Slashdot Mirror


US Charges Iranians For Global Cyber Attacks on Behalf of Tehran (reuters.com)

The United States on Friday charged nine Iranians and an Iranian company with attempting to hack into hundreds of U.S. and international universities, dozens of companies and parts of the U.S. government on behalf of the Tehran government. From a report: The cyber attack pilfered more than 31 terabytes of academic data and intellectual property from 144 U.S. universities and 176 universities in 21 foreign countries, the U.S. Department of Justice said in a statement. The U.S. Treasury Department said on its website that it was placing sanctions on those accused and the Mabna Institute, a company described by U.S. prosecutors as designed to help Iranian research organizations steal information.

36 comments

  1. Iran didn't use chemical weapons on England by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Iran has never used nerve agent to assassinate someone and contaminate a British town.

    They also haven't hacked our election systems, unlike Russia.

    More importantly, they never bribed Moscow Donald to betray his own country.

    1. Re: Iran didn't use chemical weapons on England by reanjr · · Score: 1

      Right? This is basic intel gathering. Every nation on Earth with an economy has teams doing this.

    2. Re:Iran didn't use chemical weapons on England by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep. "LOOK! OVER THERE!!!!". Besides, we need a "good" excuse to start bombing Iran to take the focus off the traitor-in-chief.

    3. Re:Iran didn't use chemical weapons on England by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It did send out assassins because a British author (Salman Rushdi) dared to write a book considered blasphemous. It did support Al-Queda and the Taliban, and it did blow up the Jewish community centre in Buenos Aires. Alas, plenty of room in the world for more than one set of villains...

    4. Re:Iran didn't use chemical weapons on England by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "traitor-in-chief"
      Trump may be an idiot and the wrong man for the job but what has he done that makes him a traitor? Like every President before them they all have to deal with their predecessors policies and actions. The US government runs with so much forward inertia that radical policy changes from one administration to another are almost impossible to pull off even in a 4 year term.

      Trump was handed the problems involving Russia, Syrian war, China trade, and the NK nuclear issues. Trump was not in office when these problems were created. The NK problem is the result of over 60 years of US and International failed diplomacy. Expecting Trump to fix this particular problem would mean two things. Option 1 is a full on military solution and damn the consequences. This option was enough to scare the Chinese into actually enforcing some of the sanctions levied against NK for the very first time. Option 2 is talking directly with NK leader to try and come to some type of negotiated resolution that everyone can live with. Of course Trump was criticized when he suggested option 1 may be the only solution and he has been criticized by the same critics for even suggesting he might attempt option 2.
      The best solution may be option 3. Ignore the crazy little fucker running NK, ramp up the sea going interdiction efforts to enforce existing sanctions, and continue financially punishing any country caught ignoring the NK sanctions. In other words force NK into doing something very stupid such as attempting to bomb a US target. Once he does that the US doesn't have to ask permission or give a singular goo goddamn what any other country says when the US turns NK into a parking lot. After all the US is pretty much out of the radiation fallout radius. To bad China, SK, and Japan didn't step up long ago and take care of the NK problem before it got out of hand. And it is primarily Japan and SK who have forced their military protector to fight with one hand tied behinds it back for all these years.

      The last President also had evidence the Russians were "attempting" to interfere with the presidential election and said nothing. The NSA, CIA, and FBI all had knowledge of the Russian activities related to the election at the time and remained silent by the President's order. The reasoning behind keeping quite is that Obama didn't want to upset the ongoing Presidential campaign. Of course at the time Clinton was sailing to victory so in the eyes of the President's advisors and the DNC the Russian activities fell into the category of no harm no foul. It wasn't until Clinton lost that Russian activities became a world ending problem.

