Slashdot Mirror


Google Removes 'Kodi' From Search Autocomplete In Anti-Piracy Effort (torrentfreak.com)

Google has banned the term "Kodi" from the autocomplete feature of its search engine because it's "closely associated with copyright infringement." This means that the popular software and related suggestions won't appear unless users type out the full term. TorrentFreak reports: It turns out that Google has recently removed the term "Kodi" from its autocomplete results. While Kodi can be abused through pirate add-ons, the media player software itself is perfectly legal, which makes it an odd decision. Users who type in "Kod" get a list of suggestions including "Kodak" and "Kodiak," but not the much more popular search term Kodi. Similarly, when typing "addons for k" Google suggests addons for Kokotime and Krypton 17.6. While the latter is a Kodi version, the name of the media player itself doesn't come up as a suggestion. Once users type the full Kodi term and add a space, plenty of suggestions suddenly appear, which is similar to other banned terms. Ironically enough, the Kokotime app is frequently used by pirates as well. Also, the names of all of the pirate Kodi addons we checked still show up fine in the autosuggest feature. Unfortunately, Google doesn't document its autocomplete removal decisions, nor does it publish the full list of banned words. However, the search engine confirms that Kodi's piracy stigma is to blame here. In a statement to TorrentFreak, a Google spokesperson said: "Since 2011, we have been filtering certain terms closely associated with copyright infringement from Google Autocomplete. This action is consistent with that long-standing strategy."

117 comments

  1. whew by mr_resident · · Score: 5, Funny

    Problem solved!

    1. Re:whew by Highdude702 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I love how everybody wants the major corporations to police the internet now.

    2. Re: whew by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In other news, google has removed the terms "debugger", "defective -by-design", and "EFF" from their auto complete results due to their association the word "piracy" as the latest savlo in their on going censorship campaign.

    3. Re:whew by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      But Google uses Linux on their servers, open sources things that has no value business-wise and said they’d Do No Evil. So now all those Google defenders get to reap what they sow from the company who holds control over more than 80% of the search engine market.

      Funny how Slashtards always raged over OS monopolies but would defend Google having a near Microsoft-level monopoly on search results because they feigned being an open source company. All this widespread filtering is a direct result of them having the market power to silence things they don’t approve of. Because who are you going to switch to? Bing?

    4. Re:whew by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I wonder when they will ban the term 'google' from search also, since thats the #1 way to find content, including pirated content...

    5. Re: whew by dj245 · · Score: 1

      Big corporations control the government, which is currently dysfunctional. It only makes sense that the people are now lobbying the organizations with the actual power and some semblance of effectiveness.

      --
      Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    6. Re:whew by emaname · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Because who are you going to switch to? Bing?

      How about DuckDuckGo? I switched to it about 4 or 5 years ago, right after I was filter bubbled by Google.

      --
      An effective "democracy" creates the illusion the people have a say in their government.
    7. Re:whew by Vitriol+Angst · · Score: 1

      Nobody asked them to. This is to please copyright holders.

      You can still search for weapons, racist comments, slurs, atrocities, porn and the like. But they draw the line at, well, some companies not making a profit.

      Is this for starving kids or something? I'll google; "how to eat starving kids" -- goes right through.

      --
      >>"ad space available -- low rates!!!"
    8. Re:whew by rtb61 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Or more accurately https://duckduckgo.com/?q=kodi... . I don't even understand what everyone is talking about, search for Kodi right there. Is it me or has the rest of the internet gone nuts, I stopped using https://duckduckgo.com/?q=goog..., I don't see a whole slew of problematic searches any more. The googlites have seemingly turned into a whole pack of problematic control freaks, their market lead, their stint in the sun, seems to have caused the arrogantly flow of blood from the bug brain to the egotistical undefined genitals brain, you think from down there and you will make stupid decisions.

      You have to keep tech companies small, otherwise they just all go nuts, absolutely nucking futs.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    9. Re: whew by donaldm · · Score: 1

      In other news, google has removed the terms "debugger", "defective -by-design", and "EFF" from their auto complete results due to their association the word "piracy" as the latest savlo in their on going censorship campaign.

