Slashdot Mirror


Bill Gates: Cryptocurrency Is 'Rare Technology That Has Caused Deaths In a Fairly Direct Way' (cnbc.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from CNBC: During a recent "Ask Me Anything" session on Reddit, the Microsoft co-founder said that the main feature of cryptocurrencies is the anonymity they provide to buyers, and Gates thinks that can actually be harmful. "The government's ability to find money laundering and tax evasion and terrorist funding is a good thing," he wrote. "Right now, cryptocurrencies are used for buying fentanyl and other drugs, so it is a rare technology that has caused deaths in a fairly direct way." When a Reddit user pointed out that plain cash can also be used for illicit activities, Gates said that crypto stands out because it can be easier to use. "Yes -- anonymous cash is used for these kinds of things, but you have to be physically present to transfer it, which makes things like kidnapping payments more difficult," he wrote. Gates also warned that the wave of speculation surrounding cryptocurrencies is "super risky for those who go long."

161 comments

  1. LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The currency of cyber crime is an excellent investment.

    1. Re:LOL by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      I hate when people can't distinguish 'cause' from 'enable'.

  2. Windows has killed more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    I would argue that the security of the Windows operating system has actually directly led to more death than any cryptocurrency Bill Gates mentions. I can cite military Navy vessels being sank due to improperly applied Windows 2000 patches. NSA spying of Windows computers has also lead to more death.

    He has caused more death than the thing he complains about.

    1. Re:Windows has killed more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Don't forget his charitable foundation that has also caused many deaths by pushing American drug company agendas in the developing world.

    2. Re:Windows has killed more by ffkom · · Score: 1

      You are absolutely right - but even on /., many people seem to have forgotten the misery that Gates brought upon mankind, both out of (sometimes illegal) greedy business practices and out of pure negligence.

      Bill believing crypto-currencies to be "anonymous" is just one more proof of him being detached from reality. Crypto-currencies are as transparent as could be - and people will be convicted for crimes they committed decades ago, due to the block-chains preserving the evidence forever.

    3. Re:Windows has killed more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the stress of using windows has killed millions over the years

    4. Re:Windows has killed more by YukariHirai · · Score: 2

      Bill believing crypto-currencies to be "anonymous" is just one more proof of him being detached from reality. Crypto-currencies are as transparent as could be - and people will be convicted for crimes they committed decades ago, due to the block-chains preserving the evidence forever.

      They're not inherently anonymous, but they can be anonymous if you can keep your wallet and all transactions made separated from anything that personally identifies you. Easier said than done, naturally, but those using them for nefarious purposes are motivated to do so and seem to have reasonable success.

    5. Re:Windows has killed more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I can cite military Navy vessels being sank due to improperly applied Windows 2000 patches.

      Bet you can't.

    6. Re: Windows has killed more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You don't know what Monero is then do you?

    7. Re:Windows has killed more by jwhyche · · Score: 4, Insightful

      . I can cite military Navy vessels being sank due to improperly applied Windows 2000 patches.

      Bull Fucking Shit!. Name one.

      --
      I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    8. Re:Windows has killed more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Calm down cowboy, he said sank not sunk.

      And you know damn well he can't cite any vessels being sank, so chill bro, he's not connected to reality.

      Otherwise, he might have actually posted a link, eh?

    9. Re:Windows has killed more by nukenerd · · Score: 1

      I have come fairly-directly close to topping myself with the frustration of installing Windows before now.

    10. Re:Windows has killed more by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    11. Re:Windows has killed more by jeremyp · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's bollocks. You can't name any such vessels and if you could, Gates wasn't the one improperly applying the patches.

      Furthermore, the NSA could equally have saved more lives than were lost by spying on Windows computers. You don't know because they don't tell you such things.

      --
      All I want is a secure system where it's easy to do anything I want. Is that too much to ask ~~ Randall Munroe
    12. Re:Windows has killed more by Sperbels · · Score: 1

      Name one.

      The U.S.S. Montana. Windows decided to reboot my machine while I was in the middle of a battle in World of Warships.

    13. Re:Windows has killed more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He also has a charitable foundation that has been one of the most aggressive forces in fighting Malaria around the world, and has probably saved many more lives that way.

    14. Re:Windows has killed more by jwhyche · · Score: 2

      You have my condolences on your loss. Should have been playing World of Tanks, then your ass wouldn't have gotten sunk.

      --
      I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    15. Re: Windows has killed more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eh, did you read the previous article?

  3. The deadly currency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The most deadly currency I can think of is Oil.

    1. Re:The deadly currency by ffkom · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes, and gold. And diamonds. Some stones are called "blood diamonds" for good reason.

    2. Re:The deadly currency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yes, and gold. And diamonds. Some stones are called "blood diamonds" for good reason.

      At least oil and gold can be useful. Killing for diamonds? Fucking hell...

    3. Re:The deadly currency by YukariHirai · · Score: 2

      Diamonds can be useful too, it's just that most of their value (or perceived value, at least) is in their being a status symbol.

    4. Re: The deadly currency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a solution for global warming, maybe we should make oil into a status symbol. It'll be worth too much to burn, forcing alternate energy sources to be used.

    5. Re:The deadly currency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Diamonds can be useful too, it's just that most of their value (or perceived value, at least) is in their being a status symbol.

      Diamonds have no intrinsic value. Want to know the worth of a diamond? Try to sell it.

    6. Re:The deadly currency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think most criminals (at least the garden variety murderers, kidnapppers, robbers, etc) use FB, Windows, Office, etc.

      I hear occasionally of cases of cyber bullying in FB, etc where the victim commits suicide.

      Some of them even use emails to threaten and plan the crime.

      So, do those software / platforms also cause death in a fairly direct way?

    7. Re:The deadly currency by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      They do have value, especially for industrial uses (very similar to gold, in that respect). Diamond powder abrasives are widely used.

      According to Wikipedia (sourced from minerals.net) around 80% of mined diamonds are unsuitable for use as gemstones, and are used in industrial applications, where diamond is valued for its hardness and thermal conductivity: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      There are also a lot of synthetic diamonds produced for these purposes, where appearance doesn't matter much as long as the physical properties are correct.

