Slashdot Mirror


Flat Earther Plans New Rocket Launch, Predicts Super Bowl-Sized Ratings (phillyvoice.com)

Self-taught rocket scientist/daredevil "Mad" Mike Hughes will finally launch his homemade rocket in two weeks -- despite "anonymous online haters questioning his every move." An anonymous reader quotes PhillyVoice: He's found some private land in the "ghost town" of Amboy, California -- complete with a brand-spanking-new road that'll enable him to get his motor home and rocket gear to the site... "It'll be a vertical launch, me strapped into the rocket with 6,000 pounds of thrust, going up about three-eighths of a mile," he said, noting it's a prologue to a major launch this Fourth of July weekend. "It's the ultimate Wile E. Coyote move."

As with the scrubbed mission, this is in part an event which he hopes will get people to investigate the ideology which holds the earth is flat -- despite quite a bit of evidence to the contrary. He said it would've happened back in November if international publicity hadn't prompted government bureaucrats to "cover their asses" by pointing out that his launch site crept 150 feet into federal land. "I could've been arrested so at that point, I just went home and got back to work," he said... "But guess what? It's about to happen again... I should get more viewers than the Super Bowl," said Hughes, adding the launch will be aired on Noize TV [a video-on-demand service].

Noize TV has already posted video of a new interview with Hughes, touting his upcoming launch at 3 p.m. on Saturday, February 3, the day before the Super Bowl (which Hughes calls "nothing but bullshit.")

Hughes says he's also filing to run for Governor of California.

219 comments

  1. Really? by Betty+Crocker · · Score: 4, Funny

    Is this what Slashdot has come to?

    This is like something that Q would teleport Picard off the bridge to watch just to WASTE HIS TIME.

    1. Re: Really? by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1, Informative

      Yes, this is what Slashdot has come to. For what Slashdot could have been, go to https://www.soylentnews.com/

      Itâ(TM)s really quite sad, but thems the breaks.

      Now get off my lawn.

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    2. Re:Really? by Patent+Lover · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Seriously, can we stop covering this asshole?

    3. Re:Really? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Seriously, can we stop covering this asshole?

      Bite your tongue. I would definitely buy a pay-per-view to watch his launch. I might even donate to his Patreon if he promises to do it.

      What could be more quintessentially American than a guy strapping himself to a homemade rocket and launching himself off his motorhome in Amboy, California. God speed, you glorious bastard.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    4. Re:Really? by Patent+Lover · · Score: 1

      That would be great except this dipshit has been making the same bullshit claims for months. This is way worse than back when Evel Knievel pretended he was going to jump over the Snake River Canyon.

    5. Re:Really? by Khyber · · Score: 1

      "This is way worse than back when Evel Knievel pretended he was going to jump over the Snake River Canyon."

      He actually attempted it, and his record of broken bones tells me you're just a bitter person with no thrills in life.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    6. Re:Really? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      I thought negative stereotyping like this was regressive behavior..

      There is no stereotyping. It says right in the story that he's launching his homemade rocket from his motorhome in Amboy California. I repeated those fact without judgement. In fact, I have great admiration for what he's about to do. He has real conviction and I applaud that.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    7. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I want to see the launch because it will be hilarious when it doesn't work or he kills himself.

      Stupid flat-earthers. He doesn't realise he could accomplish his goal with a balloon and a camera. Or, you know, just going to NASA's web site and looking at some pictures of Earth.

    8. Re: Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go play in traffic, your Nazi asshole.

    9. Re: Really? by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

      For what Slashdot could have been, go to https://www.soylentnews.com/

      The site doesn't answer... slashdotted?

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    10. Re:Really? by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1

      It's totally fake. There's no way rockets work.

    11. Re: Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's .org, not .com. But it's got the same crappy commenting as here. Ridiculous ideology, trolling, condescension, insults, etc. It's all there.

    12. Re: Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This. Please mod this up! Also, how's he gonna get an angle where he can photograph the turtles going all the way down? He obviously needs to do it by transcendental levitation.

    13. Re: Really? by polar+red · · Score: 1

      It isn't the site that's the problem. It's the people. Stupid, egoistic people.

      --
      Yes, I'm left. You have a problem with that?
    14. Re:Really? by Lisandro · · Score: 1

      He's going to die horribly because he thinks science lies to all to us.

      There's little to cheer here.

    15. Re: Really? by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 2

      'To summarize the summary of the summary: people are a problem.' — Douglas Adams

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    16. Re:Really? by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      He's doing that of his own free will and it seems he will not endanger anyone else.

      That's worthy of a Darwin Award, he'll probably win first place for 2018.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    17. Re:Really? by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      Yes onthe balloon and camera, no on the NASA website because they do not trust the data they're providing.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    18. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then they can look at ESA, JAXA or any other space agency's site.

      Wait, let me guess...they all collude to trick people for some unknown reason. It's all a big conspiracy for no reason.

    19. Re: Really? by WinstonWolfIT · · Score: 1

      Tinfoil hat neckbeards? "Hear hear"

    20. Re:Really? by lgw · · Score: 0

      Bullshit.

      He is doing science because he thinks the government lies to us all. And of course the government does lie to us all, constantly. He's simply wrong about the governments ability to lie consistently, as would be need for such a conspiracy.

      Believing what experts tell you is the opposite of science. Performing your own experiment in an attempt to falsify a published result is the very essence of science.

      Plus he'll likely be just fine - this is just a modestly scaled-up version of his previous run.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    21. Re:Really? by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      Well, they believe the Earth is flat so yes, everyone telling them otherwise is a conspiracy.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    22. Re: Really? by c6gunner · · Score: 2

      He is doing science because he thinks the government lies to us all.

      Ah, yes. "Doing science". The way that Albert Fish was "practising medicine and the culinary arts" when he dissected and ate his victims.

      Believing what experts tell you is the opposite of science.

      No, it's a big part of science. Nobody can possibly verify every single thing which they've been taught. At some point you have to accept that the millions of other scientists are probably right about the stuff which is generally accepted.

      Attempting to falsify the work of others is certainly a huge part of science, but we distribute that load; you, as an individual, will never be able to examine the many millions of papers written over the years, but they will all be looked at by many others. You either believe that those others are doing a decent job, or you don't. If you don't ... you're not going to be doing much real science; you'll spend your whole career rehashing stuff we learned back in the 1800s.

    23. Re:Really? by nukenerd · · Score: 1

      Seriously, can we stop covering this asshole?

      Yes, when he has killed himself.

    24. Re:Really? by nukenerd · · Score: 1

      That would be great except this dipshit has been making the same bullshit claims for months.

      The reason he has been making the claims "for months" is that he was going to do it months ago (last November) but was banned from doing it. I've no doubt he would have done it because he has made rocket flights before, and will do this one too if he is not banned again.

    25. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Well, they believe the Earth is flat so yes, everyone telling them otherwise is a conspiracy.

