Slashdot Mirror


James Dolan, Co-Creator of SecureDrop, Dead At 36 (gizmodo.com)

The Freedom of the Press Foundation is reporting that James Dolan, former Marine and co-creator of the whistleblower submission system SecureDrop alongside Aaron Swartz and Wired editor Kevin Poulsen, has died at age 36. He reportedly took his own life. Gizmodo reports: First deployed as StrongBox with The New Yorker, organizations such as the Washington Post, the New York Times, the Associated Press, and Gizmodo Media Group have all come to rely on SecureDrop -- which allows highly secure communication between journalists and sources in possession of sensitive information or documents. As an industry tool, it has become invaluable for reporters. Dolan joined the Freedom of the Press Foundation to maintain SecureDrop after co-creator Aaron Swartz took his life in 2013 at age 26, as pressure mounted in a federal investigation against him that many felt was overzealous. Memorial services have not yet been announced, and presently the circumstances of Dolan's death are not known.

83 of 188 comments (clear)

  1. How convenient by Stormwatch · · Score: 5, Insightful

    People who annoy governments tend to kill themselves, isn't that strange?

    1. Re:How convenient by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah it was probably the Reptilians working with the Bilderberg Group and the Clinton Foundation

    2. Re:How convenient by jfdavis668 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      People who work for SecureDrop tend to kill themselves, also a bit strange.

    3. Re:How convenient by squiggleslash · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Has anyone blamed Clinton for this one yet? I know she's not in power, but she's the go-to for conspiracy theories concerning this kind of thing.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    4. Re:How convenient by quantaman · · Score: 1

      It certainly wouldn't be the most suspicious death by someone who ran afoul of the US Intelligence Community.

      That being said I wouldn't assume there was foul play in this case, people do regularly kill themselves, even people whom other people have a good motive to kill.

      And from the sounds of it he was no longer involved with the project, if you were going to try pressure someone in the hopes of uncovering a source, and then kill said someone to shut them up, he wouldn't really be the logical target.

      --
      I stole this Sig
    5. Re:How convenient by ArhcAngel · · Score: 2

      No...word on the street is he had started an investigation into the Pastafarian's. You do NOT mess with His Noodly Appendage.

      --
      "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
    6. Re:How convenient by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      People who annoy governments tend to kill themselves, isn't that strange?

      People who join military and engage in violent conflict and then leave the military have a massively higher rate of mental illness than the general population.

      So it could be that or covert murder.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    7. Re:How convenient by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/12839/Diana-Fiat-driver-shot-in-the-head - Don't do their dirty work, they'll kill you when it's over.

      2 bullets to the head, AND he sets himself on fire with gasoline in a DIESEL car beforehand. Locked in the car, no key found. No note, no attempt to make it look good.

      This is the guy Prince Harry blames for killing his mom, the super-rich "paparazzi" - the single richest paparazzi in England at the time? - with the old beat up Fiat that he repainted shortly after he crashed into Di's car, then returned to the scene to take pictures of her dying in the back seat. Worked for MI5 and France.

      Today a whistleblower died and we all need to fill that role.

    8. Re:How convenient by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      Has anyone blamed Clinton for this one yet?

      Why, did it happen at a pizza parlor?

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    9. Re:How convenient by Hal_Porter · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think it's pretty gross to be joking about the death the actor who played Montgomery "Scotty" Scott on Star Trek. RIP Scotty ;-(

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    10. Re:How convenient by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      I trad this somewhere. I think it was in this comment section. That should prove something.

      (just tryin' to help)

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    11. Re:How convenient by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      *Fowl play.

      Ducks don't lie.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    12. Re:How convenient by OpenSourced · · Score: 2

      Yes. I'd say Kevin Poulsen is now starting to feel depressed...

      --
      Rome taught me patience and assiduous application to detail. Virtues which temper the boldness of great, general views.
    13. Re:How convenient by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Now we know who killed Seth Rich. And maybe even Vince Foster?