      --
      Eat the rich.
    8. Re:The deadly currency by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Most of the industrial diamonds are artificial though. Much easier and cheaper than trying to find and dig them up.

      The only people who care about getting their diamonds out of the ground instead of out of a factory are people looking for an expensive status symbol.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    9. Re:The deadly currency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They do have value, especially for industrial uses (very similar to gold, in that respect). Diamond powder abrasives are widely used.

      According to Wikipedia (sourced from minerals.net) around 80% of mined diamonds are unsuitable for use as gemstones, and are used in industrial applications, where diamond is valued for its hardness and thermal conductivity: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      There are also a lot of synthetic diamonds produced for these purposes, where appearance doesn't matter much as long as the physical properties are correct.

      I know all of this, your highness. I was talking about diamonds as gemstones. Unike emeralds, for example, dimonds are so common to the point of not having no value. They are nothing but glorified glass-like stones. That is it.

    10. Re:The deadly currency by Wootery · · Score: 1

      There's no such thing as intrinsic value. Value is contextual by nature.

    11. Re:The deadly currency by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      So what you're saying is that diamonds actually do have intrinsic value. They are highly valued in industry.

      That some marketers got the brilliant (ha!) idea to overhype them as gemstones is a completely different matter. The original statement was that diamonds weren't useful, unlike gold and oil, but diamonds do have tons of very good uses, just like gold.

      --
      Eat the rich.
  4. Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Windows 10 is pretty convincing proof that anonymity is frowned upon.

  5. hypocrite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    So tax evasion is ok as long as he's the one doing it.

    1. Re:hypocrite by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 2

      Someday, when you are old enough, you will pay taxes. Will you take your standard $6,350 deduction, or will you skip it to evade paying taxes?

    2. Re:hypocrite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someday, when you're old enough, you'll realize I was saying just that. Take the deduction, use crypto currency.. Nothing wrong with that.

    3. Re:hypocrite by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      When it comes to Gates; I think if no one needs Windows, then no one needs Gates. I think of the 10 million plus H1B visas all involved are all liars; and the congressional oversight is a steady "wink wink". I also think of the shortsightedness of Gates/Monsanto growing only one kind of corn or wheat that uses Round-Up to kill weeds. And I consider Gates stance on A.I. research; where he thinks it's dangerous, unless he's doing it. All and all, if Gates were to just go away, Humanity could heal from him.

  6. Physically present by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is Bill smoking crack? You certainly do not have to be physically present to transfer cash, and it can be laundered through many accounts to hide the source. And the source can just be a mule who doesn't know who is behind the scheme just that they got paid to transfer some cash.

    1. Re:Physically present by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are talking about money sent through the banking system. But he was talking about physical cash (bills). The first can be laundered, but if you are going to buy some drugs, will you do that? No, you use hard to trace bills or cryptocurrencies.

      Each payment method has their advantages and disadvantages, acknowledge that.

      Apart from speculating, I would be interested in seeing the percentage of cryptocurrency transactions used for services and goods that is for illicit services/goods vs legal services/goods. Not saying we should ban cryptocurrencies, but what are they mainly used for? Both in the number of transactions and total value.

    2. Re:Physically present by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      No but he is definitely a lot more worried about being kidnapped than the rest of us.
      I dare anyone to kidnap me for ransom, ha! They aren't getting much.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    3. Re:Physically present by jimtheowl · · Score: 1

      It is the kidnappers that are worried that nobody would want him back.

    4. Re:Physically present by darth.hunterix · · Score: 1

      No, they are worried he'll sell them Windows.

      --
      What is best in life? Hot water, good dentishtry and shoft lavatory paper.
  7. It's Toxic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bitcoin is bad, it's a pyramid scheme, now it out and out kills people! Hurry ban it, and guns, and pencils, and water because those things hurt people!

  8. great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    President Orange Julius once remarked that Bill Gates should help find a way to 'shut off the internet' to stop bad guys. If he's saying something about cryptocurrencies, our dumbass in chief will think it's gospel.

    1. Re:great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The best thing the retarded Cheeto-in-Chief could do would be to order immediate executions for any and all who traffic in Bitcoin... lol Bitcoin

    2. Re:great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If we use the concept of: "something that could be used for bad is definitely used for bad", then we definitely should shut down Microsoft. Heck, the US military, the North Korea military, both likely use Microsoft software.

    3. Re:great by postbigbang · · Score: 1

      I would trust that North Korea has at least patched it. The USA? Not so much.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    4. Re:great by sad_ · · Score: 1

      Doesn't NK use their own OS, something based on Linux?
      'Red Star' it's called, i think.

      --
      On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
  9. Don't we all know this already? by King_TJ · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Just because Bill Gates repeats what's been said for years, it's more relevant?

    Trying to finger crypto-currency as "more evil than cash" because it's "easier to use" seems to be cherry-picking scenarios.

    How many times is cash used for illicit transactions because it's so straightforward? You can't do a thing with a crypto-currency unless you're tech savvy enough to set up some kind of wallet to receive the funds, and then you have to deal with a buyer who is equally savvy to pay you with them. And right now, you have long waits for most transactions to complete if you're using a well established e-currency like bitcoin. So that's another obstacle in some situations.

    I mean, technically, he's not wrong. I'm sure people have died because of drugs that were bought and sold using cryptocoins. I just don't think the tech itself is ever anything but neutral. Again, the problem lies in the motivations of the sellers and buyers - not the payment method.

    1. Re:Don't we all know this already? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No he's right, the only people who use Bitcoin are drug pushers and murders, so it should be thrown away and those who have any executed immediately.

    2. Re:Don't we all know this already? by CanHasDIY · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Trying to finger crypto-currency as "more evil than cash" because it's "easier to use" seems to be cherry-picking scenarios.

      It is, and worse, it's a factually incorrect claim.

