Slashdot Mirror


The Gig Economy Keeps Growing, But Worker Benefits Aren't (technologyreview.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from MIT Technology Review: According to a new report out from Brookings, the number of non-employer firms -- primarily incorporated freelancers and gig-economy workers -- has grown 2.6 percent every year since 1997. By contrast, payroll employment has grown by only 0.8 percent annually in that time. That means a growing number of people lack employer-sponsored benefits like paid leave, health care, and retirement assistance. The Aspen Institute has proposed a system of portable benefits that are not tied to one job. Companies would make contributions to a worker's benefits on the basis of how much the employee works for them. To date, the U.S. government has not been helpful. House and Senate bills supporting gig-worker benefits have died in committee. But state and local governments are taking action. Washington, California, New York, and New Jersey are exploring avenues to provide benefits to their gig workers.

27 of 154 comments (clear)

  1. The socialism drum beats on. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Everyone thinks they deserve something for nothing. Premium benefits, unlimited time off, first class insurance. All paid for by someone else. Look, if you're driving people around from point A to point B, or answering customer complain calls for a living, you aren't doing something that's worth those kind of benefits. Sucks, but it's true. Improve your skills, become marketable, hoist yourself up by your own petards, and join the economy as a maker and not a taker.

    1. Re:The socialism drum beats on. by As_I_Please · · Score: 4, Informative

      hoist yourself up by your own petards

      You know this phrase means killing yourself, right? Seems less than helpful advice.

    2. Re:The socialism drum beats on. by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 2, Funny

      I took my first uber ride last week (I came along for the ride with a friend). The driver really seemed to enjoy the job and had quit his full time job a few months earlier to concentrate on driving. He said he'd driven over 200k miles in the previous year.

    3. Re: The socialism drum beats on. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Too bad everything is locked down "forever minus one day" otherwise others might try to create instead of take.

      The whole point of the "gig" economy is to strip workers of their protections by classifying them as "self-employed" contractors who have much less benefits and legally required protections, (no workman's comp, health insurance, or overtime pay) while still effectivelly treating them as employees. (Dictating their work hours, pay, job requirements, and firing options.) We've seen this coming for awhile now with the whole lack of employer trust, and constant desire to marginalize the workforce and render everyone replaceable. (C-Levels exempt of course.) It's just the latest move by greedy shareholders desperately trying to squeeze indefinite growth out of a finite resource pool.

      Of course that's capitalism for you, the losses are always socialised. Society is always expected to pick up the tab for corporate screw ups. Whether that screw up is wage theft, or too big to fail is irrelevant. They "couldn't possibly have known about such risks." But when profits are to be had, suddenly they "are solely responsible for this great achievement." Even if the achievement was produced solely with public funds.

      I'm personally waiting for the company store to make a come back under the guise of "helping our workers keep more of their hard earned money."

    4. Re: The socialism drum beats on. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The gig economy has always been around, what's different this time is exactly what you're talking about. When it was people like my mother working part time for packet change or to supplement my father's income while still raising children, it wasn't much of an issue.

      The difference is that people are increasingly forced into those sorts of arrangements to make ends meet as employers have more and more power to negotiate salary. So, folks turn to the gig economy as an essential part of their income rather than as pocket money.

      The worst thing about it is that corporate profits are the highest they've ever been. There's literally no justification for not paying workers a living wage. And our economy would probably be doing even better as people at the bottom would have money with which to pay for goods and services.

    5. Re:The socialism drum beats on. by EvilSS · · Score: 4, Funny

      hoist yourself up by your own petards

      You know this phrase means killing yourself, right? Seems less than helpful advice.

      Well it would reduce the labor market, driving up demand, pay, and benefits so..... it kinda works.

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    6. Re:The socialism drum beats on. by rlk · · Score: 5, Insightful

      We still need people to drive people around from point A to point B, answer customer complaint calls, and that. It doesn't matter how much people improve their skills and all that, somebody has to do those jobs; we still need them, and there aren't enough engineering, executive, what have you jobs to go around for everyone and there never will be.

      Are you willing to say that it's OK that some people, no matter how hard they work, have to live on the margins? Because I don't think that that's a very healthy society.

