Slashdot Mirror


BMW Says Electric Car Mass Production Not Viable Until 2020 (reuters.com)

BMW will not mass produce electric cars until 2020 because its current technology is not profitable enough to scale up for volume production, the chief executive said on Thursday. From a report: Munich-based BMW unveiled its first battery electric car in 2013, and has been working on different generations of battery, software and electric motor technology since then. The i8 Roadster model, due to hit showrooms in May, is equipped with what BMW calls its fourth-generation electric drive technology. Advances in battery raw materials and chemistry has increased its range by 40 percent over the previous version, BMW said. BMW is working to make electric car technology more modular and scalable to make mass production commercially viable. "We wanted to wait for the fifth generation to be much more cost competitive," Chief Executive Harald Krueger told analysts in Munich. "We do not want to scale up with the fourth generation."

142 comments

  1. Re:2020 by tomhath · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I don't recall anyone saying "never". Most agreed that battery technology had a way to go though.

  2. Too much investments on ICE already done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Legacy equipment and stuff, that's why it's not viable. Retooling a ICE plant to make it electric isn't free after all.

    1. Re:Too much investments on ICE already done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But, but, but.... imminent Tesla-killers! Seeking Alpha promised me that they were just around the corner!

    2. Re:Too much investments on ICE already done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      imminent Tesla-killers! Seeking Alpha promised me that they were just around the corner!

      They are. And Tesla still isn't out of the starting gate.

  3. China already doing it by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Look, BMW just doesn't want to do this, because of profit factors, not because they are not capable of making a profit doing it.

    They can convert easily. There are companies in Asia that produce far more all electric vehicles than BMW does, and they converted much more quickly and scaled up.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    1. Re:China already doing it by polar+red · · Score: 0

      >Look, BMW just doesn't want to do this, because of profit factors

      I think they don't want to because they are petrol heads; but they are seeing that electric cars are superior and are forced to switch now.

      --
      Yes, I'm left. You have a problem with that?
    2. Re:China already doing it by rogoshen1 · · Score: 1

      What makes you think that they care about what powers their cars; as long as it's profitable?

    3. Re:China already doing it by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      It's a pretty significant supply chain change for them. The operational details are probably quite complex and there are potentially contractual agreements that must expire as well.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    4. Re:China already doing it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      >Look, BMW just doesn't want to do this, because of profit factors

      I think they don't want to because they are petrol heads; but they are seeing that electric cars are superior and are forced to switch now.

      Hardly. There currently is not a profitable market for electric cars. GM had an electric car back in the 90s and it only sold about 500,000 units which wasn't enough to be profitable and justify the capital expenditures to make them.

      There are too many folks who see the small pockets where EVs are kind of selling and extrapolate to the World at large.

      Tesla's model S sales top out at about 80,000 a year - no matter how many they make, they cannot sell more than that. And as we see, Tesla has been losing money for the last 14 years and there's no end in sight. The other automakers see that and they are in the business to make money not change the World. And frankly, as a shareholder, I'd be real pissed if they started making EVs just to be stylish.

      Those are just some of the realities of the EV auto market that escapes many here on Slashdot.

    5. Re:China already doing it by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      What makes you think that they care about what powers their cars; as long as it's profitable?

      Their many scientific papers on the subject.

      Their actual large-scale production of such vehicles.

      BMW is more concerned that they were slacking and didn't corral the battery tech and material resource market contracts needed for large-scale implementation, than they are with the profit this year. They are facing hard deadlines in capacity required, and will lose market and mind share if they don't succeed.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    6. Re:China already doing it by ctilsie242 · · Score: 1

      Before Tesla was on the map, there were three wheeled electric cars scooting around Austin. Of course, the range was crap, and they looked fugly... but local stores were buying them, since they were good runabout vehicles for deliveries, and had very little maintenance requirements.

      There are a lot of companies producing electric vehicles. They may not be supercar contenders, but battery technology is stable enough that even RVs are getting lithium battery systems. Electric drivetrains are also a solved problem.

      Europe likely will go all electric before the US does, just because they have far less land to populate with charging stations. However, it is likely we will see vehicles in the US that are electric cars, except with an IC generator whose sole job is to provide power to the batteries and has no connection to the drivetrain, until battery technology improves enough that range anxiety for long trips coupled with fast charging, isn't an issue.

    7. Re:China already doing it by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      A lot of what you perceive as "electric cars" is really marketing.

      The same model that is sold in Canada to comply with their fleet replacement criteria as an "electric" car, is sold in California as a "ecologically friendly dual drive hybrid". It's the same basic car, it primarily uses all electric unless you enable "sport" or "performance" mode, when it uses the gasoline engine to provide extra power, like most modern supercars do. But it will get you to a charging point, or let you drive in areas without them. Most people who buy these find they rarely use the gasoline engines, and the cars have to force burn the gasoline periodically so it doesn't become unstable (generally every 3 to 6 months, with a mandatory full burn every year). People don't live the way they think they do aspirationally when they watch the off road adventures they'll do, but do maybe once every couple of years. You'd be better off buying a car for how you actually live, and renting one for those "let's go to the mountains" trips when you actually go to the mountains.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    8. Re: China already doing it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because they build the ultimate driving machine, and there is nothing more ultimate than dinosaur powered steal cages.

    9. Re:China already doing it by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 2

      Half a million units in the 90s? Wow, must be mature tech now. Looks like Chevrolet sold 23,000 Bolts last year, 20,000 Volts, and 75,000 Chevrolet Impalas. In January, 2018, there were 82,000 electric vehicles sold worldwide, versus 41,000 in January of 2017; sales rate tends to ramp up as the year progresses, and the 2017 year-end total was 1.2 million worldwide.

      So the worldwide slow-month market for EVs is about the same size as the worldwide annual sales of Impalas. Impalas and Volts are both $40,000 cars; the Model 3 is a $35,000 car with a 5-second 0-60 (Volt is about 8 seconds).

      By your numbers, the Tesla Model S sales top out around the same rate as Chevrolet Impala sales.