      Well you can enter "piracy" or "p" in the google search and you do get the "piracy" hint (well I do) as the first word then if you enter or select "piracy" as your search you get the definition of the word followed by top stories (as per 30th March 2018) of which the first one is Kodi. Great advertising. :)

      Well, all know that Microsoft would not condone "piracy". I mean just type in the word "sea" and I get "sea of thieves" as my first hint. Oh, wait! ... Must fight the urge. :)

      --
      There ain't no such thing as proprietary standards only proprietary formats. Standards are by definition open.
    10. Re:whew by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because who are you going to switch to? Bing?

      Why not? Results are worse but they are far from useless.

      Someone joked here "Google is a search engine controlled by an evil big corporation. You should use Bing instead." I agree.

      Miscrosoft doesn't use user data for advertisement targeting, so they have no reasons to collect it. Google have all your search results and knows what you clicked. Add it to information they get from usage of Android, Assistant, JavaScript tracking, YouTube, Maps, Drive, Calendar, Docs, Photos, GMail, Translate, etc. This is too much. There is no reason to trust Google.

    11. Re:whew by nospam007 · · Score: 1

      "I'm not sure this story is a good example of things going bad. Kodi still shows up in the search results."

      Sure, but now the pirates have to type the last 'i' themselves!
      That will show them.

    12. Re:whew by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      governments can't really afford to do it. so they are trying to outsource. it's going to be a fun ride.

    13. Re: whew by danperc7 · · Score: 0

      I really need the world to know about a real one who helped me got proof of my cheating ex .hes really reliable and an expert at his job .contact hackdigg at gmail dot com or contact him on what's app through this number .+15185049376... or text his mobile number +15186284630.he can hack into what's app.facebook .text messages ,deleted text messages or any type of spying hacking related .tell him from Anita Email:hackdigg at g mail dot com Text num:+15186284630 What's app num:+15185049376

    14. Re: whew by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google allows you to easily delete all of that. If you don't know how, it's because you're lazy.

    15. Re: whew by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you assume that they will remove this information because you're dumb. They will stop showing it to you. They track people who don't have Google account, how they supposed to remove tracking history? Shilling much?

    16. Re:whew by InPursuitOfTruth · · Score: 1

      Thanks for this news! Just switched to DuckDuckGo.

    17. Re:whew by Highdude702 · · Score: 1

      You have a low back number, do you remember what the best part of the internet was 15 years ago or so? It wasn't that most of the people that bother us now were on the internet, although I could see how that comes to mind. It was the fact that you could search for, and find anything you wanted be it illegal(In law not in a moral sense.) or not. And you didn't have search engines that would hide results.. I miss those days. The internet is garbage now, I don't really know if I would miss what the majority of the world thought the "internet" was.

  2. But the freetards will still suck Google's cock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Good thing all you freetards fell for that 'Do No Evil' bullshit back in the day to enable this shitty company.

  3. The Humanity by rmdingler · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There has to be a whole other level just north of 1st world problem to properly convey the angst and suffering experienced by the user forced to enter the full four letters to link to the Kodi site.

    --
    Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

    Ernest Hemingway

    1. Re: The Humanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AND havr to press enter!

      #NotMyGoogle
      #DeleteGoogle

    2. Re:The Humanity by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 3, Funny

      My daughter’s name is Kodi, you insensitive clod!

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    3. Re:The Humanity by Shompol · · Score: 1

      Once they start censoring they will keep censoring, whether it is to please the Disney mouse, a political party, their own agenda, etc. Do you still trust them with finding for what you are looking for or finding what they want you to see instead? Probably not yet but they are trotting towards becoming a world-wide propaganda engine.

    4. Re:The Humanity by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      There has to be a whole other level just north of 1st world problem to properly convey the angst and suffering experienced by the user forced to enter the full four letters to link to the Kodi site.

      Let me fix that for y'all:

      "There has to be a whole other level just north of 1st world problem to properly convey the angst and suffering experienced by the user forced to enter the full four letters to link to the [REDACTED] site."

      That word is banned, which means you are not allowed to use it in a post. Google will now report you as a pirate.

      Oh, shit! I used that banned word, as well in this post!

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    5. Re:The Humanity by nnull · · Score: 1

      The more they keep censoring, the more I don't care about them or their services. Google is not the first service to pull this crap and won't be the last, but it's amazing how Google doesn't learn from the past and realize the companies that went full censorship don't even exist anymore.

