Slashdot Mirror


HomePod Repairs Cost Almost as Much as a New HomePod (theverge.com)

This may not come as a huge surprise, but it's going to be pricey if you break Apple's fully sealed and densely packed new speaker. From a report: Repair pricing for the HomePod was posted to Apple's website this week, and the number is high enough that it's clear you should invest in a warranty if you're worried about breaking one: an out-of-warranty repair from Apple will cost $279 in the US, which is 80 percent of the price of a brand-new HomePod. So you're not so much repairing it as getting a small discount on a new one.

69 of 130 comments (clear)

  1. Please explain to me ... by Alain+Williams · · Score: 4, Interesting

    why there is a fixed price to the repair. Surely the cost of repair depends on what is wrong, so I can only suppose that the charge for repair has a lot of profit baked in.Yes: I understand that repair will include a charge for labour, but it was put together in the first place. All the more reason for 'right to repair' legislation that forces a vendor to provide spare parts.

    1. Re:Please explain to me ... by OrangeTide · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Repair is a fixed price because the factors in "repair" are always the same.
      1. support call and approval of "repair"
      2. shipment of a refurbish unit from inventory
      3. recovery - added to refurbished inventory

      It's unlikely that you get your same unit back from any sort of business like this. In some cases the unit may be opened up and the main board(s) are swapped out. In other cases the unit is put into a recovery pile and customer receives an equivalent refurbished unit. This is usually the case for warrant service, but it can happen in cases where customer is paying for repair.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    2. Re:Please explain to me ... by Zocalo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Most likely reason, given the fixed price? Because they know it's not viable to repair the thing and they're planning to simply replace any faulty units at cost - including any admin/diagnostic/handling fees, etc. - so the price of doing so is pretty much a constant. I'm fully expecting this to set a new low on repairability when iFixit does their inevitable teardown. Ease of repair, or even a reasonable capability to recycle, electronics has taken a back style to looks for a long while now and this is just the next step along that path. Besides, there's still plenty of places to use for landfills for all the faulty electronics that it's not economical to repair, right? Just as long as it's not in *my* backyard, of course.

      "Right to Repair" can't come soon enough in my view, but I just don't see much support from Trump's government or the Democrats in the states where Apple, etc. are based, and the lobbying opposing it from the consumer electronics companies is likely to be fierce too. The EU might get something passed, however, at which point it's going to be interesting to see whether Apple et al apply that globally to retain economies of scale, or take the path of EU-specific models that can be repaired.

      --
      UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
    3. Re: Please explain to me ... by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 3, Funny

      They don't ship them individually, they just fill a couple shipping containers and send them to some shithole 3rd world factory where the workers get paid a nickle a day. In the end, they make a huge profit.

      Do they really? Let's look at the raw numbers. According to the United States Mint, a nickle weights exactly five grams.

      According to a search on Google, Foxconn assembly-line workers will make as much as $400 a month, based on location and passing a probationary period. That's for 160 working hours a month, so the hourly pay is about $2.50.

      According to the same search, Foxconn has 1,000,000 workers.

      To make $400 you need 8000 nickels. Multiplied by 12 months, that's 96000 nickels per worker per year, multiply by 1,000,000 workers and you get 96000000000 nickels. Multiplied by 5 grams equals 480000000000 grams, or 480000000 kilograms, or 480000 metric tonnes.

      I don't know which shipping company you're using, but I know that sending 480 thousand metric tonnes to China every year can't be cheap.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    4. Re:Please explain to me ... by gweihir · · Score: 1

      The "repair" is a lie. There is no repair. What you get is a discount on a new one.

      Just remember that you are the product here and these things spy on you by design.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    5. Re:Please explain to me ... by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      why there is a fixed price to the repair. Surely the cost of repair depends on what is wrong, so I can only suppose that the charge for repair has a lot of profit baked in.Yes: I understand that repair will include a charge for labour, but it was put together in the first place. All the more reason for 'right to repair' legislation that forces a vendor to provide spare parts.

      Because obviously, Apple isn't really equipped to handle repairs on this type of device; so they worked out a deal with a vendor, possibly the manufacturer, to do flat-rate repairs. They tack on 10% and call it a day...

    6. Re: Please explain to me ... by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      The one you get as a replacement is NOT new, it's a refurb.

      They don't ship them individually, they just fill a couple shipping containers and send them to some shithole 3rd world factory where the workers get paid a nickle a day.
      In the end, they make a huge profit.

      And that distinguishes them from EVERY tech OEM, how, exactly?