    14. Re:How convenient by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 1

      Yep

      Also, all the rest of these comments suck.

      --
      "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
      --- Jerry Garcia
    15. Re:How convenient by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      Yeah it was probably the Reptilians working with the Bilderberg Group and the Clinton Foundation

      Don't forget the Mafia, Teamsters, and Freemasons.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    16. Re:How convenient by painandgreed · · Score: 2

      Yeah it was probably the Reptilians working with the Bilderberg Group and the Clinton Foundation

      Get with the times. The Deep State has absorbed all those groups and is the current danger to everything.

    17. Re:How convenient by jsepeta · · Score: 1

      "suicided" by the NSA

      --
      Remember kids, if you're not paying for the service, YOU ARE THE PRODUCT THAT IS BEING SOLD.
    18. Re: How convenient by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      You’re welcome. I’ll tell my fellow Reptilians that you’re on to us and we need to be more sneaky assassinating people these days.

    19. Re:How convenient by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      Maybe the place is just so terrible to work for that people would rather kill themselves?

    20. Re:How convenient by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What about Gary Webb?

    21. Re:How convenient by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      I also heard some people actually believe the NSA is spying on everyone and the US is covering up a network of torture sites.

      The tinfoil hat crowd is so gullible.

    22. Re:How convenient by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      Why bother when they could have just claimed SecureDrop was full of child porn and sent him to life in jail?

    23. Re: How convenient by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 2

      People wonder why we Linux users are so damn crazy about privacy.

      I’m pretty sure 99.9% of people haven’t wondered this even once.

    24. Re:How convenient by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I wonder if it's more to do with then having the skills to be successful at suicide. I'm not saying it's all because of that, but for example the majority of the difference between male and female suicide rates is mostly due to men picking more reliable methods.

      In any case, military veterans should get more help.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    25. Re:How convenient by Mashiki · · Score: 4, Informative

      Today a whistleblower died and we all need to fill that role.

      The reporter who led the charge on the Panama papers was assassinated by a car bomb a few weeks back, most people don't even know that happened. One of Wikileaks offices was raid in a professional style sweep looking for crypto keys and other information. Most people don't know that one happened either.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    26. Re:How convenient by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      It's not that men pick a reliable method. It's that when men pick a method of suicide they're picking a method that they're ensuring *will* kill them. They also don't care what they look like after they're dead, they don't care if it's violent, they only care that it gets that final job done. Compare this to women who will go out of their way to use methods of suicide that don't damage their appearance.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    27. Re:How convenient by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually most people who read the news likely knew about it. That story was covered all over the place when it happened.

      Just a sampling:

      https://www.theguardian.com/wo...
      https://nypost.com/2017/10/16/...
      http://abcnews.go.com/Internat...
      http://www.abc.net.au/news/201...
      https://www.washingtonpost.com...
      http://www.huffingtonpost.com....

      One would have to be fairly ignorant to not have run across it on some news website after it happened.

    28. Re:How convenient by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      We got a real brain trust here.

    29. Re:How convenient by azrael29a · · Score: 1

      People who annoy governments tend to kill themselves, isn't that strange?

      Just another case of a serial suicide(r). Nothing to see here, move along.

    30. Re:How convenient by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      No, you don't understand the difference, reliable means a high chance of success. When a guy decides to pop himself off he's not going for reliable, he's going for a method that's final. That's why suicide by gun make up a huge number here in North America. The chances of you walking away from putting a .44, 9mm or .38 snub to your head and walking away is next to nil.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    31. Re:How convenient by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      Pretty amazing. Shall I pass on your good morning to the Queen Mother our head Reptialian?

    32. Re:How convenient by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      One would have to be fairly ignorant to not have run across it on some news website after it happened.

