Slashdot Mirror


Hacker Adrian Lamo Dies At 37 (zdnet.com)

Adrian Lamo, a well-known hacker known for his involvement in passing information on whistleblower Chelsea Manning and hacking into systems at The New York Times, Microsoft, and Yahoo in the early-2000s, has died at 37. ZDNet reports: His father, Mario, posted a brief tribute to his son in a Facebook group on Friday. "With great sadness and a broken heart I have to let know all of Adrian's friends and acquittances that he is dead. A bright mind and compassionate soul is gone, he was my beloved son," he wrote. The coroner for Sedgwick County, where Lamo lived, confirmed his death, but provided no further details. Circumstances surrounding Lamo's death are not immediately known. A neighbor who found his body said he had been dead for some time.

54 of 137 comments (clear)

  1. 90% chance of opioid overdose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    When is this country going to stop passing out opiate pills like candy and threating in to kill heroin dealers while young people die in droves?

    1. Re:90% chance of opioid overdose by Aighearach · · Score: 2

      Every time my wife goes to the doctor, I warn her: "Don't let them give you any zombie pills!"

      They often try.

    2. Re:90% chance of opioid overdose by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      When are people going to stop making stupid decisions knowing full well the consequences?

      I dunno, but you're right, the doctors already know that it is stupid to keep prescribing the pills. But their patients are whiny, so they just turn them into zombies anyways.

      The patients, OTOH, do not know the consequences at all; patients who understood the issues were already not whining about the pain, they already understood it hurts because life is unfair, and the ability to sense pain is an adaptive trait.

    3. Re:90% chance of opioid overdose by arth1 · · Score: 1

      They actually have to ask your current pain level when taking vitals now

      Yes, but you are not under any obligation to answer.
      I prefer being seen as uncooperative to being mistreated.

    4. Re:90% chance of opioid overdose by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Rewrite your will. Improve your funeral plans.

      I'm going to be made into frozen chum blocks. Then my friends/family are going deep sea fishing/drinking/smoking. Make a nice slick out of me.

      The will calls for a clandestine diver to put my junk onto someone's hook, (likely one of the drunker ones, using a bobber) then yank like a fish striking.

      There is some question of legality. Something about 'giving the fish the munchies', not sporting.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    5. Re:90% chance of opioid overdose by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 5, Insightful

      When is this country going to stop passing out opiate pills like candy and threating in to kill heroin dealers while young people die in droves?

      Heroin dealers aren't lacing heroin with fentanyl and carfentanyl - they want repeat customers.

      The fentanyl is made in China, shipped to Mexico, and cut there with heroin made in Afghanistan (Taliban operations supported by the US Army). The CIA imports the heroin, and they get exactly the desired effect - dumbasses like you calling for more power for the government to engage in extrajudicial killings domestically.

      End the drug war, sell clean heroin at Walmart, and divert all the money into treatment centers, and you'll clean up both the crime and the body count. This experiment has been run and it works everywhere it's tried. At this point people who support the drug war are either making money on it, useful idiots, or those who just enjoy seeing people die.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    6. Re: 90% chance of opioid overdose by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Sure, but don't tell that to anyone who had major surgery like back surgery or had their wisdom teeth yanked out. You simply can't adapt to that.

      Sure you can. People had teeth pulled (even canines, which is a hell of a lot more painful than wisdom teeth), bones broken and passed kidney stones long before there were pain killers. And women give birth without medication even today.
      In short, we're sissies due to our culture, unable to grin and bear it. We fear pain almost as much as we fear death.

    7. Re:90% chance of opioid overdose by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Rewrite your will. Improve your funeral plans.

      Why? It won't make any difference to you whatsoever. The only reason to do so would be to make others happy enough that you benefit more now than the headaches of doing it.

    8. Re:90% chance of opioid overdose by h33t+l4x0r · · Score: 1

      I'm ok with killing opiate dealers as long as we start with big pharma CEOs.

    9. Re: 90% chance of opioid overdose by Swave+An+deBwoner · · Score: 1

      "After Surgery in Germany, I Wanted Vicodin, Not Herbal Tea"

      https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/27/opinion/sunday/surgery-germany-vicodin.html

      Every day, my body felt a little better. I drank mint tea. I drank fennel tea. I drank homemade chai with ginger, cardamom and pepper. I drank coffee slowly, enjoying every sip. I lingered in that in-between space.