      People need to look beyond Trump's never ending litany of stupid statements and look at what is actually happening and you will see Trump's words have changed very little in how the government actually operates. The media is too busy treating the Presidency as a gawdy soap opera because it improves their ratings. They certainly are not reporting any facts and instead do nothing but report opinions backed up by very few facts. Reporters use to have to find true sources of the information they publish but today all the facts are supported by anonymous sources and from those not authorized to speak publically. Never mind that the people who are not authorized to speak are doing it any way which makes them policy and NDA violators and in some cases outright law breakers. Add in a populace with more smart phones than smart people who are unable to understand any concept that requires more than a 140 characters of prose and we have what we have. And it's only going to get worse.

    5. Re: Iran didn't use chemical weapons on England by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the Jews relentless attack everyone else, including their closest allies ie The King David Hotel Bombing, 9-11, etc etc

    6. Re:Iran didn't use chemical weapons on England by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      They also haven't hacked our election systems, unlike Russia.

      Neither has Russia. Plot hole #3,459 of Russiagate is the fact that both parties in the United States have been virulently anti-Russian for over a century. It's like accusing Malcolm X of interfering in an election between Strom Thurmond and George Wallace - both people hated his guts so why would he bother??

  2. How? by Neuroelectronic · · Score: 1

    How were they able to hack so many universities? I wonder if this is fallout from the Snowden leaks revealing all the backdoors in legacy systems.

    1. Re: How? by reanjr · · Score: 1

      ? University networks are insecure af in my experience. Too much wild west, lots of students involved in setting up networks, student support, etc.

  3. Re: How about the JEWS who caused the 2009 Financi by reanjr · · Score: 1

    Sure. Like when the USA was spying on the German Chancellor.

  4. 31 terabytes of what by tomxor · · Score: 1

    The cyber attack pilfered more than 31 terabytes of academic data.

    I hate it when media quantifies dammage in terms of bytes... bytes of what? I can fit 31TiB in my desk draw, at little cost. The significance of the size entirely depends on what it is... is it 31 TiB of academic security footage? or decades worth of research? reducing qualatative dammage information to these kinds of numbers looses all relevance, much like that kid who looked over his techers shoulder to see his password who was charged with "computer missuse act".

  5. Re:How about the JEWS who caused the 2009 Financia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you hear the comments from the neo-nazis, white supremacists, racists, and other jackasses like this guy is, in the voice of a petulant 12 year old boy? Suddenly it makes more sense. But in the voice of an actual adult, ostensibly educated, with a three-digit IQ? Not so much.

  6. How are these laws worded? by FeelGood314 · · Score: 1

    The USA, NSA and Five Eyes regularly intercepts traffic, hacks communication, puts back doors in commercial devices and even modifies other countries hardware. I find it hard to charge intelligence operatives of other countries for doing something we do ourselves. Your morals have to be pretty messed up to make one a crime and encourage the other.

    1. Re: How are these laws worded? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure thing ChingChong.

  7. Doing Them a Favour? by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

    >US Charges Iranians For Global Cyber Attacks on Behalf of Tehran

    This makes it sound like the US is doing Tehran a favour by doing some of their legal work for them.

    --
    I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    1. Re:Doing Them a Favour? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >US Charges Iranians For Global Cyber Attacks on Behalf of Tehran

      This makes it sound like the US is doing Tehran a favour by doing some of their legal work for them.

      Which would have been entirely plausible if Obama was still president.

  8. Halp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone stoled my intellectual property. Where is it? Oh I still have it, it's still here.

  9. USA = shithole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this is the same shitty country that was exposed by snowden for hacking countries all over the world. now it's crying about iran, russia and china? lol what a shithole

  10. Re:How about the JEWS who caused the 2009 Financia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I find it is best to just assume that those statements are made by APK and ignore.

  11. The drumbeat begins by sasparillascott · · Score: 1

    Expect the Trump admin to kill off the Iranian deal (even the Prez can't say why its actually bad) - I think that comes up within a month. Would not be surprised if this the beginning of the drumbeat for regime change by this administration.