      That covers most people who don't read the news, or around 70-80% of people you realize. Why not take your theory for a test drive, and go hit your local dunkin' donuts or tim hortons, but my guess is closer to being right.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    33. Re:How convenient by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      That's what I was thinking.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    34. Re:How convenient by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      You did it again.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
  2. "took his own life" by SuperKendall · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You know we're all thinking it.

    Yeah I might believe that if the other creator of SecureDrop had not also "taken his own life".

    Truly the Deep State protects its own. Good luck to the next person to take over maintenance! Maybe you'll make seven years if you only drink water you purify yourself from random streams.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:"took his own life" by Pinky's+Brain · · Score: 1

      Even as a conspiracy minded person, I do think it's likely he took his own life.

      Trying to stage a suicide in an uncontrolled environment is risky. So if I was going to believe in a conspiracy in this case I'd believe induced depression through poison was more likely, hell I think induced depression through radiation is more likely.

    2. Re:"took his own life" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's actually very easy to fake a suicide, you only need to control one thing: the person who rules it a suicide.

    3. Re:"took his own life" by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      Or it's simply that intelligence level is linked to higher occurence of mental illness.

      https://www.sciencedaily.com/r...

    4. Re:"took his own life" by losfromla · · Score: 1

      So you're saying we used Cuban technology? Or did we subcontract the job out to the Cubans?

      --
      Only I can judge you.
    5. Re:"took his own life" by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      Ok. Thanks for the advice, boss.

    6. Re:"took his own life" by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      No where in my post did I say any such thing so... cool story, bro

    7. Re:"took his own life" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Kendall is a Trump apologist though. So take everything he says with a grain of dogshit.

    8. Re:"took his own life" by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      If the conspiracy was of quality, you'd be convinced.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    9. Re:"took his own life" by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      So... Murder by induced suicide rather than straight out murder staged to look like suicide is what you're saying?

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    10. Re:"took his own life" by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      I’m shedding so many crocodile tears.

    11. Re:"took his own life" by Yaztromo · · Score: 1

      Yeah I might believe that if the other creator of SecureDrop had not also "taken his own life".

      Unfortunately for the foil-hatted around here, there is a well researched phenomenon known as "suicide contagion", whereby people who know someone who has committed suicide are themselves at a higher risk of suicidal behaviour -- as high as a 65% increased risk.

      Yaz

    12. Re:"took his own life" by arth1 · · Score: 2

      Yeah I might believe that if the other creator of SecureDrop had not also "taken his own life".

      He did not take his own life. It was already his. You can only take the life of someone else, not your own.

      This euphemism for suicide needs to die. It's disrespectful, implying the person perpetrated a crime or sin. Saying "ended his life" is better.

    13. Re:"took his own life" by dave420 · · Score: 1

      People interested in cryptology are sometimes interested in other sorts of locks, as was the person in question. It's quite possible he was trying to escape from the suitcase and failed. Others have died in similar fashions, so you'll need more evidence than that to show something suspicious.

    14. Re:"took his own life" by Doctor+Memory · · Score: 1

      Or yawning! You ever notice how, when someone yawns, suddenly you get an urge to yawn too?

      I'll bet you've got an urge to yawn right now....

      --
      Just junk food for thought...
  3. Suicide, or murder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm starting to think that a lot of this feels like government sanctioned murder against individuals trying to help society by revealing the truth of matters.

    This whole thing stinks.

    1. Re:Suicide, or murder by arth1 · · Score: 1

      It doesn't have to be murder, but there should be a special hell for those who drive others to suicide hiding behind the letter of the law.

  4. Both founders commit suicide? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't always wear a tinfoil hat, but when I do...

    1. Re:Both founders commit suicide? by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 2, Funny

      But when you do you look like an idiot?

    2. Re:Both founders commit suicide? by Misagon · · Score: 1

      ... you are attending a Weird Al concert?

