Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Halts Bitcoin Transactions Because It's An 'Unstable Currency' (bleepingcomputer.com)

Catalin Cimpanu, reporting for BleepingComputers: Microsoft has stopped supporting Bitcoin as a payment method for Microsoft products, Bleeping Computer has learned. A Microsoft support staffer has told us the move is temporary and cited the unstable state of the Bitcoin currency. Microsoft added support for Bitcoin in 2014, and has previously temporarily stopped supporting Bitcoin in the past.

68 of 106 comments (clear)

  1. I called it earlier by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    When a currency can quickly gain or lose half it's value with no apparent reason and no apparent cause, many people won't want to take them for fear they will lose money on the deal.

    --
    There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    1. Re:I called it earlier by Holi · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Notice they only made this decision now that bitcoin is down. They had little issue with instability when it kept climbing.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    2. Re:I called it earlier by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Sure. And people using it should have had an issue with using it when it kept climbing. That is why highly unstable currencies are bad. The smart people buy low and sell high, and that "people" includes businesses. Accepting a depreciating currency is a bad business decision. If offered to pay you for a product you are selling with a 25% margin in a currency that had a 50% chance of loosing half it's value before you could trade it for the stable local currency, would you do it? If you are smart, you would tell me to pay in the stable local currency.

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    3. Re:I called it earlier by swb · · Score: 1

      Nominally maybe, but I'd wager it makes sense for MS to hold some quantity of BTC to manage transactions.

      The fluctuating price may cause them to need to buy BTC at elevated prices and increase their risk if the price goes down. I'm sure it's an accounting mess, too.

    4. Re:I called it earlier by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 4, Interesting

      When a currency can quickly gain or lose half it's value with no apparent reason and no apparent cause, many people won't want to take them for fear they will lose money on the deal.

      The gain should be obvious: Bitcoin is the preferred currency for the black market, it has a fixed liquidity requirement to meet the demand of the userbase, and non-criminals started using it for normal transactions thereby artificially inflating demand. The loss should likewise be obvious: the traders to followed the non-criminals in got freaked out by the rapid rise, expecting a bubble to burst, and subsequently bailed (or may have outright caused it.)

      The real issue with Bitcoin isn't the technology, that's a great concept for things like automated contracts. The issue is the same as its tax classification: it is a commodity with a limited quantity available. Coins/wallets get lost forever and there's only ~23 million which will ever be minted, it is inherently deflationary, meaning it not only has limited supply but that supply disappears over time.

      Actual cryptocurrencies (as opposed to cryptocommodities like Bitcoin) like Ethereum with a built in inflation rate surpassing lost coins/wallets and accounting for new user adoption (still unfortunately treated as commodities per tax codes) would be the solution to the problem, and quell a lot of the bubble-looking effects of volatility.

    5. Re:I called it earlier by supremebob · · Score: 2

      I thought that the spin is that Bitcoin is now a "store of wealth" instead of a currency now.

      Or, at least that's the latest excuse I heard on the slow purchase confirmation transaction times and high transaction fees.

      The funny thing is that if you actually want to use cryptocurrency as an actual currency, you're probably better off using a lesser known coin like Litecoin, where the network isn't as overloaded at the moment.

    6. Re:I called it earlier by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

      That because 'it kept climbing' is stable, so there was no reason to have issue with the stability.

      --
      This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
    7. Re:I called it earlier by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      "store of wealth"

      It can be.

      Say I invent some fancy new technology or have a data file that proves aliens are with us. Without showing you the data, how can I prove to you in 20 years that I have the data now?

      Store the checksum in Bitcoin as proof of existence. In 20 years you can sha256 the file yourself and see that I did in fact have that data right now.

      Parts of CableGate were put up there. I wouldn't be surprised if the next WikiLeaks document isn't already up there just waiting for someone with the right key.

    8. Re:I called it earlier by Jfetjunky · · Score: 2

      I think anyone who was educated on the hyperinflation of the Deutsche mark after WWI could have called it. The reason for that hyperinflation is completely unrelated, but it doesn't take much to see that being completely tied to one currency that is fluctuating wildly isn't sustainable and wreaks havoc on economies.

      Bitcoin might have staying power. It might keep getting acceptance for some things. But it's a pipe dream to assume it's going to obsolete the fiat currencies we have today (at least in its current form). Those currencies are the way they are PRECISELY because they are centrally managed to try to control inflation/deflation.

