Slashdot Mirror


Flat Earther Fails To Launch His Homemade Rocket -- Yet Again (facebook.com)

An anonymous reader writes: Flat earther "Mad" Mike Hughes, who also bills himself as "the last great daredevil," promised Super Bowl-sized ratings for an event Saturday where he'd blast himself nearly half a mile into the sky on a homemade rocket. "We had 20 cameras on site today, ready for a full segment," explained the video-on-demand site Noize TV on their Facebook page. One newspaper described it as also being "an event which he hopes will get people to investigate the ideology which holds the earth is flat." But judging from online reactions, the event was just another disappointment.

Noize TV's Facebook post titled "The Launch!!! Finally" shows a picture of Mike standing beside his rocket -- but it's followed by a commenters saying things like "There was no launch. I doubt there will be," and the official Noize TV account saying "We thought he would press that button... He did not. And won't be doing so we are pretty certain." And this morning Noize TV posted that "we will no longer cover non launches, only launches... It turns out non launches are not as funny as we anticipated."

One woman even posted that "I was there for awhile...police were there. Ambulance was there. 100 people that weren't supposed to be there was there..." And while there's rumors Mike might still try again another day, her ultimate verdict about the limo-driver-turned-daredevil was cynical. "He's all about getting seen rather than getting launched... My husband gave him $100 cash the last time he was going to launch...live and learn."

162 comments

  1. Too bad by XXongo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Too bad. I love that guy. America needs more full-on nuts who do crazy things with rockets and other such toys-- and I mean that sincerely.

    1. Re:Too bad by Alalalalalalalalalal · · Score: 0, Troll

      Rocket is tools for INFIDELS. This is your PUNISHMENT for failure.

      Slashdot is FAILURE and PUNISHMENT to AMERICA for drawing attention to such STUPIDITY.

    2. Re:Too bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      if they are really that stupid that they believe the earth is flat, it's no wonder they fail to launch a rocket...

    3. Re:Too bad by slazzy · · Score: 2

      That's true. America has done some great things, and most of them started in someone's garage or basement. While the flat earth thing is beyond dumb, it's probably just his marketing stunt to get in the news and get sponsors or something.

      --
      Website Just Down For Me? Find out
    4. Re:Too bad by Immerman · · Score: 2

      Yeah, it's one thing to scam a bunch of flat-earther nut-jobs into funding your lunatic daredevil stunts... but what's the point if, after all that hard work, you're not going to actually follow through?

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    5. Re:Too bad by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Too bad. I love that guy. America needs more full-on nuts who do crazy things with rockets and other such toys

      Having leaders of nations like that is NOT enough for you?

    6. Re:Too bad by geekmux · · Score: 2

      Too bad. I love that guy. America needs more full-on nuts who do crazy things with rockets and other such toys-- and I mean that sincerely.

      When it comes to certain technologies, we need those "full-on nuts" to know what the fuck they're doing. And I mean that sincerely. It's never a good thing when a Darwin Award winner ends up taking innocent lives with them.

    7. Re:Too bad by Immerman · · Score: 2

      Problem is, they're a lot less likely to kill themselves, and a lot more likely to kill a lot of other people. Crazy hobbies become a lot less admirable when you start gambling with other people's lives.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    8. Re:Too bad by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's never a good thing when a Darwin Award winner ends up taking innocent lives with them.

      If he takes out someone who lives across the street, that's tragedy. If he takes out the people who have come to see the launch, and who are rewarding his attention-whoring, that's comedy.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    9. Re: Too bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ISIS Space Agency will take care of you, mohammad. Successfully launching people into the universe of god.

      We want to take a moment to thank our sponsors and mentors, the CIA and a Nobel Peace prize winner Obama.

    10. Re: Too bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Who would sponsor him? BREITBART?! Alex Jones?

    11. Re:Too bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Current evidence suggests this guy isn't a nut, just a liar that conned a bunch of actual nuts out of some money.

    12. Re:Too bad by gtall · · Score: 2

      Yeah, like the moon shot, or...or...the SR-71...or modern cancer therapy, or lasers, or laser eye surgery, or dentistry, or the interstate highway system, or SS so grandma doesn't come and live with you, or fighting two fronts in WWII, or integrated circuits, or computers, or vaccines, or stereo systems, or....well golly, just about everything great in America was started in a garage or basement. The U.S. should build more of those, think how many more great things it would have.

    13. Re: Too bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, keep the money and live another day? It's a pathetic scam of anyone who, uh, donated, and just spam on everyone else's radar.

    14. Re:Too bad by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      The point is that you've got the money and you get to spend it.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    15. Re: Too bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The air plane, the car, the motor cycle, the television, the radio, the light bulb. None of those were developed by a large engineering firm or government agency.

    16. Re: Too bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What?

    17. Re:Too bad by beckett · · Score: 1

      America needs more full-on nuts who do crazy things

      More Steak, Less Sizzle.

      America needs More Launches, Less Fizzle.