      After a week, I took the tram to the doctor’s office to have my stitches removed. My doctor, with her usual cup of chamomile tea in hand, remarked on my progress. “I rested,” I told her. Normally, I would have said, “I did nothing,” but I didn’t say that. I had been healing, and that’s something.

      I did say that this story is not about the benefits of universal health care, but for the sake of accuracy, let me add that this hysterectomy was not without cost. After my surgery, I had to pay $25 for the taxi ride home.

    10. Re:90% chance of opioid overdose by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 3, Interesting

      We have often disagreed, but Bill has this right. (Except, perhaps, for the CIA importing heroin... that's so 1970s. But they still could be, for similar perverse reasons.)

      Basic economics has shown, and by real-world experience: end the drug war, and you also solve the other problems.

      Drug use does not go up, compared to other countries.

      Addiction rates go way DOWN. Without criminal penalty, more people seek treatment.

      Disease rates go way DOWN. No incentive to share needles (or other means of transmission) and spread disease.

      ALL LOGIC AND EXPERIENCE OVER MANY DECADES says that just like alcohol prohibition, the War On Drugs is not just a failure, but the cause of most of the problems.

      The majority of the non-suicide firearm deaths in the US are "criminal-enterprise-related". That means, almost always, something drug-related.

      Remove the underground profit motive, and you remove most of the related crimes and deaths.

      It's not just logic, we have 100 years of practice saying that is so.

      The status quo benefits BOTH sides: law enforcement, and drug dealers. Both have bigger budgets, and better weapons compared to before.

      And that won't stop. Until we eliminate the need for a black market.

      It's really pretty simple economics.

    11. Re: 90% chance of opioid overdose by jawtheshark · · Score: 1
      My wife had a smashed ancle, an external fractured tibia and a broken back. While after surgery she always had drip morphine, they always got rid of it as quickly as possible. After that paracetamol and ibuprofen. Massive amounts, I admit. She was in pain for years, until she got a phrostetic ancle. Destroyed joints is one of the most painful things you can have.

      Yes, we live in Europe.

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    12. Re:90% chance of opioid overdose by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Yes, but you are not under any obligation to answer.
      I prefer being seen as uncooperative to being mistreated.

      Then they classify you as defiant, uncooperative and hostile, pathologize you and force you into mental health care.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    13. Re:90% chance of opioid overdose by arth1 · · Score: 2

      Addiction rates go way DOWN. Without criminal penalty, more people seek treatment.

      More is needed than that. With so many states being right-to-fire states, I suspect that many people do all they can to hide their addiction, so they don't lose their job. Becoming unemployed is likely more of a problem for someone who has an expensive addiction and cannot afford CORBA, cannot afford to pay for rehab, and has no chance of passing a drug screening test to land a new job until the addiction is beaten.
      In other countries, social stigma and shame are bigger problems, but here in the US, the economical impact is likely the biggest hurdle.

    14. Re:90% chance of opioid overdose by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      The thought of the horror of your friends, makes you happy enough to justify the effort.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  2. Re:Turn coat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Decent-ish Guy, exposed a traitor with severe mental issues.

    No, you're wrong. This stuff all happened before Trump was president. The person you're thinking of that's exposing the traitor is named Mueller. Decent guy.

  3. Narc of the highest order. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    He came to the Sac 2600 meeting a few months before his parole was up, carrying a cellphone (under a tech ban as part of his parole!) and schmoozing the group. It didn't last long since another friend of his started shit with the group that remained on 2600's #916 IRC leading to them not coming back after that. I was somewhat annoyed by the whole affair, but didn't have any particular reason to dislike Adrian until after the Manning affair, when it became apparent he was an FBI narc back then too. Good thing nobody left at the time either publicly discussed or was into illegal activities (the OGs had either disbanded or moved to private get-togethers, rather than looking over their shoulders for narcs with n00bs every time someone new showed up.)

    Won't miss the guy.

    1. Re:Narc of the highest order. by Pinky's+Brain · · Score: 1

      Oh no, a sociopath didn't obey the omerta ... that sure makes him so much different from the other ones (main difference, they didn't get caught yet).

  4. whistleblowers have a hard road by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    i think this is something most people don't get and most takes on whistleblowers end up romanticizing - whistleblowers have it very very hard. it's not something one should ever do lightly because likely the full brunt of it is going to fall on your own shoulders. whether you end up doing the world any good or not, you're not going to be the beneficiary of any good yourself.

    lamo whistleblew on a whistleblower but he's part of a community that predictably would not have sided with him or THE MAN which is the government and would see him as a traitor of sorts himself.