    10. Re:China already doing it by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      Look, BMW just doesn't want to do this, because of profit factors, not because they are not capable of making a profit doing it.

      IBM sold its ThinkPad brand to Lenovo, because "it could not be made profitable" . . . even though the IBM ThinkPads were already made in China.

      Lenovo seems to be doing fairly well with ThinkPads.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    11. Re: China already doing it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are a shareholder? You must be ashamed of yourself! You are whatâ(TM)s wrong with this world! You, speculant you!

    12. Re: China already doing it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This makes much more sense. Diesel-electric railway locomotives run an engine as generator only. And only the original Volt ever came close to it.

    13. Re:China already doing it by polar+red · · Score: 1

      >Tesla has been losing money for the last 14 years a

      there is a difference between losing money and investing money.

      --
      Yes, I'm left. You have a problem with that?
    14. Re:China already doing it by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      Actually my gaming laptop is from Lenovo. And my prior laptop (decades ago) was a ThinkPad.

      That said, it has more to do with BMW being slow on the uptake, and letting China and other car manufacturing countries (hi, South Korea!) grab all the material sources for battery tech needed for vehicles. That's on them. They thought, incorrectly, that their competitors were US based. But they're not.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    15. Re:China already doing it by jawtheshark · · Score: 1

      This comment is to undo an accidental "offtopic" moderation. Please carry on.

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    16. Re:China already doing it by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      The Volt is a plug-in hybrid though.

      Likely my next car will be a current (as in current today) generation Volt used.

      The 50 Mile electric, plus 270 per tank of gas seems perfect.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    17. Re:China already doing it by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      Yep, and the Bolt (which outsold the Volt) is a plug-in all-electric. The number you need to cover most daily commuting is 80 miles on battery, which is why I'm fine with the 250-300 mile electric ranges but want any new subsidies or other state encouragement of PHEVs to require 80+ mile range in typical condition. Note that the 2013 Volt gets about 32 miles in the winter and 42 miles in the summer, while claiming 35 on battery: it sort of exceeds its range estimates most of the time (I've gotten nearly 50 out of it before).

    18. Re:China already doing it by Barsteward · · Score: 1

      99% of car journeys in the USA 95% of trips are shorter than 30 miles and 99% is below 70 mil so the need for a monster amount of charge points is not critical to most journeys http://www.solarjourneyusa.com... but a chain of fast chargers are needed for long journeys. Uptake of EVs could be fast in any country if you are lucky enough to have a dwelling where you could attached a charger and even more so if you are 2 car family where one is just used around town.

      --
      "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
    19. Re:China already doing it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And Tesla is losing money.

    20. Re:China already doing it by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      Nice to know.

      I'm a 1 car household, and I do a road trip about once a month, so a pure plugin would need a considerably higher range (750), but the 50 advertised of the current Volt seems perfect for the other 28 days a month.

      I'm right on the edge of electrics being there for me, but that much car rental adds up.

      I'm working on getting a carport built before my current car dies too (I live in a city and need my back yard to be a driveway, and I'd be more comfortable with it covered).

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    21. Re:China already doing it by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      In a reasonable world, there'd be solar power over parking lots, with that 600VDC coming straight down (from sun or from grid) for level 3 charging at 48kW--enough to add 250 miles of range in an hour. After driving for more than three hours at 80mph, you can sit down and eat.

      Level 3 charging is projected to go to 80kW and even higher easy enough (terrifying, I know), netting you 400 miles in an hour or 200 in half an hour. Most people want a reasonable half-hour charge, but most people really take about 40 minutes for a pit stop; on the other hand, the general time between meals is about 4 hours (your performance starts to drop after that: you're more likely to be fatigued if you go longer than 4 hours without eating, but not likely to be hungry after 3).

      As you can see, the numbers are kind of fuzzy until we get into triple-digit kW charge rates. This won't work for long-haul trucking: the solution there is a lot more complex (doable, but complex).

    22. Re:China already doing it by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      I assume batteries will get bigger too.

      If I can go 1,000 miles a charge, that pretty much covers me on most round trips.

      I don't need fast charging then, as long as I can charge 50-100 a typical night at home with nothing exotic (I think a standard 220v home circuit does that).

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    23. Re:China already doing it by mesterha · · Score: 1

      I curious as to how many of these level 3 chargers are in the US. Is it comparable to Tesla? I think a good charging network is a big factor in selecting an electric car. Tesla has lots of stations and is already at 120kW and is planning to go to 350kW. Is there a comparable option for other manufactures?

      --

      Chris Mesterharm
    24. Re:China already doing it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look, BMW just doesn't want to do this, because of profit factors,

      2020 is only 18 months away. That means they have already started to tool up, this is just PR to keep the shareholders at bay while they try to catch up.

    25. Re:China already doing it by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      Look, BMW just doesn't want to do this, because of profit factors,

      2020 is only 18 months away. That means they have already started to tool up, this is just PR to keep the shareholders at bay while they try to catch up.

      Correct. And to now state they can't get sufficient materials because they were asleep while China and S Korea glommed onto all the necessary parts, but they knew this was coming. I have internal docs from Davos where they talked about this, so they did know it was coming. BMW talked about it, China talked about it, S Korean and US car manufacturers talked about it in on-air interviews, and at trade shows.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    26. Re:China already doing it by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

      >Tesla has been losing money for the last 14 years a

      there is a difference between losing money and investing money.

      Someone should have told Tesla that.

      --
      I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
    27. Re:China already doing it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      is this not just BMW telling us that they can't or won't? do what many other car manufacturers are capable of?

    28. Re:China already doing it by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      Not yet. ChargePoint can deliver 500kW to a single vehicle, if your vehicle can handle it. In the future, I imagine we'll have a lot of solar-over-parking-lot to directly feed these things (panels produce 600VDC, and L3 DC is 600VDC). Over 1,400 parking spaces, our local community college installed 5MW of capacity--enough to simultaneously charge about 60 cars at 80kW or 50 at 100kW. You're going to be in class for an hour.