      They believe that the Bible tells them that the Earth is flat with a fixed firmament above. Everyone telling them otherwise is the devil lying to them. It is much more to them than a mere conspiracy of everyone else in the world.

      Of course, to some, it is just a means of making money by faking* some videos on Youtube and raking in the ad revenue.

      * you did know they were mostly fake, didn't you?

    26. Re:Really? by Patent+Lover · · Score: 1

      No, this dipshit could launch his fake rocket on private land any day he wishes. He simply has no rocket and is a dick. Good luck trying to get anybody to pay to watch his happy pretend rocket.

    27. Re: Really? by lgw · · Score: 1

      No, really, going around believing what you're told by "experts" is religion. It's all about faith. It's not that you have to perform every experiment, though as an undergrad you'll perform a lot of the key ones, but that you need to understand why experts say everything they do insofar as it relates to your field, and later your specialty. If you want to do original work you must understand what's gone before.

      I know it's fashionable in some circles to "love the science," which typically means unquestioning belief in popularizers (who, BTW, lie to you) but that's not science. Science is very much the questioning.

      So, yes, this guy is doing science. He's not doing it well, mind you, as there are much better and simpler experiments he could do, but he's got the essence of it.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    28. Re:Really? by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      Seriously, can we stop covering this asshole?

      Why? The news is so fucking depressing day in and day out now.
      It's nice to have a feel-good story like this every once in awhile.

    29. Re:Really? by stoatwblr · · Score: 1

      if the earth was flat, we could just push rockets over the edge.

  2. He might just get his crowd. by sehlat · · Score: 5, Funny

    Of course, it will be like the stunt rider who was told that the crowd wasn't there to watch him jump thirteen buses. They were there to watch him jump twelve-and-a-half.

    1. Re:He might just get his crowd. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or the idea that people watch NASCAR to see the crashes

    2. Re:He might just get his crowd. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      o/~ This is the story /
      It's sad and it's gory /
      of Robin Winter-Smith /
      He was a very brave man /
      if you get my drift o/~

    3. Re:He might just get his crowd. by Vinegar+Joe · · Score: 1

      Shouldn't be too hard considering how popular the National Felon League is.........

      --
      "The average reporter we talk to is 27 years old......They literally know nothing." - Ben Rhodes
    4. Re:He might just get his crowd. by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 1

      You mean they want to see a flat flat earther?

    5. Re:He might just get his crowd. by sehlat · · Score: 1

      I flatly agree.

  3. Not a flat earther by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This guy doesn't seem to be a flat earther. The clowns funding him might be, but not necessarily even that many of them are.

    I think the flat earth part is mostly just a gimmick to get extra media coverage.

    1. Re: Not a flat earther by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I initially took issue with his constantly being referred to as a flat-Earther but honestly, the guy is such an obvious idiot that I don't mind so much any more.

  4. Honestly by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Nowadays when we’re at the point that even a casual investigation by a grade school student can locate definitive evidence that the earth is round... it takes a special breed of delusional imbecile to hold onto the belief that the earth is flat.

    Here’s to you, Mike Hughes!

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:Honestly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Nowadays when we’re at the point that even a casual investigation by a grade school student can locate definitive evidence that the earth is round... it takes a special breed of delusional imbecile to hold onto the belief that the earth is flat.

      Here’s to you, Mike Hughes!

      I wonder what the Venn diagram would look like if we charted the people that believe his crap and the ones that believe Obama was born in Kenya. I'm guessing his group would be a small circle almost entirely contained in the Birther group. Then again, there may be more overlap than that..

      That all being said, how is this worth an article?

    2. Re:Honestly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nowadays when we’re at the point that even a casual investigation by a grade school student can locate definitive evidence that the earth is round... it takes a special breed of delusional imbecile to hold onto the belief that the earth is flat.

      Here’s to you, Mike Hughes!

      I wonder what the Venn diagram would look like if we charted the people that believe his crap and the ones that believe Obama was born in Kenya. I'm guessing his group would be a small circle almost entirely contained in the Birther group. Then again, there may be more overlap than that..

      That all being said, how is this worth an article?

      Hitler was a flat Earther too.

    3. Re:Honestly by gweihir · · Score: 2

      Well, look at some of the extreme stupidity found in human beings, and this is just a bit more spectacular than most.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    4. Re:Honestly by PPH · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well duh. Round earth has been demonstrated by incontrovertible photographic evidence.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    5. Re:Honestly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh I don't know. There are still people believing climate change does not exist.
      They are about at the same level of stupidity.

    6. Re:Honestly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nowadays when we’re at the point that even a casual investigation by a grade school student can locate definitive evidence that the earth is round

      That makes it sound as it was somehow new. Even back in Columbus days it was plainly visible to anyone who looked. Only the assumed^1 size of earth was a few orders of magnitude off and made Columbus shortcut to India look like a fools errand.

      ^1 I don't know if it was just a symbolic value for "very large", a translation error or an actual error by someone who computed it centuries before. The idea that earth is flat has been outdated for a very, very long time.

    7. Re:Honestly by dabadab · · Score: 1

      Actually Eratosthenes in the third century BC already calculated the Earth's circumference rather accurately.

      --
      Real life is overrated.
    8. Re:Honestly by Xolotl · · Score: 1

      It was Columbus who thought the Earth was smaller than it was, people who knew the real size (known since ancient Greek times) also knew he couldn't carry enough to make it. He got lucky coming across America.

    9. Re:Honestly by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1

      I thought he was a hollow earther.?

    10. Re: Honestly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One can be both a Flat Earther and a Hollow Earther. I shall start the Pita Bread Earther Society.

    11. Re:Honestly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > it takes a special breed of delusional imbecile to hold onto the belief that the earth is flat.

      The Bible tells them that the world is flat, has a firmament with waters above and waters below. In order for them to continue to believe that the Bible is true and inerrant they must believe that the 'round earth' is a conspiracy from the devil.

      Yes, fundamentalist Bible believers are a special breed of delusional imbecile*.

      * the devil told me so.

    12. Re:Honestly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Only the assumed^1 size of earth was a few orders of magnitude off and made Columbus shortcut to India look like a fools errand.

      As in another reply, the actual size of the Earth was well known for 2500 years. It was Columbus that thought the Earth was only 17,000 miles* around (and pear shaped). It was known that from the Azores to Japan it was around 13,000 miles. Thus with only 4,000 miles difference (instead of the actual 11,000 miles) a journey westward to the spice islands was achievable. Columbus never knew that he 'discovered' new lands, he thought until his death that he had been to the _East_ Indies.

      Columbus had married the daughter of the Governor of Madeira and lived on that island. If fishermen or sailors had been blown by storms across the Atlantic and survived (for which there is some evidence in the Americas going back centuries) then they may have tried to return using the trade winds. Madeira was perfectly placed to be the first place they came to. Columbus was perfectly placed to notice these and interpret their travels, or stories of them, as them having been in the 'East Indies'. Thus he could contrive (wrongly) that the world was not as claimed.