    18. Re: Too bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      By that logic, the whole world is covered uniformly with houses, roads, and telephone poles, just like the neighborhood where my family lives. Those oceans people keep talking about? Fiction. At night, the sun takes a nap so it can be well-rested tomorrow for more sunshine. Except when it rains. Thatâ(TM)s a different sun that shines rain instead of sunshine.

    19. Re:Too bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, no: he INVENTED an alarm clock. Anyone who disagrees is a racist.

    20. Re:Too bad by sysrammer · · Score: 1

      They should make a movie about him, starring Randy Quaid.

      --
      His ignorance covered the whole earth like a blanket, and there was hardly a hole in it anywhere. - Mark Twain
    21. Re:Too bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well golly, just about everything great in America was started in a garage or basement.

      Yes, in other countries by non-Americans.

    22. Re: Too bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yup, but you old world types kept killing inventors for heresy.

      That's why the US invented everything. We let the people keep and capitalize on their ingenuity, not kill them for it.

      The only things the old world really invented are slavery(thanks for blaming us BTW) and the dark ages.

    23. Re:Too bad by MerlTurkin · · Score: 2

      Just like religion!

    24. Re:Too bad by youngone · · Score: 1

      You beat me to it.
      None of things he listed were invented by Americans (except, arguably the aeroplane, but then the Wright Brothers' patents prevented the US developing any new designs and the French became the masters of the air).
      According to the idiot troll below, the real inventors were murdered for doing so however.

    25. Re: Too bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Below? Above and below.
      You're getting spit roasted by me now young'n.

    26. Re: Too bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the most fucking stupid thing I have heard all year and I actually watched the numbnuts orange turds state of the union screed.

      Go up in a airplane or hot air ballon, or the beach along an ocean.

    27. Re: Too bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. You said that like it's implausible. Yes. That's exactly who.

    28. Re: Too bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah... Just fly to China. The trip takes you over the pole from the USA. If the world were flat, that would have to be the fastest passenger jet in the world. Case closed. No rocket necessary.

    29. Re: Too bad by The123king · · Score: 1

      Most of those weren't even invented by americans. I'll give you the plane and the CRT Television though.

      --
      If you gave me a choice between a printer and a giraffe with explosive diarrhoea, i'll get my ladder and my raincoat
    30. Re:Too bad by The123king · · Score: 1

      IIRC Philo T Farnsworth was an american, so they can have CRT TV too

      --
      If you gave me a choice between a printer and a giraffe with explosive diarrhoea, i'll get my ladder and my raincoat
    31. Re:Too bad by Maritz · · Score: 0

      No, no: he INVENTED an alarm clock. Anyone who disagrees is a racist.

      I'm pretty sure that kid deliberately made something that would provoke the attention it did, probably because of the overbearing dickhead father. Hoping to score a social-media hit with school 'racism'. Worked perfectly.

      You're still a complete dickhead, though. That's how nuanced thinking works. I can do it, but I don't think you can.

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    32. Re: Too bad by riverat1 · · Score: 2

      There is a legitimate argument that the world is flat: if you look out the window it's plainly obvious.

      I don't know about you but I've been high enough above sea level on the tops of mountains or in airplanes to see the curvature of the Earth. The Greeks had it figured out to within about 5% of the actual value nearly 3,000 years ago.

    33. Re: Too bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep. Even if you believe the Earth isn't flat, your love for Abraham still makes you a problem. A stupid problem.

    34. Re:Too bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am reminded of the numerous failures of the AGW crowd...no snow, North West Passage Ice Free, etc.

      At least this guy is entertaining as opposed to the huffy, snotty AGW people.

    35. Re:Too bad by conquistadorst · · Score: 1

      if they are really that stupid that they believe the earth is flat, it's no wonder they fail to launch a rocket...

      While I wish it were that simple, it never is. Believe it or not, lots of smart people believe dumb things. Doesn't make them dumb though. People are really, really good surviving with cognitive dissonance while still getting other constructive or innovative shit done.

    36. Re: Too bad by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      You're not the first person to say he's beyond stupid.

      There is a legitimate argument that the world is flat: if you look out the window it's plainly obvious.

      So the real issue is whether we choose to believe what the government agency tells.

      Most contributors on slashdot believe the government lies and cheats on issues to various degeees.

      So when people say it's common sense that the world is round, the takeaway for me is those people believe in something because everybody else does. This herd mentality is also "beyond stupid". Time to apply l'hopital.

      You think people believe the earth is round because the government says it is? Really?

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    37. Re: Too bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's actually very boring, and people continue giving him money for his bullshit. Sort of like you!

    38. Re:Too bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Title says he failed to launch. It did not say what he did successfully, twice. He got lots of people's attention, his ego stroked, and bilked some gullible people of their cash. If people are dumb enough to give money to this idiot, it is like a stupid tax, O.K. by me. It is not likely that he will get rich, but he will get some attention at least. Understand that for some people any attention is desirable, even if it is negative attention (I.E. a lawsuit or civil penalty for violating a safety ordinance).

    39. Re: Too bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'd be wrong. The aeroplane, CRT and television were invented in Europe. CRT television is just an adaptation of previous technology and that was invented in Russia.