      The solar power is going to offset utility bills for your shopping mall or college campus (shopping center lots are enormous unshaded areas, by the way), so it actually costs a lot. I imagine future devices will allow you to log into an account, and therefor bill the power to your electrical account through your utility, sparing the operator the commercial electrical costs.

    29. Re:China already doing it by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      A 220V circuit is actually pretty exotic. A typical 110V circuit at 15 amps (13A draw) can supply 10.8kWh in 10.5 hours--yes, at 1.43kW, you're getting about 1kW of charge storage. Charging is only 70% efficient.

      At 220V and 15A draw (3.3kW, 20A circuit) can do it in 2.5 by some magic--that's only 8.25kWh charging 10.8kWh of a 16kWh battery. Magical violations of the laws of thermodynamics aside, If you want 100 miles, you need 30kWh. To do that in 8h, you want a 40 amp circuit drawing 25 amps for your charging station. You can do it in 3 with a 50 amp 220V circuit.

      You can't get 100 miles put in overnight without running some sort of special charge circuit and digging a trench for conduit, with special 8/3 UF-B wire. May as well go big, since the charger will cost you about $150 more and the circuit breaker will cost you $20 more. It's going to be an $800 investment anyway.

    30. Re:China already doing it by ahodgson · · Score: 1

      Yes. Stock buyers invest money in Tesla. Tesla loses that money.

    31. Re:China already doing it by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      My mistake, I meant 240V I guess?

      I'd hardly call a stove or dryer circuit exotic.

      A stove is often 240v 40A, which gets 125 overnight (8 hours sleep plus an hour on each side).

      I was simply doing the math that the special charger for the volt does 50 miles in 4.5 hours, so it should be possible to do 100 overnight with a typical at home 220(240?v) charger.

      I am not convinced trenching would be needed as it can be wall mounted and has a 25 foot cord.

      That's my point though, a pretty typical at home charge accessory gets 100 miles + a day (I assume that it will spend less time in too off mode to do 100 miles all at once).

      If the full range is 1,000 miles, I will essentially never need to charge at home, maybe once in a blue moon to I break 1,000 miles away from home, and only once a month 100 miles.

      Sure, there are people that always need to drive more than 100 miles/day, but I bet they are exceedingly rare. As batteries get better, I expect ranges to increase, if not to 1,000 miles, close to it. Over the last decade we've seen some pretty big gains.

      In 4 years there's been a 17% increase (Tesla, 85->100) and a 25% range increase (312->393), I'm not sure where they will decide the trade off is that makes it not worth it anymore for range (cost or weight related), but it seems likely we'll get cars that can handle an extreme driving weekend without the need to recharge, and can be slowly topped off during overnights at home (either that or plugin hybrids come to be the main thing).

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    32. Re:China already doing it by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      I'd hardly call a stove or dryer circuit exotic

      A car port requires installing a new circuit breaker, using special cable, and digging a ditch--unless you have an indoor garage built into your house. The ditch must be a specific minimum depth (18 inches nonmetal conduit, 4 inches metal conduit under concrete). The cable will be sunk in water; it must be a single run with its jacket and insulation both in tact (no nicks, no cuts, no splices, no electrical tape). A covered car port may still require special, weather-rated exterior plugs, unless you hard-wire a weather-rated charger.

      So you need either your car to park inside your house or something much more rigorous than just running standard service or riser cable.

      My car port is 40 feet from my house. If it were 20 feet, I could wall-mount a 25-foot ChargePort with outdoor-rated riser (not in-ground) and have about 5 feet of slack when the car is at the end of the car port. Caveat: The cable connector cable must make a direct run downward, then back upward to the car; it can't hang, but rather must be slack when charging. That means an extra 4 and 3 feet: 7 feet of cable for slack, so really I'd need to get the charge port (which is 5 feet back from the car's nose) within 18 feet of the house, meaning the car has to be within 12 feet of the house, or 6 feet from my porch and parked all the way to the left.

      A 25-foot charge cord only actually reaches your car from your house in rare situations. For most people, you'll need to run new circuits underground.

  4. Translation: by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

    They are waiting for companies to start cranking out cheap solid state lithium batteries. This maximizes their profit margin and they don't actually give a fuck about the environment, just their profit margins.

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    1. Re:Translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong. Alum-air batteries will be viable by that time.

    2. Re:Translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You think people will still be using napkins in the year 2020?
      Or is this mouth-vacuum thing for real?

    3. Re:Translation: by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      This maximizes their profit margin and they don't actually give a fuck about the environment, just their profit margins

      Err....you do not seem to understand the sole purpose of forming a company here for some reason.

      That is their job...their ONLY job, to "create a profit" for the owners and stock holders (if public).

      Did you never take even a rudimentary business class during your educational years?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    4. Re:Translation: by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      You are the one who is clueless here (as so often). The objectives of a company are whatever is written in the corporate charter.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    5. Re:Translation: by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      Ok, then riddle me this Batman....

      WTF would anyone create/incorporate as a for profit company.....and not have their primary goal of "making a profit"?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    6. Re:Translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only rule is to make money. Whatever else you do with is irrelevant. You need money to do anything.

    7. Re:Translation: by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      Ok, then riddle me this Batman....

      WTF would anyone create/incorporate as a for profit company.....and not have their primary goal of "making a profit"?

      For the incorporation protection and the possibility of going public. Not everyone are sociopaths.

    8. Re:Translation: by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      Idealism, for example. Or religious values. Or seeing the profit just as a means to an end.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
  5. First they should try to not make them ugly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I understand electric cars are "the future" but they don't have to be ugly. Futuristic cars in films usually look like plastic toys, real electric cars, except teslas', look like ugly plastic toys.

    1. Re:First they should try to not make them ugly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      real electric cars, except teslas', look like ugly plastic toys.

      that's on purpose.

    2. Re:First they should try to not make them ugly by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1
  6. Engine bay by Christian+Smith · · Score: 1

    I don't understand why existing engine bays have not been reused to fit motor/battery into existing car platforms.