      --
      "We mustn't be caught by surprise by our own advancing technology" -- Aldous Huxley
  5. Another alternative explanation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Smart people are usually more prone to depression that dumb ones.

    1. Re:Another alternative explanation: by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 3, Funny

      And then there are the “smart” people who are simply embodiments of the Dunning-Kruger effect.

    2. Re:Another alternative explanation: by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      I read a recent story about a guy like that.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    3. Re:Another alternative explanation: by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      He managed to do something on his second first try...

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    4. Re:Another alternative explanation: by vaibhav.dlv · · Score: 1

      Can wholesomely agree since I'm myself living in perpetual depression... Enough so that sometimes I feel like I'm living to die! And my high-school (and college and graduate college) grades and my profession (IT engineer - Team Lead at present) reflect my smartness!!!

  6. Coincidences... by bitchtits · · Score: 1

    Same thing with Gaydar. Both founders fell off high balconies, several years apart. Coincidences can seem significant. Usually, they're not.

  7. Quickly and Painlessly by 31415926535897 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    He did himself in the quickest and most painless way possible with three gunshot wounds to the back.

    I don't know what happened in real life, but these things always look suspicious.

    1. Re:Quickly and Painlessly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I thought it was common knowledge that suicide always happens by 3 gun shot wounds to the back of the head by 3 different weapons, after which the deceased then either crawls into a suitcase, or drives to Fort Marcy Park. I'm told that's normal in Washington.
       

    2. Re:Quickly and Painlessly by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Coincidence always does. Given the general suicide rate combined with stress levels in certain white collar fields it would be more suspicious if he didn't.

    3. Re:Quickly and Painlessly by NettiWelho · · Score: 1

      Coincidence always does. Given the general suicide rate combined with stress levels in certain white collar fields it would be more suspicious if he didn't.

      You talk like america was post-collapse USSR

    4. Re:Quickly and Painlessly by syril · · Score: 1

      The nature of what he did makes it hard not to jump to conspiracy.

  8. It's like the Space X accident by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    And if you believe that was an accident, you'll believe James did himself in.

    Cold War III

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  9. I wondered that also by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    I noticed the same thing. Suspicion level ratcheting up here... :-)

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  10. Alternate explanations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The foil-hatted crowd tends to assume that there is some shadowy consiracy of "men in black" types who go around killing people who are troublesome, but there are alternate explanations that require no such paranoia.

    Consider the Cliven Bundy case (whether you support him, hate him, or ignor him, the CASE is worth consideration).

    When you do something that offends elements of a massive powerful government, your life can become to some degree miserable, and not everybody is cut out to withstand that level of stress. The Bundys (who I personally find annoying) ended up finding surveillance devices on their property (not on the disputed grazing lands) eventually found themselves in an armed standoff with government agents, and then in jail. Their case is a public display of a basic fact: in ANY conflict with government, guns are involved - the only questions are [1] will the individual will back down before the government pulls its guns, [2] will the individual pull a gun, [3] will the government or the individual pull the trigger. If you do not do what the government demands, and then you keep resisting as the government tries to punish you, you will eventually be facing a loaded gun. In the Bundy case, the standoff reached the point where both sides pulled guns, and eventually both sides pulled triggers. Most Americans cave in long before the government unholsters its ever-present guns. In the aftermath, one person associated with them crumbled and made a plea deal, but Cliven and sons eventually were let out after a judge was outraged to discover the extreme misconduct of the federal prosecutors who hid and manipulated evidence and lied to the court about it. That process dragged on for YEARS, and the Bundys will have crippling legal bills even though they have prevailed. Faced with that level of stress, some people will take their own lives. Others who are not yet in as deep as the Bundys were can begin to worry that they might end up in such a situation and, in a moment of depression aand quiet desperation, choose what seems to them to be the only way out.

    We may never know what drove Mr Dolan to his demise, but it would not be shocking to discover he saw a lot of darkness in his future, did not want to face it and did not see a clear happy way out. Work in areas like encryption can lead to a lot of thinking about very negative possiblities, so it would not be surprising if this was a contributing factor.