    1. Re:whistleblowers have a hard road by RazorSharp · · Score: 2

      lamo whistleblew on a whistleblower

      That's not whistleblowing, it's acting as an informant.

      --
      "From the depths of my skeptical and rationalist soul, I ask the Lord to protect me from California touchie-feeliedom."
    2. Re:whistleblowers have a hard road by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Lamo is not a whistleblower. Charitably speaking, he's a witness or informant. Uncharitably, he's a narc, or rat.

    3. Re:whistleblowers have a hard road by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      Adrian Lamo was not a "whistleblower." Please don't lump that asshole in with people who have accomplished so much in showing to us what the governments of the world would keep in the shadows. Adrian Lamo was a paid government informant. I can only imagine that it weighed rather heavily on his mind once it became public knowledge and he wasn't the hero that he pretended to be.

    4. Re: whistleblowers have a hard road by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I have no idea who he is, but good on him for blowing the whistle on that traitor.

  5. Re:Suspicious? by rogoshen1 · · Score: 1

    Well, do you know how much paperwork is involved in a suspected squirrel murder? Plus those little fuckers get all their acorns in a knot if you accuse one of them of something.

    I mean; we all know the guy was in the park, feeding the ducks; and then from behind, one of those bushy tailed little shake-down artists whispered in his ear
    "Mr., gimme all your acorns. Now." (Despite the fact that humans almost never carry around acorns...)

    When he refused to pay up, they shot him, then hid the weapon (This is also where the saying "squirreled away" comes from by the by).

  6. Love From Putin by Templer421 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Please accept this special Russian Air Freshener.

    1. Re:Love From Putin by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Please accept this special Russian Air Freshener.

      You have on proof that the Russian military nerve gas---made only in Russia and used to poison an enemy of Putin after Putin made a public threat to poison his enemies---was Russian.

      Leave Russia Alone!

      Funnily enough, an AI (Anonymous Ivan) yesterday tried to persuade me that it cold have quite easily been Assad or Saddam Hussein. I think Comrade Putin has been skimping a little too hard on the troll training budget recently.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    2. Re:Love From Putin by Cederic · · Score: 1

      There's a very significant difference between acquiring a firearm (trivial) and creating a lethal nerve agent (bloody hard, especially if you want to live long enough yourself to then use it on someone else).

      Right now the only person defending Russia is Comrade Corbyn.

  7. Re:Turn coat by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

    Decent-ish Guy, exposed a traitor with severe mental issues.

    You forgot the "as"

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  8. Re:suspicious by arth1 · · Score: 1

    Perhaps he did the honourable thing.

  9. Re:DNC by Lisandro · · Score: 1

    Are you for real?

  10. Rest in peace by Sarten-X · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And now to burn some karma with Slashdot's most unpopular opinion...

    The world runs on faith. We have faith that people will keep waking up, going to their jobs, and keep society running. We have faith that the people we trust will live up to that trust. We have faith that our observations of the world have been genuine.

    Adrian Lamo extended that faith to the government. He had faith that the people in government offices were true to their oaths, and he had faith that eventually a proper justice would be served. He had faith that talking to the authorities would lead to a righteous outcome.

    I do not know exactly what considerations Mr. Lamo had when he made his choices. I have faith that he was trying to do what was right for the world, and I have faith that were I in his position, having had his experiences and knowing what he knew, I would also understand his decisions.

    Rest in peace, fellow human. From my perspective, I may or may not have agreed with you, but that different perspective is what makes us all important.

    --
    You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
    1. Re:Rest in peace by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2

      Hmmm, I'd replace the word 'faith' with 'trust,' then agree with you.

      If he was relying on faith, evidence to the contrary wouldn't bother him. If he was relying on trust, on the other hand, and that trust was betrayed, well, that can, and does, shatter people all the time.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    2. Re:Rest in peace by arth1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Adrian Lamo extended that faith to the government. He had faith that the people in government offices were true to their oaths, and he had faith that eventually a proper justice would be served. He had faith that talking to the authorities would lead to a righteous outcome.

      Or he was a narc because that was a condition of his lenient sentencing, and he chose to take it.