    Surely there is sufficient volume under the bonnet/hood to include a pretty much self contained motor/battery/control unit that could be a straight replacement for the existing lump of metal that is the engine/gearbox combination.

    It shouldn't even affect the car dynamics much, as you'll be just replacing one dense concentration of metal with another. I'd even wager a motor and reasonably large battery would weigh less than the engine being replaced.

    Or am I missing something?

    1. Re:Engine bay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You are missing the weight component. The reason Tesla's handle so well is that the battery is basically the width and length of the car allowing for an equal weight distribution. If you put it all in the engine compartment, you are adding a LOT of weight and the car would probably have 70% of it's weight in that area.

    2. Re:Engine bay by stabiesoft · · Score: 3, Informative

      I think you are missing something. A typical model S sized car runs around 4000-4200 lbs, some much less like the audi and caddy CT6 because they make heavy use of aluminum. The CT6 for example weighs around 3700lbs. The S also makes heavy use of aluminum in the chassis. The S comes in at 4600-4900 lbs, so it is quite a porker even with an aluminum chassis. Batteries are heavy. I also looked up just the battery weight, 1200lbs. A typical V8 performance engine comes in around 500lbs, with V6 and I4's being less of course.

    3. Re:Engine bay by DogDude · · Score: 1

      In electric cars, the wheels are generally all controlled by their own motor and controller, right at the wheel. There's no need for drive shafts. And, you get much better control by having four separately powered wheels.

      I know that at Least Tesla uses big, flat batteries that they put along the bottom of the car, for weight distribution, from what I understand.

      I don't think there's anything in an electric car to put in the engine bay.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    4. Re:Engine bay by ausekilis · · Score: 2

      BMW has been burned in the past - notably with a subframe tear issue. That's right, sheet metal that the axles mount to would tear like a bag of goldfish because they took an existing frame/subframe and slapped a bigger engine/drivetrain into it.

      Considering they bill themselves as "The Ultimate Driving Machine", I can understand how they'd want to spend some time to make sure they move from ICE to a high-powered electric motor without having the car destroy itself.

    5. Re:Engine bay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Tesla’s handle like shit.

    6. Re:Engine bay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In electric cars, the wheels are generally all controlled by their own motor and controller, right at the wheel.

      There isn’t a single electric car that works that way.

    7. Re:Engine bay by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      Electric cars are generally safer because the batteries reinforce the structure of the car and because placing the batteries at the bottom of the car lowers the center of gravity. But your design wouldn't take advantage of those properties.

      In any case, BMW is no Tesla, so if they start mass producing electric cars, they'll start cannibalizing the sales of their own combustion cars, plus they'll have a glut of electrical cars sitting on their lots that they can't sell at the price they want.

    8. Re:Engine bay by Jeremi · · Score: 2

      I don't understand why existing engine bays have not been reused to fit motor/battery into existing car platforms.

      This is commonly done -- in fact, it's easy enough to do that some technically-minded people like to convert their own gasoline-powered cars to electric in their garage.

      The only problem with doing that is that you end up with a pretty mediocre electric car with lots of design compromises -- a car designed from the ground up with electric in mind will have much better range, performance, and handling. That, as much as anything, was what separated Tesla from the rest of the automobile manufacturers in terms of how its electric cars were received by the public.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    9. Re:Engine bay by welshie · · Score: 2

      The Nissan Leaf fits CV joints to traditional wheels, half shafts, a differential, a fixed 10:1 reduction gearbox, the motor itself (single AC induction motor), the inverter (drive electronics / motor controller), the on-board AC to DC charger , as well as the normal electric power steering, 12V accessory battery, and climate control systems, into what normal cars call the engine bay. There's still plenty of space there, but I wouldn't call it empty space.
      It's a front-wheel drive car.

      A rear-wheel drive car like the BMW i3 has a similar arrangement, with the motor normally at the rear instead. The i3 also manages to shoehorn in space in the rear for a motorcycle-derived engine for the generator for the optional range extender, while having some cargo space in the front where traditional cars have an engine bay.

      Many electric vehicles with all-wheel drive (new Teslas, Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV) use two motors - one front and one rear, because that's simpler than having a transfer box and big heavy driveshafts, and gives more precise delivery of power without complicated drivetrain.

      Having the battery under the floorpan makes the weight distribution of electric vehicles really quite good in snow, even if they don't have all-wheel-drive.

      There are some four-wheel-drive, four-motor vehicles around, but none in mass production. The Audi Lunar Quattro is one.

    10. Re:Engine bay by Rei · · Score: 3, Informative

      Go find any review from anyone who's driven the Model 3 who says that it "handles like shit", and link it here, please.

      Even reviews that want to criticize it for other things generally have to reluctantly admit that the handling is superb. Motor Trend put its handling up against the BMW 330i and it beat the BMW in almost every category tested.

      --
      Is your job to sit under bridges and jump out at unsuspecting travellers?
    11. Re:Engine bay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tesla Model S battery is made of several thousand cylindrical cells (18650)

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tesla_Model_S#Battery

      Yes, those cylindrical cells are placed next to each other in strips, but to call them "big, flat batteries" is pretty wrong.

      The rear axle has a traditional open differential. Models with dual motors also have an open differential on the front axles as well. The front and rear axles have no mechanical linkage – with dual motors, the power distribution among them is controlled electronically.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tesla_Model_S#Powertrain

      So the front and rear axles are on separate motors, but the wheels share a motor.

    12. Re:Engine bay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, Tesla handles well to you? The handling might best be compared to a yacht.

      Anyway, you're correct about the weight imbalance if they would have placed batteries up in the engine compartment. That would throw the balance way out of whack.

    13. Re:Engine bay by Rei · · Score: 1

      Compare Model 3 rather than S, since S and X are older tech. Model 3 SR is essentially the same weight as its BMW size and performance equivalent, the 330i. The Model 3 LR is roughly the same weight as its BMW equivalent, the 340i. Once Tesla releases the performance packages, the car should be expected to be lighter than most of its size and performance equivalents.