    6. Re:The Humanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is how it begins. Slippery slope follows.

    7. Re:The Humanity by rmdingler · · Score: 1

      Once they start censoring they will keep censoring, whether it is to please the Disney mouse, a political party, their own agenda, etc. Do you still trust them with finding for what you are looking for or finding what they want you to see instead? Probably not yet but they are trotting towards becoming a world-wide propaganda engine.

      It seems unlikely a corporation could command as much influence as Google without eventually succumbing to either the internal pressures of wielding such power, or the external pressures of governments and advertisers to steer the narrative.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    8. Re:The Humanity by Rockoon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Google went back into China. That tells you where Googles limit is w.r.t bending for governments. No limit at all.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    9. Re:The Humanity by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      +1 Funny

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    10. Re:The Humanity by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      The more they keep censoring, the more I don't care about them or their services.

      The more they keep censoring, the more they become responsible for their content and can be held legally liable for it. Censorship is a dangerous rabbit hole for Google to scurry into.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
  4. Not that it actually matters by bobstreo · · Score: 0

    but has Google removed kodi/spmc/xbmc from the play store?

    Otherwise it's just lip service to please some advertiser(s)

    I guess there are some people too stupid or in so much of a hurry that if something doesn't autocomplete, they won't know how to actually search for something.

    I wouldn't know, I don't use google for searches, haven't for probably 15 years.

    1. Re:Not that it actually matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is just lip service. XMBC autocompletes at B, and brings up Kodi results. Xbox Media Center autocompletes at E and brings up results for Kodi. Google is not stupid, but it seems they presume anyone who feels this was a good move is.

    2. Re:Not that it actually matters by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      I don't know but I suggest renaming the project to "obama trump".

      or mpaariaa

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  5. googling my name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why won't google autocomplete my name any more?

    --kodi

  6. Thank goodness for Bing by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 0

    Kodi's official homepage is returned as the first search result.

    Cheers, MS!

    1. Re:Thank goodness for Bing by squiggleslash · · Score: 4, Informative

      That's true with Google too. Read the summary again, Google are just removing Kodi from autocomplete, not from their search listings.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    2. Re:Thank goodness for Bing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I guess Google should start removing Google products, like Android, from the autocomplete with the whole Oracle case going on. I mean, that's a much more direct link than Kodi.

    3. Re:Thank goodness for Bing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What happens when this purely symbolic gesture fails to have any meaningful benefit to the entity that dictated the change?

    4. Re:Thank goodness for Bing by donaldm · · Score: 1

      Kodi's official homepage is returned as the first search result.

      Cheers, MS!

      Well, you could try "sea of" and get "Sea of Thieves" Microsoft's latest game.

      Err isn't that about pirates? Yes, Microsoft is a good role model.

      --
      There ain't no such thing as proprietary standards only proprietary formats. Standards are by definition open.
  7. Kodi has nothing to do with piracy. Google is PEDO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    This action is so dumb I'm honestly not surprised it came from America. What is the point of attacking Kodi, a media player, for the contents some people use it for? It's like attacking iTunes or Winamp because some people use it to listen to "illegally" downloaded music.

    Google is str8 up PEDO and needs to be replaced by a neutral entity that is in no way linked to American government or associated with America's lackeys in Europe and such.

  8. Duck Duck Go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So don't use the goo and go with the duck. Entering "kod" still brings up Kodi and Kodi.tv and kodi.tv download.

    I get the point - a private company is censoring...somewhat. But they are a private company so it's their choice. Don't use them and the problem is gone.
    And for gods sake stop giving them your data! A cheap domain cost $15 a year and comes with email. Use a browser that lets you (integral or via plugins) block cookies, redirects and scripts.

    Nothing is going to keep you data 100% safe but at least they have to work for it.

  9. Why didn't they remove the term 'Youtube' by tonywong · · Score: 0

    Youtube was a huge source of lots of infringing content too, especially early on. Yet Google went and bought Youtube...

    1. Re:Why didn't they remove the term 'Youtube' by nnull · · Score: 1

      Was?! It still is!

    2. Re:Why didn't they remove the term 'Youtube' by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      Was?! It still is!