    7. Re:Please explain to me ... by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      Repair is a fixed price because the factors in "repair" are always the same.
      1. support call and approval of "repair"
      2. shipment of a refurbish unit from inventory
      3. recovery - added to refurbished inventory

      It's unlikely that you get your same unit back from any sort of business like this. In some cases the unit may be opened up and the main board(s) are swapped out. In other cases the unit is put into a recovery pile and customer receives an equivalent refurbished unit. This is usually the case for warrant service, but it can happen in cases where customer is paying for repair.

      Exactly.

  2. Re:You probably get a new one anyway by Alain+Williams · · Score: 1

    Apple will do just as well to throw them in the shredder

    That is not very eco-friendly is it ?

  3. Re:You probably get a new one anyway by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 2

    Why bother even repairing them? Apple will do just as well to throw them in the shredder and ship you another one.

    Exactly. And I wouldn't be surprised if that's exactly what they do.

    I cut out the middleman by going to the Apple store and throwing one directly into the trash bin.

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
  4. Re:You probably get a new one anyway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Bullshit. They fix it at a cost of $30-$50 and send you a bill for $279. This is the business plan that has made them the richest company on planet Earth.

  5. Why buy anything like this in the first place? by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Makes no sense. Just spies on you anyway. Why would you want that? Don't even say 'convenience'. Too many of you give up too much for 'convenience'.

    1. Re:Why buy anything like this in the first place? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Just spies on you anyway.

      For whom? Some company that provides a service in exchange for your data with the "massive" downside of them building an advertising profile? Woes me!

      Why would you want that? Don't even say 'convenience'.

      Convenience. You don't get to ask a question while prempting the obvious answer.

      Too many of you give up too much for 'convenience'.

      Too much is in the eye of the beholder and changes a lot between person and person. Do you live an adulterous homosexual life of freaky fetishes in a country you may be beheaded for doing so? You may be giving up too much. Or maybe you just ask Google / Siri what the weather is outside, and to read you a recipe or play you a tune. Doesn't sound like you're giving up much at all.

      Don't presume to know what a person's data is worth to them. Most people aren't giving up anything that these companies don't know about them already.

    2. Re:Why buy anything like this in the first place? by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      I think you and anyone who willingly has always-on devices in their house that hears and/or sees everything that goes on 24/7, and that has been demonstrated as being capable of spying on you, both by the company that makes it, and capable of being hacked by 3rd parties (criminal or government) to collect data on you, are FOOLS. How do you feel about that? Rhetorical question, I don't give a damn what you think, nothing you can say will change my judgement of the matter. You are fools if you have these or any other devices in your home that can be leveraged to surveil you.

    3. Re:Why buy anything like this in the first place? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      How do you feel about that?

      Complete indifference. What you think doesn't phase me in the slightest.

      I don't give a damn what you think

      I know it shows. You have an incredibly short sighted perspective and demonstrate an inability to think about how situations apply to a wider group of people. Fortunately we are all not *you*.

    4. Re:Why buy anything like this in the first place? by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

      Makes no sense. Just spies on you anyway. Why would you want that? Don't even say 'convenience'. Too many of you give up too much for 'convenience'.

      Prove that the HOMEPOD spies on you.

      I'll wait.

    5. Re:Why buy anything like this in the first place? by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      LOL I find it utterly ironic how you're calling ME "short sighted" and "unable to think how something applies to wider groups", when that is precisely what I am doing!

      Enjoy being under a microscope, exhibitionist.

    6. Re:Why buy anything like this in the first place? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      when that is precisely what I am doing!

      By generalising you are doing precisely the opposite of thinking.

  6. iThings by GeekWithAKnife · · Score: 2


    I know I'm supposed to give some sort of insightful comment but today I will be giving a loosely poetic, haiku-inspired rant instead.

    To discourage the frivolous repair requests and pay for all the "hassle free" returns repair costs must be high.

    You do not really care that the costs are high because a Home Pod belongs in the home. The proof is in the name.

    You will own one, you will pay for it when you buy it, when you repair it and when Apple monetizies whatever clever data collection they have on you, anonymously or not.

    It's quite a recent iThing and you already own many iThings and you know old iThings get "battery optimised" to slow down so you might as well buy.

    Also, poor people cannot afford to pay a repair bill that is near the amount of the original item, assuming they can even pay for the original. You, you are not like a poor person, you can waste money so you won't even care.

    In fact I just recently bought a HomePod, to put in my home where the Pod belongs and I ruined it just so I can prove I can afford the stupid repair costs and then asked Siri what to do and bought another! AND it connects to all my iThings. Flawless.

    Thank you Apple for making iThings. They complete me.