      How to buy drugs with crypto:
      1) decide what crypto you want to spend, find a wallet program, and set it up (sometimes easy, sometimes ridiculously hard)
      2) acquire said crypto somehow -buy it, mine it, steal it, etc.
      3) figure out how to configure Tor, then how to find dark web sites, then find the dark web site run by a drug dealer you want to buy from
      4a) if you're lucky, drug dealer already accepts the crypto you have
      4b) if not, find an exchange, create another traceable account, wait for transactions to complete, etc
      5) trade crypto for drugs (and I guess give out a physical address for shipping?)
      6) pray that your drugs don't get stopped, the government isn't monitoring the blockchain, that you don't get busted on your way to pick them up, or that they even shipped in the first place (you didn't really trust a drug dealer, did you?)

      How to buy drugs with cash:
      1) get cash (many untraceable methods here, YMMV)
      2) find drug dealer (try the 'poor' side of town)
      3) buy drugs

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    3. Re:Don't we all know this already? by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      I'm sure people have died because of drugs that were bought and sold using cryptocoins.

      Cryptocoins can also be used to buy Snu Snu!

      Bill Gates: "Death! Death by Snu Snu!"

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    4. Re:Don't we all know this already? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It depends the drug though.

      And what you want to do.

      One could, for example, use a dark net to ship drugs to a hotel they were visiting, bypassing security.

      Reviewed sellers are going to very likely give better results than an anonymous person in the poor side of town.

      good luck finding anything but rope weed, crack, or heroine in the poor part of town, maybe some really stepped on coke if you're lucky.

    5. Re:Don't we all know this already? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, cryptocurrency gives the opposite of anonymity. It indelibly records every transaction you have ever made in a distributed public record. Do something shady in BTC and not even God can help you hide it.

      Also, Bill Gates is famous for being absolutely terrible at predicting the future of technologies. He thought people would pay for web browsers and enjoy using smartphones where you had to poke at a START menu using a stylus.

      Bill Gates saying something is bad makes me want to get involved.

    6. Re:Don't we all know this already? by quantaman · · Score: 1

      Just because Bill Gates repeats what's been said for years, it's more relevant?

      Trying to finger crypto-currency as "more evil than cash" because it's "easier to use" seems to be cherry-picking scenarios.

      How many times is cash used for illicit transactions because it's so straightforward? You can't do a thing with a crypto-currency unless you're tech savvy enough to set up some kind of wallet to receive the funds, and then you have to deal with a buyer who is equally savvy to pay you with them. And right now, you have long waits for most transactions to complete if you're using a well established e-currency like bitcoin. So that's another obstacle in some situations.

      I mean, technically, he's not wrong. I'm sure people have died because of drugs that were bought and sold using cryptocoins. I just don't think the tech itself is ever anything but neutral. Again, the problem lies in the motivations of the sellers and buyers - not the payment method.

      Cash requires a physical transfer to exchange the asset, that makes it really tough to use for criminal online transactions.

      Cryptocurrency is different, if offers the ability to transfer of value to another party with complete anonymity (if you conceal your wallet ownership) and trust (ie, I don't have to worry that the bitcoin you sent me will be reversed by the credit card company).

      That makes it uniquely suitable for crime, drug transactions, hits, extortion, money laundering, etc.

      --
      I stole this Sig
    7. Re:Don't we all know this already? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      good luck finding anything but rope weed, crack, or heroine in the poor part of town, maybe some really stepped on coke if you're lucky.

      Wonder Woman doesn't sound half bad.

    8. Re:Don't we all know this already? by msauve · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No, it's because Bill Gates is ignorant of the obvious. If he can claim "cryptocurrencies are used for buying fentanyl and other drugs, so it is a rare technology that has caused deaths in a fairly direct way," then it is also true that Windows is used to make those purchases and is also causing deaths in a fairly direct way.

      Fair is fair, take the blame on yourself, BillG.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    9. Re:Don't we all know this already? by Tailhook · · Score: 1

      How many times is cash used for illicit transactions .... some kind of wallet to receive the funds

      Making sense isn't necessary because the establishment media will not question Gates, and Reddit doesn't count. This is just the blather that comes out of his mouth as he thinks up rationalizations for the imposition of his will. The establishment mentality. The thought that something, somewhere might happen beyond scrutiny is intolerable so whatever BS must be promulgated to stop it is the gospel of the day.

      --
      Maw! Fire up the karma burner!
    10. Re:Don't we all know this already? by sgt_doom · · Score: 1

      Of course . . . after all, wasn't he that super-sharp dood who gobbled up PostScript when offered the chance to buy it? Oopsy, sorry, he was the dood who turned it down! But wasn't he the dood who was supposed to have gotten a perfect score on his SATs? Oopsy, he got a perfect score on the math portion, but out of 1600 his score was actually 1400. But wasn't he the dood who created DOS? Oopsy, supposedly another dood created it, yet somehow that dood who created and sold/gave it to Gates, mysteriously included Gary Kildall's notes in the machine language code, indicative that it had been copied from Gary's CP/M os.

    11. Re:Don't we all know this already? by sgt_doom · · Score: 1

      You dare to contradict the likes of BillyG???? Yon heathen . . .

    12. Re:Don't we all know this already? by sgt_doom · · Score: 1

      You said: "I mean, technically, he's not wrong. I'm sure people have died because of drugs that were bought and sold using cryptocoins"

      Of course, Gates' main pad is in Washington state, where two former governors, Gary Locke and Christine Gregoire, got a whole bunch of people killed, raped, assaulted, robbed, etc., etc., when they signed an Interstate Compact bringing 3 out 4 ex-convicts to the Puget Sound region, where may again offended, and that's an indisputable fact, and last I read, there were over 500 outstanding warrants on them!

      Yet nary a word from any Gates people!!!

    13. Re:Don't we all know this already? by chmod+a+x+mojo · · Score: 1

      Yeah, because he is obviously talking about small time consumer buyers, not large scale distributors buying directly from drug manufacturing cartels.

      Or do you really live in such a shithole neighborhood that you can go to the "poor side of town" and pick up 200 kilos of coke, 15 kilos of good weed, and maybe 60 kilos of H with a couple kilos of Fentanyl to cut it with?

      --
      To err is human; effective mayhem requires the root password!
    14. Re: Don't we all know this already? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. All true.

        As someone else below your post points out, this is not what for small time users. To put a fine point on it, this is what your Dealer McDope does to get the stuff you buy.