  12. Only idiots think they hacked the US elections! by TimSSG · · Score: 1
    The Russians are accused of hacking the DNC not the US elections! Only idiots think they hacked the US elections! Tim S.

    Iran has never used nerve agent to assassinate someone and contaminate a British town.

    They also haven't hacked our election systems, unlike Russia.

    More importantly, they never bribed Moscow Donald to betray his own country.

    1. Re:Only idiots think they hacked the US elections! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Russia hacked the DNC, and our election systems. citation provided

      Unfortunately some traitors actually support Russia's attacks and their continuing hacks of our elections systems so they deny the obvious.

      Donald Trump is on the Russian government's payroll so he refuses to protect our country or acknowledge what happened. What's your excuse?

    2. Re:Only idiots think they hacked the US elections! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Crooked Hillary hacked the DNC. And that is why Bernie Sanders is not President.

    3. Re:Only idiots think they hacked the US elections! by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      AC the data walked out. It was a person who understood internal US domestic politics and who had access to data the media had to see.
      "A New Report Raises Big Questions About Last Year’s DNC Hack" (Aug 9, 2017)
      https://www.thenation.com/arti...

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    4. Re:Only idiots think they hacked the US elections! by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      Russia hacked the DNC, and our election systems. citation provided

      Citation is bogus.

      1) Get past the hyperbole and the ergmagerd hacking is actually....port scanning. Something that happens to every IP address on the planet.

      2) Even if the FSB was trying to hack into election systems, they wouldn't be so stupid as to do it from Russian IP addresses. Which is plot hole #2,462 of Russiagate: Putin was so diabolically strategic and prescient as to know years in advance that a sexist, racist failed businessman could be POTUS, and yet be so incompetent as to collude with someone as incompetent as Trump, or do all his hacking from Russian universities and not have an agent do it from a laptop on another continent.

  13. Sometimes the headline.... by djbckr · · Score: 1

    Sometimes the headline makes me have to do a triple reading. I read that and thought to myself, "How much are we charging for these cyber attacks?" As in a monetary value. Then I figured out "charged with crimes". The English language sucks....

  14. Well, Bolton's getting an early start... by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 1

    Nothing like the early echo of wardrums in the morning.

    --
    That is all.
  15. Re: Only idiots think they hacked the US elections by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cambridge Analytica hacked your Facebook and you're a slave. BIGLY.

  16. Reuters - mouth piece of the banking elite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    war is good business for one side..

  17. Take this as an example Brazil by aod7br7932 · · Score: 1

    Brazilian prosecutors, follow this example and charge the US staff involved in the cyber attacks against Petrobras and Brazilian government on 2014/2015

  18. Preparation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are downloading the web in preparations of Internet Trumpdown.

  19. Total cyber bullshit .. by najajomo · · Score: 1

    A fascist regime bent on fermenting discord anywhere on the planet, the united States of America. I figure what with the Russians not responding to the neocon bait, they have to pick a fight elsewhere.

  20. cough*STUXNET*cough by Uberbah · · Score: 1

    Even if this isn't just more propaganda from the usual pathological liars, the U.S. is hardly in a position to complain here after deliberately sabotaging Iran's civilian centrifuges.

    If Iran had done that to the United States, we would have invaded their asses a long time ago.

  21. Actually it was about academic papers by fygment · · Score: 1

    Yeah, Iranian universities, etc. cannot access most of the high end academic journals eg. publications of the IEEE. There's an embargo or some such. So some enterprising types likely figured it would be easy to just download a bunch of stuff à la Aaron Swartz or Alexandra Elbakyan and liberate it in to Iran (possibly for profit). Kind of a non-event in that light isn't it? They got caught and there's a big anti-piracy/anti-Iran lobby so this makes news ... kinda.

    --
    "Consensus" in science is _always_ a political construct.
  22. Let's hope it ends up in Sci-Hub by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seize the means of science production!