      --
      Is your job to sit under bridges and jump out at unsuspecting travellers?
    14. Re:Engine bay by turp182 · · Score: 1

      It would have far lower vibration due to far lower moving parts.

      You missed that... Tesla has proven them wrong given their charging infrastructure, this is an attempt to save face, which is covered by pie given what they said...

      --
      BlameBillCosby.com
    15. Re:Engine bay by Barsteward · · Score: 1

      Jaguar have done that with an E-Type https://media.jaguar.com/news/...

      --
      "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
    16. Re:Engine bay by Barsteward · · Score: 1

      Jaguar are selling conversions if you've got the money
      https://media.jaguar.com/news/...

      --
      "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
    17. Re:Engine bay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are missing the point. Battery weight per 120kwh capacity is roughly 500kg
      and coming down. This replaces inter-alia engine, gearbox, radiator, oil cooler
      which run around 350-400kg.

    18. Re:Engine bay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then find a car review that agrees with you. But I am betting you can't,

    19. Re:Engine bay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The RIMAC cars do.

  7. BMW admits by nospam007 · · Score: 1

    We suck!

  8. translation by Kristoph · · Score: 0

    "We were all about 'diesel' and we got caught with our pants down so we're just going to cede more customer to Tesla and other EV makers for a few more years until we get our act together. "

    1. Re:translation by Fly+Swatter · · Score: 1, Redundant

      How do you cede customers to a car maker that can't even meet it's own release schedule?

    2. Re:translation by Jeremi · · Score: 1

      By noticing that people who would have bought a BMW are choosing to buy a Tesla instead. Even if they have to wait a year for their Tesla to ship.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    3. Re:translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tesla's annual sales are less than 5% of BMW's and unlike Tesla, BMW makes a profit. Since they would like to keep it that way, they are not going all-in on EVs until that is profitable. Seems very sensible.

    4. Re:translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Making a USD 1000 refundable deposit towards a car that may never be built is not the same thing as buying a car. Also, BMW is selling more cars every year and Tesla's total sales are still pretty small compared to BMW's, so I doubt Tesla is much of a threat to BMW.

  9. Re:2020 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The statement is optimistically negative:

    "BMW Says Electric Car Mass Production Not Viable Until 2020"

    instead of

    "BMW Says Electric Car Mass Production fully viable in two years"

  10. It won't be viable until charge times are down by mark-t · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Recharging overnight is fine but if you forget to plug your car in overnight, you may not be able to get to work the next morning, whereas if you forget to fill up in last night when you noticed the tank was low, you can at least make a short stop along the way to work today.

    Plus, of course, if a person doesn't even live in a place where they have the facilities to charge their car overnight (eg, either a communal parking without any electric outlets or having to park their car in the street in front of their residence), electric cars as they exist today are complete nonviable. While not exactly a majority of the population, the number of people in that position is far too large a slice of the pie to ignore (more than 25% nationwide here in Canada, and in some municipalities, it's as high as 70%).

    1. Re:It won't be viable until charge times are down by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      People with electric cars have multiple cars. They use an ICE as a backup car. Of course, there will be one guy who says "I know a guy who only has an electric car!". Yeah, right.

    2. Re:It won't be viable until charge times are down by tomhath · · Score: 2

      Only if you drive 100 miles to work. For most commuters an overnight charge will last a few days. Plus, chargers in work parking lots will become commonplace; we're not there yet but the infrastructure is slowly being built out. A couple more years and all the major car manufacturers will be selling them profitably.

    3. Re:It won't be viable until charge times are down by Rei · · Score: 1

      Recharging overnight is fine but if you forget to plug your car in overnight, you may not be able to get to work the next morning

      If you have a 250 mile commute to work, you're spot on.

      --
      Is your job to sit under bridges and jump out at unsuspecting travellers?
    4. Re:It won't be viable until charge times are down by mark-t · · Score: 2

      Wanna take a guess as just how long you'd need to be driving an electric car before the price difference between electricity and gas would have paid for that second car that you are needing to have as a back up?

      And of course, expecting to add a second car into the mix only makes things worse for people who live in apartments or condos because a lot of multiple family dwellings only provide one parking spot per unit.

      Of course, if something is only going to be widely consumed by the wealthy, it's not going to ever be really mass market, is it?

    5. Re:It won't be viable until charge times are down by mark-t · · Score: 1

      How often you need to charge is not the point.... nor is the distance you need to drive. If you notice in the morning that you should have charged your car last night because you won't make it to work on what you have left, you are completely screwed over. If you don't have enough gas to make it to work, however, you can always make a quick stop on the way.

    6. Re:It won't be viable until charge times are down by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      The more people buy the vehicles, the more pressure there is to have facilities. Early pressure comes from attracting wealthier tenants; later pressure comes from attracting any tenants at all.

    7. Re:It won't be viable until charge times are down by mark-t · · Score: 0

      An electric car that is nearly depleted in charge might not even be able to go more than 5 or 10 miles, while a car that is nearly out of gas can usually at least make it to a gas station before continuing the journey.

      This is viable because the time it takes to fill up a car even from completely empty is only a few minutes. I'm suggesting that battery recharge times need to become similarly convenient before you will see electric cars really become mainstream.

    8. Re: It won't be viable until charge times are down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      however, you can always make a quick stop on the way.

      Nope. Not always. Just had to pick up somebody whose car ran out of gas on the road. Then they asked to borrow some money.

      I asked him to get out of the car.

    9. Re:It won't be viable until charge times are down by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      Recharging overnight is fine but if you forget to plug your car in overnight, you may not be able to get to work the next morning [...]

      Depends on where you work.

      Many electric cars get over 200 miles on a charge and pretty much all of them will get over 100 miles. Figure that 85% of Americans travel less than 25 miles to work. So even if they forget, they can manage to get to work and back the next day.

    10. Re: It won't be viable until charge times are down by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Charge a car? One plug. Walk off and leave.

      That's only convenient if you don't have anywhere else to be at the moment.