    (I admit to breaking with traditional haiku structure. I opted for 19-24-24-32-28-44-53-9 instead)

    --
    A 'singular oddity' is an event that cannot be explained and only happens when you are alone.
    1. Re:iThings by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Believe it or not, a lot of us haven't even bought a smart watch yet and we still use 3.5mm ports, because we recognize the new way of doing things isn't always the best way. I can see myself setting up an open-source assistant with open parts some day perhaps, if I can ever have a full English conversation with it. Otherwise these things are just annoying amusements for people who think they're too important and busy not to have an assistant. Google Voice in the car is a lot better than typing stuff on a touchscreen (only when vehicle is not in motion), but only because of the hands-free requirement. It's going to be a long time before they are very practical. Even longer if companies continue to fragment themselves into their own ecosystems.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  7. Every story about Apple I read... by Hallux-F-Sinister · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ... is an advertisement for why not to buy anything from Apple. I am so sick and goddamned tired of their bullshit. I hope as many people as possible will help Apple be a better company by PUNISHING rather than rewarding misbehavior of this kind, by refusing to buy their products. When people ask why you would not consider buying whatever the latest, ludicrously overpriced gadget Apple is trying to force-feed you, just say, “because Apple has become a monster and I refuse to aid or abet them in their crimes against the people.” That is why I won’t buy anything from Apple anymore.

    --
    Our reign has gone on long enough. Indeed. Summon the meteors.
    1. Re:Every story about Apple I read... by MikeMo · · Score: 1

      Did you norice that the Google Home costs more? Apple’s pricing is not “misbehavior” or a crime against humanity. What you don’t seem to understand is that the value of anything is exactly how much someone is willing to pay for it.

    2. Re:Every story about Apple I read... by Bobrick · · Score: 2

      The only way I can explain why people buy their crap is stockholm syndrome. It's the only way. I edit video for a living. When a friend and colleague showed me his brand-new MacBook Pro with the new "touchscreen bar" at the top, all excited about the "potential it unleashed" depending on context (Premiere, AE, whatever), the only thing that sprung to mind listening to him was "stockholm syndrome". It's the only way to make sense of it. I won't even get into the non-upgradeability, repairability, cost or decreasing number of ports, etc. It's just over-priced crap that assumes you're stupid enough to fall for it. And people do en masse. It's like paying 200$ + for a pair of fucking shoes because it has the Nike logo on it. You -have- to be an idiot to fall for it.

    3. Re:Every story about Apple I read... by MikeMo · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I was thinking about the Google Home Max, the product Google created to compete with Apple’s. It’s $399.

      Did you notice how I didn’t insult you and call you names?

    4. Re:Every story about Apple I read... by mr100percent · · Score: 1

      Apple is not competing with an Echo, they are competing with Sonos. Apple is selling a home speaker system that has Siri, not a home assistant that has crappy speakers.

    5. Re:Every story about Apple I read... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      the product Google created to compete with Apple’s

      Interesting. Which one has been on the market for half a year already?

    6. Re:Every story about Apple I read... by MikeMo · · Score: 1

      HomePod was announced in June of 2017. Google Home Max was announced in October 2017, and shipped in limited quantities in December. It became generally available in January, 2018.

    7. Re:Every story about Apple I read... by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      In other words, you have prejudices, and are willing to make any stupid assumption to maintain them. You didn't really listen to your friend talking about the possibilities of the touchscreen bar, you just jumped to conclusions.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    8. Re:Every story about Apple I read... by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      I hope as many people as possible will help Apple be a better company by PUNISHING rather than rewarding misbehavior of this kind, by refusing to buy their products

      We have a distributed method to determine the desirability of various products, in which no one asshole dictates what everyone should buy. It turns out that Apple does very well according to that method, sometimes called the "free market". If people didn't like what Apple products did for them, they wouldn't buy them.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    9. Re:Every story about Apple I read... by Hallux-F-Sinister · · Score: 1

      I hope as many people as possible will help Apple be a better company by PUNISHING rather than rewarding misbehavior of this kind, by refusing to buy their products

      We have a distributed method to determine the desirability of various products, in which no one asshole dictates what everyone should buy. It turns out that Apple does very well according to that method, sometimes called the "free market". If people didn't like what Apple products did for them, they wouldn't buy them.

      D’awww... it’s so cute when someone pops up and expresses a seemingly sincere, and not at all sarcastic assertion that they believe in the existence of something like Santa Claus, the Tooth Fairy, or free markets. Yer adorbs!

      The barriers to entry into this free-market (which Apple was only able to enter itself because it was ALREADY a tech manufacturer, it ALREADY HAD the ability to manufacture portable electronic devices, it ALREADY HAD legions of cultist fans, people who no longer properly evaluate a product before buying it beyond the Apple logo*, it already had a war-chest of R&D money to throw at the problem, already had marketing people, already had a lot of things that made going from “Apple Computers, Ltd.,” (or whatever their original name was, circa... 1982?) to “Apple, Inc.”) are far too high for most would-be competitors to enter. It was far easier than it would be for any other manufacturer who did NOT have those advantages, for Apple to bring a product to this “free” market, without regard to the relative quality or value being offered by whatever Apple decides to try to sell. While it’s true that Apple can’t exactly just MAKE anything and expect people to buy it, at any price, it does seem awfully much like that sometimes... (can you imagine ten years ago, even adjusting for inflation, if someone told you that people would be lining up around the block to drop a THOUSAND F’ING DOLLARS... on a SMARTPHONE?!?)

