Slashdot Mirror


Can A New HIV Drug Kill The Virus That Causes AIDS? (scmp.com)

"A team led by scientists from the University of Hong Kong has developed a new antibody drug that will not only protect people from contracting HIV but also serve as a long-acting treatment for the virus, unlike current medication that must be taken daily." Slashdot reader hackingbear shared this article from the South China Morning Post: There will need to be a further battery of tests before the drug, named "BiIA-SG", can be part of the global battle against the virus, which causes Aids. The research team has so far only tested the drug on mice but is now looking to experiment on larger animals such as monkeys, before conducting clinical trials on humans. Still, Professor Chen Zhiwei, the team leader and director of HKU's Aids Institute, stressed the scientific discovery had yielded "one of the most potent and effective antibody drugs". This is because the study showed that mice given the drug before being infected with HIV were protected from the virus for about a week.

In addition, the experiments, which also involved experts from mainland medical and research institutions, found that when mice were infected with HIV before being treated, 42 per cent had an "undetectable level" of the virus for at least four weeks after one injection of antibodies... The tests found that the drug was effective against 124 strains of HIV, including those that are commonly found in infected people from Hong Kong and mainland China.

27 of 73 comments (clear)

  1. No by kbg · · Score: 2

    If you have to ask, the answer is always No.

    1. Re:No by goombah99 · · Score: 1

      It shows that it prevents infection which is different than killing an existing infection.

      --
      Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    2. Re:No by kbg · · Score: 1

      Talk to me again in a year from now and I can guarantee that nothing has changed and this will not work as a viable treatment. There is no silver bullet for AIDS or cancer for that matter.

  2. Science, anyone? by johnstrass1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Perhaps we should wait for a publication in a good science jounnal, not a press release to the local cal newspaper...

    1. Re:Science, anyone? by toonces33 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not only that, but wait until they claim to have results on more than just mice.

  3. Re:Approaching a Trillion Dollars Spent... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    stop fucking men up the ass.

    But then conservative Republican politicians would have to go back to their wives!

    And we can't have that.

  4. Re:Approaching a Trillion Dollars Spent... by Megol · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Most people with AIDS doesn't fuck men in the ass.

  5. Re:Top 5 Geek Fantasies that will Never Happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Even if this drug doesn't work in humans, HIV will eventually be eradicated with currently existing medicine. Once the medicine that HIV patients take becomes cheap enough to deploy around the world, by keeping their viral load levels to an undetectable level, they will no longer transmit the virus to other people even if they are having unprotected sex. If everyone in the world with HIV is medicated, they won't spread it to anybody and eventually the last remaining carriers of the virus will die from natural causes. Long-acting injections in the form of depo shots are already available for patients with poor drug compliance issues, too.

    Unfortunately, due to corporate greed a lot of these medications still cost over $1000 per month and the day where everyone regardless of income or background gets access to HIV medication is probably hundreds of years away, unless something fundamentally changes on a global scale with regards to patents on life saving drugs. I worry that humanity's going to fuck itself over with disease the longer we allow intellectual property law to prevent life saving generics from being created and distributed. This is why drug patents and research paywalls need to be violated and broken at any cost for the greater good of human health.

  6. Profitable? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Goldman-Sachs said it was more profitable to treat rather than cure so I think this will cost at least $10,000 a week because some life saving or life extending drugs are costing $500,000 a year!

  7. Re:Top 5 Geek Fantasies that will Never Happen by Megol · · Score: 2

    1) Either physically impossible or theoretically possible but actually impossible. With our current knowledge that is.

    2) ?

    3) Nothing makes that impossible.

    4) Nothing makes that impossible. Many types of cancer have >90% survivability with near 100% survivability when detected in early stages.

    5) Genetically inferior?

  8. Re:"protected from the virus for about a week" by Megol · · Score: 1

    Because sex vacations are the leading cause of infection? Really...

  9. Re:Top 5 Geek Fantasies that will Never Happen by sheramil · · Score: 1

    3) Since arguably HIV doesn't have anything to do with AIDS...

    Which nut-case website should I have been reading to learn the "truth", here, or is this just the standard "thing you always thought was true, isn't, and then it is, then it isn't again"?

  10. Re:Donal Trump by sheramil · · Score: 1

    I was under the impression you can't catch it from being peed on, but as I demonstrated above, I - apparently - don't know anything about HIV.

  11. Re:Top 5 Geek Fantasies that will Never Happen by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

    5) We can see that with you.

    was an insightful post until you resorted to needless rudeness

    Not ‘needless’ at all because GP’s list contains an item that had already happened.

  12. That didn't take long by hyades1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So it looks like another of those scourges evangelicals claimed was a "curse from God" is about to bite the dust.

    A cynic might suggest that the old Hairy Thunderer is losing his touch. Or maybe God just doesn't give a rat's ass who you sleep with.

    --
    I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
    1. Re: That didn't take long by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1, Troll

      So, you just made a comment so you could express hate? That's it? Would you condemn Allah in the same way? Why or why not?

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    2. Re:That didn't take long by Pinky's+Brain · · Score: 2

      Nope, the half time of anti-virals makes anti-biotics look good. Especially nowadays with all the AIDS victims filling their veins with it. Unfortunately they are just as good at making non STD viral diseases immune to these drugs.