      And Google itself has proven to be the best torrent search engine. filetype:torrent and Bobs your uncle.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
  10. Allah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'll name my Kodi fork Allah. Go ban that. Then I'll rename to Yahweh, and so on. Heck, maybe call it Googel.

    1. Re:Allah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhmm, you sure ? good luck with raging muslims at your doorstep

    2. Re:Allah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The whole absurd idea implied pretty much Muslim rage and what would happen if they attempted to ban my Muslim-enraging product. I wouldn't give away my identity beyond a pseudonym either, because of that rage.

      Also exemplifies easy potential for abuse.

      That gives me an idea... call my fork the Westboro Baptist Church, Church of Scientology, Bank of America, the Official MPAA Media Player... and so on, enraging everyone as I go.

  11. kodak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kodak should be removed as well since child porn can be taken with kodak cameras

    1. Re:kodak by Desler · · Score: 2

      Kodak? Did you pull that reference from the trunk of your Delorean? Kodak hasn’t been relevant in more than a decade.

    2. Re:kodak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kodak Black would beg to differ.

    3. Re: kodak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I chew Kodak dip you insensitive clod.

    4. Re: kodak by Desler · · Score: 1

      It’s Kodiak dip.

  12. How awful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You should all totally stop giving Google your money in order to punish them for their decision.

    Oh... wait.

    What's that you say?

    You -don't- pay Google anything?

    Well gosh, isn't that just too bad for you then.

    1. Re: How awful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So we should stop giving Google our data, since that's how we pay them. Good idea!

  13. So done with google by blackpaw · · Score: 3, Informative

    Switched to DuckDuckGo and Bing (its actually not bad for technical searches).

    I just don't know what to do with my gmail address, its my real name and how I'm contacted by people important to me, a vast history of important emails and the login or recovery email for a large number of services. Dumping it is not really an option.

    Can't stand iOS so sticking with my 950XL till grim death. Hoping some of the crowd funded non android phones bear fruit.

    1. Re: So done with google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Set up your own email server.

      Forward your messages coming to your gmail address to your newly setup email server.

    2. Re:So done with google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah I left a few months back. Google and certain others have been encroaching in more aspects of my online activities anyway and I'd rather step away from all of that.

    3. Re:So done with google by DogDude · · Score: 1

      Buy your own email. Forward your gmail to it. How fucking hard is that?

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    4. Re:So done with google by blackpaw · · Score: 1

      Thanks for all the helpful suggestions, and yah I really have to just suck it up and do it, there will be no future better time or methodology. Tricky bit is deciding on a less evil provider that will stay that way, or finding a decent self hosting option that doesn't require my own inhouse servers. A pity that email addresses can't be portable between providers the way phone numbers are.

      Side note: Interesting that the AC's are helpful and positive, while the only asshole is a named account.

    5. Re: So done with google by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      That won't prevent Google from collecting data on him.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    6. Re: So done with google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right wrt to the mail passing through the gmail account. If he migrates people to his new address (owned and supported by him) it will make a difference in time.

    7. Re:So done with google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Indeed, the best is to just start, and don't expect immediate solutions. Enjoy the 'trip' and not just the destination. I think it is like it is with smoking: significant reduction is already quite an improvement to your health.
      What I did is get a protonmail account and start using that as default (every communication I initiate) and to reply (most of the mailthreads) and tell closest relations to ditch the gmail and contact me on protonmail.

      Then I started to slowly, sloooowly eat my way through my gmail, discarding everything I did not need to keep and forward to my protonmail, or copy to disk what I wanted to keep. Passwords (and contact emailaddresses) for accounts I change and I add them into keepass as i come across them, kill two birds with one stone (stupid password policies I used to have, like mailing to myself and reusing, etc).
      With k9mail on the phone for my gmail, i use 'spare time' during travel, etc to purge my gmail slowly. One day I will get to the end of that emailbox, but until that day it is actually an amusing trip down memory lane of the last 20 years or so (got my gmail account when it was still invite only).

      I keep the gmail address for android, but try to move away as much as possible. I got a cheap Motorola 4G that I rooted and flashed (just to see if I could do that without experience) only a very small gapps package (playstore, push). I ordered a puri.sm phone so next year I will see if i can step that up some more.

