Slashdot Mirror


Is Pop Music Becoming Louder, Simpler and More Repetitive? (bbc.co.uk)

dryriver writes: The BBC has posted a very interesting article that investigates whether people claiming all over the internet that "pop music just isn't what it used to be" are simply growing old, or if there actually is objective science capable of backing up this claim of a "steady decline in music quality." The findings from five different studies are quoted; the findings from the fourth study is especially striking:


1. Pop music has become slower -- in tempo -- in recent years and also "sadder" and less "fun" to listen to.
2. Pop music has become melodically less complex, using fewer chord changes, and pop recordings are mastered to sound consistently louder (and therefore less dynamic) at a rate of around one decibel every eight years.
3. There has been a significant increase in the use of the first-person word "I" in pop song lyrics, and a decline in words that emphasize society or community. Lyrics also contain more words that can be associated with anger or anti-social sentiments.
4. 42% of people polled on which decade has produced the worst pop music since the 1970s voted for the 2010s. These people were not from a particular aging demographic at all -- all age groups polled, including 18-29 year olds, appear to feel unanimously that the 2010s are when pop music became worst. This may explain a rising trend of young millennials, for example, digging around for now 15-30 year-old music on YouTube frequently. It's not just the older people who listen to the 1980s and 1990s on YouTube and other streaming services it seems -- much younger people do it too.
5. A researcher put 15,000 Billboard Hot 100 song lyrics through the well-known Lev-Zimpel-Vogt (LZV1) data compression algorithm, which is good at finding repetitions in data. He found that songs have steadily become more repetitive over the years, and that song lyrics from today compress 22% better on average than less repetitive song lyrics from the 1960s. The most repetitive year in song lyrics was 2014 in this study.

Conclusion: There is some scientific evidence backing the widely voiced complaint -- on the internet in particular -- that pop music is getting worse and worse in the 2000s and the 2010s. The music is slower, melodically simpler, louder, more repetitive, more "I" (first-person) focused, and more angry with anti-social sentiments. The 2010s got by far the most music quality down votes with 42% from people polled on which decade has produced the worst music since the 1970s.

18 of 477 comments (clear)

  1. Because "Pop Music" isn't popular anymore. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Because the style of music we call "Pop music" isn't popular anymore. EDM has stolen that crown, just look at what all the kids are listening to these days.

    1. Re:Because "Pop Music" isn't popular anymore. by stealth_finger · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Pop music isn't written to make music, it's written to make money. The more efficiently they can get that earworm in with the flattest hook they can the better. Rinse, repeat ad infinitum.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    2. Re:Because "Pop Music" isn't popular anymore. by mwvdlee · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Music hasn't become worse; record labels have become more efficiënt.
      It's far cheaper to exploit starting musicians than to cultivate succesful musicians.
      It's far cheaper to dump a performer as soon as they get popular enough to start making demands and just get another one.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    3. Re:Because "Pop Music" isn't popular anymore. by Mass+Overkiller · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think they write the lyrics and music because the 'musicians' performing aren't really musicians at all, they're actors. The actual musicians making the music are either MacBooks or studio musicians who don't get paid much, are easily replaceable and are a dime a dozen.

  2. EDM? Maybe 15 years ago by Viol8 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Where I live all the kids are listening to the same autotuned R&B cr@p either with some mysogynistic neanderthal with his pants down by his knees rapping out some teenage wannabe bullshit or else some wailing woman in her knickers putting it out there.

    1. Re:EDM? Maybe 15 years ago by TheRaven64 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      New music has always sounded crap. It's a case of Sturgeon's Law (90% of everything is crap) combined with survivor bias (the 10% that isn't crap is more likely to be remembered and still played much later). For every great song you can remember from a prior decade, there are nine more that were such complete crap that you don't even remember that they were briefly popular.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    2. Re:EDM? Maybe 15 years ago by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 2, Insightful

      New music has always sounded crap. It's a case of Sturgeon's Law (90% of everything is crap) combined with survivor bias (the 10% that isn't crap is more likely to be remembered and still played much later). For every great song you can remember from a prior decade, there are nine more that were such complete crap that you don't even remember that they were briefly popular.

      Yeah, that's part of it. but TFA talks about some actually objective measures of quality.

      In particular, #2 and #5 are hard to argue with.

  3. I think so, but my kid loves it by swb · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think pop music blows. It seems to be one "singer" who doesn't really sing, and the music is mostly some kind of beat and there's almost no melody or music at all besides the percussion beat and maybe some kind of occasional synthesizer fill in. There seems to be a side version of this, featuring only a guitar with someone who can't lift their fingers off the strings.

