Slashdot Mirror


Gay Dating App Grindr Is Letting Other Companies See User HIV Status, Location Data (buzzfeed.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from BuzzFeed: The gay hookup app Grindr, which has more than 3.6 million daily active users across the world, has been providing its users' HIV status to two other companies, BuzzFeed News has learned. The two companies -- Apptimize and Localytics, which help optimize apps -- receive some of the information that Grindr users choose to include in their profiles, including their HIV status and "last tested date." Because the HIV information is sent together with users' GPS data, phone ID, and email, it could identify specific users and their HIV status, according to Antoine Pultier, a researcher at the Norwegian nonprofit SINTEF, which first identified the issue.

Grindr was founded in 2009 and has been increasingly branding itself as the go-to app for healthy hookups and gay cultural content. In December, the company launched an online magazine dedicated to cultural issues in the queer community. The app offers free ads for HIV-testing sites, and last week, it debuted an optional feature that would remind users to get tested for HIV every three to six months. But the new analysis, confirmed by cybersecurity experts who analyzed SINTEF's data and independently verified by BuzzFeed News, calls into question how seriously the company takes its users' privacy. SINTEF's analysis also showed that Grindr was sharing its users' precise GPS position, "tribe" (meaning what gay subculture they identify with), sexuality, relationship status, ethnicity, and phone ID to other third-party advertising companies. And this information, unlike the HIV data, was sometimes shared via "plain text," which can be easily hacked.

132 comments

  1. This could be fun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's turn the comments into a Grindr hookup for us geeks

    1. Re: This could be fun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I for one welcome our new I.T. closet cleaner overlord.

    2. Re: This could be fun by Megol · · Score: 1

      To be honest, I'd rather be dead than homosexual.

      That can be arranged. Polonium or nerve agent?

  2. thatâ(TM)s gay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nt

  3. Grindr rules by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    First rule of Grindr: What happens in Grindr, stays in Grindr
    Second rule of Grindr: Never tell the truth about your HIV status

    1. Re: Grindr rules by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Second rule of Grindr: Never tell the truth about your HIV status

      So people who are negative should lie and say they are positive? Somehow I don't think that's going to end up working out the way most grindr users would prefer.

    2. Re: Grindr rules by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Somehow I don't think the whole "healthy hookups" thing is working out either, so it doesn't really matter. Being gay is super trendy right now and HIV is no longer taken seriously, to the point where now large cities are seeing outbreaks of meningitis (from causal kissing) and of course the return of classics like herpes and syphilis. The whole scene is dirty.

    3. Re:Grindr rules by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If someone lies and says they are HIV negative when they aren't, then they need to be tried for murder when they infect someone else.

      All dating sites really should flat out reject anyone who is HIV positive.

    4. Re: Grindr rules by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you just refrain from earing/fucking bats/monkeys and fucking people in the butt, you can skip getting HIV in the first place. How hard is this for you people to fucking understand?

    5. Re: Grindr rules by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      All dating sites really should flat out reject anyone who is HIV positive.

      Can you actually catch HIV if you already have HIV? This sounds tricky.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    6. Re: Grindr rules by fafalone · · Score: 2

      Well, actually you can. There's more than one strain; HIV-1, HIV-2, and subtypes.

    7. Re: Grindr rules by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Since there are different straibs of HIV, yes you can catch more than one type.

      Also, going back to the idea dating apps should turn away people with HIV, that is a pretty dumb idea. All that will do is encourage people to lie about their status, making everyone less safe.

    8. Re: Grindr rules by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Vaginal sex also transmits HIV, so the key is really safe sex and not being a rabbit. Vaginal sex has lower transfer rates due to natural lubrication and less likelihood of tearing tissue and exposing blood. HIV effects everyone but the higher transmission rate for anal intercourse coupled with the more rampant sex man crave (multiple partners, higher frequency, less screening, etc.) leads to this problem.

      Just like IT security, it works best in layers, so you can also throw Truvada in the risk if you're high risk but don't use that as some type of magic barrier, use it as a safety net for broken condoms with fewer partners less frequently.

    9. Re: Grindr rules by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It can get very nasty and some uninformed HIV positive people don't realize they can get in an even worse situation where antiretrovirals are less effective. There's several subtypes/groups and mutations that have different treatment regiments.

    10. Re:Grindr rules by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 2

      I know, it's so easy. Just add an "I have HIV" checkbox to your dating site that hides the rest of the page when checked, thus preventing the HIV positive user from accessing the site.

      Problem solved!

    11. Re: Grindr rules by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More deaths per year from the lifestyle than from guns. Ban?