    Incidentally, our government is not supposed to be so big and powerful and intrusive that we end up feeling the need to encrypt stuff. Our founders understood encryption; George Washington used encryption to communicate with his spies during the revolutionary war. Our founders did not include an escape clause from the Constitution to allow the feds to bypass the prohibition on unreasonable search and siezure, or to bypass the requirement for a warrant, if encryption is involved. They also understood war and the timeliness of information in time of war and yet still included no exception to allow government to engage in blanket spying on the population, siezure of communications, and decryption without warrants.

    Instead of getting clever or snarky, people should consider the misery this man's family is currently experiencing; their lives are forever altered. Fot the rest of their lives they will be expecting to see him at meals, then remebering he will be absent. They'll thinking of things they need to remember to tell him when they see him, then remebering they'll not be seeing him again, etc.

  11. Poor guy by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

    He probably suffered from a deep depression or was bipolar. That is fairly common in the industry. He will be missed.

  12. "He reportedly took his own life" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Wow. Did he piss off the Clintons? Because that's what happens to people who piss off the Clintons: they "commit suicide"

    1. Re:"He reportedly took his own life" by Doctor+Memory · · Score: 1

      Yeah, no surprise Monica Lewinsky, Paula Jones and Linda Tripp were found slumped over in the same hot tub.

      --
      Just junk food for thought...
  13. Re:Alternative alternative explanation: by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 2

    Why assume something logical when we can blame it on a government conspiracy plot?

  14. Wow by kamapuaa · · Score: 1

    Remember when the government has Hans Reiser framed as a way to get back at him for developing ReiserFS? It seems a lot of Slashdot does, because they're posting basically the exact same shit for this story as they were for that one.

    --
    Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
  15. Re:Deep state is being cleaned up by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

    It’s about time. Now you snowflakes can’t stop bringing up Hillary every 5 minutes. Lock her up and shut the fuck up about it already.

  16. "IRL" by harvey+the+nerd · · Score: 1

    Apparently in real life and crime, pros know which jurisdictions have the most incompetent MEs and coroners.

  17. Reason is Mind Control by Capsaicin · · Score: 2

    Why assume something logical when we can blame it on a government conspiracy plot?

    Exactly! Logic was invented by circumcising Reptilians to keep us confused about disreality. The only answer is to misinterpret the evidence.

    --
    Better to be despised for too anxious apprehensions, than ruined by too confident a security. --Edmund Burke
  18. Now taking conspiracy theory bets by sabbede · · Score: 1

    Was it the CIA? NSA? AP? Wikileaks? Trump, Hillary, or Russia's FSB? Swap your tinfoil hat for your betting beanie and put your money where your mouth is!

  19. Re:Because that's literally what usually happens! by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

    So you’re saying that veterans don’t have a higher incidence of mental health issues and depression? Because the facts say otherwise and don’t let inconvenient things like that get in the way of your conspiracy plots.

  20. Re:Nah, it was himself. by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

    Right because if you don’t believe in every loony conspiracy theory it must mean you agree 100% with anything the NSA does. Oh wait...

  21. Re:Alternative alternative explanation: by datavirtue · · Score: 1

    Assuming anything is usually dangerous.

    --
    I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
  22. Re:Please, stop worshiping Swartz by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

    You got the compassion of a sand-dab, my friend.

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
  23. Re:Please, stop worshiping Swartz by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

    I feel bad for the people who were impacted by his choice to end his own life. I feel bad for him for having not sought out or found the mental health support that he needed. I don't feel bad for him for having made such an idiotic choice of method for getting the papers out to the public. If he'd have stayed at his desk instead of breaking into the library closet the papers would have still gotten out, he could have still made his point, he'd still be alive, and we wouldn't be having this discussion.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.