Slashdot Mirror


South Korea Plans To Ban Cryptocurrency Trading

South Korea's government said on Thursday it plans to ban cryptocurrency trading, sending bitcoin prices plummeting and throwing the virtual coin market into turmoil as the nation's police and tax authorities raided local exchanges on alleged tax evasion. Reuters reports: The clampdown in South Korea, a crucial source of global demand for cryptocurrency, came as policymakers around the world struggled to regulate an asset whose value has skyrocketed over the last year. Justice minister Park Sang-ki said the government was preparing a bill to ban trading of the virtual currency on domestic exchanges. Once a bill is drafted, legislation for an outright ban of virtual coin trading will require a majority vote of the total 297 members of the National Assembly, a process that could take months or even years. The local price of bitcoin plunged as much as 21 percent in midday trade to 18.3 million won (12,730.35 pounds) after the minister's comments. It still trades at around a 30 percent premium compared to other countries.

31 of 78 comments (clear)

  1. What's really going on here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    South Korea is proposing to ban cryptocurrency trading, but that's far from certain. On CNBC early this morning, they speculated that this was unlikely to occur and that China had enacted similar measures previously before reversing course. They suggested that there would be more regulation of exchanges, much like what already happens in the US where Coinbase and others collect personal information on their customers. Another possible regulation is imposing trading curbs or halting trading when there are significant declines, much like what happens with stock exchanges. Stories like this increase the uncertainty around cryptocurrency and are likely holding the prices down somewhat until there is a resolution on these issues. It's difficult to ban the blockchain technology altogether, so it seems more likely that they will opt for regulating exchanges.

  2. Cryptocurrencies dying in Asia... by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 3, Informative

    South Korea banning trading, China already banned the exchange of cryptocurrencies and crypto mining operations, and Japan is still considering banning ICOs. Tough row to hoe for crypto folks in Asia!

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  3. This news is false and 8 hours late? by TheSimkin · · Score: 4, Informative
    1. Re:This news is false and 8 hours late? by Nikkos · · Score: 1

      Actually, that article is in response to last months actions against BTC exchanges in South Korea. Today's article is something new.

      That being said, banning bitcoin to prevent gambling is like banning hand-lotion to prevent jerking off...

    2. Re:This news is false and 8 hours late? by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      If you had submitted it ...

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    3. Re:This news is false and 8 hours late? by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 3, Funny

      8 hours? That article is dated December 12.

    4. Re:This news is false and 8 hours late? by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Well, technically there is a way to actively kill bitcoin and it's ilk basically get it banned world wide and it works like this. You create an energy backed cryptocurrency. This cryptocurrency is issued by energy corporations and is basically backed by kWh https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.... So whether they are oil, coal, gas, nuclear, wind, solar, tidal, hydroelectric, they all are enabled to sell energy futures, they future supply of kWh of energy as that krypto currency, not just any energy but a priority of supply, free of corrupting intervention, have your kWh of cryptocurrency from a registered corporation and you have your energy, either directly or indirectly via trading with other corporations. There would be variations in value of the kWh because obviously oil is harder to use than electricity, so electricity would have the highest dollar value.

      This allows energy companies to trade energy generation risk, so oil companies can trade their coins against hydroelectric, at what ever the exchange rate is. Individuals would also be able to invest ie buying coins to invest in future energy purchases, either directly or trading. So you now have a backed crypto currencies, competing against unbacked crypto currencies. You should be able to see where this is heading.

      This allows the fossil fuellers to offset future losses as a result of the growing undesirability of their energy source by trading it for other energy source cryptocurrencies, which is currently of enormous concern. Why does it kill bitcoin because the fossil fuellers loath competition and to make their coin look way better ie backed with the future value of energy, could be quite a useful investment for the right energy types versus shitty cryptocurrency backed by nothing but marketing, basically pretty much pretend hot air (they don't have any actual hot air to trade).

