bottom to keep it from falling off. It's a fiddly strap though, and usually to do it or undo it, requires removing your gloves. So to "simply lift your helmet" would involve removing both gloves, undoing the strap, lifting it, using your faceID, pushing your helmet back down, redoing the strap and putting your gloves back on.

  21. Opposite is true, majority want X by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    The X was the real shining moment that Apple was completely out of touch with what the majority of people want.

    Actually that is exactly wrong. The X is exactly what the MAJORITY of people want.

    The reason is FaceID is just better. It is better in the winter when the majority of people use gloves, but no longer need to take them off to unlock the phone.

    It is better for the elderly where the majority of people have fingerprints that become harder to read with age, but have faces that grow more distinctive as decades pass.

    The majority of people of all ages would rather have a phone that does not have a passcode. In practice, that is what the iPhone feels like - as if you are using a phone with no passcode.

    And the thing is, Apple is years ahead with FaceID, there is enough technology there it's not like TouchID where other phones makers could buy pretty good fingerprint sensors and have the same ability. Maybe Samsung can deliver FaceID in a year or two... maybe.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley