Slashdot Mirror


Are Music CDs Dying? Best Buy Stops Selling CDs (complex.com)

An anonymous reader quotes Complex magazine: The future of physical music isn't looking good. According to Billboard, consumer electronics company Best Buy will no longer carry physical CDs and Target may be following suit in the near future. Best Buy notified music suppliers that they will cease selling CDs at stores beginning July 1. The move is sure to hurt the already declining sales of CDs as consumers are switching to streaming platforms such as Spotify, Apple Music, and Tidal in large numbers. CD sales have already dropped by a sizable 18.5 percent in the past year, Billboard reports.
Billboard also reports Target has given an "ultimatum" to music and video suppliers. "Currently, Target takes the inventory risk by agreeing to pay for any goods it is shipped within 60 days, and must pay to ship back unsold CDs for credit... Target has demanded to music suppliers that it wants CDs to be sold on what amounts to a consignment basis..."

"If the majors don't play ball and give in to the new sale terms, it could considerably hasten the phase down of the CD format."

295 comments

  1. Last DRM free media by jawtheshark · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Last DRM free media: there are music executives opening bottles of champagne...

    --
    Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    1. Re:Last DRM free media by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I just have no need to drive to a store to hope they have a CD I want and pay more for. I'll buy on-line. I don't need to hold it in my hand before purchasing. I'll buy on line.

      But I tend to buy used CDs, rip and stash. So I'm only only indirect support for the new CD market.

    2. Re:Last DRM free media by TheRaven64 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Huh? iTunes and Amazon have been selling DRM-free MP3 and MPEG-4 AAC downloads for about 10 years now. The music industry was fairly quick to realise that DRM gives control to distributors at the expense of producers. The TV and movie industry is a lot slower.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    3. Re: Last DRM free media by brunes69 · · Score: 1

      I don't know of any music at all that has DRM anymore. Are you living under a rock???

    4. Re:Last DRM free media by jawtheshark · · Score: 1

      Apple dragged them kicking an screaming to non-DRM formats. I cannot buy on iTunes, bevause iTunes does not run on my systems. There are also rumors that iTunes will switch to streaming only. Once everything is streaming only, you won’t have any control any more. You won’t have the CD anymore to switch back to.

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    5. Re:Last DRM free media by cayenne8 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      just have no need to drive to a store to hope they have a CD I want and pay more for. I'll buy on-line. I don't need to hold it in my hand before purchasing. I'll buy on line.

      Yeah, I tend to buy online too....BUT I don't want to see CDs go away....

      How else will I get my music in a DRM free, lossless format?

      Streaming just doesn't provide high enough quality for my home stereo system, which I've built over the years for real listening times.

      mp3's are fine for the gym or car which provide horrible listening environments, but for my good system when I want to really sit and listen and enjoy....I want that higher quality format.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    6. Re: Last DRM free media by jawtheshark · · Score: 0

      How long do you think that will stay that way when the CD is gone? Once everything is streaming, you will have no more control and... no more fallback.

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    7. Re:Last DRM free media by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 2

      I agree. I stream but its not always convenient. I like my USB in my car full of my own collection. No data costs, no fumbling on my phone, etc. More lossless download options would be nice.

    8. Re:Last DRM free media by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have to like obscure artists, but Bandcamp does offer downloads in FLAC even if you buy a physical media. Also they allow you to stream your albums from their app. It's nice.
      Tycho isn't too obscure, but he also offers FLAC downloads from his iso50 store (well, he used to; now it seems they switched to Bandcamp).

    9. Re: Last DRM free media by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Technically CDs have DRM itâ(TM)s just shitty and horribly broken, and old enough the DCMA can't be used to prevent ripping.

      And while itâ(TM)s a "lossless" format, itâ(TM)s also got a limit in terms of audio fidelity. Audiophiles already prefer other mediums which allow for a much greater depth of sound, and there are digital formats which are not DRM encumbered.

    10. Re: Last DRM free media by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I doubt that. This a their last physical medium and I seriously doubt they like being at the mercy of the Internet. My guess this is the beginning of the end for small to medium studios.

    11. Re:Last DRM free media by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 4, Informative

      There's no DRM on the music* files sold in the iTunes Store.

      * videos are another story.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    12. Re: Last DRM free media by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CDs do not have DRM. They were open from the beginning, there is nothing to break.

      The issue isn't DRM, it's bit-rate.

    13. Re: Last DRM free media by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Compact Disc specification does not include DRM. Even Philips said copy protected CDs are not CDs.

    14. Re:Last DRM free media by trabby · · Score: 1

      For more commercial artists there is hdtracks, it requrires a downloaoder thingo but the result is DRM free.

    15. Re: Last DRM free media by BarneyGuarder · · Score: 2

      Huh? You can download flacs of albums from sites like 7digital.com and hdtracks.com. with NAS and backups, these will out last your CDs.

    16. Re:Last DRM free media by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tidal was mentioned in the summary. Is there a single, "hi-res" audio provider that would sell the music DRM free, and without subscription? The "hi-res" world is appearing a murky as high-end audio world at times, to be honest. And as locked as 4k UHD video world is.

    17. Re:Last DRM free media by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      The music industry was fairly quick to realise that DRM gives control to distributors at the expense of producers. The TV and movie industry is a lot slower.

      Consumers weren't yet willing to sign up to multiple services to get media when music became available for legal, paid download. Now they are, so the studios are gearing up to be the distributors. Doubtless everyone is watching the mouse quite closely.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    18. Re: Last DRM free media by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It isnâ(TM)t necessary to go to such extremes. £1000 worth of hifi can clearly show the difference between CD and for example Vinyl if you have the ears to hear it. Similar disagreements have been flying in Guitar amp land over valves vs transistors for at least forty years now.

      There are problems though. To begin with, those with cloth ears donâ(TM)t like the idea that someone else might have better hearing than them so decry the whole idea as âemperors new clothesâ(TM) and secondly, the recording stage is crucial. Due to processes and decisions in the recording and mastering phases of the audio, itâ(TM)s wuite possible that for a given recording there may be no advantage beyond CD.

      Audio is a very subjective area where the ability to point at a graph or set of figures isnâ(TM)t always helpful.

    19. Re: Last DRM free media by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      How long do you think that will stay that way when the CD is gone?

      For all practical purposes, the CD is already gone.

      I can go to Amazon and buy any song I want, DRM free, for $1. I don't see any reason for that to change.

      How is Amazon's service related in any way whatsoever to availability of CDs?

    20. Re:Last DRM free media by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

      I know that Linus Entertainment lets you buy albums, and songs, from the artists that they manage in FLAC format. They don't have a huge number of artists compared to the big production companies but there are some known Canadians. Every December they have 12 days in which they give an album a day away in digital format (FLAC/MP3).

    21. Re: Last DRM free media by PhotoJim · · Score: 1

      Copy-protected CDs lack the "Compact Disc Digital Audio" logo on their packaging, which speaks volumes. It has to be a CD by the standard to display the logo, and copy-protected discs don't meet the standard.

    22. Re: Last DRM free media by PhotoJim · · Score: 2

      Give us that, and losslessly, and we'll talk.

    23. Re:Last DRM free media by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vinyl?

    24. Re: Last DRM free media by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      Give us that, and losslessly, and we'll talk.

      Amazon's mp3s are 256 kpbs. The fidelity difference between that and lossless is way below what the human ear can discriminate.

      Lossless makes sense for studio mixing, not for consumers.

    25. Re: Last DRM free media by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 2

      The fidelity difference between that and lossless is way below what the human ear can discriminate.

      Which is why I don't use human ears when I am listening to my high fidelity audio system.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    26. Re: Last DRM free media by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Newp. Vinyl has about 12 bits worth of dynamic range, and starts distorting the signal above 5khz. https://hydrogenaud.io/index.p...

      Please refute with actual engineering data/arguments. Otherwise its just placebophile hand-waving bullshit.

    27. Re:Last DRM free media by Wycliffe · · Score: 1

      Consumers weren't yet willing to sign up to multiple services to get media when music became available for legal, paid download. Now they are, so the studios are gearing up to be the distributors. Doubtless everyone is watching the mouse quite closely.

      Most still aren't willing too. Sure, a few people will have hulu and netflix or some other combination but most people don't want to be subscribed to multiple services. I currently have netflix. Before that I used amazon prime. I see no reason to pay for more than one at once. Same for music and news. I would gladly pay $10 per month to have access to all the major news sites but I'm never going to pay $10 per month for the NYtimes and $10 per month for Washington Post, etc... Either their prices need to come down considerably or they all need to get together and have some sort of package where I can subscribe to a single service and have access to them all.

    28. Re:Last DRM free media by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Selling? they don't sell they lease.

    29. Re:Last DRM free media by zidium · · Score: 1

      I can't even remember when I last saw or listened to a CD. Or DVD or Bluray for that matter! It's been more than a decade for CDs, I think. 5-8 years for the others.

      --
      Slashdot Valentines Beta Massacre: iT WORKED! The boycotts killed Beta!!
    30. Re:Last DRM free media by zidium · · Score: 1

      I buy from mp3caprice.com or download what I can't find there or (reluctantly, Amazon MP3) from YouTube.

      --
      Slashdot Valentines Beta Massacre: iT WORKED! The boycotts killed Beta!!
    31. Re: Last DRM free media by zidium · · Score: 1

      So are you a Reptilian or a Grey?

      --
      Slashdot Valentines Beta Massacre: iT WORKED! The boycotts killed Beta!!
    32. Re:Last DRM free media by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I buy used CDs in great condition for like $1.00 to $3.00 each. I bring them home, rip them to FLAC, scan the inserts, put them all on a USB flash drive and store the CDs away as backups. If I want MP3s for my player or PS3, I use the FLACs as sources for those.

    33. Re: Last DRM free media by dryeo · · Score: 1

      Newp. Vinyl has about 12 bits worth of dynamic range, and starts distorting the signal above 5khz. https://hydrogenaud.io/index.p...

      Please refute with actual engineering data/arguments. Otherwise its just placebophile hand-waving bullshit.

      OTOH, vinyl is often engineered to have more dynamic range then CD.
      Personally, I like buying old used CD's for the same reason, to get the dynamic range that CD's are capable off.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    34. Re:Last DRM free media by jbn-o · · Score: 1

      Purchasing CDs with cash allows one to buy anonymously without an account (such as one uses with Amazon or Apple both businesses one has good reason to consider not doing business with at all anyhow, given how they treat the public, their employees, and vendors).

      And for all we know the shift to DRM-free media will turn out to be revisited ultimately moving audio back to DRM-riddled media built on uncritical acceptance from people endorsing doing business with abusers like Amazon and Apple. The big difference being that DRM'd audio was hard to justify while widely-playable audio CDs were being sold everywhere consumers were likely to shop (such as big box retail stores). If audio CDs are not being sold much anymore from large vendors (including online) and people are willing to buy into here-and-gone-again walled gardens known as app stores and streaming services, it seems likely to me that business greed will remain. Businesses will still want to push how much more control over the user they can achieve by no longer distributing audio in DRM-free audio codecs. There may even come a day when people can be convinced to rebuy the same media multiple times again (VHS, LaserDisc, DVD, Blu-ray, streaming for video; cassette, CD, streaming for audio). This strikes me as something an uncreative and nervous investor would find to be a desirable outcome and right in line with what they've been pursuing for decades.

    35. Re:Last DRM free media by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 1

      Apple dragged them kicking an screaming to non-DRM formats. I cannot buy on iTunes, bevause iTunes does not run on my systems.

      This is true, but it is not relevant to the OP's original point, that DRM-free music has been available in iTunes or Amazon for years.

      There are also rumors that iTunes will switch to streaming only. Once everything is streaming only, you won’t have any control any more. You won’t have the CD anymore to switch back to.

      A rumor about something unlikely. Most people that have iTunes or Amazon collections do not stream unless they are connected to the Internet. In all other cases, the typical use case scenario is to offload to a usb device (a thumb driver or phone) and hook that up to a car or USB speaker. Otherwise, you'll have to stream over a cell phone data plan (mucho expensivo.)

      Unless someone comes with a way to provide ubiquitous and convenient wifi everywhere, stream-only plans are a dumb idea.

    36. Re:Last DRM free media by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "high resolution" audio is a scam. 16-bit 44KHz is already well above what any human being can hear.

    37. Re: Last DRM free media by hairyfeet · · Score: 4, Informative

      Sigh...do I REALLY need to provide the actual A/B tests that were done when Pono Player (wow that was some snake oil huh?) came out when they put 320k MP3 ripped from CDs against the 24bit masters in FLAC and found those "ears that can tell the difference" couldn't tell shit from shineola? It got a ton of press thanks to Neil Young making out CDs and MP3s to be shit, look it up.

      At least with tubes versus solid state there is actual science there, tubes naturally accentuate even order harmonics and add a bit of organic compression to certain frequencies with a breakup that follows a smooth curve which is difficult for a solid state amp to replicate (this is why bass players like myself have no issues with solid state, our signal need to stay clean and thus the same effects the tube has on guitars produces mostly unwanted affecting of the signal on bass) but as we saw with Pono Player there are limits to human hearing that adding more fidelity simply will not change.

      BTW if you wonder why if this is the case that studios record in much higher fidelity than what you get on CDs? I have spent a lot of time in studios and can answer that, headroom. When you are recording an instrument its extremely rare these days that the signal is gonna go straight from the recording to master without alteration, you need that extra headroom for effects and equalization so that you have more room to experiment before clipping. If one puts some serious thought into everything from mike placement to effects before one hits record? Its quite possible to get VERY good recordings using only 16bit CD audio quality, just look up demos of the Tascam and Zoom portastudios on YouTube or check out the low fi movement and we have certainly seen many artists create timeless recordings using equipment that any audiophile would consider absolute garbage.

      Many think CDs sound like shit today NOT because of the format but because of the studios pushing the loudness war max compression, but go to a show where indie artists sell their own CDs and you'll find some really awesome sounding CDs because they are not slamming compressors on the entire mix. its not the format, its how its being misused.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    38. Re:Last DRM free media by youngone · · Score: 1

      Based on the track record of any of the "content owners", Disney will make an awful mess of any music (or video on demand) service they decide to get into.
      As an aside, I went to a specialist music store I know of, looking for a particular CD they might have (the search function on their site is broken).
      They now have a huge room downstairs full of old-fashioned 33 rpm records, with a bunch of bearded men looking through them.
      That's a fashion trend that will die (again).

    39. Re:Last DRM free media by tsa · · Score: 1

      After George Michael died I bought all his stuff that I didn't have yet on CD on Amazon. It was half the price Apple charged for it on iTunes.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    40. Re:Last DRM free media by tsa · · Score: 1

      I agree. The days of the bearded man are numbered.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    41. Re:Last DRM free media by rally2xs · · Score: 1

      Vinyl.

    42. Re:Last DRM free media by vlad30 · · Score: 1

      Maybe if they produced more music I would want to listen to for more than a few times. the same goes for movies some older movies I can watch over and over, most newer movies/music once can be too often and yes my kids feel the same

      --
      Your'e all thinking it, I just said it for you
    43. Re: Last DRM free media by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your stereo equipment is obviously shit.

    44. Re:Last DRM free media by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      How else will I get my music in a DRM free, lossless format?

      Buy it on Bandcamp, or similar sites. They provide FLAC and ALAC on the lossless side, as well as MP3, AAC and Ogg Vorbis (and possibly soon Opus) on the lossy side.

      They won't have the huge popular artists, but from the genres I listen to (mostly metal), there are a lot of albums available, also from bigger bands.

      --
      Eat the rich.
    45. Re: Last DRM free media by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      And while itâ(TM)s a "lossless" format, itâ(TM)s also got a limit in terms of audio fidelity. Audiophiles already prefer other mediums which allow for a much greater depth of sound, and there are digital formats which are not DRM encumbered.

      Nonsense. Please show a credible test that shows people being able to reliably tell CD-quality audio from "hi-res" based on the same master.

      Audiophiles are delusional fools.

      --
      Eat the rich.
    46. Re: Last DRM free media by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      It isnâ(TM)t necessary to go to such extremes. £1000 worth of hifi can clearly show the difference between CD and for example Vinyl if you have the ears to hear it.

      Well yes, but only because LPs have horrible bad dynamic range and frequency response compared to CDs, so of course you can hear a difference. Because the LP will be shittier, and have a lot more noise.

      There are problems though. To begin with, those with cloth ears donâ(TM)t like the idea that someone else might have better hearing than them so decry the whole idea as âemperors new clothesâ(TM)

      Please provide credible double blind tests that show this supposedly superior hearing that some audiophiles supposedly possess.

      (And no, the infamous meta-analysis doesn't count. Don't even go there)

      Audio is a very subjective area where the ability to point at a graph or set of figures isnâ(TM)t always helpful.

      There is only one credible way to gauge absolute sound quality, as perceived through the human hearing apparatus and human brain, and that is double blind testing.

      --
      Eat the rich.
    47. Re: Last DRM free media by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      To be more precise, it has nothing to do with the format. It has everything to do with the mastering.

      CDs are capable of so much more than LPs.

      --
      Eat the rich.
    48. Re: Last DRM free media by No+Longer+an+AC · · Score: 1

      thanks to Neil Young making out CDs and MP3s to be shit

      I love Neil Young, but not all of his ideas are good. In the mid '80s he wrote some opinion piece published in Harper's called "The CD and the Damage Done" in which he bitterly complained about how digitally recorded music was a horrible thing that just didn't capture the true spirit of a good old analog recording presumably transferred to LP or even cassette.

      And years later he tried to sell us the Pono?

      Like I said, I love Neil Young but maybe he should lay off the dope a little bit.....

      His full statement announcing the death of Pono can be found here:

      http://www.noise11.com/news/r-...

      It’s time to talk about Pono and the initiative we all started. As you know, together we’ve been fighting a battle to bring high quality music back to the world that’s become used to mediocre, hollowed-out files.

      blah, blah, blah - a bunch of words....

      But, despite that success, I was not satisfied. I had to put up with lots of criticism for the high cost of music delivered in the way all music should be provided, at full resolution and not hollowed out.

      was bought and shut down with no notice by Apple

      Thank you all very much for supporting Pono and quality audio. Thanks to everyone who is or was associated with Pono, especially the customers who supported us.

      I see there's ONE Pono left on Amazon and it's only $400. I'll let someone else buy it although the collector value has to be HUGE.

      I would buy it if it came with everything Neil Young ever recorded - or maybe just every version of Cowgirl In the Sand he ever played. I don't care about audio quality, I just wanna hear some guitar and nasally vocals.

      "Has your band begun to rust"?

    49. Re:Last DRM free media by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Even buying new, CDs are usually cheaper from online stores, including delivery, than they are from brick and mortar stores. And the online sellers have a much bigger catalogue. Best Buy isn't somewhere that's particularly know for having a huge stock of CDs, so you're likely to only buy one if you're there for something else and happen to see the thing that you want. CDs are just not a great use of shelf space in such a shop.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    50. Re:Last DRM free media by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You will be paying online for something you won't actually own (read the terms of service.) That's as stupid as renting a house, you will never build equity and just be pissing money away.

    51. Re: Last DRM free media by Not-a-Neg · · Score: 1

      You will also be paying 2-4 times more for those downloads vs buying a physical CD to rip your own.

      --
      -==- Buy a Mac and leave me alone!
    52. Re:Last DRM free media by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

      Why?

      --
      http://www.acetonestudio.com
    53. Re:Last DRM free media by tsa · · Score: 1

      Because I like his music very much. I was quite upset about his death. He was not that much older than me and his music has been a constant factor in my life since my early teens, first with Wham! and later in his solo career.

      And why the CDs were cheaper than the iTunes files I have no idea.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    54. Re: Last DRM free media by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No "technically" about it. CDs do NOT have DRM.

    55. Re:Last DRM free media by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's because you're a hipster dufus.

    56. Re: Last DRM free media by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Couldn't agree more. CDs were to replace cassettes for sound quality and LPs for mobility. Now people pay 4x for albumns I bought 25 years ago, down load tunes at 1/10 the digital quality of CDs but forget a CD can be played for your life ir 10000 x. That down loaded musuc bit sampled 1/64 and saved on phone to cloud, updated to new phone, appke system, ect in 3 or 4 years will either not work, need major loadings at cost equal to or more than a cd or a brand new down load again ect. repeating the cycle. CDs are master copies, simple.

    57. Re: Last DRM free media by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >20k MP3 ripped from CDs against the 24bit masters in FLAC and found those "ears that can tell the difference" couldn't tell shit from shineola?

      Welp, found one person who doesn't get what losseless codecs are for.

      here is the thing. If you keep transcoding a codec from one format to the next, over and over, you'll get generational loss.

      Unless you're using lossless.

      Lossy codecs are meant for listening. Lossless are meant for master copies and remixes. This way you can edit, re-save, remix again and again without a small loss each time. You know, stuff you do with a master.

    58. Re:Last DRM free media by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And iTunes is going away, and taking with it the ability to buy DRM-free music, (something Apple was FORCED to do, not something they wanted,) so they're sidestepping that by selling music-as-a-service, meaning it's DRM'ed again, you "stream it," and they "hold onto it for you," and then they own your music collection again, just like they did before. "Apple Music" is the weapon they're going to try to use to pry even more of what HAD BEEN your money and make it theirs, because our sick system rewards that... sorry, I digressed. In any case, holding Apple up as an example is a bad idea here, given coming attractions.
       
      As for Amazon, they're going the same basic way, I'm sure, eventually, as they push harder and harder their own "music-as-a-service" called "Amazon Prime Music," bundled with free two-day-shipping on crap bought directly from them, and their Prime Video... but it's streaming, they own it, and having used "Amazon Music," I can tell you you CAN download it, (at least that's how it used to be, I stopped using it a while ago,) but only into THEIR APP, which periodically requires an internet connection to make sure you're STILL a paying Prime customer, which means again, THEY OWN the music, YOU DON'T.
       
      So yeah, actually, physical CDs are the last DRM-free media, because the standard was designed such that you can't market what you're making as an audio CD if it has DRM baked into it. DVDs, BD, and probably other compact-disc shaped audio, like SACD, and the like, (don't know about SACD actually, but I imagine it is like DVDs etc., in this respect,) all are DRM'ed, and so is what Apple AND Amazon, (more than likely) will be "selling" "music" on in the future. Enjoy CDs continuing to be made and available while you can. In the not-too-distant-future, they're likely going to go the way of audio mini-cassette tapes. You don't see them very damned much anymore.

    59. Re:Last DRM free media by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      In any case, holding Apple up as an example is a bad idea here, given coming attractions

      You misunderstand. Apple is a great example, because they showed that DRM gives control to distributors at the expense of content creators, yet the people with the power to insist on DRM or no-DRM are the content creators. The more you point to DRM giving companies like Apple and Netflix a stronger bargaining position relative to companies like EMI and Universal Studios, the more likely these companies are to think 'hang on, we were sold DRM as a thing to protect us, but actually it's giving away control to other people'.

      The end point that you want is for the content creators to commoditise content distribution, which will cut the margins in distribution to a very thin sliver and leave the profit with the creators (or, at least, copyright owners), and the only guaranteed way that they have of doing that is to require that distributors ship their product without DRM. At that point, any commodity player can play music and videos from any source, irrespective of the distributor.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    60. Re: Last DRM free media by PhotoJim · · Score: 1

      Other codecs give better audio quality with smaller filesizes (e.g. Ogg Vorbis), but transcoding lossy to lossy makes things even lossier.

      Personally, I use FLAC at home and I use MP3 where I have to, and Ogg Vorbis where I can, when file size is more important than audio quality.

      Your point may be correct, or it may not be, but I don't want what I want decided by others. Give me lossless - remember, I had it (and still do) with CDs - don't take quality away from me without the option of retaining it.

    61. Re:Last DRM free media by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      Maybe if they produced more music I would want to listen to for more than a few times.

      It takes work to find, but there is great new music out there. I have many albums produced in the last decade I listen to repetitively. Unfortunately, most people would not recognize most of those artists.

  2. Yes, cassette tapes next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    CDs have one big problem - no iPod support.

    1. Re: Yes, cassette tapes next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      Clearly we have met the last remaining person in the world who uses an iPod.

    2. Re: Yes, cassette tapes next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's wrong with the iPod?

      1) Click wheel -- awesome.
      2) 3.5mm headphone jack -- duh.
      3) Spinny non-upgradeable hard drive -- boo, but it is fixable. I replaced the HDD in mine with a CF card using the iFlash adapter from Arkan but heck it looks like you can get them on Walmart.com or Aliexpress much cheaper now.
      4) No Vorbis support -- See Rockbox. Includes FLAC support as well, but kinda silly to waste all of that space with no noticeable sound difference (to me anyway).
      5) Must have iTunes -- See #4. Rockbox allows the iPod to appear to your Linux/Windows/Mac PC as any other mass storage device. Drag and drop your music files on to or off of your iPod.

      The only reason I don't use my iPod anymore is that my Android phone does the same job well enough.
      Now I'm just wondering if there is a way to replace the 30 pin adapter with USB-C.

    3. Re:Yes, cassette tapes next by PhotoJim · · Score: 1

      iTunes still rips CDs for you, although there are better tools for the job.

  3. Since laptops and new computers does not... by MindPrison · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...come with a CD drive anymore, this is to be expected.

    Let's face it, you don't see anyone with a CD (Discman) anymore, unless it's the obscure retro-freak that just likes to show off old toys (like me), but seriously - most people have their music on their cellphone today, just look at all the hi-fi equipment in the store, those that are regularly sold - has a "iPhone" or some other cellphone docking feature to them. At the very least - their own streaming services and possibilities.

    It's just an impractical format today. It had 30 good years, now it's all memory - literally. CD is dead - long live the CD

    Even Blu-ray kinda died because of that, no one wants that clunky old format when you can store it all on an harddisk or simply stream it from the cloud. I gotta say - I do miss collecting DVD's for the sake of always having a hardcopy of my favorite movies, and yes - I still do have them, and a few players just in case they're unavailable in the future.

    There's both a good and bad side to this. I like services like Netflix where you can basically just browse trough a huge library of movies, no need to physically find them there and then, and just select it for viewing here and wherever I want to play them. It's very convenient, especially when it's AD free. It's not even expensive for that kind of access.

    What is sad tho, is that they can remove our favorite movies at will, some months these movies just aren't available, in cases like that - a good private collection can't be beat.

    As for music CD's, since we have perfectly good streaming services available, with pretty much every tune on the planet available on those services, the CD as a musical medium is pretty much gone.

    --
    What this world is coming to - is for you and me to decide.
    1. Re:Since laptops and new computers does not... by geekmux · · Score: 5, Insightful

      ...come with a CD drive anymore, this is to be expected.

      Let's face it, you don't see anyone with a CD (Discman) anymore, unless it's the obscure retro-freak that just likes to show off old toys (like me), but seriously - most people have their music on their cellphone today, just look at all the hi-fi equipment in the store, those that are regularly sold - has a "iPhone" or some other cellphone docking feature to them. At the very least - their own streaming services and possibilities.

      It's just an impractical format today. It had 30 good years, now it's all memory - literally. CD is dead - long live the CD

      Even Blu-ray kinda died because of that, no one wants that clunky old format when you can store it all on an harddisk or simply stream it from the cloud. I gotta say - I do miss collecting DVD's for the sake of always having a hardcopy of my favorite movies, and yes - I still do have them, and a few players just in case they're unavailable in the future.

      There's both a good and bad side to this. I like services like Netflix where you can basically just browse trough a huge library of movies, no need to physically find them there and then, and just select it for viewing here and wherever I want to play them. It's very convenient, especially when it's AD free. It's not even expensive for that kind of access.

      What is sad tho, is that they can remove our favorite movies at will, some months these movies just aren't available, in cases like that - a good private collection can't be beat.

      As for music CD's, since we have perfectly good streaming services available, with pretty much every tune on the planet available on those services, the CD as a musical medium is pretty much gone.

      Let me sum up what all of this really means.

      No one likes privacy anymore. The only people who want to watch or listen to their form of entertainment while not being tracked, profiled, packaged and sold are those retro-freaks who still care about privacy and maintaining the concept of ownership.

      And "not expensive"? The death of physical medium is just another cut out of 1,000 cuts. In the end, this will be converted to yet another monthly rental cost that you will be forced to pay in order to access another form of entertainment. $9.99/month is cheap, right up until you realize you're paying that out to a dozen content owners every month.

    2. Re:Since laptops and new computers does not... by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 4, Insightful

      DVD's and Blurays are still convenient for stuff (especially series) that aren't available on streaming services here. But that's more of a shortcoming of the streaming services... or rather, of the outdated regional licensing model. And that's where we need to go back to our (Dutch) old law: pirating content was allowed if there was no reasonable legal way to obtain it. "Reasonable" meaning on prevailing formats at comparable prices and conditions. Not selling your content here or holding out? Too bad, citizens may avail themselves of the material as they please. Now I don't condone piracy, but I do think it is a legitimate form of pressure on distributors to get their act together.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    3. Re:Since laptops and new computers does not... by KiloByte · · Score: 2

      No one likes privacy anymore. The only people who want to watch or listen to their form of entertainment while not being tracked, profiled, packaged and sold are those retro-freaks

      Or instead of flimsy obsolete physical junk or bandwidth-wasting streaming, get their music via Cpt. Anakata or via one of specialized sites. I then try to find a way to support the band in some way.

      Specifically: band, not that "content owner". I do consider copyright to be a crime against humanity, those lobbying for it are not going to get a single cent from me. It's the artist who needs to get financial benefits from their work.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    4. Re:Since laptops and new computers does not... by msauve · · Score: 1

      "Since laptops and new computers does not......come with a CD drive anymore, this is to be expected."

      No, but they often come with DVD or Blu-Ray drives, which much to your surprise, read CDs.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    5. Re:Since laptops and new computers does not... by nine-times · · Score: 1

      No, but they often come with DVD or Blu-Ray drives...

      ... and they often don't. More and more, manufacturers are making computers with no optical media drive, or where the optical drive is optional. More importantly, I'd bet that most of those optical drives are going largely unused, even when they're there.

    6. Re:Since laptops and new computers does not... by nine-times · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No one likes privacy anymore.

      Plenty of people still like privacy. There's a big difference between, "I don't care if a particular company knows what music I listen to," and "I don't care if my emails are public."

      If you buy your MP3s from Amazon or you buy the physical CDs from Amazon, they still know what music you own. The medium doesn't make a big difference in that case. Even when people bought their albums at brick-and-mortar stores, going to the same Tower Records and buying CDs with your credit card meant that the store could be tracking what music you'd purchased. People weren't only paying in cash or avoiding patronizing the same store twice out of fear that the store might compile a list of what albums they owned. People didn't care.

      And that's all it is. People don't care if Amazon or Apple or Spotify know what music they like. They want those services to know, in fact, because one of the services they offer is music recommendation-- if they know what music you like, they can tell you what other music you might like. But there's still a wide chasm between that and "not liking privacy".

    7. Re:Since laptops and new computers does not... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, most don't come with any type of optical media drive.

    8. Re:Since laptops and new computers does not... by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 0

      Somebody can make a laptop with no optical drive.

      Nobody can force me to purchase such a laptop.

      Any questions?

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    9. Re:Since laptops and new computers does not... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Video game consoles are where people usually play CDs, USB drives exist, and stereo systems have come back in vogue

    10. Re:Since laptops and new computers does not... by Kjella · · Score: 1

      Let me sum up what all of this really means. No one likes privacy anymore.

      That would imply that they once did, but I doubt that. Offer anyone from the past century access to Netflix and Spotify and I think most people would use it, just like today. It's the technology that wasn't there yet. And I doubt most vinyl freaks care either since it started while it was competing with equally untraceable CDs, it's mostly about doing it retro style like shooting film instead of digital cameras. I don't think the past you imagine ever existed.

      And "not expensive"?

      Spotify + Netflix standard = $21/month = <3 hours/month at minimum wage. Granted that doesn't include the Internet service or every possible series from every possible source but seriously... how cheap do you want content to be? Here in Norway the average wage is 44310 NOK/month, average tax rate about 27%, Spotify + Netflix = 99 + 139 NOK which put together means it's roughly 0.74% of post-tax income. You don't get Game of Thrones, tough.

      People have never cared much about most of their privacy, but we've always assumed/expected that when we want something to be private we can simply not share it. The problem is that once you start cross-referencing everything it turns out to be extremely hard to do that, you really have to compartmentalize with military precision and even then Facebook seems to figure it out. I'm not really too concerned about entertainment though, even if being outed as a Celine Dion fan may be bad.

      Apart from cell phone tracking, electronic tickets, license plate readers and face detection tracking everywhere you go I think the greatest danger is news going paywalled. Sure before you might know who subscribed to Pravda but you didn't know if they read it. Now with engagement metrics all around you could track each and every article, if you wanted to find your critics you could probably simply put out slightly subversive articles critical of the government and find out who's reading them with great interest.

      Because that's really the killer feature here, make people give you circumstantial evidence that they don't think they need to hide. Like that story about store loyalty cards figuring out who's pregnant by changes in purchasing habits. That's the new MO, let them think they have their privacy but in reality you got them figured out. Just don't let them know that you know, because most would find it creepy. Actually, scratch what I said about entertainment... you can probably find out a lot by looking at who likes the Snowden movie, Ayn Rand, Michael Moore and so on. It all adds up.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    11. Re:Since laptops and new computers does not... by blind+biker · · Score: 1

      just look at all the hi-fi equipment in the store, those that are regularly sold - has a "iPhone" or some other cellphone docking feature to them. At the very least - their own streaming services and possibilities.

      3 or 4 years from now when those iPhone attachments and streaming services will be obsolete, I will still be able to listen to music on my CD player.

      Before you peep up saying that my CD player will stop working, I have to inform you that it's a rather old CD deck, produced before planed obsolescence engineering was as developed as today.

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    12. Re: Since laptops and new computers does not... by Miamicanes · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And for approximately $25, you can buy a USB3.0 BD-ROM + DVD+/-RW drive the approximate size of a CD jewelbox that can also do CD-R(W).

      You don't buy CDs to listen to directly... you buy them to get a clean source that can't be arbitrarily taken away from you {n} years from now because some company decided that "for life" means "the life of our product, as we define it" (e.g., Zune), shuts down their DRM servers, and leaves you with either nothing at all, or (at best) one final, fragile copy that'll be gone forever when the shit electrolytic capacitors (or glued-in battery) dies 2 or 3 years later.

      This past Christmas, I spent a day playing with my old C64 & Vic-20. Both worked perfectly, and so did my old 1702 monitor. My old Odyssey2 (Videopac, in Europe) and RCA Studio II worked, too. It was a sobering experience when it sank in that there's probably not a single goddamn computer or game console you could buy today, put (shrinkwrapped) in a closet for ~35 years, and have ANY reasonable hope that it will actually WORK (and be usable "for real") when you power it up for the first time. Even a goddamn Nintendo 3DS refuses to let you do anything with most games until it connects to the internet & updates... once Nintendo shuts the servers down someday (like they're doing with the Wii's e-store this year), bye-bye system. Try doing anything useful with a Logitech Revue, a Zune, or a "WMV-HD" disc from ~10 years ago (Microsoft shut down their DRM servers & said 'fuck you' to customers, so they're now unplayable). This is why I'll NEVER spend money on full-priced content tied to Microsoft devices or services again, and why Google will probably never convince me to take their future media devices seriously. I'll throw down $7.99 for a used game, maybe, but never more than $29.99 (very rarely, more than $19.99), because I now assume anything I buy will be taken away 3-5 years from now & devalue it accordingly.

    13. Re: Since laptops and new computers does not... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How long are you willing to use an old computer?

    14. Re:Since laptops and new computers does not... by msauve · · Score: 1

      Whoosh. The GP claimed they don't come with CDs anymore. That's not true - it's a buyer's choice.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    15. Re: Since laptops and new computers does not... by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      What has that to do with the fact that somebody wants my money but is not going to get it unless they offer me something I actually want to buy?

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    16. Re:Since laptops and new computers does not... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I still like making the odd mixed CD to play in the vehicle. Sure, I can use Bluetooth, but sometimes picking out an old CD that I haven't listened to in awhile is kind of cool. "Hey, I remember that song". Plus I don't have to fiddle if the CD is already in the player.

    17. Re: Since laptops and new computers does not... by adolf · · Score: 1

      To large extent I agree, but with the Wii:

      This console has been completely jailbroken/rooted/DIY since almost day 1, and it remains so. So unlike PlaysForSure (or whatever it was) on a Zune, I will always be able to at least replace my online-sourced content and play it just fine (if offline, because game servers are game servers).

      It is a champion of accidental openness, probably due in large part to the fact that at all times all of the Wii's hardware and accessory sales were profitable to Nintendo; it never was sold as a loss leader. This reduced their incentive to keep an iron grip on the software: When Sony or Microsoft lose money on every console sale, the only way for them to generate profit is through software sales and royalties.

      I don't worry about my Wii content, although I may have to do some (illegal-but-should-not-be) space-shifting with KAT or TPB in the future in order for the stuff I've paid for to remain playable as the hardware inevitably ages and dies.

      But as it is all of my Wii software is already running from an SD card, including the titles that I own on optical disc. The solid-state non-spinny bits of the Wii should last for a long, long time.

    18. Re:Since laptops and new computers does not... by zidium · · Score: 1

      Bittorrent.

      --
      Slashdot Valentines Beta Massacre: iT WORKED! The boycotts killed Beta!!
    19. Re:Since laptops and new computers does not... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. What do you do if nobody makes a laptop with an optical drive?

      I'm serious because we'll probably see the death of the 3.5mm headphone jack on smartphones and tables within 5 years. Swappable batteries in smartphones might last a little longer, but not much.

      Seems that for some design questions, the industry has decided to no longer care what the consumer wants; instead they just offer what's in their best interest. And if the major manufacturers agree that the 3.5er has to go, it will disappear - because at least half the consumers don't care, and they provide enough momentum for the change.

    20. Re:Since laptops and new computers does not... by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      Yes. What do you do if nobody makes a laptop with an optical drive?

      Then I will build one.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    21. Re:Since laptops and new computers does not... by olau · · Score: 1

      There's a bit of difference between knowing that you have bought music X and knowing that you listen to music X at a specific point in time at a specific location.

    22. Re:Since laptops and new computers does not... by Kokuyo · · Score: 1

      That's a function built into the player, not the medium.

    23. Re: Since laptops and new computers does not... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Question...

      Are MP3s going away?

    24. Re: Since laptops and new computers does not... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's nothing that requires a Nintendo 3DS to connect to the Internet before playing a game. Fake news.

    25. Re:Since laptops and new computers does not... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DVD's and Blurays are also convenient in the pretty regular case that streaming just isn't working right. Even with a gigabit connection, Hulu, CBS and NBC screw the pooch when it comes to streaming. I think it's because their ad servers are overwhelmed (always fails in commercials for me), which is kinda funny since they keep adding more and longer ad breaks.

    26. Re:Since laptops and new computers does not... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...come with a CD drive anymore, this is to be expected.

      Let's face it, you don't see anyone with a CD (Discman) anymore, unless it's the obscure retro-freak that just likes to show off old toys (like me),

      Heh...wanna bet?

      There's the old guy that's listening to *something* on his '90's era Discman of some vintage that I can see about any early morning I go into my neighborhood McDonalds.

      There are some items out there that *never made it* to CD.

      Long live vinyl rippers!

    27. Re: Since laptops and new computers does not... by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

      No, YOU'RE the one who's full of shit. Lego Legends of Chima isn't playable on a factory-fresh 3DS until you allow the 3DS to fetch some mandatory update from Nintendo. It doesn't require continuous online connectivity to play it, but until the update is done, you won't be allowed to play the game. If you had a new-old-stock shrinkwrapped 3DS that spent 30 years in a closet and tried to play that game for the first time sometime around the mid 2050s, you wouldn't be allowed to do it.

      As far as I can tell, Nintendo has an incrementing counter for patch level, and 3DS cartridges can specify a minimum patch level. If you put the cartridge in a 3DS that hasn't been patched to that level, the game won't run until the 3DS finds some way to connect to the internet, download the patch, and install it. Thus, if you're attempting to play a game for the first time that was released late in the 3DS's official life and requires a patch level that's higher than what that new-old-stock 3DS shipped with from the factory (or even a non-shrinkwrapped old 3DS that never managed to get updated to a newer patch level), you aren't going to be able to EVER play that game without some major hacking. Given Nintendo's past behavior, the likelihood that they'll have a server up and running to handle 3DS patch downloads circa 2050 is somewhere between "slim" and "none"... as is the likelihood that Nintendo (or whomever owns their copyrights at that point) would tolerate allowing anyone to independently distribute their old firmware updates after they themselves have discontinued support for them.

      So fuck you. If you think this is "fake news", you're probably dumb enough to BE a prime target audience member FOR "fake news".

      In the past, consoles either had no system software or shared libraries at all, or publishers were expected to distribute their games along with any patches to the baseline system software and libraries that their games depended upon. It wasn't until consoles gained network connectivity "out of the box" that companies felt entitled to start making them dependent upon post-manufacturing updates that could be made unavailable at any time without recourse from consumers.

      IMHO, the manufacturer of any device that's unfit for its advertised purpose without additional downloads should be required by law to provide SOME "reasonable" way for a knowledgeable (not necessarily technically-clueless) end user to obtain and apply those updates on his own, LONG after the vendor itself has ceased to provide them online. For example, suppose a scenario like...

      1. Hypothetical IETF RFC for "Post-EOL Firmware Update Service" that describes a protocol for a service you can run on a TCP/IP network and serve a firmware update to a bootloader long after a device has ceased to be supported by the original manufacturer.

      2. A vendor like Nintendo escrows its firmware updates with the Library of Congress, and pays some nominal fee like $100 to register them. Ditto, for any software vendor who ships software that can't actually run without some mandatory update that isn't shipped along with it. Every 30-90 days, the LoC publishes the escrowed code and sells it to distributors who can resell it, give it away, or otherwise do whatever they want to with it. The LoC also maintains an index of escrowed code.

      3. Years later, someone buys an antique 3DS at a flea market, along with some old games, then discovers he needs a patch to allow them to work. After doing some research, he learns that he needs to update that 3DS to patch #24.8.17.9 or newer. He could technically order it from the Library of Congress for $850, but he can instead get it free from "ancientfirmwareupdates.com" in return for watching 15 minutes of ads (because companies would buy and archive that published data, then redistribute it themselves with the LoC's full blessing). He sets up a server that implements the required service, points it to the patch data, and sets up an equally-antique 802.11n access point with SSID "3DSUPDATE". After consulting

    28. Re:Since laptops and new computers does not... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even Blu-ray kinda died because of that, no one wants that clunky old format when you can store it all on an harddisk or simply stream it from the cloud

      Fuck that. I want to own my own local copy of it, put it onto what I choose to, play it where I want to .. and not be beholden to someone's cloud to be available, and someone's DRM to tell me they've decided I can't have it any more.

      And I'm sure as shit not paying to stream content I've already bought, that model works well for the cell carriers, but I'm not playing that game.

      As for music CD's, since we have perfectly good streaming services available, with pretty much every tune on the planet available on those services, the CD as a musical medium is pretty much gone.

      On behalf of those of us who have never used a music streaming service and never will, the CD is the only musical medium I'm interested in.

      I'll buy CDs, rip them, and enjoy them how, when, and where I choose. I buy several dozen or more CDs per year ... take that away, and I'll simply stop buying music. I'm not signing up for some damned streaming service when I can carry it with me and play it without the need for an internet connection.

      You go ahead and enjoy your streaming service. Me, I'm not even going to consider one .. not now, not ever.

      At the very least, I refuse to have some ad/analytic company have the option of monetizing my music listening, because it's none of their fucking business.

    29. Re: Since laptops and new computers does not... by Waccoon · · Score: 1

      Also the reason why young people don't understand what this DRM/ownership fuss is about, while us old fogies understand all too well. My Amiga 1200 still works perfectly, and I haven't even had to reinstall the OS once since I bought it back in '92.

      But, hey, we're just dinosaurs who are scared of change. What do we know?

    30. Re:Since laptops and new computers does not... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Before you peep up saying that my CD player will stop working, I have to inform you that it's a rather old CD deck, produced before planed obsolescence engineering was as developed as today.

      But surely that's not the real point. Even if it becomes impossible to get a working CD player eventually, as long as you've got accurate CD rips (in, say, flac/cue format) and as long as you keep fresh verified backups they should still be playable in 50 years or more.

    31. Re:Since laptops and new computers does not... by nine-times · · Score: 1

      I don't think you understand what the whole "whoosh" thing is about. You're not supposed to post it when things go over your head.

      Optical drives are being offered on fewer models every year, and when they're sold, they're largely going unused. Hence, it's likely that the trend will continue until it's not a default part of any models, and you'll have to get an external DVD drive. And then those will become hard to find. Eventually... well hey, when's the last time you saw a 5.25" floppy drive?

  4. I suspect... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... that digital downloads, legal or otherwise, have also put a dent in CD sales. Storage is cheap while data is not so cheap, and many bands have made all their music already.

  5. Streaming and vinyl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Vinyl for the favourites, streaming for the rest

  6. Heh, not in Japan... by theNetImp · · Score: 5, Interesting

    That really depends on where in the world you're talking about. It still thrives in Japan because people still want the psychical medial . We still have Tower Records here and CD rentals as well.

    1. Re:Heh, not in Japan... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speaking of Japan, almost all my favorite music comes from there... good luck getting anything here in Canada on apple itunes or any other streaming service. A major label like sony MIGHT have stuff 4-6 months later, but anything else... you're stuck with obscure chinatown stores, or piracy.. something I only do as a last resort.

      Sometimes CD's are the only way to go... and yeah, Japanese cds are ludicrously expensive.

    2. Re:Heh, not in Japan... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      psychical medial

      What the effing fuck? I get how it happens, but do you really not care enough to correct that clusterfuck of a word prediction?

    3. Re: Heh, not in Japan... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I keep my psychical medial on an ethereal drive in an alternate universe. It allows me to hear future music that hasn't been copyrighted yet and so I don't have to pay royalties.

    4. Re:Heh, not in Japan... by theNetImp · · Score: 1

      Oops... hehehehehe

    5. Re:Heh, not in Japan... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's some authors who do get to the trouble of making sure their releases are on more than just iTunes Japan, such as livetune.

    6. Re:Heh, not in Japan... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Speaking of Japan, almost all my favorite music comes from there... good luck getting anything here in Canada on apple itunes or any other streaming service.

      You are doing it wrong. If you want to buy Japanese songs, open an account in Japan iTunes and pay with iTunes gift cards. (Google how to do it, yeah it also often costs double 250 yen vs 99 cents)

      Often I find songs available on Japan iTunes on the same day the CD came out.

  7. Its the content, stupid! by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 4, Interesting
    The reason CD sales are declining is cos because most of the content is rubbish. People are not going to buy music, if, after listening to it once, they never want to hear it again. If you look at the comments on Youtube, the 50's and 60's music gets tons of comments saying "This is amazing - I which I had been around in those days" while the new stuff has loads of views but few comments.

    Personally, I go to lots of live stuff instead of buying crap CDs that die quick.

    --
    Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    1. Re:Its the content, stupid! by Ritz_Just_Ritz · · Score: 2

      Yeah, mostly this. I haven't heard any new music that I've liked enough to purchase in a couple of years. I don't see much evidence of that changing. I ripped the few thousand CD's I had and keep:

      FLAC versions around for playback on the fancy home audio system
      USB fobs with high bitrate mp3's in the cars
      A select subset of the high bitrate mp3's on my mobile phone

      The physical media is in a dusty box somewhere in the attic and will likely just get chucked the next time we move.

    2. Re:Its the content, stupid! by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      Most music made back then was rubbish too, the good stuff survived. Ease of making a and distributing music today means a flood of crap, I agree, but I still find good artists and new music I enjoy thoroughly.

      My biggest gripe with CDs historically has been pricing. They decided on a very narrow price range, regardless of the quality of the content or artist. A production of painstaking effort for months from accomplished musicians cost about the same a garage band banging out 3 chords. Makes you not want to buy a lot of stuff just on principal.

    3. Re:Its the content, stupid! by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's a matter of taste, but I think back then the good stuff tended to make it into the charts, whereas today the good stuff is to be found in the fringe. The "Top 40" radio shows where they'd play the chart in reverse order were actually worth listening to. Today's chart contains at best rather forgettable fluff, at worst it's crap that makes me switch stations.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    4. Re:Its the content, stupid! by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 1

      Yeah, no. Any audio content can be distributed on CD that (at least 3 9s) of human ears can hear. I have yet to see a band, from Radiohead, to Phish, to bands that only play local ~100-person venues, that doesn't have a CD of everything they've ever made.

      I love live music, but unless you have a massive and/or high-quality PA system, expert mixers who've tuned to the venue, bartender, and at least 20 friends to enjoy it with you, CD is just plain better, usually even when it's a live show. And it's always available. Maybe there's a niche where that's not common, but that niche isn't going to kill the CD.

      50's and 60's mastering was objectively terrible. I don't think there's a single frequency or intensity that record can reproduce that a CD can't. I might be wrong about that, but if I am it's a frequency you can't directly hear. If you think CDs suck, you're a victim of the Loudness Wars. Listen to CDs mastered in ~'92 to ~'96 ('93-'94 was the peak)--some of the best, clearest music you will ever hear, and I challenge you to give a single example of an alternate format that captures the live sound better.

      CDs are dying because you have to go to the store or get them delivered. That's the entirety of it, and there's no reason for concern--compressed music will eventually get a no-comprimises engineer combined with a band intricate and talented enough to make it worth it, and incredible speakers are so cheap these days somebody just needs to make one that's Bose-compatible, Base-boosted-monitor-quality, and Apple-easy, and HiFi will be the new rage.

      Your Youtube anectote makes me worry I might be wrong, that's straight fucked that anyone could listen to Youtube music and not be annoyed, but I've been right since cassettes, so I'm going to bet on this one as well.

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    5. Re:Its the content, stupid! by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      Well, I was never much into the charts I guess. Good news is it is so much easier to find new and good artists these days, because so much stuff is a click away.

    6. Re:Its the content, stupid! by Megane · · Score: 1

      This. I have plenty of CDs and DVDs, and buy them all the time... used, and very cheaply. I just don't get to choose from a full library. But there are still tons of CDs not worth having, because of all the rubbish out there. It's worse now, though, there's been almost no new music in the western world that I am interested in for at least two decades. Ditto for movies, though not quite as bad, I barely have time to watch the few that I both care about and find.

      I also have hardly been to Best Buy in over a decade. Part of that was living near a Fry's Electronics store, but mostly it is between all the rubbish on the media side, having more than enough on the electronics side (especially way too many TVs), and I buy small stuff like cables used at thrift stores, for a fraction of the price.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    7. Re:Its the content, stupid! by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 2

      I love live music, but unless you have a massive and/or high-quality PA system, expert mixers who've tuned to the venue, bartender, and at least 20 friends to enjoy it with you, CD is just plain better, usually even when it's a live show. And it's always available. Maybe there's a niche where that's not common, but that niche isn't going to kill the CD.

      Of course live music will never be as refined as something studio produced or even live recorded and mixed. But there is nothing comparable about a live performance by a true entertainer/artist and a CD listening experience. The CD can't replicate that live experience. Of course, there are those bands that can't perform live worth a crap.

      Live performance is where the money is made these days. So at least in that vein the truly talented entertainers are making some decent money.

    8. Re:Its the content, stupid! by jawtheshark · · Score: 2

      Your physical media is the proof of ownership of the license. You should not throw it away.

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    9. Re:Its the content, stupid! by Luthair · · Score: 1

      The thing about CD pricing.... they are still cheaper than buying digital albums, especially if you try to buy high quality files.

    10. Re: Its the content, stupid! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I will be happy to take away all of your junk for free, just let me know.

    11. Re:Its the content, stupid! by Hognoxious · · Score: 0

      Makes you not want to buy a lot of stuff just on principal.

      Like a dictionary, perhaps?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    12. Re:Its the content, stupid! by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      Makes you not want to buy a lot of stuff just on principal.

      Like a dictionary, perhaps?

      Thanks Captain Typo Defender. What would we do without you?

    13. Re:Its the content, stupid! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      It's not that there wasn't always crap. It's that the new crap is indistinguishable from the old crap, so why not buy the cheaper, older crap?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    14. Re:Its the content, stupid! by gtall · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Maybe I'm an old timer, but I think part of the reason for the decline in modern music is the insistence by the media companies of the solo artist, and I use the term "artist" quite loosely. A band has several personalities and they contributed to a more interesting form of music because of the different takes they had on their instruments. Modern solo artists are mainly backed by machine, who cares about machines. A band like Deep Purple (only finally finishing up, by the way, albeit with personnel changes) were masters of their instruments. Not all the old groups who lasted should have, the Rolling Stones are still a garage band.

      Even solo artists were better back in the 60's. Take someone like Sammy Davis, Jr. He could dance, sing, well he wasn't a great actor but he could get by, he played drums, he could play piano. He was a multi-talented person who was interesting because of it. Now we have Lady Gaga...who can, well I'm sure she does something, and I even like one of her songs. But she's basically boring. Any of the hip-hop "artists" are interchangeable, singing the same rhyming verse of something we are to take to be social commentary. Nothing special, it had been done to death 20 years ago.

      The only music mediums that are still interesting producing new music are progressive rock and jazz.

    15. Re:Its the content, stupid! by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      The reason CD sales are declining is cos because most of the content is rubbish.

      Oh, not this "music is bad now" horseshit again.

      People are not going to buy music, if, after listening to it once, they never want to hear it again.

      There is plenty of music from the last year that I want to hear again and again.

      If you look at the comments on Youtube...

      Oh my god.

      If you look at the comments on Youtube, the 50's and 60's music gets tons of comments saying "This is amazing - I which I had been around in those days"

      During the 50's and 60's, there were plenty of people who called the music rubbish. In fact, much of the music of the '50s and '60s was in fact rubbish. Did you know that on the Billboard Hot 100 singles for the year 1961, you will find Laurence Welk listed above Roy Orbison?

      while the new stuff has loads of views but few comments.

      You do realize that "making comments" is not one of the primary uses for music, right?

      Listen, there is a ton of good music being made right now. 2017 was actually a really good year for music, across all the popular genres. All you need to have is a little discernment to find to good stuff. Just like in the 50's and 60's. You need to go and look for it, the same way people did back then. Fortunately, there are a lot more ways to do that then ever before.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    16. Re:Its the content, stupid! by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      It's called getting old. Time filters out the crap from your youth and those times seem better than they were.

      Most music was always bad, throwaway crap you wouldn't want to own. As you get older there is less and less good stuff to discover.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    17. Re:Its the content, stupid! by Powercntrl · · Score: 2

      Now we have Lady Gaga...who can

      Absolutely tear it up on piano (she's actually a very gifted, classically trained musician), and puts on a hell of a show. Her outlandish behavior was simply because no one in the "industry" noticed her until she borrowed a page out of Madonna's book.

      Perhaps you're thinking of other modern "artists" with minimal talent, such as Justin Bieber, who rarely sings outside of a single octave. Another example is Kanye West, who apparently has an extremely poor grasp of the concept of rhyming (Katy Perry is a bit guilty of this, too).

      --

      ---
      DRM is like antifreeze, to the MPAA/RIAA it's sweet, to the consumers it's poison.
    18. Re:Its the content, stupid! by Powercntrl · · Score: 1

      It's called getting old. Time filters out the crap from your youth and those times seem better than they were.

      I recall most of the music played on pop radio in the early 90s being pretty shitty, when I was a kid. A huge portion of my music collection though, is 90s music. You got it half right - time filters out the crap. When you can fast forward through an entire decade and only pick out the stuff you liked, it's easy to forget all the garbage released in between.

      --

      ---
      DRM is like antifreeze, to the MPAA/RIAA it's sweet, to the consumers it's poison.
    19. Re:Its the content, stupid! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is still good music being made. And the sales of vinyl records are growing.

    20. Re:Its the content, stupid! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're not wrong. Vinyl has inferior reproduction to CDs in every conceivable measure, especially when taking practical reality into account: https://hydrogenaud.io/index.p...

    21. Re:Its the content, stupid! by umghhh · · Score: 1

      There is also this other reason. Most of humans do like music but do not spend time on finding something special, extending and deepening knowledge about it and own taste too. For this majority buying a CD or vinyl is unreasonable because all they need is just a sound background. Some other people like it to the point they want to have it when they want and frankly for audiophile types subscribing to this many services to get what they want is not always the best option. I am still buying CDs sometimes. But it is far off from the peak when (20ya?) I could go to a shop once or twice a week and buy multiple pieces. I do not shuffle CDs anymore as the chaos of CD boxes was annoying me - all is digitized and backed up so I use 'internet' radio and some server (do not even recall its name anymore) stacked as VBox in the 'cellar'. I can imagine buying CDs if something nice comes along. Possibly made without big labels 'help'. So I am in line with falling sales. Whether this means death of CD I am not so sure. Vinyl is still there too.

    22. Re:Its the content, stupid! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's called getting old. Time filters out the crap from your youth and those times seem better than they were.

      I hate it when people say this ... we are designed to remember the bad that is how we learn. We learn more from pain and suffering than we do from good feelings.

      Most music was always bad, throwaway crap you wouldn't want to own. As you get older there is less and less good stuff to discover.

      There is only less to discover if you are unwilling to step out of your comfort zone. Personally, I tend to change the primary genre I listen to every few every few years therefore I am always finding new awesome stuff to listen to. I have friends that are unwilling to listen to anything other than 1 specific type (Oh, we have both kinds -- country and western.) and these are the same people that tend to complain about crap music.

    23. Re:Its the content, stupid! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Flavor Flav is also apparently a great musician who can play many instruments with great talent, but he knew that none of those avenues would bring him as much money as wearing a clock and shouting YEAAAAAAAAAH BOYYYYYYYYYYY!

      I also tire of people who claim that hip-hop is entirely cookie-cutter, as it's a clear indication of lack of familiarity and immaturity. Sure, you've got Kanye and 2Chainz and Lil Uzi Vert, but please tell me how George Watsky, Atmosphere, Death Grips, MC Frontalot and Spose fit into the generic hip hop paradigm.

    24. Re:Its the content, stupid! by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      I agree on Lady Gaga. I'm not into her music, but man is she talented. She also is very classy on how she respects accomplished artists of the past. People see her over the top stuff and fail to recognize her talent. I was one of those until I saw her carry Tony Bennett through their concert with grace and respect, she had me sold. I have tremendous appreciation for her talents.

    25. Re:Its the content, stupid! by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

      Yes, so much yes. I think there's a vid of showing some 10-13 year olds some Led Zepplin. They thought it was amazing!

      Need to get rid of the rap crap. The no-talents.

      Bring back acts like the Platters (Twilight Time), Lois Armstrong, Zepplin (Rain Song), Journey, Blondie (rip her to shreds, rapture), etc.

    26. Re:Its the content, stupid! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Old person doesn't like, or even understand, modern music. Also thinks modern musicians can't play their instruments.

      Film at 11.

      Also, my old person, may I suggest you stop looking for new music on US radio stations and TV - I apologies if my assumption about your location is incorrect - and instead look around more interesting places, like bandcamp, your local music scene and online radio stations. You may be surprised.

  8. CD died 20 years ago? by eggstasy · · Score: 1, Funny

    Is this news for nerds?
    Haven't we all gone digital yet?
    Uh, iTunes? Spotify?
    I think I bought a total of 1 CD in the past 22 years, because the artist was so obscure I couldn't find it online.

    1. Re:CD died 20 years ago? by geekmux · · Score: 1

      Is this news for nerds? Haven't we all gone digital yet? Uh, iTunes? Spotify? I think I bought a total of 1 CD in the past 22 years, because the artist was so obscure I couldn't find it online.

      Died 20 years ago? Is that the reason your brand new car still comes with a CD player?

    2. Re:CD died 20 years ago? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No CD player in my new car (Mazda3)... Instead there is USB, bluetooth, line-in; optionally Pandora / Satellite radio.

    3. Re:CD died 20 years ago? by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      I haven't seen cars with CD players in the last 182 years.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    4. Re:CD died 20 years ago? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CDs are digital ;-)

      Speaking personally, I bought a dozen CDs last month alone (not including a 10 CD box set). That's a pretty typical month for me, as I'll buy maybe a hundred or so CDs a year. Only downloads I go for tend to be creative-commons licensed stuff, and then only when the artist doesn't provide a way to buy a physical copy.

    5. Re:CD died 20 years ago? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I haven't seen cars with CD players in the last 182 years.

      Perhaps you haven't been looking. The standard radio that comes with a lot of new cars still has a CD player.

    6. Re:CD died 20 years ago? by Not-a-Neg · · Score: 1

      I just bought 4 CD's last week, you must be one of those "Millennials" I've been hearing about. How's the job hunt going?

      --
      -==- Buy a Mac and leave me alone!
    7. Re:CD died 20 years ago? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just bought a car 2 weeks ago that came with a CD player, I'm expecting delivery today of an OEM tape cassette player to swap it out with. It seems the car-maker, Ford, forgot to include an AUX line-in jack so now I have to use a tape cassette adapter to connect my iPhone. Sigh. I considered just buying an aftermarket radio but the radio component of the car is in the trunk and requires a full dash kit to run a wiring harness to the trunk. Too much work just to get a line-in.

  9. Just another cut out of 1,000. by geekmux · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Unfortunately, there are some of us who despise renting access to music via (yet another) never-ending subscription, and don't wish to have our entire listening activities measured, tracked, profiled, and sold to any bidder, which is exactly what happens with every other form of digital music. This is just another cut out of 1,000, leading to the Death of Privacy.

    I do find it odd that we managed to bring back to life a medium that people now pay 3x what it should cost, and often with no ability to play it (vinyl), and yet we're talking about killing CDs.

    1. Re:Just another cut out of 1,000. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      My friend wrote a little web app that lets him search for and queue up YouTube videos of songs and play them in a background tab of his browser.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    2. Re:Just another cut out of 1,000. by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 0

      Wait. You think your CDs, that even if you don't play them on an internet-connected device, can reproduce frequencies the human ear can't hear right next to your phone that can pick up those same frequencies, that you purchased online, or at the store with a credit card, or customer discount card, or that you googled first, you think you're immune to being tracked with them?

      As for DRM, that's been a non-issue for digital music for at least 5 years, more like 8-10.

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    3. Re:Just another cut out of 1,000. by geekmux · · Score: 1

      My friend wrote a little web app that lets him search for and queue up YouTube videos of songs and play them in a background tab of his browser.

      How do the commercials sound? Or did he pay to avoid those on that "free" service...

    4. Re:Just another cut out of 1,000. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look, everybody, another Alex Jones dipshit follower. Go fuck yourself.

    5. Re:Just another cut out of 1,000. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What commercials?

    6. Re:Just another cut out of 1,000. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any sane person should consider running an ad blocker these days

    7. Re:Just another cut out of 1,000. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I'd assume he has ad blocking installed.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    8. Re:Just another cut out of 1,000. by PeeAitchPee · · Score: 1

      The only people who like vinyl are the retro hipsters and "audiophile" douchebags who swear they can hear the difference between a $2,500 pair of Monster speaker cables and a $5 lamp cord (even though decades of double-blind listening tests conclusively prove that they cannot). Completely disregarding the absolute inability to play records while mobile, it's an inferior audio technology in terms of dynamic range, distortion, and any other measurable audio metric versus modern lossless digital formats (yes -- 1st gen digital to analog converters in cheap CD players sucked -- but that was 25-30 years ago now). Want to hear that "old, warm" vinyl sound? That's distortion, folks -- there are a million cheap plugins or "audiophile" boxes that'll give it to you. Give me all the unprocessed bits and the choice to "warm" them if and how I want.

    9. Re:Just another cut out of 1,000. by geek · · Score: 1

      "Unfortunately, there are some of us who despise renting access to music via (yet another) never-ending subscription"

      Dumb. Look dude, its no different than the radio. I pay the subscription to not hear the ads and the ability to change the song to whatever the fuck I want, whenever the fuck I want.

      Cling to your CD's all you like but don't try to pull this high and mighty "I'm so fucking right and you're all so fucking wrong" bullshit.

    10. Re:Just another cut out of 1,000. by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

      Your friend wrote last.fm?

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    11. Re:Just another cut out of 1,000. by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      "audiophile" douchebags who swear they can hear the difference between a $2,500 pair of Monster speaker cables and a $5 lamp cord

      I suppose that next you're going to tell me that my $120 ceramic cable elevators don't really make my music sound better.

      https://www.reddragonaudio.com...

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    12. Re:Just another cut out of 1,000. by PeeAitchPee · · Score: 2

      Not as much as this $10,000 "audiophile" Ethernet cable does! https://arstechnica.com/staff/...

    13. Re:Just another cut out of 1,000. by apoc.famine · · Score: 1

      This is just another cut out of 1,000, leading to the Death of Privacy.

      If you think that. you missed the funeral.

      We were fine with losing our privacy from paying cash for goods when we realized the immense convenience of streaming. But then we realized that if we connected our phones to the internet, we could stream anywhere we went. Then we realized that if we connected our cars to the internet, we could to it there too. Then we realized that if we were connected to the internet, we might as well be able to look things up and buy things. Then we realized that we didn't always have a keyboard on hand, but if we attached a microphone and paired it with voice recognition, we could just ask Amazon or Google questions. But that required an always-on microphone in our house, and at that point we shrugged and said, "The utter loss of privacy is worth the convenience."

      Now we've normalized kids asking Google and Amazon unfiltered kid questions.

      So we now have a generation that is growing up accustomed to sharing whatever is on their mind with their friendly corporate overlord. It was bad enough that we had a generation or so going to Google when they were in middle school and typing in "boobies of 12 yr old girls". But that was before Google's data collection was so incredibly vast. Can you imagine a company having a deep record of your interests and private thoughts from when you learned to talk until your dying breath?

      Our generation is pretty much the last one that's going to resist. All future ones will grow up talking to the nice corporate voice that answers their questions and tells them that everything is ok. Their parents have already opted to strip all privacy from their kids, and their kids will grow up in a world curated for them.

      We watched privacy die. When a generation grows up not knowing what it is, there is no way we'll ever get it back.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    14. Re:Just another cut out of 1,000. by geekmux · · Score: 2

      "Unfortunately, there are some of us who despise renting access to music via (yet another) never-ending subscription"

      Dumb. Look dude, its no different than the radio. I pay the subscription to not hear the ads and the ability to change the song to whatever the fuck I want, whenever the fuck I want.

      You don't control the content. They do. Much like Netflix, if the radio station or the artist chooses to remove their content, you've instantly lost the freedom to play "whatever the fuck you want, whenever the fuck you want." If those limitations work for you, so be it. But don't try and tell me that it's "no different" than owning the content, along with owning the player.

      Cling to your CD's all you like but don't try to pull this high and mighty "I'm so fucking right and you're all so fucking wrong" bullshit.

      There's no high and mighty bullshit here. Feel free to argue the benefits of the Death of Privacy all you want. I see it differently. That's it. Doesn't really matter, because I already know there's not a fucking thing that can be done about it. We'll all be winning like Charlie Sheen in the end.

    15. Re:Just another cut out of 1,000. by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      No, those $10,000 audiophile Ethernet cables don't make your music sound better, but studies have shown that they will improve your scores on Overwatch by making the bitstream more coherent and reducing lag caused by ambient gamma radiation. But you have to make sure you hook them up in the proper direction.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
  10. Perhaps It Is Time For A Physical Replacement by dryriver · · Score: 2

    No, not another shiny disk. Perhaps retail store purchases of music albums, books, films, computer games and other digital content could come on a cheap-to-manufacture read-only memory (ROM) card that holds the relevant data and is about the size of an SD card, or larger, if that is cheaper to manufacture (data-density et cetera). You would get the feeling of "buying and owning something physical" that you can take home with you, loan to others, sell second-hand and so forth. But it would be a little ROM card, not a larger CD, DVD or Bluray disk that takes up a lot of shelf space and packaging. Of course you could just as easily put digital kiosks into a store that you insert a USB thumbdrive into to get your content data when you have paid for it. But a small ROM card would allow you to pick up the product, pay and leave like in the old days. It would also be kind of cool to collect such ROMs, like we used to collect floppies, especially if they are built to last - say - 50 years without losing the data. A major bonus would be PC and console game distribution in developing countries. Internet connections are seriously slow in developing countries, and many people have internet with a 25 - 50 GB a month data download cap. Downloading 30 - 50 GB games in such countries takes many hours - sometimes more than a day - and often results in blowing your monthly download cap, causing the ISP to throttle your internet speed until the beginning of the next month, leaving you with slow internet. So if somebody COULD make cheap ROMs that hold 20 - 30 GB of data a piece, game buyers in a lot of countries would definitely go for that. Another bonus could be games that don't require installing at all - just pop the ROM card into your laptop's card slot and play the game immediately. Steam downloads are horrendously painful if you have 2 - 8 MBPS internet only. ROMs would be a much quicker way to play the game you have bought. What would you rather do? Wait 22 hours for DOOM to download on a slow connection, or pop over to the local game store to get it on Mini-ROM, taking perhaps an hour and a half of your time? ROMs also solve the problem of buying an ever-growing quantity of digital content data for your home. After a few years of digital games, digital films, digital photos and smartphone video, you wind up having to keep Terabytes of data somewhere - on multiple USB harddrives for example. It might be neat to instead have a little plastic box with all your game, music, film, TV show and other ROMs in it, just as we used to have for Amiga disks or PC floppy disks for example. What you want on your PC, you copy from ROM. What you only access occasionally, you just keep in ROM form, and pop the ROM card in when needed.

    --
    Why did the chicken cross the road? Because Elon Musk put an AI chip in its head.
    1. Re:Perhaps It Is Time For A Physical Replacement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps retail store purchases of music albums, books, films, computer games and other digital content could come on a cheap-to-manufacture read-only memory (ROM) card that holds the relevant data and is about the size of an SD card, or larger, if that is cheaper to manufacture (data-density et cetera).

      They simply aren't cheaper, and are more vulnerable than the optical media, they won't be lasting 50 years even. The biggest problem? Physical contact to the unit. Lasers are much less of a problem.

    2. Re:Perhaps It Is Time For A Physical Replacement by nine-times · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That totally makes sense. If you really want physical media, CDs are pretty outdated. These days, you can fit an entire collection with several hundred albums on a single micro-SD card. And that's with a lossless codec. CDs are a waste of material and space.

      Part of the appeal of CDs once upon a time was that they would last a long time. They scratch easily, but if you took care of them, they were supposed to last hundreds of years. However, things didn't really work that way. Instead the industry made cheaper CDs that only lasted a handful of years.

      If we were going to stick with physical media, it'd be nice if someone were to produce a standard for cheap, compact, durable, long-lasting media that would be suitable for archival purposes. It seems to me that ideally there would be no moving parts, but also no physical connectors to wear out or break. Having enormous capacity and quick write speeds could take a back seat to redundancy and durability.

      Basically, if I'm going to pay for data on a physical medium, I want a medium that you could throw out the window of a moving car, go swimming with it in your pocket, or just stick it in a drawer for 20 years, and still have a reasonable expectation that it wouldn't lose a bit of data.

    3. Re:Perhaps It Is Time For A Physical Replacement by Baron_Yam · · Score: 1

      I imagine a single high-capacity encrypted media player with two copies of the files would work - one high quality copy with analog outputs and one lower quality copy for direct digital access that (presumably) you'd expect owners to pirate.

      It could hold music and music videos, album playlists, etc., and music stores would have the required equipment to add another song or album. And if I were doing it, I'd have the tracks and videos re-encoded at purchase with the purchaser's credit card information as a watermark.

      You could have limited-edition album or artist-specific players, too, to encourage people to buy more than one.

      But please... with user-replaceable batteries...

    4. Re:Perhaps It Is Time For A Physical Replacement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you'd expect owners to pirate.

      How. The. Hell. Do. You. Presume. This. ???

    5. Re:Perhaps It Is Time For A Physical Replacement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, not another shiny disk. Perhaps retail store purchases of music albums, books, films, computer games and other digital content could come on a cheap-to-manufacture read-only memory (ROM) card that holds the relevant data and is about the size of an SD card, or larger, if that is cheaper to manufacture (data-density et cetera). You would get the feeling of "buying and owning something physical" that you can take home with you, loan to others, sell second-hand and so forth. But it would be a little ROM card, not a larger CD, DVD or Bluray disk that takes up a lot of shelf space and packaging. Of course you could just as easily put digital kiosks into a store that you insert a USB thumbdrive into to get your content data when you have paid for it. But a small ROM card would allow you to pick up the product, pay and leave like in the old days. It would also be kind of cool to collect such ROMs, like we used to collect floppies, especially if they are built to last - say - 50 years without losing the data. A major bonus would be PC and console game distribution in developing countries. Internet connections are seriously slow in developing countries, and many people have internet with a 25 - 50 GB a month data download cap. Downloading 30 - 50 GB games in such countries takes many hours - sometimes more than a day - and often results in blowing your monthly download cap, causing the ISP to throttle your internet speed until the beginning of the next month, leaving you with slow internet. So if somebody COULD make cheap ROMs that hold 20 - 30 GB of data a piece, game buyers in a lot of countries would definitely go for that. Another bonus could be games that don't require installing at all - just pop the ROM card into your laptop's card slot and play the game immediately. Steam downloads are horrendously painful if you have 2 - 8 MBPS internet only. ROMs would be a much quicker way to play the game you have bought. What would you rather do? Wait 22 hours for DOOM to download on a slow connection, or pop over to the local game store to get it on Mini-ROM, taking perhaps an hour and a half of your time? ROMs also solve the problem of buying an ever-growing quantity of digital content data for your home. After a few years of digital games, digital films, digital photos and smartphone video, you wind up having to keep Terabytes of data somewhere - on multiple USB harddrives for example. It might be neat to instead have a little plastic box with all your game, music, film, TV show and other ROMs in it, just as we used to have for Amiga disks or PC floppy disks for example. What you want on your PC, you copy from ROM. What you only access occasionally, you just keep in ROM form, and pop the ROM card in when needed.

      We don't need any more software-controlled audio playback methods to replace actual physical media. CD's rely on a lot of parts that rely on software. CD's were never a replacement for vinyl. You should never try to replace mechanical with digital. Ever (looking at you, car makers). That is what ownership vs. renting amounts to, even with CD's. Software breaks, as do the drivers that enable what is already physically possible without digital without software-driven devices. We need better mechanical, physical audio playback solutions (that we can produce and fix ourselves), not non-tangible, easily obsoleted methods that are beholden to patents and the recording industry cabal.

    6. Re:Perhaps It Is Time For A Physical Replacement by rcharbon · · Score: 1

      AND!!! You'd have to buy your music AGAIN to get it on this new miracle format.

    7. Re:Perhaps It Is Time For A Physical Replacement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vinyl is objectively inferior to CD audio in every single metric.

  11. People are Stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    CDs are cheaper and higher quality than downloads. Streaming is basically a rip-off of the listener and the artist. So naturally, CD sales are declining.

    1. Re:People are Stupid by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 1

      Lossless purchases are extremely easy to find, and in the last 3 years have been mostly equal or superior to CDs.

      Not that I'm aware of a single A/B/X test where people were able to tell the difference, but hey, it's as good, unless you have a janky playback system without correct high/low-pass filters.

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    2. Re:People are Stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Lossless purchases are extremely easy to find, and in the last 3 years have been mostly equal or superior to CDs.

      Pure Audiophile/Pedophile bullshit. Even if the lossless format is greater than 44.1khz/16-bit, you can't hear the difference. If you do hear a difference, it's because the 2 versions are mixed differently. Example: Weezer - Everything Will Be Alright In The End (2014). The CD version is brick-walled and clipped to hell. Sounds like shit. Yet the HDTracks version is not. It sounds great. Convert the HDtracks version down to 44.1khz/16-bit and the 2 versions are indistinguishable.

    3. Re:People are Stupid by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 1

      In which case, your incredibly accurate studio monitor speakers that you hooked up to a consumer-level receiver with the HPF/LPF turned off (filters still aren't common on woofers and tweeters in consumer receivers) will play weird resonances from the tweeters and woofers as they recieve signals they either are too heavy to vibrate at or too light to deal with the amount of power it takes to move the heavier speakers they were intended for, and if you don't pair them right (overlapping frequency responses, set the H/LPF filters there) you'll get certain freqencies standing way out (and usually distorting) or you'll have your subwoofer playing 150Hz, which if it's bigger than 6" you'll then turn way up to even out the volume with the mids, but never manage to get "Nine Inch Nails - Closer" to properly be "Boom - (inaudible because of your brain Boom) - Tiss".

      Seriously, if you're buying a stereo, play Closer. Make sure your sub is at least 10 inches, and has at least 50% db at 20Hz (closer to 100% the better). Set the mids to mid, treble to mid, base keep turning up to where it goes "Boom Boom Boom Boom Boom Boom". Slowly decrease the bass, at some point that weird thing your brain does that MP3 exploits will take over, and it'll become "Boom Tiss Boom Tiss Boom Tiss", but the Tiss will just "feel" impactful. If it's a single unit, speakers and all, that should be very close to halfway. Next, increase treble until the Tiss and other highs make it sound cheap, then back it off by a half-number (on a 1-10) until it sounds crisp. This will be +/- 2 numbers on a good pairing of speakers, and +/-1 on integrated tweets and woofs. Finally, bring the mids to where Reznor's voice is easily understandable without trying (this is a really, really well-mastered album) but the music is still in the foreground enough that you lose words by being distracted by new layers or progressions in the instruments.

      Been my main stereo-benchmark song for ~8 years, and it's both saved me from some clunkers and got me incredible deals. Just make sure you have a lossless copy, and don't play it over bluetooth unless that's specificially what you want to test (although you'll do better by checking the A2DP protocols your devices support for that--bluetooth play is only worth it as a final smoke test).

      Also, if anyone has other songs that really exercise a system's edge cases, I'd love to add it to my rotation.

      Portishead - Roads, aside from making any white noise in the area sound really strange, should sound amazing with the Closer tuning--the bass that makes the wah-wah should almost be inaudible unless you're in a white-noise-free room. If it doesn't, the high/low filters between mids and sub is fucked, or even worse you've got a gap (4" "woofers"), and you'll never find a non-annoying song without a fill-in speaker + EQ that will be a huge investment of time to get a smooth response from.

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    4. Re:People are Stupid by Not-a-Neg · · Score: 1

      The biggest downside to lossless purchases (HDTracks, et al...) is they are more expensive than buying the physical CD. The only upside to the lossless purchase is that some are from the original masters and done at a higher bit depth. Regardless, only the physical CD can be re-sold.

      --
      -==- Buy a Mac and leave me alone!
  12. Re:Good by geekmux · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Music CDs is like the Floppy disc, who buys that crap other than a few hardcore dedicated fans.

    Privacy is like ownership, who buys into that crap other than a few hardcore dedicated fans.

    The owner overlords in the world are celebrating yet another win. They're going to make trillions with this infectious attitude towards renting everything, along with selling your every click.

  13. no, itâs selling music in an offline store th by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    imho, first and foremost, brick and mortar stores are dying. iâm pretty sure, amazon still sells a lot of CDs.

    I still buy them occasionally for their physicallity. so i have an offline-backup with (usually) better sound quality. why would i want to buy a download for the same price that offers less quality and has no booklet? granted, I then rip the cd and upload it to itunes match so I can stream it. but when i really want to listen to an album, i still prefer putting a physical token into a stereo.

    also, i donât want to buy an ipod for my three-year old, heâll go virtual soon enough. and i donât want to spend 10â/month on streaming music - i already got more music than iâll ever listen in the cloud plus there are countlesd radio streams and podcasts.

    so, to sum it up - itâs the industry, music and retail, thatâs changing, the medium is just a matter of choice (and quality)

  14. Are the streamers giving the artists their dues?? by Provocateur · · Score: 1

    I for one *do* purchase CDs (especially for artists who have died) Granted, they may have passed on, but hey, in my time of need their voice was there. Whether it be Cobain, Chris Cornell, Pennington, or Layne Staley or Bowie, my purchase must mean something to the rest of their respective bands, or their families or estates.

    --
    WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
  15. The slow death of ownership by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This has been an ongoing trend for a generation, slowly weening folks away from ownership. Why buy DVD's when Netflix is so much more cost efficient? (Although your favorite show can disappear any time.) Why buy MP3s or CD's when you can just subscribe to a streaming service? (A studio dispute has taken your favorite song away.) Of course, media is just the beginning. I suspect very soon one will not be able to purchase a copy of MS Office, only subscribe. This is already a norm in professional software such as Photoshop. Computers are getting more and more locked down limiting the options you have with them. With Windows toying with the idea of becoming an advertising platform, one has to wonder who owns the device on your desk. The trend here is worrying. Make no mistake that the purpose of ride sharing companies is to obsolete car ownership (self driving cars will displace human drivers later.) Heck, we're even beginning to see active discouragement of home ownership. (What about all that yard work and maintenance? You don't have time for that! What if you have lousy neighbors? You'd be stuck with them!) Meanwhile, why purchase a home when you could lose your job at any time and have to move? And speaking of money, you can't afford anything. But that's okay, you can find people who will loan you some money. Thus preventing you from the heavy burden of owning money. Manage to stay out of debt? Don't worry, the bank will hold onto your money for you. And they "tots swear" they won't do anything stupid with it or make a mistake in their accounting. Physical money ownership is stigmatized and actively discouraged. The biggest bill is $100 which is like the biggest bill you could get in 1850 being $5 (back then bills went up to $1,000). And if you have a lot of cash, there's a stigma of being a poor person with no bank account or a drug dealer doing shady stuff. Nevermind that walking around with absurd sums can subject you to civil forfeiture where your money is accused of a crime and is unable to defend itself for some reason. But naturally, civil forfeiture can be used on anything you own, which is why you shouldn't own anything.

    Ownership is economic power. And the state of ownership is terrible in the United States. This tears at the very fabric of civilization and we are sliding towards serfom all over again.

  16. Re:Stupid by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

    Bateman: Did you know that Whitney Houston's debut LP, called simply Whitney Houston, had four number one singles on it? Did you know that, Christie?
    Elizabeth: [laughing] You actually listen to Whitney Houston? You own a Whitney Houston CD? More than one?
    Bateman: [ignoring her] It's hard to choose a favorite among so many great tracks, but "The Greatest Love of All" is one of the best, most powerful songs ever written about self-preservation, dignity. Its universal message crosses all boundaries and instills one with the hope that it's not too late to better ourselves. Since, Elizabeth, it's impossible in this world we live in to empathize with others, we can always empathize with ourselves. It's an important message, crucial really. And it's beautifully stated on the album.

    --
    echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
  17. Convenience vs sound quality by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1

    I suspect in the longer term, physical media for CDs will be available only on demand for those who do not want the sound of lossy music. The main reason for the popularity of non-physical media is convenience. The question is: will those who like streamed music acquire a sense for higher-quality music sources, and will there be enough of those people to support distribution of that higher quality music source? There's a reason for the resurgence of vinyl records.

    1. Re:Convenience vs sound quality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The vinyl resurgence is strange and rife with bullshit. From a purely scientific standpoint, vinyl is pure fucking garbage on every measurable level. It's nasty bad. However, music producers and mastering engineers for the past 20 years have had their heads inserted so far up their own rectums that they think every track should be ultra compressed, brick-walled to hell, and as LOUD AS FUCKING POSSIBLE. These fucking faggots should die in the most painful way possible. Since vinyl is in inferior format, it doesn't allow for this type of mastering, thus the sound quality ends up being a little better than the CD.

    2. Re:Convenience vs sound quality by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1

      ...Since vinyl is in inferior format, it doesn't allow for this type of mastering...

      The overcompression of which you speak puts less of a demand on vinyl than the very high dynamic range of non-compressed music. But reality doesn't seem to enter into your opinions.

    3. Re:Convenience vs sound quality by HanzoSpam · · Score: 1

      Keep in mind music is recorded to sound best in the media it's going to be distributed in. The ambience of the media is factored into the production, whether intentionally or not.

      If you play an old 78 from the 1920's on a modern turntable with modern amplification, it sounds like someone is frying an egg in the background, because modern equipment can pick up the defects in the media.

      If you play it on 1920's Victrola, it'll actually sound pretty decent, because the acoustic reproduction equipment is incapable of picking up the noise generated by the media. It's the equipment the music was made to be played on.

      I suspect the same thing is at work with modern media. If I listen to a piece of music recorded in the vinyl era reengineered for modern formats, it usually sounds like it's lost something. Music is recorded with the current limitations of reproduction technologies in mind, and when you change the reproduction parameters the result can frequently be sub-optimal. Modern formats may be "better" technically, but if it's presenting sounds that weren't intended to be heard when the original music was recorded, the ear isn't likely to interpret it as sounding better.

      I don't have any problem with believing music originally produced for vinyl sounds better when reproduced on it. But I doubt it would do much for music produced with modern technologies if they were transferred to vinyl.

      --

      Progressivism: Parasites helping parasites to help themselves - to other people's stuff.
  18. CDs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nutz

  19. bb cd by ohgary · · Score: 1

    Best Buy never had much CD selection even in the hayday of CD sales. If it was in the top 40 it didnt exist. Can see this as a loss.

  20. The ownership model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There is one good reason to always buy physical media - it can be transferred.

    I can rip my own MP3s, move them from device to device, and leave the original media to my children. When people subscribe to music services, they lose all of these rights that come with ownership.

  21. cds were never retro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unlike cassettes and vinyl which are getting revivals, there is no nostalgia for cds therefore it is caught in the middle and forgotten about.

  22. No! by nospam007 · · Score: 1

    They died years ago.

  23. Re:Good by lucasnate1 · · Score: 2

    Considering the fact that our governments eavesdrops on us and can easily steal our property, I would say that yes, privacy and ownership are an illusion. Might as well get something in return, even if it is just a music rental service.

  24. Time Life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Time Life Music collections!

  25. Opportunity is knocking --Shelves Need Your CD! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not a music CD -- the new DontTrackMe Browser or NoSpyingYou Lying CDs, loaded with the software for the paranoiac. This is the future of the intertubes! Get them soon, on CDs bought with cash from a brick-and-mortarget. Go ahead, you don't have to chase me =]

    What was your vision of the future? Mine had starships and flying cars; and faxes sent to a distant space station. And a different kind of CD, at the mall.

  26. Poorly managed, in my opinion, like Sears by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Best Buy is worst buy.

  27. Re: Good by c6gunner · · Score: 3, Funny

    The owner overlords in the world are celebrating yet another win. They're going to make trillions with this infectious attitude towards renting everything, along with selling your every click.

    I've never met anyone this passionate about their floppy disc collection. You are a dying breed.

  28. They Won't Die by DrSpock11 · · Score: 1

    In 20 years, the 2030's equivalent of hipsters will show their independence and rebellion by going to vintage stores to buy CDs and make dubious claims of "superior quality" from listening to something coming from a physical medium.

  29. I miss albums by Pseudonym · · Score: 2

    There is nothing quite like a good well-structured album. That's one of many things that is missing from the top 40 today. Artists make collections of songs. They don't make albums.

    --
    sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
    1. Re:I miss albums by HanzoSpam · · Score: 2

      Why would they bother when the music won't be experienced as an album? Users can buy only the tracks they're interested in, order them as they see fit, or put them on a play list mixed with other music. Artists made creative use of the limitations imposed by LP's and CD's. Now that those limitations have been removed there's no point in putting the effort into structuring the material for formats it won't be experienced in.

      As an old-timer I understand what you're saying about the album experience, and I miss it, too. But I understand that the album format evolved due to limitations of the media. Sadly, everything is a trade-off. We've exchanged the album experience for unlimited playback time and the convenience of being able to drag our entire music collection around with us on our phones.

      --

      Progressivism: Parasites helping parasites to help themselves - to other people's stuff.
    2. Re:I miss albums by yy1 · · Score: 1

      I saw some show where there was a music producer that lameted that the death of the album (which will be be cemented with the death of CDs) meant that every song has to be a "hit". Gone were the gems on the album that you didn't like first play, even the 2nd play, but the 5th+ time you heard them you started to "get" it.

      I recognized this phenomena back when I used to copy my CD's to cassette tape to listen to in the car (car CD players still skipped all the time). Songs that I would just skip with my CD remote, I now had to listen to in the car or start fiddling with the FF while I was driving. I noticed I found these "5th play" songs and some of these are still my favorite songs to this day. These are what made albums truly stand out.

      As well, there is the artistry described by the parent, where the album is not just a collection of songs, but a cohesive listening experience. When I rip my cds, I still put the whole album on my phone, but there is not much incentive for artists to create albums like this if there is no medium for them to exist on.

      Its a shame, another nail in coffin of the dying music industry. Pretty soon music will just be something to put in soundtracks of movies and shows.

      --
      Because, sometimes they just have to touch the stove.
      -YY1
    3. Re:I miss albums by Pseudonym · · Score: 1

      Oh, I get why they're doing it. I just miss them.

      I understand that the album format evolved due to limitations of the media.

      Not really. I mean, that is the way it was in the 40s and 50s, sure. But the concept album and the rock opera album owes more to theatre than it does to the limitations of the album format.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
  30. Amazon was first with non-DRM a year before iTunes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    iTunes/Apple had the stupidly named FairPlay DRM well after Amazon was doing 256 kbps +/- mp3 releases. Godawful quality (loudness war) were these, but no DRM. It took Apple another year+, before it came out with iTunes+, which was a 256 kbps m4a (aac) with no DRM. Each did have your email address in the metadata.

  31. Re:Good by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Me. The transients aren't as raspy and the midrange has a warmer soundstage.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  32. Re:Stupid by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

    Yeah, "Batman Returns" was a great monie.

  33. 1/50th the capacity of a 32GB microsd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1/50th the capacity of a 32GB microsd in an object 100 times larger, such that the microsd fits down the hole in the middle. And with typical broadband you can download 680MB in less time than it takes to walk to the local shop.

  34. please leave the Zeppelin boxed CD set where it is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The last of a very impressive collection, remastered, and the guitar sounds exactly the way the master Jimmy Page himself wanted YOU to hear it

  35. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone may have said the same thing about vinyl 10 years ago.
    Buy CDs now! You'll be one of the first Music CD Renaissance hipsters in 2045!

  36. WWWD (What Will WalMart Do?) by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 2

    WalMart is likely the targets CD retailer in the US (I saw likely as I cannot find hard data but they have been in the past IIRC) what they decide is likely to have a major impact on CDs in the US. At any rate, CD sales are declining along with overall album sales in any media. Digital represented about 505 of sales in 2016 vs. 34% for physical media. Of digital, 59% was streaming, the first time it was greater than 50% and drove the 18% increase in digital sales. It seems buyers are more interested in buying songs rather than albums in most cases; with album purchase dominated by older titles; which makes sense if you look t US retailers shelves you see a lot of older albums and a few new ones, mostly from big names.

    What's old is new again, as buyers have streamed to single songs, harkening back to the old days of 45's.

    --
    I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    1. Re:WWWD (What Will WalMart Do?) by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Wal-Mart is a big part of the problem. They only carry censored music, but they are big enough to have helped put real music stores out of business. Wal-Mart has literally decreased the availability of CDs that people want to buy.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:WWWD (What Will WalMart Do?) by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      Wal-Mart is a big part of the problem. They only carry censored music, but they are big enough to have helped put real music stores out of business. Wal-Mart has literally decreased the availability of CDs that people want to buy.

      I agree, an even bigger impact is their driving CD prices down to the point where record stores couldn't compete as consumers expectations were CDs were only worth $10 or less. Streaming's growth completed a 1 - 2 punch to their collective jaws. The only record stores we have now combine a large used CD / Video catalogue with some new releases. You can buy a CD and return it so your cost is essentially a dollar or two for the album; making it competitive with digital if you rip the CD or even cheaper if you like more than one song. The rise of digital also changed how we want to listen as well. Streaming has made it easy to play hours of music, either from a subscription or once you have ripped your collection without changing of CDs.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
  37. When did Best Buy become a Trend-Setter? by mykepredko · · Score: 1

    Maybe it's different in the US, but here in Canada, Best Buy has evolved into a chrome plated appliance store with phones, video gaming, cameras, computers, audio (in that order) with any technology at least a year old and marked down.

    They do know *their* market, but I don't see any indication that they're working to a trend, instead they're looking at floor space and where they can make the most money.

  38. Last DRM free media = Online Radio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Streamtuner and Streamripper is the answer for music on USB memory sticks and SD cards. For the extremely lazy with 24/7 online capability, there is https://www.internet-radio.com/

    1. Re:Last DRM free media = Online Radio by jenningsthecat · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Streamtuner and Streamripper is the answer for music on USB memory sticks and SD cards. For the extremely lazy with 24/7 online capability, there is https://www.internet-radio.com...

      Sure - if you have tin ears and the crappy audio systems that usually go along with them. But some of us actually listen to music as a primary activity, rather than just having it on as party music or background noise. For that kind of listening, streaming quality just doesn't cut it.

      And for those of you who insist that 320K mp3's are indistinguishable from lossless, I can short-circuit that whole conversation with one word - "gapless". Unless the mp3 is a single file containing a whole album, then classical music, live albums, and other albums in which the music plays continuously across track boundaries, sound like shit no matter how good the inherent sound quality is. Flac files play as gapless, and mp3 files don't - unless you're talking about some cheesy crossfade that actually makes things worse. So for a lot of the music some of us listen to, mp3 would be unacceptable even if the inherent sound quality was indistinguishable from lossless.

      --
      'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
    2. Re:Last DRM free media = Online Radio by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      But some of us actually listen to music as a primary activity, rather than just having it on as party music or background noise. For that kind of listening, streaming quality just doesn't cut it.

      Please provide credible proof that you can double blind ABX 320kbps Ogg Vorbis (as used by Spotify) from a lossless original.

      Flac files play as gapless, and mp3 files don't

      LAME (the de facto standard MP3 encoder) has been able to create gapless MP3s since basically forever. Yes, it's a hack, but it works.

      MP3 is an obsolete format, though. Ogg Vorbis, AAC and Opus provide much better quality at similar bitrates, and they all support gapless playback natively.

      --
      Eat the rich.
    3. Re: Last DRM free media = Online Radio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly if you buy digital you might as well go get on welfare you are just as bad as a crackhead passed out in an alley somewhere

  39. Need a luddite colony. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only way to keep privacy and the right kinds of retro-tech alive is creating a privacy-centric free nation akin to what America was supposed to idealize.

    America as that country has failed, and is rapidly colluding with members of the other major Nation States to take those ideals, rights, and liberties away, all in the name of corporate or sufficiently wealthy personal gain.

    At the macro level this can't be stopped, short of a massive purge of the lower rings of the populace, or sufficient incitement to turn that populace into a frenzied mass (which is only a temporary fix, since those cattle are breeding themselves away from free thinking, rather than towards.)

    However gathering together people who still believe in privacy and technology which helps support said privacy is possible, although based on my last 5 years of attempts at it, is infeasible, for the simple reason that not enough people are willing to give up their current lives or citizenship to make it happen, unlike the various groups who have rebelled over the years to take their colony, nation, or region back for themselves.

    Think about what you truly want out of your life and then decide what you are willing to do to get to it. Because the opportunities are rapidly dwindling, as is one's ability to independently make money inside of the current frameworks.

    Good luck.

  40. No way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If CDs go away, now I'll have to download a file and burn it separately to a CD? WTF? And how about cover art and information about the release? No way I will stop buying CDs. I love the flexibility of being able to pick a CD from the shelf and bring it in the car to listen. Having to download music to a phone or other device just seems silly to me.

  41. Hopefully audiophile will keep it alive by Eravnrekaree · · Score: 2

    MP3s tend to have inferior sound quality to a CD. It is noticeable. The heavy compression throws out a lot of data. You have lossless formats such as FLAC or Wavpac which never caught on. Wavpack is nice because you can split the file into a lossy file you can copy to a device and an additional smaller file that contains additional data for lossless play. As others have mentioned the decline of CD has other problems relating to DRM. Will audiophiles keep CDs alive. Lets hope so.
      There was a resurgence in record sales due to perceived characteristics of that platform, hopefully audiophiles will also keep the CD alive in a similar manner.

    The other factor in all of this is that there is not much, I would say, no music that comes out of Hollywood these days that even warrants a poorly encoded MP3, not to mention CD, since such music is not worth listening to at all. Nearly all mass market music produced out of hollywood belongs in the trash, or the recycle bin directory to make room for more valuable data. Of course, there is still older music such as classical music, jazz, beatles etc where the use of CDs is still very important for people being able to get a quality recording of such masterpieces.

    Some have said vinyl doesnt have the same nostalgia of CD. But the fact is CD has long been an audiophile choice because of the high fidelity and the resistance to mechanical abrasion and wear. A stamped CD will last for decades of continuous use whereas a record will suffer from wear and tear. Remember that audiophiles have invested big bucks, we are talking a thousand dollars, in high end CD players such as Pioneer Elite and Marantz for high end CD play. Even on an el cheapo $30 player, the difference in CD quality from vinyl and MP3 is real and noticeable. You dont get the same dynamic range and the same lossless, artifact free play back from an MP3 to drive your tweeters and subwoofers.

    1. Re:Hopefully audiophile will keep it alive by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      I've got literally one mp3 where the CD was noticeably better, out of... lots. mp3s are good enough to where playing them on a better stereo or with better headphones will reveal detail you've never experienced in the song, I have that experience all the time here. I wear Sennheiser HD420s hooked up to an M-Audio Mobile Pre, on a filtered USB port...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Hopefully audiophile will keep it alive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CDs tend to have worse audio quality than super audio CD, but only really if you listen at high volume. It was not enough that people would pay more for SACD. It's pretty much the same thing with 256 kbps AAC files. They sound pretty OK, so people think they're good enough.

    3. Re: Hopefully audiophile will keep it alive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Redbook. mp3 is nowhere near it and memory and download speeds these days allow it, but still Apple does lossy with the same enthusiasm that Debbie did Dallas.

      Message is 'Don't trust the corporates to act in the consumer's interest'. Even at CD tech level and performance level to provide great analog sound in pristine digital format, Sony stuffed it for the consumer by selling discs that had bitrot, to the point that the laserdisc market failed due to lack of trust.

    4. Re:Hopefully audiophile will keep it alive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, that stops being fun when you get to the point where the details revealed are encoding artifacts.

    5. Re:Hopefully audiophile will keep it alive by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      Why do audiophools keep blathering on about MP3s? The world has moved on, we have significantly better audio formats now. Spotify uses Ogg Vorbis, Apple Music uses AAC. Both are vastly superior to MP3.

      --
      Eat the rich.
    6. Re:Hopefully audiophile will keep it alive by Chelloveck · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that stops being fun when you get to the point where the details revealed are encoding artifacts.

      Don't worry, it's only a matter of time until those encoding artifacts are revered by the audiophiles just like tube amps are today. "I hate the modern stuff. It's cold, lifeless. It doesn't have the rich, warm sound of a good old-fashioned MP3. Just make sure you encode with a constant bitrate, you can hear the warble as the variable rate encoders add and drop bits. 192 Kbps is the sweet spot. Now hand me that Monster Cable so I can listen to my 1st gen iPod."

      Me? I only listen to the fall of rainwater, that or pure unmodulated sine waves. Everything else is a plot by the commies to take away our purity of essence!

      --
      Chelloveck
      I give up on debugging. From now on, SIGSEGV is a feature.
  42. There are lots of places by rsilvergun · · Score: 1, Insightful

    to get DRM free MP3s. eMusic comes to mind. Hell, didn't Apple remove DRM? They might have added it back. And besides, CDs aren't going away, but you won't be able to buy them at Best Buy, Target and Walmart. Good. That'll drive people to independent record stores and to concerts. Folks still want physical media. If only for the collectability. Hell, it probably won't even raise prices given the amount of profit built into a CD.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  43. Wintergatan by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

    There's also new kinds of artists, such as Wintergatan, who's like a modern Da Vinci.

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  44. No. by DogDude · · Score: 2

    No, they're not "dead". I buy them regularly. I've never bought a CD at "Best Buy", so I really couldn't care less what they sell or don't sell. Best Buy is clearly a poorly run business run by people who make poor decisions.

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
  45. think of the aunts and grandmothers!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    An entire category of clueless gifts for the kids ... Removed ...

  46. Netcraft Confirms It by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    It is now official. Netcraft has confirmed: *Compact Disc is dying

    One more crippling bombshell hit the already beleaguered *Compact Disc community when IDC confirmed that *Compact Disc market share has dropped yet again, now down to less than a fraction of 1 percent of all servers. Coming on the heels of a recent Netcraft survey which plainly states that *Compact Disc has lost more market share, this news serves to reinforce what we've known all along. *Compact Disc is collapsing in complete disarray, as fittingly exemplified by failing dead last [samag.com] in the recent Sys Admin comprehensive networking test.

    You don't need to be the Amazing Kreskin [amazingkreskin.com] to predict *Compact Disc's future. The hand writing is on the wall: *Compact Disc faces a bleak future. In fact there won't be any future at all for *Compact Disc because *Compact Disc is dying. Things are looking very bad for *Compact Disc. As many of us are already aware, *Compact Disc continues to lose market share. Red ink flows like a river of blood.

    But seriously, mother-fscking vinyl moved 14 million units last year and CDs cleared 104 million. yeah, it's way down, but now so low it can't support a healthy industry, especially with a product with margins like CDs.

    Expect to see more independent record stores and better sales at concerts as the money gets too small for the big fish to care, which can't help but be a good thing.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  47. iTunes has been DRM free since 2009 by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    See here. Then there's eMusic. The music industry gave up on DRM because it wasn't worth the tech headaches. If you want lossless though you'll pay a premium, but there's no shortage of options out there for audiophiles.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  48. Physical media is useful for libraries by rjnagle · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I hear you that cds are a technology past its due date.

    But public libraries can buy, store and lend physical media easily and not have to deal with DRM or licensing restrictions.

    Patrons can check out CDs and then decide to rip from them in the privacy of their own homes. Totally legal too.

    Ironically, the ripping habit (which I admit I have) leads me to buy a lot of digital music that I never would have learned about otherwise.

    Even if CDs stopped being sold tomorrow, there are still lots of indie/fringe CDs out there which aren't being sold digitally anywhere. Don't believe me? Go to a garage sale or used CD/DVD store and count the number of CDs still unknown to most of the musical world.....

    --
    Robert Nagle, Idiotprogrammer, Houston
  49. IT MUST BE THAT BAD NAPSTER by exabrial · · Score: 1

    napster ist the problem npot thes E millential kids using modern downloadin and streamin services. napster is the probmelm. RESIST FELLOW EXECS RESISTS

  50. I see Target's Point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I see Target's Point. Disks are a dying market. They're taking all the risk currently. The cost of duplication (unit production cost) for the disk and packaging is trivial. Sending it back is highly inefficient and costs about as much as the unit production cost if you include not just the shipping but the labor for Target and receiving. So it makes sense that Target ask for this. Think about paperback books. If they don't sell the bookstore does not send back the book, they rip off the cover and send just that back. Same economics.

    By the way, I'm not an Anonymous Coward. Recently SlashDot signin has not been working. It lets me sign in but then when I click on a story from the newsfeed it signs me right back out again. This happens intermittently. Sometimes the login is working. Nothing has changed on my end. This appears to be a SlashDot bug. Ideas?

  51. Fuck the recording industry. by Chas · · Score: 1

    It couldn't happen to a sleazier bunch of shitbags.

    Yes, it's not a panacea to consumers.

    But there's just SO! MUCH! SCHADEFREUDE! at how these greed, grasping fucksticks have basically painted themselves into a corner in the last 40 years.

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  52. We are Mediocre, be proud! by thatDBA · · Score: 1

    I still buy CDs as MP3 sound quality is not good enough and both my cars have Surround Stereos. The difference between playback of MP3 vs a CD is night and day. However even within the team of IT professionals I work on I am the only one that is concerned about sound quality - MP3 suffices for the rest. AptX ? They've never heard of it. I rip my CDs to FLAC using the highest sampling rate available in EAC and use a dedicated Sony High Resolution Audio player with AptX paired with Sony Bluetooth headphones with AptX for playback while hiking/walking or on long flights. I believe the lack of concern for music quality mirrors the quality of the politicians we elect in the USA which also mirrors the lack of outrage over internet speeds - we are Mediocre, be proud!

  53. Differnet "pressings"? by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 1

    Without getting into the argument regarding streaming quality, there's another reason I prefer CD's. I listen to a lot of music from my youth, or older even. Much of which has been remastered, remixed and re-released several times over the years. Often times the streaming/downloadable versions are not the versions I want to listen to. The loudness wars are real and often times remastered versions don't have the dynamic range of the older versions.

    There are also a lot of weird things that happened in older recordings. There was a recording studio in the late 1960's that did not have the speed of their recording equipment calibrated correctly for a fairly long time, and it was running slightly too slow. Since that time several albums from that studio have been remastered. Fortunately some of the remasters took this into account. However many did not. The ones that did not have shorter run-times and are pitch shifted accordingly. The problem is that the play times for the tracks do not match what is actually on those disks, so you can't tell by looking at the track times. It's been my experience that many of the remasters that did take this mis-calibration into account are also now out of print. Any streaming service or digital download would likely be from the newest remaster and not sound very good in my opinion.

    Some albums were actually changed in later releases. One of the lyrics of the Eagles song "Life in the Fast lane" was actually changed after the initial release of the Hotel California album.

    I can't say I'm a big Ice-T fan, but his song Cop Killer was unavailable for a couple of decades at one point. There have been other albums that are no long available due to other legal reasons as well. In those cases, you will not be able to hear them on your streaming service either.

    I also listen to a lot of classical music. There are numerous versions recorded by different orchestras. There are many version of Wagner's opera Der Ring des Nibelungen. Since it's a very long opera and is broken up into 4 parts/cycles, it can take several years between the opening of the first and last cycle. So there is a considerable amount of variation between versions of the full recording. I'm going to guess that I'd be lucky to find one version of of it on a streaming service, let alone two or more.

  54. WTF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    AOL is dead and now this. Where am I supposed to get my coasters from now?

  55. I know, I know by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

    Like, I know!

    I was SO upset when they stopped selling wax cylinders for my Gramaphone, now it's CDs!

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
  56. CD == cable bundle 500-channel universe by knorthern+knight · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The rock/pop music market was dominated into the late 1970's / early 1980's by kids buying "hit singles" on 45-rpm format, for approximately $1. Then the corporations got effing greedy and told you that you could only get the one popular track by paying $20 or $25 for a CD that had that track... plus a dozen other pieces of crap you didn't care about. "Music sales" cratered. Well... like... dohhhh. Let's blame piracy.

    It wasn't until Apple came out with 99-cent single tracks that music-buying picked up again, beacuse kids with limited allowances could buy a song, rather than having to purchase "the bundle".

    This is very similar to cable TV today. Try getting just your favourite channels, without paying for a bunch of crap that you don't want. That's the CD equivalant. Specialized streaming services are the equivalant of single tracks on Itunes or Google Play.

    --

    I'm not repeating myself
    I'm an X window user; I'm an ex-Windows user
    1. Re:CD == cable bundle 500-channel universe by jrumney · · Score: 1

      CD singles existed for a while, maybe even long enough for iTunes to get established as the preferred way to buy single tracks.

    2. Re:CD == cable bundle 500-channel universe by toddestan · · Score: 1

      The problem with the CD singles is that they were like $4-$7, when the album was like $12-$15. So naturally they didn't sell well. I've got a few of them though, mostly because they had no real resale value, so I could get them for $1 or less at the second-hand store.

    3. Re:CD == cable bundle 500-channel universe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes and no, earlier people put effort in making a record and others made an effort listening to it. Listening to a balanced record is, strangely enough, often a better experience than getting 10 hits from a streaming service. This is obviously not valid for the rip-off records with 1 hit.

    4. Re:CD == cable bundle 500-channel universe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting jump from 45s to CDs there. 45s disappeared long before CDs went mainstream; by the mid-80s, the music section was all albums in vinyl and cassette, with CDs still in their infancy. With 45s accounting for less than 20% of industry revenue by 1984, they were largely boutique items; CDs would surpass them in dollars by 1985. Cassingles never caught on as a 45 replacement and albums back then usually had several good songs on each, not just one (the overall market for singles was constantly shrinking until the rise of downloads, likely from a combination of availability, perceived value, and piracy - this is likely a major cause for poor album content, as there was no risk of singles cutting into album sales with single unit sales down to practically nothing in 2000 from about a third of unit sales in the mid-70s).

      As for prices, tapes could usually be found for less than $10 and CDs topped out around $19 by the end of the '90s (but the rise of fly-by-night e-commerce sites in the late '90s meant that you rarely had to pay more than $10). And piracy was rampant - thanks to dual cassette decks, only one kid needed to buy an album in any group of friends, so kids were spending the $1 on a blank tape to get a full album rather than a $1 single (possibly cementing a preference for albums over singles). CD-Rs weren't practical until the late '90s (the same time that MP3s became common for piracy), so there were only a few years where CDs were the dominant format and were hard to duplicate; this was also roughly the same time that the industry engaged in price fixing and the same time period that saw sales figures for CDs double (though part of the abnormal spike was likely due to people re-buying old albums in the new format). Music sales didn't actually crater until iTunes came into the picture.

      In short, your premise that the music industry's fortunes have followed the success of the single format is completely wrong. Music sales, both in units and dollars went up with the rise of CDs and singles were never a major factor in terms of dollars until digital downloads became common. The massive surge in sales of CD albums was an abnormality that has since been corrected, first by downloads and now streaming.

  57. There are still music stores, screw BB by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There are still music stores around, they sell CDs, why would you go to Best Buy for that anyway?

    However I have been and will continue to be of the opinion that all of you who pay for 'streaming' services are fools. You're encouraging a world where you OWN NOTHING. It's not just media, if you haven't noticed: Barriers to owning a home, and not just financial; things like HOAs making it difficult to impossible for the average person. Car 'leasing' instead of purchasing (and you're still paying for maintenance). Shit companies like Microsoft, pushing 'subscriptions' instead of letting you own a copy of software. And so on. Don't deny it's happening like so many of you deny so many other things that you said would never happen, only to find a few years later they did.

    1. Re:There are still music stores, screw BB by TheLongshot · · Score: 1

      Actually, there aren't. Most of them have gone under. FYE is one of the few left, and the one near me cut their CD section in half. The only major chain that still carries CDs is Barnes & Noble. Really, the only option is buying online, and even some of those storefronts are struggling.

    2. Re:There are still music stores, screw BB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I noticed that some of my favorite records are not available on iTunes, they play me a later version of the record instead. Not just re-mastered but re-mixed! This is annoying that instead of the 1986 release you get the 1992 re-release. How to combat this? What if the only version available is suddenly changed? I have stopped trusting in streaming services, I still use them but in case I really like something I try to buy it as CD.

    3. Re:There are still music stores, screw BB by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      I don't think you're looking hard enough.

  58. I don't miss CDs... but by tomxor · · Score: 1

    But, I miss the lossless DRM free no bullshit format etched on them. I've never bought any music online, most of it is low quality lossy and some even DRM.

    But there must be some demand for this? I came across "Tidal" for streaming which looks promising, but is there anywhere you can actually buy lossless stuff or am I relegated to piracy in an age where everything where the whole pipeline is designed for shitty earbuds and iPhones?

    1. Re:I don't miss CDs... but by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      Don't bother with Tidal. Their selection is crap, their app is crap and they keep pushing the nonsense MQA format (which has DRM baked in).

      Buy from Bandcamp. They offer FLAC downloads of everything.

      --
      Eat the rich.
  59. I want physical media by kencurry · · Score: 1

    But reality is different. There have been times that I wanted to listen to some music that I own on CD or vinyl, and I was at work, so I just downloaded it. Sigh

    Apple wins this round.

    --
    sigs are for losers (except to point out that sigs are for losers)
  60. Last perpetual license by Solandri · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Unless something has changed recently, MP3 doesn't support DRM. In fact most of the audio sound formats I've encountered don't support DRM. It's not like the case with movies, where the "video file" format is actually a container containing a video file, audio file, subtitle files, chapter index, etc, and you can insert all sorts of funny ways and conditions to play it. Pretty much all the music audio file formats I've encountered are just straight audio files - compressed, but not encrypted.

    The bigger loss is that CDs, being a physical format, carried with them a perpetual license. You could bequeath your CD collection to your children upon your death. The license agreement terms for most online music/movie purchase services grant you a non-transferable license. That is, your "ownership" of the content you've "purchased" expires upon your death. The only way to allow your heirs to inherit your music or movie or ebook or game collection is to break the EULA and share your login and password with them before you expire.

    I expect this will be hashed out in court over the next 40 years, as the "loss" of a loved one's or relative's online media collection upon their death becomes more commonplace. People will challenge it, and the courts will have to decide if that's really how we want online "purchases" of copyrighted media to work. In the meantime, you can completely bypass the content industry's attempts to erode our ownership rights of things we've paid money for by purchasing CDs. (Or by pirating stuff - though "pirating" is probably not the right word when it's done to take back rights we should have had from the beginning.)

    1. Re:Last perpetual license by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 1

      No, there's no perpetual license for CDs. There doesn't need to be one, and in fact, there can't be one. A copyright holder can't grant someone a license for a right that isn't part of copyright, and the right to listen to music -- separate from copying it, distributing it, or performing it publicly -- is not part of copyright. Take a look at 17 USC 106 to see that it's not there among the major rights that are granted as copyright.

      As for transferring copies, again, not part of a license. There is a statutory exception in the law such that copyright does not apply to distributing legitimately-made copies of works after their first sale under the authority of the copyright holder. It's at 17 USC 109.

      As for 'hashing stuff out,' that already happened. That was the ReDigi case, and the music industry won. If you want things to improve, you need to look to Congress.

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
    2. Re:Last perpetual license by darth.hunterix · · Score: 1

      Commandeer - it's a nautical term...

      --
      What is best in life? Hot water, good dentishtry and shoft lavatory paper.
  61. Maybe the medium is not the message by louden+obscure · · Score: 1

    Recorded music is at best a close approximation of a live event. It may or may not be massaged/mangled by post production. My opinion is real music is experienced live. There are probably exceptions...Electric Ladyland comes to mind.

    I've been watching/listening to Postmodern Jukebox on youtube and the audio is only one component, the presentation is smile inducing. Babymetal's Gimme Chocolate video makes me smile.

    The evolution of recorded sound marches on. Good enough is always going to be good enough. Best will always be superseded by the next best.

    --
    Serenity now, insanity later.
  62. Irony by mapkinase · · Score: 1

    Vinyl will outlive CDs

    --
    I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    1. Re:Irony by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      no they'll both be produced as niche formats for a while, doubtful it would last half a generation (~15 years) though

  63. Is Best Buy the one dying? by TigerPlish · · Score: 1

    Seriously, I go there every now and then to buy the latest Pixar (or Disney, if it is worth it) Blu-Ray. Last one was Cars 3 a couple of months ago.

    The shelves (all the shelves, not just media) are bare. Product is arranged in a manner reminiscent of a bad comb-over. You can tell at a glance it's a sick store. Has the same desperate air of death as the local R/C store before it died.

    I get it, CD and Blu-Ray are not the primary method of content aqcuisition for Most People.

    I wager those who read here are not Most People.

    What does CD and Blu-Ray offer ME that the more hip / convenient formats don't?

    Permanence. Presence. Some of us still like shelves well-stocked with books, CDs, dvd/blu-ray, records.

    I'm fairly certain one day, not too far, the pendulum will swing back to physical.. especially when people start realizing what they like to watch / listen can be dropped by the $STREAMER at their whim.

    Example: I LOOOOOOVE Animaniacs. I have the entire thing on DVD, right here in my shelves. I watched them on Netflix, or played 'em while I did other stuff. Then Netflix dropped them. I said "No biggie, they're all here right here. I can watch whenever" Then Hulu picked 'em up in January, and I watch 'em again. Convenience wins, but so does having a physical backup. The point I'm stressing is... the streamer can drop your favorites like a bad habit, and then what? Get on Facetwat and whine like a bitch, or just reach into your shelf and pop one into the player? Spend hours looking for the stuff to pir8, or just pop one into the player? To each their own, but I know what method I prefer.

    And that is what will swing the pendulum back. It's *GOOD* to have that shelf full of cool stuff. Sucks when one has to move house, but looks awesome when lit by spotlights and frankly, has a comforting quality to it -- much like a library. Remember those? A building where one could go and read to one's heart's content? Lined wall to wall and floor to ceiling with books?

    As for music, I buy CD, then rip to MP3 for the phone and the ipod in the car. Do I liste to the CD again? Sure! IF i have the time, I'll listen to a whole album, accompanied by some distilled spirit or by some other mood enhancer - by spinning the CD in a player.

    What guarantee do I have that if I buy all 7 seasons of $SHOW or a complete collection of all $MOVIES by $DIRECTOR on a streaming service or itunes or similar.. what guarantee do I have that they'll be there 10 years from now?

    Yes, to me, *that's* important. Permanence. Everything in my life has been too goddamn fleeting to have things which help my sanity become fleeting as well.

    --
    The "Civilized World" jumped the shark ca. 1973.
  64. Replaced by another media by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    CDs are being replaced by a new old format : Vinyls. ;-)

  65. The problem isn't Best Buy by trudyscousin · · Score: 1

    Best Buy may have stopped selling CDs, but the problem doesn't exist only with Best Buy.

    Shopping for CDs at any major retailer in 2018 is a pointless exercise, unless you're looking for the very latest thing, or greatest hits collections.

    When Streetlight and Rasputin's (two indie retailers here in the San Jose area) go out of business, only then will I worry.

    --
    Those who can, do. Those who can't, write technology blogs.
  66. Re:Good by PhotoJim · · Score: 2

    There's a difference. Floppy disks became obsolete because of lack of storage capacity. CDs are becoming obsolete because music listeners these days value convenience over quality and actually owning their music.

  67. They stopped selling graphics card and by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Business is a boomin.

  68. Best Buy never sold CDs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No one ever sold CDs. What was sold was a means for people to experience and enjoy music. The experience part is vital and is why there are still people buying vinyl and even tape. With vinyl there is moment between placing the needle at the start or finding the location to drop it. There is the scratchiness that gives way to the music. CDs, press a button and go, so easily replicated, that many early computer music players had interfaces that resembled physical players. Fast forward (pun intended) and the physical CD is gone yet the playing experience is largely unchanged.