  2. Shocking! by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The "gig-economy" isn't a new concept. This is how things used to be before there were unions. What happened was laborers were exploited and then unionized to fight back for fair treatment. The outcome here will be no different, even if different means are used.

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
  3. insurance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    12000 PER year in insurance.

    Yeah. In 1999 12k per year would have bought me a full coverage plan with 0 co pay for my whole family and then some etc etc etc.

    This year that buys me basically catastrophic coverage for 2 people.

    We dumped HUGE sums of cash into the system and all of the pencil pushers raised the prices accordingly.

  4. What's the difference by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 2

    between "The Gig Economy" and running your own business where you use a service to find customers?

  5. The point is to make an end run by rsilvergun · · Score: 2, Insightful

    around minimum wage and overtime laws. There's no other purpose. If you're a worker then you should be deeply opposed to this. Unless you're in a strong union they _will_ eventually come for you too. And the only strong union left I know of is the AMA. Lord knows us tech workers don't have anything of the sort.

    The only potential good that might come out of all this is America might wise up and vote single payer healthcare in. But right now the party in charge is completely opposed to it and I don't see them getting kicked out anytime soon. We're still arguing over assault rifles and abortion for Pete's sake (hurray for wedge issues!).

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:The point is to make an end run by rfengr · · Score: 4, Informative

      It’s not “single payer”. It’s 48% of taxpayers paying for everyone. At least call it what it is.

    2. Re:The point is to make an end run by Billly+Gates · · Score: 3, Interesting

      around minimum wage and overtime laws. There's no other purpose. If you're a worker then you should be deeply opposed to this. Unless you're in a strong union they _will_ eventually come for you too. And the only strong union left I know of is the AMA. Lord knows us tech workers don't have anything of the sort.

      The only potential good that might come out of all this is America might wise up and vote single payer healthcare in. But right now the party in charge is completely opposed to it and I don't see them getting kicked out anytime soon. We're still arguing over assault rifles and abortion for Pete's sake (hurray for wedge issues!).

      It is more than this. Businesses LOVE temp work!

      They can fire them. Replace them. Use them as needed and throw them out to make room for coffee in the budget ( my brother's words who is a senior director in a fortune 100 company which I will not mention here).

      I know. I was just laid off yesterday. I am 41 and screwed in the contract trap. I was doing ok until I lost my job in February 2017. I took a contact job which I was promised was long term but asked around found out only 2/3rs are still employed after metrics within 6 months. I had bills to pay. So I took it. I was let go when my metrics didn't match.

      5 months later employers decided I was "unhirable". I took a temp job which I was promised was only 6 weeks. I took it as my savings were near empty. Now that is done and I had another only contract job but I was told I would always be hired and htis was a contract until December. I took it. ... 2nd day I was reprimanded when for giving advice to my boss when he asked for suggestions. I was told I was a contactor and a nobody to him! Do what I what I say and keep your mouth shut until you are hired. I immediately called the company I wanted to work for to see if the job was sitll open as I didn't trust my new employer. I do not want to hear about you etc. 4 weeks later the Gartner Group came in and mentioned a company called TATA India and how we waste money on I.T. when competitiors outsource to cut costs etc.

      Funny I was let go again due to organization structural changes. The permanent employees had to be protected but the share price was down and the CIO wanted to justify his job.

      The other employer I wanted is now hesitant as the client is wondering why I fucking can't hold onto a job!!

      This is BS! I never had such job hopping or bad experiences until I started contracting. Once you are in and your resume lists so many employers over years you are stuck as HR assumes you are incompetent. Once contracting things end all the damn time for any reason which reconfirms you are unhirable and this is not the true me by a long shot.

      I am telling you from experience it is because companies want to fire all their employees after each project ends. It has nothing to do with healthcare and I have been lied to so many times and another commenter mentioning being let go 1 day before benefits kick in is just the kicker.

      I saved projects twice and got let go for being too good at what I do as I am no longer needed.

    3. Re:The point is to make an end run by stupidcomputers · · Score: 2

      "I saved projects twice and got let go for being too good at what I do as I am no longer needed." Phrase it differently. You have been an independent consultant for awhile now. You are so good at what you do, that you have been able to quickly solve multiple client problems quickly and efficiently. Steve

    4. Re:The point is to make an end run by nbritton · · Score: 2

      You're listing these wrong on your resume. Start your own business and work corp to corp, then you can list on your resume one continuous employer.