    3. Re:Rest in peace by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      Not quite.

      He felt that Manning was toxic.

      He didn't give a flying shit about anything but protecting himself.

      I agree with his decision. Why should he go down in flames with Manning?

      It's an interesting story, though. Good read.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    4. Re:Rest in peace by xski · · Score: 1

      Yeah, not a big fan of the F-word there.

  11. Re:Snitches Get Stitches by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    Good Riddance. We don't need people like this in the community.

    First the Korean guy who promised to crack down on cryptocurrencies, now the guy who turned in Bradley Manning.

    Prediction markets were predicted decades ago but they were waiting for fungible cryptocurrencies to show up. 2018, perhaps?

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  12. Re:So much for editing. by arth1 · · Score: 1

    This is not an editing error. It's exactly what Mario Lamo wrote. A [sic] might have been in order, though.

  13. And he was trying to narc on his... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    fellow hackers long before Manning. He was at meetings before he even finished parole, running a fishing expedition.

  14. Stories like this illustrate a problem w/ slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It's all well and good to let readers moderate but a case like this shows how quickly a post about a hacker can devolve into a political debate in which one person makes an assertion, almost completely unrelated to the story itself, or in fact COMPLETELY unrelated to it, which then will get modded up or down, (I suspect though obviously can't prove,) according to the feelings or perception of the person with mod-points, rather than ALL being modded down to -1 for being off-topic.

    If only there were some kind of system in place to mark a story itself as likely to devolve, and therefore subject to moderation by more responsible parties, rather than letting flame-wars erupt within a short time after a story goes live. In fact, despite having a slashdot login and excellent Karma, I think I'll post this anony, just so as not to get dragged into the mudslinging. Anyway, just a thought.


    Regarding the story itself, this seems to be developing, and apart from condolences, doens't seem to warrant a lot of commentary until more is known. In this case, the reported decedent was under 40 years old, which would indicate, I think most people would agree, a low degree of likelihood that the culprit is "natural causes," which means the remaining suspects are accident, (including internal accidents, such as CVA, MI / AMI, intracranial aneurysm, PE, etc., as well as externals, such as a slip & fall,) suicide, or some species of homicide, (i.e., murder, assassination, etc.) Obviously, without more information, it's probably not useful or helpful to anyone to start playing pin-the-diagnosis-on-the-corpse, at least until after the autopsy, inquest, investigation, or whatever comes next in the case.

    Just saying.

  15. In a just world... by SigIO · · Score: 1

    ...this obituary would make the cover of Time Magazine: Lamo's face with a bloody red X over it. Fitting for someone who'd finger his own mother for a few pieces of silver.

  16. Either suicide, opioid overdose or contraindicated by jd · · Score: 1

    When most celebrities die of an "overdose", what is really meant is the doctor screwed up and prescribed two meds that are known to react badly. It's called an overdose to avoid liability.

    Opioid overdose will sometimes fall into that category and sometimes it's a get-rich-quick scheme involving kickbacks and deliberate fraud knowing the patient will die anyway.

    Suicide is a third possibility. America has bugger all for mental health, on the pretext that Real Men never need help. Oh, you can spend a lot, and there's lots of Manly therapy where you're given the chance to give a moron lots of money for no help.

    Apparently, the solution to everyone being unhappy all the time is to move around lots of green pieces of paper. Which is odd, because on the whole it isn't the little green pieces of paper that are unhappy. See the Guide for details.

    There's nothing suspicious about it, there's lots suspicious about paranoid schizophrenics blaming Clinton, the CIA, and so on. These people need help, but Reagan shut down all the hospitals instead of fixing them.

    If you want something to get suspicious about, it's the homeless lunatics being armed by the Feds, under a plan currently under review.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  17. Won't be missed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This piece of shit turned in a whistleblower who was exposing US military's war crimes against children in Iraq (see Collateral Murder). In the video, one can see US soldiers raining fire upon journalists, good Samaritans, and children, and laughing about it as they carry out the atrocities. The whistleblower underwent torture under the Obama administration, according to UN.

  18. Lamo by name and by nature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Rot In Hell Adrian Lamo you piece of shit.

  19. Re: Turn coat by pslytely+psycho · · Score: 2

    Did you complain as loudly over the several years and multiple hearings over Bengazi that wasted far more money than this?