    12. Re: Grindr rules by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Vaginal sex also transmits HIV

      At like 1% the rate of anal sex

      Anyway, this story is shitty as fuck, I didn't read the guy you replied too so I am assuming he is some antigay troll so fuckim, and corporations cannot be trusted with any data because information is capital and if you give it away for peanuts you deserve your enslavement.

    13. Re: Grindr rules by madbrain · · Score: 1

      In practice, superinfection (with multiple strains or subtypes) is exceedingly rare for people who are already on antiretrovirals. At least according to my physician.

      --
      -- Julien Pierre http://www.madbrain.com/blog
    14. Re:Grindr rules by madbrain · · Score: 1

      You realize that doesn't prevent anything, right ?
      This very likely violates ADA and all kinds of anti-discrimination laws as well.
      Considering the extremely high rate of HIV in the LGBT community, this would be a really bone-headed move by any site
      Even with the current option to do so, very few positives ever disclose their status in their profile. Very likely because of uninformed, backwards attitudes like yours. With TasP, PreP and PEP available, the people of known HIV+ status on anti-retrovirals are the least likely to infect anyone on the whole site.
      The real danger with HIV is people who do not actually know their status.

      --
      -- Julien Pierre http://www.madbrain.com/blog
    15. Re:Grindr rules by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone who infects someone else and is shown through medical records to have been informed of their condition should face murder charges.

    16. Re: Grindr rules by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Vaginal sex also transmits HIV
      That will not be of concern to anybody on slashdot as their chances of ever getting to try it is nil.

    17. Re: Grindr rules by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No.
      I sexually identify as HIV negative, so check your fucking privilege asshole.

    18. Re: Grindr rules by Cederic · · Score: 2

      How hard is this for you people to fucking understand

      Very hard, as although I'd normally ignore you as a troll, you're dispensing lethally bad advice, so please, let me assure you: You're wrong.

      You can get HIV without fucking anybody, and going nowhere near a bat or a monkey.

      Learn the transmission vectors and learn how to protect yourself.

    19. Re: Grindr rules by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, sure. Play the semantics game and see if that keeps you safe. "Don't put your dick in there" covers about 99% of cases.

    20. Re: Grindr rules by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Based in available statistics, about 67% or 2/3 of HIV cases are caused by MSM (men who have sex with men). The total HIV deaths per year in the US is around 6,700, 1/3 of which aren't caused by that practice, so ~4,500 deaths per year. Most available statistics and estimates place gun related deaths at around ~38-40k per year. That brings the ratio to about 3 HIV:25 gun related deaths.

      Risk assessment and relative compariosn is not a strong point these days.

    21. Re: Grindr rules by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Vaginal sex also transmits HIV

      At like 1% the rate of anal sex

      Anyway, this story is shitty as fuck, I didn't read the guy you replied too so I am assuming he is some antigay troll so fuckim, and corporations cannot be trusted with any data because information is capital and if you give it away for peanuts you deserve your enslavement.

      Does it matter what statistic difference is? Once infected, it is infected and no 100% cure. One can only control the virus but can't kill it off once infected. Don't try to make it look like vaginal or butt infection is different in anyway.

    22. Re:Grindr rules by eaglesrule · · Score: 1

      Sure, because people can always be relied upon to be honest about providing that kind of information. They'd never lie to get what they are biologically driven towards.

    23. Re:Grindr rules by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a fucking idiot. Ever heard of condoms or (gasp) sex without penetration? Also for most people who are HIV+ and in treatment, the antivirals reduce their virus load to the point that they're not even infectious.

    24. Re:Grindr rules by madbrain · · Score: 1

      Makes no sense since HIV isn't a death sentence and hasn't been for years.

      Condoms also fail occasionally, even if one is informed of their partner's HIV status.
      But at this point, anyone who is positive should go on HAART and become undetectable, which makes HIV untransmittable, regardless of condom use.

      --
      -- Julien Pierre http://www.madbrain.com/blog
    25. Re: Grindr rules by Cederic · · Score: 1

      No, it does not. There are around 20,000 HIV positive women in the UK, they didn't stick their dick anywhere.

      Your ignorance risks qualifying you for a Darwin Award.

    26. Re:Grindr rules by Anonymous+Cow+Ward · · Score: 1

      I think flatly rejecting HIV positive people won't work out the way you want it to. Some of them will just lie about it and increase the risk of infecting others. We should be encouraging people to be honest and open, as much as possible. Putting such a huge stigma on it helped make the epidemic worse in the first place.