    9. Re:I called it earlier by argStyopa · · Score: 2

      Notice they stopped when it started FALLING...not when it was climbing into the sky, despite it being precisely as "volatile" on THAT side of the hill....

      --
      -Styopa
    10. Re:I called it earlier by slazzy · · Score: 1

      Yeah I just did some litecoin transactions. Pennies in fees, and very fast transfers! There are better generation 3 crypto currencies like Cardano (ADA).

      --
      Website Just Down For Me? Find out
    11. Re:I called it earlier by tlhIngan · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sure. And people using it should have had an issue with using it when it kept climbing. That is why highly unstable currencies are bad. The smart people buy low and sell high, and that "people" includes businesses. Accepting a depreciating currency is a bad business decision. If offered to pay you for a product you are selling with a 25% margin in a currency that had a 50% chance of loosing half it's value before you could trade it for the stable local currency, would you do it? If you are smart, you would tell me to pay in the stable local currency.

      The problem is not that - because they only accept bitcoin for the few minutes it takes to confirm a transaction - as far as Microsoft is concerned, they get US dollars either way.

      The problem is Bitcoin takes forever to confirm transactions, or you start paying through the nose for it - and I'm sure the real reason is Microsoft is not going to pay the $50+ it takes to do a near-instant confirmation. And likely, because cheap confirmations can take over two weeks, I'm sure people don't like to wait either - only to find out they're still short in the end.

      I'm guessing the real problem is the processor is unable to reflect the current bitcoin transaction fee status to the customer - and customers are refusing to pay the inflated fees.

    12. Re:I called it earlier by edtice1559 · · Score: 1

      USD has been depreciating, but it's not unstable. It has been slowly losing value in a predictable way. CFOs know how to deal with this. They can pre-exchange their projected sales for their desired currently at a fixed price. (The mechanism is to buy options). They can adjust their local / USD prices based on anticipated currency fluctuations. The USD doesn't swing nearly as wildly as Bitcoin. I can'f figure out if this is a troll, just terribly uninformed, or somebody just couldn't resist taking a jab at the US. I guess that's the danger is reading AC posts on a non-political topic.

    13. Re:I called it earlier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes, the people failing to use logic or rational thinking are definitely the ones halting transactions on the wildly fluctuating "currency" that is traded like a commodity and has no intrinsic or backed value.

      On the other hand, let's trust the person who equates the USD and bitcoin.

      Bitcoin is a "currency", again, backed by nothing, which lost approximately 25% of it's value in a single day and whose lifetime minimum (I'd use ten years but it hasn't been around for 10 years yet) is equivalent to 1,52 euros with a maximum of just over 16K euros. It's single year min and max is 745 and 16K euros respectively.

      Meanwhile, the derided US dollar is backed by the government of a country who represents the largest economy based on GDP, and controls the largest military. Their currency has "depreciated" by about -23 euro cents over 10 years... in other worlds, the euro is actually what is depreciating, unless you mean just this past year alone, which the US dollar admittedly lost around 13 cents. This is over a 10 year min max of 0,62 and 0,96 euros,and a single year min max of 0,82 and 0,95 euros respectively. Or a 10 year swing of 1.54%.

      I'm not an economist, but I'm going to guess the volatility index of something that swung approximately 10664% in less than 10 years is going to represent a riskier investment than something that swung around 1.54%

      PS: Now if you've lost faith in America due to our most glorious leader, you might have something, but honestly I doubt the major players in our economy are struggling under our current administration. If anything they are thriving, making the USD an even better bet-- but that's heading into political discussion which is probably best left for another time.

    14. Re:I called it earlier by edtice1559 · · Score: 1

      Except that, if you do this, nobody will pay in the crypto currency since they can get a 50% discount just by using their Visa card!

  2. Re:Wait bitcoin is unstable now? by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

    If you bought 1 btc for $15,000.00 c and then the price went down to $10,000, you would care about stability too. As a retailer, they would be constantly buying and selling btc and so the stability of it is important to maintain revenue.

    --
    There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
  3. blah blah by circularWaffle · · Score: 1, Funny

    I hate cryptocurrency and everyone that likes it. I love the US Dollar and the banks holding on to my money for me. Generic response about a bubble and how I don't want responsibility in my life. I'd rather someone else do it for me, blah blah. :)))))

    1. Re:blah blah by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

      I love the US Dollar and the banks holding on to my money for me.

      Me too. I like shopping in USD when it's down again compared to EUR.