      Some support for this hypothesis is that the log of the first voyage of Columbus contains some references to places that he had not yet visited. This indicates that he probably had some foreknowledge of the area, such as may have been obtained from previous unwilling visitors.

      * he rationalised the '24,000 miles' and his ideas about the size by claiming that it was '24,000 Roman miles' which were considerably shorter than statute miles or nautical miles.

    13. Re:Honestly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nowadays when we’re at the point that even a casual investigation by a grade school student can locate definitive evidence that the earth is round... it takes a special breed of delusional imbecile to hold onto the belief that the earth is flat.

      Here’s to you, Mike Hughes!

      I guess that whole "Angular Momentum" he has to account for is meaningless errata.

  5. Darwin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nuff said.

  6. "Crater", not "ratings" by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 3, Funny

    Flat Earther Plans New Rocket Launch, Predicts Super Bowl-Sized Crater

    FTFY.

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    1. Re:"Crater", not "ratings" by HiThere · · Score: 1

      O, he might get his ratings. That's a bit different from supporters, though.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    2. Re:"Crater", not "ratings" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speaking of which, does he have the licenses to handle explosives? And has he managed to cover his rocket with the required and very heavy protective sheets to prevent structural damage to nearby buildings and people? His announcement of the danger zone seems to be in order, at least.

    3. Re:"Crater", not "ratings" by riverat1 · · Score: 1

      His rocket is steam powered so he probably doesn't need a license for explosives but maybe he needs a license for his boiler.

    4. Re:"Crater", not "ratings" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He will be so screwed, and grounded because of that. But, if he builds a house around his boiler, that will change everything!

    5. Re:"Crater", not "ratings" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > to prevent structural damage to nearby buildings and people?

      He should be worried about structural damage to the firmament that he thinks covers the flat Earth. If he makes a hole in it all the air could leak out and all the 'waters above' could flood back in for the return of 'The Flood'.

  7. 90% of flat-hearters are trolls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    90% of flat-hearters are trolls.

    9% are ten-year-old kids who believe anything they see on youtube.

    The one percent remaining are con-artists trying to make a buck, and succeeding.

    1. Re:90% of flat-hearters are trolls by jittles · · Score: 1

      90% of flat-hearters are trolls.

      9% are ten-year-old kids who believe anything they see on youtube.

      The one percent remaining are con-artists trying to make a buck, and succeeding.

      Geez. I need to start fleecing 10 year old children, too. Sounds quite lucrative. I didn't realize they had so much pocket money.

    2. Re:90% of flat-hearters are trolls by plopez · · Score: 1
      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    3. Re: 90% of flat-hearters are trolls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What separates you from a turd? Not much.

    4. Re:90% of flat-hearters are trolls by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2

      90% of flat-hearters are trolls.

      And 2% of them are dyslexic.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    5. Re:90% of flat-hearters are trolls by Archfeld · · Score: 2

      Just ask Mattel or FisherPrice how much money that market is responsible for. Hint Barbie is NOT poor...

      --
      errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
    6. Re:90% of flat-hearters are trolls by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      In high school, a friend and me wanted to sign up for the flat earth society, just so we could get their newsletter and laugh at it (before the internet). We never did it though, we didn't have the money.

    7. Re:90% of flat-hearters are trolls by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 2

      What separates that group from the Trump core?

      The covfefe, of course.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    8. Re:90% of flat-hearters are trolls by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1

      I was going to join in college, but pre internet it was too difficult to find out how. Same thing for muon and nambla (what ever happened to them? You used to hear about them all of the time.

  8. Kook makes kooky predictions by Beeftopia · · Score: 1

    He probably doesn't understand anything more than very simple cause and effect. Deducing indirect effects is beyond this fellow's ken.

    Truculent ignorance is often self-resolving, especially when high energies and risks are involved.

  9. Flat earther by iTrawl · · Score: 4, Funny

    Who are you calling flat? He's not flat... yet!

    --
    "Everybody's naked underneath" -- The Doctor
  10. let's kickstart this by slashmydots · · Score: 1

    Do you think if I started a Kickstarter campaign to sponsor his live stream with a mental health "get help" campaign that I could hit a million dollars in 24 hours?

  11. Haven't we already done this? by Mozai · · Score: 2

    Wasn't there already a non-government extra-terrestrial live video event where we could see the curvature of the Earth from above? Or is this one of those things where anybody who produces evidence we don't like is clearly in-on-it and part of the big-as-we-need-it-to-be conspiracy?

    1. Re:Haven't we already done this? by alvinrod · · Score: 1

      There's just no convincing some people. You could send them into space so they could see for themselves and they'd swear up and down you'd really just put them in some kind of sophisticated VR room and faked the entire thing.

    2. Re:Haven't we already done this? by plopez · · Score: 1

      They're trapped in the Truman show

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    3. Re:Haven't we already done this? by bobstreo · · Score: 1

      There's just no convincing some people. You could send them into space so they could see for themselves and they'd swear up and down you'd really just put them in some kind of sophisticated VR room and faked the entire thing.

      I endorse the idea of putting flat-earthers into rockets. I'm just not in favor of having them return safely.

    4. Re:Haven't we already done this? by careysub · · Score: 1

      The temptation to put them in the airlock and open it would be strong.

      --
      Starships were meant to fly, Hands up and touch the sky - Nicky Minaj
    5. Re:Haven't we already done this? by alvinrod · · Score: 1

      I once heard somewhere that the the Russian researchers behind the domesticated fox project not only kept and selectively bred the most friendly animals (leading to the domesticated fox), but also did the same for those that were the least domesticated, creating more ferocious and wild animals.

      I'd like to think that flat-earthers are proof of a similar alien project related to human intelligence and that the aliens are also keeping the most aggressively stupid offspring.

    6. Re:Haven't we already done this? by Brett+Buck · · Score: 1

      That's how all conspiracy theorists work. The more you prove reality, the more "proof" there is that the conspiracy is working overtime to "suppress the truth" . Complete lack of any evidence to support the existence of a conspiracy merely indicated how vast and effective the conspiracy has gotten. Fail to respond, and you can say "see, no one is even attempting to say we are wrong, because they know we are right.

            Psychologically, the entire system is self-reinforcing, which is why it is so difficult for these people to stop, and usually, they believe in multiple unrelated conspiracies because the same set of conclusions and behaviors can apply to literally any circumstance.

              Hard to say what this particular nutjob is up to here, whether he believes the earth is flat, or that he is doing it for publicity (wanting publicity for proving yourself and idiot in public is a different disorder...), or he is working some scam, can't tell.

    7. Re:Haven't we already done this? by beckett · · Score: 1

      Presenting incontrovertible evidence or data would not change the mind of someone ideologically committed to the contrary.