      So energy futures cryptocurrencies issued by corporations on a regulated exchange, to balance out future energy disruptions, would kill marketing based unbacked crypto currencies. You could of course still trade those on the sly and because they are backed, they could make real coins with an embedded chip which validates the coin, not cheap, those coins would be around the hundred to a thousand dollar range at initial issue. Some people want that investment in their hands, not in the hands of traders who when they seem to have enough, always get raided by insiders 'er' outsiders, yeah prove it, they have the millions now or is it nothing now. Energy backed cryptocurrencies will kill unbacked cryptocurrencies and they will do it on purpose via lobbyists, you have been warned.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    5. Re:This news is false and 8 hours late? by Capsaicin · · Score: 1

      You create an energy backed cryptocurrency. This cryptocurrency is issued by energy corporations and is basically backed by kWh

      A few decades ago, when I was reading that kind of stuff, I came to the conclusion that Marx, Ricardo and Adam Smith were wrong in regard the the Labour Theory of Value and that the Physiocrats, whom Marx mercilessly castigated, were in fact correct. It is not labour on the factory floor that creates 'value,' it's the fact that the amount of labour required to generate a certain amount of food is less than the labour that can be powered by that food. Which is to say the 'value' apparently generated by labour is in fact an energy input from the sun. When you look through this lens, 'standard of living' is practically a measure of energy consumed.

      It occurred to me too, that if money were backed by energy (which makes sense if it is the true value), energy efficiency would be built into the market and the great emerging (at that time) environmental question would somewhat be addressed. Though not as thoroughly thought through (enough th*gh* words?) or as far reaching as you have it.

      While I'm not really sure anymore that money requires backing by any commodity (the MMTers have messed with me ;), I'm finding your particular implementation of energy-currency interesting. However, I'm not entirely clear why (indeed how) this would need to be a crypto-currency in particular. Isn't the idea of the block-chain not only to create trust but also an implementation of the marginalist notion of 'value' (or mere 'price') as a function of rarity?

      --
      Better to be despised for too anxious apprehensions, than ruined by too confident a security. --Edmund Burke
    6. Re:This news is false and 8 hours late? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      It's amazing that you falsify a news article published on the 11th of January about something that happened recently using an article published on the 12th of December.

      Do you have a time machine?

  4. That's nothing! by Kenja · · Score: 4, Informative
    --

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    1. Re:That's nothing! by Njovich · · Score: 1

      Yeah we know, it was posted here yesterday...
      https://entertainment.slashdot...

  5. good one... by kiviQr · · Score: 1

    how much did you leverage!?

    1. Re:good one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      He's in for 100,000 beanie babies.

  6. Re:What's really going on here ... by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Except that's only happened to a few of the popular cryptocurrencies. When you at a low you can't tell if it's a shelf or the base of a mountain... could be people a while from now will look back on this as the last good buying opportunity.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  7. overreaction much? by slashmydots · · Score: 1

    They're probably 1% of all Cryptocurrency transactions. Everyone hears about the ban. Crypto loses like 10% of its value as a whole. Now that's logic, everyone. Literally everyone who owns a currency in Korea could dump it into the market in a sell order overnight and it wouldn't have lost this much value. This is what happens when stupid day trader wannabes pat themselves on the back for being mister big smart investor and reacting appropriately to news.

    1. Re:overreaction much? by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      The volatility is a serious problem. Variation of 10% in a day is not uncommon. A sudden plummet in reaction to this news is pretty typical.

      The value is so speculative. It rather reminds me of this parable about wisdom of crowds. People speculate it has value because everyone else is.

  8. Re:What's really going on here ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    could be people a while from now will look back on this as the last good buying opportunity

    Although what you write is true --without hindsight we cannot be certain where on the curve we are --when just this second leg is uncritically accepted, it's also a nice illustration of the thinking which manifests as the post-bubble shelf. (BTW I'm not claiming you uncritically accept this! Obviously you are entertaining both possibilities, which put you on safe, if unprofitable, ground.)

    What we saw with the post-bubble shelf after the silver rush was the battle between two classes of investors. The true-believers encouraged by the dead cat bounce perceived mere volatility and saw $35 a buying opportunity, while ideologically uncommitted speculators who came in purely because of the dramatic rise as the bubble was building began dropping away for lack of those previous exceptional gains. Finally when it was clear sliver was dead, the true-believers moved onto their next project ... And they say history never repeats.