      Americans always try to steal credit for shit.

    40. Re:Too bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Wright brothers didn't invent the aeroplane, Jean-Marie Le Bris did in France.

      Philo Farnsworth didn't invent the CRT television, Boris Rosing did in Russia.

    41. Re: Too bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhh, you can measure the curvature of the Earth yourself with mathematics, just like the ancient Egyptians did. You can see it when you travel on an aeroplane. You can see it every time there is a crescent moon. The movement of astronomical bodies is a complete give away that the Earth is round and orbits the sun. Only a completely uneducated moron would believe the Earth is flat.

      You're also proposing that not only all of the space agencies are colluding for some reason to lie to everyone, but also all of the corporations that have satellites in orbit are also in on the conspiracy.

    42. Re:Too bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh come on, rocket science isn't exactly rocke...uhh... yeah, I guess you got a point.

    43. Re:Too bad by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      i People are really, really good surviving with cognitive dissonance while still getting other constructive or innovative shit done.

      For reference, see religion.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    44. Re: Too bad by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      When you pit the observations made against flat vs. round earth, the round earth explains the observations better.

      By the way, the reason the world appears flat when you look out of your window is the size of the planet we're on. The various drawings you find all over the place where there's a ball and a stick figure drawn onto it that should make it "obvious" when you look at the ball that you should see a curve? Forget them. They are WAY out of scale.

      Do you know what size you would have if the Earth had the size of a baseball? You'd be as large as an e. coli bacterium. To draw the stick figure to scale on the circle, it would be smaller than a pixel, even if you had a 16k monitor.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    45. Re: Too bad by The123king · · Score: 1

      Last time i checked, Philo T Farnsworth and the Wright Brothers were americans....

      --
      If you gave me a choice between a printer and a giraffe with explosive diarrhoea, i'll get my ladder and my raincoat
    46. Re: Too bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And? I fail to see what they have to do with the invention of the aeroplane or the CRT or the CRT television.

    47. Re:Too bad by conquistadorst · · Score: 1

      For reference, see religion.

      You say it as if it has some kind of special monopoly. For reference, see anything. Politics, science, health, legal, history, sports, education, technology, economy, etc. Endless examples anywhere you look.

  2. Useful entertainment.... by beheaderaswp · · Score: 1

    While I'd not pay to see this...

    This seems like useful entertainment. Not only from the standpoint of seeing a very dumb person "press the button"- because there are many levels of both entertainment AND education here...

    The entertaining part is watching someone dumb, do something stupid, and the resulting consequences. Some people say that is cruel. Which I'd agree with to some extent. But comedy is based on tragedy created by the butt of the joke.

    Imagine if Basil Fawlty was a scientist....

    Education comes from watching the guy blow himself to bits. Those who think the world is flat will have to confront the idea that a guy who blew himself up out of stupidity is capable of assessing the curvature (and spheroid nature) of the planet.

    All in all... if he presses the button- we all win.

    --
    Another consultant who stuck it out.

    "We are the Priests, of the Temples of Syrinx..."
    1. Re:Useful entertainment.... by geekmux · · Score: 1

      Education comes from watching the guy blow himself to bits...All in all... if he presses the button- we all win.

      Does everyone win when a Darwin Award winner ends up taking someone else's life? Education comes from understanding that certain technologies should not be fucked with by a very dumb person. There's a valid reason NASA doesn't hire the Cletus T. Dipshits of the world.

    2. Re: Useful entertainment.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep. Because those highly paid and clever non-dipshit scientists will go and fill a space capsule cabin with pure oxygen because they think its a good idea.......

    3. Re:Useful entertainment.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a valid reason NASA doesn't hire the Cletus T. Dipshits of the world.

      When there are a small available amount of positions and a large number of candidates you can afford to be a bit picky. When the reverse is true not so much. Thus ends the macro economic lesson for today.

    4. Re:Useful entertainment.... by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Does everyone win when a Darwin Award winner ends up taking someone else's life?

      If he kills his neighbor, it's a tragedy. If he kills all the people who came to reward his attention whoring, then it's a comedy.

    5. Re: Useful entertainment.... by The123king · · Score: 2

      Or forget to convert from imperial to metric

      --
      If you gave me a choice between a printer and a giraffe with explosive diarrhoea, i'll get my ladder and my raincoat
  3. Maybe he started to doubt that... by DrTJ · · Score: 1

    ... his gravity model could match Newton's and his engineering NASA's.

    Tall order (double pun intended) to match them both, to a level where you're prepared to put your life on the line.

    1. Re:Maybe he started to doubt that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah but as we know well now, Newton's gravitational model is not all that precise, and NASA's engineering capabilities are second to everyone.

    2. Re: Maybe he started to doubt that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, no.

      Completely incorrect on both fronts. Not even a little bit true.

    3. Re:Maybe he started to doubt that... by mixed_signal · · Score: 1

      Good enough to go to the moon and back and live to tell about it. That's pretty darn good for Newtonian physics and an, as yet, unmatched engineering achievement, eh?