      --
      bickerdyke
    2. Re:blah blah by circularWaffle · · Score: 1

      Sure.

  4. Obsnark by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

    This is good news for Bitcoin.

    --
    You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  5. Shocking! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    No one saw this coming.

  6. Well..... they're not wrong by Ayano · · Score: 1

    It's just not stable enough do to the inability to scale it. The number of bit coin in existence is capped and we're feeling those repercussions as transactions are mere fractions of btc now.

    --
    I don't read AC
    1. Re:Well..... they're not wrong by ThunderBird89 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      They're quite far from the cap (21 million, out of which app. 17 million have been mined). What they can't scale is throughput: the Bitcoin network can manage about 10-14 transactions per second, while Visa for instance executes about a hundred times that per second.

      Now, miners can apply all the hacks they want (SegWit and co.) but if the system wasn't made to scale, no amount of patching will make it scale.

      --
      Hyperbole: I use it liberally!
    2. Re:Well..... they're not wrong by inking · · Score: 1

      Visa executes around 2000 on average. It’s capacity is 56,000.

    3. Re:Well..... they're not wrong by paskie · · Score: 1

      > Now, miners can apply all the hacks they want (SegWit and co.) but if the system wasn't made to scale, no amount of patching will make it scale.

      Unclear why this would be the case. The Lightning Network should compress many transactions to a single one per a long time period.

      --
      It's not the fall that kills you. It's the sudden stop at the end. -Douglas Adams
    4. Re:Well..... they're not wrong by houghi · · Score: 1

      Not sure how much they do, but 1.000 to 1.400 per second worldwide looks not like much.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    5. Re:Well..... they're not wrong by edtice1559 · · Score: 1

      That's because the figure appears to be wrong. Visa claims they can do 65k/second as of August 2016 ( https://usa.visa.com/dam/VCOM/... ) or about one per living person per day. And they can grow that number larger if they ever get even close to capacity.

    6. Re:Well..... they're not wrong by ThunderBird89 · · Score: 1

      Two orders of magnitude is not a big difference??

      --
      Hyperbole: I use it liberally!
    7. Re:Well..... they're not wrong by edtice1559 · · Score: 1

      I pointed out in a sibling post that you need to add another two orders of magnitude to Visas capacity so it's really 4 orders of magnitude. But more importantly, Visa has plans to increase capacity. Bitcoin has architectural issues that make that impossible.

    8. Re:Well..... they're not wrong by Khyber · · Score: 1

      The long time period is the unscalable part.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  7. Re:This is good for bitcoin because... by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1

    No spin needed - if MS says its screwed, you should probably bet your shirt on it!

    --
    Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
  8. Cause of volatility is obvious by sjbe · · Score: 4, Interesting

    When a currency can quickly gain or lose half it's value with no apparent reason and no apparent cause, many people won't want to take them for fear they will lose money on the deal.

    The cause of the volatility is obvious. Fear Of Missing Out combined with greed which is what drives most asset bubbles.

    Microsoft ultimately has to convert all transactions to dollars for financial reporting. They hold many currencies (global company) but it's a bad idea to hold particularly volatile ones since they will have to convert those to dollars at least on their financial reporting statements. They can take the risk since in reality bitcoin is basically a rounding error to them but they aren't going to take a loss on it either.

    1. Re:Cause of volatility is obvious by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That is the cause of the volatility but not the cause of the individual fluctuations. Generally, when a conventional currency's value changes, there is an identifiable cause, such as interest rate, unemployment, sanctions, trade issues, war, inflation, etc. With bitcoin, you have none of that because it is just 1s and 0s backed by nothing. There is no identifiable cause for the individual fluctuations of bitcoin value so the changes can't even be guessed. Some people decide to sell when no one is buying and the value crashes. Some people decide to buy when no one is selling and value explodes. The reasons for each transaction can be literally anything.

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    2. Re:Cause of volatility is obvious by Luthair · · Score: 2

      Its also classic investment psychology, people buy high and sell low.

    3. Re:Cause of volatility is obvious by thegarbz · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The cause of the volatility is obvious. Fear Of Missing Out [wikipedia.org] combined with greed which is what drives most asset bubbles.

      No, that is only the cause of the most recently spike in price. The cause of volatility is incredibly low trading volumes against items with pegged value which means that even small transactions can have a real impact on value.

      If I convert 50m BTC into USD it would register enough to influence the price.
      If I convert 50m EUR into USD no one would notice.