      Now I hear what you’re saying, if what you’re saying can be boiled down to “if you don’t like it, fine, don’t buy it,” which begs the question, don’t you think I know that I am free not to buy their stuff? The question is, is it alright with you if I express my opinion? Did I write, “I COMMAND YOU not to buy Apple products”? I don’t think I did, but I’ll go back and check. Hmm... no, I only opined that I HOPED people wouldn’t. You might think that’s splitting hairs, but then I guess we’ll just have to agree to disagree. I know being a semi-anonymous writer on Slashdot gives me a GIANT amount of influence and power over a HUGE swath of Apple, Inc.’s customer base, and it is... heady, given the ability it gives me to impact adversely the fortunes of a giant, soulless, multinational corporation. (Hehehe). I should use this power judiciously.

      BUT, on the other hand, sir, your assertion, (see what I did there? LOL) that no one asshole dictates what everyone should buy is misleading if not outright false and patently absurd. Remember the famous (or infamous?) assertion, attributed to Henry Ford, that you can get one of his company’s cars, the Model T, in any color, so long as it’s black? Apple has used intellectual property law like a cudgel, giving them a monopoly first on producing and selling computers that run their Operating System, (Mac OS, OS X, or macOS, or whatever,) then on producing devices that run iOS, (when iOS is actually built on top of a freely available, open-source operating system, just like OS X and macOS are, though it’s even more hidden away from the user,) which means that actually, if you (as I did,) made the mistake of buying ANY Apple device, then bought any others that work WITH them, or made an investment** in buying software, you’re increasingly stuck, and at the mercy of t

      --
      Our reign has gone on long enough. Indeed. Summon the meteors.
    10. Re:Every story about Apple I read... by Bobrick · · Score: 1

      No, the touchscreen bar revealed itself as a complete waste of time. A good editor's left hand over keyboard shortcuts will save huge amounts of time over whatever functions you might add to the gimmick that the touchscreen bar is. But hey, it looks cool!

    11. Re:Every story about Apple I read... by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      You seem to think that companies should produce what you want, rather than what's best for them. We have a lot of competition in computer manufacture and phone manufacture. There are barriers to entry, sure, but there's still plenty of manufacturers from a variety of countries. (This does not apply to desktop and laptop operating systems. There isn't a free market there, which leads to many of your complaints in your final paragraph. If there were a free market, someone would be selling and maintaining some version of Windows 7.)

      If you want to buy a computer, you can buy one from Apple, if you think what you get is worth the price. Two of the things Mac does special are OSX and iOS. Sufficiently many people want those to keep Apple raking in the gigabucks.

      In your price comment, you seem to be saying that an Apple computer with X basic stats is much more expensive than a computer from another manufacturer with the same basic stats, and that's true. If that's what you care about, then obviously you shouldn't buy Apple. Apple has been known for making things nicer to use. Suppose you can get a $600 laptop with certain specs, and a nicer Apple for $1200. That's $600 difference. If you're going to use the laptop pretty much daily for a few years, that's under $1/day for what many people think is a more pleasant experience. That's the rough equivalent of buying a fancy coffee at Starbuck's weekly. To use a car analogy, I spent something like $30K on my current car. I could have gotten reliable transportation for at least $5K less. Figuring a ten-year lifespan, that's $500/year I'm spending for a more pleasant experience, and I doubt I use my car more than two hours a day on the average.

      I don't know why you think corporate oligarchs wiped out Blackberry and similar systems. People could buy iPhones at first, provided they would put up with AT&T as the carrier in the US (all US carriers are frustrating). People could buy Blackberries. People bought more iPhones, and when Android phones came out to fill in the lower end, more Androids. Businesses didn't dictate the downfall of RIM. In fact, the Blackberries were more business-friendly than iPhones and Android phones, and RIM tried to market on that basis. iOS and Android showed up and, commercially speaking, kicked the crap out of the older players. (It's arguable that Nokia's systems were sacrificed in an attempt to make Windows Phone possible, but WP went nowhere anyway. Some of it was Microsoft mistakes, like shafting their early WP7 adopters on upgrades they'd promised, but it was mostly that people didn't want it. In any case, Microsoft also marketed WP as good for business, and the corporate oligarchs just watched it fail.)