    4. Re:Maybe he started to doubt that... by EETech1 · · Score: 2

      Half of the same fools don't believe we landed on the moon either!

  4. GoFund Me Turtle One by jwhyche · · Score: 5, Funny

    I do not understand why these people want to just launch up and bounce off the dome surrounding the earth. It should be clear that is what is going to happen.

    Instead I want to announce my kickstarter project to fund exploratory project. I want to build a "sphere" probably made of metal that we will lower over the edge of the planet to investigate the large turtle that carries the earth, and it supporting elephants on its back. While we are down there we will attempt to discover the sex of the turtle and possibly communicate with it.

    This is an entirely original ideal and there is no precedence for in any written proposal fictional or otherwise.

    --
    I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    1. Re:GoFund Me Turtle One by Darinbob · · Score: 4, Funny

      You're going to try and communicate with the sex of the turtle?

    2. Re:GoFund Me Turtle One by c · · Score: 5, Funny

      That is the most stupid idea I've ever seen.

      What if you spook the turtle?!? YOU'LL KILL US ALL!!!1!

      --
      Log in or piss off.
    3. Re: GoFund Me Turtle One by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's dangerously close to saying he wants to have relations with the turtle. Fortunately, if he isn't interested in the gender of that turtle, it's turtles all the way down. This implies possibly infinite turtles, so he's very likely to find one that interests him.

    4. Re:GoFund Me Turtle One by jwhyche · · Score: 2

      Sure, why not?

      --
      I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    5. Re:GoFund Me Turtle One by jwhyche · · Score: 4, Funny

      What if you spook the turtle?!? YOU'LL KILL US ALL!!!1!

      That is a risk I'm willing to take.

      --
      I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    6. Re:GoFund Me Turtle One by c · · Score: 1

      What if you spook the turtle?!? YOU'LL KILL US ALL!!!1!

      That is a risk I'm willing to take.

      Ah. Well, seems fair, I guess. After all, you're doing all the work...

      --
      Log in or piss off.
    7. Re:GoFund Me Turtle One by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1

      Would you need a space suit? The turtle has to be breathing something.

    8. Re: GoFund Me Turtle One by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's assuming non zero variation in the turtles. If they're all the same, infinite turtles won't help.

    9. Re:GoFund Me Turtle One by Guyle · · Score: 1

      It would be good to know precisely where the Hub is so I know how to align my razor.

    10. Re: GoFund Me Turtle One by careysub · · Score: 1

      So... you are saying that maybe they are all the same turtle! Consider my mind blown!

      --
      Starships were meant to fly, Hands up and touch the sky - Nicky Minaj
    11. Re: GoFund Me Turtle One by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not so sure. Infinity and zeros are counterparts to one another.

      If we set them off on a celebrity death match, it's not clear who would win. You seem to think zero wins, but it's possible infinity wins.

    12. Re: GoFund Me Turtle One by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where were you when the LHC was about to destroy the universe?

    13. Re:GoFund Me Turtle One by beheaderaswp · · Score: 1

      Actually... it's the turtle doing to work.

      --
      Another consultant who stuck it out.

      "We are the Priests, of the Temples of Syrinx..."
    14. Re:GoFund Me Turtle One by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But what if they don't investigate, and the turtle is female, and meets a male turtle? The mating could kill us all!

    15. Re: GoFund Me Turtle One by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's actually just a single turtle, twisted into a Klein bottle.

    16. Re:GoFund Me Turtle One by c · · Score: 1

      Actually... it's the turtle doing to work.

      Well, actually, we don't know its sex; it might just lay there...

      --
      Log in or piss off.
    17. Re:GoFund Me Turtle One by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      At least he's not assuming its gender.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    18. Re: GoFund Me Turtle One by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Shh! Don't... too late, the PETA demonstration is forming.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  5. Hypothesis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I am starting to think that there is some kind of distortion in space-time that attracts things towards the ground.

    1. Re:Hypothesis by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      There is no such thing as gravity. The earth sucks.

    2. Re:Hypothesis by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Nobody really knows what gravity "is" in terms of the underlying mechanism, beyond conjecture. If you define it in terms of a "distortion of space/time", then you have to explain the mechanism of space/time first, not just its behavior.

    3. Re:Hypothesis by msauve · · Score: 1

      Gravity is pretty easy to figure out. It's the opposite of comedy.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    4. Re:Hypothesis by MerlTurkin · · Score: 1

      I have a button around here somewhere that says that!

    5. Re: Hypothesis by Zeromous · · Score: 1

      Levity.

      --
      ---Up Up Down Down Left Right Left Right B A START
  6. Surprise, Surprise, Surprise. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Americans totally fell for a completely obviously bullshit con-artist loony-toons crackpot nutjob. Frankly, I'm surprised he's not running for public orifice. He would fit right in with the majority that is actually in minority, but not welcoming to minorities by the majority of them.

    What next, the return of Kent Hovind? Roy Moore's Spoken Word Album goes Platinum? Michelle Bachmann hears the call of God?