  6. Law of Supply and Demand by DeplorableCodeMonkey · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Legal chain immigration brings about 1M legal immigrants into the country per year. That's on top of the illegals, most of whom compete with workers on the low end.

    It doesn't matter what you feel about immigration. The fact is that our immigration policies are nothing more than a safety valve on capital to ensure that the supply side is always high enough that the demand side never has to negotiate.

    Here's a simple plan that would cause real growth in average wages very quickly:

    1. Build the wall with the military's budget like Trump is threatening.
    2. Abolish chain immigration.
    3. Shred the green cards of all immigrants who arrived on chain migration in the last 20 years and order them to self-deport or face prison time.
    4. Tie corporate taxes to how much business and how many American citizens are employed by the business.
    5. Impose steep FICA excise taxes on outsourced labor. Make that offshore team in India so damn expensive in FICA costs that its not competitive.
    6. Shred NAFTA and impose a minimum 25% tariff on all goods made by American companies in Mexico for the American market.
    7. Pass a federal law that allows state and federal law enforcement to declare any business that relies on illegals to be a criminal enterprise as a whole entity and make its entire asset sheet liable for liquidation upon conviction.

  7. "demographics is destiny" by supernova87a · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Ladies and gentlemen, what we have here is a supply problem. The world is oversupplied with labor (people) for the amount of work demanded, thanks to productivity, automation, and the gradual end of the baby boomer growth era that fueled jobs and pay for everyone without a college degree.

    No amount of hand-wringing or puzzling over the edges of the gig economy, or living wages, the decline of manufacturing, or working conditions, are going to overcome the fundamental pressure of demographics.

    There are too many workers for companies to feel any pressure to raise wages, provide better benefits, or do anything that they don't need to, to keep sufficient workers on staff. (in general).

    Welcome to what it feels like when growth stalls -- everyone yells at everyone else thinking that someone caused / can fix the problem, when in fact it's mostly out of our hands. Don't worry, it'll work itself out -- in about 10-15 years... just wait a while.

    1. Re:"demographics is destiny" by seven+of+five · · Score: 4, Insightful

      While there's truth in all that, the other truth is the very wealthy are getting better and better at "drinking your milkshake" -- siphoning off the financial rewards of the many to benefit the few. Tearing down the old style benefits like pensions, raises, etc, and with increasing frequency, creating new jobs that are far less stable, have fewer rights, pay less and offer traditional benefits to fewer workers.

    2. Re:"demographics is destiny" by seven+of+five · · Score: 3, Informative

      Though people are making less and have fewer benefits, the economy isn't losing money -- it's getting sucked to the top.

  8. Doesn't Scale [Re:The socialism drum beats on.] by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    you aren't doing something that's worth those kind of benefits. Sucks, but it's true. Improve your skills...

    The problem with using "just get better" as a justification for accepting growing inequality is that it does not scale. If everyone had PhD's, there wouldn't be enough room for the elite positions, and many PhD's would end up mopping floors and other grunt work.

    It's not a zero-sum game, but close enough that "just get better" isn't a complete solution.

    American workers rank among the top in the world in economic productivity, but the benefits of that hard work is not trickling down to most workers. I'm not proposing pure socialism, just enough of it to distribute the wealth better without significantly harming incentives. There's a better balance point than what we have now. Set the dial to 5 instead of 9 on the socialism-to-plutocracy scale.

    1. Re:Doesn't Scale [Re:The socialism drum beats on.] by thePsychologist · · Score: 4, Insightful

      >The problem with using "just get better" as a justification for accepting growing inequality is that it does not scale. If everyone had PhD's, there wouldn't be enough room for the elite positions, and many PhD's would end up mopping floors and other grunt work.

      Sad thing is, the world is already getting to this point. I recently got my PhD, and in recent years I have seen (in multiple disciplines) many more people with PhDs than there are jobs (both industry and academic ones).

      What happens is that the 'gig economy' is edging its way into the academic and industrial world too, with many more "visiting" or "contract" positions than there ever was before.