      I set duckduckgo as my default search engine. I added Startpage as an extra that I try if duckduckgo does not find what i am looking for, and i resort to google only after these two fail me. A year ago this would happen quite often, but the past few months duckduckgo is often all i need.

      For Whatsapp (which I never had) I asked one-on-one relations to get signal private messenger for messaging with me (groups refuse to change to signal for me until all are over on signal because I asked each of the members individually). Not having Whatsapp is a bit of a social isolation sacrifice, but one that I am willing to make. My entire social network has already sold me out by giving their addressbooks to Whatsapp. I'm the clearly white spot in the middle of that social group and they know it...It's a matter of principle now :)

    8. Re:So done with google by geek · · Score: 1

      Do what I did. Put an auto responder on your gmail telling everyone to now email you at your protonmail address. You can forward it too. After a few months, kill it.

      I'd recommend getting used to iOS. Its presently the only option for anything resembling privacy. Maybe the Librem phone will change that in time but I'm not holding my breath.

  14. Will this happen to all generic media player apps? by ZorinLynx · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Because you can use VLC, MPlayer, IINA, Plex and more to watch pirated content, ya know.

    It seems odd that Google would single out Kodi. I do wonder how long until the software industry starts making it hard for us to play back arbitrary DRM-free video files.

  15. other terms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Has 'Remington' been removed from auto complete yet? How about 'Smith & Wessen'? These companies manufacture guns which are used to kill people, which is worse than piracy. Why do they still autocomplete? Lots of other examples....

    1. Re:other terms by BlueStrat · · Score: 1

      guns which are used to kill people,

      Absolutely true.

      Guns are used every day to kill rapists, home-invaders, armed robbers, and would-be murderers.

      âoeSelf-defense can be an important crime deterrent,âsays a new report by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC). The $10 million study was commissioned by President Barack Obama as part of 23 executive orders he signed in January.

      âoeStudies that directly assessed the effect of actual defensive uses of guns (i.e., incidents in which a gun was âusedâ(TM) by the crime victim in the sense of attacking or threatening an offender) have found consistently lower injury rates among gun-using crime victims compared with victims who used other self-protective strategies,â the CDC study, entitled âoePriorities For Research to Reduce the Threat of Firearm-Related Violence,â states.

      Won't somebody stop the madness?

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
  16. Re: Will this happen to all generic media player a by c6gunner · · Score: 1

    VLC doesn't have plugins which let you stream pirated content directly from pirate sites.

    Don't get me wrong; this is definitely stupid. But your comparison isn't really valid.

  17. Should remove google too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    since it can be used to search for illegal anything. It is not their job to be the police, but if they want to be, then they should take responsibility for anything found through their 'service'.

    Honestly google search now returns results that don't even match by words anymore, conveniently giving results that don't even contain major keywords - it's becoming a junky search algorithm.

  18. Great by CptLoRes · · Score: 1

    I needed a reminder that I haven't donated to Kodi in a while. And donation.. done.

  19. What autocomplete? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't see any auto complete of any kind when using google search.

  20. Re: But the freetards will still suck Google's coc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    They turned into a shitty company, but they didnâ(TM)t start out that way. Any company with deep pockets will eventually attract interesting sociopaths looking to exploit the war chest. These big companies are magnets for the worst possible monsters in society because why would you stop at owning a two-bit company. Itâ(TM)s no wonder they turn evil.

    Remember, shit floats to the top.

  21. Irrelevance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good, one more step towards irrelevance google.

    There was a web before google, there will be a web after google too.

  22. Re: But the freetards will still suck Google's coc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nope, they’ve always been this way. They just have more reach because you idiots allowed them to strangle out any meaningful competition.

  23. Big Brother by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Google has become everything they set out to replace. Time for a new alternative.

    1. Re:Big Brother by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You act like that wasn’t their plan all along? Were you really dumb enough to fall for “Don’t Be Evil?”

  24. It works if... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you type "kodi k" and it autocompletes "odi".

  25. Re: Will this happen to all generic media player a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Streaming is built in with VLC.

  26. Re: But the freetards will still suck Google's co by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Google had a vastly superior search engine compared to the major players. I wish there was more competition too; maybe like the Internet, search should be considered a utility.