      --
      Examine even your most deeply held beliefs. Nobody is always right.
  4. Plain text can be easily hacked ROFLMAO by iamhassi · · Score: 2

    Anyone else find it funny when it said plain text can be easily hacked. Author apparently doesn't understand plain text doesn't need to be hacked, it's already plain text

    --
    my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    1. Re: Plain text can be easily hacked ROFLMAO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It takes extreme hax0r sk1llz to find the hidden notepad.exe program to open the file with.

    2. Re:Plain text can be easily hacked ROFLMAO by iamhassi · · Score: 1

      I guess anyone that can read is a hacker now, a hacker of "plain text" lol

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    3. Re:Plain text can be easily hacked ROFLMAO by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      Author apparently doesn't understand plain text doesn't need to be hacked, it's already plain text

      You have to be literate to understand plain text. I guess that's a skill that even befuddles internet "journalists" now.

      ---
      Brought to you by BRAWNDO. The thirst mutilator!

    4. Re:Plain text can be easily hacked ROFLMAO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      any one else find it funny that this is 100% owned on by a Chinese country? Doubt this only thing be shared i mean leaked to china

    5. Re:Plain text can be easily hacked ROFLMAO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They tried to sell it to South Africa, but it was already copyrighted as the Johannesburg White Pages. Recently rebranded as the "White and Everybody Else Pages"

    6. Re:Plain text can be easily hacked ROFLMAO by madbrain · · Score: 1

      You still need to tap to intercept the plaintext traffic somewhere.

      --
      -- Julien Pierre http://www.madbrain.com/blog
    7. Re:Plain text can be easily hacked ROFLMAO by nzkbuk · · Score: 1

      Author, You mean BuzzFeed !
      I don't find it surprising at all that they haven't got about encryption or hacking. Most content from BuzzFeed is along the lines of more keyboards with more windows open is how you hack stuff. Many consider the average trashy glossy mags to be more reputable.

  5. Optimize apps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    which help optimize apps

    What does this even mean?

  6. Can you imagine the value of their database?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1) Obtain full DBS
    2) Blackmail emails found (paired with social media info)
    3) Profit!

    No âoe ? âoe step needed!

  7. Apps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    leaky black boxes of comfort.

  8. Apps have sexual preferences ? by Archfeld · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I wasn't aware that apps, or programs, or code in general had sexual preferences. I think they mean the Grindr app used by homosexuals is making data that ignorant people have inappropriately shared available to others which seems like a case of you get what you deserve for over sharing...

    --
    errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
    1. Re:Apps have sexual preferences ? by Gojira+Shipi-Taro · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Except that Medical Data generally has a higher standard of privacy (HIPPA) which Grindr may well be in violation of. If you're in possession of that data, and you're not the individual to which it applies, you're probably going to have a big problem if you're giving it out freely. In the US for HIPPA, and I'm certain that the EU has even more strict rules.

      --
      "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
    2. Re:Apps have sexual preferences ? by quantaman · · Score: 1

      I wasn't aware that apps, or programs, or code in general had sexual preferences. I think they mean the Grindr app used by homosexuals

      It's an app intended for gay dating, "Gay Dating App Grinder" is a perfect way to describe it.

      "Grindr app used by homosexuals" is both awkward to say and could just as well describe an app for grinding spices that happens to be popular among homosexuals.

      is making data that ignorant people have inappropriately shared available to others which seems like a case of you get what you deserve for over sharing...

      "Inappropriately shared"? We're talking about HIV status on a dating/hookup app. It's information that can literally saves lives.

      --
      I stole this Sig
    3. Re:Apps have sexual preferences ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Never heard of HIPPA. I work on HR software, so it apparently isn't something that common. Is it a gay-related term?

    4. Re: Apps have sexual preferences ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HIPPA is extremely well known with respect to all digital medical information.

    5. Re: Apps have sexual preferences ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be fair it should be shared privately but I think the approach they use makes it less awkward for HIV positive people so others know what they're getting involved with before even starting a discussion.

    6. Re: Apps have sexual preferences ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If a "straight" guy is on grindr he is either curious or bi. It's not an app for "straight" people. The whole point of it is for men to hook up with other men. You aren't going to find women on it except for some transsexuals

    7. Re:Apps have sexual preferences ? by Archfeld · · Score: 4, Insightful

      HIPPA applies only to doctors, dentists or pharmacists, as well as healthcare insurance companies, but NOT life insurance companies. If you choose to share your medical data with a cab driver or your barber they are not bound by the strictures of the law. The law does include some 3rd party entities to which you are referred such as companies that make orthopedics and the like.