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    12. Re:Every story about Apple I read... by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      There are lots of stupid-looking things that most people don't like that some people really like. If someone claims to like the touchscreen bar, I'd assume that it happens to work for that person rather than that that person had gone totally irrational.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  8. Probably because they just swap the guts out by rsilvergun · · Score: 2

    for any device that comes in bad. Modern electronics aren't very repairable. The whole thing is probably a giant block of solder with an occasional computer chip and a pair of speakers.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  9. I am not surprised, motherfuckers. by blind+biker · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Apple's overarching policy is to discourage recycling at all costs. They even mandate recycling companies to destroy perfectly fine iPhones Macbooks.

    I have to laugh at Apple fanbois (and sockpuppets) that claim Apple's ostensible green credentials. Truth is, there is no worse company in IT at the moment, than Apple. At least Microsoft doesn't explicitly order recycling companies to destroy their hardware - thought repairability of Surface and Surface laptops is abysmal and effectively nil. But at least they don't lay down the pretense as thickly as Apple does.

    --
    "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    1. Re:I am not surprised, motherfuckers. by TRRosen · · Score: 1

      There is a reason you send things to a recycling company "TO RECYCLE THEM". Like every other company they do not want to be fined for their goods ending up in a trash heap in China and they don't want their products reputation damaged by unreliable used components.

    2. Re:I am not surprised, motherfuckers. by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      Apple's overarching policy is to discourage recycling at all costs. They even mandate recycling companies to destroy perfectly fine iPhones Macbooks.

      Yes, because you know what's worse than shredding a working computer or phone?

      Having said phone end up on eBay with data intact. And with working units sold for scrap, some unscrupulous employee, or the company management might do just that - if Apple sends them a working unit to recycle, it may end up on eBay.

      And really, in this day and age of people stealing laptops for their data, thousands and millions of people's personal information being stolen (Equifax, anyone?), that you'll want to let a potential data leak happen.

      So Apple will mandate that the machines they send out for recycling actually end up with the data destroyed as well. The danger of data leaking out is far greater than chip level recycling that Apple mandating it be destroyed by shredding is a good thing. Far too many companies woiuld rather just hand it off to a third party company and next thing you know, another Equifax happened because that machine was from a hospital and contained tons of patient records.

      Sure, you can mandate that hard drives and SSDs are wiped before reselling used, but I'm sure you'll find plenty of "wiped and erased HDD/SSD" on eBay now with user data on them. Or available with a quick un-format utility. Or just a quick scan. (SSDs can be quickly erased with the ATA_SECURE_ERASE command, but how many people do that versus "format c:"?).

      Because crap happens - people get lazy, people think they can format their drives and sell it on eBay as erased. Apple doesn't want to risk that, so it mandates companies literally destroy the media. Unfortunately, there's no way around it, either - if you allow the media to be saved, you allow for the chance of data being leaked because of sheer human laziness.

  10. Re: Credit Cards for warranty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Directive not law. Implementations in member states can differ. For example Dutch consumers have a warranty depending on expected live spans, if a washing machine breaks after 5 years but is expected to last 10, the seller (not manufacturer) has to prove misuse or repair the thing. There is a minimum of 1 year under law.

  11. Re:You probably get a new one anyway by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's as eco-friendly as their laptops with non-upgradable RAM.

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  12. That's my fetish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Maybe I like being spied on.

  13. quite universal by e**(i+pi)-1 · · Score: 2

    The economics of buying new rather than reparing applies already to many products. There are two strategies: buy good quality and repair if damaged or buy cheap and replace often. Unfortunately the second choice appears to be the better one even for producs which do not innovate that fast. For example: I bike everyday, summer and winter, the bikes start to deteriorate after about two years (which is for me about 6000 miles), pretty much universally so that I have to replace a lot, like breaks, gears, pedals, cables etc. (smaller things can be fixed nicely in bikes still fortunately). Bringing such a bike to a shop can cost close to get a new cheap one. Expensive bikes last longer as the quality of the ingredients is better the chance of having it snatched away. Also with electronics which are carried around, I started to buy frequently new cheaper products more frequently than expensive in larger intervals. Also there, the danger of losing it, or having damaged keyboard, charging plug or battery issues etc makes the first option the better one for me. It is a bit unfortunate that many products also are less and less self repairable.

  14. Re:What are you doing? by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

    It's actually designed to be moved every so often. There's an accelerometer that when tripped, instructs the homepod to recalibrate the sound. Seems an odd design choice if the engineers expected the users to never move their speaker.

  15. sorry by supernova87a · · Score: 1

    You (collectively) wanted stylish, small, and cheap. The laws of manufacturing and hardware design don't allow you to just throw "easily repairable" into the equation without paying for it somewhere else.

  16. Who cares by mr100percent · · Score: 1

    How much does it cost to repair Soros speakers if they break? That's who Apple said they are competing with here, and those speakers are more expensive.