      Red Bull was bought off by BIg Round Earth, and they're taking Round Earth Dollars, dontcha know??

    8. Re: Haven't we already done this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's just trolling your religious fervor.

    9. Re: Haven't we already done this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like every American I ever had the misfortune to speak with. They are an ignorant and proudly so people.

      Nuke them from orbit. Only way to be sure. That's Musk's big plan btw!

    10. Re:Haven't we already done this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's worse than that. The 911truthers, chemtrail-believers, antigmo and antivaxers all create "evidence" that contradicts each other constantly and they all believe each other.

    11. Re: Haven't we already done this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pot meet kettle

    12. Re:Haven't we already done this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fish eye lense, thats why the state of Nevada takes up the entire globe. Also when they open the hatch the camera seeing out sees no curvature, just a flat horizon.

    13. Re:Haven't we already done this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I'd like to think that flat-earthers are proof of a similar alien project related to human intelligence and that the aliens are also keeping the most aggressively stupid offspring.

      It doesn't need to be aliens, the evangelist Bible thumpers (where the flat earth idea comes from) are doing a great job of raising the most aggressively stupid offspring.
       

  12. Balloons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wouldn't just using hot air balloons be much easier and affordable? Unless flat Earthers have a "scientific theory" on how a camera mounted on a balloon will affect imaging.

    1. Re:Balloons by plopez · · Score: 1

      or climbing a reasonable tall mountains. Ive seen it at 12k , it is even more apparent at 14K.

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    2. Re:Balloons by omnichad · · Score: 1

      You don't even have to climb a mountain to get that high - you can drive to 14K feet by car in Colorado.

    3. Re: Balloons by Jesus+H+Rolle · · Score: 1

      No need to go to Colorado to get high - Old California's got you covered, even if Mount Whitney seceded.

  13. Rabid Trump Support is Hughes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you had any doubt.

  14. o.O Really? by Notabadguy · · Score: 0

    Until now, I *literally* thought that flat-earthers were a straw-man argument that snowflakes used to point out how intellectually superior they are by making fun of them.

    I didn't think there would actually be a real one out there somewhere.

    Who...probably really isn't, but loves publicity, and just like the people on facebook who drink hot sauce or pour vinegar into their eyeballs in front of a camera for attention, here's a fellow who queued into something to attention whore.

  15. Need an Intervention! by Shogun37 · · Score: 1

    It'll be the most watched suicide attempt in history...Who wants popcorn?

    1. Re:Need an Intervention! by sound+vision · · Score: 1

      It's an attention attempt, the suicide part is just incidental and may not even happen. It was scheduled to happen months ago and never did.

  16. Re:Notice the weak winter Sun is strengthening? by jfdavis668 · · Score: 0

    Is this why Sydney, Australia is undergoing the the most extreme heat wave on record?

  17. Get a Balloon, or a plane ticket by vix86 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    He says he'll go up 3/8ths of a mile, that's just under 2,000ft. A commercial airline flight goes higher than that, as well as some cheap high altitude balloons. Of course the point of this isn't to prove anything except that this is a publicity stunt.

    1. Re:Get a Balloon, or a plane ticket by jittles · · Score: 2

      He says he'll go up 3/8ths of a mile, that's just under 2,000ft. A commercial airline flight goes higher than that, as well as some cheap high altitude balloons. Of course the point of this isn't to prove anything except that this is a publicity stunt.

      I believe he got quite a bit of money in donations, in addition to the publicity stunt. Win-win?

    2. Re:Get a Balloon, or a plane ticket by bobstreo · · Score: 1

      He says he'll go up 3/8ths of a mile, that's just under 2,000ft. A commercial airline flight goes higher than that, as well as some cheap high altitude balloons. Of course the point of this isn't to prove anything except that this is a publicity stunt.

      I'm guessing you could use a few Estes Rockets with a webcam and get more height, without the cost, or loss of life...

    3. Re:Get a Balloon, or a plane ticket by Ryanrule · · Score: 1

      i mean, you can do that in a building.

    4. Re:Get a Balloon, or a plane ticket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing you could use a few Estes Rockets with a webcam and get more height, without the cost, or loss of life...

      Is it really a loss?

    5. Re:Get a Balloon, or a plane ticket by Balial · · Score: 1

      Or on the side of a mountain

    6. Re:Get a Balloon, or a plane ticket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I mean, it doesn't really make sense to start such a sentence with "I mean". Fucking filler.

    7. Re:Get a Balloon, or a plane ticket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Idiot just needs a plane ticket and a waltz into the elevator of the Burj Khalifa to get higher off the ground than his shitbox "rocket".

    8. Re:Get a Balloon, or a plane ticket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm guessing you could use a few Estes Rockets with a webcam and get more height, without the cost, or loss of life...

      Alternatives always have advantages and disadvantages. In this case cost vs gene pool improvement.

    9. Re:Get a Balloon, or a plane ticket by greebowarrior · · Score: 1

      He would be able to get a similar view from the viewing gallery of 1 WTC, but with a longer observation period, and a lower chance of hitting the ground at high speed

    10. Re:Get a Balloon, or a plane ticket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Idiot just needs a plane ticket

      Did you not know that aircraft have special windows that make the straight horizon look curved. You can't know the 'truth' of the flat earth when _everyone_ is deceiving you.

    11. Re:Get a Balloon, or a plane ticket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...or just go to the top of a moderately small hill.

    12. Re:Get a Balloon, or a plane ticket by evileeyore · · Score: 1

      I am sitting 1000 feet above that in my office building right now :P, not a great vantage for seeing the curvature though.

    13. Re:Get a Balloon, or a plane ticket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seems all your old comments are completely useless. Pity I cant point out how wrong your were in all of them, but can't wait for you next bit of bullshit.

  18. First 2018 Live Darwin Awards! by Andrew+Lindh · · Score: 4, Funny

    This needs to be live viewing feed (for about 5 minutes) because it will only happen once and you want to make sure it's not censored by the crazy round planet people. He needs to get a circus monkey to push the launch button just to compliment the entertainment value. We'll get to see the first human firework that celebrates his own Darwin Award. Even if he survives, he won't see much at 2000 feet that you can't see from a skyscraper (Burj Khalifa is more than 1/2 a mile tall).

    1. Re:First 2018 Live Darwin Awards! by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      T Even if he survives, he won't see much at 2000 feet that you can't see from a skyscraper (Burj Khalifa is more than 1/2 a mile tall).

      Or a mountaintop.

      Meanwhile, the US is continuing to make stupid people famous.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    2. Re:First 2018 Live Darwin Awards! by careysub · · Score: 2

      There are mountains taller than that less than 15 miles away due south of Amboy, in direct line of sight. From there you can look down on this guy as he reaches the peak of his ascent.

      --
      Starships were meant to fly, Hands up and touch the sky - Nicky Minaj
    3. Re:First 2018 Live Darwin Awards! by mysidia · · Score: 1

      I don't blame him for wanting to leave earth -- you could legitimately say it's been flattened as a metaphor by environmentally-unfriendly companies and all the political BS, but 3/8 of a mile is not enough to escape.

    4. Re:First 2018 Live Darwin Awards! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meanwhile, the US is continuing to make stupid people president.

      FTFY

    5. Re:First 2018 Live Darwin Awards! by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

      Now that would be a hell of a vantage point for the whole ordeal.

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
    6. Re:First 2018 Live Darwin Awards! by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Put him in the rocket also.

  19. Re:o.O Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ironically, it is the flat-earther crowd that uses the snowflake term the most. Evangelicals. What can you do?

  20. Re:Notice the weak winter Sun is strengthening? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes. You notice your Sun at sunset and sunrise is pretty powerful? Well, here in winterful northern latitudes, it is the opposite, but has already about a month of strengthening since winter solstice.

    That shouldn't happen on the globe. There is no explanation for it.

  21. Just stop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Stop making stupid people famous" comes to mind...

  22. What only 3/8ths of a mile? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is the fucking point? This person could gather more evidence of the earth being round or flat by spending a few hundred on a commercial airline flight and looking out the fucking window at 5.5-6 miles up

    1. Re:What only 3/8ths of a mile? by sheramil · · Score: 1

      What is the fucking point? This person could gather more evidence of the earth being round or flat by spending a few hundred on a commercial airline flight and looking out the fucking window at 5.5-6 miles up

      gonna go way out on a limb here, and when not admiring the earth's visible curvature from this height i'll guess that he's doing this for the attention, and not any variety of scientific truth. perhaps society should stop convincing people that they're not real unless they're famous, even if they're famous for being suicidally stupid.

    2. Re:What only 3/8ths of a mile? by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Especially if they are flying from Australia to southern Chile or Argenta, or vice versa.

      One only has to compare the distances on a globe to the distance required if the earth were flat to realize how infeasible it is.

    3. Re:What only 3/8ths of a mile? by F.Ultra · · Score: 1

      You mean the air planes that are built by the round-earthers? They clearly have realtime photoshopping windows that shows a fake curvature.

  23. Re:Notice the weak winter Sun is strengthening? by jittles · · Score: 1

    Yes. You notice your Sun at sunset and sunrise is pretty powerful? Well, here in winterful northern latitudes, it is the opposite, but has already about a month of strengthening since winter solstice.

    That shouldn't happen on the globe. There is no explanation for it.

    Pythagoras has a bridge in Greece he'd love to sell you.

  24. Re:Notice the weak winter Sun is strengthening? by plopez · · Score: 1

    because the angle changes. FYI, the atmosphere is not uniformly distributed. It bulges out at the equator and this thinner at the poles. Which is exactly what to expect from a fluid on a spinning sphere-ish object.

    --
    putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
  25. I fully support this by gweihir · · Score: 1

    Idiots like this one should to everything they can to remove their presence from this world. If they do it in an entertaining fashion, all the better.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    1. Re:I fully support this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be fair, you can usually see the curvature of the earth on the very big skyscrapers. I know that was something I noticed at The Sears Tower (or whatever they call it now) and the old WTC.

  26. Re:o.O Really? by sound+vision · · Score: 2

    Evangelicals are people with no morals who pretend to have morals. The people who use that term are typically a different breed: People who have no morals and don't pretend to.

  27. Re:Notice the weak winter Sun is strengthening? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, the angle at sunrise is zero.

    The angle does NOT change just because it rises from a more southern point. That is the trick they put in your mind.

    You can go look up the 'bulge' of the atmosphere on wikipedia. It is insufficient at the equator to have any effect on a sunrise/sunset in the moderate northern latitudes.

  28. I've been up 3/8th of a mile by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    That was the elevation change for my 10 mile hike.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    1. Re:I've been up 3/8th of a mile by Godwin+O'Hitler · · Score: 1

      I've hiked up to an altitude of 5000 metres in the Himalayas, but all I saw below me was 4999m high ground.

      --
      No, your children are not the special ones. Nor are your pets.
    2. Re:I've been up 3/8th of a mile by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      I could see about a mile down from the ridge line. The trail head started about half way up. Altitude was 7100 ft (2100 m) above sea level.
      I've never hiked anywhere that was more than a 3 hour drive from where I live. So I haven't been to the Himalayas, and I'm not sure I could afford to go.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  29. I get some conspiracy theories, but... by Pollux · · Score: 2

    Flat earthers are a different breed altogether. With your typical conspiracy (9-11 inside job, fake the moon landing, vaccines cause autism, etc.), all it takes is a combination of a good story, not understood or misunderstood science, and a belief that you know something special that most people don't. It also becomes more popular as time gets further and further away from the initial event. But a key element is the inability for everyone or the average person to recreate the original variables surrounding the conspiracy. (We cannot recreate 9-11, we cannot recreate a moon landing limiting our technology and knowledge to what we had in 1968, etc.

    But with flat earthers? There are literally hundreds of ways today the average human can observe that the Earth is round. There's no depth of science to it. One can ask themselves the question, "Why can't I see the Rocky Mountains from my house?" Or, one can go find a straight road (perhaps on the salt flats or on ND Hwy 46), get a pair of binoculars or a good telescoping lens on a tripod, watch a car drive by, and watch it disappear over the horizon, then ask the question, "Would the car disappear if the Earth was flat?" Or just go onto YouTube and watch all the videos made floating weather balloons up to the stratosphere, where the camera can capture the curvature of the Earth. Or talk to an airplane pilot. Or control tower personnel whose equations they use to calculate distances, vectors, and flight plans would fail miserably if they were to use Euclidian Geometry instead of Spherical Geometry. Or duplicate Eratosthenes' experiment. (Yes, that one's far more complicated than watching video's on YouTube, but if it worked for some dead white Greek dude over two thousand years ago, who didn't have the internet or Google, then it can work for anyone today as well.)

    Most conspiracy theories choose to ignore expert opinions because they're incapable of understanding the science themselves. Flat-earthers are fully capable of understanding the science; they just refuse to understand.

    1. Re:I get some conspiracy theories, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is not a conspiracy theory. It is part of an extremely sophisticated gaslighting campaign on the American people.

    2. Re: I get some conspiracy theories, but... by Reverend+Green · · Score: 1

      You understand this guy is trolling you, right? It's really amusing to see how bent out of shape some people get over his antics.

    3. Re: I get some conspiracy theories, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah it's crazy. I spent about 2 hours one time on the flat earthers forum and it's insane how many creative answers they have to dispute pretty much everything. For example the reason a car or ship appears to "sink" over the horizon is because they believe that light slowly falls, thus giving it the appearance of sinking.

      They come up with excuses for pretty much everything.

      Actually now they say that the reason you can't see the curvature of the earth is because flights are not allowed to go high enough.

      https://wiki.tfes.org/Frequently_Asked_Questions

    4. Re:I get some conspiracy theories, but... by Lije+Baley · · Score: 1

      Most people have something that they just want to believe in, and for practical purposes in their particular lives it just makes things better. Big things like God/No God, yes, but also small things like "my wife did not eat the last cookie", which is easily proven, but it's just easier and better for them to stay on the couch and not eat the cookie, even if it's true.

      --
      Strange things are afoot at the Circle-K.
    5. Re:I get some conspiracy theories, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Flat-earthers are fully capable of understanding the science; they just refuse to understand.

      Because it contradicts the Bible, which they have been taught is inerrant.

  30. Running for Governor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would strongly urge Mike Hughes to postpone filing until after the launch... just sayin'

  31. Re: o.O Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go eat a Tide pod.

  32. Most comments on this thread... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and on the internet in general do no seem to understand what flat-earther movement is aimed at. It is supposed to be there to help you engage your critical thinking first and not immediately deride everything you have been told is true by laughing at it.

    1. Re:Most comments on this thread... by arth1 · · Score: 1

      and on the internet in general do no seem to understand what flat-earther movement is aimed at. It is supposed to be there to help you engage your critical thinking first and not immediately deride everything you have been told is true by laughing at it.

      Except that I think that most people accept that the Earth isn't flat because it explains quite a few things. Like how there can be midnight sun, why you can't see across a sea on a clear day, or why GPS works.

    2. Re:Most comments on this thread... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good good you have thought it out. Boats disappearing over the horizon etc.. You still misunderstand the concept tho they do not actually believe the earth is flat. But I guess you are just far too intelligent to work with.

  33. Isn't there an easier way? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wouldn't a ship, an inertial navigation recorder, and some sailing around in the Southern Hemisphere be an easier and safer way to test the flat earth bit? The distances and angles between stuff would have to be fairly different between round and flat. Of course acknowledging that would require flat-earthers to explain why everyone involved moving ships and planes around down there haven't said anything.

  34. Re:Notice the weak winter Sun is strengthening? by modmans2ndcoming · · Score: 1

    Right there is an imbecile folks.

  35. The Earth is Flat... by neoRUR · · Score: 2

    When I lay the world map down on the table it's flat, how can you argue with that?

    1. Re:The Earth is Flat... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah but the mercator projection is racist. Don't use it. It makes the USA and Russia look larger than Africa.

      https://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2017/03/16/north-america-really-bigger-than-africa-this-map-sets-things-straight/lK52K7aKYFpQ3b8ujJj6LP/story.html

    2. Re:The Earth is Flat... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      If it was flat, the cats would have knocked everything off the side by now.

  36. So Red Bull should sponsor him ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They can have a helicopter film it from above his whole light path.

  37. Where's the edge of the earth? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the earth is a flat surface, then it has an edge (unless the earth is infinite in area).

    Why doesn't Mike Hughes walk to the edge of the earth, point to it, and say, "There's the edge of the flat earth"?

    1. Re:Where's the edge of the earth? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For some reason people like him are stuck in 2 dimensions its either flat or round, when its neither its an oblate spheroid.

    2. Re: Where's the edge of the earth? by Jesus+H+Rolle · · Score: 1

      Why doesn't Mike Hughes walk to the edge of the earth, point to it, and say, "There's the edge of the flat earth"?

      Because there's a giant ice wall around the edge of the known world. The government no doubt knows what lies beyond, but they don't tell us. Frost giants, perhaps? After all, Magellan met giants while rounding Cape Horn through his eponymous Straits.

    3. Re:Where's the edge of the earth? by Godwin+O'Hitler · · Score: 1

      That's poor intelligent design. If it had been a prolate spheroid, many more people could have enjoyed living in the tropics.

      --
      No, your children are not the special ones. Nor are your pets.
  38. He will get a crowd... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And then proceed to die horribly, knowing he was wrong.
    Flat earth'ers are insane and the fact he wants to fly up on a home made rocket instead of sending a camera or something like that, just help proving that fact.

  39. idiot travelling 2000 feet up? by spineboy · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't it be cheaper for him to just fly a basic Cesna - he's certainly get higher - 10,000 feet vs 2,000.

    --
    ..........FULL STOP.
    1. Re: idiot travelling 2000 feet up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't it just be cheaper to get round trip tickets somewhere?

    2. Re:idiot travelling 2000 feet up? by h33t+l4x0r · · Score: 1

      Who would pay to see that?

  40. I have to ask.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the earth is flat how thick is it? I know, its shaped like a lens, a galaxy if you will. It's actually kind of fun to think up possible explanations why the earth is flat. You know, come to think about it, if the earth is spinning on an axis and gravity is acting toward the center, I guess it would want to flatten out to some extent at the poles due to centripetal force. I could run some calculations and..nah.

    1. Re:I have to ask.. by Plus1Entropy · · Score: 1

      The Earth is spinning on an axis, and it does get "flattened out" slightly, i.e. the Equator has a larger circumference than the Prime Meridian.

      --
      Only crack the nuts that crack. You don't put the ones that don't crack in the sack.
    2. Re:I have to ask.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aw, come on, let's not body-shame the Earth. She has pleasant "planet bumps".

    3. Re:I have to ask.. by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      The Earth is in great shape. Round is a shape, isn't it?

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
  41. Re:Notice the weak winter Sun is strengthening? by arth1 · · Score: 1

    So why is the winter Sun weak and yellower than the summer sun at the same altitude in the sky?

    Based on your ignorance, you must be from the American South. I grew up in the far North, and can tell you that the sun is not any more yellow during winter at high latitudes; if anything it is more white.
    At least at latitudes where there is a little bit of sun during winter. Where I started out at 70 degrees North, there are weeks with no sun, and the day the sun would finally peek up above the ocean to the South is celebrated. That was yesterday, this year, in my mother's town.
    Explain how that happens with a flat earth...

    The sunshine is slightly weaker during winter, but that is in part due to the temperature: a colder atmosphere is quite a bit denser.
    And in part because the Earth is not a sphere, it's slightly pear shaped, so when the sun is closer to the South, it traverses more atmosphere than when it's closer to the East or West.

  42. He will be the first distributed governor of CA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If he doesn't chicken out, he's likely to be evenly distributed across a pretty large area.
    pity he's using steam instead of a liquid fueled rocket.

  43. This Year? by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 0

    Yeah, he can probably beat the superbowl. The Fookin` Kneelers destroyed the ratings.

  44. I predict by dimko · · Score: 1

    They gonna launch, gonna fail and gonna blame on NASA, I guarantee you that.

    1. Re:I predict by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're not going to launch, but they *will* blame NASA "trying to hide the truth" for it.

  45. Re:Notice the weak winter Sun is strengthening? by nyet · · Score: 1

    Let me know if you can spot the North start from Australia.