      --
      errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
    8. Re:Apps have sexual preferences ? by Archfeld · · Score: 1

      I agree that sharing such information with someone you might potentially be in a physical relationship is wise and should occur, but giving that info to a 3rd party intermediary prior to even establishing a relationship seems a bit umm, reckless ? foolish ?

      --
      errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
    9. Re:Apps have sexual preferences ? by Archfeld · · Score: 1

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      governs the usage and security of medical health information in the US. Very unlikely to appear in employer HR software as it is primarily designed to prevent employers or others from discriminating against individuals based of existing health risks or conditions.

      --
      errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
    10. Re:Apps have sexual preferences ? by madbrain · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It makes complete sense, IMO. Maybe a positive person only wants to hookup with another positive person, to avoid uncomfortable conversations that lead nowhere.
      Of course, conversely, a lot of misguided negatives will filter out based on HIV status, not understanding that sero-sorting does not work for "negatives". Most people on the site who claim to be negatives haven't had a recent HIV test. Even the most sensitive HIV tests still have a 2 week window period of false negative. The most common and cheaper antibody tests have a 3 months window period for false negatives.

      --
      -- Julien Pierre http://www.madbrain.com/blog
    11. Re:Apps have sexual preferences ? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      The sexual orientation of an app is none of your business and please quit staring at its package.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    12. Re: Apps have sexual preferences ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HIPAA

    13. Re:Apps have sexual preferences ? by Cederic · · Score: 1

      It's an app intended for gay dating, "Gay Dating App Grinder" is a perfect way to describe it.

      It's also helpful for people like me that don't use Tindr or Grindr and always mix the two of them up.

      Which leads to some interesting misunderstandings when others discuss them.

    14. Re: Apps have sexual preferences ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's also those who flat out lie. You should treat every situation as a potential infection, keeping overall risk in mind, though don't live in complete fear.

      Missing those who haven't undergone sereoconversion (the period when one is infected but at a point below the test's sensitivity to detect reliably - MDL) is one thing, but the fact is people can simply lie.

      There's also HIV positive people who, through treatment, can sereoconvert to a sereonegative state. This doesn't mean they no longer have HIV and are cured, they're simply functionally cured at the time of testing and method of detection can't detect the low concentration of the virus. At the same time, it also means the chance of that person transmitting is also much lower (obviously not 0 as in the case of someone truly negative). None the less, you should assume there's an inherent risk with everyone.

      There are likely unknown or not understood diseases that are STIs that we don't even understand yet so keep the shagging down to sane levels with fewer partners if you want to live less complicated lives and be sure to always use straightforward protections and precautions like condoms. It wont protect you from everything but it will protect you from some things.

      The fact of the matter is, due to antibiotic abuse, traditional bacterial infections that we typically consider treatable are becoming more risky to longevity and could ultimately be more dangerous than HIV. A recent case of a drug resistant case of gonherea contracted in Europe is just s precursor of things to come. Due to the stigma, HIV is very well studied, understood and mashable while some other STIs have been more neglected.

    15. Re:Apps have sexual preferences ? by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      Maybe a positive person only wants to hookup with another positive person

      Unfortunately, while the logic undelying this decision is usually "it doesn't make any difference if we're both already infected", things don't actually work like that and you risk HIV superinfection.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    16. Re: Apps have sexual preferences ? by madbrain · · Score: 1

      HIV+ individuals who have an undetectable viral load still test positive on HIV antibody tests. They do not "seroconvert to a seronegative state".

      As far as risk of transmission not being zero, even the CDC states that "People who take ART daily as prescribed and achieve and maintain an undetectable viral load have effectively no risk of sexually transmitting the virus to an HIV-negative partner." .

      --
      -- Julien Pierre http://www.madbrain.com/blog
    17. Re:Apps have sexual preferences ? by madbrain · · Score: 1

      Yes, it really does work like that. HIV superinfection is not a real concern once one is undetectable. Contacting another strain while on HAART is almost impossible. This is because the strains that are resistant to some meds are also not very "fit" as explained by my doctor.

      If you are positive but not on treatment, yes, there is more of a risk that you could contract multiple strains.

      --
      -- Julien Pierre http://www.madbrain.com/blog
    18. Re:Apps have sexual preferences ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm well aware of HIPAA. I was asking what the GP meant with his claim.

  9. Well in fairness.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They should not be prevented to move to Israel just because they are carrying HIV. ;)

  10. Name? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Who gave it that name? That's a horrible name. It would be like naming a family horse trail vacation company "rash.com".