      Filling a typical car completely with gas from a virtually empty tank takes 3 or 4 minutes. Charging a car to a usable level takes no less than 20.

    11. Re:It won't be viable until charge times are down by Barsteward · · Score: 1

      "An electric car that is nearly depleted in charge might not even be able to go more than 5 or 10 miles, while a car that is nearly out of gas can usually at least make it to a gas station before continuing the journey." - these type of comments aren't really useful - you could say if the car out of gas is 20 miles from a gas station when it runs out, it'll take ages to get the fuel and you have to hope the nearest gas station isn;t empty and waiting for stock.

      Most EVs owners will have apps on their phone to access their EV - i wouldn;t be surprised if the app gave you a reminder that you are low on charge.

      --
      "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
    12. Re: It won't be viable until charge times are down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, letâ(TM)s u vest in polluting batteries and low efficiency and expensive charging stations and draconian rotation rules yay. It is much cheaper to build an overhanging contact network and have the cars connect to it, bumper car style

    13. Re: It won't be viable until charge times are down by mark-t · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure what that has to do with anything... I was saying that if you are low on gas, you can make a quick stop at the gas station on the way to work that will only add 5 minutes at most to your commute time.

      If you are too low on a battery charge to make it to work in your electric car, however, then you're screwed.

    14. Re:It won't be viable until charge times are down by mark-t · · Score: 0

      Sure... but I wasn't suggesting that you necessarily needed to have a full charge every day to get to work... any more than you need to have a full tank of gas. I was saying that with an electric car you need to have your car charged overnight whenever the charge is running low.

      If you only notice as you are leaving your home that you don't have enough charge to get to work in your electric car, you're completely fucked.

      If you notice as you you are leaving your home that you don't have enough gas to get to work, a quick stop at a gas station will add perhaps 5 minutes at most to your total commute time.

    15. Re:It won't be viable until charge times are down by NitroWolf · · Score: 1

      So... stop at a DC fast charger on your way to work. Problem solved. Duh.

    16. Re: It won't be viable until charge times are down by NitroWolf · · Score: 1

      No, you just stop at a DCFC and charge for 5 minutes or so. You're not screwed by any means.

    17. Re: It won't be viable until charge times are down by NitroWolf · · Score: 1

      No, charging a car from 0 to 250 miles takes about 25 minutes. Yes, longer than filling a gas tank, but if you want to "fill to a usable level," you only need about 5 minutes, ten at most.

    18. Re:It won't be viable until charge times are down by TomGreenhaw · · Score: 0

      I can go for the better part of a week before I have to charge our Tesla. I use about 30 miles of range per day and the standard 80% charge for ours is 232 miles. I typically keep it topped off every night because its easy but not really necessary. The 220V 80A power cord in our garage gives us about 60 miles of range per hour of charging.

      I've never driven long distance. We use the good old Mercury Mariner Hybrid for that.

      --
      Greed is the root of all evil.
    19. Re:It won't be viable until charge times are down by mark-t · · Score: 1

      That fast charger is still going to be a whole lot longer than a fill up... which is my entire point.

    20. Re: It won't be viable until charge times are down by lazarus · · Score: 2

      I think we need a standard form for replying to people who drag out the same old arguments about EVs. Sort of like that form we had for "I just invented a new method to stop SPAM" which starts with "Your idea won't work because:"

      I'll start:

      Your argument against EVs is invalid for one of the following reasons:
      - You have conveniently forgotten the slow advancement of petrol-based vehicles over the past 100 years. Electric vehicles are advancing far faster than petroleum-based vehicles ever have in terms of power and range.
      - You can't make gasoline in your garage overnight (at least not easily). Perhaps biodiesel if you're skilled. So refueling at home is limited to electric cars and in most cases you would never need to visit a refueling station.
      - You are forgetting that every gas station has electricity. While they are not widespread now, charging stations will become ubiquitous as soon as the demand is there.
      - You do not understand that even when electricity is produced with coal that an EV produces fewer emissions than the most efficient petrol vehicle. This is due to economies of scale and the greater than 5x efficiency of electric propulsion. (can site study)
      - You think that the primary ingredient in current battery technology can only be produced by monks in remote regions of rural China, while actually Lithium is produced from seawater.
      - You have no appreciation for supply and demand economics and are unaware of how markets adapt to the changing requirements of consumers.

      I'm sure people can add some more. Once we have a comprehensive list we can save the thoughtful denizens of the Internet lots of cycles.

      --
      I am not interested in articles about life extension advancements.
    21. Re:It won't be viable until charge times are down by mark-t · · Score: 1

      If one lives in a relatively high-density populated area, there's a pretty good chance that they live within a mile of a gas station.

      Ideally a person could just take public transit to work in such areas, but in my experience public transit rarely adequately services industrial park areas where a lot of people have to go to work, and where driving might take only 20 to 30 minutes, taking public transit can push that closer to 90 minutes, each way... in some cases as long as 2 hours.

    22. Re: It won't be viable until charge times are down by mark-t · · Score: 1

      By usable level, I meant usable in any practical sense. If you frequently charge your car minimally like what you are suggesting, it will utterly destroy your battery capacity. Charging an electric vehicle to a usable level if you are wanting to still have prolonged use of it afterwards generally means getting it to at least 80% capacity.

    23. Re: It won't be viable until charge times are down by toadlife · · Score: 1

      Yeah, letÃ(TM)s u vest in polluting batteries

      Lithium ion batteries are not toxic, though they should still be recycled.

      low efficiency and expensive charging stations

      Charging is about 85%-90% efficient and the cost to build a charging station is a fraction of what it costs to install an underground fuel tank and gas pumps.

      --
      I don't always use unix-like operating systems; but when I do, I prefer FreeBSD.
    24. Re:It won't be viable until charge times are down by Rei · · Score: 1

      So your point is that if you forget to charge your car 5-15 times in a row, you might have to stop at a DC charger on the way for five minutes to add enough range for the trip?

      Heavens to Betsy, EVs are doomed.