    Better yet, describe the equation that relates linear distance from the equator with the angular elevation of the North Star

    Good luck, flat earth moron.

  46. Prediction: Something will happen to stop launch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He will never launch. Launching will put the lie to his flat-eartherism. It can never happen.

  47. Re: Notice the weak winter Sun is strengthening? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    kill your self

  48. Making money in the social media world by CptJeanLuc · · Score: 2
    1. Pretend you believe in something outrageous
    2. Wait for simpletons on social media to believe you and spread the story
    3. Spice it up by throwing in something grand like launching a rocket
    4. Wait for sensationalist media to pick up the "story" and make it go viral
    5. Watch the audience grow
    6. Profit
  49. See what happens when retards get made leaders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You get a whole bunch of idiots thinking they can do shit that will get them killed. Fucking seppos. leave the science to the non-shithole countries.
    Find me one thing US science has done without help from other countries.
    YOU CAN'T.
    fucking retarded seppos

  50. Every damned time... by Hallux-F-Sinister · · Score: 1

    I have gotten to this point regarding the Trump "presidency": Just tell me when it's over.

    This is also how I feel about this guy. Slashdot, would you PLEASE stop posting stories about this schmuck until he either successfully launches himself high enough to be able to say, upon landing, "oops, looks like I was wrong, it is round after all," or he launches himself into the side of something really big, hard, and generally resistant to rockets, in which case, I will very much like to hear about it. Once. One more time. Then no more about him.

    So to be clear, Slashposters and Slasheditors, please let me know when this moron/attention-whore either somehow manages to get some homemade POS to fly, learns what the saner among us already know, or inters himself using a homemade rapid-burial system, and until then, can you PLEASE stop posting each and every bullshit promise he makes about what he's ALLEGEDLY going to do until he has actually DONE it?

    --
    Our reign has gone on long enough. Indeed. Summon the meteors.
  51. darwen award! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Come on down and receive this wonderful trophy" ... "Oh ummm he's dead is he?"

    1. Re:darwen award! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      News flash: your spelling just received the Darwin award.

  52. Governor of California? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Given past presidential history in the U.S., he might have a fair chance. Or... scratch it. Why not run for president right away? Chances there are better, I've heard.

  53. I'm reminded of those beer commercials by Pezbian · · Score: 2

    Looks like "Real Men of Genius" might have a comeback.

    --
    In a world of the blind, the one-eyed man is king--and the two-eyed man is a heretic.
  54. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  55. Darwin Awards by DrYak · · Score: 1

    And risk missing the opportunity to witness a Darwin Award getting won on live TV ?

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  56. Let's let Mikey try it! by AndyKron · · Score: 1

    The new road will be good. I've heard the slightest bump causes parts to fall off the rocket. It even broke before getting it out of the driveway.

  57. Re:Notice the weak winter Sun is strengthening? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You've never been on an airplane, have you?

    Dumbass.

  58. Uh huh. Right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This guy's not going to launch - again. He's just doing this for the momentary celebrity (and thus sponsors), and to voice his ideology for a moment. He didn't intend to launch and he still doesn't.

  59. Ummmm.... by MerlTurkin · · Score: 1

    ....ROTFMFAO! Ooh, I pee'd a little!

  60. I hope he's bringing paper and a pen by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

    I hope he'll have enough time to draw a map of the flat Earth, including the obligatory "Here be dragons" note.

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  61. Being noticed on Slashdot by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1
    1. Use the name of a well-known TV show character
    2. Wait for simpletons on the forum to read and reply to your comments
    3. Spice it up by using weird formatting
    4. Watch the replies accumulate
    5. +5 moderation
    --
    #DeleteFacebook
    1. Re:Being noticed on Slashdot by CptJeanLuc · · Score: 1

      And being wildly unsuccessful, I really only made it to step number one in your list ... which I am quite happy about. I am just tired from watching media and social media users get played again and again by these cheap tricks ... which may sound harmless, but it is basically the same thing that gave us Donald Trump. So not so harmless, it turns out.

      Note that I did not say step number two, which is a complement to your comment. Regarding weird formatting, I actually wrote my comment using the OL and LI html tags ... I blame the /. layout not rendering it as a numbered list.

  62. Should we be laughing at this guy? by walterbyrd · · Score: 1

    Could it be that this guy has some serious psychological issues that could get him, or others, hurt or killed?

    1. Re:Should we be laughing at this guy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Could it be that this guy has some serious psychological issues that could get him, or others, hurt or killed?"

      Why is it that we must protect people from themselves? The Gene Pool is diverse, we don't need to protect people from their own stupidity.

  63. Never in history has stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Been so thick.

  64. Evel Kenevil Jumps the Canyon by goombah99 · · Score: 1

    Didn't Evel Kenevil already sort of do this test?

    Anyhow I have a new conspiracy theory I want to float for the first time here on slashdot.

    I think this so=called flat earther is really part of the conspiracy to convince us the earth is not flat. See he's only pretending to be a flat earther so when he goes up and say "golly the earth isn't flat" we'll all be convinced and the Round-Earth Conspiracy wins!

    It makes sense too. What's amazing really is that with all the space faring nations and corprorations and people launching their own balloon, the Round Earth Conspiracy is having to constantly get new people on board. It's hard work to keep a lid on the secret the earth is flat. It would there fore be much more likely that this guy is part of the con then not part of it. So how can we trust him not to be in on. It would make a lot more sense if he was in on it too.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
  65. lead = bad by AndyKron · · Score: 1

    This is why they took lead out of paint

  66. Re:Notice the weak winter Sun is strengthening? by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1

    I've noticed that the Sun is the same all year round. It is traveling through more air at sunrise and sunset, so it is less intense, not more.

  67. Not even faintly "News for Nerds" by thomst · · Score: 1

    So, another unscrupulous narcissist hijacks clickbait farms to attract attention to a pointlessly-idiotic stunt.

    In what universe is this even arguably "News for Nerds?"

    Is there any "nerd" anywhere who takes flat-eartherism seriously?

    Seriously?

    This attention whore was never a flat-earth advocate - until he figured out that they're dumb enough to be willing to bankroll his stupid, steam-powered suicide machine. Now he's suddenly a passionate proponent of an idea so fundamentally idiotic, so stubbornly anti-scientific, so willfully blind to all the scientific evidence since at least as early as the 13th century that only aggressive dimwits like Atlanta rapper B o B take it seriously?

    I'm not even going to facepalm or shake my metaphorical finger at /.'s so-called "editors" over this non-story, because all the evidence to date leads to the inescapable conclusion that such reactions only encourage them to post still more of this kind of horseshit. I am going to say that such blatant manipulation of the click-hungry meda - including /. - becomes progressively more tiresome with each iteration.

    Downvoting crap like this is exactly what meta-moderation is for, folks ...