    1. Re:Name? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The gay people who use it like that shit.

    2. Re:Name? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is bad with the name?
      It is short, descriptive and popular with the target consumer group.
      I can't even think of many services with better names.

      The bad description is in the slashdot title. As the summary says it is a hookup app.

    3. Re:Name? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      I suspect it was more like a jokish name when the site was small and informal, but the site grew in size.

    4. Re:Name? by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      Perhaps, but R Kelly- who isn't homosexual as far as I'm aware (#)- used almost the same term in the name of a song almost 25 years ago, and it didn't stop *that* from becoming a hit.

      (#) He's apparently more into the wholesome heterosexual act of urinating in the mouths of underage girls. (Link goes to music website article entitled "R. Kelly’s Alleged Sex Crimes Are Still Horrific 13 Years Later " in case you're wondering whether it's okay to click).

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  11. Utah gulag ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where do they put the towers? I though HIV+ perps were all hustled-off to that bran + water barbed-fenced gulag in Western Utah. You know ... oh give me a bone, where the Salt-Sea doth roam ...

  12. HIV Status?? WHY! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .. on Earth would you put that on your dating profile?? Or did they redefine what HIV meant too?

  13. Re:HIV Status?? WHY! by Cinnamon+Beige · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's not a dating app, it's a hookup app for male homosexuals. There are people for whom it does in fact matter, and the least problematic group of 'em are those who are deliberately seeking sex partners whose HIV status is the same as theirs.

    Part of how you can tell the difference is that hookup apps assume that, basically, you're for various reasons unable or unwilling to hire a sex worker--but you probably should, if you're not willing to even talk enough before having sex to discuss things related to safe sex. Of course, that might also be why you may not be able to hire any of the local sex workers anymore...

  14. Re:HIV Status?? WHY! by postbigbang · · Score: 2

    Disclosure is part of the law in a number of jurisdictions. Others don't want to have that strange moment when one of the two says, "Oh, BTW, I'm poz.". A lot of poz guys get broken hearts that way. Some guys want to be aware of the status, while it doesn't matter to others.

    --
    ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
  15. Re:HIV Status?? WHY! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When homosexuals are looking for a dating partner, the ultimate goal is to sock and fock. Knowing someone's HIV status makes it easier to avoid getting yet another STD.

  16. Definitely. Not. HIPAA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Disclaimer - I believe Grindr sharing this data, and other data is bad. And other sites sharing unknown types and amounts of data without the individuals knowledge is bad. BUT - the person chose to disclose this information to a third party in a non-medical setting. If the same person got up on a bar stool and told the whole bar they were HIV positive, everyone in the bar would NOT magically be bound by HIPAA to keep their secret... Don't disclose private information to untrusted entities.

  17. Do we need reminding? by VeryFluffyBunny · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Number one rule of the web: Don't disclose sensitive personal information to startups or apps.

    Number two rule of the web: Don't disclose sensitive personal information to startups or apps.

    Number three rule of the web: DON'T DISCLOSE SENSITIVE PERSONAL INFORMATION TO STARTUPS OR APPS!

    etc..

    --
    Debate is a form of harassment. Do not question my truth.
    1. Re:Do we need reminding? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes but... Why did they even share any user data with companies that... "Optimize" apps? Wtf does this even mean anyway. Ux? Performance? Data leakage?

    2. Re:Do we need reminding? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      as an ex grindr user:
      I'm glad that people disclose their hiv status.

    3. Re:Do we need reminding? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      You do know that people have developed a capability lately that became known to experts as "lying"?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    4. Re:Do we need reminding? by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      Long ago, I actually considered this when looking at the whole STD spread thing. I live in a community that has a considerably-high STD rate.

      This lead down a rabbit hole of designing an ID card or bracelet that contains medical records (using high-security storage--military-grade chipsets are actually dirt cheap, e.g. what Yubikey uses in $20 devices) and uses RTC tracking. You bring yours up to someone else's, you both acknowledge (physical button press) the exchange, and they blink a color-coded code to show time-decayed status (recent STD test? Clean? Positive?). Doctor has to code the update into it, so you have to go for a blood test to keep your shiny, green rating.

      "Stick your HIV status into an online user profile" seems like it would have really bad outcomes.

    5. Re:Do we need reminding? by eaglesrule · · Score: 1

      This idea is interesting but as a form of trust verification it still relies heavily on the user, and would instill a sense of false security that could only lead to more not adhering to safe sex practices. It seems to be more of a Rube Goldberg method of sharing lab report printouts.