    1. Re:Surprise, Surprise, Surprise. by gtall · · Score: 1

      You forgot Sarah Palin espying Russia from her back yard.

    2. Re:Surprise, Surprise, Surprise. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Palin's moved to Arizona, she's never been a hardcore Dominionist anyway. Seriously, she probably can't even spell Ten Commandments.

    3. Re:Surprise, Surprise, Surprise. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Americans totally fell for a completely obviously bullshit con-artist loony-toons crackpot nutjob. Frankly, I'm surprised he's not running for public orifice.

      Naw, he's not so stupid as 1) to actually launch himself or 2) to think that he could compete with the professional con-artists in politics.

    4. Re:Surprise, Surprise, Surprise. by MerlTurkin · · Score: 1

      If you take Sarah Palin's brain and put it inside a pistachio shell, you got yourself a rattle!

    5. Re:Surprise, Surprise, Surprise. by samwichse · · Score: 1

      He's already actually done it once and nearly died:
      http://www.vvdailypress.com/ar...

      View from the back of the rocket at the shitfest parachute design that almost killed him. 400' isn't much in rocketry, but it's plenty high to kill you.
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      Sam

    6. Re:Surprise, Surprise, Surprise. by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      What do you mean, the return? Kent has never been away (ok, aside of his state mandated vacation, all expenses paid by the taxpayer, i.e. not him). But his son stepped up and took over the family business of conning ignorant people out of money for while he was away, and now he's back and more obnoxious than ever.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  7. Clearly Obama did this by UnknowingFool · · Score: 2

    [conspiracy logic]Obama wasn't there. He never mentioned this event. Therefore it is a conspiracy that he stopped. With the aid of Illuminati of course.[/conspiracy logic]

    --
    Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    1. Re: Clearly Obama did this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obama on rockets: "you didn't build that."

  8. If only by backslashdot · · Score: 2

    If only there was a way, or some kind of technology already existing, that someone could pay a few hundred dollars to go up thousands of feet in the air.

    1. Re: If only by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean jet planes? That's a hoax. They just strap TVs to the outside of all the windows and make it look like you go up in the air. How do they get you from city to city in a short time? Maps are fake. It's actually only a couple hundred miles from NY to Los Angeles; you can drive it in less than four hours, if you don't follow the fake maps or use the fake GPS. Who funds all this fakeness? Taxpayers, that's who! We need to close the government and go back to digging mud for a living.

    2. Re:If only by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      If only there was a way, or some kind of technology already existing, that someone could pay a few hundred dollars to go up thousands of feet in the air.

      Yeah, it’s pretty funny that he claimed he was going to prove something by rocketing up to an elevation much lower than commercial jetliners routinely travel.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    3. Re: If only by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He plans to go no higher than the worlds tallest building (Burj Khalif). The only thing he's proving is that he can convince people to give him money to pursue his hobby.

  9. I blame TV. by mark_reh · · Score: 1

    For the last 30-40 years popular media in the US has been promoting stupidity and turning dumb people into stars, making them famous, and in some cases rich.

    I'm hoping that the pendulum has swung as far as it's going and will start to swing back the other way, but I'm probably foolish to think we've reached peak stoopid.

    1. Re:I blame TV. by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      Social media and crap like "Noize TV" have made it much much worse. I assume Noize TVs money is coming from venture capitalists. No one sane would spend money on such a venture.

    2. Re:I blame TV. by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      what are you talking about, look at the huge thing this self-made star did, and he learned from TV!

      https://www.cnn.com/2017/12/01...

    3. Re:I blame TV. by TimSSG · · Score: 1

      For the last 30-40 years popular media in the US has been promoting stupidity and turning dumb people into stars, making them famous, and in some cases rich.

      I'm hoping that the pendulum has swung as far as it's going and will start to swing back the other way, but I'm probably foolish to think we've reached peak stoopid.

      Stupid has no limits. Tim S.

    4. Re:I blame TV. by Scarletdown · · Score: 1

      They have to build up as many as possible, because we don't know which one will be the next sacrifice. Remember, "Sacrifice in March, corn has plenty of starch."

      --
      This space unintentionally left blank.
    5. Re:I blame TV. by jwhyche · · Score: 2

      An just think, we all thought this was just another comedy movie.

      http://www.imdb.com/title/tt03...

      Now it is clear that it is a documentary.

      --
      I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    6. Re:I blame TV. by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      It's a bit like 1984. Done as a warning, taken as a manual.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  10. What did I say last time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He'll never launch. Launching would put the lie to his beliefs. That can never happen.

    1. Re:What did I say last time? by Excelcia · · Score: 1

      You can't say what his beliefs are. The man is getting attention - that is, after all, what some people crave. Whether or not they are his real beliefs or the man is just a huge troll, no one can ever really know. Poe's law holds true.

      The correct response in either case is the same, however. Quietly call the man an idiot, and refuse to engage in the argument or discussion.

    2. Re:What did I say last time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You can't say what his beliefs are.

      Fine, his stated and publicly professed beliefs.