    1. Re:Who cares by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If apple thinks they are competing with Sonus, they are utterly delusional. The fucking thing doesn't even support multi speaker setups out of the box. That is one of the fundamental basic features of a Sonus speaker system, hell even a google home or amazon echo can do this already.

      The fact they claim it is coming with a future software update tells me the product is rushed out the door, and they couldn't figure out how to do multi speaker, so they just commented out all that code and will make an attempt at revisiting it later.

  17. Re: You probably get a new one anyway by rthille · · Score: 1

    Seems legit. Lots of companies have ~$750B-$900B hanging around in vaults.

    --
    Awesome furniture, accessories and cabinetry in Santa Rosa, CA: http://humanity-home.com/
  18. Re:You probably get a new one anyway by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

    Oh yes, shredding components and letting them sit in some third world dump (where people also live) is very beneficial to the environment.

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  19. Re:What are you doing? by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

    You have never had electronics fail on you for any reason other than physical damage?

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  20. Re: You probably get a new one anyway by BlueStrat · · Score: 1

    Who buys these stupid annoying things. If I see one I will put it out of its misery, it is so fucking ugly, like a Trash Can 2.

    That's not an "Apple-enough" name!

    Sp-iCan!

    t goes along with many of the other Apple products.

    Sp-iMac

    Sp-iPhone

    Sp-iMacPro

    Sp-iMac-Mini

    Sp-iPod

    Such meme. Much wow.

    Strat

    --
    Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
  21. Re: You probably get a new one anyway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
  22. How exactly would you damage one? by tlambert · · Score: 3, Insightful

    How exactly would you damage one?

    It's a lump.

    It sits there looking lump-like.

    Occasionally, you talk to it.

    If it talks back, it's no longer just a lump: instead, it's a talking lump.

    Mostly it just sits there.

    1. Re:How exactly would you damage one? by tlambert · · Score: 1

      Put it in the middle.

  23. How often do you break one, though? by King_TJ · · Score: 1

    I'm just as grumpy as the next guy about finding out about yet another product you can't easily open up and do repairs on. But this thing is just a speaker with some wireless network connectivity, essentially.

    I've got some pretty nice Bluetooth wireless speakers over here (a pair of Harmon Kardon Onyx mini's, and my wife has a pair of UE Boom 2's), and these even have rechargeable batteries inside them. Yet they don't look too repairable either. MAYBE the Onyx can be disassembled. I see some "how to" stuff on a Google search that refers to a larger model of the speaker, at least? But I'm pretty sure with most of these -- people just trash them when their batteries finally stop holding a charge.

    Typically, speakers last for many years. You used to blow traditional speakers because they weren't mated up optimally to the amplifier they were attached to. If the amp couldn't put out enough wattage for the volume level you wanted to listen at, you got "clipping" -- damaging distortion that tore up the speakers. With these "all in one" units, that shouldn't really be much of a problem anymore. They should handle the maximum volume level they allow you to turn it up to.

    I'm pretty confident if I purchased these HomePod speakers, they'd be trouble free for as long as I'd care to use them. Eventually, the built-in amps in these things tend to fail, but I'm talking 10 years or so. I have several nice 3 piece amplified sets of PC speakers that all lasted about that long before the amps failed. (Probably capacitors drying out and failing on the circuit boards -- but I never cared to even try to repair one before.)

  24. I put Apple accessories on my do-not-buy list long by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    They have a history of abandoning devices.

    1. Airport Express. I have a bunch of perfectly good routers serving up music in various rooms. Have to use windows to configure it since apple obsoleted the config util on macOS.

    2. Apple TVs.

    3. The old white Bluetooth keyboards.

    At this point even MacBooks look like a dead end purchase so I'm sticking with my old 2012 pro until it's dead. Then we'll see.

  25. Nothing like "Apple hate" ... I hate the haters. by King_TJ · · Score: 1

    I've been primarily a "Mac user" since around 2000-2001, when I got really tired of the Windows world and discovered the new Mac OS X operating system and all the new hardware Apple was suddenly creating under Steve Jobs' take-back of his company.

    Apple really had a good run between 2000 and Jobs' death. Under Tim Cook? I feel like the company hasn't been nearly as pleasing to support and follow along with. The thing is though? Like a lot of Mac users I know, we're all pretty heavily invested in the ecosystem, and it doesn't make any sense to try to bail out on it wholesale. The Apple bashers/haters have been saying essentially the same things since as far back as I can remember. The thing is, I've been into computers and I.T. since the late 1980's and I *also* bashed Apple back in the days of "Classic" MacOS. That's when Apple was at their low point, selling crappy Performa towers that couldn't even multitask well enough to format a floppy disk at the same time you did anything else with the machine.