      Technology that could provide a test quickly and accurately on demand would go much further in helping to limit the spread of infection.

    6. Re:Do we need reminding? by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's pretty much it. You'd get closer with medical reporting and some sort of social system (e.g. people anonymously notate details about their sexual partners and the data is correlated, so we can extrapolate sexual habits, risk behaviors, and contact with those infected to identify potential infections); but that involves the back-end to be aware of all of these facts about everyone.

      The whole approach was to eliminate any third-party knowledge. That becomes ... difficult at high connection rates. Shamir's Scheme doesn't help here.

    7. Re:Do we need reminding? by antdude · · Score: 1

      Why just startups? Also big companies too like MS, Apple, Google, Facebook, etc.

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    8. Re:Do we need reminding? by madbrain · · Score: 1

      Diseases that were recently acquired cannot instantly be detected . Individuals who just contracted HIV are actually the most infectious. they have a very high viral load, but test negative on an antibody test, which is typically used for screening. You would need to know for sure that you haven't had any exposure during the entire window period of the test. And moreover, you would need to make sure that your partner either. I fail to see how a technological gadget helps with that problem.

      --
      -- Julien Pierre http://www.madbrain.com/blog
    9. Re:Do we need reminding? by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      Yep. The whole thing is a risk control; there's no such thing as risk elimination. You can avoid the risk by not having sex, although you still have the risk of transmission by other bodily fluid contact (e.g. blood). You can mitigate it with condoms (these can fail).

      We currently have a sort of voluntary system whereby people give you soft data: "Yes I'm clean, I get tested regularly, I always use condoms". The fact that they're willing to perform oral sex without a condom should be a warning, although it's hard to get HIV on one end of that. If you're concerned about e.g. HSV, though, they're essentially running around unprotected. Then you have the problem that they may have contracted HIV by performing oral on another partner and the condom full of nonoxyl-9 is the only thing protecting you from HIV. You even have serial monogamists who sleep with one partner at a time for a short-term dating span, so churn through lots of partners just like promiscuous folks; and some of those are lax about protection or testing of their partners.

      So you have personal trust and lots of uncontrolled risk, rather than a validated hard metric.

      That means you have the risk of being given faulty or incomplete data among a sea of faulty and incomplete data.

  18. Re:Uhh.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "other degenerates in your general vicinity"

    I laughed when I read that phrase. True and funny. It's like dogs walking about whilst smelling each other's anuses. Anyone who would fancy some hairy man's nasty anus has mental issues. Sodomy absolutely has to smell vile.

  19. Re:Just thought I'd point out: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The human anus is a breeding ground for diseases, particularly hepatitis, be this sodomy between men or a man and a woman. It's unnatural and abnormal, no matter what anyone says. There are heaps of studies worldwide to prove this. Being "clean" doesn't prevent disease. Being monogamous between two disease-from-the-start people is what prevents disease, although sodomy is still a way to get deathly sick from bacteria no matter how careful. The anus was and is meant to be exit only. Nature proves this out.

  20. Re:Just thought I'd point out: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You sound like an expert on this topic, i.e. a real asshole.

  21. Re: Uhh.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As someone whose bi, I can attest that vagina can be pretty hairy and can smell pretty gross as well (even neglecting yeast infections). In fact, I was shocked for awhile at how women weren't this perfect hairless creature the media portrayed (some are but most aren't all the time). Took some getting used to for me, that reality differed.

  22. Re:Just thought I'd point out: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You sound like an expert on this topic, i.e. a real asshole.

    You sound like a person who needs his teeth kicked in.

  23. Re: Uhh.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As someone whose bi,

    There's nothing wrong with you that hanging from a barbed wire fence for 3 weeks won't fix.

    By the way your grammar is that of an uneducated turd. Shut the fuck up until you learn English, you worthless piece of shit.

  24. Re: Just thought I'd point out: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anal sex happens in the rest of the animal kingdom. I'm sorry but a snatch ain't much better than an ass. It can be just and bacteria laden and it fucking oozes blood once a month. Pro tip if you're hooking up with random strangers both male and female wrap your dick up and you eliminate lots of problems

  25. Wrong mindset by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    HIV is spread BECAUSE people who have it then go spread it and don't tell their partners. HIV users should have to wear a fucking tattoo or something on their face. It's completely unfair to be infected by someone who knows they have HIV but is protected by society that allows them to run around freely giving it to others. The outrage of being outed is part of the problem. HIV could easily be eradicated if not for the privacy "issues" that let these assholes hide and infect others.