  27. Yep, that'll work by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

    As long as everyone forgets how to spell Kodi by themselves, this'll work beautifully.

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    1. Re:Yep, that'll work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless you're one of the morons that search for google to get google search.

    2. Re:Yep, that'll work by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      This will stop the flow of "heard about it at work" folks adopting the kodi platform. The autocomplete gets them where they intended to go before they type "y"

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    3. Re:Yep, that'll work by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 1

      At least if I type "Kody" into Google, the first result is for https://kodi.tv/.

      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
  28. A funny thing happened on my way to googling Kodi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My fingers autocompleted "google.com" as "duckduckgo.com".

    So strange... of course, it could be a result of the fact that I am sick and tired of Google's efforts to steer people around the internet. People turn to Google for INFORMATION, not to have their noses and asses wiped for them, and Google's got no business arbitrarily deciding to make ANY effort to steer anyone, and this WILL I'm sure, (or at least I hope,) bite them MIGHTY HARD in the ass.

    You see, for Google to make ANY effort at all to "curb" use of Kodi in this fashion, they have abolished any cover they could ever take in a future court case that they don't censor or have a duty to censor. Much like a doctor or other healthcare professional in most (at least American) jurisdictions, the SECOND he or she begins treating a patient, regardless of whether or not he or she had a duty to begin doing so legally, he or she ACQUIRES an obligation by beginning treatment. To STOP treatment after beginning is legally called abandonment, and carries substantial civil and/or criminal penalties that that healthcare professional would NOT have faced if he or she had NEVER started in the first place. Oops.

    I believe Google now finds itself in this position. NOW when someone uses Google even very tangentially to violate IP rights, the owners of the allegedly violated IP can also potentially reach into Google's very deep pockets, alleging that by failing to do anything (even removing the allegedly infringing material from autocomplete,) they are complicit in the alleged crime. Just the cost of fighting the lawsuits could be damaging to Google, as well as on the flip side, the fact that people like me are now FAR less likely to use their services, given how they are trying to manipulate my behavior, which, in case I haven't already made my feelings clear on the matter, FUCK. THAT. SHIT.

  29. Precursor to new Google home theatre platform? by Mike+Sheen · · Score: 1

    If in 12 months Google release a product/service/platform for managing your offline as well as online media content in a nice interface, then this makes a lot of sense.

  30. Streisand Effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll just leave this link here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Streisand_effect

  31. Bing It by NeilAtWhartonSquare · · Score: 1

    Oh no, I'll have to use Bing to find out how to spell Kodi.

  32. Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Google has really started to suck.

  33. Keep it, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remove it from new business cards/contact details, find an alternative provider, and then add a signature to all new messages to begin all new emails to you with the updated email address as your google one is being deprecated.

    It may take 3-5 years before you get to the point where you can shut it down, but eventually you will, and depending on who all your customers use, you might even be helping to limit the amount of email data google can siphon off you and people you interact with via email.

    1. Re:Keep it, but... by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Also register your own domain, then you can move it between different hosting without changing address...
      Relying on someone else's domain is only ever temporary, they could shut off the service at any moment or change the terms.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  34. #deletegoogle by Iem+Eel · · Score: 1

    As the subject states, no more, no less.

  35. TVaddons by amiga3D · · Score: 1

    And yet TVaddons still autofills! It's amazing they attack the legitimate side and leave the "bad" addons alone! How stupid.

    1. Re:TVaddons by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      And yet TVaddons still autofills! It's amazing they attack the legitimate side and leave the "bad" addons alone! How stupid.

      It's not stupid, it's evil. They're deliberately attacking the platform, not the addon, because it's actually the program they have problems with. It lets you turn a useless Android TV device into one which can play Youtube content without stuttering, and they can't handle the competition.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  36. Who needs a totalitarian government... by hellopolly · · Score: 1

    When a free market monopolist censors just as well.

  37. Much ado about nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Life still goes on. You still have a choice of many search engines.

  38. What about the German department store "Kodi"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I mean this one. They are probably going to be annoyed.

  39. Kodi is a word by tonique · · Score: 1

    Kodi is a word at least in Karelian, Veps, Ludian, Latvian, Swahili and Chichewa! So members of some linguistic minorities in Russia have to press enter when searching for home.