      In a usable stable currency, FOMO would not cause a change in value.

    4. Re:Cause of volatility is obvious by lannocc · · Score: 1

      There is no identifiable cause for the individual fluctuations of bitcoin value so the changes can't even be guessed.

      This means only that you have not connected to enough of the signals that drive Bitcoin's price.

    5. Re:Cause of volatility is obvious by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      So? If there's no identifiable cause because it's based on quantum-generated random numbers, or because I can't tell what the cause is, it's still no identifiable cause.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  9. Re:This is good for bitcoin because... by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 3, Interesting

    No spin needed - if MS says its screwed, you should probably bet your shirt on it!

    They didn't say it is screwed, they said it is unstable, which, at least at the moment it is. How can you use a currency to price things when the value changes dramatically daily, even hourly? You can't. At least whilst it is this volatile it can't be used as a currency for most purchases usefully.

    Give it time, with banks moving in, and professional investors coming in, and no doubt- automated algorithms being place on trading computers, it will probably stabilize. Of course, then you have to deal with the transaction fees, and times next.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  10. Re:The USD has lost 98% of its value since 1913 by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Actually, it is about 96% and that is over 100 years. In that same amount of time, pay and the CPI have gone up as well.

    Bitcoin has gained, lost, gained, and lost again up to 30% of it's value over the last month. Did the amount you pay for gasoline, electricity, bread, etc fluctuate like that? No, they did not. If you bought a $1.00 product on December 14, on December 19, that product had cost you $1.30. If you sold a product on Dec 19 for $1.00, on December 30 you have only $0.65 for that product, but what you are paying for the material to make that product hasn't changed.

    --
    There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
  11. Re:This is good for bitcoin because... by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

    They didn't say it is screwed, they said it is unstable, which, at least at the moment it is. How can you use a currency to price things when the value changes dramatically daily, even hourly? You can't.

    Not quite, as you can use it easily.

    It's just the risk that is on you if you accept it.

    It may risky or stupid to do, but you can.

    --
    bickerdyke
  12. "Because it's an unstable COMMODITY" by PeeAitchPee · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's the speculation related to the market dynamics of blockchain currencies being treated as commodities in a market that is currently causing any instability, either perceived or otherwise. That is a completely different issue than any cryptocurrency's intrinsic *technical* stability.

    1. Re:"Because it's an unstable COMMODITY" by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      Does it matter if the "unstable" part is due to some random blue blocks in the chain or that the value fluctuates because of current bills attempting to regulate the marriage of sunflowers?

      In this case, the source is irrelevant.

      Microsoft doesn't want it.

      That's the message.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  13. Re:Microsoft got hacked by supremebob · · Score: 1

    Did Microsoft actually hold Bitcoins, though? I thought that most people who took Bitcoin for payment used a payment service like BitPay, that converted it to USD almost instantly.

  14. Re:This is good for bitcoin because... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    No it won't. It will be blamed for the collapse of the Dollar and other things. A Central authority will then declare them all illegal but will give you an option to conver to their own crypto of which the central bank WILL have FULL control over.

    If they want to tax you at 99.99% there will be nothing you can do to stop it.
    If they want to prevent you from spending outside your state, there will be nothing you can do to change it.
    If you decide to run, they will be able to track every place you stop for gas, food, shelter, medicine.
    if you decide to rebel, they will prevent you from buying guns, ammo, supplies, and they will know exactly where you are at.

    Avoid Crypto's at ALL costs.

  15. Re:Microsoft got hacked by subanark · · Score: 1

    If they did use BitPay, then they might have stopped due to higher fees that BitPay would charge due to instability.

  16. How is bitcoin down? by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Notice they only made this decision now that bitcoin is down.

    It's not really down though. It's oscillating between 14k-15k for a while now. It's down 4% since last month, hardly dramatic.

    Ethereum for some reason never really went down and has been on mostly a steady climb for some time.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:How is bitcoin down? by Khyber · · Score: 1

      "Ethereum for some reason never really went down and has been on mostly a steady climb for some time."

      That's because the proof of stake system was finally demoed.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  17. Re:Missing a few things by Smidge204 · · Score: 2

    Then it would not really matter if BTC increases or drops by 10% in a few hours.

    Yes it would.

    As a buyer paying in bitcoin, if I can anticipate the value increasing by 10% in an hour then I will wait an hour to make my purchase. If I anticipate the price rising significantly in the future at all, then it's in my best interest to spend as little of it as possible.

