Slashdot Mirror


George Soros, Rockefeller Take Their Marks Before Diving Into the Cryptocurrency Pool (businessinsider.com)

john of sparta shares a report from Business Insider (Warning: source may be paywalled; alternative source): Reports of a crackdown on cryptocurrency advertisements by tech giants such as Google and Facebook as well as regulatory uncertainty in Asia and the U.S. have weighed on the coin for much of March and April. The coin is down 50% since the beginning of the year. But investors appeared to be more bullish during Sunday's trade following reports that two Wall Street icons were looking to get into the market for cryptos. More notably, the investment fund founded by billionaire George Soros is preparing to dive into cryptocurrency trading, even though Soros himself previously described them as a "bubble." Adam Fisher, who oversees global macroeconomic investing for Soros Fund Management, has gained internal approval to invest in and trade cryptocurrencies, according to a Bloomberg News report. Also, Venrock -- a venture capital firm founded by descendants of famed capitalist John D. Rockefeller -- announced it was partnering with a cryptocurrency investment firm based in Brooklyn. Fortune first reported on the partnership.

59 of 100 comments (clear)

  1. Yes please by demon+driver · · Score: 2

    But introducing yet another kind of money, let alone one that is without substance insofar as its value isn't backed by a profitable industry which is the only thing that can induce real value into a currency, and even one that is devoid of every safety that conventional banks are bound to offer by law, would not really be the way to go.

    And to get rid of money, we'd need to get rid of capitalism in the first place.

    1. Re:Yes please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      let alone one that is without substance insofar as its value isn't backed by a profitable industry which is the only thing that can induce real value into a currency

      Not true, the USD is backed by debt and the threat of violence, for instance.

    2. Re:Yes please by jythie · · Score: 1

      USD is backed by being the only currency you can pay your taxes in.

    3. Re: Yes please by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      And how do they ensure that taxes get paid...??

    4. Re: Yes please by DannyHallwood · · Score: 1

      A few US states accept bitcoin to pay taxes. Arizona , as example. http://fortune.com/2018/02/10/...

    5. Re: Yes please by liquid_schwartz · · Score: 1

      They look at how big you are. If you're a small fish then you better pay your taxes. If you are wealthy enough to hide your money off shore then you're OK. Finally if you can get connected politically then you're fine as well. It's most definitely a scam and I hope that I live long enough to see the guillotines brought out for the corrupt billionaires who thrive off this corruption.

    6. Re: Yes please by stinerman · · Score: 1

      Without even reading the article, I guarantee that they immediately convert that to dollars, and the exchange rate changes pretty regularly.

      Arizona is not sitting around holding Bitcoin. They're allowing people to pay off their dollar-denominated debts by use of an exchange as an intermediary.

    7. Re:Yes please by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      That is not what 'backed' means.
      And I pay my taxes in EUR, you insensitive clod!

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    8. Re: Yes please by jythie · · Score: 1

      Taxes are self reported regardless of where you get your money from. If you defraud the IRS they might not notice, or they might.

    9. Re:Yes please by demon+driver · · Score: 1

      Bitcoin's value is in the kostenlos nature of the services and transaction network; it has far lower transaction cost, carry cost, etc... than does the USD.

      That's not 'value' in the economic sense of being a reliable exchange equivalent for goods. A currency gets real and reliable purchasing power only if there's an underlying industry that successfully fulfills its only purpose, transforming money in more money through investing labor in commodities and base products, producing end-products which are worth more than the sum of what was needed to produce it.

      Bitcoin itself can only exist because 1. there are such real currencies with real value it can technically be exchanged to, and 2. because there are enough gamblers who speculate on there being enough gamblers believing in Bitcoin's value.

      As for the USD [...]

      See above.

      Getting rid of money is the wrong idea. Do you really think having no money would be better?

      I guess in the long run, it will be the only option if humanity wants to survive. Because even real currencies are sowly losing their real value, too, because, with technological progress, less and less labor is needed to produce the goods that have to be produced. What, in a naive way, sounds "good", slowly bereaves the economic system from its capability to feed its populations. (And because alternative currencies, whether Bitcoin or regional currencies or something else, are no solution of that problem.)

      People what, barter? [...]

      How about people simply deciding together, with democratic means, firstly, what they want to own and consume, and secondly, also what they want to produce?

      Or are you a zeitgeister/venusprojecter/digitalcommie? Human wants and needs are infinite and resources are finite. This means that there will forever be inequity [...]

      What I am is completely irrelevant. What you are, too. But what you're writing is just the old dogma out of the capitalists' prayer book, based solely on pseudo-religious belief, not on fact.

    10. Re:Yes please by demon+driver · · Score: 1

      Only a profitable industry? False. Only the gub'mnt tax-collecting gunbarrel can validate a "monies" [...]

      If there wasn't a profitable industry that would charge the currency with value, your money wouldn't buy your bread, regardless of what the goverment does or doesn't do. After all, both the value of a currency and the amount of money floating around depend on how good the chances are for someone who invests money in the currency area to get more money back. (There are more aspects and details to it, but at its core, it's as simple as that.)

    11. Re:Yes please by demon+driver · · Score: 1

      let alone one that is without substance insofar as its value isn't backed by a profitable industry which is the only thing that can induce real value into a currency

      Not true, the USD is backed by debt and the threat of violence, for instance.

      Which does not give it it's value, its purchasing power. If there was not at least a halfway functional industry that successfully transforms goods and raw material into more expensive goods, so that money invested in the currency area has a plausible chance of coming back as more money, it wouldn't have the purchasing power.

  2. Bubble by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    though Soros himself previously described them as a "bubble."

    Getting involved with it does not necessarily prove it otherwise, he may just want to get his fair share of that bubble before it bursts for good.

    1. Re:Bubble by Zocalo · · Score: 1

      Or to somehow try to pop the crypto-currency bubble so that people get burnt and go back to investing their remaning funds (if any) in more traditional funds, such as those managed by Soros and his partners, e.g. by using his political leverage to get various legislations passed with the aim of driving the privacy and anti-regulation types into increasingly more niche and sketchy alt-coins, thus undermining a lot of the original support. Whether such a scheme would even work is another question entirely, but as long as he *thinks* it will he may be prepared to give it a try. I guess it depends on whether Soros is personally involved in decisions at this level or it's up to lower-level management, has changed his view on crypto currencies, or - as you say - just thinks he can get in, make some money, and get out before the pop he's expecting.

      --
      UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
    2. Re:Bubble by tomhath · · Score: 2

      Getting involved with it does not necessarily prove it otherwise

      Hedge funds are a bet that the market will move, you can bet on it moving either up or down. It's likely Soros was waiting until he could short the funds and profit from other people's losses.

    3. Re:Bubble by FudRucker · · Score: 1

      yup, never can tell what sneaky schemes those financial wizards have going

      --
      Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
    4. Re:Bubble by rahvin112 · · Score: 1

      Soros isn't getting involved, a Fund he set up a long time ago is. I doubt he has $0.10 in that fund today.

    5. Re:Bubble by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      Most likely already has a shitload of crypto, and saw what the news of the Bitcoin ETFs did to the price, and now lending their support to them will cause it to go back up so they can cash out the rest.

      You. Will. Be. The. Bagholder.

      Again.

    6. Re:Bubble by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Hedges aka options aka derivatives.

      Hedge funds are mutual funds for the rich and connected. High fees, high minimum deposit, but usually they've got returns to (sort of) justify the fees. Insider traders that will take the hit for their investors, what Madoff was pretending to be.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  3. Fools and their money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "John Burbank, who shuttered his main fund last year, plans to raise $150 million for two funds investing in digital currencie"

    Please be clear. Burbank is taking US Dollars for a 'Fund'. Funds take money (real actual $$$ money) and buy something with it, and take a fee for managing that something. He is not investing in crypto, you are, he is taking fees as $$ for your investment in it. He is not the idiot making the bad pseudo investment, you are.

    "Soros has already been indirectly betting on crypto. The firm amassed a stake in Overstock.com in the fourth quarter, making it the third-biggest shareholder of the discount e-commerce company. In August 2017 it became the first major retailer to accept digital currencies. The company had also planned to start an exchange for cryptocurrencies as well as offer digital coins that could trade on the platform."

    Again, he is not investing his money in crypto, he bought Overstock.com who in turn were planning to setup an exchange TAKING MONEY FROM IDIOTS BUYING CRYPTO. A different thing.

    Don't be fooled.

    1. Re:Fools and their money by jythie · · Score: 1

      Isn't that the main use of cryptocurrencies though? The main industry that has popped up around and using the coins seems to be the 'exchanges' were various amature currency traders try to out-algorithm each other and profit off a steady flow of people trying to jump on the bandwagon.

    2. Re:Fools and their money by Comrade+Ogilvy · · Score: 1

      As someone who is bearish on Bitcoin but bullish on blockchains, I would really like to know what portion of the transactions are really being used for the useful economic activities that can positively benefit from kind of system, e.g. sending money back to my parents in the old country.

    3. Re:Fools and their money by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      Why are you bullish on blockchains?

    4. Re:Fools and their money by jythie · · Score: 1

      I would also be curious what the actual numbers look like. The system and its usage though suggests most of it is going to trading. The fees have been going going up, making small transactions less and less viable, and more and more of the traffic has been going to the exchanges. BTC isn't very good at anything other than large transactions that lock in quickly but can take time to process.

  4. Re:What? When naysayers finally eat crow? by Joce640k · · Score: 5, Interesting

    All this announcement means is: They think they can game the system.

    (Possibly by buying a load of cryptocoins then going around spreading rumors that they're "getting into crypto"...)

    --
    No sig today...
  5. Re:Can we get rid of money yet? by Joce640k · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Honestly this seems the way of the future, it is sweeping the globe. It works better than money, and it has none of the down sides of the bickerings of the international community.

    "Works better than money?" LOL!

    No bickerings? LOL!

    You're blowing off the "international community" and putting your money in the hands of a bunch of Chinese who've already shown that they'll manipulate the price all day long:

    https://hackernoon.com/the-gre...

    --
    No sig today...
  6. on the nature of capitalist champions. by nimbius · · Score: 5, Insightful

    People like Soros and the descendants Rockefeller arent visionary, but products of their respective dynastic wealth. They benefit disproportionately from a wealth that came about to an extremely lucky subset of people once in a generation. The methods by which their fortunes were amassed arguably could only ever take place once in history.

    Venrock, the venture capital company mentioned in tfa, has nothing to do with intrepid capitalists championing the helm of innovation and change and more to do with a branded venture capital firm seeking out new revenue streams, like an old dog seeking out the dinner bowl by smell.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
    1. Re:on the nature of capitalist champions. by wbr1 · · Score: 1
      --
      Silence is a state of mime.
    2. Re:on the nature of capitalist champions. by ytene · · Score: 2

      I think this is a fair argument as a general rule, with the caveat that there will always be exceptions to that singular rule. However, we've also had people who have become successful in multiple industries/sectors... Elon Musk: SpaceX/Tesla/etc, Sir Richard Branson: Virgin [Airlines, Media, Foods, Financial Services, etc].

      What is a little harder to determine is whether or not we've always had serial entrepreneurs of this magnitude and perhaps didn't really see earlier examples of people being ultra-successful in multiple fields, or whether this is a relatively recent phenomenon.

    3. Re: on the nature of capitalist champions. by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      And... they're parasites.

    4. Re:on the nature of capitalist champions. by radarskiy · · Score: 1

      " products of their respective dynastic wealth"
      In Soros's case, that would be pretty much none.

    5. Re:on the nature of capitalist champions. by coastwalker · · Score: 1

      Enjoyable rant, just one small question though - has anybody who has billions in wealth actually earned it. No? I thought not.

      --
      Facts are history now plebs have politics for religion on social media.
    6. Re: on the nature of capitalist champions. by ytene · · Score: 1

      Interesting - if true.

      Can you cite any sources?

  7. Re:What? When naysayers finally eat crow? by Joce640k · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What's hard to understand?

    A handful of Chinese own most of the cryptocurrency and are busy manipulating the markets* so they can take all the round-eyes life savings and college funds.

    (*) By buying and selling between themselves at artificial prices

    Here they are, all sitting in a row:

    http://cointimes.tech/2017/01/...

    --
    No sig today...
  8. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  9. No JEW SOROS with APKoin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    See Subject: APKoin is better than all other cyypto coin guarantee to not loose value

    Get APKoin by spreading the word of "LORD of HOSTS" to all conrners of teh internet

    Get APKoin by "Kick stomping heart" FAKE name slashdot l[users] who dare defy brilliant APK

    Redeemable for ultra premium moose dik you can suck or take in ass

    Premium rewards like suk my MEGA MAN PENIS or lick my gaint ballz

    APK

    P.S.=> The Soros and ROTHSCHILD backed jew bankers want to destroy CRYPTO COIN because it can derail their plans to enslave great american worker. Trump was the first major disruption to they plans APKoins is the next... apk

  10. Cryptoscams by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Are (any) fiat-currency and (any) cryptocurrency really equivalent, as cryptocurrency fans claim?
    For example, US Dollar and Bitcoin are really equals?
    Value/validity/authorization of US dollar is provided/guaranteed by US Government (and in-turn whole US Public)!
    Also, not to mention, US Dollars in any US Bank is insured by US Government!
    What authorization/guarantee/insurance is behind Bitcoin? Nothing!
    Sorry but that is the end of discussion then!

    Why do you think Satoshi Nakamoto is really hiding his identity, if Bitcoin is really such a great innovation?
    He is just someone does not like media/fan attention?
    Or, could it be really because Bitcoin (and all cryptocurrencies followed it) are actually Ponzi Schemes?
    (So he knew very well that law enforcement would come after him sooner or later?!)

    If so-called cryptocurrencies are really good innovation, why they attract so many criminals/criminal activity?
    Could it really be because, all cryptocurrencies themselves are scams, and that is why they attract all kinds of criminals/criminal activity?

    If so-called cryptocurrencies are really currency, why no company/store can use Bitcoin as currency anymore?
    Because the price of Bitcoin proved to be extremely unstable to use as a currency?
    Would the result be different, if Bitcoin replaced by any other "cryptocurrency"?
    Aren't all work the same way?

    Or, they are not actually virtual currency but virtual investment?
    But, if they are actually investment, why we need/want them?
    What would happen to world economy, if people invested in virtual investments, instead of real investments?

    Or, all so-called cryptocurrencies are actually just a modified (made decentralized and paying variable interest) Ponzi Schemes?
    (Price of cryptocurrencies would keep increasing in the long term (by their design), so it is equivalent of paying variable interest to all long term investors.)

    As more and more people invest in cryptocurrencies, it will become harder and harder to ban their trading everywhere!
    All cryptocurrencies need to be banned globally before it is too late!

  11. Re:Cryptocurrency Taxes by Zocalo · · Score: 2

    Same way they do any other transaction that is subject to tax but might bypass channels they can readily track: require you to declare your profits (or losses) from the transaction (or "investment", if you prefer) coupled with some deterrance in the form of severe sanctions (fines, jail time, etc.) for anyone who thinks they can keep their profits hidden from "the man" but fails to do so. Typically, in nations that are implementing this, the approach seems to be to class it as a form of capital gains (e.g. just like stocks, shares, etc.) and tax accordingly at similar rates. YMMV but, speaking from experience, if you're converting a large chunk of crypto currency into traditional currency and want it all above board, you can expect "the man" to take quite a large bite.

    --
    UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
  12. Re:Cryptocurrency Taxes by lamer01 · · Score: 2

    This, the goal is to avoid taxation, that's why the crypto disciples are called crypto-anarchists.

  13. Re:What? When naysayers finally eat crow? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    They've probably already quietly bought shitloads of it, and now it's time to talk up the price.

  14. Re: Can we get rid of money yet? by gnick · · Score: 1

    The only thing crypto currency is good for is generating hype stories and bubble inflation...

    ...and buying contraband. As long as it's good for this, it's not going to disappear entirely. Cryptocurrency is still the primary trading medium for the dark web.

    --
    He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
  15. Mark by wjcofkc · · Score: 1

    Of the beast. Considering the two.

    --
    Brought to you by Carl's Junior.
  16. Getting Into the Crypto Market... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    When people like this "get into the market," it does not mean what most retail investors think it means. They may be long, short, selling derivatives, buying derivatives, or, most likely, all of the above. They are also looking at being middle-men, making a few (more) cents on every transaction, being money changers.

    Having people think it just means they are going long helps them by bringing in dumb money. Their job is to help that dumb money find its way home to where the smart money lives. "Price discovery" is a nice way to tell people "you paid too much."

  17. Re:What? When naysayers finally eat crow? by jythie · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yeah, I read it as 'there are enough sheep with enough money for the wolves to be interested'.

  18. Re:Cryptocurrency Taxes by jythie · · Score: 1

    It is only a way to avoid taxes or embezzle funds as pictured by people who do not know much about either and have only ever worked W2. They kinda hope that if enough people say 'no more taxes' and invest in their cryptothingie the various governments will just give up and stop collecting them or something.

  19. Re: Can we get rid of money yet? by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

    The only thing crypto currency is good for is generating hype stories and bubble inflation...

    ...and buying contraband. As long as it's good for this, it's not going to disappear entirely. Cryptocurrency is still the primary trading medium for the dark web.

    I'm guessing that one or more state actors can trace it. Unless it's based on the only secure software on the planet.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  20. Re:Can we get rid of money yet? by allcoolnameswheretak · · Score: 1

    It works better than money, and it has none of the down sides of the bickerings of the international community.

    I agree. Digital currency only has upsides. Stealing Bitcoins online is way easier than robbing a bank.

  21. Re: Can we get rid of money yet? by Type44Q · · Score: 1

    I hope you don't have to rely upon your "thinking ability" for anything important...

  22. Re: Can we get rid of money yet? by Type44Q · · Score: 1

    Yeah; no.

  23. Another Big Drop by DERoss · · Score: 1

    About five hours ago (9 April 2018 10:14 UTC), bitcoin fell off a cliff. It dropped $268.36 in 18 minutes. How can anything be a currency for use in financial transactions if it is so volatile? How can you price goods and services with such volatility?

    1. Re:Another Big Drop by stinerman · · Score: 1

      Because............blockchain!

    2. Re:Another Big Drop by DERoss · · Score: 1

      Actually, almost half my living expenses are paid from dividends, interest, and capital gains on my investment portfolio. The other half of my living expenses are paid from a small pension and Social Security. I manage my wife's and my own portfolios as well as the portfolio in which I invested my grandson's inheritance from his deceased father.

  24. REPORTS that two Wall Street icons were looking to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    1. Soros and Rockefeller leak "reports" that they are about to get into cryptocurrencies
    2. Wait for the market to spike and short cryptocurrencies
    3. Soros and Rockefeller issue official statements that cryptocurrencies are a terrible investment
    4. Cryptocurrencies nose-dive and they sell their short
    Soros got rich shorting a currency...

  25. Rumors and speculation and name dropping by UnknowingFool · · Score: 2

    Here's what I'm read from the article. The fund founded (not run by George Soros but his son) has approved trading in cryptocurrency.

    The Soros Fund Management venture internally approved the trading of virtual coins in the past few months. So far, no actual “big trades” have has been made, but that situation will come to change very soon.

    As for Rockefeller, this was the relevant passage:

    Also, Venrock — a venture capital firm founded by descendants of famed capitalist John D. Rockefeller — announced it was partnering with a cryptocurrency investment firm based in Brooklyn.

    The article makes clear that the fund not run by Soros himself has only approved trading not that it has traded in cryptocurrency. It doesn't necessarily say that the fund will invest in cryptocurrency as an asset; the fund could be shorting them. As for Venrock, there are no details on what and how much investment is being made. It could be a small amount.

    --
    Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  26. Re:I, too, watched Netflix's Marco Polo. by Joce640k · · Score: 1

    Sorry, I forgot the apostrophe:

    It should be "...take all the round-eyes' life savings and college funds."

    --
    No sig today...
  27. Re: Can we get rid of money yet? by gnick · · Score: 1

    That's not affecting its popularity.

    --
    He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
  28. if you are stinking rich... by hAckz0r · · Score: 1

    How to make lots more money

    1) Buy up a lot of Bitcoin very quietly
    2) Announce that you are thinking about buying Bitcoin
    3) Sell all your Bitcoin
    4) Tell everyone Bitcoinis just a bubble
    5) Go back to step #1

  29. Re:What? When naysayers finally eat crow? by jwhyche · · Score: 2

    All this announcement means is: They think they can game the system.

    I can promise you that is what it means. People like Soros don't see it as something that can benefit everyone. Right now all they see is a way to increase their own personal money and power. It is just another tool they can use to accomplish this.

    Personally, I think bitcoin and its like is nothing more than a ponzi scheme and will collapse sooner or later. But with Soros and his like getting involved, that will lend it a air of legitimacy. Which will only make the collapse so much bigger when it does happen. Only now fuckers like Soros will walk away with a fat bank roll while so many other people will be left destitute.

    To bad someone can't figure out how to game Soros through this and empty a few of his bank accounts.

    --
    I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
  30. Bitcoin by manu0601 · · Score: 1

    I bet that if Soros infests in cryptomoney, it will not be in bitcoins. That specific bubble is already too much inflated.