  9. What cryptocurrencies measure themselves against by The+Evil+Atheist · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The fact that cryptocurrencies are talked about in terms of "real money" (what's real?) means people know they are lying to themselves about their value. "Real money" today is already measured against a CPI. Until cryptocurrencies are measured against a CPI directly, and not through a proxy measure, it is a pointless currency.

    --
    Those who do not learn from commit history are doomed to regress it.
  10. Bitcoin is the Napster of cryptocoins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    shut the fuck up for good ... since no one wants or cares about your lies ... complete and utter morons ... constant shit. You're like fucking Trump or his supporters ... fucktards like you parroted ... "old money" ... And yes, I'm angry ... stupid fucking post ... So take you FUD, shove it up you ass then pull it back out and choke on it. Keep to working fast food. You're clearly not sharp enough ...

    So that's what it looks like when your investments shrink by 30% in two weeks.

  11. Re:What's really going on here ... by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1

    Wasn't the silver bubble due to an attempt to corner the market by a small group?

  12. Re:Taxed to Death by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    In the US any significant gains are taxed at 40%

    Only ~3% of the population reaches that tax bracket, and they're likely rich enough that they shouldn't worry about paying taxes (or if not, could easily become more rich by also living frugally.) Also, said 3% is also likely to depend on government services, including paved public roads, etc - and simply shutting down government (including municipal) will cause a breakdown in how things get coordinated.

    The founders killed men over less.

    The founders killed men because they were taxed without being represented - a far cry from being taxed with the same amount of representation as your poor neighbor.

  13. Re:What's really going on here ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I have a lot in crypto but even I can see the fall coming. Dogecoin's marketcap is 2 BILLION. If you can't see that the majority of these coins are worthless, and if you can't see the major players adopting their own coins with the open source code that's there for them to study, then you're a fucking moron.

    It was a great ride while it lasted, and I'm leaving a bit in just in case I'm wrong, but it's time to start cashing out.

  14. Re:Probably Better Off by pezpunk · · Score: 1

    the jealousy is dripping off your poor sad post. just mad you missed out on making millions, huh? my bitcoin visa card is fucking loaded, you fucking chump.

    --
    i could live a little longer in this prison
  15. Re:Taxed to Death by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

    They're only charged if they want to trade those bitcoin in for things from society. If they kept them in bitcoin, they'd be fine. So, you know, printing dollars is kind of a service.

    --
    Your ad here. Ask me how!
  16. Re:What cryptocurrencies measure themselves agains by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

    It is probably time to excise the 'currency' part of the name for this stuff. Then it's Beanie Babies all the way down, though.

    Let's do it, and discover what the net worth of all the millineal twits amount to.

  17. Re:What's really going on here ... by 91degrees · · Score: 1

    But bitcoin has done this sort of thing dozens of times. Last June it was almost at $3000, before falling to $2,200.

    It is a bubble, but speculation about when it will burst is wild guessing.

  18. Re:What cryptocurrencies measure themselves agains by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    The measurement is not the problem. Trading is.

    Cryptocurrencies won't be measured against CPI until you can buy and sell products with them in a wide spread manner. While you're restricted to internal trading or trading against real currencies then the only way measure its value is against real currency.

  19. Re:What's really going on here ... by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

    If it's the base of a mountain and prices are only going to go up, every day will be a good buying opportunity.

    --
    If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
  20. Re:What's really going on here ... by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1

    Oh ok, thanks. Yes, I was thinking of the Hunt Brothers. I remember they dragged gold along with it, to a then unheard of $800 an ounce.

  21. Re:What cryptocurrencies measure themselves agains by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

    I made $40,000 by buying a house and selling it two years later for $40K more than I paid for it. I got to live in it for the two years. Try living in a cryptocurrency.

  22. Re:TOLD YOU SO by slashrio · · Score: 1

    If you weren't an AC, I'd have modded this up.

    --
    "Trump!!", the new Godwin.