      --
      "What lies behind us, and what lies before us are tiny matters compared to what lies within us." Ralph Waldo Emerson
  9. It's the same laws by rsilvergun · · Score: 3, Interesting

    minimum wage laws stop the race to the bottom. They buoy up wages leading to consumers who can purchase your goods and services. Without them a handful of robber barons monopolize everything. Great if you end up one of the barons, but that's highly unlikely.

    tl;dr. No man is an island.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  10. Duh! by jenningsthecat · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The Gig Economy Keeps Growing, But Worker Benefits Aren't

    Umm... wasn't that kind of the whole point of companies pushing for a gig economy? Does anybody really believe that this consequence wasn't at least foreseen, if not downright planned for, by the corporate sector? Corporations believe it to be in their best interests both to reduce the amount of money they pay their employees, and to decrease those employees' freedom and autonomy so as to make them more docile and compliant. A gig economy gives workers the illusion of increased freedom, even as it increases their servitude. I'm pretty sure that's the penultimate wet-dream of c-levels and board members everywhere. Of course, the ultimate wet-dream is to replace all those workers with machines.

    --
    'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
  11. Re:What, is it illegal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Gig-work is meant to undermine worker benefits by turning everybody into a private contractor who gets no benefits.
    If it is lowering costs to business owners as well, then it is working entirely as designed.
    Anybody who expected a different outcome is just a sucker

  12. Re:What, is it illegal? by BlueStrat · · Score: 2

    Gig-work is meant to undermine worker benefits by turning everybody into a private contractor who gets no benefits.

    Nonsense!

    Lack of *employer-sponsored benefits* does not mean a lack of benefits. One can buy health insurance, invest in health savings plans, and whatever other investment strategies you'd prefer like money markets, stocks, bonds, etc. As much or as little, any combination or none at all, whatever the individual chooses.

    It's all about asking oneself how much individual liberty are you prepared to be responsible for? How much of your life do you want government and corporations involved in?

    Having everyone as working-dead meat-popsicle in wage-slave dependency, working cookie-cutter corporate cubicle job-hells makes Zorg's layoffs (and the implied political-economic*control*) from The Fifth Element possible.

    Remember, the easiest way to solve "income inequality" is to make everyone equally poor.

    Strat

    --
    Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
  13. Re:What, is it illegal? by cayenne8 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    For many workers this is exactly what it means. They do not make enough money to buy health insurance or save for retirement. Individual choice is limited by how much money you have.

    Err...because in the real ADULT world of work, especially if you incorporate and do 1099 contract work, you'd better put on your big boy pants, and realize to do it full time, you need to learn to find jobs that have a high enough bill rate that you can negotiate for your needs.

    This isn't rocket surgery, you need to figure what you need for expenses, (your salary you pay to yourself), and also out of that bill rate you figure in enough for you to take off maybe 3 weeks a year for vacation/sick leave...you set up a HSA (Health Savings Account) and fully fund it pre-tax with money you put into your bill rate to pay routine medical expenses, and finally..yes, you calculate enough into your bill rate to pay for medical insurance.

    If you are not working in an area that you can bill that much, then you have a couple of choices...work multiple gigs at once that can pay this amount totaled together, or realize this is just side money, and you need a W2 regular job until you are valuable enough with your skills to negotiate jobs that pay enough to do 1099 full time.

    This isn't for everyone.

    But if you are an adult, can act like an adult....and take care of yourself, your work, paperwork, taxes, etc....it can be a fulfilling work lifestyle, it can be lucrative and there is a good amount of freedom to enjoy from it.

    I personally like the S-corp filing for my business....extra paperwork etc....BUT, it allows me to save substantially on how much of my bill rate I have to pay in employment taxes (SS/medicare)....

    But again, this isn't for everyone....you have to know what you cost to live, and bill accordingly and hunt only jobs that pay that much...otherwise, this is not a full time "gig" for you.

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  14. Re:What, is it illegal? by cayenne8 · · Score: 2

    I always thought that freelancing should pay better than a salaried job,

    It can and often does....you just need to have skills valuable enough to commend the bill rate that can sustain you as a full time "gig".

    If you aren't making that kind of $$ doing 1099, then you face facts that this is either just extra income to embellish the regular W2 job you really need, or you just find it isn't worth your time.

    We should all be adults here, and these are very simple and plain choices to make here.

    No one is holding a gun to your head to do this.

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........