      --
      Is your job to sit under bridges and jump out at unsuspecting travellers?
    25. Re:It won't be viable until charge times are down by mark-t · · Score: 1

      If short charges like that did not impact the battery life, it would be fine... but it does, so it's not. Do it too often, and you pay for that forgetfulness with the price of having to buy a new battery long before you would have otherwise.

    26. Re: It won't be viable until charge times are down by Trogre · · Score: 1

      Pretty sure he was talking about those one-off occurrences where he's forgotten to charge it fully overnight.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    27. Re:It won't be viable until charge times are down by Rei · · Score: 1

      If short charges like that did not impact the battery life, it would be fine.

      They do impact battery life.... for the better (shallow charge cycles are better for li-ion than deep cycles).

      Your knowledge of batteries is literally four decades old. "Memory effects" are from the Ni-Cd days. Ni-MH had something that looked like a memory effect, but it disappeared after a few charges. Li-ion has never had memory effects in any way, shape, or form.

      --
      Is your job to sit under bridges and jump out at unsuspecting travellers?
    28. Re:It won't be viable until charge times are down by Rei · · Score: 1

      And more to the point, even if they did (as mentioned, they don't), manufacturers would simply just just modify the BMS to charge the thousands of individual cells consecutively, not incrementally.

      Shallow charges are normal in EVs, particularly long-range EVs where only a tiny portion of the range is used in a typical day. And they demonstrably last for long time periods and ranges. There are Tesla taxis with hundreds of thousands of miles on them that still have more than 90% of their original capacity.

      --
      Is your job to sit under bridges and jump out at unsuspecting travellers?
    29. Re:It won't be viable until charge times are down by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Recharging overnight is fine but if you forget to plug your car in overnight, you may not be able to get to work the next morning

      Why? Do you work 150miles from where you live? My neighbour has an electric car. He happily goes a couple of days without charging.

    30. Re:It won't be viable until charge times are down by Local+ID10T · · Score: 1

      Dude your straw-man is getting pretty threadbare.

      You should do some research and maybe you can do a better job at anti-electric trolling. The only people who will believe the shit you are spewing are already convinced electric vehicles are the devils creation.

      --
      "You want to know how to help your kids? Leave them the fuck alone." -George Carlin
    31. Re:It won't be viable until charge times are down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People with electric cars have multiple cars. They use an ICE as a backup car. Of course, there will be one guy who says "I know a guy who only has an electric car!". Yeah, right.

      I have a model S and no ICE backup car. There's no need. An ICE car would sit in my garage unused until the battery died (*this may have happened).

    32. Re:It won't be viable until charge times are down by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Or maybe you should bother to read what I wrote instead of throwing terms like 'strawman' around, and perhaps while you're at it, check a dictionary and look up the word, because nothing that I've said here would qualify as such. I have not taken anyone's arguments out of context, nor attacked my own interpretation of such an argument, so there's been no strawman here from my side.

      I've never claimed any position beyond the one I began with which is that EV's need to be more convenient for people to own before they will actually become mainstream. If you believe otherwise that's great for you... but I have as much right to be skeptical of that as you do of my claims. If there's any winner I'd put money on for the future, it is on human laziness, and if something isn't going to appeal to that by being at least as convenient as what people are already used to, I'm not putting any bets on it taking off anytime soon until there is no other choice.

      And I am not discouraging anyone from getting one or suggesting they are making any kind of error in judgement for wanting one, so I'm not sure where you think I'm coming from any kind of "anti-electric" point of view.

      Besides, even the staunchest EV advocates will admit they are not practical for people who do not have access to charging facilities where they park their vehicle at home. The number of people in this position is not small.... more than a third of them in my city, and I'm one of them.

    33. Re:It won't be viable until charge times are down by mark-t · · Score: 1

      No, but one might need to charge it every 3rd or 4th day or so.... and if they were to forget to do so overnight when I need to, I'm not getting to work on time that morning at all.

      With an ICE vehicle, at worst, one would need to make a pit stop for gasoline, which in large urban areas is not usually out of one's way at all owing to how common gas stations are in cities, and adding at most 5 minutes to a commute.

      People get EV's right now because they think that the inconveniences of it* are offset by the benefits... and I don't deny the importance of those benefits, but the threshold of additional people that are willing to do that is eventually going to be reached, and soon, unless those inconveniences are addressed.

      *eg: much more expensive initial purchase, offsetting the money saved between the cost of electricity and gasoline for many years, taking a long time to completely recharge compared to gasoline fill up, sparseness of rapid charging stations (which still take 5 or more times longer to recharge than it does to fill up a car), having to have recharging facilities at home where you park your car to be even *REMOTELY* practical, and others.

    34. Re:It won't be viable until charge times are down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably more common is multi-car households (as in, married, so doesn't apply to most of Slashdot) with a main car and a commuter car, where the cheap EV car works great as a commuter car and the gas car is used for the occasional road trip.

    35. Re:It won't be viable until charge times are down by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      No, but one might need to charge it every 3rd or 4th day or so....

      So your ability to plan ahead suddenly goes to shit because "electrons". Key difference now being you no longer need to call AAA, you can just roll out the extension cord. Look we get it, you're incredibly anti-electric cars and will come up with any excuse. The rest of the world won't wait for you.

    36. Re:It won't be viable until charge times are down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An electric car that is nearly depleted in charge might not even be able to go more than 5 or 10 miles, while a car that is nearly out of gas can usually at least make it to a gas station before continuing the journey.

      This is viable because the time it takes to fill up a car even from completely empty is only a few minutes. I'm suggesting that battery recharge times need to become similarly convenient before you will see electric cars really become mainstream.

      .
      It is also worth pointing out that even a gas powered car that is completely out of gas can be fueled quickly from a portable gas container either by having someone else bring some, walking to a gas station or getting a gallon out of someones lawnmower gas can. The worst with 1 gallon of gas from a gas can can easily go 20 miles so getting to a gas station for a complete fill up would be trivial at this point. (I ran out of gas like an idiot one time less than a mile from home. Called my wife and she brought the lawnmower gas can and I was home in 5 minutes).
      .
      A depleted electric on the side of the road today is going to need a tow truck.