      And he likely gets the crypto currency he uses to buy the supply he sells from a guy who knows a guy that gives him a hard wallet in exchange for (some of your) actual cash.

    15. Re:Don't we all know this already? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fallacy of the small.

      A local drug dealer isnt using this, it is organized crime and the highly corrupt state actors killing thousands at a shot. Its the same false economy that means we target small time individual crime which may effect a small number of people and ignore the ugly white collar crime that deprives thousands of their means of life - and often life due to suicide, inability to pay small medical, etc.

    16. Re:Don't we all know this already? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And there was such a supply problem before Bitcoin came on the scene.

    17. Re:Don't we all know this already? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shoot, a fella could have a pretty good weekend in Vegas with all this stuff.

    18. Re:Don't we all know this already? by Espectr0 · · Score: 1

      He thinks crypto currencies have anonymity. I'm surprised he made this comment being so ignorant in the subject..

    19. Re:Don't we all know this already? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I think you are getting direct and indirect confused.

    20. Re:Don't we all know this already? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      "more evil than cash"

      He didn't say that though. That phrase does not appear in any of his posts, nor anything like it.

      He was just saying that it's unusual for technology to lead directly to deaths, by which I think he meant computer technology because obviously military tech is pretty common.

      Gates has done a lot wrong in his lifetime, but that doesn't excuse attributing things to him that he didn't say or believe. Like the classic 640k meme.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    21. Re:Don't we all know this already? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cash requires a physical transfer to exchange the asset, that makes it really tough to use for criminal online transactions.

      Cryptocurrency is different, if offers the ability to transfer of value to another party with complete anonymity (if you conceal your wallet ownership) and trust (ie, I don't have to worry that the bitcoin you sent me will be reversed by the credit card company).

      That makes it uniquely suitable for crime, drug transactions, hits, extortion, money laundering, etc.

      It's not as hard as you'd think for criminal online transactions. It turns out, cash fits into a standard envelope, and stamps are cheap...
       
      It's certainly not as convenient or as useful as cryptocurrency, but criminals managed online transactions just fine before bitcoin came around...

    22. Re:Don't we all know this already? by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, you completely left out the money laundering process on the cash side. That's the area that law enforcement has gotten pretty good at tracking. Not so much with crypto, and that's the entire point.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    23. Re:Don't we all know this already? by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      I'm no expert on the topic, but didn't we just have an article yesterday where Woz got scammed out of $70k worth? How is that not anonymous for the scammer?

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    24. Re:Don't we all know this already? by Espectr0 · · Score: 1

      his credit card was stolen, after that all bets are off. the blockchain holds the records of who has the bitcoins, so it's possible to identify the person who received the coins.

  10. Says the killer of innovation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and maker of software that loses clubs matches before they start playing, and so much more digital goodness.

    Why isn't he claiming cold hard cash is causing deaths, and let's get rid of it? Or that pesky DHMO chemical?

    How can you be so rich yet so arrogantly stupid? Really one reason: By having an agenda.

    1. Re:Says the killer of innovation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      arrogantly stupid is an oxymoron. And stupid people couldn't have an agenda, they're stupid.

  11. Liar or Ignorant by AncalagonTotof · · Score: 1

    Cash can be laundered through many paradises. Did he ever heard of Panama ? Malta ? Delaware ? (Non exhaustive list)
    Many recent documentaries showed how money can be transferred through these countries and their rotten lawers companies without living town. I guess that for people like him, it's easy to forget because he gates (ooops, sorry for this one ...) everything done for him.

    --
    Totof
    1. Re:Liar or Ignorant by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      The premise that being Bitcoin rich doesn't require laundering a lot of cash is pretty weak too.

      Bitcoin gives you a legitimate transaction to pay taxes on (selling it), but if you raise flags, they'll track back your transactions and see them tumbled af and investigate, or see them outright shady.

      Of you want to spend the cash, it needs to be laundered.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
  12. "Caused Deaths" ... Shifting blame to the tools. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NO. It is financial greed and criminal energy that caused deaths!
    Which is caused by people having no conscience or foresight and just wanting to leech off ALL the wealth without giving anything in return.
    Something that was a huge part of your entire professional life, dear Billy!

    Now I don't know yet, where such people come from,
    but I suspect they have a natural advantage in societies so far above Dunbar's number, due to being able to hide their assholery in the inherent anonymization. Which also allows good people to turn to psychopaths because it is impossible to empathize with the faceless masses.

    I'm curious about the theories of the more reasonable people here on /.

  13. 502 Bad Gateway nginx/1.13.9 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Russian interference.

  14. It's not that it's easier to use by rsilvergun · · Score: 4, Insightful

    it's that it's harder to trace. In theory if you can keep your name from being associated with your wallet it's impossible to trace. But it doesn't need to be impossible. A locked car is harder to steal, not impossible to steal. Similarly you just need to make it hard enough to trace money laundering that the relevant authorities time/money runs out.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:It's not that it's easier to use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's what you think today... Tomorrow, it could be the case the NSA could connect 75% of bitcoin transactions to individuals thanks to some unknown hack.

      The truth is that if you commit a big enough crime, with or without bitcoin, that someone will still be searching for you in 20 years... You will be found, probably in a very unexpected way.

      The difference between cash and bitcoin is that bitcoin leaves a trace that just cannot be deleted. And you do not exactly know what this trace contains.

  15. People tend to forget... by Mindragon · · Score: 1

    Lest anyone forgets $1B went missing. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    Oh and you wanna talk about baby killers? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    How about that opoid crisis? 20 million painkillers to a town of 3,000. ALL CASH. https://www.npr.org/sections/t...

    Also...the anonymity isn't crypto's main feature. Just look at the most recent $10 Billion lawsuit. It turns out all those rich list addresses were owned by exchanges and things like that. Cash is far more anonymous than crypto. Why else would drug dealers have bedrooms full of billions of cash: https://www.veteranstoday.com/...

    So please tell me how Crypto is killing fucking babies again. I dare you.

    --
    Just add {In Space!} to anything.
    1. Re: People tend to forget... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do as I say, not as I do. - US Govt.