    --
    Check out my novel.
    1. Re:Not even faintly "News for Nerds" by nukenerd · · Score: 1

      In what universe is this even arguably News for Nerds?" Is there any "nerd" anywhere who takes flat-eartherism seriously?

      You don't have to take flat-earthism seriously in order to take an interest in this. For one thing it offers a demonstration of a type of psychology, and that's science in itself. It also promises to be an entertaining show, even for nerds, and possibly a recorded coverage of a Dawin Award being won, as most of them do not get coverage at the time.

      This attention whore [is] suddenly a passionate proponent of an idea so fundamentally idiotic, so stubbornly anti-scientific, so willfully blind to all the scientific evidence since at least as early as the 13th century

      LoL, you protest too much; so much it sounds like you are the one taking the threat to the established view of a round earth seriously - by appealing to evidence for it. Since the 13th century eh? So did you find that by Googling for evidence that it was indeed round because you needed the re-assurance yourself?

    2. Re:Not even faintly "News for Nerds" by thomst · · Score: 1

      I snarled:

      This attention whore [is] suddenly a passionate proponent of an idea so fundamentally idiotic, so stubbornly anti-scientific, so willfully blind to all the scientific evidence since at least as early as the 13th century

      Prompting nukenerd to sneer:

      LoL, you protest too much; so much it sounds like you are the one taking the threat to the established view of a round earth seriously - by appealing to evidence for it. Since the 13th century eh? So did you find that by Googling for evidence that it was indeed round because you needed the re-assurance yourself?

      Does 1492 ring any bells for you?

      As someone points out further down the page, Eratosthenes calculated the Earth's diameter pretty accurately - in the 4th century BCE. So, it's not like the fact it's a spheroid is exactly news.

      You seem awfully smug for someone so easily entertained ...

      --
      Check out my novel.
  68. Who Cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If he sees the curvature of the Earth heâ(TM)ll just claim it âoeproofâ of a Flat Earth since heâ(TM)ll view it as the edge of a disk

    Best thing is for his landing to go awry and pull a Wile E Coyote in the literal sense to rid this planet of at least one ignorant fucktard

  69. Re:Notice the weak winter Sun is strengthening? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, on your first sentence. Start your observations today.

    Yes, on your second.

  70. Re:Notice the weak winter Sun is strengthening? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the atmosphere was the cause, it would turn the sun redder, not just dimmer. And if you check the figures, it can't be the atmosphere. It doesn't thicken at anywhere close to the rate that would be required to have an effect.

    The Earth is not pear shaped to any degree significant enough to cause an effect. But of course, that is a hypothetical argument, as it isn't a sphere at all.

    You've got the most important detail right: the sun is weaker. Unfortunately, you're so far north that you don't have a year-round reference to do the comparison. As to how this works on the flat Earth? Amazingly simple: the heavens are not the Earth. They follow their own laws.

    Check out the eclipses I linked. You'll be surprised.

  71. Lots of people waiting to laugh by wardrich86 · · Score: 1

    It must feel great knowing so many people will be tuning in to watch you fall on your face!

  72. Re:Notice the weak winter Sun is strengthening? by lgw · · Score: 1

    Is this why Sydney, Australia is undergoing the the most extreme heat wave on record?

    Well, duh, of course it is - the Sun if off orbiting close to Australia during the winter, and orbits close to America during the summer so of course it's cold in Australia then.

    --
    Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  73. Bets on whether he'll blow up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Based on the history of rocket development I'm guessing he will.

  74. Re:We have to Stop by lgw · · Score: 1

    Gotta STOP making stupid people famous.

    But without Hollywood or news shows, what would people watch?

    --
    Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  75. Hit that nail on the head by TiggertheMad · · Score: 2

    Parent post shouldn't have been voted down, it is probably pretty accurate. I think that most flat-earthers are either doing it for attention or money. I suppose a few might have genuine mental health problems. But it is pretty hard to swallow that someone who is sane would actually think that the Earth is flat. in the face of modern technology and the evidence it presents.

    Of course this guy is a troll. He has the technical acumen to construct a primitive rocket, but yet it has not occurred to him to just put a camera on a small model rocket to 'prove' his theory rather than risk his life on an expensive and complicated stunt? Weather balloons are super cheap compared to rocketry, and those can go to the edges of space. He has a number of options to test his theories with little effort.

    He isn't trying to prove anything, he just wants attention.

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
  76. Hey now, no need to go there by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

    We were enjoying a fine discussion without bring up bitcoin.

    --
    Your ad here. Ask me how!
    1. Re:Hey now, no need to go there by CptJeanLuc · · Score: 1

      If I could upvote your comment, I would. But as you said, let's not go there. I have noticed that nothing will give me reddit downvotes as quickly as dropping a few truths about cryptocurrency. Believers will want to believe.

  77. around the world flight? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps he could just book a ticket to Singapore, hop a plane over to Europe, and then come back to LAX? For a couple thousand bucks he could see that nobody is clinging to the edge of the world... just saying?!

  78. Re:Notice the weak winter Sun is strengthening? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > If the atmosphere was the cause, it would turn the sun redder,

    It does. We get sunrises and sunsets where the clouds are turned red. This happens (as well as the sun appearing to be yellow when it is actually white) because the nitrogen in the air scatters blue light. This scattering makes the sky blue, when otherwise it would be black. The more air that the sunlight travels through, the more blue is scattered and the deeper into the spectrum the scattering affects. At sunrise and sunset the sunlight has to travel through more air, 'sideways' as it were, than it does when overhead. The redness is seen when the sun goes close to the horizon, or below it, and shines on the underside of the clouds.

    But, of course, the 'flat earth' doesn't have horizon, or sunrise or sunset, the sun is _always_ 4,000 miles up in the sky and thus must _always_ be more than 20 degrees or so 'up'. It must be my imagination that I see a sunset every day and a sunrise every morning, those couldn't _possibly_ happen.

    From my point on Earth, 45 degrees south, the 'flat earth' sunrise should be in the North-East, or even further North. At this time of the year (summer) we get sunrise somewhat south of east and sunset somewhat south of west. Even casual observations disprove your 'flat earth' and consign to the ignorance of Biblical fundamentalism.

  79. Re:Notice the weak winter Sun is strengthening? by Kellamity · · Score: 2

    Because Australia isn't real and we are all actors perpetuating the myth. Hi from 'Melbourne'.

  80. Really? by TheInkStainedWretch · · Score: 1

    The rocket was built by ACME.

  81. Is everybody sure of this? by DiEx-15 · · Score: 1

    I mean, I always love a good fireworks show. Also love watching Darwin in action too.

  82. Re:Notice the weak winter Sun is strengthening? by Rakarra · · Score: 1

    I'm pretty sure the AC here is married to the Timecube guy.

  83. Re:We have to Stop by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

    what would people watch?

    Paint, drying.

    --
    Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"