    As a seller accepting bitcoin, instant conversion makes things a bit easier but there is a similar dilemma in that it might not pay to convert immediately. But if you are converting BTC to USD immediately, and presumably pegging the price in BTC to the price in USD, then why bother with the extra headaches and just use USD to begin with? There's little incentive to accept a form of payment that customers are reluctant to use.
    =Smidge=

  18. Re:This is good for bitcoin because... by Cajun+Hell · · Score: 2

    "Believe me, I'm a very stable currency!" - Donald Nakamoto

    --
    "Believe me!" -- Donald Trump
  19. bitcoins fees and transaction time are to high for by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 2

    bitcoins fees and transaction time are to high for most day to day things.

  20. Re:YOu got that straight! by circularWaffle · · Score: 1

    Good observation. Have you seen any of the literal hundreds of other coins out there that ARE feasible for consumer use?

  21. Re:Missing a few things by next_ghost · · Score: 1

    To be able to purchase goods and services online, you would need:

    a) (Close to) Instant payments
    b) (Close to) Instant conversion to USD
    c) (Close to) Zero fees

    It is my understanding that a) and c) are coming soon (eg Lightning Network).

    Unfortunately, your understanding is wrong. Lightning Network allows you to squash an arbitrary number of transactions with another party into two on-chain transactions. It's worse than useless for one-off transactions. If you do less than 3 transactions with the same person in a short period of time, Lightning Network offers no benefit for that.

  22. Re:This is good for bitcoin because... by quetwo · · Score: 1

    Not only does the price fluctuate, but the price to settle a transaction is about $20, and as high as $35 in the last few weeks. This is the amount that you pay regardless of the amount you are sending....

    Kinda hard to pay for something worth $25, when you have to pay $20 to send it.

  23. It is not a payment method by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 2

    Accepting bitcoin payment is similar to accepting payment in terms of commodities, frozen concentrated orange juice ("Sell 30 April at 142!") or pork bellies. Or, at best, a foreign currency with a very volatile exchange rate. So there is no surprise, nor real news in this announcement.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:It is not a payment method by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Recent? The CFTC has considered it a commodity since 2015, and people were calling it that before then. If it looks like a duck...

      Just because I call my commodity a currency doesn't make it so. Anyone want to buy some OJcoin? It's totally a currency, not a bunch of frozen orange juice.

    2. Re:It is not a payment method by edtice1559 · · Score: 1

      Well in order to be a (useful) currency, there needs to be certain properties, none of which Bitcoin has. The *most* important characteristic of a currency is that there is a stable, effective government that collects taxes in that currency. Until you have a nation-state that mandates use for tax payments, you can have all kinds of things, but you can't have a currency.

  24. There is a cause, wall street speculation by perpenso · · Score: 1

    When a currency can quickly gain or lose half it's value with no apparent reason and no apparent cause, many people won't want to take them for fear they will lose money on the deal.

    There is a cause, wall street speculation. Bitcoin's price rose 65x as wall street speculators were joining the pre-existing home based speculators.

  25. Re:This is good for bitcoin because... by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 2

    Kinda hard to pay for something worth $25, when you have to pay $20 to send it.

    And now you know why Canadians don't want to order things from USA websites. The shipping costs are crazy expensive. I've seen a seller asking $100 shipping for a $40 solar panel.

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  26. Re:This is good for bitcoin because... by easyTree · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It won't be stable until the people that matter control it xx

  27. Do *not* join the Cryptocurrency Mining Scene by perpenso · · Score: 2

    If you want to get in on the cryptocurrency mining scene ...

    Stop yourself, don't do it. Take either of these two paths:

    (1) You were going to buy a GPU anyway for some non-mining reason. Go ahead, buy the GPU. Maybe, **maybe**, buy a model up one level of performance/price from what you would have otherwise bought, if its a low to midrange model. Say if you were otherwise planning on a GTX 1050 Ti 4GB ***maybe*** get a GTX 1060 6GB, ****maybe****. If you were otherwise getting a high performer, say a 1070 Ti for that 4K monitor, do *****not***** go up a level to a 1080 Ti. Then let the GPU mine when you are not using the machine. Use a watt meter to determine the total power consumption of your machine to determine power usage, do *not* trust online references that say your GPU uses so many watts. When your GPU is mining other parts of the computer are also drawing power, especially the CPU which may also be mining. You want to know the total system power and make sure your mining proceeds exceed that amount. Be sure to use above baseline residential power rates in your calculations, do *not* just look at your current bill and expect the current rate. If it is not profitable to mine do *not* fall into the trap that "the coin price will eventually rise and make it profitable", that is a losing game. Instead, take whatever money you would spend on power and just buy the coins directly, you will have more coins that way if the price rises. But above all else, do not get into the mindset of joining the mining scene, that is a path to losing money. Stay in the scene "the GPU I have anyway can make some coin when I'm not using it".