  16. Everything causes death by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not just bitcoin, it's everything. One cannot commit a kidnapping without a car, for example. Who is against cars? I am sure many old people in the 1900's were against cars - they'd prefer faster horses, they said. These days, many crimes are planned on internet - text messages, chat conversations, voice calls... Who is against internet? My old boss in the 1990's was against internet. He'd prefer an pen and a paper, and a calculator. Everything is dangerous. Even pretzels can be dangerous. George Bush almost choked to death on one.

  17. Direct? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Is this some new definition for "direct"?

    1. Re:Direct? by russotto · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it means "indirect". It's like "literal" meaning "figurative". At this rate, words will have no meaning at all sometime between January 2025 and September 2031.

  18. Re:What does Gates want on his tombstone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Downvote my question, I maintain that it's a valid one. We all have to face our eventual demise. What will his tombstone say?

  19. Every form of wealth does it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Money and every single other form of wealth have produced massive deaths slavery and innocent's deaths, Bitcoin is that exposes wealth and money as the fraud it is, anyone can make it's own currency based in anything and with enough commercial connections can make it usable, we can see currency do not have to be backed by real resources and even debt can be traded as a regular commodity.

  20. This guy doesn't think very hard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, the deaths were caused by the money. That means it's actually safe to OD on opioids, since Bill blames the death on something else (the money).

    One alternative (and some would say: conventional) way of looking at the situation, is that ODing on opioids caused deaths in a fairly direct way. i.e. it's actually the drugs that are dangerous, regardless of however you bought them, what brand car you drove to meet the dealer, the color of the shirt you were wearing when you took the drugs, etc.

  21. Bill Gates falsely calls cryptocurrency anonymous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Proof that no mater how smart and rich you are when it comes to ignorance you are what you say. Unless you are bigly powerful and the jury is still out on that.

  22. seriously?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "so it is a rare technology that has caused deaths in a fairly direct way."
    not so rare. tazer guns, automobiles, etc.... technology directly kills people all the time. this is just another prong of the multi-pronged approach to destabilize crypto currencies. the 1% fear it

  23. Evil corp E-coin... by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    "more evil than cash"

    1. that's a pretty high bar... cf Timothy 6:10. Actually, how does one manage to be more evil than the root of all evil?
    2. oh that's bloody great, now the Church of Satan has to come out with yet another crypto-coin. Thanks.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:Evil corp E-coin... by Joey+Vegetables · · Score: 1

      You have to be an even worse student of Scripture than usual, in order to equate "the love of money" with "money."

  24. so has fiat currency by js290 · · Score: 3, Funny

    All Wars Are Bankers' Wars https://youtu.be/5hfEBupAeo4

    --
    "Tempers are wearing thin. Let's just hope some robot doesn't kill everybody." --Bender
  25. Neo-Feudalism globalists hard at work by DigiShaman · · Score: 0

    So *Lord* Bill Gates (a globalist neo-feudalist) is against anything that's rooted in libertarian-ism and self-determination. I'm shocked I tell you, SHOCKED!!

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
  26. Just like Windows by dimko · · Score: 1

    Someone used Windows with Microsoft Windows with Microsoft Outlook to send a message to a killer with promise of money and a target. Someone has had installed Windows on Submarine equipped with god knows what. Now suddenly Messiah is concerned with crypto currency.

  27. Greed and Corruption causes death. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Right now, cryptocurrencies are used for buying fentanyl and other drugs, so it is a rare technology that has caused deaths in a fairly direct way."

    Right now, the illegal status of a rather harmless plant (cannabis) has caused deaths in a fairly direct way.

    Cigarettes has caused more deaths than both World Wars. It is the most deadly product on the planet, and yet it is legal. Alcohol isn't much better.

    Big Pharma brought the opium den into the United States and turned it into a multi-billion dollar legal industry by putting it in a prescription bottle, fueling a growing health crisis.

    Greed and Corruption causes death. One of the richest men in the universe should fucking know that.

    PS - Didn't the Microsoft store accept Bitcoin for a while? I wonder how many drug kingpins run their business off Microsoft OS and Office products. I hear MS Excel is pretty handy when you need to convert ounces, kilos, and pounds...

  28. Absolutely absurd by leftistsrmentallyill · · Score: 1

    Here is the guy raping your privacy, destroying the morals of your society, telling you that nobodies in the corner are the bigger threat. We are in the midst of an evolutionary speciation event. Those with courage, intelligence, and wisdom splitting from those selected for blind, all-consuming greed (plutocrats) and their cowing, mindless, rootless slaves.

    1. Re:Absolutely absurd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bill Gates isn't in charge of Microsoft any more.. not sure if you heard. He hasn't been for quite awhile. I'm pretty sure he didn't design Windows 10 either.

  29. Does Bill sponsor Slashdot? by ffkom · · Score: 3, Informative

    I am seriously frustrated that some non-informative blabber from grandpa Gates is published on Slashdot, while even exciting new IT research results like the one linked here do not qualify for publication.

    Does Bill sponsor Slashdot for citing him so often?

    1. Re:Does Bill sponsor Slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He used to be featured on here as a "Borg" during the days when Slashdot was relevant.

  30. He is correct, but oil and coal more lethal by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 2

    billg is right about this, but most of the harm is only to Americans and Canadians who have shortened their lifespans due to said pharmaceuticals, and to a lesser extent those who died as the result of oil and coal exploration, extraction, processing, and shipping to provide the electricity to generate them.

    On a global scale, these "epidemics" are mostly reduced.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    1. Re:He is correct, but oil and coal more lethal by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      No, he's entirely wrong, because the normal cash used for such things make the cryptocurrency used a rounding error. the problems existed long before cryptocurrency and will continue with or without it.

    2. Re:He is correct, but oil and coal more lethal by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      No, he's entirely wrong, because the normal cash used for such things make the cryptocurrency used a rounding error. the problems existed long before cryptocurrency and will continue with or without it.

      You say that as if, it's not a matter of time for all "normal" transactions to be done via crypto so that the money doesn't need to be laundered. No need to meet in some dark alley with assault rifles, and no risk of tracking the funds. I'm not a crypto guru, so please tell me why that's not accurate?

