Slashdot Mirror


Demand For Batteries Is Shrinking, Yet Prices Keep On Going and Going ... Up (wsj.com)

schwit1 shares a report: Batteries on average cost 8.2% more than a year ago, while prices in the overall household-care segment rose only 1.8%, according to Nielsen. At a time when prices are stagnating on everything from toilet paper to diapers, such pricing power for a product that is increasingly obsolete has confounded shoppers [Editor's note: the link may be paywalled]. "As far as the prices go, you don't have a choice," said Samuel Hurly, a contractor from Mount Vernon, N.Y., as he scanned a Home Depot display of AAA batteries to power flashlights he uses on the job. Batteries ordered online take too long to arrive, Mr. Hurly said, and he finds cheaper, private-label options lose power too quickly.

Battery prices were more likely to fluctuate a few years ago, when Duracell was owned by consumer-products giant Procter & Gamble Co. and Energizer was part of Edgewell Personal Care Co. Those companies were more focused on their bigger, more profitable razor businesses -- Edgewell with Schick and P&G with Gillette. They would invest less in batteries, or slash prices to drive up volume, to compensate for weak sales in other units, said SunTrust analyst Bill Chappell. Energizer Holdings Inc. spun off from Edgewell in 2015, and Duracell broke apart from P&G a year later when it was acquired by Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
schwit1 asks, "Both businesses have become more profit-focused since separating from their previous owners. Is the Energizer/Duracell duopoly ripe for disruption?"

11 of 210 comments (clear)

  1. Ripe for disruption by mysidia · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And not environmentally friendly to have disposable batteries with plastics and electrolyte compounds tossed into landfills.

    Time to ban disposable batteries and introduce LiON chemistry replacement cartridges for these old AA and AAA cells.

    1. Re:Ripe for disruption by jellomizer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Please ask a Galaxy Note 7 user about LiON batteries.

      The main Risk with swapping batteries, is the fact older devices may not be designed for them to run on. Not expecting them to heat up as much, putting them in a confined location where they cannot expand. And just different power usage and lasting power change, could effect the usefulness of products.

      Yes new devices should reconsider the standard batteries. But older devices there wern't much choices other then NiMH which have less of a life.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    2. Re:Ripe for disruption by PPH · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Please ask a Galaxy Note 7 user about LiON batteries.

      Please ask Boeing.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    3. Re:Ripe for disruption by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 3, Funny

      And we also need a law stating these companies should also buy everyone a pony.

      As long as we can pick both Fluttershy and Rarity, I'm fine with it.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    4. Re:Ripe for disruption by Luckyo · · Score: 4, Informative

      Problem being that that's not how AA standard works. Alkaline battery goes from 1,5V at full charge to about 0,8 as it is close to being empty. As a result, AA devices are commonly configured to accept any voltage in that range.

      Modern NiMH stays at very stable 1,2V throughout the charge, making them actually better than alkaline in most usage scenarios. The only problem is that they tend to trip "at below 1,2V, alkaline is probably at about 1/3 charge left, so change the battery please". I have this issue with xbox 360 wireless controller, where my second gen, 5 year old eneloops will trip that after about 10 hours of usage, and then keep powering the controller for about 40 more hours before they need to be swapped.

      Typical alkalines trip it after about 20 hours, and shut down about 10 hours after that.

  2. Eneloop is the way to go by ZorinLynx · · Score: 5, Informative

    Nobody should be buying any batteries that aren't Eneloop rechargeables. They come charged, do not self discharge appreciably, and perform better than alkalines in most situations. Once you have a set you can keep using and recharging them for many years. I have decade old Eneloops that still work great.

    Sanyo (later Panasonic) solved the rechargeable battery problem completely.

    1. Re:Eneloop is the way to go by Junta · · Score: 5, Informative

      If you need more than 1.2V out of your alkaline battery, you will chew threw batteries pretty quickly. A typical discharge curve has about 40% capacity left when the alkaline hits 1.2V. Generally you don't consider an alkaline depleted until it's at 0.9V.

      If you design for 1.5V, then the batteries will become useless even though you have more than 95% of your capacity remaining.

      Alkaline voltage drops proportional to charge pretty dramatically. It would be *nicer* if the voltage on NiMH was higher, but anything that demanded more than 1.2V out of alkaline batteries was pretty crappy.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    2. Re:Eneloop is the way to go by Junta · · Score: 4, Informative

      Oh, I neglected to mention that while Alkaline voltage drops with capacity, NiMH has a pretty flat voltage relatively speaking. It stays right around 1.2V for most of it's capacity, then drops all of a sudden as it nears drained.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  3. Most profit is on the retail side by technosaurus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Battery markups are not measured in percent, but multiples... 10X markup is not uncommon.

  4. Demand for "batteries..." by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Demand for batteries is likely going up, driven by electric cars, computers, phones, etc. What's going down is demand for STANDARD batteries. Many devices have proprietary batteries of all different sizes, often inaccessible to the user.

    Thing is, there's no good reason for it other than planned obsolescence. Take smartphones. Almost all of them use 3.7V LiIon batteries. Most of them are about 5 to 6 inches diagonally, with a specific height/width ratio. Time for an industry standard for swappable smartphone batteries. Imagine if you could just buy a battery at 7-11, pop the door, and swap it in when your phone's battery dies. Or maybe have a few different sizes, depending on screen size. Call then X, Y, and Z.

    But no, this will never happen because throwing things away is a big profit center for sellers of e-trinkets.

  5. Re:It was ripe for disruption a while ago by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't buy anything that's not rechargable

    I feel the exact opposite - I love AA devices. I want batteries to be replaceable and standard. I have rechargeable AA's. The batteries are obviously user-replacable. I can keep a bunch of them charged for quick swaps. I don't need to figure out which device needed to be charged, I just put the AAs in the charger from wherever they came from. I don't need to move the devices to near an outlet to charge them. And, in an emergency, I can just get a bunch of non-rechargable AAs from the store to run devices.

    I'm clearly a large enough use case that it's driving single use batteries into a niche market.

    I'm not sure that's really true. While the number of rechargable devices has exploded, most of those are things are replacing power cords, not AAs.

    --
    Your ad here. Ask me how!