      The man is getting attention - that is, after all, what some people crave. Whether or not they are his real beliefs or the man is just a huge troll, no one can ever really know. Poe's law holds true.

      Well, you can't know you're not a brain in a jar, but so what? Either way, the flaws remain. There is no genuine behavior of integrity for him.

      The correct response in either case is the same, however. Quietly call the man an idiot, and refuse to engage in the argument or discussion.

      No, the correctness of indifference is questionable, given that the great part of the masses does not seem to follow the same principle. It would be preferable to indulgence, but may not be more correct than refutation.

  11. a pattern by sucko · · Score: 0

    starts to emerge.

  12. Re:Not likely by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 3, Insightful

    His launch is not likely to influence his beliefs. Not due to the strength of his convictions, but because he only planned to go up about 600 meters.

    Note that the bare-minimum for being able to detect the curvature of the earth with the naked eye, in ideal / cloudless conditions, is over 10,000 meters. The most-common views that one typically sees of the "curved earth" / thinks of when considering the curvature of the earth, are from the the international space station (or other orbits of roughly that area), which averages 400,000 meters from the earth's surface.

    600 meters much less than he'd get from riding in an airplane. If he didn't trust the windows on those things, and wanted a definite unobstructed view, he could just get into a normal hot air balloon - those tend to go up a little more than 600 meters, on average.

    --
    -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
  13. Propaganda. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this news? Does it matter? Does anyone ever wonder why /. brings this man's every action to our attention?

    1. Re:Propaganda. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its for the lulz numbnuts.

      Laugh once in a while, it is healthy.

    2. Re: Propaganda. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clickbait. Slashdot is a clickbait site. Just read the last days worth of posted articles. Politics and conspiracy theories get all the posts, science and technical stories get next to nothing. The days of Slashdot being News For Nerds, Stuff That Matters is before many of its current readers could read.

  14. This man is crazy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Crazy like a Trump.

    Remember Trump insisting he had ironclad proof that Obama's birth certificate was forged? That he had pros in Hawaii investigating it right now, etc. It didn't matter that all the news outlets covering his crazy pronouncements were skeptical, or even declared outright he was lying. He got TV ratings and that launched his Presidential campaign.

    1. Re: This man is crazy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just another crazy guy that i hope does not kill anyone but himself.
      He just want to be on the news and get some money.
      The truth is he really wants a dildo up in his a...
      The sad thing is the image that passes of the US people.... sad.....

  15. Only in America.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..do flat earth loonies still exist.

    1. Re:Only in America.. by hey! · · Score: 1

      Oh, that's not true. I'm sure they're everywhere. The question is whether *this* guy is an actual flat-Earther, or just a smart promoter.

      Steam rockets go back quite a ways in daredevil history, back to Evel Knievel's 1972 attempt to jump the Snake River Canyon in a rocket engineer designed by a team of rocket and aerospace engineers. His attempt failed because of a premature parachute deployment. The jump was successfully completed in 2016 using a replica which reached altitudes of 2000 feet and a speed of 400mph, setting a steam rocket distance record of 4756 feet.

      That was a daring and dangerous stunt stunt, and the Evel Knievel angle guaranteed a lot of public attention. But let's say you're going to break that record, in reality the altitudes and distances are paltry compared to what you can reach in an airplane. Or even driving over a mountain pass. So how do you attract money and eyeballs? A good cock and bull story, one that lazy and ignorant media will be sure to swallow.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    2. Re:Only in America.. by Camel+Pilot · · Score: 1

      Oh, that's not true. I'm sure they're everywhere.

      Flat Earth nutbars are exclusively northern hemisphere residents. The southern celestial pole (with different star trail patterns) and long summer days disprove the flat theory which is a northern sphere centric "theory".

    3. Re:Only in America.. by hey! · · Score: 1

      The Flat Earth Society publishes a membership register. You can check for yourself: there are members from Australia, New Zealand and South Africa.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    4. Re:Only in America.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, that's not true. I'm sure they're everywhere.

      Flat Earth nutbars are exclusively northern hemisphere residents.

      You've never been to Africa I take it. If you ever visit you'd notice that nutbars beliefs are *much* more numerous, various and nutty in Africa. The only reason that Flat Earthers from Africa don't make it into the news is because it's not newsworthy over here to believe in a flat earth - that's the standard belief system that the educational systems are fighting hard against.

      I'm living in Africa, and belief in a flat earth is one of the saner beliefs that are widely held. The locals here have a lot of nutty beliefs - they believe in muti that, when rubbed over the body, makes one bulletproof, they believe that raping a virgin will cure AIDS, they believe that body pars cut off a live albino human will cure other ailments, they believe in the death penalty for homosexuality, that raping a Lesbian will "cure" her.

      These are all widespread African beliefs, by the way, not fringe beliefs.

      Trust me, the northern hemispheres nutbars are both fewer in number and saner in nuttiness than anything you'd find in Africa. Those nutbars with beliefs in fringe "science" are in a significant minority. In Africa those nutbars are the clear majority.

  16. What by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wait, this was just a scam to get people to signup for a paid service. I don't believe it. I just don't believe it.