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
  31. Stuid lie by gurps_npc · · Score: 5, Insightful

    When you buy a gun and kill someone, no one says "OH MY GOD, US DOLLARS KILLED HIM."

    That is not "Direct" harm. That is not even secondary harm. That is very, very, very indirect harm. Tertiary at best.

    The shooter and the gun 'directly' caused the harm. The secondary cause might be the drug sales or whatever made you mad enough to kill him.

    The stuff you used to buy the weapon? That's at best tertiary. Not a direct cause.

    --
    excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    1. Re:Stuid lie by sgt_doom · · Score: 1

      Thanks for some logic here --- and to remind everyone about the false claim that Forbes magazine and others keep repeating, that DOS wasn't a copy from Gary Kildall's original CP/M program - - either Novell or some guys from there bought the rights to Dr.DOS after Gary's death and sued Microsoft, which settled out of court with them to the tune of $1 billion. Really doubt if they would pay them off that much if it wasn't factual.

    2. Re:Stuid lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      “US dollars killed him” would be a DIRECT cause iff deaths did not happen previously but are happening now.

      Cypto causes an order of magnitude increase in malware ransom payments and ease of drug purchase. That’s a fairly direct relationship.

    3. Re:Stuid lie by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      The people who bought the rights to DR DOS (Caldera, the company that eventually became the hated SCO) didn't sue over copyright infringement but unfair competition. Given Microsoft's behavior during the late 1980s and early 1990s, yeah, you bet they had to settle for a pretty large sum. You might want to read Judge Jackson's finding of fact to see how far they took it, even managing to intimidate IBM into effectively dropping OS/2 as an ongoing mass market product.

      I used CP/M. And I used early versions of DOS. The two operating systems were nothing alike. The only thing they had in common was that early versions of DOS had a CP/M like API, to make it easier to port CP/M applications to it. It is 100% false that DOS was ever a clone of CP/M.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    4. Re:Stuid lie by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      When I first got DR DOS, it was on a hand-labeled floppy. Someone had written it as 'Dr. DOS.' It took a long time before I met someone who asked why I was pronouncing it as 'Doctor Dos.'

    5. Re:Stuid lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "even managing to intimidate IBM into effectively dropping OS/2 as an ongoing mass market product."
      Not even slightly true

    6. Re:Stuid lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about the wheel ? How many people have died because they were in some sort of wheeled vehicle that suddenly stopped ?

    7. Re:Stuid lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      deep breath you window licker.

  32. Until by thadtheman · · Score: 1

    Microsoft creates a cryptocurrency called BillBucks. This new cryptocurrency will solve all the outstanding problems and introduce a new feature: the blue creen of debt.

  33. Meanwhile fire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... is a much more common tech that has killed VAST amounts of people.

  34. Is Gates really an expert in anything anymore? by swb · · Score: 1

    He was obviously a "good" businessman (as in made a lot of money and dealt with a lot of competitors) and he had some technical chops early on, but what makes Gates an expert on much *now*?

    I'm not even sure he has more than just a slightly better-informed opinion on many things anymore.

  35. rare? by CSMoran · · Score: 5, Insightful

    it is a rare technology that has caused deaths in a fairly direct way.

    Bill, this is gunpowder. Gunpowder, Bill.

    --
    Every end has half a stick.
  36. New money by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    1980's rich person from a wealthy family has issues with new money https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  37. Pot calling the kettle black by Notabadguy · · Score: 1

    And how many deaths has Windows called?

    How many BSODs causing ACTUAL DEATHS?!?

  38. Re:What does Gates want on his tombstone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Downvote my question, I maintain that it's a valid one. We all have to face our eventual demise. What will his tombstone say?

    "Resistance is futile"

    "xx years ought to be enough for anybody"

    "TTL expired"

    "I'm being exploited by worms"

  39. I think Bill Gates is demented. by SigIO · · Score: 1

    Or, he's just bashing a currency medium that the elite are having difficulty wrapping their tentacles around.

    1. Re:I think Bill Gates is demented. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or, he's just bashing a currency medium that the elite are having difficulty wrapping their tentacles around.

      The real issue with cryptocurrency and elites it's a rather effective means of redistributing money from elites (investors) to the poor (crypto miners).

      They keep getting taken for a ride yet keep coming back for more. They are drawn to it like a moth to a flame.

  40. So just like the US dollar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The US dollar does the same, but even worse. Let's ban it.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zhenli_Ye_Gon

    I think BG has become senile in his old age. He should know better than this.

  41. It's complicated by TJHook3r · · Score: 1

    The stupid are unlikely to get directly involved in BTC, it's just too complicated. Easier to buy Oxy off the local contact.

  42. Arrogant comment by cloud.pt · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I didn't expect anything else: the guy who most benefits from the current finantial system bashing a trending, actually revolutionary. It is quite shameful to see him resort to such a low blow. It's like saying: "hey, 20 people died making this humongous undersea tunnel", without acknowledging the bridge prevents 200 deaths a year out of whatever the fuck they did to cross the straight before.

    Seriously, this guy has been the top richest dude, in the world, for 18 out of the last 23 years. He has - wait scratch that -
      him and his next 10 generations have absolutely no say in the matter of "what is fairer than what we have now?". Fairness is seriously not something at play here.

    I assume he and everybody else know Microsoft has surely caused deaths in a fairly direct way as much as any cryptocurrency, and just like crypto, none of them were part of the plan. Obviously not as direct as, say Smith and Wesson, Heckler and Koch, Lockheed Martin or any so-called "defense"-related company, but even those have their own sorry excuses for liability.

    But screw "fairly" - you know what causes human death in a very fucking objectively direct way? Other humans. And maybe old age and disease and natural disaster. Now go get an actually decent argument to bash crypto, you know, like common people have to do when they want to make a point instead of using that odd "I am so popular I can say anything" falacy.

    1. Re:Arrogant comment by cloud.pt · · Score: 1

      TYPO: "revolutionary... *one", obviously

  43. That was kinda my point by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    as a criminal your goal is to do crime big enough to live well but small enough that the authorities moves onto easier targets.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:That was kinda my point by turbidostato · · Score: 1

      "as a criminal your goal is to do crime big enough to live well but small enough that the authorities moves onto easier targets."