    And the artist? It's like "Sharyian, Featuring Gtili and Wryannn" or some other kind of "collaboration" which ranges from the featured artists' presence being almost unknowable without the credits or totally dominating the song so that you don't know it was the "main" artists' song.

    But my kid loves it, so who am I? Some old guy who thinks this younger generation is full of it? Where have I heard that one before?

    My larger take is that this is just pop music subsuming "rap" music. The kid if given the choice will also try to play the rap station, which is even worse. Lyrics totally devoid of meaning and a "beat" that's just kind of a cacophony of rhythm and noise. It makes flipping the station back to classic rock like discovering something amazing.

    1. Re:I think so, but my kid loves it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think pop music blows.

      So do I. I stopped listening to the radio habitually quite a while back. Of course, I'm interested in listening to things I like to listen to. Youngsters listen to whatever is on top of the pops because that's what they all do.

      My larger take is that this is just pop music subsuming "rap" music.

      This "rap" "music" started out as (black) kids trying to do something with their life other than end up as gang fodder. (Behold the irony in "gangsta rap".) And they did that with what they had, a rhytm box and a mike on an illegal tap on a street light. You might say this is just the next step in popular music being "of the people".

      Of course, there's also the rampant commercialisation and the problem of rehashing the rehashes (yet again) by large companies trying to part kids with more of their lunch money at bigger margins and even less investment. One might look into typical royalty structures sometime. Why is it we have some really great rock bands with members sometimes in their 70s still touring, and then a whole lot of nothing, and then some mayflies? This is a problem that has been with us for decades already.

      I recall a conference discussing concerns like dumbing-down, inconsiderate re-hashing, manufactured groups, and so on, and so forth, threating long-term viability of dance music around the start of the century. Now it's the bbc noting the problem in mainstream pop. To me it's nothing new. The music conglomerates do have a habit of drilling for rock bottom while complaining external factors ("piracy", say) are eating into their profits. I have more sympathy for the devil.

  4. Re:That ain't be pop by hazardPPP · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That be hip hop!

    Word!

    Except that I've noticed that this

    1. Pop music has become slower -- in tempo -- in recent years and also "sadder" and less "fun" to listen to.

    seems to apply to hip-hop as well. To my ears, hip hop music has become less "funky", less dance-able, a lot slower, a lot less R&B/soul-like, more drawn out, with more "irregular" and slower beats. Note, I'm no music expert, I'm describing it as I hear it. I mean, compare the stuff say Drake puts out with hip hop of the 2000s and the 1990s. If I listen to some 2016/17 hip hop mix (the biggest hits, the mainstream stuff) it all sounds drawn out, slow, feeble, with lyrics which are more pathetic and pop-like compared to a mix of hip hop hits from say, the late 90s.

  5. Re:That ain't be pop by stealth_finger · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Even metal has gone shit in recent years. It's all emo crap these days.

    --
    Wanna buy a shirt?
    https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
  6. Re:Designed for the Left by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Michael Jackson died in 2009. Pop music became the worst in 2010. Coincidence? We've also recently lost other pop greats like David Bowie, Prince and George Michael.

    Personally, the only pop music I really listen to is from the 80s. That was the best decade for music.

  7. Compression by kbg · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No the problem is compression or the loudness war:

    https://www.cnet.com/news/comp...
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    When people say that music used to be better in the old days, that is actually true, it was better in the old days. Music in the old days had more dynamic range. Today it's just loud and flat.

  8. Re:That ain't be pop by r1348 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    He said metal, and you pull out Grohl?

  9. Music is not created; it is manufactured. by geekmux · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Pop music is not created anymore. It is manufactured, based on a known recipe of repetitive beats, a breathy oversexualized, Autotuned voice track crooned by a pop star that is valued more for their looks than their talent.

    Labels don't employ singers or artists anymore. They employ entertainers, because a good portion of revenue comes from touring, where only the best lip-syncing dancers fill sold-out stadiums and pretend to belt out their most popular tracks for two hours. The Loudness Wars confirmed that the quality of the recording no longer mattered; it merely needed to be loud enough for radio airplay.

    What is sad is finding Profit always being the #1 priority, which is why pop music is manufactured to fit into a proven revenue model. The fact that it's become simpler and more repetitive tends to show how lazy you can be to entertain the simple masses. Johnny Crooner and his iPad "band" can probably crank out a Top 10 hit in less than an hour these days, and rip off (a.k.a. "sample") a dozen hit songs doing it.