    1. Re:Wrong mindset by madbrain · · Score: 1

      No. It is mainly spread because many people don't know their real, current HIV status.

      --
      -- Julien Pierre http://www.madbrain.com/blog
  26. mod points by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People are spending their precious moderation points on these AC comments. So sad.

    1. Re:mod points by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Russians still getting focked by flabby cowardly poisoner Putin, so sad.

    2. Re:mod points by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lol, read the news, Todd. British lab on which May based her entire campaign against Russia just announced they couldn't link the chemical to Russia.

  27. Plain-text and network surveillance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Sandvine (AKA Procera Networks) recently and quietly added a signature for Grindr, more or less directly when that department was out-sourced to India. The plain-text "feature" is a chilling fact knowing this, and knowing that their products can excerpt details from dataflows in realtime, adding only configuration.

    Posting AC for obvious reasons.

    1. Re:Plain-text and network surveillance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, maybe not that quiet: https://download.proceranetwor...

      (Search for "Added Grindr")

  28. That's a serious HIPAA violation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Would not surprise me at all if they receive a rather nasty letter from Health and Human Services about the disclosure of conditions like HIV to third parties. You would not believe the amount of training HR departments have to go through on this sort of thing, so either the people behind Grindr weren't listening to their own HR and legal staff, or that staff is actively complicit in the act and are not in for a fun time.

    And sadly, it does happen that HR people are complicit in these kinds of things. I worked at a well known computer OEM in the SF Bay Area once upon a time. It is certainly true that the Bay Area has a large Asian population, but out of roughly 300 employees at this site, I counted maybe 10 who were any race OTHER than Asian. That would mean white, black, hispanic, native american, indian (even though India is technically on the Asian continent, I'm not counting them as Asians) and any other race I'm leaving out. I started making some noises about this, particularly because my coworkers were going out of their way to treat me like shit, and was very quickly shown the door. If the HR department had actually done its job, basically the entire management, including the CEO, would have been fired, and the company would have unraveled. Funnily enough, the HR rep who showed me the door and helped cover this up, was non-Asian and was shown the door herself only a couple months later. Probably because they figured out she was a lesbian and very clearly had a thing for a VP, but that's a whole other story.

    1. Re:That's a serious HIPAA violation by Megol · · Score: 1

      So if someone tells you they got HIV they violate HIPAA? Because this it people telling other people (potential hookups) some vital information with Grindr the media they use for communication.

  29. Grindr isn't about coffee dates with hipsters? by Pezbian · · Score: 1

    I guess I understand the gay thing in theory. I just can't relate on any practical level.

    Hey, if it's love, it's love, and love is difficult enough to find in the "straight" world as it is.

    --
    In a world of the blind, the one-eyed man is king--and the two-eyed man is a heretic.
    1. Re:Grindr isn't about coffee dates with hipsters? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What I really don't get about gays is the flamboyance thing.
      If you are looking for men who like other men, why act in a way typically associated with femininity?
      Shouldn't gays act extra manly to attract other gays?

    2. Re:Grindr isn't about coffee dates with hipsters? by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

      Odd, isn't it? That must be why they never have big moustaches and wear lots of leather.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    3. Re:Grindr isn't about coffee dates with hipsters? by eaglesrule · · Score: 1

      It is probably enough to appreciate that people are wired differently, and human sexuality is as varied and unique as individual facial features. There are things about it I'll never be able to understand, and thankfully, I don't need to.

  30. Re: Just thought I'd point out: by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Still, more people have a pussy as a pet than an ass.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  31. Re:HIV status should be public record. by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Do they get to choose the side they have to wear the star on?

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  32. Re: HIV status should be public record. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why? Are you expecting to spontaneously exchange blood with the person next to you?

    Worrying about catching HIV without intimate contact is harmful. It leads to unprovoked and unjustified violence against the gay community.

  33. just a couple more by AndyKron · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm about one or two more posts like this before I rip the Internet cable out of my property and throw away my phone.

    1. Re:just a couple more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just do it already

  34. app 4 spreading AIDS in degenerate perv community? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    App for spreading AIDS in degenerate pervert community? This is just brilliant while politically correct, especially when you subscribe for "love is love" etc.
    They only make up about 2% of the population. Is grinder it helping to lower that?

  35. Pretty Simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try to get as many people infected with HIV as possible, sell them meds that will not cure them, scare the living shit out of people so they don't have sex. So as a good business model we can reduce the world's population by subtle kills, encourage abortion for "undesirables", prevent the rest from procreating, and make a buck off of it while we make the corpse of Margaret Sanger and the majority of the billionaires in this world happy.