      We are coming up to a whole new age of puritanism, simply because of all the untreatable STDs.

    3. Re: That didn't take long by Beyond_GoodandEvil · · Score: 1

      That's it? Would you condemn Allah in the same way? Why or why not?
      Not a theological scholar, but my understanding is that Allah is technically, the same God as the one found in the old Testament of the Jews and New Testament of the Christian faith. Ergo, he did condemn Allah.

      --
      I laughed at the weak who considered themselves good because they lacked claws.
    4. Re: That didn't take long by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      What an odd thing to say. Why would it matter what you call your imaginary buddy?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    5. Re: That didn't take long by vlueboy · · Score: 1

      Not a theological scholar, but my understanding is that Allah is technically, the same God as the one found in the old Testament of the Jews and New Testament of the Christian faith. Ergo, he did condemn Allah.

      Hi, there. I agree with the sentiment. Still, there are reasons the technical similarity is superficial. Apologies for the long post this late at night.

      Both religions agree that there is a single god. However, at best, Allah and the religion around him represents a fork of the Abrahamic god. Saying both are the same is inaccurate similar to how certain words are hijacked beyond the original intent: "hacker" does not accurately reflect the context of "cracker".
      Not being a Muslim, finding this article for my reply was interesting:
      http://www.truthortradition.co.... One of the point is that Muslims do not believe in Jesus being the son of God. Some muslims present Jesus as just another prophet.

      Considering bitrot, I'll paste some bullet points here though I do not agree with all the points:

      God’s only begotten Son is Jesus. Allah has no begotten son.
      God made salvation available by sacrificing His Son and promises salvation by grace to those who believe. Allah sacrificed nothing, and only saves if sufficient works are done.
      God has a payment for sins—Jesus Christ. Allah has no payment for sins.
      God’s Christ paid for the sins of mankind. Allah paid for nothing, and all men pay for their own sins.
      God’s salvation is through Christ’s work. Allah’s salvation is through people’s works.
      God’s saving work is, “Come to Christ.” The major part of Moslem salvation is to believe Mohammed was the sum and seal of the prophets.
      God’s book is very different from Allah’s book. They contradict each other, so they cannot both be true. For example, the Bible says Christ was resurrected from the dead. The Moslems reject that as a lie.
      God says his Son is the Way, the Truth and the Life. Allah says Christ is “only a messenger” (Chap. 5, “The Food” sect. 10, par. 75).
      God treats men and women equally. Allah does not.
      God says marriages today (Christian) are to be monogamous. Allah allows more than one wife.
      There is no marriage in God’s Paradise. Faithful men get many virgins in Allah’s.
      God says it is not necessary to have special days. Allah does: for example, Ramadan, the Moslem holy month during which Moslems fast during the day.

      God does have a personal name mentioned thousands of times in the original manuscripts. The original Jewish Tetragrammaton spelling of God's name has been largely replaced by misinterpretation of a commandment to respect the name. You see titles like "Allah" ("The [true] god"), "Lord" or the Jewish "The name" shaping tradition in ways God would not approve, considering his very liberal use of "God" alongside the characters for his name. Considering that we do know the names for mythological gods like Zeus and Apophis, it is funny that a name so important would be so uncharacteristically buried by his enemies. In modern faiths, the original Jewish name still survives in a few bible translations. The King James bible includes one of them, where it's survived the replacement largely customary within that translation and the name appears as Jehovah:

    6. Re: That didn't take long by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Usually I don't click through and read anonymous comments, and this is why. Come on, you've got to try harder. This is just lame.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    7. Re: That didn't take long by hyades1 · · Score: 1

      How can I hate something that doesn't exist? Please try not to be silly.

      And for that matter, your failure even to make the basic distinction between a religion and the most fanatical of its practitioners identify you as a fool, a fanatic, or a troll. I have little time for any of those.

      --
      I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
  13. Re:Top 5 Geek Fantasies that will Never Happen by postbigbang · · Score: 3, Insightful

    How ugly that it seems to pay to NOT cure something. Jonas Salk wasn't the greed-filled developer of his vaccine. He didn't develop it to reward stockholders. He did it to save lives and the fates of those infected with polio, a common disease of a couple generations ago.

    So far, we don't know about the business model that might result, or even if the drug is effective and safe over the long term. So far, Truvada seems to be the best prophylactic out there, outside of abstinence. Abstinence is never going to work. The drug's vendor, Gilead, by keeping their prices at $1500+ a month for Truvada, has the blood on their hands of those that can't afford it, and get infected, and can't control it, and die hideous deaths.

    --
    ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
  14. Re: Approaching a Trillion Dollars Spent... by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    Have you at least HEARD of Africa? It seems like we need to start there...

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  15. Re:Top 5 Geek Fantasies that will Never Happen by dgatwood · · Score: 1

    Just give it a few hundred years and someone will find a way to spread it from chimpanzees to humans again.

    --

    Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  16. Re:Approaching a Trillion Dollars Spent... by jrumney · · Score: 1

    Gay and bisexual men account for 70% of infections

    That's in the US. The US makes up about 3% of the world's HIV cases.

  17. Re:Approaching a Trillion Dollars Spent... by Megol · · Score: 1

    Oh. I thought we were talking about the world. You know, with the development of the drug _not_ being done in the US, most humans _not_ living in the US, most HIV/AIDS patients _not_ being in the US. ...