    The re-invented Apple of the Jobs era is probably what kept me interested in computers, when I saw so many of my peers get burnt out on it and change careers and focus.

    The "Mac haters" I run across today tend to fall into two camps; The ones who always refused to use a Mac and insist they're substandard, overpriced junk based on an idea nothing changed since 1990 in the business .... and the younger ones who just hate how successful the company is, and/or the fact they can't afford to buy them.

    These days, I get paid to support a mix of both Windows PCs and Macs, and I've gone back and forth between using Android phones and iPhones. I typically own some products on both sides of that fence and believe in using the best tool for the job, no matter who manufactures it. All this Apple hate is the same baseless garbage it always was. But that doesn't change the fact that a lot of us who DO still buy Apple's products are feeling a decline in the quality and value for the dollar. There have been a lot of software bugs in OS X and iOS that feel like Apple is slipping on quality control. Product launches such as for the Apple Watch were botched, trying to position it like a piece of high end jewelry or a fashion statement, instead of a piece of tech complimenting an iPhone for the masses. (I think they got that pretty much corrected with "Series 3" of the watch and sales are better than ever on it now.) The HomeKit home automation support was another botched launch, really. Just now, you finally have companies like Belkin selling reasonably priced "gateways" so WeMo devices can work with HomeKit properly -- and until iOS 11, Apple didn't have the HomeKit UI in what I'd call a finished state, either.

    My point is? I have a LOT to thank Apple for and have gotten a whole lot of use out of their products. I have enough invested in them that I'm not going to be quick to migrate away from them either. BUT, I'm not going to make apologies for Apple's mis-steps either. I just find the blanket "Apple hate" to be utterly nonproductive and uninformed. If you love products from Apple's competition, you should be thankful every day that Apple survived. Many things you use are better BECAUSE they were challenged by Apple.

  26. Re:You probably get a new one anyway by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

    Bullshit. They fix it at a cost of $30-$50 and send you a bill for $279. This is the business plan that has made them the richest company on planet Earth.

    Prove it, or STFU, hater.

  27. Re:You probably get a new one anyway by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

    Because they're the ones who started this insanity? Thinness at all costs is not good for the users.

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  28. Re:You probably get a new one anyway by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

    The phones are a loss leader.

    No they're not. They're made just as cheaply as the rest and sold for a massive mark up.

    --
    Wanna buy a shirt?
    https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
  29. Re:You probably get a new one anyway by ilsaloving · · Score: 1

    I can confirm that Apple's repair rates are nothing less than abusive. I wanted to upgrade our Mac Minis to SSDs from HDDs. The official repair centre I contacted quote me at $1000CAN for a 256GB SSD. And that's not counting labour. I told them that that was ridiculous and asked about using a non-official drive, and they said that they weren't allowed to. For comparison, the single most expensive consumer-level 256GB SSD I could find was $350CAN. The median price was approximately $150CAN.

    So yeah, Apple charges absolutely obscene rates for repairs. I could literally buy a brand new mac mini /w the upgraded drive ($240 on their website) for less than it would cost me to repair an existing computer.

  30. Re:You probably get a new one anyway by ilsaloving · · Score: 1
  31. Re:You probably get a new one anyway by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

    Because they're the ones who started this insanity? Thinness at all costs is not good for the users.

    Thinness at ALL costs is not; but I'm sure that Apple (and others) looked at the statistics regarding what percentage of Laptop Owners ACTUALLY Upgraded their RAM and/or File-Storage, and found that it was in the single-digit range. And as an OEM, you don't often make design decisions based on the desires of that low of a percentage of your userbase. At least not if you have stockholders to answer to.

    Connectors are expensive, failure-prone, and large. Two of those disadvantages have NOTHING to do with "thinness". And one of them has EVERYTHING to do with percentage of failures (both in and out of warranty). Laptops ARE mobile devices, ya know...

    People have accepted without whining for many years that CPUs and GPUs in laptops are VERY rarely upgradeable (and even when they are, it's usually kind of a joke); so what's different here?

    Personally, I'd like laptops to be configurable with snap-in/attach-with-a-single-screw Ports. Buy your base unit, and then purchase any combination of up to, say, six "port modules". These would be simple SPI/I2C-connected peripherals, with an ASIC or small SoC on it, just enough to get the signals on/off a peripheral bus. But I am in a small minority of people that would enjoy that.

    So, that's why we have TB and USB-C docks and adapters. They answer the same need, without needless expense and physical overcomplication of the laptop itself.

    Engineering and Product Design is always ALL about Compromises. This is no different.

  32. Re:You probably get a new one anyway by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

    I can confirm that Apple's repair rates are nothing less than abusive. I wanted to upgrade our Mac Minis to SSDs from HDDs. The official repair centre I contacted quote me at $1000CAN for a 256GB SSD. And that's not counting labour. I told them that that was ridiculous and asked about using a non-official drive, and they said that they weren't allowed to. For comparison, the single most expensive consumer-level 256GB SSD I could find was $350CAN. The median price was approximately $150CAN.