    37. Re:It won't be viable until charge times are down by mark-t · · Score: 1

      You don't need to call the AAA if you are low on gas, unless you don't even have enough to make it to a gas station (which in many cities is often not very far... I think the furthest I've ever lived from a gas station was about 2 miles). If you don't have enough electric charge in an EV to get to where you want to ultimately go, however.... you're in for a bit of a wait as you recharge, however.

      And I'm not anti-electric at all.. I've presented what I think are the biggest objections to electric cars at the moment, and if those barriers can be overcome at some point, I don't see any remaining reason why they would not become mainstream. They all ultimately boil down to one thing:: inconvenience.

  11. Did I miss something? by rsilvergun · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Is it 1980? Because if not 2020 is 2 years away. That's not even a blip in an industry as large as cars. The headline shouldn't be "not viable until 2020" it should be "will be viable by 2020".

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Did I miss something? by Gilgaron · · Score: 2

      Yeah you're right... if 2020 is go time, then they're already ready and it just takes the two years to draw their processes out and get the assembly line guys trained on the new procedures. It probably takes nearly as long to change the corporate logo and letterhead.

    2. Re:Did I miss something? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      To put it in context, the generation of car radios being manufactured today are for 2020 model cars. Basic testing, verification, and integration is a long process.

      in auto industry terms, 2020 = "today".

  12. In 2020 . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    . . . they will say 2025. Etc.

  13. BMW is smart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Electric is a fad. Hopefully BMW never puts out an electric car.

    1. Re:BMW is smart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm still waiting for those rubes to realize that these gasoline-powered horseless carriages will never surpass the utility of trusty old Secretariat towing the family around in our buggy. Any day now this "car" trend is going to pop and people will go back to good reliable buggies.

  14. BMW i3? by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 3, Informative

    Good thing I didn't buy the BMW i3 electric car I was thinking about getting! Their website tells me it's "the revolution", but here Reuters claims BMW says it's not viable until 2020!

    https://www.bmwusa.com/vehicles/bmwi.html

    --
    http://www.geoffreylandis.com
    1. Re:BMW i3? by tomhath · · Score: 1

      That's correct. They're currently manufacturing in low volume (and losing money). They won't scale up production until they can make a profit.

    2. Re:BMW i3? by Ryanrule · · Score: 1

      It’s a pretty crap car

    3. Re:BMW i3? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It must be. An acquaintance of mine has an i3 and is getting rid of it in favor of a Chevy Bolt. So it must be a crap car.

    4. Re:BMW i3? by Zorpheus · · Score: 1

      That doesn't make any sense. Why does it matter to you if they make a profit on it?

  15. It's a round number to start a 20-year clock at by rbrander · · Score: 1

    It's pushing 15 years now since Dr. Peter Tertzakian, maybe the continent's most distinguished "energy economist", wrote the book "A Thousand Barrels a Second", when the world consumption topped 84.6 million bbl/day. His company, Arc Energy, isn't in oil per se, they consult on the economics of developing various alternatives, whether undersea exploration will pay off, etc.

    He accepted that the entire industry had to go, eventually, and provided many contrasts to the all-coal era and how Winston Churchill started the beginning of the end for coal as a transportation fuel (trains, ships) by demanding the British Navy switch to oil in prep for WW1. That required every port to have oil facilities, which then stimulated civilian oil cargo ships, the development of oil-based engines that wound up in trains.

    For changing over all cars to an alternative (in 2004, it wasn't clear whether batteries or hydrogen or biofuels or what was the next thing) he noted that the "North American vehicle fleet" takes a minimum of 20 years to turn over. That's the period where both infrastructures have to be around for two kinds of cars. So that's a pretty large societal cost and the flip won't start until everybody can see that there's enough eventual profit to get over the cost 'hump' of the switchover.

    I didn't start a mental 20-year clock with the first Tesla or Leaf, however, as they seem still experimental, we don't even have a standard charger settled on yet. (The next Blu-Ray vs HD-DVD war is coming. Presumably, at some point, we'll see a YouTube where "Hitler is told that GM just standardized on Tesla chargers").

    2020, however, is an irresistible year for starting a 20-year countdown to the Last Gas Station closing up. Or at least the last ones in small towns.

  16. Re:2020 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    optimistically negative

    The word is pessimism.

  17. Knock Knock.. by Dutchmaan · · Score: 1

    Not until 2020... Oh we'll SEE... we'll SEE!

  18. Not Profitable by hackel · · Score: 1

    It's almost as if environmental calamity alone is not enough motivation for a capitalist company to change its behaviour. Who would have guessed! You know when even Germany cant force companies to do the right thing, we're all doomed.

  19. What matters is charging opportunity, period. by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    99% of car journeys in the USA 95% of trips are shorter than 30 miles and 99% is below 70 mil so the need for a monster amount of charge points is not critical to most journeys

    You all still ignore the hell that is apartment complex parking. Absolutely no-one seems to be thinking through the question "what happens when all cars are electric". They cannot be until that question is considered; until the problem of mass numbers of electric cars is addressed electric cars will remain HipsterMobiles.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:What matters is charging opportunity, period. by ahodgson · · Score: 1

      I agree. Only people who own their own house with off-street parking can realistically own electric vehicles today.

  20. 2020 is only 20 months away.. by zr · · Score: 1

    ..wow, thats way sooner than i expected and i'm pretty optimistic on electric cars.

    (i thought we'll be lucky to see model 3 in full swing by then)

  21. Re:Na Our generation by wolfheart111 · · Score: 1

    Just needs to die already. The newcomers are quite brilliant... well having every piece of knowledge available in an instant since thier birth == genius.

    --
    [($)]
  22. Leaving oxygen for Tesla by msevior · · Score: 1

    Nice of BMW to leave it to Tesla to be the first manufacturer capable of producing over 500,000 BEV's per year. The experience could enable them to continue to be the prime mover in this technology.