  10. Re: Designed for the Left by rickb928 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    'Angry'. 'Uneducated'.

    There ya go, insightful analysis. Not.

    Actually, the lemming comment is equally valid accusing our youth of following whatever meme they are being fed at the moment.

    Me? I'm an aging white cracker homophobe post-Republican conservative, and I love Camilla Cabello, Lourde, Khalid, Halsey. I still prefer 70s power rock/metal, Led Zeppelin is with Pink Floyd the eipitome of power rock, and She Came in Through the Bathroom Window (the Beatles version, please) is a blues song. And the Blues is God's music. Mostly. Bass305 is worth a slot in my playlist still, FSOL was and is a revelation, Air is my guilty pleasure, Moby is clever, I do NOT CARE that Toni Childs is white, Sara McLachlan can sing that sad shit forever, and Madeleine Peyroux seemed like a scared little girl when I first heard her, and it's wonderful she's still working at this. Yes, I'm a fool for female voices. Between Mahler's First, Ravel, Handel, and Beethoven I have enough, so Tchaikovsky is dessert. Puccini is enough.

    But try to expand the musical horizons of my 15 yo FD? Oh, dear God, she kinda likes George Clinton, thinks George Michael is saccharine, Boy George is some weird inside joke, Snoop is old but cred, Will Smith is an actor, Hammer is a tool, and I'm stupid trying to share my decrepit music with her. All the time I realize that her radio is filled with the same 8 songs all day long, she prefers 'gangsta' rap from men who she would file restraining orders against if they were in her life, and has the modern version of picket fence/station wagon/2 .2 kids/dog/cat/vacation on the shore, which is total devotion/two against the world/total bliss/rule the world. I pray that dream is broken gently, but the music is corrosive. And she knows it, but it's like a drug. Actually, it's a drug. Yes.

    I'll pass on having to explain how Baby, It's Cold Outside and Acid Queen are less sexual than anything she's listening to. That is not so easy after all.

    And so it's the Deja Vu all over again.

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  11. Repetitive beat, trite lyrics? Never! by Whibla · · Score: 4, Insightful

    We hate it, yeah yeah yeah
    We hate it, yeah yeah yeah
    We hate it, yeah yeah yeah

    You think you've found your groove
    Well, I'm here to set you stray-e-ate
    It's not that hard to prove
    Your music ain't that grey-e-ate

    We say we hate it
    And you know that it's all sad
    We say we hate it
    And you know you should feel bad

    We said it hurts our ears
    We almost lost our mind
    Not heard such crap in years
    Your drummer must be blind

    We say we hate it
    And you know that it's all sad
    We say we hate it
    And you know you should feel bad

    Oo, we hate it, yeah yeah yeah
    We hate it, yeah yeah yeah
    With a song like that
    You know you should feel bad

    You know it's come to this
    I think it's only fair
    Stop writing all that shit
    And take it off the air

    We say we hate it
    And you know that it's all sad
    We say we hate it
    And you know you should feel bad

    Oo, we hate it, yeah yeah yeah
    We hate it, yeah yeah yeah
    With a song like that
    You know you should feel bad
    With a song like that
    You know you should feel bad
    With a song like that
    You know you should feel bad
    Yeah, yeah, yeah
    Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah

  12. Fewer hit songwriters too by AdamD1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's worth noting that much of the top-5 songs in the past 10 - 15 years have all been written by the same tiny handful of songwriters.

    Obviously Max Martin tops this list, and has been writing #1's since at least 1997. He has dominated the pop charts even more in the past decade. He has either written or co-written most #1 pop songs you can think of for the past 5 years. He also produces the songs he writes for the singers that release them. Taylor Swift, Ariana Grande, Justin Timberlake, Katy Perry, Maroon 5, P!nk, Kelly Clarkson - every single one of them had a #1 with Max Martin in the past few years - and some (Timberlake) since the beginning of their careers.

    Whenever I hear that a song by Katy Perry is a "dis track" against Taylor Swift I just go "They're written by the same guy!" In fact he might be suggesting these tracks to specific artists with that kind of press in mind.

    Martin himself might be single-handedly responsible for the actual stats this article outlines.

    And when it's not Max Martin, it's one of his protegés, e.g.: Dr. Luke.

    --
    Because I can! [Brainrub.com]