    --
    Donald Trump, on a crusade to make Nixon look respectable
  20. CT are the worst by aepervius · · Score: 1

    The CIA imports the heroin, and they get exactly the desired effect

    While I agree with your opinion that decriminalizing would be better far a variety of reason, I can't condone CT. Do you have any evidence of this ? Because I certainly DO have evidence that drug dealer mix drug together to get a more potent effect (I grew up in a bad city where a few were they discussed it openly - you gotta love the 70ies) , or even a variety of dangerous and potentially fatal chemical to cut the drug and make more money. There is no evidence which I know of that the CIA mix fentanyl and heroin to get addict death and new drug policy. When you m,ix CT , falsehood, with interesting opinion, you poison the well. Just sayin'.

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
    1. Re:CT are the worst by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 2

      Why would you expect him to give you evidence, when that isn't even close to what he said?

      I admit to being puzzled by your assertion that he said the CIA mixed anything with anything.

      Maybe you need to read it again?

  21. Re:re "faith" by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    There's "blind faith", where you close your eyes and jump...
    and then there's "reasonable/reasoned faith" where your knowledge and experiences lead you to believe that jumping, even with your eyes closed, is the reasonable thing.

    That's the thing though. What kind of idiot learns to trust the government? It proves how untrustworthy it is every day. Probably his parents did him a gross disservice and raised him to trust authority. What rubes. Never trust authority. They have you over a barrel. Suspect them at every turn.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  22. Re:This country is NOT passing out pills like cand by Megol · · Score: 1

    Spoken as an entitled whining idiot that can't even stand for his opinion.

    If you aren't lying and actually was given opioids without becoming dependent it still doesn't say anything about the general case.

    We can say anything about the general case by reading up on the research and statistics about the problem and can see:
    . Opioids are overprescribed in cases where other drugs would be better.
    . Opioids are prescribed in high doses than necessary.
    . Opioids are prescribed for longer duration than necessary.
    . Opioids causes dependencies and different people have different chances of developing such.
    . Opioids are prescribed in cases where they obviously shouldn't be (people prone of developing dependencies++).

    But you and your know-it-all friends like to claim everything is easy. It isn't. Your claims doesn't correspond to research. It doesn't apply to the real world with real people.

    But I agree with your first line of text. I'd like your to grow up and be responsible. But people like you never do.

  23. Re:suspicious by Megol · · Score: 1

    Why would it be honorable? And why don't you do it if it is?

  24. Re: Suspicious? by Megol · · Score: 1

    Why do you care so much?

    Some of us don't like sick twisted people.

    Most of us don't. Most of us limit that dislike to actually twisted sick people.

    Some of us are god damned tired of seeing the people who do NOT keep society going asking for special treatment and asking
    for tolerance when their lifestyle makes many in the majority want to vomit.

    You should seek medical help for that, seems like a big problem for you.

    You CANNOT FORCE PEOPLE TO LIKE STUFF THEY FIND SICKENING. And the sooner you quit trying to force your twisted lifestyle
    on others, the better for you.

    But it's fine when you do it Mr. Hypocrite?

  25. Re:This country is NOT passing out pills like cand by i286NiNJA · · Score: 1

    You said you think you won't get addicted if you don't get high. Those are famous last words. You won't believe anyone when they suggest that your pain is opiate withdrawal. I mean that's silly, you never felt high.

  26. Re: Turn coat by LinuxLuver · · Score: 1

    The "traitor" exposed war crimes.....and revealed a culture of impunity in the US military in Iraq. The traitors are the people who think murders and murderers are ok.

    --
    Only boring people are ever bored.
  27. Re: Turn coat by pslytely+psycho · · Score: 1

    Trump should be kissing the media's ass. They covered every fart he made, for free! The media got Trump elected.
    He got ten times the coverage of any candidate, just by being a bigger ass than anyone else. If the other candidates had been granted equal time, there would of been no time for regularly scheduled programming.

    As to the Bengazi hearings, the improper server was a 'meh' moment at best, and had nothing to do with the (IIRC) nine witch hunt investigations that uncovered nothing and wasted millions, but that's apparently OK, as long as it's the 'party of fiscal responsibility' doing it.

    --
    Donald Trump, on a crusade to make Nixon look respectable
  28. Re:re "faith" by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

    That's not faith. That's confidence.

    Faith is 'belief without evidence.' Blind faith, what 'faith' often turns into for religious folk, is 'belief despite evidence.'

    --
    Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.