    (2) Take whatever money you were willing to spend on a GPU for mining and just buy coins with that money. You will likely do better that way if the price rises. Many miners fall into the trap that they are profitable and pat themselves on the back. They do not consider the opportunity cost of the alternative of just buying coins directly. The following are very rough estimates but the point will nonetheless be clear. Lets say you spent $500 on a GPU last summer and another $500 on a GPU last fall. At above baseline residential power rates maybe you have about an extra $1,000 after factoring in power. Congrats your GPUs are now paid. However your friend bought $500 worth of bitcoin in the summer and another $500 in the fall and now has $3,000 worth of bitcoin. You are at net $0, he is at net $2,0000. If you are willing to gamble on increasing coin prices you may be better off just buying coins directly. Things are not as simple as a mining rig being profitable, the opportunity cost of the just buy directly must be considered. Many other things must also be considered before joining the mining scene.

  28. Re: This is good for bitcoin because... by gnick · · Score: 2

    ...who will even pay in bitcoin with a $20 fee?

    Depends on what you're buying. For some of the products that bitcoin is popular for, expensive overhead is less important than anonymity. $20 on top of a $80 software license? Pay with a credit card. $20 on top of a $300 sheet of LSD? Pony up the $20.

    --
    He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
  29. Re:"literal hundreds of other coins" by circularWaffle · · Score: 1

    I guess that was a "No".

  30. Re:This is good for bitcoin because... by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

    Do as you will, but I'm looking at the data and it's inherently obvious to the most casual observer that "unstable," is accurate.

    BITCOIN PRICE (BTC - USD)
    Trade Time 12:25PM
    Daily High 17,180.3496
    Trade Date 1/8/2018
    Daily Low 13,971.2598
    Open 16,193.3301
    52-week High 19,843.1094
    Prev. Close 16,182.3096
    52-week Low 766.5300

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  31. Re: This is good for bitcoin because... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    So block chain is the mark of the beast? A fun hypothesis.

  32. Re:This is good for bitcoin because... by edtice1559 · · Score: 1

    This comment is an exercise in having only one hair and trying to turn it into two. I could also price my product randomly. It will be somewhere between $1 and $100. Neither you nor I know until after we both agree to do the transaction. You're right that there is a difference between something being impossible and simply being absurd. But you don't stay in business by doing too many absurd things, so in this context, the practical difference is pretty much non-existent. I think you would get along with my wife.

  33. Re:This is good for bitcoin because... by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

    I think you would get along with my wife.

    Well... if you knew....

    *ducking for cover* :-)

    --
    bickerdyke
  34. Re:This is good for bitcoin because... by exomondo · · Score: 1

    Microsoft isn't betting against it, they just aren't betting on it.

  35. Re:Missing a few things by david_thornley · · Score: 1

    Then it would not really matter if BTC increases or drops by 10% in a few hours.

    Sure it would. BTC don't free-float in the ether. Somebody owns them at all times. This means that, if somebody offers a service to convert between BTC and USD or Euros or Yen or something, they're going to have to have substantial amounts of BTC and USD (or whatever) on hand, if only to cover statistical variations. The BTC stock is a risk because of BTC volatility, and whoever's running the service will view that as a cost, and charge for it.

    Suppose I make a $10K payment to my favorite drug dealer. I go to the service and buy $10K worth of BTC. I transfer it to my drug dealer. He needs to get out on bail, so it takes a few hours for him to get the BTC and sell them back. At that point, the value has gone up 10%, and the service pays my drug dealer $11K, losing $1K on the transaction.

    Alternatively, the service determines that it needs to have $100K in both USD and BTC in reserves. The value of BTC goes down 10%, and the service now has $90K in BTC, and needs more BTC. The service can then buy more BTC on the market, costing money, or hold more BTC than it would normally need, which ties up capital and opens the service to larger losses should BTC value drop.

    --
    "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes