Slashdot Mirror
Ubuntu Linux 18.04 LTS 'Bionic Beaver' Beta 2 Now Available (betanews.com)
An anonymous reader writes: Ubuntu Linux 18.04 "Bionic Beaver" is almost here -- it is due on April 26. In the interim, today, the second -- and final -- beta becomes available. Bionic Beaver is very significant, as it is an LTS version, meaning "Long Term Support." This is important to those that prefer stability to bleeding edge and don't want to deal with the hassle of upgrades. In other words, you can install 18.04 and be confident that it will be supported for 5 years. In comparison, non-LTS Ubuntu versions get a mere 9 months.
There is plenty to be excited about with Ubuntu Linux 18.04 LTS 'Bionic Beaver' Beta 2, including the GNOME 3.28 desktop environment -- Beta 1 did not include GNOME at all. Of course, all the other DE flavors are available too, such as KDE and Xfce. The kernel is at 4.15, which while not the most current version, is still quite modern. Also included is LibreOffice 6.0 -- an essential tool that rivals Microsoft Office. Wayland is available as a technical preview, although X remains the default display server -- for now.
There is plenty to be excited about with Ubuntu Linux 18.04 LTS 'Bionic Beaver' Beta 2, including the GNOME 3.28 desktop environment -- Beta 1 did not include GNOME at all. Of course, all the other DE flavors are available too, such as KDE and Xfce. The kernel is at 4.15, which while not the most current version, is still quite modern. Also included is LibreOffice 6.0 -- an essential tool that rivals Microsoft Office. Wayland is available as a technical preview, although X remains the default display server -- for now.
Is it just me or does "Bionic Beaver" sound awfully similar to "Cybernetic Vagina?"
I miss the days of Ubuntu Linux 18.02.
You are welcome on my lawn.
I've got to ask you about the bionic beaver. Gussy it up however you want, Shuttleworth. What matters is, does it work?
You're sitting on a goldmine Shuttleworth!
One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
Jesus, are you a fucking idiot or something???
18.04 LTS is undergoing beta testing - in case anything is seriously bad before it's finally released. It's not the beta itself that is LTS, it's the final product. You're beta testing what will be 18.04 LTS.
Though, it seems kind of late, I mean, it's April already and they're not at release candidates? Might as well call it 18.05LTS or 18.06LTS...
My first though was some mid/late 1970's naughty fan fiction between Steve Austin and Jaime Sommers.
Apart from Gnome 3 and systemd, you mean?
Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
If you're in an enterprise environment with a policy that you must have paid support available for everything, then your only option is systemd.
Ubuntu is going after Mint.
It's a way to proof your bad idea with Unity!
The funny part of the show, is that Mint is a lot more stable and have better hardware discovery than Ubuntu. They lost their leading in usuability, and not only because the strange UI !
Ceci n'est pas une Signature !
I'm still disappointed they didn't use my suggested release name, "Masturbating Monkey".
I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
There is plenty to be excited about ... including the GNOME 3.28 desktop environment.
'Cause I use Mate, not that GNOME 3 <expletive deleted />
It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
I'm very much looking forward to installing this. I recently put together a nice Machine Learning / linux workstation / build machine.... https://pcpartpicker.com/list/... And Linux pre 4.14 just flubbed pretty bad with the processor... https://www.phoronix.com/scan.... I got things working somewhat smoothly with Manjaro linux, but getting the CUDA support working was a total hack (currently GCC 6.3 is all they support, not 6.4, much less 7.3 and the arch linux "fix" is very much an admitted dirty hack), and getting Caffe 2 to compile right was turning into more work than it was worth ...
http://docs.nvidia.com/cuda/cu... ...
So yes, these problems are largely the fault of Intel and NVIDIA clutching their proprietary pearls, but I am looking forward to running a well supported and stable version of linux that can support and be optimized to the latest hardware that came out 6 months ago.
Comment removed based on user account deletion
I've said before in previous posts that I personally use Fedora, since my day job revolves around Red Hat based systems. But I LOVE Ubuntu. When I starting using Linux back in 1997 (I was late to the game), the community was toxic.
The choices were basically Slackware, which, while a good distro the SW community really expected you to be a Unix god and was unwilling to provides helpful answers other than "gtfo n00b" and "go use windows".
The other choice was Mandriva which had a better community but just the worst documentation. Which meant, you'd go to the community to ask for help, you'd get a response of "RTFM", which would have been fine, had there been a manual and/or if it had had correct information in it. (Yes, I know there were other distros at the time but those were the two big communities)
So a lot of my time was spent reading/editing source code to learn how to use application which should have "just worked" in the first damn place. Now to be fair, I learned a ton because of that.
Then came Ubuntu, along with its rich sugar-daddy. In came professional tech-writers documenting the system, documenting the applications, writing correct and updated how-to guides. In came professional coders fixing long standing bugs. And I watched many other distros die as they bled users to Ubuntu. Even if you dislike some of the design decisions Ubuntu has made over the years, they greatly increased the quality of the entire Linux ecosystem.
Thank you Ubuntu devs for raising the bar!
Personally I've tried Mint and Mate a few times and always went back to Ubuntu. There was always something that either didn't work right or something else that ended up annoying me. Of course I don't use the default Ubuntu look, I've customized it to be some sort of OS X looking hybrid (another thing I could never get working in Mint). Now that I've customized it, I really like Ubuntu.
Zippy, fast, responsive remote Desktops and Citrix-like Published Applications, all useable from the standard Ubuntu 18.04 repository, no more need to manually add a PPA.
TL;DR: https://wiki.x2go.org/doku.php/doc:newtox2go
Ubuntu has hit industry and pretty much the only option from most companies for those that prefer .deb over .rpm.
Companies usually target LTS and LTS-1 for this reason. Most of my tools are on 14.04 and 16.04. Knowing that 18.04 is coming and in beta means that I can get out ahead of the curve and figure out what's broken and what scripts I need to write to prepare for our migration.
Knowing how we roll things out that may come 2019, but I can at least start preparing now in my 'down time'. Or I can sit on my hands until bossman says "We're moving to 18.04 LTS" and give them a deer in the headlights look and expect breakage like my peers.
This is about as much news for nerds in industry as you can get.
Yeah, I was thinking Lindsay Wagner. Hubba-hubba!!!
In other words, you can install 18.04 and be confident that it will be supported for 5 years
But if you install any third-party apps, there is little prospect that they will install on a 5 year-old system, if you feel the need to upgrade them during the LTS period. Even if you install all the fixes, patches and other stuff provided by the LTS supplier.
And it is practically certain that some of your apps will require bug fix upgrades or security upgrades during that time. And once those (non LTS) apps start to require libraries or other dependencies that fall outside what the LTS system has chosen to provide as part of that 5 year support, then having an O/S that is "supported" - i.e. receives upgrades - becomes pointless.
politicians are like babies' nappies: they should both be changed regularly and for the same reasons
Your post is marked flamebait and I personally hate all the nastiness against Ubuntu or, really, anything that moves or doesn't move on Slashdot.
But YEAH. At least on the systemd, I agree with your sentiment. Ubuntu would be a much better distribution without it.
I don't want to use gnome 3. Or really gnome anything. I like my systems simpler than that. But I can use KDE or even TWM if I want to. I'm not forced to use another distro because Ubuntu has gnome 3. Me running some other window manager doesn't affect how postgres or nmap or httpd runs. On the other hand, favoring systemd and not caring much about the development of init scripts has the potential to crap up anything I might do on Ubuntu.
They need to drop systemd.
I agree. And Charles Lindbergh was pro-Germany at the start of WWII. Give Ubuntu it's due for its great work, then hold Ubuntu to the fire on systemd. It's crap. They should remove it, so we can go back to focusing on their heroism.
Usenet, comp.misc
"The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
The summary plays up the LTS status of this beta. But a beta version is of no interest to those of us that use LTS distros. The time to upgrade from 16.04 to 18.04 will be around October when a round of bugfixes from the suckers on 6 monthly released has gone in, not 3 weeks (or 6 weeks in the case of the earlier hyped article about the first beta) before official release.