      Or really big enough that you can bribe governments and still have spares for you.

      It might be the case that Gates knows a thing or two about that.

  44. Bill Gates Quote by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 2

    "Bitcoin is easy!"

  45. Bitcoin scam! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If so-called cryptocurrencies are really good innovation, why they attract so many criminals/criminal activity?
    Could it really be because, all cryptocurrencies themselves are scams, and that is why they attract all kinds of criminals/criminal activity?

    If so-called cryptocurrencies are really currency, why no company/store can use Bitcoin as currency anymore?
    Because the price of Bitcoin proved to be extremely unstable to use as a currency?
    Would the result be different, if Bitcoin replaced by any other "cryptocurrency"?
    Aren't all work the same way?

    Or, they are not actually virtual currency but virtual investment?
    But, if they are actually investment, why we need/want them?
    What would happen to world economy, if people invested in virtual investments, instead of real investments?

    Or, all so-called cryptocurrencies are actually just a modified (made decentralized and paying variable interest) Ponzi Schemes?
    (Price of cryptocurrencies would keep increasing in the long term (by their design), so it is equivalent of paying variable interest to all long term investors.)

    As more and more people invest in cryptocurrencies, it will become harder and harder to ban their trading everywhere!
    All cryptocurrencies need to be banned globally before it is too late!

  46. Dottering old fool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    STFU you dottering old fool. Nothing you say now is important.

  47. daqfuq? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'Rare Technology That Has Caused Deaths In a Fairly Direct Way'

    There is this tech known as fire that this mythological actor Prometheus supposedly gave humanity. Does Gate know the studies that have been done that shows wood smoke killing, even in modern times, tens of thousands of people through downstream cancer effects? Or the 2nd or 3rd noted cause on death certificates from basic smoke inhalation? Or the number of deaths from combustion? Or simply burning, as in acts of war, whether propelling a bullet, throwing oil on people and lighting it, or flamethrowers?

    And isn't this the guy whose foundation sponsors bunker or coal energy plants that, in effect, does this exact thing to nearby communities?

    We can play this game too. Windows costs more than open source software. Microsoft has lobbied for the maintenance of the Windows OS environment in government. This is inefficient and wasteful use of taxpayer dollars. Money that could be spent on fundamental research, such as medical research including infectious disease and cancer treatments. Therefore, Window purchases impinges on medical advances which impacts lives. Given death rates of say 20 per 10k for cancer, and Window market penetration in most Western coutnries and India, that's roughly 2 billion, so Gates is on the hook for 4 million deaths. Therefore, as the one person who promoted and profited from this OS and its successors, MR. Gates is a mass murderer.

  48. All technologies have killed by GuB-42 · · Score: 1

    Pretty much every technology killed some people in some way. Electricity caused many deaths, and the wheel, and fire. Even medicine kills on a regular basis.
    A company making helicopters even use this argument in their communication. They proudly say that helicopters saved more lives than they took. They don't deny that helicopters kill, they just say that they make up for it by saving others during search-and-rescue missions.

    The argument works in reverse. One could argue that the atomic bomb saved lives by ending war early. In the case of bitcoin and drugs, drugs found on the deep web are supposedly of better quality than these found on the street, and then preventing deaths from bad products. I don't know if it is true but it shows that the exact same argument can be used both ways.

  49. 640k moment. by arunce · · Score: 1

    Ya.. I'm old.

    1. Re:640k moment. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ya... you're also wrong.

    2. Re:640k moment. by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      Could you link the original video, article or conference where he specifically said that?

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
  50. Re:Dumb Money by Stoutlimb · · Score: 1

    Yes. Every currency has blood on it. How many have been murdered for the cash in their wallets? Time to ban money entirely.

  51. Easily traceable by phantomfive · · Score: 1

    I want to point out that bitcoin is easily traceable. Once the transaction is converted to cash, you can find out the entire chain. It isn't designed to be anonymous, and it's not.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  52. Bill Gates is a dope. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does anybody else want to see him in a bondage porn get spanked?

  53. Lots of folks won't risk a drug dealer by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    but will buy online. A drug dealer could be a cop, or a junkie looking for someone to mug. An anonymous online transaction is safe, and if you're reasonable well to do in a blue state (or very well to do in a red one) it's essentially legal. You won't even got a slap on the wrist.

    There are _lots_ of folks looking for pain meds because our healthcare system is so fucked up. Some of them need the meds to manage cronic pain, some of them need them because they have treatable conditions they can't afford to treat. A lot of them are (to be frank) middle class whites unlikely to be punished for having a gram of heroine. Why risk the poor neighborhood if you don't have to?

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  54. If Crypto currencies make it effortless by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    to buy a gun illegally, and as a result of that people who normally couldn't get guns (like criminals, violent spouses and the severely mentally ill) do, then yeah, you probably do have a case to make against them.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:If Crypto currencies make it effortless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you just have to demonstrate that crypto currencies actually make that effortless.

      I'll be waiting for your demonstration sitting down.

  55. The War on Drugs is worse than drugs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Drug War is one of the most evil government programs in history. It has driven up drug prices and sustained the black markets and cartels with their lucrative profits which are made possible precisely because of prohibition. Nobody loves prohibition more than the cartels. Instead of running his mouth on this, if Gates really wanted to help he'd pour some of his billions into an effort to end the drug war.

  56. Technology That Has Caused Deaths In a Fairly Dire by Reverend+Green · · Score: 1

    I rode my motorcycle to lunch today. Now *there* is a technology that has caused a lot of deaths in a fairly direct way.

    Ban motorcycles now!!!1!!!!!1!!3!!! Who will think of the childrens?!?!?!555!!??!

  57. Death by desperation! by SpaghettiPattern · · Score: 1

    As if M$ hasn't caused deaths. Almost anything causes deaths. Death by sheer desperation is one of the cruelest ways to go.

    Oh non existing deity! Why do we still have to reboot Windows 10 almost daily to have patches installed? Why so many meaningless updates on Skype since M$ took over? And always when I actually want to use the bloody thing!