  69. Re:Good by TigerPlish · · Score: 1

    music listeners these days value convenience over quality and actually owning their music.

    ^^ That. People couldn't be bothered with proper turntable setup, so their mass-market "record changers" ruined the sound (and the records.) So Cassette took over. Then CD took over Cassette. And now "nothing" took over. I call it "nothing" because I can't hold it in my hand, I can't file in my shelves, it's here now gone tomorrow if you didn't make backups - or if the $STREAMER decides to pull it.

    Convenience wins. Every time. No matter of the other way is the better way. People just can't be bothered.

    There's that slim faction that *can* be bothered, and we're the ones lamenting the passing of the physical.

    You can have my sheet music when you pry it off my cold dead fingers!

    --
    The "Civilized World" jumped the shark ca. 1973.
  70. on consumption patterns as sentience proxy by epine · · Score: 1

    you can probably find out a lot by looking at who likes the Snowden movie, Ayn Rand, Michael Moore and so on. It all adds up.

    We know precisely how this adds up.

    Dear Totalitarian Leader is invariably an expert mechanic of the 80–20 law: remove the 20% of the population most likely to cause problems, and voila!

    I've spent quality time with all three of these coloured wires, even though I think Ayn Rand is a springy shit sandwich, and Michael Moore is a thrice-insulated turd meatloaf (not, however, composed of actual fecal matter, though it steams up the outhouse all the same). Snowden is beyond the ken of simple DC analysis. Assange—the deceptively naked ground return—is a mad, upside down, digital Diogenes (who also delighted in yanking the collective chain).

    On the indecency of his masturbating in public he would say, "If only it were so easy to banish hunger by rubbing my belly."

    But still, from a decent remove, a sometimes interesting cat.

    The malign minions of Dear Totalitarian Leader would not concern themselves over the fly in the ointment of expressed (anti)-preference: anyone capable of routinely seeking out that which they dislike for the betterment of critical thinking is sure to receive a seat assignment for the Director's Edition first cut.

    But if you need more accuracy than "potentially capable of independent thought" your list of things you 're read or consumed is not an accurate sentiment proxy—except for sheep. Sheep are political assets. Everyone else, not so much.

    If that's all you meant by "find out a lot", then QED—may your rough-and-ready regime endure for a thousand years.

  71. But how do you confirm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...the tracks are true lossless from an actual 16 bit CD, and not simply upsampled from a shitty 64 bitrate mp3?

    1. Re:But how do you confirm... by c120plus · · Score: 1

      You can rip the CD and look at the file in an audio editor like Audacity. Visually it's easy to identify uncompressed musich from music that was compressed to mp3 before. Also, there's tools that do this job for you.

  72. What's a CD? by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

    I bought a new truck last weekend, and it had a CD slot in the dash. Totally joking, I asked the ~20 year old sales girl what it was for, and she said "oh that's where you put your cell phone holder. We have them inside and you get one free with the truck."

    And sure enough, when I got done signing the papers, there was a CD-slot mounted cell phone holder in it.

    CDs died eons ago. Best Buy, as usual, is catching on to shifts in technology ten years after the fact.

  73. I have a dvd player that can still play cds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a dvd player in the computer that I can use to play cds. I don't because most music is now online, and I can store 10,000 songs on something else, and it all sounds just fine. I like to listen to stuff in the car and have a little thing that plugs into the cigarette lighter and accepts an sd card. The SD card can hold about 30,000 songs, and if I want more, its easy to have more than one SD card. The music isn't as 'pure', but most musicians process the hell out of music anyway, so purism is an ill-defined concept. CD's also tend to scratch/bend/warp/melt, and don't store nearly as much as a DVD. I don't even use DVD's much anymore. It can store a lot, but comparing a DVD to a hard disk is like comparing a toothpick to a forest. And I don't even store much music on hard disk; solid state devices are so much more practical. Much larger than you will ever need for all the music you listen to, virtually indestructable, can fit in a pocket easily, cheap. If you are tired of the music, you can always erase it and put on something else.

  74. They've been "dying" for a while by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been hearing about the death of CDs for a few years now, but I'm still buying new CDs and others I know are too. Local record shops still seem to have a consistently sized selection and do a decent business (always lots of people in my local HMV, young and old), although I tend to buy most CDs online because of the better choice and usually the price.

    Why CDs? DRM-free and I can rip them in whatever format I want, lossy or lossless, and use them wherever I want. I like the tangible product, the album art/booklets, and just the whole idea of an album as a conceptual entity. I don't have to put up with the record companies cancelling access to music I've bought, or finding that I have to use different services to find different artists, or having to put up with the inconvenience of streaming. Plus the costs are still about the same as downloads - which is particularly amusing given the negligible costs for reproduction compared to physical media, they're just creaming off yet more money that doesn't go to the actual artists.

    If you're complaining that albums are shit because you're paying to buy one or two decent songs, I'd humbly recommend you go find some decent music rather than be spoonfed generic, mass-marketed rubbish. It's very rare that I've bought something where most of the album has been filler. In fact, I can't even remember the last time that was the case. There are so many great albums out there, new and old - 2017 seemed to be an exceptionally good year.

    If I have one complaint, it's that some independent labels are moving from CD, except for very limited editions. They seem to be opting for download and vinyl of all things, despite vinyl making up a much smaller market than CD. Don't get me started on some labels adding analogue cassette over CD - I mean who even has a tape player these days?

  75. Defining lossless by tepples · · Score: 1

    How else will I get my music in a DRM free, lossless format?

    No digital audio format is lossless. CD for instance loses all frequencies above Nyquist.

    Want to listen? For the major codecs (MP3, AAC-LC, Vorbis, and Opus), what is the highest bitrate that you can successfully distinguish from the original CD in an ABX test?

    Want to transcode? For the common use of "lossless" to refer to 16-bit 44.1 kHz linear PCM as a source for transcoding free of artifacts, you'll still be able to mail-order CDs, just not walk into a Best Buy.

    1. Re:Defining lossless by TranquilVoid · · Score: 1

      Really lossless refers to the integrity when converting from one consumer format to another, not from the original performance or master.

      This is the primary driver for me in preferring FLAC. I don't want my music collection to degrade over time as I convert to whatever the current format is supported by each successive generation of players. Of course my ears are likely to degrade faster, but that's not the point.

    2. Re:Defining lossless by anyaristow · · Score: 1

      you'll still be able to mail-order CDs, just not walk into a Best Buy

      Not being able to get them at Best Buy means the market for them will shrink, which will make them more expensive, shrinking the market farther, and possibly convince labels to stop making them.

      It's the Walmart effect. The purchase decisions of other people do affect you.

  76. Then how do you buy music? by iamhassi · · Score: 1

    Without a cd and CD player, you can't walk in a store, buy music, and walk out of the store with music to listen to. If they had some sort of kiosks where you could login or create an account and download music to a device that would be fine but they don't. We take for granted that everyone is suppose to have a smartphone with high speed cellular data service in their pocket and credit card linked to it so music can be bought and downloaded on the device, but not everyone has those things.

    --
    my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    1. Re:Then how do you buy music? by No+Longer+an+AC · · Score: 1

      You're not wrong, but were those people without smart phones really buying all that much music anymore anyway?

      And unless I lacked access to the internet at home, why would I walk into Best Buy and sign up for some online music service? If I didn't have internet at home, couldn't I just as easily do it at a library?

      Maybe it's just a sad state of affairs that Best Buy stores are more accessible to poor people than libraries.

      I stopped buying CDs years ago. It wasn't really a conscious decision. I just had no desire to buy anything except for an occasional new release from some old artist.

      The last CD I bought because I really wanted it was Mark Knopfler's "Kill to Get Crimson" (2007) and the very last CD I ever bought was Guns and Roses "Chinese Democracy" (2008) but I only bought that because Best Buy was selling it for $1 and I figured GNR was worth a whole dollar. I can't imagine either Best Buy or GNR made much money on that deal, but I honestly would not have bought it if it had been priced at even $1.99. I"m pretty sure I only listened to it once.

      For the last 10 years I've been more than content to listen to my older CD collection and whatever I find on YouTube or archive.org or occasionally the musician's own website.

      And wouldn't you know it, I just found a previously unheard of (by me anyway) Frank Zappa recording - on YouTube. I'll download a copy for myself...WHY? In case YouTube ever deletes their entire FZ collection? I kind of doubt they'll ever do that but even if they do I've got at least 50 FZ albums I can listen to if I can't just click away on YT.

      and the sad thing is I bought about half of those FZ albums from a used CD store that had apparently acquired some other Zappa fan's music collection.....presumably after he (or she) died or otherwise was forced into economic circumstances where they had to sell all their CDs.

      Or is it possible that they just got sick of listening to Zappa?

      I think I bought most of some dead person's Zappa collection and I wonder what will happen to it after I pass away. I suspect when I'm dead whoever deals with all my old property will either just throw them out or sell my entire CD collection in bulk for about a penny per disc.

      I don't know how many discs I have, but let's say it's 5000. At a penny per disc that's a whopping $50. Do you have any idea how much money I spent collecting those? I certainly don't but it's obviously thousands of dollars.

  77. People love privacy. Always have. by jbn-o · · Score: 1

    Don't you believe that people don't like privacy. Almost one year ago, Noam Chomsky, Glenn Greenwald, and Edward Snowden spoke on privacy (use youtube-dl or avideo to download the video so you don't run YouTube's nonfree software by visiting their site) and the whole talk is worth hearing.

    One part stands out—when Greenwald talks of common privacy myths around 28m23s (such as "I don't have anything to hide") by pointing out the results of his ongoing privacy test—he has an email account he invites anyone to send mail to listing all of the credentials and connection points for every account they control (including work accounts, bank accounts, social media accounts, and all sites for anything else). Why? He explains quite straightforwardly, "I just want to be able to troll through what you're doing online and post under your name because obviously if you're not a bad person you should have nothing to hide.".

    The result is obvious and predictable: "To this day, not a single person has taken me up on this offer.".

    "The people who say that they don't value their privacy don't actually mean it at all." Greenwald reminds us, and he's right. There has never been a time where people didn't value their privacy and any corporate sycophant who wants to claim otherwise here (or on any other corporate news repeater site) is either ignorant or lying.

  78. Physical media will not be going anywhere ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most artists make dick off of any purchase of their music, execpt when they are selling at their shows. You can really sell a stream at show or indeed much in the way of a digital copy. So as long as artist do shows there will be physical media sold.

    Keep in mind most of these sales do not count toward their "album" sales either so there may be more sold than people realize as most people I know have realized this and generally only buy music at shows, and stream otherwise.

  79. Dying? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    CD are not dying, they're dead.

  80. Re:Amazon was first with non-DRM a year before iTu by Uberbah · · Score: 1

    iTunes/Apple had the stupidly named FairPlay DRM well after Amazon was doing 256 kbps +/- mp3 releases.

    Amazon was negotiating new contracts whereas Apple had existing ones - no wonder why it didn't happen overnight.

  81. um by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You typed: There's a big difference between, "I don't care if a particular company knows what music I listen to," and "I don't care if my emails are public."

    NO, there's not.

    Perhaps you lack the maturity and wisdom to realize this yet. Someday you will.

    Let me get you started: People knowing what music you listen to and where you get it and when you get it, etc are like people who know the books you read, the movies you watch, your friends, the schools you attended, etc ..... aside from all the other badness that can result, these things allow businesses, politicians, and others to build profiles of you and then use those profiles to manipulate you, and to further enhance the profiles of your friends and relatives, the better to manipulate them too. Politicians will eventually have no need to rig an election - they'll just manipulate the public by pushing the right micro-targeted buttons. Corporations will not need to engage in illegal market manipulations, monopoly tactics etc - they'll just manipulate the buying public.

    It's bad enough as a problem facing the individual free person, but when you consider the long-term societal consequences, things can get rather chilling.

  82. Re:Amazon was first with non-DRM a year before iTu by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

    Not quite. Apple had DRM-free music from EMI, but not from the other big four record labels. Then the rest granted Amazon a license for DRM-free music to try to reduce Apple's bargaining power, because Apple wouldn't license FairPlay and this was the only way for someone else to be able to sell music that would work on iPods.

    The lesson from all of this was that DRM let Apple tie their store to the player and so gave them more leverage than the music studios had.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  83. hip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The real hipsters have already moved on to Freddy Mercury moustaches. But well trimmed beards will always stay in style if only as a niche because some women prefer them. The giant beard we will look back on and laugh.

  84. Re: Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Amiga will never die!

  85. Amazon + on demand manufacturing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I understand Target's complaint - they have to either sell the CDs in 60 days, buy them, or pay to ship them back. Unless you're a dedicated music store which can anticipate demand, that's a difficult bet to make.

    However, I'm sure there's still an opportunity for music makers to sell CDs - just not on the shelves of big bricks & mortar retailers. The trick is to connect to those consumers (e.g. via artist websites & social media), make the CDs available for purchase (e.g. via Amazon) and manufacture those CDs in such a way to minimize the amount of stock which needs to be warehoused (on demand manufacturing).

  86. I hope not by ThurstonMoore · · Score: 1

    CD's are still my primary method of obtaining legit music.

  87. While I started back in the 1990s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm hoping that for my family and friends that 2018 will be the year of going back to owning physical things. I've gotten a few of them started. and they're already cutting their monthly costs on services that they don't get any real enjoyment out of other than being caught up on worldly trends. The best part about all of this is that we can freely share our physical media with each other. There's been a very "reviving dry bones" effect.

    1. Re:While I started back in the 1990s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The good ole family "library".

  88. I keep all my CD's in my car now by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    Because it is the only place that actually has a CD player anymore. Even then, it also supports USB, Bluetooth, and has an Aux out port, so you're by no means forced to use CD's anymore either. I expect my next car/stereo probably won't even have a CD player in it...

  89. No. by whitroth · · Score: 1

    What a stupid concept. Now, for those of you who aren't, y'know, like TERRIFIED OF PEOPLE, and say, go out to live music, that's how you buy their music at the concerts.

    AND that is how most of them *make* money - by selling CD's.

    But go ahead, don't buy CDs, tell the folks whose music you like that they should go back to work at a real job, and just make live music for the fun of it, unless some RecordCompanyScumbag decides that they fit his market profile....

  90. CD is a freakin brilliant format by Zobeid · · Score: 1

    Someday the audio CD will be rediscovered and appreciated as the freakin brilliant format that it is. When they are produced and mastered right, the audio quality is stunning, and it's quite close to what the human ear is capable of perceiving. They're long-lasting and resistant to damage (if you don't outright abuse them), and totally DRM-free and region-free too, and you don't have to wade through menus and promos and crap like with DVDs.

    The major problem with the audio CD is that all the record companies have forgotten how to master music so it'll sound good, or maybe they just don't care. They compress the hell out of everything in the whole rock-and-pop space. New LP records usually sound better than the CD counterpart just because they are mastered better. Pick out CDs from the 80s and 90s and they sound fantastic. (And avoid anything with "remastered" on the label. That's the mark of death.)

  91. How long do you think that will stay that way when the CD is gone?

    For all practical purposes, the CD is already gone.

    I can go to Amazon and buy any song I want, DRM free, for $1. I don't see any reason for that to change.

    How is Amazon's service related in any way whatsoever to availability of CDs?

    ...what you've written here is like a small child walking into negotiations between the Israelis and Palestinians and saying "but why can't you guys just get along?" You have demonstrated you have no idea what we're talking about. Please go back to the kids' table. "oh, I can buy any song from Amazon for a dollar..." Jesus H.M.F. Christ... One day, when CDs are extinct, and Amazon tells you that you don't need to be able to buy songs, when you can get them for "free" with "Prime membership..." you can come back and read this again, and maybe will understand better why I'm likening you to an ignorant child. It's not to hurt your feelings nor to feel superior, it's because you seem to be somehow assuming that the way things are now will never change, ignoring the forces at work here.

    Basically, in terms of being able to buy music, and OWN it, and play it wherever you like, whenever you like, however you like, without big corporations taking their cuts, (in the case of Amazon (which you brought up,) and Apple (which you didn't, but they're in the same basic boat,) when it comes to manipulating things so that you have to pay, and pay through the nose,) it seems as if you're happily enjoying the lovely wedding ceremony, and somehow have no idea why the mood in the room just suddenly turned dark and foreboding as the musicians wraped up the tune they were playing before, and began playing "The Rains of Castamere," or why Amazon.com's Lord Jeff Bezton is wearing chain-mail under his shirt to an occasion such as this. "My shareholders send their regards," he'll say...

    You and people like you, ShanghaiBill will wake one day and wonder where the hell your ability to buy music and not pay over and over again for it went... and we (people like me) fucking warned you about this. "Oh, ho ho ho... I can buy any song I want on Amazon for a dollar..." yeah. When you look back on this, I hope you'll recall one day that today I asked you (in advance,) "how's that working out for you now?"

    --
    Our reign has gone on long enough. Indeed. Summon the meteors.
  92. Phase Down? by fygment · · Score: 1

    Does that mean that AI is undergoing a phase up? If nothing changes is it phase flat?

    --
    "Consensus" in science is _always_ a political construct.
  93. Re:Have no need for CDs anymore. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just fuck off and shove your 'fecal matter' up your ass.