  36. Re:HIV Status?? WHY! by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

    You can get double aids, in fact already having aids makes you super sensitive to getting a second strain of it. The HIV status is used by people trying to pretend they are being safe while having unprotected sex with strangers and "bugchasers" whose fetish includes having sex with/contracting AIDs.

    --
    Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
  37. Re:Just thought I'd point out: by Cederic · · Score: 1

    What fucking gay bashers on here? I've seen maybe two posts in the whole discussion that are critical of homosexuality and they're hardly fucking 'bashing'.

    Still, don't let your defensiveness stop you being a bigger arsehole than, well, the goatse guy. Who may or may not be gay.

  38. Gay HIV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hadn't realized that there was so much HIV within the gay community that they had to declare it on the app profile. Maybe they shouldn't be so promiscuous....

  39. Re:HIV Status?? WHY! by Cinnamon+Beige · · Score: 1

    I did say 'least problematic' group. Most of the discussion about all of this isn't happening in public, and some of the people I've met who are offended by bringing it up are involved in shaping the public health response to HIV...so, unfortunately, a decent number of them aren't 'trying to pretend' but rather completely unaware because the people whose job it is to make sure they know better are playing ostrich.

  40. Re:HIV Status?? WHY! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can get double aids, in fact already having aids makes you super sensitive to getting a second strain of it. The HIV status is used by people trying to pretend they are being safe while having unprotected sex with strangers and "bugchasers" whose fetish includes having sex with/contracting AIDs.

    Please educate yourself. HIV+ != Aids. The Aids comes as a result of your body immunity gives up to HIV after a certain period of time of having the virus. Unlike in the past, if you have HIV+, with the current medication, you can control the virus which is called "undetected." In other words, the virus may be hiding or in hibernate state which is less likely be contagious (but best way is still practicing safe sex).

    I thought people who are on here would be educated. Apparently, many of them are not and very immature.

  41. Re: HIV status should be public record. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh look, the political correctness police are here. Who said anything about "violence against the gay community"?

    The danger from HIV and AIDS is real, and promiscuous homosexual behavior is the primary cause of the epidemic. We should all be repulsed by the relentless promotion of the gay lifestyle. Never mind about the mental poison of the "transgendered" movement among college students and teenagers.

  42. Re:HIV Status?? WHY! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  43. Re: Uhh.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your ideas are intriguing to me and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.

  44. Re: Uhh.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I suspect the GP poster will realise this when he sleeps with a woman for the first time.

  45. Re: Uhh.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That sentence should read:

    "By the way: your grammar..."
    or
    "By the way, your grammar..."

    As well, the more correct manner of writing would be:

    "...your grammar is [b]as[/b] that of an uneducated turd."

    As you seem to be very concerned about the usage of correct grammatical syntax, I figured you would be interested in the above information.

  46. Re:Just thought I'd point out: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On the contrary, if you suggested sodomy was unnatural around the sort of people I hang with, you'd probably be the one having your teeth kicked in. Lmao

    And maybe your asshole too.

  47. Re:HIV Status?? WHY! by madbrain · · Score: 1

    There is no such thing as double AIDS. If you had AIDS and went on HAART, the chance of being infected with a second strain, ie. superinfection, is remote. Source: my primary physician who is also an HIV specialist.

    And the HIV status on hookup apps/ads is primarily used for other cases, not the deranged cases your cited.

    --
    -- Julien Pierre http://www.madbrain.com/blog
  48. Re:HIV Status?? WHY! by madbrain · · Score: 1

    There are missing facts from that page, IMO. People who are on HAART on already contract seldom, if ever, become subsequently infected with another strain which may be resistant to their own meds. If this actually happened, they would cease to become undetectable, ie. their meds no longer would work. As long as the meds work, and the viral load remains undetectable, viral particles that could be analyzed to determine the presence of another strain are simply absent, by definition.
    Thus, superinfection is really only a concern prior to going on HAART and becoming undetectable. Ie. you can initially be infected by multiple strains.
    But once you go on treatment - which will depend on which strain and mutations you got - this is no longer a real issue.

    --
    -- Julien Pierre http://www.madbrain.com/blog
  49. Re:HIV Status?? WHY! by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

    Super infections are common.
    https://www.sciencedirect.com/...

    --
    Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
  50. Re:HIV Status?? WHY! by madbrain · · Score: 1

    Not in people already on HAART.

    --
    -- Julien Pierre http://www.madbrain.com/blog
  51. Re:HIV Status?? WHY! by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

    What does HAART have to do with using a dating app?

    --
    Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.