    --

    I hadn't the slightest objection to his spending his time planning massacres for the bourgeoisie... (P.G. Wodehouse)
  58. energy by Torvac · · Score: 1

    doesnt it bother anyone that tons of energy get wasted to calculate this crap ?

    1. Re: energy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, bring on usefull POW and POS

  59. Bill probably threatened by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bill has financial interest in emerging economies/3rd world countries, cryptocurrencies is cheap enough to offer banking for the unbanked. Probably just threatened.

  60. Connecting to the real world by DrYak · · Score: 1

    They're not inherently anonymous, but they can be anonymous if you can keep your wallet and all transactions made separated from anything that personally identifies you. Easier said than done, naturally, but those using them for nefarious purposes are motivated to do so and seem to have reasonable success.

    Yes, you could be anonymous if the only single usage you do of crypto currency would be shifting numerical values around between crypto-wallet.
    Then yes, you could be even exchanging BTCs with known terrorists, child porno graphers, etc. and never be found out by the government.

    But usually, the point of making transactions with other parties is that you want not only value shifting wallets, but also obtain something for it :
    You'd like to buy arms from an illegal arm dealer, you'd like to receive drugs, etc.

    At that point there's a transaction happening on some block chain, that will be couple to some real-world event (some illegal packets getting shipped to your drop-off address).

    At that point, a sufficiently motivated entity with enough ressources (basically, government-level entity) can manage to eventually track down the chain of event and de-anonymize you.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
    1. Re:Connecting to the real world by YukariHirai · · Score: 1

      As I said, easier said than done. If what you're exchanging for cryptocurrency boils down to data - child abuse material, stolen credit card numbers/personal info, whatever else people trade in - it's less easy to tie to real world events, but still within the realm of possibility.

  61. Usefull diamonds by DrYak · · Score: 1

    Diamonds can be useful too

    ...and the industry has evntually found a way to produce what it needs artificially at a much lower price than the crazy market.

    it's just that most of their value (or perceived value, at least) is in their being a status symbol.

    ...and for some weird reasons, most of the people have been conditionned to see the status symbol only if that peculiar piece of diamond happens to have been dug out of the ground, despite having all the same atoms in the same position as what the industry grows in labs.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  62. Car analgoies. by DrYak · · Score: 1

    it's that it's harder to trace. In theory if you can keep your name from being associated with your wallet it's impossible to trace. But it doesn't need to be impossible. A locked car is harder to steal, not impossible to steal.

    A car with doors welded shut would be close to impossible to steal.
    But eventually, for a car to be more useful than a giant paper weight, you need to be able to enter it and drive it.
    so instead you settle for merely locking door, which makes stealing the car deginitely possible.

    Using crypto-wallet exclusively for shifting numbers between them would be pretty much impossible to trace.
    But eventually, for crypto-currencies to be more useful that a cryptographer play toay, you need to be able to order good delivered.
    So instead you settle for merely pseudonymity, knowing that a big player (government-level) will eventuall manage to make a link between your transaction in the blockchain and the drop-off points you ordered delivery too, getting step by step closer to de-anonymise you.

    The main advantage of crypto currency protocol is no anonymity (they are merely pseudonymous).
    The main advantage is (theoretical) absence of central authority.

    Just like you can hand out cash in person to anyone,
    crypto currencies enable you to send cryptocoin to anyone online without there being some "Bitcoin Inc" that can unilaterally decide to block your transaction or freeze your account (unlike credit cards).
    everyone can see it on the block chain (That the whole idea behind distributed trust), but there's no single entity that can prevent you.

    (Well, in Theory. In practice, some large mining pools are dangerously close to becoming some kind of central authority).

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
    1. Re:Car analgoies. by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      A car with doors welded shut would be close to impossible to steal.

      You've clearly never stolen a vehicle. A broken window, or entry with a crowbar through the trunk/back seat would be simple enough.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
  63. the old man needs to stfu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    he is an old man, and is loosing touch with reality
    it's a bit like the top brass politicians, military or business men (good example being hollywood) where guys who were good at their job, haven't realised that they have become dinosaurs while the world has moved on
    they all need to go the way of the dinosaur and we need to stop listening to and publishing them

  64. APKoins never kill only screw jew bankers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See Subject: APKoin is better than all other cyypto coin guarantee to not loose value

    Get APKoin by spreading the word of "LORD of HOSTS" to all conrners of teh internet

    Get APKoin by "Kick Stomping Heart" of FAKE name slashdot l[users] who dare defy brilliant APK

    Redeemable for ultra premium moose dik you can suck or take in ass

    Premium rewards like suk my MEGA MAN PENIS or lick my gaint ballz

    APK

    P.S.=> The Soros and ROTHSCHILD backed jew bankers want to destroy CRYPTO COIN because it can derail their plans to enslave great american worker. Trump was the first major disruption to they plans APKoins is the next... apk

  65. Cash is just as anonymous as any cryptocurrency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cash is as anonymous as any cryptocurrency, just use a 3rd party escrow and you have the same type of transactions ... except cash can't be traced back through every transaction that it has been involved with over decades, like BC can.

  66. Just the opposite..but hard to see from that side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Money laundering, tax evasion and illegal drugs have one thing in common: Government. Laundering comes in several flavors, from failed services to the govt, fake expenses, etc. Tax evasion comes with complicity of bankers and accountants to suck $ from hard workers individuals and transfer it to wealthy corporations, which need to find loopholes to get the latest boat/plane or house in Switzerland. Illegal drugs have that status otherwise all the players in the enforcement roles would not be needed, and, because most of that budget is being laundered anyway, nobody will cut it's own piece of a cake. Cryptocurrencies basically kicks the middle man in transactions, banks. Like Amazon with bookstores. Like streaming with Blockbuster. but banks are not happy and will fight back under any label.

  67. M$ Windows too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Windows is also one of those 'Rare Technology That Has Caused Deaths In a Fairly Direct Way'. Especially at NHS where WannaCry destroyed machines and made the doctors lost their prescriptions and medical records for their patients.

  68. Ebola junkie by nmo.marques · · Score: 0

    Says the dude whom has quite a nice portfolio of Ebola (and variants) patents. :)