Slashdot Mirror
Interviewing the Interviewer (vulture.com)
Terry Gross, NPR's The Fresh Air host, on the art of the Q&A: "People are always projecting things. They're hearing things that weren't said or projecting meaning that was not intended and, perhaps, not even implied. I've gotten both insults and compliments for interviews I've never done. What can you do? There's no way of controlling what people think. I do have a bullshit detector and it's something I'll use, but I do think I try and be empathetic to everyone I interview," said Terry Gross.
Interesting to know if you have a better example of how to interview someone.
const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
So this is an interview where one interviewer interviews and another interviewer who usually interviews some famous people?
Where's the nerd connection? Is it that the nerds among us would start genering jokes about the meta-levels of interviewing?
Can we reach level three here by having a slashdot Q&A with the author? Level four, anybody?
Bill O'Reilly
NPR to be informed.
I don't get why folks have a problem with NPR. It's the only news source that I can actually hear both sides without the yelling and other bullshit - they do have many conservatives and Republicans on and let them say what they have to say. As a matter of fact, it's the only source where I can actually hear and understand the conservative side because the NPR folks actually ask decent questions.
And NPR is the news source that keeps me a centrist and not drinking the Leftist Kool-Aid because I can hear the rational versions of the conservative side - unlike Fox News.
I also can hear the rational side of the liberal side.
Say what you will about Terry Gross, but she is an astute observer and has a breadth of knowledge about human psychology from the sheer number of years that she has spent interviewing and studying people. I find her personally overbearing and a little annoying but I will give her the credit she is due. However, I do like it when her bullshit-o-meter hits critical mass and she can no longer hold back. People need a good solid dose of reality at times.
Would you like to post a link to an interview that you felt was extremely biased one way or the other? NPR has everything up on their website.
I meant surprising if they claimed left-right blindness or admitted they're not sensitive to their donors when choosing content.
Now this isn't all Terri's fault... Bill O'Reilly is a huge douchebag and Al Franken is charming. But listen to her differing approach in these two interviews of people who, at the time, had almost the exact same role (political-based entertainment):
Bill O'Reilly's Fresh Air Interview
Al Franken's Fresh Air Interview
W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
Your comment is a perfect example of a NPR listener!
We are discerning, we don't take things at face value, we question and are skeptical......
Of course there's horseshit! We've all heard it. I mean there have been times when I have cringed at what I've heard.
But all in all, NPR is one of the best things in the USA for information - obviously it's not perfect. But that's what the tissue in our skull is for.
You're preaching to choir.
-Parent Poster
I'm not sure what that has to do with my point... did the word "Franken" trigger you? I certainly wasn't defending the man, but he is charming. So is Bill Clinton, and I think the man is far worse than Franken in the sexual predator department.
W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
I was just trying to cut Terri a break - but whether or not you agree that he is charming is not really important to make my point. She clearly approached the two men very differently and my assertion is it was (perhaps unconscious) bias on her part.
W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
You don't think:
1.) Terry Gross is a nerd?
2.) That her stuff matters?
I do, and I enjoyed the article.
Get your own goddam forum and edit it yourself.
It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
I’m really not fond of her interviewing style. I find that, like many seasoned journalists, she rarely lets her guests develop their thoughts for more than a few seconds, interrupting them and then speaking as much (if not more) than them. She has the irritating tendency to feed words to her guests (at least, those who are less comfortable speaking than her), starting a line of thought for them (as in “It must have felt so blah blah such and such. How did you feel when blah blah blah?”) and getting them to just repeat and complete the line, and so basically making them say something that they likely would not have quite said on their own. She may be confusing that technique with “getting them to open up” but, in reality, the result feels about as valuable as a forced police confession.
It’s a pity, given that her shows are pre-recorded and edited, giving her the opportunity to let guests take as much time as they’d like to precisely formulate their thoughts.
Apparently, it meant a LOT to you.
It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.