  40. Kodi? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just googled it. Home page says its a media player? WTF?

    1. Re:Kodi? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just googled it. Home page says its a media player? WTF?

      autocomplete you moron

  41. Re: Will this happen to all generic media player a by donaldm · · Score: 1

    VLC doesn't have plugins which let you stream pirated content directly from pirate sites.

    Don't get me wrong; this is definitely stupid. But your comparison isn't really valid.

    Bring up VLC then click on Media and select Open Network Stream. Enter the URL of the video you want to play.

    In case you are interested the above does work with YouTube as well.

    Basically, if you can see it and/or hear it you can pirate it.

    --
    There ain't no such thing as proprietary standards only proprietary formats. Standards are by definition open.
  42. Then Google should suppress Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since they lost that huge lawsuit for copyright infringement for billions of bucks.

  43. Is that list available? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Purely for research reasons and so I an avoid doing anything bad, of course.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  44. Oh please... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You could at least have said you push your *foot* into her sphincter up to the knee, and for not swallowing your *shit*!

    What kind of troll are you, when you cannot even match things that I have literally seen on video?
    (The anal footing one is quite hot, btw. She has wonderful toes, and her foot literally goes up to the knee in that asshole. Resulted in mounds of cum coming from my dick, that you all get to lick and swallow before I piss down your throat and double-punch-fist your wrecked anal cunt.)

  45. they should block themself by sad_ · · Score: 1

    google should block themself, their search is also used a lot for piracy purposes.

    --
    On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
  46. More search bans by Daralantan · · Score: 1

    This reminds me of google banning searches for "gun" in the the shop search. Not for "gun" by itself, but anything with "gun" in it. EG: Burgundy wine, Gundam, etc.

  47. so? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who relies on autocomplete? Oh yeah, the idiot masses.

  48. Pretty silly by Riceballsan · · Score: 1

    I get that it's just not advertising kodi within the search bar, actually making people learn how to spell kodi before they search for it... but it's still stupid. I'd get it if they just blocked terms for the known kodi piracy addons. But if you are going to punish a software program just because there's a checkbox to allow you to use unofficial sources in the settings, and some of the possible unofficial sources contain tools that can be used for piracy... isn't that basically what android does?

  49. GSOC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And yet they are still accepted into Google Summer of Code 2018.

    Google needs a consistent voice...

  50. First step... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...on one incredibly slippery slope.

    If you use their own logic, shouldn't Google be banned?

    -Copyright violations
    -Child pronorgraphy
    -Illegal drugs
    -Identity theft

    You can find information on all of the above items through a Google search.

    The only terms that Google suppress are those terms that they are required to suppress by Federal law.

    I'm switching my default browser to DuckDuckGo.

  51. Android by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since nearly all of the Kodi multimedia thieving ripoff pirate boxes that are undermining the commercial bedrock of the increasingly rabid and out of touch media empires are actually running Android, shouldn't google be going after Android as well?

  52. Ban the tool by sheph · · Score: 1

    Yes. Ban the tool because it could be used for illegal purposes. This reminds me of something else.

    --
    I don't believe in karma, I just call it like I see it.
  53. Re: Will this happen to all generic media player by c6gunner · · Score: 1

    I take it the two of you aren't actually familiar with kodi addons.

  54. Shoulda banned "Kony" instead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kony 2012!!!

    LOL at idiots who run sites like this, and think that "banning" will get them "more eyeballs"...

  55. Re: Will this happen to all generic media player by donaldm · · Score: 1

    I take it the two of you aren't actually familiar with kodi addons.

    I was only replying to his VLC comment, not Kodi.

    For your interest, I only run Linux on my desktop and laptops (Fedora 27). Although I do have Kodi installed I don't really use the application and I am aware it does have plugins, some of which can be used to pirate certain content. Still, most of that content I am not interested in so I have not investigated it.

    --
    There ain't no such thing as proprietary standards only proprietary formats. Standards are by definition open.
  56. What courage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh, thank you, thank you, thank you, Google. You have saved the world.

    (See Apple, you're not the only tech company that can be courageous)

    I don't know this Kodi of which you speak, but more tech companies should ban more things so that we, the stupid masses unable to think for ourselves, can feel both more anxious and more secure at the same time.

    Hallelujah. Silicon Valley be praised!