    So yeah, Apple charges absolutely obscene rates for repairs. I could literally buy a brand new mac mini /w the upgraded drive ($240 on their website) for less than it would cost me to repair an existing computer.

    Ever taken a car to a dealership for repairs?

    Same thing.

    And yes, you should know that an Apple Repair Center can't use aftermarket parts.

    And nice try (actually not even that); but that's STILL no proof regarding Repair Costs of "$30 to $50" for the HOMEPOD, which is what I was challenging.

  33. Re:You probably get a new one anyway by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

    The wholesale price of the device is less than half the msrp. Someone is getting ripped off.

    --
    Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
  34. Re:You probably get a new one anyway by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

    But upgradable RAM, even if it were in custom form that would require a trip to an Apple store, would at least lower the environmental impact of laptops being discarded because they can't be upgraded. Environment should always come before profits and it should be made into law.

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  35. It's the.... by MerlTurkin · · Score: 1

    ...Apple bend over tax!

  36. Re:You probably get a new one anyway by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

    But upgradable RAM, even if it were in custom form that would require a trip to an Apple store, would at least lower the environmental impact of laptops being discarded because they can't be upgraded. Environment should always come before profits and it should be made into law.

    See above. VERY few people actually "upgrade" their Laptops. They use them until they are attracted by the new shiny and them throw them away, like an elderly Greek slave...

  37. Re:You probably get a new one anyway by ilsaloving · · Score: 1

    Yes, and the general opinion of car dealerships that they're sleazy crooked bastards that will soak you for as much as they can get away with. Nobody goes back to a dealership for repairs unless it's under warranty or if there are some special circumstances. If that's that kind of negative reputation Apple wants to cultivate, then all the power to them.

    The problem is that Apple is trying to have their cake and eat it too. They want to charge ridiculous money for repairs AND deny people the ability to repair things themselves. And that is NOT ok. This attitude (Not just Apple but many others, including John Deer I believe...) is exactly why "right to repair" legislation is popping up all over the place, and IMO it can't come fast enough.

    And no, I have no idea what the repair costs are for the homepod. Not do I really, care, to be honest, because I will never buy one of the ridiculous things. My point is that, based on my own experience, if said poster is being hyperbolic it's probably not by much.

  38. Re:You probably get a new one anyway by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

    Yes, and the general opinion of car dealerships that they're sleazy crooked bastards that will soak you for as much as they can get away with. Nobody goes back to a dealership for repairs unless it's under warranty or if there are some special circumstances. If that's that kind of negative reputation Apple wants to cultivate, then all the power to them.

    The problem is that Apple is trying to have their cake and eat it too. They want to charge ridiculous money for repairs AND deny people the ability to repair things themselves. And that is NOT ok. This attitude (Not just Apple but many others, including John Deer I believe...) is exactly why "right to repair" legislation is popping up all over the place, and IMO it can't come fast enough.

    And no, I have no idea what the repair costs are for the homepod. Not do I really, care, to be honest, because I will never buy one of the ridiculous things. My point is that, based on my own experience, if said poster is being hyperbolic it's probably not by much.

    If you wouldn't buy a HomePod under any circumstances; then you don't care what the repair costs are, or whether they are reasonable.

    So you are nothing but spewing Apple Hate.

    Thanks for identifying yourself. We're done here.

  39. Re:You probably get a new one anyway by ilsaloving · · Score: 1

    If you wouldn't buy a HomePod under any circumstances; then you don't care what the repair costs are, or whether they are reasonable.

    So you are nothing but spewing Apple Hate.

    Thanks for identifying yourself. We're done here.

    No, we're not done here. You know what, I really gotta know... Are you even for real?

    When I've written past posts that is positive about Apple, you responded with back-slapping-preach-it-brother stuff. But then when I write a post criticizing Apple, you accuse me of being an Apple-hater.

    So what am I? An Apple fan or a hater?

    I'm currently typing on an Macbook Pro. In fact, I've been using Apple computers for over a decade. My last several phones were all iPhones. So am I a fan, or a hater?

    I convinced almost every member in my family to buy Apple. I bought my parents Mac Minis for Christmas. So am I a fan, or a hater?

    Well? What am I?

    I mean, I could suggest that you think about it and maybe realize that the world isn't black or white, but I think that would probably be asking too much.

    I would similarly guess that it is beyond your ability to understand that a consumer product company is not a religious institution and shouldn't be treated like one.

    Can you at least admit that people purchase/use products via specific criteria (sometimes even solid practical ones) other than mindless obedience to a brand?