  17. Just reputation building by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I could see a possible cabinet post in his future, he's got the right mindset.

  18. An attention whore by sacrilicious · · Score: 1

    This guy is nothing but an attention whore.

    --
    - First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then ???, then profit.
    1. Re:An attention whore by bruce_the_moose · · Score: 1

      Can't we all just acknowledge his 15 minutes of fame are up? Should the modern day Wan Hu succeed in blowing himself up, then, and only then, should we hear about him again.

      --
      To reduce crime, make fewer things against the law.
  19. Chicken by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So he chickened out. Again. Wouldn't you? He's not really a flat earther - that was just a publicity stunt for money. He knows enough to know he's set himself up for disaster. So quite reasonably he chickens out and milks it for all the publicity he can get.

  20. Re:Not likely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or just drive across the country and record times of sunrise/sunset. I don't think there's any shortage of ways to prove it.

    I actually find the gymnastics the flat-earthers do to try to explain these things rather interesting. But ultimately it all seems a bit half-hearted.

    Anyone who gets angry when they read flat-earth theories might want to consider breathing more often (or therapy).

  21. Re:Not likely by careysub · · Score: 1

    600 meters much less than he'd get from riding in an airplane. If he didn't trust the windows on those things, and wanted a definite unobstructed view, he could just get into a normal hot air balloon - those tend to go up a little more than 600 meters, on average.

    Or just climb one of the local mountains which go up to a about 2000 meters. From the top of one you can look down on him as he reaches the apex of his little trip (and I do mean little).

    He would do far better with a lawn chair, weather balloons and some tanks of helium.

    --
    Starships were meant to fly, Hands up and touch the sky - Nicky Minaj
  22. Re:Its turtles all the way down by wolfheart111 · · Score: 1

    No elephants. just turtles

    --
    [($)]
  23. Re:Not likely by careysub · · Score: 1

    Or just drive across the country and record times of sunrise/sunset. I don't think there's any shortage of ways to prove it.

    No there isn't.

    Slashdot has had a flat earther posting here pretty often recently (as an AC of course) and he scoffs at such esoteric tools as geometry and arithmetic. He could not provide a coherent explanation of why Eratosthenes was wrong, he just dismissed the proof as "obviously wrong", but couldn't explain this "obviousness".

    --
    Starships were meant to fly, Hands up and touch the sky - Nicky Minaj
  24. Can we please just stop by LeftCoastThinker · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Can we please stop posting stories about this guy, he is either mentally unstable (in which case he needs help, not an audience, and Slashdot is contributing to the problem) or he is a con man (who should also not be encouraged or given a platform as well...)

    Anyone who is a "flat earther" can easily test their hypothesis by spending around $10k. Fly from SFO to Hawii, take longitude and latitude measurements at each destination and track the flight time, use a compass to confirm you are always traveling West. Hell use GPS to track your flight path. Then fly to Tokyo, London and back to the US. Proof positive that the earth is round, and around $10k in plane tickets.

    This is generally why there are very few flat earthers, because plane and business travel is common enough that most people know someone who has actually flown around the planet...

    --
    If you disagree, please post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like
    1. Re:Can we please just stop by bruce_the_moose · · Score: 2

      Cheaper: sit on a beach with a pair of binoculars and look for ships to come over the horizon. Binoculars: $50, sunscreen: $5.

      --
      To reduce crime, make fewer things against the law.
    2. Re:Can we please just stop by ProzacPatient · · Score: 4, Funny

      For everything else; there is MasterCard

    3. Re:Can we please just stop by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 1

      Cheaper: sit on a beach with a pair of binoculars and look for ships to come over the horizon. Binoculars: $50, sunscreen: $5.

      Could be refraction, if the air has an inversion layer of warm air near the surface.

      --
      http://www.geoffreylandis.com
    4. Re:Can we please just stop by uvajed_ekil · · Score: 1

      Can we please stop posting stories about this guy, he is either mentally unstable (in which case he needs help, not an audience, and Slashdot is contributing to the problem) or he is a con man (who should also not be encouraged or given a platform as well...)

      The coverage this idiot gets is worse than America's fascination with sports sideshow clown Lavar Ball, and that's saying something. Maybe Big Baller Brand will finance a shitty rocket and the two can go out together at the towering height of 1000 feet, or whatever lame altitude the moron was aiming for. Or could someone at least tell him that a cheap commercial plane ticket will get him way higher than his little toy and its 19th Century technology?

      --
      This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
    5. Re:Can we please just stop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you disagree, please post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like

      Modded -1 with my other account, due to your whiny sig. Why do you get to express your opinion freely, but when others do in a way YOU deem improper, it constitutes censorship? Stop being an indignant fascist and you'll stop getting modded down.

    6. Re:Can we please just stop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't think like a flat earther:

      "GPS is designed to simulate a sphere positioning."
      "Compass will be spoofed in the plane, because of course all planes are fitted with compass-spoofing devices, airlines and aircraft makers are part of the conspiracy."

    7. Re:Can we please just stop by worf_mo · · Score: 2

      Yeah, nice try! Everyone knows that there are large escalators placed around the ends of the earth for just that purpose: to make you beach-sitters think that the ships come over - or disappear behind - the "horizon".

    8. Re:Can we please just stop by 91degrees · · Score: 2

      I see him as more of a publicity hound than a con man. He doesn't believe the earth is flat, but he's playing a character that does. He's a lot of fun if you're in on the joke.

    9. Re:Can we please just stop by serviscope_minor · · Score: 2

      For $150, you can launch a weather balloon with a camera high enougough to see the curvature of the earth if you REALLY know what you're doing.

      For the inexperienced ameture, you're probably looking at $250 to $300.

      This is generally why there are very few flat earthers, because plane and business travel is common enough that most people know someone who has actually flown around the planet...

      I doubt that: it's been generally rare since well before the era of common plane travel.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    10. Re:Can we please just stop by houghi · · Score: 1
      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    11. Re:Can we please just stop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The man is only going to rocket to half a mile into the sky... That is only 2500 feet or so. It would be cheaper to get on an airplane and fly at 3 miles up into the atmosphere flying across the country or roughly 15,000 feet. He would see much more flying in an airplane than you would in his home built rocket.

      Nathan

      Captcha: memorial

  25. Con-artist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone that hasn't figured out yet that this f...ing moron is a con-artist needs to be prevented from reproducing.

    1. Re:Con-artist by coolsnowmen · · Score: 1

      But he's only conning other Flat-Earthers...It's hard for me to get upset about it.

  26. Really Dumb Believers by JimSadler · · Score: 1

    Today anyone can watch th earth rotate and clearly see that it is not flat. So exactly how can someone believe that it is flat? Ignorance and psychosis can at times be identical.

    1. Re:Really Dumb Believers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Today anyone can watch th earth rotate and clearly see that it is not flat. So exactly how can someone believe that it is flat? Ignorance and psychosis can at times be identical.

      Wait... I can watch it from where exactly? In person? Or you mean on TV? Or the Internet?

  27. he's trying to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    make science great again, but all you fools can't see that because you're too busy believing the lies that mainstream science has put in your heads. typical round earthtards.

  28. Asshole by AlexMorales · · Score: 1

    For less than 20k he can get a ride on a su 27 and get higher than needed to prove himself wrong.

  29. he's a full on idiot by spineboy · · Score: 1

    Rocket dude is estimating his height to be obtained is something like 1600 feet.

    Just where does he think jet planes fly?

    --
    ..........FULL STOP.
  30. Too obvious by uvajed_ekil · · Score: 2

    Clearly the government paid/coerced him not to launch so he can't see and reveal the true nature of our flat Earth.

    --
    This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
  31. Seeing as he's clearly not going to do this by Maritz · · Score: 1

    How about ignoring the attention whore?

    --
    I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
  32. Attention seeking by sjbe · · Score: 2

    Too bad. I love that guy. America needs more full-on nuts who do crazy things with rockets and other such toys-- and I mean that sincerely.

    You mean we need attention seeking whores with idiotic ideas who don't actually do anything? You're a big fan of the Kardashians aren't you?

    I have no idea why anyone is giving this lunatic the time of day.

  33. Maybe.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If he took in to account for the curvature of the Earth he might lift off better?

  34. Could not get above the Atmoplane by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A Flat-Earther has to launch a rocket above the Atmoplane.
    But the Atmoplane does not exists. Earth is a sphere and has an Atmosphere.

    Actually, a little over a week ago I was listening to
    a lecture on Earth systems: Atmosphere, Lithosphere, Biosphere,
    Hydrosphere, etc. and it struck me that a Flat-Earther,
    to be consistent, would have to believe in the flat-equivalences:
    Atmoplane, Lithoplane, Bioplane, Hydroplane, etc.

    Me.

  35. Enough of this fucking idiot already by Bearhouse · · Score: 1

    This ain't "news for nerds" and it sure as shit ain't "stuff that matters".
    Please stop.

  36. Truth will be revealed, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but let me guess .. that their starting-point will happen to be located just right in the middle in the flat earth and so.. from rocket they just will see this flat eart stright from the top.. ok, let's say that is "PROVED"

    Next

    if right after surset there will be eclipse on moon.. oh, on Super Moon, there has to be line on the moon (maybe even shadow of turtle), not circle. Oh well, let's say that is also "PROVED".

    Go on.. next question

  37. Re:Not likely by Verdatum · · Score: 1

    To clarify, he wasn't planning to prove or disprove anything with this particular launch regarding Flat Earth, he was just raising awareness.

  38. Um, 'scuse me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm no rocket scientist, but wouldn't it be much simpler, safer, and cheaper to just hop in an airplane and fly to an elevation of 2,500 feet (i.e. half a mile)?

    How does arriving at that elevation via a ballistic trajectory rather than via winged flight change the calculus.

  39. Well shoot by DiEx-15 · · Score: 1

    I was hoping for a fireworks show :(

  40. Re:Not likely by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    It is obviously wrong because it contradicts his desired outcome.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.